Nope, they're bad. Bredehoft is very unprofessional that she argues with the judge in front of the jury when she over rules her objections. The judge is basically instructing her at the bench every time because she obviously doesn't get to ask the questions once she's been overruled.
The difference is Johhny's lawyers are actually making appropriate objections whereas many of the objections Amber's defense made were overruled and invalid 😂
Yep U hit the nail on the head.. amber is so vilr it makes me angry she can say what ever n JD got blamed it's sickening 😤🙄🤨I hope she gets extradited over here to Oz I'm sure the women in the jail system will absolutely love her lol
Camille Vasquez is just phenamenol. Even when she is not doing the questions she is still controlling the questions. Honestly I am a lawyer from the UK, I've done hearings, but I am just in awe of her skill. They could use her performances in law schools. Johnny Depp certainly is fortunate to have such able representation.
I’ll tell you what... Johnny couldn’t have picked a better lawyer to represent him. Camille’s demeanor does not waver from anything but tactful. I absolutely love how she has AH’s lawyers on their heels before they even ASK a question. The picture is clearly painted.
I like the way the judge says, "next question" after sustaining an objection. It leaves no room for argument. She makes it clear the attorney needs to move on. She has made her decision. Brilliant.
This is what happens when you(AT lawyers)are not prepared for court and your opponent is totally prepared this is what you look like. You can sure tell who did there Homework. Congrates to Johnny D and his Counsel.
@@nathandevine437 I totally agree with you 💯 Johnny team came out the Gate wanting blood surely they was on their Game fully ready , packed and loaded 🤔
“What if anything is not a cure all” I’m so glad the judge called that out, she keeps trying to lead questions or to call for hearsay. I blown away by how good Vasquez is at shutting down these questions. Amber’s lawyer even sighs and says “I’m trying” 💀
Credit where credit is due, they’re still a team. She is the selected person to handle objections but the whole team is looking out for them and when any of them catch one they feed it to her as quick as possible. They’re all doing a great job none the less.
Vasquez and the rest of the team are basically a flight of F-35s and F-15s working together against a bunch of biplanes. It's a bit of a slaughter to be honest. They don't really have to do everything they are doing, but it's better to shoot down as much as possible to make sure most of what they are trying to rebuild into her defense ends up falling short.
I don’t understand how Elaine can be an attorney for as many years as she has been and yet be so awful at trial litigation and so extremely unprofessional. What sort of thing does she normally do?
@@Chalupa_Sue I just hope that Johnny actually prevails in this. I highly doubt the jury is picking up what AH and her team are trying to put down, but there's always that chance. It is stuff like this that makes guys not want to deal with women, even though it's certainly not even close to most that do this, but the repercussions it can have to simply be accused without any evidence is enough to deter many. This needs to help make the law see men and women as equals when it comes to abuse/assault/domestic violence, because it is equally damaging to the victims regardless of gender.
LEGAL TERMS for context : - *Overruled* means the objection isn't valid. - *Sustained* means the objection is valid. - *Hearsay* is ANY out of court statement. Verbal evidence, voice recordings and even real/relevant documents can still be considered hearsay. - *An out of court statement* is anything from outside the courtroom that has lack of foundation. - *Lack of foundation* is things based on exhibits not properly entered into evidence. - *Leading* is a question that implies the anser for the witness, and is only allowed under cross examination.
Hearsay is actually a third party testimony. For example, What did the doctor determine was your injury. This is a hearsay objection because the doctor can testify about the injury findings and do not need someone else to testify about it.
@@jeffkami6932I'm not a person of knowledge lol, but as far as I know "calls for speculation" means that the question asks the witness to speculate on what could've been, because there is not enough proof /evidence it had happened
True! Even during her X examination you can already hear her blaming her attorneys ie: "it's not up to me" "it's not my job" "I handed over everything"
Amber's lawyers are most likely excellent lawyers, but no one can make a person this guilty look good. That's really difficult to do. And also, Johnny's lawyers are clearly worth every penny.
It’s an uphill battle for Amber’s team at this point. Ms. Vasquez exposed Amber. Hard. Also, I think Johnny hired the limited edition deluxe elite lawyers. They’re probably more expensive to hire but they deliver.
Just like she can't remember JD getting her the Aqua Man role. She auditioned but only bc he told the director to put her in. He pulled strings for her & she won't even let him have that. The nerve if this woman I tell you, if at all you call her a woman. She's the real monster.
And the jury is noticing that, people shouldn't be so worried that they're not, the thing to be cautious about is if there are any jurors sympathetic to Amber? No way to really know until they deliberate and a verdict is reached!
Imagine what that jury thinks about it. They have to be so furious for her wasting their time acting so victimized when it's obvious that she's manipulative in every waking moment.
Being narcissistic, she probably believed that she could convey some type of emotion or other by looking directly at them. She probably was coached to do so. That she was making them uncomfortable, didn't cross her mind, because she is convinced of her ability to influence or manipulate others. That's how narcissist behave. She is not right in the head and probably ruined her attorneys' carrier. Sad!
One of them recalled in a later interview that her constantly looking at them was making him uncomfortable so he had to look down and just listen the entire time she was on the stand
@@mikel8850 Oh, no, I agree 100%. She's super consistent. I'm just saying her obviously, obviously, fake "sad face" that she does? drives me insane. I didn't know that it was a thing to face the jury and look them in the eye - but I figure it out after about 2 videos of watching her testify. "Don't look at the attorney questioning you, you don't need to convince her, you need to convince THEM."
Her own lawyers don't believe a word she says. That's the part she has to deal with plus everyone else is learning about the modern feminist toxic woman who have hate of all men. They only see men as a ATM MACHINE.
She doesn’t have to stare them down during the objections, or while the attorneys are at the bench. She just has to answer the questions to them during her testimony so yes… the stare downs was creepy
I cannot believe this is one continuous re-direct. This is more in line with several different excerpts pulled of sustained objections and edited into one video. Anyone that Elaine Berehoft has defended, especially in criminal hearings, prior to 2022, may have a case for a new hearing based upon ineffective counsel
Amazing how she has a perfect....perfect memory for anything that supposedly helps her but none for anything else. CKEARLY even the judge knew what was up.
@@blork3192it’s the fact that everything she’s asked by her lawyers, things she expects to be asked, she knows it to every detail. When the opposing lawyers ask her things, she suddenly knows nothing. Little suspicious no?
You know if I was in that jury, every time she looked over at me I would whisper to her..."Why are you looking at me?" It's very odd and very unsettling, not to mention how unnatural of a behavior to display. Even when the lawyers are talking, she constantly makes eye contact with the jury. It just looks forced or fake.
Vasquez is amazing that she’s not only unnerving AH but also putting off the opposition lawyer! Almost schooling the older more experienced lawyer on the correct way of phrasing questions.
@@laurel1865 that's what happened to Johnny when he was on the stand. They objected literally everything and a lot of them were sustained. Maybe not as many because they have an actual case (aren't trying to craft one on the fly asking leading questions).
@@laurel1865 not at all, depps team has proven in many ways a lot of what heard and her team brings forth is hearsay and they have no evidence of almost anything they are saying to be true. It makes complete and utter sense for these objections to be sustained at this point. It’s not even about “revenge” for them objecting to Johnny because that’s based in emotions, it’s about the fact these people have no foundation to stand on really.
She’s looking at the jury and trying to find one that will feel sorry for her. She’s a worst human being…her attitude to Johnny Depp’s lawyer is ridiculously disgusting and very disrespectful.
I am no AH fan, by any means -- never heard of her until 3 weeks ago. But, AH is actually able to maintain control after being drilled in the box, meaning she has no physiological/medical reason why she resorts to violence when she gets upset. I did expect AH to have a bit better attorney than Elaine. I realize it may be more challenging building a defense for someone so obviously guilty, but Elaine getting ripped a new one by Camile "Objection!" Vasquez should not happen with any experienced atty, esp during redirect.
There is actually 1 male juror that Amber has singled out and is giving him the majority of her eye contact. She even gives him little half-smiles when the trial is paused. She hopes it'll work in her favor.
Every time I watch this it’s like it gets better with age! A year later and it’s like the first time watching! One of my favorite parts of this trial was watching Elaine fail horribly and her “I’m trying, I’m trying” she didn’t try very hard. GO CAMILLE this will never get old. 💕
It is strange that, as an attorney, Elaine couldn't seem to figure out that her questions were not the problem. The problem was how she was phrasing them as though she were on a fishing expedition. "What f anything. . . ?" She was just inviting Camille to object!
It's like that for me. It's worth taking a second look at this. By doing this, I realize that I missed a lot the first time. Elaine comes off as unprepared and confused. She lacks finesse and never learned how to turn on her microphone
You are right about the phrasing, but I also noticed that Amber’s attorneys had so many opportunities to object during Camille’s cross examination, but they didn’t say a word.
If you remember Johnny did ON OCCASION. To get a point across, in a conversational way, like you would at a get together with a lot of people. There is the normal human way to engage a jury and be relatable, sympathetic, get your points across and then there is this. What she's doing is very NOT what most people would do. I dare say nearly every normal person would do. It just comes off so fake, creepy, weird, performative. I could not handle being a juror with her doing that. It's so weird 🙅♀️
I've been a juror on a Murder trial, its weird when they stay. It happened once but this with amber heard is wild. She can't look at johnny, she can't look at the gallery, and the jury is holding 50 mil she doesn't have.
This constant starring at the jury, even while taking a drink is completely nuts! I would be super uncomfortable if someone just starred at me, in silence for no reason
I believe she thinks it makes her more intimate with them, when in reality it’s the complete opposite. From what I’ve seen from her social skills it wouldn’t shock me if she thinks this is normal behavior to display to the jury.
@@Triqkshot I've heard that this kind of behavior is typical of sociopaths, as they thrive in using people while lacking empathy... So they mostly act what they believe is expected in each situation even if they don't feel it natural to have these responses. And some sociopaths are extremely good at this, as it's almost like a science, an algorythm, instead of just being human, and apparently they can learn to read and manipulate people extremely well, but of course AH here is not good at this, it looks completly offputting and it's extremely clear that shes been told, or decided by herself, that she should make this presentation to the jury instead of whoever is asking her questions.
She is trying to love bomb them, excessive eye contact is one of the tactics narcissists use to get you to let your guard down and be sort of “hypnotized” by them. She is so transparent.
Because her haircut is from the 70’s and the judge’s is from the 80’s. Based on haircut, she has seniority. 😂 I don’t really know how real women determine this. I’m only a wig-wearing trans. 😅
SCAR TISSUE IN HER NOSE?! She's had at least 2 nose jobs,of course she has scar tissue in her nose! Wow! Her lawyer is really reaching! Johnny's lawyer is sharp!
Elaine is so disrespectful in every way. She even tries to argue with the judge after every objection even when the objections have been sustained. So unprofessional and rude 🤦🏻♀️
Her attorney is doomed after this case. She shouldn’t have taken this case. It’s so sad. How do you defend a pathological liar with no evidence at that.
@@rchristy4540 for now. I am not completely familiar with the law nor do I have witnessed trials like this before. But if I am a client looking for a reliable lawyer to defend me, I will NEVER reach out to AH’s lawyers’ firm based on their acts here.
Plain and simple they saw green and their greed allowed them to jump on the Heard bandwagon without due diligence. Sad how many everyday Johnny Depps couldn't escape ordinary Amber heards. She may have the spotlight but she's far from the only narcissist pathological liar that has set out to destroy a man and got away with it
Even when she isn't asking the questions Camille is still getting to the point. Love this women if I was in this situation I'd want her on my legal team.
@@LadyLove2668 WOW even with all of the evidence that proves she's been lying through her teeth, you still believe her?! I guess what they say is true, "common sense has definitely skipped some people!!"🙄🤔🤨😊
Something tells me that the judge has had enough of Heards lies. Judge: You can lay the foundation. Heard: I saw the emails… Judge: objection sustained.
It brightens my day to see relatively young Camille trounce the alleged experienced lead attorney for Amber. I recall my days as a trial attorney. I’m telling you that Camille was having a fantastic time defeating the dragon who is used to getting away with being sloppy and expecting to get the upper hand just because she’s older. Hurray for Camille. She is the high point of this trial! Thank you for making so many sustained objections that I lost count at 23.
have you ever met elaine in the courtroom in your days? sorry if thats a question you can’t answer, but i’d like to know if she usually is this whiny and unprepared. it seems to be her regular way to try and get away with being objected to.
She's an awful attorney, there's a reason she did it for the publicity and not for money, because there was no way she'd win. She just wanted her name out there.
@@MikeyWins11 exactly, Karen (Elaine) knew from the beginning her client was the cold blooded criminal and she still took the case and even traveled with tuurrdd in that fraud England case in 2020
I was just watching that part. Its like the cameraman wants everyone to see how weird she is. There are times she stares right into the camera and then I feel uncomfortable.
E Paxton my only guess is that her lawyers told her that looking at the jury it would make them feel some sort of connection and make her crap seem more believable.
Anyone notice that whenever AH’s lawyer asks her something and she tells with her ‘crying face’, but during the whole cross examination with JD’s lawyer she literally showed no emotions whenever she talked about her SA..
I clocked that straight away, whilst her lawyer is questioning she’s in bits and screwing her face up but on cross examination her face is strong, confident and arrogant
@@lindassewcrafty5114 yes, Amber operates from a narcissistic and histrionic arrogance. She’d have the lies ready…and with no real sense of integrity, use whatever gets her what she wants. You can’t con a con…Depp’s lawyers need to stay in control.
This should be used in law schools for instructing future attorneys what not to do while examining a witness, 1) how not to cause ongoing objections from incorrectly phrasing questions 2) how not to be argumentative with a Judge, (Judge Azcarotti was very generous in not holding Elaine Brederhoft in contempt for being as argumentative as she was) 3) how not to have your client unprepared for the witness stand 4) how not to be unorganized with your annotations and notes 5) how not to be unfamiliar with the courtroom proceedings 6) how not to lose your cool in front of a jury and let them see you are sinking by exclaiming, "I am trying, I'm trying"........ this is a total shitshow from beginning to end starring Elaine Bredehoft
I recently left a comment, as I came back to this video for pure respect and enjoyment saying similar. Especially the fact that a professional and supposed respectable attorney was annihilated by a young non-partner attorney in such a fashion that it went as far as her arguing “what if any/anything” is a “cure-all” in a cross was the most embarrassing thing I’ve ever seen in 15 years of law.
Nobody could prepare " fat ass " as she is always CORRECT, therefore doesn't have to listen. Remember we are dealing with an Asshole, ooops, Narcissistic personality. Enough with the 'approaching ' every 3/60 Shouldn't the concussion exam been the other way round. By the way the dress looked like she'd slept in it ...
Amber is trying so hard to hide how pissed off she is. She’s trying to answer as quickly as possible just so she can beat Camille’s objections but she’s ain’t quick enough 😂
This is the day she stormed out of a side door after the judge told her twice to have a seat beside her attorney. She didn’t even wait for the jury to be dismissed!
Honestly thought Johnny’s lawyers weren’t doing too great in the first half of this trial but Camille is coming through on the second half! Man!!!!!! It was also genius to have another female cross-examine Amber so that she can’t use the excuse that a man was bullying her around in the courtroom. Bravo!
I have followed every minute of this trial, and I do believe Mr. Depp's lawyers deliberately were playing a softer approach, maybe to encourage Amber's team to be less aware of them as an EXTREMELY competent team. I won't dispute the fact that Amber's lawyers seem much less competent, but a "pro" never underestimates the competition. That being said Depp's team is kicking ass and taking names.
@@1RFB308shooter totally agree. I see now that they knew exactly what they were doing. And they didn’t want to object because they knew Johnny would come across as authentic and keep his composure so they just let Heard’s lawyers look like assholes lol
Her attitude has changed from short and snotty while his lawyer is questioning her to poor me with her lawyer. She really does think people are blind and dumb.
Her facial expression looking at the jury even when she not answering any questions she heated hope she don't attack anyone JD attorney getting her mad piss angry the looks are on her face I don't feel anything she says I can watch a sad movie on TV and cry her story has not touch me at all her abuse lies not good to accuse JD or anyone else.
The way AH is looking over at the jury during sidebars is so telling! She is trying to portray this sad victim when really it comes across as kind of evil. Trying so hard to make them see her as something different than the complete monster that she is.
"I don't recall" "I don't remember" "I can't remember the exact sequence" "I disagree with that characterization" "I made poo poo in Johnny's bed" - Ambuser Turd
Exactly and I couldn't help but notice turds lawyer kept reading those junk headlines about Johnny but they objected the first time Johnny's lawyer tried to read one headline about Turd abusing her ex at the airport!
I agree, I’m just re watching this now 7 months after the trial and it still creeps me out the way AH always just stares at the jury constantly, it’s weird and unnatural!!!
You know i wonder if because the other causes weren't publicized as this and Amber had better backing back then caused her to win cases which caused her to feel she doesn't need a great lawyer. Not simply because of money (elon, franco and whoever else would have helped her with that) but because she thought things were so good for her she didn't need a great lawyer.
It's disgusting how when judge & lawyers are discussing something privately, she trying to stare down the jurors, including the strange pitiful expressions & twitches.
I love when elaine says "your honor said I could redirect after the cross"... LOL.. maybe if she stopped leading and calling for hearsay, and actually asked the questions properly then she would be able to redirect. Allthough it is difficult to defend a malicious liar.
@@ejmtv3 she's probably very good, but she's working a difficult case, with a difficult client, against the best experts money can buy. and her situation has only gotten more difficult with time. at this point, its over, and she probably knows that.
@@FOX12-y2e Yeah I wouldn’t pick her over Camille Vasquez; however, I don’t believe she is a bad lawyer. She just has a horrible client. Thought there were a few questions she could have worded differently to get around the leading objections.
W few more should have been sustained judge felt sorry for her. How could she say Lauren Anderson had two black eyes. That's not true. It wasn't proven unless she is part raccoon
The nerve on her to claim she did not hit Johnny SECONDS after hearing a recording in which she admits to kicking a door in his face and punching him. Damn I wonder if she actually believes her lies or if she’s just so desperate
Sociopaths don’t even realize it. That’s the sadness of it. I know 2 women like this, and they never “healed” from it. It’s almost like a brain injury.
She knows this is her last chance. Its do or die. So i think she is desperate at this point. In her life she hasn't been held accountable i suppose. I hope she finds another job to do barring movies. Because no one is going to hire her.
their brains dont send signals like those of us who feel they cant feel literally those signals don't even fire which is why they can lie with lie detector tests and it not pick up. to them what they say is the absolute truth and what happened. the world is there playground and they control it. if someone tries defending themselves then they get picked on more.
I’m starting to feel sorry for Elaine and Rottenburg. They thought it would be a home run but Camille is exposing almost every one of Amber’s lies and in such a professional and classy manner. Very satisfying to watch! I’m glad that this time, the public has access to all elements of the trial.
She is also throwing her lawyers under the bus and lying like literally just ruining their career like I felt annoyed with the laywers in the start but now I feel bad for them
Yep. She did by trying to make it seem as though her own lawyers are withholding evidence. What a joke. Most likely her own team deemed them to be doctored or they were lacking meta data, hence no time stamp etc.
Note that liars will always elaborate whether asked or not. A simple yes or no question doesn't exist to liars because they constantly have to repeat the entire story so that they can keep their facts straight
You are right. What kind of damage will she do to that child? Just by being a pathological liar, then you add bpd and histrionic and this kid is fudged.
When you have a 35+ year career as one of the most respected trial attorneys in Virginia… and then you have a meltdown in the biggest case of your career. Oof
It's my information that most of Elaine's cases never went to trial. She was known for settlements - not going to trial. And that would definitely explain her poor demonstration at redirect & rebuttal.
Imagine you're in a minefield, and each mine is a "Objection you're honour, leading, calls for speculation, hearsay". You probably won't want to step on it
Elaine may have struggled a bit, but it was Ms. Heard that lost the case. Elaine "what if anything" Bredehoft was most likely fighting a losing battle with a client that insisted on getting things in that weren't allowed or did not matter. (IE ENT records without the actual ENT testifying=heresay and why Johnny would not look at her in the eyes) This was a good example of a client refusing to listen to her attorneys. Elaine Bredehoft is probably also used to depositions where you can ask leading questions and the majority of her cases never make it to trial. Bottom line is Amber lost this case for Amber. Nobody else.
Imagine if that truly was a cure all... Why did you kill your wife with a crowbar and stuff her in a dumpster? Objection: Leading Sustained What, if any, reason did you have for killing your wife with a crowbar and stuffing her in a dumpster? Objection: Leading Nah, totally fine
The judge is done with the case. You can hear it it her voice. The judge knows that it is in fact defamation. She just can't say it in court. If AH is not found guilty, this will be a huge blow for men who have been abused and falsely accused. It will be a blow for actual victims. This trial started as entertainment, but has become much more. Not because they are celebs, but because it is so public.
Not how it works. The defamation is for her publishing lies that tarnish his reputation. If he laid hands in retaliation she isn't a victim of domestic abuse. If they can prove he attacked her (which they've provided no evidence for) then they could argue that her statement was factual
@@narlywaves2371 No, that is not how defamation cases work, or any other trial works. Defamation is accusing someone for which the evidence is not provided or can't be provided, to prove the accusation. This case is not about if Depp is guilty of laying hands on her. The case is about: can AH provide the evidence for the accusations. If she can't, then it is defamation. If she can, then it's not defamation. So far, she has been unable to provide the evidence. So at this point, she is guilty. The case is not, I repeat so you would understand, about Johnny being guilty. Johnny can't be found guilty in this trial. That can only happen in a criminal trial where he is the defendent. That is the nuance you seem to not get. The scope of the trial is reflected in the question presented to the jury: Is AH guilty of defamation? It's the only question that will be answered in this trial. So it's not 'if Johnny laid hands on her'; it's can AH provide evidence for the accusations (there are 2: physical abuse and sexual abuse). If it was a criminal case, then the question would be different: is Johnny guilty of domestic violence and sexual abuse? I recommend reading up on defamation in legal terms. An analogy: a divorce case is about divorce and the consequences. Even if one party comitted domestic violence, it will be considered as the grounds to grant a divorce, but the divorce case will not deal with the domestic violence as a criminal offense. For that, you need a criminal trial.
Your honor looked so pissed at Elaine. She is tired of her arguing about objections. Elaine was speechless as a result of bombardment of all the right objections. She even forgot how objections work.
As a father of a 10 year old daughter, watching this warms my heart and terrifies me at the same time. Knowing that my daughter can become a Ms Vasquez sends me into the stratosphere - what an amazing role model. At the same time thinking that about the fact that the world contains people like Ms Heard absolutely terrifies me. Talk about 2 extremes.
Oh, I was thinking the same and my daughter is as same age as yours. I have never thought of being a lawyer is ever be one of the choice. Seeing how Miss Vasquez professionally perform, change my point of view.
@@teerawand9564 interestingly your daughter doesn’t necessarily need to aspire to be a lawyer. There are many lessons that a role model can subliminally impart. Such as the power of education, confidence, politeness, class, being grounded and the best at whatever you chose to do, wearing the correct attire etc.. etc…. Thank you Ms Vasquez you will inspire a generation of young girls AND boys.
While she waits for lawyers, she pans the jury with a feel bad for me look. It is like she is stalking them more than the sympathy she so desperately seems to be seeking!
The look seems to say believe me, feel sorry for me, I gave up a life of privilege, I have to lie so don't sanction against me if you know what's good for you.
She's probably been advised to do that by her lawyers. I assume it's a usual tactic. It just loses its luster when it's not a human being, but some reptilian creature looking at you from the stand
Yeah she's seeking any sort of approval. No way the court put anyone on that jury stupid enough to believe her bs, especially for such a high profile case. Like it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that she's crying without tears or her face not staying red, like the nose and eye area.
psychosis involves hallucinations and delusions and chronic psychosis can be debilitating to live with. staring can not be psychotic. just like the weather is not bipolar and you can't look anorexic. they are mental illnesses. next time, just say "crazy." y'all are trying to sound smart using psychiatric terms but really you're just showing your ignorance.
Amber's Attorney was getting nervous and, angry over all the objections from Camille. I couldn't stop laughing it was like watching a funny movie. J.D. Lawyers did an amazing job throughout the trial. TEAM JOHHNY ALL THE WAY!!!🤣👍💞
@Johnny Depp lmao impersonating a celebrity on UA-cam. Imagine being this big of a loser. Okay "Johnny Depp" with your 500 subscribers, no real videos, and asking for peoples telegram accounts
Who else is coming back, listening to it again for the sheer entertainment value? LOL
Totally! I love the Depp funny videos someone posts on UA-cam.
All the time 😂😂
Me
Yes"🇨🇦really L💞 TEAM JD" TURN ambers'story of LIES----UP RIGHT-FOR 🌎TO SEE💯🙏🇨🇦💞
I can't get enough of this
This is what happens when someone who thinks they’re always the smartest person in the room gets called out by the smartest person in the room.
Love it !! lol 😂
Top comment!
Pure gold !
"TRUMPISM"
You are amazing in the courtroom Camille.
It’s not that her lawyers are bad. It’s just you LITERALLY can’t defend Amber Heard.
Combined with bad lawyers, the case is a done deal
Nah..... The lawyers are awful...
No they are BAAAAAAD!!
Nope, they're bad. Bredehoft is very unprofessional that she argues with the judge in front of the jury when she over rules her objections. The judge is basically instructing her at the bench every time because she obviously doesn't get to ask the questions once she's been overruled.
AND…that her lawyers are bad
Thanks Johnny for insisting that this be televised.
What a amazing victory!
You don't need to be a lawyer to realise how terribly Amber's lawyer is doing, but that's what you get when you try to defend the indefensible.
exactly. i mean lets be real. Ambers judges are probably very good they just cant defend ambers lies
To be fair, they have nothing to work with. They know she's crazy. But yeah Johnny's team is demolishing defense.
I initially didn’t like her until I had this same realisation. Poor woman. Couldn’t pay me all the money in the world to defend this trash.
Well bloody said! That exactly what happens when you try to defend the indefensible
Navigating all those objections with nothing to work with must be impossible.
27 sustained, 7 overruled as of the 29:00 mark.
Camille is handing AH’s legal team there arses and I’m loving every second of it.
Ms Vasquez has an incredibly quick mind. A joy to behold. 😊
Camille is handing AH her own nasty arse!!!!
Thank god I found your comment I was so tempted to go through and count them lol. Felt like even more lol
I almost feel like some of the overruled objections the judge felt bad for sucking so bad🤣
@@fnoland07 yeah she literally said at one point "oh go ahead try and lay a foundation"
I’m so glad amber is getting a taste of all the “objection hearsays” that Johnny had to deal with during the beginning of the trial
Its funny because Amber's lawyer gets so flustered
Yeah most definitely I agree 100%
I wish Vazquez would shut up now and then. She drones on like a hive of bees.
The difference is Johhny's lawyers are actually making appropriate objections whereas many of the objections Amber's defense made were overruled and invalid 😂
I luv this its better than any soap opera on TV. She has lied so many time I counted 11 buy its not over yet
The way Amber tried to answer the questions faster once Camille started getting so many objections sustained 😂😂
I was waiting for this comment 😂😂😂
Yep U hit the nail on the head.. amber is so vilr it makes me angry she can say what ever n JD got blamed it's sickening 😤🙄🤨I hope she gets extradited over here to Oz I'm sure the women in the jail system will absolutely love her lol
I never noticed until you mentioned it
@@aidenlewiii7056 This sexist misandrist shthole Western justice system will never put her in system.
yeah no room for her big sighs her constipated face trying to force emotion lmo
Camille Vasquez is just phenamenol. Even when she is not doing the questions she is still controlling the questions. Honestly I am a lawyer from the UK, I've done hearings, but I am just in awe of her skill. They could use her performances in law schools. Johnny Depp certainly is fortunate to have such able representation.
I bet AH wishes Vasquez was on her team! She's doing such a stunning job 👌🏾
Thats how you spell Phenomenal in UK?
@@danhenderson5198 🤣
Johny has always attracted very positive and honest people including his legal team (except we know who😕)
@@danhenderson5198 Definitely not haha
I had second hand embarrassment for her attorney. You can’t defend those lies. You can’t defend Amber.
That is where you are wrong. Vasquez would not be leading with her objects if Johnny's case was meritorious.
It’s like that old saying: “you can’t polish a turd.”
@@AlcoholicBoredom you can, but it's still a turd.
Well they probably thought this was a wash, and figured a woman would easily win in this scenario. So it seems they weren’t prepared for the flip.
Time to retire nana herd! 🤪
I’ll tell you what... Johnny couldn’t have picked a better lawyer to represent him. Camille’s demeanor does not waver from anything but tactful. I absolutely love how she has AH’s lawyers on their heels before they even ASK a question. The picture is clearly painted.
FACTS. Camille is insanely good at her job, she doesn't allow any bs from ah or her lawyers
So true!
That's because Camille is badass and doesn't play games.
I agree. She's brilliant.
@@maga8307 yes she certainly IS! 👍
I like the way the judge says, "next question" after sustaining an objection. It leaves no room for argument. She makes it clear the attorney needs to move on. She has made her decision. Brilliant.
The judge was very effective. She kept the proceedings from turning into an even bigger circus.
This is what happens when you(AT lawyers)are not prepared for court and your opponent is totally prepared this is what you look like. You can sure tell who did there Homework. Congrates to Johnny D and his Counsel.
T
He judge should have been stricter with Elaine
@@nathandevine437
I totally agree with you 💯
Johnny team came out the
Gate wanting blood
surely they was on their Game
fully ready , packed and loaded 🤔
Hello!!
Greetings from Johnny Christopher Depp thanks for your love and support where are you supporting me and my movies from??
Watching Elaine get flustered when 'objection', 'sustained' get thrown at her is so satisfying!!!! 😂
Cuz she is ultimately defending a bullshitter
Judge: "Sustained"
Elaine: "I-uh-erm-UH-I-I...."
Agreed!
@@FuckFascistUA-cam Lmao that's exactly what she sounds like she gets flustered
Camille is one of the most publicly fierce attorneys of our time. Such a great Lawyer!
“What if anything is not a cure all” I’m so glad the judge called that out, she keeps trying to lead questions or to call for hearsay. I blown away by how good Vasquez is at shutting down these questions. Amber’s lawyer even sighs and says “I’m trying” 💀
Credit where credit is due, they’re still a team. She is the selected person to handle objections but the whole team is looking out for them and when any of them catch one they feed it to her as quick as possible. They’re all doing a great job none the less.
Vasquez and the rest of the team are basically a flight of F-35s and F-15s working together against a bunch of biplanes. It's a bit of a slaughter to be honest. They don't really have to do everything they are doing, but it's better to shoot down as much as possible to make sure most of what they are trying to rebuild into her defense ends up falling short.
I don’t understand how Elaine can be an attorney for as many years as she has been and yet be so awful at trial litigation and so extremely unprofessional. What sort of thing does she normally do?
@@wruenvadam If nothing else they are getting her flustered and it’s making her look awful to the jury.
@@Chalupa_Sue I just hope that Johnny actually prevails in this. I highly doubt the jury is picking up what AH and her team are trying to put down, but there's always that chance. It is stuff like this that makes guys not want to deal with women, even though it's certainly not even close to most that do this, but the repercussions it can have to simply be accused without any evidence is enough to deter many. This needs to help make the law see men and women as equals when it comes to abuse/assault/domestic violence, because it is equally damaging to the victims regardless of gender.
LEGAL TERMS for context :
- *Overruled* means the objection isn't valid.
- *Sustained* means the objection is valid.
- *Hearsay* is ANY out of court statement. Verbal evidence, voice recordings and even real/relevant documents can still be considered hearsay.
- *An out of court statement* is anything from outside the courtroom that has lack of foundation.
- *Lack of foundation* is things based on exhibits not properly entered into evidence.
- *Leading* is a question that implies the anser for the witness, and is only allowed under cross examination.
Thankfully someone wrote this!
Hearsay is actually a third party testimony. For example, What did the doctor determine was your injury. This is a hearsay objection because the doctor can testify about the injury findings and do not need someone else to testify about it.
What's compound and speculation question? Thank you
@@jeffkami6932I'm not a person of knowledge lol, but as far as I know "calls for speculation" means that the question asks the witness to speculate on what could've been, because there is not enough proof /evidence it had happened
@@jeffkami6932
Compound is when multiple questions are packed into one. For Example: "Where were you and how would you have known?"
Nothing is going to stop Camille when she is determined, that is obvious.
Plain and simple!
Camille needs an Oscar....she is great!
@@karilynn3535 and Turd’s lawyer hasn’t taken the class on heresay or what constitutes “leading”. The woman is a bumbling fool.
@@karilynn3535 She is real, she is much better than any Oscar imo.
She's a barracuda!
You know it's bad when your own lawyer sighs and goes “I'm trying.”
Doesn't this fit w that meme "and this was the moment she knew....she f***ed up!"? 😁
😂
Enter TheFstric. Now she knows what it's like, she was doing it all the way around with JD lawyer. What comes around, goes around
what time mark did this happen?
That line was absolute GOLD, lmao
This is so embarrassing for Amber and her legal team and when this is over she will blame her lawyers because that is what a narcissist does
True! Even during her X examination you can already hear her blaming her attorneys ie: "it's not up to me" "it's not my job" "I handed over everything"
Bingo! She most definitely will blame her legal team.
They must argue in private. Amber looks pissed as f.
How right you are.
lol so real!
That "I'm trying I'm trying" will never not be absolutely hilarious
Amber's lawyers are most likely excellent lawyers, but no one can make a person this guilty look good. That's really difficult to do. And also, Johnny's lawyers are clearly worth every penny.
Best comment I’ve seen in days
They chose to take the case though. They should have refused if they were that good.
It’s an uphill battle for Amber’s team at this point. Ms. Vasquez exposed Amber. Hard. Also, I think Johnny hired the limited edition deluxe elite lawyers. They’re probably more expensive to hire but they deliver.
He has hit her... he is guilty.
@@narlywaves2371 that’s not what this case is about lmao
She remembers absolutely everything when it's her team asking her, but when it's the opposition asking, she can't remember a single thing
Not even the recordings she just listened to! This woman needs serious mental help.
Just like she can't remember JD getting her the Aqua Man role. She auditioned but only bc he told the director to put her in. He pulled strings for her & she won't even let him have that. The nerve if this woman I tell you, if at all you call her a woman. She's the real monster.
And the jury is noticing that, people shouldn't be so worried that they're not, the thing to be cautious about is if there are any jurors sympathetic to Amber? No way to really know until they deliberate and a verdict is reached!
Yes, she makes it impossible for the prosecuting team. It is really difficult to deal with a psycho liar.
Imagine what that jury thinks about it. They have to be so furious for her wasting their time acting so victimized when it's obvious that she's manipulative in every waking moment.
Vasquez is probably going to raise her lawyer fees after this and she will be worth every penny. She’s doing an astounding job.
She is a master!
This will be her signature case- it should be in her marketing when getting new clients
Not really.
Right!?
@@narlywaves2371 she will.
Watching this again I can’t get over how uncomfortable the jury must have felt when Amber was constantly looking at them
I’m watching also. The way depp team can’t believe what Elaine is doing is so funny. I wish we knew what was said at the sidebars 🤣
Being narcissistic, she probably believed that she could convey some type of emotion or other by looking directly at them. She probably was coached to do so. That she was making them uncomfortable, didn't cross her mind, because she is convinced of her ability to influence or manipulate others. That's how narcissist behave. She is not right in the head and probably ruined her attorneys' carrier. Sad!
I have second hand embarrassment. She looks at them during session breaks 🤪
One of them recalled in a later interview that her constantly looking at them was making him uncomfortable so he had to look down and just listen the entire time she was on the stand
I wathed a video of someone who was in the courtroom and he said the jury was very uncomfarable because of that and even looked the other way
Her CONSTANT looking at the jury during objections. And making these sad faces.
Disgusting.
@@mikel8850 Oh, no, I agree 100%. She's super consistent.
I'm just saying her obviously, obviously, fake "sad face" that she does? drives me insane.
I didn't know that it was a thing to face the jury and look them in the eye - but I figure it out after about 2 videos of watching her testify.
"Don't look at the attorney questioning you, you don't need to convince her, you need to convince THEM."
Her own lawyers don't believe a word she says. That's the part she has to deal with plus everyone else is learning about the modern feminist toxic woman who have hate of all men. They only see men as a ATM MACHINE.
She doesn’t have to stare them down during the objections, or while the attorneys are at the bench. She just has to answer the questions to them during her testimony so yes… the stare downs was creepy
@@mikel8850 if she was instructed to turn to them after every question,then she shouldn’t have been.It’s terribly unnatural looking.
Yes, It Sooooo drives me up the wall.
Camille didn’t even take her hand off the button 😂 She is so amazing! I’m so proud of her!👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 round of applause
Camille is Gangsta, she’s so awesome 👏
I hope she's a future Justice someday. She's a lovely person and knows her area of legal expertise quite well.
listening to her completely demolish them is so satisfying. She knows her stuff and is sharp as a tack
And at the opposite, Amber''s attorney doesn''t even know how to use the damn mic
This is the definition of "tearing open a new one."
The legal definition lmao
I cannot believe this is one continuous re-direct. This is more in line with several different excerpts pulled of sustained objections and edited into one video. Anyone that Elaine Berehoft has defended, especially in criminal hearings, prior to 2022, may have a case for a new hearing based upon ineffective counsel
Yaaasssss 🙌🏼
Ctfu the lawyer keeps going “ughh uhh uhh uhh” 🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤷🏽♀️🤷🏽♀️🤷🏽♀️😂😂😂
Objection - Hearsay, lack of foundation, Improper expert opinion. 😁
Amazing how she has a perfect....perfect memory for anything that supposedly helps her but none for anything else. CKEARLY even the judge knew what was up.
@@blork3192it’s the fact that everything she’s asked by her lawyers, things she expects to be asked, she knows it to every detail. When the opposing lawyers ask her things, she suddenly knows nothing. Little suspicious no?
and so many people are in on the conspiracy. the cop, the plane people...
You know if I was in that jury, every time she looked over at me I would whisper to her..."Why are you looking at me?" It's very odd and very unsettling, not to mention how unnatural of a behavior to display. Even when the lawyers are talking, she constantly makes eye contact with the jury. It just looks forced or fake.
@blork ０−
@@thomascavanaugh5458 Playing to an audience
Vasquez is amazing that she’s not only unnerving AH but also putting off the opposition lawyer! Almost schooling the older more experienced lawyer on the correct way of phrasing questions.
It s more esayer when you have the true by your side..i guess!
Yea she could have a good career as no matter how this trial goes
Of course , she's Latina❤️
She could be more experienced but she sucks...
Objection foundation! It hasn't been established Amber's lawyer is more experienced
It’s surreal how many objections there were, and the fact that they were sustained, this is crazy 😂
I’m not a lawyer, but it seems like the judge is biased. Some of the sustained objections seem over the top.
And I’m in no way defending Ms.Heard. I just think all the sustained objections are strange.
It's technical, it shows the efforts AH's lawyer has to do to allow her to tell her lies. She is playing a role but this is not a film.
@@laurel1865 that's what happened to Johnny when he was on the stand. They objected literally everything and a lot of them were sustained. Maybe not as many because they have an actual case (aren't trying to craft one on the fly asking leading questions).
@@laurel1865 not at all, depps team has proven in many ways a lot of what heard and her team brings forth is hearsay and they have no evidence of almost anything they are saying to be true. It makes complete and utter sense for these objections to be sustained at this point. It’s not even about “revenge” for them objecting to Johnny because that’s based in emotions, it’s about the fact these people have no foundation to stand on really.
She’s looking at the jury and trying to find one that will feel sorry for her. She’s a worst human being…her attitude to Johnny Depp’s lawyer is ridiculously disgusting and very disrespectful.
I am no AH fan, by any means -- never heard of her until 3 weeks ago. But, AH is actually able to maintain control after being drilled in the box, meaning she has no physiological/medical reason why she resorts to violence when she gets upset. I did expect AH to have a bit better attorney than Elaine. I realize it may be more challenging building a defense for someone so obviously guilty, but Elaine getting ripped a new one by Camile "Objection!" Vasquez should not happen with any experienced atty, esp during redirect.
There is actually 1 male juror that Amber has singled out and is giving him the majority of her eye contact. She even gives him little half-smiles when the trial is paused. She hopes it'll work in her favor.
She is giving someone "bed - room eyes ." Wo/ man ?? Flirting more likely .
All it takes is one jury member to "believe" AH. That is just awful.
@@watchinvidzwatchinvidz7691 sadly yes 😢 that also goes for criminal cases.
Every time I watch this it’s like it gets better with age! A year later and it’s like the first time watching! One of my favorite parts of this trial was watching Elaine fail horribly and her “I’m trying, I’m trying” she didn’t try very hard. GO CAMILLE this will never get old. 💕
It is strange that, as an attorney, Elaine couldn't seem to figure out that her questions were not the problem. The problem was how she was phrasing them as though she were on a fishing expedition. "What f anything. . . ?" She was just inviting Camille to object!
It's like that for me. It's worth taking a second look at this. By doing this, I realize that I missed a lot the first time. Elaine comes off as unprepared and confused. She lacks finesse and never learned how to turn on her microphone
According to Elaine, that was $6M worth of trying.
You are right about the phrasing, but I also noticed that Amber’s attorneys had so many opportunities to object during Camille’s cross examination, but they didn’t say a word.
@@mbryanf Right! It's a puzzle why they didn't raise any objections to that searing cross examination.
Whoever advised Amber to keep looking at the jury every time she speaks really got it wrong....it's creepy; if I were a juror, I'd feel uncomfortable.
And I would know she was lying and manipulating.
If you remember Johnny did ON OCCASION. To get a point across, in a conversational way, like you would at a get together with a lot of people. There is the normal human way to engage a jury and be relatable, sympathetic, get your points across and then there is this. What she's doing is very NOT what most people would do. I dare say nearly every normal person would do. It just comes off so fake, creepy, weird, performative. I could not handle being a juror with her doing that. It's so weird 🙅♀️
I've been a juror on a Murder trial, its weird when they stay. It happened once but this with amber heard is wild. She can't look at johnny, she can't look at the gallery, and the jury is holding 50 mil she doesn't have.
This constant starring at the jury, even while taking a drink is completely nuts! I would be super uncomfortable if someone just starred at me, in silence for no reason
And she gives them that puppy dog look.
I believe she thinks it makes her more intimate with them, when in reality it’s the complete opposite. From what I’ve seen from her social skills it wouldn’t shock me if she thinks this is normal behavior to display to the jury.
@@Triqkshot I've heard that this kind of behavior is typical of sociopaths, as they thrive in using people while lacking empathy... So they mostly act what they believe is expected in each situation even if they don't feel it natural to have these responses. And some sociopaths are extremely good at this, as it's almost like a science, an algorythm, instead of just being human, and apparently they can learn to read and manipulate people extremely well, but of course AH here is not good at this, it looks completly offputting and it's extremely clear that shes been told, or decided by herself, that she should make this presentation to the jury instead of whoever is asking her questions.
If we notice and are creeped out, at least a couple of jurors are too. I would bet it comes up when they are deliberating.
She is trying to love bomb them, excessive eye contact is one of the tactics narcissists use to get you to let your guard down and be sort of “hypnotized” by them. She is so transparent.
Ugh, the fact that Elaine doesn’t wait for the judge to rule on an objection and argues her point is absolutely inappropriate.
Why does her lawyer battle the judge when she sustains the objections? That is so inappropriate!
Very unprofessional
Because her haircut is from the 70’s and the judge’s is from the 80’s. Based on haircut, she has seniority. 😂
I don’t really know how real women determine this. I’m only a wig-wearing trans. 😅
@@Natasha26 LOL
If I was in that jury I’d be SOOO annoyed of Amber constantly looking over to me for sympathy 🙄
I'd be losing my 💩 if I was on the jury!
Stop looking at me!!
I'm getting irritated with her answers and looking at the jury every milliseconds
It's so ridiculous!
2:09 She does it even when she isn't answering a question.
It’s not just here and there, it’s every sentence, every answer
My heart rejoices when I hear the judge say "Sustained". I dont think that word has ever made me this happy.
🤣🤣🤣
or " overruled i'll allow it"when their lawyers try & object 🤣
shes so quick with it too
SCAR TISSUE IN HER NOSE?! She's had at least 2 nose jobs,of course she has scar tissue in her nose! Wow! Her lawyer is really reaching! Johnny's lawyer is sharp!
Guess she might also bring up some cooked up story to talk about cheek implants as well.. 😂😂
AMEN!!! NAILED IT!!!!
Also, cocaine use can cause scar tissue as well as holes inside the nostrils
@@humblecommenter not implants her cheeks look bad its definitely some cheap quality fillers
Exactly I was screaming that at the tv
Elaine is so disrespectful in every way. She even tries to argue with the judge after every objection even when the objections have been sustained. So unprofessional and rude 🤦🏻♀️
Absolutely!!!! I’ve never seen an attorney argue after the judge makes her ruling !! I guess that’s why amber just fired her going into her appeal .
@@kjh6903 right! Unbelievable 🤦🏻♀️
Hello!!
Greetings from Johnny Christopher Depp thanks for your love and support where are you supporting me and my movies from??
Elaine and Amber deserved this
What irritates me is her deliberate mispronunciation of Camille's surname. She never did it before here and didn't do it in her GMA interview.
Her attorney is doomed after this case. She shouldn’t have taken this case. It’s so sad. How do you defend a pathological liar with no evidence at that.
She still gets paid
@@rchristy4540 for now. I am not completely familiar with the law nor do I have witnessed trials like this before. But if I am a client looking for a reliable lawyer to defend me, I will NEVER reach out to AH’s lawyers’ firm based on their acts here.
I bet she doesn't pay the full bill.
@@bb2nice4u i bet she just “pledged” the bill 😂
Plain and simple they saw green and their greed allowed them to jump on the Heard bandwagon without due diligence. Sad how many everyday Johnny Depps couldn't escape ordinary Amber heards. She may have the spotlight but she's far from the only narcissist pathological liar that has set out to destroy a man and got away with it
Crazy how Amber seems to know how to answer with yes or no or “I did” ONLY when it’s her lawyer asking.
She needs to blab out as much lies as possible with Depps lawyer because she's sure not getting any chance with her own lawyer getting shutdown.
Not to mention the fact she doesn't stop talking after an objection has been made.
Not crazy thats how it works the lawyers on your side are suppose to throw alley-oop questions
I noticed that too. A direct answer WITHOUT EXPLANATIONS when Amber is answering her lawyers questions. Why is that so??? I wonder 🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨🤨
@@chrissyfocus5887
Even when she isn't asking the questions Camille is still getting to the point. Love this women if I was in this situation I'd want her on my legal team.
@@LadyLove2668 Objection. Lack of foundation.
@@JimLem LMAO love it!!😂
@@LadyLove2668 WOW even with all of the evidence that proves she's been lying through her teeth, you still believe her?! I guess what they say is true, "common sense has definitely skipped some people!!"🙄🤔🤨😊
@@aida087 dont categorize "turd herd" as "people" please
@@captainhades3975 LMAO agreed!!😂
When your attorney says “I’m trying” You should be concerned
Lol look at Camille, even SHE is being annoyed with all questions she has to object like "are u srsly asking again" 😂
She gives the look of seriously you went to college like I did.
8:30 you can hear it in her voice, the eternal sigh
I love it
I cannot believe how she's literally fighting with the judge on the objections???? Like what????
I agree! But hey, Johnny’s attorney is doing such a great job! Go Vazquez!
If I had someone like this objecting to all the bad calls I made in my life - my life would be much better now...
🤣🤣
Objection, stupidity
🤣
XD
The way Heard constantly stares at the jury to try and gain sympathy is just pathetic. Glad they didn't fall for it.
Yep, it probably had the complete opposite effect 😅
That instruction from her lawyer should get her sued.
Thank you Camille!! for teaching everyone especially Heard's lawyer that there are more objection than hearsay!!
🙌 yeeees
Correct! 😁
Something tells me that the judge has had enough of Heards lies.
Judge: You can lay the foundation.
Heard: I saw the emails…
Judge: objection sustained.
Yes. She changed and it was time.
So true
It brightens my day to see relatively young Camille trounce the alleged experienced lead attorney for Amber. I recall my days as a trial attorney. I’m telling you that Camille was having a fantastic time defeating the dragon who is used to getting away with being sloppy and expecting to get the upper hand just because she’s older. Hurray for Camille. She is the high point of this trial! Thank you for making so many sustained objections that I lost count at 23.
This is beautiful to watch
have you ever met elaine in the courtroom in your days? sorry if thats a question you can’t answer, but i’d like to know if she usually is this whiny and unprepared. it seems to be her regular way to try and get away with being objected to.
I stopped counting at “what if anything is not the cure all” 😫😫
@@lunahri4173 Fortunately, for her, I’ve never met her. LOL!
Yes, I whole heartedly agree..
When you realize too late that you took the wrong case. This was brutal.
She's an awful attorney, there's a reason she did it for the publicity and not for money, because there was no way she'd win. She just wanted her name out there.
@@MikeyWins11 exactly, Karen (Elaine) knew from the beginning her client was the cold blooded criminal and she still took the case and even traveled with tuurrdd in that fraud England case in 2020
The way she keeps looking at the jury, begging for siding, tells a lot about her narcissistic personality!
im cringing, like dont look at me bih
I agree! If I were a juror, it would make me uncomfortable.
I was just watching that part. Its like the cameraman wants everyone to see how weird she is. There are times she stares right into the camera and then I feel uncomfortable.
E Paxton my only guess is that her lawyers told her that looking at the jury it would make them feel some sort of connection and make her crap seem more believable.
@@AZQueen31 I was just thinking that as I watched her. I probably wouldn’t have even looked at her when she looked my direction.
99% of the Objections were right on. Literally most of them were sustained.
What's the 1%?
@@ohdarn1970 amber turd winning the case
@@CaptainMayoYT wait she did? I just started following this case. So I don't really understand
@@ohdarn1970 no she didn't its still going on
@@gloriamichel5775 oh good
Anyone notice that whenever AH’s lawyer asks her something and she tells with her ‘crying face’, but during the whole cross examination with JD’s lawyer she literally showed no emotions whenever she talked about her SA..
I clocked that straight away, whilst her lawyer is questioning she’s in bits and screwing her face up but on cross examination her face is strong, confident and arrogant
Yes!!! It’s like her lawyer is her comfort zone where everything is premeditated
@@lindassewcrafty5114 yes, Amber operates from a narcissistic and histrionic arrogance. She’d have the lies ready…and with no real sense of integrity, use whatever gets her what she wants. You can’t con a con…Depp’s lawyers need to stay in control.
I caught that indeed
Or in her testimony video that they showed from years ago.. just cool as a cucumber. Seemed happy as hell to me. 🤣
This should be used in law schools for instructing future attorneys what not to do while examining a witness,
1) how not to cause ongoing objections from incorrectly phrasing questions
2) how not to be argumentative with a Judge, (Judge Azcarotti was very generous in not holding Elaine Brederhoft in contempt for being as argumentative as she was)
3) how not to have your client unprepared for the witness stand
4) how not to be unorganized with your annotations and notes
5) how not to be unfamiliar with the courtroom proceedings
6) how not to lose your cool in front of a jury and let them see you are sinking by exclaiming, "I am trying, I'm trying"........
this is a total shitshow from beginning to end starring Elaine Bredehoft
YESSSSSSS
I recently left a comment, as I came back to this video for pure respect and enjoyment saying similar. Especially the fact that a professional and supposed respectable attorney was annihilated by a young non-partner attorney in such a fashion that it went as far as her arguing “what if any/anything” is a “cure-all” in a cross was the most embarrassing thing I’ve ever seen in 15 years of law.
Agreed except for your #2. I don’t think it was anywhere near contempt.
Nobody could prepare " fat ass " as she is always CORRECT, therefore doesn't have to listen. Remember we are dealing with an Asshole, ooops, Narcissistic personality. Enough with the 'approaching ' every 3/60
Shouldn't the concussion exam been the other way round. By the way the dress looked like she'd slept in it ...
@L agua She was ok during the London case, so Amber trusted her, and refused the insurance attorney. The result : a disaster ❤❤
Amber is trying so hard to hide how pissed off she is. She’s trying to answer as quickly as possible just so she can beat Camille’s objections but she’s ain’t quick enough 😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I noticed that too, lol
And it resulted in her forgot to act pitiful and sad 🤣🤣🤣
This is the day she stormed out of a side door after the judge told her twice to have a seat beside her attorney. She didn’t even wait for the jury to be dismissed!
Hahahaha
Honestly thought Johnny’s lawyers weren’t doing too great in the first half of this trial but Camille is coming through on the second half! Man!!!!!! It was also genius to have another female cross-examine Amber so that she can’t use the excuse that a man was bullying her around in the courtroom. Bravo!
Definitely agree with everything you said!👌🏾
I have followed every minute of this trial, and I do believe Mr. Depp's lawyers deliberately were playing a softer approach, maybe to encourage Amber's team to be less aware of them as an EXTREMELY competent team. I won't dispute the fact that Amber's lawyers seem much less competent, but a "pro" never underestimates the competition. That being said Depp's team is kicking ass and taking names.
@@1RFB308shooter totally agree. I see now that they knew exactly what they were doing. And they didn’t want to object because they knew Johnny would come across as authentic and keep his composure so they just let Heard’s lawyers look like assholes lol
She was assigned to cross examine because she was the best person for the job - man or woman!
@@1RFB308shooter totally 👍
Her attitude has changed from short and snotty while his lawyer is questioning her to poor me with her lawyer. She really does think people are blind and dumb.
PRECISELY!!!! OMG. It's clear to see.
Yeah,she's pathetic
Exactly.
Her facial expression looking at the jury even when she not answering any questions she heated hope she don't attack anyone JD attorney getting her mad piss angry the looks are on her face I don't feel anything she says I can watch a sad movie on TV and cry her story has not touch me at all her abuse lies not good to accuse JD or anyone else.
Exactly what I thought!
The way AH is looking over at the jury during sidebars is so telling! She is trying to portray this sad victim when really it comes across as kind of evil. Trying so hard to make them see her as something different than the complete monster that she is.
Exactly what I was thinking just now. She is a modern Cruella D'vill. An unrepentant villainess
And you just AH has Camille’s face on a dart board somewhere, if she could even afford one at this point. This was pure demolition. Lol
@@Jarlaxle_Baenre And it was Beautiful!! lol
"wHut IF aNy..." 🙄 Gosh, Elaine is so insufferable. She can't ask questions to her own client without leading her. It's clear that AH was coached.
"I don't recall"
"I don't remember"
"I can't remember the exact sequence"
"I disagree with that characterization"
"I made poo poo in Johnny's bed"
- Ambuser Turd
🤣🤣🤣🤣 this comment is a riot!
The number one sign that she's been coached is her looking over at the jury every time she answers a question.
Amber's lawyers wouldn't even let Depp finish a sentence,but when Vasquez objects her lawyers act as if it's ridiculous.
It's no fun when the rabbit's got the gun
@@kanamexzeroxyuuki It is when you're the rabbit!
Exactly and I couldn't help but notice turds lawyer kept reading those junk headlines about Johnny but they objected the first time Johnny's lawyer tried to read one headline about Turd abusing her ex at the airport!
She can't even get anything out, camille is the best
Leading, speculation, lack od foundation
The Lies have hit a PULL STOP
If AH stared at me the way she did the jury I would really be creeped out!
Right?! It’s so bizarre. It’s a mix of intimidation, pathetic, and manic.
I agree, I’m just re watching this now 7 months after the trial and it still creeps me out the way AH always just stares at the jury constantly, it’s weird and unnatural!!!
That's why I suggest a tainted window. If I was stared at like AH did, I would have looked at her with my crossed eyes!
Heck...I would be so tempted to give her the evil eye if I were a juror.
@@megpaterson7613 It is unnatural. She was instructed to do that by her council who was completely worthless. Annoying as hell.
That judge deserves a raise. She's gotta be worn out. Geez I can't imagine dealing with incompetent attorneys such as Amber's.
You know i wonder if because the other causes weren't publicized as this and Amber had better backing back then caused her to win cases which caused her to feel she doesn't need a great lawyer. Not simply because of money (elon, franco and whoever else would have helped her with that) but because she thought things were so good for her she didn't need a great lawyer.
Agreed!🤣🤣 She's wiping her forehead wishing Maury was on cuz there are smarter peolpe6on Maury. Wait!, What! He's not the father 🤣🤣
@@marlak4203 hey I'll buy that, not bad at all
I agree, she's an amazing judge!!! Always keeping a positive attitude.
I don't think Amber's attorneys are incompetent but they are fighting a uphill battle....
Did she really just say "I'm trying"?!? That was the nail in the coffin for the defense. Johnny won.
🤣. She might as well put up the white flag. Through the towel in. Hands in the air. We have nothing amber!!!
It's disgusting how when judge & lawyers are discussing something privately, she trying to stare down the jurors, including the strange pitiful expressions & twitches.
Shoo I as a juror would want a restraining on her just because she stared at me so much that I wouldn't feel safe lmao
Indeed
That doesn't help anymore 😆
yeah its creepy..... very creepy....
She dies it non stop its crazy
I love when elaine says "your honor said I could redirect after the cross"... LOL.. maybe if she stopped leading and calling for hearsay, and actually asked the questions properly then she would be able to redirect. Allthough it is difficult to defend a malicious liar.
"Mom said I could play xbox after dinner so it's my turn" Literally her
When a good lawyer says "I'm trying... I'm trying" before postulating a question, it's obvious who's guilty
And to add to that, shes not good.
@@ejmtv3 she's probably very good, but she's working a difficult case, with a difficult client, against the best experts money can buy. and her situation has only gotten more difficult with time. at this point, its over, and she probably knows that.
@@FOX12-y2e i might agree that shes good but in this case that the truth is not on her side, she's struggling
@@FOX12-y2e it only takes one stubborn juror to force a mistrial tho
@@FOX12-y2e Yeah I wouldn’t pick her over Camille Vasquez; however, I don’t believe she is a bad lawyer. She just has a horrible client. Thought there were a few questions she could have worded differently to get around the leading objections.
Is it common to have a lawyer say “but you honor…” like a child whining “but mooooom”?
Eric Cartman???
I counted, and she was only able to answer 12 questions without objections. This redirect did not go well for her AT ALL!! This was embarassing!
And some of them should have been sustained but judge was afraid of a mistrial
W few more should have been sustained judge felt sorry for her. How could she say Lauren Anderson had two black eyes. That's not true. It wasn't proven unless she is part raccoon
Mirror. Mirror on the wall, whose the prettiest of them all Camille and Dr Currie
We saw the backless dressno injuries
That number of times she is looking to the Jury, with her “abandoned dog” face is crazy. Nobody believed her since the beginning
And guzzling down her water?
The nerve on her to claim she did not hit Johnny SECONDS after hearing a recording in which she admits to kicking a door in his face and punching him.
Damn I wonder if she actually believes her lies or if she’s just so desperate
Sociopaths don’t even realize it. That’s the sadness of it. I know 2 women like this, and they never “healed” from it. It’s almost like a brain injury.
She knows this is her last chance. Its do or die. So i think she is desperate at this point. In her life she hasn't been held accountable i suppose. I hope she finds another job to do barring movies. Because no one is going to hire her.
@@sdavis5001 it IS a brain injury
@@SparklesStudios yes….truth!!
their brains dont send signals like those of us who feel they cant feel literally those signals don't even fire which is why they can lie with lie detector tests and it not pick up. to them what they say is the absolute truth and what happened. the world is there playground and they control it. if someone tries defending themselves then they get picked on more.
I’m starting to feel sorry for Elaine and Rottenburg. They thought it would be a home run but Camille is exposing almost every one of Amber’s lies and in such a professional and classy manner. Very satisfying to watch! I’m glad that this time, the public has access to all elements of the trial.
She is also throwing her lawyers under the bus and lying like literally just ruining their career like I felt annoyed with the laywers in the start but now I feel bad for them
@@jellybeans7192 lol you guys are ridiculous
Explain how they're being ridiculous
Yep. She did by trying to make it seem as though her own lawyers are withholding evidence. What a joke. Most likely her own team deemed them to be doctored or they were lacking meta data, hence no time stamp etc.
@@eliongaro6798 Nah you ridiculous for thinking they're ridiculous
Note that liars will always elaborate whether asked or not. A simple yes or no question doesn't exist to liars because they constantly have to repeat the entire story so that they can keep their facts straight
THANK YOU , for your words.
I've never known a high profile lawyer so woefully unprepared as this. Embarrassing.
She remembers dates and time with her lawyer but not with Johnny Depp's lawyer. Wow, she lies badly.
I thought that too I wish someone would of pointed that out
Is anyone else frightened for the child she is raising? She lies about everything!
Heard's child and the Markle children can do group therapy together when they are older.
Yes, it will be like the movie- mommy dearest
@@bronest1 really? There's bs there too? Interesting.
You are right. What kind of damage will she do to that child? Just by being a pathological liar, then you add bpd and histrionic and this kid is fudged.
Nope.
Jesus, Camile is just hovering her hand over the button
Elaine: about to say something stupid
Camile: Objection, leading
😂😂😂 and Elaine can’t remember to switch her microphone on. How many times today did the judge tell her this???
"What if anything" is not the cure all.😂😂😂. Loved it.
I but yet she continued to say what if anything
It’s crazy how she doesn’t remember anything when his lawyers are asking and she has like the exact time recollection when her own lawyers ask 😂🙌🏼
This.
🤫😂🤣
Truth served on a platter, thank you I'll have two please.
Thought the same thing
@@MeToo-py1tq is there a 10pc meal of truth on the menu?
I'll have one of those
That was embarrassing
Yet fun to watch. Could become a new drinking game.
@@trendywipp3715 you’d get blackout after a minute ☠️🤣
@@trendywipp3715 9th pm
Qpq
“Objection, Leading” is what Elaine Bredehoft is going to hearing in her dreams tonight.
She looks so lost.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
The coordination of Johnny Depps lawyers is wonderful..each one helps the other with whatever issue needs to be resolved.
Teamwork is dreamwork
When you have a 35+ year career as one of the most respected trial attorneys in Virginia… and then you have a meltdown in the biggest case of your career. Oof
I kind of feel bad because all those years are down the drain. This doesn't show skill or anything close to it
It's my information that most of Elaine's cases never went to trial. She was known for settlements - not going to trial. And that would definitely explain her poor demonstration at redirect & rebuttal.
@@suzanne1392absolutely
This crazy woman has an answer for everything, doesn’t she? That’s the problem with lying: it’s too difficult to keep your story straight.
Shes a compulsive liar.
Not really. People lie succesfully on a daily basis, only a narcistic sadistic creature would create such a ridiculous predicament.
It was easy for her,she blamed everyone but herself
Worse she remembers her scars but doesn’t remember anything’s she did or say to Johnny
"Where are the medical records of your wounds, bruises and bleeding" is all the question you need and the answer is there's none
Love when AH lawyer is desperately trying to justify her question. And the judge has to describe to the lawyer why the objection is sustained.
It feels disrespectful that they've tried to oppose the objections so much, when JD's lawyers have never done it afaik
She’s assertive without being overtly aggressive and yet somehow, she always manages to break Heard.
😞😓😩
The judge is likely fed up with Bredehoft, the way that lawyer loudly argues and disputes the sustained objecting is beyond disrespectful.
Can a lawyer be fined or reprimanded for arguing with the judge? Especially this often? AH lawyer is so disrespectful.
Watching this over again really speaks to what a terrible lawyer this woman is, enough of the "what if any"
Wasn't she in the top 100 lawyers of America for some time? I hope it was false but idk, some systems in the USA I don't understand
Imagine you're in a minefield, and each mine is a "Objection you're honour, leading, calls for speculation, hearsay". You probably won't want to step on it
Elaine may have struggled a bit, but it was Ms. Heard that lost the case. Elaine "what if anything" Bredehoft was most likely fighting a losing battle with a client that insisted on getting things in that weren't allowed or did not matter. (IE ENT records without the actual ENT testifying=heresay and why Johnny would not look at her in the eyes) This was a good example of a client refusing to listen to her attorneys. Elaine Bredehoft is probably also used to depositions where you can ask leading questions and the majority of her cases never make it to trial. Bottom line is Amber lost this case for Amber. Nobody else.
Imagine if that truly was a cure all...
Why did you kill your wife with a crowbar and stuff her in a dumpster?
Objection: Leading
Sustained
What, if any, reason did you have for killing your wife with a crowbar and stuffing her in a dumpster?
Objection: Leading
Nah, totally fine
Amber never paid her lawyers, she pledged 😂
Synonymously 😂
😂💀
😂😂😂 she hasn't yet she's being sued 😂😂
Hahaha.
Deeeaaaddd
The way she keeps talking when there’s an objection says a lot about her
💯
The judge is done with the case. You can hear it it her voice. The judge knows that it is in fact defamation. She just can't say it in court.
If AH is not found guilty, this will be a huge blow for men who have been abused and falsely accused. It will be a blow for actual victims.
This trial started as entertainment, but has become much more. Not because they are celebs, but because it is so public.
Its not defamation if he laid hands on her!
Not how it works. The defamation is for her publishing lies that tarnish his reputation. If he laid hands in retaliation she isn't a victim of domestic abuse. If they can prove he attacked her (which they've provided no evidence for) then they could argue that her statement was factual
I think *
@@narlywaves2371 No, that is not how defamation cases work, or any other trial works.
Defamation is accusing someone for which the evidence is not provided or can't be provided, to prove the accusation.
This case is not about if Depp is guilty of laying hands on her. The case is about: can AH provide the evidence for the accusations. If she can't, then it is defamation. If she can, then it's not defamation. So far, she has been unable to provide the evidence. So at this point, she is guilty. The case is not, I repeat so you would understand, about Johnny being guilty. Johnny can't be found guilty in this trial. That can only happen in a criminal trial where he is the defendent.
That is the nuance you seem to not get. The scope of the trial is reflected in the question presented to the jury: Is AH guilty of defamation? It's the only question that will be answered in this trial.
So it's not 'if Johnny laid hands on her'; it's can AH provide evidence for the accusations (there are 2: physical abuse and sexual abuse).
If it was a criminal case, then the question would be different: is Johnny guilty of domestic violence and sexual abuse?
I recommend reading up on defamation in legal terms.
An analogy: a divorce case is about divorce and the consequences. Even if one party comitted domestic violence, it will be considered as the grounds to grant a divorce, but the divorce case will not deal with the domestic violence as a criminal offense. For that, you need a criminal trial.
@@keyboardwarrior7538 Correct. This case is about providing evidence for the accusations.
Camille did everything but pull Elaine’s hair… LOL!
Your honor looked so pissed at Elaine. She is tired of her arguing about objections. Elaine was speechless as a result of bombardment of all the right objections. She even forgot how objections work.
As a father of a 10 year old daughter, watching this warms my heart and terrifies me at the same time. Knowing that my daughter can become a Ms Vasquez sends me into the stratosphere - what an amazing role model. At the same time thinking that about the fact that the world contains people like Ms Heard absolutely terrifies me. Talk about 2 extremes.
Oh, I was thinking the same and my daughter is as same age as yours. I have never thought of being a lawyer is ever be one of the choice. Seeing how Miss Vasquez professionally perform, change my point of view.
@@teerawand9564 interestingly your daughter doesn’t necessarily need to aspire to be a lawyer. There are many lessons that a role model can subliminally impart. Such as the power of education, confidence, politeness, class, being grounded and the best at whatever you chose to do, wearing the correct attire etc.. etc…. Thank you Ms Vasquez you will inspire a generation of young girls AND boys.
❤ this comment.
Or she could be the judge and run the whole show!
Scary scary world.
So creepy how she can't stop looking at the Jury even when the lawyers are talking to the Judge.
Performers always look to engage with the audience as they act ... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I was wondering why she would be asked the question by the council and answer to the jury
👏 👏 👏 💯 She needs to stop it!! Her “narcissistic psychopath” is showing
The only thing Elaine hit the nail on the head with in that line of questioning was saying "Your honor, I'm ENTITLED."
This needs more likes ! She was disrespectful to the judge in my opinion.
While she waits for lawyers, she pans the jury with a feel bad for me look. It is like she is stalking them more than the sympathy she so desperately seems to be seeking!
Yess she seems completly ..loste
yeah that was uber creepy.. almost threatening
The look seems to say believe me, feel sorry for me, I gave up a life of privilege, I have to lie so don't sanction against me if you know what's good for you.
She's probably been advised to do that by her lawyers. I assume it's a usual tactic. It just loses its luster when it's not a human being, but some reptilian creature looking at you from the stand
Yeah she's seeking any sort of approval. No way the court put anyone on that jury stupid enough to believe her bs, especially for such a high profile case. Like it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that she's crying without tears or her face not staying red, like the nose and eye area.
I actually feel badly for the judge… she’s demonstrated a remarkable amount of patience!!
Sist at 9:14 look like she’s taking a test. It was the deep sigh for me.
@@Xcellent2k Nice catch. lol
@@Xcellent2k that and the instant sustaining of the objection.
If her lies on top of lies, snotty ass remarks and bad acting doesn’t do it for the jury, her psychotic staring at them will. She is 100% nuts!
Psychotic staring 👌 Very rightly said 🤣🤣🤣
Yaaaaassss
I don't what the staring at the jury is all about
psychosis involves hallucinations and delusions and chronic psychosis can be debilitating to live with. staring can not be psychotic. just like the weather is not bipolar and you can't look anorexic. they are mental illnesses. next time, just say "crazy." y'all are trying to sound smart using psychiatric terms but really you're just showing your ignorance.
@@skrittle555 you can correct people without been rude too
Amber's Attorney was getting nervous and, angry over all the objections from Camille. I couldn't stop laughing it was like watching a funny movie. J.D. Lawyers did an amazing job throughout the trial. TEAM JOHHNY ALL THE WAY!!!🤣👍💞
@Johnny Depp lmao impersonating a celebrity on UA-cam. Imagine being this big of a loser. Okay "Johnny Depp" with your 500 subscribers, no real videos, and asking for peoples telegram accounts