HANFU is not HANBOK: Please Respect the History!丨Shiyin 十音
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 лис 2020
- There's something very important I wanna talk about: Hanfu is not Hanbok.
For those who are trying to distort Hanfu into a copy-cat byproduct of Hanbok, please stop and have some respect.
My reaction to some comments, pls check • Hanbok was influenced ...
------------------------------
You can also find me here:
▶Facebook Shiyin 十音: / hanfushiyin
▶Weibo: 十音Shiyin bit.ly/34VNESn
▶Bilibili: 十音Shiyin bit.ly/2LpcJgu
▶Instagram: shiyin.w bit.ly/2PFmmGH
#hanfu #hanbok #koreanhanbokchallenge
I tried to start a respectful discussion backed up by historical references which can all be found on ENGLISH SITES. non of my materials came from Chinese references. i even read all my references ALOUD in the video, and if you watched the video, you will realize that my main arguing points came from books written by Korean authors. and yet it seems that a large portion of the comment section didn't even watch the video before making a comment. swearing, spamming, attacking me personally, attacking other nations and calling names will not make you right. it will only make you look more ignorant
(btw, i can see the average watch time of this video in the content creator page. and guess how long that is? only 2 minutes. 2 minutes into this video i haven't even gotten to the main argument yet. so unless you watched the full video, pls think again before commenting)
토론같은소리하네.
@@ShiyinOfficial 굳이 다보고 조회수올려줄생각없고
다른 컨텐츠에서 보고 왔음
姐姐，支持你！谢谢你upload 这个视频！你真的真的很棒！！！
姐姐加油
十音从来就没说韩服是汉服 只是说韩服在一定程度上受到了汉服的影响而已 部分韩国人 不要再说什么“我们的就是我们的 ”这种话了！！在韩国留学 好人坏人见了很多 记得有语学院老师竟然和我说 汉字就是韩字 ！？？Are you kidding me?当然喜爱中国人的韩国人也很多！谢谢你们尊重中国的传统文化！
那就请他们恢复他们的古老文字。我对他们恢复汉语表示十分欢迎且认同。
大宇宙韩民国，是白叫的？
既然是他们的，为什么他们要去汉字呢？他们不觉得这逻辑根本不自洽吗？
slaves of autocratic states
This is such a BS. Koreans calling Hanja Korean letters? No Korean would ever say that because Koreans hate Hanjo for its inefficiency. And please. Stop making up shit like this. Your government warned not us Koreans, but you little pinks to stop spreading these types of rumors that has resulted in creating so much conflict between the two countries.
我是土生土长的马来西亚华人，我知道我的祖先是在战争的时候被逼到马来西亚当苦工的，之后就定居在马来西亚了，马来西亚保留了人很多中国的习俗和文化，除了汉服，在马来西亚基本没有多少人了解汉服，都是知道韩服和日本的和服，我也是到了中国留学才喜欢上汉服，了解了汉服，希望汉服可以一直流传下去。汉服也是很漂亮得而且历史更悠久的。希望汉服可以让更多人看到啊！
看到了，被韓國人竊取了
我也想不到以前作為我們的屬國，現在都這麼跳了。
傳播和繼承需要我們的努力！我家已經囤了很多漢服了，每年去國外旅遊都帶好幾套去。等疫情結束，我就可以穿漢服遊走東京街頭了⋯
马来西亚有汉服社了，好多华人参加这类活动
@@user-bw8hd8ew2z 我知道有一些 但是还是太少了 我身边是没有接触到啦
The Japanese never deny their Chinese cultural origin, and they evolved very well, that’s why Chinese people respect them despite historical wars. Think about what Korean netizens do
Japanese overall are definitely better in this respect. Korea is extremely arrogant when it comes to things like culture, race and blood. Infact it's downright dangerous.
중국인들은 착각속의 세상에 빠져있다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 전 세계가 가장 싫어하는 나라가 중국인 이유가 뭘까?
@@user-wn5um9ck3y Korean constitution was written in Chinese lol
@@nmsllol한국 헌법은 한국어로 적혀있다😂😂 너는 중국 언론의 피해자고 중국이 전세계 1위 비호감 국가라는것도 모르고있네 그 이유가 뭘까?
@@nmsllol C constitution has copied Soviet consititution, and J constitution was made by US.
When people think about great, ancient civilizations they don't think about Korea. They think about China, Egypt, Maya, Greece, Rome. It's an insult to compare China and Korea in the same sentence.
We K people don’t care about how the world people think about K for ancient civilization. *We are interested in what the world thinks of us today.* The reason why it is important for us to make efforts to reveal the truth about ancient history is not to brag to the world, but to enable ourselves and East Asians to know their roots. In other worlds, efforts to understand ancient history correctly without distortion are for ourselves and East Asian people, not for the rest of the world.
C and J people are too much care about how the world see and think of them. Your comment also reflects that. C people look at everything (including culture and ancient history) from the perspective of profit and loss (利害得失). The reason C people extremely dislike K culture becoming world-famous is because they think it is a loss for them.
In my observation, among East Asians, only K people can study ancient history objectively based on facts without distortion, and can accept newly discovered ancient historical facts without hesitation even if they are against our national interests. C and J can never accept the new fact if it is against their national interests. This is because C people act based on profit and loss (得失), J people act based on harmony (服從, 和) within the established hierarchy, but K people value justice (義). That’s why C people cannot bear 不益 while K people cannot bear 不義. When it comes to ancient history also, C can never bear 不益. J people also can never say or accept the newly discovered truth if it is against their established national belief because 和(harmony) is more important than the truth for J people.
Ultimately, 天 blesses those who pursue justice and truth. According to [三國遺事], the founding ideology of Gojoseon was 弘益人間 which means *“widely benefit the human world”.* What a beautiful and philanthropic founding ideology suitable for the 21st century. All East Asians were born from K people, which means K people are their biological parents. *Everything is to be done as it is said: K people are parents and exist to widely benefit the human world.* That’s why getting closer to K and befriending K people bring blessings.
@@random_guy1084 They don't though.
I am Japanese. Japanese textbooks say that Japanese culture, including kimono and Zen, evolved from ancient Chinese culture. Japan respected the culture of Tang and Song and achieved its own development to become Japanese culture.
私は日本人です。日本の教科書には、着物や禅をはじめとする日本の文化は、古代中国の文化から発展したものであると書かれています。日本は唐や宋の文化を尊敬し、独自の発達を遂げて日本文化になったのです。
Stop stealing !
Happy Korean Christmas
Happy Korean Easter
Happy Korean Diwali
Happy Korean Halloween!
Stop lying! Stop cheating! Stop stealing!
ええ。。日本は 全部中国か。。オ-ケ
めでたしめでたし
Thank you. I respect your honoring the history. There are many Korean online trying to back stapping Chinese by their fake account.
You know you win when the other side had to bring up things that are completely unrelated just to attack you.
Politics doesn’t change history. Using it to spread hate just makes you look pathetic and ignorant.
说的没错 因为它们说不过了才会攻击其他的 一群💩一样的东西
Why China distroied their culture and steal other countries’s culture?
@김정환 “You know you win when the other side had to bring up things that are completely unrelated just to attack you “I think you just proved it .😊
@@user-hi7ix8re1c Destroied what？You'd better be careful that one day the North Korea destroy you.They have nuclear bombs😄But the only thing that can explode in your country is Samsung Note7😆
Fun fact: In China, people on Internet are getting used to use the country flag of korea to represent the verb "steal", for example: what a interesting meme, let me 【🇰🇷】it
一个连国旗都是由中国道教八卦图为元素设计的国家，文化不自信是正常的
that’s just racist
Respect for clothing and culture is as important as respect for one's own history. It is an indisputable fact that China, as one of the four ancient civilizations, has a profound cultural accumulation. There is no need for us to steal other cultures because we have strong cultural confidence, and I hope you have the same in front of the screen.
@@temujinjeon1742 No matter which clansman becomes emperor, use Han language! Speak the Han language!
Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 3000 years. Look up conquest dynasty. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and invention came from koreanic Mongolic peoples. Chinese characters were invented by koreanic peoples when they created china's first shang dynasty.
@@JENNYLEEWORLD I don't know where you got that information! But what is the record of Korean history? Are there written records dating back more than 3,000 years? Chinese characters have a trend of development, from oracle to han Dynasty small seal script, evolution to the back of large seal script, regular script and so on! Korea has been enslaved by different countries throughout its history! How do you develop your own civilization?
@@chenleighton1091 koreanic peoples have lived in Korea area for over 60,000 years ago. Look up dolmens. You will find dolmens in only certain areas. That area is the homeland of Koreanic peoples. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 3000 years. Look up conquest dynasty. Korea was never conquered and ruled by anyone in history. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and invention came from koreanic Mongolic peoples. China has zero history. 95% of Chinese history is of Korean Manchu mongol peoples. No country has ever conquered and ruled Korea in history. Five Chinese people getting lost and building one tent somewhere near Korea doesn't equal as conquered and ruled. Delusional Chinese. Chinese originated from Austronesians. Chinese came from Burma and southern china and southeast Asia. Chinese first arose in hand river which is connected to Yangtze river..not yellow river. Chinese are originally 100% austronesian. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 3000 years. Look up conquest dynasty
@@JENNYLEEWORLD Koreans seem to like making up shyt to support their perspectives. There are no archaeological or written records to support your opinion.
Hanbok is korean
Kimchi is Korean
Hanfu is diffrent to hanbok
Hanfu is chinese
Paochai is Chinese
Agree
Wym u guys copy everything in other country
@@user-qk6wt5zm8j son is telling his mother that she looks like him, and that,s what u guys defining plagiarism.
@@user-jj2nx1hz1z By seeing the attitude of China?
both hanbok and kimchi are copy of chinese hanfu and paocai, there are history record to prove this, pretty much everything in korea is copy from china
A lot of people in the comments be failing their AP World History exams
haha, so unfortunate :')
when ppl take "we shall rewrite history" too literally
i dont even think they have history classes in their educational system lmao
They probably don’t have to take history class lmao
@@snowyy.5275 what i said was sarcasm, they do have history class, but they teach children based on "history" that are not confirmed to be true, most of them are obvious that its either fake or wrong. for example they had a MYTH of a god-like creature and somehow they put it in ACTUAL HISTORY CLASS for kids? google "檀君" or "hroukiliv dankastle". they just think whatever "proves" that they have a long history is true and ignore everything else. it shows how they have no respect to true history and are pathetic. people keep bragging about what they dont have and are insecure of, that why koreans get crazy when people tell them they have no original culture. thats the same reason why they dont have sportsmanship
Hanbok's meaning
han>>korea=한국. "한" is pronounced han
bok>>it means clothing in korea
hanbok and hanfu is different so plz don't fight
In every video about China and Japan, you will see Koreans in the comment section spreading hate and claiming cultures from these 2 countries. Ironically, Korea was ruled by both so it's obvious who's the liar.
J is in decline because of 嫌韓. It’s because 天 (heaven) abhors those who curse their parents.
한국은 일본을 좋아한다 근데 중국은 싫어해 😂 왜 착각속에 살아?
@@user-wn5um9ck3y 위 글을 쓴 사람이 일본인입니다 (예전에도 대화했던). 저도 일본인 좋아합니다. 단지, 위 혐한글에 대해 답변을 달았을 뿐입니다. 일반 일본인과 극우 혐한 일본인은 구분을 하셔야 합니다.
@@random_guy1084 쟤 한국 관련된 영상이면 어딜가나 있던데 참 대단하다고 생각합니다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 인도 영상에도 가서 한국에서 인종차별 당했다는 썰 지어내던데 원래 저런 얘인가요?
@@user-wn5um9ck3y 네, 맞습니다. 이곳에도 3년전부터 꾸준히 와서 한국 험담하는 혐한론자 입니다. 웃긴점은 한국에 너무 관심이 많다는 것입니다. 즉, 한국에 대한 콤플렉스를 한국에 대한 혐오로 나타내는 것이라 생각합니다.
I saw a comment on a Hanfu video claiming that they're copying the Hanbok. I thought of writing a history lesson, but decided to just dislike the comment instead. As a Scandinavian, the three countries all have similar cultures, languages and traditions, but no one would claim that one of us is the original. There were Vikings in Norway, Denmark and Sweden. They were all distinct and separate from each other. When you think of a Viking you think of raids and wariors and not traders and explorers, which majority were. Norwegians and Danes were the raiding types, but only during dire need. Swedish vikings explored and traded and established what is now Russia. That is a historic fact. Russians on the other hand denies vikings ever being in Russia.
China has been a thriving culture thousands of years before the Kingdom of Korea was established. Sure, there lived people on the peninsula, but they had no influense over a well estabished culture such as China was at that time.
Being influensed by your neighbours is perfectly fine. After all, it's them you have the closest bond with. Cultural exchange is vitally important still today. We give and take from each other and expand our cultures to become better. Chinese and Korean cultures, clothes and languages blended over thousands of years. But that doesn't mean that one is owned by the other or that one is a copy of the other. It's same same, but different. Just like Scandinavian nations are very similar in most ways, we're still distinctly different, have our own history and culture apart from the others.
It just saddens me that people, in this day of unlimted access to information, still make baseless claims because of their feelings and beliefs. Just because you believe it to be true, doesn't make it fact. But that is, unfortunately, the human condition.
The name china was awarded and given to china by it's western Masters who saved weak scared china from dangerous koreanic and Japanese during WW2. Over 40 million Chinese wiped out during WW2. Over 500 million Chinese wiped out in total by koreanic and Mongolic peoples. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Delusional Angry confused jealous Chinese. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and Chinese invention originated from koreanic and Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese population were austronesian negritos. Yangtze river southern china Burma southeast Asia is Homeland of Chinese austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited only by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Han people and han dynasty was named after han river which is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture.
Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to fake china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 5000 years.,....
Thanks for speaking out! Also sharing the history of your people, I know bit more about Vikings now lol
2.7万个踩，偷国到底是花了多少钱，雇了多少人来刷啊？
@@ivyfu9296 国人好多用不了UA-cam
@@wendywang396 大陆翻墙的人少说也得有一亿
有组织的，而且官方默认。看数字就知道了。
@@ivyfu9296 為什麼要心痛？我覺得dislike 愈多愈代表韓國人的惱羞成怒，我們不需要花時間花心思在這小事上比拼
後亦多畜高麗美人, 大臣有權者, 輒以此遺之, 京師達官貴人, 必得高麗女, 然後爲名家. 自至正以來, 宮中給事使令, 大半高麗女, 以故四方衣服、靴帽、器物, 皆仿高麗, 擧世若狂.
- 續資治通鑒) 卷214, 원기(元紀) 32
I'm so worried. Hanbok is a symbol of democracy....is it real?? Then, Are you guys really okay?
They still have to pay their America dad and lick their boots
@@Littlewatermelon_Melons America is going to nuke your home lol
Taiwan no.1
Korea used to be a vassal country of China and Japan but now it’s part of the USA
@@Littlewatermelon_Melons ?? It’s doesn’t make sense
My question is Does Hanbok represent democracy? My Chinese friend was afraid of talking about Hanbok..
we in Mexico have the same problem, central and south America are claiming our culinary art as theirs to the point that even well, I cannot say names but some of them are now requesting to be recognized in UNESCO for their culinary art when all they did was copying ours. so do not fall into the same mistake as we did, fight for your culture, fight for your rights!!!! now they have a campaign that claims that if the UNESCO do not accept their claims they will label them as racists...ensuring their success..
The name china was awarded and given to china by it's western Masters who saved weak scared china from dangerous koreanic and Japanese during WW2. Over 40 million Chinese wiped out during WW2. Over 500 million Chinese wiped out in total by koreanic and Mongolic peoples. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Delusional Angry confused jealous Chinese. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and Chinese invention originated from koreanic and Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese population were austronesian negritos. Yangtze river southern china Burma southeast Asia is Homeland of Chinese austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited only by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Han people and han dynasty was named after han river which is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture.
Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to fake china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 5000 years.,.
The name china was awarded and given to china by it's western Masters who saved weak scared china from dangerous koreanic and Japanese during WW2. Over 40 million Chinese wiped out during WW2. Over 500 million Chinese wiped out in total by koreanic and Mongolic peoples. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Delusional Angry confused jealous Chinese. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and Chinese invention originated from koreanic and Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese population were austronesian negritos. Yangtze river southern china Burma southeast Asia is Homeland of Chinese austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited only by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Han people and han dynasty was named after han river which is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture.
Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to fake china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 5000 years.,.
lol why not just name them ?
they know they have nothing so they try to steal, China has thousands of years of history, they are only tricking themselves with revisionist history, no one but Koreans believe a word of what they're saying, even Japan, Vietnam, etc. admit that a lot of things came from ancient China
South Koreans say that the influence of Hanbok on Hanfu is mainly due to the records of the Yuan Dynasty in the Zizhi Tongan Xu （资治通鉴续）. During the Yuan Dynasty, China set up an eastern province in Korea, and the king of Korea served as the Prime Minister of the eastern province. The king of Korea was only the second leader of a province in China. Since then, the six generations of kings of Korea did not get the temple name, but received posthumous titles from the Yuan Dynasty, The posthumous titles are all marked with the word "Zhong" .The period from 1270 to 1356 was called the "Yuan intervention period".The murals of the tomb of bureaucrat Park Yi in Miyang, South Korea, show the Mongolian style of the late Koryo PeriodUnder the control and influence of the Yuan Dynasty, braided hair and beard clothes were popular in the Koryo, and the loyal king once ordered to shave hair and change Mongolia clothes. Koryo has been Mongolian, and Koryo is braided hair and improved Mongolian clothes. A large number of eunuchs and palace maids in the Yuan Dynasty came from Korea. According to the time records, these Mongolia style palace maids affected the clothes of some Mongolian nobles. In addition, it is obvious that male Mongolian nobles cannot be Affected from the clothes of Korean eunuchs. The clothes of the Yuan Dynasty are not considered to be one kind of Hanfu, but Mongolian clothes. After the establishment of the Ming Dynasty, Zhu Yuanzhang clearly instructed to restore the clothes of the Han traditional costume, and the clothes of the Yuan Dynasty were thrown into the pile of old paper, so how can we talk about the influence of hanbok on the Hanfu of the Ming Dynasty? After the establishment of the Ming Dynasty, Koryo quickly changed from a province of the Yuan Dynasty to a subsidiary of the Ming Dynasty. The clothes of the Jorge king's officials were rewarded by China. Finally, Koryo could wear Mongolian clothes no more and without braiding. It was obvious who influenced who.
Koreans are from Mongolian our culture and Dna is very different with China.
Just that’s science and truth.
China kills and buried and burned ur owned culture
Protect ur original culture
Koreans and all world liked ur origin
Not copy from others
Hanfu is from Korea
And Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China
Hanfu is from Korea
When Korea conquered China before Ming dynasty .
Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China
Hanfu prove our history
letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz
Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture
Not from China
We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
Hanfu has existed in Ming Dynasty But Text of Hanfu has been created just 20years ago You guys haven’t wore thousands years and even 10years ago.
You suddenly started wear hanfu just in 10years You guys insist Hanfu is origin.
Korea has been Manchuria before ming dynasty Hanbok has been for a long time in Korea
Youguys insist Ours r from Korea
We don’t say Kimono is from Korea even though we have wore Kimono for along time
No one says kimono is Korean cloth
China is greedy
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
@@666Yourkarma 日本的部分文化也起源于中国，你这句话就像英文是美国发明的一样
@@user-ru2kz7ix4o 응 Evil
@@user-ru2kz7ix4o Koreans hope China can make freedom for Taiwan, Mongolians, Tibetan, Hongkong, Joseon tribes for respect their owned history and culture
@@666Yourkarma 韩国人是什么重要的东西吗，为什么要在意韩国人的看法，一个小殖民地，以前是中国的藩属国，后来是日本的藩属国，现在是美国的藩属国，从来没有过国家尊严，你记得中国人民志愿军打进你们的首尔吗，这足以证明你们的民族是多么的渺小
没见过说爷爷像孙子的
描述的真确切
韩国历史是用汉字记载的，景福宫和光化门上是汉字，韩国宪法的原件是用汉字写的，明明就是中国的文化属国。😅说爸爸遗传了自己的基因，真不像话。
한국 역사는 한자로 기재되어 있다. 경복궁과 광화문에는 모두 한자가 쓰여 있다. 한국 헌법 원본까지도 한자로 쓰여 있다. 고대 한국은 중국의 문화 속국이었다。😅아버지가 자기 유전자를 물려받았다고 하더군요，정말 말도 안 돼요
搞笑 那爷爷 有多少个孙子
中国56个民族 都称为汉族文化的话 越南，日本，俄罗斯，印度，欧洲 全当孙子吗 无理取闹! 想支持 资本主义， 来啊 怎么羡慕的不得了吧 哈哈哈😄
对了 不是你们 禁止 UA-cam 了吗? 能在这儿 说话吗?
@@albertwong5031 你的知识是在哪里学的。한국은 중국의 속국이 아닙니다. 한글이 만들어지기 전에는 한자를 사용하기는 하였지만 엄연히 중국과 표기법이 달랐습니다. 제대로 된 상식을 가지고 이야기를 해주었으면 좋겠습니다. 그리고 오랜 세월 동안 한복과 김치는 한국의 전통 문화로 인정 받아 왔습니다. 단 한번도 전 세계인들에게 중국의 것이라고 인정 받은적이 없죠. 실제로도 중국의 것이 아니고요. 왜 갑자기 한복과 김치를 중국의 것이라고 우기는지 이해가 되지 않습니다. 당신들의 후세대들이 잘못된 역사 의식을 가지지 않도록 지금부터라도 제대로 된 역사를 알려주길 바랍니다.
₩uhan V!rus is only yours. 👌
好几个月了，韩国人还在复制粘贴，精神可嘉！
Hhhhh
kroea Comfort women also
hhhhh
spot on
To insult other countries with human suffering only makes you inhuman. Don't forget that your country was also a victim of war, and that fascist atrocities were also perpetrated in your country
Why there are so many duplicated comments?
Hanfu is Chinese.
Hanbok is Korean.
The end
Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China
Hanfu is from Korea wen Korea ruled China before Ming dynasty we influenced in China 1500years ago
Koreans are from Mongolian our culture and Dna is very different with China.
Just that’s science and truth.
China kills and buried and burned ur owned culture
Protect ur original culture
Koreans and all world liked ur origin
Not copy from others
Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China
Hanfu prove our history
letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz
Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture
Not from China
We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
Hanfu has existed in Ming Dynasty But Text of Hanfu has been created just 20years ago You guys haven’t wore thousands years and even 10years ago.
You suddenly started wear hanfu just in 10years You guys insist Hanfu is origin.
Korea has been Manchuria before ming dynasty Hanbok has been for a long time in Korea
Youguys insist Ours r from Korea
We don’t say Kimono is from Korea even though we have wore Kimono for along time
No one says kimono is Korean cloth
China is greedy
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
China will be broken Chinese will admit their greedy fault and Tibet and Hongkong and Taiwan will be happy and free
China will be heaven when they will be broken completely
Such an easy concept but so many people just wake up and decide no 🥲
That's right
@@jjyoon3616 Thx you for admitting Korean’s history was in Manchuria And China made Fake information
No worries We forgive you. Peace of world!
많은 한국인들은 그런 단순한 진실을 모르고, 어디에서나 다른 나라의 문화를 훔치는 방법만을 알고 있습니다.
评论区给爷整笑了，一个个复制粘贴啥呢这是，他们是有个组织还是都是机器人哦？
老饭圈了，毕竟拿得出手的只有偶像文化嘛
饭圈阴阳人鼻祖啦
老阴间复读机了😂
@JW Yoo oh thank you！ shame on you korea and Korean too～
@@hehe9226 pathetic life. keep it up!
史书有记载朝鲜王曾多次遣使向明朝廷请求赐予官服
我记得朝鲜官服等级是必须低于明朝官服二品的 在韩剧里，大明朝赐服朝鲜的桥段也不少吧？
Hanfu influenced hanbok from early time, since Tang, Song, Ming Dynasty
Costumes of Ming Dynasty influenced Korea / was awarded to Korea, which was a vassal region under Ming Dynasty.
The emperor of Ming welcomed Korean officials to visit Ming palace and learn Ming systems of all kinds, including Chinese characters, political system and costumes.
The emperor of Ming awarded costumes to Korea, and Korea took it as a honor, applying all kind of Ming systems to Korea.
A king of Korea said: ‘Korea is the good son while Japan is the evil son’, which was recorded in an ancient book.
This is the vassal relationship, which is why Ming Dynasty protected Korea from being invaded by Japanese.
If you want to see the true history, it’s all written in ancient books and antiques in the historical museums of all kinds. Even Korean ancient books are in Chinese. Korean people cannot see the true history without learning Chinese.
@@user-td2jl9gv5v 每个文明都有兴衰起伏的时候，重要的是有人为她努力复兴，朝鲜半岛自立国以来周遭强敌环伺，不是向强国臣服，就是被攻打占领。至今分裂只能充当殖民者的一粒棋子，和某些人一样已经快要忘记自己的历史了，可以理解
@@user-td2jl9gv5v what is ur point？
他们的建筑也是不能用明黄色
한국군 위안부 명성황후 강간 당하다 병자호란 남한산성 북한은 몽골, 위안 왕조, 중국 당나라, 명나라에 젊은 여성을 기부했습니다
maybe you also can explain the difference between both hanfu vs hanbok so we can see their special characteristics.
It’s really difficult you know 😅 there are so many different styles of clothing throughout several thousand years. All very distinctive. Plus there are so many minority groups in China and their clothing are also very different then Hanfu.
Her follow-up videos are compared.
Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China
Hanfu is from Korea wen Korea ruled China before Ming dynasty we influenced in China 1500years ago
Koreans are from Mongolian our culture and Dna is very different with China.
Just that’s science and truth.
China kills and buried and burned ur owned culture
Protect ur original culture
Koreans and all world liked ur origin
Not copy from others
Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China
Hanfu prove our history
letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz
Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture
Not from China
We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
Hanfu has existed in Ming Dynasty But Text of Hanfu has been created just 20years ago You guys haven’t wore thousands years and even 10years ago.
You suddenly started wear hanfu just in 10years You guys insist Hanfu is origin.
Korea has been Manchuria before ming dynasty Hanbok has been for a long time in Korea
Youguys insist Ours r from Korea
We don’t say Kimono is from Korea even though we have wore Kimono for along time
No one says kimono is Korean cloth
China is greedy
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
China will be broken Chinese will admit their greedy fault and Tibet and Hongkong and Taiwan will be happy and free
China will be heaven when they will be broken completely
@@666Yourkarma A large number of documents prove that Korean culture is greatly influenced by Chinese culture.Your only evidence is your mouth.
@@666Yourkarma A large number of documents prove that Korean culture is greatly influenced by Chinese culture.Your only evidence is your mouth.
Yes, we must not ignore history. But what's more important is no one should claim that something is theirs if it is not. Kimchi, handbok, ssam and more may have similar or related history but are not the same. Time passed and evolved. Move on, please. I wonder how many among those who keep arguing about these history do things so great for their country. Culture can be similar and can come from one another but are not the same. No one from Korea claimed malatang to be Korean food even when it's really popular that a lot of malatang restaurants opened up.
I saw a lot of Koreans on Twitter claiming that Malatang is korean traditional food, ignoring that even Malatang restaurants in SK were opened by chinese. Funny.
确实有很多人称 麻辣烫是韩国的，
Hanfu has influenced the traditional clothing of many neighbouring cultures, including the Korean hanbok,[7][8] the Japanese kimono (wafuku),[9][10] the Okinawan ryusou,[11][12] and the Vietnamese áo giao lĩnh (Việt Phục).[13][14] Up to a certain extent, hanfu has also influenced some elements in Western fashion, especially those influenced by Chinoiserie fashion, due to the popularity of Chinoiserie since the 17th century in Europe and in the United States.[15]: 52 [note 1] Silk remains a core element of Hanfu and Chinese traditional clothing.
lol, Korean start to claim Soy milk is their traditional food now.
They first claimed that the Chinese stole Korean culture
我认为这个视频下面需要有更多汉字的评论，快要被韩文淹没了
上次说要为香港示威加油的是什么?
@@dandana14 nmsl
@@user-ml7ng9nh5u 小心被当局逮住 / 工作一结束手机就销毁
@@user-ml7ng9nh5u 我认为,为了摆脱中国的通信网,在韩国网站上用韩文进行民主化运动是非常好的。
@@user-ml7ng9nh5u 你说得对,台湾和香港是中国独立的国家
fact : North Korean announcer still wears Hanbok.
yes
@@southiefcountykorea692 니가 북한사람이라는 증거 보여봐ㅋㅋ
@@southiefcountykorea692 북한이 유툽이 되냐? ㅋㅋ
@@southiefcountykorea692 cry about it. 개속 울어라
@@southiefcountykorea692 Hello~ North Korean Why aren't you answering?ㅜㅜ Come on, answer me in Korean ㅋㅋㅋ
People seem to forget that just because the hanbok was influenced by the Chinese doesn’t mean it’s not still Korean.
Korean logic is that Hanbok, which literally 2 Chinese words stands for 汉袍 han Po, Chinese Han's robe）influenced Chinese Han's robe. LoL it is like Korean invented the suit and ties.
@@mcc9102 kinda reminds me how some vietnamese people claimed how their lunar new year or 'Tet' was adopted and copied by the chinese which resulted in the chinese new year.
No one in China gives a sh*t to your Hanbok if Korean hadn’t stolen from Chinese Hanfu styles and claim to be their original traditional clothing in the first place🤮🤮🤮
Hanfu is from Korea
And Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China
Hanfu is from Korea
When Korea conquered China before Ming dynasty .
Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China
Hanfu prove our history
letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz
Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture
Not from China
We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
@@666Yourkarma Go back and see what language your history books are written in.Poor Koreans,thousands of years of vassal history has done this to you?😂
Historical records show that royal attire during the Joseon Dynasty were gradually improved to suit the aesthetics of Koreans, maintaining the design of attire sent from china in their basic form.
But it is a logical leap to claim that hanbok originated in Hanfu, China.
In fact, the Joseon hat Gat was developed from the Goryeo Dynasty by improving the Mongolian round brim hat. However, the murals of Goguryeo and Silla indicate that it has been a widespread culture for a long time.
If you look at the portraits of the Chinese in the early Ming dynasty, they inherit the designs of Mongolian clothes and Mongolian hats. There are too many Chinese who lie about the Han Chinese's invention, but their writings that occupy the online distort the truth.
If you look at the early Ming paintings, you see the headgear of the Mongolian empress.
(The last Empress of the Yuan Dynasty was a Goryeo woman.)
Even at that time, Chinese women did not tie a string to the right, but tied it to the left. This is the culture recorded by the ancient Han Chinese as the culture of other peoples. In other words, the Chinese at that time became so accustomed to the culture of immigrants that they could not clearly distinguish the difference between hanfu and hobok.
The name china was awarded and given to china by it's western Masters who saved weak scared china from dangerous koreanic and Japanese during WW2. Over 40 million Chinese wiped out during WW2. Over 500 million Chinese wiped out in total by koreanic and Mongolic peoples. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Delusional Angry confused jealous Chinese. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and Chinese invention originated from koreanic and Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese population were austronesian negritos. Yangtze river southern china Burma southeast Asia is Homeland of Chinese austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited only by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Han people and han dynasty was named after han river which is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture.
Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to fake china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 5000 years.,....
HANFU is not HANBOK: Please Respect the History!
@YUYING ZHAO your country government must stop the 東北工程 first
@@lucileliu2099 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
@@lucileliu2099 I'm sorry, but that's not the case. HANBOK IS KOREA'S OWN TRADITIONAL COSTUME. We wore hanbok even when we were in Goguryeo. Isn't the culture of your country influenced by South Korea if you fix it by being influenced by the culture of neighboring countries? Not only you but South Korea has a very old history. In the history of the democratization movement, Hanbok was with us. Hanbok has been with us for a long time. Don't distort history.
@@lucileliu2099 그래 이게 잘못된말이야
@못생김이자글자글
Hanfu is not Hanbok
Based on the quotes from Korean Kings and authoritative historical documents. Korea Hanbok is the one that was influenced by China Hanfu, not the other way around. Claiming Hanfu's characteristics and styles belong to Hanbok only shows your ignorance. Hanbok shares similarities with Hanfu because ancient Korea adopted Chinese costumes and headgears. You can use them, but you don't have the right to distort history or claim these Hanfu features as Korean origin. Hanfu is for everyone, but Hanfu is Chinese
1.Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀) : AD 648
“春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製”
“춘추가 또한 장복(章服)을 고쳐서 중국의 제도에 따를 것을 청하자”
" Gim Chunchu 무열왕 asked the Emperor of Tang for permission to change the traditional cloth of Silla, the country shall follow the Chinese style "
2. History of Goryeo 고려사권 137권 (高麗史 137卷): AD 1392
“復行洪武年號，襲大明衣冠,禁胡服”
“부행홍무년호 습대명의복 금호복”
“Joseon Dynasty shall adopt the era name of Hongwu of Ming, wear Ming costumes and headgears, ban Hu Dress”
3.Samguk Sagi Volumn 5『삼국사기』권5 『三國史記』卷5 : AD 649
“(真德王) 三年,春正月，始服中朝衣冠”
“(진덕왕) 3년(649) 봄 정월에 비로소 중국의 의관(衣冠)을 착용하였다”
" In the third year of Jindeok, the first month of spring, people in Silla (South Korea) started to wear Chinese-style cloth and hats"
4.Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty Volume 36 고종실록 고종 36권 朝鮮王朝實錄 高宗 36卷
“我邦疆土, 係是漢、唐古地, 衣冠文物, 悉遵宋、明遺制, 接其統, 而襲其號, 無所不可"
“우리나라의 강토는 한(漢) 나라와 당(唐) 나라의 옛 땅에 붙어있고 의관(衣冠)과 문물(文物)은 다 송(宋) 나라나 명(明) 나라의 옛 제도를 따르고 있으니, 그 계통을 잇고 그 칭호를 그대로 쓴들 안 될 것이 없습니다”
“The territories of Korea used to be ancient land of Han and Tang. Our costumes and relics conformed to Song. The kingdom system and structure adopted from Ming. It is rightful and legal to inherit the true name of Greater China and her culture - Joseon Gojong조선고종 高宗”
5. Taejo of Goryeos' Ten Rules 왕이 훈요10조를 내리다 高麗太祖 訓要十條
"惟我東方, 舊慕唐風, 文物禮樂, 悉遵其制, 殊方異土, 人性各異, 不必苟同. 契丹是禽獸之國, 風俗不同, 言語亦異, 衣冠制度, 愼勿效焉"
“우리 동방(東方)은 옛날부터 중국의 풍속[唐風]을 흠모하여 문물(文物)과 예악(禮樂)이 다 그 제도를 따랐으나, 지역이 다르고 인성(人性)도 각기 다르므로 꼭 같게 할 필요는 없다. 거란(契丹)은 짐승과 같은 나라로 풍속이 같지 않고 말도 다르니 의관제도(衣冠制度)를 삼가 본받지 말라”
"We, the East admire the customs of the Tang Dynasty, learn her rite and music, adopt her system and style. People from far land are different from us in terms of humanity, do not try to make them look similar in a subservient manner. The nature of Khitan (契丹) is brutal and bestial, we do not share the same value or language with them, so do not follow their system of attire"
以前没有什么感觉，现在真的感受到了为什么韩国叫“宇宙起源国”......整个宇宙都是韩国的，我那你点中国的东西怎么了^-^
我宇宙国仅疆域地图就是以银河系黑洞为中心的广域总星图。不知其中哪里有强词夺理，巧取豪夺之说？（保命）
Seong O Shim lmao, don’t say shits like this, u r making it sounds so funny.
@Seong O Shim In fact, we have been already modest. I don't think we are the center of the world,even though many countries are concerned. It's you who keep claiming that the Mid-Autumn Festival, hanfu,Qu Yuan and so on are your Korean.That's ridiculous.Since your history is shorter than ours, why not trace it to its source with a heart of learning?We never care what other countries get from us. Our only request is to respect history. Why close yourself off in your own world instead of listening to the history and world of others?But the Internet is grumpy. I don't ask you to understand my thoughts. Just stop trying to quibble with me. I don't have time for pointless conversations with you here. If you want to know the history, look it up. Keep pleasing yourself if you don't want to face it. It's simple.话说我都没发现我的赞这么多了。明明只是想来支持一下十音而已。超级不喜欢回复星人有点懵逼。明明只想安安静静地看视频发评论结果就被对线了。0.0
@Seong O Shim No Chinese said that! We did say we are arising but we are creating happiness by our own hands and have no intention to rob from others. Stop believing these lies which demonize Chinese for their own profits.
@Seong O Shim no idea what you are talking about.
As a Korean I think we can all get along and respect each other in present time.
Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.
@@JENNYLEEWORLD I don't know if it is written in your country's history book. If it is, I can only say that you are ignorant and very ignorant. Respect for history is respect for yourself. Obviously, you can't do it. You won't admit that South Korea was a subsidiary of China in ancient times, nor that it was enslaved by Japan in modern times, nor that it is now a dog of the United States. South Korea now wants to build cultural confidence, but you don't have much culture at all, so you can only make it up, The south is obviously more suitable for survival. Only a fool can take tens of thousands of people to the north. The world thinks that you Koreans can only steal and have no shame
@@sea618 USA western world saved china from Japan WW2. Japan wiped out more than 49 million Chinese. Today china is factory dog of USA and world. Koreans created japan. Japanese emperors all koreans. USA respects Korea and helped become rich. Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture.
Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.
@@sea618 Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture.
Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.,..,,.
@@sea618 Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture.
Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.,...
I said I wanted a logical discussion in this video, so I don't have any expectations, but I'll give it a try. In other Chinese videos, they just deleted my comment.
First, it is influenced but interactive.
Hanbok and Hanfu have different roots. Hanbok is based on the clothing of the northern equestrian people, and Hanfu is based on the clothing of the southern settled people. Accordingly, China's Hanfu was also a form in which men also wore skirts in the ancient era, but in the 3rd century BC, under the influence of Hufu, they began to wear pants. There is a record in the Jaji Tonggam that while King Jo Muryeong was enforcing the ban on wearing trousers, Chinese society vehemently rejected it, calling it barbarian culture.
Additionally, due to frequent exchanges with Joseon during the Ming Dynasty, similar cultures often appear. To conclude, the Ming Dynasty clothing that is suggested to be similar to Hanbok, which China claims to be an imitation of Hanbok, is Goryeo style brought over from Goryeo.
The Hanfu of the Yuan Ming Dynasty was greatly influenced by the Hanbok from the late Goryeo Dynasty to the early Joseon Dynasty due to the influence of the Goryeo style that was popular during the Yuan Dynasty, and Chinese historical materials such as Sokjachi Tonggam also record that Chinese clothing during that period was influenced by the Goryeo style. In other words, it is not that Hanfu from the Ming Dynasty came over and became Hanbok, but rather, Hanbok came over and changed Hanfu into the way it was during the Ming Dynasty. In addition, Danryeong, which was given and maintained by the Ming imperial family, is a costume that originated in the West and spread through China.
Of course, a lot of Chinese culture and clothing were imported to the Korean Peninsula, and Tang Dynasty clothing was adopted as royal clothing by most countries in East Asia. Han Chineseists ignore the history of the introduction of Goryeo style clothes and claim that Goryeo style hanfu is an independent Han clothing, was influenced by the Tang Dynasty, or that Ming Dynasty Hanfu influenced Hanbok. However, according to common sense, if Koryo-style hanfu was the unique cultural attire of the Han people, there was no reason for the Ming royal family to ban it by edict, saying, "This is not a Chinese custom."
Also, influence is overinterpreted. Just because a country has been influenced by it, the clothing and culture of that country cannot all become imitations. The fact that ancient Japan's clothing was so strongly influenced by Baekje's clothing that it was worn directly from Baekje is also described in a number of Japanese records, such as Nihon Shoki and Shangfu Ryuki. However, that does not mean that kimono is collectively called hanbok. In other words, culture is not imperialism that takes over each country. Cultures are transmitted, merge, or coexist.
In a similar case, Neo-Confucianism was strongly influenced by Buddhism in India and Nepal. However, it is the same as saying that Neo-Confucianism is the Buddhist ideology of India and Nepal.
Second, the traditional clothing of the Korean people does not represent the entire hanbok.
Based on the Korean-Chinese hanbok, it can be said that the Korean-Chinese hanbok exists in Chinese traditional clothing. However, it is incorrect to interpret the Hanbok of the Korean people as one of Chinese costumes.
In the past, China used the ethnic Koreans to carry out the Northeast Project to intentionally deny the history of Goguryeo and Balhae, that is, Korean history, and reduce them to a minority in China. Of course, it is not currently underway, but the problem is that in the private sector, Chinese people still cite studies from the Northeast Project and provide incorrect information to foreign sites and foreigners.
In this situation, Hanbok is shown to foreigners and, without any further explanation, they say, “Because there are Korean-Chinese people, it is a traditional Chinese costume.” If so, even in the private sector in Korea, it is inevitable to receive fierce criticism, such as "China's influence and subcategories are often emphasized without any historical context."
In order for China to call the Korean-Chinese and Hanbok traditional clothing, it must recognize Hanbok as Korea's unique clothing. Korea is a different country from China, Hanbok is Korea's unique traditional costume inherited from northern nomadic peoples, and the Hanbok worn by Korean-Chinese people is also a traditional costume derived from Korea's Hanbok. This must be explained in advance to avoid 'misunderstandings'.
In conclusion, although it is true that China has had a great influence on East Asia, it is only at the level of “influence.” The influence of western regions such as the Hobok of the northern nomadic tribes, Korea's Goryeo Yang, and Central Asia and India on China cannot be ignored. Claiming that another country's culture is one's own based on cross-cultural influence is simply a claim that causes discomfort in the country in question.
This is also true in other cultures. In the case of European traditional clothing, after the fall of Western Rome, Gothic clothing was popular, and then through Southern Europe and France, at one time even Turkish and Persian clothing were popular, and now they are wearing suits originating from England, and these past clothing are their own unique style. I do not claim that it is the culture and clothing of . By this logic, Chinese culture was also influenced by Korea, so it would be meaningless to argue that Chinese culture is a part of Korean culture.
Incidentally, Hanfu is a traditional Chinese clothing. However, the modern Hanfu popular in China is not traditional Chinese clothing.
The reason is simple. In fact, Hanfu was fused with the clothing of the Manchu people, and has been passed down to modern times under the name of cheongsam.
The Chinese claim that the cheongsam is the clothing of the Manchu people, and that the original Chinese clothing was hanfu. This is no different from cultural imperialism. Culture does not move towards an imperialistic form as the Chinese claim. They fuse together and develop in a better direction.
Hanbok developed into its modern form through exchanges with various cultures, including Hanfu and Kimono. Even if we study Goguryeo clothing now and wear it again, it is bound to be reinterpreted in a new form. This is because we do not even know how people wore clothes during the Goguryeo period. In other words, you are wearing a newly created costume rather than a traditional costume.
It is correct to see Hanfu as a reinterpretation of the Hanfu wearing movement that is popular in modern China. I don't even know how to wear Hanfu, so isn't it inevitable that it will have to be reinterpreted? It even looks different from the Hanfu of the past. To be exact, it is closer to Hanbok. If you deny the entire cheongsam, the unique beauty of hanfu mixed in it will also disappear, and then people will try to take a part of it from hanbok that looks similar. Then it has no choice but to resemble hanbok.
Considering that China's Hanfu wearing movement also took place after the popularity of K-pop and Korean dramas, we can see that Hanfu = Hanbok was an unreasonable claim due to China's cultural inferiority complex.
In other words, the reality of Hanfu is a fake that is completely different from the Hanfu of the past, and is a newly created costume in modern times. Just because the name is borrowed from tradition does not mean it is a traditional costume. In other words, Hanbok can be listed as a UNESCO cultural heritage, but Hanfu cannot.
China needs to love its traditional culture. Cheongsam is a unique Chinese traditional culture that was passed down through the fusion of Manchurian clothing and Hanfu during the Qing Dynasty. Now, denying the cheongsam and insisting on Hanfu is in fact denying their own history of the Qing Dynasty and Hanfu, and in conclusion, they cannot help but fall into the same contradiction as denying the entire history of China.
Considering these circumstances, it is highly likely that China's cultural misunderstandings and misconceptions will strengthen its negative influence on Korea. In reality, it is only worsening the feelings of each country, and China's external image is worsening. On the contrary, in the process of fighting like this, Hanbok becomes more famous.
Lastly, it occurred to me, but I hope that no one appears who says, ‘Both cheongsam and hanfu are Chinese.’ As explained above, Hanfu cannot be revived in modern times. Hanfu already exists under the name of cheongsam, so how can it be revived? It is impossible to resurrect a living person. This kind of behavior is no different from a child throwing a tantrum and claiming that everything is his or hers. Simply put, that is cultural imperialism.
In the past, there was a saying like this in Joseon. “The territory is too large to be called a small country, and the mind is too narrow to be called a great country, so it is called China.” It's natural, but it's extremely wrong to say and do, and I really hate this. So don't let me get to the horrible reality that these words were true. I want to like China.
说实话，我并不赞同韩服是全盘借鉴汉服。对于中国人来说其实汉服更多是中国古代以来所有的服饰，比如现在流行的战国袍，也是汉服的一种，就服饰和文化历史长度而言说它更为悠久和传统很过分吗？而且我们是多民族国家，你们是不是忽略了我们本身就有朝鲜族？任何国家都有自己的文化，存在争议是自然而然的事情，我本人是没有把这事太放在心上。但我觉得中韩两国的历史记载差异大的离谱，但日本的历史记载是承认中国的文化影响的，而且文化争议也并不只是明朝的服饰问题，而且前段时间韩国女团的祥云纹、铜钱纹、扇子舞、中国结流苏、卷轴、水墨画等也强硬对外表示展现了韩国的独特之美，这些你也认同是韩国的独特文化吗？我们文化流传至今已经有数千年了，到现在我们也能读懂数千年前的文字以一窥昔年光景，我们的文化认同其实是涵盖了相当大的部分，你不用担心我们不热爱自己的传统文化，极大部分中国人也没有想抢占别国的文化来补充我们的文化内涵，因为我们的文化底蕴足够深。双方各国都有偏激者这没什么，难道我们和日本之间不存在文化争议吗？其实也有不少。但是我们的文化认知差异要比你想象的严重和扭曲的多得多，有一些激进派认为汉字也是韩国的，你不觉得这更是一种文化自卑吗？文字是文化的载体，意图夺取文字不就等于全盘觊觎它所承载的文化吗？我相信这部分人是少数的，但是双方国内民意无疑是被少数极端分子破坏的，对此我认为你应该着眼看世界，韩国并不是你认为的站在道德制高点，我们就文化起争端不意味我们是不讲道理的一方，对于一些言论，我们需要好好甄别，而不是全盘接收。
中国的文化博大精深源远流长，至少国际历史文化形象上我们绝对是翘楚，其实大部分国人最看重的仍是国家硬实力问题，世界各国对于中国和韩国的记载就在那，少数人的阴谋不会得逞。中国人的自信是全面开花的，文化和历史固然是民族自信最重要的部分之一，但国家硬实力底气才是谈判桌上最重要的筹码是我们一直坚信的，因此我们的文化自信在于和中韩之间的争端所占据的比重并没有你想象的那么绝对重要，包括我关注这件事是因为部分韩国人因此认为中国是韩国附属国，我感到不可思议才来看看评价的。还有，我们很热爱我们的文字历史以及文化，除去目前争议的部分我们还有很多文化，我们绝不会觉得这会影响我们数千年来对外的文化输出，世界史以及周边国家的记载除去明朝以外，我们还有太多灿烂文化需要复兴，我们接收部分文化存在争议以及我们曾受到周边文化影响过，但绝不接受我们我们整个中华文化都是外国传入和影响的说法。如果我们双方能够认同对方的文化，并且求同存异，哪怕存在争议我们也可以挖掘和探讨，但是直接想推翻或者占有对方的文化，不管是中国人还是韩国人，这都是可耻的行为。
历史不是自己说什么就是什么，还是要有考据的，比如说地底下出土的文物，史书的记载。请问韩国朋友有实证吗？
我最服韩国人说元朝鲜人被画到清明上河图里面
顶上去
他们当然没有，不然怎么只靠一张嘴叭叭
@사이버수사대 What does that have to do with anything? So you agree hanbok originated from hanfu then?
@사이버수사대 哈哈哈哈 你们自己都是个被美国殖民的国家 还要给美国交军费 先管好自己吧 中国可是个独立自主不受外部势力控制的自由国家哦 你们太可怜了 古代被中国统治 近代被日本统治 现在还是逃不过被殖民的命运
受不了韩国这种邻居了，逻辑大国，甩不掉的口香糖，呕
真的 碰瓷中国 甩不掉最恶心 不然谁TM鸟它。叫嚣着把CNY给改掉 可是也不想想要不是中国这种大国过春节世界上谁会关心你一个小国过啥节…
古代韩国→中国附属国
고대 한국→ 중국의 속국 →🧎🏻🧎🏻♂️🙇🏻♂️
现代韩国→美国殖民地
현대 한국→ 미국 식민지 →🦮🦮🦮
韩国人的历史是用汉字记载的 和宗主国争古代文化 就像说美国嘻哈模仿K-Pop一样可笑🥺
고대 한국인의 역사서는 그래도 한자로 쓴 것이다 .고대 문화를 놓고 대 군주와 경쟁하는 것은 미국 힙합이 K-Pop을 모방한다고 말하는 것만 큼 우스꽝 스럽습니다.🥺
韩国历史用汉字记载，景福宫和光化门上是汉字，韩国宪法原件用汉字写的，就是中国的文化属国。🥺🥺居然说爸爸遗传了自己的基因，真不像话。
한국 역사는 한자로 기재되어 있다. 경복궁과 광화문에는 모두 한자가 쓰여 있다. 한국 헌법 원본까지도 한자로 쓰여 있다. 고대 한국은 중국의 문화 속국이었다。🥺🥺아버지가 자기 유전자를 물려받았다고 하더군요，정말 말도 안 돼요
对韩国真的无语了，历史虚无（捏造历史），文化虚无（偷盗文化），精神虚无（韩国体育精神），恐怕连脑子也是虚无的吧
@설아 🪱🪱🪱🪱🪱？？ 中国人看不懂你们的蚯蚓文啊😂
Everyone know that chinese cultures spread globaly...i'm from indonesia no doubt might be immigrant from ancient china bring hanfu influent to korean clothing...korean netizen must googling their history because they are not that long comparing china history....
There are so many this kind of rhetoric here such as "I'm Vietnamese and we admit great C influence, I'm Japanese and we admit great C influence... Try to search Goguryeo murals and see Hanbok there. Just as Xianbei, Mongols, Manchus had their own cultures and clothing styles even though they were geographically closer to China, and they culturally influenced China a lot, Koreans also had their own cultures and clothing styles since very ancient times (far before AD). Chinese mainly started to influence the neighboring regions far later since Tang/Song periods.
Yeah...like your "confession" of admitting that Chinese culture had influence on your Indonesian culture matters...History says that China and Korea is completely different country and Hanbok/Kimchi belongs to Korea. You're basically arguing against the fact with your "tiny belief" which is not even convincing. BTW, I bet you're Chinese (in your root at least), and go get some English lesson 'cause your grammar stinks. And next time, argue with facts.
korea just making gimmick for effort co'z famous kpop globally
@@random_guy1084 Records of the Joseon Dynasty Volume 36 고종실록 고종 36권 朝鮮王朝實錄 高宗 36卷： AD 1897
“我邦疆土, 係是漢、唐古地, 衣冠文物, 悉遵宋、明遺制, 接其統, 而襲其號, 無所不可"
“우리나라의 강토는 한(漢) 나라와 당(唐) 나라의 옛 땅에 붙어있고 의관(衣冠)과 문물(文物)은 다 송(宋) 나라나 명(明) 나라의 옛 제도를 따르고 있으니, 그 계통을 잇고 그 칭호를 그대로 쓴들 안 될 것이 없습니다”
2.2 History of Goryeo 고려사권 137권 (高麗史 137卷): AD 1392
“復行洪武年號，襲大明衣冠,禁胡服”
“병오 다시 홍무(洪武) 연호를 시행하였고, 명(明)의 의관을 이어 사용하였으며, 호복(胡服)을 금지하였다.”(朝鲜现代语翻译）
3. Taejo of Goryeos' Ten Rules 왕이 훈요10조를 내리다 高麗太祖 訓要十條: AD 943
"惟我東方, 舊慕唐風, 文物禮樂, 悉遵其制, 殊方異土, 人性各異, 不必苟同. 契丹是禽獸之國, 風俗不同, 言語亦異, 衣冠制度, 愼勿效焉"
“우리 동방(東方)은 옛날부터 중국의 풍속[唐風]을 흠모하여 문물(文物)과 예악(禮樂)이 다 그 제도를 따랐으나, 지역이 다르고 인성(人性)도 각기 다르므로 꼭 같게 할 필요는 없다. 거란(契丹)은 짐승과 같은 나라로 풍속이 같지 않고 말도 다르니 의관제도(衣冠制度)를 삼가 본받지 말라”
5.Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀) : AD 648
“春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製”
“춘추가 또한 장복(章服)을 고쳐서 중국의 제도에 따를 것을 청하자”
4.Samguk Sagi Volumn 5『삼국사기』권5 『三國史記』卷5 : AD 649
“(真德王) 三年,春正月，始服中朝衣冠”
“(진덕왕) 3년(649) 봄 정월에 비로소 중국의 의관(衣冠)을 착용하였다”
So what you try to say?
Hanbok is Chinese or Korean cloth?
很多时候历史是不容易让人接受的，只需要对比两国的地理位置和当时的国力强弱就很容易理解
몽골 만주 거란 선비 흉노 족 말이어 ?
Mongols, Manchus, Khitan, Turks, Xiongnu? haha
땅 크고 인구 많아서 고구려에 박살 나고
일본에 영토 점령 당했냐 ?
The land was large and populated, so was it destroyed by Goguryeo and occupied by Japan?
@@Abys-Album Where are they now?
早就说了 高丽近代都是学习大明的技术文化和语言的 居然还有人不知道
現在的韓國與高句麗沒有半毛錢關係。他們已經都搞不清自己的祖先是誰了，還老說高句麗，真得是可悲到不能認祖歸宗。之後建立的高麗，第一任皇帝是王建，雖然出生在朝鮮半島，卻是個高句麗和漢人的後代。王建自認是淮河流域的漢人後裔。第二個皇帝，王建的兒子還是公認的中國血統，李氏王朝的太祖李成桂，是女真族，他推翻高麗後，被明朝封為朝鮮王。我都覺得韓國是中國人建的了⋯⋯
@@TeddyLikesGame 他们还认为高句丽是他们的祖先哈哈哈，我看文献记载，韩国人祖先是三韩人，高句丽把他们打的落花流水的，现在居然认贼作父
@@lidai6387 哈哈哈 对的 他们只是觉得谁在他们家附近住过，那就是他们祖先。 到处认亲戚这脸皮也没谁了
@@TeddyLikesGame 我就说了是日本人统治朝鲜半岛历史太短，否则韩国人现在绝对要去认日本祖宗。
@@denglinzhiniao 是的！應該再統治個一兩百年。還好，日本人留下了一堆露乳裝的照片，他們想抵賴也不行。我們建立秦朝封建國家的時候，他們才建立第一個奴隸制國家。這落後了不知幾千年,還想著要去領導中原文化。太可笑了。
《三国史记》中的《新罗本纪》中有“真德王三年正月，始服中朝衣冠”的记载。
《宣和奉使高丽图经》在描写高丽衣冠制度上有“遵我宋之制度焉”的记录。
《高丽史》中也有“三十二年六月，宋神宗赐衣二对”的记录。
崔溥《漂海录》提到：“盖我朝鲜地虽海外，衣冠文物悉同中国”
朝鲜文人徐居正诗云“明皇若问三韩事，衣冠文物上国同”
李氏朝鲜《成宗实录》中，也有过类似的记载：
“吾东方自箕子以来，教化大行，男有烈士之风，女有贞正之俗，史称小中华”。
All those korea historical document are described korea hanbok was heavily influenced by chinese hanfu. After korea prohibited using chinese as official language they are losing there hiatoey too. It's very sad that Koreans can't read their own hiatoey document witch is written in chinese.
Its very stupid for China to say hanbok and kimchi are Chinese all of sudden in 2020 while China had their mouth shut for past centuries. 🤣🤣
Maybe they got jealous cuz of K culture and K Pop being famous
Being us the source ^^
We do not want your LIE
Korea has been using korean langauge since 1500, when hanbok was prevailing. Please STOP LYING 🤔🤔
别发史料，他们会过来骗资料然后写到自己的历史里。
@@yiningli9251 都是他们自己的
@@padeng555 wow, are you sure? i thought y’all started using in 1970s. fuck kff
That comment is just a work of troll. All civilized people knew that Hanbok and Kimono had been influenced by Hanfu (not copying,though,since lots of detail of which had been altered.), hence the term "Sinophere". So just don't feed the troll. But having fight back with info and knowledge like you did in this clip is a creative one 😊
There was a Japanese channel that actually admit Kimono was from Hanfu but Korean trolls attacked the comment section.
What's scary is that there are many Chinese who support Korea and Koreans on the matter. Mainly because they are fans of K-pop, K-dramas, or they are dating/married to Koreans.
Don't be scared. They will be blessed if they support K and K people. This is my sincere and serious advice.
@@random_guy1084 So should Koreans support Chinese people and culture. EVERYONE SHOULD SUPPORT EVERY CULTURE!
Im Nagalim this Korean are crazy
can i follow you in Instagram?
I said I wanted a logical discussion in this video, so I don't have any expectations, but I'll give it a try. In other Chinese videos, they just deleted my comment.
First, it is influenced but interactive.
Hanbok and Hanfu have different roots. Hanbok is based on the clothing of the northern equestrian people, and Hanfu is based on the clothing of the southern settled people. Accordingly, China's Hanfu was also a form in which men also wore skirts in the ancient era, but in the 3rd century BC, under the influence of Hufu, they began to wear pants. There is a record in the Jaji Tonggam that while King Jo Muryeong was enforcing the ban on wearing trousers, Chinese society vehemently rejected it, calling it barbarian culture.
Additionally, due to frequent exchanges with Joseon during the Ming Dynasty, similar cultures often appear. To conclude, the Ming Dynasty clothing that is suggested to be similar to Hanbok, which China claims to be an imitation of Hanbok, is Goryeo style brought over from Goryeo.
The Hanfu of the Yuan Ming Dynasty was greatly influenced by the Hanbok from the late Goryeo Dynasty to the early Joseon Dynasty due to the influence of the Goryeo style that was popular during the Yuan Dynasty, and Chinese historical materials such as Sokjachi Tonggam also record that Chinese clothing during that period was influenced by the Goryeo style. In other words, it is not that Hanfu from the Ming Dynasty came over and became Hanbok, but rather, Hanbok came over and changed Hanfu into the way it was during the Ming Dynasty. In addition, Danryeong, which was given and maintained by the Ming imperial family, is a costume that originated in the West and spread through China.
Of course, a lot of Chinese culture and clothing were imported to the Korean Peninsula, and Tang Dynasty clothing was adopted as royal clothing by most countries in East Asia. Han Chineseists ignore the history of the introduction of Goryeo style clothes and claim that Goryeo style hanfu is an independent Han clothing, was influenced by the Tang Dynasty, or that Ming Dynasty Hanfu influenced Hanbok. However, according to common sense, if Koryo-style hanfu was the unique cultural attire of the Han people, there was no reason for the Ming royal family to ban it by edict, saying, "This is not a Chinese custom."
Also, influence is overinterpreted. Just because a country has been influenced by it, the clothing and culture of that country cannot all become imitations. The fact that ancient Japan's clothing was so strongly influenced by Baekje's clothing that it was worn directly from Baekje is also described in a number of Japanese records, such as Nihon Shoki and Shangfu Ryuki. However, that does not mean that kimono is collectively called hanbok. In other words, culture is not imperialism that takes over each country. Cultures are transmitted, merge, or coexist.
In a similar case, Neo-Confucianism was strongly influenced by Buddhism in India and Nepal. However, it is the same as saying that Neo-Confucianism is the Buddhist ideology of India and Nepal.
Second, the traditional clothing of the Korean people does not represent the entire hanbok.
Based on the Korean-Chinese hanbok, it can be said that the Korean-Chinese hanbok exists in Chinese traditional clothing. However, it is incorrect to interpret the Hanbok of the Korean people as one of Chinese costumes.
In the past, China used the ethnic Koreans to carry out the Northeast Project to intentionally deny the history of Goguryeo and Balhae, that is, Korean history, and reduce them to a minority in China. Of course, it is not currently underway, but the problem is that in the private sector, Chinese people still cite studies from the Northeast Project and provide incorrect information to foreign sites and foreigners.
In this situation, Hanbok is shown to foreigners and, without any further explanation, they say, “Because there are Korean-Chinese people, it is a traditional Chinese costume.” If so, even in the private sector in Korea, it is inevitable to receive fierce criticism, such as "China's influence and subcategories are often emphasized without any historical context."
In order for China to call the Korean-Chinese and Hanbok traditional clothing, it must recognize Hanbok as Korea's unique clothing. Korea is a different country from China, Hanbok is Korea's unique traditional costume inherited from northern nomadic peoples, and the Hanbok worn by Korean-Chinese people is also a traditional costume derived from Korea's Hanbok. This must be explained in advance to avoid 'misunderstandings'.
In conclusion, although it is true that China has had a great influence on East Asia, it is only at the level of “influence.” The influence of western regions such as the Hobok of the northern nomadic tribes, Korea's Goryeo Yang, and Central Asia and India on China cannot be ignored. Claiming that another country's culture is one's own based on cross-cultural influence is simply a claim that causes discomfort in the country in question.
This is also true in other cultures. In the case of European traditional clothing, after the fall of Western Rome, Gothic clothing was popular, and then through Southern Europe and France, at one time even Turkish and Persian clothing were popular, and now they are wearing suits originating from England, and these past clothing are their own unique style. I do not claim that it is the culture and clothing of . By this logic, Chinese culture was also influenced by Korea, so it would be meaningless to argue that Chinese culture is a part of Korean culture.
Incidentally, Hanfu is a traditional Chinese clothing. However, the modern Hanfu popular in China is not traditional Chinese clothing.
The reason is simple. In fact, Hanfu was fused with the clothing of the Manchu people, and has been passed down to modern times under the name of cheongsam.
The Chinese claim that the cheongsam is the clothing of the Manchu people, and that the original Chinese clothing was hanfu. This is no different from cultural imperialism. Culture does not move towards an imperialistic form as the Chinese claim. They fuse together and develop in a better direction.
Hanbok developed into its modern form through exchanges with various cultures, including Hanfu and Kimono. Even if we study Goguryeo clothing now and wear it again, it is bound to be reinterpreted in a new form. This is because we do not even know how people wore clothes during the Goguryeo period. In other words, you are wearing a newly created costume rather than a traditional costume.
It is correct to see Hanfu as a reinterpretation of the Hanfu wearing movement that is popular in modern China. I don't even know how to wear Hanfu, so isn't it inevitable that it will have to be reinterpreted? It even looks different from the Hanfu of the past. To be exact, it is closer to Hanbok. If you deny the entire cheongsam, the unique beauty of hanfu mixed in it will also disappear, and then people will try to take a part of it from hanbok that looks similar. Then it has no choice but to resemble hanbok.
Considering that China's Hanfu wearing movement also took place after the popularity of K-pop and Korean dramas, we can see that Hanfu = Hanbok was an unreasonable claim due to China's cultural inferiority complex.
In other words, the reality of Hanfu is a fake that is completely different from the Hanfu of the past, and is a newly created costume in modern times. Just because the name is borrowed from tradition does not mean it is a traditional costume. In other words, Hanbok can be listed as a UNESCO cultural heritage, but Hanfu cannot.
China needs to love its traditional culture. Cheongsam is a unique Chinese traditional culture that was passed down through the fusion of Manchurian clothing and Hanfu during the Qing Dynasty. Now, denying the cheongsam and insisting on Hanfu is in fact denying their own history of the Qing Dynasty and Hanfu, and in conclusion, they cannot help but fall into the same contradiction as denying the entire history of China.
Considering these circumstances, it is highly likely that China's cultural misunderstandings and misconceptions will strengthen its negative influence on Korea. In reality, it is only worsening the feelings of each country, and China's external image is worsening. On the contrary, in the process of fighting like this, Hanbok becomes more famous.
Lastly, it occurred to me, but I hope that no one appears who says, ‘Both cheongsam and hanfu are Chinese.’ As explained above, Hanfu cannot be revived in modern times. Hanfu already exists under the name of cheongsam, so how can it be revived? It is impossible to resurrect a living person. This kind of behavior is no different from a child throwing a tantrum and claiming that everything is his or hers. Simply put, that is cultural imperialism.
In the past, there was a saying like this in Joseon. “The territory is too large to be called a small country, and the mind is too narrow to be called a great country, so it is called China.” It's natural, but it's extremely wrong to say and do, and I really hate this. So don't let me get to the horrible reality that these words were true. I want to like China.
部分韩国人的素质简直了，po主都说了请相互尊重，还跑来攻击别人
众所周知，韩国是宇宙中心，万物皆由韩国发明，除了美国，因为美国是韩国爹。
对，他们先跑过来恶语伤人，真的无耻。
I met two Korean people in the Chinese restaurant in Japan. The restaurant was very small. They began to smoke and put their feet on the chair. They had no quality at all. I was also charged double for Korean food. The most important thing is that he served only one dish, and it was not finished.
喷他们就完事儿了
世人皆知他们连自己国家多少明星都不放过喷死多少，能不喷粪别人吗
说的事实 泡菜朝鲜服是朝鲜的 但发源地不是 正视自己的历史 而不是政府美化后的历史
首爾為什麼叫漢城
弹丸之地，从古至今一直都是个别人的附属国，仰人鼻息生活，古代一直都是中国的附属藩国，现代又是美国的狗儿子？咋了，当了几千年的儿子。给你们当上瘾了？？？
为什么你的头像这么搞笑
看清楚，发源地不是朝鲜我说错了？
被误伤了😂
你只是說出實話
請不必害怕
👍
Korean hamburger, lol!
Many C people criticize when K celebrities introduced some culture originated from C as oriental style. Then, why do they (C people) call Son Heun-Min as pride of Asia rather than pride of Korea? When you want to promote your culture or anything, you need to do that by your own effort without attempting to get free ride on Hallyu. Germans or French don't get angry when other European countries call their culture as western culture. When we call something as oriental style, mostly China is recalled because C heavily influenced east Asia unlike Europe where not a single country was dominant, so C people must be rather satisfied with that kind of terms.
on Heun-Min？他是谁？中国人都不认识他是谁？整天制造谣言，自娱自乐，搭韩国便车？韩国真是太把自己当回事了吧
Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China
Hanfu is from Korea wen Korea ruled China before Ming dynasty we influenced in China 1500years ago
Koreans are from Mongolian our culture and Dna is very different with China.
Just that’s science and truth.
China kills and buried and burned ur owned culture
Protect ur original culture
Koreans and all world liked ur origin
Not copy from others
Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China
Hanfu prove our history
letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz
Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture
Not from China
We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
Hanfu has existed in Ming Dynasty But Text of Hanfu has been created just 20years ago You guys haven’t wore thousands years and even 10years ago.
You suddenly started wear hanfu just in 10years You guys insist Hanfu is origin.
Korea has been Manchuria before ming dynasty Hanbok has been for a long time in Korea
Youguys insist Ours r from Korea
We don’t say Kimono is from Korea even though we have wore Kimono for along time
No one says kimono is Korean cloth
China is greedy
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
China will be broken Chinese will admit their greedy fault and Tibet and Hongkong and Taiwan will be happy and free
China will be heaven when they will be broken completely
Yup hanfu and hanbok are totally different. No need to argue just like Kimchi is Korean and Pàocài is Chinese.
🤔
@Loong Hwang you are just jealous lol plz stop making your own country stupid. China is a great country only if there's no people like you. Oh and plz study history =) Jakckie Chan and Jet Li are Koreans. How do you feel? lolz
@@user-uw9zf5ev5o Yup they are both beautiful
@@takeshimaxdokdoorisingsunf8597 🤔 both sides have too many stupid and crazy people. maybe this agrument will nerver be ended
@@user-uw9zf5ev5o agree! Hope people study the 'real' history not the 'twisted' history.
清朝的文化也很美旗袍也很美汉服也很美，都是中国文化，为什么南朝鲜人只说中国人为什么明明有旗袍和辫子头但是偏要吹汉服，难道南朝鲜人学的历史里中国只有清朝一个朝代吗 没文化真的好可怕哦，支持十音！
是啊，每個族群都有自己的傳統服飾，而且都很有特點呢。
에휴 ㅉ
因为朝鲜半岛的历史都是用汉语文书写的；现在的朝鲜和韩国已经放弃了汉字教育，当然也就无人知晓真正的历史了！
@냥냥펀치 China has many dynasties, not only Han or Qing.
@냥냥펀치 China is not the union of Han, it’s a union of 56 cultures, including Han. Qing is only one part of Chinese history, ruled by Mongolian and Manchu. The part of culture that Koreans had been using as reference is Ming, ruled by Han. Chinese culture is not as simple as Korean’s since they have a much more profound history and capacious land. By the way, you could purchase history books at good price on taobao when shopping for hair bands made in Zhejiang. Do not do plastic surgery on your brain, it’s fetal and ridiculous.
After the Song Dynasty was occupied by Jurchen of Qin in the 12th century, a culture of northern immigration flowed into China.
Without knowing this historical trend, the Chinese claim that the Ming Dynasty's Hanfu was created in the form of the Tang and Song dynasties.
In Chinese dramas these days, many people wear 19th-century Joseon hats and Gat. However, the Ming Dynasty collapsed in the 17th century, and Ming's clothes were different from Joseon's. Even Chinese court ladies appear with the same hairstyle as Joseon court ladies. The Chinese used the same Korean drama scenario as ctrl +v.
There is also a Chinese Ming drama in which the police outfit of the Joseon Dynasty was copied by ctrl + v.
Only a few years ago, a Joseon Dynasty 'officer costume' appeared at a Chinese Hanfu fashion show. The Wang Jin of the Ming Dynasty was a net-shaped hat, unlike the horse-tailed mangeon hair band of the Joseon Dynasty. These days, however, more and more Chinese people are wearing Joseon's hat in various media. The Chinese should live honestly. Can't Chinese people live without lying?
The name china was awarded and given to china by it's western Masters who saved weak scared china from dangerous koreanic and Japanese during WW2. Over 40 million Chinese wiped out during WW2. Over 500 million Chinese wiped out in total by koreanic and Mongolic peoples. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Delusional Angry confused jealous Chinese. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and Chinese invention originated from koreanic and Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese population were austronesian negritos. Yangtze river southern china Burma southeast Asia is Homeland of Chinese austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited only by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Han people and han dynasty was named after han river which is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture.
Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to fake china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 5000 years.,
韩国古书里只有"汉服"二字，从来没出现过"韩服"二字，说明韩国古人知道他们的服饰来自汉服，包括韩国古人描述他们新罗/高丽/朝鲜等时期的服饰时，都是用"中华制""唐风/唐国服/唐衣""悉同中国""上国同"等词语来描述，并且记载了中国各朝代给韩国各朝代的赐服， 请大家了解古代韩国服饰都是从中国传过去的，即使赐服给韩国，也是中国服饰，不是赐给韩国就可以称韩服，《高丽史·舆服志》："东国自三韩仪章服饰循习土风，至新罗太宗王请袭唐仪，是后冠服之制稍拟中华"。《燃藜室记述》冠服条："吾东自三国以来，冠服皆循土风。新罗武烈王法唐制，仪章服饰稍拟中华"，贞观二十二年（649），新罗道臣入唐，学习汉制。《新罗本纪》记载：“春秋又请改其章服，以从中华制。”新罗真德王"请袭唐仪"，唐太宗赐新罗衣冠，文武王“又革妇人之服，自此已后，衣冠同于中国”。《新罗本纪》“真德王三年正月，始服中朝衣冠”。 早期王氏高丽时期:高丽王健:"惟我东方旧慕唐风，文物礼乐悉尊其制"。《宣和奉使高丽图经》描写高丽衣冠制度“遵我宋之制度焉”。《高丽史》“三十二年六月，宋神宗赐衣二对”等。元朝时高丽穿胡服，所以高丽末期请求明朝赐服:《高丽史·舆服志》:事元以来，开剃辫发、袭胡服，殆将百年。及大明太祖高皇帝赐恭愍王冕服，王妃、群臣亦皆有赐，自是衣冠文物焕然复新，彬彬乎古矣"。《明史·舆服志》:洪武二年，高丽入朝，请赐祭服制度，命制给之”。高丽国王及世子冕服、王妃翟衣的沿用及改革，就是以明朝所赐章服为基础。自此高丽开始依照明朝衣制从上而下改革。 李氏朝鲜按照明制汉服进行服饰改革，下令“复行洪武年号,袭大明衣冠、禁胡服"，频繁朝贡赐服让朝鲜衣冠和“上国同”，朝鲜人崔溥《漂海录》提到:“盖我朝鲜地虽海外，衣冠文物悉同中国” 朝鲜文人徐居正诗云“明皇若问三韩事，衣冠文物上国同” 李氏朝鲜《成宗实录》:"吾东方自箕子以来，教化大行，男有烈士之风，女有贞正之俗，史称小中华”。
@@cosmob9602 中国自隋唐以来就开始了民族大融合，现在哪里还有纯正血统的汉人，自隋唐以来，中国的汉人，就已经不是之前的汉人了，都是胡人和汉人的融合，胡人指得就是匈奴、鲜卑、羯、氐、羌，比如说我，是蒙古族和满族以及汉族的结合，而我们每个民族都认为对汉服文化做出了贡献，这才有了现在的汉服，所以现在的新汉人的祖先不应该单纯的只有汉人，也应该有胡人。
@@cosmob9602 中国自隋唐以来就开始了民族大融合，现在哪里还有纯正血统的汉人，自隋唐民族大融合以来，中国的汉人，就已经不是之前的汉人了，都是胡人和汉人的融合，胡人指得就是匈奴、鲜卑、羯、氐、羌，比如说我，我是蒙古族和满族以及汉族的结合，而我们每个民族都认为对汉服文化做出了贡献，这才有了现在的汉服，而不同朝代有不同朝代的服饰，所以现在的中国人的基因上除了汉人基因，也有胡人基因，我不知道你说汉服不是汉人做的是什么意思，建议你去了解一下汉服的演变史，殷商后，冠服制度初步建立，西周时，服饰制度逐渐形成。，汉代秦之初至东汉明帝时期，服饰端庄、典雅，魏晋轻灵飘逸、仙气飘飘，唐制汉服，雍容华贵，宋制汉服含蓄简约，明制汉服优雅大方。
@@cosmob9602 这就是汉服，如果你认为它只是概念，那么我的祖先穿的是什么呢？古画中记载了我们祖先的服饰，这个博主其他视频里也介绍了，如果你想了解的话，就去看一下这个博主的其他视频。
@@cosmob9602 看来你还是不太了解我们国家的文化，这个up主展示的是纯正的汉服，我出生在中国的内蒙古，我们的少数民族服饰叫蒙古袍，和汉服完全是两个概念，如果你想了解的话，你可以去搜索一下蒙古袍。我们56个民族都有各自的衣服，和汉族是完全不同的。而这个博主其他视频展示的确确实实都是汉服，因为在油管我很少看到有人展示除了汉服以外的其他中国少数民族的衣服。
@@cosmob9602 中国每个少数民族都有各自的服饰，蒙古族的叫蒙古袍，满族的服饰叫旗袍，还有回族服饰，等等我就不一一列举了，还有汉服的各个朝代的服饰，这个博主展示的视频确实都是汉服，你和我谈论我们民族的服饰之前最起码应该做些了解，不能把汉服和其他少数民族的衣服混淆，当然我们所有民族加起来的文化，才使得我们华夏文明更加多姿多彩。
진짜로 궁금해서 그러는데~하나만 물어보자. 창피하지도 않아?? 손바닥으로 하늘을 가려라...한심하네.
@Olivia Akama 헛 소리 길게 하느라 애 썼다. 좀 쉬어
@Olivia Akama so poor country... that 56 ethnic`s culture were all burned by your "red guards" so you guys always yelling "thats mine ! thats mine!!!!" like 4yrs old boy
韩国人如果想反驳回击的话起码要先自己去翻翻文献资料，搜集一下文案有理有据才叫辩论吧，什么都不愿意做，只会在网上顾左右而言他扯东扯西，黏贴复制一样的评论，原来这就是韩国人跟别人争辩的方式吗？怪不得网上流行你们最多的东西就是骂人脏话跟低级段子，看了觉得真可怜。
Hanbok is a symbol of democratization in Korea. I support the Chinese people's desire for democratization through Hanbok. Let's wear hanbok and drive out the Communist Party.
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈你真的好搞笑
@@SNIPER-XYZ Do you know your remarks look silly? I don’t think South Korea is as democratic as the United States and South Korea is a bad place
@@liugwen8425 China can also be democratized. Cheer up! I hope Korean hanbok will affect China's democratization.
🤣
People who think Hanfu is learning Hanbok must finish watching this video. If you still think so, it can only show that you have no culture and don't understand what history is. It's not a shame to learn from it. Moreover, the truth of history is here. You can't change it. It can only damage the image of your country. This is not a good thing
This is also very funny.another basic thing is that China is a country with a long history of 5000 years, not Korea.
support
支持
I'm pretty sure that you didn't have any research before you write this comment. Korea also has a history of more than 5000 years. Stop spreading fake news that you don't even know about.
I think this topic is going ridiculous because it is true Korea and China had a really close relationship. But I think China is acting like everything that becomes globally popular in Korea is theirs(like things that make profits because of the increased spotlight on Korea). As a Korean, I grew up wearing Hanbok every time for a specific day and Hanbok was an actual culture that never stopped. Also, I saw numerous embezzlement that China followed to make after the Korean original product such as beauty, drama, idols, movies, etc. And this is one of the biggest parts that a lot of countries including Korea think China makes mass imitation products.
(Sorry if my English is bad)
@@user-yf4bh2cy4w You say I don't know history. I think it’s very funny.Koreans always boast that their country has 5000 years of history, but they don't really understand their country's culture. To be honest, You may not know that most Chinese people know that some Koreans like you tell themselves that South Korea has a history of 5000 years all day, which is a joke for Chinese people and foreigners who really understand Chinese culture. You say that you grew up in Hanbok,Chinese people are the same. They grew up in their own traditional clothes .You can also say these words to show that you still didn't watch the above video Hanbok was born under the influence of Hanfu clothing in the Ming Dynasty. You can't change history no matter how you say it. If you want to change history, you'd better dream😀 and don't show your inferiority complex, okay? Chinese people have known their country's cultural heritage since childhood. You don't know your country. You come here to talk about these. Some don't even bring in today's popular culture to change the topic. I think you can read more history books when you have time
In the end, I would like to emphasize once again that you should not show your own country's inferiority complex in this. In our view, this is quite embarrassing. And I want to give you a Chinese sentence ＂想改变历史？你还是做梦去吧 别自欺欺人了＂
@@user-yf4bh2cy4w 搞笑，朝鲜一直是中国的附属国，需要中国的保护，文化也是学习中国的，不然都是原始人
必须支持一波～节目非常的棒
是的，思路清晰明確，有理有據。
아아 한심해~~ㅋㅋ
朝鲜人崔溥曾说：“盖我朝鲜地虽海外，衣冠文物悉同中国……”朝鲜文人徐居正亦曾作诗云：“明皇若问三韩事，衣冠文物上国同。”这里的“上国”指的自然就是中国。明王朝对李氏朝鲜也格外施恩，明太祖曾言：“九州之外，则每世一朝，所贡方物，表诚敬而已。惟高丽颇知礼乐，故令三年一贡。”
这群韩国人是不是都高中没毕业啊。英文看不懂吗？
저를 포함한 대부분의 한국인들은 한푸를 한복이라고 생각하지 않습니다. 한푸를 한복이라고 착각하는 것은 소수의 한국인입니다.
泡菜和韩服是中国的，多么愚蠢啊。 你脑子受伤了吗？还是还在进化？
韩国历史用汉字记载，景福宫和光化门上是汉字，韩国宪法原件用汉字写的，就是中国的文化属国。🥺🥺居然说爸爸遗传了自己的基因，真不像话。
한국 역사는 한자로 기재되어 있다. 경복궁과 광화문에는 모두 한자가 쓰여 있다. 한국 헌법 원본까지도 한자로 쓰여 있다. 고대 한국은 중국의 문화 속국이었다。🥺🥺아버지가 자기 유전자를 물려받았다고 하더군요，정말 말도 안 돼요
@@user-yf3mg8fs9m 韩国历史用汉字记载，景福宫和光化门上是汉字，韩国宪法原件用汉字写的，就是中国的文化属国。🥺🥺居然说爸爸遗传了自己的基因，真不像话。
한국 역사는 한자로 기재되어 있다. 경복궁과 광화문에는 모두 한자가 쓰여 있다. 한국 헌법 원본까지도 한자로 쓰여 있다. 고대 한국은 중국의 문화 속국이었다。🥺아버지가 자기 유전자를 물려받았다고 하더군요，정말 말도 안 돼요
@@albertwong5031 고대 한국이 중국의 속국이었다는 것은 맞는 말이지만 한국도 한국만의 고유한 문화가 있었다.
Buddhism originated in India (the Kingdom of Kapila at the time .. present day Nepal) and was transmitted to China.
This what you call red herring. The reason why this is an issue is because Chinese are claiming Hanbok is Chinese. No Koreans claim Hanfu is Korean except for fringe trolls
张昱《张光弼诗集》卷三《宫中词》： 宫衣新尚高丽样，方领过腰半臂载，连夜内家争借看，为曾着过御前来。"
"궁중에서 새롭게 유행하는 것은 고려양이라네 방령에 짧은 허리, 반소매 궁중 여인들이 밤까지 이어져 구경하려 하네 이는 고려 여인이 황제 앞에 이 옷을 입고왔기 때문이라네"
Translation: The new trend in the palace is Goryeo Style. Short-waist, short-sleeved court women in Bangryeong continue to watch until night.
The Short-waist, short-sleeved clothes has nothing to do with Ming dynasty Hanfu, another evidence that Hanbok was influenced by Hanfu, because in Yuan dynasty Korean still wear Short-waist, short-sleeved clothes.
[숙원잡기]《菽园杂记》：：“马尾裙始于朝鲜国，流入京师……于是无贵无贱，服者日盛。至成化末年，朝臣多服之者矣。阁老万公安冬夏不脱……。大臣不服者惟黎吏侍淳一人而已。此服妖也，弘治初始有禁例。”
"마미군은 조선국(고려)에서 시작되어, 수도로 유입됬으며......귀천을 가리지 않고 복식이 날로 성했다. 성화말년에 이르러, 조정 신하들도 많이 입게 되었다. 각로 모두 공, 사, 겨울에도 여름에도 벗지 않았다.....이 복식은 요사하므로, 홍치 초시에 금지되었다."
Translation: Woven horsetails skirt started in Chosun (Korea) and flowed into the capital... By the end of the torch, many court officials were also wearing them. All of the corners were not taken off in the winter or in the summer.
In Ming dynasty, we wear马面裙 has no inner skirt, which is not puffy. 马尾裙, which is inner skirt that make outsider skirt puffy, we do not wear that in Ming dynasty. Even we wear inner skirt, it is not made of Woven horsetails and has nothing to do with korea.
[만포필기], 《寓圃笔记》:"发裙之制，以马尾编成，系于衬衣之内。体肥者一裙，瘦削者或二三，使外衣之张，俨若一伞。",
"치마를 넓히는 제도는, 말꼬리를 옷안에 엮어서 만든다. 몸을 비대하게 만든 하나의 치마로, 마른사람은 혹 두개 세개를 입는다, 옷을 바깥으로 넓게 퍼지게 만드는데 쓰는데, 우산과 같다."고 기록하고 있습니다.
Translation: The system for widening the skirt is made by woven horsetails into clothes. It is a skirt that makes the body enlarged, and the skinny person wears two or three lumps, and it is used to spread the clothes widely outside, and it is like an umbrella."
Are you kinding me, Hanfu in Ming dynasty do not use horsetails panty to enlarge the body, what we wear is 马面裙，not 马尾裙，马尾裙 made of woven horsetails is a kind of inner skirt.
That is all 高丽 clothes mentioned in these material, after translation, we can see that it has nothing to do with Ming dynasty clothes. In turn, it proves that hanbok in Joseon Dynasty was heavily influenced by China because it is totally different from Goryeo style.
but you south Korea is not 高丽, America founded your country, your country did not ever exist until 20th century.
@@user-il9oj7ov4b 여러개의 중국 응원해! 니가 말한 티베트의 독립과 free 홍콩은 정말 감동적이야. 나중에 문자로 대자보 운동을 계획해보자!
I think china people have inferioty complex about Korean culture. I definitely like korean drama and their attitude. I used to live China and Korea both. But China people have very rude attitude over other country people. Also Korea is more clean and people are very nice
@김지민 제대로 얘기좀 해라~ 뭐라하는지 모르겠다~
@김지민 야 김치도 중국거라고 중국 방송에서 그러더라 ㅋㅋㅋ 한국의 문화가 탐나서 어쩔줄 모르는 중국인들 ㅋㅋㅋ
腦子是個好東西，希望韓國朋友也能經常使用它，再不行多動動發財的小手查查資料，不要什麼都是你們的好嗎？朝鮮以前就是中國的藩屬國，文化文字服飾都是借中國的，就算改良了那也是起源於中國。好勝沒錯但是硬要說自己是宇宙起源就很無恥了。
他们的脑子就是畸形的。
其实正常的交流都没关系，就是看到有些nt认为汉服是抄了韩服，我直接震惊了……他们以为中国五千年的历史是闹着玩的吗，一点历史观也没有吗……
@@hailunss3004 他们以为四大文明古国包括韩国 噗噗噗
@@user-td2jl9gv5v 你的中文翻譯太爛了，恕我無法理解，寫清楚再來好嗎:)
@@user-td2jl9gv5v 現在你們穿的韓服是中國明朝的衣服用的漢字是中國千年傳下來的文化，儒學是中國春秋時期開始的思想，你們的古蹟景福宮名字也是從中國的詩經裡來的，都不是韓國的文化，快放棄它們，改穿你們原本漏出胸部的那種傳統服飾，放棄使用漢字，放棄書法跟儒學，希望你們還有文化可以流傳下來:)
Korean could never know what the really history is, because their acient history books are written in Chinese.
Koreans hope China can make freedom for Taiwan, Mongolians, Tibetan, Hongkong, Joseon tribes for respect their owned history and culture peace of world
You speak English so Do you think you are UK,
@@666Yourkarma As a vassal state of China and Japan in history, Korean should make themselves free from USA nowadays. As for the hope about Taiwan, Tibetan..., you could fignt and win a total war against China then your dream will come true. You delusional clown. XD
@@666Yourkarma I speak English because Eng is international language. But Korean use Chinese in histroy because Korean is one of China's vassal state and Korean have no their own language before 15 century.
@@nokoxia6413 Korea spoke Chinese because Chinese was international language. But Chinese use English in History because China is one of the vassal states united 56 tribes. And Korean have owned language what was Mandarin. we created Korean 700years ago biologically because Mandarin was hieroglyphics uncomfortably because many primitive people created and mixed too many ways by too many ancient people
有文化和素质的中韩两国人民，其实是非常友好的。我的几个韩国同学曾经就说，他们非常清楚如今传统韩服的前身底色是“大明赐服“，但随着时间的流逝，渐渐地融入了古朝鲜的部分特色。当然我说的这部分韩国人是极少数，大部分韩国人罔顾事实，被韩国狭隘的历史教育洗脑，居然反过来说是大明学习了李氏朝鲜的服饰，不然你觉得所有的华人为什么生气？中国怎么不去说和服是自己的？因为日本人至少在这一点上大方承认，和服脱胎于中国吴服，但后来自成体系，当得上是日本文化。就好比日本人说，大唐是去日本学了文化，不可笑吗？景福宫按照史料记载，李氏王朝得到大明的钦定才有资格开建，而且规格形制仅仅是大明郡王级别，不承认有用吗？从来就是中国的附属国，直到大清衰弱了才独立出去，不承认有用吗？
总看到韩国人发台湾 香港 拜托 我们根本就不care好吗 自以为在戳痛谁的神经呢
从这里是不是能看出来韩国人G点在哪里。
@@noctislee598 竹岛？
哈哈哈，的确完全不care，香港再闹也跳不出手掌心，它都闹了快两年了早习惯了，现在看看也就只会砸砸自家东西了，台湾这几年恶心我们反正都不拿它们当同胞看了，除了嘴臭还有什么啊，随它们便，不就一个流亡政权吗？韩国没墙都这么孤陋寡闻，可悲，一个活在美国殖民下的小国
hgr没常识罢了
韩国人自我高潮一直可以的
抄袭者反过来说原作者抄袭，太可笑了，韩国最近的古装剧也一股中国网剧风，看着就恶心🤢
History of Goryeo 고려사권 137권 (高麗史 137卷): AD 1392
“復行洪武年號，襲大明衣冠,禁胡服”
“부행홍무년호 습대명의복 금호복”
“Joseon Dynasty shall adopt the era name of Hongwu of Ming, wear Ming costumes and headgears, ban Hu Dress”
Korea is a vassal state of China. South Korea steals not only Chinese culture but also Japanese culture.
@@cosdv Where does the origin of Korean costume come from?
@@cosdv However, according to Wikipedia, Koguryo and Koryo have no relationship of succession, and the two dynasties are more than 200 years apart.
@@cosdv That is to say, do you admit that Koguryo and Koryo are two different dynasties
We ethnic chinese(Malaysian Chinese here) everywhere are very proud folks and we are also very self-assured people. Unlike those people from tiny country and under thousand of years of being a satellite of the Middle Kingdom….they have what I would consider as "little country syndrome”:)
땅은 크나 마음이 작아 중국이라지요
@@user-sn2jg6re1d English perhaps my East Asian cousin:)
I also consider Chinese as "Wide country syndrome", which is Burning their traditional things.
@@Thinkofwhat 그대도 마음이 작은자인가? 뇌도 작은가? 생각도 작은자!!
@@user-sn2jg6re1d What are you barking my little one?
尊重历史才是尊重自己
Obviously the food, drink etc. really comes from God.
Some people dont have self respect
@@jameshenrysmith not talking about god here.
@@jameshenrysmith This is a cultural discussion, nothing here is about god. Do not bring religious stuff into a regular reasonable conversation
@@Embers-qu8vg Maybe God put the hanfu and hanbok in!
请部分网友尊重历史。韩国人不要空口编造历史了。
韩国人不是对历史胡编乱造的，而是对少数中国人要夺走韩国的历史感到恼火的。那样说真叫人遗憾
한국인은 역사에대해 날조하는것이 아니라 소수의 중국인이 한국의 역사를 빼앗아하려는것에 화가난것이다.말을 그렇게 하다니 섭섭하다
hwang se Chinese are also annoyed at the Korean theft of Chinese culture.we dont say hanbok is hanfu.Why do Koreans come to Hanfu videos and say it's Hanbok？ur han is korean nationality.our han means han nationality which is the main ethnic groups in China.Why korean want to steal our Hanfu？
@@hwangseee294
The slave of three masters , a tributary state for thousands of years.
South Korea is three state's slaves of China(BC87s-AD1895s), Japan(AD1896s-AD1945s) and
The US(AD1950s-Now)
//
The tragedy of the Korean Peninsula is his location，
When China was strong, Korea became a vassal state of CN.
When Japan was strong, Korea became a vassal state of JP too.
When The US is NO.1, Korea has also been a vassal state of USA until now.
So China and The US will not agree to the reunification of North and South Korea forever.
//
The US army committed murder, rape and robbery on the mainland of South Korea, but the South Korean government did not control it, which shows that S.Korea is a slave country of the United States
@@hwangseee294 As a vassal state for thousands of years, so their people are very self-abased.
They steal all the traditional culture and food from China ，then claim it as theirs.
//
The ancient S.Korean royals and aristocrats spoke/wrote Chinese, while the common people spoke/wrote Korean.
that is why all the ancient S.Korean books are written in Chinese
and the Republic of S.Korean first constitution was written in Chinese!
//
Most of S.Korean young people can't read the ancient books written in Chinese，so they learn historical nihilism and think everything from China were made in S.Korea.
@@hwangseee294 放屁，做賊喊捉賊，噁心
It's weird to see people confuse Hanbok and Hanfu with each other, because they look completely different.
Wait oh damn didn't expect the like-dislike ratio to be nearly tied
@정도영 明朝是韩国的宗主国，甚至李氏朝鲜的名字也是明朝的皇帝给的，他们以接受明朝的赐服为荣，接受大明正统的华夏服饰文化是一件非常值得炫耀的事情。
朝鲜人崔溥曾说：“盖我朝鲜地虽海外，衣冠文物悉同中国……”
所以，韩国的传统服饰受到明朝的影响很深。
来自明朝的文化在韩国一直传承到现在，笠帽和翼善冠也经常在电视剧中出现。
from 知乎
please study first bfor u comment here 🤡
@정도영 wdym by so different? Did u see and learn all of the hanfu design?? Did u know how many kinds there are? Dont judge it when u dont even know🤷♀️🤡 小丑竟是你自己
@정도영 o do u think that Korea really owned china bfor? Ha ha ha u can go search in google or libraries first
@정도영 Come on, you don't really think the history records in China were all written by the current “china government" do you. Whatever hatred you have on CPC, Chinese history of one dynasty was recorded by the history official from the descending dynasty. The integrity of these records is unquestionable, or at least could not be questioned by an ignorant like you. Read more kid.
China is one of the oldest civilizations in the world. There r 4 in total, China Babylon Egypt and India, how come Korea is not included?🙂
*The key to achieving hegemony in East Asia and the world*
All East Asians were born from K people (pls see my previous comments), so getting closer to K (parents) brings blessings. Thus, historically, the country who honored and respected K achieved hegemony in East Asia. It applies to non-Asians also. The founding ideology of Gojoseon (the first K nation) was 弘益人間 which means *“widely benefit the human world”* [三國遺事]. What a beautiful ideology suitable for the 21st century! No country in human history has such kind of philanthropic founding ideology. *Everything is to be done as it is said: K people are parents and exist to widely benefit the human world.* That’s why getting closer to K and befriending K people bring blessings, and breaking off relations with K brings misfortune. I’ll show some historical evidence:
1. *Sui dynasty (581AD ~ 618AD)* unified C for the first time since AD. They waged three big wars against K (Goguryo). In their third invasion, they attacked Goguryo with 1.14 million troops which was the biggest war in human history before WW1, but they were brutally defeated and finally collapsed.
2. *Tang dynasty (618AD ~ 907AD)* was the most brilliant dynasty in C history and Tang Taizong, who is considered the greatest hero in C history, waged many wars against K (Goguryo), but they were defeated. Tang eventually formed an alliance with another K (Silla), and was able to destroy Goguryo. Even though they initially faced big misfortunes by attacking K, these misfortunes could be offset by the blessings of making alliance with another K (Silla). Later, Tang achieved big blessings by having strong tie with K (Silla).
3. *Jin (金) dynasty* considered K (Silla) as their origin [金史] and never waged war against K (Goryeo), so they got blessing and achieved hegemony by acquiring Central Plan (中原).
4. *Mongol* General 哈眞 made a brotherhood treaty (兄弟之盟) with K (Goryeo) in 1218AD and said “Our two countries have become brothers forever, let's not make our children forget it even after 10,000 years (萬世)”, then they got big blessings and were able to occupy the biggest land in human history.
5. *Mongol* Kublai Khan made a special peace treaty with K (Goryeo), so got big blessing and founded Yuan dynasty in 1270AD. He loved Goryeo so much and said “I see Goryeo as one family (一家) with us. If Goryeo faces hard times, how could I not rescue Goryeo?”. Yuan dynasty granted autonomy to Goryeo and married their princesses to the kings of Goryeo.
6. *Qing* invaded K (Joseon) and forced to make a brotherhood treaty (兄弟之盟). After getting K (Joseon) to his side, Qing was able to take over China. From the Ming Dynasty's perspective, they suffered the great misfortune of losing the entire country to the Qing as a result of not providing military aid to Joseon. Qing was able to occupy K (Joseon), but never did it. People say it’s a big mystery. The reason was Manchus had a special kinship feeling towards K people. Manchus tried to find their origin from K (Silla) in [滿洲源流考][金史]. So, they were blessed and lasted long. Both the Mongols and Manchus had special kinship feeling towards K people. All East Asians were born from K people, thus have innate affection for K.
7. *Japan* annexed K in 1910AD without war, which was the first time for K to lose autonomy through entire K history. This was not to bless J, but because it was 天 (heaven)'s punishment for the most corrupt K government in K history. Whatever the reason, J, which acquired K, gained hegemony in East Asia. However, J tried to place their parents K people below them, minimized K's ancient history, and increasingly persecuted K people, thus eventually collapsed. Then, K experienced even more severe punishment - war and division of South and North. *All of this was a pain that had to be experienced before being newly born and becoming a light to East Asia and to the world.*
8. *U.S.* who has hegemony in East Asia now, has a strong alliance with K.
*Question: Currently, K is divided into South and North. In this situation, which K should we get closer to?* Then answer is South. Why? The reason is Gojoseon in Liaohe, who was the origin of K, migrated to the South and founded Mahan [三國志: “With every dawn, many (Gojoseon) refugees flowed into Mahan's homeland, and Mahan was founded"]. Qin (秦) people, who were another branch of Gojoseon, also migrated to South K [三國志, 後漢書: “Jinhan (Silla) old people said they were refugees from Qin (秦) to avoid hard labor, and Mahan allocated the eastern border (Jinhan)”]. Thus, Mahan and Jinhan, which were located in South K, became the final destination and safe haven for the descendants of Gojoseon. That’s why South K was protected, and South K (Silla) unified Three Kingdoms of K and Tang dynasty who had alliance with Silla was blessed. Manchus (Qing) were blessed because they sought their origins to Silla (South K) rather than Goguryeo (North K). During K war, US who chose South K have been blessed.
*There have been big mysteries in East Asian history:* Mongols (Yuan) was able to annex K (Goryeo), but they didn’t. They granted autonomy to Goryeo even though Goryeo was located right in front to their capital (Beijing). Manchus (Qing) was able to annex K. They invaded K (Goryeo), captured the capital of Goryeo and subjugated the King of Goryeo. However, they didn’t annex K. Instead, they forced K to make brotherhood treaty (兄弟之盟) with them and retreated. During J invasion of K (Joseon) in 1592AD, J army captured up to Pyongyang, but stopped its advance even though Uiju, where the king of Joseon had taken refuge, was very close. 懲毖錄(징비록), which was a best seller book in Joseon and Japan written by 류성룡(柳成龍) right after the J invasions of K (Joseon), says “The J army stopped in Pyongyang was truly the Will of Heaven and not something that could be done by human power.” This was one of the main reasons why J eventually failed to occupy K. K people are parents of East Asians, and it has been 天 (heaven)’s Will to protect K who are destined to unite all his children and become the light and spiritual leader in East Asia.
明朝當時國力與朝鮮是相對強勢的，而且漢服一路從更早到唐、宋、元、明各朝代都有發展脈絡，是自成一眽的。而後來到清朝又發展出旗袍，這比較常見於國際，明代漢服比較少穿出來，所以不為人所熟知了。
韓文留言真的刷新我的印象..
真的...无理取闹且无聊
都懒得去翻译一个一个人看 猜都知道只会抓着什么vpn哔哩吧啦的
@Daniel Shin korea too
@Daniel Shin Do you know who cares the most about other's thoughts - when pets looking for the owner’s approval
我觉得很多韩国人还是理智友好的。那些复制粘贴韩文评论的网友估计是真的听不懂英文又看不懂中文。他们根本不知道十音给他们科普的什么...
那你是想多了
你想太多了，他们骂人可比我们脏多了
理智？友好？哈哈哈哈哈哈
@@maxg691 算了，他们骂人的语言真是又脏又贫瘠
理智？友好？怕不是忘了这件事是谁先挑起的？？？？
(Answer to Kez) What you mentioned is only during 400 ~ 450AD when Goguryeo was strong. Baekje was strong in 4th century and Silla was strong in 6th century. If you look at authentic history book 後漢書 which was written 450AD, it describes each nations in K peninsula along with their peoples’ characteristics, *but not a single mention about 倭(왜) people in K peninsula. It means there were no J people in K peninsula.* Based on records, we can say J had some military influence during 400 ~ 450AD on southern part of K peninsula, but it’s only some military influence. *The cultural influence was always unidirectional from K peninsula to J archipelago.* Enormous amounts of Baekje, Gaya, Silla relics in J, but not vice versa at all. I’ve shown you drawings of 倭(왜) envoy in 梁職貢圖(양직공도) who didn’t even wear shoes (barefoot). According to another authentic record 隋書, J people didn’t wear shoes until 7th century. Several drawings show that J wore only upper clothes at that time (Sumo style). They didn’t have iron technology. So, I agree that J did good job in military with primitive technologies (stones and wood) without shoes and (lower) clothes during 390 ~ 450 AD.
高句里和高丽不是一个好吧 韩国啥都没有所以喜欢争抢 自卑造就了自大
Goguryeo had not much connection with current Korean, OK?
Obviously the food, drink etc. really comes from God.
高句丽是朝鲜死敌，然而现在你当祖宗😂🎉
i would like to see the stats on how many were black listed. lol
提到韩国有的而中国没有的，我第一个想到的是美国大兵，这个确实是韩国的一个特色，韩国人可以发展一下“美国驻军文化”，树立自己的文化自信🤣😂
Its very stupid for China to say hanbok and kimchi are Chinese all of sudden in 2020 while China had their mouth shut for past centuries. 🤣🤣
Maybe they got jealous cuz of K culture and K Pop being famous
@@padeng555 古代模仿中国 现代照搬欧美, 这可能就是你们的南韩传统吧
Ancient imitation of China modern copy of Europe and the United States, this may be your South Korean tradition
@san jack so you are saying that China always steal others culture right?
Agree 👍 👍
@san jack 불쌍한 중국은 자기의 문화가 없어 남에 문화를 훔치려 합니다!
露奶装中国也没有啊。绝对的韩国特色。
아 오해가 있으시군요.
그 수치스럽지 않으세요?
남의꺼 뺏기나 하고
그 가오세던 명나라는 어디가고.
이런데서 한국의 문화나 훔치고
미국도 안하는짓을 중국이 하는게
@Maatje Benassi we are saying ours what is ours you are saying yours what is not yours
@Maatje Benassi 그건 니네 입장이고 중국아
짝퉁의나라 중국이라ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
문화도 짝퉁으로 쓰려는듯
@@user-ww2ff8go9e ㅋㅋㅋ
ㄹㅇㅋㅋ ㅇㅈ
@주원 Sounds like you are talking about Koreans in the comments section.
“洪武二年，高麗入朝，請賜祭服制度，命制給之” 南韓人請尊重歷史！
@@csik7996 한국은그들의문화가없다는것을폭로하고, 매일중국의것을표절하고, 중국사람들의웃음거리가되고, 한국은그들의역사가오래다고하지만이름난명인한사람을내지못한다고말했다.중국역사는 모르시겠지만 삼국지는 해보셨죠.이것은 문화 지식 아니, 한국은 모두 중국의 성어와 음식 문화를 포함합니다.한국은 오직 성형의 걸 그룹 문화 👎
@@csik7996 USA🇰🇷🐶
@@laughing6206
Not only the "fake Korean Wave," which openly copies Korean trademarks and products, but also the "fake Korean Wave," a foreign product packaged as if it were a Korean product, is a headache.
This is because the low quality of such "fake Korean Wave" products sold overseas may lower the reliability of Korean products to foreign consumers and negatively affect the Korean image.
Logos of major "Fake Korean Wave" companies.
According to the distribution industry and KOTRA on the 19th, MUMUSO, a Chinese household goods store, is mentioned as a representative example. Although its headquarters is a Chinese company in Shanghai, China, it uses "KR" for brand marks and imitates Korean products and designs. The product belongs to a Chinese company, and the packaging is also distributed with false Hangul and Korean-related logos engraved. Mugunghwa Life is conducting business in more than 30 countries around the world, opening stores in Uruguay and UAE last year. Chinese company Ilahui is operating in major countries in a similar form. The logo is equipped with "KOREA" to advocate a Korean brand. In addition, KIODA (You're cute), YOYOSO (Hansangwoopum), MINIGOOD (Sammu), and XIMISO (Himmyo) have jumped on the Korean Wave and are thriving in Southeast Asia. Those who use Hangul that is not grammatically correct or sell products that plagiarize Korean products and designs are mistaken for Korean brands there.
Chinese products sold by "Fake Korean Wave" companies. Awkward Korean expressions stand out.
The Korean court ordered the dissolution of Mugunghwa Life and Yeonhye Woopum's Korean subsidiary in 2019. It is believed that a ghost corporation was established in Korea to avoid crackdowns and sanctions by local patent authorities while selling products imitating Korean products on a large scale overseas. In addition, the Korean Intellectual Property Office and the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy have also responded by requesting governments in major countries to investigate and crack down.
Since then, the government explained that there have been fewer explicit Korean impersonations, such as promoting products in hanbok or specifying that they are Korean brands, but there are still many cases of clever copying of Korean brands and products.
@@laughing6206
1. Since ancient times, Chinese people have been the center of civilization.
There is no culture in the surrounding peoples.
- Ancient Chinese recorded that they were culturally influenced by the eastern immigrants.
Now, it is creating a miracle logic to include the entire Asia in China.
2. China does not stxxal Korean culture.Korea is stealing Chinese culture.
It's a typical lie.
At the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics, traditional Korean culture was used. Is this all?
The Chinese are manipulating that the language of Koreans is part of Chinese.
3. Western media is framing China.
- They are claiming to be right, but the lie was eventually revealed.
A perfect defense excuse.
Numerous people are suffering from China's txxxft of high-tech technologies from other countries.
However, the Chinese are pretending not to know even though they know.
Conclusion:
Unable to communicate with Chinese people
They don't feel guilxxy even though they lie. This is the completion of self-dexxption.
@@laughing6206
"중국인들의 계획적인 거짓말"
중국 광저우(廣州)에서 발간되는 신쾌보(新快報)는 최근 ''한중문화 전쟁''이라는특집기사를 통해 한국이 한자를 세계문화유산으로 등재하려는 움직임을 보이고 있다고 전했다.
신쾌보의 보도에 따르면 지난해 ''박정수 서울대 역사학과 교수''가 10여년의 연구 결과 한(韓)민족이 한자를 발명한 이후 중국 중원(中原)으로 옮겨가 한자를 중국에 전하면서 지금의 한족(漢族) 문화가 형성됐다고 주장했다.
박 교수는 한국 정부에 떳떳하게 한자 문화를 복원하고 유네스코에 한자를 세계문화유산으로 신청할 것을 건의했다는 것이다.
그러나 서울대 국사학과나 동양사학과 등에 재직중인 교수중에 ''박정수''라는 이름을 가진 교수는 없으며 한국이 한자를 홀로 세계문화유산으로 등재하려는 움직임도 전혀 없는 것으로 확인되고 있다.
이런 잘못된 보도는 13일 홍콩 문회보(文匯報) 등에도 인용되며 중국 네티즌들의 엉뚱한 분노를 사고 있다. 한국에서 유학했다는 한 중국 네티즌은 한글이 15세기에야 창제됐음을 상기시키며 "이는 중국문화에 대한 도둑질"이라고 주장했다.
신문은 나아가 한국을 필두로 한 중국, 일본, 대만 4개국 학자들이 최근 베이징국제한자회의에서 번체자(繁體字.한국과 대만에서 사용하는 정체자)를 기초로 한 상용 표준한자를 만들기로 했다는 소식을 전하며 반한 감정을 부추기고 있다.
신문은 또 4개국 학자의 표준한자 합의 소식을 부인하며 "간체자(簡體字)는 중국의 법정 문자로 절대 바꿀 수 없는 것"이라는 중국측 대표의 발언을 전하기도 했다.
이밖에도 중국 언론은 강릉단오제의 세계문화유산 등재 이후 한국에서 제기되는 한의학, 두유, 풍수지리 등의 한반도론 주장을 시시콜콜 전하면서 중국 문화를 한국에 빼앗기고 있다는 피해의식에 사로잡혀 있다.
유교 창시자인 공자나 월나라 미인 서시(西施), 명나라 시기 본초강목(本草綱目)의 저자 이시진(李時珍)이 한반도에서 넘어왔다는 근거 불명의 한국내 주장까지 일일이 소개하고 있다.
한국인들은 그런적 없는데 계속 거짓말하네 ㅎ ㅡㅡ
누구말이 맞는지 유네스코에 확인해 보자.
진짜 계획적으로 모함을 하네 ㅎ
이거 중국 공 산 당 이 한국 혐오하게 만드려고 퍼뜨린 거짓말인거 이미 들통났다
Korea got lots of influence from Ming Dynasties.
Ming Dynasty helped Korean fight against Japanese invasion.
Why the hate😭
China steals from us too much
Korea culture is from India and Hanbok is from Scythian and Mongolian Not from china
We thx to Mongolian
Ming dynasty is influenced by Korea
@@666Yourkarma Then why you guys use Chinese characters? I bet you can’t distinguish 韓 and 漢。 you simply call it Han.
And the heck Korean is related to India? Korean sail to India thousand years ago?
@@noobwow2009 Korea was reached out Manchuria because We are Mongolian Korean kings have married with Indian princess who my grandmother and grandfather 2000years ago
一直碰瓷，甩都甩不掉的hgr，TMD烦死了(-᷅_-᷄)
紧跟时事
活学活用啊
你不对劲
一转头就去说日本寿司是韩国的然后又说樱花是韩国的啧啧啧
爽言爽语笑死了
ㅋㅋ 주구장창 변발한 모습만 보다가 한류열풍으로 갓쓰고 도포자락 휘날리는 모습 보니까 멋있고 탐나긴 하겠지요^^
你看 小偷😂😂 5:10
Is Tai Chi Korean?
What is korean national flag called? 🇰🇷태극기 (Taegukgi) 太極旗 。why do they use Chinese Tai Chi symbols for their national flag?
nationalism + Sinocentrism = cultural imperialism
This is the goal of Xiaofenhongs who spread flsxxxxxd to making aggro. Keep work hard!!!!
This symbol is found in a Korean temple which was built 1400 years ago during Silla era. Northern area of China and Koreans have been using this symbol from ancient times, but as far as I know, Han Chinese have nothing to do with this symbol.
@@random_guy1084 korean should learn some history
@@juliakaurbhullar1796 Chinese need to learn correct history.
@@random_guy1084 Very cute, your message suggested that you don’t know anything about Tai Chi nor I Ching, not that I understand the I Ching myself, but at least I know where it came from. If you want to discuss this matter, I suggest you do some research and I’ll be happy to hear from you, I’m always eager to learn something new. 네, 공부 열심히 하시고 나서 다시 토론 합시다. God bless you all !!
Some Chinese companies go abroad and pretend to be Korean companies. They put up signs with Korean writing and sell products as if they were Korean. Minigood, llahui, and mumuso are examples of these Chinese companies. They even use the word "Korea" on their overseas signboards, play KPop songs, and greet customers with "Welcome" in Korean. Despite not actually being Korean products, these companies sell their products as if they were. China has a reputation for copying.
Delusional angry confused jealous Chinese. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and Chinese invention originated from koreanic and Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese population were austronesian negritos. Yangtze river southern china Burma southeast Asia is Homeland of Chinese austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited only by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Han people and han dynasty was named after han river which is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture.
Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.,.
Korean hamburger, lol!
오직 코로나만 중국의 것이다.
ㅋㄱㅋㄱㅋㄱㅋㅋㅋㅋㄱㄱㄱㄱㄱㅋㅇㅈ
@하녕 ̆ 아ㅏㅏㅏ주 좋소
real
중국발 미세먼지도 추가요
@하녕 ̆ 어떻게 만든거지?
古朝鮮連自己的文字沒有，到了快近代才自創文字系統，可是系統漏洞很多，文字沒有含義，只是代表讀音。就像用漢語拼音或注音來當文字使用。
韩文还是逃脱不了方块字的构架
안녕? 중국의 개
可笑。 你们汉字要不是商朝(东夷)的甲骨文 你们哪里来的汉字? 商朝人知道遗民到哪里吗？ 商朝的文化和朝鲜文化为什么密切? 你们中国历史要是没有其他民族 那还是中国历史? 阿Q
@@kandad8340 东夷和你们有什么关系，东夷在山东境内，箕子只是将中国文化带去朝鲜，你真以为你们和东夷是同族同源？你不会看你们国家野史看多真以为汉字是你们发明的吧？
尚書大傳·卷二》記載：「武王釋箕子之囚，箕子不忍周之釋，走之朝鮮。武王聞之，因以朝鮮封之箕子。」
@@shengdiyago235 阿Q🤣还中国文化? 中国大陆上的文化是你们汉族文化吗？ 你们跟商朝人有关系? 还否定商朝与朝鲜关系? 这不就是你们共产党东北工程执行的目的吗。 还篡改西藏历史 做西北工程。 真是厉害 汉族阿Q
引用《菽园杂记》的人需要搞清楚马尾裙和马面裙完全是不同的。十音穿的是马面裙，有折轴且修工华丽精细。马尾裙是丫鬟穿的便宜朴实的服装。中国古代汉人雇佣购买朝鲜国做丫鬟穿马尾裙，很正常。
And it was during the Yuan Dynasty that the Chinese alphabet was called hanzi. At that time, Mongolians began to record Chinese characters different from their own as hanzi. And for thousands of years, mainland China was not a unified culture of Han Chinese. There were many other ethnic groups of Mongolian Tungus in northern China, but after the qing era, all of them began to be integrated into China. Even look at the records of Chinese prince being captured by Mongolian armies during the Ming era. And the ancient hwaxia Chinese recorded that they were taught the pants culture by the northern Huns. The northern horseback-riding people were a different group from the Han Chinese. so Chinese Hanfu was accepted the cultures of immigrants and other ethnic groups, so it's forms changed with the times. Don't lie that the Han Chinese invented it
汉服不是韩服，请部分网友尊重历史
呵，请部分网友正视现况，某国各大影视剧的服装、世界遗产、风俗、甚至瓷器、中国结都声称均为韩国发源？那可以的，全世界都是某国的，某国创造了全世界。
Lol a history book can make u cry
Chinese lies too much
@@jacobjay8333 history can make Korean lose No .1
@@jacobjay8333 read the history book and you'll be the one crying
한삼 맨날 미국싫다싫다하면서 영어로 설명하는거 무엇?ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
영어는 영국꺼자나...
ㅋㅋ근데 영어도 중국의 사투리라고 우겼다가 기사한번 났다고함ㅋㅋ엌ㅋㅋ
다들 동영상 보지말고 신고 고고
listen to your ancestors, you pathetic creature read your history, oops sorry, they are written in Chinese, you can't understand. Hahahahaha
Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty Volume 36 고종실록 고종 36권 朝鮮王朝實錄 高宗 36卷： AD 1897“我邦疆土, 係是漢、唐古地, 衣冠文物, 悉遵宋、明遺制, 接其統, 而襲其號, 無所不可" “우리나라의 강토는 한(漢) 나라와 당(唐) 나라의 옛 땅에 붙어있고 의관(衣冠)과 문물(文物)은 다 송(宋) 나라나 명(明) 나라의 옛 제도를 따르고 있으니, 그 계통을 잇고 그 칭호를 그대로 쓴들 안 될 것이 없습니다” “The territories of Korea used to be the ancient land of Han and Tang. Our costumes and relics conformed to Song. The kingdom system and structure adopted from Ming. It is rightful and legal to inherit the true name of Greater China and her culture - Joseon Gojong조선고종 高宗”
History of Goryeo 고려사권 137권 (高麗史 137卷): AD 1392“復行洪武年號，襲大明衣冠,禁胡服” “부행홍무년호 습대명의복 금호복”“Joseon Dynasty shall adopt the era name of Hongwu of Ming, wear Ming costumes and headgears, ban Hu Dress”
Taejo of Goryeos' Ten Rules 왕이 훈요10조를 내리다 高麗太祖 訓要十條: AD 943"惟我東方, 舊慕唐風, 文物禮樂, 悉遵其制, 殊方異土, 人性各異, 不必苟同. 契丹是禽獸之國, 風俗不同, 言語亦異, 衣冠制度, 愼勿效焉"“우리 동방(東方)은 옛날부터 중국의 풍속[唐風]을 흠모하여 문물(文物)과 예악(禮樂)이 다 그 제도를 따랐으나, 지역이 다르고 인성(人性)도 각기 다르므로 꼭 같게 할 필요는 없다. 거란(契丹)은 짐승과 같은 나라로 풍속이 같지 않고 말도 다르니 의관제도(衣冠制度)를 삼가 본받지 말라”"We, the East admire the customs of the Tang Dynasty, learn her rite and music, adopt her system and style. People from far land are different from us in terms of humanity, do not try to make them look similar in a subservient manner. The nature of Khitan (契丹) is brutal and bestial, we do not share the same value or language with them, so do not follow their system of attire"
Samguk Sagi Volumn 5『삼국사기』권5 『三國史記』卷5 : AD 649“(真德王) 三年,春正月，始服中朝衣冠”“(진덕왕) 3년(649) 봄 정월에 비로소 중국의 의관(衣冠)을 착용하였다”" In the third year of Jindeok, the first month of spring, people in Silla (South Korea) started to wear Chinese-style cloth and hats"
Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀) : AD 648“春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製” “춘추가 또한 장복(章服)을 고쳐서 중국의 제도에 따를 것을 청하자”" Gim Chunchu 무열왕 asked the Emperor of Tang for permission to change the traditional cloth of Silla, the country shall follow the Chinese style "
삼국사기 제28권 백제본기 제6 三國史記 卷第二十八 百濟本紀 第六“高句麗亦以高辛氏之後 姓高氏 古史曰 百濟與高句麗 同出扶餘 又云 秦漢亂離之時 中國人多竄海東 則三國祖先 豈其古聖人之苗裔耶”“고구려는 역시 고신씨(高辛氏)3)의 후손이라 하여 고씨로 성을 삼았다고 한다. 의 기록에 보인다.] 고사(古史)에 이르기를 “백제와 고구려가 모두 부여에서 나왔다.”고 하며, 또 “진, 한의 난리 때 중국 사람이 해동으로 많이 왔다.”고도 한다. 그렇다면 삼국의 조상들은 어찌 옛 성인의 후예가 아니겠는가?”“Goguryeo is descendants of Gaoyang Clan, so the surname Gao is adopted. The ancient book recorded: “Baekje and Goguryeo. They all came from Buyeo." It is also said that“a lot of Chinese people came to Haedong during the riots of Qin and Han." Then, how could the ancestors of the Three Kingdoms not descendants of the Chinese ancient saints?”
@@user-en9bu9ul7c ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ복사 붙이기에 재미들렸냐?
*Proposals for the prosperity of East Asia*
J people here claims south K was ruled by J and north K was ruled by C at ancient times. They show their unrealistic wish to divide K (J occupy south and C occupy north). That’s why C also collaborate with J when it comes to ancient history. One example is C’s attempt to annex Goguryeo history and C blindly accept J’s fabricated ancient history of K. I’ll try to show that their collaboration is bound to fail, then I’ll try to propose the realistic way to strengthen their position in this region.
*1. K and C origins:*
At ancient times, K peninsula and Liao River were within the cultural sphere of Liao River (汎遼河文化圈) and C belonged to Yellow River culture. Liao River was inhabited by ancestors of K (Gojoseon, Buyeo) until 200 BC when Weiman and Han dynasty occupied Liaoxi (요서). Gojoseon crossed the Bohai sea and founded Mahan in 200 BC, and later Buyeo founded Goguryeo, Baekje, Silla. So, their northeast project cannot succeed merely by annexing Goguryeo history unless they annex Gojoseon and Buyeo history. C history books have never considered Gojoseon, Buyeo, Goguryeo, Baekje, Silla as part of C history. Thus, their attempt to change the 史觀(사관) formed through 3000 years of history is bound to fail.
*2. Origin of J*
*(1) Jomon period (14,000-300 BC):* There were only Jomon (D) in J archipelago. Jomon reached to the K peninsula first at Paleolithic period then O1b2 arrived to K peninsula. We can guess that arrival of O1b2 was the reason why Jomon in K peninsula retreated to the J archipelago and southern coastal regions of K peninsula.
*(2) Yayoi period (300BC ~ 300AD):* There was big Yayoi (O1b2) migration from southern K peninsula to J during this period. It was a time when Gojoseon (O2) from Liaoxi (요서) migrated to K peninsula and founded Samhan. Authentic history books affirm it:
[三國志], “With every dawn, many (Gojoseon) refugees flowed into Mahan's homeland, and Mahan was founded".
[後漢書], “King Jun of Joseon(Gojoseon) was defeated by Weiman, and led the remaining thousands of people through the (Bohai) sea, attacked Mahan, defeated Mahan, and established himself as the king of Han(韓).”
We can guess these events were the reason why many K peninsula natives (Yayoi, O1b2) migrated to J at that time. During this period, the Yayoi introduced advanced rice farming techniques to Japan. Many J people, who don’t want to accept that K peninsula people introduced this advanced technique, try their best to prove O1b2 originated from Yangtze River, but O1b2 never inhabited the Yangtze during the entire prehistoric and Bronze Age. Not a single bone with O1b2 has been found in the Yangtze River. At that time, most people of the Yangtze River were O1a, and the proportion of O1a among Koreans and Japanese is negligible.
*(3) Kofun period (300AD ~ 538AD):* Kofun people had totally different genes than people of Jomon and Yayoi periods based on gene analysis. The excavated eight bones of Gaya people had exactly the same genes as Kofun people. Based on these facts, even children can confidently say that Gaya people moved to J archipelago and replaced the existing Jomon and Yayoi people. Historians all over the world know that the J people are never allowed to excavate Kofun for fear that relics of Gaya and Baekje would come out. This was the time when Gaya was under big pressure by Three Kingoms of Korea (Baekje, Silla, Goguryeo) which were founded by Buyeo migrants (O2) from Liao River. J people don’t want to accept this fact, so they insist that J occupied and ruled Gaya. However, based on gene analysis, it must be the opposite. Based on archeology, an enormous amount of Gaya relics were found throughout the J archipelago, but J relics are rarely found on the K Peninsula. Gaya had advanced iron technology while J still used stone and wood at that time. Gaya introduced 神道(신토) to J.
*(4) Asuka period (538AD ~ 710AD):* Baekje had close relationship with J during this period. When Baekje was destroyed by Silla in 660 AD, many Baekje people (O2 + O1b2) migrated to J with advanced cultures and technologies and made enormous contribution to form J’s first ancient nation and Asuka culture. Baekje introduced Buddhism to J.
Summary: In J archipelago, Jomon (D) arrived first, then Yayoi (O1b2) arrived next, then Gaya (O1b2 + D) arrived next, then Baekje migrants (O2 + O1b2) arrived next. All of them came from K peninsula. That’s why modern J = D (Jomon, 33%) + O1b2 (K peninsula, 32%) + O2 (Liao River, 19%). The first comers (D) have highest proportion (33%), then the next comers (O1b2) have 32%, then the last comers (O2) have 19%.
*Thus, we can conclude that the history of J is the history of K peninsula people who were pushed out of the power struggle on the K Peninsula.*
The ridiculous J people here try to claim legitimacy on K peninsula. K has much more Yayoi blood (O1b2) and Liao River blood (O2) than J, and K were descendants of winners in K peninsula while J were descendants of the people who were driven out of K peninsula to J archipelago. Thus, K are true descendants of Pan Liao River Culture (汎遼河文化圈). If J don’t want to accept the truth, I wish J people keep believing they’re descendants of ancient Jomon in J archipelago and just stay there permanently.
In east Asia, the country that draws K to its side can have great regional hegemony. The current strategy of C would never work. Northeast and culture project will be considered as a kind of invasion, and will further separate K away from them and K will be more united and seek a closer alliance with the West. To win K to their side, they need completely different approach. C need to frankly admit K (Gojoseon, Buyeo) were in Liaoxi (孤竹, 朝陽, etc) until 200 BC, and start to collaborate in studying ancient history, and support unification of K. Historically, Han C absorbed northerners by inducing them into mainland C rather than invading or separating them. Now C is rising, so they need to have confidence and take risk to gain big thing.
For J to win K to their side, they need to sincerely apologize for the past, and admit they originated from K rather than claiming leadership in this region. However, it’s not going to happen in near future because J are very rigid, conservative and have complex against K. Japan will continue to hope for a second war between South and North K.
inferiority complex create a wonderful fantasy 😂😂😂
so scary😂
Both Manchurian and Korean brides wore "bumpits" like what Amidala used in "Attack of the Clone" when she entered a Chancelor's office on Coruscant or Trantor so interestingly from 1938 to today in of Wonsan such a region has aerospace factories of braided composite fuselage aerospace frames.
文轨攸同，赐王冕服，王妃群臣亦皆有赐，衣冠服饰，焕然一新，使我东方得免胡元左祍之俗，复见礼乐文物之盛，诚千载盛际也。
--韩国汉文古籍《增补文献备考》
@@user-td2jl9gv5v only copy and paste, are you bot?
@Vanina 厉害，说得好。
有什么好惊讶的，我都能在这里找到韩国人的视频 说汉字是韩国的，哈哈哈
完了，我担心传统建筑会。。。
我认识那么多韩国人就没见过这么说的
它们的身份证上还需要备注汉字，否则名字都搞不清楚哈哈哈哈哈哈
@@leifang6017 6啊兄弟，這我真不知道
ZeRoAthrun 他们的法律都要用汉字来写，要不然法律都有问题。。。
생긴게 한복 그 자체인데 딴소리하냐 ?? 완전 어이없음
Hanfu는 한복이 아님;;
Very informative video! Love it! Read some of the comments below, I have to say, man! Some people really don't care about facts and reality! It is hard to have a normal and sane conversations with those people!😩😩😩
I know ur chinese
I agree! Some crazy people say that hanbok is Chinese!
Koreans are from Mongolian our culture and Dna is very different with China.
Just that’s science and truth.
China kills and buried and burned ur owned culture
Protect ur original culture
Koreans and all world liked ur origin
Not copy from others
Hanfu is from Korea
And Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China
Hanfu is from Korea
When Korea conquered China before Ming dynasty .
Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China
Hanfu prove our history
letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz
Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture
Not from China
We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
Hanfu has existed in Ming Dynasty But Text of Hanfu has been created just 20years ago You guys haven’t wore thousands years and even 10years ago.
You suddenly started wear hanfu just in 10years You guys insist Hanfu is origin.
Korea has been Manchuria before ming dynasty Hanbok has been for a long time in Korea
Youguys insist Ours r from Korea
We don’t say Kimono is from Korea even though we have wore Kimono for along time
No one says kimono is Korean cloth
China is greedy
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
@@user-rc6hj3fd1r hanbok is korean
@@lime1015 That's right
who dares to defend their own culture, is worhy to be respected
This video is more like dares to steal.
@@jiey7916 uno reverse card
I’m an East Asian Studies student and I remember through most of the time until Japan colonized Korea, Korea was the affiliated country of ancient China. Another funny thing is that since Korean historical literature was mostly written in Chinese characters, the modern Korean people can’t read hanza at all. That’s probably why they refused to learn history. Sad for their bad attitudes.
@@6sinegohwan336 if you are free and have a lot of time, you can study Chinese to read the ancient books (because the references of Law History Medical Science in South Korea are Chinese). Plz don’t waste time for uno, try your best to find the truth, okay?
@@jiey7916 ur saying like every culture existing in europe is Italian culture because they used latin characters for thousands of years. Thats just ridiculous man
미안한데 전세계인들이 이미 한복이 한국의 전통의상이라는걸 다알아
Yes, South Koreans have the smallest eyes in the world.
@@user-hv8fw1hb1n and Chinese has small pp
@@user-hv8fw1hb1n It has a big terrytorry. But it has a small magnanimity. That's why we call it a "country in the middle." In Chinese; 中国
@@user-fk5kr9gx6q 9.6 million square kilometers in China
100000 square kilometers in South Korea
1 China = 96 South Korea
Lol
@@user-hv8fw1hb1n yes chinese copy everything hahaahaha
Simply put, the Dragon boat festival in China is a completely different event from Dano in Korea. The Chinese have different characteristics from Korean festivals, where rituals are held to the gods. Since ancient times, Koreans have had a culture of festivals and rituals every season, and don't lie that these cultures, which are prevalent in East Asia, are owned by the Chinese. The Chinese are protesting that the Luna new year should also be designated as the Chinese new year. Are the moon, Earth, and calendar all cultural heritages of the Chinese? It is not completely clear who invented the calendar in ancient times, but there is a record that Sumer people used it a long time ago. Ancient Koreans embraced Chinese culture and borrowed many Chinese words to use them, but they have developed different traditions and cultures from China. Korea's old tradition did not steal Chinese culture. The Chinese who protest like that are envious of Korea because Chinese could not passed on their culture for centuries. Look at the Chinese who had came to Korea to learn rituals and rituals for Confucius, which were already delxxxxted hundreds of years ago in China. Chinese people who are envious korea wave phenomenon are using VPNs to secretly come to UA-cam.
The name china was awarded and given to china by it's western Masters who saved weak scared china from dangerous koreanic and Japanese during WW2. Over 40 million Chinese wiped out during WW2. Over 500 million Chinese wiped out in total by koreanic and Mongolic peoples. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Delusional Angry confused jealous Chinese. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and Chinese invention originated from koreanic and Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese population were austronesian negritos. Yangtze river southern china Burma southeast Asia is Homeland of Chinese austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited only by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Han people and han dynasty was named after han river which is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture.
Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to fake china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 5000 years.,.
*Answer to dandylion on who copied who between K and J*
Dandylion complains that K copied J on many items. Yes, K copied J last few decades, but J copied K for thousands of years. Now, J started to copy K again. K's copying of J was unnatural and temporary, but J's copying of K has been a tradition. I will show the examples:
Originally, D was living in J archipelago.
Then, lots of O1b2 (Yayoi) migrated from K to J since samhan (三韓) was founded by northern immigrants (O2, Gojoseon refugees).
Then, lots of O2 + O1b2 (Kofun people) migrated from K (Gaya) to J during Kofun period (250 AD ~ 600 AD). These Gaya people founded the first J nation (Yamato). That’s why Kofun culture is an exact copy of Gaya culture, and lots of Gaya relics were found in J.
Then, lots of Baekje people migrated from K to J during Asuka period (600 AD ~ 710 AD). Asuka culture is an exact Beakje culture.
Hanja (漢字) was introduced to J by Baekje people (王仁). In J language, reading Hanja based on both sound (音読) and meaning (訓読) was first introduced to J by Baekje people. Evidence: “According to a study by the Department of Linguistics at Seoul National University in 2017, the numbers of Baekje were found in a wooden tablet excavated from the Mireuksa Temple site, and these words were found to be the same as that of the Koreanic language family. According to this study, the number 2 is pronounced as 의털읍(矣毛邑), the number 3 is 새태읍(新台邑), the number 5 is 도사읍(刀士邑), and the number 7 is 일고읍(日古邑), the number 8 is 옅털읍(今毛邑).” -> It clearly shows that Bakje people used both sound(音) and meaning(訓) to read Hanja.
J language is Gaya language because Gaya founded the first J nation Yamato. Before the establishment of the first nation, each neighborhood had a different language and it is not easy to unify the language among various tribes, but when the first nation is founded and the administrative system is established, the language of the ruling class spread rapidly.
Thus, we can assume that J language is the language of Yamato ruling class. However, the first nation in southern K peninsula was samhan (三韓). In other words, K language is Gojoseon (ancient 朝鮮) language because Samhan was founded by Gojoseon migrants from southern Manchuria (Liaohe). On the other hand, J language originated from the Gaya language. Gaya was founded by Buyeo (Fuyu) migrants from northern Manchuria. [Evidence: Several Goguryeo place names in the Nihongi have J pronunciations, and the number pronunciation in J is exactly the Goguryeo style pronunciation. Historically, it can be assumed that this is not because Goguryeo, the descendants of Buyeo, crossed over to J, but because Gaya, another descendant of Buyeo, crossed over to J and founded Yamato.]
K people have DNA to continuously innovate while J people have DNA to preserve. Descendants of Gojoseon created oraclebone script for the first time during Shang dynasty, Baekje people made a way to read Hanja with sound (音読) and meaning (訓読), and then Silla people also made Idu script (吏讀). This usage of Hanja using 音読 and 訓読 in Baekje and Silla was introduced to J and became Hiragana, which has been well preserved in J until now. However, K people who repeatedly innovate did not stop there, and King Sejong created Hangeul in 1443AD. An innovative K people are leading the technology in the 21st century's 4th industrial revolution, while J, who value preservation, are lagging behind.
Baekje was also founded by Buyeo migrants, but Baekje ruling class was not able to establish Buyeo language because K peninsula was already unified with the Samhan language. Once the language is unified by the first nation, it is hard to replace it. Only in the southern coastal area where the influence of the central government was weak, Gaya was able to establish Buyeo language. [Evidence: Referring to the records of Bidatsu Tennojo in the Nihongi, the ancient Yamato had an interpreter for Baekje because J language did not communicate with Baekje, and Baekje's language was classified as '韓' language. What is noteworthy here is that the J people called the language of Baekje as 'Han(韓)' language. In other words, the language of Baekje was the language of Samhan, not the language of Buyeo (Fuyu).] Baekje began to influence Yamato much later, and at that time, the Gaya language was already established in J, so it seems that Baekje was not able to replace it with Koreanic (韓) language.
The name china was awarded and given to china by it's western Masters who saved weak scared china from dangerous koreanic and Japanese during WW2. Over 40 million Chinese wiped out during WW2. Over 500 million Chinese wiped out in total by koreanic and Mongolic peoples. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Delusional Angry confused jealous Chinese. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and Chinese invention originated from koreanic and Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese population were austronesian negritos. Yangtze river southern china Burma southeast Asia is Homeland of Chinese austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited only by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Han people and han dynasty was named after han river which is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture.
Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to fake china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 5000 years.,.
讲个笑话。
（不是我的 从非正式会谈里的一位小哥那里看到的）
有人跟我说金字塔是外星人做的。我说是埃及人。他非得跟我说是外星人。我懒得跟他讲，就说是韩国人做的。
Translation:
Let me tell you a joke. ( Not told by me. I am just sharing this joke by a foreign guy from a TV show. )
Somebody told me Aliens built Pyramid. I said it was Egyptians. That person insisted on his point of view but I was too lazy to argue so I just said it was built by South Koreans.
哈哈哈哈哈哈
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈
所有bts的粉丝如果发现你这个言论应该丢脸丢死的
@@xijinpingpingpooh5093 我觉得您不应该因为您粉了一个那个国家的偶像而忽略那个国家另一些人做的事情。
만화 일러스트 허락받고 올리는건가?
이거 조차 함부러 하는데 한복이 자기꺼래 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
어우 그러게요ㅠㅠㅠ 화딱지 나네요
Now i will tell the truth.
The name of Hanfu has been established since 2001. Also, Hanfu is clothing that started from following Goryeo's clothing. READ
지정 이래 궁중의 급사와 사령은 태반이 고려의 여인이었다.
自至正以來, 宮中給事使令, 大半爲高麗女.
Since the designation, the placenta has been a woman of Goryeo as the chief and commander of the court.
이 때문에 사방의 의복과 신발, 모자, 기물이 모두 고려를 따라 일시의 유행이 되었으니 어찌 우연하다 할 수 있는가?
以故, 四方衣服鞋帽器物, 皆依高麗樣子. 此關系一時風氣, 豈偶然哉.
Because of this, clothes, shoes, hats, and articles all over the place became a temporary fashion following Goryeo. How can it be said that it is a coincidence?
권형(權衡), 경신외사(庚申外史)
This is Chinese history. Read, and learn from your history. Don't make the lie
@@user-op5he1nm6f lmao since 2001?
Nice one dude, you’re the one make my day
@@user-op5he1nm6f She isn't lying! what you listed above was in Yuan dynasty... come on you Korean people don't even recognize Yuan dynasty as part of Chinese history and now you are showing me this? Some of the hanfu style has already been like the Ming hanfu 2 piece style since Song dynasty (from actual finding). Plus, the description you can find about 高丽样is completely unrelated to whatever she is showing in her video. It's half sleeve and square collar. So overall, we are in no way claiming 高丽样as hanfu, and don't say hanfu is hanbok...
Now read your own history from various times:
1.According to the Samguk sagi삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀): “春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製”Translation: Gim Chunchu asked the Emperor of Tang to change the traditional cloth of Silla, the country shall follow the Chinese style)King Taejong Muyeol 무열왕／武烈王, Kim Chun-Chu, was the 29th ruler of Silla, one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea. In AD648, he asked the Tang Emperor to adopt the Chinese cloth style.
2.According to the “History of Goryeo” 고려사 (高麗史):” 復行洪武年號，襲大明衣冠,禁胡服”Translation: Joseon Dynasty shall adopt the era name of Hongwu of Ming, wear Ming costumes and headgears, ban Hu Dress.
3.Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記): “”真德王三年春正月，始服中朝衣冠“”Translation: In the third year of Jindeok, the first month of spring, people in Silla (South Korea) started to wear Chinese-style cloth and hats. Jindeok reigned as Queen of Silla, one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea, from AD 647 to AD 654.
4.Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty (Joseon Wangjo Sillok) 조선왕조실록. 朝鮮王朝實錄 : 高宗 36卷, 34年( 丁酉 / 대한 광무(光武) 1年) 9月 29日(阳历) 번째기사 " “我邦疆土, 係是漢、唐古地, 衣冠文物, 悉遵宋、明遺制, 接其統, 而襲其號, 無所不可"Translation: Korean King, Joseon Gojong조선고종 高宗 said: "The territories of Korea used to be ancient land of Han and Tang. Our costumes and relics conformed to Song. The kingdom system and structure adopted from Ming. It is rightful and legal to inherit the true name of Greater China and her culture.
5. Taejo of Goryeo고려 태조高麗 太祖 left 10 rules before he is gone, and these ten rules are known as Ten Rules 訓要十條 (훈요10조). The 4th section: 其四曰, 惟我東方, 舊慕唐風, 文物禮樂, 悉遵其制, 殊方異土, 人性各異, 不必苟同. 契丹是禽獸之國, 風俗不同, 言語亦異, 衣冠制度, 愼勿效焉.Translation: We, the East admire the customs of the Tang Dynasty, learn her rite and music, adopt her system and style. People from far land are different from us in terms of humanity, do not try to make them look similar in a subservient manner. The nature of Khitan (契丹) is brutal and bestial, we do not share the same value or language with them, so do not follow their system of attire.
@@chencyril7707 bro the word hanfu didnt even exist until you guys wanted to steal our culture
Listen to your ancestors, you pathetic creature, and read your history! Oops, sorry, they are written in Chinese, you can't understand. hahahahah
1.-According to the Samguk sagi삼국사기 (三國史記. 新羅本紀): “春秋又請改其章服，以從中華製”
-Translation: Kim Chunchu asked the Emperor of Tang dynasty to change the traditional cloth of Silla to follow the Chinese Hanfu system.
King Taejong Muyeol 무열왕／武烈王, Kim Chun-Chu, was the 29th ruler of Silla, one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea. In AD 648, he asked the Tang Emperor for permission to adopt the Chinese Hanfu style.
2.-Samguk sagi 삼국사기 (三國史記): “”真德王三年春正月，始服中朝衣冠“”
-Translation: In the third year of Jindeok, the first month of spring, people in Silla (South Korea) started to wear Chinese Hanfu, including clothes and hats.
Jindeok reigned as Queen of Silla, one of the Three Kingdoms of Korea, from AD 647 to AD 654.
3.-Wang Geon(왕건/王建)(877-943), the first King of the Goryeo Dynasty and the founder of Goryeo Yang(고려양/高麗樣) said in the "Ten Instructions" (훈요십조/訓要十條).
-我東方舊慕唐風，文物禮樂，悉尊其制……契丹是禽獸之國，風俗不同，言語亦異，衣冠制度，慎勿效焉。
-Translation:All the systems of antiques/articles, rituals, instruments of our country are following the Tang dynasty (of course the costume system is included in)...Khitan is a country of animals, we are different from them in custom and language, and we should not learn the costume system from Khitan.
Strictly speaking, Mang-geon of Joseon is from China, but its appearance and manufacturing method are completely different from those of China.
In the Annals of King Sejong 世宗實錄地理志, there is a record of giving Mami Mang-geon as a gift to the envoy of the Ming Dynasty, and even in ≪조선부 朝鮮賦≫of Dongwol 董越), the envoy of the Ming Dynasty, who came in 1488 (the 19th year of King Seongjong's reign), all Joseon mangans are made of horse tail hair.
In fact, Wang-gin of the Ming Dynasty was in the form of a net-shaped hat without lacquer.
As such, Mang-geon and various hats are improved by Koreans.
The method of using horse tail hair as a material was a unique creation of Joseon.
There are several records of the case in which only Mang-geon was stolen when Joseon envoy went to China.
It is obvious cultural thexxxft for Chinese people to walk around wearing Joseon's horse tail hair Mang-geon these days.
Chinese people accuse Korea of stealing drama costumes, but Chinese drama costumes are a completely different cultural apprxxxxxxtion
世界都是韩国的，何况一个汉服。
@@user-pm2io2tf6f
한국은 NATO에 가입할수 있지만, 중국은 가입할 수 없다.
바이든 대통령은 기자회견에서 “우리의 미래에 중요한 중국의 도전에 집중하기 위해 대서양과 태평양의 민주주의 동맹과 파트너들이 뭉쳤다”고 말했다.
토니 블링컨 미국 국무장관도 “중국이 어떤 방식으로든 국제질서에 도전하면 우리는 이에 함께 맞설 것”이라고 말했다. 지나 러몬도 상무장관은 “중국 최대 반도체 회사인 SMIC가 러시아에 반도체를 공급하는 것을 적발하면 문 닫게 할 것”이라고 경고했다.
Koreans are from Mongolian our culture and Dna is very different with China.
Just that’s science and truth.
China kills and buried and burned ur owned culture
Protect ur original culture
Koreans and all world liked ur origin
Not copy from others
Hanfu is from Korea
And Hanbok is influenced by Mongolian and Indian and Scythian 3000years ago not from China
Hanfu is from Korea
When Korea conquered China before Ming dynasty .
Chinese hasn’t wore hanfu even 10years agoMing Dynasty has influenced by Korea when we conquered China
Hanfu prove our history
letter “Hanfu”is created just 20years ago suddenly China hasn’t wore Hanfu even 10years ago don’t lie plz
Koreans thank to Mongolian and Indian and Japan and Egyptians who gave our culture
Not from China
We are children of Mu dynasty and we are Altaic tibes we are not Chinese
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
Hanfu has existed in Ming Dynasty But Text of Hanfu has been created just 20years ago You guys haven’t wore thousands years and even 10years ago.
You suddenly started wear hanfu just in 10years You guys insist Hanfu is origin.
Korea has been Manchuria before ming dynasty Hanbok has been for a long time in Korea
Youguys insist Ours r from Korea
We don’t say Kimono is from Korea even though we have wore Kimono for along time
No one says kimono is Korean cloth
China is greedy
China needs to protect your owned culture first rather than taking from other countries You guys burnt and destroy ur owned culture by yourself why steal from others?
Obviously the food, drink etc. really comes from God.