Hanbok was influenced by Hanfu: Hate Speech WILL NOT Change the History!丨Shiyin 十音

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 лют 2021
  • In November, I made a video explaining the history of Hanfu and Hanbok. My original intention was to clear up some misunderstandings, but the neverending brainless comments make me decide to make this video.
    ------------------------------
    You can also find me here:
    ▶Facebook Shiyin 十音: / hanfushiyin
    ▶Weibo: 十音Shiyin bit.ly/34VNESn
    ▶Bilibili: 十音Shiyin bit.ly/2LpcJgu
    ▶Instagram: shiyin.w bit.ly/2PFmmGH
    【這個號是正版十音 所有其他號都是未經允許的轉載 感謝關注!| Shiyin official channel】
    #hanfu #hanbok #history

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26 тис.

  • @ShiyinOfficial
    @ShiyinOfficial  3 роки тому +2060

    In case anyone doesn't know, here is my last video discussing this topic.: ua-cam.com/video/Wd6Z2ZOzbOY/v-deo.html
    Comments with proof and logic are absolutely welcome! I just want to say, instead of copying and pasting hate speech, having some actual communication will be the best for both Hanfu and Hanbok.

    • @typemy9381
      @typemy9381 3 роки тому +375

      Wat a shame on Korea....................
      To be honest, it's strange that Koreans to advocate various origins. Those who have studied history know that South Korea is a country greatly influenced by China, even without the saying of "Korean civilization", Japan has civilization, although compared with China, Japan is a secondary civilization and China is a primary civilization.................

    • @wanderingnation4569
      @wanderingnation4569 3 роки тому +40

      话说 他们的韩服 在现在的朝鲜叫做啥?

    • @guangwu3768
      @guangwu3768 3 роки тому +76

      支持十音!汉服是我大中华的文化,不容别人偷窃!

    • @oliveryb
      @oliveryb 3 роки тому +28

      well done! you are our superstar!

    • @oliveryb
      @oliveryb 3 роки тому +5

      @罗茂群 有意思的观点!

  • @user-oy8wf2kz4w
    @user-oy8wf2kz4w 3 роки тому +1529

    中国也穿西装。也会去改良西装。但是从没有人恬不知耻的去说西装起源于中国

    • @user-ro7qn8xu3h
      @user-ro7qn8xu3h 3 роки тому +289

      文化本来就是互相影响的,韩国的万物起源论,就尼玛离谱

    • @luciac7964
      @luciac7964 3 роки тому +150

      @박두보 穿啊,中式礼服没听过吗?龙凤褂秀禾服明式礼服你不知道吗?没见识就不要出来丢人了。

    • @jewel6535
      @jewel6535 3 роки тому +147

      @박두보 您一副众人皆醉我独醒的样子真的很好笑 说到底我们有文化自信 你们的文化自信呢? 体现在偷盗和诋毁别的国家文化上吗

    • @user-lg8gd8bl5i
      @user-lg8gd8bl5i 3 роки тому +130

      @박두보 韩文是什么东西别人不知道吗?哈哈哈哈哈不就是自尊心作祟然后强行改文字最后连自己国家的生活和历史都读不懂了XDDDDD(顺便提一下~韩文看起来像土著文;富有野外森林的体验感)

    • @jewel6535
      @jewel6535 3 роки тому +105

      @박두보 谷歌翻译里复制粘贴来的中文就不要来这里丢人现眼了

  • @jocelynjocelyn5579
    @jocelynjocelyn5579 2 роки тому +719

    When people talk with facts and evidence, some country talk with their imaginations

    • @user-dn7xw9bo6o
      @user-dn7xw9bo6o 2 роки тому +17

      This is fact

    • @user-vg866
      @user-vg866 2 роки тому +19

      indeed

    • @user-cg8nc8bl3w
      @user-cg8nc8bl3w 2 роки тому +13

      True.

    • @Hannah-wr9iw
      @Hannah-wr9iw 2 роки тому +6

      true

    • @user-vg866
      @user-vg866 2 роки тому +33

      @@user-cv9ki1nx3k U already known it’s CHINESE minority. What’s wrong a Chinese Korean National Minority wear their costume???

  • @Iamnotasellout
    @Iamnotasellout 2 роки тому +186

    Trust me, In China no one will think that Hanbok is Chinese, everyone can tell that they are different in designs and styles.

    • @user-qk2ly3vn9c
      @user-qk2ly3vn9c 2 роки тому +15

      Thank you for relieving me of my depression…
      I don’t know why some of the Chinese don’t admit that Korea and China influenced each other.

    • @moumuooo.o2283
      @moumuooo.o2283 2 роки тому +43

      @@user-qk2ly3vn9c its opposite China influenced Korea how does a country like Korea influence China when Korea didnt even have its own righting.

    • @YufengLuo77
      @YufengLuo77 2 роки тому +15

      韩国的服饰是学中国明朝的服饰制度

    • @user-dj4kb8zj2k
      @user-dj4kb8zj2k 2 роки тому +24

      @@user-qk2ly3vn9c 是韩国人先污蔑我们抄袭了他们,这无论落到哪个曾经为该国的宗主国头上,都会很生气吧,在中国没有人会认为韩服是中国的都只是说韩服源于汉服,反倒是你们一直不承认还要反咬我们一口

    • @user-qk2ly3vn9c
      @user-qk2ly3vn9c 2 роки тому +5

      @@user-dj4kb8zj2k
      The concept of a dependent state(附庸國) in the West is different from that in the East.
      Many different concepts such as the vassal state, client state, and attribute state are all expressed as just ‘附庸國’ in the East.
      Academics are also divided on the relationship between China and Korea in history, and it is just ignorant to describe it as "just a subordinate-perpetuating state relationship."
      And in the past, there was a China-centered thought(中華思想) in Korea, so it is natural to accept culture from China, and Korea also teaches about it now a days, but it lacks a sense of history to describe it as "followed" or "stealing culture," and it just seems childish.
      And I wrote a comment that I was relieved to see the comment above that no one in China thinks Hanbok belongs to China.
      I'm relieved to know that now, and you don't have to say it again.
      And it is true that Hanbok was influenced by China during the Ming Dynasty, but its origin has nothing to do with Hanfu.
      Stop BS that Hanbok originated from Hanfu.
      It is unfortunate that China, which has a beautiful culture, is internationally recognized as a "country of thieves."
      How sad it is.

  • @oceanz8892
    @oceanz8892 2 роки тому +86

    小家子气就是这样,毕竟本来也没有啥拿得出手的,稍微有点风吹草动就觉得所有人都盯着他手里的稻草。要说腌渍食品中国不知道有多少花样,只不过一般都是拿来当开胃小菜,或者配粥的配菜。谁家放着大鱼大肉不吃非要抢你的泡菜吃。。😂

    • @holin3513
      @holin3513 2 роки тому +7

      而且重點韓國的帝王料理 全是醃製食品🤣

    • @barb5982
      @barb5982 2 роки тому +6

      冬奥也就只有他们运动员说中国给他们准备的食物种类少,还不好吃,也不见其他国家的人说,多少有点幼稚了。

    • @augustinaliu1103
      @augustinaliu1103 2 роки тому

      @@holin3513 哈哈哈哈吃起来全都是一个味道🤪

    • @Hoo88846
      @Hoo88846 Рік тому

      就是 我根本就覺得韓國泡菜不好吃。拿了中國的炸醬麵居然又給上了」韓國」的牌子。一天到晚抄襲完中國文化,馬上改牌子是」日本」」韓國」的。抄襲一流。篡改歷史一流。

  • @mandahhh3074
    @mandahhh3074 3 роки тому +128

    汉服影响了韩服,仇恨言论并不会改变历史。

  • @Siitan
    @Siitan 3 роки тому +61

    十音姊說的很詳細了。題外話,話說泡菜只是一個鹹菜,客人來家裡的話根本不能端上桌去請客人的,很不大氣。

    • @kik4242
      @kik4242 3 роки тому +6

      所以以前我们根本不抢,他们要喜欢说韩国kimchi就那样说呗~毕竟是少数他们拿得出手的东西了! 但是要来抢我们的东西就不乐意了!! 春节,中国结甚至麻辣烫!? 可笑至极! 区区一个弹丸之地有没有想过自己的地方有没有能力承担到这么有内涵的文化~

    • @xuanchuteng3118
      @xuanchuteng3118 3 роки тому +4

      在中国的确是这样哈

    • @jaksvlogs7195
      @jaksvlogs7195 3 роки тому +4

      说白了是穷,没有新鲜蔬菜,也没有保存方法,才吃咸菜。

    • @chenxiapu5518
      @chenxiapu5518 3 роки тому +10

      而且最逗的是,他们在纽约时报上宣传Kimchi有上千年的历史,可辣椒原产地在南美,是15世纪末才有葡萄牙人传入亚洲,而且先是中国和印度;不知道他们那个千年历史咋算出来的

    • @FXXKV
      @FXXKV 3 роки тому

      Since ancient times, the Chinese have been slåv€s of the northern peoples. 😉 Hahaha~ Northern peoples are mostly Mongolian ethnic groups such as the Huns(Xiongnu), Jie, Di, Xianbei, the Qiangs, Kitans etc and the jurcheons. far from Kazakhstan to Uyghur, Tibet, Northern China region, Manchuria they ruled. China brought goods or offered princesses to northern ethnic peoples or Tibet. The original peoples of China were dominated by Xiongnu, Jie, Di, Xianbei, Qiang etc. 😁 Starting in the 10th century, Kitans the Liao empire, Jurcheons the Jin Empire, Mongolian the Yuan Empire of Genghis Khan and Kublai, and jurcheon the Qing Dynasty, which raised their powers in Manchuria, They conquered China and even the emperor and his family were taken captive.(emperor huizong, qinzong of SONG dynasty) 😂😂 Basically, China offered them enormous amounts of silver and regularly offered many things to flatter them. Because the Chinese were worried that the northern peoples would invade again&again&again ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ During the Tang Dynasty, they dedicated princesses to Tubo 吐蕃 (Tibet), which Ccp now occupy. In Fact~ In the early days of the Han Dynasty that Chinese love so much, When Gaozu was defeated by Xiongnu in the Siege of Baideng, Gaozu even tried to give his married daughter to them for begging for peace!!! 😝 Hahaha~ It remains in the history books and records. 😝🙉😆😄😁😂😜😌😚

  • @yesterday0101
    @yesterday0101 Рік тому +67

    I am a fan of Chinese culture🇨🇳🇹🇼🇭🇰🇲🇴.I don't understand why people around the world who have read a little world history don't understand why Koreans don't understand the history of their country😅, which was written in Chinese, after King Sejong invented the so-called Korean alphabet.Moreover, it is shameful for Korea to make up history by imagination without any archaeological or cultural basis.The point is that they still have the right to think they're the victims, which is ridiculous.I also hope that the Chinese government will work harder on its own cultural propaganda and cultural exports.--- from the United Kingdom.

    • @user-wf8mm8zp9m
      @user-wf8mm8zp9m 7 місяців тому +3

      感谢英国的朋友❤❤

    • @funlovin82
      @funlovin82 25 днів тому

      I'm an overseas born Chinese of Chinese desecent who agrees with this video

  • @AwardQueue
    @AwardQueue 2 роки тому +19

    有理有节,这就是大家闺秀。文化自信要有实力,而不是蛮横无理的攻击和仇恨。

  • @user-jg4he1hv9j
    @user-jg4he1hv9j 3 роки тому +50

    to Korean:just see your old books wrote by kanji汉字,see what is true history,yes,now,Korean eating kimchi wearing hanfu,just find out where its came form,OK

    • @user-hg7lm1bx9y
      @user-hg7lm1bx9y 3 роки тому +1

      I'm Korean. We wearing Hanbok not hanfu. We wear hanbok at weddings, holidays, events etc
      We eat kimch 3 times one day and every family have kimch refrigerator.
      It doesn't matter where it comes from. Culture is about influencing each other.
      Kimchi is Korean food and Hanbok is Korean traditional clothes. Like Chi Pao, Han Fu, Pao Chai are from China.

  • @anica_alim4976
    @anica_alim4976 3 роки тому +422

    马来西亚华人支持十音!!!
    中华文化太悠久了,只能说身为华人我很光荣很高兴!
    比起某些小偷一点证据也拿不出来只会Copy and paste ,只会让人觉得很弱智!
    !!!RESPECT THE HISTORY, STOP BEING BRAINLESS!!!
    另外,马来西亚也在极力复兴汉服文化,我看到周围的朋友开始渐渐了解汉服,我曾经穿着汉服上台主持活动,和学生们介绍汉服,也有举办过相关讲座,还有几次穿着汉服拜年逛街,目前为止还没有遭遇过过异样的眼光!其他中学也开始有学生穿着汉服上台表演了!马来西亚喜欢汉服的小伙伴请勇敢穿出来吧!

  • @lulusunboxing1678
    @lulusunboxing1678 2 роки тому +319

    I don’t understand why everyone keep on leaving comments as if they haven’t finished the video at all.
    She’s literally saying that hanbok belongs to South Korea, but hanfu is NOT Korean as some are claiming. It’s not that China is claiming hanbok as their own. But hanbok in itself is inspired and influenced by Chinese Ming dynasty culture. But some Koreans are saying that China is actually copying Korean hanbok, which is odd considering that China made the hanfu first that eventually inspired the creation of hanbok. People really need to be educated. This UA-camr is unbiased and simply speaking facts. History is not going to change itself for anyone’s pride.
    There will always be haters in both China and South Korea that are ignorant. There will always be people in both countries that are uneducated and causing these type of unnecessary arguments online. Everyone is just arguing over history, this is ridiculous. Why are people arguing over facts?
    What’s frustrating a lot of Chinese right now is how Korea is starting to create “Korean” historical dramas that fully depict hanfu and NOT hanbok. This is where the issue really comes in. If Koreans are so angry at Chinese people wearing a hanbok at the Olympics. Then why can’t Chinese people be angry that Koreans are taking Chinese culture and making it their own by promoting it in historical K-dramas? That’s literally worse!
    I was just browsing on Asian social media recently and some Koreans are starting to claim that pizza is Korean too! It’s just ridiculous. Both sides are starting to become really petty and doing things to hurt each other on purpose. Sure, some uneducated Chinese are claiming kimchi are Chinese. But there’re also many Koreans that claim many Chinese foods are Korean. Obviously these claims are made by extremely uneducated people. Facts are facts, you can’t change the fact that Korea was influenced by ancient China. But you also can’t say hanbok is Chinese, because Koreans have taken inspiration from China and twisted it, so it’s no longer a “hanfu” anymore. So uneducated Chinese people should also stop calling hanbok chinese.
    Even parts of Russia and Mongolia have influenced each other’s culture in clothing and some foods. It’s not a shame, it’s common for nations to share and take. But it becomes a big issues when people start to become patriotic and deny that their own culture was influenced by another. Because some people are so proud of their own culture, they don’t want to sound like their culture is “unoriginal”. I get that it’s a fear, but creating war on social media is insane.
    If Korea keeps on taking Chinese culture and incorporating it into pop culture/ k-dramas, this will warp some people’s knowledge of real history. It will cause misunderstandings and foreigners will never know what the hell is going on. This is just misleading… people really need to stop. Educated Chinese have only said that hanbok was INSPIRED by Chinese culture, not that it’s actually Chinese.
    People do eventually get brainwashed after only listening to one side of the story. Koreans will always make Chinese people sound bad and Chinese people will always make Koreans sound bad. So if this keeps on going, people from each side is just going to hate each other. Korean culture is also more popular due to kpop/kdrama, so more westerners only hear from the Korean side of the story. Many people hate China for being a communist country, so this whole argument is really unfair to begin with as many already have a hate for China. But China was not a communist country in ancient days, facts are just facts. Don’t let today’s political issues affect simple history when it comes to clothing and food. Those things will forever be the same.

    • @random_guy1084
      @random_guy1084 2 роки тому +13

      It's your imagination. Goryeo Hanbok influenced Ming Hanfu. Han ethnics Hanfu was Tang/Song and late Ming Hanfu. Northerners influenced Hanfu, not vice versa. Ming Hanfu was influenced by Goryeo Hanbok, Yuan dynasty Hanfu was Mongol clothes, Tang Hanfu was northern Xianbei clothes, Han dynasty Hanfu was also influenced by northern Hobok(Hufu). Not only Han ethnic has been ruled by the northerners, their culture also was tremendously influenced by the northerners. Their latest northern influence was Qipao from Manchus. Please study history without saying from your mere imagination. The main hero of Chinese history has been the northerners rather than Han ethnic.

    • @The_Art_of_AI_888
      @The_Art_of_AI_888 2 роки тому +21

      We don't see Chinese and Japanese argue and fight against each other about the origin of cultural things at all. Because Japan totals confidence at acknowledging that they had been influenced by the Ancient Chinese and many of their traditional things like languages (Kanzi), clothes (Kimono), Tea Ceremony, and even Sushi, Katana ...were inspired or actually originated in China. Unlike these shameless ultra-nationalist SKarens whose ancestors had copied many things from China in the past, yet now accusing Chinese of stealing their culture! while claiming everything from Confucius, Chinese characters (which they call Hanja), Fengshui, to Sushi, Katana, Kimono...all were Korean origin, which of course annoyed and pissed the Japanese as well LOL! What a joke !

    • @santospako8131
      @santospako8131 2 роки тому +8

      Technically Chinese culture originated from Mongolia too so there’s no such thing as ‘pure Chinese culture’.

    • @random_guy1084
      @random_guy1084 2 роки тому

      @@The_Art_of_AI_888 J ancient culture originated from three Kingdoms of Korea, especially Baekje. They want to hide they originated from K, so they want to bypass K and want to say their ancient culture originated from C. Thus, the background is different for K and J. The origin of J is Jomon and immigrants from K (Yayoi). However, Koreans originated from Northeast and natives of K. No meaningful migration from C to K throughout entire history. Northeast had ancient civilization as long as mainland C but distinguished from C. Even though K got many cultural influences from C after AD, origin of K people and K culture is Northeast including Hanbok and Kimchi. Unfortunately, it’s impossible to enlighten C public who think they originated all east Asians.

    • @xiapartzota
      @xiapartzota 2 роки тому +13

      @@The_Art_of_AI_888 나는 한국에 거주중이고 sns를 하는 학생이다. 살면서 스시, 기모노가 한국에서 유래되었다고 말하는 사람은 한번도 본적이 없다.

  • @ddukzhj6578
    @ddukzhj6578 2 роки тому +204

    支持像你这样的youtuber!可以给外国人好好科普我们的文化真是太棒了!我们一定要守住自己的东西啊

    • @kim-bv5ik
      @kim-bv5ik 2 роки тому

      支持像你这样的youtuber!可以给无知的外国人好好骗骗我们的文化.真是太棒了!我们一定要守住我们认为是自己的东西啊

    • @firstnamelastname9365
      @firstnamelastname9365 2 роки тому

      @으으승르트 bok bok booookok

    • @oneself3690
      @oneself3690 2 роки тому

      @@sijunliu3355 개소리ㅋ

    • @user-nq7fy7dy5u
      @user-nq7fy7dy5u 2 роки тому

      @@kim-bv5ik 呵呵笑死。就你们韩国啊,只要脸皮够厚,全世界都可以说成是你们的。🙄

    • @user-nq7fy7dy5u
      @user-nq7fy7dy5u 2 роки тому

      @@kim-bv5ik 啊对对对,怎么不说全世界都是你们的呢。🙄

  • @coconutman2392
    @coconutman2392 3 роки тому +537

    Chinese Hanfu is the national treasure of our country and we will not let anyone steal our culture!

    • @albertwong5031
      @albertwong5031 3 роки тому +18

      Ancient Korea was a vassal state of China, if you visit the museums of Korea, you will find all ancient thing were written in Chinese characters.Korean clothes also was copied from China.古代韩国是中国的属国,如果你参观韩国的博物馆,你会发现韩国古代所有东西都写着中文。고대 한국은 중국의 속국이었다. 한국의 박물관을 둘러보면 한국의 옛 사물에 중국어가 적혀 있었다.

    • @user-te7ui7gu2g
      @user-te7ui7gu2g 3 роки тому +4

      @@albertwong5031 Chinese vassal state for writing Chinese characters? What about Vietnam and Japan?

    • @user-qn8uf8bl6b
      @user-qn8uf8bl6b 3 роки тому +6

      @@user-te7ui7gu2g Japan does not use Chinese characters, but invented Japanese by absorbing Chinese characters. Japan has never denied the influence of Chinese culture on them from the beginning to the end, and has developed its own culture, just like Japan has dumplings, but the Japanese do not say themselves. Koreans would say that they invented dumplings by themselves. As for Vietnam, Song Dynasty was a county in China called Jiaozhi. If a country does not even have its own characters, can you believe that there will be other splendid civilizations at the same time as there is no own characters?

    • @user-te7ui7gu2g
      @user-te7ui7gu2g 3 роки тому +4

      @@user-qn8uf8bl6b There is a saying that dumplings are made in Korea, but most of them are just jokes. Isn't it common sense in Korea that Zhuge Liang invented dumplings?
      And I meant Vietnam after 10th century independence from China.
      Does that mean that all countries that use the alphabet in the world are worse civilizations than Greece or Rome? All of them adopted the alphabet used in Greece and Rome and wrote their own language.

    • @inhim05
      @inhim05 3 роки тому +1

      Take hanfu leave hanbok what’s so complicated?

  • @tiffanyc237
    @tiffanyc237 3 роки тому +143

    Come on Korean people. She said it’s not shameful to admit that hanbok is influenced by hanfu. Learn your history, and educate yourself. It’s truly a shame that you try to steal Chinese culture which originated thousands of years ago, long than your country has ever existed.

    • @Dan-jq8wj
      @Dan-jq8wj 3 роки тому +20

      @K Y Hi, ur country and ur ethnicity history starts in Silla period. Which is 57 BCE, just *2000* years of history

    • @Dan-jq8wj
      @Dan-jq8wj 3 роки тому +11

      @K Y In case u bring up Damgun, remember its a pseudo-history that u koreans have invented, no one in the world recognizes that invented history

    • @minhu1596
      @minhu1596 3 роки тому +2

      History of civilization and history of culture inheritance are different topics.
      Hanfu is not the Chinese traditional clothing.China(PRC) don't have the history of culture inheritance.
      People were forced to change clothing under Qing government.Hanfu disappeared for hundreds years after Ming was eliminated.China(PRC) also destroyed almost all traditional culture during Culture Revolution.Chinese people are just copying the Hanfu from museums and other countries now.China don't have the right to claim the ancient cultures belong to China(PRC) without inheritance.

    • @minhu1596
      @minhu1596 3 роки тому +1

      Shame on you mix ancient Hanfu with Moden Hanfu which copy from museums and steal from other countries.

    • @jiumi8814
      @jiumi8814 3 роки тому +5

      How could they learn the real history lol. The history in their country is even build up in some fairy tale and copy form some other Asia culture

  • @user-sf4tp7io8y
    @user-sf4tp7io8y 2 роки тому +12

    你这个节目太棒了,我觉得我们也得让世界知道我们到底啥样,给你点赞哈哈

  • @shiloh4315
    @shiloh4315 2 роки тому +54

    History will not change because of who supports more. Culture will spread, but the choice of root causes should be more reasonable. The so-called support of stars and celebrities is shallow and has no roots.

  • @user-kg4kr9lt3z
    @user-kg4kr9lt3z 3 роки тому +799

    加油!我是马来西亚华裔 但是看到做件事情也觉得韩国网民很荒唐 没知识真的很可怕

    • @chenguochen6044
      @chenguochen6044 3 роки тому +123

      中国国内很多因为不会翻墙,来这边支持的人真的不多,即便来,也很多时候不怎么方便,,,我们中华的文化真的只有靠你们这些海外的华人帮忙支持了,最近韩国人太猖狂了,我们国内的能力又有限,所以真的真的拜托了

    • @junhadlai9814
      @junhadlai9814 3 роки тому +85

      加油我也是马来西亚人反对文化小偷让他们认识自己的历史

    • @mushangking2941
      @mushangking2941 3 роки тому +36

      在看李氏朝鲜实录,确实是小中华,就是有些繁体字认不全,不过结合上下语义能读懂九成九,看到孝子那还是有点忍不住的!

    • @junyanglee7777
      @junyanglee7777 3 роки тому +12

      @@user-yt5yc4mn8u Didn't China, Japan, and the United States all enslaved Korea?😆😆😆

    • @junyanglee7777
      @junyanglee7777 3 роки тому +36

      @@user-yt5yc4mn8u In fact, the history of South Korea is so simple that it can be summed up in three sentences. 1.爸爸您好。2.お父様,こんにちは。3.Hello,father.😂

  • @mia_hqy
    @mia_hqy 3 роки тому +448

    亲爱的,韩国人并不是搜不到历史,他们只是不想听而已哦。那些故意说傻话的人是不会被说服的

    • @user-jc9wh8nb6p
      @user-jc9wh8nb6p 3 роки тому +75

      亲爱的,韩国人并不是不想回去查历史,只是因为他们的历史是中文写的所以看不懂罢了

    • @mia_hqy
      @mia_hqy 3 роки тому +29

      @@user-jc9wh8nb6p 老实说 韩语互联网都能查到正确的历史,跟我们是有共识的,只是很多傻子不看而已

    • @yifan5423
      @yifan5423 3 роки тому +22

      Totally agree with you. You can never wake up a person who pretends to be asleep

    • @user-qt1bb7yn5b
      @user-qt1bb7yn5b 3 роки тому

      That's awesome, that's awesome.

    • @limuzi761
      @limuzi761 3 роки тому +12

      韩国去中国化取消用汉字已经有很多人看不懂历史文献了,博物馆里的陈列的文物可都是中文

  • @juliaann1669
    @juliaann1669 9 місяців тому +8

    For many ignorant comments down below! It's like saying? People in Europe already had concrete, roads, bath houses, aqueduct, glass, public toilets and Latin writing before Ancient Rome. But in reality the people in Europe got these things from Ancient Rome.

  • @user-fe8se5uq2b
    @user-fe8se5uq2b 2 роки тому +253

    The hanbok (in South Korea) or Chosŏn-ot (in North Korea) is the traditional Korean clothes. The term "hanbok" literally means "Korean clothing".
    Hanfu (simplified Chinese: 汉服; traditional Chinese: 漢服; pinyin: Hànfú) is the traditional styles of clothing worn by the Han Chinese. There are several representative styles of hanfu, such as the ruqun (an upper-body garment with a long outer skirt), the aoqun (an upper-body garment with a long underskirt), the beizi (usually a slender knee-length jacket) and the shenyi (a long, belted robe with wide sleeves),[1] and the shanku (jackets and trousers).[2]
    Hanbok and Hanfu may look similar, but this is clearly a different outfit, and Hanbok belongs to Korea and Hanfu belongs to China. You can wear clothes from other countries and enjoy culture, but trying to take it away, copying it, and damaging it is no different from damaging the country.

    • @user-nm4pj4dp3r
      @user-nm4pj4dp3r 2 роки тому +12

      맞습니다

    • @user-uw8uy1oh5r
      @user-uw8uy1oh5r 2 роки тому +15

      What matter is that there is no country who claims It is our traditional clothes which disappeared for long centurys ago. Traditional clothes means that the clothes which many people keep wearing long time ago to recent years.
      So chinese traditional clothes is obviously Qipao. You can see the many picture of 17 century to 20 century and then you can realize that chinese keep wearing Qipao style clothes and it tend to be more like near the recent year. BUT korean have kept wearing Hanbok style literally.
      What I just feeling is that chinese suddenly get a envy of hanbok style through K-contents, then they've compared it to their own traditional cloth(which is clearly many chinese have kept wearing by long time, Qipao). Now they say ridiculous claim that so-called hanfu is our traditional clothes. but the fact is that there is no chinese had worn those clothes since at least 300 years ago to 1990s.
      Please. THERE Is NO COUNTRY who claims that culture which disappeared in 400 years ago and many people even hadn't known the exist untill the recent years is our traditional culture.
      Back to 1990s, No chinese claimed that hanfu is our traditional clothes, But they said that qipao is our own.
      Hanfu is rather just a relic in the old museum than a traditinal culture.
      Yeah, I agree with chinese culture had affected many asian country include korea, vietnam and japan. But the true is that other countries excluding china, Their people have kept worn their traditional clothes. In this context, what chinese people have kept wearing traditionally is absolutely qipao. back to 20 years ago, Not chinese but also whole world didn't percieve hanfu as a chinese traditional clothes. Isn't it strange? You can see the picture of qipao girl in modern(I mean 20 century) china, But there was no hanfu girl during the same age(It can also apply china about 300-400years ago). However, you can see the lots of picture about modern korean people(20 century) wore hanbok, there is plenty of data that 300-400 years ago korean kept wearing hanbok.
      So stop force us that hanfu is your traditional clothes. It was just relics disappeared 1616 to 2000.

    • @monicac5203
      @monicac5203 2 роки тому +44

      @@user-uw8uy1oh5r qipao is not traditional clothes thank you very much, it is invented in modern china (isn't 17 and 20 centuries modern enough? or you just have a little history that makes you think 17 century is already ancient time?) Our Han汉 ethnic people wear Hanfu since 5000+ years ago.

    • @hallo84
      @hallo84 2 роки тому +26

      @@user-uw8uy1oh5r You are so ignorant. Qi Pao isn't historic clothing. It was invented in the modern era of china. Please study more histroy. Chinese wear Qi Pao because it was modern and chic not because it was passed down from ancestors. Koreans wear chinese influenced hanbok because chinese emporors told them to. Not the other way around.

    • @user-wu2my7tq5q
      @user-wu2my7tq5q 2 роки тому +18

      My friend, you're mistaken. Who wants your broken things? You keep stealing Chinese things, okay? Holding Chinese things and opening your mouth and closing your mouth is the Oriental style, and then secretly saying it's your own traditional culture. Don't you think it's shameless? Even your armillary sphere on paper money is Chinese, and traditional Chinese medicine is Chinese, To your South Korea, you are now called Han Yi. Papermaking is China's invention. A lot of crazy South Koreans call it Korean paper. I just read your South Korean saying that China's things are from East Asia, and East Asia's are shared by East Asia. Let's take a look at your national flag. Taiji Bagua, Yin, Yang and five elements are also spread from China to the peninsula. Seoul used to be called Seoul, It means the city of Han people. You changed your name for that poor self-esteem. Does Korea need to change its name? Go and see how many place names you have come from China. Finally, if you want to confirm your so-called history, please take out the ancient books or unearthed relevant archaeological culture from ancient times. You can't find out the problem, A bunch of crazy Korean unofficial history inventors have made up a pile of history to meet and make up for the tragic facts of your history. As for this, I suggest you go to a world-famous school like Harvard to have a good look at the general history of the world, and you will know what you Korean unofficial history experts are

  • @xuefengzhou8082
    @xuefengzhou8082 3 роки тому +72

    小姐姐你高看泥棒了他們沒幾個聽懂英文以為你誇獎他們呢😆

  • @Evelyn-生命有你更精彩
    @Evelyn-生命有你更精彩 3 роки тому +214

    所以,我们全球华人一起穿起汉服/汉元素服饰,尽力好好传承所有华夏文化。要不然自己的文化就被人偷了,被人传承! 谢谢楼主的短片(拱手)Support from Malaysia 🇲🇾

  • @LanJetmew
    @LanJetmew 2 роки тому +11

    Knowledgeable beauty, your culture and justice are as beautiful as your appearance❤

  • @courtly5982
    @courtly5982 Рік тому +196

    Saying hanfu is Korean is like saying Romans didn’t influence Europe.

    • @mengmeng8629
      @mengmeng8629 Рік тому +55

      Now they said Korea's history is longer than Romans😂 That's so funny😅

    • @courtly5982
      @courtly5982 Рік тому +27

      @@mengmeng8629Korean nationalists be like: we went to war with the Babylonians then conquered Sparta and Macedonian empire then deicided to devolve and now here we are

    • @trex1448
      @trex1448 Рік тому +8

      The only people who say that hanfu is Korean are Chinese people. LOL. Zero Korean claim that hanfu is Korean. There are many Chinese who say that kimchi is Chinese or that Hanbok is Chinese however.

    • @KrazeDiamond
      @KrazeDiamond Рік тому +16

      Koreans: We invented the Solar System.

    • @KrazeDiamond
      @KrazeDiamond Рік тому +12

      @@trex1448 Hanbok literally means Hanfu in Corean pronounciation. Han = (漢)Han-Chinese;bok = (服) Clothing. It wasn't until recent years when South Korea started the whole "De-Hanization" movement to erase any Chinese influence on their country, that they changed the Han (漢)Han-Chinese to Han (韓) Korean. There's 2 main reasons behind this: 1>South Korea became a US Proxy State; 2>South Koreans always had a fantasy of having their own "Cradle of Civilization" that possesses a long rich history with deep cultures and heritage; but reality is more cruel than fantasy - they don't. So what do they do? They lie, cheat, and steal, just like the Anglo-Saxons.

  • @lomlucky6776
    @lomlucky6776 3 роки тому +365

    Support from Thailand, in my country we respect Chinese culture very much, you know we have China town, we all know that the Chinese new year , handu and qipao, and i studied Chinese history

    • @noneofyourbusiness9338
      @noneofyourbusiness9338 3 роки тому +10

      Let's vanish the rumors or fake news spread about hanfu and habok by Cat Dumb News and some Thai news pages. Plz, help report the false info given on the news :)

    • @chenguochen6044
      @chenguochen6044 3 роки тому +20

      thanks for everyone who like Chinese culture. we welcome to share our culture for everyone .but except Southeif Korea. They ar so ignorant and aggressive.

    • @aygulmemet4201
      @aygulmemet4201 3 роки тому +2

      Which one is more popular in Thailand, wuxia or kung fu?

    • @noneofyourbusiness9338
      @noneofyourbusiness9338 3 роки тому +5

      @@chenguochen6044 now the dislike for this video is increasing...those people are stepping in

    • @jeanmiyu6904
      @jeanmiyu6904 3 роки тому

      さす

  • @user-ff1mf9mj2n
    @user-ff1mf9mj2n 3 роки тому +517

    人家李子柒就做了个泡菜,重点是泡菜,并不是非要表明泡菜是我们中国发明的,好家伙,这韩国人不依不饶的…人家李子柒还烤面包呢,也没看见欧洲不依不饶说面包是我们欧洲的呀…韩国文化太不自信了…

    • @user-ff1mf9mj2n
      @user-ff1mf9mj2n 3 роки тому +5

      @罗茂群 就是😊😊👍👍👍

    • @ericyao3355
      @ericyao3355 3 роки тому +68

      他们电视剧里的咖啡也是外国,也没见他们标注来自意大利嘛

    • @user-ff1mf9mj2n
      @user-ff1mf9mj2n 3 роки тому +4

      @@ericyao3355 哈哈哈,有见识☺☺👍👍👍

    • @macyxin9156
      @macyxin9156 3 роки тому +18

      对 谁说泡菜是韩国的,韩国泡菜恐怕是被中国influence了

    • @fangshuma8969
      @fangshuma8969 3 роки тому +29

      我觉得李子柒那个我还能理解,滇西小哥有一集视频用生菜包烤肉吃韩国人也骂说是copy他们的饮食我就彻底不能理解了lol

  • @ey2313
    @ey2313 2 роки тому +314

    한국은 한복을 명절에도 입고 결혼할 때도 입습니다. 한복 디자이너도 있죠 이미 대한민국 모든 추억에는 한복이 함께하고 있습니다🇰🇷

    • @user-jm7or3uu7d
      @user-jm7or3uu7d 2 роки тому +31

      韩国国旗也是中国人帮你们做的。

    • @elizabethlee8271
      @elizabethlee8271 2 роки тому +29

      @@b.y.s6111 1.Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty Volume 36 고종실록 고종 36권 朝鮮王朝實錄 高宗 36卷: AD 1897
      “我邦疆土, 係是漢、唐古地, 衣冠文物, 悉遵宋、明遺制, 接其統, 而襲其號, 無所不可"
      “우리나라의 강토는 한(漢) 나라와 당(唐) 나라의 옛 땅에 붙어있고 의관(衣冠)과 문물(文物)은 다 송(宋) 나라나 명(明) 나라의 옛 제도를 따르고 있으니, 그 계통을 잇고 그 칭호를 그대로 쓴들 안 될 것이 없습니다”
      “The territories of Korea used to be the ancient land of Han and Tang. Our costumes and relics conformed to Song. The kingdom system and structure adopted from Ming. It is rightful and legal to inherit the true name of Greater China and her culture - Joseon Gojong조선고종 高宗”
      2. History of Goryeo 고려사권 137권 (高麗史 137卷): AD 1392
      “復行洪武年號,襲大明衣冠,禁胡服”
      “부행홍무년호 습대명의복 금호복”
      “Joseon Dynasty shall adopt the era name of Hongwu of Ming, wear Ming costumes and headgears, ban Hu Dress”

    • @user-fo6to2di2s
      @user-fo6to2di2s 2 роки тому +14

      你看的懂你们本土挖掘的古迹文字么?要不要我帮你们看看里面写什么。😂

    • @user-mb7pq3ru1v
      @user-mb7pq3ru1v 2 роки тому +22

      @@user-jm7or3uu7d 好像是中国人,果然中国很像中国。 你那么羡慕韩国吗? 对太极旗还不是很清楚,就不要说了 看视频或者写评论吧

    • @Becho45112
      @Becho45112 2 роки тому +20

      너무 감성적으로만 말하지말고 제대로 된 근거를 말해줘야해 안그럼 중국인들이 바로 공격온다?

  • @georgedeng8646
    @georgedeng8646 3 місяці тому +6

    "Never argue with idiots or they will drag you to the depths of their stupidity."

  • @yebo5078
    @yebo5078 3 роки тому +196

    I hope everyone still remember that chopsticks are from China, period.
    Support from Malaysia. ✊

    • @wesleythomas2885
      @wesleythomas2885 3 роки тому

      华人吗

    • @loganwong3012
      @loganwong3012 3 роки тому +6

      Of course it's from China

    • @user-lg8gd8bl5i
      @user-lg8gd8bl5i 3 роки тому +12

      korean:what is chopstick...oh I see...Mine!

    • @bydamaz3101
      @bydamaz3101 3 роки тому +1

      Well you are providing new ideas that some people want to take over and pretend to be theirs 🤫🤫🤫

    • @MRKLBS
      @MRKLBS 3 роки тому +4

      of course, in Spanish we call them "palillos Chinos" (Chinese sticks)

  • @Joliebaobao903
    @Joliebaobao903 3 роки тому +246

    To Korean friend: read history before leave your comment.

    • @racheld6268
      @racheld6268 3 роки тому +32

      It's hard for them. Their history book is written by hanja (Chinese characters), but they don't learn anymore.

    • @robbies7191
      @robbies7191 3 роки тому +16

      他们看不懂的

    • @user-qv4vj6dg3v
      @user-qv4vj6dg3v 3 роки тому +7

      their eyes are too small to read the real history

    • @albertwong5031
      @albertwong5031 3 роки тому +8

      Ancient Korea was a vassal state of China, if you visit the museums of Korea, you will find all ancient thing were written in Chinese characters.Korean clothes also was copied from China.古代韩国是中国的属国,如果你参观韩国的博物馆,你会发现韩国古代所有东西都写着中文。고대 한국은 중국의 속국이었다. 한국의 박물관을 둘러보면 한국의 옛 사물에 중국어가 적혀 있었다.

    • @rickr9435
      @rickr9435 3 роки тому +6

      they can't read it anymore

  • @tye3630
    @tye3630 7 місяців тому +6

    History Influencer🗿: 🇨🇳🇮🇹🇬🇷🇮🇳
    History Inventor🤡: 🇰🇷🇰🇵🇯🇵🇹🇼🇮🇳

  • @oliviaytz.8552
    @oliviaytz.8552 2 роки тому +8

    Study history with the real history book plz
    Support Shiyin 加油💗

  • @user-yn4hr8ij8d
    @user-yn4hr8ij8d 3 роки тому +235

    海外华人支持十音小妹妹勇敢发声,有理有据有节,捍卫祖国文化!

    • @yanganqi9635
      @yanganqi9635 3 роки тому +5

      @ilililil ililil a mad dog barking at the sun -- in the futility

    • @fnatics8049
      @fnatics8049 3 роки тому +1

      @ilililil ililil Citizen of the Nation

    • @andyln9607
      @andyln9607 3 роки тому

      孔子 is taiwanese. not chinese

    • @yanganqi9635
      @yanganqi9635 3 роки тому +7

      @@andyln9607 走了个蠢的,来了个更蠢的

    • @andyln9607
      @andyln9607 3 роки тому

      @@yanganqi9635 孔子 is taiwanese. not chinese

  • @ariesh7852
    @ariesh7852 3 роки тому +47

    十音做出的回应是很正确的,我是看过,在ins那边,有很多韩国友人在批评汉服(没有针对任何人),但但凡有眼睛有脑子的都知道,中国汉服复兴从很早几年就开始了,而韩国友人批评汉服文化的潮流是从前年还是去年才开始的

    • @TeddyLikesGame
      @TeddyLikesGame 3 роки тому +4

      很多韓國人說漢服起源與2000年 哈哈哈哈哈 你說他們是不是笑死人了⋯

    • @jhfddvjhde3670
      @jhfddvjhde3670 3 роки тому +3

      外族人越讨厌越急越反对的,那么证明我们做的都是对的

  • @user-mr4qp3fx2e
    @user-mr4qp3fx2e Рік тому +90

    作为内地人希望大家放下政治立场以华人的身份保护我们的文化

    • @user-qs4xz1jk3h
      @user-qs4xz1jk3h Рік тому

      我们做好传承就好了,韩国偷文化的背后是西方国家指使,目的是切断我们文化的传承。这也就是为什么韩国人开始将各个搜索引擎上的四大文明中的中国改为古中国,并且全方位的偷中国文化,甚至一些偷窃漏洞百出。只要我们开始不断怀疑我们的文化、不断质疑我们的文化,不断地内耗并且不再传承,出现文化断代,那么他们就成功了。他们会说我们文化断代,五千年文明是假的。将我们文明少说一两千年,将他们文明再编一些,提前个一两千年,就可以说西方文明是人类文明的起源,是所有文明的尽头。进一步对我们的文明、我们的发展进行攻击打压。同时,把我们的一些文化就可以顺理成章的偷走反向输入给我们,获取经济利益等。
      至于为什么选韩国?一是,韩国没有主权,只有听从美国的;二是,韩国没有太多自己的文化,但他需要文化,从他偷中国、日本和其他国家文化就可以看出,选择韩国可以方便全方位的偷取中国文化;三是,从历史上来讲,韩国先是中国的附庸地,再是日本殖民地,然后现在一定程度上是美国的附庸地,他们从未有过独立自主的权利,导致他们内心有一种极度扭曲的自卑心理,自卑的想向世界展示自己的优秀,以为成功的偷窃中国文化并占为己有能够证明显示自己的历史悠久,文化丰富;四是,韩国对中国和日本文化的偷窃能够挑拨中日韩三国的团结。假如中日韩三国能够团结起来,美国对中国的打压将会大打折扣,亚洲势力将会快速崛起,西方的霸权将会受到挑战,这是美国不愿看到的。当然,由于日韩没有主权也注定了中日韩三国不可能在现阶段团结。
      韩国从来没有想过的是他们全方位偷文化的后果。首先,他们宣传中国文化是韩国的文化的第一受众是韩国人,这就会造成韩国下一代,下下代人对韩国本土文化传承一定程度上的断代,高度接受中华文化,被中华文化同化,再次深受中华文化的影响。其次,历史从来不会因为谎言而改变,历史学家的存在便是科学的对历史进行考证。几百年,几千年后,韩国会得到怎样的评价我们可想而知。
      所以,我们做好自己的文化传承就好了。教育我们的后代学习传承传统文化和民族文化,我们的文化就不会断代,不会消失,更不会被偷走。历史上,也有过其他民族想将中华文化替代消灭的,但无一例外的不是被同化就是被熬死。中国人是务实的,被中国人选中的必然是有用且不脆弱的,中国文化符合生存、符合发展、符合中华大地,不会水土不服,我们不要怕。我们要相信我们文化坚韧的生命力,几千年来什么大风大浪都见过了,有过命悬一线,但终将起死回生。另外,文化的背后是我们的精神寄托,是我们的价值追求,是我们的人生指引。而这一切是我们一代又一代人传承下来的,是流淌在我们血液中刻进DNA里的,是潜移默化中影响我们的,更是韩国那表面浅显的偷窃所不能偷走的。

  • @Nuxl
    @Nuxl 6 місяців тому +7

    I love Chinese culture and history I am often subjected to insults by Koreans and Japanese when I try to tell them that Hanfu is the Chinese, and I endure a lot of ignorance. Is this just because I am telling the truth?

  • @user-uf4qp6xe8m
    @user-uf4qp6xe8m 3 роки тому +174

    疏影横斜水清浅,暗香浮动月黄昏

    • @ying6673
      @ying6673 3 роки тому +5

      霜禽欲下先偷眼,粉蝶如知合断魂

    • @TeddyLikesGame
      @TeddyLikesGame 3 роки тому +11

      哪天這首詩又要被他們捏造個朝鮮詩人出來了⋯¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • @user-ue3ow1ez1j
      @user-ue3ow1ez1j 3 роки тому +3

      @@TeddyLikesGame 哈哈哈,韩国人会读懂意思吗?

    • @TeddyLikesGame
      @TeddyLikesGame 3 роки тому +2

      @@user-ue3ow1ez1j 不懂也會裝懂吧 😂

    • @user-ue3ow1ez1j
      @user-ue3ow1ez1j 3 роки тому

      @@TeddyLikesGame 说实在的,。。。第一句有点印象。。想不起来哪个的。。。

  • @winwinner6674
    @winwinner6674 3 роки тому +618

    Knetz just love cyberbullying, that's what they're doing even to their celebrities. Bullying is even huge in their schools: from the classmates to the teachers. Don't mind them, their history books are not even accurate about Korea's history just like in US.

    • @knnhzzh7924
      @knnhzzh7924 3 роки тому +73

      yup...I dont know why they are so mean even to their own kpop celebrities, I am sure not all Korean people are like that, probably kpop culture become more and more toxic to their young people

    • @mewhy826
      @mewhy826 3 роки тому +171

      I’m not Chinese, but we learn world history in high school and the only ancient civilization in East Asia is Ancient China, of course it means Ancient China play a huge part in East Asian culture. It’s written on world history books, it’s also written on Korean websites (I mean the official ones) even the Kimchi 😂 it’s says pickled technique and Chinese Cabbage are from China.
      And the Goguryeo was actually listed as China’s culture heritage by UNESCO, because China has all the proofs. Korea did complain about it but they didn’t have any backup proofs so they failed.
      (And take note It’s 2004 , China was poorer than Korea that time )
      it’s also on BBC news.

    • @jenny-jv9nb
      @jenny-jv9nb 3 роки тому +19

      @@mewhy826 Thank you really. It can be used as an objective way to tell the truth from the perspective of a third party

    • @shirokisasaki3233
      @shirokisasaki3233 3 роки тому +46

      Cyberbullying is a trademark of the Korean online community, remember who invented the notorious ANTI culture,who was the biggest racist when it comes to South-east Asians? the whole drama with the Fillippines were not that long ago. You will be surprised to find out how many elementry school kids are behind all those hate comments

    • @mewhy826
      @mewhy826 3 роки тому +23

      @@knnhzzh7924 I saw a knetz who’s been charge of cyber bullying a BTS members, and his reason is just that member looks so good and he’s too successful, makes him jealous, that’s why he sends dead threats to that BTS member 🙂
      It’s just pure bullshit, no wonder my Korean Friends just hate going back to Korea, and he said the pressure and bullying in Korea is just intense and stressful. especially the extreme mannerism that’s mostly nonsense.

  • @ndrzmansn
    @ndrzmansn 2 роки тому

    Nicely done!

  • @yijingling3271
    @yijingling3271 2 роки тому +197

    Just wanna share an interesting personal experience. As a Chinese, when I was traveling in soeul, the capital city of Korea, I walked randomly into an museum showing the historical artworks of Korea. and all the calligraphy works are written in Chinese, which I can read without any difficulty, while the workers there still needs to read the explanation written beside LMAO

    • @bigpoop1901
      @bigpoop1901 2 роки тому +7

      Cool.

    • @juuns4360
      @juuns4360 2 роки тому +9

      And you type Chinese charater using alphabets. It's interesting too.

    • @lian4067
      @lian4067 2 роки тому +25

      @@juuns4360 连自己国家的历史都看不懂,也挺可怜的

    • @barry3585
      @barry3585 2 роки тому +18

      언어가 같다고 다 중국 문화는 아니다.
      영어쓰는 국가의 문화는 다 영국꺼인가?
      얼마나 멍청한지.
      제발 논리적으로 얘기좀해.

    • @xin9340
      @xin9340 2 роки тому +22

      @@juuns4360 It’s because we type chinese using “ping yin” which is the way we pronounce words. For example “hello” , which pronounce as “ni hao” in Chinese, if we type this into the chinese keyboard, it gives us “你好” 😗

  • @sanzhang1656
    @sanzhang1656 2 роки тому +89

    想起了之前看过的电视剧里的一句台词:能做大明的狗就是我最大的荣幸啊!😁👌

  • @AnneLin1128
    @AnneLin1128 3 роки тому +136

    我常去吃的某家日式丼飯,套餐還可以選四川泡菜或韓國泡菜咧~其他國家都知道泡菜有分不同種類了,不知道韓國人在裝什麼傻

    • @user-ul9mg3cu4s
      @user-ul9mg3cu4s 3 роки тому +13

      @@user-yt5yc4mn8u Please do not copy and paste, ok

    • @user-kx6tj2mh8x
      @user-kx6tj2mh8x 3 роки тому

      给你来个不一样的吧,我们看不上你们偷东西行为

    • @user-kx6tj2mh8x
      @user-kx6tj2mh8x 3 роки тому

      @@user-ul9mg3cu4s 给你来个不一样的吧,我们看不上你们偷东西行为

    • @luciaclaire2985
      @luciaclaire2985 3 роки тому +1

      This woman is a propaganda UA-camr belonging to the Chinese Communist Party.
      Keep in mind that their purpose is to cover issues inside China with other issues
      It is a propaganda frame that utilizes the jealousy of the Chinese in Korean culture.
      The chain bankruptcy of Chinese financial institutions and the bankruptcy of large corporations is a task to conceal the reality of China, where a lot of things are happening.

    • @value523
      @value523 3 роки тому +1

      @테무진 Southief korea😄

  • @kattylews4391
    @kattylews4391 Рік тому +20

    The clothes of the Korean kings and officers were all given by the Ming Dynasty, how can Koreans dare to say that Hanfu originated in Korea? It's just like to say grandpa looks like his grandson

    • @random_guy1084
      @random_guy1084 Рік тому +3

      What you mentioned is called 冠服(관복). When we call Hanbok, it is ordinary K peoples' traditional clothes such as the thumbnail picture of youtube video "Hanbok is Chinese? False claims about Korean traditional attire debunked" or the one in google search “박신혜 한복에 中 네티즌 구토 테러”. Hanbok and Han C clothes look very different. Hanbok (short Jeogory + puffy skirt) looks much more elegant without excessive decorations. This is the *Korean beauty. Simple, but looks aristocratic and elegant.* The western traveler *B.B. Benedek (1929) said about the K people,* “Not only the nobles, but even those of the lowest ranks have the noble appearance. In terms of physique and appearance, they are very aristocratic compared to the J… and C…. In particular, women are much more beautiful than J… and C…. Also, the hair style of the women with their entire hair braided back was very similar to that of the Hungarian women, which was very impressive.” “K.. are physically s3perior to any other ethnic group in the surrounding countries.”
      *Book: “Korea, The Land of Morning Calm”*

    • @JENNYLEEWORLD
      @JENNYLEEWORLD Рік тому +2

      Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and Chinese invention originated from koreanic and Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese population were austronesian negritos. Yangtze river southern china Burma southeast Asia is Homeland of Chinese austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited only by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Han people and han dynasty was named after han river which is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture.
      Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.,..,

    • @yin-yi5189
      @yin-yi5189 Рік тому +3

      @@JENNYLEEWORLD Stop spamming and liking your own comments.

    • @JENNYLEEWORLD
      @JENNYLEEWORLD Рік тому +1

      @@yin-yi5189 truth hurts. Accept the truth and be a happy Chinese for once. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 5000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and Chinese invention originated from koreanic and Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese population were austronesian negritos. Yangtze river southern china Burma southeast Asia is Homeland of Chinese austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited only by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Han people and han dynasty was named after han river which is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are not even considered Asian in Korea.chinese are same as Southeast Asians Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan Burma southeast Asia. They look same and behave same. Same lifestyle. Same culture.
      Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.,.

    • @justinvang561
      @justinvang561 Рік тому +5

      @@random_guy1084 The book of Samguk Sagi (삼국사기) or (三國史記) will still strongly disagree with you.

  • @justinvang561
    @justinvang561 9 місяців тому +6

    So I suppose people are going to say? The People in Europe were already using aqueduct, roads, concrete, Latin writing, and etc. Before Rome gave it to them or independently invited it on their own before Rome existed. Come on people it's not that hard to see Korea was heavily influenced by China in the past before the Modern times even started.

  • @Stimkie
    @Stimkie 3 роки тому +370

    Most of the dislikes likely didn't even watch the whole thing.

    • @tkddnz8989
      @tkddnz8989 3 роки тому +15

      yes because it was full of lies and uneducated opinion and full of 中華思想

    • @kunlongwu5686
      @kunlongwu5686 3 роки тому +44

      @@tkddnz8989 邪教又来了是吧 差不多得了

    • @shuruitao1843
      @shuruitao1843 3 роки тому +24

      @@kunlongwu5686xswl哈哈哈哈哈他们真的好爱扯政治 是不是真的很nt

    • @fuji8283
      @fuji8283 3 роки тому +16

      @@tkddnz8989 awkward for u😅

    • @willyang4487
      @willyang4487 3 роки тому +16

      @@tkddnz8989 so who sounds more like a member of a cult?👀

  • @tfsigo4764
    @tfsigo4764 3 роки тому +491

    我对汉服没有兴趣。但我是一个中国人,我觉得在外网打群架的时候我们站在她后面她也会更有安全感。 同胞们可以无条件关注为祖国发声的up主。

    • @NoChinaforever17
      @NoChinaforever17 3 роки тому +1

      Korea no.1 Japan no.2 China no.999

    • @wesleythomas2885
      @wesleythomas2885 3 роки тому +42

      Korean No. 1 in the hole Unnirvis since the big bang

    • @stellasou9606
      @stellasou9606 3 роки тому +37

      전준 Korea no. 1. Even Big Bang is invented by Korean:)

    • @christinem4266
      @christinem4266 3 роки тому +10

      @@NoChinaforever17 Leave our culture alone.

    • @qianglin5240
      @qianglin5240 3 роки тому +16

      @@NoChinaforever17 what a giant face you have. Astonishing!

  • @weqxsdqwdzxa3501
    @weqxsdqwdzxa3501 Рік тому +5

    Korean professor now even claiming Korean created Chinese characters.
    Don't know when they start to claim the whole universe, the Japanese even have a word for this 韓国起源説

    • @JENNYLEEWORLD
      @JENNYLEEWORLD Рік тому +1

      Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.,,

    • @user-xn9zq6fp8t
      @user-xn9zq6fp8t Рік тому +1

      it is.just mionority of korean

    • @JENNYLEEWORLD
      @JENNYLEEWORLD Рік тому +1

      @@user-xn9zq6fp8t Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.,,

    • @user-xn9zq6fp8t
      @user-xn9zq6fp8t Рік тому +2

      @@JENNYLEEWORLD what the fu...

    • @JENNYLEEWORLD
      @JENNYLEEWORLD Рік тому +1

      @@user-xn9zq6fp8t Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. Chinese are Yangtze river han river southern Chinese austronesian negritos. That is why in Korea Chinese are same as Vietnamese Thailand phillipines taiwan and Burma. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Chinese and southeast Asians originated from Austronesians and negritos. Han dynasty and han Chinese were named after han river that is connected to Yangtze river and not yellow river. Chinese are 100% austronesian negritos. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. It was inhabited by koreanic and Mongolic peoples since time began. Koreanic and Mongolic peoples conquered ruled and colonized china for over 4000 years. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. Nearly every Chinese dynasty and chinese invention originated from koreanic Mongolic peoples. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from Korean Manchu mongol history. The Chinese have zero history remaining without stealing Korean Manchu mongol history. Look up CONQUEST DYNASTY. 95% of Chinese history is stolen from koreanic Mongolic peoples history. Chinese have zero history. Chinese only lived in han river Yangtze river southern china and burma and southeast Asia. Chinese never lived in yellow river region. please look up conquest dynasty. that is why most chinese people dont even look asian. most chinese look vietnamese thailand burma phillipines. also if a chinese person looks korean then the chances of that person having korean dna is 100%. millions and 10 millions of koreans manchus and mongols moved to northern china after conquering ruling and colonizing china for over 4000 years.,,,,..

  • @Clee-os6pv
    @Clee-os6pv Рік тому +12

    China was the Superpower of Asia throughout most of it's history. The reason why China has a long history as a single state nation. China was the most dominant force of Asia in their respected part of the world. And it is dubbed "The Roman Empire of Asia". So Korea not been influence by China is like saying USA wasn't influence by the British. Most of Korea's written history was written using Chinese characters. Most of the stuffs comes from China long before the modern times, everyone in the world is still using China's 4 great inventions Gunpowder, Compass, Printing Press, and Paper. People can hate all they want Hanbok was heavily influenced by Hanfu. People need to get their facts correct and right. It's even written in a document called Samguk Sagi 三國史記 and yes it's written in Chinese characters not in Korean. So people can say bad stuffs and lies but we know that Hanbok was stolen and copied and was heavily influence by Hanfu. Just look up Samguk Sagi 三國史記 which again is written in Chinese characters.

    • @nationfighting3929
      @nationfighting3929 Рік тому +1

      Among the women's clothing in ancient China, the jacket with such a neck collar stands out is Hanfu from the Ming Dynasty.
      In the era of Han, Tang, and Song, there was no such Aoqun. Even that clothing has the same design as the relics of the Yuan period.
      Check the pipa sleeve and string position.
      Such a design was very common in traditional clothes of the ancient northern nomadic peoples.
      In fact, China's Yellow River civilization was not civilization of northern nomads, but an ancient Chinese agricultural people.
      The ancient Chinese built the Great Wall of China to prevent the invasion of the northern people.
      In other words, from the beginning, Han Chinese's traditional clothes were not the design of such northern ethnic clothes.
      The clothes and cultures of immigrants such as Hun, Xianbei, Mongol, Khitan, and Jurchen were handed down to mainland China.
      Ironically, ancient China had more times when other ethnic groups dominated than the dynasty founded by Han Chinese.

    • @nationfighting3929
      @nationfighting3929 Рік тому

      @gison M
      Sttttttttttling is a long tradition of han Chinese people. Tibet and Uighur people should be independent. Inner Mongolians should be Mongolians, too. The Chinese have man1pxxxxxed ancient history to unify the surrounding ethnic minorities into Han Chinese over and overagain. The Chinese have gaslighted other peoples as unciv111zed and claimed their culture to be the best. However, Taoism(including oracle bone, bagua,yin yang theory), rituals, territorial expansion, and golden culture of the ancient Chinese are all derived from other northern peoples. The Chinese st01e the culture of northern Asian people and manixxxxxted it to be founded by the Han Chinese. Many Chinese claim that ancient Chinese records are completely consistent with real history.But the ancestors of the Han Chinese in China were farmers in southern China and st01e the history and culture of the people of northern Asia for thousands of years.
      eventually China's Sin0centrism has exactly the same goal as current Chinese politics.
      Now China has been planning to divide the Korean Peninsula and turn North Korea into China. thfffffft of han nationalism is the most important element of Chinese culture.

    • @nationfighting3929
      @nationfighting3929 Рік тому

      @gison M
      During the Yuan and Qing dynasties, the Han Chinese people were conquered and ruled by immigrants. In particular, during the middle of the Yuan Dynasty, the Han Chinese rule was severe, and according to analysis of Chinese scholar 신력건(信力建), the Mongol Yuan was strongly influenced by Tibetan Ramadan, and all Mongolians in the Yuan Dynasty believed in Ramadan. In addition, 100 han Chinese were assigned to each Mongolian soldier, forcing the women to dedicate the right of night to Mongolian soldiers. So at that time, the Han Chinese even had a custom of kxxxxing the first child. This was historically a rare culture seen only in the Yuan Dynasty in East Asia and was a method of domination imposed only on the Han people. At that time, Han Chinese were employed during the Mongol and Manchurian periods, but the positions that Han Chinese could do were often limited, and there were more people who were despised as l0wc1ass people such as pr0stxxxde and eunuchs.

    • @nationfighting3929
      @nationfighting3929 Рік тому

      @gison M
      For your information, i attached the article.
      글: 신력건(信力建)
      많은 사람들은 원(元)나라를 중화민족역사상 가장 자랑스러운 왕조라고 여긴다. 예를 들어, 1930년대에 청구(淸癯)라는 사람이 쓴 라는 글에서 이런 말을 했다: "원나라 징기스칸의 역사를 읽었다. 몽골에서 일어나서 중원의 주인이 된다. 개국 이후, 킵차크, 아수르 여러 부가 있었으며, 수부타이에게 명하여 메르키트를 정벌하고 다시 병력을 관전길사해(寬田吉思海, 카스피해)를 우회하여 태화령(太和嶺, 코카서스)까지 갔다. 원태종 7년, 다시 수부타이를 선봉으로 하고, 바투를 따라, 황자 구육, 황질 몽케등이 서역을 정벌한다. 태종 10년에는 대거 정벌전쟁을 벌여서 야열찬성(耶烈贊城, Ryazan 랴잔, 모스크바 남쪽의 도시)까지 밀고들어가고, 모스크바성을 함락시킨다. 태조의 장남인 주치가 그 자리에서 칸의 지위에 오른다. 이는 천고에 없던 일이다. 일대의 영주로 개창때 전쟁을 하면 승리하고 공격하면 취하니, 그 병사들의 위력은 세계를 통일하는데도 어렵지 않았다. 역사책을 보면 우역(禹域)이내에 머물고 지금까지 서로 유사(流沙)에 이르고 북으로 끝까지 간 경우는 없었다. 그런데, 유럽의 내지에까지 밀고 들어가고, 유라시아를 통일할 기세를 보인 것은 우리나라의 전쟁역사상 가장 자랑스럽고 가장 영예로운 한페이지가 아닐 수 없다. 원나라때의 병력의 창끝은 유라시아의 목구멍을 겨누는데 충분했고, 모든 것을 석권하고 끌어안을 기세였다. 중국의 후세인들의 용기를 일깨워주기 충분하다."
      그러나, 이것은 정신적 자위일 뿐이다. 원나라는 근본적으로 이민족이 중원의 주인이 되어 식민통치를 한 것이다. 그들의 실제통치행위를 말하자면, 원나라는 한족이 주체가 된 중화민족역사상 가장 부끄러운 왕조라고 할 만하다.
      사회를 보면, 원나라는 봉건사회가 아니라 노예사회이다. 원나라가 처한 역사단계는 기껏해야 반봉건 반노예사회로 수백년전의 당나라 봉건 문명단계보다 훨씬 낙후되었다. 송나라의 인민 자유의 경제 상업사회에 비하면 더 더욱 낙후되었다. 최소한 수백년의 문명발전을 낙후시켰다.
      원나라통치자들이 실행한 것은 분봉제(分封制), 공노제(工奴制)같은 전형적인 노예사회의 특징이다. 원나라에는 대량의 "구구(驅口)"(노예)가 아주 보편적으로 존재했다. 이는 원나라가 노예사회라는 것을 입증한다. 개설된 '인시(人市)"에서는 구구를 임의로 매매할 수 있었다. 원나라의 중급관리는 백명이상의 구구를 보유했고, 대사장(大使長, 노예주)의 구구는 왕왕 수천수만이었다. 쿠빌라이의 총신인 아하마는 7천여명의 구구를 보유하고 있었다. 구구는 노예로 인신의 자유가 없고, 주인의 사유재산이다. 구구는 사장에게 조(租)를 바치고 국가에 부(賦)를 내야 했다. 원나라의 법률에는 "구구는 돈이나 물건과 같다"라고 규정한다. 주인은 임의로 매매하고 증여할 수 있다. 주인이 죄없는 구구를 죽이면 장87대이고, 양인이 다른 사람의 구구를 죽이면 장107대이다. '구구' 한 명을 죽이면 소나 말을 죽였을 때의 형벌과 거의 비슷하다. 원나라때 전호(佃戶)의 지위는 극히 낮았다. 원나라의 법률에는 이렇게 규정했다: "주인이 전호를 때려죽이면 장107대이다" 원나라는 자유신분의 농민도 농노의 운명으로 전락시킨다.
      원나라는 법률의 형식으로 적나라하게 각민족의 불평등을 선언했을 뿐아니라, 적나라하게 동종인들도 극도의 불평등함을 선언한다. 중국의 북방은 3등공민이다. 역사서에서 말하는 그 "한인(漢人)"이다. 이것은 역사서에서 말하는 것이다. 그 배후의 이야기는 역사가 말하지 않는다. 몽골인들이 어떻게 한인을 통치했는가? 필요한 군사역량과 진압도구(감옥)을 둔 이외에 최하층의 모든 마을에는 하나의 몽골가정을 파견하여 전체 마을의 한족을 다스리게 했다. 한족 여인이 결혼하려면, 반드시 몽골인의 남자와 3일을 자야 했다. 문언문으로 말하자면 한족 여인의 초야권은 몽골인에게 있었다. 한족노인은 60세가 되면, 반드시 들판으로 보내어지고 묘혈 속에서 죽음을 기다린다. 이 모혈은 바로 노인들이 말하는 "전타묘(塼打墓)"이다. 이를 보면 몽골 원나라시대의 중국인들은 가장 굴욕적이고 가장 어두운 시기였다. 어느 후안무치한 '애국'역사전문가가 자랑하는 것처럼 '강대무비하고 유라시아에 위력을 떨친' 것이 아니다.
      구체적인 통치조치에서도 원나라는 더할 수 없이 암흑이었다: 한족들의 반란을 방지하기 위하여, 5개 가문의 한족들은 요리칼 1개를 가질 수밖에 없었다. 그리고 이 요리칼도 몽골인의 집에 두었다. 몽골인의 동의를 받아야, 한족인은 불을 피우고 요리를 할 수 있었다. 그래서 한족인들은 습관적으로 이들 몽골인 남자를 "노조야(老竈爺, 조는 부엌이라는 뜻임)"라고 불렀고, 몽골인 여자는 "노조내(老竈奶)"라고 불렀다. 이들을 그림으로 그려서 부엌에 걸어놓고 새해가 되면, 이들 몽골인들은 현성으로 가서 전체 마을의 상황을 보고한다. '노조야'가 '위에 좋게 말해주도록' 하기 위하여 음력 십이월 이십삼일, 집집마다 맛있는 음식을 몽골인의 집으로 보냈다. 이를 "제조(祭竈)"라고 불렀다. 만일 농촌에 가서 '노조야'와 '노조내'의 화상을 볼 기회가 있다면 그림 속의 인물들이 몽골인 복장을 하고 있다는 것을 알 수 있을 것이다.
      원나라의 한민족에 대한 잔혹한 통치는 심지어 침상으로까지 확대된다. 몽골인들이 정복한 기간동안 한인과 다른 각 소수민족백성의 신부의 첫날밤은 반드시 몽골인과 지내야 했다. 굴욕적인 초야권으로, 당시의 한인들은 결혼후 첫째 아이는 낙태시켰다. 첫째 아이를 낙태시키는 습관이 생긴 내력이다. 한족의 조상들은 어쩔 수 없지만, 굳건한 방식으로 혈통의 순수성을 유지해왔던 것이다.
      원나라통치자들의 한인에 대한 살육은 더욱 심했다. 몽골인들은 한때 중국인들을 모조리 죽여버리려고 한 바 있었다. 논밭은 모조리 목장으로 만들기 위해서. 만일 야율이 말리지 않았더라면, 그들에게 '납세'의 공능이 있다는 것을 일깨워주지 않았더라면, 당금 천하에 중국인의 흔적은 일찌감치 사라졌을 것이다. 비록 그러했지만, 몽골인들은 여전히 몇몇 대성(大姓)을 도살하는 정책을 실행한다. 쓰촨에서 일찌기 수백만명을 죽여버린 바 있다. 몽골인들의 통치는 중국사회를 극도로 피폐하게 만들었다. 한인, 남인은 천민이었고, 재산은 마음대로 빼앗을 수 있었고, 처자식은 마음대로 유린할 수 있었으며, 생명은 마음대로 죽여버릴 수 있었다. 중국인들은 심지어 성명조차 없었다. 그저 출생일시를 이름으로 삼았고, 무기를 가질 수도 없었다. 몇 집이 요리칼을 공유할 수밖에 없었다. 몽골인의 살륙과 통치하에 중국인구는 급감한다. 1223년(남송 가정16년), 남송의 인구는 7,681만이었다. 여기에 금나라의 인구를 합하면 총인구는 1억이 넘었다. 그런데, 1278년 남송이 멸망한 후 12년이 지난 1290년에 이르러서는 면적이 훨씬 넓었던 원나라의 인구가 겨우 5,883만명에 불과했다. 이를 보면 살륙이 얼마나 참혹했을지 알 수 있다. 중국의 문화는 몽골인의 침입과 통치로 쇠락한다. 몽골인들은 한때 산동 연해일대에서 매년 여름가을교체기에 바다에 마을의 한인들을 던져넣어서 한인의 인구증가를 통제하고자 했다.
      (뒷 부분 생략)

    • @nationfighting3929
      @nationfighting3929 Рік тому

      @gison M
      if you look at the paintings of the Ming era, young children still shave their hair and look the same as the Mongolian era. You can tell by looking at the pottery from the Ming period remaining in Korea. And if you look at the pictures of the emperor going hunting in the early Ming period, he's wearing a Mongolian hat and a hobok similar to the Yuan era. There is too much evidence that a culture similar to that of the Yuan era was maintained for at least 100 years in the early Ming era. Second, the Chinese continued to claim that the Sui and Tang kingdoms were Han China's kingdoms, but they were ruled by other peoples, such as the Yuan and Qing eras. A few other northern peoples ruled mainland China. But now the Chinese are lying that Mongolia is also Chinese history, interpreting that Emperor Yuan has been assimilated into the Han Chinese culture. Even if Xianbei joined the Han Chinese a thousand years ago, their ancestors were nomadic northern peoples, not southern Han Chinese. Likewise, even if the majority of the manchu people now changed their identity to han Chinese, their ancestors were different peoples in the north. The Chinese have repeatedly changed their interpretation of history and distorted history to unite the surrounding peoples for thousands of years.

  • @kaioumichiru3041
    @kaioumichiru3041 3 роки тому +251

    同樣來自儒家文化圈内的兩個國家:日本和韓國。
    日本從不掩蓋自己曾經向中土學習唐宋文化,並將之發揚出了自己的形式。
    而韓國卻對此羞於啓齒,終究還是對自己的文化不夠自信了。
    承認了能有什麽嘛,萬年前大家都同居新月沃土呢。。。

    • @LiLi-nm6fy
      @LiLi-nm6fy 3 роки тому +1

      就是

    • @user-jj6mx3tc1g
      @user-jj6mx3tc1g 3 роки тому +7

      日韩先祖是通古斯人种,是先进入的俄罗斯,然后南下和华夏人种混血建立的韩国,虽然韩国人只有三分之一的通古斯血统,不过语言和文化底层还是通古斯!萨满宗教和韩语,除了这两种文化之外其他全是把中国文化稍做本土化的“韩国文化”~

    • @dasein1668
      @dasein1668 3 роки тому +1

      没有,准确的说黄白人种的分化在四万年前的伊朗高原,万年前我们已经到黄河流域了。

    • @andyln9607
      @andyln9607 3 роки тому

      孔子 is taiwanese. not chinese

    • @andyln9607
      @andyln9607 3 роки тому

      @Shaw Lan shut up. it is true. learn from history. 孔子 is taiwanese. not chinese

  • @fnchsg120
    @fnchsg120 3 роки тому +606

    怎麼說呢,但凡有點歷史常識的人都知道這件事根本沒有任何可以狡辯的餘地......

    • @user-im9wc8ce1s
      @user-im9wc8ce1s 3 роки тому +110

      众所周知韩国大部分人不讲道理

    • @tinach1791
      @tinach1791 3 роки тому +77

      也许只能说明他们并不具备任何历史常识

    • @shengbincui7066
      @shengbincui7066 3 роки тому +48

      他们都看不懂历史书,哪来的历史常识

    • @nhyxf6456
      @nhyxf6456 3 роки тому +37

      众所周知韩国人发明一切

    • @1874.
      @1874. 3 роки тому +22

      韩国的历史是按照他们自己的心情来的😂

  • @lcc7584
    @lcc7584 2 роки тому +20

    希望有更多的在国外看到博主多多普及中国汉服!中国文化!

  • @lupimali9504
    @lupimali9504 2 роки тому +33

    Park Chung-hee 朴 正煕 was a South Korean politician and army general who had been the country's third president since 1963 till 1979.
    Park Chung-hee observes, "Our national history of 5,000 years, in a word, was a negative chain of conservatism, crudeness and stagnation. ...
    I cannot but say that our history has been undignified when considered once. ...
    Our national history should be renovated by all means if we truly expect our ethnic restoration.
    We would rather burn up our history which is just like a warehouse full of every wickedness."
    ("Selected Works of Park Chung-hee 2: The Country, the Revolution and I" (English transl. by Leon Sinder), p.238)
    From his words, you will find that Koreans were deeply ashamed of their miserable and regrettable history.
    Indeed, just like Park Chung-hee, most of the Koreans in those days were well aware of the fact that their national history had been distressful one.
    Above all, just note the passage of "We would rather burn up our history which is just like a warehouse full of every wickedness." ... "burn up our history" ... this expression implies that "Koreans should eliminate, or invalidate, their real history somehow or other."
    Consequently, "Korean Nationalist Historiography (민족주의사학)" which Shin Chae-ho 申 采浩 advocated before WW2 has been restored, and flourished as "신민족주의사학" in the postwar years in Korea.
    These excessively patriotic historiographers of North/South Korea began to fabricate their national history by blinking any descriptions recorded in numerous historical documents of ancient China such as "Twenty-Four Chinese Historical Books (二十四史)", and distorting any historical facts which were inconvenient for them.
    Needless to say, the abolition of Chinese characters in Korea was part of the administration's attempt to interrupt its peoples' access of information from any historical documents written in Chinese characters.
    Thus, Koreans have been indoctrinated to believe blindly that they are superior, and their country greatly exerted its influence on neighboring nations by chauvinistic amateur researchers in their country.

    • @random_guy1084
      @random_guy1084 2 роки тому

      So ridiculous analysis as always. They (C people) don't even analyze correctly what's happening right now in Korea, so I don't even laugh for this kind of stupid remarks.

    • @achtungbaby2009
      @achtungbaby2009 Рік тому

      insecure inferior complex ruining these people without the courage to embrace the truths. They should learn from the japanese. japanese doesn't steal & false claim Chinese cultures as their. They usually proudly show their version and cite that their culture originate from China. Example: Kanji, Chinese literatures, types of teas like macha, green tea...tea ceremony, kimono, ramen, katanas that was derived from Tang Swords in the 600s AD etc.

    • @user-lf3zi5nb9k
      @user-lf3zi5nb9k Рік тому

      수나라를 망하게한거는 지우고 싶지않은데 게다가 우리는 역사를 지운적이없다 역사를 지우는거는 위구르와 티베트를 탄압하는 너가 하는거고

    • @johhw_6432
      @johhw_6432 11 місяців тому

      👍👍👍

    • @johhw_6432
      @johhw_6432 11 місяців тому

      @@random_guy1084 韩国人应该学习真实的历史,而不是伪造出来的。

  • @xuanmulsy
    @xuanmulsy 3 роки тому +110

    我就是来支持十音的!

  • @huiqideng8008
    @huiqideng8008 3 роки тому +193

    Shiyin, you should have shown the other 4838275 comments that “미미” posted. I scrolled for at least 2 minutes and it was still her comments🤯 I worry that more waves of copy-pasting and spamming are coming ...

    • @jayzeelee4810
      @jayzeelee4810 3 роки тому +1

      lmao

    • @KaKa_.
      @KaKa_. 3 роки тому +2

      Bro, Do you know 1989 六四事件?

    • @user-oy8og9sj4v
      @user-oy8og9sj4v 3 роки тому +21

      @@KaKa_. The Koreans shocked the world at the 2002 World Cup, and your spirits are extraordinary

    • @aygulmemet4201
      @aygulmemet4201 3 роки тому +35

      @@KaKa_. Changing the topic to something completely unrelated when you don't have evidence to argue back makes you look very childish. And embarrassing.

    • @jasoncck1233
      @jasoncck1233 3 роки тому +1

      @@user-oy8og9sj4v China has shocked the world since the birth of CCP. And they fucked up ur 2020 and 2021 will be no different.

  • @reginalee9112
    @reginalee9112 2 роки тому +23

    ? 한국 네티즌이 중국 문화를 공격했다니 뭔솔...?ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 지네가 먼저 시작했으면서 ㅋㅋㅋ그니까 왜 건들고 그래

    • @Darling-fv6cb
      @Darling-fv6cb 2 роки тому +1

      你们不是成天在网上叫嚣着奥运会那个汉服抄袭你们的吗?哈哈哈哈哈哈哈,怎么还在装不知道啊?

    • @MS-fp9ze
      @MS-fp9ze 2 роки тому +1

      @@Darling-fv6cb 댕기머리에 한복. 그게 한국문화를 가져온거지 뭔가요. 그게 중국 문화 공격이다? 그건 중국 문화가 아니라 한국 문화입니다. 그게 어떻게 중국 문화공격이지? 한국문화 표절이지.

    • @reginalee9112
      @reginalee9112 2 роки тому +1

      @@Darling-fv6cb ​ 이뻐보이지? 멋있지? 부럽지? 그게 한복이야 ㅋㅋㅋ 뺏고 싶지? 응 못 뺏쥬~~ 우리가 그렇게 호락호락 하지가 않아서 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그렇게 입고 싶으면 너네 옷이나 입어 ㅋㅋㅋ 자신이 지금 가지고 있는것에 항상 감사하고 만족하세요 ~~ 그래야 삶이 행복하답니다 ㅋㅋㅋ

    • @reginalee9112
      @reginalee9112 2 роки тому

      @@Darling-fv6cb 그리고 너는 아래 댓글에 나는 한국 문화를 존중한다 많은 중국인들이 한국을 좋아한다 이런 말 써놓고서는 여기에서는 왜 비난하냐 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 존중을 하고 좋아하면 비꼬지는 않겠지.

    • @reginalee9112
      @reginalee9112 2 роки тому

      @@Darling-fv6cb The hanbok (in South Korea) or Chosŏn-ot (in North Korea) is the traditional Korean clothes. The term "hanbok" literally means "Korean clothing".[1]
      The hanbok can be traced back to the Three Kingdoms of Korea period (1st century BC-7th century AD), with roots in the peoples of what is now northern Korea and Manchuria. Early forms of hanbok can be seen in the art of Goguryeo tomb murals in the same period, with the earliest mural paintings dating to the 5th century.[2] From this time, the basic structure of the hanbok consisted of the jeogori jacket, baji pants, chima skirt, and the po coat. The basic structure of hanbok was designed to facilitate ease of movement and integrated many motifs of shamanistic nature.[3] These basic structural features of the hanbok remains relatively unchanged to this day. However, present days hanbok which is worn nowadays is patterned after the hanbok worn in the Joseon dynasty.[3]
      The clothing of Korea's rulers and aristocrats after AD 7, was influenced by both foreign and indigenous styles, including significant influences from various Chinese dynasties, resulting in some styles of clothing, such as the simui from Song dynasty,[4] gwanbok worn by male officials were generally adopted from and/or influenced by the court clothing system of the Tang,[5][6] Song,[6] and Ming dynasties,[7] and Court clothing of women in the court and women of royalty were adapted from the clothing style of Tang and Ming dynasties,[8][9] the cheolik from the Mongol clothing and bestowed from the Ming court,[10] and the magoja from Manchu clothing. The cultural exchange was also bilateral and Goryeo hanbok had cultural influence on some clothing of Yuan dynasty worn by the upper class (i.e. the clothing worn by Mongol royal women's clothing[11] and in the Yuan imperial court[12]).[13] Commoners were less influenced by these foreign fashion trends, and mainly wore a style of indigenous clothing distinct from that of the upper classes.[14]
      The closure of the jeogori to the right is an imitation of the Han Chinese jackets.[15] However, jeogori typical style is hypothesized to have originated from hufu or nomadic dress which is worn by northern nomadic people in Asia.[16][17] Such style also appear in the history of Chinese clothing as they were also influenced by nomadic dress.[18][verification needed]
      Koreans wear the hanbok for formal or semi-formal occasions and events such as festivals, celebrations, and ceremonies. In 1996, the South Korean Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism established "Hanbok Day" to encourage South Korean citizens to wear the hanbok.[19]

  • @user-cj9pu9gp8s
    @user-cj9pu9gp8s 2 роки тому +1

    十音真的很棒!!!!

  • @lylias3446
    @lylias3446 3 роки тому +51

    嚯,看完评论我大概明白了,韩国人和中国人争论的完全不在一个点上,在两条平行线上车轱辘话。

    • @user-sx8eb8hm9l
      @user-sx8eb8hm9l 3 роки тому +28

      因为他们没有办法反驳啊,所以只能转移话题+撒泼打滚,他们要是有水平早就有理有据的反驳了,问题在于他们国家的古文物都没有多少,这才是最令他们无奈的

    • @lylias3446
      @lylias3446 3 роки тому +14

      @@user-sx8eb8hm9l 主要中国人的点是在于【正视历史、正视汉服】或者说【正视中国人的汉服是中国人的】这件事。然后韩国人的点前前后后就在于【泡菜、孙兴民、高句丽】乱七八糟一堆。啊对,当时李子柒出泡菜那期争议蛮大的,拿泡菜说事儿可以理解。
      但是就跟某位韩国朋友说的一样,意大利面条是受到中国影响,但至今我们叫的都是意大利面而不是中国的面条,为什么?
      因为在出现自己的特征、自己的历史的基础上,对于【溯源】这种东西是没有扯皮的。
      说什么爹什么孙子那都是气话,林子大了什么鸟都有。
      但争论的点始终在于,韩国人尊不尊重别国历史?
      之前因为兴趣,参观了韩国的青瓦台和首尔的国家历史博物馆,我真的是看到了非常多有意思的东西,尤其是【朝代时间表】。
      在时间表中清楚地写着韩国的历史最早可以追溯到的时间,比中国的5000年历史还要悠久。(当时是大概15年夏天参观的,我没有留存照片,具体怎么描述的忘记了。我相信博物馆现在依旧留着那张时间表在墙上。)
      就好像中国说自己是炎黄子孙,我们最早有炎帝和黄帝的传说,但从来不拿他当【正史】,而是一种由上而下传承的文化。我们从夏朝开始的正统历史已经可以从文物追溯到商,夏朝文物的发迹指日可待。
      但为什么就有人会鼓吹文化矛盾,忽略史诗记载、颠倒黑白呢?
      维持民族自信难道就真的只能用充实历史这种办法了吗?

    • @lqzhang9161
      @lqzhang9161 3 роки тому +2

      @@lylias3446 虽然夏朝的文物没有被发掘,但前不久在河南省发掘出了河洛古城(好像是这个名字),距今有5300年,(名字记不太清了,嘻嘻)

    • @caelanl7785
      @caelanl7785 3 роки тому +4

      @@lylias3446 何况李子柒讲的是中国自己的泡菜,辣白菜中国也有啊,更何况中国也有朝鲜族,有辣白菜太正常了吧,他们就因此网暴李子柒,说的就不允许中国也有泡菜一样,很搞笑,他们这会不说韩国人很爱吃的炸酱面糖醋肉是正儿八经改自中国了,只允许他们把中餐改一些带回去,就不允许中国介绍自己的泡菜了

    • @WoodieYang
      @WoodieYang 3 роки тому +1

      @@lylias3446 就是缺乏民族自信,韩网暴民真是可怕

  • @beilichen3471
    @beilichen3471 3 роки тому +138

    没想到还会有回击视频,真的好感动,十音太棒了👏

  • @bellla9474
    @bellla9474 2 роки тому +24

    Great job Shiyin! Thank you for making this video!

  • @letskculture8930
    @letskculture8930 6 днів тому +1

    🟥The word hanfu, is a word made up by Chinese netizens that first appeared in the early 2000s. So the most Chinese people don't really know what hanfu is. It’s because it is a word that did not even exist before 2000s.
    They were envious of Korea's HANBOK becoming popular around the world, so they suddenly made up the similar pronouncing word hanfu. Chinese people must wear either the Manchurian Qipao of the Dongyi ethnicity, the Northeastern ethnicity in the past, or the People's Uniform of the Chinese Communist Party.
    The Dongyi ethnicity same as Koreans,using the same Altai Mongolian language, conquered China's Han ethnicity so the Dongyi ethnicity: The Mongols who founded the Yuan Dynasty, and the Manchurians who founded the Qing Dynasty in China are the greatest!

  • @minus21334
    @minus21334 3 роки тому +406

    many foreigners who wore hanfu were cyberbullied by korean

    • @noneofyourbusiness9338
      @noneofyourbusiness9338 3 роки тому +70

      This is true. I was cyberbullied by them as well.

    • @user-rl7jw2ns5u
      @user-rl7jw2ns5u 3 роки тому +76

      They can actually claim cyber bullying as their tradition . No rejections.

    • @claudec1843
      @claudec1843 3 роки тому +1

      @@user-rl7jw2ns5u ahahahahahah

    • @J.U.Kim514
      @J.U.Kim514 3 роки тому +5

      @@user-rl7jw2ns5u I'm sorry on behalf of Korean.
      Just I want you to know that not everyone does.

    • @user-mj9il5gs9m
      @user-mj9il5gs9m 3 роки тому

      When?

  • @ziruishao3833
    @ziruishao3833 3 роки тому +89

    不是复制粘贴刷屏就是在那边讲政治,真感觉特别没素质,网络喷子真可怕。十音姐姐加油,我们都在挺你。

  • @jianyuhe6892
    @jianyuhe6892 2 роки тому +58

    Totally agree. No one can change history. HANFU is Chinese. Many Korean culture is actually influenced by China(the country has 5000 years of history).We respect people comes from different cultural backgrounds.

    • @random_guy1084
      @random_guy1084 2 роки тому

      Northerners have been masters of Han C. Northern Hobok(胡服) influenced Hanfu both in the era of Han and Tang dynasties. Northern Aoqun and Qipao heavily influenced Han C, not vice versa. For example, Han C have been wearing Manchus clothes, but I’ve never heard Manchus wearing Hanfu. Don't fabricate history. Korean Hanbok is originally from northern Hobok and gradually developed unlike Hanfu who experienced many sudden changes by their northern rulers. Koreans were originally northerners.

    • @user-vn6be3et1q
      @user-vn6be3et1q Рік тому

      @@random_guy1084 Retarded don't spread rumors, we are the masters of your Hu people, never what Hu clothing. The Han emperors during the Han and Tang dynasties, after conquering the barbarian tribes of the Hu people and introducing them to your civilization, forced you to grow clothing and made you abandon the primitive animal skin clothing and replace it with magnificent Han clothing, but you copied the story of the farmer and the snake and stole the culture and wealth of the master. This is very shameless

    • @random_guy1084
      @random_guy1084 Рік тому

      @@skraskraa._.5371 Clothing culture is about design rather than material. If we make Hanbok or Hanfu using polyester, we don’t say Hanbok or Hanfu is influenced by the western culture. In addition, C need to frankly admit that most of their clothing culture were from their northern rulers' cultures.

    • @badmashdogesh3939
      @badmashdogesh3939 6 місяців тому

      @@random_guy1084 Dude, Hanbok was influenced from hanfu from various chinese dynasties.. Nearly all reliable sources including magazines, and academic research papers will tell you this. Hanfu was first developed by a chinese empress named Leizu 4500 years ago. Since then it has went tremendous evolution and influencing others countries in the region. I'm sorry if this hurts u but this is historical fact u can't deny. Korea is doing great today. No offense to them but plz be humble.

    • @danielzhang1916
      @danielzhang1916 2 місяці тому

      @@random_guy1084 the name 胡服 is Chinese, that's where all the names like Beidi, Nanman, etc. came from, they all mean foreign barbarians, why would the Chinese call themselves that, the Manchu (Qing) forced the Chinese to wear those clothing like qipao, they are not real Chinese clothing... the Jin were Jurchen, the Yuan were Mongol, none of them were Chinese to begin with, you are confusing them with legitimate dynasties

  • @xinxinli3696
    @xinxinli3696 2 роки тому +331

    You gave the Koreans a real history lesson. They should pay for you.

    • @user-cg8nc8bl3w
      @user-cg8nc8bl3w 2 роки тому +3

      I also think so

    • @user-cg8nc8bl3w
      @user-cg8nc8bl3w 2 роки тому +11

      @@user-cv9ki1nx3k Are you sure? photo of Shiyin's Hanfu released on IG was before the opening of the Olympic Games. At that time, there were already many extreme Internet mobs who carried out cyber violence against her, attacked her in life, and even sent her threatening emails. Why is this? By the way, Koreans are one of the 55 ethnic minorities in China. According to you, don't they deserve to wear their traditional costumes?

    • @xijinping4520
      @xijinping4520 2 роки тому +5

      你们要认识你们的行动却贬低中国的国格, 中国人的人格 😥
      🇹🇼🤝🇰🇷 sorry korean people

    • @user-cg8nc8bl3w
      @user-cg8nc8bl3w 2 роки тому +7

      @@user-cv9ki1nx3k You are a reasonable person, it's pleasure talk to you, anyway I want to tell you that in China, no one thinks Korea is part of China, everyone knows Korea is a sovereign state and independent country, thank you.

    • @user-cg8nc8bl3w
      @user-cg8nc8bl3w 2 роки тому +3

      @@user-cv9ki1nx3k I hope everyone can look at things objectively and not be led astray by ideology. Many times, media reports may not be true because they have subjective biases

  • @Victor-ht1qy
    @Victor-ht1qy 3 роки тому +285

    多出点英文视频吧!不然浪费了你这么好的英文了。谢谢你向世界推广中国的文化

  • @xxlee7195
    @xxlee7195 3 роки тому +22

    有理有据,支持十音!历史不可以随意修改!

  • @shanshanlu5016
    @shanshanlu5016 2 роки тому

    great job!

  • @Anna0518yb
    @Anna0518yb 16 днів тому +1

    In recent years, there has been an increase in claims from China that traditional clothing and cultures from other countries originated in China. For example, it has been claimed that Mongolian traditional attire, Korean hanbok, Russian traditional dress, and Japanese kimono all have their origins in China. However, these claims are often lacking in historical evidence or are distorted, making them widely unaccepted internationally.
    Such assertions have been met with criticism from many people, especially from the countries whose cultures are being claimed. Similar claims have been made about pasta, pizza, paper, and writing, alleging that they all originated in China. These claims seem to be more about showcasing national pride rather than being based on historical facts.
    Historical facts need to be verified through various documents and archaeological evidence, and such claims cannot be accepted simply on the basis of assertion alone.

  • @user-lq4gv5le5r
    @user-lq4gv5le5r 3 роки тому +172

    我们不奢求他们认识到韩起源于汉服,但是他们跳起来骂我们明制汉服抄袭韩服就是欠揍了

    • @fnatics8049
      @fnatics8049 3 роки тому +1

      @ilililil ililil Citizen of the Nation

    • @andyln9607
      @andyln9607 3 роки тому

      孔子 is taiwanese. not chinese

    • @user-yo5mm1wn3z
      @user-yo5mm1wn3z 3 роки тому +2

      South Korea, a nation that gives history plastic surgery

    • @user-yo5mm1wn3z
      @user-yo5mm1wn3z 3 роки тому +1

      South Korea, a nation that gives history plastic surgery

    • @shiwookim2846
      @shiwookim2846 3 роки тому

      @@user-yo5mm1wn3z China, a nation that destroy every history even themselves lol

  • @catherine2026-gg
    @catherine2026-gg 3 роки тому +27

    有理有據外加好聽的英語發音,十音真棒。

  • @missnaevia
    @missnaevia 10 місяців тому +22

    Chinese culture had a strong influence on other asian countries as you said, it's just a fact. I know Kimono also took its origins in chinese clothing, and japanese people don't like hearing that haha (I majored in japanese)

    • @notreally488
      @notreally488 9 місяців тому

      I think the origin of the kimono is Kampui.

    • @snowyy.5275
      @snowyy.5275 Місяць тому +3

      Japanese are pretty open about it, in my experience. To this day, kimono is often called gofuku and they openly acknowledge Chinese influence in many aspects of culture. I think that indicates admirable cultural confidence and respect for others

    • @user-lm2rk1wk8u
      @user-lm2rk1wk8u 13 днів тому +2

      Hi.I'm japanese!Japan is not particular about its own 'origin' like korea. Rather, they love "foreign things," so they always say which country they originated from. I am a disciple of the Japanese tea ceremony, and I know that it is based on the Chinese Rikuwa(陸羽)☺️

  • @korlouder2734
    @korlouder2734 23 дні тому +1

    The Chinese keep denying Goryeo Yang's existence and distorting history by making unreasonable claims that "the culture of the Ming Dynasty was unilaterally passed down to Joseon, so Joseon has no own culture." In addition, some Chinese insist that hanbok inherited the clothes of the Tang Dynasty. but the evidence that hanbok inherited the clothes of ancient Korean peninsula countries can be confirmed by relics of Goguryeo tombs from the 4th to 6th centuries, Silla, and Baekje.
    China emphasizes that hanbok is a subclass or replica of Hanfu, and at the same time, emphasizes that "Chinese clothing has been formed only by indigenization without external influence, and China is a master nation of all asian culture throughout East Asia including Korea." Of course, this is China's unilateral argument, and China's clothing is also the result of harmony with the outside world, including the xianbei people (Danryeong: roundid collar dress hobok), Central Asia (Burnryeong: folding collar dress), Mongolia (Balip,hyungbae,Dapho, Cheolik: telig), and Goryeo (Goryeoyang). It hides or ignores facts that have been influenced by mutual exchanges.
    In recent years, as the global influence of Korean culture has rapidly emerged, Korea has been attacked as a major target of the angry chinese. They are trying to undermine Korea on the Chinese Internet in any way possible. They claim that Korea originated from the anti-Korean culture (the Confucius Korean theory, the Korean origin of Chinese characters, the Three Continents theory), the culture that Korea stole (Gangneung Danoje, Jikji Simcheyoje, Donguibogam), and the claim that Korea is a problem (the theory of meat, the American colony, and the dictatorship of super rich people). And now this is not enough, and Korea has claimed that it has no traditional culture itself, and that it is all Chinese culture, and that it is its own culture, so it calls Korea the "sttttling country."

  • @qianxunli9354
    @qianxunli9354 3 роки тому +45

    姚明是韩国人?😂人家还活著呢,不像孔子你隨便説人家都沒辦法反駁,姚明可以直接問當事人就知道結果了。這個造謠造的太沒水平了

    • @daniellezhou406
      @daniellezhou406 3 роки тому +10

      昨天还说江疏影名字是姜素英也是韩国人,直接被人家怼了

    • @adelynchanschannel3852
      @adelynchanschannel3852 3 роки тому +4

      全宇宙都是他们的,见怪不怪 😂 他们这些人不知道自己有多么的幼稚

    • @maggiezou8222
      @maggiezou8222 3 роки тому +3

      @@daniellezhou406 WTF LMAO!本来江疏影多有画面感的名字变成姜素英瞬间low爆了

    • @user-fg6kf5wl4i
      @user-fg6kf5wl4i 3 роки тому +2

      @@maggiezou8222 姜素英好像大妈的名字😂😂

    • @catherinezhao4766
      @catherinezhao4766 3 роки тому +1

      @@daniellezhou406 只有韩国人自己不知道他们的文字是表音字吗???姜素英,江疏影都是一样的韩语,真是搞笑

  • @judithtsui7974
    @judithtsui7974 3 роки тому +340

    Not admitting does not mean that history does not exist. Koreans should learn Chinese seriously so that they can understand the characters on their historical relics

    • @albertwong5031
      @albertwong5031 3 роки тому +36

      韩国历史用汉字记载,景福宫和光化门上是汉字,韩国宪法原件用汉字写的,就是中国的文化属国。🥺🥺居然说爸爸遗传了自己的基因,真不像话。
      한국 역사는 한자로 기재되어 있다. 경복궁과 광화문에는 모두 한자가 쓰여 있다. 한국 헌법 원본까지도 한자로 쓰여 있다. 고대 한국은 중국의 문화 속국이었다。🥺🥺아버지가 자기 유전자를 물려받았다고 하더군요,정말 말도 안 돼요

    • @albertwong5031
      @albertwong5031 3 роки тому +28

      Ancient Korea was a vassal state of China, if you visit the museums of Korea, you will find all ancient thing were written in Chinese characters.Korean clothes also was copied from China.古代韩国是中国的属国,如果你参观韩国的博物馆,你会发现韩国古代所有东西都写着中文。고대 한국은 중국의 속국이었다. 한국의 박물관을 둘러보면 한국의 옛 사물에 중국어가 적혀 있었다.

    • @rkim9117
      @rkim9117 3 роки тому +12

      HANFU IS NOT HANBOK. HANBOK IS NOT HANFU.
      Most South Koreans know that Hanfu is NOT Hanbok. They do have similar components (as all Asian cultures inevitably do with one another due to close proximity), but they look very different. I don't know who in South Korea would say that Hanfu is Hanbok - maybe some people who weren't educated. I also hope there aren't that many uneducated Chinese people who say that Hanbok is Hanfu.
      The traditional/folk clothing of different cultures can be very similar if they are located near each other.
      (i.e. The dirndl dress is traditionally worn by women and girls in southern Germany, Austria, Liechtenstein, Switzerland and Alpine regions of Italy.) Likewise, Hanbok was influenced by Hanfu and vice versa throughout history. As China was one of the oldest civilizations in the world, I assume that Hanbok was influenced first by Hanfu.
      But both cultures came under Manchu influences when the Manchus rose to power during the 1600s and when both countries were invaded.
      There is no need to argue: Hanfu is NOT Hanbok & Hanfu is Chinese. Hanbok is NOT Hanfu & Hanbok is Korean. Hanfu influenced Hanbok and vice versa until the Manchus took over both. (Lucky Japan!)
      + all cultures in the world originated from the following oldest civilizations in the world: "Civilizations first appeared in Mesopotamia (what is now Iraq) and later in Egypt. Civilizations thrived in the Indus Valley by about 2500 BCE, in China by about 1500 BCE and in Central America (what is now Mexico) by about 1200 BCE."
      All Asian cultures originated from India and China. Not just Korea but also Japan, Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Cambodia, Bhutan, and the list goes on. BUT THEY ARE DIFFERENT COUNTRIES WITH DIFFERENT CULTURES THAT ARE DISTINCT FROM CHINA.
      Yes, ancient China influenced all Asian cultures like ancient Rome influenced all European cultures. But today they are NOT CHINESE, like how today all European countries are NOT ITALIAN.

    • @stellaluminant2213
      @stellaluminant2213 3 роки тому

      @@albertwong5031 如果说韩国是中国的属国,那么中国可以说是世界上众多的属国。 例如,日本帝国主义侵略。 英国、香港等,您对此有何看法?

    • @albertwong5031
      @albertwong5031 3 роки тому +8

      @@stellaluminant2213 那可不一样 日本之前那是殖民侵略 韩国之前可是心甘情愿当大明朝的狗啊 哈哈哈哈哈

  • @KrazeDiamond
    @KrazeDiamond Рік тому +73

    Hanbok literally means Hanfu in Corean pronounciation. Han = (漢)Han-Chinese;bok = (服) Clothing. It wasn't until recent years when South Korea started the whole "De-Hanization" movement to erase any Chinese influence on their country, that they changed the Han (漢)Han-Chinese to Han (韓) Korean. There's 2 main reasons behind this: 1>South Korea became a US Proxy State; 2>South Koreans always had a fantasy of having their own "Cradle of Civilization" that possesses a long rich history with deep cultures and heritage; but reality is more cruel than fantasy - they don't. So what do they do? They lie, cheat, and steal, just like the Anglo-Saxons.

    • @user-ee5wr3kh4l
      @user-ee5wr3kh4l Рік тому +1

      That’s not right.

    • @user-ee5wr3kh4l
      @user-ee5wr3kh4l 11 місяців тому

      @@CaryShaw-tm4yb Chinese

    • @johhw_6432
      @johhw_6432 11 місяців тому +1

      越是强大,越不在乎。

    • @demigodfangirl721
      @demigodfangirl721 8 місяців тому

      This is misleading. The korean Han character and the Han chinese han character is vastly different. We have been using Han to call ourselves for thousands of years.

    • @KrazeDiamond
      @KrazeDiamond 8 місяців тому +1

      @@demigodfangirl721Corea is barely 1500 years old theF you mean thousands of years? All Corean written records are literally in Han-Chinese. SK's capital used to be named "Hanseong" (한성; 漢城) and the main river is Han River (漢河) paying homage to the Han-Chinese roots. Your personal opinion and sentiment don't change facts. Keep coping.

  • @aez5619
    @aez5619 2 роки тому +1

    为你鼓掌👏🏻

  • @juliaz2395
    @juliaz2395 3 роки тому +53

    Happy Chinese New Year!

  • @yulinli7533
    @yulinli7533 3 роки тому +583

    支持十音小姐姐!Nothing can change the history.

    • @user-qv4vj6dg3v
      @user-qv4vj6dg3v 3 роки тому +9

      the true history!

    • @albertwong5031
      @albertwong5031 3 роки тому +18

      古代韩国→中国附属国
      고대 한국→ 중국의 속국 →🧎🏻🧎🏻‍♂️🙇🏻‍♂️
      现代韩国→美国殖民地
      현대 한국→ 미국 식민지 →🦮🦮🦮
      韩国人的历史是用汉字记载的 和宗主国争古代文化 就像说美国嘻哈模仿K-Pop一样可笑🥺
      고대 한국인의 역사서는 그래도 한자로 쓴 것이다 .고대 문화를 놓고 대 군주와 경쟁하는 것은 미국 힙합이 K-Pop을 모방한다고 말하는 것만 큼 우스꽝 스럽습니다.🥺

    • @albertwong5031
      @albertwong5031 3 роки тому +9

      Ancient Korea was a vassal state of China, if you visit the museums of Korea, you will find all ancient thing were written in Chinese characters.Korean clothes also was copied from China.古代韩国是中国的属国,如果你参观韩国的博物馆,你会发现韩国古代所有东西都写着中文。고대 한국은 중국의 속국이었다. 한국의 박물관을 둘러보면 한국의 옛 사물에 중국어가 적혀 있었다.

    • @qiwennie8795
      @qiwennie8795 3 роки тому +8

      @@user-vh6dp6vq1x oh poor things, why don’t you just say Korea invented China? Oh so poor

    • @alexandragomez4276
      @alexandragomez4276 3 роки тому +4

      @@user-vh6dp6vq1x who is son hungmin? Why did chinese calim he or she is chinese?

  • @user-tg9ov2vo8l
    @user-tg9ov2vo8l 2 роки тому +66

    The truth is that Koreans' overly distorted patriotism makes it impossible to face up to history.

    • @Aurora-ng9qe
      @Aurora-ng9qe 2 роки тому

      No its the chinese people who are

    • @user-vy4pg8ky6z
      @user-vy4pg8ky6z 2 роки тому

      Well, I am not sure about your talking, but I am sure that changing the word 'Korean' into 'Chinese' make sense.

  • @Jellybean-gz4cj
    @Jellybean-gz4cj 10 місяців тому +4

    Excellent video response

  • @emmarklien3714
    @emmarklien3714 3 роки тому +71

    最近幾乎所有的韓國影片 都拿「高麗樣」這段紀錄 到處宣傳
    但是實際上 高麗樣只是過去曾經發生過的短暫小事而已
    但韓國人卻把這個小紀錄當成是救命繩一樣抓得緊緊地
    然後不斷地放大解釋
    最後竟然變成 「元朝因為曾經受高麗服裝的影響 所以元朝自己的服裝消失 然後只穿韓服
    然後明朝由於接在元朝後面 所以明朝的服裝都是韓服」?!
    1.事實上 「高麗樣」對元朝的影響並沒有向韓國說的這麼誇張
    再來就是,明朝的服裝 還是以唐宋服裝為基礎而繼承的,
    高麗樣只是眾多漢服中的其中一種而已
    2.而 「大帽」和「網巾」早在明朝之前的中國朝代就已經存在,
    中國目前留下來的當時的眾多繪畫和古董中 經常可以看到
    雖然 現在 韓國的大帽 和中國的大帽已經不完全一樣 但大帽早在中國存在的事實是不會變的
    3.再來就是,
    韓國人自己的祖先 「崔溥」和「徐居正」等等的人 也有寫下
    ”蓋我朝鮮地雖海外,衣冠文物悉同中國”
    ”明皇若問三韓事,衣冠文物上國同。”
    如果漢服真的大部分是從韓服來的話
    為什麼韓國的祖先要寫下這些話呢?
    4.還有,
    朝鮮時代的官服也是明朝皇帝下賜而來的
    朝鮮時代的貴族戴的帽子「程子冠」也是從宋朝傳過去的
    不是只有朝鮮的官服長這樣
    過去的琉球和越南的官服也是長這個樣子
    難不成你們還想說 「琉球和越南的服裝也是韓服」嗎?
    5.事實上 朝鮮半島在西元前12世紀開始 就受到中原的影響,其後所有的韓服 都含有某種程度的中國元素
    更不用說 元朝時期的高麗 和 明朝時期的朝鮮
    所謂的「高麗樣」 正確地來說 只是將漢服稍微改變後 再重新回到中國而已
    ----------------
    此處為韓文版
    요즘 거의 모든 한국 동영상들이 다 “고려양” 의 역사 기사로 여기저기 홍보했어
    근데 우리의 생각에는 고려양은 그냥 당시의 일시적으로 발생됐던 사소한 일 뿐이었어
    하지만 한국 사람들이 그 문장을 구명줄로 꽉 잡고
    계속 그 문장을 확대하고 또 확대한 후
    그냥 원나라는 고려양의영향을 받고 원나라 자기의 전통옷이 다 없어지고 한복만 입은 듯이 말하며 명나라가 원나라의 뒤에 이어져서 명나라의 한푸는 다 한복이라는 소리로 우겼다니
    1.사실은 한복은 원나라에 영향을 준 정도는 그렇게 크지 않고 명나라의옷은 아직도 당송나라를 바탕으로 계승한 것이야
    고려양은 그냥 명나라의 복장 중 한 가지야
    전부가 아니야
    2.게다가 “갓”과”망건”은 중국 명나라보다 더 이른 중국왕조의 그림과 골동품들 중에도 많이 보여주거든
    요새의 한국”갓”하고 한국”망건”과 완전 같지 않지만 갓과 망건은 이미 중국에 존재한 지 오래 됐어
    3.니들의 한국 조상 “최부(崔溥)”와”서거정(徐居正”께서 남긴 기록 중의 문장
    ”蓋我朝鮮地雖海外,衣冠文物悉同中國”
    ”明皇若問三韓事,衣冠文物上國同。”
    한국어로 번역하면 바로
    “우리 조선 비록 중국땅 밖에 있지만 우리 한국 옷과 물건들이 다 중국거과 같다”
    “만약 명나라 황제께서 한국이 뭐냐고 물었다면 바로 중국 옷 하고 물건과 다 같은 나라이라고 할것이다”
    한푸는 대부분 한복의 영향을 받았다면 니들의 조상들께서 왜 그런 문장들을 남긴 거냐
    4.그리고 조선시대의관복도 명나라의황제께서 조선에 하사”下賜” 한 것이야
    조선시대 양반 썼던 모자”정자관”도 송나라에서 전한 것이야
    조선 뿐만 아니라 예전의 오키나와 하고 베트남의 관복도 같은 모양으로 생겼어요
    설마 오키나와와 베트남의옷까지도 한복이라고 주장하려고 하나?
    5.조선반도는 기원전 12세기부터 이미 중국의 영향을 받아서 그후 모든 한복들은 어느정도 다 중국요소가 안에 있어
    원나라시대의 고려와 명나라시대의 조선도 물론이다
    그 고려양이란 말은 정확히 말하면 한푸를 조금 바꾸고 중국에 다시 되돌아왔을 뿐이야

    • @tyf4113
      @tyf4113 3 роки тому +5

      知识分子来发言了!

    • @mayayao6928
      @mayayao6928 3 роки тому +4

      有个斯洛伐克up主也发了个视频说汉服是中国的,然后评论里就有韩国人拿高丽样说事,想知道这个评论怎么可以复制下来发过去

    • @emmarklien3714
      @emmarklien3714 3 роки тому +1

      @@mayayao6928 我其實也不太清楚怎麼複製UA-cam的留言
      但如果您能提供您的email或其他聯絡方式 我可以把這個留言寄給您

    • @mayayao6928
      @mayayao6928 3 роки тому +1

      或者你可以去她评论区发,叫马佳popmatta,辛苦了

    • @wanningchu7100
      @wanningchu7100 3 роки тому

      顶他上去

  • @pll1378
    @pll1378 3 роки тому +164

    No one will use TV series and movies to prove history, except Korean

    • @knnhzzh7924
      @knnhzzh7924 3 роки тому +6

      hahaha, that is all they have probably

    • @WowisHilda
      @WowisHilda 3 роки тому +2

      hhhhhh 夺笋啊!

    • @qiwennie8795
      @qiwennie8795 3 роки тому +2

      Hahahahaha right that’s an amazing country !

    • @maggiezou8222
      @maggiezou8222 3 роки тому

      They even use ads photo from online shops LMAO

    • @aygulmemet4201
      @aygulmemet4201 3 роки тому

      Hahahahahhahahah

  • @rb2bz4u
    @rb2bz4u 2 роки тому +128

    Your point is well taken. But you will need to hear me out as well.
    American Football is a game that was evolved from the game of Rugby and changed a bit to make it more...well, American. However, even though rugby was originated in England, I don't see a single comment made by the English claiming that American football is not American but British. They know the game of football came from rugby but they also do understand it is a two different sport. They rightfully grant the title of American Football and leave it at that.
    What you are claiming is that Hanbok was influenced by Hanfu. Let's just say, for the sake of the argument, you are correct. The issue lies not with your remark but what other Chinese people are claiming. What the other Chinese people are claiming is that Hanbok is actually a authentic clothing of China because of the very reason that it was influenced from Hanfu. That will be as distorted as Latin spraking countries to claim the language of English as theirs because the original alphabet was used for the latin language in the 5th Century. Just becaue there is a chance that Hanbok may have been influenced by Hanfu, it does not mean Hanbok belongs to Chinese culture.
    If you want to talk about respect, let's get that fact straight once and for all.

    • @peggym8706
      @peggym8706 2 роки тому +38

      Thanks for yr response first. As mentioned in the video, the dispute started when many Koreans posted pictures of REAL costumes from ANCIENT Chinese BOOKS on ig and twitter and claimed that they were Hanbok which is so ridiculous. Why don't you Korea focus on this issue?Is it because Korean ancient books are also in Chinese characters and you mistook them for yours?Waiting for your answer,thks

    • @monicac5203
      @monicac5203 2 роки тому +9

      thank you for your comment. As you mentioned in your reply, it was our Ming dynasty emperor who offered you ppl the initial idea of clothes, so you ppl can develop your own. We would like to claim that Hanbok is a variant from Hanfu, but it is definitely not Hanfu.

    • @arvinsun7308
      @arvinsun7308 2 роки тому +10

      Are Koreans so insecure? Steal everything from other countries? It's sad that you don't know your own history so clearly.

    • @plumagekk3949
      @plumagekk3949 2 роки тому +14

      Hanfu is a general calling for ancient Chinese clothes (Han Chinese汉族 is a majority ethic group in China) and ancient Chinese clothes differ by dynasties. The typical Hanfu caused arguments here is form Ming dynasties (clothes from Han, Jin, Tang, Song and other dynasties are also called Hanfu in general). Korean ancient clothes Hanbok was influenced by Ming Chinese clothes. No one is claiming Hanbok is Hanfu. She is trying to distinguish Hanfu汉服 and Hanbok韩服, but Koreans are trying to prove that it is a 100 percent Korean thing and claiming it was stolen by China. The absurdity.

    • @julieparker800
      @julieparker800 2 роки тому +19

      笑死,不是你们说我们偷了你们的韩服吗?英国人没说是因为,美国也从未说过英式足球是模仿抄袭的美国吧,你有逻辑吗?井水不犯河水知道吗?你们先说中国还不许中国解释自己不是抄的?绿茶🍵

  • @user-cg8nc8bl3w
    @user-cg8nc8bl3w 2 роки тому +19

    thank you ShiYin,let more people know about Hanfu.

  • @midorikow3518
    @midorikow3518 3 роки тому +440

    Support from America... I was major in Asian History back in school, wondering why Korean knows nothing about their history... hmmm

    • @yjl9542
      @yjl9542 3 роки тому +99

      Midoriko W
      Because they can’t read their own history book anymore since all of them were written in Chinese characters, the young generations only read and write modern Korean.
      That make people misunderstand their history and even make up things when they find true history is too hard for them to believe.
      They even published a book showing ancient Korean was the biggest country in Asia, contained whole China Japan Russia. I guess that’s why some of the young Korean saying Chinese characters was from Korea, China was part of Korea
      It’s hilarious

    • @midorikow3518
      @midorikow3518 3 роки тому +46

      @@yjl9542 that’s interesting. I guess my Korean friends are just humble ppl cuz I never heard them talking about these bullshit lol. possibly because we are all educated

    • @lisawu874
      @lisawu874 3 роки тому +31

      @@midorikow3518 maybe you can ask them about these facts. Will They admit that Acient Korea was vassal state of Ancient China? I doubt that. They just won't face the true history

    • @midorikow3518
      @midorikow3518 3 роки тому +20

      @@lisawu874 most of my Korean friends were born in the state so I assume they were educated with real history or they just don’t care 🤷‍♀️

    • @lennybunny2661
      @lennybunny2661 3 роки тому +11

      @@midorikow3518 So true😂😂😂

  • @yanjiang945
    @yanjiang945 3 роки тому +315

    支持十音,还有子柒。千年文化,娓娓道来,有理有据,还原历史。

    • @user-yt5yc4mn8u
      @user-yt5yc4mn8u 3 роки тому

      1) Tang Xianbei people are not Chinese, they are basically Proto-Mongols and partly Korean. Proto-Mongols are those Xianbei-branch Mongols before Ghenghizid Mongols who are Korean Mongols.
      2) China was ruled by the Mongols during Tang period and Chinese were slaves of the Mongols like during Yuan Dynasty.
      대야씨 선비 당나라
      Tang Xianbei were not Chinese. They are ancient Mongols. Li Hao, the grandfather of Gaozu Li Yuan had the Mongol family name of Daya (大野). Li Yuan's mother was Doggo Kara a Mongol women. His grand mother was from Gae clan famly of Goguryeo (Korea). Yangzhong the father of Yangjian of Sui Dynasty had the Mongol family name of Puluru(普六茹, meaning Willows, Yangliu). All these shows that they were Mongols! Korea means Goguryeo, so Goguryeo is still here now! KKKK
      Tang Xianbei are ancient Mongols and Yuan Mongols are Korean Mongols. Chinghiz Khan means ‘King of Chingui (King of Korea)’.
      1. Goguryeo was destroyed, but they built Jin Kingdom (Barhae-Goryeo-Kingdom) right immediately. King the Supreme, Dae Joyeong was one of the Royal Family of Goguryeo Kingdom and his son, King the Martial attacked Tang in 734 and Tang had to ask for help from Silla. This Barhae-Goryeo Kingdom was coexisting with Silla.
      2. In the mean time, Yi Zheng-gi (Li Zheng Qi) a noble man and General of Goguryo built Qi Kingdom (765~819) in 1/3 of Tang territory and ruled China for 3 generations!
      Tang State of the Mongols collapsed in 907 and Zhuquanzhong and Li Keyong the Turk and other Turks ruled China. By that time in 905 the Kidans, another Mongol tribe ruled Northern China, but in Korea, we had Jurchen Kingdom and Goryeo Kingdom! Do you know this?
      So, China was partly ruled by the Mongols and partly by Goguryeo people during Tang Dynasty! HHHHh
      3. In 926, the Kidans (Qidans), who are Korean-Mongols, invaded China and ruled the northern China and the Song kings had to flee to the south of Yangzi River.
      The country name of Liao Kingdom in Kidan language is ‘Koruji Kiday Gur” meaning “Koru-ji (Kore-an) Ki-day (Ki clan) Goryeo (Kingdom)”. Yelu Abaoki of Liao Kingdom had the same family name with the King of Barhae-Goryeo, Keul (Dae) Joyeong because they come from Goguryeo Royal Family. The only difference was that Yelu Abaoki’s family was Mongol-ified (Xianbi-an-ized).

      In 936, Goryeo Kingdom of Wang Geun absorbed Silla, unifying Korean peninsula again. There was Jurchen (Joseun, Chaoxian) Kingdom in Manchuria and part of North Korea. So, we had 2 kingdoms at that time.
      4. Jurchen Kingdom became Keum-nara(Jin / Gold-Kingdom, Jin Guo) and ruled China during Liao (Kidan-Qidan Mongol) Dynasty and Song Dynasty, the southern small kingdom. Song Kings had to serve the Kidans and Jurchen Kingdom as its Central Government and the so called Emperors of Song Kingdom were arrested and taken to Liao and Keum (Jin) Kingdoms!
      5. At that time, there was Goryeo Kingdom in Korean peninsula. So we had 3 kingdoms, Yo (Liao), Keum (Jin), Goryeo, in total.
      6. In the mean time, another descendant of Barhae-Jin-Goryeo Royal family, Temujin, the laterday Chinghiz Khan and his grandson Khubilay destroyed Keum-nara (Jin Guo) and the Song Dynasty and ruled the whole China.
      Chinghiz Khan was 19 the generation descendant of Dae Joyeong, the fist King of Barhae-Goryeo Kingdom, who was also one of the members of Goguryeo Royal Family!
      At that time, there was Goryeo Kingdom in Korean peninsula. So we had 2 kingdoms, one Korean Goryeo Kingdom, two, Korean-Mongol Imperium in the whole Eurasian continent, including that small Chinese continent.
      7. After that, Zhu Yuanzhang was a Jurchen (Northern Joseon -Chaoxian) created Ming State (Ming Guo) and the name of his son, Emperor Yongle' is "Gaoli Gongfei" (meaning "Korean Khongirad clan concubine") and Korean women became the mothers of all the Ming State Emperors! So, Ming state was a continental Korea that existed at the same time with Goryeo-Joseun (Gaoli-Chaoxian).
      8. Then, Nurhachi, the descendant of Keum-nara (金國, Golden Kingdom, Jin Guo) who was descendant of Goguryeo-Barhae-Goryeo Royal Family ruled China until 1911 and 1932~1945(August 18)!
      The descendants of Goguryeo Royal family are the very Manju (Manchu) Cheong -nara (Qing Guo) Emperors. They ruled the whole China! Hahaha.
      테무진1초 전
      9. In conclusion, Goguryeo people ruled China for more than 1300 years until August (8), 18, 1945 ! So, China should be part of Korea and serve Korea as its Central Government! All Chinese civilization also comes from Korea. Korea is modern Ko-guryo (Great-Goryo, Great Korea)! Hhhh Do you get it?

    • @DF18sayhi
      @DF18sayhi 3 роки тому +4

      @@user-yt5yc4mn8u 你们的世祖大王是外星人

    • @DF18sayhi
      @DF18sayhi 3 роки тому +2

      @@user-yt5yc4mn8u your Sejo of Joseon, 조선 세조, was an Alien.

    • @yibeierguotou7333
      @yibeierguotou7333 3 роки тому +3

      @@DF18sayhi let’s not tell him that China is not a single-ethic country and Xianbei, Qidan, Jin, Liao are all in China. He doesn’t even know these were all Chinese ethnicities and local governments /kingdoms and thought China was as small as Korea (1/10 in area, 1/20 in population).
      Nothing is true in his comment but I realized how creative Koreans are in fabricating history, we call it K-history. Just keep this cherish fool dreaming in K-history so who sees his comment will have fun from it.
      Koreans must believe they were suddenly appeared and evolved independently in Chaoxian Peninsula and pls pls don’t tell him that all human came from Africa so his culture was all from Africa as long as he has one blood from Africa according to his logic, I’m afraid he can’t afford the shock.

    • @DF18sayhi
      @DF18sayhi 3 роки тому

      @@yibeierguotou7333 ups, we call this Koreans as 'The thief come from south Korean, the Universe-Creator-Country. Some Koreans have created everything in the world(Universe) with their no-one-met murals.

  • @kolrzul
    @kolrzul Рік тому +14

    i kept seeing hanfus labeled as hanbok on pinterest its so sad
    i wanna go to china so im trying to learn more abt the culture and language china and its culture and language and food and everything is all so beautiful its sad how stigmatized and made fun of it is just because of the government and whenever ppl see something beautiful from china they call it japanese or korean🙁 yall deserve better

    • @seoul_louis9584
      @seoul_louis9584 Рік тому +1

      Well. They are Hanbok. Its China who started their claims over Hanbok as Chinese Hanfu from 2000s. They suddenly claimed this kind of nationalistic history

    • @diluc5414
      @diluc5414 7 місяців тому

      @@seoul_louis9584even after the video you still say this ? Even with google you still have the nerve to write this ? I finally know where the people with an IQ of 2 come from lol . Just go to an old age home cause you clearly need it , while your there , why don’t you think about how your not even close to Asian and still trying to make these ridiculous claims

  • @user-tq7mv6wk7r
    @user-tq7mv6wk7r 2 роки тому +106

    자꾸 한복 현대식으로 디자인한거 가져와서 fake 이러지 좀 마라

    • @hellomasato
      @hellomasato 2 роки тому +3

      인내심좀 있을 40대 후반인데 몇일 동계올림픽 보고 참다참다 한복까지 왔는데 한국현대식 디자인을 교묘하게 ... The thing that people all over the world have in common is that they hate the Chinese

    • @ydks8663
      @ydks8663 2 роки тому +5

      쟤네 한족 역사가 다 파괴돼서 그래요 ㅎㅎ한족이 만주족 몽골의 노예였을때 한푸나 한족 문화 다 사라졌고 지금 뭐 옷감에 대한 자료도 없어요 ㅎㅎ
      그냥 쟤네가 제일 무서워하는건 중국 분열이고 쟤네가 만주족의 노예였다는 사실이죠.. 치파오도 만주족거니까요..
      (쟤네가 한국이 중국 속국이라고 하면, 너희는 그냥 만주족 몽골의 노예다..속국도 아니고 하면 돼요)
      이제 그냥 대만 홍콩 외에도 만주족 독립 내몽골 독립을 도울거라고 우리나라 사람들이 말하고 다니면 돼요 ㅎㅎ
      CHINESE HISTORY = MANCHURIAN & MONGOLIAN SLAVERY. You all know this, stop denying the real facts here. Chinese history and culture has been continously enslaved, destroyed, and tortured by others (+themselves) in unprecedented levels. There is no history or culture there.
      Free Manchuria, Free Inner Mongolia

    • @Gurbbyxd
      @Gurbbyxd 2 роки тому +7

      @@hellomasato 죄송합니다. 우리도 한국인을 싫어합니다. 결국, 도둑들은 모두 때리라고 외칩니다.

    • @kim-bv5ik
      @kim-bv5ik 2 роки тому

      @@Gurbbyxd 싫어하면서 왜 유트브에와서 날리고,, 니네 나라 철창으로 ip다 봉쇄했는데 어떻게 나온기고??? 혹시 조선족이가??? 그러면 동포비자 발급받았지??? 근데 조상이 어디에 살았었고.. 자신은 几代자손인지는 아나????? 혹 니 한족이라 생각카나????!!!조상들이 저 위에서 울고있다 아이가

    • @xiurongzhang7044
      @xiurongzhang7044 2 роки тому +1

      하하, 태극기는 기본적으로 음과 양 또는 바구아 태극권의 노크입니다 🤣🤣 방금 색상을 변경하고 국기의 4면에 세로선을 사용했습니다. 저작권

  • @QHC-li1gk
    @QHC-li1gk 3 роки тому +92

    韩国人评论说中国人羡慕嫉妒韩国文化,妈妈呀这是谁给他们的勇气和自信啊。。。

    • @sheshe9979
      @sheshe9979 3 роки тому +2

      那可不,中国食物不行,看看韩国食物多厉害,有各种各样的泡菜还有各种各样的泡菜。。。韩国人在亚洲文化的地位就跟泡菜在中国餐桌的地位一样。

    • @user-bw5ru3uw6p
      @user-bw5ru3uw6p 3 роки тому +1

      梁静茹给的

    • @user-sl4hn8fx9f
      @user-sl4hn8fx9f 3 роки тому +7

      @@user-bw5ru3uw6p 韩国人:已将《勇气》加入申遗清单√

    • @1874.
      @1874. 3 роки тому +1

      中国人不喜欢韩国的神话历史😂

    • @hahahannahluo
      @hahahannahluo 3 роки тому +3

      我就问一句,韩国有文化吗?🤣

  • @amyc5151
    @amyc5151 3 роки тому +162

    Instead of attacking the chinese, Koreans should learn hanja and study their own historical documents.

    • @xjf8344
      @xjf8344 3 роки тому +14

      Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty (Joseon Wangjo Sillok) 조선왕조실록.
      朝鮮王朝實錄
      : 高宗 36卷, 34年( 丁酉 / 대한 광무(光武) 1年) 9月 29日(阳历) 번째기사 " “我邦疆土, 係是漢、唐古地, 衣冠文物, 悉遵宋、明遺制, 接其統, 而襲其號, 無所不可"
      Translation: Korean King, Joseon Gojong조선고종 高宗 said: "The territories of Korea used to be ancient land of Han and Tang. Our costumes and relics conformed to Song. The kingdom system and structure adopted from Ming. It is rightful and legal to inherit the true name of Greater China and her culture.

    • @hhj51
      @hhj51 3 роки тому +1

      Why do you think Koreans need to study hanja(Chinese characters)?? Korean use Hangul plz study first before tell your opinion

    • @laocongge
      @laocongge 3 роки тому +10

      @@hhj51 but your historic records were all written in Chinese characters...

    • @gopaellen2255
      @gopaellen2255 3 роки тому +2

      @@xjf8344 fake new. You guys enjoy creating fake history!

    • @xinzhehu3378
      @xinzhehu3378 3 роки тому +4

      @@hhj51 Read your history books which are written in Chinese, only in recent years you have your own language of the poor nation. Korea was first a colony of China, then a colony of Japan, and now a colony of the United States.

  • @justinvang561
    @justinvang561 Рік тому +34

    There is a book called Samguk Sagi (삼국사기) or (三國史記) it was written by a Korean guy named Kim Bu-sik it mentions the Hanbok basically copied and was very very influence from China's traditional dress called Hanfu.

    • @random_guy1084
      @random_guy1084 Рік тому +2

      This record is only for nobles. There are numerous C books, written by C historians, that says "All the clothes, shoes, hats, and props everywhere have imitated Goryeo, as a result the whole world seems crazy." -> Cultural influence of Goryeo in Beijing was so intense much more than 'K wave' now. Both C and J have been too much craving K women and K beauty, fashion, culture since ancient times.

    • @Hoo88846
      @Hoo88846 Рік тому +6

      @@random_guy1084 Sure, I never crave any Korean stuffs. I only see Koreans misbranding all Chinese plagiarism as “Korean.” Just wish we could unbrand them and then we are all good to go. Koreans don’t need to “improve” on Chinese culture. They are so smart. They should invent their own. Like zhajiangmian is Chinese, not “Korean jjajangmyon”.

    • @goryeo1392
      @goryeo1392 Рік тому +3

      12세기 몽골 침략전 쓴 삼국사기와 몽골의 영향을 받은 한복과 비교하는 오류....
      고려말 복식, 갑옷등은 12세기와 많은 차이가 있다
      고려 13~14세기는 몽골의 간삽기로 서로 영향을 줬다...
      몽골+고려 복식등이 명나라 초기에 많은 영향을줬다...
      물론 관복등은 정통 한족왕조의 영향을 고려도 받았다

    • @dathunderman4
      @dathunderman4 Рік тому +2

      “Some Korean guy” wrote a book saying something, therefore it must be true. What a compelling argument.

    • @ChrisL369
      @ChrisL369 Рік тому +7

      @@dathunderman4 You don't even need a college degree to realize Koreans are copycats and Hanbok is just a rip-off of the China's traditional dress the Hanfu.

  • @xxx-tn8xz
    @xxx-tn8xz 2 роки тому +22

    그렇게 우기는거 잘하면서 왜 코로나는 니들꺼라고 인정을 안해

    • @xiurongzhang7044
      @xiurongzhang7044 2 роки тому

      하하, 태극기는 기본적으로 음과 양 또는 바구아 태극권의 노크입니다 🤣🤣 방금 색상을 변경하고 국기의 4면에 세로선을 사용했습니다. 저작권

    • @xiurongzhang7044
      @xiurongzhang7044 2 роки тому

      너 같은 바보 한국인이 집에 머물면서 뉴질랜드처럼 행동했다면 한국은 한 달 만에 코비드-프리가 되었을 것이지만 아니. 하지만 너희들은 내가 생각했던 것처럼 바보야

    • @xiurongzhang7044
      @xiurongzhang7044 2 роки тому

      당신은 코비드가 전 세계의 첫 번째 바이러스인 것처럼 행동하는 반면, 이것은 이전에 바이러스였습니다.

    • @xiurongzhang7044
      @xiurongzhang7044 2 роки тому

      한국 사람은 분노 관리 수업을 들어야 합니다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

    • @xxx-tn8xz
      @xxx-tn8xz 2 роки тому

      @@xiurongzhang7044 你为什么隐藏了对武汉的访问?

  • @LouisZy
    @LouisZy 3 роки тому +116

    这里的韩国人一直说中国人说他们的韩服是中国的,拜托没有中国人喜欢韩服吧,也从来没人说韩服是中国的,是他们说汉服起源韩服吗不是?

    • @user-lm7fc3mt6s
      @user-lm7fc3mt6s 3 роки тому

      汉服太难看,中国白不要呢,他们自己也觉得丑才来抢汉服的吧

    • @yuaoliu9209
      @yuaoliu9209 3 роки тому +14

      @@user-lm7fc3mt6s 到底是汉服太难看还是韩服太难看咱可是要说清楚啊

    • @jiumi8814
      @jiumi8814 3 роки тому +5

      我还看到有位憨憨留言 大意就是是你们的怎么了 以前是你们的现在又不代表你们的 你们都没有把汉服传承 我们韩国拿了怎么了怎么了怎么了?你们说这face大不大

    • @yuaoliu9209
      @yuaoliu9209 3 роки тому +7

      @@jiumi8814 我其实隐隐感觉韩国人被当枪使了但是不自知...肯定不是向着他们,就是觉得这种神逻辑如雨后春笋一般突然冒出来了...就怕咱们也会被当枪使

    • @sixiaoli5192
      @sixiaoli5192 3 роки тому +3

      就是当枪使了

  • @tinach1791
    @tinach1791 3 роки тому +120

    果然大批泡菜水军出现了,跟他们讲道理都不可能听的,永远都不可能。看完他们的评论真就一句话都不想跟他们多说。可惜油管不能多次点赞。

    • @hizzxl2930
      @hizzxl2930 3 роки тому +2

      本来想跟他们探讨服装起源问题,自从我给他们回复了韩国国家历史研究院网站链接之后,所有人都不理我了..

    • @paulsanders2504
      @paulsanders2504 3 роки тому +3

      @@hizzxl2930 韩国人头埋在沙子里什么都看不见,什么都听不见了怎么会理你???这是你的问题,兄弟

    • @kishichen3279
      @kishichen3279 3 роки тому +1

      @@hizzxl2930 诶 我想看看!他们真的 我每次给了文献也不理我了...

    • @hizzxl2930
      @hizzxl2930 3 роки тому

      @@paulsanders2504 不是,本来还好好聊聊,互相举证辩论,等我贴出链接,人就消失了。

    • @user-jg8hp4xt4y
      @user-jg8hp4xt4y 3 роки тому

      @@hizzxl2930 这个起源没多大关系,看传承的历史

  • @user-kv4sy7rb7u
    @user-kv4sy7rb7u Рік тому +8

    미친 ㅋㅋ 나중에는 징기스칸도 지들 조상이라고 하겠네 뻔뻔한 종자들 ㄷㄷ

  • @user-le7gb2gn4z
    @user-le7gb2gn4z 15 днів тому +7

    한복은 전형적인 유목민족 복장으로 명나라 황제도 유행을 금지시켰는데 무슨 한푸영향이냐? ㅋㅋㅋ수백년전 사라진 복장 복원한다고 한복을 베낀 주제에 뻔뻔하네.ㅋㅋ

  • @ranren4430
    @ranren4430 3 роки тому +394

    South Koreans try to appropriate some of China's traditional culture by using their KPOP culture. This kind of cultural appropriation is unreasonable.

    • @shirokisasaki3233
      @shirokisasaki3233 3 роки тому +70

      Just because Kpop had a certain influence in the world,they are trying to glorify their history by stealing from its neighbour

    • @tuneannn3605
      @tuneannn3605 3 роки тому +30

      Tbh i'm confused Why there's "kpop"😅isn't It "pop"culture?maybe south korean will say That "The origin of world pop is kpop"😅😅

    • @miril3540
      @miril3540 3 роки тому +43

      In Kpop they steal black culture and use Chinese elements on stage, it’s insane

    • @helloworld5334
      @helloworld5334 3 роки тому +25

      They also appropriated Middle Eastern culture.What's wrong with them, they have no culture of their own?

    • @lexielau3651
      @lexielau3651 3 роки тому +4

      agree with you

  • @jewel6535
    @jewel6535 3 роки тому +213

    友友们 咱有理有据怼回去就行
    hgr刷屏和上升诋毁国家就善用举报吧
    救命我已经佛了 感觉和他们说不了人话

    • @danielfong4534
      @danielfong4534 3 роки тому +17

      韩国人他们从来就没讲过人话,但是也别太高估国人们的想法,汉服与韩服亦或是和服的区别其实蛮大的。西人的眼睛一般都是高度近视,从来就没有分清楚过韩国人、中国人和日本人。我成长在一个加东的亚裔社区,省政府服务处的工作人员有不少韩国人,直到今天我驾照上的大头贴被照得还是很像韩国人 :( 就很离谱。。。
      有一次夜里我从港口附近的办公室回家,捎上了一个扛着一麻袋龙虾的西人渔民,他一路上都在讲电话,说一个“韩国人”捎上他回城,我就™很无语。

    • @lulucai9221
      @lulucai9221 3 роки тому +1

      别给他们抬咖和热度

    • @jewel6535
      @jewel6535 3 роки тому +5

      @@lulucai9221 啊?我这里纯属说的是那些已经和hgr杠起来的甚至骂人的 我觉得还是理智一点比较好 不要落人话柄把刀子递给hgr (我也累了救命 hgr他们根本不听别人说的话自顾自狡辩混淆历史 乌鱼子)

    • @jewel6535
      @jewel6535 3 роки тому +4

      @@danielfong4534 哈哈哈就像我已经在国外待了好几年了还是没分清楚美国人欧洲人的区别一样

    • @f-o-lm2478
      @f-o-lm2478 3 роки тому +2

      哈哈哈是这样 好像疯了 就知道乱咬

  • @user-lx5yq1pr4s
    @user-lx5yq1pr4s 4 місяці тому +3

    Two countries have been geo politically located side by side for over 5000 years. It would be absurd to think that there was no trade of cultures. After all, the current borderline of China has long been functioned as a trade platform and managed by various ethnicities surrounding the region. Over the course of 5000 years of Chinese history, only 680 years(Song and Ming) has been of Han people. Most recent Qing dynasty who completed the present day Chinese borderline were the Manchurians.
    It perfectly makes sense why all the cultural heritages of surrounding nations are also found within the present day Chinese border -- it was a geopolitical platform like Alibaba.
    If you want to argue Hanbok is originated from China, then you need to first explain how the special features of Hanbok has come about. Why both men and women wear underpants in Hanbok? Why Hanbok is a multiple piece wear when all traditional Chinese wears are in one or two pieces?
    As for Kimchi, Koreans started to use pepper because they were so poor. Pepper back in the days were considered toxic. If Chinese were to argue Kimchi originated from China, they need to prove why they suddenly decided to eat toxic plants. If you want to say the pickles are from China, there is Egyptian record that proves it wrong.
    Lastly, Han is not an ethnicity. Please refer to a paper "A critical Han studies" from Harvard. Han is a more high level concept to unite various cultures and thus it doesn't really fit into the modern definition of ethnicity.
    It was pretty funny when your government claimed Genghis Khan as a Han(refer to how the Genghis Khan exhibition in France has gone haywire because of this).