Su-25 Aircraft Safely Lands After Being HIT by Ukrainian MANPADS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 бер 2022
  • Russian Sukhoi Su-25 aircraft safely lands after being hit by Ukrainian MANPADS - The Russian Ministry of Defence released footage early on March 14, 2022, demonstrating once again how tough the Sukhoi Su-25 Frogfoot can be. The clip illustrates the plane taxiing with considerable damage to the rear right hand side of the fuselage allegedly caused by a MANPADS or Man Portable Air Defence System.
    In regard to the case, it can be seen that the incident demonstrates two crucial aspects one is the threat posed by MANPADS operated by the Ukrainian forces to all Russian aircraft operating at medium and low altitudes, and the second one is the damage tolerance of the Su-25.
    All content on Military TV is presented for educational purposes.
    Subscribe Now :
    / @military-tv
    / militarytv.channel
    defense-tv.com/
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 264

  • @subitnath8751
    @subitnath8751 2 роки тому +289

    Really a flying tank

    • @KINGKongKaliKongs
      @KINGKongKaliKongs 2 роки тому

      More like drones fire

    • @dominien6487
      @dominien6487 2 роки тому +2

      Not really

    • @e.sstudios1015
      @e.sstudios1015 2 роки тому +37

      @@dominien6487 It's Highly armored though.

    • @dominien6487
      @dominien6487 2 роки тому +3

      @@e.sstudios1015 not as much as you would think, its mainly a redundant aircraft with a small area around the pilot armored

    • @drunklorry3406
      @drunklorry3406 2 роки тому +27

      @@dominien6487 no. The engines are armoured as well and also there was some old photage of test shooting this aircraft with a cannon and on that photage you could see it withstanding its shots, also some system that stops leaks within ~30 secs. It's a heavily armoured aircraft designed to be extremely survivable

  • @Thunderbolt_1000_Siren
    @Thunderbolt_1000_Siren 2 роки тому +71

    It's basically a jet version of the IL-2

    • @MrTungy
      @MrTungy Рік тому +2

      Yep

    • @cubanspy1231
      @cubanspy1231 2 місяці тому

      the il-40 looks more like the il-2 doe

  • @detailingdiaries6562
    @detailingdiaries6562 2 роки тому +192

    Impressive that it was able to make it back safely, but I assume that it will be out of the fight for a while.

    • @Donkeymaster9000
      @Donkeymaster9000 2 роки тому +15

      Maybe a month or 4, depending how far the shrapnel is

    • @Combatwombat-sn7ng
      @Combatwombat-sn7ng 2 роки тому +3

      agreed, it won't be involved in this conflict any more so it's as good as shot down for the Ukrainians

    • @ninny65
      @ninny65 2 роки тому +22

      Don't worry, a few thousand standing by

    • @eliasziad7864
      @eliasziad7864 2 роки тому +7

      They have a lot

    • @detailingdiaries6562
      @detailingdiaries6562 2 роки тому +1

      @@eliasziad7864 I had no idea they had so many!

  • @bilic8094
    @bilic8094 2 роки тому +38

    Wow that's a durable plane.

  • @RandomInside
    @RandomInside 2 роки тому +85

    S25 is a tank with flying wings , build from zero to take a hit or 2

    • @elitewavez4768
      @elitewavez4768 Рік тому

      No the nissle exploded near it it would be a different story if it was a direct hit

    • @diesirae8954
      @diesirae8954 Рік тому +1

      @@elitewavez4768 That's how missiles work smartass, they have a proximity fuse to explose next to the target. The missile is virtually incapable of scoring a direct hit on a target because once it gets close enough it explodes.

    • @SimplyHero
      @SimplyHero Рік тому +6

      @@elitewavez4768 all missiles are ment to expldoe near, not direct

    • @znerodarp5392
      @znerodarp5392 Рік тому +5

      @@elitewavez4768 the missiles that your saying is anti nuke is missiles that instead blowing when near to the nuke, it rams it, but no anti Air missiles have been built to ram planes, because that's thats less effective, the missiles today are like the flak cannon proximity fuse shell from ww2 they explode when near to a plane

    • @WilliamStewart1
      @WilliamStewart1 11 місяців тому +2

      ​@elite wavez You realize anti air missles aren't designed to make contact with a plane right? They're supposed to explode just before contact and throwing a lot of shrapnel at the plane.

  • @jaiprakash17k
    @jaiprakash17k 2 роки тому +38

    Wow even 😳 engine completely damaged impressive.

  • @annoymouse890
    @annoymouse890 Рік тому +12

    Ukrainian forces: "it's time to go."
    Frogfoot: "maybe another day."

  • @genxmurse7019
    @genxmurse7019 2 роки тому +99

    Another feature that was not mentioned here, is that the SU25 has the ability to go supersonic. The A10 cannot go that fast.

    • @Repented008
      @Repented008 2 роки тому +14

      True. Then again, the Warthog was designed around an armor penetrating gun. I don't think they're really that similar except for their attack roles.

    • @TheTuscanyGuy515
      @TheTuscanyGuy515 Рік тому +15

      no Su25 it's a subsonic plane not supersonic

    • @Economics365
      @Economics365 Рік тому

      Really

    • @MrTungy
      @MrTungy Рік тому +8

      SU-25 cant go super sonic with it going 560mph as Super sonic or "Mach" is over 720mph+ but yes A-10 is slower than SU-25

    • @rafaelgomez1200
      @rafaelgomez1200 Рік тому +1

      It cant even if it did it would be with no load

  • @nashdapistolshrimp8641
    @nashdapistolshrimp8641 2 роки тому +12

    An absolute beast. Packs a massive punch too. 🔥🔥

  • @AchwaqKhalid
    @AchwaqKhalid 2 роки тому +80

    Something that any "Modern and advanced" aircraft can't do

    • @stc2828
      @stc2828 2 роки тому +15

      Maybe "modern" aircraft won't get hit in the first place.

    • @AchwaqKhalid
      @AchwaqKhalid 2 роки тому +6

      Name one that can fly beyond hypersonic speed...

    • @RasPutintheGreat
      @RasPutintheGreat 2 роки тому +1

      @@stc2828 like what? Rain?

    • @dominien6487
      @dominien6487 2 роки тому +6

      @@AchwaqKhalid modern aircraft usually cant fly that fast because they dont need to and its more efficient to fly slower, this also extends their range and allows for greater efficiency and performance in the tasks they perform
      Just because modern aircraft may not be as resilient (which is arguable honestly) or as fast, doesnt make them worse, they are not made to do the same things that older cold war era stuff was made to do, they are made to fill entirely new roles that largely were not present at the time that these older aircraft were being designed

    • @heritageimaging7768
      @heritageimaging7768 2 роки тому +2

      I wonder if the F-35 will be taken down by not a golden BB, but some duck birdshot. You know, a pellet enters the engine and the sensors shut down the computers, and auto-eject the pilot. Or heaven forbid a shot scratches the stealth coating and the plane has to be rotated back to the states for depo maintenance and it's claimed as a class A incident.

  • @j.johnson3520
    @j.johnson3520 2 роки тому +70

    Nice to see an oldie's still got it 😉
    She's a tough old bird. The Ukrainian Air Force also has them.

    • @Knight7562
      @Knight7562 2 роки тому +6

      the Russians destroyed them all mostly on the ground some fought the Russian but most destroyed on the ground

    • @hecunotmakingalogisquad5785
      @hecunotmakingalogisquad5785 2 роки тому +27

      there all destroyed

    • @VovaSidorOff
      @VovaSidorOff 2 роки тому +35

      Had them, not has.

    • @j.johnson3520
      @j.johnson3520 2 роки тому

      @@VovaSidorOff 😒

    • @wharris7594
      @wharris7594 2 роки тому +4

      @@VovaSidorOff
      да, нё сичас 😂😂😂😂
      всё разбить 💪

  • @jagdpanther2224
    @jagdpanther2224 2 роки тому +10

    It happened occasionally in Afghanistan war of 1980s, there was a firewall between the engines to prevent the other engine got a fire!

    • @anydaynow01
      @anydaynow01 9 місяців тому

      I didn't know there was a firewall, that explains a lot of how the other engine still had thrust to get back.

  • @Aspenglow_
    @Aspenglow_ 6 місяців тому +4

    So, seems Su25 in Warthunder is tough as IRL.

  • @faqihaqil9044
    @faqihaqil9044 2 роки тому +6

    that's what we call a bison instead of frog

  • @accessdenied5998
    @accessdenied5998 11 місяців тому +4

    Its 30 sec repair don't worry

  • @deetwodcs4683
    @deetwodcs4683 2 роки тому +16

    Tough cold war attack aircraft. I love it in DCS (simulator). If you're playing a cold war scenario this thing is pretty neat eventhough it has WW2 like avionics...

    • @darugdawg2453
      @darugdawg2453 Рік тому

      f no. it flies like a tub and the tv looks like a fking tv tf

    • @patriktoth6258
      @patriktoth6258 8 місяців тому

      Thankfully the Su25 have modernized versions. Even some can be armed with radar pods and long range AAM's

  • @RuiPlaneSpotter
    @RuiPlaneSpotter 2 роки тому +3

    Nice!

  • @papyfun5097
    @papyfun5097 Рік тому +2

    bro the fact that the voiceover says "suck-hoi SU25" and "ahh 10" lmao

  • @issrah7620
    @issrah7620 Рік тому +4

    This frogfoot IS a tank still better Than a lot of 21st century aircraft

  • @AM-zk7pj
    @AM-zk7pj Рік тому +4

    I has more combat record than a10 .. the a10 only flew in countries without any air defence..

    • @anydaynow01
      @anydaynow01 9 місяців тому

      DCASA and AH are only supposed to come in once the stealth fighter/bombers have neutralized the air defenses. The DCASA are designed to take small arms fire and manpads and get the pilot back to the forward base so they can climb into another aircraft for another loitering rotation to support the battle.

  • @doktoronyx6619
    @doktoronyx6619 2 роки тому +4

    In this type of airplanes pilots wear even double underpants for safety reasons.

  • @darkprofile
    @darkprofile 2 роки тому +8

    Disqualify is succesfull enough. After that su25 was shot. It had to return and make emergency landing and it has serious body damage. it needs a month to be repaired. And other jets in the area escapes. it is a victory for the one who used the manpad.

    • @adomenaltas8693
      @adomenaltas8693 2 роки тому

      Yea but they didn't know it's successful or not because that plan didn't crashed after the attack

    • @adomenaltas8693
      @adomenaltas8693 2 роки тому

      Same thing with A10

    • @KondorDCS
      @KondorDCS 2 роки тому +7

      Not really, dark, cz if the pilot surived uninjured, then he can just get a new plane and be back to bombing targets the next day. So now, it's not a victory for the manpads user, this is a victory for the pilot.

    • @sull5307
      @sull5307 2 роки тому +2

      it will probably be used for parts

    • @darkprofile
      @darkprofile 2 роки тому +2

      @@KondorDCS Battle and War different words. It doesnt matter who will win the war at the end. There was a battle between pilot and manpad. And manpad was victorious because pilot couldnt success on his mission and manpad was succesful.
      Tomorrow will be new battle. Pilot will be more experienced and more cautious. And manpad man will create a new ambush and new tactics.
      If any plane goes to base without completing his mission it is an unsuccesful pilot.
      Even if the pilot has been dead and plane was crashed a new pilot and new plane would fly there tomorrow. So manpad was victories untill next battle.

  • @damirsirotic052
    @damirsirotic052 2 роки тому +3

    Respect.

  • @user-xc5ue3xj8f
    @user-xc5ue3xj8f 2 роки тому +18

    Да су-25 в очередной раз подтвердил что он самый не уязвимый и живучий штурмовик на планете земля, да и как просто самолёт он опять же самый живучий, не знаю других таких крепышей.

    • @itsnotalwaysblackandwhite8624
      @itsnotalwaysblackandwhite8624 2 роки тому +4

      Strong men. I’d like to nominate the Ukraine 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 people.

    • @ZipTrunk
      @ZipTrunk 2 роки тому

      Try to pull your head our of your a.. and meet the real world - if you dare see the light!

    • @furrynuts1883
      @furrynuts1883 2 роки тому

      It was more likely a badly targeted attack than a lucky plane.

    • @ddarkon1223
      @ddarkon1223 Рік тому

      @@itsnotalwaysblackandwhite8624 I'd say the Gurkhas are tougher
      Or the Finns
      Maybe even the Palestinians
      Or indians those guys are good

  • @LondonSteveLee
    @LondonSteveLee 2 роки тому +6

    I'd like to see an SU-25 survive a Starstreak - the sheer kinetic energy these Mach 3+ weapons carry tears anything they hit to pieces.

    • @stateservant
      @stateservant Рік тому +5

      Yeah, i think the SU 25 will not survive that. Starstreak missile has solid penetrator since it is a KE-Missile, it will rip off the engine and fuselage. But... that happens only IF the starstreak hits, which will be harder than most missiles because it requires direct hit, not just proximity explosion like most AA missiles are.
      This plane survived because MANPADS are weak. But you dont need starstreak, had it been an ADATS missile, we won't have this news.

    • @LondonSteveLee
      @LondonSteveLee Рік тому +2

      @@stateservant Yep, Starstreak is not the easiest weapon to aim - that's why the British are deploying more non-MANPAD RADAR-guided variants. But if one does hit you - you're in trouble! It's great against many targets - if you can guess where the engine on a boat is - it'll punch through most hulls and destroy the block. We should be creating a "marinised" version with RADAR guidance for marine point-defence.

  • @censortube7160
    @censortube7160 2 роки тому +31

    Keeping liberating Ukraine from the American backed coup d'etat in Feburary 2014 and the resulting 8 years of war crimes and violations of the Minsk agreement and deaths of over 14,000+ Russian speaking Ukrainians in the Donbass region from war crimes and violations of the Minsk agreement...
    Thank you Russia for standing up for innocent civilians in the Donbass...✌❤

  • @nightman7263
    @nightman7263 Рік тому

    You're making a small mistake: the Su-25 is called "Grach" by NATO and the Su-25T is called "Frogfoot".
    And we can see the two types in the video.

  • @Reddoguk
    @Reddoguk 2 місяці тому

    If that was the British starstreak that Frog would be dead.

  • @giorgikibabidze
    @giorgikibabidze Рік тому

    For first time Su 25 in ussr was built in Tbilisi Georgia.
    31 aviation factory and many su 25 in russias and ukraine arsenal was made in georgia

  • @jeanettewest
    @jeanettewest 2 роки тому

    That's not going to buff out. Engine change, major airframe repair.

  • @SSFFRRJJ
    @SSFFRRJJ 9 місяців тому

    Bro survived

  • @michaelcerda5514
    @michaelcerda5514 Рік тому +1

    A plane that can't be flown again.

  • @brambo129
    @brambo129 2 роки тому +1

    The script is read in a way that distracts. It seems as if the narrator is not familiar with the subject(s).

  • @MovieSpottingBerlin
    @MovieSpottingBerlin Рік тому

    Sieht interessant aus!

  • @ARI-ks1vj
    @ARI-ks1vj Рік тому +1

    “a ten” warthog 😭😭😭

  • @rajatdani619
    @rajatdani619 2 роки тому +3

    Everyday I hear "Hello Everyone welcome to military tv..."
    But today I feel kinda Naked.🥺

  • @Economics365
    @Economics365 Рік тому +1

    Strong armor

  • @MrTryAnotherOne
    @MrTryAnotherOne 2 роки тому +3

    Inspired by Northrop's YA-9A ground attack aircraft.

  • @KisHeszusz
    @KisHeszusz 2 роки тому +3

    I only seen an aircraft who damaged and it is on the ground.
    Where I check the aunthencitiy? More photos or a video where I can see it is flew. Independen certification.

    • @DG-gm3yz
      @DG-gm3yz 2 роки тому +1

      These actions took place in a real battle. Do you seriously think that he was greeted with cameras? The Russian military does not use phones or cameras. Therefore, you cannot see footage of real battles from Russian soldiers.

    • @KisHeszusz
      @KisHeszusz 2 роки тому

      @@DG-gm3yz The problem is that in addition to the physical war, there is also a war of disinformation and it is advisable to double check the news.
      You have to be a little skeptical when you see a scattered plane on the ground that they want to set up as an all-surviving device.

  • @mynamesjudge
    @mynamesjudge 11 місяців тому

    So weird that a military channel would call the A-10 an ahten or whatever that lady was saying. Is this AI narration?

  • @lusqwerty
    @lusqwerty 2 роки тому +1

    This aircraft like the A10 and the attack helicopters are designed specifically for this job. Many have questioned why the russians did not deploy their air superiority fighter. First of all Ukraine does not have any significant airforce. Look at right now most of low flying russian aircrafts were destroyed by manpads. The russians are not dumb repeating the lessons of Afghanistan where most of their frontline fighters and helicopeters were destroyed not by another multi million dollar F16 OR Eurofighter but a cheap manpad called stinger missiles that US provided to the Taliban. These ground support aircraft have armor in its belly means they can add thick skin. Air superiority fighters have very thin skin. Especially those new stealth have composite skins unlike older fighters have metallic skin. We all know that carbon fibre can be hard to repair.

  • @rendelbariuan7583
    @rendelbariuan7583 Рік тому +1

    Wonder what its Replacement 😎

  • @jedslather
    @jedslather Рік тому

    Fast and low is your savior and to be in a SU25

  • @heritageimaging7768
    @heritageimaging7768 2 роки тому +10

    Impressive but doesn't come close to the A-10s and the one wing F-15. It saved the pilots life though.

    • @off_grid_javelin
      @off_grid_javelin 2 роки тому +17

      Considering unit cost of warthog and f15 ? it's massively impressive feat.

    • @bryjb10
      @bryjb10 2 роки тому

      @@off_grid_javelin Yeah but the F-15 and the A-10 don’t get shot down like SU 25 so the price tags are irrelevant.

    • @off_grid_javelin
      @off_grid_javelin 2 роки тому

      @@bryjb10 Nope they can be shot down, they can only flex muscles at 3rd world countries like Iran or Iraq, Come near south east asia, or Russia, they'll get the taste of sam missiles or Mig 21 and Su 30 interceptors. Remember Cope India friendly exercises ? where Su 30s decimated F15s, even Mig 21s were taking out F15s.

    • @rogue__agent5884
      @rogue__agent5884 2 роки тому +9

      @@bryjb10 a-10 and f-15 did shot down
      A-10 a lot

    • @MrTungy
      @MrTungy Рік тому +3

      Yeah and then a Soviet Bi-Plane took down an American Jet in Korea.

  • @yzyz7779
    @yzyz7779 2 роки тому

    Yeah 2 part is better then 1

  • @scothf1273
    @scothf1273 11 місяців тому

    Why doesnt it use modern guided munition?

    • @anydaynow01
      @anydaynow01 9 місяців тому +2

      Expense mostly, rocket pods get the job done quite well for a fraction of the cost. I know I wouldn't want to be on the receiving end of that barrage.

    • @thenibblershow5305
      @thenibblershow5305 2 місяці тому +1

      it does. its just that it mostly uses unguided

  • @mrplease66
    @mrplease66 Рік тому +1

    is this being read by an AI?

  • @Kane-ib5sn
    @Kane-ib5sn 2 роки тому +18

    there is no 'equivalent' to the A-10. it is in a class all by itself. and, probably always will be.

    • @Jabba.Da.Hutt_
      @Jabba.Da.Hutt_ 2 роки тому +5

      Agreed, A-10 is in its own class. I hate when people compare the Su-25 and the A-10 like they’re somehow the same.

    • @dominien6487
      @dominien6487 2 роки тому +12

      Too bad that the A-10 isnt very good for the modern day

    • @Jabba.Da.Hutt_
      @Jabba.Da.Hutt_ 2 роки тому +2

      @@dominien6487 what ru talking about, “the A-10 isn’t good in the modern day”. Bro they’re literally making a completely new A-10 called the super Warthog and the original A-10 is doing just fine and is still 100% relevant for todays wars because if it wasn’t the USAF would know it and they wouldn’t be using them anymore is your statement was true.

    • @ZipTrunk
      @ZipTrunk 2 роки тому

      @@Jabba.Da.Hutt_ agreed - as always a poor and lousy russian copy cat.

    • @kepszlok
      @kepszlok 2 роки тому +5

      ​@@Jabba.Da.Hutt_ The A-10 is still a good and capable aircraft, but the amount of close-range SAM and MANPAD systems in today's battlefields forces it to attack from higher altitudes. Even in desert storm, they did most of the attacks with guided missiles, not with the brrrrr gun. It is somewhat strange from an airplane that designed around a giant Gatling gun, but times and battlefield needs are changing.
      Also, modern or modernized tank armor getting a bit more resilient against 30mm shells, so an A-10 may need to get closer to the enemy to ensure a kill with the brrrrrr gun than the old days.

  • @ML-762
    @ML-762 Рік тому +1

    Ak47 of the sky

  • @nikogrujic6807
    @nikogrujic6807 2 роки тому +2

    And FROM what junk yard GRAVE did they find this old plane . Russia don't use planes like this for more THAN 25 YRS. Greetings from LAS Vegas

  • @serhiymg6404
    @serhiymg6404 2 роки тому

    RF 90965 number 32 yellow

  • @DG-gm3yz
    @DG-gm3yz 2 роки тому +1

    Soviet means excellent.

  • @RasPutintheGreat
    @RasPutintheGreat 2 роки тому +1

    Flying tank for a reason..

  • @chrisjohnson4666
    @chrisjohnson4666 2 роки тому +1

    It's still a mobility kill that plane looke to need ALOT of work may be a write off...

  • @wildeninja2836
    @wildeninja2836 2 роки тому +6

    I can post about five more videos where IT DIDN’T LAND NOR EJECT SAFELY HAHAHA

    • @MrTungy
      @MrTungy Рік тому +1

      And then here is another heavy westerner, yeah take your hog out of here, this is about the frog.

  • @no_hyperbole_xone
    @no_hyperbole_xone Рік тому

    I get so tired of Americans calling it "S U " 25. It's called "Soo 25" as shortened form of the OKB SUKHOI name. Russian form is CY 25, or Soo 25 latinized

  • @TheDustysix
    @TheDustysix Рік тому

    Northrop A-9.

  • @whatyeah2032
    @whatyeah2032 2 роки тому

    A-10: hold my beer...

    • @wellplayedwho9491
      @wellplayedwho9491 Рік тому +2

      A-10 can hold beer but SU-25 can hold vodka that the power of Russia

    • @MrTungy
      @MrTungy Рік тому +3

      What is stronger? Vodka or beer? Vodka

  • @grantt1589
    @grantt1589 2 роки тому +2

    So basically an A-10

  • @willlacey8183
    @willlacey8183 2 роки тому

    SU TWOUNTAY FIVE

  • @SuperPopopirat
    @SuperPopopirat Рік тому +4

    NATO Plane would fall down like a potatoe with less than half the damage…

  • @nikabelashvili2037
    @nikabelashvili2037 2 роки тому

    A-10 is made by Georgian. Alexander kartveli!

  • @cowansimstudio
    @cowansimstudio 2 роки тому +3

    Pity it isn't a wreck in a Ukrainian field

    • @mistahj8968
      @mistahj8968 2 роки тому +7

      Another wet dreams I assume?

    • @cowansimstudio
      @cowansimstudio 2 роки тому +1

      @@mistahj8968 not a dream. A reality, Russian dead litter Ukraine. All for the overreach of a dictator at the helm struggle to maintain power. Russian strength is clearly overrated. Just like the failed invasion of Afghanistan and Georgia we are seeing history repeat itself. Russia cannot stand on its own again. Its laughable

    • @iamnotreallyherenow
      @iamnotreallyherenow 2 роки тому

      @@cowansimstudio turn off CNN and your western medias. Maybe get some news from the other side of the barricade too.

    • @cowansimstudio
      @cowansimstudio 2 роки тому +1

      @@iamnotreallyherenow Then explain to me why I just watched a Russian person run onto the Russians Premier news channel saying "you are being lied to"...... You can continue trying to support this dictatorship but the faster you wake up the better. Hundreds of thousands of Russian have left the country as reported by Georgia ministry. Wake up you fool

    • @mistahj8968
      @mistahj8968 2 роки тому +1

      @@cowansimstudio Keep dreaming kid, keep dreaming

  • @scrimmo
    @scrimmo 2 роки тому

    @1:57 Terbuffin

  • @federikus2928
    @federikus2928 2 роки тому

    CHAD

  • @zBijs
    @zBijs Рік тому

    One tincan got back, (and damaged beyond repair), while 24 others downed. Tottaly impressive account. Not bad, for russians :)

  • @moonpatrol9717
    @moonpatrol9717 2 роки тому

    Ja nee, dit is n mooi vlamgat, but my VW Jetta Kalahari Ferrari is tougher.

  • @BigMemory
    @BigMemory Рік тому

    Ukraine shot down another SU-25 yesterday; the Frogfoot crashed in Valuysky while trying to limp back from a combat mission. The pilot ejected successfully but later succumbed to his injuries

  • @olegchaser6960
    @olegchaser6960 2 роки тому +15

    Российские самолёты и пилоты лучшие в мире!!!!!!!!!!

    • @ZipTrunk
      @ZipTrunk 2 роки тому

      Pretty small World you operate in. “Big steps in a small World - small steps in a big”

    • @bighueso2428
      @bighueso2428 2 роки тому +2

      Russian warship, go……

    • @wharris7594
      @wharris7594 2 роки тому

      я домаю гуски и амёриканёц пилот тожё

  • @AScottish-AustralianM-84
    @AScottish-AustralianM-84 Рік тому

    WOOO!!! SOVIET ENGINEERING!!!!

  • @thestranger6554
    @thestranger6554 2 роки тому +2

    Brave pilot with great jet fighter

  • @aresgow8452
    @aresgow8452 Рік тому +1

    In Soviet Russia tanks fly😁

  • @yellowboot6629
    @yellowboot6629 Рік тому +1

    🧙❣️

  • @user-yz9kp9rl1t
    @user-yz9kp9rl1t 2 роки тому

    next time no chance to survive,

  • @PauloPereira-jj4jv
    @PauloPereira-jj4jv Місяць тому

    Barely landed.

  • @lucario_never_broke_again
    @lucario_never_broke_again 4 місяці тому +1

    twentuh faahv

  • @prizefighter8699
    @prizefighter8699 2 роки тому

    Flying tank😂😂😂

  • @jollygoodyo
    @jollygoodyo 2 роки тому +4

    Is this a video about su25 or a10? Perfect example of Western propoganda talking

  • @drbendover7467
    @drbendover7467 2 роки тому +1

    Then why are so many getting shot down in Ukraine and only a couple flying around tens of miles away from those convoys lol:)

    • @alexkor380
      @alexkor380 2 роки тому +2

      Keep waching fake eastern news...

    • @user-fd4il6pi9i
      @user-fd4il6pi9i 2 роки тому

      12

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 2 роки тому

      No Russian Su-25s were shot down in Ukraine. You lie. That's just lies of Ukrainian and Western propaganda. Nothing proves that. Though , Russian air-force and anti-aircraft defense snot down a few Ukrainian Su-25s.

    • @MrTungy
      @MrTungy Рік тому

      Bigger SAMs or Anti Air System missiles from the USSR.

  • @Stl10699
    @Stl10699 Рік тому +1

    Decent damage for su25, minimal damage for a10.

  • @GUNTHER1
    @GUNTHER1 2 роки тому +4

    I would much rather fly the warthog it can stay in the air 2 1/2 times longer and It can be armed to the teeth not just the main gun but multiple missiles rocket bombs just like the other one

    • @Oleg111222333
      @Oleg111222333 2 роки тому +13

      The Su-25 has a higher speed than the A-10. The Su-25 has a higher climb rate. For pilots, this means that with the same threat from the ground, the Su-25 is less likely to be in a dangerous zone where it can be shot down by portable air defense systems. Both aircraft have been seriously upgraded since development and can carry missiles fired and forgotten. But the classic A-10 is built around a machine gun, the pilot had to hold the target for a few seconds, the classic Su-25 carried several unguided missiles that he had to fire at the accumulation of equipment or soldiers on the ground and no longer worrying about missiles to gain altitude. These few seconds are very important. Operators with manual air defense do not stand ready with missiles on their shoulders, they also need time to prepare for the shot.

    • @gamingrex2930
      @gamingrex2930 2 роки тому +2

      The a10c's sniper pod is deadlier than that 300 kg waste of space called the avenger. The only time any pilot in a conventional war would use that gun is if the enemy ran out of AA missiles. The reason why the a10 can work is purely because it can lob PGMs way beyond the reach of MANPADs.

  • @sergeyka9809
    @sergeyka9809 2 місяці тому

    Не украинской ракетой , а ракетой США. Украина шестерка в этой войне.

  • @namesomega3694
    @namesomega3694 8 місяців тому

    Toyota hilux of jets

  • @costiqueR
    @costiqueR 2 роки тому +4

    This is old news, that rocket hit the plane in February, a few days after the start of the war. And yes, ground attack planes are reinforced to resist. And the rocket was a light manpad one, a big AA rocket is tearing apart a warplane. Probably the Russian army will get close to Central Europe, this is the scope, the rest is just smoke. And a new curtain is built. Russian citizens will pay the price also. Poor and proud...as always...

    • @iamnotreallyherenow
      @iamnotreallyherenow 2 роки тому +2

      Omg I never thought I would meet such an updated guy here on the comments.... You know more than every journalists and the mod of Russia. Do you have any agency?

    • @costiqueR
      @costiqueR 2 роки тому

      @@iamnotreallyherenow nope, if you can imagine, I really use my upper part of the body... You know all the discussions are just smoke for us? You know this is not ending without Russia occupying the entire Ukraine and in 5 years making it Russia. Same as Belarus? Do you need a paint to see that NATO coming to Russian borders is not acceptable (as they say) but Russia coming to NATO borders is super? Why no one from their former servants wants to be with them, why do all eastern countries seek NATO protection? Is so hard to understand that not NATO run East Europe, was East Europe running to NATO? Propaganda is dangerous for the brain tissue...And by the way, my life was in both areas, so no one outside can tell me what and how. But many in the west have absolutely no idea what is going about. Russia is locked in time with the same feudal political system which Ivan the IV- the terrible started. In 1917 they changed just the name, the system was doing the same for the other people... Look at Putin in 1990s, and now, look what he said at that time about his relationship with the power...oh, just remember when Rusia closed the relations with NATO and why... And I was radar operator for a guided AA missile unit, I know what can do (our rockets could destroy a plane even blowing 200 m away, some similar with what Iranians does with the passenger plane)...

  • @mccazhad
    @mccazhad 2 роки тому

    Why are you panned Somali UA-camr, Husein kurdi? Really, you are wicked. 😡

    • @MrTungy
      @MrTungy Рік тому +1

      The what ever Somalis did not make these jets, learn before you talk.

    • @mccazhad
      @mccazhad Рік тому

      @@MrTungy What am I learning? You just prove to me that, you are a jealous person.😡😡

  • @Bruh_77809
    @Bruh_77809 Місяць тому

    Russian bias is real i guess

  • @willlacey8183
    @willlacey8183 2 роки тому

    TURBOFIN ENGINE, UH-10 THUNDERBOLT, SUCKOI-25

  • @fh6758
    @fh6758 2 роки тому +2

    Such a shame he landed👎🤮🤮🤮

    • @bighueso2428
      @bighueso2428 2 роки тому +2

      I’m an advocate of safety, but not in this case

    • @ispeaku759
      @ispeaku759 2 роки тому +5

      Such a shame you survived your childhood

    • @MrTungy
      @MrTungy Рік тому +2

      You A-10 missing both engines? *NAH DONT FUCKING LAND*

    • @icespikegaming6786
      @icespikegaming6786 6 місяців тому

      Such a shame someone who probably was drafted survived fighting for his country. Even if he wasn't drafted he was fighting for his country something you would never do

  • @darugdawg2453
    @darugdawg2453 Рік тому

    i wouldnt call it tough. more like lucky

    • @scothf1273
      @scothf1273 11 місяців тому +1

      Not the first time it was hit and kept safely flying so a very tough plane.

  • @mrs.chandler9384
    @mrs.chandler9384 Рік тому

    They go down all the time