Something that I always look for in the evolution of anything is if it was around during the Beatles lifetime- 1962-1970. Always puts things into perspective as to how old yet innovative some things were
3:00 That actually looks incredible, especially for mid 80's CGI _(I think it's mostly the color scheme that does it)._ It looks dozens of years ahead of its time. Heck, in my opinion it still holds up pretty well nearly 40 years into the future. Sorry about all the spam comments people are making, btw, I'm sure those get really annoying. (-_-)
It's crazy to think that back then it took months of work and a huge team of programmers to make just that one short, while today it's something that could probably be whipped up by a single guy in a week using Blender
Anything the people behind Pixar made looks years ahead of its time. Early Pixar animations could hold up pretty well today (except for Tin Toy, that's for sure).
For some reason, Polar Express no longer looks uncannily realistic because of how old it is. It's just... weird Edit: What I meant was that the Polar Express no longer looks weird for the same reasons it did back in 2004, I'm not saying it looks any less creepy
Time flew fast,now,in 2050 we will be amazed how CGI will come to life,and remember all these shows and will say "It's poor graphic" but it used to be our childhood memories
We are so close to complete realism that I think we will reach that point way before 2050, I think the real impressive thing will be how live video games will eventually be able to produce this level of quality, even now with the new console and pc hardware gen, it is getting really impressive, just consider how it took some of these early cgi things months to render, while now it is rendering at 30-60 fps
Games like red dead redemption 2 are already exceptional when it comes to 3D graphical matters. Depending on which media we are viewing in the future, we might not have such a different opinion. There is a limit to realism, and the limit is reality. As we progress in our technological fields, we get closer to a peak, and once we reach that peak, it’s all been done.
@@williamsmith6921yeah, honestly I'm more scared about ia now. Cgi will always improve but it's almost real life already. But who knows, we will always find details that we like to improve
10:48 The movie is now turned 21 years after A.LI.CE still existed, Xevious CG movie making a lost film were existed around the obscure rare anime titles
Before I’ve doing on future plans to creating 3D anime art style and Japanese influences with legacy of A.LI.CE, To takes much development for internal department of our company, I usually to equipment few more big budgets and big studios as well
I think there are two main reasons why people don't like today's CGI. 1: An over-reliance on the medium has caused it to lose its magic. Nowadays, no one will ask "how did they do that?" when they watch a scene in a movie. 2: No one's innovating on the technology anymore (at least not many filmmakers are). As soon as CGI became realistic, we've hit a plateau.
1994: we are going to create a movie with motion capture shrek! 1996: could people really watch 90 minutes of shrek lookin like that 2001: great shrek movie 2023: fnaf movie
I like how throughout the 2000s, you've got Sharkboy and Lavagirl with horrible CGI, Cars with the thousands of individually animated cars, and then there's Transformers.
The first CGI used very simple and limited material/lighting models (ie phong). They could render plastic decently (that's why they used to use toys in the animations and in toy story) but we had to wait for more advanced techniques like sub surface scattering, anysotropy, microsurface distributions, layered materials, fresnel etc to render truly realistic materials..
seems like Jar Jar would have been a better choice as he was one of the first all digital characters to share significant screen-time side by side with live actors.
Imagine this: Woody: Hey, guys. Buzz: We need some ideas... Bob: Sure, we can help you out. Larry: How bout a movie about superheroes and maybe one about a robot, how about an old man and his flying house? BTW, I love westerns and space. Hey, maybe I'll write a song about it in 20 years...
Good job! And yet, I think some really important milestones are missing. Both the massive battles of lotr and gollum deserve a place here, as well as Pirates of carribean (Davy Jones in particular). Blue Sky "Robots" featured some of the most amazing materials (exp. metals) ever seen at the time. Movie Twister was an amazing spectacle. Roland Emmerich's 2012 was stunning. Etc.
![Evolution of Video Game Graphics 1958-2020 [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IsPPWWlV-T8/mqdefault.jpg)
"They used CGI to fake the moon landing"
*Quality of CGI in 1969*
flat earthers: im gonna pretend i didnt heard that
Earth is a Cube
@@Pixiloom Is this a joke?
@@arlynnecumberbatch1056 LMAOOO
@@ionpion yes the one below me is sarcasm
The concept of CGI, even in its infancy, existing during Beatlemania is absolutely surreal.
Something that I always look for in the evolution of anything is if it was around during the Beatles lifetime- 1962-1970. Always puts things into perspective as to how old yet innovative some things were
Imagine in the future playing a disney movie in the ps15
What the flip is beatlemania and who the flip are the beatles
1995: Wow! This CGI stuff is awesome! Hope they use it in more movies!
2021: I miss traditional animation...
Traditional?
@@angeld7849 hand drawn I mean
@@flippyfrogman okk
Honestly, It's been way too long since Disney made a 2D animated movie.
I love 3D animation but we could use some variety
The jump from johhny quasar to toy story is incredible. The detail in toy story is immaculate for its time
3:00 That actually looks incredible, especially for mid 80's CGI _(I think it's mostly the color scheme that does it)._ It looks dozens of years ahead of its time. Heck, in my opinion it still holds up pretty well nearly 40 years into the future.
Sorry about all the spam comments people are making, btw, I'm sure those get really annoying. (-_-)
Time and time again Pixar flexes on everybody
It's crazy to think that back then it took months of work and a huge team of programmers to make just that one short, while today it's something that could probably be whipped up by a single guy in a week using Blender
Anything the people behind Pixar made looks years ahead of its time. Early Pixar animations could hold up pretty well today (except for Tin Toy, that's for sure).
The whole thing is made out of phong materials
@@Nugcon What are you doing here
The CGI of the 1980s and early 1990s looks alot better than alot of people think
They're so imaginative, creative, and original.
@@brandonspain12345 or maybe because is expensive
@@brandonspain12345 heck even low budget is so good like that corn god
@@brandonspain12345 sometimes CGI look realistic sometimes today we don't even know what fake or not
@@brandonspain12345check the new topgun. They used a lot of CGI and I know you didn't realize.
2:37 looks like something out of a 90's nickelodeon bumper
yes
yea it does
Yah it does
For some reason, Polar Express no longer looks uncannily realistic because of how old it is. It's just... weird
Edit: What I meant was that the Polar Express no longer looks weird for the same reasons it did back in 2004, I'm not saying it looks any less creepy
;-;
Now it’s just uncanny
@@Dumb_Killjoy Exactly
I still think it looks way better than people say, just don't look at the girl or know it all kid too much xD
when i was in 3rd grade everyone thought the movie was live action and not cgi 🫠
They had cgi in 1965 holy crap
yees
don't let this distract you from the fact the world is round, and the moon landing was not faked
@@Nyctophiliac. the *earth* is round, wait a minute, is earth and world the same?
@@eveflash733 I think no since world probably means the entire countries and earth has countries, atmosphere, Air
probably took up a lot of memory
As much as early CGI may be creepy it‘s also interesting at the same time to see how rare they were because making them back than was really hard
Great video, dude! I never knew there was CGI in 1965.
CGI goes as far back as the 50s with the movie Vertigo by Alfred Hitchcock
Time flew fast,now,in 2050 we will be amazed how CGI will come to life,and remember all these shows and will say "It's poor graphic" but it used to be our childhood memories
We are so close to complete realism that I think we will reach that point way before 2050, I think the real impressive thing will be how live video games will eventually be able to produce this level of quality, even now with the new console and pc hardware gen, it is getting really impressive, just consider how it took some of these early cgi things months to render, while now it is rendering at 30-60 fps
Games like red dead redemption 2 are already exceptional when it comes to 3D graphical matters. Depending on which media we are viewing in the future, we might not have such a different opinion. There is a limit to realism, and the limit is reality. As we progress in our technological fields, we get closer to a peak, and once we reach that peak, it’s all been done.
Man 40 years from now people will call Thanos unrealistic idk
@@RasinnFlakes grape man already looks unrealistic.
@@williamsmith6921yeah, honestly I'm more scared about ia now. Cgi will always improve but it's almost real life already. But who knows, we will always find details that we like to improve
people say the moon landing is fake, and yet CGI at that time looks like it was made by a kid..
Ikr itd so stupid
They want you to think cgi was bad back then so they only released the crappy ones
@@aregag7049 oh,hmmm... Maybe it was alien technolgoy was so advanced in the 60's
@@aregag7049 are you being ironic or somthin
You dont need GCI for that tho, stanley Kubrick made movies about landing on the moon around that time
the 80's and the 90's are way advanced than what i expect
ikr idk what i was expecting, looks pretty good
They look much better than most movies today which the movies are 90% cgi and green screens.
it was the budget that made those movies look good
Jurassic Park got an oscar for great CGI
its probably because they spend dozens of hours rendering it which means its not real time at all so I can understand mostly
11:07 ah yes, my favorite animated movie, SHERK
Too ofensive for you?
@@angeld7849 naw, it just sounds funny
@@parkerheyen4446 Oh Ok, I thought you were angry because I misspell shrek
Says the guy with a baby Yoda picture
@CrystalCat dunno
10:48 The movie is now turned 21 years after A.LI.CE still existed, Xevious CG movie making a lost film were existed around the obscure rare anime titles
Before I’ve doing on future plans to creating 3D anime art style and Japanese influences with legacy of A.LI.CE, To takes much development for internal department of our company, I usually to equipment few more big budgets and big studios as well
All the previous clips really puts the First Toy Story into perspective, when I saw it I thought "what the hell it looks so realistic."
I am once again blown away by the technological advances from 1985-1995. Literally insane
80s/90s: wow CGI is awsome, i wish they would use it more in movies
2024: I miss practical effects
The first 3D animation being a 4th dimensional cube is wild.
Man CGI has evolved for so many years from 1960s to 2020s realistic CGI.
the toy story prototype is terrifying
I want to watch 80s movies with CGI. 80s CGI is so cool to look at.
22:26 it's called Spiderman into the Spider-verse btw
I love the old 3D and CGI animations...
Same
The leap in quality for T2 is awesome to see. Also, I had no idea Toy Story was a short before it was a full movie
I don’t think they publicly released the short version. They kept it a secret.
I think there are two main reasons why people don't like today's CGI.
1: An over-reliance on the medium has caused it to lose its magic. Nowadays, no one will ask "how did they do that?" when they watch a scene in a movie.
2: No one's innovating on the technology anymore (at least not many filmmakers are). As soon as CGI became realistic, we've hit a plateau.
4:38 This is very nostalgic, I feel Dejavu watching this for the 4th time
I don’t think I realize that Luxo Jr., Tin Toy, and Knick Knack all came out in the mid to late 80s. I thought they all came out in the early 90s.
""tHEy UsED cGi tO FAKe thE MoOn lanDiNGs!!!!!!!!"
CGI in 1969: *b a l l*
--which ball-- hAhA fUnNy
Nice, you even included the 60's
4:15
toy: im lonely
*demon casually walks through door*
toy: --HOLY SH-- yay :D
How did u do that type of text
@@klubwinxsk1556 just type - that twice like this -- words here --
but dont do it like that no spaces between -- and the words like this --words here-
--o--
--oh--
Anyone just noticed how CGI characters in 1990s movies are looking much more natural than modern CGI in Marvel movies?
Kid: "Mom, I want some Jimmy Neutron"
Mom: "We have Jimmy Neutron at home."
Jimmy Neutron at home: 7:10
when you realise we are closer to 2076 then 1965
1994: we are going to create a movie with motion capture shrek!
1996: could people really watch 90 minutes of shrek lookin like that
2001: great shrek movie
2023: fnaf movie
18:56 Wow. Animating liquids in cgi is hard enough but to animate condensation that well too? That’s amazing.
nah, its easy
I cant believe that "Toy Story" was made in 1995 until I saw Andy's face
6:38 Me gustó esa serie
ReBoot 1994
it all started..
*with 2 cubes*
Me: mom can we get Jimmy newtron
Mom: no we have Jimmy newtron at home
Jimmy newtron at home: 7:04
Neutron*
That was an early version of Neutron (Probably already know that put still)
@@jeremy3261 well no shit that’s the point of the comment
Not having beast wars in here is a crime
I'm surprised District 9 didn't make 2010. The CGI is mind blowing in that movie.
4:15 Bosses in Dark Souls be like:
LOL THAT BABY
"People the first landing moon is just a CGI"
CGI in 1960's
I invested all my time in this video and I don't regret it
1980s cgi looks awesome
1:13 aMoNGus REfereNcE
when the CGI is sus
@@JohnnyMoose23 Folks cgi is actin kinda sus totally can't be me
donald pump was the imposter......
tron looked like it was ahead of it’s times
that's because it is
1:25 wow this one is actually pretty good
back when a 10 mb computer is powerful enough.
You can't even run in a 4gb ram computer sadly
We went from 1965's Hypercube from the 90s, To a Live Action Sonic The Hedgehog Movie
And thus,He returns. Also good video!
"Hey honey, you wanna watch the extended cut of them Lords of Rings you like so much?"
The Clip on 2:10 Was Like Animated I was Amazed that CGi can Do this.
It's more used in anime
a fursuit kid!?
@@ZygardeCruiserNah the backround dude
It’s pretty cool to see how it has the 2d and 3d together but one thing is the flat colors
I like how throughout the 2000s, you've got Sharkboy and Lavagirl with horrible CGI, Cars with the thousands of individually animated cars, and then there's Transformers.
0:42
you are watching the first sims prototype
I can’t believe Sonic was made in 1965. It’s so impressive for 1965
the tin toy baby looks as if it were having multiple strokes at once lol
thanks for putting Money For Nothing. That was a nice surprise. It's my childhood
I do love the timeless classic sherk
Shrek*
I enjoy it's spin off, Piss in Boots
6:50 Xdddddddddd
:'D
Why’s no one talking about The Abyss? That was some insane cgi for 1989!
Thanks for more additions to my blacklog of movies 🍿
Damn, 80s CGI actually looks better than most 90s & early 00s CGI!
I can't believe that CGI went from plastic/silicone/rubber looking to more variety of textures, probably because of the lighting
The first CGI used very simple and limited material/lighting models (ie phong). They could render plastic decently (that's why they used to use toys in the animations and in toy story) but we had to wait for more advanced techniques like sub surface scattering, anysotropy, microsurface distributions, layered materials, fresnel etc to render truly realistic materials..
flat earthers:THEY USE CGI ON THE MOON LANDING
cgi in 1969: 0:06
~that's professional level~
I do that when i was 12yrs old
4:13 - This is the reason Pixar decided to make a movie about toys, because making a movie with humans was too uncanny.
1965 to 2024 that’s crazy dude
Jurassic park is such a stunning example for its time
seems like Jar Jar would have been a better choice as he was one of the first all digital characters to share significant screen-time side by side with live actors.
But no one likes Jar Jar
Lesson learned, never watch a early cgi video at night
The 1987 Doctor Who Title Sequence Also Used CGI.
Cool
The jump from everything prior to 1995 was beyond any sort of jump since.
If I saw the 1972 and 1974 CGI, it wouldn't have inspired me to get into programming at all.
Omg your other comment
you need to keep this series updated ♥️
I just hope Jurassic Park, The Matrix, and Avatar are in this version. Maybe even A Bug's Life.
Yes, I did not add Bug life, I have not seen this movie and I really don't care
The matrix is a masterpiece of a movie
early 10's is the peak of humanity, from then its going straight down
Toy story really was amazing for its time
Fr i love that movie
Cgi was available extremely early....but memory and processing speed held it back.
Thanks for the update
Earlier cgi in the 1970s-80s is like bowling alley screens.
You forgot Veggietales! They helped in a big way. Pixar came to Big Idea for ideas.
Yes. I am glad to see you say this.
Imagine this:
Woody: Hey, guys.
Buzz: We need some ideas...
Bob: Sure, we can help you out.
Larry: How bout a movie about superheroes and maybe one about a robot, how about an old man and his flying house? BTW, I love westerns and space. Hey, maybe I'll write a song about it in 20 years...
Seeing the sophistication of CGI in this year is truly crazy
Future world was the 3D Sculpture in 1974 and then there was a movie in that time
Stuff got advanced real quick...
Me parece increíble como hay un gran cambio en los años 80's con el estilo de CGI es fascinante y se ve muy bien
Asies!
@Someone Called Alvaro sii
You missed Jurassic Park! I thought that deserved a spot on the timeline.
Damn, Tron looks kinda sheeeeesh and good
Yeah it looks like 12-13 years ahead of it's time
i just love how in the movies even old ass ones the cgi was already crazy
4:16 took me out and I don’t know why 😭😭
Thanks for add Tron
After seeing that Sherk part, I just thought of something.
What if Pinnocio says "My nose will now grow"?
xD
You both misspelled Shrek
@@kepapi6985Its the joke lol
0:30
This was made by Pixar’s founders when they were studying computer science in the university of Utah! :)
The first CGI I saw was veggietales
forgetting to add shadows on cgi objects will be a common issue in the future
good taste in music
I used to listen 80s and 90s songs in my childhood, rock pop, bosa nova, etc
Good job! And yet, I think some really important milestones are missing. Both the massive battles of lotr and gollum deserve a place here, as well as Pirates of carribean (Davy Jones in particular). Blue Sky "Robots" featured some of the most amazing materials (exp. metals) ever seen at the time. Movie Twister was an amazing spectacle. Roland Emmerich's 2012 was stunning. Etc.
11:03 ah yes my favourite movie: *sherk (2011)*
There was a time when I was a toddler, I was scared of 3d CGI. But the Weird Al CGI didn't scare me.