The level shown when I talk about the environments is in Norway* not the Netherlands. The bridge level was the one in the Netherlands. Thanks for watching everyone - and stay tuned, a new documentary is in the works and coming soon ;)
It would be great if we get an engine which is best of both world.. Because I love both engine at what they do best. Dynamic Destruction is one key feature I love Frostbite and the photorealistic environment of the IW Engine. Overall I love both and they will always get better.
Yah but bfv have that big opened beautiful maps mw19 small medium boundaries but it's how u see it I've been playing battlefield all my life of course I see bfv as an amazing game
@@smoltoast44 really?i feel like BV Guns sounds more quiet than COD guns,the Echo that makes BV guns sounds loud but the actual sound of gunshot itself is not as loud and heavy as COD does.
@@terrybohart. ! . ¡, ¡¡. ¡! . .!?...!.!................!.. ¡!. ¡¡.!..! ¡. ¡!.!. ¿¡.. .. . . ¡.. ¡..! ¡¡! ¡!!.. ¿¡¡¡¡. ¡. ¡¡.. ¡¡.. . ¡.!! ¡¡. ¡! ¡!! ¡¡. ¿! ¡. ¡. ¿!. ¡!! ¡. ¡. ¡.! ¡¡¡¡¡. ¡... ....... .................... . ¡..!. ¡!.!.! ¡!!!.!! ¡!. ¡...!! ¡... ¡...!..........! ¡!! ¡. ¡..!!!! ¡! ¡.!...........!...! ¡...... . . ..... .. ......!!! ¡. ¡..!. ¡.... ¡.. ¡. ¡.! ¡...!.. ¡...... Mm. . M. . . ... Mm.. .. M. ¡. ¡.! ¿. .. M. Mm m m m. M m m. M mm. M. M m m mm. M. M. M m m. M. M m m m. M. . ¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡. ¿¡¡M. M. M m. M m. M. M. M m m. M. M. M m. I. M. M. . M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M.
@@dipoz2254 hard to understand what you mean, everyone who win the macthes put da fking game on low settings for high frame rate, the loser put it on max settings because they wanto J3rkoff while playing a seeing the walls details or the water resolution.
Battlefield games have been always visually good. Battlefield 5 messed up real with ww2 setting but overall that was a fun game to play regardless of that. I hope the new one improves on anti cheats...
@@solid5502 yeah I get what you mean but when someone is talking about an engine they're usually talking about a games visuals, and if I'm correct 3 and 4 use the same engine....
Cao Urso-polar he was talking about the actual quality of the textures which are higher in BFV not the amount of items on the characters, which is also present in BFV he just doesn’t have any higher tier outfits to showcase
Cao Urso-polar the character model is giving a blank stare that’s the problem but it’s just a selection screen anyways. Cod would feel alive if characters didn’t look so floaty when they moved around the ground.
Before David Sirland left the company, he stated that we would expect Russian weapons and technology. I have a high suspicion that the reason BFV ended so early was a matter of two factors - COVID and rise of the next battlefield game. We even uncovered a Russian LMG and voice lines. Both will not be making an appearance. Two words to describe BFV - Wasted Potential
Capitanul yeah I agree. COD’s don’t have as much detail but they are more reminiscent of a real person. Bf5’s look great but something about them is off.
I agree , also random thought , mw is a great game compared to recent cod's . It aint perfect but its the right step to the franchise. I hope they dont milk the multiplayer though and keep it good but not overdone
Two things about BF5 to take in. 1) He was playing with max settings, which can cause a huge difference like oversaturation of sharpness or colors, maybe even the contrast he's got it set on, and each class has a unique skin color. Kinda like BF1. 2) But it's the details to take account for. The pores and creases and dirt splotches on the soldiers face that also adds to the realism. Now if BF5 details were mixed with COD: MW's somewhat realistic textures, then it would be a flawless mix.
Cod mw 2019 models in general feel way more realistic. They feel like real people, especially when it comes to idle animations, voice lines, and reload animations
K W I S P Y yeah I agree to for the fact that the faces look genuinely real,like the model itself is more realistic,even tho the resolution is better in battlefield,but still
@@jackgolden1774 I think the small maps are fantastic in MW but battlefield 5 maps blew me away. the interiors of houses felt empty to me though, but they are destructable. MW doesnt have destructable maps so the attention to detail is more and the space is much smaller allowing for more detail and less strain on the system
The thing I hate about battlefield is how the shooting feels so weak and floaty. Especially the reload animations. But In cod everything feels like it really packs a punch. It feels great to shoot your weapon in cod.
@@clayciusaustin9188 yah it's unrealistic in quite a bit there is a vid of a dude shooting the bfv guns and they have the same weakness as in game just a wee bit louder gotta remember that it's WW2 you guys are talking about modern Ware fare
Visually, MW for weapon models and animations, character models. Battlefield for explosions and the environments and lighting effects are just stunning
@@shane4429 The sounds aren't though BFV got the sounds right especially with WWII weapons. They each have their advantages but the sound is better. The BFV sound has the crack of the bullet as it breaks the sound barrier that is missing in MW.
That “lens filter” on the explosions in MW are actually meant to mimic the shockwave off real life explosions. That’s an effect you would actually see if you watched a real explosion
The funny thing is, Battlefield 1 (2016) is better visually and in terms of audio when compared to Battlefield V (2018). Battlefield V is a clearly rushed and uninspired game.
@Maclues If you're looking at pure graphics? Yes, BFV looks better. However, every time I see side-by-side comparisons (or just play both games back-to-back) BF1 always looks better to me. I think it's the lighting. BFV's lighting is more detailed, but it's overdone. It makes everything look almost oversaturated, to the point that it looks less like reality and more like an edited photo. Still really good, but it doesn't look real.
Ansari.exe. Yes I’m not blind, the third person character model animations are more advanced then the first person animations in BFV they are not the same thing. Reflections reflect those third person animations not first
@@Sicklehead88 bro it has too do with the sound Echo engine in the game which makes for a pretty realistic game unlike cod which does not have that feature.
In cod, the lens affect is bc you’re actually looking through a helmet or body cam. Hence why they made the game winning killcam an actual cam recording.
I mean you can’t feel the dirt going on you so they just gotta show dirt going you after the explosion. Shouldn’t have anything to do with cameras or anything
It was not a full revert they only slighty reverted the sniper rifles to what they were in 5.0, there's going to be another "revert" in a month or two when 6.2 drops.
1:28 I disagree with you about the facial models. MW has way better looking facial models. the character looks more alive and not as bland as the battlefield V character in comparison
I love battlefield V it’s an awesome game, yes there’s some mistakes made from here and there, and Cod MW is also an amazing game, and I would play it more often if I wasn’t running into toxic players all the time. Otherwise both games are awesome.
Vhulrum while Battlefield 1 did a lot of things right (hell its one of my favorite BF games), BFV improves upon some of them. Graphics are smoother Destruction is more organic Guns are now more accurate and no more random bullet deviation Customization is a lot better Plane combat is also very satisfying And the community believes that closest feeling they’ve gotten to WW2 in BFV is the Pacific Theatre. I agree completely. Iwo Jima has an amazing atmosphere
Vhulrum True their may be incorrect characters, but at least I don’t get killed in a ww2 game by an m-16, while in battlefield 1 you get killed by weapons that weren’t even in ww1 but were in ww2.
If DICE adds decent matchmaking and anti cheat system with TTK Revert, everyone will enjoy this game and especially the 4 pacific maps are awesome. Hey Nick when IW released Warzone for MW, compare that thing to PUBG
Faults I mean the animation not the design itself and based on this video only. I haven’t played battlefield V but will definitely play the next battlefield not this one as the old game’s franchise dies whenever the next one arrives.
I prefer how the gameplay is actually different in both games, battlefield has more detail on environment and physics, and huge maps with diverse vehicles, cod mw is great but multiplayer is just the same as the others.
I think it also would have been cool to cover third person player animations like running and sliding. BFV’s animations are especially impressive, with how player models interact based on their movements, such as tripping and stumbling over foliage and uneven surfaces, and shifting their balance when rounding corners. Running straight into a wall will also cause the third person model to react as if it realistically collides into a surface. Edit: I know it probably would made the video even longer, but also comparing the sounds based on environments would have been cool. Both games have their sound effects interact based on whether the player is inside or outside, and near surroundings.
1:36 MW’s default character showcase menu is the main issue.. when I inspected a skin from Season 2 Battle pass menu it has a high quality to it compared to the when you look at it in the default Character Preview menu.
@@rayhezbroham7297 he means the menu showcase, it's blurry there when you zoom in, but if you preview the suits in the battlepass that effect is disabled so you can preview them without blur effects
whenever it comes to sound design...I love that punchy sounds of Modern Warfare...but having fired guns the crackling effect in BFV is more realistic..... What yo thoughts people?
@Quality High in the campaign, there's a bridge map which is one of the clips I showed here. It's called "Nijmegen Bridge". It says "NETHERLANDS" as it's loading up. Twisted Steel is a different location.
@@Nick930 The game is BS'ing you. They just threw the twisted steel map into the singleplayer intro and said: look it's Nijmegen. It is in fact in no way shape or form a representation of Nijmegen.
Even though bf5 has the upper hand in graphics and details, cod me just feels so much better in terms of gameplay and feel. Bf5 is not even close in those terms which is why I will always choose Modern warfare
diego Antonelli I’ve played all the battlefields none of them felt anything like cod. They’re good at what they do and cod is good at what they do. Most people just prefer the way cod feels
@@Diego-el2is bro neither games copy each other most of the cod games are made with fan requests Like the recent cod mw and cod ww2 and I can say for sure that bf5 is a very good game but I will always choose cod for storyline and the gameplay and feeling which it gives it just feels alot immersive then bf5
Thats because BF5 is more realistic and most prefer to play more of a fun video game type of game.. COD is more fun and gimmicky and BF5 more realistic and its slower..
After watching this video I felt motivated to try out BF5 and i actually had fun with it. There's a lot of content to go through still and almost feels like a new game again. Thanks Nick for a great video 👍
I'm happy to see someone who actually tries to like the game and try all the content in it, I think most of the people who dislikes battlefield v haven't even played the game yet because of the shitty reveal they did :)
@@_dylanzz i played that since December 2018, it sucks. The smgs are too powerful and if you use another weapon you get destroyed. The medic has INFINITE bandages without a "reload" time so he can spam them. The airplane hitboxes sucks.
COD MW weapons animations are insane, i really can't name other games with this level of fluidity and detail, for me just makes everithing better, i don't even care about the graphics.
Same boat. BF looks amazing as far as color and scenery but it still feels like the characters and guns don’t move fluidly. I rather a very natural animation than graphics as well 🤘🏼
@@baldgamer3965 yeah, i think it is a matter of personal taste in that regard, but mw weapon customization is so majestic, hundreds of acessories and combinations, weapons sound more impactful and strong. i dont know, in my opinion gunplay is superior in mw and makes me wanna play more with diferent weapons. (im from brazil, english not that good).
A hardcoore gamer once told me. If you want to have a paintball match with machine guns. Buy COD. If you want warfare. Buy battlefield. That comment has always stood out to me.
Pretty much since most COD player base pretty much run and gun solo. COD is and was design around MLG tournament so trying to translate it into a massive battle failed.
Perhaps in individual weapon sounds, but Battlefield will still be overall superior in regards to the ambience and the fact that pretty much all the war-related sounds such as distant shooting and explosions are player generated.
@@PoisoningShadow671 Agreed. Modern Warfare sounds good at first, but then you realise that it's all bass and impact to make it sound meaty, but in reality, doesn't really sound the way guns do.
The first thing I noticed when the trailers and gameplay started dropping for MW was the shotgun sounds. It sounded almost exactly like an actual 12ga (a bit quieter, but that's a given).
Found your channel while looking up the modern fixes for Quake and Doom etc. Really great work all around your channel. Good taste. Good coverage on details. Fantastic channel. Sub'ed! 👍👍👍
BFV guns sounds like youre far from the point where the gun was shot at COD sounds like youre really close to the gun. (edit) COD sounds + BFV graphics + COD story = 🔥🔥🔥
I agree mostly. Cod guns sound like they are more in a close quartered outside environment. Not too accurate sounding for the more open map of cod in video. But on other maps, I think the small daytime uk map and the small desert map with the cave, it sounds about right. Bfv, maybe it's because of the war tapes, sounds like the player is wearing earplugs and do indeed sound muffled/distant. Maybe if the sound on our device(s)/in game would be maxed there might be a difference. But I do have to say that the k98 in cod is a little over the top in sound.
Upon listening closer too, cod seems to almost have a more indoor sound with some guns too. Which if one is shooting indoors in the game, its freaking awesome.
Bf5s Multiplayer feels unrewarding and not satisfying at all. The gunfights and gunplay/recoil is just anti fun. Characters aren't as customisable as in modern warfare and there's no real "reason" to grind in bf5. Cod has all of those, making the bf5 multiplayer fun for a short amount of time before losing to cod. The fun you have on bf5 is a short lived one, whereas cod is way more fun in the long run, when you have all those sweet skins, attachments, characters, emblems and calling cards. It gives you the feeling of accomplishment and prestige. Edit: Also, the feeling when you laser someone across the map and hearing those sweet hitmarkers feels so satisfying, it makes you wanna go for more kills, it's like having the M1 Garand Ping in a game. Modern warfares gunplay is the most fun I had since Bf4. I tried bf5 when they released the beta. As a Bf4 vet I was displeased and turned off cause it just feels way too different. I still play bf4 to this day, waiting patiently for a better Battlefield experience in the future.
BF: graphics looks nicer, better pistol audio, and multiplayer with better ground war map design, better character quality COD: campaign hands down, attention to detail, better small map designs (FFA, TDM, etc), co-op is better with spec-ops (it was somewhat of a flop in this game), textures conclusion: DICE needs better writers and artists, Infinity ward (the other studios can't keep up) needs better quality and large-scale multiplayer.
Something you forgot to address is that battlefield has had years perfecting all the little details and I understand call of duty has had time to practice stuff as well but the cods new engine and lighting effects is a one game thing and infinity wars haven’t had as much experience as dice
But you know what. Look it this way. Battlefield developers bring a new game in a few years and call of duty developers bring a new game almost every year meaning they don't take much time in creating the perfect game but just sent it out bcuz call of duty fans can't wait for a new game. I'm not saying Battlefield is better but I'm saying that one is taking time to make a game and the other not. I hope you understand this and hope you agree with me
@@Gtafan20014 Here’s the difference though, Battlefield games have only 1 main studio creating Battlefield games, Dice. Call of Duty has Infinity Ward, Treyarch and Sledgehammer as well as half a dozen support studios. So typically each CoD game has about the same dev time as a battlefield game would
I’m a Battlefield fan, but I gotta say, COD got my attention with this game. Especially the characters design details, for they are much more realistic. Probs to COD👍
Everyone's mistake is using BFV's war tapes setting for the sound test. It actually isn't mixed as well as the other settings and muffles the guns quite a bit. Speakers or Headphones settings brings that punch your looking for for the sound test.
listen kid , NEVER EVER EVER compare DICE/rockstar games graphic with any other game from other stuios, just dont do it becausse those studios are literraly from the future
+1 Aaah man that's what am talking about. Battlefield is the goat for the "battlefield" environnement. Texture for big map, lighting, man to much work on this through the years. BFBC3 maaaan I can't wait. People will continue to buy cod but we know that Battlefield is THE war game in the FPS industry
No, the gun does not sound realistic. They sound like movie guns. The BFV has the correct Tail end of the bullet crack as it flies through the air. MW has better recoil though.
Grenades don’t create shockwaves, it’s called blast overpressure, which is very minimal and although people think this is what kills you in a grenade, it’s not, fragments is what does kill you. So no, blast over pressure is very minimal and would never be visible to the naked eye.
People saying aah bfv has dinamyc destructive thing that why is better than cod, well...theres a lot of kind of shooters, cod is a standar one and bf is a sort of a battlefield sim, thats why props in cod mw are not destructible bcz it will affect the dynamism of the map and the consistancy of it, and battlefield maps are made to be destroyed. U kno?
@@felinvirginia1 As a Consumer why do you care if it's a Nightmare or Not? As Consumers its not affecting our Gameplay.. When I play games using those Engines it doesn't feel like a Nightmare to play the games..
@@rashidhumine well you didn't played Battlefield V tho Look at all the frostbite games and tell me if they are good? At the exception of battlefield, none (Anthem, ME Andromeda, NFS). And what is the reason of their failure when you look at them? Development nightmare, and the same is even happening to DICE now. So no, you should bother because with this engine, you got more chance to get a poor game than a great
@@felinvirginia1 When we have Battlefield 4, there's no need for Battlefield V, yes other companies struggle to use it properly and in that case they should stop using it.
It's funny how cod ww2 was compared to every game , to show how horrible their guns were , now the tables have turned and cod mw 2019 is compared to every game to show how good their guns are
Call of duty sound effects sound sooo much more realistic it's incomparable. Battlefield has too much echo and it ruins the beauty of the sound. Also I like weapon designs a lot better visually in cod but when it comes to character design and environment look battlefield takes the cake.
1:03 “MW has more variety” but there’s only 16 operators which most are locked behind a BS spec ops mission and you can’t change they outfits 😂,! BFV definitely has more variety for outfit choices.
I love the new modern warfare, in my opinion I don’t think BFV is a finished game again I love both games to bits. Due to the comparison, from when BFV first came out I spotted a lot of improved details from the new updates and characters looking less cartoony, shadows from where you hold a gun are less darkened, I even spotted tiny hairs on hands as well, again I love both Modern warfare and battlefield but I have to say BFV has made some incredible improvements do I have to give credit to that, but I think modern warfare and battlefield to me are equal to me
I think MW looks overall better because the weapons and the characters are photorealistic, and the engine has some gorgeous lighting, but battlefield is a way more dynamic game with the environment interaction, those palm trees look amazing in the wind, COD is very static.
Great video I love the BF series but must say COD has better sounds effects / sound quality. I also love how the FOV (Field of View) in BF seems much more broad vs. COD where I always feel, "Zoomed in" even when I'm not.
I think Modern Warfare is much better than BFV. BFV is an example of a highly realistic game that asks for numberous glitches and errors. While MW is a great example of balancing what details are nessesary and what details are not nessesary. I have to object his statement that BFV's player model is photo realisitc. Their looks look unatural wherhas MW looks so much more natural. I also kinda suspect that small details in BFV affects the performance of the game like for example player models do not developed properly. Sound effects for MW are much immersive. Most of the time when the person is near the weapon, you don't hear the gunshot cracking sound as its most of the time muffled.
The level shown when I talk about the environments is in Norway* not the Netherlands. The bridge level was the one in the Netherlands.
Thanks for watching everyone - and stay tuned, a new documentary is in the works and coming soon ;)
It would be great if we get an engine which is best of both world.. Because I love both engine at what they do best. Dynamic Destruction is one key feature I love Frostbite and the photorealistic environment of the IW Engine. Overall I love both and they will always get better.
which game is your documentary about?
Need a game engine to combine the best of Two Worlds however you could have done a comparison between white phosphorus and smoke barrage
No rotterdam is the netherlands. Twisted steel(bridge map) is in france.
@@mikehulsman4735 The level in the single player featuring the bridge is NOT "Twisted Steel." It's in the Netherlands.
Cod game compared to battlefield
Both fanbase: this is where the fun begins.
What about the droid attack on the Wookiee’s ?
@Marge bouvier Simpson it's important that we send an attack group there immediately.
Armaan Bal Go I will, good relations with the Wookiee’s I have..
@Ricky Medina it’s settled then.
You are on this council but we do not grant you the rank of master
Take a seat young bal.
Finally a graphical comparison that covers every aspect. Someting that most videos out there just can't deliver . Thanks for the video
Why are you doing 2 spaces between each word dude?
@@Sal3600 I swear I didn't noticed🤣🤣🤣
Sal3600 no big deal
@@sentientteapot6499 oof, demanding much?...
@@sentientteapot6499 no u
i get killed in bf5 switch to cod get killed switch to bf5 and the cycle continues 😬
The cycle ends here
- kratos 2018
Play titanfall or doom if you get stressed out...
OH MY LORD DUDE THAT'S ME EVERYDAY LMAO
Yah but bfv have that big opened beautiful maps mw19 small medium boundaries but it's how u see it I've been playing battlefield all my life of course I see bfv as an amazing game
Play insurgency sandstorm
I feel like cods guns sound design makes them feel more powerful but I like how battlefields gun shots echo
Imo battlefield makes the gunshots and explosions feel like they are as loud as they are irl and CoD doesn’t do that
@@smoltoast44 really?i feel like BV Guns sounds more quiet than COD guns,the Echo that makes BV guns sounds loud but the actual sound of gunshot itself is not as loud and heavy as COD does.
yeah the sound of echoing bullets is dope it was much more better in BF1 also MW sound seems decent because of current modern settings except KAR98
@@terrybohart. ! . ¡, ¡¡. ¡! . .!?...!.!................!.. ¡!. ¡¡.!..! ¡. ¡!.!. ¿¡.. .. . . ¡.. ¡..! ¡¡! ¡!!.. ¿¡¡¡¡. ¡. ¡¡.. ¡¡.. . ¡.!! ¡¡. ¡! ¡!! ¡¡. ¿! ¡. ¡. ¿!. ¡!! ¡. ¡. ¡.! ¡¡¡¡¡. ¡... ....... .................... . ¡..!. ¡!.!.! ¡!!!.!! ¡!. ¡...!! ¡... ¡...!..........! ¡!! ¡. ¡..!!!! ¡! ¡.!...........!...! ¡...... . . ..... .. ......!!! ¡. ¡..!. ¡.... ¡.. ¡. ¡.! ¡...!.. ¡...... Mm. . M. . . ... Mm.. .. M. ¡. ¡.! ¿. .. M. Mm m m m. M m m. M mm. M. M m m mm. M. M. M m m. M. M m m m. M. . ¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡. ¿¡¡M. M. M m. M m. M. M. M m m. M. M. M m. I. M. M. . M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M.
@@ff586541 i too speak enchantment table
This is the first cod that you can actually have a really good comparison on.
If you Look at all COD games 2003-2008 COD looks better.Ever since Frostbite BF games have looked more beautiful
@@ChandranPrema123 you dont know what are you talking about, if a good shoter game for you just good graphics, so, your opnion doenst matter.
@@AugustoV8Cesar im sorry but i dont want graphics i want mlg 360 no scope with doritoz
@@dipoz2254 hard to understand what you mean, everyone who win the macthes put da fking game on low settings for high frame rate, the loser put it on max settings because they wanto J3rkoff while playing a seeing the walls details or the water resolution.
Battlefield games have been always visually good. Battlefield 5 messed up real with ww2 setting but overall that was a fun game to play regardless of that. I hope the new one improves on anti cheats...
I played both in low settings,so both looked nowhere near to realism but now i realize how realistic these games are.
Why did you decide to play on Low Settings?
wolverine his PC is either not that powerful or he wants to get as many frames as possible
Bfv is getting alot better btw there is an important update coming very soon
Brandon Bosworth The “TTK” change and could be a new navel map
@@rachel6301 well that should be interesting
Frostbite engine is so damn beautiful. The smoke effects in Battlefield 3 still look great
@Andy Garcia I'm specifically talking about 3.
@@solid5502 3, 4, 1, V, and possibly hardline all look great....
@@thedreamz9376 yeah they all look beautiful. That engine is something else dude.
@@solid5502 yeah I get what you mean but when someone is talking about an engine they're usually talking about a games visuals, and if I'm correct 3 and 4 use the same engine....
The video compare bf5 duh
Although, a BF player myself, I believe that CoD's character models are way superior overall. They look and feel much more realistic.
Yup while bf5 characters loook ooff
ikr, i think he mixed up his words there. Cod's character models are clearly way more detailed
Cao Urso-polar he was talking about the actual quality of the textures which are higher in BFV not the amount of items on the characters, which is also present in BFV he just doesn’t have any higher tier outfits to showcase
@@ruhidmohamad it's not just that, bf's face models look lifeless, cod feels more alive
Cao Urso-polar the character model is giving a blank stare that’s the problem but it’s just a selection screen anyways. Cod would feel alive if characters didn’t look so floaty when they moved around the ground.
“In bfv there is many places to play on”
Me: but we don’t have *R U S S I A N S*
@Its Just Yash I bet they want the ussr in BFV
@@sleepingturtle32 everybody wants that.
I think if u played the old battlefields like battlefield bad company there would be RUSSIANS
Luis Vargas Ik but I want *S O V I E T S*
Before David Sirland left the company, he stated that we would expect Russian weapons and technology.
I have a high suspicion that the reason BFV ended so early was a matter of two factors - COVID and rise of the next battlefield game. We even uncovered a Russian LMG and voice lines. Both will not be making an appearance.
Two words to describe BFV - Wasted Potential
"BFV is of course a WW2 shooter"
Ah, so that's the war DICE was trying to portray.
The pacific maps definitely feel WW2-ish, everything else is meh
@@Justin_GFM Sten and STG 44 or FG 42 in Pacific isn't realistic. Peace✌
The European maps would feel far more realistic if they would get the British uniforms right for once.
A WW2 game should have at least 3 French/Belgium maps
Renik Žoldák Does it really matter? That’s like complain that a Russian is able to use a M16 in BF4. Its not that serious
“The Netherlands”
*shows norway*
they both are dutch
@@A34-q3w germany , hold my nebelwerfer
@@A34-q3w No, they're not?
Where's ze flamenwefer?
@@A34-q3w er du Dum eller?
I think the cod characters are more human like and are waaay closer to real people. Sharp textures doesn’t mean more realism...
Capitanul yeah I agree. COD’s don’t have as much detail but they are more reminiscent of a real person. Bf5’s look great but something about them is off.
Yep i agree
I agree , also random thought , mw is a great game compared to recent cod's . It aint perfect but its the right step to the franchise. I hope they dont milk the multiplayer though and keep it good but not overdone
Two things about BF5 to take in. 1) He was playing with max settings, which can cause a huge difference like oversaturation of sharpness or colors, maybe even the contrast he's got it set on, and each class has a unique skin color. Kinda like BF1. 2) But it's the details to take account for. The pores and creases and dirt splotches on the soldiers face that also adds to the realism. Now if BF5 details were mixed with COD: MW's somewhat realistic textures, then it would be a flawless mix.
@@nicogarcia7451 but bf 5 had a shitty launch and older
Don’t forget BFV’s Sound effects has those fighter plane and bombers
They are absolutely stunning
Nothing beats the sound of the Jericho Sirens wailing as a Stuka Dives.
I believe the Stuka and V1 rockets were actually recorded by DICE
that silence before the v1 rocket annihilate your team entire existence
Even the whistling from the Corsair before the BOOOM
Combined all our warfare is just something else to experience, it’s just so awesome
I actually think character faces look way more realistic on COD MW.
Cod mw 2019 models in general feel way more realistic. They feel like real people, especially when it comes to idle animations, voice lines, and reload animations
K W I S P Y yeah I agree to for the fact that the faces look genuinely real,like the model itself is more realistic,even tho the resolution is better in battlefield,but still
Definitely but the maps are far from battlefield imo
@@jackgolden1774 I think the small maps are fantastic in MW but battlefield 5 maps blew me away. the interiors of houses felt empty to me though, but they are destructable. MW doesnt have destructable maps so the attention to detail is more and the space is much smaller allowing for more detail and less strain on the system
A civil BF vs CoD conversation? Impossible.
The thing I hate about battlefield is how the shooting feels so weak and floaty. Especially the reload animations. But In cod everything feels like it really packs a punch. It feels great to shoot your weapon in cod.
Hey buddie it's gotten slot better and I watched a vid of the type 11 lmg and it's sounds the same
Ikr!!
@@clayciusaustin9188 yah it's unrealistic in quite a bit there is a vid of a dude shooting the bfv guns and they have the same weakness as in game just a wee bit louder gotta remember that it's WW2 you guys are talking about modern Ware fare
I remember the good ole days when those roles were reversed
@@seeseees2798 wym
Visually, MW for weapon models and animations, character models.
Battlefield for explosions and the environments and lighting effects are just stunning
I think that weapon models go to Bfv tho
Doge4242 the recoil and sounds are much better in cod, the models also look better than bf in cod tho
Can't have both can we?
@@shane4429 The sounds aren't though BFV got the sounds right especially with WWII weapons. They each have their advantages but the sound is better. The BFV sound has the crack of the bullet as it breaks the sound barrier that is missing in MW.
@@Cm38271 In ww2 the soldiers didnt have ear protection, in mw, they do.
ah yes the graphics comparison
not a gun coparison finally
Your pfp
Well Alex, battlefield strength is environmental graphics, call of duty easily wins the gun comparison
@@xxpiredcheez4432 no
@@jenishmaharjan9655 did u see battlefields reload animations? They're whack
@@xxpiredcheez4432 ur opinion but psst it sucks
That “lens filter” on the explosions in MW are actually meant to mimic the shockwave off real life explosions. That’s an effect you would actually see if you watched a real explosion
Bryce Persons plus when a explosion happens in real life your eyes will water a bit due to the heat and bright light
Yes but very irritating for multiplayer I always turn of motion blur
The funny thing is, Battlefield 1 (2016) is better visually and in terms of audio when compared to Battlefield V (2018).
Battlefield V is a clearly rushed and uninspired game.
Maclues on console bf1 look better than bfV
Honestly Battlefield 1 is the best fps ever for me, its just perfect
@Maclues If you're looking at pure graphics? Yes, BFV looks better. However, every time I see side-by-side comparisons (or just play both games back-to-back) BF1 always looks better to me.
I think it's the lighting. BFV's lighting is more detailed, but it's overdone. It makes everything look almost oversaturated, to the point that it looks less like reality and more like an edited photo. Still really good, but it doesn't look real.
@@SomeGunNerd I agree. That No HUD immersion vid of BF1 is simply astonishing graphically
No it isn't
im happy there is no fight in the comments
it seems were finally getting civilized
Wait a day or two
@@mihaipislaru5598 nothing happened
I think Cod and Battlefield allied against fortnite
We’re* civilised but uneducated
Probably cus they can't use the "you are comparing a 2013 game to a 2019 game" argument anymore
5:14 that reflection is doing it's own thing
Thandolwakhe Zungu because the reflections are tied to your third person animations not first
Thandolwakhe Zungu lmaooooooo
Send the footage to Chills
@@ruhidmohamad dont u see the hand moving by itself in a different stance
Ansari.exe. Yes I’m not blind, the third person character model animations are more advanced then the first person animations in BFV they are not the same thing. Reflections reflect those third person animations not first
bf5's guns all sound like they are not fired by the player, but from someone else in some distance
Sicklehead88 but cods are far too bass heavy and produce an unrealistic amount of smoke. It’s clear that there’s pros and cons to both audio designs
That's because he was shooting them in open ground on Hamada, if he were to shoot them in a building in rotterdam they would be a lot louder
@@ruhidmohamad i was just talking about the bf5 gun sounds, i wasn't saying that the cod gun sounds are better
@@Sicklehead88 bro it has too do with the sound Echo engine in the game which makes for a pretty realistic game unlike cod which does not have that feature.
That's because he's shooting in a canyon on the Hamada map. If you go into one of the buildings in Rotterdam they sound much punchier
nothing beats Battlefield’s epic gameplay environment, so cinematic
Rdr2
Rdr2
Play 64 crazy niggas destroy maps on RD2.
Ethan [][] well them killing their own game kinda just hit that idea out of the way because why would you care if the game looks great but isn’t.
Red Dead Redemption: Im About To End This Mans Career
As visually impressive as bf5 is the sounds in cod mw 2019 was startling and I jumped when the frag went off
im guessing next cod size is going to be 500gb on day 1
😂👌
Wait till you see redemption 2 size
At least ps5 have 1tb at launch not that much pain to handle than having a 500gb ps4
thicc boi 420 it’s not even as big as mw now it was a lunch but on my pc mw is taking 180 gb of space
@@thiccboi4205 this aged bad, mw now takes up more space than rdr2
In cod, the lens affect is bc you’re actually looking through a helmet or body cam. Hence why they made the game winning killcam an actual cam recording.
none of the operators wear a body cam or helmet cam so if thats their excuse or something you made up still is pretty stupid
@@whiteiron4408 I assumed it's meant to look like it's going on your screen. Like looking through a window, except it's just your monitor.
im pretty sure its just an additional effect to add more to the explosion
@CMB, you need a hug or something?
I mean you can’t feel the dirt going on you so they just gotta show dirt going you after the explosion. Shouldn’t have anything to do with cameras or anything
Wow, this video made me want to play BFV...and then I remembered that they ruined the TTK...
Sedan57Chevy think they changed it back.
Didn't they revert it back?
@@StevenT-sb2qt Partially
It was not a full revert they only slighty reverted the sniper rifles to what they were in 5.0, there's going to be another "revert" in a month or two when 6.2 drops.
Longer TTK requires more gun skill so you basically want the game to be as noob friendly as modern warfare is.
1:28 I disagree with you about the facial models. MW has way better looking facial models. the character looks more alive and not as bland as the battlefield V character in comparison
I disagree with you
AGREE
Well not with the texture quality
MW looks blurry AF
I love battlefield V it’s an awesome game, yes there’s some mistakes made from here and there, and Cod MW is also an amazing game, and I would play it more often if I wasn’t running into toxic players all the time. Otherwise both games are awesome.
Vhulrum Can you throw grenades a back in battlefield 1? No.
Vhulrum I can agree though battlefield V has been disappointing in certain times, but I stuck to it.
Vhulrum while Battlefield 1 did a lot of things right (hell its one of my favorite BF games), BFV improves upon some of them.
Graphics are smoother
Destruction is more organic
Guns are now more accurate and no more random bullet deviation
Customization is a lot better
Plane combat is also very satisfying
And the community believes that closest feeling they’ve gotten to WW2 in BFV is the Pacific Theatre. I agree completely. Iwo Jima has an amazing atmosphere
Vhulrum True their may be incorrect characters, but at least I don’t get killed in a ww2 game by an m-16, while in battlefield 1 you get killed by weapons that weren’t even in ww1 but were in ww2.
@@anakinskywalker4086 True and all these bf1 guys keep hating but I bet they didn't even play
If DICE adds decent matchmaking and anti cheat system with TTK Revert, everyone will enjoy this game and especially the 4 pacific maps are awesome.
Hey Nick when IW released Warzone for MW, compare that thing to PUBG
They reverted the TTk from what I know
@@gamertriggered4396 I mean nearly full revert, they reverted some in 5.2.2
Them changing the spotting mechanics half way through the games life cycle for a more casual player base killed bfv for me and made me uninstall
BFV's historical uniform is absolutely unreal. Paladin unifrom for Germans never existed.
They still gotta fix the trash balancing
Battlefield: superior lighting effects, better texture quality. Cod MW: better reload animations, better sound design, better recoil design.
BFV plays like shit tho
The sound design in battlefield ist also relly good. They recorded almost every weapon live. Also the V1 Rocket
@@timmeh2834 Yeah they're good, they're just lacking the impact CoD has this time around. But they're definitely not bad at all.
@Faults I think he meant more so the animation of recoil, not the in game mechanic itself.
Faults I mean the animation not the design itself and based on this video only. I haven’t played battlefield V but will definitely play the next battlefield not this one as the old game’s franchise dies whenever the next one arrives.
You should do a comparison of call of duty’s and battlefields soundtracks. In my opinion battlefield 5 and 1’s sound track is astonishing.
Dakota Tuck agree massively, I got the Apocalypse dlc soundtrack saved on a playlist though I would say that cods soundtrack is good as well
halo in my opinion has the best soundtracks like marty is the god of video game music
@@nelite8817 Crysis
MW2, CoD 4, Bo1, Bo2 all exceed the talents of Battlefields scores to be entirely honest. Especially seeing as Hans-Fucking-Zimmer scored MW2’s Theme.
@@TheBebeHabibi no WaW?
I prefer how the gameplay is actually different in both games, battlefield has more detail on environment and physics, and huge maps with diverse vehicles, cod mw is great but multiplayer is just the same as the others.
the only thing that shook me for the first time was the impressive kickback of weapons in COD when compared to BF's robotic ones
Environmental graphics : *BF5*
Visual effects : *BF5*
Facial Expressions : *MW*
Sound : *MW*
*Winner :*
Both
I think it also would have been cool to cover third person player animations like running and sliding. BFV’s animations are especially impressive, with how player models interact based on their movements, such as tripping and stumbling over foliage and uneven surfaces, and shifting their balance when rounding corners. Running straight into a wall will also cause the third person model to react as if it realistically collides into a surface.
Edit: I know it probably would made the video even longer, but also comparing the sounds based on environments would have been cool. Both games have their sound effects interact based on whether the player is inside or outside, and near surroundings.
1:36 MW’s default character showcase menu is the main issue.. when I inspected a skin from Season 2 Battle pass menu it has a high quality to it compared to the when you look at it in the default Character Preview menu.
Benjamin Ice he’s showing ghost?
@@rayhezbroham7297 he means the menu showcase, it's blurry there when you zoom in, but if you preview the suits in the battlepass that effect is disabled so you can preview them without blur effects
Smooth isnt realistic
That film grain for you
whenever it comes to sound design...I love that punchy sounds of Modern Warfare...but having fired guns the crackling effect in BFV is more realistic.....
What yo thoughts people?
Agreed
Bruh. This man said that Battlefield 5 was photorealistic facial models. My man looks like a plastic toy, MW looks super real
how
@@isaiahletsplay5492 MW facial models actually move when u shoot. its a nice little detail
@@dayfrmct3627 you mean like with the recoil
@@isaiahletsplay5492 for example, when h shoot, our character mouth olens and foes this kinda thing eith the eyes
@Jarrit Louttit ive seen does there really cool that cod barely does
3:09 T H E N E T H E R L A N D S
(That map is Narvik, which is in Norway), no worries though loved the video!
Yeah, that one stood out. :D
bah.. good catch. The bridge map was the one in the netherlands. Oh well
@Quality High in the campaign, there's a bridge map which is one of the clips I showed here. It's called "Nijmegen Bridge". It says "NETHERLANDS" as it's loading up. Twisted Steel is a different location.
@@Nick930 The game is BS'ing you. They just threw the twisted steel map into the singleplayer intro and said: look it's Nijmegen. It is in fact in no way shape or form a representation of Nijmegen.
reichsbande71 literally one second of the video is enough for you to comment. Go watch history channel or something
Lul I haven't played either of them but still a big fan of both
They're both great, only problem about both can be bugs and gameplay.
@@2156Charlie Ask an Intel HD 4000 gamer like me, I haven't even played GTA V on my Lappy need prayers
@@Kjrov what? What should I represent?
Haven't played lol You sound like a huge fan
@@Kaioo6142 me too lol ..luckily I played GTA on my PS3
Even though bf5 has the upper hand in graphics and details, cod me just feels so much better in terms of gameplay and feel. Bf5 is not even close in those terms which is why I will always choose Modern warfare
Actually MW copied BF in earth war
diego Antonelli I’ve played all the battlefields none of them felt anything like cod. They’re good at what they do and cod is good at what they do. Most people just prefer the way cod feels
@@Diego-el2is bro neither games copy each other most of the cod games are made with fan requests
Like the recent cod mw and cod ww2 and I can say for sure that bf5 is a very good game but I will always choose cod for storyline and the gameplay and feeling which it gives it just feels alot immersive then bf5
@@Diego-el2is Lol, that translator tho! 😂👌
Thats because BF5 is more realistic and most prefer to play more of a fun video game type of game..
COD is more fun and gimmicky and BF5 more realistic and its slower..
After watching this video I felt motivated to try out BF5 and i actually had fun with it. There's a lot of content to go through still and almost feels like a new game again. Thanks Nick for a great video 👍
I'm happy to see someone who actually tries to like the game and try all the content in it, I think most of the people who dislikes battlefield v haven't even played the game yet because of the shitty reveal they did :)
@@_dylanzz i played that since December 2018, it sucks.
The smgs are too powerful and if you use another weapon you get destroyed.
The medic has INFINITE bandages without a "reload" time so he can spam them. The airplane hitboxes sucks.
@@we_need_moneh2132 The "INFINITE" bandages only heal 2 a second whilst in combat. And if you know how to aim then you wouldn't complain about it.
You said smoke isnt useful in battlefield V. nothing could be farther than the truth sir.
Ya
I don’t know why, but I’m highly satisfied when you say “Direct Comparison”
Me too
So you got a direct erecteion
"Additionally many of these levels feature some great weather effects like rain and snow..."
*wind blowing fire*
is that not what's supposed to happen
That is how fire works
COD MW weapons animations are insane, i really can't name other games with this level of fluidity and detail, for me just makes everithing better, i don't even care about the graphics.
Same boat. BF looks amazing as far as color and scenery but it still feels like the characters and guns don’t move fluidly. I rather a very natural animation than graphics as well 🤘🏼
The MW reloads look really fake to me, take the maneurisms of the character for example.
@@baldgamer3965 yeah, i think it is a matter of personal taste in that regard, but mw weapon customization is so majestic, hundreds of acessories and combinations, weapons sound more impactful and strong. i dont know, in my opinion gunplay is superior in mw and makes me wanna play more with diferent weapons. (im from brazil, english not that good).
graphics in cod are also much better. people that say they're bad probably never played the campaign
i dont really look at the animation while reloading. i dont think its as important as other things
A hardcoore gamer once told me. If you want to have a paintball match with machine guns. Buy COD. If you want warfare. Buy battlefield. That comment has always stood out to me.
Pretty much since most COD player base pretty much run and gun solo. COD is and was design around MLG tournament so trying to translate it into a massive battle failed.
The modern warfare game easily takes the sound effects imo. BFV still sounds like a video game, while MW somehow really sounds like real weaponry.
Perhaps in individual weapon sounds, but Battlefield will still be overall superior in regards to the ambience and the fact that pretty much all the war-related sounds such as distant shooting and explosions are player generated.
@@PoisoningShadow671 Agreed. Modern Warfare sounds good at first, but then you realise that it's all bass and impact to make it sound meaty, but in reality, doesn't really sound the way guns do.
Bruh mw Sounds good but it doesn’t sound that crisp and real and it doesn’t interact with the environment
The first thing I noticed when the trailers and gameplay started dropping for MW was the shotgun sounds. It sounded almost exactly like an actual 12ga (a bit quieter, but that's a given).
@Jarrit Louttit I take my guns to the range every week if I can help it, so yes. I have in fact heard guns being shot irl.
Found your channel while looking up the modern fixes for Quake and Doom etc.
Really great work all around your channel.
Good taste. Good coverage on details. Fantastic channel.
Sub'ed! 👍👍👍
BFV guns sounds like youre far from the point where the gun was shot at
COD sounds like youre really close to the gun.
(edit) COD sounds + BFV graphics + COD story = 🔥🔥🔥
@chris ortiz have you ever fired a gun? It's loud buddy.
I agree mostly. Cod guns sound like they are more in a close quartered outside environment. Not too accurate sounding for the more open map of cod in video. But on other maps, I think the small daytime uk map and the small desert map with the cave, it sounds about right. Bfv, maybe it's because of the war tapes, sounds like the player is wearing earplugs and do indeed sound muffled/distant. Maybe if the sound on our device(s)/in game would be maxed there might be a difference. But I do have to say that the k98 in cod is a little over the top in sound.
Upon listening closer too, cod seems to almost have a more indoor sound with some guns too. Which if one is shooting indoors in the game, its freaking awesome.
Command_not_recognized its a sharp loud crack, cods guns are waaaay to bass heavy. BFV has the sound almost right but is too quiet
@@AloofTheDuck No shit? Just because MWs guns are loud doesn't mean they sound better
Cod: campaign
Battlefield: multiplayer
Change my mind😂😂😂
Matt Was Taken I can’t change your mind if I agree
Agreed.
Bf5s Multiplayer feels unrewarding and not satisfying at all. The gunfights and gunplay/recoil is just anti fun. Characters aren't as customisable as in modern warfare and there's no real "reason" to grind in bf5.
Cod has all of those, making the bf5 multiplayer fun for a short amount of time before losing to cod.
The fun you have on bf5 is a short lived one, whereas cod is way more fun in the long run, when you have all those sweet skins, attachments, characters, emblems and calling cards. It gives you the feeling of accomplishment and prestige.
Edit: Also, the feeling when you laser someone across the map and hearing those sweet hitmarkers feels so satisfying, it makes you wanna go for more kills, it's like having the M1 Garand Ping in a game. Modern warfares gunplay is the most fun I had since Bf4. I tried bf5 when they released the beta. As a Bf4 vet I was displeased and turned off cause it just feels way too different. I still play bf4 to this day, waiting patiently for a better Battlefield experience in the future.
@@kyaryi1 HAHAHAHAHHAHA
CoD campaign wasn't even that good
BF: graphics looks nicer, better pistol audio, and multiplayer with better ground war map design, better character quality
COD: campaign hands down, attention to detail, better small map designs (FFA, TDM, etc), co-op is better with spec-ops (it was somewhat of a flop in this game), textures
conclusion: DICE needs better writers and artists, Infinity ward (the other studios can't keep up) needs better quality and large-scale multiplayer.
why does cod need large scale mp? the appeal of cod is literally its fast pace
This was the stupidest take i've read in this comment section
Something you forgot to address is that battlefield has had years perfecting all the little details and I understand call of duty has had time to practice stuff as well but the cods new engine and lighting effects is a one game thing and infinity wars haven’t had as much experience as dice
But you know what. Look it this way. Battlefield developers bring a new game in a few years and call of duty developers bring a new game almost every year meaning they don't take much time in creating the perfect game but just sent it out bcuz call of duty fans can't wait for a new game. I'm not saying Battlefield is better but I'm saying that one is taking time to make a game and the other not.
I hope you understand this and hope you agree with me
@@Gtafan20014 Here’s the difference though, Battlefield games have only 1 main studio creating Battlefield games, Dice. Call of Duty has Infinity Ward, Treyarch and Sledgehammer as well as half a dozen support studios. So typically each CoD game has about the same dev time as a battlefield game would
@@MacTac141 true true, I can't disagree with you.
I’m a Battlefield fan, but I gotta say, COD got my attention with this game. Especially the characters design details, for they are much more realistic. Probs to COD👍
*props
personally, the cod gameplay for me is way too fast. it looks like a war but doesn't play like one
@@theasherroseman thats why its call COD
Transcendent Chungus the entire genre is always been that.
Have you ever played mw2 if you like bfbc series you are gonna love mw series specially mw2
Battlefield looks amazing
@@salty-gj7rs yeah
@Joshua Pondoff We talk about Cod mw 2019, not about Warzone.
The single best series on UA-cam.
Everyone's mistake is using BFV's war tapes setting for the sound test. It actually isn't mixed as well as the other settings and muffles the guns quite a bit. Speakers or Headphones settings brings that punch your looking for for the sound test.
listen kid , NEVER EVER EVER compare DICE/rockstar games graphic with any other game from other stuios, just dont do it becausse those studios are literraly from the future
Looks like someone is mad
COD mw2019 Is better than battlefield 5
Randomly came across your channel & would like to wish you goodluck to 2020
I CANT EVEN THINK, THE LEVEL OF DETAIL IN NEXT MODERN BATTLEFIELD.............
+1 Aaah man that's what am talking about. Battlefield is the goat for the "battlefield" environnement. Texture for big map, lighting, man to much work on this through the years. BFBC3 maaaan I can't wait. People will continue to buy cod but we know that Battlefield is THE war game in the FPS industry
@@FunkyGOAT And BFV just got cancelled...... so much for the goat.....
Nikola Tesla Whaaaaaaat?!
BF6 pretty much all but confirmed to be modern. 2021
@@themanager1485 yes
You forgot to mention the fact that in battlefield weapons will have different sounds when inside buildings or other areas
Cod does that better
@@technicalbeasts4962 lol no it doesn’t
I just cant wait to see what is possible for both games (battlefield especially) for the upcoming next generation consoles
Gunfire in Modern Warfare sounds so damn frightening and realistic, the recoil of the weapons are so smooth and realistic af.
No recoil in both are unrealistic mounted guns in a vehicle have no recoil and and held have a lot
No, the gun does not sound realistic. They sound like movie guns. The BFV has the correct Tail end of the bullet crack as it flies through the air. MW has better recoil though.
Battle Field 4 will always be my go to :’)
What are you some sort of caveman ?
I still enjoy the clasics to
I enjoy all of them
Bf4 and bf1 will always be my favorites
BF4 for life♡
CoD SOUNDS like it has more punch. BFV looks amazing as always and is visually superior, but CoD is at the very least on par sound wise.
This guy's attention to detail continues to surprise me
and the most important thing, battlefield is so WELL optimized that you do NOT NEED to SPEND 2k in a graphics card to PLAY in MAX settings like COD. 👍
Easily the best graphics comparison on youtube ❤️
MW sound design feels like it's playing in a room or something when B5 sound design feels much epic in scale and quality 🔊
The sound in MW changes according to were you are. the sound would be different if you are in an building or in an open area
I never thought u would make this vid brah but u did awesome
Good thing battlefield is reverting the TTK and making more improvements in a week
they said not a full revert...but,did they say it was coming this month?
I'm having a lot of fun with both games. It's a good time to be an FPS fan.
What shoud i buy? Bf5 or MW?
@@childsx9744 yes
7:07 I think that's meant to be a shockwave effect from the explosion.
that isn’t how shockwaves worked
Grenades don’t create shockwaves, it’s called blast overpressure, which is very minimal and although people think this is what kills you in a grenade, it’s not, fragments is what does kill you. So no, blast over pressure is very minimal and would never be visible to the naked eye.
People saying aah bfv has dinamyc destructive thing that why is better than cod, well...theres a lot of kind of shooters, cod is a standar one and bf is a sort of a battlefield sim, thats why props in cod mw are not destructible bcz it will affect the dynamism of the map and the consistancy of it, and battlefield maps are made to be destroyed. U kno?
@Faults yeah right!! "More realistic" 🤣
@Faults Sure cod fanboy
Faults hahaha more realistic 🤣🤣🤣🤣 soldiers sprinting and jumping everywhere is realistic 😂
@@justanotheridiot3862 Who critisized you mate? We were talking about Faults
Frostbite Engine has only a few competitors, Cry Engine, and maybe Unreal Engine 4.
Unreal engine is the best for me
Yes but development on the frostbite looks like a nightmare, as is the cry engine
@@felinvirginia1 As a Consumer why do you care if it's a Nightmare or Not? As Consumers its not affecting our Gameplay.. When I play games using those Engines it doesn't feel like a Nightmare to play the games..
@@rashidhumine well you didn't played Battlefield V tho
Look at all the frostbite games and tell me if they are good?
At the exception of battlefield, none (Anthem, ME Andromeda, NFS). And what is the reason of their failure when you look at them?
Development nightmare, and the same is even happening to DICE now.
So no, you should bother because with this engine, you got more chance to get a poor game than a great
@@felinvirginia1 When we have Battlefield 4, there's no need for Battlefield V, yes other companies struggle to use it properly and in that case they should stop using it.
It's funny how cod ww2 was compared to every game , to show how horrible their guns were , now the tables have turned and cod mw 2019 is compared to every game to show how good their guns are
Im wait for someone to start an argument with you ._.
@@JohnDoe-gq9hp I know right!
I think every CoD had bad sounds except Bo1. They were beefy. Though MW is sexy and beautiful
Cod's new engine is like frostbite 2, it's not even comparable to frostbite 3
No, COD's new engine is even better
Finnaly a fight between two legendary games:)
dude I swear MW looks more realistic here 1:27
The models in MW are more detailed, but not as graphically impressive.
iCoolaxe they still look better tbh
Im so in love with "house raid" mission
Its called "Clean House"
Call of duty sound effects sound sooo much more realistic it's incomparable. Battlefield has too much echo and it ruins the beauty of the sound. Also I like weapon designs a lot better visually in cod but when it comes to character design and environment look battlefield takes the cake.
Preach
Sound Quality is MW2019 by a longshot. As in BFV, you feel like shooting a bb gun, in MW2019 you feel like you are really shooting a real-life gun.
I was a COD fanboy but after seeing BF-V multiplayer gameplays, I've changed my mind.
1:03 “MW has more variety” but there’s only 16 operators which most are locked behind a BS spec ops mission and you can’t change they outfits 😂,! BFV definitely has more variety for outfit choices.
dude.... isn't that call of duty has operator skins?
No point in changing attires for operators.
Nikola Tesla yeah there is considering how shitty most of em look lol
@@leorousseau8668 yes so that means outfits in bf5 is also kind of pointless for the same troops division
Player base in Bf is no way near as big as Cod. Good thing is it seems like its on a decline
Cod: Animations, Guns, sounds, campaign, customization, iconic characters, gameplay, competitive.
BT: Environment.
8 Vs 1, who will win? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Jesús Sifuentes All you said = environment
Should I continue?
Jesús Sifuentes So, campaign = Competitive multiplayer??
BT is a dead game, it has nothing special, Cod game will last forever
I love the new modern warfare, in my opinion I don’t think BFV is a finished game again I love both games to bits. Due to the comparison, from when BFV first came out I spotted a lot of improved details from the new updates and characters looking less cartoony, shadows from where you hold a gun are less darkened, I even spotted tiny hairs on hands as well, again I love both Modern warfare and battlefield but I have to say BFV has made some incredible improvements do I have to give credit to that, but I think modern warfare and battlefield to me are equal to me
I think MW looks overall better because the weapons and the characters are photorealistic, and the engine has some gorgeous lighting, but battlefield is a way more dynamic game with the environment interaction, those palm trees look amazing in the wind, COD is very static.
Great video I love the BF series but must say COD has better sounds effects / sound quality. I also love how the FOV (Field of View) in BF seems much more broad vs. COD where I always feel, "Zoomed in" even when I'm not.
I think Modern Warfare is much better than BFV.
BFV is an example of a highly realistic game that asks for numberous glitches and errors. While MW is a great example of balancing what details are nessesary and what details are not nessesary.
I have to object his statement that BFV's player model is photo realisitc. Their looks look unatural wherhas MW looks so much more natural.
I also kinda suspect that small details in BFV affects the performance of the game like for example player models do not developed properly.
Sound effects for MW are much immersive. Most of the time when the person is near the weapon, you don't hear the gunshot cracking sound as its most of the time muffled.
While in the battlefield v the grenade explosion and the 1911 pistol sounds more realistic, in CoD the MG34 and Kar98 sounds far more realistic.
CoD KAR98 sounds awful. It sounds nothing like that. It makes a CRACK sound, not a POOM sound.
You forgot to compare animations! I know cod has some great gun animations. great video though
I like how things actually break when you blow up stuff in Battle field V
Destruction is awesome in Battlefield. Better play it.
@@Xfighter04 I'm getting a series x this year, and I guarantee you im getting bfv
@@Iminfinity1773 wait. Get Battlefield 1 first. It's set in ww1 and V is set in ww2. V was hated at first. Then it finally became great at the end.
@@Xfighter04 ok sure
Why does it have to be war. Can’t people just accept both games.
The only thing that can be appreciated from now
COD MW 2019 is the first COD that looks not awfull. They did a huge jump from the last game. Still no match for the Frostbite engine
1:22
Wtf are you? vs Let's do this
That's so something a 12 year old fanboy would say.
@@horrendouss5960 I'm pretty sure every gamer loves ghost. Even battlefield players love him
@@CoolSwipe Battlefield players don't give a fuck about some stereotypical australian badass special forces dude. Could be wrong though xd
@@CoolSwipe too bad the new ghost doesn't look nearly as cool as the original
lorenzo _ the new ghost still looks really good
If bf 6 is going to be modern like this oh boy am I ready to see the extreme realistic graphics.
Dream comes true
this comparison is 1000x better than that other vid I watched