Brian Greene | AI, Time, Dimensions, Entropy, Black Holes | Ep. 204A

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 230

  • @Christopherurich33
    @Christopherurich33 Рік тому +22

    Einstein once said "I have no special talents I'm only passionately curious" I resonate too that quote

    • @kenadams5504
      @kenadams5504 Рік тому +1

      Einstein had the fearlessness required to posthulate that the seeming nonsence of Spactime could be actually applicable to the Universe .He , then , had the intellect and workrate required to prove his theory in a mathematical sense.

    • @johnpawlak9846
      @johnpawlak9846 Рік тому +1

      @@kenadams5504 m

    • @kenadams5504
      @kenadams5504 Рік тому +1

      @@johnpawlak9846 is that all you can think of ?

    • @garyfrancis6193
      @garyfrancis6193 Рік тому +1

      But you hilearned to spell.

    • @dennisholst4322
      @dennisholst4322 10 місяців тому

      They can't figure out GOD

  • @QueenRozell
    @QueenRozell Рік тому +17

    You and I are the same age and I'm ecstatic that you have so many of the same questions that I do. I have become hooked on your podcast and told all of my girlfriends. Keep on shining girl you're doing an awesome job and those of us who stick with the light truly appreciate you❤

    • @PamelaLeighRichards
      @PamelaLeighRichards Рік тому +1

      totally ...

    • @BlessedBec
      @BlessedBec Рік тому +2

      So well said and I feel the same! Keep spreading the knowledge and light Danica!

    • @robin.monique
      @robin.monique Рік тому +1

      Same! So grateful to have aligned with her channel bc it lets me know I’m on a solid journey through to my ascension. Love the way she asks questions with such intentional curiosity met with respect and inserts her own take as well as her own experiences when called. 💫

  • @ronaldshapiro1238
    @ronaldshapiro1238 Рік тому +19

    Excellent job Danica! Your podcasts are so good; it's like time stood still:)🕊

  • @digitraxanr
    @digitraxanr Рік тому +3

    We are all Higgs bosons on this bus. Thank you for this really intense interview with one of my long time heros. I was as impressed by your brilliant questions as I was inspired by Professor Greene's brilliant explanations. It was a match made in the heavens.
    I will be watching this interview over and over again and then passing it on.

  • @gijszegers5201
    @gijszegers5201 Рік тому +6

    I believe the analogy about the waterdrop not knowing it is the ocean because it can't zoom out and be aware of the whole, still holds up for us humans. We as humans in our physical form are - at this moment - not aware we are the earth. We only see ourselves as separate from everything that makes up the earth. Which in essence is our biggest challenge, being able to zoom out and become aware (or perhaps feel) we are the earth. In the end we perhaps have to accept that, in this physical form, we don't have the capacity to be aware of the bigger picture. Just as the character in a simulation can't be aware what's outside of that simulation.

  • @Alchemicalanesthesia
    @Alchemicalanesthesia Рік тому +16

    Danica, excellent questions you asked and thank you for answering the call to psychedelics. It’s obviously given you a platform from which to speak to a whole different perspective on reality. Being an anesthesiologist, I’ve observed so many states of consciousness in others, but none myself through mind altering substances. Hearing about it from you has been fascinating for me. I listened to your interview of Mateus (sp?) yesterday and interestingly found many similarities between these two men. This for me just validates that we each have our own version of reality, created by us, for us, assigned meaning by us, for our own purposes, but ultimately, what is the purpose ? Only the purpose we each give it. Makes me feel called to just breathe, sink into the present moment of now, stop thinking, quiet the monkey mind of endless questions and just BE. Thanks for a great channel Danica, you’re a bada$$ inspiration for women!

  • @billenglish6352
    @billenglish6352 Рік тому +14

    Nothing disturbs the academic mind more than psychedelics. Cudos to the professor for understanding that a fear of letting go is the source of his terror.

    • @lynking4141
      @lynking4141 Рік тому

      It appears to be the impetus for every angst we endure, here...

    • @sunnybenton
      @sunnybenton Рік тому

      It's the source of yours as well.

  • @daveadcock9128
    @daveadcock9128 Рік тому +14

    These podcasts are so good Danica, and this is defiantly one of the best this year. Everything put simply and in everyday lexicon, these are questions we all should be pondering.

  • @billenglish6352
    @billenglish6352 Рік тому +2

    I love when Danika talks about the energy hum zone. I got so scattered on Owsley Acid in 1967 that I too asked the cosmos: How will I ever put myself back together again. It's a very profound experience to be blown up in such a fashion.

  • @hectorrivas7655
    @hectorrivas7655 Рік тому

    Ms. Danica, this must be the greatest interview of professor Greene I have seen thus far. I am new to your podcasts but this ends now I am hooked. You brought out professor's Greene beautiful soul out into the sun. I love you both.

  • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546
    @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546 Рік тому +3

    Brian is Brilliant but Danica is Devine 🥰 What about an assessment of CIG Theory ?? Over 10 years and still waiting patiently.

  • @isabellerobbe-dren752
    @isabellerobbe-dren752 Рік тому +2

    Fantastic interview/discussion with professor Greene. You are a thoughtful interviewer who consistently puts forth excellent questions and gives your guest generous space to answer fully - love that! Well done.

  • @makalanewman5358
    @makalanewman5358 Рік тому

    I love to binge watch your episodes so I try and take breaks so I can apply all I learn and be in the moment but I start to miss watching them and always end up coming back to them to watch whatever I miss which gives me something to look forward to and feel like Ive finally found someone with a like mind. Feels less lonely. Thank you.

  • @manifold1476
    @manifold1476 Рік тому

    ~44:00ish Regarding extra dimensions - - - "A street, an avenue, a floor number and a particular time will specify the location of an 'event', but information on the colour or temperature (or pressure) of the event requires descriptions of dimensions beyond x,y,z & t

  • @_JustinCase_
    @_JustinCase_ Рік тому +4

    Excellent episode, Danica. Imagine if, through our early education, we all had instructors like Brian Greene, Neil DeGrasse Tyson or Carl Sagan. Such great communicators who can grab your attention and maintain your enthusiasm for learning.

    • @steveflorida8699
      @steveflorida8699 Рік тому +1

      However, all 3 scientists do not know the source and origin of Life (living organisms) and consciousness.
      Two very fundamental attributes of human nature... Life - living and Consciousness.

    • @cindybann2363
      @cindybann2363 Рік тому +1

      We would definitely be a very advanced species! Because no matter how complex of language we understand what he’s saying. Danica is brilliant in asking questions. I think as a child ai remember being scared to ask to many questions. I guess I’m ready to hear these thought provoking topics.😮😊

  • @sneibarg
    @sneibarg Рік тому +2

    I read Brian Greene's books.

  • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546
    @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546 Рік тому +1

    Wow - two of my favorite people talking to each other - and I can listen in. Fascinating. I wonder how the conversation would go with Danica and Ed Witten?

  • @cryptomagus5555
    @cryptomagus5555 Рік тому +1

    Thank you Brian and Danica for a very interesting and fascinating multi-dimensional sharing on where main-stream theoretical physics is validated by empirical observations both on and off planet. I loved the journey into cosmology of the expanding universe, entropy and mathematical predictions of several additional dimensions.I was excited by the review of of the relationships between gravity, time the speed of light and the journey to create a more complete theory of general relativity. Looking over the last 100 years then the consideration that quantum physics as proposed in the 1920s now underpins our human electronics and technologies which have emerged in the 2020s in cell phones and quantum computers operating at instantaneous speeds using quantum entanglement. This leads to the question of the predictions of new technologies which may emerge in the coming years from a more complete understanding of quantum physics.

  • @terrancehenriparkin5964
    @terrancehenriparkin5964 Рік тому +1

    Hi Brian Randolph Greene WELCOME BACK TO THE
    INTERNATIONAL ARENA BRO ..MISSED YOUR INSPIRATIONAL INFO ...✌...Its by time that we see & hear more from you !
    Love to get you , Gregg, Joe, Theresa, Bruce , Sue & the rest of the 21st century teachers, masters & mentors .. thx bro ⚖👌

  • @kennyrumrill1860
    @kennyrumrill1860 Рік тому +2

    This was truly enlightening. Thanks for the great questions, Danica. And thanks for the great answers, Brian.

  • @IamIam123
    @IamIam123 Рік тому +1

    Thank You❣️❣️❣️ Right on time!

  • @victord.silvestri8959
    @victord.silvestri8959 7 місяців тому

    Danica has done it again ! She gets all the right and amazing guests to interview on her show. I believe Dr. Greene is also the author of a book titled "The Elegant Universe" which I read many years ago and was my first introduction to String Theory. Knowledge of String Theory is a must for those who make the jump from Newtonian mechanical physics to Quantum physics. One could be amazed at these Pod Casts wondering how Danica has such amazing guests. But one will not find the true answer until achieving the realization that Danica is truly and enlightened being and a national treasure for all of us.

  • @JustaGirl.357
    @JustaGirl.357 Рік тому +1

    Thanks for another great video Danica! Can't wait to watch while I work from home!👍😎🙏 thanks for having this podcast and not being afraid to be your true self and shed light on topics that a lot of people wouldn't admit to being curious about! You're an inspiration to women on so many levels!👊

  • @kellylewis4766
    @kellylewis4766 Рік тому +2

    Danica she should have been a showgirl in Las Vegas she's so pretty

  • @kateashby3066
    @kateashby3066 Рік тому +1

    I LOVE listening to scientists such as BG because they like to philosophize and not just demand that they have all the answers that science has yet to prove. It’s very refreshing how reasonable he is ❤

  • @deniserichard5613
    @deniserichard5613 Рік тому +1

    Very fascinating stuff! Thank you so much Danica for this video❣️

  • @tarascheible4491
    @tarascheible4491 Рік тому

    Danica, you are getting younger by the day. Beautiful inside and out!!! Keep this info coming, sister.

  • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546

    To perhaps clarify - the smaller the vibration (wavelength) the higher the energy. Wavelength and frequency being inverse to one another. E=hf. High frequency = high energy (i.e. gamma versus microwave) QM uses the shortest wavelength. Why I don't know. GR is using the longest wavelength. The vacuum of space. This is like comparing the two different sides of the MTS equation. A long long wavelength (small frequency) exists at the Dark Energy side (S side of MTS) (10 to the minus 29 g/cm3) while the shortest wavelength (Planck & 5.16 to the 93rd g/cm3) (high frequency) exists as the extreme density of a black hole (M side of the MTS equation) . Remember The MTS equation is from 0 mph to "c" in the MTS direction. In the STM direction, we go from "c" to 0mph. And with Lorentz transformations along the way. [As a side note I recall I believe out of Chicago two scientists saying that as things were brought an Bose-Einstein condensate, they approached a black hole, well, this appears evident in the MTS equation as the M (black hole) side of the equation is one of no motion. I believe I left a nervous and blathering phone message to one of them some ten or so years ago. ] What I have just realized now is that there are some 10 to the order of 120 magnitudes between the M and S side of the MTS equation. In your vacuum catastrophe you are comparing a short wavelength (high mass-high frequency ) QM environment to a long wavelength (low mass - high space-low frequency) GR environment. Why? The zero point energy of QM has nothing to do with the vacuum of space. You are mixing apples and peanuts.

  • @RobertSmith-pw9io
    @RobertSmith-pw9io Рік тому +1

    Little Lady, you never cease to amaze me. From your first start in auto racing world to today. When you talk with people like Diann Cowrn, Brian Green it shows that you are far more than just beautiful. You are excellent!. Thank you for that and keep doing what you do so well...

  • @brendan9159
    @brendan9159 Рік тому +2

    Hello danica Patrick my name is Brendan I'm big fan of pretty intense podcast

  • @nickgarrity764
    @nickgarrity764 Рік тому +1

    Thanks for the post! I’d love to see Nassim Haramein take you through his insights and breakthroughs on unification of big and small.

  • @_JustinCase_
    @_JustinCase_ Рік тому +5

    Fun fact: A photon of light from a distant star can take tens, hundreds, millions or billions of years to travel from the source to your eyeball. Yet from the photons perspective, traveling at the speed of light, it was virtually instantaneous.

    • @Dreki776
      @Dreki776 Рік тому

      Even more fun of a fact...there is no such thing as a photon that travels!

    • @manifold1476
      @manifold1476 Рік тому

      wave packet, then (smh) @@Dreki776

  • @elizabethlink3993
    @elizabethlink3993 Рік тому +2

    💚 Awesome conversation, I love learning more and more! Thanks for the questions you ask, Danica and for having such great guests! Would love to hear what Nassim would say..💚

  • @rudyvanderhoeven9628
    @rudyvanderhoeven9628 Рік тому +1

    brilliant discussion, thank you both

  • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546

    Remember, in MTS, we have Black Holes (M side) followed by the Standard Model (slowest to fastest), followed by Dark Matter, followed by Dark Energy (S side). The MTS equation as regards wavelength goes from short (M side) to long (S side). Dark Energy wavelengths are longer than Dark Matter which are longer than Standard Mode which are longer than Black Hole.

  • @terrancehenriparkin5964
    @terrancehenriparkin5964 Рік тому +1

    Hi Danika , thx for the 👌as well as bringing him to the fore & thx for your
    humanistic services ⚖
    Very appreciative 💯☯️

  • @Aetriex
    @Aetriex Рік тому +1

    20:00 I feel like this is rather simple. Base reality is pure consciousness. Everything else is a simulation of that consciousness. All beings, all realities, all things, all places, all times, all dimensions, ALL things are simulations of the pure consciousness, and it is the thing creating them. So, yes, we are in a simulation, but that doesn't make us any less "real", we are simply shadows casted by the source of our being, the state of pure consciousness.
    People hear simulation and they think technology, but a simulation is by definition: imitation of a process, or the action of pretending.
    All realities are simulations of being that one source (pure consciousness) is creating to experience things. God is pretending to be all of these things, its a fun game to play when you can forget that you are all things.

  • @jamesokeeffe6353
    @jamesokeeffe6353 Рік тому

    I love the facial expressions from Danica as she listens and reacts !

  • @wojohowitz5432
    @wojohowitz5432 Рік тому +1

    Wonderful conversation once again. This just hit me: If perhaps the universe is indeed expanding, and we are looking out.. towards the unknown, but like the sphere of earth we would just arrive back at the start eventually, once we set out.... and the Universe/ consciousness may be the same?... So we are looking out and out and out and not seeing anything.... shouldn't we just turn around and look back..... to see what is in front of us?🤯

    • @dawnisin
      @dawnisin Рік тому

      They say to know the future, study the past

  • @anniem8133
    @anniem8133 Рік тому +2

    Love this podcast and I, like you, loved the movie "Contact "
    Taking an Astronomy course in summer of 1969 heightened my sense to explore the universe and my spirituality
    Reading a science book in 7th grade about Albert Einstein and his theory of relativity which also opened my mind to study Astrophysics to Archeology
    I love learning and contemplating our human race and the knowledge we gain through a collective consciousness.
    Watching the original TV series called "Cosmos" with Carl Sagan as well as
    the current time presented byNeil DeGrass Tyson
    Keep the podcast coming 👍🥰

  • @melsmysticrealm3768
    @melsmysticrealm3768 Рік тому +2

    Deja vu is an interesting thing that happens for me from time to time. I wonder if that is like time travel
    Thank you for the brilliant insights!

  • @castinglighthealing
    @castinglighthealing Рік тому +1

    Great topic - "Is time speeding up?"

  • @PamelaLeighRichards
    @PamelaLeighRichards Рік тому +2

    🎼🎶I love your style of podcasting Danica. I'm so glad this crossed my path today! I think we have some Mirrors with each other and just how we see things and want to learn more ... like ... can we fly a spaceship purely with thought? Even that is difficult to describe. Think it, or even NOT 'think it' and in a flash you are where you want to go. I've had lucid dreams doing that and FEEELS like hOMe to me ~ now on to listening to this wonderful interview with Brian Greene.🙏

  • @naturepeeps922
    @naturepeeps922 Рік тому +1

    We need to understand density and dimensions very few and far in between

  • @paulterry1232
    @paulterry1232 Рік тому +2

    If I'm ever picked up by an Alien Spaceship, I'm working hard to convince them to pick up you Danica and Brian Greene. 😎 Listen to all your podcasts. 615

  • @AdjacentDoor
    @AdjacentDoor Рік тому +2

    All is one, consciousness is fundamental

  • @jonathanrodrick5209
    @jonathanrodrick5209 Рік тому

    She's awesome. Love her curiosity!

  • @SuperBlinding
    @SuperBlinding Рік тому

    I enjoy that Brian Greene is a very nice humble man.

  • @EmadIbnahaten-c3y
    @EmadIbnahaten-c3y Рік тому

    great pod, and i know how you felt about his discription ;) entropy and expansion and light.

  • @nayanendusaha9781
    @nayanendusaha9781 Рік тому

    Amazing : one of your best podcasts ever

  • @michaelschmidt8752
    @michaelschmidt8752 Рік тому

    New part of the house? Beautiful home Danica. and as always awesome show 8836

  • @RavenTD46
    @RavenTD46 Рік тому +1

    Danica on the stair landing? The interdimensional space between up and down.

  • @FractalSoul1111
    @FractalSoul1111 Рік тому +4

    Spiritually, I do like a nice blend of woo-woo and science; so, this was extremely interesting.
    I read an analogy for psychedelics stating it’s like barging through a door you weren’t invited to enter. 💯

  • @kevinalderton2846
    @kevinalderton2846 Рік тому

    So interesting and mind boggling....so many questions every answer has another question

  • @jameelbarnes3458
    @jameelbarnes3458 Рік тому +3

    AGI gonna create new math for us and new physics and it’s gonna be able to break it down and explain why it matters. We’ll probably even be able to create new alien structures that’s never been observed before.

  • @Terryadfg
    @Terryadfg Рік тому

    You have so many fascinating interesting guests on your podcasts! How do I apply them to enhance my daily life? Way I look at it! Crazy thoughts come from drug’s! Kidding

  • @JDavidChilders
    @JDavidChilders Рік тому

    Learning past our limits is a great way to phrase the best method for growth.

  • @custommolding349
    @custommolding349 Рік тому +1

    This was very informative in the way of seeing life through another lense of observation. I am very skeptical about even my perception of what I observe (which sometimes is not accepted by many, i.e. instances of telepathic connections with people). I think if we could get a group of scholars together and modernized the ritual of the Iawasca or even psilocybin that would make the group feel within their comfort zone. That we could possibly help facilitate bringing the new spiritual movement together with science. What could that come up with, an new understanding or just a distortion?

  • @billy3779
    @billy3779 Рік тому

    Thank you for these "Mind Blowing" podcasts

  • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546
    @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546 10 місяців тому

    Thank you to Danica for this podcast.
    Any comments on CIG & the Electromagnetic Spectrum would be helpful. Here is a new post on Mariangela Lisanti's site that I just made.
    I'm posting it here because I'm hopeful the intelligent people who come here may have something to contribute. And, answer my balloon question.
    In my Theory, CIG Theory, Mariangela Lisanti has helped me to incorporate my understanding of the Electromagnetic Spectrum into CIG. Today I have documented a reply to one of my prior posts.
    So, within the MTS equation we have all wavelengths, from the shortest (Black Hole) to the longest (Dark Energy). Dark Matter then is a wavelength not as long as Dark Energy. But CIG Theory still needs a more direct link to the reality of the electromagnetic spectrum in the context that the spectrum proceeds at "c". Are we sure it always proceeds at "c"? Maxwell made this link yes, but in CIG, the "c" portion of the spectrum is reserved for Dark Energy, while the lesser rates = more solid forms of matter. Quantum Gravity appears resolved in CIG. But this aspect of melting CIG into the spectrum because of the consistency of the spectrum to travel at "c" confuses me. Any help would be appreciated. CIG resolves so many quantum and cosmological conundrums. We know it is correct. While inherent to CIG is the link between Dark Matter and Dark Energy, the direct reference to Dark Matter waves was absorbed from Dr. Lisanti's Simon Foundation video on Dark Matter. She is amazing. The offering then is that we extend the wavelength to Dark Energy which is much much longer than even Dark Matter. The MTS equation links Black Holes to Dark Energy. As stated above though, that issue of "c" as applied to the spectrum bothers me. HELP!
    New as of Today:
    Reply
    The Douglas W. Lipp Channel
    Internal Note: OK, We have MTS where all Matter and Space resides, where the curvature exists (Gravity), the Strong Force, the Weak Force, and the Electromagnetic Spectrum, where all motion exists as well, where everything exists outside of "nothing" which I gather exists outside the equation - perhaps we place a circle around MTS to contemplate "nothing" (think about it). So, we have seen the pictures [ 9en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EM_Spectrum_Properties_(Amplitude_Corrected,_Bitmap).png ] associated with the spectrum, yes, as for instance buildings, humans, molecules, butterflies. And these have different frequencies, yes, but still travel at "c" per that which Maxwell found. Now we know that full "c" in MTS is how Matter turns to Space, yes, so my confusion above (HELP) was to normalize "why" the travel at "c" for the humans, butterflies, etc., essentially the entire spectrum while "c" is reserved for Dark Energy in MTS. That was my confusion. I'm now thinking that since any motion creates a new Spatial environment, yes, per CIG, and that new Space pushes upon the existing environment to displace, at "c" in an manner similar to an infinitely long rod that when pushed at one end, travels at "c" in a manner such that the other end moves accordingly instantaneously so so far away. So even at the near end of MTS, the Matter side , any motion will travel at "c" due to the displacement since a small but distinct spatial environment has manifested. Though it will still retain itself as Matter. But when the entirety of Matter travels at "c", the matter turns to the Dark Energy. So this paragraph is an attempt to normalize my confusion in the above paragraph in the manner described. it has helped me to understand how the spectrum travels at "c" - it's due to the creation of the new Space - as in the rod analogy. Any replies are helpful. We've got a lot to learn but MTS should help.
    Learn CIG Theory today!

  • @robertvandeloo
    @robertvandeloo Рік тому +1

    Time is only relevant to the human experience is it right in front of you Danica you have an awesome mind

  • @diamondblack3776
    @diamondblack3776 Рік тому +1

    in "Rule of Law" there is only 1 rule.
    Comply, or Law will eliminate you.
    It encompasses the entire 3D realm as beings residing within it are restricted to complying to it's "physics" eg. the meat suit on the planet is NOT suitable for space or very deep water diving or high velocity movement. So beings within 3D HAVE TO comply with the realms parameters or you will eliminated.

  • @beingbeforetheveil
    @beingbeforetheveil Рік тому

    4:12 this is the great thing I realized about our project cataloging Pre-Birth Experiences which was although it was an out there subject for most the research & science has already been done & around & proven for me 🙏💙❤️⚔️

  • @shawnmichael428
    @shawnmichael428 Рік тому +2

    DP , as it was told to me , i think were all making our way home ......or walking each other home .

  • @alex79suited
    @alex79suited Рік тому +1

    That epiphany you mentioned if referring to VEM =0Msquared. That's a PhD, it's a contribution to science and education moving it forward. 👍 incase your were wondering lol. That's about 20 years of understanding. Just sayin. Have a great day. And try a blanket some place without lights around take the whatever lol 🍄 and just look up it's incredible. Peace ✌️ from Canada, eh

  • @castinglighthealing
    @castinglighthealing Рік тому

    It's also about perspective - a child is born and lives his first year of life. The first year represents 100% of the child's life experience. The second year, one year represents 50% of life experience. The third year, 33% of life experience. The older we get, experiences are repeated i.e. daily routines to where our brains no longer focus on every mundane thing, but explores new and out-of-the-ordinary things that become time markers. The fewer the markers, the less time there is recorded. Thus by perspective, time moves faster.
    But also as an Energetic Healer, I have witnessed that time is fluid and it is moving faster on an energetic level. My wife, my fellow Healers all concur.
    Peace🙏🏼
    Gavin

  • @Christopherurich33
    @Christopherurich33 Рік тому +3

    Passion, diligence, patience, are just sum of the great keys too this beautiful universe there's a lot more keys still out there

  • @beingbeforetheveil
    @beingbeforetheveil Рік тому

    10:33 when he said that I thought what if everything a conscious person creates also has a fragment of consciousness idk sounds cool tho

  • @carrollvance
    @carrollvance Рік тому +1

    Still looking for the answer to the hard problem of consciousness. Is consciousness even fundamental?
    Consciousness = is_a_dual_of( Mind)
    Matter/Space/Time = Computation = is_a_dual_of( Mind(Creating) )
    Therefore the relationship of Consciousness to Matter is a construct of Mind completely outside of Consciousness and that construct cannot be known within the Consciousness construct.
    The answer to the hard problem of consciousness cannot be found within consciousness. Therefore it cannot be found in the domain of "thinking about consciousness".
    This is why there are never any answers to the question of the root consciousness/matter relationship by conscious agents.
    Sure there are relationships like consciousness seeming to leave when in a sleep state. That is not at all what is being discussed here.
    Consciousness is not fundamental. Matter/Space/Time is not fundamental. They are both constructs by Mind.
    Until one experiences Mind, this all sounds like madness. Like the crazy manuscripts that Dr. Greene receives.
    No answer of any significant value can be give to any question of this stream of consciousness..

  • @52soccerstar
    @52soccerstar Рік тому +1

    What if spin is the next dimension?

  • @officialdandaman
    @officialdandaman Рік тому +1

    Aloha from Hawaii 😎🤙

  • @JDavidChilders
    @JDavidChilders Рік тому

    A great book that details one physicist's journey of his understanding of the thought processes is "The Jazz of Physics" by Stephon Alexander.

  • @georgeshepherd3381
    @georgeshepherd3381 Рік тому +1

    Thank you! Liking

  • @KilleansRowMusic
    @KilleansRowMusic Рік тому

    How can we be careful in the ways of a physicist, such that we can always distinguish the little c (crazy) from the big C (Crazy!)? Brian touches on this wrt priors.For instance he knows the Simulation Hypothesis is not falsifiable from the standpoint of computation, yet admits going with his gut regarding whether we really are in a simulation. It's important also to understand that since our own corpus of knowledge has similar bounds we can't always rule out the big C (Crazy) stuff. We can attempt to judge whether some priors have little c origins-- and so are not entirely ruled out even though they are "edge cases"

  • @jenisunfruit
    @jenisunfruit Рік тому +1

    I listened on Spotify today and I have to say this was decent. But I felt like I was listening to a traditional western medicine doctor, with a teeny bit of an open mind and thats it. (make sense?) I'd like to see him chat with Richard Rudd.

  • @Christopherurich33
    @Christopherurich33 Рік тому +1

    Thank you

  • @Christopherurich33
    @Christopherurich33 Рік тому

    Just know what I explain will complete a circle of understanding of my lecture

  • @paulbouvier1997
    @paulbouvier1997 Рік тому

    I have some crazy thoughts about Danica, hahaha

  • @videobob
    @videobob Рік тому

    Expressing thoughts and expressing reasons become harder if one attempts in a written formulation

  • @scootergem
    @scootergem Рік тому

    Is this the Danica Patrick that wreaked so many cars for nascar? She did so well leading up to Indy.

  • @JustinLanier
    @JustinLanier Рік тому +1

    Pretty sure mindful consciousness surfing will take you to another dimension B

  • @paulterry1232
    @paulterry1232 Рік тому

    Was this taped on June 6, its July 20th

  • @0-by-1_Publishing_LLC
    @0-by-1_Publishing_LLC Рік тому

    (1:12:20) *BG: **_"The universe doesn't give a hoot if we do X, Y, or Z."_* ... And I would expect nothing less from a _theoretical physicist._ What the universe (Existence) gains from self-aware humans doing X, Y, and Z is *new information.* After 13.7 billion years of evolution, *value judgments* are the name of the game. ... Existence put it all out there, and now it's time to categorize it all based on value.

  • @kayakMike1000
    @kayakMike1000 Рік тому

    The math is pretty important to meaningfully apply physics in modern technology. There's a bunch of math in the specific engineering, like a rocket, engine, reactor...

  • @nayanendusaha9781
    @nayanendusaha9781 3 місяці тому

    fusion reaction ; a race to tame clean endless energy ...a podcast would be enlightening

  • @Mar108108
    @Mar108108 Рік тому

    Thank you very much :)

  • @rumblethis2023
    @rumblethis2023 Рік тому

    Interview Dan winter!

  • @Christopherurich33
    @Christopherurich33 Рік тому +1

    Also remember water holds memory so this can take you down a rabbit hole

  • @beingbeforetheveil
    @beingbeforetheveil Рік тому

    0:46 fun stuff

  • @StardustAscending
    @StardustAscending Рік тому +1

    Thank you Danika, for another AMAZING podcast! You always ask the right questions…. And I’m of the theory that all scientific theories are not necessarily complete.
    Once again , you provoke our minds to EXPAND🥰🙏 thank you 🙏

  • @drblast
    @drblast Рік тому +1

    btw, Danica, your podcasts are extremely interesting!

    • @DanicaPatrick
      @DanicaPatrick  Рік тому +2

      Glad you like them!

    • @drblast
      @drblast Рік тому +1

      @@DanicaPatrick what you said at the beginning was oh so cogent; you said to always have more to learn about and talk about than we know about - or something to that effect! That is wisdom!

  • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546

    As we know, CIG Theory reinterprets Einstein's Field Equation in terms of the "=" sign, as opposed to a proportionality only.
    Matter is curved spacetime and space is unfolded matter.
    And, as regards the worst prediction in the history of Physics, perhaps some mathematician (Gregory ???) could learn CIG Theory and calculate that the value obtained via the Standard Model Quantum mechanical version as represented by the 10 to the 93rd g/cm3 Zero Point Ground State Matter that has not yet fully reached its spatial dimension. How much faster would that matter have to travel to reach the full spatiality of the vacuum density of 10 to the minus 29 g/cm3 ? Then, this difference in the rates of motion of the entities will renormalize the values.
    One may see that the Ground State responsible for the so called Standard Model Zero Point is actually the slowest state, and therefore the most massive. Then it is no wonder that the 10 to the 93rd g/cm3 value is so much more massive, as the mass has not yet turned into the vacuum.

    • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546
      @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546 Рік тому

      (Brian ???)

    • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546
      @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546 Рік тому

      In the graph at 3:17, and the accompanying comments, it is stated that Zero Point Energy or Vacuum Energy is the lowest possible energy that a quantum system can have, and 3:41 states that the ground state (1/137) is the lowest Energy. But the lowest energy (rate of motion) is the most massive per CIG Theory. Therefore, the 10 to the 93rd g/cm3 exists as the unit area is so much more massive as it has not turned to space. The space exists as 10 to the minus 29 g/cm3 - so much more diluted density. The Ground State is actually the greatest density mass since it is the slowest. CIG Theory explains the Vacuum catastrophe in this manner.
      The times above are taken from:
      ua-cam.com/video/0UBoo4KICCY/v-deo.html&ab_channel=SeethePattern

    • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546
      @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546 Рік тому

      To perhaps clarify - the smaller the vibration (wavelength) the higher the energy. Wavelength and frequency being inverse to one another. E=hf. High frequency = high energy (i.e. gamma versus microwave) QM uses the shortest wavelength. Why I don't know. GR is using the longest wavelength. The vacuum of space. This is like comparing the two different sides of the MTS equation. A long long wavelength (small frequency) exists at the Dark Energy side (S side of MTS) (10 to the minus 29 g/cm3) while the shortest wavelength (Planck & 5.16 to the 93rd g/cm3) (high frequency) exists as the extreme density of a black hole (M side of the MTS equation) . Remember The MTS equation is from 0 mph to "c" in the MTS direction. In the STM direction, we go from "c" to 0mph. And with Lorentz transformations along the way. [As a side note I recall I believe out of Chicago two scientists saying that as things were brought an Bose-Einstein condensate, they approached a black hole, well, this appears evident in the MTS equation as the M (black hole) side of the equation is one of no motion. I believe I left a nervous and blathering phone message to one of them some ten or so years ago. ] What I have just realized now is that there are some 10 to the order of 120 magnitudes between the M and S side of the MTS equation. In your vacuum catastrophe you are comparing a short wavelength (high mass-high frequency ) QM environment to a long wavelength (low mass - high space-low frequency) GR environment. Why? The zero point energy of QM has nothing to do with the vacuum of space. You are mixing apples and peanuts.

  • @Christopherurich33
    @Christopherurich33 Рік тому +1

    I'll take on that challenge and my lecture will be out of this world bet I can explain it weather you prove it or not that's on y'all

  • @JDavidChilders
    @JDavidChilders Рік тому

    Meditation is very simple, but it's not easy.
    A great book about the study of psychedelics is "DMT The Spirit Molecule" by Dr. Rick Strassman
    There are some mind boggling stories in that book.

  • @keithmetcalf5548
    @keithmetcalf5548 Рік тому

    My favorite gal Danica! ❤️🍑 And my favorite scientist Brian Greene ☄️ you had me at fundamentals, this one's got to be 🔥🔥🔥

  • @yoyo-jc5qg
    @yoyo-jc5qg Рік тому

    The brain is insane, everytime we go to sleep it simulates a universe that we time travel to ... pure craziness 🤯

  • @MileHighVibz
    @MileHighVibz Рік тому +2

    👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼✨🪄🪬🧬💈

  • @Throstur05
    @Throstur05 Рік тому

    Excellent, extra dimensions, time. Ai will be everywhere after 3-5 years, those who were well built.

  • @julianroccopesa3491
    @julianroccopesa3491 Рік тому +1

    ❤❤❤, Ty ✌️🙏❤️🕯️💯🎈🌻😊

  • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546
    @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546 Рік тому +2

    I am not a lunatic making stuff up. I resent that Brian. My theory is fairly well grounded without math. I am asking the science community to apply their rigor. But the foundation has been laid.