Professor Brian Cox CBE | Black Holes, Life On Mars, Space and Time, Fractals | Ep. 143

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @TucBroder
    @TucBroder 2 роки тому +52

    Brian Cox is the teacher I wish I had...
    He explains everything so calmly, and he doesn't talk down to you.
    He makes sure you understand, by using language even I would understand.

    • @New-ye2fl
      @New-ye2fl Місяць тому

      Yeah he’s great with language, always involves himself when dumbing down for us😂

  • @deannabanman243
    @deannabanman243 2 роки тому +65

    As a teacher, I think Brian is a shining exemplar of the passion and curiosity we should instil in our student. The connections he makes that are traditionally considered separate, such as democracy to black holes, is next level. This is what I hope to inspire ❤️🌎

    • @garyskinner2422
      @garyskinner2422 11 місяців тому +2

      With that attitude, you definitely will

    • @RichardWilliamsowdrick
      @RichardWilliamsowdrick 11 місяців тому +3

      The passion Brian has, perhaps illuminates the difference between Teachers, and Educators?

    • @scottballinger40
      @scottballinger40 11 місяців тому +1

      ​@@RichardWilliamsowdrickHear, hear! Well said

  • @ronaldweir712
    @ronaldweir712 2 роки тому +81

    Danica has impressed me as an interviewer on Sky F1 where she asks really awkward and probing questions. She and Brian certainly gave us a very good show. More please.

    • @DanicaPatrick
      @DanicaPatrick  2 роки тому +11

      Thanks for watching!

    • @M33K3RZ
      @M33K3RZ Рік тому +1

      She is the Next Art Bell.

    • @MrAfrojoe89
      @MrAfrojoe89 Рік тому

      Pretty smart

    • @dennisholst4322
      @dennisholst4322 Рік тому +2

      Pretty and smart

    • @johnford6967
      @johnford6967 11 місяців тому

      Danica don"t understand but a little of your chat with brian but its so cool listening anyway!

  • @mdre3mnc
    @mdre3mnc 2 роки тому +27

    Danica is such a great host and importantly allows Brian to speak uninterrupted. What an amazing guest and conversation as well. Love them both !

  • @padrigderoiste3220
    @padrigderoiste3220 2 роки тому +18

    A host that lets someone answer their questions (smart not dumb questions). A brilliant person answering the questions in depth but very understandable way. Well done for both!

  • @Cfullerrrr
    @Cfullerrrr 2 роки тому +116

    Have him on more! Could listen to Brian talk about physics and space time for days.

    • @RobBCactive
      @RobBCactive 2 роки тому

      @USA TAMONDOMUNI Incorrect, old Norse influenced English but High German is a relatively modern standardisation so your "from" relation is obviously wrong.
      Modern German gives English words like Schadenfreude and Zeitgeist while Germany in Germany is heavily polluted by English

    • @mikemorris4548
      @mikemorris4548 2 роки тому +2

      @@RobBCactive, when someone types an ESSAY like that, which is clearly full of drivel, on what is basically a social media base, you know they're talking a load of cr*p, one reason is because it's that long, not many are going to read through the whole of that fgs, you may as well switch the screen off and read a darn book.

    • @RobBCactive
      @RobBCactive 2 роки тому

      @@mikemorris4548 well I'm interested in languages, so it was funny to see. But yes, I politely told him he pasted in obvious drivel.

    • @slow-mo_moonbuggy
      @slow-mo_moonbuggy 2 роки тому

      What is it about space time do you enjoy?

    • @ufoman4468
      @ufoman4468 2 роки тому

      He talks shite . Just looks after his own career. Mans a fake , As are all Astro Physics Scientists.

  • @damonwallace4490
    @damonwallace4490 2 роки тому +44

    Danica, I want to praise you for being a great interviewer and more importantly, a great listener. Most interviewers don't have the ability to listen, to let the guest share their knowledge and experiences, but you do.
    Love that!
    I can also tell that you have a genuine interest in the topics of your guests. I appreciate a real interest because it makes for a real, deep thinking interview.

    • @jameskelly8506
      @jameskelly8506 2 роки тому

      Danica went on to interviewing because she never really competed well in races or driving. She tried several types of formats, and never was very good.

    • @tedscott1478
      @tedscott1478 Рік тому +2

      ​​@@jameskelly8506 okay so what? She's great at what she's doing now and she's very intelligent and well read about physics and science generally.👍🙂

    • @eddie1975utube
      @eddie1975utube 10 місяців тому +1

      @@jameskelly8506she made it to Formula Indy and NASCAR. That means she’s more successful than 99% of race car drivers and can most certainly run laps around you and me.

  • @truthteller1246
    @truthteller1246 2 роки тому +7

    Always love watching Brian cox..as a fellow brit he's well loved over here..hes so down to earth..pardon the pun... fantastic watch

  • @dtrjones
    @dtrjones 2 роки тому +35

    Thank you Prof Brian Cox and Danica Patrick, I honestly can't remember an interview I enjoyed more in recent memory. Wonderful show!

  • @the_spiritual_librarian153
    @the_spiritual_librarian153 Рік тому +3

    Danica finds the most interesting people to have a conversation with. Loved this guy’s work for years and years. She’s very skilled at covering numerous topics and always guiding it to the meaning of our existence here

  • @davidbowser5534
    @davidbowser5534 2 роки тому +21

    My grandson and I once saw a couple that had sunburned after a day at the beach. When I asked him to think about how powerful the object that caused their sunburn must be to burn their skin from 93 million miles away. That really blew his mind! Now he can’t get enough science documents. It doesn’t matter if it’s about weather, nature, space exploration, the ocean, construction or farming he’s all in. You just never know what will peak a kids interest and set them off on their voyage of discovery.

    • @davebruneau6068
      @davebruneau6068 2 роки тому

      The "Power" of the Sun is moot. Its Ultraviolet Radiation that caused the sunburns. Tanning beds & Lamps will do it,too,& you can be within a few feet of them.
      Oh,& its "Pique",not "Peak"

    • @scottballinger40
      @scottballinger40 11 місяців тому

      Truth

  • @alanhaynes9672
    @alanhaynes9672 2 роки тому +231

    If there is one Brit (other than Sir David) who deserves to be a knight, it is Sir Brian. A true national treasure

    • @siroswaldfortitude5346
      @siroswaldfortitude5346 2 роки тому +13

      I believe he is in possession of the 'One Ring', as he never seems to age

    • @serevinvukele8046
      @serevinvukele8046 2 роки тому +8

      He's a clown.

    • @serevinvukele8046
      @serevinvukele8046 2 роки тому +1

      @@siroswaldfortitude5346 Just for Men.

    • @pabloandersonbye1069
      @pabloandersonbye1069 2 роки тому +1

      What a bloke picked to candy please mums of kids , as he reads off everyone else’s papers .. every scientist ends up wrong a 100 years on .

    • @Man_fay_the_Bru
      @Man_fay_the_Bru 2 роки тому +7

      @@pabloandersonbye1069 what about all the scientists who’ve been right then,including fckn EINSTEIN😏🤫

  • @jeffk1482
    @jeffk1482 2 роки тому +43

    Okay - I just stumbled on Danica's channel here in the middle of the night - and have to say I'm hugely impressed. The lady obviously has a deep, natural curiosity about a great many things, and the way she steered the conversation to let Prof. Cox "do his thing" was masterful. I'll definitely be back for more.

    • @mikemorris4548
      @mikemorris4548 2 роки тому

      She has the skills, it's all good. Anyone with a half decent brain, can do what she is doing, the thing is, not many people, believe me, have the capacity to think outside the box, and keep questioning things that others are seriously curious about, most people are seriously narrow minded.

    • @jayh9529
      @jayh9529 2 роки тому +1

      @@mikemorris4548 hibbeler productions channel may help you out that box

    • @nicolasnicolas3889
      @nicolasnicolas3889 2 роки тому

      You must still be asleep....this guy is a complete tool

    • @nicolasnicolas3889
      @nicolasnicolas3889 2 роки тому

      Brian Cox is a complete new world order mind control muppet, he's just a really boring parrot, I only dropped on here to leave your this very sensible comment in amongst the mindless undeserved zombie adulation which is constantly showered upon him by everyone except those who can think for themselves, incidentally I disproved the entire NASA space program, using there own numbers, without ever having to resort to the endless visual fakery and CGI BS which they produce, I disproved ever supposed space probe EVER, on one side of A$, using there own numbers, and this physics genius? who I can tell spends most, if not all of his time consciously lying, is a complete dullard stooge, I can show you my math if you like. Anyone can do it. Have a more enlightened day....if you can....xD

  • @anja2716
    @anja2716 2 роки тому +63

    Drove 10 hours to catch this "Quantum Rockstar" in Vancouver. Would of driven days. Cannot get enough of his genius intelligence, captivating presentation and youthful, contagious energy. A unique "Star" in OUR universe 🌠

    • @T0mat0S0up
      @T0mat0S0up 2 роки тому +1

      I assume Rockstar since he was in D:Ream.

    • @anja2716
      @anja2716 2 роки тому

      @@T0mat0S0up more of a play on words for his expertise on our "Rock" Earth and all the surrounding "Stars."

    • @FatherTau
      @FatherTau 2 роки тому +3

      Well said…truly captivating brilliance.

    • @mrtoothless
      @mrtoothless 2 роки тому +2

      would have*

    • @seltonk5136
      @seltonk5136 2 роки тому

      I drove 9 minutes to see Chewbacca Mom at an Arby's

  • @JoshB42069
    @JoshB42069 2 роки тому +38

    Brian Cox is so eloquent and makes everything incredibly interesting and easy to understand. The wonders of the cosmos are truly fascinating.

    • @taistelija86
      @taistelija86 2 роки тому

      And one of the greatest things listening to him, is to hear his smile when he speaks.

    • @thermalrain_yt9725
      @thermalrain_yt9725 2 роки тому +1

      He is definitely one of the best. When he quoted one of his heroes Carl Sagan I thought to myself one day I'm gonna quote Brian Cox quoting Sagan lol

    • @RobBCactive
      @RobBCactive 2 роки тому +1

      @@thermalrain_yt9725 Carl Sagan would appear on a BBC Science documentary programme that I used to sneak out of bed to watch, as my parents would stay up to see it.
      Brian's a little younger, but I imagine he was inspired by the same documentaries.

    • @thermalrain_yt9725
      @thermalrain_yt9725 2 роки тому

      @@RobBCactive yeah I bet. I'm only 36 so I never really knew who the guys these guys talk about. Sagan, Feynman and those inspirational people.
      I got Tyson, Cox and bill Nye

    • @RobBCactive
      @RobBCactive 2 роки тому

      @@thermalrain_yt9725 Feynman lives in UA-cam, my Bro-in-Law and I actually binge watched a load of Feynman lectures during one of their holiday stays. I moved abroad and am near the sea.
      There's really no excuse, Feynman is far more accessible now than ever before

  • @qthelost
    @qthelost 2 роки тому +9

    Danica, I've only just discovered your channel and it's so wonderful to see your intense interest in science. This was a fascinating conversation between yourself and Brian. For me, Brian Cox filled the void that Carl Sagan left. Thank you for this video.

  • @carl_d_music
    @carl_d_music 2 роки тому +46

    Danica does a really great job here letting Professor Cox just go off and do his thing. Such a fascinating guy and excellent communicator

  • @NarenLumpkin
    @NarenLumpkin 11 місяців тому +2

    We have learned a grain and forgotten a dune. May we understand the understander to let the understanding begin.❤❤❤

  • @Showmetheevidence-
    @Showmetheevidence- 2 роки тому +6

    I love Brian Cox, one of those rare scientists/specialists who can articulate difficult ideas and concepts to the rest of us to understand!!!

    • @mikemorris4548
      @mikemorris4548 2 роки тому

      Exactly, being able to explain something that's actually hard or confusing at times to understand, in simply terms.

    • @MultiBikerboy1
      @MultiBikerboy1 2 роки тому

      Hope he is able to get his head around the ‘UAP’ issue currently being discussed in Congress. He has always dismissed the very idea that we are already being visited.

  • @patrickgravel9261
    @patrickgravel9261 2 місяці тому +1

    Brian Cox is the man. He is humble and caring.

  • @Popcorncedar
    @Popcorncedar 2 роки тому +5

    I wish there was a talk like this from Cox for every evening of the rest of my life.

    • @NarenLumpkin
      @NarenLumpkin 11 місяців тому +1

      Seek and ye shall find.❤❤❤

  • @majellavito5784
    @majellavito5784 Рік тому +2

    Danica, this is a side of you I never could’ve imagined! I was captured by your interviews with Matthias de Stefano, Dr. Greer, Darryl Anka, Josh Gates (love that guy on his shows) and now Brian Cox! You really do ask genuine, intellectually charged, from-the-heart questions that captivate the discussions! We are likeminded in your interests on metaphysics, alien life, ET, pursuits of discovering the universe, spiritualities etc…. Glad you live in Phoenix AZ, I feel your energy & am glad you emanate positivity 🙏🏼✨

  • @chadwickseronio9363
    @chadwickseronio9363 2 роки тому +16

    Love Brian, lovely bloke his science docs are superb, also didn't know much about Danica other than the racing and the Media making her seem a bit abrasive, I stand corrected, lovely, intelligent, great interviewer, genuine sense of wonder for physics, deffo a fan now👍

    • @ufoman4468
      @ufoman4468 2 роки тому

      Cox is a fake fool in denial. As are all Astro Physicists .Who are looking after their own fake bullshit careers.

  • @RobBCactive
    @RobBCactive 2 роки тому +25

    First time I saw a Danica interview, it was a pleasant surprise as the questions were fresh, a little child like, were inspired from intellectual curiosity, yet followed from the answers even when the theory is beyond human understanding. The result meant that the information Brian gave was different from typical interviews.
    I wish it were possible to take Brian & Danica's holographs down the pub for a few hours conversation 😉😉

    • @scottballinger40
      @scottballinger40 11 місяців тому

      Try Magic Mushrooms... conversations for hours on end with whomever you wish!! Best part is they come to you.

  • @juliafox7904
    @juliafox7904 2 роки тому +21

    Brian is so good at educating us- his sense of wonder transmits!

    • @stolearovigor281
      @stolearovigor281 2 роки тому

      Brainwashing

    • @ufoman4468
      @ufoman4468 2 роки тому

      Cox is a fake fool in denial. As are all Astro Physicists .Who are looking after their own fake bullshit careers.

  • @barryjamesw
    @barryjamesw 2 роки тому +5

    It's nice to have mind bending facts and ideas described in a way that is relatively understandable! Brian Cox is superb at that! And a good interviewer too! The first time I have encountered this lady - great questions and lets her guest talk.

  • @cosmoslogic9088
    @cosmoslogic9088 2 роки тому +5

    Danica Patrick and Brian Cox Thank you for a wholesome encounter of a very complicated system as the Cosmos. Information is never lost Quantum mechanics will not allow it to happen. We are breathing in the atoms of past generations all the time not a joke at all. Thank you for this sense of thoughts on a very deep subject .

  • @canderson1955
    @canderson1955 2 роки тому +3

    Two very talented people. Love Danica on Sky Sports. They need to sign her full time.

  • @MrBeltaine
    @MrBeltaine Рік тому

    Sir Brian is truly gifted. His enthusiasm whilst discussing a subject is beyond compare. Good on you Brian.
    Thx Danica for having Brian as a guest. Great interview!

  • @tedherrera9180
    @tedherrera9180 2 роки тому +17

    Awesome episode! Was able to catch Brian's Tour while he was in Indianapolis. Thoroughly enjoyed the show, he is a fascinating individual which is not only entertaining but also informative. He makes you think differently.

  • @summerguy1022
    @summerguy1022 11 місяців тому +1

    Wow! I am absolutely riveted watching your interview with Prof. Cox. He is so brilliant deciphering the subject of "space and time." It's amazing how you take it all in and respond with such clarity.

  • @gallo5263
    @gallo5263 2 роки тому +8

    What a fantastic video. Really great questions, that cut to the heart of some complex stuff, and asked the stuff that I would want to ask. Professor Brian Cox is just amazing, his intellect, his humility, his ability to engage and educate is just staggering. Thank you

  • @peterbray4214
    @peterbray4214 2 роки тому +31

    Fabulous interview. This should be taught in school instead of religion that takes us backwards. Wonderful.

    • @herewardofbourn8197
      @herewardofbourn8197 2 роки тому +1

      You mean mainstream organised religions yeh

    • @jerrdog5568
      @jerrdog5568 2 роки тому

      i say do both. knowledge is power.

    • @danielvazquez7482
      @danielvazquez7482 2 роки тому

      I think the education that’s needed should go to adults. People should know truth and reality prior to posting, reposting, regurgitating and spreading information.

    • @ZeHoSmusician
      @ZeHoSmusician 2 роки тому

      In proper countries, such things are taught--and religion is sidelined (mostly taught because it's part of fuman culture and history)... :)

    • @geraldbutler5484
      @geraldbutler5484 2 роки тому +1

      Yes! Look what happened to the marvellous Islamic scientific endeavours when they turned to religious interpretations.

  • @bluecheese1066
    @bluecheese1066 2 роки тому +8

    I'm chuffed to stumble upon your channel, Danica. I've always rooted for you in Indycar and NASCAR, and have recently enjoyed your spots in the Sky F1 commentary. Now I find you doing some mega-interesting interviews such as this one! Loving it, cheers! Love and peace from the UK.

  • @burbt6069
    @burbt6069 2 роки тому +4

    Great interview Danica. Your inquisitive and thought provoking questions definitely brought out the best in Prof.Brian Cox. Well done! Burb.T

  • @neileyre6019
    @neileyre6019 2 роки тому +5

    Brian is an amazingly talented and knowledgeable chap. If no-one has heard of it, he does a show on BBC radio called the Infinite Monkey Cage. Some very interesting programs over a very wide range of subjects with some humour thrown in. All available as podcasts and about 13 years worth of shows…highly recommended. As an added bonus the theme tune for the show is written and performed by the incredible Eric Idle. Keep at it Bri!

  • @felixreali7101
    @felixreali7101 2 роки тому +18

    Not a lot of people would be capable of distracting me from Danica Patrick long enough to actually listen to what they were saying...but Brian Cox is one such person. So knowledgeable and eloquent...and also so down to earth...I could listen to him for hours on end. And it was nice to see Danica asking great questions and really grasping what was said. A lot of the time, during such interviews, the guest would be interrupted constantly and would be completely overshadowed by silly, vain remarks...but not here. Can't wait to see more such interviews....

    • @Jay-ft3xh
      @Jay-ft3xh 2 роки тому +2

      Had to put the screen down. Tiupriddy.

  • @rcmakingtracks18
    @rcmakingtracks18 11 місяців тому +2

    Just gripping. Could have listened for hours more... brilliant. Thanks for sharing. John

  • @johnpalgrave9331
    @johnpalgrave9331 2 роки тому +15

    Such a pleasure to watch ; Brian's genius and enthusiasm and Danica's attentive and interested demeanour, equal in the dialogue - exceptional !

  • @deanpickess1152
    @deanpickess1152 11 місяців тому +1

    Just mind blowing. I could watch Paul Cox all day. Amazing channel 🎉

  • @jackoboyle2833
    @jackoboyle2833 Рік тому +4

    I just discovered your podcast. I subscribed. Thank you for great, thought provoking shows and interviews. I’m glad I found you in the ever expanding miasma of the information revolution of our times.

  • @NarenLumpkin
    @NarenLumpkin 11 місяців тому +1

    Danica you are a heavenly body with loving awareness, Merry Christmas!!❤❤❤

  • @unfi6798
    @unfi6798 2 роки тому +13

    Congratulation on getting Brian Cox on your show. This man is an encyclopedia of future activity. Yeah..he's definitely a Rock Star in the science world. Got yourself a new sub. Greetings from Christmas Island.

    • @slow-mo_moonbuggy
      @slow-mo_moonbuggy 2 роки тому

      Astronomy is not Natural Science.

    • @benwilliams2243
      @benwilliams2243 2 роки тому

      I was a rockstar before he became a world renowned scientist :)

    • @slow-mo_moonbuggy
      @slow-mo_moonbuggy 2 роки тому

      @@benwilliams2243 A scientist that doesn't do science is just a washed up rock star.

    • @paulwood6729
      @paulwood6729 2 роки тому

      He was in a band called D-Ream in the '90s.

    • @jackwhitbread4583
      @jackwhitbread4583 2 роки тому +1

      @@slow-mo_moonbuggy except Brian Cox is both a practicing scientist and a rock star. People can be whatever they want to be, they don't have to fit in to your bullshit boxes or meet your approval

  • @dancooper3066
    @dancooper3066 5 місяців тому +1

    I love listening to David. He can explain physics without making you feel stupid. Cool dude.

  • @magic_hotel
    @magic_hotel 2 роки тому +5

    When Brian was talking about patterns and the 6-cornered snowflakes, my mind shifted to the 6-cornered cyclone system at the pole of Jupiter. There does seem to be something special about this configuration in nature.

    • @chrisgabiger2399
      @chrisgabiger2399 2 роки тому

      Thought that was Satern

    • @magic_hotel
      @magic_hotel 2 роки тому +1

      @@chrisgabiger2399 No, it was from the NASA Juno mission - south pole of Jupiter. Each cyclone was the size of Texas.

  • @falcon147
    @falcon147 5 місяців тому

    Professor Cox has the right stuff. Humble and open minded individual.

  • @sando99
    @sando99 2 роки тому +10

    Great Podcast. Many thanks to Danica and Brian for such an interesting talk.

  • @meshakvb6431
    @meshakvb6431 2 роки тому +1

    I was just looking up Brian Cox, and I read the title to the video, so I clicked it and low and behold, Dana Patrick has a podcast! And she has Brian Cox on her podcast! How perfect! I love both of them!

  • @darrenstoddart8673
    @darrenstoddart8673 2 роки тому +5

    @Danica You're covering so many of my favorite topics, I always feel your passion, curiosity, intelligence, and playfulness. You have a way of adding a deeper layer to your points using your eyes and expressions. Glad to see you're making a speedy recovery,, imagine your potential now that you're healing all of your health conditions. More energy, clarity, and creativity it's exciting.

  • @michaelyounger-howard999
    @michaelyounger-howard999 11 місяців тому

    I love Brian because he actually strings verything together. Danica, it goes without saying

  • @keithnicholas
    @keithnicholas 2 роки тому +3

    Love Brian Cox, but most impressed by the comment section, so many potential Nobel prizes! wow, lots of definitive claims about the nature of reality that, at best, most physicists would regard as outrageously speculative! wow. Sure hope they publish their research soon.

    • @MarCuseus
      @MarCuseus 2 роки тому

      Yeah. This one is gold:
      "Just theory’s at the end of the day ."
      😂🤣

  • @JayCee-Musics-xs3gl
    @JayCee-Musics-xs3gl Рік тому

    Brian Cox's voice could probably create world peace. Also Danica seems to have an incredible soul.

  • @patrickmoriarty7273
    @patrickmoriarty7273 2 роки тому +3

    Well Done Danica ~ very interesting ~ an excellent interview ~ I’ll be returning to your podcast 👍

  • @michaeljamespitt8728
    @michaeljamespitt8728 Рік тому +1

    Didn’t think I’d ever see Danica Patrick and Brian Cox engaging in conversation like this but here we are. What a world!

    • @DanicaPatrick
      @DanicaPatrick  Рік тому +1

      Thanks for manifesting.

    • @RaileyClay
      @RaileyClay Рік тому

      @@DanicaPatrick are you going to apologize to all the people's families who are suffering and hurting from grief because they died from your anti-vaccine lies you spread?

    • @bwmclaurin
      @bwmclaurin Рік тому

      ​@@RaileyClayafter all the actual data, actual science, proof of all the propaganda and lies exposed finally, coordinated efforts with government and the "media" to ban actual facts and stats that they knew was accurate, and you still remain this uninformed, ignorant, indoctrinated and delusional? Maybe you should have skipped the 6th "booster", touch some actual grass, take the mask off for some fresh air finally and definitely, I mean definitely change where you get your news, propaganda programming, and "science" from! Also, destroy your Fauci shrine and creepy Fauci doll! That's just sad, creepy AF, and maybe finally realize why people are laughing at you daily and why your world view has been crumbling like the "others" easily predicted because of common sense and basic logic...

  • @eziop5539
    @eziop5539 2 роки тому +5

    Holy f*cking shit, Brian Cox needs to be protected at great cost. What an amazing and compassionate perspective he offers. A national treasure.

  • @TheSixthSense1972
    @TheSixthSense1972 2 роки тому

    Professor Brian Cox maybe the one i'm injoying listen to the most... Brilliant man

  • @spridle
    @spridle 2 роки тому +24

    Brian deserves to be very well known in America. He's such a living legend. I'd take Brian over Neil degrasse Tyson any day.

    • @davidbarnes6410
      @davidbarnes6410 Рік тому

      I’m surprised that he isn’t already

    • @davidbee8178
      @davidbee8178 Рік тому +1

      I'm with you on that . . . Neil is VERY knowledgeable and VERY enthusiastic but when he teams up with that other guy for their UA-cams, they get a little too "clown-like" for my taste . . . I realize that they are trying to make their knowledge "accessible" but Brian Cox does the same thing while being VERY accessible too. I love Danica's sense and look of awe when Brian speaks of the wonders of our Uni-verse - the One Song :-)

    • @mrstevo32100
      @mrstevo32100 Рік тому +2

      Why not both?

    • @josephgreen2824
      @josephgreen2824 Рік тому

      Why focus on personalities more than science? Maybe you're just used to focusing on celebrities?

    • @davidbee8178
      @davidbee8178 Рік тому

      @@josephgreen2824 Wow you must be the life at parties :-) Actually what makes this world REALLY fascinating, are the PEOPLE who are active and creative in it. What they do is secondary to who they are as a person, celebrity not withstanding and certainly less important than how one carries oneself in this world. So cheer up ! It's a great place if you know how to have fun ! :-)

  • @ComboBreakerHD
    @ComboBreakerHD 2 роки тому +2

    Danica you're awesome. Brian is among my favourite science communicators and it's been a real shame that he isn't more well known in America. You both compliment each other so well.

    • @jackwhitbread4583
      @jackwhitbread4583 2 роки тому +1

      I mean he is getting there, Neil degrasse tyson did mention just how beloved he is in the UK. British people apparently never approach Neil when he works with Brian in the UK and its because to British people Brian is the much bigger figure in science and he is pretty much universally beloved in the UK. Brian is currently doing a massive arena tour of the US and it is a spectacular show by all accounts so i hope this encourages more people to take notice of this well educated and fascinating man

  • @kbbarton1
    @kbbarton1 2 роки тому +5

    Danica Patrick and Brian Cox, each brilliant in their own right, having a fascinating conversation - I love it!

  • @PeterMcCracken-n3g
    @PeterMcCracken-n3g 9 місяців тому

    Fantastic work Brian. We need more level headed people like yourself who live in the real world, Reality.

  • @barbaralachance5836
    @barbaralachance5836 2 роки тому +18

    Please make more podcast with scientists!! Brian Greene, Max Tegmark, Jana Levin, Natalie Starkey, Richard Dawkins... I could listen to these guys talk all day. ❤️

    • @jackwhitbread4583
      @jackwhitbread4583 2 роки тому +1

      Richard Dawkins would be an amazing one, I have much respect for Dawkins especially given the intense vitriol he is subjected to by Christians abusing him simply because he does not believe. This is very unchristian behaviour in my book and if you're wishing people death just because they don't believe in your God then you need to take a really good look at your morals and shitty behaviour

  • @ollivainikainen9388
    @ollivainikainen9388 Рік тому

    We need more people like Ms. Patrick and Dr. Cox.

  • @irrefudiate
    @irrefudiate 2 роки тому +4

    Ah, finally a bit of information regarding "space". I find it very interesting that quantum entanglement is considered the source/generator of space/time. I've been asking the question for a while and even though this answer means next to nothing to me, it is very satisfying to know. That is so cool. Thank you, Danica, for stepping off these deep ends. Very courageous of you.

    • @hareecionelson5875
      @hareecionelson5875 2 роки тому +1

      @USA TAMONDOMUNI I don't think youtube is the place to submit your dissertation. Chill your beans bud

  • @scarrgk
    @scarrgk 3 місяці тому

    Wow, only just now finding this. Wonderful combination of questions and answers that really put science deniers/conspiracy theorists in perspective and the pair come up with some very poignant and interesting aspects of both science itself and the wonder and inspiration that should inspire everyone, young and old. I have one of Brian's books but listening to him makes the science really come alive in the moment

  • @richardanthonybiggs
    @richardanthonybiggs 2 роки тому +6

    Great line of questioning to enable Mr Cox to flow so beautifully

  • @rmt586
    @rmt586 2 роки тому +13

    Danica, if you are interested in rocket science you should interview Tim Dodd - The Everyday Astronaut, he can tell you how it all works. He is a fellow UA-camr, he is bringing Space down to Earth for Everyday People.

    • @Bpace777
      @Bpace777 2 роки тому +1

      🚀🚀🚀

    • @kswis
      @kswis 2 роки тому

      He def knows a bit more about rockets than the average human.

  • @edisusak6267
    @edisusak6267 2 місяці тому +1

    I am 1% smarter than I was before listening to this podcast. Thank you.

  • @NoxiousRob
    @NoxiousRob 2 роки тому +92

    Got to love Brian, he's 54 years old and such an intelligent guy, yet looks like a goofy youngster with a permanent smile on his face.

    • @fc-qr1cy
      @fc-qr1cy 2 роки тому +4

      that is one of the everyday blessings we can have to know things are okay and there is a reason why things are and love and curious about new things to find out. child like.

    • @cdavidson7583
      @cdavidson7583 2 роки тому +2

      He talks a load of rubbish
      No proof of anything he says

    • @leethrelfalllt
      @leethrelfalllt 2 роки тому

      Who are you? A jealous ex girlfriend? Did he pinch your spice girls cd?

    • @samm928
      @samm928 2 роки тому

      He's not a user ..

    • @kenadams5504
      @kenadams5504 2 роки тому +3

      He only looks about 40 .He's a very smart guy , but very respectful as well .I learnt a lot from this discussion.

  • @Chertoff88
    @Chertoff88 24 дні тому +1

    Ive never watched one second of race car driving but this id watch all day every day.

  • @Lance-yl5sz
    @Lance-yl5sz 2 роки тому +6

    Thanks Danica for your interview with Brian. Haven’t come across your channel before but thank you for your support of science. Keep it up, we need more of it from public figures 👍

  • @ChristopherRyan1776
    @ChristopherRyan1776 2 роки тому

    Whaaaaaaaaaaaaat..... Danica doing podcasts?? Yesssss please. I could listen to Brian Cox speak all day long

  • @breadcrumbs2276
    @breadcrumbs2276 2 роки тому +3

    Brian is totally immersed into science down to every atom, a man with laser beam focus on a serious mission to break through the fabric of the universe literally

    • @slow-mo_moonbuggy
      @slow-mo_moonbuggy 2 роки тому

      Brian is a nonsense machine. His claims have no empirical evidence.

  • @benhilder8088
    @benhilder8088 2 місяці тому

    Brian explains everything, (literally) and does it with humility and passion.
    He is a brilliant combination of space dust and water.
    But Danica is something special.
    A very rare type of star exploded to get that result,
    It's science people.🤩🤣🤣.
    But on a serious note.
    Conversations like this are loved by all and eagerly awaited most.
    👍👍👍

  • @Slavigrad
    @Slavigrad 2 роки тому +5

    Great podcast! Physics is always great topic.
    I follow many physics UA-cam channels: ScienceClic, Arvin Ash, Veritasium, The Action Lab, PBS Space Time, Plasma Channel…
    What I found to be the most important thing in my personal life was understand trauma.
    But understanding electricity, charge, voltage, pressure, tension in physics helped me to understand trauma, muscular tension, neurological and psychological tension and release of trauma.
    Also understanding of computers and background processes in operating systems helped me to visualise our unconscious mind.

  • @jaeljade3609
    @jaeljade3609 2 роки тому

    Brian was the first person to get me interested in science. I could listen to him forever.

  • @irrefudiate
    @irrefudiate 2 роки тому +9

    Ah, way to go, Danica. Not enough to learn the nature of space, now you want to know the nature of "thought". Of course, you are right, that is the next frontier.

  • @NarenLumpkin
    @NarenLumpkin 11 місяців тому +1

    Consciousness alone exists. I am that❤❤❤

  • @Si-nf7dl
    @Si-nf7dl 2 роки тому +3

    First time watching Danica’s channel and I’m instantly a fan. Great framing of questions to keep the conversation flowing with Brian. A really enjoyable watch & listen.
    I look forward to seeing more videos.

  • @stephenlane9168
    @stephenlane9168 2 роки тому +1

    Great chat from two real characters. Liked your presenting Danita, as a Brit I know of you as a racing driver, so this was really refreshing and I’ve subscribed. Brian is a legendary Brit and a beloved part of UK / GB culture.

  • @TheSnookerShed
    @TheSnookerShed 2 роки тому +18

    Science is our only hope, it solves the problems that our governments create.
    The future of our species depends on science.
    Awesome to listen to Brian

    • @scottscottsdale7868
      @scottscottsdale7868 2 роки тому +2

      I knew an environmental scientist from NC. I asked him about climate change. He said “as a scientist I cannot argue with the evidence. But I do not think we should change out economic system to deal with it”. So politics is important but s wince is the foundation. Without science we are no where.

  • @jakefromsf7580
    @jakefromsf7580 Рік тому

    I love listening to his voice. It's so soothing to listen too regardless of the topic.

  • @michaelwalker7155
    @michaelwalker7155 2 роки тому +3

    Love listening, the thoughts the questions......thank you.

  • @rataflas
    @rataflas 2 роки тому

    Praise to Danica for letting the host speak and keep going no matter where it took us.

  • @Danofstockport
    @Danofstockport 2 роки тому +4

    Great discussion, I knew Brian when he was in a rock band back in the day. Both of us in different bands. His was called Dare. Spoke to him once in the Banshee rock club in Manchester. Quite a thoughtful young man...with bigger hair than I had 😂

  • @bimmergeezer
    @bimmergeezer 2 роки тому +1

    Ms. Patrick, absolutely wonderful! Thank you very much!! ❤

  • @WalterHolstad
    @WalterHolstad 2 роки тому +6

    When I imagined the end of the universe, as in the boundary of the universe, I would think to myself, "Is there a brick wall there? But then, what is on the other side of the brick wall?" It's so hard to imagine infinity and if infinity actually exists but it must. Because it's impossible for there to be an end with nothing on the opposite side, the way I see it right now in my mind thought experiment.

    • @martinwillemse8923
      @martinwillemse8923 2 роки тому +1

      So I think we came out of a huge cloud of dust, that's the cloud that's referred to as the big bang remnants, and if we look closely at the conditions, it looks like the star formation started at the same time, but the light from so many billions of light years away gives us a picture of the evolution of this dust cloud. We see the same development in all directions at great distances and the development that we observe 28 billion light-years apart would take place almost simultaneously, which would mean that that cloud has the same composition over a very great distance, from which you come. can infer that that cloud is infinitely large for us and possibly millions or even more if billions of times larger than what we can now perceive. Behind this cloud eventually there will be a space that has a different composition and the cloud that we are in may be part of a world infinitely larger than our world and we end up being in some kind of atom, causing a world wherever life can arise, the size of this world will exceed our imagination, but this world in an even larger world will also be a particle of dust and the larger these worlds are the slower it progresses, where an electron in the time it a circle around the core our world will have set in a fraction of the orbit and complete worlds will arise and decay in every atom of our world in a time immeasurably small for us. In these worlds there will also be worlds to infinity and it is clear that communicating with those worlds is virtually impossible, which only the future and our development will offer an opportunity to make that possible.
      Ik denk dat we dus uit een enorme stofwolk zijn ontstaan, dat is de wolk die word aangeduid als de oerknal restanten en dat als we goed naar de omstandigheden kijken, het er op lijkt dat de ster vorming gelijktijdig begonnen is, maar dat het licht van zo veel miljarden lichtjaren ver ons een beeld geeft van de evolutie van deze stofwolk. We zien in alle richtingen op grootte afstand de zelfde ontwikkeling en zou de ontwikkeling die we waarnemen op 28 miljard lichtjaar van elkaar, zo goed als gelijktijdig plaats vinden, wat zou betekenen dat die wolk over zeer grote afstand de zelfde samenstelling heeft, waar je uit kan op maken dat die wolk voor ons oneindig groot is en mogelijk miljoenen of zelfs meer als miljarden malen groter is als wat we nu waar kunnen nemen. Achter deze wolk zal er uiteindelijk een ruimte zijn die een andere samenstelling heeft en de wolk waar wij in zitten mogelijk een onderdeel is van een wereld die oneindig keer groter is als onze wereld en wij uiteindelijk in een soort van atoom zitten, die een wereld veroorzaakt waar ook leven kan ontstaan, de grote van deze wereld zal onze fantasie te buiten gaan, maar zal ook deze wereld in een nog grotere wereld een stofdeeltje zijn en hoe groter deze werelden zijn hoe langzamer het verloopt, waar een elektron in de tijd dat het een rondje om de kern draait onze wereld in een fractie van de omloop zal zijn onder gegaan en zal in iedere atoom van onze wereld complete werelden ontstaan en vergaan in een voor ons onmeetbaar kleine tijd. In deze werelden zullen ook weer werelden zitten tot in het oneindige en het wel duidelijk is, dat communiseren met die werelden zo goed als onmogelijk is, wat alleen de toekomst en onze ontwikkeling een mogelijkheid zal bieden om dat toch mogelijk te maken.

    • @michaelbariso3192
      @michaelbariso3192 2 роки тому

      The theory of everything according to humans that believe their intellect evolved from a monkeys brain. If the light waves from the sun were 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of Einstein's space-time then people on Earth are just imagining the infrared warmth of the sun coming up on the horizon. The communications delay between Earth and Mars is approximately 20 minutes. We're either viewing the light from Mars in the future, Einstein's past dimensions of space-time or in real time, which do you think is more logical? Einstein's relativity is wrong light has no limitation of speed; it cannot be slowed down because it isn't moving. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other.
      The speed of light according to Einstein's relativity is 186,000 miles per second, but according to physics if two mechanical watches were synchronized on earth and one traveled across the universe and back, there would be no difference in time between the mechanical watches proving the speed of light is instantaneous as the only way a mechanical watch will run slow is if you tighten the main spring. Big Bang, Einstein's relativity-time dilation and nearly all of science debunked. Using optical clocks, lasers and GPS to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing.
      Light waves can stretch, bend-curve and occupy a state of superposition, whereas the hypothetical Einstein projectile light particle (photon), a particle that has never been observed cannot. Unlike a TV or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of frames that create the appearance of a moving image. There are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just video recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. Neither time, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch Time, energy, and matter like a rubber band into space-time dimensions. Monkey see monkey do, the science of monkeys have brainwashed you.
      Will the James Webb Telescope view the birth of the first galaxies? Nope, the universe goes on to infinity. Neither time, the atom, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you can’t travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future :-). Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If science uses Einstein's wrongly theorized speed of light like an odometer to calculate past dimensions of distance and time, then using that same method to calculate forward dimensions of distance and time would mean the Big Bang was created and expanded in the future before time existed. Unlike a television or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of still image frames that hypothetical Einstein projectile light particles photons create to give us the appearance of a moving image :-).
      The speed of electromagnetic wave is 186,282 miles per second vs Einstein's projectile light particle proton at 186,000 miles per second. Is this a coincidence or did Einstein plagiarize yet another phenomenon to fit the math of relativity? Electromagnetic waves in space can neither slow down or speed up, this is consistent with the law of conservation of energy. If light slowed down, its energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy so the speed of light is instantaneous and cannot travel slower than it does. If Einstein's projectile light (particle photon) had mass it's light could not travel across the universe, high speed particles traveling at 186,000 miles per second would break the Hubble and James Webb telescope mirrors, debunking the speed of light, Big Bang, Einstein's relativity and any science that uses relativity in their theories.
      Everyone knows cell phone electromagnetic radio waves travel both ways, yet Einstein's disciples believe time energy, mass and light can only travel one way back in time. If you simply run the Big Bang theory in reverse you reveal the insanity of Einstein's relativity and Big Bang theory. If the expansion of the Big Bang were true, time, energy, mass and light would be in the future from the vantage point of an expanding singularity-Big Bang and planet Earth would now reside in a past dimension of Einstein's time dilation (moving clocks run slow) space-time 13.8 billion years ago :-).
      It's truly amazing how the science and politics of the left are able to keep people denying reality, there are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space, yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. Pretending not to notice the gross contradictions-pseudoscience in Relativity is typical of Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs-theories. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. If the light from the universe travels to past dimensions of time then it's light is also traveling into future dimensions of time (instantaneously). “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.” a state of superposition where time and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end. "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End" Revelation 22:13. Disciples, remember thy 1st commandment, thou shalt not question thy lawgiver of relativity for blasphemers are the devil's pawn. Let thee not dwell in dissension of our Lord Albert, shun them, drive them back to their jungle lair amen.
      Albert Einstein, an autistic violinist patent clerk that had access to more papers than Suzanne Somers litter box yet creates theories with more bugs than Terminix- Magnetron. View my paper on academia (Big Bang, Einstein's Relativity-Time dilation and nearly all of science debunked) You can also find me on Twitter, Facebook, Truth Social and Mewe

    • @Handlebar-MustDash
      @Handlebar-MustDash 2 роки тому

      @USA TAMONDOMUNI But doesn't the Bible teach us that the Earth is just 6,000 years old as is the heavens 😂 Selective Bibling is pointless. Even the Devil can quote the Bible to his own ends. As Christopher Hitchens once asked 'Are we to believe a God who said we are born sick and commanded to be well'.
      Kind of mischievous to place temptation in the Orchard for Eve, an original creation of God, for this
      pure being to succumb, original sin.

  • @11gugugaga11
    @11gugugaga11 Рік тому

    Danika, i think you hit the nail on the head with your question on conciousness. Well done.
    Dr. Cox is right. We don't know much about it yet... or do we?
    Here's my take on it.
    The physical universe, space-time-gravity is one aspect. The other is quantum universe, where everything is a propagating quantum wave. Everything we call solid is gazzilions of quantum waves propagating in a given physical configuration called matter, cells, lifeforms...
    A deeper intermediary is conciousness, but a closer to the nose intermediary is causality.
    In inanimate causality the driver is the laws of material physics and chemistry at the base (and at different complexity zoology and biology).
    In life forms the causality driver is conciousness.
    Conciousness is Indescribable as of now.
    But interms of causality is somewhat describable.
    It's a reaction to or interaction with physics/ chemistry inputs via the senses.
    Let me illustrate using one sense, sight.
    An object exists. A strawberry. Which is itself a gazzilion quantum waves propagating in a particular configuration we identify as a strawberry.
    Light is incident upon the strawberry. Light is a quantum wave of photons. It undergoes a physics/chemistry reaction with the quantum wave system called strawberry and part of it is reflected.
    That reflected light propagates to come in contact with an eye. An eye is another particular biological configuration which is part of the body of a life form itself a quantum configuration.
    That light from the strawberry is incident on the back of the eye where sits the cones, which sense the light by defined physical/chemical reactions. Which then prompts the cones of the eye to pass a biological electrochemical signal to the nerves its connected to.
    Nerves are also a quantum configuration of it's own rights.
    Nerves transmit the electrochemical signal to the brain, causing a defined segment of the brain to get stimulated. The brain too is a particular quantum configuration.
    That segment of the brain causes some data processing to occur, memory recalls, pattern finding, identifying phenomenon as having seen a strawberry. All physics/chemistry reactions. Thus far.
    Then opiniating begins. Brain or mind that's the murkey part. Let's call it the mind for now.
    Mind generates a mental opinion. Collection of thoughts "It's a strawberry, i love strawberries..." or "i hate strawberries"
    Then a mental impetus forms. Desire or aversion depending on like or dislike.
    The desire mind impetus causes a second mental reaction. To do something about that strawberry. Acquire it, bite in to it, consume it...
    A third mental impetus is automatically generated. The plan to acquire the strawberry.
    A fourth mental impetus is generated execute the plan.
    Which causes a reverse electrochemical signal to flow to various other bodily organs. Hands feet eyes other internal organs, where the body actions the plan to take possession of the strawberry perhaps proceed to eat it.
    If an aversion mind impetus then opposite is true and action is taken to avoid the strawberry at all costs
    All that internal process from the moment light from strawberry makes contacts with eye to executing a plan on what to do about the strawberry we call conciousness.
    But the strawberry conciousness and plan execution gives rise to a phenomenon physicists don't think in terms of yet. It causes something called causality. The religious or doctrinal term perhaps is karma.
    So living in a nutshell is been bombarded by such inputs to the senses eyes ears nose tongue other sensory organs, and mind (in terms of hopes dreams imagination etc), and reacting with a desire or aversion mind impetus ultimately giving rise to causalities, thousands or millions of such inputs per minute of life, every quantum second of life.
    So life is actually a propagation of the self in a space-time-causality continuum called existence.
    Space-time is the physical universe.... propagation-causality the quantum universe??
    Now link this to the concept of observation in quantum physics... 🤔🤨

  • @mcblu9344
    @mcblu9344 2 роки тому +11

    I’m still amazed that everybody who talks to this dude never asks him for a book recommendation list….my zoom doesn’t work well enough to catch those books behind him

  • @hollywooda111
    @hollywooda111 5 місяців тому

    Danica is a fantastic interviewer because she understands her role is to allow the guest to do the talking.

  • @larryburns7225
    @larryburns7225 2 роки тому +5

    "If you want to find the secrets of the universe think in terms of energy, frequency and vibrations." ( Nikola Tesla) humans are reaching there limitations, this is where our creation of A.I. comes into play it will give the answers to what is Consciousness. the answer is in the 4th dimension. but when we get there as in the 3rd dimension there will be more questions than answers which can be found in the 5th dimension. just a theory. great interview Danica. Bravo to you.

  • @GBlunted
    @GBlunted 2 роки тому +3

    This one awesome! I love all the topics you guys covered and that you actually mentioned to him that you found personally interesting which is crazy because that's actually all my favorite shit as well! And the way you segwayed into the topics like astronomy stuff with the moon and connecting quantum and relativity theories and how you can easily talk about consciousness stuff and bring up cymatics like you did made it obvious to me you're no joke and really do find this stuff interesting like I do which is cool and gets you some bonus points in my book lol!
    Keep having discussions like this and I'll keep coming back everytime! Would love to have both a more fringe and female version of Lex Friedman to indulge! Either one would be cool but both in the same content would be cooler! 🙏🏽🤔👍🏽😍

  • @desoconnor7445
    @desoconnor7445 5 місяців тому

    Maginficent presentation Brian.. Danica rocks for assisting getting the ethos out there.

  • @henryseldon6077
    @henryseldon6077 2 роки тому +9

    Danica did pretty good with the topic, it's not easy. Brian: in billions of years there's ample time for multiple civilizations to come and go leaving absolutely no evidence. The time is there and our knowledge in this area is based mostly on assumptions.

    • @michaelbariso3192
      @michaelbariso3192 2 роки тому

      Black holes are nothing but plasma driven vortex centrifugal-centripetal electromagnetic fields, expanding electromagnetic light waves at the event horizon while moving the electromagnetic light waves away from its core. The positive charges of moving electrons in the electromagnetic fields create spin similar to the relaxation circuit of a high voltage camera strobe. The earths magnetic fields block dangerous radiation from space in the same way electromagnetic fields of black holes block electromagnetic waves-visible light, you do the math :-). Electromagnetic waves curve light in a centrifugal-centripetal vortex, exactly what we see in an induction coil. According to Einstein's gravitational wave theory black holes are spinning time energy and matter like water flowing down the drain, except the centripetal forces of moving particles would expand mass towards the event horizon not compress mass to infinite density towards its core.
      If black holes reside is a region of Einstein's theorized spacetime where gravity and mass are so dense that nothing neither mass-particles nor electromagnetic radiation such as light can escape then how could it be possible for the mass of our universe to escape the unimaginable density of the proposed Big Bang? According to Einstein's general relativity sufficient compact mass-density will deform spacetime to form a black hole which obviously debunks both Big Bang theory and relativity. There is no evidence that matter can collapse to “near infinite density” as a result of gravity, black holes do however debunk Einstein's relativity and Big Bang theory quite nicely.The communications delay between Earth and Mars is approximately 20 minutes. We're either viewing the light from Mars in the future (as Mars comes up on the horizon) Einstein's past dimensions of space-time (as Mars goes down on the horizon) or in real time, which do you think is more logical? Einstein's disciples simply conflate the delay in electromagnetic radio wave communications with light :-). Ignorance is not knowing and doing, stupidity is knowing and doing anyway :-). The speed of light according to Einstein's relativity is 186,000 miles per second, but according to physics if two mechanical watches were synchronized on earth and one traveled across the universe and back, there would be no difference in time between the mechanical watches proving the speed of light is instantaneous as the only way a mechanical watch will run slow is if you tighten the main spring 🙂. Big Bang, Einstein's relativity-time dilation and nearly all of science debunked. There are 7.7 billion people on planet Earth, yet I was the only one who knew I was viewing the light and images of the universe in real time, maybe I should be working for NASA or Elon Musk 🙂. Einstein's relativity is wrong light has no limitation of speed; it cannot be slowed down because it isn't moving. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions. Newsflash, the light-year is a wrongly theorized hypothetical theory of Einstein's-time dilation relativity. You have now left the Einstein Zone.
      Light waves can stretch, bend-curve and occupy a state of superposition, whereas the hypothetical Einstein projectile light particle (photon), a particle that has never been observed cannot be both a particle and wave. There are no space-time fantasy unions or gravity waves that can join a particle, wave and time together then bend, curve and stretch them like a rubber band. Neither time nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch time like a rubber band into space-time dimensions. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you can’t travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future 🙂. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If science uses Einstein's speed of light like an odometer to calculate past dimensions of distance and time, then using the same odometer to calculate forward dimensions of distance and time would mean the Big Bang was created in the future before time existed.
      The speed of the electromagnetic wave is 186,282 miles per second vs Einstein's projectile light particle proton at 186,000 miles per second. Is this a coincidence or did Einstein plagiarize yet another phenomenon to fit the math of relativity? Electromagnetic waves in space can neither slow down or speed up, this is consistent with the law of conservation of energy. If light slowed down, its energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy so the speed of light is instantaneous and cannot travel slower than it does. If Einstein's projectile light (particle photon) had mass it's light and images would be distorted and could not travel across the universe. The Hubble and James Webb telescope mirrors would only magnify these distortions, but most likely the high-speed particles would break the mirrors before we received the first distorted images, debunking the speed of light, Big Bang, Einstein's relativity and any science that uses relativity in their theories.
      Everyone knows cell phone electromagnetic radio waves travel both ways, yet Einstein's disciples believe time energy, mass and light can only travel one way back in time. If you simply run the Big Bang theory in reverse you reveal the insanity of Einstein's relativity and Big Bang theory. If the expansion of the Big Bang were true, time, energy, mass and light would be in the future from the vantage point of an expanding singularity-Big Bang and planet Earth would now reside in a past dimension of Einstein's time dilation (moving clocks run slow) space-time 13.8 billion years ago 🙂. Disciples, remember thy 1st commandment, thou shalt not question thy lawgiver of relativity for blasphemers are the devil's pawn. Let thee not dwell in dissension of our Lord, shun them, drive them back to their jungle lair amen.
      Will the James Webb Telescope view the birth of the first galaxies? Nope, the universe goes on to infinity. Neither time, the atom, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you can’t travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future 🙂. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If science uses Einstein's wrongly theorized speed of light like an odometer to calculate past dimensions of distance and time, then using that same method to calculate forward dimensions of distance and time would mean the Big Bang was created and expanded in the future before time existed. Unlike a television or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of still image frames that hypothetical Einstein projectile light particles photons create to give us the appearance of a moving image 🙂.
      It's truly amazing how the science and politics of the left are able to keep people denying reality, there are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space, yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. Pretending not to notice the gross contradictions-pseudoscience in Relativity is typical of Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs-theories. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. If the light from the universe travels to past dimensions of time then it's light is also traveling into future dimensions of time (instantaneously) and that means light is not moving disciples.
      Einstein Relativity 1=2 Fantasy Physics, Wave-Particle Duality, Photon, ... ua-cam.com/video/0cjBdTwF6v8/v-deo.html via @UA-cam
      The Scientific Evidence Against the Big Bang lppfusion.com/science/cosmic-connection/plasma-cosmology/the-growing-case-against-the-big-bang/
      Pareidolia, the illusion of viewing a face on planet Mars is very similar to a narcissists warped perception of reality, believing the bogeyman is real. Cults always demonize their adversaries as enemies, racists, Nazis, white supremacists, deplorables, fighting their imaginary demons they believe they are evildoers out to destroy the world. Newsflash I'm not the bogeyman :-).

    • @jbellos1
      @jbellos1 2 роки тому +1

      @@michaelbariso3192 Lol...easy for you to say.

    • @LeMAD22
      @LeMAD22 2 роки тому +3

      @@michaelbariso3192 The pills your doctor asks you to take, please do take it.

    • @philproffitt8363
      @philproffitt8363 2 роки тому

      By "ample" time, do you mean the past? Our civilisation has taken one third the age of the universe to develop...and you can sensible say that nothing was getting this advanced in the first third. I think it's why Brian Cox says that intelligent civillisations will be very rare. There hasn't been enough time for enough places to develop that could sustain the development of intelligent life. And even if there were many more in our galaxy than Brian would predict...the observational distances to find things as small and insignificant as 'us' are just too great.

    • @henryseldon6077
      @henryseldon6077 2 роки тому +1

      @@philproffitt8363 That's my point! Two thirds of the age of the universe is a lot of time. I think it's sensible to say that if conditions allow, life will evolve regardless of when it happens. I agree that intelligence will be rare, but not impossible.

  • @TheSulross
    @TheSulross 2 роки тому +1

    listening to Brian talk about matters of the cosmos is like listening to a poet - he turns science into poetic expression

  • @jeffg592
    @jeffg592 2 роки тому +3

    I’m a big fan of Brian Cox, bought my tickets to his Dallas event 6 months ago, can’t wait!

  • @JamesPilutik
    @JamesPilutik 6 місяців тому

    She’s definitely asking the right questions. Questions you have to ask to get a great mind like this, on cruise control

  • @AZMarine513
    @AZMarine513 2 роки тому +13

    His statement about military pilots not being contemplative and his inability to acknowledge a time that he had to change his mind on something tells a lot about him. I don't question that he is a very intelligent person. I do question that he is an open minded scientist looking for the truth. There was zero comments on the volume of research that says our climate is driven by the sun and earths position in our solar system and our solar systems position in our galaxy. No comments on how drastically our magnetoshper has been weakening and how that impacts our climate. Nope, he went straight to Anthropogenic Climate Change... I had high hopes for this podcast. I have been in Aviation Maintenance for 34 years. I love topics on technology, space and physics. To me, this guy came off as an educated elitist.

    • @henrikf9015
      @henrikf9015 2 роки тому +4

      Well that's because the constant release of CO2 from burning oil is something that we can do something about. If one of the super volcanoes erupts it is pretty bad and may even kill us all, but that is beyond our capability to fix, but we can fix the human disasters ( climate change), that will surely effect us all in the foreseeable future.

    • @nickgarrity764
      @nickgarrity764 2 роки тому +1

      Spot on. He and his makeup are far gone from the actual intelligence we need to exhibit as a species on this rock at this moment.

    • @HiroNguy
      @HiroNguy 2 роки тому +1

      If you follow the currency it's easy to figure out why a certain kind of person will sell out real scientific methodology for a phat income by espousing an agenda.

    • @dallassukerkin6878
      @dallassukerkin6878 2 роки тому +2

      I'm not sure you paid full attention at certain critical points to voice your opening thoughts there.
      As to those other aspects of climate change, yes, they exist. No argument at all. But the analysis presently is that they do not explain the changes we are seeing, accepting the proviso that we live in a chaotic system and that life itself changes the system it is a part of.
      Those induced changes are not always good for the life that causes them - a prime example being the oxygen producing life forms that killed themselves off by changing the constituents of the atmosphere and thus paving the way for the forms of life we now recognise.

    • @AZMarine513
      @AZMarine513 2 роки тому +1

      @@henrikf9015 What does doing something about an issue that has miniscule impact do for us? Especially when we are wrecking economies, hurting emerging countries and making our near peer enemies wealthy by doing it? On top of the fact that is setting up our nation and our grid for failure as the Grand Solar Minimum cycle progresses.

  • @rabindergangapersad3665
    @rabindergangapersad3665 10 місяців тому

    Brian voice is so soft en calm…it’s a delight listening to to him.,only respect he sad every one is good in their fields..practice practice .,

  • @forzastella1
    @forzastella1 2 роки тому +4

    Great chemistry between you two!!! And fantastic podcast, these topics about the universe are fascinating. . Although I must say, it irked me slightly hearing this intelligent scientist speak about all these "unknowns" and "unsolved equations" when Nassim Haramein has already so elegantly solved many of these, and he has the math to prove it!!! If only scientists like Brian Cox could open their minds more to think outside of the box, humbly without any bias and previous "programming" which they learned in school. I think some scientists are afraid to acknowledge Nassims research because it would throw everything they worked their whole lives on out the door. . Nassim Haramein has resolved the equation to everything (bridging together the macro and micro scales) which Einstein left incomplete

    • @pandadragons
      @pandadragons 2 роки тому

      Exaggerating (lying) about accomplishments and having the ability to produce paragraphs of word-salad-pseudo-nonsense appears to be Nassim Haaramein's only real skills. Brian Cox is distilling volumes of leading edge research to share a deep wonder and amazement of the natural world, while Nassim is desperately trying to confuse you with shallow, wispy ideas and official sounding nonsense so you'll think he's someone who matters. They are completely opposites.

    • @forzastella1
      @forzastella1 2 роки тому

      @@pandadragons it’s not nonsense when he has the math to prove it. His concepts actually make much sense, just because it doesn’t follow the “mainstream” narrative it doesn’t mean that it is wrong. If all scientists had your mentality, they would still be calling the earth square and no progress would ever be made. Any scientist who dared to suggest the earth was round a couple centuries ago was also ridiculed, even burned to the stake. Science requires an open mind to solve the gaps. And Nassims research has filled many gaps in several areas of science including chemistry, because there is harmony and balance with the math to prove it

  • @NarenLumpkin
    @NarenLumpkin 11 місяців тому +1

    Meaning of life lies in apperception thereof.❤❤❤