Witness Begins to Lose His Patience During Questioning From Heard's Attorney
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 тра 2022
- During his testimony on Monday, Richard Marks was being questioned by one of Heard's attorneys about articles related to Johnny Depp. After being questioned about his knowledge of multiple articles, Marks appeared the begin to lose his patience with the attorney.
#JohnnyDepp #AmberHeard
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter! bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Watch Law&Crime Network NOW on UA-camTV!
tv.ua-cam.com/users/welcome?...
OTHER WAYS TO WATCH LAW&CRIME NETWORK IN YOUR AREA:
lawandcrime.com/where-to-watch/
READ MORE GREAT ARTICLES FROM LAW&CRIME NETWORK HERE:
lawandcrime.com
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS:
Coptales&Cocktails Apple Podcast:
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Law&Crime Sidebar:
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK UA-cam CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Channel B: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel C: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel D / @lawandcrimebodycam - Розваги
Can’t believe this guy is a professional lawyer. He doesn’t even let the person finish their answer before asking another question. Every time he asks a question you can tell he doesn’t even know if he should be asking it.
And then he objects to himself
This “lawyer” deserves to get a thank you gift from the lawyers from Mr Deep. 😜😁
At this point you can see they're trying to argue with the witness instead of asking questions lmao, I know intimidated and being Aggressive towards witness is one of lawyer tactics or whatever but at this point the way he spoke himself just like a teenager on social media spewing random trivia without anything backing up his argument
@@OrdinaryMemer6969 props to them for sticking to their plan even though all it is doing is helping Johnny haha. Interrupting to create anger and trying to create an image of him being an abuser with no evidence except that he loves to drink and take drugs.
Unfortunately that doesn’t equal violence in all people.
Unprofessional, rude LOSERS LOL
Can’t believe the lawyer is using tabloid gossip as a measure of proof to gauge Johnny’s integrity. Absurd beyond reproach. Speechless!
As Marks pointed out, there's hundreds of articles about Depp all the time, cheery picking the gutter press to try and suggest the op ed had no effect on JDs career backfired spectacularly, Marks was just too strong a witness and Heard's lawyer was definitely out of his depth..
yup it's insane that this is somehow allowed, while "hearsay" applies to any counter to any of it!
They should be required to put the person the article states directly heard whatever the claim in the article is onto the stand or not be allowed to use any of it! IE, if they want to claim he's the most overpaid actor, they should be required to produce someone who provided that information to the article & that person should be held to hearsay rules & subject to cross examination to see if they really have the financial information on all actors in hollywood to be able to make that claim or not
Never interrupt an enemy when he's making a mistake.
Actually they're proving that Heard caused damage. 100s of articles = JD is still "most overpaid actor" - 1 article from H = his career is over.
My thinking is that Heard's defence team are trying to suggest news articles are meaningless and harmless (such as Amber's article about Johnny).
Look!... everyone's written a harmful article about Johnny... Amber's article was just a drop in the ocean.
Many levels of unsubstantiated earsay ...and that judge just let's it be said
More infuriating is the fact usa courts are using spent legal documents to trail twice on Dv .. in USA that's called double jeopardy by exposed prejudices
the fact that TABLOIDS were even allowed to be used as EVIDENCE is absolutely INSANE... LITERALLY the definition of HEARSAY...
going the way of the U.K. case. i have said i do not trust this judge!
My college rubric was a lie
They may be trying to draw a parallel with Amber Heard’s article. If the witness says something like “those tabloid articles don’t matter”, then it goes to show that Heard’s article wouldn’t matter either.
@@invoker619 never thought of that aspect. Nice.
You realize this is a defamation trial and that Depp claims the negative press coverage arising from Heard's statements injured him?
“No sir, Im afraid I don’t have a picture perfect memory of every specious clickbait article written in an obvious effort to dog pile Depp.”
Yeah pretty much lol
😂
Richard, nice one. 👍 😁
So much of what Heard’s lawyers did, from Muffin-gate to these tabloid quotes, backfired badly. A lot of times it backfired because they just went on too long, other times it was like this where they were using rags that everyone in the country knows are rags to support their opinions. By the time Rottenborn was finished he’d have had more credibility if he’d asked about an article in the Enquirer and just left it at that.
@@rickbateman2401 Yes, it felt to me like Heard's lawyers were scraping the bottom of the barrel... There was nothing tangible.
Lawyer: Calls hearsay on everything.
Also that same lawyer: Uses articles based on hearsay as evidence.
And Johnny's lawyers are smart enough to let them hang themselves with that "evidence."
Show some respect, his name is ROTTENborn!!!
@@hamricmike8 no one cares
@@rashaa873 Ever hear of sarcasm?
@@rashaa873 No worries 😎
Imagine having “a journalists opinion ” as a credible source in court? Like they really having nothing to serve.
Yeah, and then all those objections about 'hearsay' by Amber's lawyer but none from Depp's lawyer about this. Journalists' opinions are literally hearsay.
Yeah doesn’t that qualify as hearsay haha
OBJECTION! Hearsay
True! Basically the entirety of the defense is hearsay!
If all they have is articles they really have no case
I cannot believe how absurd this lawyer is!!! Almost trying to force the witness to make a claim/statement based on articles written by others?? I mean, is he REALLY a lawyer??? If HE is, I TOO can be a lawyer!!!
The reason they do that. Is because Amber Heard has nothing no evidence. They have no claims. What else can he do.
Right. I understand he is trying to establish their were other bad articles but the difference is none of those publications had first hand knowledge.
Obviously everybody is going to believe the one written by someone b with private knowledge of him
Lawyers play mind games to make evidence up when they have none. These attorneys could PERSONALLY like JD way more, but they were hired by AH so they gotta work for her lol
😂 yeah agree, all JD lawyers have calm tone in questioning, but hearing AH lawyer just makes my blood boils
His tactics seem to be just to bully and be rude to the witnesses .
This line of questioning is beyond desperate.
I just don’t understand how the defense objects to everything as hearsay, yet uses tabloid articles as proof - aren’t those a prime example of hearsay????
Yes, they are hearsay papers too.
Exactly! This team she has is a joke
I would be appalled at how JD's team allows all this tabloid use without objecting as hearsay if this wasn't the sh1tshow it is right now. I guess they let it roll because AH's team is pretty much sinking themselves and making everyone dislike them with such childish/dirty methods.
Because Heard's lawyer have lost the plot and they are desperate.
@@vaizyh I agree with you, but maybe his lawyers are allowing it because it's actually helping JD's case. Unintended consequences.
For me personally, Amber's goal of trying to make the public hate Johnny and destroy his credibility has had the opposite effect.
so true. Her plan is getting backfired
I agree. This trial is humanizing him, which automatically makes him more relatable and likable. She exploited and manipulated Johnny Depp and used his generosity against him. Her ridiculous lawyers are a representation of that. JD is a grown man but that doesn't mean that women can't be the abusers and in this case she was.
Karma at its best
it's kind of like the Streisand Effect
Agree. I didn’t even know who she was or that all of this was happening in Johnny Depp’s life till this law suit came out. But I don’t like her 😅
"Does she have another husband?"
Knowing that Heard has lied about pretty much everything, she probably does.
If men are smart none of them will ever marry this woman!
@The Amber Heard Playlist!! You believe in amber heard when its so obvious she is a pathological liar and a narcissist. I mean its obvious karens like you are on her side. Good luck on your soul though
Seriously this lawyer is like:
"So you are aware of Johnny's existance?
Yes
"So you are agreeing that he is guilty"
"You agree that Johnny Depp is guilty? He said mean words to Ms Heard. Somebody wrote an article about it. That's how you know it's true! Admit it! He's guilty!"
Perfectly stated!
All of her lawyers don’t let anyone finish speaking. Why doesn’t the judge stop this from continuously happening?
It's because all her lawyers get a taste of that action too and know it'll be worse when she loses
the lawyer's job is to ask questions, and the witness is supposed to answer them exactly how the lawyer wants.
when they start adding context or explaining, theyre cut off b/c it's the lawyer's cross examination not the witness'.
Imagine if you had a lawyer that was asking the a witness of the murder of your family: "is it true the defendant jumped in the car and took off?" and the witness kept answering slightly off like "well, he certainly didnt jump. both of his feet were on the ground.... (and on and on)" not a great example but its the best i could do at this time in the morning lol
@@toericabaker but is it allowed to interfere when the witness is answering and giving his testimony? these lawyers are a joke! worse than the lawyer in kyle rittenhouse case
Because thats how trials go
Right? They say, "Just answer the question. I asked you a yes or no." It's to the point of disrespect.
This lawyer is disgusting. He keeps saying "you would agree" when he never outwardly says he agrees. This is a joke. This case is going to kill his career.
The lawyer will make so much money from this case that he'll be set for life, he won't need a career lol.
so that's not leading 🤔 or Johnny's lawyer would have objected
That is how you ask questions during cross examination. It’s a normal practice, not exclusive to this lawyer
@@ezay8694 this shows us how miserable is the continental law system. Manipulation and deception.
This attorney's career was over the minute he objected to the answer of his own question.
Did she have another husband, indeed. The deaf team definitely had the better lawyers. I don’t remember any of them asking such ridiculous questions, over and over and over.
I love this guy. The lawyer is using tabloids, literal pieces of teen gossip, and this guy is just dealing with him like he's a snarky child (which, at this point, all of AH's lawyers are).
It's amazing how much nonsense this judge has allowed, how disappointing.
Reminds me of the Speaker of the House of Commons
don't be surprised if she rules in Amber's favor.
She’s bias
@@MusicforMe123 I thought there was a jury?
@@TheHungryPigeon yeah, jury is there
If the public is getting annoyed with Heards lawyers then you know the jury is as well. Guy kept asking different versions of the same question over and over and over.
Very good observation.
it's too aggravate the witness before asking the question they actually want the answer for, it's a very aggressive way to do things but often effective.
@@Jeff-rm3lv I appreciated the reminder to imagine how the jury is perceiving all this testimony!
@@Jeff-rm3lv Swing and a miss here.
Not to mention he was asking the witness for hearsay answers any time he asked "would disney want this actor associated with them"
I love how they're trying so hard to prove Johnny Depp has struggled with addiction. He's never tried to hide it. He has even talked about it in TV interviews.
These have got to be the worst most annoying lawyers ever…they ask a question and won’t let the person answer….
The fact that these lawyers are going off on “posts/articles” made from people who have never once spent a second with both or either one of these people as facts is laughable. Anyone can write anything to get a second of recognition or infamy
OBJECTION! Hearsay your honor!
Objection: relevance
The channel Legal Eagle made a video explaining that to prove defamation in the case of a public person, you need to prove malicious intent and some kind of negative impact (if I remember correctly). So I’m guessing the lawyer and bringing up all this articles to try and show that Amber Heard is not the one responsible for problem’s with his career.
@@yogajourney9519 Being drunk and disruptive on set is vastly different to being a accused of domestic violence. Drunk and disruptive can be deemed normal in Hollywood, historically speaking. Wife beating not so much.
@@MrJackydragon except he didn't beat his wife
"Most overpaid actor"
Sounds like it was written by a jealous underpaid actor. Johnny Depp is a fantastic actor. There will always be people in life who try to drag others down with mob mentality
For real written by salty bae much
Asked by maybe the most overpaid lawyer? 😁
This witness was so strong it was embarracing watching Heard's lawyer try to discredit him. His mistake was letting the witness flesh out his answers rather than keeping him to yes or no answers. This guy was as good a witness as JD is an actor and the result was crushing.. This is definitely someone you want on your side..
also he cant be overpaid when he is one of the best actors
Most overpaid lawer 🤪🤪🤪
What is wrong with this lawyer?!? Omg he’s insane
“Netflix is a joke.” I don’t know why that made me laugh.😅
This comical court case is making Johnny Depp’s popularity soar instead of bringing hate to him.
Good job Amber👏🏽👏🏽
I screen shot his instagram after his testimony was completed and Ambers…Ambers has stayed the same and he has gained almost a million followers in less than a week!
He's the guy who got a child killer of death row. Johnny Depp's Karma is Amber Heard----
Johnny is suing Amber for defamation from her previous allegations, this court case is supposed to make Johnny look good.
@@samhead9836 and it's def working and Im not complaining
She Will has her karma that is sure¡¡
When Heard's lawyer introduced a fan blog as evidence I died laughing.
Lmfao I didnt catch that but I cant rewatch I just cant so I'll take you on your word
Requesting a time stamp..🙏
@@artpela2020 🙏🏾
I didn't see that
@@artpela2020 I’m just guessing because I’m not certain, but he mentions articles starting at 2:18. I’m not sure if one of those that he mentioned is the fan blog 🤷🏻♀️
This attorney could not control his anxiety. I cringed whenever he got up to examine anyone. Isn't he the same guy who called "objection, hearsay" on his own question?
He's very hyper
How can a lawyer use random news articles as facts! This is ridiculous
How can this type of hostile questioning keep going?? It’s pathetic and unprofessional! AH’s lawyers are plain rude.
It's so annoying, but I'm hoping it's making the jury loathe them as much as we do.
OMG I could not agree more. I get it, they are her Defense Attorneys, but there is no reason for any of them to behave the way they are. Rude, disrespectful, not letting them answer. There is no need for the lack of respect. They're losing, they know it. It's going to be hard to for AH to dig herself out of this. She lied. She didn't even right the op Ed, Johnny never hit her.
Extremely unprofessional and rude
@@northerngirl1637 oh of courseeee . It has to be
To be fair...these are hostile witnesses to their client. It will be interesting to see the tone and persistence when his lawyers talk to AH.
Amber’s lawyer tried to break this witness with ridiculous and pointless “hearsay”, but the witness did a great job by not busting out laughing.
This is possibly because its a cout of law Not a school of higher learning
witness is a lawyer himself, he knows that Amber's lawyer is asking redundant questions to aggrevate him before asking their real question
Hes literally asking questions where the answer would be hearsay as well. "disney wouldnt want to be involved with an actor whos drunk all the time would they?" Idk why you think one man can legally speak on behalf of all of disney
@@Jeff-rm3lv how do you know so much
You musta missed the part where depps attorneys on ejected to hearsay continuously without success
This gentleman is extreeeeemely patient. Much respect!
Who wouldn’t be drinking with all of the misery he was dealing with after getting with this toxic woman? Pfffftt
He's asking someone to AGREE to a news article title that specifically says "allegedly". So the reporter didn't even know for sure....yet this lawyer is using it as fact? Unbelievable.
Even better:
He doesn't ask them whether they agree with the article, he asks them whether they agree that the article exists.
It all comes down to the credibility of the witness testimony. Marks was crushing in his response to some very weak cross examination. When asked by the judge if they might want to recall Marks, there was no doubt from JDs team, who wouldn't want this guy on the back burner?
I think the point is to repeatedly state that allegations against Depp have been made consistently, so what makes this one so damaging?
I don't necessarily think it's going to work as a strategy, but I think that's what he's going for.
@@epr8974 exactly my thoughts, like what does it help either case if he agrees about the existence of the article or not
@@epr8974 THIS! Its the most moronic thing and I truly question this guys intelligence.
Marks has a lot of patience with those insufferable lawyers. Not everyone can handle such annoying gaslighting.
Depp is a gaslighting.
Agreed! I would be all over the incompetence of this legal team! Utter fools.
AH lawyers are not questioning at this point, they're testifying. They're putting this into the juries mind by a backdoor and it should be stopped.
Gaslighting! Excellent choice of words. Thank you
@@carolburnette2019 "Gaslighting" means tricking a person into doubting their own perceptions or memories. It comes from an old play named _Gaslight,_ and movies based on it.
The judge should have stepped in here and said "enough." What a waste of time.
“You would agree that… right?” Is that leading the witness? Glad that no objections were made. This was funny to listen to.
You can ask leading questions during cross-examination. You cannot ask leading questions of your own witnesses on direct examination.
@@djm55 exactly
that was basically an objection to smart defense . lmfao
This trial is a perfect example of the old saying: Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake.
is it because how pointless the statements they are bringing up just makes them look dumber?
@@kayjay. I think thats exactly it :)
That’s exactly what I was thinking!!
Art of War
This is what I called the Art of Tzu Sun
the fact that this lawyer is getting so heated, argumentative and almost yelling says A LOT. not to mention cutting the witness off and bombarding him with questions without letting him answer the previous ones. so unprofessional and inappropriate. they really are grasping at straws and have NO case xD
The witness gained control so easily the lawyer doesn't even know he's lost and getting buried alive he thought he was winning some of those questions
Seems real unprofessional lol... Asking questions then talking all over him wth
Where's the judge?
@@christinemarrinan5781 I swear the judge is against Johnny she sustains every ridiculous objection that comes out of rottenborn’s lips
@@christinemarrinan5781 get some fudge
Haha I love this man. He's so gangster. He's been a lawyer since 1973.
This lawyer is a joker runs before he walks
Imagine being a junior lawyer talking to a practicing attorney of 50 years like this. Man that must be embarrassing, Amber's career isn't the only one she ruined, this defense team won't see another trial anytime soon.
To be fair, they are trying to defend the impossible.
oh well they shook their heads yes and took the case in the first place
They can become public defenders
Yeah after this when they lose they’re better off looking for new careers or retiring
They’re ruining their own career’s by being a bunch of smug and petty dickweeds, she didn’t tell them to be incompetent.
watching johnny smile throughout all this gives me life
I love when he smiled and nodded about "depp being the most overpaid actor"
he is always drawing doodles :D
@@Boss-jl4ue he knows he has cleared his name and we're all on his side. He couldn't care about the 50 million. Bless him
his reactions are so funny
Meanwhile you got Amber lookin like a complete psychopath lmfao
I love how JD's lawyers are not objecting to any of this, instead letting her lawyer make a total fool of himself!
I don’t understand how the defense objects to everything as hearsay, yet uses tabloid articles as proof!?! Those are in fact examples of hearsay!!!
It's a big brain play.Modern day court is just 4d Chess with laws. If they don't discredit their use of tabloids, they can in turn use tabloids as their own evidence without fear of being shot down.
stolen comment
It's not hearsay. Copying from what I wrote above: There's an exception to the hearsay rule here (actually it's not even an exception -- by definition it's not hearsay). What is said in the articles is not being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted in those articles (e.g., whether or not Johnny was drunk for example); rather, it's being used as an example of negative publicity. This is why Depp's lawyers aren't objecting. Trust me, they would if they could, and they have objected to hearsay many times.
Hearsay would be, for example, Amber Heard testifying "My doctor told me I suffered a broken arm from being hit" -- because she's offering an out of court statement ("My doctor told me I suffered a broken arm from being hit") as evidence that she did indeed suffer a broken arm. Of course, if her team called her doctor, he could testify that she suffered a broken arm, since that's not hearsay.
@@kieran786 what?
@@andershebekk251 you just copy pasted a comment that was made 2 weeks before yours, from word to word.
Her Attorneys have “Anger Issues” just like their client! So rude & definitely NOT Professional! It’s painful to listen to them! 🤯
For real
I hope JD wins but I'm really wondering why literally everyone in the trial keeps repeating the same words and stuttering a lot before they can say most of their sentences with so many things they are talking about. It's very strange to me
So agree.. he speaks like he's on trial not Amber. The slick comments and shade is so unprofessional.
It’s like nails on a chalk board listening to that old lady on ambers team talk. It really irritating
yes! like why is her lawyer yelling at this guy
The way the lawyers constantly say “you agree” “correct” “would you not” they’re repeating themselves to create a false narrative and trying to get into the juries head by proxy.
Well that is their job to be fair
Not exactly. The phrases you quote turn statements into questions. On cross, I prefer to start questions with the phrase "Isn't it true that..." Call me old fashioned.
It’s called cross examination. Annoying, yes, but that’s how you’re supposed to ask questions on cross.
That's normal in cross
Reminds me of the Rittenhouse case. Where the lawyer kept saying "you would agree" "would you not" "correct". It's the same playbook.
I really REALLY hate how the lawyer says “You would agree that…..”. And then the witness says “No” then the lawyer goes off to the next question saying “AND you would also agree that…..”
Wtf? He never agreed with your supposition, but you’re wording it in a way that makes it seem like the witness DID agree with it. Did anyone else catch that?
I’m cringing everytime this lawyer says «correct ?»
Me too 😭😭 I can’t stand this man 😭😭
This lawyer is unbelievably discourteous to anyone he’s interviewing. This was super interesting and actually quite comical to watch 🤣
Let's see how he acts towards witnesses when he presents Heard's case. I think there'll be quite a difference.
Is it a coincidence that Heards lawyers are aggressive and rude and Johnnys are kinds and patient? Probably not lol wonder how the tables will turn when Heard is presenting her case 😬
You should see Elaine. She’s the worst one out of the bunch. Extremely aggressive and throws a tantrum when her questions have objections that get sustained 😂
@@Rich-94 that’s the older lady with the bowl cut right? Lol
That's what lawyers do. Push witness to the limit of their patience to tilt them.
I like how the judge is allowing us to see that these lawyers have NO CASE, suck at what they do and loose emotional control while on the job. I think she's doing a service by letting us and jurors see workers like this, they are terrible at what they do.
I totally agree some said “she seems to be leaning towards AH’s team” but honestly she’s just letting them make fools of themselves lol
Unless Johnny lawyer object to the question she doesn't necessarily have to overrule those questions. If the judges decides it on their own on every little questions like that she can be said to be biased.
🙌🙌🙌
When you say “no case,” are you referring to the actual case here? Johnny Depp’s claim of defamation?
Yep!
I would’ve refused Amber’s case. Even if I was a good lawyer I wouldn’t let my career get destroyed by representing her.
You would if u were getting a check either way.
I think it’s more so destroyed because they are acting incompetent and silly, not so much that they are defending her.
@@mayfalltribe4747 I wouldn’t if that would end up being my last check because nobody will want an incompetent lawyer.
I think that's why her lawyers were so bad, all the others saw her case and refused
Everytime this lawyer talked I knew I was in for a lot of "correct?, don't you agree?, & and you would agree?".
I have said this before and I will say it again and again and again: the whole world is with you Johnny!!!
Blind Male Feminist
@I melt snowflakes What?
No the whole world isn't.
You do not speak for the world.
No, we are not.
@I melt snowflakes Exactly. Karma is a b*tch, Johnny!!!
I really hope the jury isn't taking these questions seriously. Shouldn't questions about tabloid articles fall under a hearsay objection?
I don't think there is a jury. This isn't a legal court case, this is civil court. I'm not sure tho.
@@MaybeGodwillsaveMe you can have a jury in civil court
tbh i think johnny's lawyer just let it play out because of how bad it looks. digging their own grave
@@MaybeGodwillsaveMe They have a jury
I’m sure the jury is looking at this like we are. Like, what’s your point? Every star has articles written about them that are 90% lies. Not everyone has one written by their ex wife that she claims as fact though. This is irrelevant to the case. Articles written before by journalists aren’t relevant. Only the one written by Amber is his issue
Whether he wins or loses, his and his legal team's demeanor has won the internet and he can live in peace. If there is any justice in this world, he should win handily. But knowing how the law works, they may even screw this over
How much has Depp spent on PR to "win" the internet?
@@32braveheart probably nothing lmao, most mainstream media is actually against him
@@32braveheart Watching the videos and how AH and her lawyers are in a rapid process of self-destructing anyways, what he paid for PR was too much. If he has paid anything.
He and his lawyers asked to broadcast the whole thing, so I assume they were quite aware of what will happen. So why spend money on PR?
@@johnscaramis2515 So they can blitz the internet with their spin. This guy is an abusive alcoholic that they're spinning into a victim.
I love to create videos and my aim is to show you how beautiful the world is by taking you on a journey with amazing nature scenery and relaxing music!
3:06 _"December of 2016, there's an article that says quote Johnny Depp is Hollywood's most over paid actor for the second year in a row. Did you recall reading that?"_
_"was that written by the second uh...uhh underpaid actor?"_
This had me laughing suddenly, even though I am half asleep!!
😂😂😂
And also _"I'm sorry, I haven't committed his IMDb page to memory..."_
at this point these guys are just asking the dumbest questions so that amber can fire them too
good theory hahaha
they’re getting payed 300-700 an hr I’m sure they’re ok with drawing this out
Lol
🤣🤣🤣🤣
OMG！ Sounds so reasonable！ never thought about that!
Lawyer: "do you agree that an article was written years ago saying this?!"
Witness: "if someone wrote it, I guess it exists"
what's even the point of the question? agreeing if something exists? wouldn't the more logical question be if he agrees with the content of the article?
@@agbrenv I think that's the exact point of the question... I honestly think Heard's defence are ultimately trying to suggest that Heard's article is one of thousands of negative articles about Johnny, therefore it doesn't matter, and it had no meaningful impact on his career.
@@Zerobob26 Yeah but the article was written by his wife not journalist or other commenters. It’s not the same so it does have an impact on him.
The lawyer isn't speaking to the witness, that's why he isn't interested in his answers. These are not questions, these are statements quoting tabloid headlines to the jury to try to depict Depp as a bad person.
@@onigiri460 I think we all know that just Heard's team trying to twist logic.
I’m not a lawyer and know nothing about being one but… that was not good. How did this guy get into law school and get to where he is? That was terrible.
It’s painfully obvious that, in society, there is a difference between self destructive behavior such as occasionally being too drunk and looking silly, and being the abuser in an abusive relationship.
Heard’s lawyers are trying to equate the two, but the jury won’t buy it. They are in no way equal. Society tolerates people getting drunk and being silly, as long as they don’t hurt anyone. Society doesn’t tolerate someone being physically abusive to their spouse.
The idea that Disney sacked JOHNNY DEPP for being drunk rather than the allegation of wife-beating is just ridiculous. That's quite a reach. I doubt any of the parents of the kids he visited in a hospital or whose days he's made in full character were concerned about his personal issues before the allegation of physical violence.
If Disney started drug testing their actors they wouldn't have any left.
I’m sorry but the end 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Considering that the Disney movie that makes money on a drunk pirate who loves rum? I think they'd take the drunkenness' as ADVERTISING
@@WonderLady EXACTLY! He would be in character if he was “drunk”
Disney is a bunch of groomers anyways so i doubt they have those sorts of standards. Theyd only get rid of Depp because the allegations of violence against women in this political climate will get you protestors and cancel culture, which affects the money they make. Money is all they care about. They'd have Depp back in an instant after this case is settled because there would be millions of people paying to see his next movie just to show him support.
If they started drug testing actors there wouldn’t be any left
AH claims she did't mentioned Johnny Depp in the op-ed, and the witness said: "is there any husband that she have at the time?" is really on point.
Objection, hearsay
@@jdriz9669 lol
😂 I’m blonde 👱♀️ but wasn’t born blonde lol but ah lawyers is exploiting all her plot in the articles that isn’t allegedly false allegations of domestic violence to Seek revenge of ex-husband
Her lawyers is providing evidence that the article SHE wrote does pin point at Johnny Depp 🌽🎭🤪🐩🙈🤦♀️🤦♀️
I’m not even being questioned and this dude is raising my blood pressure.
Objection
That's hearsay!
a lot of people are saying how the judge appears biased with how she won't cut off Amber's judges when they make obvious mistakes, but I have to disagree I think the judge, for as impartial and educated as she seems, is having a little thrill letting heards lawyers absolutely destroy their own case themselves. they don't need a judge to stop them after every sentence to prove what a poor job they're doing, she just let's them go at it and utterly embarrass themselves.
Give them enough rope and fools & liars will hang themselves ... every time!
Her lawyers were constantly reading articles from trash magazines. They literally collected them all. I was surprised that the judge allowed that. And this are highly paid lawyers? So ridiculous.
Because there being paid and they actually couldn't give a rats arsh at this point. It's all about MONEY 💰
They're basically testifying via questioning. The way they cut him off without regard to his answer a few times is evidence that they're just trying to build a narrative on their own.
Expensive lawyers with no case who get paid for every minute they spend in that court room. If it costs Amber more money more power to em I say. Their billable hours are probably sky high at this point
They literally only keep bringing up those freaking articles
I was lowkey waiting for "you agree in 2016 an article was written that mr.depp is a lizard person who cheated on Amber with a Martian? From the onion news"
Why is this judge allowing all this nonsense in court? This is ridiculous to me.
So unprofessional.
It's not up to the judge. Depp's lawyer could object but they know this questioning is normal and appropriate.
Depps lawyers aren't objecting because him (hearsay lawyer) rambling his nonsense is actually helping their case lol
@@hmacklemore2226 what kind of trial are you seeing? there is nothing normal in interrupting and treating in that way the witnesses. It is insane and ridiculous
@@saimonldable what he meant was the question was valid, even if it wasn't directly relevant or socially acceptable. It's up to the lawyers to make objections anyway.
@@hmacklemore2226 Wrong. It’s not appropriate at all but that’s why they’re not objecting. Amber’s lawyers and making themselves look like clowns, so why object to that?
This witness was the most honest down to earth you could wish for !
This attorney's really trying to say JD was the Hollywood joke, when he's representing a chick nobody even cared about UNTIL she got with JD 😆
Like, my guy, what were you trying to do here???
For lawyers that love to say “OBJECTION HEARSAY” they sure do love hearsay in these articles. Like is that the core of your argument? Article titles? Really? That’s the base of your case? That’s pathetic
And they can’t even be bothered with things like the specific dates and headlines and writers of these articles. I mean, produce a printed copy or a screen grab or some other concrete thing-ANYthing-or move the fck along to a real question.
Hearsay is what they have to resort to when truth is not on their side so...
To me i just saw an attorney with a personal goal to ruin jd nothing more. And taking his own personal feelings into play vs being an actual attorney.
It's a defamation lawsuit, so it makes sense to bring up articles defaming Johnny Depp before Heard did to make the point that Depp's career failed due to those articles and not Heard's lies. The argument has little merit, but since they have nothing to work with, I think it's a valid attempt.
Love his remark, “ think I already testified…” “are you just going to keep reading these?”, “I don’t know currently right now Netflix seems to have a running joke…” such great counters! I especially love how he pointed out, “I don’t know did Amber have another husband who she claimed was abusive in 2016?’ Such great responses! Whew!
Couldn't agree more. He roasted him with swaggs!😂
I liked the ‘was that written by the second underpaid actor?’ In response to Johnny being the ‘most overpaid actor for the second year in a row’
Totally agree!
🤣🤣🤣🤣
He actually kept reminding me of Jack Nicholson so strongly I had to keep reminding myself it was real life and I wasn't watching A Few Good Men. Great dude.
This man was amazing to watch live lol
Lawyer behaving like a student in mock up trial. Good to see he is getting schooled
The Attorney now is grasping at straws. You can hear it in his voice. He’s so proud of himself. pfft.
Literally. He's not even asking a question that means anything. "Do you agree that these headlines exist?" Lol like wtf are you talking about dude?
@@bigboi301slg He is trying to show that Johnny's reputation was not great before Amber's op ed. That perhaps Johnny's inability to get work is due to his behavior and his addictions
@@LindaC616 and the witness didn’t agree
@@LindaC616 the evidence is so against it though lmfao. he lost all his work immediately after the op-ed. there is no coincidence since he lost multiple jobs after this and his drug use was already known WELL before any of this happened and yet he still had acting jobs
This attorney puts a lot of pressure on witnesses, that’s for sure! Heavy artillery is working, speaking metaphorically.
WHAT IS WRONG with this lawyer lol. He sounds like he is having a panic attack just firing one after the other... desperate questions that make NO SENSE 😳
Yes!! Good point. Panic attack lol. What's his deal? Lol
He knows he is losing 😁
It’s a train wreck & downright embarrassing watching/listening to him … but I find it hilarious. Adding nail after nail in the coffin for amber.
It is on purpose, he is trying to confuse the witness and get him to agree to something that would hurt Johnny case. If he is successful he will latch onto that. Luckily the people giving testimonys have not played into his BS.
He´s a virgin. At 50. Imagine his frustration 😁
Lawyer dorked up with those questions.
*Why is the lawyer asking him about all those news citations like he was supposed to be reading every news.*
It’s actually beautiful how Johnnys Lawyers are letting AH lawyers ask these ridiculous questions over and over. They know it’s annoying the jury and only helping Johnny. They could have objected with “hearsay” lots of times but just let the guy keep digging his hole deeper.
Exactly.
😅🤣🤣I actually keep thinking the judge is on meds now, she's just going with the flow 🤣🤣🤣JD did Raoul Duke in 98' and these guys talking about Pirates of the Caribbean🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I'm a little confused as to why the judge doesn't cut Amber's lawyers off from time to time. They're extremely unpleasant and almost belligerent in tone whenever they're trying to juice the "right" answer out of the witnesses. I don't feel like it's an equal playing field for the two plaintiffs.
@@hasselett I'm praying it's all just being flushed and dismissed and the jury actually has common sense, JD laughing and blasting reggae to court, now that comforts me, lots lol😅🤣.
Hearsay, or speculation… “Disney wouldn’t want to be involved with someone like that, would they?”
I cannot believe her team has built their case solely around tabloid articles.
And makeup. Dont forget the makeup
@@sherpaderpdingo3405 and muffins. don't forget the muffins!
@@laincoubert7236 😂
@@laincoubert7236 and objections hearsay.. Don't forget the objections
opinion articles are MY TRUTH, said amber heard
Never paid much attention to JD before this whole saga.. but must say, becoming a huge fan of how he’s been able to put up with this crap throughout his life. All those complaining about his drug addiction should be put up on trial for causing it in the first place.
Yes literal crap.
Why does this lawyer seem so unhappy. Doesn't seem like he enjoys being a lawyer at all.
Great strategy by Depp's lawyer here: they could have made so many objections that probably would have been substained, but they let it play out instead to let everyone see just how bad Heard's lawyers are.
They basically let AH & her team dig their own graves XD
@@idfrancisco5057 Could not agree more. I also love how they let Heard's psychological expert give lengthy explanations rather than trying to force her to answer only 'yes' or 'no' on cross - I see it as demonstrating that they actually want all of the information to come out rather than manipulating the testimony to fit their narrative.
True !!!
You can literally see the lawyer to his right smiling a few times. Chess vs checkers.
@@englishish well remember, the judge told both sides that they have a limited amount of total time for testimony so the longer Depp’s team let’s the other side the more they cut the defenses strategy.
She's literally on tape admitting she assaulted him. How is she not under criminal investigation?
That's a little weird here. This is a civil case against defamation towards Johnny. Not a criminal case against Amber for DV. I would think though, if something substantial came up for the DV against Johnny, possibly the state could open a case, but unlikely. Johnny would have to open that CRIMINAL case against her but it'd be completely different.
He is choosing not to sue her for that. It would be up to him to press charges regarding those allegations (I say allegations loosely as we know it's true). He could sue her for that, but he's choosing to sue for deformation of character, only to stand up for himself. I believe it is smart of Johnny to do it this way as he's just letting her make a fool out of herself.
I saw a lawyer commenting said a lot of time has passed now, also this is not a criminal case it’s a defamation case
@@user-ft6bq9wd6r correct. I'm not sure what statute of limitations are for DV cases in California but this is completely separate from that. It essentially is if Johnny is the person Amber made him out to be, and if he's not, then he's entitled to the money he lost from her going to tabloids, him losing Pirates, and making him seem like a bad person.
You ask the same question on every single video, are you a bot
Amber has not only made herself look like a joke of a human but also made her lawyers look like absolute clown heads for trying this hard to defend her
The lawyer here mentions, like, a million articles painting Johnny in such a bad light and yet doesn't even show any of the articles he was saying. Dear god, that begs the question if those articles actually did exist
The level of anger i have for these attorneys
I don't get why they are always referring to headlines and articles from some random magazines and trying to present them as serious evidence. Everyone knows that those headlines are lurid to catch peoples attention and increase sales. Sometimes there are even partly made up just to get publicity. No sane human being can take this seriously. No wonder that poor man loses it.
I think he's just trying to argue that Amber Heard was not the cause of that bad publicity, and shift the blame away from her in regards to defamation. The article headings can change the public view of Johnny, make him lose favor with people and cost him future projects. If they could prove that none of the bad press Johnny received was a result of Amber, then she would be innocent of defamation, which is ultimatly what this trial is about and why Johnny sued her in the first place.
No, someone (me) not following the situation prior to this trial had no idea. Good point to bring up sources, made a marked shift in my consideration of all that. (Some of us are holding out for neutrality until all evidence presented. 😇)
Maybe they should read some headlines for articles about Amber??? Sure they’re all true too😂
Rottenborn knows that the articles are useless. He's just hoping that as he reads them out loud, the negativity behind the titles sticks in the mind of the jury and the public. It's pathetic but the psychology behind it is valid. But as he has used this monologue on at least 3 or 4 occasions now, even a blind man can see what he's doing.
the lawyer literally asking questions but refused to hear the answer and simply goes to next question??
I literally would have had to ask the judge for a break if I were a witness, it would be so hard to hold back from cussing out someone on Amber's team. They interrupted all of the witnesses during almost every answer and had invalid objections for questions that hadn't even been fully asked. The case would have been over already if it weren't for her lawyers wasting the court's time day after day.
If you ever needed another reason to hate lawyers just try watching this video
If you think Heard’s legal team reflects all lawyers then maybe you should take a break from the internet buddy
My ex-wife was an attorney and i went pro se (represented myself after spending 40k on attorneys) after a year of courtroom drama… still won. I despise scavengers-a lot of attorneys fall in that category
@@_EzGREEN Its sad how generalizing everything is so common these days.
Nothing will ever beat the prosecutor from the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, but man these defense lawyers are making a run for his money.
@@_EzGREEN "Not all lawyers" is inching perilously close to the same territory as "not all men." Pointing out the exceptions doesn't solve the problem. There are A LOT of lawyers just like this, and yet nothing is done to change it.
The lawyer was trying to make him lose his temper and say something like: "Well, articles are articles and whatever they said isn't really that important" therefore implying that what AH wrote wasn't that meaningful to JD career after it was published. Glad he didn't fall for it.
I didn't think about it 😕 you are so right
If that was true, it would be pretty weak. It's a complete different story when some third-party journalist writes about you vs your own wife in a high-profile marriage. Still a nice observation regardless.
@@smigglesmiggles614 it also would run counter intuitively to heards article. To try and create the assumption that the articles are viewed as non-factual and therefore can’t harm one’s reputation then that also applies to Heards article. Whic mean her own lawyers are trying to say her story and retelling of events must be viewed as lies and isn’t truthful.
wooooww👏thanks for spotting and telling. it is like a Chess move! Now that i think, he said u dont think this article is important?. Great.
How would that be losing his temper 😂
WTF is he trying to prove? That random newspapers have headlines? This is an absolute ridiculous line of questioning.
This is hearsay asking about hearsay.
Interesting how the lawyer called Johnny’s last movies flops. I wasn’t aware of a single movie of his being a flop, some were better than others but to call them flops? Absolutely absurd. That’s a disgusting insult to every single person involved with those movies.
Who hires a drunk pirate & then ‘supposedly’ fires him for being a drunk pirate?!?!? Disney!
Not only does this trial shed light on traumatic abusive partners, but it is definitely shedding a different light on Disney corporate as a whole. Disney can thank Amber Heard for any future boycotts & loss. So much coming to light in this trial. Makes you look back at all the things other famous people have said about Disney but it was just swept under the rug.
Disney was friends with Aleister Crowley along with a few other Nazis. Should tell you all you need to know about that satanic company
the entire world knows how diesney works. and still keep watching disney movies
You think that’s bad?? What about the fact that Disney is a facade for a massive say-tan-ick pay-dough-file cult that works for the gov?? Oh. Right. Most people don’t believe that one because it completely crushes whatever illusory reality they live in.
7 Companies owned by Disney,
Walt Disney (DIS):
21st Century Fox (TFCF Corp.)
Capital Cities/ABC
Pixar Animation Studios
Lucasfilm Ltd.
Marvel Entertainment
Fox Family Worldwide
BAMTech LLC
Can’t boycott a company like Disney unfortunately. They’re too large
He just roasted the lawyer and his entire cross examination.
Exactly!! 🤣😅😅🤣😂 I just love 3:00 on!! 😂🤣😅
@@Rebecca-hc5ju I agree with this though
At the rate at how fast Amber heards attorney speaks and just throwing questions to every person they cross examine, you would think they in a hurry to go somewhere. Like allow these people to speak. What kind of tactic is this? Asking a man questions on articles and expect him to give a straight answer on it is absurd on so many levels. This is so pathetic. Until they can allow these witnesses a decent chance to answer properly as its their right to do so lawfully, Amber's legal team shouldn't be allowed to ask questions.
This lawyer is a joke! 😂 Quoting a bunch of tabloids, and articles, as if they are absolute truth... and he is just reading out his lines, expecting yes answers. And when the answers deviates from his questions, he moves on to the next question. What kinda tactic is this? 😂🤣
How is the Judge allowing the lawyer to just interrupt the witness like that? It's just inappropriate.
Unless it's because it's not in the defence's favour and the Judge just wants it to be over and is having a laugh.
Defense interrupting every single witness.
Just as the witness is expected to be respectful in Court so does the lawyer. If not more so.
Disrespect left and right from AH's attorneys. A complete an utter shambles on top of weak questioning of witnesses and lack of basic principles/courtesy and information.
Can't wait to see her take the stand.
Well if the Judge interrupted, she could be labelled as biased if so. I think Johnny's Legal Team is just letting Amber's Team clown themselves but allowing them to speak everything. They dont really do objections, or as I have observed. Its mostly Amber's Team doing the most nonsense objections, and safe to say, the Jury overruled those objections and allowed the questions (Johnny's Team). Man Amber's Team is just, a whole circus.
That is for the show
I've seen a lot of comments on various videos saying what you are saying. This is cross-examination. They want yes and no answers. They in fact are also entitled to those. The opposition can then clarify those questions after cross if they feel like context was required. The exact same will happen with Ambers witnesses by Johnny's lawyers.
I know this is a show because any judge would have interrupted by now and said every single one of these questions is hearsay and irrelevant.
@@ruukinen not exactly. You can't confine a witness to yes or no if they have an explanation right then and there. They are allowed to explain their answer as long as it doesn't turn into a rambling monologue. Judges don't allow a lawyer to elicit a yes or no answer and then not allow the witness to explain
Can someone legally trained actually explain why the lawyer is asking this guy whether or not he agrees that these articles exist?
I'm not legally trained but I believe he's trying to establish that Johnny's own behavior and addictions had as much to do with his inability to get contracts as Amber's op ed
it’s a defamation case, johnnys lawyers have to convince the jury ambers allegations caused financial losses.
Ambers lawyers are trying to build a case that johnnys own behavior cost him his movie roles and the money that would’ve come with them. Not ambers allegations.
They're trying to proof that Johnny defamed himself, but the only thing this guy had was the initial lawsuit which as we all know by now, was all a bunch of lies, so he's got nothing and is trying to get the witnesses to screw up by putting pressure on them
he is trying to make an absurd connection that somehow him losing the movies after amber lied is bc of his other "issues"
Linda C,
Which is complete BS, of course.
So you're telling me, this lawyer, studied for almost and if not, 10 years, to get this license.
And.... he is like this?
He's desperate,,they are losing..
Imagine if they were trying to lose on purpose? Maybe the guilt is getting to him
What else can he do? He's got himself trapped in a situation where he has to defend the indefencible.
The fact the lawyer is asking such repetitive questions over and over again about something which is relatively unimportant is in itself a sign of desperation.