$700 - I Bought the Most Expensive Backpack - Osprey UNLTD AntiGravity 64L
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 сер 2024
- I'm shocked that this backpack cost $700!
This is the first look at the Osprey UNLTD AntiGravity 64L!
...
100% Agenda Free :
This channel is Agenda Free and is fully supported by the viewers.
Support TOGR through Patreon : / togr
or
Support TOGR through UA-cam : / @theoutdoorgearreview
...
The $750 Osprey UNLTD AntiGravity Backpack - First Look
What it is : For the last 2 years, Osprey has been working on what is known as the UNLTD project which is a line of backpacks that harness every single advancement, innovation and technology;
These packs were designed with a focus on design and performance rather than price.
Agenda Free Link : www.osprey.com...
Versions :
Male and Female
Sizes :
Small to Medium - 64L
Large to XLarge - 67L
Measurements : 31.89H X 16.14W X 15.35D IN.
Materials :
MAIN210D High Tenacity Nylon Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Ripstop, PFC-free DWR
ACCENT210D High Tenacity Nylon Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Ripstop, PFC-free DWR
BOTTOM500D bluesign® approved recycled High Tenacity Nylon, PFC-free DWR
YKK Zippers
3D Printed Carbon Fiber Lumbar Pad
7075 Aluminum frame
Weight : 5.5lbs
Price : $750
Impressions :
From what I understand, this pack is based upon the design of the Osprey Atmos AG backpack which is one of my favorite backpacks ever. It’s a top notch system it’s a very good platform to build upon.
With the UNLTD AntiGravity, it is impressive to behold; when you look at the quality of the materials, the very intriguing design, innovative features….it’s impressive….impressive from a design standpoint….
But….
Is it $750 impressive; I wouldn’t go that far. Not from a monetary perspective at least not yet. When the testing begins with this pack, that may entirely change….I will talk about this more in a second.
My wife said it best when this pack arrived; it looks like a regular backpack and it cost $750 and that is true. From a distance, it doesn’t look to be any different from the majority of backpacks that are out on the market.
Standout Features : The 3D printed lumbar support is indeed different and the AutoLift harness system is indeed interesting.
Weight : This pack is heavy at 5.5lbs
Questions and Going Forward -
My Ultimate Question is this : Does the performance of this backpack justify the high price tag?
The Atmos AG backpack from Osprey is already incredibly durable, very comfortable and can be found for a good price, around $270 at the time of filming…..
How does the UNLTD backpack build upon that and improve upon it…..
In other words, how does it justify the price increase?
Considering that the OG Atmos AG is already comfortable enough, it is strong enough…what does this pack do differently or substantially better?
Question : Is this pack going to be substantially better or is it going to be more of a luxury?
Similar to driving a luxury vehicle sort thing?
That is what we are going to find out with my upcoming adventures and testing. My plan is to take this pack across the country to test it out in a wide range of environments to see just how well it performs and I will share with you, my completely agenda thoughts on this backpack.
My goal here with TOGR is to provide information and that’s it. I don’t push products, I don’t sell products, I don’t do commissions….I bought this backpack so I can review it honestly….so you can make an educated decision with your money.
The other UNLTD Backpack :
The other pack in the UNLTD lineup is the AirScape and it was designed to be a hauler; in other words, it was designed to carry more weight than the AntiGravity where it was designed with a priority on comfort and ventilation.
The price of that pack is $750 as well.
...
Web Site : www.theoutdoorg...
Come Join Us on Facebook, Twitter Instagram :
Facebook : / 281509538652229
Twitter : / outdoorgearrev
Instagram : / theoutdoorgearreview
For 700$, the Backpack has to travel on his own behind me.
My exact thoughts lol
It's in fact more expensive than a sherpa. 😅
😜
🤣🤣🤣
🤣😂
They still have the annoying connector for the chest strap. I've had it come off the rail several times and then it's a lot of work to get it back there. At $700 I would expect it to be ultralight and completely waterproof. And bearproof. Maybe it could feature a solar panel + usb. Throw in an air compressor for inflating and deflating sleeping pads. Maybe it could turn into a chair.
The things already 5.5 lbs, don’t give them any ideas.
AWESOME reply.
I hate that thing.
bearproof...really? gtfo
Love a ultralight, bear proof, mouse proof, waterproof bag. Happily pay $1100 for that over the zpacks.
My Gregory pack cost half that. The original was purchased maybe 12 years and I wore it out. Over stuffed, over loaded, hauled up and down...I sent it in thinking they would repair it...THEY REPLACED IT. For free. The new model is an extreme upgrade, easily as good as this pack with many of the same features. The customer service was gold, the pack is amazing. Half the price or so of this. I had an Osprey pack, it was nice, but $700 is nuts. Just plain nuts. As was mentioned by someone else if this came with a NO questions asked LIFETIME warranty, it might be worth it. But I bet it doesn't. At my age I suspect my Gregory pack is the last one I'll own. Enjoy yours!
Service depends on whether you're in the US or Europe but Osprey's warranty pretty much identical.
Osprey: It took us 2 years to develop this...
Also Osprey: It will cost you $700
China: Hold my beer....
China 4 days later: $39.95
😂😂😂
Make my day 😂😂😂
At Walmart
@@TheRealPontificator aliexpress no doubt haha
This is the winning comment
Luke I’m sorry but will NEVER EVER spend $700 on any backpack! Love all you do….Keep on keeping on!
@golli waffen It's not about having money for it, it's about is it worth it. For me the weight is a deal breaker. My Exos 48 together with my 2p tent weight as much as this pack.
@golli waffen Because expensive is always better?
I knew this bag will sell well, because it is simply the most expensive.
A single Bugatti Chiron tyre costs about £9,000
@golli waffen What with ya made up new account, ok Troll .
@Obese Sheboon Ratchet if I were rich ( I'm totally not at only 45k a year) I'd buy top end on every hobby I love
Just took my UNLTD backpacking this week. I was unimpressed with it out of the box, but on the trail, Oh MG! Forty-five pounds became nothing. I am highly impressed with the comfort and ease of access to my stowed gear. Taking it to Honstrandir next month. Can't wait.
this is interesting. I get ready for PCT 2024. One point of view is weight distribution, however another side - for me for thru-hike same importancy - is versatility and ease of access to everything. I consider bag as my home for six months. Weight of the bag is not that big concern if it helps me to feel good.I remember for pilgrimage to Santiago, how difficult is even to take bag out, not speaking about digging into it when you are tired. You are even ready to quit drinking if it is too difficult to get your bottle.
The features look nice. In order to justify the price tag, I would want all of that in a pack that weighs 2 to 2.5 lbs, max. Possibly with a smaller 45-55 liter capacity.
I went with Ula ultralight from 100% USA made, in Utah- I am a gear head and guide, so happy to support a company that has a warehouse of workers and makes it all... great value, great style- Circuit is what I got!
And a solar panel water heater shower * :p
I have had also a very similar concept rucksack Deuter Vario (got it about 10 years ago) which weighs unfortunately 2 Kg and the material is way less durable, so I can't imagine shrinking it to 1 Kg... maybe some helium inside (lol).
and water proof
I'm just not sure where this price-point is coming from. I get the carbon fiber webbing.. but why isn't the frame also carbon fiber or titanium? Almost every single decent pack (costing hundreds less) has aluminum in the frame. Why the heavy nylon? Why not Dyneema or some other ultralight/completely waterproof material? Maybe strength? In that case they could have a Dyneema inner layer with maybe a lightweight polyester outer layer - and then just ditch the pack cover completely. I love how the pack opens from the top and from the bottom. That is pretty spiffy... but is it $700 spiffy? I feel at over 5 lbs they missed the mark on what most backpackers and SERIOUS hikers (the ones who are willing to spend $700 on gear) are looking for - water resistance / proof, weight, long-term comfort over everything and then stuff like the water access, mesh pockets, detachable hood, etc. as bonus features. Starting out with 5 lbs before adding any hiking gear is a bit much.... especially for $700. I guess I just don't get it. An entry-level hiker would never buy this. They might spend $700 on all their gear combined. Sure, over time they'll upgrade on things like sleeping pads, tents, sleeping bags, and even packs as they learn where spending extra money is worth it... but most experienced hikers just aren't going to dish out that much money to get a heavier pack that isn't waterproof and doesn't have any mind-blowing features they can't get in the Atmos or similar... Just doesn't make sense.
Regarding the zipper system: its standard for Deuter for years. My almost 10 year old 75l bagpack has it. Its nothing new at all.
About your conclusion: I absolutely agree. I mean my backpack got thrown around in dirt and other crap over the years. Even if this bag would have some unique features I would be worried to much that its getting damaged and that alone reduced the usability in my opinion.
I'm with you, my first thoughts were "why are the materials not high end?" There's just not 700 dollars worth of equipment on here so I'm not sure what the market is supposed to be for this pack...
To everyone, thanks to your support and enjoying of this product. I'm a member that designs this pack, I totally understand many comments on the price and I want to add some details of what you will get:
The price is high because of the following:
1. New advanced technology parts: the lumbar is developed with Carbon company, which has the most advanced 3d print technology DLS. This technology can do many things that none others can do so far. it means that it adds so much benefits to the users: patterned cushioned areas, different hard cushioning layers ( outer layer is softer than the inner layer so it's comfortable whether you have heavy or light load) you can get this from foam, sponge. ... as usual, the down side of it is the time to make it is very long, the machine is very expensive. You can find this in the Specialized bike seat, Adidas shoes and many other...
2. The print on the mesh is silicon. Print silicone on mesh is very hard and labor, time consuming, but this make your pack part of your body.
3. The frame is Aluminum 7075 series, there're not many company can do the extrusion as well as bending it. How much values of this material you can find in the bike industries! strength, flexibility and light weight.
4. The fabric is a composure of high molecular yard which is very strong.
Cool info
I love Osprey products, but there is no way I'm spending $700 on a backpack.
Unless it comes with a sherpa to carry it for me.
Don’t then 🤷♂️
The weekend warriors who use their ultralight tents twice a year will be eating this thing up. Smart of Osprey to realize how many people mindlessly spend money now imo
@@Ro7ard how do you know a lot of people buy UL tents they only use twice a year?
amen sister !!!
that's just crazy & not wieght losses!!!!!!
I'm with you 👍🏽👍🏽
Im working in a sports store. The representative from osprey told us that the reason for the high price is the low production rate from a few hundred pieces of this model, so its more or less an (marketing)experiment.
I appreciate a company deciding to go full "John Hammond" and sparing no expense because a lot can be learned from it even if it is just a one-off exercise. However, there is no way I'd spend that much to own one of them. I said before: I'd rather buy a $160-200 backpack and spend the rest of the money on knitting a friend out so that they could join the fun.
lol John Hammond? From Jurassic Park? I haven't heard that before. lol
Great point btw.
- Luke
Hit the nail on the head. Osprey make great packs. That’s not really news. The features they’ve developed and materials used all look great. Does this justify the cost? Nope. Is it significantly better than their current (MUCH) cheaper stable of packs. Nope. Is there really a point to it. Nope.
Still, really informative and entertaining review as always Luke. It was nice to have a look anyway.
@@07YNWA
There is a point.Some people want something they perceive as being special - and good luck to them.
A single Bugatti Chiron tyre costs about £9,000 !
@@TheOutdoorGearReview Yep, that's the reference. Another way to look at this is that if Osprey made these packs as an R&D exercise to see just how good a pack they could make without selling them, there would be a small number of people begging them to make a few to sell. They're not for everyone, and there is no way Osprey expects them to be either. In making these, they probably did learn some things that they'll be able to use on their other packs.
I agree to your opinion.
And I agree to the "full John Hammond" expression.
700 + dollars for any backpack in my view is that it had damn well even carry itself. I have a Frostfire 73 expedition pack that is well over 20yrs old that has many of those same features for many hundreds of dollars less, and that pack is still going strong.
Wow that's insane! So that would probably be close to 900$+ Canadian! Quality hiking and camping gear is outrageously expensive in Ontario, Canada!
It'll probably be 1k + up here. I've seen the osprey aether sold for $500+tax.
You got that right I dropped $500 on my jaakari L pack but it has not let me down.
My price cap is 150 CAD.
It quite simply should be waterproof, I have two custom made ultralight waterproof packs that are supremely comfortable and both were less expensive, a lumbar bag, a flight cover 🤷♂️ I don’t get it, like you said it should be ultralight like a levity but with all the extra features, basically it’s a gimmick for people with more money than sense
This backpack is way too expensive for me! It must have gold implanted in it somewhere! Thank you Luke for checking on this backpack, I just don't see the point in paying that much when there are GREAT backpacks for a lot less! Hey Susie!🥰
That would make it to heavy. Platinum, diamonds better 😁
I have one of those smaller Osprey for summer activities, light weight, for light weight gear. I love it, very versatile. I have a large Savotta for winter gear, heavy pack for heavy gear. With colder weather it is slightly less difficult to have some extra weight in the pack itself. I think I won't spend this amount of money on a lightweight pack, personally. However I think there are people who may want (to pay the price for) this for the longer mountain trips, it is an awesome pack of course.
Thanks for the introduction!
This is hard to say but to people who uses a backpack going outdoors might love it without thinking of the price but to me I would not purchase it not because of the price but it's a bit much for my own usage being in the Navy, I have used the ALICE and MOLLE packs and has served me well. Having the right equipment is always the answer. Thanks Luke for the info.
I would say the pack would have to be part of a system. A tent that fits perfectly, a bear bag that is easily pulled out, bear spray quick access, a chair that quickly attaches to the side, hiking poles... But I still would not spend 700.
Great ideas! Are you listening Osprey?
Ooo, that's a good idea. Like, a "system" of items that are quality and fit in the pack.mesnt for it, which also has great features. You hit the nail on the head
An interesting product for sure. But for that price I would expect at least two hip belt pockets and fabrics that don't require a separate rain cover.
Good first impressions. I’ve never bought an Osprey pack and at this price I wouldn’t even if they kept all the features and managed to reduce the weight by half. At that empty weight they’re in the range of several military packs which are significantly less to purchase and have more storage space.
I feel like the price is to fund the massive R&D that went into this pack so that its features can trickle down into the rest of the lineup over time, and end up benefiting from economies of scale
I'm thinking the same, feels like this was one of those 'what would you build if you could build anything!?' projects. I reckon they've designed a fantastic pack, with some neat ideas; the price will eventually come down, and like you say ideas and feedback will be applied to the rest of the Osprey family.
I appreciate the fact that Osprey isn't afraid to go for it. $700 isn't in my budget although I've already begun to keep an eye out for a used one that is in my price range. I'm a diehard Osprey fan and currently own three of their packs. Which I love with each having a different purpose. If I had an extra seven hundred I would have one.
Gregory has been doing a lot of this for 20 years now. Top loaders with side access zippers. Huge detachable lids that can be used independently or strapped to your chest. Designs that hold the back panel away from your back for airflow. Huge, very stretchy mesh front stuff nets that work independently from what is stuffed in the main compartment. That's why I initially fell in love with Gregory packs. They always had huge mesh stuff nets on the front that were very stretchy. You never need to take something off and toss it in the main compartment. You could often stuff so much into them that I'd often end up with half a 65 liter pack on the outside mesh stuff pocket by the end of a trip.
What people are missing with this bag is, it's not really a bag they're pushing intending to sell alot of them....what they are is a backpack equivalent of a concept car, its what can they do if limitations are removed, the only difference to a concept car is they are offering it for sale for anyone who really wants to own a concept backpack.
People will not be complaining when you start getting features drip down onto other bag ranges at reasonable prices.
This bag offers nothing new or inovative. It's not a "concept" bag. It's a frog with lipstick on it. What does this bag do or offer that a $200.00 bag doesn't?
@@briansimpson8116 name a bag with the 3d printed carbon fibre lumbar support, or the new harness system?
@@TheSotai I would if he'd said the lumbar support and "new" harness system were at all impressive or better than any pack he ever used. But he didn't. So those features were unremarkable to him. And he's been using products for decades.
@@briansimpson8116 he was impressed with the harness system, and the 3d printing.
The only thing he wasn't impressed by was the weight and price tag. But seeing as it was designed for comfort not weight we can possibly over look the weight issue. We won't have a real review from him for awhile as he intends to use it before doing so.
@@TheSotai I don't agree. I like the sticky stuff idea so the bag have a less tendency to slide or move. But at the same time, it would seem as if there are features on this bag, that counteracts this, such as being thick and heavy.
And I don't like the placement of the waterbag. Could puncture, get really dirty and it seems a lot of hazzle to get it in and out.
I also find it plain ugly, that is of course taste. It's screaming color and says "come and steal from me, I am a city slicker and walking in the jungle".
Sometimes features are not so smart after all. Look at curvy tv sets. No one sell that anymore. It came and it went. We'll see. It may prove long term positive.
3d printing can either be fragile or strong. Carbon is not always strong in all directions. For example my own carbon MTB brake discs that splinter if touched sideways.
Aluminium 7050T6 frame sticks is okay but not ultimate. And we all know extruded aluminium bicycle frames that bent or dented and became soft over time. And sun degrades
carbon parts. And good luck trying to take out a tent in heavy rain through that top front letter box opening. Or doing the same with the whole pack open in heavy rain.
To me, it looks like a computer geeks weekend bag. It's like other outdoor brands mixing with some self proclaimed "upmarket" clothing brands. Doesn't make any difference except the manager who shovels money in to his or her own account in bonuses.
It's not very innovative and way overpriced. I see it as a move towards stealing more money, by trying to call this an "upmarket" piece of kit. It's not. Waste of money.
Kind regards.
There are some great features built into this pack. Good on Osprey for having the balls to even produce this pack. Im not sure how many they will sell to individuals, at five and a half pounds it is on the heavy side. I can see rescue groups or institutions like Nolls having these for their instructors. Otherwise for the price I could buy so many other things that i actually need like a down payment on a car or replace parts on my house.
Plenty of people can easily afford it though.
@@redpillnibbler4423 Really? , The world skint.
@@gazza1858
Are where I live - millionaires! - £700.= pocket change,honest.
@@redpillnibbler4423 What ever .
Or a tent
I don’t think there is ever a justification for $700+ for a back pack of any sort. That’s just insane. $700 better give you all of the components in one. That being; Light weight, Comfort, storage, extras like the lumbar/backpack detach options, customizable, and I would love to see a roll top on it for expandable options. And still I would be hard pressed to pay $700 plus tax for it. Maybe $500 max. Just not enough features for a main storage area and some side pockets with breathable frame. But that’s just my opinion. Love the videos Luke! I watch all your videos but never have commented. Strength and Honor my man! Till next time.
looking at my ole reliable bleached out, mud encrusted, 5 years old, 40 Bucks, China Made, 3-day-assault-pack copy cat by "Mil Tec"... I had to drag that thing through countless work commutes, travels, hikes & camps UNTIL it finally tore on a day where I stuffed it real heavily and had excessive amounts of weight hanging on the Molle-webbings all around - I was barely able to lift it up and upon arrival noticed small blood vessels on my shoulders popped from the weight. And I am still using it today because the little rip that appeared on its outside tissue doesn't even mess with the backpack's integrity or weight bearing structure, it's just a potential leaking spot.
So when I compare that to 700 dollars, never ever could that backpack somehow ever impress me, no way! I watched your review on it with great curiosity and interest and I wanna thank you a lot for your detailed and objective approach, you give insights most people wouldn't dare to take for such a price in the first place.
But to be fully honest, like.... am I the only one who feels like.... if you have 700 dollars flying around so loosely that you even remotely consider getting such a backpack, wouldn't there maybe be more noble things you could do with such money? Don't know what target audience Osprey thought of, but for what I can say, all the people I know enjoying nature, hikes, travels, outdoor sports etc. would laugh their brains out hearing about a guy who spent 700 dollars on a backpack. It's a hillariously pathetic way to compensate for a midlife-crisis or last-resort-gift-idea. Would never let myself be seen with such a thing!!!
Hands down you are one of my favorite gear reviewers and I know that you'll lay it all out honestly.
My opinion is similar to your first impression, I wouldn't even blink at the price if Osprey made an Atmos AG and used carbon fiber stays and Dyneema and got it down to sub 2lbs. They went the complete opposite way though, rather than practical they went full gimmick
Luke, I know this may go against what your channel is all about, but I think a fair evaluation of this pack is to let another person who doesn’t know the price tag on this pack test it out. We are all human and even though you do great on evaluating products, deep down there is always that bias that may skew your opinion. Just my 2 cents brother. Think of it as a “control”.
If it's your passion, go for it. I bicycle tour, bike pack and even have a snow bike. I got rid of my car because I didn't use it and bicycling became a way of life. I spend on items that don't make biking easier, but the quality give me peace of mind. If this pack gives you a buzz, buy it...or you'll be out hiking and thinking about it, even if it turns out to be a minor upgrade
Every company should be doing what Osprey has done here. Put all the research and development into a high quality and innovative product. Yes, it is expensive but that is not the point. The beauty of it is that people WILL buy it and start sharing the pros and cons. Adjustments will be done to it, competitors will heed the call, and more affordable packs with similar tech will start to be produced. Bravo Osprey
A lot of those features are not new to Osprey packs, but what would make that worth 700$ to me is less shoulder/neck stress and pain when backpacking. That is what I find to be unbearable when hiking and I've always wished for something more dynamic. I am excited to see what the results are!
How much load do you usually carry? I have found that the best way to prevent shoulder/Neck Stress is to use a heavier but more comfortable Backpack and lighten the weight of your other Equipment.
By using a quilt, a Air and foam Pad Combo (for Winter) and a light tent (Like lanshan) + clothes like the Decathlon down Jacket, you can get a base weight of Like 5kg without the Backpack for a full setup for really cheap. Paired with a really comfortable Backpack you can get around 9-10kg for 2-3 nights with food and water. Really light, comfortable, cheap and no more pain
@@cedrics1220 about 30
This review is like Top Gear / Grand Tour. Thank you for the detailed review of the Ferrari that 99.9% of your viewers will never be able to buy.
I know for a fact that osprey makes amazing bags but for $700 I hope it also makes amazing coffee.
👍👍
Absolutely love my Osprey Xenith Pro, it's a 7500 cubic inch capacity expedition pack, and it's been a solid bag for two decades now. Also attached is a Vector Summit for a great day bag.
I do believe it was the $700 pack of it's day. I spent two active duty enlistments in the Army and this is by far best fitting bag I've ever used.
🇺🇸
With inflation over 8% and gas prices over the top, Osprey releases a backpack for $700...someone in marketing has completely lost it. Sorry you threw your money away by purchasing a gimmick that will never sell to real backpackers. I love your reviews Luke. Keep up the good work.
While I agree with most of what you said... the CF lumbar support is hopefully something that we will see in some more reasonably priced packs. And to be honest, I'm quite curious how it compares to something like Deuters Air Mesh.
inflation goes up and down so if they price based on that alone they can sell now for cheap and charge more for it later. lol thats just stupid
@@coryb6722 Long-term, inflation does not go down. The down points are always temporary before rising higher than ever before (without government intervention, beyond the classic "print more"). Remember in the 90's when candy was 50 cents to 75 cents? Then 1 dollar, now 1.5-2 for all candies for the past 5-6 years. I don't even eat candy but just something I noticed.
I was waiting for your conclusion after trying it?
Looks like they took a duffle bag, turned it on end and added a frame. Innovation is not throwing a Fanny pack on top and adding some Lycra pockets. For 700 bucks it could have detachable pockets that convert to gaiters, a mini inertia electricity generator for batteries, color matching internal bags, or any number of truly innovative design aspects. This is a backpack.
Hi Luke, Mark here from New Zealand! I've just bought this pack and will report back to you after my first hike (we call it tramping). A huge improvement over the Atmos 50ag
Would love to hear back about this!
Setting aside price for a moment... I think there's been a bit of a tunnel vision on reducing weight on certain components that has actually gone down a wrong path. The backpack weight itself is only a fraction of your total system weight. Therefore it may in fact be wise to expand the "weight budget" of the backpack a bit if doing so provides compounding or exponential benefit. i.e. it allows you to build a far more advanced harness and weight distribution system. Which allows you to carry more total system weight far more comfortably than a ultra light backpack. Coming from a military perspective there is a trend among load barring equipment (chest rigs, plate carriers, battle belts, etc.) towards more sturdy, better load distributing rigs that themselves are heavier than what was formerly the trend of ultra light ones. I think this was what Osprey is trying to achieve; jury is still out on if they've successfully done that however.
Nope. At that price I’d be too worried about getting it dirty or scuffing/tearing it, that it would take the fun out of backpacking for me.
That pack looks amazing!
I am from Germany and a huge fan of american outdoor equipment.
I especialy like my MysteryRanch Terraframe.
It is the most thought through pack i have ever seen. I did not find any flaws....
The load panel and the bag only option are truely amazing.
I also like the hyperlite mountain gear packs.
I enjoy your channel and videos a lot.
Thanks:)
I got one, its amazing. A whole weeks wage but it is super comfortable, and although i thought id have buyers remorse, once i wore it I’m in love. Mind you, i haven’t had other backpacks so don’t really have anything to compare it too.
I wonder how durable this backpack is in the long run. With that price tag it should last a lifetime and then some aswell. It looks awesome but I wonder if small knife cut, branches or ember ruin this backpack?
Yup a major part of it being justified to be that price would be an expectation of it lasting to be handed down to the next generation to be used.
No doubt, this pack is EXTREMELY cool. I love the features and it looks amazing, but as many have already said, $700 is complete and utter insanity. Lol The weight is a huge turn off too, but that’s just me.
Agreed. Part of the weight is the adjustability. You can easily get around that if you try a couple of other backpacks and find one that fits you well.
@@etherealicer For sure! I actually just bought the REI Flash 55 on sale for $139.99 and it’s nothing too special, but at the same time it is pretty much the perfect pack for me in every way. I do really love the look of this Osprey pack though.
@@ManivanAdventures Currently my most used is the TSL Dragonfly 15/30 (I think I paid around $70). Overall a pretty mediocre backpack (quality looks etc). But it can switch between 15 and 30 litre and that is so amazing for me...
Crazy amount but I got it and am glad. I've done lots of mileage with this pack and where I've come home with aches and pains before with other packs, this one brings me home in great shape carrying the same if not more weight. This alone makes it worth it for me. Very well made, extremely comfortable...
You could get a very good tent for that price that will last you for years. 700 for a backpack is just insane!
I’ll take my ULA Ohm 2.0 over this pack every time. Cost me a little over $250, weighs 2lb and no complaints after 4 years.
I wouldn’t pay $700 for a pack unless it came with a mule.🤷🏻♂️
I think a pack that big is meant for people who intend to carry a mule on their back though..
Now because this bag is the most expensive on the market the ultra light fruit cakes are going to jump on it and make a shift to "technical gear" because it's outrageously priced
Except it weighs like half my base weight lmao
I want to say that I have an 2 Ospreys, a 75 and 100 and they are already high quality!
To me, I dont care if a pack is ultralight. I'd rather lasting durability. I'm looking forward to seeing your thoughts after testing this bad boy. Definitely a cool design, and I'm sure theres alot of people who are more than happy to buy this!
The most advance and the best tool one can ever have is one's own body. Keep it sharp and you're good to go anywhere.
I'm sure there's a market for this. I know people who insist on carrying a load out that requires a pack like this. Not me, but hey, that's why there are different types of packs and innovations. My new, totally custom, UL waterproof pack was several hundred dollars less and includes features I find much more useful to me. I'm glad for the availability and diversity of outdoor manufacturers so we can all find a pack that helps us get out and enjoy the wilderness!
What's up Luke I see you got a new osprey that you're reviewing for a second time and yes $700 is still way more than what it should be
Tell Susan the kids I said hello and take care
Good video as always
700!? Made of gold and platinum?
I need a rugged waterproof shell. Can handle branches and brush scrapping up against it, and still stay waterproof. If this can do it. I'd pay around $325-$360 for this. Good support and back saving designs is more beneficial than just cutting load weight by a pound or two. Can't wait to see how this holds up this summer!
I use Kelty exclusively. They are the mid, to upper price packs, and I really, really love them. Osprey makes good packs, just been partial to Kelty. However, even for a Kelty, I would not spend $700. Too pricey for me. My go to packs are the Kelty Coyote family, in the 50L and 65L packs, and I don't much care for the new versions. The last version, IMHO, was the best!
Thank you for the video and keep the reviews coming!!
Meanwhile, the ULA Ohm 2.0 63L, a tried and true pack used by many experienced hikers, weighs 33 oz. and costs around $260 depending on options.
I’m starting my 5th year with my Ohm 2.0 with zero complaints, and it’s still going strong.
Great pack from a great company.👍🏼
I’ve got a Catalyst. Half the weight of the Osprey. Mine is Xpac, not sure how that fabric compares to that used in the Osprey but I like it. Just can’t see packing around 5.5 pounds before even adding gear.
To justify the price, it better come fully loaded to take camping for at least 2 days (hammock/quilts, tent/pad/sleeping bag food, water bladder or bottles, headlamp, etc). Something other than the pack. My 65L-70L for under $100 works great for what I use it for.
I paid 150 bucks a few years ago for my 57-liter Z-packs Zero that weighs 9 ounces. The best purchase I've ever made. It transformed my backpacking experience. My big 3 weigh less than that osprey pack.
The good thing about the price (what most people do not initially think of) is that it is going to last a lifetime. Not only the materials used are top-notch and highly durable - but the owner is also going to take great care of it - because it's so expensive. That pack is going to last decades of use, and when you calculate the price/years of use - you'll suddenly find, that it's actually quite cheap. And moreover, these kind of products saves the planets resources, because they are not your everyday-throwaway things - they are built to last. That's why I just bought one of these.
I'm also poor, so I have to buy the best quality available. Only rich can afford to buy crap over and over again.
Lots of people have also complained about the weight of this back pack. They say it's too heavy.
Well, if 2.5 kilos (or 5.5 pounds) is really too heavy, then I'm sure there's a local gym nearby which can help with that issue...
But seriously, there are lightweight back bags which are so poorly made, that 20 pounds load feels like 40. And there are normal weight back bags which are so well made, that 40 pounds load feel like 20.
You all know that. So in this case there's really no weight issue.
Nice and thorough presentation.
Just FYI; the lumbar pad is not carbon fiber. It is a photopolymer resin. It is 3D printed by the *company* Carbon, whose name confuses a lot of people. Adidas has used the same company to 3D print their 4DFWD sole, and Specialized has made a 3D printed bike saddle with them.
@Luke Try reviewing the Mardingtop 75L pack. I think you'll be impressed with that pack and it's quite affordable.
$700 is a substantial amount of money, but gear freaks pay that much for tents, and IMO, the backpack is important enough that i would consider paying this price if it was really good and it came with a great warranty - which Osprey is known for.
I recently bought the Klättermusen Raido 38L backpack for $340, in addition to 7 accessory pockets and bottle holder. Total price got up to $650, so it was pretty expensive, but now i have a really comfortable lightweight backpack with external frame, and superior organizing possibilities 👍
Separate pocket for
1 - first aid kit and hygiene articles
2 - eating utensils
3 - straps, cords, 2 small tarps, and the external side pockets (unless they are connected to the outside of the pack)
4 - the Osprey "Ultralight Stuff Pack", shopping bag, and Arcteryx Incendo SL jacket
5 - small pocket on the hip belt for snacks or GPS
6+7 - big attachable side pockets that is big enough to fit a loaf of bread in one, and my 1liter Stanley food thermos + 3 cup Bialetti "Moka Express" (classic Italian coffee pot) in the other.
I have an 1800lumen Nitecore MH12S flashlight in its holster attatched to the hip belt, next to a 8-20x magnification monocular, and a nice €300 knife from MKM. The huge built in (not accessory) side pockets can each fit 3x 1L bottles of water, or the Zpacks Duplex tent, or my 1,6liter cook kit + Rab Neutrino 200 quilt. So that leaves plenty of space for extra clothes and enough food for longer trips 😁
It looks like a nice pack. I'm looking forward to seeing what you really think of it over time.
Agreed. Amazing features, but not worth the price. The lumbar pack was fluff, just like the travel bag. I think they overthought the design.
I enjoy your reviews and I am a gear junkie for sure, but nothing will ever replace my dear Alice!
Loved your review of the OMG-$700X! Osprey.
For $700, it really should have my coffee ready first thing when I wake-up while in the back country. I've seen several reviews for these packs already, and: 1) I really like some of the features of this pack. 2) You hit the point directly; for $700, you would want a pack with the same features (or very close) and be a lot lighter weight. At 5.5 lbs (6.3 for the S/M AirScape!) I agree.
I realize that this pack is designed to carry the load so that it feels lighter, but for the money, it seems they could have found ways to shed some weight.
This comes to mind : “ a fool and his money are soon parted” - Thomas Tusser
I really appreciate you purchasing this and reviewing it. Based off your knowledge and experience I believe you will give this the real world tests and reviews that us the consumers really deserve. Looking forward to your critique on this. I however would not ever purchase this, unless I win the lottery. But again thank you for doing this and your honest opinion with these products.
Me: Wow, stowable gear loops.
Osprey: $700!!!
Ok,it’s a nice pack.but the clamshell design doesn’t allow any gear to be added on the outside. It certainly looks comfortable but it’s over 5pounds empty,and at that price i could buy 2 different high quality packs to better fit different situations. Thanks Luke another great video
Because I needed a load hauler for work as a backcountry caretaker I just got the 2022 version of the Osprey Atmos AG 65. It’s feature set is very similar to that pack, minus the lumbar pack and “auto lift”. It’s still very comfortable and weighs significantly less than that pack. The torso length, shoulder strap length, and hip belt are fully adjustable. It also is guanteeed for life. There is NO WAY the UNLTD is worth $400 more. But Elon Musk would probably buy it.
I got this lil pack from lidil on sale for 5 bucks about 3 years ago, still holding up good. Nothin special, one large pouch one small pouch. Decent pack.
I know I know, a bit pricy but I figured you only live once
I've been watching tent reviews et cetera for many months now. Never really decided to subscribe, I don't know why. But $700 for a backpack? OK, OK.. I'll subscribe now
It is good, but my exos 48 is good too! I just don’t see the additional value for money in this pack, they just came in at a super high price point for the gear snobs that will buy anything just because it’s expensive so must be the best
For $700 dollars, I'd want it to include a Sherpa to carry the damn thing. 😀
I bought mine few days ago for 630€ and it is the first big backpack ive ever bought. My thoughts while wearing it for the first time was: "wow its fit so well i feel ready to climb the mount everest. I will start an interrail europa Trip with a tent etc. Im planning to switch my way of traveling and living while im on my trip.. (somedays in tents, somedays hostel and somedays hotel/apartments ) im sure this backpack is way to advanced for me but i love it. Its made for ppls like nims purja from 14peaks.
Hey Luke. A backpack I was sort of keen on, but not the price is the Snigel 100L Backback 2.0. It's slightly cheaper or dearer depending on which online shop you visit. I can't find any reviews on it, only a presentation video by Snigel. It looks impressive, but looks can be deceiving. So I have been on the fence for a long time. It could be the best thing since sliced bread and worth the buy once/cry once, or crying for a very long time
Thanks for taking the hit on this one, Luke!
When it comes to gear like this, try to remember it's relative and to what exactly. I ride a $900 downhill skateboard at 60 mph because anything less won't handle the speed safely and then there's my $330 Swiss, full-face helmet I won't ride without and the cheapest USED, Stan Bogdan Fly Fishing reel for Salmon/Steelhead you can find will START...at $3000.00 Sleeping bags and tents are already at this price point and this is a Backpack! As essential for form and function as it gets. You will appreciate this Osprey pack MORE, every mile you carry it after the first. Bet on that. 😉
the lid becoming a hip bag is really smart
I'm sure this pack costs the same to manufacture as any other pack they make using the same sweat shop workers. 700.00 theyre robbing the consumer.. they must be insane.
Waterproof with no need for a rain cover, super tough bottom so it doesn’t matter if you catch a rock and super light super strong. Then maybe £650.00 plus shipping.
Love ur vids! Keep up the good work!
I picked the ULTD Airscape up with an eye for single bag travel with camera gear. I agree with most of your assessments of the bag series.
One of the poorly designed things I noticed was how the hydration pouch clip is mounted and the clip choice. One end of the clip is mounted on a short loop and tucked up under the zipper. The clip's ends that on the end that you run through your bladder are wider than the clip - meaning you're working blind trying to feed the clip back together, trying to squeeze one end together while holding the other end in place against the tension of the bladder and bag's zippered flap. I wasn't able to do so intuitively or easily in my home. I had to flip the bag up on its top more so to get the clip clipped at all with good lighting. I was a little disappointed and feel that most people will probably have to rig something up to use it in the field or just use water bottles. Which sucks, because now you're carrying a zippered, sewn in tube clamps, and sleeved compartment that isn't good for much of anything, increasing the weight of the bag. Also, why only have a hip belt pocket on the left side? I assume it's for access to your water bottle, but I know both can exist, as they do on many other bags on the market, and since this was the "no expenses spared" bag, why not have a slightly smaller pocket?
Everything else seems to have a purpose, albeit with a bit of a weight penalty. The padding on the straps, back and waist band are probably the best I've seen. It has enough well placed straps without being too strappy. The day pack lid is kind of cool on this and was a decent selling point for me.
The price point does bug me though for having stainless stays, heavy materials, and some features that are questionable. If you have the money, sure, it's a nice bag, but it isn't that huge of an upgrade over a bag half it's cost.
In the UK it will cost you £650 beer tokens!
The features are revolutionary. It is the overall weight of the rucksack that is the deal buster for me.
For the price, it requires to be a great deal lighter.
For that price, it has be absolute perfect backpack-
Besides the price, I find it way too fiddly for everyday use. The top detachable pack is interesting, but primarily in the way of clear access to the top of the rest of the pack, hence the need for the front access zippers which can be a weak point for water ingress and failure if overloaded, and the zips opening from the bottom could become an issue if they fail and you suddenly find yourself losing stuff falling out unnoticed as you go. Or even if you just didn't notice you failed to zip them completely. The rain cover is a separate pouch, why? Just added weight.
It seems Osprey has forgotten about the K.I.S.S. method of operation. It's also huge! If they made it in a smaller version that maybe carried 45 liters max, then I'd say they might have something worth considering for the average market. (At a lower price point!)This thing just encourages you to break the rule of only taking what you need if you're going out for more than a day or two.
I agree wholeheartedly.
This thing has too many failure points, uses a cheaper, less functional fabric than DCF or XPAC, and seems more directed to the newbie hiker with deep pockets, zero knowledge and shallow interest in pure function.
I saw one of the designers commented here. He was claiming the pack was expensive because of certain features, like the fabric and the carbon mesh. I got that fabric on three cheap, cheap, cheap backpacks I got for free in a special promo and gave to my cousin's kids. They retailed for $69.
I have the carbon mesh on my Seek Outside Divide pack for the front pouch. It is not exclusive to Osprey. That Divide pack is an expensive, semi-custom, handmade XPAC backpack rated to carry up to 200 lbs., at nearly half the cost and at half the weight, with better features, like a roll-top entry, dual hip pockets, and the best strap system in the biz.
Why on Earth would I want to buy this inferior Osprey, even if at $250?
I said my peace with the last video. To pay $700 it would definitely need to be sub 3 pounds, be waterproof, carry up to 50lbs, be super comfortable with any pack configuration, and be adjustable to suit any loadout.
If I pay 700 dollars for a backpack it better weigh less than 5 pounds. My Atmos is 4.5 for Pete’s sake! I would love to see you review a Lite AF pack. Love all your videos! Keep up the great work!!!
You can get a wisport raccoon 65l for less then half that straight from the manufacturer.
I just received my Osprey UNLTD 32. I just didn't think I needed the big brother for short hikes or even an overnighter. I'll find out though. As of right now, the pack seems great but I wish it had some of these features your pack has although it has a lot of them. I can't wait to get out there and try it out
Now you can say you have a $700 backpack. It’s like a $500 pair of sunglasses. At the end of the day, they’re polarized sunglasses.
My z packs arc hall cost me $1112.00 aud. Even before exchange rates when you add all accessories you need to add individually it was $770 usd. To buy this Osprey bag in Australia is $800. Biggest difference is weight. For us all hiking gear has a high cost. No ultra light gear available here.
$700 out of my tax bracket .......... unless the thing jumps off my back and sets up base camp itself while i take a nap no way would I even think about spending $700 for a backpack. Solid review of the product Luke cheers mate keep up the good work.
It would have to carry 30 lbs better than any pack I have ever owned , and . Carry , forget it was there . My first pack ( non-military ) was a Osprey . I hope this pack lives up !!
My roomier has a women's Osprey that she paid $250 for. I can't believe that they made so many improvements to justify $700!
As an Indian I could do 3 mountain pass (above 5000 meters) trek expedition on this price 🤔. And I use a $50 rucksack.