*Read This:* 1. I didn't add any cartoon/anime in this video *(The video is about 3D CGI)* 2. I didn't add any prequel/sequel from a movie that are already in the video. _(That's mean you won't find Toy Story 2, Star Wars II, etc)_ 3. Don't confuse *Hand-drawn CGI* with 3D CGI. 4. Don't confuse *visual effects* with 3D CGI. 5. Don't confuse *Stop-motion* with 3D CGI 6. I added the movies that had the best CGI for the year it was released. _(That's mean you won't find Hulk (2003), The Mummy Returns (2001), etc)_ 7. I didn't add any game in this video. *Thank you, enjoy the video! :D*
I keep on forgetting that toy story was made in '95. The only thing that really gives that away are the absolute nightmare fuel that are the human models.
Some characters' facial animations look odd a few times, particularly whenever they get surprised, plus a few backgrounds, particularly at the gas station, seem a bit empty. Despite that, that movie still generally looks great to me and is a relic in CGI. It's astounding how _Toy Story 2_ was an improvement despite production issues.
Something that I always look for in the evolution of anything is if it was around during the Beatles lifetime- 1962-1970. Always puts things into perspective as to how old yet innovative some things were
3:00 That actually looks incredible, especially for mid 80's CGI _(I think it's mostly the color scheme that does it)._ It looks dozens of years ahead of its time. Heck, in my opinion it still holds up pretty well nearly 40 years into the future. Sorry about all the spam comments people are making, btw, I'm sure those get really annoying. (-_-)
It's crazy to think that back then it took months of work and a huge team of programmers to make just that one short, while today it's something that could probably be whipped up by a single guy in a week using Blender
Anything the people behind Pixar made looks years ahead of its time. Early Pixar animations could hold up pretty well today (except for Tin Toy, that's for sure).
For some reason, Polar Express no longer looks uncannily realistic because of how old it is. It's just... weird Edit: What I meant was that the Polar Express no longer looks weird for the same reasons it did back in 2004, I'm not saying it looks any less creepy
Time flew fast,now,in 2050 we will be amazed how CGI will come to life,and remember all these shows and will say "It's poor graphic" but it used to be our childhood memories
We are so close to complete realism that I think we will reach that point way before 2050, I think the real impressive thing will be how live video games will eventually be able to produce this level of quality, even now with the new console and pc hardware gen, it is getting really impressive, just consider how it took some of these early cgi things months to render, while now it is rendering at 30-60 fps
Games like red dead redemption 2 are already exceptional when it comes to 3D graphical matters. Depending on which media we are viewing in the future, we might not have such a different opinion. There is a limit to realism, and the limit is reality. As we progress in our technological fields, we get closer to a peak, and once we reach that peak, it’s all been done.
@@williamsmith6921yeah, honestly I'm more scared about ia now. Cgi will always improve but it's almost real life already. But who knows, we will always find details that we like to improve
10:48 The movie is now turned 21 years after A.LI.CE still existed, Xevious CG movie making a lost film were existed around the obscure rare anime titles
Before I’ve doing on future plans to creating 3D anime art style and Japanese influences with legacy of A.LI.CE, To takes much development for internal department of our company, I usually to equipment few more big budgets and big studios as well
I think there are two main reasons why people don't like today's CGI. 1: An over-reliance on the medium has caused it to lose its magic. Nowadays, no one will ask "how did they do that?" when they watch a scene in a movie. 2: No one's innovating on the technology anymore (at least not many filmmakers are). As soon as CGI became realistic, we've hit a plateau.
Actually in the 60s computer were too big and only had 1 thing command prompt until the 70s Which meant that hypercube and the other 1960s animation was made in the 70s l
1994: we are going to create a movie with motion capture shrek! 1996: could people really watch 90 minutes of shrek lookin like that 2001: great shrek movie 2023: fnaf movie
seems like Jar Jar would have been a better choice as he was one of the first all digital characters to share significant screen-time side by side with live actors.
Imagine this: Woody: Hey, guys. Buzz: We need some ideas... Bob: Sure, we can help you out. Larry: How bout a movie about superheroes and maybe one about a robot, how about an old man and his flying house? BTW, I love westerns and space. Hey, maybe I'll write a song about it in 20 years...
im as old as wall-e and its one of my favorite Disney movies! i remember playin ps2 ratatouille amd there being trailers for wall-e...nostalgia... another movie i love from the year i was born is the Hulk! played the 2008 hulk ps2 game so much
Incredible. I guess after 20-30 years, we could watch cartoons looks like a full real life. All what will need from actor that his face and maybe voice, although i not sure)
8:18 Cara Muito obrigado por colocar Cassiopeia mano muito obrigado nunca vi gringo colocando essa animação porque é desconhecida e Toy Story é mais famosa mas valeu!
@@angeld7849 No I'm NOT. There was a CGI scene in wrath of khan, look it up and admit you're also wrong. Also arrogant much? learn how to do a simple google search ua-cam.com/video/52XlyMbxxh8/v-deo.html
Wait a minute,what about pirates of the Carribbean dead man's chest? It kicked the cgi of and was a good example of cgi done right and then had a successor called avatar.
![Evolution of Video Game Graphics 1958-2020 [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IsPPWWlV-T8/mqdefault.jpg)
*Read This:*
1. I didn't add any cartoon/anime in this video *(The video is about 3D CGI)*
2. I didn't add any prequel/sequel from a movie that are already in the video.
_(That's mean you won't find Toy Story 2, Star Wars II, etc)_
3. Don't confuse *Hand-drawn CGI* with 3D CGI.
4. Don't confuse *visual effects* with 3D CGI.
5. Don't confuse *Stop-motion* with 3D CGI
6. I added the movies that had the best CGI for the year it was released.
_(That's mean you won't find Hulk (2003), The Mummy Returns (2001), etc)_
7. I didn't add any game in this video.
*Thank you, enjoy the video! :D*
First
You added Star Wars prequel
First
@Rapidical the comment was very silly and I didn't know what to answer.
...and yet there’s Spider-Man and then Spiderman into the spider-verse
I keep on forgetting that toy story was made in '95. The only thing that really gives that away are the absolute nightmare fuel that are the human models.
Cmon there not bad in 2nd movie they look good nooving foward
@@jaredanacleto9239 That doesn't really change the fact that they appear in my nightmares.
@@sqrt2295 agreed
@@sqrt2295 ain’t no way that *thing* is a dog
Some characters' facial animations look odd a few times, particularly whenever they get surprised, plus a few backgrounds, particularly at the gas station, seem a bit empty. Despite that, that movie still generally looks great to me and is a relic in CGI. It's astounding how _Toy Story 2_ was an improvement despite production issues.
"They used CGI to fake the moon landing"
*Quality of CGI in 1969*
flat earthers: im gonna pretend i didnt heard that
Earth is a Cube
@@Pixiloom Is this a joke?
@@arlynnecumberbatch1056 LMAOOO
@@ionpion yes the one below me is sarcasm
The concept of CGI, even in its infancy, existing during Beatlemania is absolutely surreal.
Something that I always look for in the evolution of anything is if it was around during the Beatles lifetime- 1962-1970. Always puts things into perspective as to how old yet innovative some things were
1995: Wow! This CGI stuff is awesome! Hope they use it in more movies!
2021: I miss traditional animation...
Traditional?
@@angeld7849 hand drawn I mean
@@flippyfrogman okk
Honestly, It's been way too long since Disney made a 2D animated movie.
I love 3D animation but we could use some variety
3:00 That actually looks incredible, especially for mid 80's CGI _(I think it's mostly the color scheme that does it)._ It looks dozens of years ahead of its time. Heck, in my opinion it still holds up pretty well nearly 40 years into the future.
Sorry about all the spam comments people are making, btw, I'm sure those get really annoying. (-_-)
Time and time again Pixar flexes on everybody
It's crazy to think that back then it took months of work and a huge team of programmers to make just that one short, while today it's something that could probably be whipped up by a single guy in a week using Blender
Anything the people behind Pixar made looks years ahead of its time. Early Pixar animations could hold up pretty well today (except for Tin Toy, that's for sure).
The whole thing is made out of phong materials
@@Nugcon What are you doing here
2:37 looks like something out of a 90's nickelodeon bumper
yes
yea it does
Yah it does
the 80's and the 90's are way advanced than what i expect
ikr idk what i was expecting, looks pretty good
They look much better than most movies today which the movies are 90% cgi and green screens.
it was the budget that made those movies look good
Jurassic Park got an oscar for great CGI
its probably because they spend dozens of hours rendering it which means its not real time at all so I can understand mostly
people say the moon landing is fake, and yet CGI at that time looks like it was made by a kid..
Ikr itd so stupid
They want you to think cgi was bad back then so they only released the crappy ones
@@aregag7049 oh,hmmm... Maybe it was alien technolgoy was so advanced in the 60's
@@aregag7049 are you being ironic or somthin
You dont need GCI for that tho, stanley Kubrick made movies about landing on the moon around that time
They had cgi in 1965 holy crap
yees
don't let this distract you from the fact the world is round, and the moon landing was not faked
@@Nyctophiliac. the *earth* is round, wait a minute, is earth and world the same?
@@eveflash733 I think no since world probably means the entire countries and earth has countries, atmosphere, Air
probably took up a lot of memory
The CGI of the 1980s and early 1990s looks alot better than alot of people think
They're so imaginative, creative, and original.
@@brandonspain12345 or maybe because is expensive
@@brandonspain12345 heck even low budget is so good like that corn god
@@brandonspain12345 sometimes CGI look realistic sometimes today we don't even know what fake or not
For some reason, Polar Express no longer looks uncannily realistic because of how old it is. It's just... weird
Edit: What I meant was that the Polar Express no longer looks weird for the same reasons it did back in 2004, I'm not saying it looks any less creepy
;-;
Now it’s just uncanny
@@Dumb_Killjoy Exactly
I still think it looks way better than people say, just don't look at the girl or know it all kid too much xD
when i was in 3rd grade everyone thought the movie was live action and not cgi 🫠
The jump from johhny quasar to toy story is incredible. The detail in toy story is immaculate for its time
As much as early CGI may be creepy it‘s also interesting at the same time to see how rare they were because making them back than was really hard
1:13 aMoNGus REfereNcE
when the CGI is sus
@@JohnnyMoose23 Folks cgi is actin kinda sus totally can't be me
donald pump was the imposter......
11:07 ah yes, my favorite animated movie, SHERK
Too ofensive for you?
@@angeld7849 naw, it just sounds funny
@@parkerheyen4446 Oh Ok, I thought you were angry because I misspell shrek
Says the guy with a baby Yoda picture
@CrystalCat dunno
Great video, dude! I never knew there was CGI in 1965.
It was also made in 1963
Wow my 2 year old comment
CGI goes as far back as the 50s with the movie Vertigo by Alfred Hitchcock
Time flew fast,now,in 2050 we will be amazed how CGI will come to life,and remember all these shows and will say "It's poor graphic" but it used to be our childhood memories
We are so close to complete realism that I think we will reach that point way before 2050, I think the real impressive thing will be how live video games will eventually be able to produce this level of quality, even now with the new console and pc hardware gen, it is getting really impressive, just consider how it took some of these early cgi things months to render, while now it is rendering at 30-60 fps
Games like red dead redemption 2 are already exceptional when it comes to 3D graphical matters. Depending on which media we are viewing in the future, we might not have such a different opinion. There is a limit to realism, and the limit is reality. As we progress in our technological fields, we get closer to a peak, and once we reach that peak, it’s all been done.
Man 40 years from now people will call Thanos unrealistic idk
@@RasinnFlakes grape man already looks unrealistic.
@@williamsmith6921yeah, honestly I'm more scared about ia now. Cgi will always improve but it's almost real life already. But who knows, we will always find details that we like to improve
4:15
toy: im lonely
*demon casually walks through door*
toy: --HOLY SH-- yay :D
How did u do that type of text
@@klubwinxsk1556 just type - that twice like this -- words here --
but dont do it like that no spaces between -- and the words like this --words here-
--o--
--oh--
Man CGI has evolved for so many years from 1960s to 2020s realistic CGI.
I want to watch 80s movies with CGI. 80s CGI is so cool to look at.
I love the old 3D and CGI animations...
Same i think i like 60's-90's CGI better than 00's- CGI
10:48 The movie is now turned 21 years after A.LI.CE still existed, Xevious CG movie making a lost film were existed around the obscure rare anime titles
Before I’ve doing on future plans to creating 3D anime art style and Japanese influences with legacy of A.LI.CE, To takes much development for internal department of our company, I usually to equipment few more big budgets and big studios as well
4:15 Bosses in Dark Souls be like:
LOL THAT BABY
The leap in quality for T2 is awesome to see. Also, I had no idea Toy Story was a short before it was a full movie
All the previous clips really puts the First Toy Story into perspective, when I saw it I thought "what the hell it looks so realistic."
the toy story prototype is terrifying
I don’t think I realize that Luxo Jr., Tin Toy, and Knick Knack all came out in the mid to late 80s. I thought they all came out in the early 90s.
22:26 it's called Spiderman into the Spider-verse btw
I do love the timeless classic sherk
Shrek*
I enjoy it's spin off, Piss in Boots
Nice, you even included the 60's
the tin toy baby looks as if it were having multiple strokes at once lol
1980s cgi looks awesome
Me: mom can we get Jimmy newtron
Mom: no we have Jimmy newtron at home
Jimmy newtron at home: 7:04
Neutron*
That was an early version of Neutron (Probably already know that put still)
@@jeremy3261 well no shit that’s the point of the comment
1:25 wow this one is actually pretty good
18:56 Wow. Animating liquids in cgi is hard enough but to animate condensation that well too? That’s amazing.
nah, its easy
The Clip on 2:10 Was Like Animated I was Amazed that CGi can Do this.
It's more used in anime
a fursuit kid!?
@@ZygardeCruiserNah the backround dude
when you realise we are closer to 2076 then 1965
tron looked like it was ahead of it’s times
Yeah it looks like 12-13 years ahead of it's time
I invested all my time in this video and I don't regret it
I think there are two main reasons why people don't like today's CGI.
1: An over-reliance on the medium has caused it to lose its magic. Nowadays, no one will ask "how did they do that?" when they watch a scene in a movie.
2: No one's innovating on the technology anymore (at least not many filmmakers are). As soon as CGI became realistic, we've hit a plateau.
Thanks for the update
""tHEy UsED cGi tO FAKe thE MoOn lanDiNGs!!!!!!!!"
CGI in 1969: *b a l l*
--which ball-- hAhA fUnNy
And thus,He returns. Also good video!
it all started..
*with 2 cubes*
back when a 10 mb computer is powerful enough.
You can't even run in a 4gb ram computer sadly
Actually in the 60s computer were too big and only had 1 thing command prompt until the 70s
Which meant that hypercube and the other 1960s animation was made in the 70s l
1994: we are going to create a movie with motion capture shrek!
1996: could people really watch 90 minutes of shrek lookin like that
2001: great shrek movie
2023: fnaf movie
Thanks for more additions to my blacklog of movies 🍿
you need to keep this series updated ♥️
"People the first landing moon is just a CGI"
CGI in 1960's
seems like Jar Jar would have been a better choice as he was one of the first all digital characters to share significant screen-time side by side with live actors.
The 1987 Doctor Who Title Sequence Also Used CGI.
Cool
4:38 This is very nostalgic, I feel Dejavu watching this for the 4th time
0:42
you are watching the first sims prototype
I cant believe that "Toy Story" was made in 1995 until I saw Andy's face
We went from 1965's Hypercube from the 90s, To a Live Action Sonic The Hedgehog Movie
I just hope Jurassic Park, The Matrix, and Avatar are in this version. Maybe even A Bug's Life.
Yes, I did not add Bug life, I have not seen this movie and I really don't care
The matrix is a masterpiece of a movie
i just love how in the movies even old ass ones the cgi was already crazy
*Someone stole my video:* ua-cam.com/video/emfvPvnmwPQ/v-deo.html
And is getting support, please report th video!
If I saw the 1972 and 1974 CGI, it wouldn't have inspired me to get into programming at all.
Omg your other comment
I'm surprised District 9 didn't make 2010. The CGI is mind blowing in that movie.
Damn, 80s CGI actually looks better than most 90s & early 00s CGI!
Me parece increíble como hay un gran cambio en los años 80's con el estilo de CGI es fascinante y se ve muy bien
Asies!
@@angeld7849 hablas español
@@alvaro73656 sii
"Hey honey, you wanna watch the extended cut of them Lords of Rings you like so much?"
Best Transformers
11:03 ah yes my favourite movie: *sherk (2011)*
The adventures of Andre and Wally B and Luxo Jr. looks way ahead of it's time
Thanks for add Tron
Seeing the sophistication of CGI in this year is truly crazy
4:16 took me out and I don’t know why 😭😭
You forgot Veggietales! They helped in a big way. Pixar came to Big Idea for ideas.
Yes. I am glad to see you say this.
Imagine this:
Woody: Hey, guys.
Buzz: We need some ideas...
Bob: Sure, we can help you out.
Larry: How bout a movie about superheroes and maybe one about a robot, how about an old man and his flying house? BTW, I love westerns and space. Hey, maybe I'll write a song about it in 20 years...
thanks for putting Money For Nothing. That was a nice surprise. It's my childhood
im as old as wall-e and its one of my favorite Disney movies! i remember playin ps2 ratatouille amd there being trailers for wall-e...nostalgia...
another movie i love from the year i was born is the Hulk! played the 2008 hulk ps2 game so much
Wall-E is from Pixar and I like hulk 2008 too
Future world was the 3D Sculpture in 1974 and then there was a movie in that time
Incredible. I guess after 20-30 years, we could watch cartoons looks like a full real life. All what will need from actor that his face and maybe voice, although i not sure)
What’s that music at the beginning of the video, I really like it?
It is in the video
Request: Clint Eastwood - Great Transfornation (1930-Still Alive)
1:22 my fav amogus
Sus
0:51 4K
You missed Jurassic Park! I thought that deserved a spot on the timeline.
11:03 Sherk, what a beautiful name for a movie
Why’s no one talking about The Abyss? That was some insane cgi for 1989!
Damn, Tron looks kinda sheeeeesh and good
Yeah it looks like 12-13 years ahead of it's time
11:03 *Sherk*
I am not a company, I am a single person who made the whole video, no one helped me correct or tell me what else is missing in the video.
@@angeld7849 its okay! Its not that big of a deal if u get a name of something wrong
How the cgi was made in the 70's? Their computers are to simple
I have the same question.
@@angeld7849 in one word, sgi and sun microsystems, their servers/gpu technology was almost 15 years ahead of everything in 1985
After seeing that Sherk part, I just thought of something.
What if Pinnocio says "My nose will now grow"?
xD
You both misspelled Shrek
@@kepapi6985Its the joke lol
22:57 my favourite
Deleting that video is a big mistake, it's literally your most famous video!
Yeah but.. I'm tired to get comments of people asking me for movies but they don't see the pinned comment :(
I will delete the other video, not this
1:14 BOBBLY MAN IS *SUS*
:o he is S̴̜͚̎͘ ̵̏͜ ̸͓̻̿̄ ̸̤̣̋̕Ú̶͕̆ ̷̬̄ ̴̹̖̏ ̷̩̃S̴̩̉
Stop posting about among us. I’m tired of seeing it
@@caravel5500 Ангелочек Caravel is sus
@@DoisMitosEmBuscaDeAventuras Among us is trash
@@caravel5500 yeah
A lot of 2001, what happened in 2001?
Edit: didn’t mean to imply that lol that is not what I meant😭
I want to know too
ROFL
Shrek and monsters Inc were both massive turning points for dreamworks and Pixar.
Can you make george Michael transformation and George Ezra too
So can i put *Bobbly Man* in my movie now?! YEAH
Weird that the Stained Glass Knight from "Young Sherlock Holmes" isn't here given that it was the first ever fully CGI character in a movie.
8:18 Cara Muito obrigado por colocar Cassiopeia mano muito obrigado nunca vi gringo colocando essa animação porque é desconhecida e Toy Story é mais famosa mas valeu!
The wrath of khan should be on here. There's an amazing cgi sequence in it of a planet landscape with mountains and river way ahead of its time
Read the pinned comment, you are confusing special effect with 3d CGI
@@angeld7849
No I'm NOT. There was a CGI scene in wrath of khan, look it up and admit you're also wrong. Also arrogant much? learn how to do a simple google search
ua-cam.com/video/52XlyMbxxh8/v-deo.html
@@greathornedowl1783 omg, calm down 😅
@@greathornedowl1783 well I never received an answer.
The first CGI I saw was veggietales
Wait a minute,what about pirates of the Carribbean dead man's chest? It kicked the cgi of and was a good example of cgi done right and then had a successor called avatar.
Your back!!
Why your name is similar as me?
@@angeld7849 well it was angel E, but the reason is because I didn’t wanna use my real name so I just put “angel” and then my last name initial
@@xuphy9503 okaay
@@angeld7849 but I got the angel part from you. It was kind of a way of hiding my identity.
@@xuphy9503 Thank you!
good taste in music
I used to listen 80s and 90s songs in my childhood, rock pop, bosa nova, etc