I wanted one of these back when I was 16 in 2002. My dad wouldn't let me buy one cause of insurance cost. This was easily my #1 car back in the day & still looks great today in 2023.
I got me a 97 now. That was my car I wanted when I was 17 when it came out. Couldn't be happier with it. ua-cam.com/video/ItJ4kFxdWIo/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/C2gFCcXRhUA/v-deo.html
It would have been great for the time if the rpo code "L99" 265/4.3L small V8 (base engine for the Caprice) would have been offered as V8 option on the base Camaro. Maybe 215-220hp and 255-260 lbs-ft of torque with the dual exhaust. Kind of an intermediate range performer and a less pricey V8 Camaro than the full on Z28.
I could get down with that. It would've made for a cool Rally Sport package option. Or a Berlinetta where you get all the nice interior options, standard trim and the entry level V8.
I wanted one of these back when I was 16 in 2002. My dad wouldn't let me buy one cause of insurance cost. This was easily my #1 car back in the day & still looks great today in 2023.
Go get one now
I have one 🙂 72,000 original miles
@@ItzOwenL mine just got 80,000 😔
Mines been stuck at 282,000 for over 15 years it's ok life support now😂
I got me a 97 now. That was my car I wanted when I was 17 when it came out. Couldn't be happier with it.
ua-cam.com/video/ItJ4kFxdWIo/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/C2gFCcXRhUA/v-deo.html
My favorite generation of Camaro
Dang, this is clearer than a lot of the official uploads from Motorweek.
I love this style body this Camaro
Thank god they went to the 3800 v6 in 98.
I had a 1996 with a 3.8
V8 only . V6 camaro sucks
@justinwhite9689 the lt1 was good in some parts but overall not worth it I would prefer the ls1 5.7
@@justinwhite9689 The Sixth Generation V6 is way underrated. It's come along way since the time of this vid.
I had on around 2007-2015, what a gas guzzler that was 15-16 mpg city and 24 mpg highway. 160hp was not enough out of the 3.4L
Still got mine remain engine 95 3.4l v6
Mine won't start... no 5 volts from pcm
Beautiful Camaro
The 4th gen fbodys never aged
I love this generation of Camaro
It is a family thing.😊
96-02 V6 F bodies were 2nd only to the ground shaking 5.7 LT1 V8.
The black mirrors make the entire car look a little un-finished. Good looking and these were everywhere back in the day.
The Camaro is more beautiful in Black anyway.
The black mirrors only work if the basket handle and roof are also black.
Got to have the black roof ua-cam.com/video/ItJ4kFxdWIo/v-deo.html
Them on their own yes. you had to have the mirrors, roof, headlight buckets and basket handle black for it to look good
It would have been great for the time if the rpo code "L99" 265/4.3L small V8 (base engine for the Caprice) would have been offered as V8 option on the base Camaro. Maybe 215-220hp and 255-260 lbs-ft of torque with the dual exhaust. Kind of an intermediate range performer and a less pricey V8 Camaro than the full on Z28.
I could get down with that. It would've made for a cool Rally Sport package option. Or a Berlinetta where you get all the nice interior options, standard trim and the entry level V8.
@@christopherhouck3846 Absolutely, maybe even an LT in there as well. You said it.
It's a hard top😊
2:38
Jesse from full house sitcom.,,😊
The F bodies didn't get a good V6 engine, Buick 1996-02.
I had a 93 V6. Was so slow
I had a 3.4 it was decent for its time in 93. The 3.8 was a big improvement after 96 though
@dougsmith9571 I traded my 93 3.4, 4 speed auto for a 2002 3.8, 5 speed. I would keep up or beat the old 4.6 liter mustangs in the 2002.
Hard-Top?😊😊
Pacific Metals international Ltd via/ local #1 boiler makers & shipbuilding union Vancouver British Columbia Canada. 😊
a Camry sport of the same year was a second faster lol
Nobody wanted a Camry Sport.
@@TeeroyHammermill lol
Chevrolay better than Camray
@@commonsence1129 lmaoooo for a $90 bi-weekly payment lol
It also cost more than a v8 z28. not to mention held the road and handled like 🤮