What a GREAT video Suchomimus!!! I really enjoyed that one, though pity the drone didn't get wedged in the turbine. I'm Sanath, the person at the end of the clip running the fundraiser. As you can see, we've collected the 4x4 vehicle, to be converted into an armoured 4x4. It will be installed with an BMW M57 engine, because of the additional weight from ceramics and kevlar. These are urgently required at the front, along with Pick Up trucks...they can't get enough of them! Thank you to everyone that's donated. We can't do this without your support!!
DJI holds 78% off world drone market for a reason.I have for more the a year DJI mini which is only 249 grams and is amazing how such small drone has stabile video even in the wind ,and is very agile .Cant imagine bigger drones how they act ,this one was my first drone and for now only ,even is to tiny its 99% off my needs off recording
@@-108- if you was educated and actually flew drones you would know it's not actually "unbelievable" that's just an adjective he used but clearly you don't know anything about much
I too myself, was debating for past few days if it was real or fake, however I decided to take it for real as: - Lighting and colour of the jet matches with the surroundings - Drone shows close object warning when jet is meters away - People says drone would be blown away and yes, because it was, sucho pointed it out, check how quickly drone descended after the jets pass - Some say engines thrust would down the drone if not the speed of the aircraft itself but that's incorrect as engines are pointed up to keep the jet ascending during the turn ;) - You can see the camera gets shook when it passes - Condensation on the wings and fumes from the jet are hard to replicate so perfectly, biggest giveaway for me
There’s no brown in the reflection, and the jets brown exhaust seems to cling to the jet like it was attached, it even passes to the right of the drone like there was no source point on the left. It’s a lot of effort to fake all of this, but I’ve seen very convincing fakes of UFOs and orbs before
If you watch frame by frame there is no motion blur whatsoever. The speed with which the camera would have to be grabbing frames to make that a reality is quite impossible. You can check yourself if you pause the video and then use . and , keys to step through. So many people here just really want to believe.
@@Hereford1642 I'd say too many people are fixated on it, whether its true or not it does not change much, actually bold statement but i'd feel amazed if I was wrong, because such CGI would be top tier
Odd, my comment was removed. I noticed the exhaust was clinging to the airframe and then jumped to the right side of the drone as it passed. Looks more like it was placed there as a flat texture rather than being created by the plane
Between the drones auto stabilization and the camera stabilization, the view direction hardly changes, but check the altitude readings on the screen: it drops about 19 meters (~62 feet) in just two or three seconds. I'd like to see it do that by it's own power. Perhaps some actual pilot of a similar model drone can tell us if that would be possible or not.
@@JilynnFurlet The screen recording looks just like my Mavic 3 which is DJI Fly app. DJI specs say the Mavic 3 can drop 6 m/sec. Plus it uses a barometric sensor for altitude up that high and im not sure how accurate it is. Its most accurate sensor is the downward sensor but its range stops at 59feet / 18m. I just find it hard to believe its real. Although some comments say the SU-25 has directional thrusters (thrust vectoring?) to help it turn and might be why it survived. Ive flown mine in 30mph (rated for 28mph) wind and it seemed fine but you could tell it was working its butt off to stay stable! Cut my flight time drastically! If its fake its the best fake ive seen though!
To all the morons saying this is CGI, I fly RC aircraft as a hobby, and while I've dabbled briefly in drones due to my preference for traditional fixed wing planes, I can certify that even those not meant as video platforms and with no stabilization for the camera itself are extremely stable even in the turbulence and winds . The motor controllers for some drones can calculate inputs 100000x a second. Dedicated video platforms like the DJI drones have stabilization for the camera itself on top of that as well, so short of hitting one with a baseball bat, these things are always rock solid. The wake turbulence made it drop significantly though it's subtle. Had this been a fixed wing drone, it would've been knocked out of the sky from the wake turbulence alone. But don't take my word for it, there's thousands of videos right here on the tubes showing quad drones completely stable in hurricanes and very near tornadoes. It's actually why I don't enjoy flying them anymore, they feel too video-gamey to me. You still get the challenge of winds and turbulence with traditional line-of-sight fixed-wing RC planes.
How many actual, for-real, 1/1 jet fighters have flown past one of your toys that fast and that close? I'll put the over-under at less than zero. . And what the hell does "made it drop significantly though it's subtle" mean? Was it significant or was it subtle? . It doesn't matter if the calculations are made a million times a second if the power to move the drone to counteract the wake turbulence doesn't react as quickly. . The wake turbulence of an Su-25 going that fast that close is considerably more than a hit from a baseball bat and what you forgot, Sparky, is a baseball hit is ONE impact. A wake vortex lasts longer and it keeps moving as it follows the aircraft. It doesn't keep up with it, but that vortex is still moving past the drone after the jet has gone and the vortex is expanding, too. . Facts. They can demolish any nonsense as long as people are willing to open their damn eyes and see reality. There are none so blind as those who refuse to see.
@@JeffRL1956yeah no you’re right, the Ukrainians must have invested tens of thousands into contacting a top grade animation studio to fake a video of 😱😱😱a plane flying by…what a huge propoganda win
Imagine a drone operator; becoming a flying ace... a modern Ukrainian version of the Red Baron. Then we'd have Russian Snoopys to go along with the Russian Scooby Doo buses.
CGI, set video at 0.25x and you can see the layers cuts from edition. The drone records at 4k at 30 FPS, soo It is impossible to record something at that speed without motion blur.
So you’re telling me that a jet that produce big turbulences that could damage other planes behind him will not knock down a little drone that only weighs 1Kg. It’s nonsense. Also the Su-25 is way too clean it’s 100% CGI!
@@thiefsleef6752the only way it could realistically damage that aircraft would be the engine inlets. The chances of that are slim to say the least, but possible
@@trog7986 the mavic weighs 700gr, you only need to get close enough to the inlet for the drone to be sucked in, and the turbine inside is not gonna like it, it may land safely back at base but that plane is gonna remain grounded for a long while
Depends on the jet though, doesn't it? A large widebody airliner like the Boeing 777 can have more than 10x the thrust of a CAS aircraft like Su-25 or A-10.
You know full well that drone operator was ducking for his life even though he was nowhere near the drone hahaha even i was to be honest. Great little clip
This near miss (and I'm sure it has happened many more times around the world) brings up a possibility. If low flying aircraft are spotted in the area, could a swarm of drones be sent up to mimic the effect of barge balloons in WW1 and WW2? That would be a hell of a cheap way (versus MANPADS or even more significant kit) to take down an aircraft, not to mention Ukraine is able to supply a lot more units with drones than actual AA weapons. The drone itself would probably cause enough damage (especially if ingested into the turbines) to down the aircraft; put a simple hand grenade on it and it would virtually guarantee a kill, regardless of where it hit the aircraft. And quadcopters are so small that it would be virtually impossible to detect their presence with RADAR, and there would be no warning from onboard threat detection (as is the case with an IR or RADAR guided missile threat). So unless the pilot is able to visually identify something as small as a robin, maybe no bigger than a hawk, while flying at 400 knots, the pilot would be totally screwed.
The Su-25s are turning hard to starboard, so it's likely they were flying west towards the front line soon before this clip. I'm curious what the red warning that flashed up at the top of the drone screen means.
@@nehalemxtv5331 it does have gps,,, that how it knows how far from the controller it is, also the display shows a sattelite icon, and how good the reception is, it does show two out of maybe five
well, yes, gyros, it has lots of those; but the camera sensor isn't fully used to take footage, only a part of it, to minimize shaking and what not the camera uses software to float the frame of view around the sensors field of view. thats how we we from dashcams looking like earthquakes to being buttery smooth, same with handhelds. nasa technology, if i remember correctly.
This gives me an idea of using drones to mine the air space. If you know planes are around you send them up in mass formations, maybe you could even make them solar powered.
During our flight training 40+ years ago we were told if we hit a 1lb or it may have been a 1kg seagull at our cruise speed of 90kts it would have an impact force of *1.2 tonnes.* If the drone had been ingested into the jet intake the engine would have been toast and if it had been the starboard engine then it may have caused a nice yaw towards the ground. At that height AGL it could have resulted in orc jam across Ukraine. I would imagine it was well outside the seat ejection envelope at that very high bank angle and *G* forces.
Nadie presta atención el ángulo de visión del dron, está mirando por debajo de la línea horizontal, supongamos que tenía puesto la cámara en modo zoom (que daría la impresión de estar más cerca), la perspectiva del dron realmente estaría ubicado más a la izquierda y más arriba de dónde se ve el video y hubiese terminado dentro de uno de los motores del Sukhoi. Es falso.
I see a lot of trollbots claiming to have some expertise in wake turbulence from a Su-25. My guess is that all those bots are the same person; but nevertheless... I *have* had some experience with wake turbulence behind a jet fighter of similar weight and wing loading, piloting a light aircraft into the wake an F-4 Phantom. Exciting times; but the wake follows quite some time, 2 or 3 seconds, behind the heavy fighter before you get tossed about. This video cuts off before the joy ride could begin. So no, there is no reason to conclude that the lack of wake turbulence response in the video indicates any sort of falsehood in the recording.
I doubt you’ve ever been anywhere near that close whilst flying, much less to a manoeuvring aircraft like that. The further you are away, the longer it will take for wake turbulence to reach you, and I’m sure you can attest to the fact that it can completely toss around a full sized aircraft, so the idea that it wouldn’t even loop out a mavic drone even slightly is ludicrous. I’m not a bot either, I just understand that to make over 14 tonnes of aircraft corner like that you need to beat an equal amount of air into submission.
In the end of the drone´s video, you can see the smoke trails from the unguided rockets fired by the other pair of SU´s, so they were ideed doing close air support on the front lines.
Really? The pressure wave from a plane that close and that fast would almost certainly send that drone spinning out of control. No image stabilisation ever designed would correct that! I suspect that this is an optics aberration making the plane look a lot closer than it actually was.
A stinger missile weighs only 10kg. Unfortunately, sustained flight times with that kind of load is low. Engineering in time can bring that curve down, balancing lower weight against effective kill with lower weight drone borne aa systems. Fortunately, Ukraine now has access to the kind of R&D funding needed to roll their own solutions.
How do you know that this is an ukrainian drone ? When you ear the reaction they seem to be amused by the situation. The video come from a russian telegram.
Not necessarily. Some engines have ingested far more than "even one small piece of metal" and kept running. They certainly needed repairs, but they're not destroyed "straight off" in every case of FOD.
I have a mavic and a dji. Both camera's have amazing stability. You can use them and do quite alot of tricks and the camera will not even show it. And these are off the shelve drones from 2020 (cvd hobby)
@@dontsupportrats4089 DJI stated with NAZA controllers and the quad was called a Flame wheel, Mavic is just the branding name like DJI phantom, Mavic, Mavic mini etc. Mavic is a heavyish lift camera drone.
I wonder what the @CorridorCrew will say about this one. Personally I feel like the jet looks a bit too high quality, not sure what it is but maybe it's the odd lack of motion blur.
message to the Ukraine drone techies..." look into proximity explosive trigger on the drones....jets might be a stretch but helicopters and other drones would be possible??
What a GREAT video Suchomimus!!! I really enjoyed that one, though pity the drone didn't get wedged in the turbine. I'm Sanath, the person at the end of the clip running the fundraiser. As you can see, we've collected the 4x4 vehicle, to be converted into an armoured 4x4. It will be installed with an BMW M57 engine, because of the additional weight from ceramics and kevlar. These are urgently required at the front, along with Pick Up trucks...they can't get enough of them! Thank you to everyone that's donated. We can't do this without your support!!
Thank you for being awesome!
Stay safe Sanath.
This video has been debunked as fake everywhere.
Fantastic to see you, Sanath! Thank you for all you do.
@@IconoclastXshit poster slope
The stabilization on that Mavic is unbelievable.
EXACTLY. Unbelievable. lol
DJI holds 78% off world drone market for a reason.I have for more the a year DJI mini which is only 249 grams and is amazing how such small drone has stabile video even in the wind ,and is very agile .Cant imagine bigger drones how they act ,this one was my first drone and for now only ,even is to tiny its 99% off my needs off recording
@@-108- if you was educated and actually flew drones you would know it's not actually "unbelievable" that's just an adjective he used but clearly you don't know anything about much
@@raz4371 But I IS educated! I really is!
No, it's a fake video. The drone would have been obliterated by the pressure. It doesn't move at all
Did you say: Rostov on Drone? 😊
That was nearly a Frogfoot on Drone.
Yes, and this is the second time I’ve heard him say that today!😊
New name for the city
@cabanford And on other vids. Funny eh👍
@@bigblue6917 Brill. made me smile🤣
I like how even the operators are like holy shit what did I just see?
Fantastic stabilizer!!!
CGI has a tendency to be amazing in that regard. lol
@@-108- You're so delusional and isolated you've completely disconnected from reality. Educate yourself and you wouldn't be so ignorant.
@@-108- you're completely disconnected from reality 😂😂
@@raz4371 You are among the most gullible people in the world. 😂🤣
@@-108- Yea me and 7 billion other people. 💛💙
I too myself, was debating for past few days if it was real or fake, however I decided to take it for real as:
- Lighting and colour of the jet matches with the surroundings
- Drone shows close object warning when jet is meters away
- People says drone would be blown away and yes, because it was, sucho pointed it out, check how quickly drone descended after the jets pass
- Some say engines thrust would down the drone if not the speed of the aircraft itself but that's incorrect as engines are pointed up to keep the jet ascending during the turn ;)
- You can see the camera gets shook when it passes
- Condensation on the wings and fumes from the jet are hard to replicate so perfectly, biggest giveaway for me
There’s no brown in the reflection, and the jets brown exhaust seems to cling to the jet like it was attached, it even passes to the right of the drone like there was no source point on the left. It’s a lot of effort to fake all of this, but I’ve seen very convincing fakes of UFOs and orbs before
The Su-25 doesn't have thrust vectoring. The exhaust direction doesn't change relative to the engine alignment.
If you watch frame by frame there is no motion blur whatsoever. The speed with which the camera would have to be grabbing frames to make that a reality is quite impossible. You can check yourself if you pause the video and then use . and , keys to step through.
So many people here just really want to believe.
@@Hereford1642 I'd say too many people are fixated on it, whether its true or not it does not change much, actually bold statement but i'd feel amazed if I was wrong, because such CGI would be top tier
Odd, my comment was removed. I noticed the exhaust was clinging to the airframe and then jumped to the right side of the drone as it passed. Looks more like it was placed there as a flat texture rather than being created by the plane
Drone Operator: 😱
SU operators 💩
And the pilot 😬
You can even see them just sit there and look around slowly as well
@@ruger8412 more like: did I see that right!?😂
In the midwest USA we refer to this as “ope gonna sneak right past ya!”
😂
Your geolocation is MAGIC! 😊
Cheers. This wasn't done by me. Blinzka on twitter
Seems only a matter of time until someone figures out how to modify the dji to make them fighter hunters
Yes. Skynet is waiting, after all.
Caution: wake turbulance!
...or not. Weird how the drone wasn't affected at all. I mean, c'mon, that jet creates a hell of a wake when it goes by.
@@NorthernChev it got dropped by a lot
@@NotFound-sm9rg is was already dropping, but hey this one is tricky ither way
@@NorthernChev it dropped around 60 feet though you just couldn't tell
That's a good ad for DJI drones. The stabilization in incredible.
Incredible as in fake.
How that drone remain stable in flight and not be pushed by the turbulence baffles me. Amazing video thanks for the updates.
It's because it's comletely fake
thats because the drone camera has its own resolution and lenses and that would make the plane look closer than it actually was
Between the drones auto stabilization and the camera stabilization, the view direction hardly changes, but check the altitude readings on the screen: it drops about 19 meters (~62 feet) in just two or three seconds. I'd like to see it do that by it's own power.
Perhaps some actual pilot of a similar model drone can tell us if that would be possible or not.
@@JilynnFurlet The screen recording looks just like my Mavic 3 which is DJI Fly app. DJI specs say the Mavic 3 can drop 6 m/sec. Plus it uses a barometric sensor for altitude up that high and im not sure how accurate it is. Its most accurate sensor is the downward sensor but its range stops at 59feet / 18m.
I just find it hard to believe its real. Although some comments say the SU-25 has directional thrusters (thrust vectoring?) to help it turn and might be why it survived. Ive flown mine in 30mph (rated for 28mph) wind and it seemed fine but you could tell it was working its butt off to stay stable! Cut my flight time drastically!
If its fake its the best fake ive seen though!
@@JilynnFurletI'm only rated on Matrice 600 but I guess it could drop 20m in three seconds (it's much heavier though).
An aerial mine could be made to work like this.
Alternative title: “Russian Su-25 almost destroyed by a Ukrainian Mavic drone!”
Seeing how close the drone was to the Su-25s air intake that would have been highly likely.
NAFO title
That's how Ukrainians are ''winning' all the time .
🤡
@@TikhonT.Cope
Total BS… the jet wash would have trashed that drone…
The SU-25 is a flying tank, I imagine the pilot wouldn't have felt much if it collided.
To all the morons saying this is CGI, I fly RC aircraft as a hobby, and while I've dabbled briefly in drones due to my preference for traditional fixed wing planes, I can certify that even those not meant as video platforms and with no stabilization for the camera itself are extremely stable even in the turbulence and winds . The motor controllers for some drones can calculate inputs 100000x a second. Dedicated video platforms like the DJI drones have stabilization for the camera itself on top of that as well, so short of hitting one with a baseball bat, these things are always rock solid. The wake turbulence made it drop significantly though it's subtle. Had this been a fixed wing drone, it would've been knocked out of the sky from the wake turbulence alone. But don't take my word for it, there's thousands of videos right here on the tubes showing quad drones completely stable in hurricanes and very near tornadoes. It's actually why I don't enjoy flying them anymore, they feel too video-gamey to me. You still get the challenge of winds and turbulence with traditional line-of-sight fixed-wing RC planes.
You won't teach the trolls much. They get paid to read their scripts. No matter how many facts you give them.
How many actual, for-real, 1/1 jet fighters have flown past one of your toys that fast and that close? I'll put the over-under at less than zero.
.
And what the hell does "made it drop significantly though it's subtle" mean? Was it significant or was it subtle?
.
It doesn't matter if the calculations are made a million times a second if the power to move the drone to counteract the wake turbulence doesn't react as quickly.
.
The wake turbulence of an Su-25 going that fast that close is considerably more than a hit from a baseball bat and what you forgot, Sparky, is a baseball hit is ONE impact. A wake vortex lasts longer and it keeps moving as it follows the aircraft. It doesn't keep up with it, but that vortex is still moving past the drone after the jet has gone and the vortex is expanding, too.
.
Facts. They can demolish any nonsense as long as people are willing to open their damn eyes and see reality. There are none so blind as those who refuse to see.
@@JeffRL1956yeah no you’re right, the Ukrainians must have invested tens of thousands into contacting a top grade animation studio to fake a video of 😱😱😱a plane flying by…what a huge propoganda win
@@JeffRL1956Refuse to see what? Do you actually think this is CGI?
@@cadennorris960 Is CGI
Now there's a sad word.
ALMOST
Imagine a drone operator; becoming a flying ace... a modern Ukrainian version of the Red Baron. Then we'd have Russian Snoopys to go along with the Russian Scooby Doo buses.
Ukrainians already did that. Google Ghost of Kiev. As fake as this videos
Literally a battlefield 4 moment.
And the Mavic did not even blink😮
A great ad for Mavic
@@andrewgray5220 I am not an expert, but basic physics from primary school tells me that anything so close to that flyby will be blown away..
@@gimigimi1299 It was blown away... it dropped 19 metres very quickly.
Rostov-On-Drone 😀
Nice slip up there.
Thanks to all the people who are supporting this amazing fundraiser.
60 billion dollars... hmm makes ya wonder where that money is going
@@jlo7770 me too.
@@jlo7770 they make russians go 2 meters under ground
@@jlo7770 your money goes into your pocket if you producing and working, we dont shooting dollars we shooting ammo its easy
@@dmytrobibik1366 lmfao "you're shooting" millions of dollars of my tax money
Permission for Fly By Tower....
Do you mean the Su-25 or the drone.
@@bigblue6917 probably the Su25, drone was stationary doing it's own thing..
Negative. The pattern is full.
@@PalisadeFence ☕😯
CGI, set video at 0.25x and you can see the layers cuts from edition.
The drone records at 4k at 30 FPS, soo It is impossible to record something at that speed without motion blur.
It was screen recording, only the final product is 4k 30fps
@@3zxcomas Nope, is the info about settings recording from the drone.
Cue the ignorant trolls' comments about the oh-so-skilled Su pilot. Eyeroll.
some dude is trying to claim its CGI 🤣😂
It 100% is
@@RedFail1-1 😂😂🤡
@@raz4371there’s trolls who claim most footage of anything involving Russian incompetence or Ukrainian success is either AI of CGI 😂
I mean, flying at that altitude must be pretty hard tbh. That's extremely low to the ground
And Sanath has thawed up again, gratz, I was worried after we saw in a snowstorm.
Yes )) but I am a bit sick )) all bunged up ))
The Mavic seems like a stable platform.
So you’re telling me that a jet that produce big turbulences that could damage other planes behind him will not knock down a little drone that only weighs 1Kg. It’s nonsense. Also the Su-25 is way too clean it’s 100% CGI!
I replayed the clip several times, idk why, but something didn't feel right..
Oh if the operator just moved the drone a bit more to the left and a bit up.
SU-25 would still be okay, its been proven to be a beafy plane
@@thiefsleef6752the only way it could realistically damage that aircraft would be the engine inlets. The chances of that are slim to say the least, but possible
@@thiefsleef6752 it’s still would receive some minor damage though
@@trog7986 the mavic weighs 700gr, you only need to get close enough to the inlet for the drone to be sucked in, and the turbine inside is not gonna like it, it may land safely back at base but that plane is gonna remain grounded for a long while
Exhaust and turbulence from a jet can take out a small airplane.
Just ask Goose.
Depends on the jet though, doesn't it? A large widebody airliner like the Boeing 777 can have more than 10x the thrust of a CAS aircraft like Su-25 or A-10.
Wow!!! I bet the pilot was thinking “WTF was that???”.
...bet the pilot didn't even see it at 800 MPH.
Pilot was very likely looking half ahead, half down to the right and never saw it.
@@soupfork2105 Yeah, this was a complete coincidence. Pilot never saw it. In a turn like that you're looking up and to the right. Not under you.
Funny thing is that the pilot has by now seen the video and had to make a quick change of underwear.......
@@vegas1a Pity it wasn't the underside of his parachute.
Shame on Russia
for what? not supporting western coups?
@@Spazzfrom.1989 name checks out.
hey mate. where do you live? good people who hate traitors want to know.
@@Spazzfrom.1989 You probs live in west XD
@@Spazzfrom.1989 'nough talking boy... it started...!
@@dawggonevidz9140 Threats to someone for having a different opinion than yours, how very NAFO like
You know full well that drone operator was ducking for his life even though he was nowhere near the drone hahaha even i was to be honest. Great little clip
Wow
This near miss (and I'm sure it has happened many more times around the world) brings up a possibility. If low flying aircraft are spotted in the area, could a swarm of drones be sent up to mimic the effect of barge balloons in WW1 and WW2? That would be a hell of a cheap way (versus MANPADS or even more significant kit) to take down an aircraft, not to mention Ukraine is able to supply a lot more units with drones than actual AA weapons. The drone itself would probably cause enough damage (especially if ingested into the turbines) to down the aircraft; put a simple hand grenade on it and it would virtually guarantee a kill, regardless of where it hit the aircraft. And quadcopters are so small that it would be virtually impossible to detect their presence with RADAR, and there would be no warning from onboard threat detection (as is the case with an IR or RADAR guided missile threat). So unless the pilot is able to visually identify something as small as a robin, maybe no bigger than a hawk, while flying at 400 knots, the pilot would be totally screwed.
I don't know. It would have obliterated the drone for sure. But SU-25 ... that thing is built like a tank to withstands couple MANPAD hits.
Thank you good sir
If Maverick was flying this Mavic, there never would have been a flat spin and Goose never would have died.
The camera was also zoomed in a tiny bit so it probably wasn't that close but close enough to do some turbulence but very little
0:13 Oh yeah, rewatching I can see the other 2 here ✅
I love the way he takes a pause before Ukrainian place names, then pronounces it in a wool accent.
The Su-25s are turning hard to starboard, so it's likely they were flying west towards the front line soon before this clip. I'm curious what the red warning that flashed up at the top of the drone screen means.
That's the Ooooh Shiiiit warning light.
"Navigation systems something something"
Navigation system failure. There is no GPS on those drones for safety reasons
That was the Mavic warning about an object near by. It's used for collision avoidance.
@@nehalemxtv5331 it does have gps,,, that how it knows how far from the controller it is, also the display shows a sattelite icon, and how good the reception is, it does show two out of maybe five
well, yes, gyros, it has lots of those; but the camera sensor isn't fully used to take footage, only a part of it, to minimize shaking and what not the camera uses software to float the frame of view around the sensors field of view. thats how we we from dashcams looking like earthquakes to being buttery smooth, same with handhelds. nasa technology, if i remember correctly.
💙💛💙💛💙
Ukraine is losing grandma
This gives me an idea of using drones to mine the air space. If you know planes are around you send them up in mass formations, maybe you could even make them solar powered.
What??? The ruzzian Su25 missed in it's attempt to intercept a Mavic drone?
During our flight training 40+ years ago we were told if we hit a 1lb or it may have been a 1kg seagull at our cruise speed of 90kts it would have an impact force of *1.2 tonnes.* If the drone had been ingested into the jet intake the engine would have been toast and if it had been the starboard engine then it may have caused a nice yaw towards the ground. At that height AGL it could have resulted in orc jam across Ukraine. I would imagine it was well outside the seat ejection envelope at that very high bank angle and *G* forces.
You can continue to imagine. That's all you can do, since the SU 25 is fitted zvesda k-36, a zero-zero ejection seat.
We're one step away from introducing barrage drones.
The Mavic drone is so stable!!
I guess that pilot gets court marshalled for failing to successfully intercept the mavic..
I guess the pilot still doesn't know that he even flew past a drone.
Yup...Sukhoi engines wouldn't blow it and launch it to space LoL
No, the camera of the drone was in zoom mode, it may still 50-60m from the Su25. Otherwise for such a close passing by, the drone would be stumbled.
Nadie presta atención el ángulo de visión del dron, está mirando por debajo de la línea horizontal, supongamos que tenía puesto la cámara en modo zoom (que daría la impresión de estar más cerca), la perspectiva del dron realmente estaría ubicado más a la izquierda y más arriba de dónde se ve el video y hubiese terminado dentro de uno de los motores del Sukhoi.
Es falso.
Thats nuts.
Rostov on Don, not Rostov on Drone. Cute.
Rostov-on-Don Trump
Cool footage!
I see a lot of trollbots claiming to have some expertise in wake turbulence from a Su-25. My guess is that all those bots are the same person; but nevertheless...
I *have* had some experience with wake turbulence behind a jet fighter of similar weight and wing loading, piloting a light aircraft into the wake an F-4 Phantom. Exciting times; but the wake follows quite some time, 2 or 3 seconds, behind the heavy fighter before you get tossed about. This video cuts off before the joy ride could begin.
So no, there is no reason to conclude that the lack of wake turbulence response in the video indicates any sort of falsehood in the recording.
I doubt you’ve ever been anywhere near that close whilst flying, much less to a manoeuvring aircraft like that. The further you are away, the longer it will take for wake turbulence to reach you, and I’m sure you can attest to the fact that it can completely toss around a full sized aircraft, so the idea that it wouldn’t even loop out a mavic drone even slightly is ludicrous.
I’m not a bot either, I just understand that to make over 14 tonnes of aircraft corner like that you need to beat an equal amount of air into submission.
some say it was Thrust Vectoring that probably saved it.
@@WW5RM On an SU25?!
@@mcgherkinstudios someone said that. im trying to find it.
But i now see its an old aircraft so that doesnt add up.
@@mcgherkinstudios i think they had it confused w the SU-35
👍🇺🇦🇺🇦👍
So useful to track flight paths..
In the end of the drone´s video, you can see the smoke trails from the unguided rockets fired by the other pair of SU´s, so they were ideed doing close air support on the front lines.
It looks so close but the plane missed by more than 7 feet.
Really? The pressure wave from a plane that close and that fast would almost certainly send that drone spinning out of control.
No image stabilisation ever designed would correct that! I suspect that this is an optics aberration making the plane look a lot closer than it actually was.
Did he say “Rostov on Drone”? 😂
There was even a health bar as he passed through.
The pressure difference would snap the plastic in tiny pieces
Almost scored an air-to-air with that drone.
Mavic?
Maverick!
Looks like in a movie :D
was that the jets health bar that popped up at the top?🤣🤣i play too many video games
i believe it was from the 'jet wash' mate
This and the russian pilot playing battlefield in real life are like tho most crazy videos ive seen yet!
A stinger missile weighs only 10kg. Unfortunately, sustained flight times with that kind of load is low. Engineering in time can bring that curve down, balancing lower weight against effective kill with lower weight drone borne aa systems. Fortunately, Ukraine now has access to the kind of R&D funding needed to roll their own solutions.
And again, reality looks like video game footage. I’m losing track of how many times this has happened since Feb ‘22.
One of those fishing magnets would be interesting attached to a drone.
Wow that was nuts
How do you know that this is an ukrainian drone ? When you ear the reaction they seem to be amused by the situation. The video come from a russian telegram.
Plus the on-screen language is Russian
If that was a FPV drone I would’ve flinched so hard lmao.
Pants: shit
if the drone was a foot higher, that could have been the most cost effective SU-25 kill to date?
If ingested into the engine, even one small piece of metal will destroy the turbine straight off..
Not necessarily. Some engines have ingested far more than "even one small piece of metal" and kept running. They certainly needed repairs, but they're not destroyed "straight off" in every case of FOD.
Why do you look like the typical NAFO soldier? 😂
Its not a partner, its a wingman.
Badass fighter jets and pilots
I have a mavic and a dji. Both camera's have amazing stability. You can use them and do quite alot of tricks and the camera will not even show it. And these are off the shelve drones from 2020 (cvd hobby)
A Mavic is a DJI. FYI
@@441rider One is black and says mavic on it the other white and says dji. I'm guessing one is a brand name or model name the other manufacturer name?
@@dontsupportrats4089 DJI stated with NAZA controllers and the quad was called a Flame wheel, Mavic is just the branding name like DJI phantom, Mavic, Mavic mini etc. Mavic is a heavyish lift camera drone.
would be some damage, but would probably survive judging based on past happenings.
Why my brain says; it's a CGI brother, bro it's not a CGI!!
He was no near that craft ,the camera zoomed ,if it was that drone would have been sent flying away,nice video noneless
Flying at 50 meters above ground on a real battlefield… Russian are crazies as hell, real fighters.
@ 1:34 "Rostov on Drone" 😊
Now that's a new form of AA
Holy shit what a video
That's wild!
That looks like a constructed video, the quality it too high as the plane gets close, plus no turbulence.
What do you suppose caused the drone to suddenly drop 19 metres when the plane went by?
Frogfoots always out-trump the Mavic. 💛⚓💙
If real, then this is one for the history book for sure
There's a reason why I have dji camera drones...
SU25 are quite tough though, airframe is partly titanium I think.
It's similar to an A10 and made to take a few hits, even from manpads. Most CAS aircraft are made like this.
Looks like it was armed with S-8 rocket pods and KMGU subminitions dispensers.
This could end horrible for the SU. I wonder if the Pilot even notice the danger ?!?
I wonder what the @CorridorCrew will say about this one. Personally I feel like the jet looks a bit too high quality, not sure what it is but maybe it's the odd lack of motion blur.
message to the Ukraine drone techies..." look into proximity explosive trigger on the drones....jets might be a stretch but helicopters and other drones would be possible??