Shoutout to ArtOfTimeTravel who designed the incredible poster used in the thumbnail. You can find him on Instagram here: instagram.com/artoftimetravel
FUN FACT: Peters cringe dance and behavior in 3 was because thats Peter's perspective on what a badass is like. Cause hes a huge nerd. But it flew over everybodys heads
I still hope we get a Spider-Man 4, the passion and creativity Sam Raimi has for Spider-Man and his world would just make a truly amazing and spectacular film.
I know they never would.m, but it would be a dream come true to have all the original soiderman cast and director back to make the send off film Spider-man 4 .
Would love a Logan style of Spider-Man 4, maybe not as depressing but would be nice to go back to that dramatic take in Spider-Man or any Marvel movie since we haven’t seen that in a long time. MCU movies are very light hearted and comedic now and maybe just the one off would be a nice side project. They have the money just throw at this project and will attract an audience.
Bringing on Felicia Hardy and then NOT have her be Black Cat but some other character made up just for this movie would have been a straight slap in the face to Spider-Man fans.
It also seems really dumb that her motivation to do so would be that her adoptive father got killed in self defense, after trying to murder New York’s greatest crime fighter and her own boyfriend. I personally despise character decisions that follow that format, because it seems so unnatural. Most people upon seeing their parents turn into murderous lunatics that got themselves rightfully killed in self defense wouldn’t then go and try to do exactly as their parents. Maybe have her and Peter break up (I’m sure it would make for an uncomfortable relationship on both ends after that), but having a character go from in love to hellbent on bloodshed towards her own boyfriend because her _dad_ went nuts is just stupid and contrived. Also, black cat is sick. Why can’t we have black cat?
@@DannyDevitoOffical-TrustMeBrothey literally try to write Harry Osborn revenge story arc again but change it to Felicia Hardy also what with Peter Parker and MJ keep dumping each other in this series lmao, Mary Jane in this series is so controlling and horrible.
The idea that he's called the Vulture because his technology will literally leave you a pile of ash and bones is metal af and already makes me wish Vulture went that hard in the comics
They would’ve turned Mysterio into a joke. I was actually very happy with what they did with Mysterio in Far from Home. Jake Gyllenhal nailed the character
No, I don't think that's right especially for the Tobey Maguire Spider-Man series. Bruce Campbell and all three films was a side character, as he was always meant to be.
I like Spider-Man 3 more than most but it’s not a great not note to leave the series. I really wish that one day we can see a conclusion that Raimi and co are happy with.
I remember being heartbroken when I heard the news that Spider-man 4 was canceled. I never had faith in a reboot. I knew Raimi made something so special that it couldn't be replicated or improved upon. And it still hasn't been. Spider-man 2 is still up there with The Dark Knight as one of the greatest superhero movies of all time.
Spider-Man 3 isn't as bad as a lot of people remember. Definitely the weakest of the trilogy imo, but it does serve as a pleasant ending to all the character drama. The original trilogy feels genuine in that way, as now we see an endless chain of superhero films that won't end any time soon.
I don’t think Spider-Man 3 is bad because there’s too many villains. I actually think they tie in together really nicely. I dislike Spider-Man 3 because everyone is just awful to each other for literally no reason
@@cpenner7086 you’re just a hater following the mob Spider-Man 3 isn’t that bad and just because the director doesn’t like it doesn’t mean others won’t like it
A friend of mine had a small role in Spider-Man 2. It was originally a single scene and one line, but he hit it off with Raimi, and his role was slightly expanded. A few years later, we were talking, and he said "Don't tell anyone, but I was asked to be in Spider-Man 4". Raimi liked to use actors who he liked in small roles in his films, and he remembered my friend from SM2. He told me that he was going to do a full-cast table read of the script in a few weeks, and was excited for it. A couple of months later, I saw him again and asked how everything went. He told me "They're rebooting the series with all new actors, and not doing SM4". That was the first I had heard about the reboot, and also one of the factors that left a bad taste in my mouth about those two reboot films.
Hey that’s still awesome for your friend tho! Did he ever get to meet Tobey or was it just Raimi? And did Raimi ever ask him to come back for another movie? (This is a fascinating story for me if you couldn’t tell 😅)
@@timechanger6679 As far as I know, he only met Raimi. His scenes were with Kirsten Dunst. He was the stage manager for her play. He first shows up for the "5 minutes, ladies", which was supposed to be his only scene. Then Raimi gave him the scene where Kirsten doesn't say her lines when she sees Tobey in the audience, and my friend is at the side of the stage, trying to prompt her to say the line.
At least the video games acted on it. I loved the video game trilogy. (Although agains 3 did end up being a downgrade but only due to the swinging mechanics.)
I’m pretty sure Sam Raimi admitted that he was just using his favorite villains and not the popular ones, but I don’t see the problem in that. Sure, Venom probably sold more toys than Vulture would’ve, but if you don’t care about the characters you’re writing, then your writing’s gonna suffer. I like Spider-Man 3, it’s my favorite of the trilogy, but even I have to admit that Venom wasn’t written as well as he could’ve been. I never agreed with everyone saying that it had too many villains and plotlines. I think the movie was structured well, and the main problem was just that Sam Raimi didn’t know enough or care enough about Venom to do him justice. Still, I find it odd that Sam Raimi wanted to use the villains he liked the most, but somehow ended up using Spider-Man’s four biggest villains (at least in my opinion) in descending order across his three films.
As a Venom fan, I think that Sony should've let Raimi do his Vulture/Sandman story for Spider-Man 3, saving Black Suit Spider-Man/Venom for a fourth or even fifth movie. That way, the director can do his research and naturally come to respect the character naturally instead of the character being a half-assed adaptation. Then they already have Doctor Connors lined up as The Lizard and they could save him for Spider-Man 6.
A lot of time, studio heads are that one friend at Game Night who doesn't know how to play the board game, won't listen to the people who know how to play the board game, and then slaps the entire game board off the table and demands a different game when it becomes clear they are losing- only to repeat the process all over again.
As much as it kills me Raimi never got to make another Spidey, I'm glad he understood the 4th film wasn't coming together like he wanted and walked away. After Spider-Man 3, I couldn't handle yet MORE Peter and MJ drama. The trilogy almost flirts with making them too unlikeable together as is, if they broke it off in the 4th film so Peter could pursue Felicia, it would have been a bridge too far imo. I like how the third one ends on a bittersweet, quiet moment of healing. Having that come undone in the next one would have been awful.
I feel like now that we’ve seen Tobey in no way home I want to see a spider man 4 the way raimi originally intended, and potentially see an older spider man deal with his final and biggest villains yet, although idk how they would top doc ock he’s my favourite villain of all time
Man, if that's the movie then I'm lowkey glad it didn't happen. Tobey's Spider-Man losing to Vulture, accidentally killing him, then Felicia Hardy becomes Vulture to defeat and spare Spider-Man? Also, no J. Jonah Jameson? What? Nah, I'm good. But it would've been nice to see him arrest Shocker, Rhyno, Prowler, and Mysterio.
I bet you everything I have to my name that Venom in No Way Home was a "Gotcha!" moment aimed at Avi Arad for shoehorning the character into everything.
Naw fr why haven’t they got him in a movie cs he can spiderman some problems and what about kingpin why haven’t they put him in a movie already they missing some big name villains or like catwoman she could’ve been cool in 3 and that would’ve been interesting cs tobey turned into a bully and catwoman would have changed him they could’ve did so much more but hopefully In marvel phase 6 or 7 they have them
Having been recently rewatching Spiderman 3 for the first time in 3 years, I'll be honest I think the film is pretty great, and has arguably some of the best moments in the series. The only real issue is that the film is bloated with lots of plotlines which can often lead to some plotlines disappearing for a while before coming back. But aside from that, when the film works DAMN does it work. It's great to see how Peter, who was being beaten down thoughout movie 2, now has the opposite problem where his soaring success and personal overconfidence is his new hamartia. It leads to such an interesting struggle that affects his relationship with MJ in a complex and compelling way and also his career as Spiderman in a corrupted way.
@@Bulletsandblockbusters It's definitely got a more somber ending than the first two films, but I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing. But hey, that's just me.
I thought I heard rumors that Spider-Man 4 was going to have Carnage in it. Or originally Peter was going to get rid of the black suit at the end of 3 and then in 4 Venom was the villain.
They could still make Spider-man 4 with an older Toby and Kirsten now parents and Spider-man now retired. But then a Villain(s) bring him back into the suit. Then at the end when the villains are defeated we get a hint that there is a greater villain in the background that needs the whole Spider-verse team to fight them.
Bringing on Felicia Hardy and then NOT have her be Black Cat but some other character made up just for this movie would have been a straight slap in the face to Spider-Man fans.
Yeah that part ruined it big time. Already was not feeling it with MJ being gone either at the start after everything they went through in spiderman 3 and got back together.
They could have been printing money just making these for another decade. There’s so many villains and team ups they could have easily done a few sequels past 3. And everyone would have seen 4 onward easily.
I'd like to be added onto the list, of those who want to see Sam Raimi make Spiderman 4 with Tobey and Kirsten. I can understand why Mr Raimi didn't like the script; the story had another love interest, much like Gwen from Spiderman 3. Yes, Felicia would've had more screen time than Gwen, but wouldn't it be great to end the franchise with Peter and MJ finally having a stable relationship? We only got a little bit of that with just Peter B. Parker.
It doesn't surprise me that Tobey Maguire was eager to return. It showed in his face in "No Way Home" that he was excited to be back in the role again Also I was sure that Lizard would be in the 4th one bc as you said they'd already established Dr. Connors back in spider man 2
I think Spider-Man 3 is the most underrated Spider-Man film. I don’t blame Sam Raimi for the way Spider-Man 3 turing out the way it did it was studio interference from Sony and Avi Arad. I hope one day Sam Raimi will make Spider-Man 4 with Tobey Maguire returning as Spider-Man
You know I think a lot studios dropped the ball with superhero characters like spider-man and the tim burton Superman film, which we kind got in the flash but we need a film animation or live action, but with spider-man the wrongs can be righted easily now thanks to the multiverse.
The Spider-Man 4 that we have through the concept art wouldn't have been great just because of the further split between Peter and MJ. Had we gotten Sam's Spider-Man 3 the relationship might have come off as less toxic and maybe they could have figured things out better. I would love it if Sam came back and did something involving Spider-Girl since that story has more in common with how Raimi does Spider-Man stories and it would fit perfectly with Tobey and Kirsten's ages.
Sam Raimi makes two great Spider-Man films and then Sony interferes with too many villains for #3. Marc Webb makes a good reboot and then Sony interferes with too many villains for the sequel. They lend Marvel Studios the rights, they make two great films and then they make a third with all the villains possible, but yet make it work perfectly with a great plot and storyline. Sony somehow screwed up twice and had Marvel Studios clean up their mess.
Both Raimi and the studio are at fault here in their own ways. The bigger issue is just the obvious lack of planning and I remember even seeing the very first one and thinking that if they are killing off the Green Goblin in the first movie, and they killed Ock in the second, then they are making the same fundamental mistake as the Burton / Schumacher Batman films by making the films focus too much on the spectacle of a new villain for each movie, something that always leads to diminishing returns because you are using the most interesting villains first. To be frank, Venom and Lizard are conceptually better villains than Sandman, Vulture and Harry Osborn, so I can see the wisdom of the studio there; at the same time, they clearly not only meddled, but meddled in the worst way by wanting Raimi to do both his version and theirs at the same time. Though I never liked the "multiple villains" complaint about Spider-Man 3- the 90s cartoon's take on the Venom story had Kingpin, Shocker, Rhino, Smythe and Venom and that was way better than any of these movies; the issue was too many sub-plots and that those plots and villains didn't gel together so well. I actually do think that John Malkovitch could have been great as the Vulture, but the story always sounded weak and despite any protests that might have been set off, having one or two other villains for him to play off of probably would have made more sense. Frankly a story involving both Vulture and Lizard might possibly have worked better. Also, from that script, it sounds like Mary-Jane is an afterthought.
I would have preferred “Lizard and Kraven” , basically adapting Kraven’s Last Hunt where the Lizard is in the role of Vermin, and Spidey must protect his mentor from the Hunter.
@@lyndoncmp5751 Sandman was a better character yes, but that's because Raimi didn't "get" the character of Venom (and fumbled Harry Osborn). From a story perspective though, Sandman added nothing except a rehash and retcon of Uncle Ben's death. Both Harry and Venom are far more relevant to the overall plot than he was, and he's got nothing to do with anything set up in the previous movies the way both Harry and Curt Connors were. Nobody who watched Spider-Man 2 finished the movie and said "Can't wait for the Sandman!"
@@jonathancampbell5231agreed. To me, Sandman was the least interesting of the three villains. His connection to Peter felt very forced. The movie would've benefited if Harry was the only villain in the movie and Peter got the symbiote. Then after the final fight and Harry died, Peter would let go of the symbiote, and it would attach itself to Brock in the post credit scene setting up spiderman 4
I agree it was mistake for Sam Raimi to kill of those villains. But what I like about the MCU is the multiverse so they were able to correct that mistake and bring them back and reuse them in a way that was not cheap and had them return on this epic way. Spider-Man: No Way Home retroactively corrects the errors of the Tobey McGuire and Andrew Garfield movies.
I would still love to see Spiderman 4 with Tobey. To explore what happened with Peter after the events of Spiderman 3. It would also explain the events of No way Home.
Spider-Man 3 is actually a great film. I don't think the vulture would have fit the overall theme of the film which is forgiveness is more powerful than revenge. Yes, it has it's cheesy moments but we get a satisfying conclusion to Tobey Maguire's Spider-man story. Harry and Peter forgive each other, Peter forgives the sandman, and Peter and Mary Jane's relationship is left up in the air. Again, it has its moments of being silly or over the top but is definitely a satisfying conclusion. A fourth film would have run the risk of undoing the feeling that the story had ended for audiences.
It's not a great film. Enough with the hyperbole. It's something that could have been entertaining if it were more restrained with everything they were trying to do, and the elimination of some god-awful characterization. That's about as far as it goes. To think it's as good as one of the first two films is laughable.
Spider-Man 3 is my all time favourite movie as a child and I think a lot of that is to do with the dark creepiness of Venom who is also my favourite villain, so I’m glad they decided to put venom in even if it ruined the franchise, can’t wait for Tom Hollands spiderman against venom😍
I'm with Sam, not exactly sure what I think of the story beats here either It makes no sense to me why Peter would suddenly jump ship in him and Mary Jane's relationship, Spider-Man 3 already tackled their instability as people and now they should be smooth sailing. The Vulture seems like a cool antagonist, I think Vulture could be still compelling in a fourth installment, given his stories' themes of aging and mortality. Kraven too, who's been discussed by Sam relatively recently.
But you just explained why Sam Raimi was so unhappy with the script and not to mention with the final film itself. He loves Spider-Man No Way Home from what I understand, and probably because it gave his characters a better send off than he was able to give them. It's kind of an impressive feat that that movie manages to not only be the MCU Spider-Man 3 but to also be The Amazing Spider-Man 3 and Spider-Man 4 all in the same movie
My personal head Cannon is that Spider-Man 4 that Sam Raimi originally envisioned played out in the intervening years after Spider-Man 3 and before No Way Home. It sucks that Raimi Spider-Man never got the send off it deserves. No Way Home doesn't count, that was more a cameo (which means that Webb Spider-Man never got the Sendoff it deserved as well)
Spider-Man: No Way Home definitely counts they both had more than just a cameo. They both had nearly 40 minutes of screen time and were actual supporting characters in the movie that actually participated in the plot. Both of them got to wrap up their own personal storylines and tie up loose ends and resolve certain things while Tom Holland got to wrap up his storyline as well. They both got a proper send off, so I don't know what movie you watched, but it wasn't the same movie as everybody else. What it had been better for them to have gotten a proper send off in their own solo movies, perhaps. But this did a pretty damn good job at giving them the proper send offs that we never thought that they were going to get. So sorry. I'm going to defend that movie's honor and not downplay the roles that they both played in that movie, which were far more significant than you give it credit for. If someone at least have 30 minutes of screen time in a movie and actually plays a significant part in the plot, that's not a cameo. You need to learn the difference between a supporting character and a cameo.
Wow this is quite interesting and yes if Raimi made this movie and Felicia Hardy was in it I would’ve loved to see it too! Also I love his Vulture pitch! While I also see more than a few flaws in the plan of this project, it’s definitely a movie that I would’ve loved to have seen! Oh well maybe we’ll get something similar with Tom Holland someday or maybe even Raimi coming back to do it years later. Time will tell! Thank you for sharing this with us!
Spiderman 4 only if Rami has full control, and no MCU bullshit! I want “ZERO!” Far from Home references. I just want to see a true continuation of Ramis Spiderman World.
Thanks for including that last bit where Sam Raimi tells Avi Arad that he was not welcomed on set. After I'm found out that in order to protect his interest in the rights to the Fantastic Four, he destroyed the original negatives of Roger Forma as 1994 version. Regardless of what you think of it, that was the act of a true Villain.
Many people say No Way Home was the other Spider-Men’s endgame. Tobey’s story is done, finished. He fell in love and married the girl of his dreams, he revisited and, FINALLY after all these years of trauma, finally got to cure some of the villains he fought. He met and help his other selves from their trauma and past and went back home to his family. The perfect ending for one of my favourite Spider-Man’s story. But seriously though, they still have to finish Andrew’s story. Sony left to many cliff hangers in his previous Spider-Man film
There is not a single cancelled film that I would've liked to have seen more than Spider-man 4. After Far From Home I was hoping it would eventually materialize, however I think I feel differently now. I have my own head canon as to what happened with everything and I'd rather it just be left alone. If Raimi were left to his own devices I think he has the potential to do something great. My concern would be with forced cameos and constant sequel/spinoff baiting within the film. The Raimi trilogy, while flawed, dealt a lot with Peter's duty. While I enjoy some of the modern hero flicks I don't feel like they have similar themes at least to the same extent. To me they feel more surface level. The third film is about forgiving someone who murdered a relative and having sympathy for them. Both Peter and Harry go through this. I don't feel like modern cinema would hit these beats and if they did I do not feel they'd reach the same level. I want to thank you for making this video. I've watched a lot of material on the cancelled 4, but yours was the most concise and I did learn some new things.
Yeah I think it aged pretty good, especially compared to the ones that came afterwards. I think ending at Three was the wise decision, 3 wasn’t bad but the writing was far from perfect and a fourth one would’ve probably made the trilogy formulaic at that point. One thing I appreciated about Hollywood back then was the fact they knew when to call it quits when it came to certain projects.
Why couldn't the studio just let Raimi do Spiderman 3 the way he wanted? He proved twice that he was the best man for the job, but they ruined it for everyone
Lets put Raimi's face over Dafoes, and Avi's over poor Norman's assistant. That was what Spider-Man 4 was going to be. What gets me, Avi Arad and his habits and ways, shunned by Feige, who ensures that guy is as far away from his productions as possible, is slowly turning into Arad.
I recently rewatched the Raimi trilogy and felt a bit of heartbreak after watching SM3, just knowing there wasn't a fourth! Its the best set of super-hero movies, bar none.
Even though most we will never see, its great to imagine from what we know what could have been, thanks for giving us these what could have been ones, one of my favs is Bryan singers xmen 3
Love the plot of SM 4. Peter is friends with the child of his villain, who happens to be his boss/mentor, until the climax when Peter's identity is revealed. Oh, wait, that's the plot of SM 1. Oops!
I can’t speak for everyone else but I found it a pretty big disappointment when it came out. It had too many characters, it butchered venom and rushed his storyline, it had a mean spirited vibe throughout the entire film and the climax was super cheesy with the inclusion of the poorly acted newscaster and reporter. Just my 2cents
If you were to make a spiderman trilogy what would be your main antagonists? Spiderman 1 - Kingpin Spiderman 2 - Scorpion Spiderman 3 - Mr Negative and Green Goblin (Green Goblin is the main and final one)
Spider-Man 3 should've been Black suit Spidey vs Lizard with Eddie getting the suit at the end. That's what they set up in the previous films. They introduced an astronaut then just had a meteor land next to Toby. Could've done just like in the animated series
Weird how a lot of people say they didn’t like spider man 3. I loved the movie. Black suit was crazy. Not sure why people just jump on the bandwagon and say that they didn’t like it. You all know you were driving up to Burger King every other day trying to get that PlayStation three from one of those coupons.
Shoutout to ArtOfTimeTravel who designed the incredible poster used in the thumbnail. You can find him on Instagram here: instagram.com/artoftimetravel
Who are the stars?
FUN FACT: Peters cringe dance and behavior in 3 was because thats Peter's perspective on what a badass is like. Cause hes a huge nerd. But it flew over everybodys heads
Yeah that’s what the video said.
I immediately picked up on that. It's my opinion that's why most people don't like the movie
Yeah but the girl was impressed...?
Spidey was more cool in college but okay. I feel like Tobey overdid it with the nerd thing.
I still hope we get a Spider-Man 4, the passion and creativity Sam Raimi has for Spider-Man and his world would just make a truly amazing and spectacular film.
Sensational😜
Thank god Sam raimi won’t ever do it
I know they never would.m, but it would be a dream come true to have all the original soiderman cast and director back to make the send off film
Spider-man 4 .
@@jamescoleman3103😂 he said yesterday he would dipshot better the bs we got now puss boy tom
Great Idea For A Channel Dude, Subscribed!
If a Spider-Man 4 came out now, I’d still watch it. I’d really like to see what he could do if he had all of the creative control.
Would love a Logan style of Spider-Man 4, maybe not as depressing but would be nice to go back to that dramatic take in Spider-Man or any Marvel movie since we haven’t seen that in a long time. MCU movies are very light hearted and comedic now and maybe just the one off would be a nice side project. They have the money just throw at this project and will attract an audience.
🎉
Of course you would. That movie would make $1 billion even if it sucked.
@@mast3rchief536you’re not wrong.
Bringing on Felicia Hardy and then NOT have her be Black Cat but some other character made up just for this movie would have been a straight slap in the face to Spider-Man fans.
Agreed. Dumb idea. Stick to the lore.
It's why its good the series ended on 3.
It also seems really dumb that her motivation to do so would be that her adoptive father got killed in self defense, after trying to murder New York’s greatest crime fighter and her own boyfriend. I personally despise character decisions that follow that format, because it seems so unnatural. Most people upon seeing their parents turn into murderous lunatics that got themselves rightfully killed in self defense wouldn’t then go and try to do exactly as their parents. Maybe have her and Peter break up (I’m sure it would make for an uncomfortable relationship on both ends after that), but having a character go from in love to hellbent on bloodshed towards her own boyfriend because her _dad_ went nuts is just stupid and contrived. Also, black cat is sick. Why can’t we have black cat?
@@DannyDevitoOffical-TrustMeBrothey literally try to write Harry Osborn revenge story arc again but change it to Felicia Hardy also what with Peter Parker and MJ keep dumping each other in this series lmao, Mary Jane in this series is so controlling and horrible.
@@BulletsandblockbustersMake her Black Cat but using the Vulture Tech
The idea that he's called the Vulture because his technology will literally leave you a pile of ash and bones is metal af and already makes me wish Vulture went that hard in the comics
Campbell as Mysterio is something I feel personally robbed of
My headcanon is that the different characters he played in the Trilogy are all Mysterio
@@seankelly8432okay I’m taking that as my head canon too
Fun fact: he was considered as Malcolm for Jurassic Park.
CAN YOU IMAGINE
They would’ve turned Mysterio into a joke. I was actually very happy with what they did with Mysterio in Far from Home. Jake Gyllenhal nailed the character
No, I don't think that's right especially for the Tobey Maguire Spider-Man series. Bruce Campbell and all three films was a side character, as he was always meant to be.
I like Spider-Man 3 more than most but it’s not a great not note to leave the series. I really wish that one day we can see a conclusion that Raimi and co are happy with.
Sam Raimi is one of my favorite directors it wasn't his fault but I am a Raimi brothers fan boy so I might not be the best judge but I agree
That would require a full director's cut of Raimi's original vision for Spider Man 3 before 4, 5, and 6.
Completely agree
I'm ok with it ending on a trilogy, my problem is that andrew never got a 3rd movie and so his character arc was never completed.
@@emperortrevornorton3119 kingdom hearts styles
I remember being heartbroken when I heard the news that Spider-man 4 was canceled. I never had faith in a reboot. I knew Raimi made something so special that it couldn't be replicated or improved upon. And it still hasn't been. Spider-man 2 is still up there with The Dark Knight as one of the greatest superhero movies of all time.
Spider-Man 3 isn't as bad as a lot of people remember. Definitely the weakest of the trilogy imo, but it does serve as a pleasant ending to all the character drama. The original trilogy feels genuine in that way, as now we see an endless chain of superhero films that won't end any time soon.
I don’t think Spider-Man 3 is bad because there’s too many villains. I actually think they tie in together really nicely. I dislike Spider-Man 3 because everyone is just awful to each other for literally no reason
lol defending bad movies is hialrious...its bad the director thinks its bad stop defending crap
@@cpenner7086 calm your ballsacks. it aint that bad
@@cpenner7086 you’re just a hater following the mob Spider-Man 3 isn’t that bad and just because the director doesn’t like it doesn’t mean others won’t like it
@@thexplodenator3007Your WRONG Spider man 3 is the BEST but everyone has their own opinions
I think absolutely we should get Spider-Man 4, hell bring on Amazing 3!
Amazing 3 if they can somehow canonize the alternate ending from 2??? Just saying
@@xxxTheManOnFirexxx what alternate ending
@@Theriople Peter is crying at Gwen's grave...and then his dad shows up, alive.
Nah the Internet bitched so much about amazing spiderman 2 not being rubbish because its not in mcu, that it cannot repent now.
@@jonathancampbell5231 oh i see
A friend of mine had a small role in Spider-Man 2. It was originally a single scene and one line, but he hit it off with Raimi, and his role was slightly expanded. A few years later, we were talking, and he said "Don't tell anyone, but I was asked to be in Spider-Man 4". Raimi liked to use actors who he liked in small roles in his films, and he remembered my friend from SM2. He told me that he was going to do a full-cast table read of the script in a few weeks, and was excited for it.
A couple of months later, I saw him again and asked how everything went. He told me "They're rebooting the series with all new actors, and not doing SM4".
That was the first I had heard about the reboot, and also one of the factors that left a bad taste in my mouth about those two reboot films.
Hey that’s still awesome for your friend tho! Did he ever get to meet Tobey or was it just Raimi? And did Raimi ever ask him to come back for another movie?
(This is a fascinating story for me if you couldn’t tell 😅)
@@timechanger6679 My aunts ex worked on doc ock’s arms in spider man 4. Apparently Tobey was claustrophobic in the mask
And then everyone clapped
@@timechanger6679 As far as I know, he only met Raimi. His scenes were with Kirsten Dunst. He was the stage manager for her play. He first shows up for the "5 minutes, ladies", which was supposed to be his only scene. Then Raimi gave him the scene where Kirsten doesn't say her lines when she sees Tobey in the audience, and my friend is at the side of the stage, trying to prompt her to say the line.
@@gamecatv6949 that’s interesting
Man I always think about Raimi’s Spider-Man 3 and 4 and what they could’ve really been
I was hoping they'd do something with The Lizard. They'd been working up to it in the first two movies.
Raimi kept putting it off. Not sure why. Guess he wasn't that interested in the character.
I know! Curt connors was already in the first 2 movies. He was right there!
At least the video games acted on it. I loved the video game trilogy. (Although agains 3 did end up being a downgrade but only due to the swinging mechanics.)
@@Bulletsandblockbusters I don’t think so many he was trying to build a proper relationship between him and Peter
I’m pretty sure Sam Raimi admitted that he was just using his favorite villains and not the popular ones, but I don’t see the problem in that. Sure, Venom probably sold more toys than Vulture would’ve, but if you don’t care about the characters you’re writing, then your writing’s gonna suffer. I like Spider-Man 3, it’s my favorite of the trilogy, but even I have to admit that Venom wasn’t written as well as he could’ve been. I never agreed with everyone saying that it had too many villains and plotlines. I think the movie was structured well, and the main problem was just that Sam Raimi didn’t know enough or care enough about Venom to do him justice.
Still, I find it odd that Sam Raimi wanted to use the villains he liked the most, but somehow ended up using Spider-Man’s four biggest villains (at least in my opinion) in descending order across his three films.
Exactly. He just didn't care for Venom. Nor do I. He's Ditko/Romita eras.
I don’t find it that good a mov
As a Venom fan, I think that Sony should've let Raimi do his Vulture/Sandman story for Spider-Man 3, saving Black Suit Spider-Man/Venom for a fourth or even fifth movie. That way, the director can do his research and naturally come to respect the character naturally instead of the character being a half-assed adaptation. Then they already have Doctor Connors lined up as The Lizard and they could save him for Spider-Man 6.
@@gfilmer7150 I concur
@ Art can’t be rushed and Sony trying to jump to the big boy Venom put so much in jeopardy.
Bruce Campbell as Mysterio is a form of high art.
A lot of time, studio heads are that one friend at Game Night who doesn't know how to play the board game, won't listen to the people who know how to play the board game, and then slaps the entire game board off the table and demands a different game when it becomes clear they are losing- only to repeat the process all over again.
This was an incredible analysis!
As much as it kills me Raimi never got to make another Spidey, I'm glad he understood the 4th film wasn't coming together like he wanted and walked away.
After Spider-Man 3, I couldn't handle yet MORE Peter and MJ drama. The trilogy almost flirts with making them too unlikeable together as is, if they broke it off in the 4th film so Peter could pursue Felicia, it would have been a bridge too far imo.
I like how the third one ends on a bittersweet, quiet moment of healing. Having that come undone in the next one would have been awful.
I still want Sam Raimi's Spiderman 4.
I feel like now that we’ve seen Tobey in no way home I want to see a spider man 4 the way raimi originally intended, and potentially see an older spider man deal with his final and biggest villains yet, although idk how they would top doc ock he’s my favourite villain of all time
Would love it too
Carnage maybe?
"He's my favorite villain of all time".
Spider-Man PS4 entered the chat.
Maybe all the villains vs tobey ?
Won’t Doc Octopus and Norman Osborn be alive again in the 4th Spiderman 4.
Man I don't blame him for leaving but I still wish it was made. Great vid man.
Thnx! Same here :(
it's avin fault
The way Spider-Man 3 and amazing Spider-Man 2 both ended were kinda sad and weren’t the send offs they both deserved
Man, if that's the movie then I'm lowkey glad it didn't happen. Tobey's Spider-Man losing to Vulture, accidentally killing him, then Felicia Hardy becomes Vulture to defeat and spare Spider-Man? Also, no J. Jonah Jameson? What? Nah, I'm good. But it would've been nice to see him arrest Shocker, Rhyno, Prowler, and Mysterio.
This
With all this empowerment female culture nowadays, I bet Sony would had accepted that plot right away
Don't forget Stilt Man!
Not gonna lie, the multiple villain montage is a genius idea. And I wish someone would do that if they haven’t
I bet you everything I have to my name that Venom in No Way Home was a "Gotcha!" moment aimed at Avi Arad for shoehorning the character into everything.
I really want a movie with scorpion as the villain!
Give me the Chameleon since Raimi made Darkman.
Naw fr why haven’t they got him in a movie cs he can spiderman some problems and what about kingpin why haven’t they put him in a movie already they missing some big name villains or like catwoman she could’ve been cool in 3 and that would’ve been interesting cs tobey turned into a bully and catwoman would have changed him they could’ve did so much more but hopefully In marvel phase 6 or 7 they have them
Raimi confirmed that Felicia would’ve been Black Cat.
You are absolutely smashing out this content and I love it, keep it up this is going to be a huge channel
I appreciate that! Thanks!
Read this and immediately checked the sub count, thought this was a pretty high brow account cause of the quality and views.
Having been recently rewatching Spiderman 3 for the first time in 3 years, I'll be honest I think the film is pretty great, and has arguably some of the best moments in the series.
The only real issue is that the film is bloated with lots of plotlines which can often lead to some plotlines disappearing for a while before coming back.
But aside from that, when the film works DAMN does it work. It's great to see how Peter, who was being beaten down thoughout movie 2, now has the opposite problem where his soaring success and personal overconfidence is his new hamartia.
It leads to such an interesting struggle that affects his relationship with MJ in a complex and compelling way and also his career as Spiderman in a corrupted way.
I just find there’s a dark cloud over the whole film. I watched it recently too. I found the whole thing depressing.
@@Bulletsandblockbusters It's definitely got a more somber ending than the first two films, but I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing. But hey, that's just me.
@@BulletsandblockbustersI love the dark feel of it.
I thought I heard rumors that Spider-Man 4 was going to have Carnage in it. Or originally Peter was going to get rid of the black suit at the end of 3 and then in 4 Venom was the villain.
Sam Rami's Spiderman and the first two X-men movies literally helped create the modern superhero genre that Marvel later rode on.
They could still make Spider-man 4 with an older Toby and Kirsten now parents and Spider-man now retired. But then a Villain(s) bring him back into the suit. Then at the end when the villains are defeated we get a hint that there is a greater villain in the background that needs the whole Spider-verse team to fight them.
Boring spider verse plot, older spiderman is cool tho
I wish the 4th one was made
Sony would’ve ruined it.
We got Spider Man: No Way Home and that was enough I think.
@@Infinite_Ethan03 That is why Sam Raimi walked away.
That Felicia twist would have sucked really bad.
Yeah, I’m not a fan of it tbh. I think The Lizard made the most sense for Spider-Man 4.
Bringing on Felicia Hardy and then NOT have her be Black Cat but some other character made up just for this movie would have been a straight slap in the face to Spider-Man fans.
@@endorbr exactly. It seems like such a weird choice.
@@Ravum She shouldve just been black cat who was working with vulture
Yeah that part ruined it big time. Already was not feeling it with MJ being gone either at the start after everything they went through in spiderman 3 and got back together.
The funny thing is we still got all the villains Vulture, Lizard, Mysterio, Shocker, Electro, Rhino, and Prowler eventually anyway.
No Way Home proved that people would still watch a Spider-man 4. Make it happen Sony!
They could have been printing money just making these for another decade. There’s so many villains and team ups they could have easily done a few sequels past 3. And everyone would have seen 4 onward easily.
Spiderman 3 is honestly my favourite of the trilogy
I'd like to be added onto the list, of those who want to see Sam Raimi make Spiderman 4 with Tobey and Kirsten.
I can understand why Mr Raimi didn't like the script; the story had another love interest, much like Gwen from Spiderman 3. Yes, Felicia would've had more screen time than Gwen, but wouldn't it be great to end the franchise with Peter and MJ finally having a stable relationship? We only got a little bit of that with just Peter B. Parker.
#MAKERAIMISPIDERMAN4 #MAKERAIMISPIDERMAN4 #MAKERAIMISPIDERMAN4 #MAKERAIMISPIDERMAN4 #MAKERAIMISPIDERMAN4 #MAKERAIMISPIDERMAN4 #MAKERAIMISPIDERMAN4
I’m a fan that loves Spider-Man 3 with a passion
I loved Spider-Man 3 for what it was and still to this day defend it
If Spider-Man 4 does happen, that needs to be the poster.
It doesn't surprise me that Tobey Maguire was eager to return. It showed in his face in "No Way Home" that he was excited to be back in the role again
Also I was sure that Lizard would be in the 4th one bc as you said they'd already established Dr. Connors back in spider man 2
I think Spider-Man 3 is the most underrated Spider-Man film. I don’t blame Sam Raimi for the way Spider-Man 3 turing out the way it did it was studio interference from Sony and Avi Arad. I hope one day Sam Raimi will make Spider-Man 4 with Tobey Maguire returning as Spider-Man
🤞🏻
You know I think a lot studios dropped the ball with superhero characters like spider-man and the tim burton Superman film, which we kind got in the flash but we need a film animation or live action, but with spider-man the wrongs can be righted easily now thanks to the multiverse.
All 3 parts were masterpieces and he is the only Spiderman who can really act
Another banger! Great video
Appreciate it!
and episode's like this is why im set with all notification's on.
The Spider-Man 4 that we have through the concept art wouldn't have been great just because of the further split between Peter and MJ. Had we gotten Sam's Spider-Man 3 the relationship might have come off as less toxic and maybe they could have figured things out better. I would love it if Sam came back and did something involving Spider-Girl since that story has more in common with how Raimi does Spider-Man stories and it would fit perfectly with Tobey and Kirsten's ages.
Sam Raimi makes two great Spider-Man films and then Sony interferes with too many villains for #3. Marc Webb makes a good reboot and then Sony interferes with too many villains for the sequel. They lend Marvel Studios the rights, they make two great films and then they make a third with all the villains possible, but yet make it work perfectly with a great plot and storyline. Sony somehow screwed up twice and had Marvel Studios clean up their mess.
Don't forget the venom universe of turning the villians into good guys.
@@christophergarrett7082 Venom is not a bad guy tho.
Spider-Man 4 and The Amazing Spider-Man 3 both need to happen since the Multiverse has been established.
Interesting! I never truly understood why they couldn't go through with the fourth movie, thanks for delving into it.
We need this! Would want Mj and peter to be stable and have a kid
Both Raimi and the studio are at fault here in their own ways.
The bigger issue is just the obvious lack of planning and I remember even seeing the very first one and thinking that if they are killing off the Green Goblin in the first movie, and they killed Ock in the second, then they are making the same fundamental mistake as the Burton / Schumacher Batman films by making the films focus too much on the spectacle of a new villain for each movie, something that always leads to diminishing returns because you are using the most interesting villains first.
To be frank, Venom and Lizard are conceptually better villains than Sandman, Vulture and Harry Osborn, so I can see the wisdom of the studio there; at the same time, they clearly not only meddled, but meddled in the worst way by wanting Raimi to do both his version and theirs at the same time.
Though I never liked the "multiple villains" complaint about Spider-Man 3- the 90s cartoon's take on the Venom story had Kingpin, Shocker, Rhino, Smythe and Venom and that was way better than any of these movies; the issue was too many sub-plots and that those plots and villains didn't gel together so well.
I actually do think that John Malkovitch could have been great as the Vulture, but the story always sounded weak and despite any protests that might have been set off, having one or two other villains for him to play off of probably would have made more sense. Frankly a story involving both Vulture and Lizard might possibly have worked better.
Also, from that script, it sounds like Mary-Jane is an afterthought.
I would have preferred “Lizard and Kraven” , basically adapting Kraven’s Last Hunt where the Lizard is in the role of Vermin, and Spidey must protect his mentor from the Hunter.
Venom was the worst thing about Spider-Man 3. It just didn't work. Sandman was fine (apart from the giant cloud of sand).
@@lyndoncmp5751 Sandman was a better character yes, but that's because Raimi didn't "get" the character of Venom (and fumbled Harry Osborn).
From a story perspective though, Sandman added nothing except a rehash and retcon of Uncle Ben's death. Both Harry and Venom are far more relevant to the overall plot than he was, and he's got nothing to do with anything set up in the previous movies the way both Harry and Curt Connors were.
Nobody who watched Spider-Man 2 finished the movie and said "Can't wait for the Sandman!"
@@jonathancampbell5231agreed. To me, Sandman was the least interesting of the three villains. His connection to Peter felt very forced. The movie would've benefited if Harry was the only villain in the movie and Peter got the symbiote. Then after the final fight and Harry died, Peter would let go of the symbiote, and it would attach itself to Brock in the post credit scene setting up spiderman 4
I agree it was mistake for Sam Raimi to kill of those villains. But what I like about the MCU is the multiverse so they were able to correct that mistake and bring them back and reuse them in a way that was not cheap and had them return on this epic way. Spider-Man: No Way Home retroactively corrects the errors of the Tobey McGuire and Andrew Garfield movies.
I would still love to see Spiderman 4 with Tobey. To explore what happened with Peter after the events of Spiderman 3. It would also explain the events of No way Home.
If rumours are true we may get it 🤞
@@Bulletsandblockbusters I really really hope those rumors are true and it happens. 🙂
Same here
Spider-Man 3 is actually a great film. I don't think the vulture would have fit the overall theme of the film which is forgiveness is more powerful than revenge. Yes, it has it's cheesy moments but we get a satisfying conclusion to Tobey Maguire's Spider-man story. Harry and Peter forgive each other, Peter forgives the sandman, and Peter and Mary Jane's relationship is left up in the air. Again, it has its moments of being silly or over the top but is definitely a satisfying conclusion. A fourth film would have run the risk of undoing the feeling that the story had ended for audiences.
I completely agree with you
It's not a great film. Enough with the hyperbole. It's something that could have been entertaining if it were more restrained with everything they were trying to do, and the elimination of some god-awful characterization. That's about as far as it goes. To think it's as good as one of the first two films is laughable.
Film is such a hot mess lol where is the “Greatness” in it? Another Rami fan blinded by nostalgia.
@@KaneRobot Meh, it's a great film and easily my favorite of the trilogy. Spiderman 2, however, was a sentimental bore that took itself too seriously.
@danman6431 imo ots the best in the trilogy and don't get much of the hate I loved sand man and Peter had alot of meme worthy lines
if Rami did spider-man 4 now. I would hope it was somewhat like Logan. but with a happy ending.
They had 10 different mask ready in made and other costumes it’s was pretty cool to see
Man I would love to see spider man 4 with Toby 😢
Spider-Man 3 is my all time favourite movie as a child and I think a lot of that is to do with the dark creepiness of Venom who is also my favourite villain, so I’m glad they decided to put venom in even if it ruined the franchise, can’t wait for Tom Hollands spiderman against venom😍
They need to put scorpion in 4 to along with catwoman and kingpin cs how they have kingpin in a video game but not in a movie
Very2 long time waiting movie spiderman tobey maguire and kristen dunst directed sam raimi..TQ you all came back
I'm with Sam, not exactly sure what I think of the story beats here either
It makes no sense to me why Peter would suddenly jump ship in him and Mary Jane's relationship, Spider-Man 3 already tackled their instability as people and now they should be smooth sailing. The Vulture seems like a cool antagonist, I think Vulture could be still compelling in a fourth installment, given his stories' themes of aging and mortality. Kraven too, who's been discussed by Sam relatively recently.
Probably why raimi hated the scripts.
But you just explained why Sam Raimi was so unhappy with the script and not to mention with the final film itself. He loves Spider-Man No Way Home from what I understand, and probably because it gave his characters a better send off than he was able to give them. It's kind of an impressive feat that that movie manages to not only be the MCU Spider-Man 3 but to also be The Amazing Spider-Man 3 and Spider-Man 4 all in the same movie
the way that clip you put at 9:42 fits the context made me burst out laughing🤣🤣🤣🤣
Seeing the story about Vulture and Felicia, not to mention axing MJ…
Yeah, Spiderman 3 is a great ending.
bro, i just friggin love spider-man and sam raimi 🥲
My personal head Cannon is that Spider-Man 4 that Sam Raimi originally envisioned played out in the intervening years after Spider-Man 3 and before No Way Home. It sucks that Raimi Spider-Man never got the send off it deserves. No Way Home doesn't count, that was more a cameo (which means that Webb Spider-Man never got the Sendoff it deserved as well)
Spider-Man: No Way Home definitely counts they both had more than just a cameo. They both had nearly 40 minutes of screen time and were actual supporting characters in the movie that actually participated in the plot. Both of them got to wrap up their own personal storylines and tie up loose ends and resolve certain things while Tom Holland got to wrap up his storyline as well. They both got a proper send off, so I don't know what movie you watched, but it wasn't the same movie as everybody else. What it had been better for them to have gotten a proper send off in their own solo movies, perhaps. But this did a pretty damn good job at giving them the proper send offs that we never thought that they were going to get. So sorry. I'm going to defend that movie's honor and not downplay the roles that they both played in that movie, which were far more significant than you give it credit for. If someone at least have 30 minutes of screen time in a movie and actually plays a significant part in the plot, that's not a cameo. You need to learn the difference between a supporting character and a cameo.
Spiderman is an older man now. In his 40s. He has kids and a wife in MJ. You could do something really amazing with that foundation.
Great use of the storyboards!
Thanks!
Wow this is quite interesting and yes if Raimi made this movie and Felicia Hardy was in it I would’ve loved to see it too! Also I love his Vulture pitch! While I also see more than a few flaws in the plan of this project, it’s definitely a movie that I would’ve loved to have seen! Oh well maybe we’ll get something similar with Tom Holland someday or maybe even Raimi coming back to do it years later. Time will tell! Thank you for sharing this with us!
Spiderman 4 only if Rami has full control, and no MCU bullshit! I want “ZERO!” Far from Home references. I just want to see a true continuation of Ramis Spiderman World.
Thanks for including that last bit where Sam Raimi tells Avi Arad that he was not welcomed on set. After I'm found out that in order to protect his interest in the rights to the Fantastic Four, he destroyed the original negatives of Roger Forma as 1994 version. Regardless of what you think of it, that was the act of a true Villain.
Also, autocorrect spelling sux.
We need a 2099 live action movie with all the 2099 heroes like Spider-Man and daredevil 2099
From what I've heard, Carnage & Rhino were gonna be the main villains of Spider-Man 4.
Nah carnage and lizard was gona be main villane and jim carry was rumore to play carnage
Spiderman 3 was great!
Many people say No Way Home was the other Spider-Men’s endgame. Tobey’s story is done, finished. He fell in love and married the girl of his dreams, he revisited and, FINALLY after all these years of trauma, finally got to cure some of the villains he fought. He met and help his other selves from their trauma and past and went back home to his family. The perfect ending for one of my favourite Spider-Man’s story.
But seriously though, they still have to finish Andrew’s story. Sony left to many cliff hangers in his previous Spider-Man film
Im not too keen on Felicia becoming Vulture instead of Blackcat, but other than that i like it.
Yea that's a stupid Idea. We want Black Cat not some alternative lol
Agree
Nostalgic spiderman tobey maguire😢!!! IT'S BACK please, it's back!!!!!
There is not a single cancelled film that I would've liked to have seen more than Spider-man 4. After Far From Home I was hoping it would eventually materialize, however I think I feel differently now. I have my own head canon as to what happened with everything and I'd rather it just be left alone. If Raimi were left to his own devices I think he has the potential to do something great. My concern would be with forced cameos and constant sequel/spinoff baiting within the film.
The Raimi trilogy, while flawed, dealt a lot with Peter's duty. While I enjoy some of the modern hero flicks I don't feel like they have similar themes at least to the same extent. To me they feel more surface level. The third film is about forgiving someone who murdered a relative and having sympathy for them. Both Peter and Harry go through this. I don't feel like modern cinema would hit these beats and if they did I do not feel they'd reach the same level.
I want to thank you for making this video. I've watched a lot of material on the cancelled 4, but yours was the most concise and I did learn some new things.
Glad you liked it! Thank you!
@@Bulletsandblockbusters Unsure if any exist, however if there are any cancelled films by Nolan that would be a good video imo
Howard Hughes but not much known about it
@@Bulletsandblockbusters Anything on the original plans for his third Batman film before Ledger died (or did you do that already)?
I did that one :)
Dope thumbnail makes me fantasizing
Spiderman 3 was still enjoyable that's proof it wasn't a bad movie
i don’t get why people hate on Spiderman 3 it wasn’t even bad it was one of the greatest movie oat in my opinion and completed the trilogy.
Yeah I think it aged pretty good, especially compared to the ones that came afterwards. I think ending at Three was the wise decision, 3 wasn’t bad but the writing was far from perfect and a fourth one would’ve probably made the trilogy formulaic at that point. One thing I appreciated about Hollywood back then was the fact they knew when to call it quits when it came to certain projects.
Why couldn't the studio just let Raimi do Spiderman 3 the way he wanted? He proved twice that he was the best man for the job, but they ruined it for everyone
Lets put Raimi's face over Dafoes, and Avi's over poor Norman's assistant. That was what Spider-Man 4 was going to be. What gets me, Avi Arad and his habits and ways, shunned by Feige, who ensures that guy is as far away from his productions as possible, is slowly turning into Arad.
I recently rewatched the Raimi trilogy and felt a bit of heartbreak after watching SM3, just knowing there wasn't a fourth! Its the best set of super-hero movies, bar none.
Please do What Could Have Been: Batman Triumphant/Unchained 🦇🟣🟡
Even though most we will never see, its great to imagine from what we know what could have been, thanks for giving us these what could have been ones, one of my favs is Bryan singers xmen 3
Love the plot of SM 4. Peter is friends with the child of his villain, who happens to be his boss/mentor, until the climax when Peter's identity is revealed. Oh, wait, that's the plot of SM 1. Oops!
Man why do people hate on Spider-Man 3. It’s not even a bad movie in fact it’s my favorite out of all of the Spider-Man movies.
I can’t speak for everyone else but I found it a pretty big disappointment when it came out. It had too many characters, it butchered venom and rushed his storyline, it had a mean spirited vibe throughout the entire film and the climax was super cheesy with the inclusion of the poorly acted newscaster and reporter. Just my 2cents
Hot take: spider-man 3 was GOOD.
Not a hot take. You’re just a smart man
With amazing taste
You must be one of them Kansas City feebits I been hearin bout over yonder’s
No it wasnt
I really liked it but that doesn’t mean it’s a good movie
"Stilt Man" I've never even heard of that guy let alone knew he was a Spider-Man villain until now lol.
I don’t see why people don’t like Spider Man 3 so much. I honestly love the movie. Skinny Venom was an interesting change I like.
The memes make up for everything. It's basically a fever dream of a film, so weirdly different it was from the other two.
Thanks for the ❤!!! Your content is amazing!!
Spider man 4 was meant to be about the lizard and doctor Connor’s
If you were to make a spiderman trilogy what would be your main antagonists?
Spiderman 1 - Kingpin
Spiderman 2 - Scorpion
Spiderman 3 - Mr Negative and Green Goblin (Green Goblin is the main and final one)
If I were to make another trilogy after that it would probably be:
Spiderman 4 - Doc Ock
Spiderman 5 - Kraven
Spiderman 6 - Venom
Not only did Arad ruin this franchise but he also ruined Garfield's take.
Spider-Man 3 should've been Black suit Spidey vs Lizard with Eddie getting the suit at the end. That's what they set up in the previous films. They introduced an astronaut then just had a meteor land next to Toby. Could've done just like in the animated series
Am I the only one who actually enjoyed Spider-Man 3? Everyone always shits on it
I think it's the media that shits on it. Spiderman 3 was AWESOME to me, idk what people are talking about. If you enjoy it, fuck them.
Weird how a lot of people say they didn’t like spider man 3. I loved the movie. Black suit was crazy. Not sure why people just jump on the bandwagon and say that they didn’t like it. You all know you were driving up to Burger King every other day trying to get that PlayStation three from one of those coupons.
I would prefer this movie over The Amazing Spider-Man 3 that movie had an awful script
Same.
I swear, I remember hearing rumors saying that the main villian for spiderman 4 would've been carnage with kletus being played by Jim Carrey.
Spider man 3 was not a disappointment let’s get that clear, ok I’ll admit there was some bad writing, but not a bad movie at all..
audience weren’t a big fan of when it came out can’t change that unfortunately