Inside the New Air Force One

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 сер 2024
  • Used by the American President for decades, and even the inspiration for a blockbuster Hollywood action film, the call sign for the President’s personal ride has become a household name. But as time goes on and technologies evolve, so too must Air Force One. So pack your bags and get ready for takeoff in the Presidential suite, because in today’s video, we’re taking a look inside the new and improved Air Force One.
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @TickleSalty
    @TickleSalty 2 роки тому +298

    The exterior colors were designed by industrial designer Raymond Loewy as requested by Jackie Kennedy in 1961. 60 years later it still looks as new as ever.

    • @dtxgmoney
      @dtxgmoney Рік тому +8

      Trump directed the color scheme be changed I'm glad Biden reversed that decision. Air Force One's look is iconic and timeless and instantly recognizable around the world.

    • @dtxgmoney
      @dtxgmoney Рік тому

      @@dangf1 The color scheme picked out by Trump lacked creativity and vision as like most of his ideas, please refer to the long list of business decisions that resulted in numerous bankruptcies.

    • @slipperychugger
      @slipperychugger Рік тому +1

      @@dangf1 Dude said he preferred the old colors better and u found a way to politically attack lmao...like wut go to therapy and let everyone else just enjoy a harmless video about a plane.

  • @C-Doug
    @C-Doug 2 роки тому +548

    “Fastest passenger airplane to date”
    We just gonna ignore the Concorde?

    • @drone-time
      @drone-time 2 роки тому +65

      Mach 1? They do realize what happens when you reach Mach 1.0, right? There's no way you're pushing this whale through that wall and coming out in one piece. Nah, Mach 0.9 is plenty fast enough, thank you. (I.E. there's a reason the Concord looks like a pencil, not a beer can)

    • @Jay-jb2vr
      @Jay-jb2vr 2 роки тому +5

      The one that crash into a hotel?? That Concorde?

    • @chesterwang3070
      @chesterwang3070 2 роки тому +52

      ​@@Jay-jb2vr Well yes, one Concorde did crash into a hotel. However, that accident was caused by ANOTHER aircraft leaving a piece of debris on the runway. The Concorde rolled over said piece of debris, causing a tire explosion. This ruptured one of the fuel tanks. The resulting leakage of fuel caught fire, and, combined with the failure of engine 1 and 2 caused by ingestion of combustion gases and/or the debris from the tire, as well as loss of hydraulic fluid, ultimately caused the loss of the aircraft.
      Once again, this incident was caused by another aircraft, and was not the Concorde's fault.
      That said, one can not think of the Concorde as the aircraft that crashed into a hotel, since it did serve honorably as the world's fastest airliner for nearly 3 decades. It remains one of only two supersonic airliners to enter service (the other being the Tu-144, however it flew just 76 flights before being retired).

    • @JackTheMurderer
      @JackTheMurderer 2 роки тому +15

      @@chesterwang3070 also there had been several instances of Boeing airplanes crashing due to technical failures, so he shouldn't be so arrogant. Just remember what happened to two Boeing 737 max three years ago.

    • @Sk3tchPad
      @Sk3tchPad 2 роки тому +4

      Concorde was a myth, just like my sex life. Never existed

  • @johno9507
    @johno9507 3 роки тому +593

    As someone who's maintained 747's for the last 26 years there is no way the 747-8 will go supersonic (Mach 1) without serious structural damage.
    0.9 Mach or transonic is the best it'll do without a wild pitch change as the center of pressure on the wing changes as shock waves form.
    The wing and engine intakes are just not designed for supersonic airflow.

    • @timkerwin6886
      @timkerwin6886 3 роки тому +23

      Agree with you. Not too much difference in altitude and speed. The current AF1 can fly at 45,000 and go max 560k. 16 hrs nonstop

    • @azrielgoldberg7908
      @azrielgoldberg7908 3 роки тому +49

      Thank you! I'm so happy someone else said it. Also, it's awesome that you've been working on the 747 for that long! I'm starting my first day of training to become an Airframe and Powerplant Technician literally tomorrow. Cheers!

    • @johno9507
      @johno9507 3 роки тому +17

      @@azrielgoldberg7908
      Doing your A&P's I'm assuming that you're in the US?
      I'm based in Australia and we have a slightly different system.
      All the best with your training my friend, those years were some of the best and most fun I've had.

    • @azrielgoldberg7908
      @azrielgoldberg7908 3 роки тому +9

      @@johno9507 yessir I am in Los Angeles. Thank you!

    • @DanielLewisSEO
      @DanielLewisSEO 3 роки тому +5

      Yeah thats an insane claim on their part, its just NOT happening.

  • @bungwohlio
    @bungwohlio 2 роки тому +32

    I like the interior schema of the old airforce 1 and I think it looked better. The new one looks very sterile and cold but the only one looks cozy and natural.

    • @nanoflower1
      @nanoflower1 2 роки тому +9

      I'm hoping/thinking that the color scheme in the video is just the artist rendering and not what they actually are going to use. As you say their ultra modern look does end up looking sterile and cold unlike the old look.

  • @notsoso6408
    @notsoso6408 3 роки тому +462

    It's a giant smartphone with wings.

  • @peterkim3718
    @peterkim3718 2 роки тому +28

    Ive always wondered what the inside of a shoe looks like thanks guys for doing this

  • @thesege
    @thesege 2 роки тому +41

    Me: “Taxes are so high”
    Also me watching this video: “that’s a fortress plus the maintenance cost”

  • @brucebelitz3451
    @brucebelitz3451 3 роки тому +203

    Please keep the original paint design, it's absolutely airforce 1!

    • @jaredlu2200
      @jaredlu2200 3 роки тому

      @@titaniumspecial4207 its not sadly

    • @bustabass9025
      @bustabass9025 3 роки тому +8

      That new proposed paint scheme makes it look like a postal cargo freighter.

    • @fredsalter1915
      @fredsalter1915 3 роки тому +1

      They should paint it like Eddie's Frankenstrat.

    • @darkcloud1948
      @darkcloud1948 3 роки тому +15

      @@jaredlu2200 Biden overturned Trump's design and AF1 will be back to its usual color scheme.

    • @HellcatMad
      @HellcatMad 3 роки тому

      @@bustabass9025 a cross between tiffany blue and the red from JFK jr plane since he will be the VP

  • @gary1705
    @gary1705 3 роки тому +253

    I prefer the traditional blue paint work on the exterior as it makes it stand out more and can be clearly defined as Air Force One any where it goes 👀👍

    • @DavidJRomo
      @DavidJRomo 3 роки тому +23

      I agree, trumps choice of colors were made this look like a flying United States Postal Service car🙄😂

    • @abkh5780
      @abkh5780 3 роки тому +3

      Agree!

    • @kaamkmca
      @kaamkmca 2 роки тому +6

      I fully agree. I also like the traditional blue paintwork. Its like the United States Flag. People feel re assured and safe with the continuity of tradition.

    • @razorsedge1854
      @razorsedge1854 2 роки тому

      @@kaamkmca that’s what the Trump colors were., red white and blue. No red in the current iteration.

    • @aclator
      @aclator 2 роки тому +1

      @@DavidJRomo fortunately that didn’t go through.

  • @bernardvard2954
    @bernardvard2954 3 роки тому +26

    6 actually/ the 1st one to use it was GBush father/ they also always build 2 planes

    • @Redbusser40
      @Redbusser40 3 роки тому +3

      And usually the public almost never sees the eb4 nightwatch is usually behind air force 1

  • @shakillatif6327
    @shakillatif6327 3 роки тому +128

    My request kindly keep the original colour pattern which was selected by Jackie Kennedy which is still the best and eye catching and easily recognizable as the pride of America 💕🇺🇸💕🇺🇸💕🇺🇸💕🇺🇸💕🇺🇸💕🇺🇸💕

    • @ATLcentury334
      @ATLcentury334 3 роки тому +20

      You beat me to it. The original Raymond Lowey design was always eye catching, and made the statement that the “United States has arrived”. The updated new scheme looks like a cut rate airline. Considering where it originated, it’s not surprising.

    • @DavidJRomo
      @DavidJRomo 3 роки тому +5

      My sentiments exactly! And recognizable around the globe, respectfully!

    • @jasonthomas9364
      @jasonthomas9364 3 роки тому +3

      It’s not necessarily the best just a paint job you’re used to

    • @xgtiguy
      @xgtiguy 3 роки тому +1

      I agree

    • @Group51
      @Group51 3 роки тому +15

      New design looks too Trumpy.

  • @drone-time
    @drone-time 2 роки тому +64

    *Any AIR FORCE aircraft that carries POTUS becomes AF1, not 'any aircraft'. When he/she flies on a Marine helicopter, the callsign is Marine One. Likewise the callsign Navy One and Army One are used when aircraft from either of those branches carries the commander-in-chief. Though never used, Coast Guard One would be used as well (CG2 was used once!)

    • @honglee6880
      @honglee6880 2 роки тому +1

      So you believe in the information everyone can get from the internet?

    • @gasaholic47
      @gasaholic47 2 роки тому +7

      @@honglee6880 Sorry, But he’s absolutely correct.

    • @PBurns-ng3gw
      @PBurns-ng3gw 2 роки тому +3

      If POTUS ever traveled on a Coast Guard One, the Coasties would be bragging about it for the next fifty years to nobody who cares.

    • @riderr5990
      @riderr5990 2 роки тому

      True

    • @jd4501a
      @jd4501a 2 роки тому +5

      If the POTUS ever flies on a private, civilian aircraft, its call sign is Executive One.

  • @lilliemcgiffert7388
    @lilliemcgiffert7388 3 роки тому +4

    Great! I enjoyed the tour!

  • @jessiemcfarland3666
    @jessiemcfarland3666 3 роки тому +154

    As long as it keeps the original livery and not look like the defunct USAirways.

    • @pacman7709
      @pacman7709 2 роки тому +1

      wrong! it's beautiful

    • @scarecrow108productions7
      @scarecrow108productions7 2 роки тому +1

      Correction: US Airways just merged with AAL. It didn't really went defunct...but rather been saved by AA, at a cost...

  • @stephenboster8925
    @stephenboster8925 3 роки тому +46

    The decor is very ‘Apple Store’.. By the way, that thing he calls a ‘heart monitor’ is actually a mechanical ventilator..

  • @fredricc5771
    @fredricc5771 2 роки тому +38

    Why does everything need to be that cold looking? I mean the interior and led light. The old looks more stylish and warm and cozy..

    • @KumaBean
      @KumaBean 2 роки тому +8

      The West has lost it's class.
      Just look over pictures of the interior of the Tiranic, and compare those to pictures of the interiors of modern cruise ships, they're completely different worlds 🍻

    • @antonhojman18
      @antonhojman18 2 роки тому

      I agree.

    • @planefan082
      @planefan082 2 роки тому

      It probably won't actually look like that.

  • @jacksdrawings4692
    @jacksdrawings4692 2 роки тому +3

    Wow! This new air force one is so cool!!👍 and 💪!

  • @DianaKazimiera-
    @DianaKazimiera- 2 роки тому +7

    Air Force One 🇺🇲✈️ This machine is absolutely awesome.I love this.Fantastic project
    Great respect 🕊️🤝

  • @madhumitamondal9265
    @madhumitamondal9265 2 роки тому +1

    Very nice and amazing video. Very well explained. Thank you for sharing this video. Very imformative video.

  • @sreenath5402
    @sreenath5402 2 роки тому

    Very nice content...love to watch...learn many things with u...

  • @cjmillsnun
    @cjmillsnun 3 роки тому +94

    What you said any aircraft taking on the call sign AF1 is not true. If the president is in a Marine aircraft (as he often is) it's Marine 1, in a Navy aircraft it would be Navy 1, in an Army aircraft it would be Army 1, and in a civilian aircraft it would be Executive 1. AF1 is used only when the president flies in an air force aircraft.

    • @paulsuprono7225
      @paulsuprono7225 3 роки тому

      Foolish Air Force . . . put'em in their place ! 💀

    • @Skwertydogs
      @Skwertydogs 3 роки тому

      Thank you

    • @coltstooth9967
      @coltstooth9967 3 роки тому +3

      Who gives a flying fuck?

    • @jeffdur1330
      @jeffdur1330 3 роки тому

      That's not entirely true.

    • @AMomentInTimeProductions
      @AMomentInTimeProductions 3 роки тому +7

      Not true that use to be the case but now any time the president is on any aircraft it's Call sign is AF1, even if he got aboard a Cessna 172 that would be AF1.
      AFT is not the name of a plane it's a call sign, read about how AF1 call sign came about, it was in the Kennedy Administration. John F Kennedy was the one who came up with AF1..
      don't believe me look at this..
      ua-cam.com/video/Ze1Ku4gkvgE/v-deo.html
      by the way The New Aircraft is going to be Equipped with Air To Air rockets to be able to shoot down any enemy aircraft that attacks it, and it will be able to fire on targets at any direction even enemy aircraft directly behind the AF1 Jet.
      And yes there is going to be an escape pod for the president, but not a single pod it will hold 3 people at once, so the president can be in the company of 2 secret service agents.
      I know all this first hand, Not going to tell you how, but believe me on this.
      It Also will have the ability to be controlled VIA Secure Satellite From any where on the planet but where is unknown but they it will be able to be controlled by some one not on the plane incase something happened to the pilots, yes of course it's totally secure and can't be hacked from some one trying to take control to crash it.
      there is 6 sets of codes that must be entered to be able to enable it.
      Each set is 20 digits, and it's changed every flight by a computer generated system that they enter before each time the plane is active.
      so if it takes off in the US and then lands in Russia, then when the president gets in it to return to the US, it's changed again.
      And when controlled remotely it has an automated system where it can land it self safely and a set airport, they have tested this remote system and landed demo planes while in development many times and all landings worked 100% accurately and safely..
      This is the state of the art aircraft with just about everything you can think of.
      Oh and By the way, this has always been the case, we all know ATC controls air traffic, they are in charge of where planes fly what altitude and speed and headed, EXCAPT, Yes AFT Airforce 1 is NOT controlled by any ATC anywhere, they have authority over all the airspace, they dictate the airspace over ATC, and it's all controlled from AF1 lets say when they fly over Kennedy airspace Kennedy Center no longer controls the airspace, AF1 Does, and they tell Kennedy Center what to do, and who to deny any other aircraft anything, they can even instruct Kennedy center to ground all aircraft at a specific time while AF1 travels though it, AF1 makes it's own flight plans and does not have to reveal it to any one they just simply go where they please and how they please and they just instruct who ever is in control of that airspace what they are doing and to keep all other aircraft far away from them and not a one can be at the same altitude even 500 miles away.

  • @GrepidYT
    @GrepidYT 3 роки тому +75

    It being the fastest passenger airline to date isn't really correct, Concorde was a British-French Passenger airline that flew from 1976 - 2003 And could go Mach 2.04, but it would be correct to say it is the fastest passenger plane still in service

    • @turkey0165
      @turkey0165 2 роки тому +2

      You’re correct on the Concord but the fastest subsonic airliners were the Convair 880 and 990 still have speed records! Though the prototype DC-8 did go supersonic in a dive during testing for a short time period! 👍

    • @patrickdunn8918
      @patrickdunn8918 2 роки тому

      Exactly.

  • @gaylegardinerankerry12123
    @gaylegardinerankerry12123 2 роки тому

    ITS WONDERFUL ALWAYS WANTED TO SEE IT HOW BEAUTIFUL IT IS

  • @sultanmedia6357
    @sultanmedia6357 3 роки тому +2

    Congratulations to 1k

  • @GrandAdmiralThrawn.7th_Fleet
    @GrandAdmiralThrawn.7th_Fleet 2 роки тому +54

    I absolutely despise the style of the interior but as long as he keeps the livery of the exterior, the famous blue and white, I'm good. The interior can always be redesigned and re-fitted. Now the med bay and galley, needed an upgraded, so that's fine.

    • @ziepex7009
      @ziepex7009 2 роки тому +4

      its a disgusting interior, we dont want futuristic man we want normal

    • @GrandAdmiralThrawn.7th_Fleet
      @GrandAdmiralThrawn.7th_Fleet 2 роки тому +1

      @@ziepex7009 Exactly, it's too Star-Treky. That being said, I guess we can say Trump created Space Force and Biden created the Air Force One interior to go along with it.🤣

    • @ziepex7009
      @ziepex7009 2 роки тому +4

      @@GrandAdmiralThrawn.7th_Fleet LOL "Star Treky" thats an amazing way of describing it, I agree

    • @GrandAdmiralThrawn.7th_Fleet
      @GrandAdmiralThrawn.7th_Fleet 2 роки тому

      @@ziepex7009 Well thank you.😂👍

    • @johnestep7544
      @johnestep7544 2 роки тому +2

      @@GrandAdmiralThrawn.7th_Fleet actually donny bone spurs "redesigned" it, his idea for a paint job made it look like a circus plane.

  • @karenmoreno1309
    @karenmoreno1309 3 роки тому +10

    I love Air Force one ❤️

  • @screenapple1660
    @screenapple1660 3 роки тому +2

    Nice.... can't wait to see what's inside brand new air force one in National Geographic or history channel. I'm waiting for surprises.

  • @harin6603
    @harin6603 2 роки тому +1

    AMAZING !!

  • @richwilliams135
    @richwilliams135 3 роки тому +49

    I prefer the paint design of the current Air Force One. It is striking, unlike the white, dark blue and red strip proposed design.

    • @DavidJRomo
      @DavidJRomo 3 роки тому +10

      Again I agree, trumps color selection would just make this beautiful plane look like a United States Postal Service plane

    • @ObamaFromKenya
      @ObamaFromKenya 2 роки тому +2

      @David J. Romo he wanted the livery to look like his old Trump Shuttle (which went bankrupt) airline. The classic blue color design by Jacqueline Kennedy should be the permanent color scheme

    • @kevinbloom5566
      @kevinbloom5566 2 роки тому

      It would look like Trump Junk One!
      NO THANK YOU!!!

  • @anasohdavid9375
    @anasohdavid9375 3 роки тому +14

    Wow, I just love the US.
    So organized. Good job

    • @geothompson9866
      @geothompson9866 3 роки тому +12

      Yeah. Trump really organized America. biden is disorganizing it.

    • @TitaniumTurbine
      @TitaniumTurbine 3 роки тому +14

      @@geothompson9866 Stay salty!

    • @zeeone4492
      @zeeone4492 3 роки тому +2

      Especially when invading occupying and bombing other countries

    • @RudieObias
      @RudieObias 2 роки тому +5

      @@geothompson9866 Trump organized it so well that he didn’t need to win a second term. He was good with just one! Haha!

    • @itsmarvin6999
      @itsmarvin6999 2 роки тому +3

      Alright lets keep politics out of this everyone.

  • @gpmcd1044
    @gpmcd1044 3 роки тому +1

    Love it!

  • @dakshanbalaramesh
    @dakshanbalaramesh 11 місяців тому +1

    "It's the longest passenger plane in the world"
    The 777X - Am I a joke to you?

  • @williamhirsch1001
    @williamhirsch1001 3 роки тому +10

    Keep the current livery colors and pattern. Its what distinguishes the plan from just an ordinary commercial plane

  • @gerardmoran9560
    @gerardmoran9560 3 роки тому +171

    Air Force 1 isn't the call sign for any plane carrying POTUS. If he's on an army chopper it's Army 1, a Navy aircraft it's Navy 1 etc. BTW- let's keep the traditional paint scheme!

    • @GH-oi2jf
      @GH-oi2jf 3 роки тому +29

      Usually “Marine One” for the helicopter.

    • @Redcoat6650
      @Redcoat6650 3 роки тому +12

      @@GH-oi2jf Air Force One, is the designated call sign for any aircraft carrying POTUS, VPOTUS is designated Air Force Two. Marine One is the designated call sign for any marine HMX-1 aircraft that carries him. Army One and Navy One are never used, just in papers. However as the WH and the Pentagon confirmed in a press briefing a cpuple years ago, AF1 and AF2 are for any aircraft carrying them. The president actually has a small propellor plane used for transport to Camp David, that is designated AF1 when he on board. That is ATC for you.

    • @willgaukler8979
      @willgaukler8979 3 роки тому

      ... when you really want get there go USAF ...

    • @iLoveBoysandBerries
      @iLoveBoysandBerries 3 роки тому +4

      There's no navy or army 1 it's marine 1 lol

    • @gerardmoran9560
      @gerardmoran9560 3 роки тому

      @@iLoveBoysandBerries It's been a long time since my USAF days but I believe a president (Bush 43) on a navy aircraft is Navy 1 and in the odd chances the president flew on an army aircraft it would be Army 1. Let us know. Cheers

  • @pfefferle74
    @pfefferle74 Рік тому +1

    I chuckled at the concept of "landline" phones on a plane.

  • @Luxury-Royale
    @Luxury-Royale 2 роки тому

    This was very interesting to watch.

  • @aerocap
    @aerocap 2 роки тому +24

    Yes there was an outstanding plane that surpassed the current Air Force One in many ways. The queen of the sky is the 747, but Concorde was just the goddess of the sky.

  • @Ramsi-Berlin
    @Ramsi-Berlin 3 роки тому +4

    I take two of them, too ❣️😅

  • @marklisiecki5790
    @marklisiecki5790 2 роки тому +1

    Very impressive!!!

  • @roadkillrangers6007
    @roadkillrangers6007 2 роки тому +2

    The planes that will be used for the new AF1 have been redesigned. That's why they come with a cost of $2 billion each. These are one off custom versions of the 747-8, not the standard passenger version for commercial airline use.

  • @gilboudreau3929
    @gilboudreau3929 3 роки тому +7

    yes keep the original color scheme its our plane also.

  • @mohammedsatomi7009
    @mohammedsatomi7009 3 роки тому +2

    Excellent

  • @paulhough5143
    @paulhough5143 2 роки тому

    Hello there I like this video it is good and interesting four me to watch.

  • @eddie10191
    @eddie10191 3 роки тому +6

    I want one with a Slurpee dispenser.

    • @douga3212
      @douga3212 2 роки тому

      and why just a queen sized bed? King beds are soooo much more spacious

    • @machupikachu1085
      @machupikachu1085 Рік тому +1

      @@douga3212 exactly. There's room for 3! ;)

  • @manitw.4998
    @manitw.4998 3 роки тому +11

    "The 747-8 can go Mach 1."
    Um, more like Mach 0.85 to Mach 0.93.

    • @manitw.4998
      @manitw.4998 3 роки тому

      They should modernize the paint and change it to black or red to make it look more modern and sleek. The dumb old blue looks too much like a normal airline like Russian Aeroflot or American Airlines.

    • @mousemortimer6235
      @mousemortimer6235 3 роки тому

      when you buy a car, one of the first things you notice is how fast is it? well. the house that builds that car declares it as the maximum speed limit x, but you will never get there, because before you get there, your wheels jump, the radiator jumps, you lose your car plate, and you don't see anything at the sides of the guide .. ..what do you deduce?

    • @retinaquester
      @retinaquester 3 роки тому

      @@titaniumspecial4207 The structural designlimit of the airframe determans the maximum speed of the plane. In case of 747-8 it cannot go beyond the speed of sound. So subsonic or 1< mach.

  • @pasqueocwe1744
    @pasqueocwe1744 3 роки тому

    BEAUTIFUL nice new cours

  • @domingosantos1292
    @domingosantos1292 3 роки тому +1

    Very nice 👌

  • @monstrok
    @monstrok 3 роки тому +16

    Thanks for the production, yet so many factual errors

    • @mariajose-cp2gu
      @mariajose-cp2gu 3 роки тому

      How would u know the guy said that most of the information of the ship is confidential. Not trying to be mean I’m just confused

    • @echo_cx0374
      @echo_cx0374 2 роки тому

      @@mariajose-cp2gu A 747 can never. Hit mach 1 for example

  • @billag9220
    @billag9220 3 роки тому +3

    Previous paintings much more stylish

  • @leilaniford3574
    @leilaniford3574 2 роки тому +2

    Beautiful.

  • @bandawilly5282
    @bandawilly5282 2 роки тому

    This will be a super aircraft !!

  • @fiesty161
    @fiesty161 3 роки тому +60

    I don't like the new paint schemas it looks more like a regular airline.

    • @r1explode1
      @r1explode1 3 роки тому +13

      I believe that Biden will change the color scheme back to the traditional colors. Besides, trump’s paint scheme looks A LOT like Putin’s plane. Coincidence? I think NOT!

    • @TravisTrittFan
      @TravisTrittFan 3 роки тому +4

      @@r1explode1 I'm guessing you were meaning the airplane livery looked a lot like Trump's plane? That is absolutely true. But honestly, I actually kind of dig the new dark blue, white and red stripe design. It's different, but I do like the original. It's an iconic staple of the President. Whether or not Biden will undo the change, I'm not sure, but I wouldn't be disappointed if he stuck with the new design.

    • @monnidesmonnides8554
      @monnidesmonnides8554 3 роки тому +1

      What do you expect the paint schemes was done by the previous ad min.

    • @gavynhohon2818
      @gavynhohon2818 Рік тому +1

      @@r1explode1 It looks nothing like Putin’s plane…

  • @johnmoss8230
    @johnmoss8230 3 роки тому +8

    I think they should leave the livery alone!!

  • @dhianashintawati5302
    @dhianashintawati5302 3 роки тому +1

    Wow, keren banget, banget di hati selalu

  • @TheDoomWizard
    @TheDoomWizard 2 роки тому +1

    4 billion? But I don't even have health insurance...

  • @vanmanmike7651
    @vanmanmike7651 2 роки тому +4

    As long as they don't mess with the original paint scheme!

  • @Scottie404
    @Scottie404 3 роки тому +13

    It's ONE five star cabin" not "five star guest cabins" - only the Prez gets his own cabin on AF One.

  • @eduardoquirino8131
    @eduardoquirino8131 2 роки тому

    a beautiful plane with it's well known blue, white and gold adorning it's exterior

  • @urooshahmed
    @urooshahmed 3 роки тому

    Wow beauty in the sky

  • @krazmokramer
    @krazmokramer 3 роки тому +20

    Incorrectly states this is the fastest passenger plane at Mach 1. Concorde (a passenger plane) flew at Mach 2.04.

    • @sandybutt9898
      @sandybutt9898 3 роки тому

      TU144 was faster than Concorde at Mach 2.15

    • @Fluterra
      @Fluterra 3 роки тому

      And it cannot reach Mach 1

    • @mustafashulqamy1844
      @mustafashulqamy1844 3 роки тому

      @@Fluterra Yup.

    • @jimfberry
      @jimfberry 3 роки тому +2

      Only the others are NOT flying anymore. It WILL be the fastest!!

  • @lapipesmoker3751
    @lapipesmoker3751 3 роки тому +12

    It all looks so cold. It kind of has the dentist office feel to it. The bedroom doesn't look particularly inviting. Everything is so white it's going to take a crew working 24/7 to keep it clean. Definitely not the interior that I would choose. Also, Air Force One is not the name given to the president flying in any aircraft. For example, if he was flying in a private jet, the call sign would be Executive One.

    • @Alex-ho1nr
      @Alex-ho1nr 3 роки тому +2

      Found the air traffic controller

    • @timkerwin6886
      @timkerwin6886 3 роки тому +3

      The last President who flew commercial while in office was Jimmy Cater. No other President has flown private of commercial since the 70’s

  • @zordorian55
    @zordorian55 3 роки тому +2

    I also have a car, in Romania, Bucharest, a van from 2008, blue inscribed on the sides above with AIR FORCE ONE and the president seal above the doors, in front of the bonnet and at the rear doors above. I'm very proud of that. Some people look very surprised when they pass by the car. :)

    • @zordorian55
      @zordorian55 3 роки тому +1

      I always wanted to fly this presidential plane too, but I know for sure that this will never happen. I haven't even flown a plane to my 57th birthday so far. Yet! I would like it to be the first flight from Romania to the United States. He thinks he's already dreaming. :( :)

    • @zordorian55
      @zordorian55 3 роки тому +2

      And then, I would like to travel all over America from east to west and vice versa with Amtrack. This reminds me of the movie I saw when I was a child at almost 14 years old, in Romania at the cinema, Silver Streack (1976). What a movie ..., what music, action, dialogues with jokes, everything ... And I still dream now. I got on the train from a plane but ... it's still good if I were in America ... If! :)

    • @kathrynjaneway5346
      @kathrynjaneway5346 2 роки тому

      how embarrassing for your family if you have any

    • @zordorian55
      @zordorian55 2 роки тому

      @@kathrynjaneway5346 I hate you!!😬😡

  • @rexeffect7122
    @rexeffect7122 3 роки тому +2

    Nice!

  • @jaywhoisit4863
    @jaywhoisit4863 3 роки тому +3

    Wow! A heart monitor! Just like on my 3 year old smart phone.

    • @hzwanepol6947
      @hzwanepol6947 3 роки тому +2

      No really. Even the most up to date phone has very basic functions compared to a full heart monitor. And it won't be 'just' a heart monitor, but an entire vitals sensor suite.

    • @TitaniumTurbine
      @TitaniumTurbine 3 роки тому

      What? Heart monitors are still current technology, and will continue to be even in hospitals that won’t even be built for 5 years. I’m not sure that’s what I would have chosen to rip on when it comes to technological innovations in a plane.

  • @Muroadana01
    @Muroadana01 3 роки тому +11

    Can't wait to see the movie:
    " Airforce 2 " 😉

    • @lindamilks5455
      @lindamilks5455 3 роки тому +2

      Unfortuneately Airforce 2 is the call sign for any plane carrying the Vice President. Maybe the reboot of the movie is "Airforce One deux"? ;-)

  • @evelynestipona3209
    @evelynestipona3209 3 роки тому

    Very nice.

  • @javierochoajr7046
    @javierochoajr7046 Рік тому

    The commander in chief has a nice ride !

  • @Jack3md
    @Jack3md 3 роки тому +29

    Lol these artist interior renderings will look nothing like the new Air Force one

  • @ILoveManCity.
    @ILoveManCity. 3 роки тому +11

    So much white and blue will look like a hospital, the point of the plain is to provide comfort and security, a mirror of the Oval office, I'm sure the decorations will be close but not this drastic.

    • @edenub6791
      @edenub6791 2 роки тому

      The redesign under the trump admin (and obama admin?) looked much better. It was much more simple and actually had a cool paint job.

  • @michelles4
    @michelles4 3 роки тому +1

    Interior design looks cold

  • @rolmaguiland21
    @rolmaguiland21 3 роки тому +1

    Wow lovely 😍♥️🎉

  • @lpzgrv2010
    @lpzgrv2010 3 роки тому +21

    These planes won't be delivered until 2024. I'm sure there will be changes made to the interior design/color by then.

    • @donaldshannon6541
      @donaldshannon6541 3 роки тому +10

      Just in time for Trump's return LOL

    • @r1explode1
      @r1explode1 3 роки тому +18

      Return? Ha! trump had better go and get his old condemned 757. It’s sitting on the side of the runway at some airport. It’s missing an engine or two (which he can’t afford to fix). It’s okay, though. He won’t need it in prison.

    • @NoRegertsHere
      @NoRegertsHere 3 роки тому +5

      @@r1explode1 🙄 your TDS is showing

    • @artsilva
      @artsilva 3 роки тому +14

      @@donaldshannon6541 gonna be hard to fly or even get re-elected from prison

    • @Andy_M986
      @Andy_M986 3 роки тому

      @@r1explode1 Famous last words.

  • @ericericson3535
    @ericericson3535 3 роки тому +8

    Think of all the money McDonalds is going to lose now!

  • @aj529
    @aj529 2 роки тому

    Ahhh, love that it once again has a bed for two.

  • @thegreatcanadianguy
    @thegreatcanadianguy 3 роки тому +2

    Ahhh going into a galaxy class interior I see

  • @JorgeMendez-kn5ql
    @JorgeMendez-kn5ql 2 роки тому +6

    Traditional designs are more timeless. Contemporary designs seldom age gracefully.
    This is just another example of more profligate spending chasing form over substance.

  • @scmanuel4947
    @scmanuel4947 3 роки тому +5

    Tbh, I really like the interior but not the exterior. The colors doesn’t stand out. It reminds me of American Airlines old colors.

  • @SAINT-ANTONIO
    @SAINT-ANTONIO 2 роки тому

    Wow at 5:44 ...is that a symbol of domaninace?
    Probably good to boost confidence

  • @paulhough5143
    @paulhough5143 2 роки тому

    Hello there what year did they start building this plane and what year did they finnish building the plane.

  • @B1g5t1nk
    @B1g5t1nk 2 роки тому +8

    Respect to the pilots for flying that beast

  • @Hawkeye6957
    @Hawkeye6957 3 роки тому +11

    "Insane" luxury is correct. The whole thing is INSANE!

  • @Cjk777-h8e
    @Cjk777-h8e 3 роки тому +1

    It's a beast

  • @aaronerskine3401
    @aaronerskine3401 2 роки тому

    i want to see how the escape pod looks in the new airplane? does it have white cushions?

  • @jackfitzgerald2955
    @jackfitzgerald2955 2 роки тому +4

    A Stannah stair lift will probably be a required add on for dementia joe😂

  • @disorderlyconduct6011
    @disorderlyconduct6011 3 роки тому +3

    Where is short bus 1 for our current potato n chip? 🤣🤣

  • @anthonysaponaro6318
    @anthonysaponaro6318 2 роки тому +1

    If they wanted to build a suspersonic 747 they should have changed the wings to more of a delta config . . . . imagine something with a 225 ft. wingspan and 4 massive engines hanging off them going supersonic, it is already an amazing feat of engineering it can travel as fast as it can subsonic

  • @arielg7000
    @arielg7000 2 роки тому

    Bad ass cool

  • @pattigouker3096
    @pattigouker3096 2 роки тому +4

    Hopefully the ICONIC paint job stays it will be good!

  • @MyThoughtzAndOpinionz
    @MyThoughtzAndOpinionz 3 роки тому +3

    The interior looks more like a spaceship

    • @bustabass9025
      @bustabass9025 3 роки тому

      Where's Mr. Spock when we need him?

    • @scavengers19
      @scavengers19 2 роки тому

      Looks more luxurious than spaceship prometheus

  • @mastain8227
    @mastain8227 2 роки тому

    Top 👍👍👍👍

  • @juicygranolabar
    @juicygranolabar 2 роки тому

    love the inside, gives me star trek vibes

  • @B-A-L
    @B-A-L 3 роки тому +3

    Can't afford a public health service but can afford this, huh?

  • @allansheehan2033
    @allansheehan2033 2 роки тому +6

    I think the existing color scheme of AirForce One should remain for the new fleet that is coming !! It is iconic, has world wide recognition and a softer more impressive appearance than the proposed colors !!

  • @morganrock7651
    @morganrock7651 2 роки тому +1

    Jackie Kennedy picked out the baby blue in the 60s it’s iconic yes presidential or American maybe.

  • @MaduPresident
    @MaduPresident 3 роки тому

    wow.!!! air force one

  • @pacman7709
    @pacman7709 2 роки тому +4

    the new paint and exterior livery is BEAUTIFUL, inspiring, and perfect!

  • @Mckjku16
    @Mckjku16 3 роки тому +17

    Air Force one isn’t any aircraft, it’s any Air Force aircraft. The helicopter isn’t called Air Force one for example, it’s marine one since it’s operated by the marines.

  • @mauroizolirani8107
    @mauroizolirani8107 2 роки тому +1

    It looks cold

  • @GeeBee909
    @GeeBee909 3 роки тому +2

    I hereby designate the new call sign to be Air Force FUN

    • @davewatson2124
      @davewatson2124 3 роки тому

      Whilst you have Biden call it Air Force Dumb

  • @supremeemperor4747
    @supremeemperor4747 3 роки тому +15

    Something tells me there's gonna be a Space Force One along with this new Air Force One, but it'll probably be top secret.