Star Wars: Inside the Imperial Star Destroyer

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 січ 2021
  • The iconic Imperial-class Star Destroyer first appears in the opening scene of Star Wars in 1977, where the Imperial Star Destroyer Devastator, with Darth Vader on board, chases the CR90 Corvette Tantive IV above Tatooine.
    Manufactured by Kuat Drive Yards, the Imperial I-class Star Destroyer is described as a technological successor of the Venator-class Jedi cruisers used by the naval forces of the Galactic Republic during the Clone Wars.
    Ever wanted to see how an Imperial-class Star Destroyer actually works? Here is a deeper dive inside an Imperial Star Destroyer. A technical 3D animation showcasing the power behind a Star Destroyer.
    But also learn how this Star Wars capital ship works and why it's considered one of the most iconic spaceships in the Star Wars saga.
    They were nonetheless essential in the Imperial doctrine of planetary containment and fast infantry deployment, and the vessel was noted as one of the most resource-intensive ships in the Imperial Navy.
    Exterior 3D model by Ansel Hsiao
    fractalsponge.net/
    Title: The Awakening
    Composer: Christian Baczyk
    Genre: Epic Heroic Sci-fi Orchestral Trailer Score
    • Christian Baczyk - The...
    The product I used to recreate this animation.
    Here is a list of books and tools I have used to recreate these animations. (affiliate links)
    Star Wars Complete Vehicles New Edition Hardcover
    amzn.to/31q6iTs
    Star Wars: The Visual Encyclopedia
    amzn.to/3HyToSA
    Zoom H5 Mic Handy Recorder Kit
    amzn.to/32Eo71O
    Logitech MX Master 3 Advanced Wireless Mouse
    amzn.to/3eNcU1m
    SAMSUNG 970 EVO Plus SSD 500GB - M.2 NVMe
    amzn.to/3mU3SUp
    AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-core
    amzn.to/32MA995
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,3 тис.

  • @jeffreytan2948
    @jeffreytan2948 3 роки тому +368

    Noticed the millennium falcon still hanging at the back of the bridge. Nice comparison for scale.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +41

      I think you the first to spotted that. Nice observation!

    • @majoraccident1924
      @majoraccident1924 2 роки тому +6

      It is also a representation of how to safely escape imperial fighters by disgusing yourself as part of the garbage being thrown away from the ship

    • @jordanbridges
      @jordanbridges 2 роки тому +3

      @@majoraccident1924 unless you're being tracked by a bounty hunter

    • @tankythemagnorite9855
      @tankythemagnorite9855 2 роки тому

      i noticed that too

    • @Donleecartoons
      @Donleecartoons 2 роки тому +1

      A YT-1300 hanging off the back of the bridge module is standard equipment. That's why nobody on the Avenger noticed it, even the one guy who bothered to look out the back window.

  • @charlesfuentes3695
    @charlesfuentes3695 2 роки тому +338

    Seeing S.W. for the very first time over 40 years ago, we never thought about the ship's interiors. The details you displayed made it so Vivid & Imaginable, you brought me back to the Geekness. Bravo!

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 роки тому +15

      Glad you enjoyed it!

    • @jcharmaine1
      @jcharmaine1 2 роки тому

      How old r u

    • @NaughtyNovaroo69
      @NaughtyNovaroo69 2 роки тому +7

      @@Halfscreen tho i wish We could learn where the med bays, armory, sleeping qauters, officer beds, prison cells, tie fighter beds, bathrooms and cateen but still good animation and the falcon and the runway ship

    • @mj3541
      @mj3541 2 роки тому

      @@jcharmaine1 probably in his 50s depending on how old he was when star wars first came out

    • @Yautah
      @Yautah 2 роки тому +1

      Sorry but we ? This has existed this the 2000s or late 90 at least, whole books with descriptions and images consists inside SW machinery. Then again no shame in not knowing, I guess its pretty niche.

  • @jbtdmc
    @jbtdmc 3 роки тому +873

    Thanks for having the Ghost of Stephen Hawking to narrate this video. =:0)

    • @xkm-thebasetecchannel3823
      @xkm-thebasetecchannel3823 3 роки тому +13

      Make it 2 times faster.

    • @1joshjosh1
      @1joshjosh1 3 роки тому +10

      Why am I the only one that's not bothered by this voice.
      If you play it at 1:25 this videos are perfect

    • @1joshjosh1
      @1joshjosh1 3 роки тому +6

      It's not that bad.
      Play at 1:25

    • @kennethferland5579
      @kennethferland5579 3 роки тому +5

      That's not remotely the same synthesizer voice Hawking used.

    • @rh5466
      @rh5466 3 роки тому +34

      This robovoice is stupid. Why would they do that?

  • @tropicalhorizongaming5459
    @tropicalhorizongaming5459 2 роки тому +210

    4:54
    Im surprised by how much of the inside is engineering and power, didn’t expect the engines be so far inside, just like the venator. Especially given how many people it can hold.

    • @MrChickennugget360
      @MrChickennugget360 2 роки тому +20

      i don't like the idea that its intended crew is 40,000. maybe 10,000 or less. With the "40,000" number being with a full military ground force embarked.

    • @Simon-ho6ly
      @Simon-ho6ly 2 роки тому +3

      @@MrChickennugget360 maybe but consider a nimitz class carrier is circa 6000 crew

    • @MrChickennugget360
      @MrChickennugget360 2 роки тому +8

      @@Simon-ho6ly i know but remember Starwars is futuristic so they don't always have to have as big a crew as modern ships. Of course the size of the crew would vary based on what was embarked.

    • @N0d4chi
      @N0d4chi 2 роки тому +12

      @@MrChickennugget360 With the number of decks, the size of the ship, 40000 is really low actually. People dont realize how many square kilometers these things have. With 40k crew, youd be hard pressed to run into anyone for a couple hundred meters of corridor

    • @MrChickennugget360
      @MrChickennugget360 2 роки тому

      @@N0d4chi i guess. part of my idea of course is that lots of the ship is void space or set aside for storage and hanger space.
      i could see a fully manned Star Destroyer having a crew of 40,000 including air wing support if it was loaded out for a 100% star-side mission (carrying more fighters, bomber and gunships)
      No matter what i think the Star Destroyer's complement should vary based on what mission its equipped for

  • @Reindeer911
    @Reindeer911 2 роки тому +37

    975 km/hr? That's all?!? Even in space? Man, that thing is SLOOOOW... that's only MACH 0.8 or so, not even close to the speed of sound. Any airliner could keep up with it and any modern fighter could easily run circles around the Star Destroyer speed wise.

    • @Jarl_Thidrandi
      @Jarl_Thidrandi 2 роки тому +10

      This can't be right, unless we're talking about its speed in an atmosphere similar to ours. In space, there is no speed limit for an engine. Mph or Kph is not used as it is not relevant or relative. Instead meters per second are used as a metric, for both velocity and potentiality. The delta V of a craft can be summed up as how much energy is available in the fuel and able to be output through the engine, relative to the mass of the craft and the amount of gravitational effect it is experiencing. The efficiency of these engines is categorized as the ISP, or specific impulse. This is all to say that with what is essentially a fusion reactor powering a set of massive ION engines, your potential relative velocity could be relatively close to light speed, given enough time. The only downside would be maneuverability, since any inertia would need to be cancelled to change direction in space. With how massive these craft are, perhaps a standard operating speed was established to allow for maneuvering in a vacuum. Considering star destroyers are poorly designed for any type of axial acceleration, specifically along the normal/antinormal nodes, and the radial in and out nodes, it would take a lot of time to reposition one of these beasts to change their direction. With all that said, these craft would have an almost limitless amount of delta V at their disposal, and could basically go whatever speed they wanted to within the laws of physics.

    • @worldstateproductions8787
      @worldstateproductions8787 2 роки тому +5

      That's its max atmospheric speed. While In space, its max acceleration is 2300 gravities or about 22,563 meters per second per second.

    • @Highly-grounded
      @Highly-grounded 3 місяці тому

      Idk I think that’s the in atmosphere speed

    • @onik7000
      @onik7000 2 місяці тому

      975 that's atmo speed. ISD has 60 MGLT topspeed in realspace (not hyperspace).
      MGLT was used by Industrial Light & Magic to compare ship speeds. As far as i know - there is no way to convert it to real speed (m/s or kph)

  • @mortgoldman8341
    @mortgoldman8341 3 роки тому +47

    The amount of time they take to make complete 3d models of these things and add small details just to show you is amazing.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +10

      I'm a detail freak by nature, I can't help it.

    • @mortgoldman8341
      @mortgoldman8341 3 роки тому +3

      @@Halfscreen Don't worry about it this work is amazing and I love it

  • @admiralpeak
    @admiralpeak 3 роки тому +174

    ‘In order to reduce the weight of the vessel.’
    Sad vacuum noises

    • @geraltofrivia323
      @geraltofrivia323 3 роки тому +25

      The star destroyers could fly in-atmo too.

    • @ZzaphodD
      @ZzaphodD 3 роки тому +50

      Should be switched for 'mass'

    • @chokoloteblack9328
      @chokoloteblack9328 3 роки тому

      @@geraltofrivia323yes

    • @chokoloteblack9328
      @chokoloteblack9328 3 роки тому +1

      @@geraltofrivia323 he said about hyperspace

    • @forgilageord
      @forgilageord 3 роки тому +6

      Vacuum doesn't have anything to do with weight. Mass would often be the more relevant term, but if you take what's on screen for fact, ships almost never orbit in Star Wars, so what they're really doing is hovering at an extremely high altitude. Gravity at these heights is only slightly less than on the surface, so especially in those cases the weight in that planet's gravity would be relevant.

  • @lorenzoguerra-iq4gl
    @lorenzoguerra-iq4gl 3 роки тому +111

    I love to know How a star Destroyer Works...

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +16

      I don't seen to many video on the Star Destroyer on youtube.

    • @lorenzoguerra-iq4gl
      @lorenzoguerra-iq4gl 3 роки тому +6

      @@Halfscreen me too

    • @bullhead3852
      @bullhead3852 3 роки тому +1

      No you don't

    • @Nervisor23
      @Nervisor23 3 роки тому +2

      @@Halfscreen Same,i like these kinds of vids.
      I also liked the milennium falcon easter egg at the trash thing.

    • @darthvader5802
      @darthvader5802 3 роки тому +1

      it has one purpose in his life: being destroyed

  • @SiberiusRises
    @SiberiusRises 2 роки тому +4

    Great video. The details of the interior sets this presentation apart from so many others out there. Thanks for the work on this.

  • @targe762
    @targe762 Рік тому +16

    Sorry I dont listen to droids😊

  • @kevalsolanki6292
    @kevalsolanki6292 2 роки тому +2

    I was looking for this for so long, finally. Great Video👏

  • @nl59
    @nl59 3 роки тому +10

    I've been waiting for someone to do this for years! Many thanks!

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +1

      Any many more to come.

    • @WillyBob.Becker
      @WillyBob.Becker 3 роки тому

      @@Halfscreen but what are the sources ? Do you try to imagine what’s actually inside or do you try to puzzle it together based on the movies/series/comics or has it been designed entirely and you’re just relating to those original plans ?

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому

      @@WillyBob.Becker I'm currently using the artbook from Star Wars (cross-section), but there is a lot of guessing on my part to make it work.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому

      @@WillyBob.Becker Star Wars: Complete Vehicles Hardcover is a good book for references, but I still have to put a lot of guesses to fill in the gap. Luckily for me, I'm a bit creative.

  • @srisaiyoutube4126
    @srisaiyoutube4126 3 роки тому +18

    Good job on this - would love to see more detail on the crew quarters, etc. once your channel picks up and you can get more ad revenue. Will support!

  • @ale9335
    @ale9335 3 роки тому +6

    I immediately subscribed! This recreation is awesome!

  • @OdintheGermanShepherd
    @OdintheGermanShepherd 3 роки тому +262

    Great detail of the Millineum Falcon......very interesting video.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +25

      Thanks!

    • @forkliftcertifed123
      @forkliftcertifed123 3 роки тому +4

      I don’t think that’s the millineum falcon but ok

    • @wtf028
      @wtf028 3 роки тому +25

      @@forkliftcertifed123 The Millineum Falcon is hiding at rear port side of command bridge. 3:18

    • @forkliftcertifed123
      @forkliftcertifed123 3 роки тому +4

      @@wtf028 oh I misunderstood you

    • @jonathanperry8331
      @jonathanperry8331 3 роки тому +2

      This was really cool but it makes you wonder why the tie fighters facing sideways? Why wouldn't they be docked the fly straight out?

  • @chuuska1972
    @chuuska1972 3 роки тому +1

    Beautiful! Simply beautiful... thank you for this video!

  • @BladeKi11a
    @BladeKi11a 3 роки тому +53

    Talks about the ISD1 but shows an ISD2....
    For those that don't know the difference between the two ISDs, are the tractor beam and sensor array systems on the top. The ISD1 has an X-shape tractor beam and sensor array system while the ISD2 has a rectangular shape. Another noticeable difference is the heavy turbolaser systems. The ISD1 has 4 heavy turbolaser batteries on each side, each cannon holding two guns. While the ISD2 has 4 octuple barbette heavy turbo laser batteries on each side, each cannon holding eight guns.

    • @MikeSHA2009
      @MikeSHA2009 3 роки тому +4

      Yes, they are Turbolasers, not only Ion Cannons...

  • @bradyvelvet9432
    @bradyvelvet9432 3 роки тому +65

    The Falcon hanging on there like a damn tick! 😂😂😂
    So these ships were mostly engine
    Awesome video! ❤️

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +3

      Thanks!

    • @jcharmaine1
      @jcharmaine1 2 роки тому

      @@Halfscreen hey uh could you do a video about the space colony arks size and purpose pls that would be amazing

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 роки тому

      @@jcharmaine1 I really don't know much about the space colony arks.

    • @jcharmaine1
      @jcharmaine1 2 роки тому

      @@Halfscreen well it 15 kilometers in diameter the sonic adventure 2 stage select screen shows its inside its where shadow the hedgehog was made and where shadows creator "prof gerald" who eggmans grandfather worked there along with black doom who is the leader of a alien race called the black arms but if you want to know more look up the lore of sa2 and shadow the hedgehog

    • @jcharmaine1
      @jcharmaine1 2 роки тому

      @@Halfscreen and its from sonic adventure 2 and shadow the hedgehog

  • @cardphins68
    @cardphins68 Рік тому

    That was an awesome job, really impressed.

  • @NarrowFTW
    @NarrowFTW 3 роки тому +1

    Awesome, thanks for making this :)

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +1

      No problem. I couldn't find a good animation on it, so I said screw it, i make my own animation.

  • @zeddddd2846
    @zeddddd2846 3 роки тому +140

    Not tryina be mean but a good chunk of the info here is wrong, it doesn't lineup either with legends or cannon well.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +27

      I based my information from various sources websites, but I'm definitely not a subject matter expert on different variation or classes.

    • @kservant71
      @kservant71 Рік тому +3

      Canon. 😊 sp

    • @michaeltaylor2121
      @michaeltaylor2121 Рік тому +2

      @@Halfscreen I don't think. I know it's fkn awesome.

    • @leef-pe8
      @leef-pe8 Рік тому

      Send me the real video

    • @FACTBOT_5000
      @FACTBOT_5000 Рік тому

      Example?

  • @minecat1839
    @minecat1839 3 роки тому +5

    I love Star Destroyers! This video is so well detailed. The model is perfect.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому

      Thank you very much!

    • @stfanboy
      @stfanboy 3 роки тому

      The exterior model was made by Ansel Hsiao, AKA Fractalsponge.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +1

      @@stfanboy He did a great job. Excellent 3D model.

    • @donpewsky1723
      @donpewsky1723 2 роки тому +1

      But where maneuvering motors? xD

  • @Danny___Riot
    @Danny___Riot 2 роки тому +1

    Man I really enjoy your channel! Thanks for the great videos! 👊🏼❤️

  • @nicholasdickens2801
    @nicholasdickens2801 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you for this amazing video.

  • @marklogan3813
    @marklogan3813 2 роки тому +5

    The Star destroyers are such a complex piece of machinery. STATE of the ART

  • @zanith56
    @zanith56 3 роки тому +57

    I am a big fan of the modeling and diagraming. We need more of this. The AI voice over is a bit annoying though. Also - just a friendly heads up - do some additional fact checking before going through all the work to produce these. There are several notable issues with the facts presented I’m sure more hardcore fans will (or have) pointed out.
    Nice work!

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +17

      Yes, that is understanding since I'm not a subject matter expert on different classes or different versions. I originally used the AI voice to streamline my workflow, but most of the audiences seem to reject the robotic VO, which is understandable. In addition, I have a slight accent that could be an issue, so AI voices were an easier solution. The animation was really intended for the average joe but I have many experts pointing out the mistake regarding size, classes, naming convention, something I didn't anticipate.

    • @RetroJack
      @RetroJack 2 роки тому +2

      @@Halfscreen Sounds like you plan to address these issues - Bravo! 👍
      PS: Don't worry about the accent - On UA-cam, most of us have probably heard worse anyway! 😁

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 роки тому +5

      @@RetroJack it's basically insecurity on my part. Having the whole world actually hearing your voices is a bit scary at first.

  • @dw69376
    @dw69376 2 роки тому +2

    I enjoyed this video very much, thank you for putting it together. I loved seeing the detail of the Millennium Falcon clinging to the hull!

  • @walterwright8454
    @walterwright8454 Рік тому +2

    My favorite Imperial starship.

  • @kirkbolas4985
    @kirkbolas4985 3 роки тому +118

    I just discovered your channel. I don’t think I’ve seen another channel that not only describes the iconic vehicles and tech of SW and has the kind of interior view cross sections like yours does. Keep up the extraordinary and superior work.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +3

      Wow, thanks!

    • @Comicsluvr
      @Comicsluvr 3 роки тому +2

      Agreed! I play several different kinds of games that allow the construction of vehicles. Building the outside is relatively easy. Building the INSIDE is much harder!

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +4

      @@Comicsluvr Tell me about it. It's much harder.

  • @freelancenerd4804
    @freelancenerd4804 3 роки тому +7

    Cool breakdown! 🖖🏼

  • @GTA.Sven.Andreas
    @GTA.Sven.Andreas 3 роки тому +1

    awesome video...thank you so much mate

  • @Tk5869
    @Tk5869 3 роки тому +1

    Awesome animations. Well done

  • @master_gunner_4316
    @master_gunner_4316 2 роки тому +76

    Technically this is an Imperial II class Star Destroyer, given the shorter sensor arrays on top and the Octuple turbo-laser barbettes as the main armament. The Star Destroyer found in A New Hope that captures Leia's Tantive IV was actually an Imperial I, which has a sensor tower on the top and actually has 6 heavy turbo-lasers and 2 heavy ion cannons instead. Other than that this really is a great video.

    • @RetroJack
      @RetroJack 2 роки тому +1

      I think I found the "actually" guy! 👓

    • @areynoso18
      @areynoso18 2 роки тому +2

      @@RetroJack Technically...I think you may be partially correct :D

    • @meleardil
      @meleardil Рік тому +2

      The Venator is not the predecessor. Kuat Drive built the Victory class for the empire. Later on, when megalomani started to kick in, the Imperial class was ordered.

    • @petergriffin383
      @petergriffin383 Рік тому

      If I ever have a Star Wars question, op is my guy...

    • @white-dragon4424
      @white-dragon4424 Рік тому +1

      @@RetroJack No, I'm the "actually" guy, because the original blueprints designate it an "Imperator-class" rather than Imperial.

  • @scottroche6548
    @scottroche6548 3 роки тому +78

    This is an Imperial 2 class Star Destroyer model, those Turrets are octuple barbette turbolasers. Either way great video.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +17

      Yeah...Didn't used the correct 3D model unfortunately but thank for watching.

    • @mcc1719
      @mcc1719 2 роки тому +1

      But it also has the tractor targetting strip on the top of the bridge.
      Absolute muck up.

    • @machirim2805
      @machirim2805 2 роки тому +2

      that 'tractor beam array' is a communications array which only the Imperial-IIs have

    • @gearthehuman2115
      @gearthehuman2115 2 роки тому

      what's the differences between imperial l and ll? they look same to me.🤔🤔🤔🤔

    • @collins3D
      @collins3D 2 роки тому +1

      @@gearthehuman2115 the two biggest and easiest to spot differences are 1) the structure between the two shield bulbs ( I is an X shape where II is a stripe) 2) is the side turrets ( I has blocky turrets that are higher and are a mix of turbolaser and ion cannons where II is just 8-4 on each side octuple barrel turbolaser turrets which are lower structures)

  • @MisaelDiaz
    @MisaelDiaz 3 роки тому +1

    Damn nice, excellent video :D

  • @nozyspy4967
    @nozyspy4967 3 роки тому +2

    Incredible Cross-sections in 3D!

  • @Godric_71
    @Godric_71 2 роки тому +4

    I saw Star Wars: A New Hope when it first came out. It's crazy to me just how detailed this fictional ship is.

  • @user-xj2hp7kc4u
    @user-xj2hp7kc4u 3 роки тому +12

    Yo this channel needs more attention 100%

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +3

      Yeah...it does 🤷‍♂️🤦‍♀️.

    • @wesley5729
      @wesley5729 3 роки тому +4

      it needs real voiceover

    • @kyndred-ry5mm
      @kyndred-ry5mm 3 роки тому

      @@Halfscreen hes right, i just sub,your doing a great job

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому

      @@kyndred-ry5mm I don't have any problem with the suggestion.....that is the only way I can approve my channel.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +1

      @@kyndred-ry5mm I don't have any issues with suggestions, it's the only way I can improve my channel...

  • @carlosschmitt7777
    @carlosschmitt7777 3 роки тому +1

    Enjoy it a lot!!! Congratulations!!! Signing up!!

  • @patrickmcdonald8513
    @patrickmcdonald8513 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent! A true fan.

  • @AW-ch3jm
    @AW-ch3jm 3 роки тому +18

    Great video! love the details! I still can't comprehend how something so massive carries so few Tie fighters. 72 seems so few. a Nimitz class aircraft carrier is insanely smaller and is capable of carrying about 70-80 air craft. but w/e, Awsome video!

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +2

      Thanks Willy for the nice comment.

    • @metaknight115
      @metaknight115 Рік тому

      The WW2 era Japanese carrier, Zuikaku, at 256 meters long and 26 meters wide, was much, MUCH smaller than a star destroyer, and yet, could carry a standard 84 aircraft

    • @fattlebieldproductions3198
      @fattlebieldproductions3198 Рік тому

      With future technology 72 might be all you need if you’re the empire

    • @thomasp506
      @thomasp506 Рік тому +4

      That's because all a Nimitz class does is carry aircraft. It doesn't also carry 9000 infantry, 20 massive armored vehicles, and 30 or so smaller vehicles. It's not armed with battleship-grade weapons on 50m wide turrets that can glass planet surfaces. It doesn't have deflector shields, the ability to fly ('cept that Avengers one), or the ability to travel faster than the speed of light. So yeah, it makes plenty of sense when you think about it.

    • @metaknight115
      @metaknight115 Рік тому

      @@thomasp506 But a star destroyer is so big. That is could easily carry at least twice the carrying capacity of a Nimitz

  • @marcusalvarez370
    @marcusalvarez370 2 роки тому +3

    3:17 The Millennium Falcon hiding behind the brigde Nice👍

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 роки тому +1

      Couldn't help myself. 😁

    • @mistylover7398
      @mistylover7398 Рік тому

      @@Halfscreen 😶‍🌫️

    • @Nocturnal39
      @Nocturnal39 5 місяців тому

      No I will NOT be quiet Chewbacca, wHy DoEsN't AnYoNe LiStEn tO mE?!

  • @dbk_kvd
    @dbk_kvd 3 роки тому +2

    AMAZING VIDEO

  • @dakotabu
    @dakotabu 3 роки тому +1

    wow! .... really interesting video. Really understand clearly!

  • @edwardh3020
    @edwardh3020 3 роки тому +8

    Star destroyers are the definition of cool!!

  • @joju5849
    @joju5849 2 роки тому +45

    The sheer size of these ships is awesome, and remembering Starkiller pulling one down from the stratosphere using the Force is just amazing

    • @pgm8464
      @pgm8464 2 роки тому +11

      Starkiller was way too overpowered.

    • @jonbutcher4079
      @jonbutcher4079 2 роки тому +1

      Starkiller was such a show off !! Lol

    • @mj3541
      @mj3541 2 роки тому +1

      @@pgm8464Ppl always say that especially when comparing him to Luke but what if he was at about average power level. Maybe someone like Luke or anakin could’ve pulled 3 or more star destroyers out of the sky at once.

    • @MrWitteman10
      @MrWitteman10 2 роки тому +3

      @@mj3541 Galen marek is stronger than any character we have seen in the movies.
      Legends however is a whole different story.
      In legends Grandmaster luke is one of the most powerful force users in existence, even surpassing sidious.
      Sidious was able to use force storm, an ability that could wipe out entire fleets of star destroyers.
      Its safe to say that at the peak of their potential, luke and anakin could pull several star destroyers from orbit

    • @sethcourtemanche5738
      @sethcourtemanche5738 2 роки тому

      That wasn't canon

  • @vollkrassmann
    @vollkrassmann 3 роки тому +2

    Please make more videos like this one!! ❤️

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому

      Trust me, there will be more in the pipeline!

  • @craigowens4629
    @craigowens4629 3 роки тому +1

    Good job on the video - keep it up! :)

  • @clevelandexplorer2221
    @clevelandexplorer2221 3 роки тому +3

    I love the detail showing the falcon latched on, I was really thinking where it was hidden in the film/s XD

  • @animewaifu1001
    @animewaifu1001 3 роки тому +10

    For the tractor beam array, the model shown was an Imperial 2, which replaced the tractor beam for a communications array (tractor beam array was taller)

  • @soavioes153
    @soavioes153 2 роки тому +1

    Good video, have many details.

  • @shanejaredberezowski5467
    @shanejaredberezowski5467 2 роки тому +1

    Awesome video!!!

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 роки тому

      Thanks for checking it out!!

  • @jacksonshore7151
    @jacksonshore7151 3 роки тому +14

    Am I the only one here that’s realizing that’s not an imperial 1 but an imperial 2 class destroyer?

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +1

      You ain't the only one that spots the mistake...the model I used didn't specify which version, and to be honest, I didn't know there were 2 different versions.

    • @adnr2677
      @adnr2677 3 роки тому

      @@Halfscreen Wouldn't it only be called Imperial Class if there wasn't another version?

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +1

      @@primotef8863 That is the general consensus I'm getting from my viewers.

    • @adnr2677
      @adnr2677 3 роки тому +1

      @@Halfscreen well the most obvious difference is the sensor array on top of the comand tower. Imperial 1 has a larger sensor array, mostly reaching higher than the shield generators, while Imperial 2 has a much smaler one. That is the easiest way to tell them apart

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому

      @@adnr2677 Do you have a recommendation as to references on different version?

  • @jackrutledgegoembel5896
    @jackrutledgegoembel5896 3 роки тому +4

    this is amazing

  • @jfd9616
    @jfd9616 3 роки тому +1

    Imagine seeing one of these just peeping into our atmosphere, the star destroyer: “hello there, just peepin in”

  • @carldooley9344
    @carldooley9344 3 місяці тому

    I love these breakdowns, all the storage space for food water and air to last for several years.

  • @unsinnkim3690
    @unsinnkim3690 Рік тому +3

    This is BY FAR the sexiest ship of the entire SW franchise.

  • @gremlin66n
    @gremlin66n 2 роки тому +3

    I remember playing old X-Wing and the biggest, most fun challenge was to bring down a Star Destroyer by myself. You know, destroy the shield generators with your torpedoes, then blow up the generator on the bottom, and you could slowly whittle away at the Star Destroyer with your lasers 🤷‍♂️🤣

  • @NellyHartnell
    @NellyHartnell 2 роки тому +1

    There are some people in this world who have mastered the exact location and function of every area of a Star Destroyer. It blows my mind, man.

  • @isaacb725
    @isaacb725 3 роки тому +2

    I love this, feels like I'm watching how it's made, also Star Destroyer best sci fi ship ever (debatable I know)

  • @skoulikiagamwtanekrasas
    @skoulikiagamwtanekrasas 3 роки тому +6

    am i the only one that would love to live inside a star destroyer

  • @JukeboxOddities
    @JukeboxOddities 3 роки тому +10

    The Stah-DEE-stroya

  • @lowehandell750
    @lowehandell750 3 роки тому +1

    Love the video!

  • @mahigupta8505
    @mahigupta8505 3 роки тому +2

    Very Good Work

  • @oizus1370
    @oizus1370 3 роки тому +3

    I love how big e undangerous this ship is for alliance

  • @TheJosep70
    @TheJosep70 2 роки тому +11

    Bah, any A-Wing pilot worth his salt knows that you just need to smash into the bridge to destroy it.

    • @stargate375
      @stargate375 2 роки тому +1

      But first you need to take out the two shield generator domes

  • @michaeltaylor2121
    @michaeltaylor2121 Рік тому +1

    For 6.40 it's very informative and very impressive, especially the graphics.
    Count me in"

  • @frankanon4450
    @frankanon4450 3 роки тому

    Super fun video to watch! Hard to imagine someone put so much time spec'ing out a fictional craft!

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +1

      Glad you enjoyed it! I couldn't find any animation on UA-cam, so I decided to create one myself.

    • @frankanon4450
      @frankanon4450 3 роки тому

      @@Halfscreen I did! Watched Millennium Falcon one also. Can't wait to watch the others. Thanks again!

  • @jontelcher2165
    @jontelcher2165 3 роки тому +11

    The commonly referred shield generator towers on the bridge are actually sensor globes - the turrets on the ventral surface are 'axial defence turrets'

    • @marcosrios1246
      @marcosrios1246 3 роки тому +1

      Also the whole solar ionization/hypermatter reactor creating a small star inside isn't the official explanation either.
      The reactors cause hypermatter to be exposed to real space causing it to annihilate itself. The reaction has an output similar to a small star, not an actual star inside.

    • @robertjohnston8531
      @robertjohnston8531 2 роки тому

      I hate how these inaccurate memes spread. Shield globes.. or Star Destroyers are weak at close range.. because in episode III they go in close to avoid a Death Star super laser.

  • @mattwho81
    @mattwho81 2 роки тому +24

    The Imperial Navy fell into the trap of planning to "refight the last war." The ISD 1was designed to beat the Separatists Subjudator and the ISD 2 was designed to beat the ISD1. Ties were designed to beat vulture droids. What none of them were designed to do was fight small hyperdrive equipped fighter squadrons. The Empire was sending a capital ship killing navy, against a foe who had no capital ships. What they should have done is replace their 20year old tie fighters with the lethal tie defender, not sink resources into vanity project death stars.

    • @atig51
      @atig51 2 роки тому +6

      The Empire wanted to have peace in the galaxy, preferring more peacekeeping focused ships, unfortunately the aggressive rebels had no intention of peace, and took advantage of the ship's downsides. It would take a lot of planning and resources to produce a more capable ship to deter the rebels.

    • @onittowinit8131
      @onittowinit8131 2 роки тому +3

      @@atig51 you would have been a fan of the nazis aswell back then..

    • @rustyshackleford7200
      @rustyshackleford7200 2 роки тому +5

      @@onittowinit8131 face it, the rebels were terrorists and after the fall of the empire countless died due to instability and in fighting and their squabbling let the first order rise to power unchallenged.

    • @onittowinit8131
      @onittowinit8131 2 роки тому

      @@rustyshackleford7200 the empire enslaved and killed Billions of people/ Alien. Are u srs? Thats like saying we better be nazis then becoming communists..

    • @mr.spongylikeaboss4987
      @mr.spongylikeaboss4987 2 роки тому +5

      @@onittowinit8131 You realize the first person who brings up "NAZIS".. automatically looses the argument. It's called Godwin's law

  • @pbxn-3rdx-85percent
    @pbxn-3rdx-85percent 3 роки тому +1

    Imperial-class Star Destroyer is my next ride. Andromeda galaxy here I come. I got to renew my license : )

  • @michaeldunne338
    @michaeldunne338 2 роки тому

    Iconic spacecraft. Always liked this one over later concepts (like the Super Star Destroyer, Light Cruiser, the Eclipse or the rebel alliance space craft).

  • @sos_legio_primus9177
    @sos_legio_primus9177 3 роки тому +15

    I thought the victory 1 class was the direct successor to the Venator and the Imperial 1 class being a successor to or an offshoot of the Victory 1 class

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +1

      I have to double check that information. To be honest, most of my basic information are based on some google research. I'm not really a subject matter expert on the different classes.

    • @chrissonofpear1384
      @chrissonofpear1384 3 роки тому

      They''re more contemporaries, really, I guess. The Victory was quite rare originally - also, continually retconned commissioning dates keep on confusing the issue. Seems like the VSD I premiered around the mid point of the Clone Wars, currently.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +2

      @@chrissonofpear1384 You know, it wasn't until i started this channel that I'm starting to know the differences between classes and different variations. I came with the assumption they all the same.

    • @Baz-ms7pb
      @Baz-ms7pb 3 роки тому +1

      @@Halfscreen If my memory serves me correct, the Victory class were quite a bit smaller than the Imperial class at 900 meters to 1600 meters. I remember VSD's making many appearances in the old Star Wars "Legends" books before Disney changed the expanded universe.

    • @ArmouryTerrain
      @ArmouryTerrain 3 роки тому +1

      I also noticed the lack of Victory Class Star Destroyers mentioned. The other thing that people always forget is that a Star Destroyer is really meant as the command ship of a small fleet. Think an Aircraft carrier group.

  • @minipop1138
    @minipop1138 3 роки тому +5

    I kept wondering when he was going to remind me that my car warranty expired

  • @Tiisiphone
    @Tiisiphone Рік тому +1

    The most beautiful ship of all SciFi. I fell in love with her as soon as I saw her on screen in A New Hope.

  • @jlomesou
    @jlomesou Рік тому +1

    As big as this vessel is, it’s really just a lot of big open spaces filled with equipment and fighters. It actually quite cramped for personnel and utilitarian. They are poorly shielded, with standard turbo blaster cannons that were mounted on the old Republic battleships just 20 years earlier. They’re maneuverability is quite slow and depend heavily on fighter support to defend its flank.

  • @MegaGmoney84
    @MegaGmoney84 2 роки тому +4

    Kinda funny to me how I used to get into "discussions" with fellow nerds about who would win in a fight between the Star Wars IDS 1 or 2 vs Star Trek's USS Enterprise D. People would go back and forth about shields, teleportation tech, the force, etc. etc. yet nobody ever pointed out how a single SD had a crew of almost 40,000 where the Enterprise had around 1,000. Once I brought that up the Star Trek people kinda thought hard for a few minutes and could only see the Enterprise winning if it were to surprise a SD with an attack of teleporting a bunch of torpedoes in critical areas. Beyond that the SD turbo lasers, dozens of fighters, deflectors, and all the other insane weapons available would cut through the Enterprise like wet paper. I love both universes so I'm not partial or biased against or for either one, but still....have an ISD go up against Enterprise D is like a navy aircraft carrier going up against light frigate. The frigate might be able to do some damage, but it's going to get totally blown away in the process.

    • @Strahan740i
      @Strahan740i 2 роки тому +1

      Yea, they didn't point it out because it is irrelevant. More crew =/= more power.

    • @LeoH3L1
      @LeoH3L1 2 роки тому

      Totally meaningless statistic, and a really stupid thing when you think about it, since most of the SD's internal space is taken up by machinery, where would you possibly fit all those people and all the things needed to support a crew that big, if it was 4,000 I could buy it, but not 40,000.

  • @m26a1pershing7
    @m26a1pershing7 3 роки тому +3

    Very nice video, but that model is of an Imperial II, with the lower tractor beam targeter and eight octuple turbolaser batteries. The Imp I had a much taller array and six much more self-contained twin turbolaser turrets, the remaining rear barbettes taken by the Ion turrets

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому

      Yes, you are right. Unfortunately, I can't change my video once I uploaded it into UA-cam.

    • @m26a1pershing7
      @m26a1pershing7 3 роки тому

      @@Halfscreen Shoot, reading the other comments I can see you have realized just how pedantic ship nerds can be.......
      Can't say it enough, really well done video

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +1

      @@m26a1pershing7 I'm fine with the comments...Learning as I go along. Thanks for the info!

    • @chrissonofpear1384
      @chrissonofpear1384 3 роки тому +1

      Little known fact - the ISD I is the wider vessel, going by the filming miniature dimensions. This was somewhat retconned in Rogue One, though, where the new CG model was closer to resembling the type II in width.

  • @Robert-sy4bd
    @Robert-sy4bd 2 роки тому +2

    Watching this reminds me of the part in Return of the Jedi. When the rebels realize the Death Star is operational and decided they will stand a better chance of surviving by attacking the Star Destroyers.

  • @colinleat8309
    @colinleat8309 Рік тому +2

    Very cool! It would be nice to see a more detailed interior of the CNC, engineering etc. I knew they are big but... WOW! 9000+ Storm troopers. That's almost a Roman Legion. 👍🤘😁🖖

  • @anequallygoodchannel.2761
    @anequallygoodchannel.2761 3 роки тому +33

    Get someone to narrate your videos please.

  • @trayolphia5756
    @trayolphia5756 3 роки тому +7

    3:55 actually it’s IMMEDIATE predecessor was the VICTORY class star destroyer...which was a capitol ship combat focused vessel designed to aid the venators, which were powerful in their own right, but were geared and focused more in carrying fighter craft, the victory class were 900m long “miniature” versions of the imperator class (their designation before the rise of the empire as they were coming off the line right as order 66 occurred), the victory class were intended as a stepping stone up from the frigate class ships often seen escorting venators

  • @GuitarLessonsBobbyCrispy
    @GuitarLessonsBobbyCrispy 25 днів тому +1

    Movie fact: the thrusters on the original Star Destroyer were molded from plastic eggs that panty hose were sold in in the 1970's ( L'eggs brand ).

  • @onstage1978
    @onstage1978 3 роки тому +1

    Nice!!!

  • @meleardil
    @meleardil 3 роки тому +8

    The Venator is NOT the direct predecessor. That is the Victory class.

  • @siriusa4404
    @siriusa4404 3 роки тому +5

    Comedy gold.

  • @dm8336
    @dm8336 Рік тому +2

    3:23 the Millenium Falcon as an attachment :) 😁

  • @allbriardup6451
    @allbriardup6451 2 місяці тому

    This is awesome and I appreciate it greatly! Forget nay sayers, I was a Star Wars fan before the term “canon” was invented.

  • @sirmunchkin4388
    @sirmunchkin4388 3 роки тому +3

    I always find Star destroyers are very under equipped. I think about 50 light gun turrets would do them good.

    • @W74_Pizza
      @W74_Pizza 2 роки тому

      Nah 200

    • @jakegrant5698
      @jakegrant5698 Рік тому

      They already have heavy turrets capable of firing 40tt bolts thousands of kilometers

  • @Noone-of-your-Business
    @Noone-of-your-Business 3 роки тому +5

    2:06 - "hangAr", not "hangEr" You wanna hang _ships_ there, not _shirts._
    Also: what is a "deestroyer"?
    3:39 - which one is it? "heavy ion cannons" or "turbo lasers"? Pick a lane, please.

    • @SeinarCustomShop
      @SeinarCustomShop 3 роки тому +1

      It’s a robot speaking. So that explains that.

    • @JeffGeorge666
      @JeffGeorge666 3 роки тому

      Both hanger and hangar are pronounced the same.

    • @Noone-of-your-Business
      @Noone-of-your-Business 3 роки тому

      ​@@JeffGeorge666 Which is why I pointed out the _spelling_ and not the pronunciation. Read again. 2:06.

  • @StarWars_Pla
    @StarWars_Pla 3 роки тому +1

    Good work✨ Fine👍

  • @Alex-ri5to
    @Alex-ri5to 2 роки тому

    The TIE Fighter is something I always liked. Of course the Star Destroyer is even more interesting.

  • @dshbwlto1
    @dshbwlto1 3 роки тому +4

    dude legit sounds like that Text-to-Speech voice

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому

      Next version won't be google speech...

    • @dshbwlto1
      @dshbwlto1 3 роки тому

      @@Halfscreen ok lol. Great video! Making a model star destroyer and this definitely helped out😁

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому

      @@dshbwlto1 FYI, There are two different versions of the imperial star destroyer.

    • @dshbwlto1
      @dshbwlto1 3 роки тому

      @@Halfscreen this is the 2-class, right?

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому

      @@dshbwlto1 Yes.

  • @kaibrost1931
    @kaibrost1931 3 роки тому +4

    They Need Plans For a STAR WARS Cruise Liner ... could be much more adventurous and entertaining
    than a Walt Disney Cruise !

    • @joshcaldicott
      @joshcaldicott 3 роки тому +1

      They are. Look it up.

    • @kaibrost1931
      @kaibrost1931 3 роки тому +1

      @@joshcaldicott Yah .. ... now ... ....
      They Are NOW !!! !!!
      - 1038

    • @joshcaldicott
      @joshcaldicott 3 роки тому +1

      @@kaibrost1931 Ok bot.

  • @gearthehuman2115
    @gearthehuman2115 2 роки тому

    hey @Halfscreen. since you're making the star destroyer videos. would you make the xyston one?

  • @Bucketroo
    @Bucketroo 3 роки тому

    Robot voice, hangar misspelled as hanger, quad turbolaser turrets mislabeled as ion cannons.
    Class production all around!

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому

      I have decided to use my voice on my newer animation due to a lot of complaint on my text-to-speech. Thanks for watching Bucketroo!

  • @am-bushgaming4811
    @am-bushgaming4811 3 роки тому +6

    Cool facts, but please use your actual voice. The computer voice is just, AGHRHG

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +2

      That is understandable...... and have thought about using my voice instead but I have a bit of an accent. it why i used google voice.

    • @am-bushgaming4811
      @am-bushgaming4811 3 роки тому +3

      @@Halfscreen Nahhh, it would be super cool and really make your videos special, even if it is a "bit harder to understand"

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +1

      @@am-bushgaming4811 I will probably give it a go down the road...I just need to buy a proper mic really.

    • @deloceanophoto
      @deloceanophoto 3 роки тому

      @@Halfscreen Yep, would much rather hear your voice - these robot voice videos make me not want to watch as much, and feels much less like someone has actually made the vid. I'm sure your accent would only help to give your videos more personality! Go for it!

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  3 роки тому +1

      @@deloceanophoto I recently brought a zoom h5 mic for voice recording.

  • @scottabc72
    @scottabc72 3 роки тому

    Good video and the droid voice works well for Star Wars

  • @Inestafear1
    @Inestafear1 2 роки тому +1

    thanks for the cool video! :)
    i only have one point of criticism (because i see/saw this misinformation a lot on the internet, unfortunately): the two domes set atop the command tower of a star destroyer are not shield generators, but sensor globes!

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  2 роки тому

      Thanks for the tips! I made a mistake on using a wrong 3D model (Its a Imperial II-class Star Destroyer and not the Imperial I-class Star Destroyer).

  • @willysworld1989
    @willysworld1989 Рік тому +1

    thanks you. I did not know that this starship really exist. I thought it was just. a movie. But thanks für your footage from the inside.

    • @Halfscreen
      @Halfscreen  Рік тому +1

      No problem and thank for watching.