check out the latest video - Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 vs Battlefield 2042 - Attention to detail, Graphics & Weapons Comparison ua-cam.com/video/sAEJSqt70y8/v-deo.html
7:24 to be fair mw3 characters don't panic when grenades are near, but they do call out exactly which type of grenade enemy team threw at them like "flash incoming" or "careful thermite" in a nervous or panicked tone and that seems only happened when you have nearby teammates
Yes and they don't move their heads because a soldier should be prepared not to look at an explosion lol, that's how you get shrapnel stuck into your face
@@husklo bf5 soldiers are regulars, unlike mw3 which is mostly spec ops Said details are running on the assumption spec ops which are usually veterans does the rational thing compared to regulars
If I'm correct but isn't BFV the first published game to ever feature the RTX technology on its game engine. Its still a major feat that's now followed by the trend
@@doobadood it's not a trend though , yes you're right it was the first game , but rtx was an old feature it was used in animated movies but developers didn't implement in video game due to lack of tech advancement
I think it had to do something with the game engine also? Frostbite engine, as buggy as it can get could be built to fit open-world FPS sandbox game like Battlefield franchise as it can optimize the processing progress, thus provide a more cinematic feeling with great detail if it was done right with the right talent. Meanwhile, IW engine is built to fit an fast-pase arcade game so it require the processing progress for such game to be as optimize as possible, thus less detail since honestly, when you zooming at 30mph, I doubt you ever gonna notice such thing so why bother makes it.
@@binhanjustbinhan9141 yes and ground destruction is obviously not for CoD because cod will be a more competitive arcade shooter while battlefield is made for vehicles and realistic combat scenarios
The effect you are referring to at around 4:00 with light passing through the soldiers ears is called ‘Subsurface scattering’ in which light enters a translucent object, scattering inside and then exiting in a different location. This happens to everything from grapes and fruit to human skin, and is an option in almost every AAA game nowadays as a graphics option. It’s a fun experiment to try in real life to get your phone light and shine it through your fingers or your ear and see the light passing through as you move it around. It’s so cool watching video games simulate these natural phenomena and I really look forward to what other things games will be able to simulate in future!
When I was a playful kid I got thorns in my hands and fingers all the time and my mom would use a flash light to light thru to locate the thorns before taking them out.
If you didnt know, while inspecting a gun in MWIII that only has one bullet left, the magazine will not have any cartidges inside, because the last one is already in the chamber, but if you reload with only one bullet, the animation is the same as with any amount of bullets still left, so when you reload youll see that theres still a few bullets still in the mag, when there shouldnt be any except for the one already chambered
The weird thing is that when you reload when there's one in the Chamber, the gun should have 31 bullets instead of 30 because theres already one in the chamber. It always shows 30 which means if u keep one in the chamber, the magazine would only give u 29 bullets instead 30.
@KrugerderGrosse yeah, another shortsight by none other than yours truly, activison. Helldivers 2 has amazing attention to detail, if you haven't played or heard of it
I mean its expected one is a war game fps when cod is a standard fps ofc bf gon have more attention to detail they game calls for it cod doesnt need craters and shi cause its not sum that would help ina game
@@idripflsalty cod boy right here for sure lmao. Call of duty was better back in 2008-2014. Cod has been hot garbage since the new MW2. 2042 is hot garbage also. I only play battlefield 4 till this day for its immersion and gameplay so he is right WTf dO yOu EveN Talking about sounding ah lmao
it's really sad how majority of the OG devs of battlefield are now gone. they always had a keen eye for detail. im still looking forward to a new BF game if it ever comes out.
A lot of them are at Embark now making THE FINALS. You can definitely see the Battlefield influence in it man.. all in it's sound and visuals. I'll be paying attention to BF6 but as far as I can tell, DICE is gone
Try putting a stick (or tube, or just anything cyllindrical) on an uneven/sloped surface, and see if it stays in place. I am sure you will reconsider this belief then.
@asdf13558 already tried it. If cylindrical shape object is on uneven surface it will roll but if the cylindrical shape is kept in vertical position against the uneven surface it will not roll like that in the video
BFV was made within 2 years after BF1. That tells me, how talented Dice were at that time. Then those devs left and came 2042, which is a disaster. i also think BFV still has the best graphical fidelity of all the shooters still.
@@HolyNamedYeah but imagine if Bodycam was of the sam scale as battlefield. Bodycam does have some insane graphics, yeah, but the cost is that the environment is small
Correct me if I'm wrong, isn't that just a "Steilhandgranate" (forgive my spelling), the actual German infantry's hand/stick grenade? If so, that is NOT a sticky grenade, it has a wooden stick to hold, sure, but it doesn't stick to things
battlefield grenade physics always sucked, the actual sticky grenade lags when thrown like bf4 grenades, the one in the video indeed is a stielhandgranate. I'd rather play bfV than bf2042 or any post mw2019 cod
Battlefield v is more affordable, low in size and low in system requirements, and a great campaign with an active multiplayer, so much fun, i am playing for years ❤
The 80 per cent of the coments are childs crying about MW3 saying, oH iN BaTTlEfIEld V thE gRaNeDEs dOeSn't rOLl on unEveN sUrFacEs wHat a ShiTTI gAme. Can we all agree that Battlefield was one of the most detailed and inmersive games in the fps history?
Also battlefield fucking rocks because you get put on a big ass map with 63 other people and you're free to sweat like the #1 try hard or sit in a building 500 meters away from any objective for 50 minutes. I hate that because COD and BF are both shooters they get compared endlessly. They're hardly similar.
7:24 For the "Panic" when grenades are nearby, CoD MWIII's characters *Do* react to it, instead of a panic breathing, you get the character acknowledging the kind of Lethal/Tactical throwable, so they'll scream the thing thrown their way with some remark on what to do, stuff like "MOVE" or "CLOSE YOUR EYES" depending on what it is, it's weird your character didn't say anything, perhaps you had Covert Sneakers on? it's the same as the perk Ninja in older CoD games as they make both your footsteps and character silent, so they just never speak.
It's decent and it could've been a 10 outta 10 if they stuck with it. I've played it since beta and love it, but that they shouldn't have canceled both BFV and Battlefront 2 for 2042.
9:35 Ok, I've played this game a long while on that camo grind, and I can say with 100% certainty that characters breath heavily after a long sprint, and especially after tac sprinting
People hate on BFV but they only do because they're comparing it to some of the best games ever made, compared to most games BFV outshines them completely.
BFV crouch run mechanics literally turned its environment as literally ground cover, the smaller the silhouette the less you get hit. man i love the pacific maps, the trenches and bunkers systems, to airfield's hail marry run which made smoke effective. it made arsenal and tools has purpose sense every route you take has its advantages
8:02 You got me on the destruction part, but you actually don't see the shockwaves like BFV in real life. They would look more like MWIII, where you can only see how the dust gets kicked up around the blast site and near you. That's your only visual indicator of a shockwave, and not that weird heat distortion, so MWIII does that better.
I guess the thing with those multiplayer maps in mw3, since the playing ground is so much smaller they remove the destruction feature so that players still have something to play on bc if the did have destruction with the amount of explosions that occur in a game there would be no buildings left
Battlefield V is such an underrated game and you can see how much passion is behind its development, It is such a stunning game, but it came out at the wrong time and the Treatment of the fans where so poorly that it died very quilckly.
So the only thing Battlefield has to fix is Suspension(Car Jumps) and yet this game on sale costs 4e while lowest price of cod with just updated/polished graphics from COD MW(2007) costs 20e..
Is it just me or is the rolling grenade mechanic realism getting in the way of fun? Please don’t have my grenades roll away from people I’m throwing them at lol
Rolling nades are better, in CS for sure is the case, I would argue even for MW3 since if you know the map - grenade can give you kill in unexpected ways instead of being stuck for BS reason.
i find both games very well done, but in my mind they are 2 different games with 2 different playstyles with details in the areas that fit the playstyle
I think what many people also dont get is that it is not all the graphics that impress but the attention to detail. For example the craters, the waddling also the magazines and ofc the flag thing. So dont think that BFV only impresses with graphics nowadays.
It’s pretty clear to me both games had very different priorities in terms of interactivity. Going back to a classic setting like WW2 definitely seems to have motivated DICE to go above and beyond what they had done before for animations and environmental interactivity. It really paid off as V is arguably the best playing game of all the Frostbite titles. COD’s last huge update was MW19 and they’ve been iterating on that ever since. It looks great and they’ve done a lot in terms of interactivity and animation for sure, but I can’t be the only one who thinks each game has somehow looked a bit worse than the last (excluding BOCW which didn’t run on the newer MW engine as far as I know)
The head turn part is there wayy back before these AAA games released. it's nostalgic remembering having fun without sweat in my childhood game, Point Blank
@@x-ray_channel2226 true it was. would have prospered if the launch wasnt complete dogshit just like every other bf game. nowadays however, bfv is the most well optimized game that i and many others have played.
check out the latest video - Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 vs Battlefield 2042 - Attention to detail, Graphics & Weapons Comparison ua-cam.com/video/sAEJSqt70y8/v-deo.html
7:24 to be fair mw3 characters don't panic when grenades are near, but they do call out exactly which type of grenade enemy team threw at them like "flash incoming" or "careful thermite" in a nervous or panicked tone and that seems only happened when you have nearby teammates
Yes and they don't move their heads because a soldier should be prepared not to look at an explosion lol, that's how you get shrapnel stuck into your face
@@husklo bf5 soldiers are regulars, unlike mw3 which is mostly spec ops
Said details are running on the assumption spec ops which are usually veterans does the rational thing compared to regulars
Huh, COD fanboys
@@husklo
@@angeemmanuelassassindri8090 Not necessarily a fan boy; it's important to call out small details in any video games to appreciate their effort.
10:48 “FUSE IS LIT!” *Gets blown to ashes by the power of over 20 tons worth of explosives.*
fr
😂😂😂
And somehow lives.
@@magikaros definitely died my man, it was just cut for another player's view.
@@Rinue618 oh ok, I thought he glitched or something, thanks fir clarifying
3:16 no one gonna talk about how funny the quick head turn is?😂
*"Mein gott Kurt i think we just gave away our position"*
Lol fr
lmao fr
you can do it irl soo ..
100% looks like the toy soldier from toy story
BFV still flexing its graphics even in 2024
i still play it it has lot fo players
Its the engine, frostbite is the most optimized and best looking engine on the planet.
Def not just the engine. There is a reason 2042 is never the one in these comparison videos.
If I'm correct but isn't BFV the first published game to ever feature the RTX technology on its game engine. Its still a major feat that's now followed by the trend
@@doobadood it's not a trend though , yes you're right it was the first game , but rtx was an old feature it was used in animated movies but developers didn't implement in video game due to lack of tech advancement
10:50 that explosion was so powerful it had to teleport/respawn you to get blown up again!
Checking for Nuclear bombs be like
Thats the other player pov
they had to censor the gore blown to bits 😆
It so amazing that a 6 years old game has more details and better graphics than the newest fps games
edit: thanks for 1.9k likes :O
for real 2018 game vs 2023 game and 2018 wins
IKR
Hell even BF1 which was made in 2016 looks better than the newer cods 🤣
I think it had to do something with the game engine also? Frostbite engine, as buggy as it can get could be built to fit open-world FPS sandbox game like Battlefield franchise as it can optimize the processing progress, thus provide a more cinematic feeling with great detail if it was done right with the right talent. Meanwhile, IW engine is built to fit an fast-pase arcade game so it require the processing progress for such game to be as optimize as possible, thus less detail since honestly, when you zooming at 30mph, I doubt you ever gonna notice such thing so why bother makes it.
@@binhanjustbinhan9141 yes and ground destruction is obviously not for CoD because cod will be a more competitive arcade shooter while battlefield is made for vehicles and realistic combat scenarios
I love how dirty and gritty BFV's artstyle is. Say what you want about anachronistic equipment and female soldiers but it FEELs like a warzone.
No it’s feels like a
BATTLEFIELD
And BFV inmerssion is shit, BF1 make feel like a sand sack in the Battlefield
@@anti-materielrifle Hence why i purchased BF1 during Sale instead of BFV, I loved BF1's dark atmosphere more than BFV
It’s kinda sad that BF1 dying rn
@@Oily_Vector fr, why you soy It’s dying, on pc there are a lot of community servers that are full every day with queves up to 10 people per server
0:45 you'd think in modern times, we got more efficient window wipers so of course it'd look cleaner lol
Yeah may be
it's the effort that counts
No, stains on the glass should remain in any case
@@clerky771 Yeah, when you don't tidy up, of course it stains.
If this isn’t coping idk what is
The effect you are referring to at around 4:00 with light passing through the soldiers ears is called ‘Subsurface scattering’ in which light enters a translucent object, scattering inside and then exiting in a different location. This happens to everything from grapes and fruit to human skin, and is an option in almost every AAA game nowadays as a graphics option. It’s a fun experiment to try in real life to get your phone light and shine it through your fingers or your ear and see the light passing through as you move it around. It’s so cool watching video games simulate these natural phenomena and I really look forward to what other things games will be able to simulate in future!
When I was a playful kid I got thorns in my hands and fingers all the time and my mom would use a flash light to light thru to locate the thorns before taking them out.
and the feet thing is called Inverse Kinematics or IK
At least BO6 looks better than MWII/III already.
Que dices, MW2 es el COD mas avanzado grafica y detalladamente de los ultimos Años, el MWIII si se mira re feo, esta igual que cold war
mw 2019 tiene los mejores graficos bro y warzone 1
@@josuefrings381mw 2019 seve mejor y warzone 1 que mw2 y 3
@@vegetagta005 MW19 se ve mejor que el MWII, pero el Warzone en las últimas temporadas se veía de plastico
@@sussyman9034 no creo bro porque recuerda que warzone es un modo de juego de mw19 es el mismo motor grafico
If you didnt know, while inspecting a gun in MWIII that only has one bullet left, the magazine will not have any cartidges inside, because the last one is already in the chamber, but if you reload with only one bullet, the animation is the same as with any amount of bullets still left, so when you reload youll see that theres still a few bullets still in the mag, when there shouldnt be any except for the one already chambered
there is only one bullet left
The weird thing is that when you reload when there's one in the Chamber, the gun should have 31 bullets instead of 30 because theres already one in the chamber. It always shows 30 which means if u keep one in the chamber, the magazine would only give u 29 bullets instead 30.
@KrugerderGrosse yeah, another shortsight by none other than yours truly, activison. Helldivers 2 has amazing attention to detail, if you haven't played or heard of it
@@soupstr rappers screaming in our ears like we're deaf
@@The-one-and-only-catzillatempt me do a number on the label
I love both games but if were talking attention to detail Battlefeild has the edge easily.
Has the edge? BF got the whole counter
I mean its expected one is a war game fps when cod is a standard fps ofc bf gon have more attention to detail they game calls for it cod doesnt need craters and shi cause its not sum that would help ina game
@@idripfl CoD glazer, detail can go a long way to making games more immersive.
@@HolyNamed not even but ok😂 think yk wtf u tb
@@idripflsalty cod boy right here for sure lmao. Call of duty was better back in 2008-2014. Cod has been hot garbage since the new MW2. 2042 is hot garbage also. I only play battlefield 4 till this day for its immersion and gameplay so he is right WTf dO yOu EveN Talking about sounding ah lmao
*MW3 doesn’t have this detail*
MWIII*
@@Motyliait’s the same thing.
@@TyDie1well,MW3 is the name of the original mw series,MWIII is from the reboot
@@holasoypoloxxshut up
@@holasoypoloxxБез разницы, MW3 2011 года также серьёзно проигрывала Battlefield 3 в 2011 году по реалистичности и графике 😂
it's really sad how majority of the OG devs of battlefield are now gone. they always had a keen eye for detail. im still looking forward to a new BF game if it ever comes out.
goodluck waiting till the end of time dude
A lot of them are at Embark now making THE FINALS. You can definitely see the Battlefield influence in it man.. all in it's sound and visuals.
I'll be paying attention to BF6 but as far as I can tell, DICE is gone
This seems bias
Go play the finals then... destruction is so satisfying
@@pilotsayshello1758 there's a lot of old battlefield devs working on combat champions too, it has open betas on steam every now and then
0:18 i ain't no bf gamer. But that my friend is a stick grenade, and stick won't roll even in uneven surfaces.
Try putting a stick (or tube, or just anything cyllindrical) on an uneven/sloped surface, and see if it stays in place. I am sure you will reconsider this belief then.
@asdf13558 already tried it. If cylindrical shape object is on uneven surface it will roll but if the cylindrical shape is kept in vertical position against the uneven surface it will not roll like that in the video
I’m 1000% sure that not only did they use regular grenades but they did it multiple times outside of just that one clip that they showed us.😒
BFV was made within 2 years after BF1. That tells me, how talented Dice were at that time. Then those devs left and came 2042, which is a disaster. i also think BFV still has the best graphical fidelity of all the shooters still.
bodycam:
@@HolyNamedYeah but imagine if Bodycam was of the sam scale as battlefield. Bodycam does have some insane graphics, yeah, but the cost is that the environment is small
0:30 that's a huge jump in graphics quality
are u being sarcastic?
@@saiyeedbilalalhakim6506 yes, backwards
lol
@@saiyeedbilalalhakim6506of course 😂😂
Dear god what are those graphics 😭
Weird to compare a game like cod too bf when battlefield has total map destruction when cod has trouble rendering bullet holes in tin.
I think it's totally fair, since Battlefield V soon is gonna be a 6 yrs old game...
Can’t believe grenades cannot roll in uneven surfaces on bf5. That’s the weirdest thing I ever seen before
I think it's intentional not to get in the way of gameplay
He used a stick grenade. Had he used a spherical one it would’ve rolled easier
It's a sticky one 😂
Correct me if I'm wrong, isn't that just a "Steilhandgranate" (forgive my spelling), the actual German infantry's hand/stick grenade?
If so, that is NOT a sticky grenade, it has a wooden stick to hold, sure, but it doesn't stick to things
battlefield grenade physics always sucked, the actual sticky grenade lags when thrown like bf4 grenades, the one in the video indeed is a stielhandgranate. I'd rather play bfV than bf2042 or any post mw2019 cod
Bro MWII and MWIII are cashgrabs. No way we're comparing games with no effort to games made with passion and love.
But that's the point of the video right? To show what cashgrabs they are and that they don't compare to a game like bf5.
MWII is ok,MWIII is bad
@@holasoypoloxxbesides the $70 dlc part and the shitty campaign mw3 has one of the best and most content packed multiplayers
@@holasoypoloxxstfu ur opinion doesn’t matter
The developers reading this comment: 😢
Title should be "If you bought MW3, watch this to feel even worst."
People care about the game not polygons dumbass
0:29 let's just... Not talk about the graphics okay???
3:17 did anyone noticed how scary the soldier was? My god never saw a scarier soldier
Battlefield v is more affordable, low in size and low in system requirements, and a great campaign with an active multiplayer, so much fun, i am playing for years ❤
Mwiii looks like a mobile game compared to bf5
I’m sorry but fuck no 💀 you can tell how old battle field 5 looks, it’s a game that came out in 2018 or so
Been playing cod for a decade and yes its true
The current state of cod is bad af
hope bo6 will bring back enjoyment
I would think the same thing if I was overdosing on copium due to being to poor to buy mw3
yeah what mobile games are you playing broski
@@1ts3rickHahaha bf5 looks better then MW3. You clearly saw the video blindfolded
Man, Battlefield V's Breakthrough was so fuggin good.
9:39 wdym it’s not heard? You can literally hear it, it’s just tonned down compared to BFV
Tonned down fr...
10:47 is my favorite part of the whole video. It doesn’t even need a caption
BFV: teenage soldiers with fear in their eyes
MWIII: 21 savage and Nicki Minaj
The 80 per cent of the coments are childs crying about MW3 saying, oH iN BaTTlEfIEld V thE gRaNeDEs dOeSn't rOLl on unEveN sUrFacEs wHat a ShiTTI gAme. Can we all agree that Battlefield was one of the most detailed and inmersive games in the fps history?
Also battlefield fucking rocks because you get put on a big ass map with 63 other people and you're free to sweat like the #1 try hard or sit in a building 500 meters away from any objective for 50 minutes.
I hate that because COD and BF are both shooters they get compared endlessly. They're hardly similar.
@@GenericMedicground war is a similar game mode to battlefield
Pretending like BF is not a shitty game.
@@GG22n Turn back think again and then edit ur comment, u're grounded for being a Tryhard At CoD
@@Joselu1337 No 😐
Activision was really quiet since this banger dropped
They’ve actually gotten louder about the new battle pass
7:24 For the "Panic" when grenades are nearby, CoD MWIII's characters *Do* react to it, instead of a panic breathing, you get the character acknowledging the kind of Lethal/Tactical throwable, so they'll scream the thing thrown their way with some remark on what to do, stuff like "MOVE" or "CLOSE YOUR EYES" depending on what it is, it's weird your character didn't say anything, perhaps you had Covert Sneakers on? it's the same as the perk Ninja in older CoD games as they make both your footsteps and character silent, so they just never speak.
Almost forgot cod had this detail 7:15
Hehe
Battlefield 5 could be a good game if EA/DICE care about it
It is good lol
it is good?
Where my Soviets and iconic maps 😭
It's decent and it could've been a 10 outta 10 if they stuck with it. I've played it since beta and love it, but that they shouldn't have canceled both BFV and Battlefront 2 for 2042.
@@GenericMedicIf they add historical accurate factions and maps BFV would have been the greatest FPS game in the decade
9:35
Ok, I've played this game a long while on that camo grind, and I can say with 100% certainty that characters breath heavily after a long sprint, and especially after tac sprinting
You can hear it too
That running effect in BF5 is so cool I like that
0:15 because it's a stick grenade
I mean its still enough angle to get it rolling
@@idk0622 it was a pun😔
Oooooh
@@khactiep057 Thats not what a fucking pun is
@idk0622 Yes it is 😅
11:34 thousand yard stare 💀
maybe in mw3 people just know how to clean windows correctly
10:48 was so sick, felt like in a movie when they film the explotion close up and then further away, hella sick and cinematic game
People hate on BFV but they only do because they're comparing it to some of the best games ever made, compared to most games BFV outshines them completely.
Crazy that bfv is still competing graphics wise. Game was ahead of its time.
Call of Duty can't even count the extra bullet in the chamber after a tactical reload. Something battlefield can from battlefield 3
BFV crouch run mechanics literally turned its environment as literally ground cover, the smaller the silhouette the less you get hit. man i love the pacific maps, the trenches and bunkers systems, to airfield's hail marry run which made smoke effective. it made arsenal and tools has purpose sense every route you take has its advantages
my dog when they smell a treat from a mile away 2:55
8:02 You got me on the destruction part, but you actually don't see the shockwaves like BFV in real life. They would look more like MWIII, where you can only see how the dust gets kicked up around the blast site and near you. That's your only visual indicator of a shockwave, and not that weird heat distortion, so MWIII does that better.
Okay Battlefield V still looks 10x better
@@HolyNamed ok keep glazing
man, I love battlefield v
It looks so beautiful
I guess the thing with those multiplayer maps in mw3, since the playing ground is so much smaller they remove the destruction feature so that players still have something to play on bc if the did have destruction with the amount of explosions that occur in a game there would be no buildings left
Battlefield V is such an underrated game and you can see how much passion is behind its development, It is such a stunning game, but it came out at the wrong time and the Treatment of the fans where so poorly that it died very quilckly.
Yeah 😢
the newer games always look blurrier than the older ones
Next do Delta Force Hawk Ops vs Battlefield when the alpha comes out
So the only thing Battlefield has to fix is Suspension(Car Jumps) and yet this game on sale costs 4e while lowest price of cod with just updated/polished graphics from COD MW(2007) costs 20e..
What’s your point?
Cause one game is good and other one is shit
Battlefield 5 sucks
Is it just me or is the rolling grenade mechanic realism getting in the way of fun? Please don’t have my grenades roll away from people I’m throwing them at lol
wow weird seeing you here! but i think the rolling grenades are better cuz they have more physics and I guess makes it so that people dont spam frags
Rolling nades are better, in CS for sure is the case, I would argue even for MW3 since if you know the map - grenade can give you kill in unexpected ways instead of being stuck for BS reason.
More of a skill check compared to older thames where they ricocheted
6:48 the reason is because they didn’t have suspension yet at that time
All these little details that people just take for granted.
All the little details that people need to watch a video to realize it was even in the game in the first place
At 3:19 bro was like “you seein this shit?”
Man was staring into the dudes soul and then he fr went 🤨, 🤷♂, 🙁
Real af
Call of Duty has never done environmental deformation, sadly.
The tumbling animation is crazy.
The coughing when the tank is on fire is cursed
Didn't expect the whole mountain to blow up with the explosives
honestly, i think bfv's version of frostbite is still great even for as old as it is. frostbite engine in general is still great looking engine.
1:51 Call of Duty WW2 (2017) Campaign NPCs have these animations as well. But they aren't adaptive - rather decorative
i find both games very well done, but in my mind they are 2 different games with 2 different playstyles with details in the areas that fit the playstyle
bf5 was ahead of its time
low-key it still is. its better than the newest BF and no other company has created a large scale multiplayer as well as DICE.
Tbf mw3 was a complete afterthought and was supposed to be DLC for mw2, but still you can see which game had love and passion put into it
I see potential for you to be a big UA-camr. Good job
he has been doing this for 6 years
@@U_niquey he had such a tiny view count I was surprised lol
10:27 Actually a map I don't remember which one. But the weapon had gotten dirty. Of soil or snow. That then this detail is there from the time of ww2
7:44 Modern day soldiers eat nades like real men and don't cry about it. 😂😂
Lil bro saying it like he will not panick if he have a real active granade right under him and only have 3 seconds to do something about it
lil bro watched too much of captain america
ya really think you're him
Lil bro this and that, you 2 tards don't realize its a joke
@@AE-zm6dgi cant tell if your takng it too seriously or just sarcasm
you have a real talent for making informative and fun videos!
Glad you like them!
Imagine what content we would have in BFV if EA wasn't EA...
2:55 "Hey! HEY!"
2:57 "You wanna sprite cranberry?"
MW3 honestly looks like an asset flip
It’s literally an mw2 asset flip lol they just released it as a 70 dollar game because they had nothing else for 2023 it was supposed to be mw2 dlc
I think what many people also dont get is that it is not all the graphics that impress but the attention to detail. For example the craters, the waddling also the magazines and ofc the flag thing. So dont think that BFV only impresses with graphics nowadays.
MWIII looks like an extra clean mobile game.
I think this just shows how incredibly detailed battlefield 5 is tbh
The vehicle in MW is an RC cars like COD:Ghost RC tank mission
i make human sized rc vehicles for airsoft it’s pretty dope especially fpv
1:53 look at the shadow
i feel like a lot of this you could sum up to optimization for esports play? (I am not sure of this so don't take my word for it).
I mean you can just turn graphics settings down.
2:55 my nephew asking if my fone has any games in it
MWIII's windows were just cleaned better.
😂😂
not the point man....
Video: Battlefield has window cleaning streaks while MW doesn't
Janitor in MW: 😔
xDDDDDDDDDDDD
BFV more realistic then BF 2042
if these games had a collab it would be crazy
I never hear anyone talk about the trigger reset in mw
I have mentioned that in mw vs bf2042 video long back. I will add that in the next video
@Stay_Frosty Can't wait to see it. Thank you!
@@Stay_FrostyNEXT VIDEO
TRY ENLISTED
@@azimahmad8401 No, that game is a trash fire.
@@Ashen_Night116 try bro
It’s pretty clear to me both games had very different priorities in terms of interactivity. Going back to a classic setting like WW2 definitely seems to have motivated DICE to go above and beyond what they had done before for animations and environmental interactivity. It really paid off as V is arguably the best playing game of all the Frostbite titles.
COD’s last huge update was MW19 and they’ve been iterating on that ever since. It looks great and they’ve done a lot in terms of interactivity and animation for sure, but I can’t be the only one who thinks each game has somehow looked a bit worse than the last (excluding BOCW which didn’t run on the newer MW engine as far as I know)
2:07 bro got scalped 😭
The head turn part is there wayy back before these AAA games released. it's nostalgic remembering having fun without sweat in my childhood game, Point Blank
3:23 so u want me to turn my head 180°?
Late the time is earlier
2:57 dude be like stop fooking recording me 🤣
Yes it will dry over time i play mw3 zombies in 3rd person and the wet clothes drys over time
This is just glazing the shit out of battle field ngl
Nah Cod is the most basic/ MID fps franchise oat, I wouldn’t drop 70$ on this dogshit let alone on a yearly basis
bf5 isnt the best game ever but at least it had soul
mwiii is an asset flip that feels like you put a realistic graphics filter over a mobile game
30 GB vs 230 GB
bfv is literally 90 gig
Bf1 and bfV are my favorite fps games and I didn’t even know some of these details
BF5 was a gem and got way too much hate...
Brother. It was unplayable dogshit
@@x-ray_channel2226 true it was. would have prospered if the launch wasnt complete dogshit just like every other bf game. nowadays however, bfv is the most well optimized game that i and many others have played.
Not gonna lie though, the Modern Warfare eye on the thumbnail looks so realistic
MWIII looks like Roblox by comparison
ive actually seen roblox games with better graphics.
Honorable mention: The Desert Eagle in MW2 has a ring of smoke in front of the barrel when you fire it
mw3 looks like a mobile game
10:50 What is the name of that map? I want to experience that explosion for myself.
pretty sure its wake island
@DatBom. Thank you
Why are mw2 and mw3s colors so washed out?
because its a shit game that is only a money grab and poorly developed shit heap.
10:53 Geez I felt that.
We need this in battlefield 1