World's First OLED TV Panel I've Measured to Hit 3000 Nits!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 чер 2024
- We measure LG Display's latest OLED panel with META Technology 2.0 which can hit 3000 nits on a 3% window at panel native white point, courtesy of MLA+ & META Multi Booster innovations.
To find out more about META Technology 2.0, please visit: bit.ly/47t2gFP
The "Includes Paid Promotion" message in this video refers to the sponsorship by LG Display.
========================
**Click Below to SUBSCRIBE for More Reviews, Sneak Peeks & Tips:
/ @hdtvtest
========================
VISIT HDTV Test
www.hdtvtest.co.uk/
FOLLOW US!
www.threads.net/@hdtvtest
/ hdtvtest
/ hdtvtest
/ vincent_teoh
/ hdtvtest - Наука та технологія
That's cool that MLA enhances off axis brightness. Before I was concerned the tech would narrow the brightness by focusing the light straight ahead.
I actually wonder if the biggest improvement that MLA brought for LG's TVs is detail and depth.
Can confirm. I'm amazed how good my 77" G3 looks at really wide viewing angles.
This is a really good summation of the LG display improvement. Good stuff!
As a G3 owner im amazed that only within a year they could improve the MLA tech so much! Congrats. I am also very excited to see this new detail enhancer in action since near black posterization is still an issue.
While I’m excited too, best to temper your expectations
Most of the brightness improvements seem to just apply at 3% window sizes. Also, lots of it seems to rely on AI boosting, so won’t be sustained.
I continue to be so impressed with how well you communicate the nuances between display technologies. The test patterns are really revealing in the luminance and color shifting on the mini LEDs. The technology has its place but best dark room picture is still from OLED.
It’s evident how much thought and efforts get put into the comparisons especially when considering the rest of the field which at worst will give a subjective opinion and at best read the manufacturer’s spec sheet. Thanks as always, keep it up!
Will be interesting to see the new Sony tech , especially if they bring in to 98". Again Vincent is technically right , but in real world viewing watching say a Sony X95M with it's new control panel , you probably have to look for this stuff in certain movies . Buyers of the X95L 85" seem very happy . G4 83" should be a great TV, and coming with stand option in some countries as well
Vincent's talk about about OLED being superior to Mini-LED here has me wondering: why have TV manufacturers and VR headset manufacturers embraced the latter if it's clearly inferior?
I'm a big fan of the variety of test patterns you use! I would not be suprised (like the car industry was found to do) whether the display industry boosts performance higher than normal if detecting such patterns on screen; given an assumption they'll be short lived on-screen. They'll likely now hide it behind "AI" upscaling!
There was much ado about exactly that with the S95B early firmware builds. Debatable whether it was intentional cheating, but it had an algorithm that reacted to motion and resulted in static test patterns seeming fairly accurate while moving video was brightened. Influenced a lot of early side-by-side comparisons with the brightness sugar rush. Samsung has changed things since this was uncovered, and the tests have gotten better too.
For one of the cooler examples, check out Classy Tech showing off tests from Spears & Munsil that can quantify available peak brightness at various picture averages. Plotted over time, and you can see how thermals affect the display performance.
Lol! I'm sharing this to FOMO's channel, with all of his talk about 4000 nits. This tech will only get better / brighter in coming years to boot.
I remember a few years ago when FOMO said OLED might never reach 1000 nits...
Yet another excellent video that shows why I keep telling everyone that you are one of the best in the business! Thanks!
I'd love to see brightness measurements evolve to have brightness for the individual colors as of course just having a bright white subpixel does not allow for bright, fully saturated colors.
Yes, rtings has that data too and HDTVTest should include it as well. Just measuring white brightness is pretty dumb, as it heavily favors WOLED with the white subpixel
The brightest highlights are predominantly sunlight. Presumably that's why LG went with WRGB in the first place. That said, publicizing a brightness at almost 10,000K is ridiculous.
+ way more content benefits from higher color volume vs just overall peak brightness.@@AnimeUniverseDE
Lots of Sony films have insane HDR brightness (f.e. Robert Langdon trilogy, Inferno 10.000 nit MaxContentLightLevel, 3647 nit MaxFrameAverageLightLevel, Black Hawk Down 4000/1391, Lord of War 2508/2394).
I wonder if this is a policy to boost future bright TV sales (since they seem to focus now on brighter LED TVs) - though they also have access to the best Sony mastering monitors, but ye, probably has sth to do with selling bright TVs.
On the other hand there is Chris Nolan, who had his peak with Inception (1538/308) and now seems to favor a natural filmic projector look with Oppenheimer just peaking at 186/147, where you really wonder if any upgrade for brighter TVs is needed, if he doesn't want it to look brighter than on a film projector.@@concinnus
@@concinnus I agree , people have been stressing about colour saturation , But red looks red etc. It's only side by side demos , or when brightness really pushed will you see some destauration . People need to get outside. look at the green leaves, they are reflecting white light in hot spots and on edges . Yeah shine a pure green laser in your eye, or watch burning metal on a dark night, you will see pure colours . If you watch TV or 99% of movies made to date , They are SDR ( Rec-709) or DCI-P3 . This Tv can do these 100% , Do they want samsung pop , do they want classic Technicolor westerns to look weird as hell . As you say , it's hard to go outside and see pure colours, they all have white or colour casts from surrounding light surfaces.
Given that having 100% BT2020 would be good for future protection and allow animators and directors to do use it wisely or as stupidly as they like .
Also people forget how brains work. How red is something is based on what surrounds it, or what becomes before. A cherry tomato is super sweet, if you don't drink fanta and eat surgery foods. A patch of green on a barren mountainside appears more green, yet would seem pale in a jungle.
Just buy what TV you want and enjoy it. There is little advantage to seeing imperfections if you train yourself to .
sixties and seventies was filled with people enjoying AM music on the radio through cheap plastic/cardboard speakers .
Given that the G4 83" may be a cracker if no QD-OLED equivalent, 83 beats 77 every day of week if close in ability
Although I've been a long time LG fan, I'm actually thankful Samsung introduced the QD OLED, without the competition, LG was dangerously slacking.
Yeah me and my wife are holding out for a big Living Room TV and have sold our 75inch SONY X95K big boy and are very interested in the new G4 and the Matte Screen of the S95D
Don't forget sony released qd oled at the same time as samsung
@@chrisbullock6477 Samsung actually made the tech, Sony just used it.
@@chrisbullock6477if you have a mini led Sony tv right now you should look at their flagship this year
Now let’s see Peak Red, Green, Blue primaries.
i bet color luminance is still in the 300 nit range.
Thank you for the update !
Please do an updated Settings video for PS5 and Xbox Series X on LG C2 since there have been many updates released after your last Settings video.
Hell yeah, I bought C3 and I need my TV guru to help me with the settings. I feel like I made the wrong decision because all this OLED gaming on LG OLED is way to dark bro.
@@KalinhoPLile cali ma twoj c3?
Why tho? The LG C2 and C3 are literally trash
@@HUSTLEONLY-kz5bf why?
@@HUSTLEONLY-kz5bf Don't be silly.
Good stuff! Thanks Vincent!
Everything impacts picture accuracy but color gamut and color space is the most important part to deliver lifelike picture as like trilluminous delivers.thanks HDTV
It's impressive how much improvement LG Electronics and LG Display can squeeze from WOLED. I wasn't expecting too much change from G3‚ but it looks like LG is getting another nice improvement with G4. OFC‚ it will not be worthy to replace the G3 with G4. But who has GX or G1 and feels the need of an upgrade‚ G4 shapes to be a pretty nice choice.
Going to upgrade from an 55 c1 to an 77 G4 hopefully it will be worth it.
@@kjell9745 this video is making me want to replace my C9 with a G4 lol
@@Showwieh that will be worth it.
UNREAL G4!!!
@@Showwiehsame
awesome. keep improving, i'll maybe upgrade from my c1 in 3 years or so
Those flashbangs in call of duty are going to hurt
not really, OLEDs are 220 nits at 100% window size lmao
Great video Vincent. Would love to see a settings video for the G3!
Filmmaker Mode for SDR (adjust OLED light to your viewing environment), Filmmaker Mode for HDR with dynamic tone mapping disabled and Cinema for Dolby Vision. That’s all you need for picture accuracy, as well as colour accuracy.
Oled’s motion handling is its real killer that LCD won’t be able to duplicate no matter how small the zones get or how fast the logos get. I play competitive games and 240hz OLED is way better than the 500hz LCDs on the market.
Im legit surprised how few people understand this.
500hz with strobing still better than 240hz oled
@@adamek9750 Yeah, I don't buy that because to my eyes watching an LCD screen is like looking into a flash light. Which is tiring for the eyes already, and so when you add strobing it will even further strain the eyes.
So in a full focus/concentration environment you would want to have your eyes as relaxed as possible and not strained, as that would cause loss of reaction time as your eyes can't respond quick enough anymore as they get tired and lose speed of focus change.
So if you really are competitive you don't only seek the best performance out of your equipment but the best performance out of the player together with their equipment. In which case I think OLED would be the better choice, especially the longer a competition lasts.
@@LogiForce86 bruh what u smokin
144HZ 4K no BFI G4.
*INSANE!* 😱
I have the C1 and love it. I wonder if the 2024 model will justify an upgrade. Other than that, what I really wanted my from my next tv, is CRT-like motion clarity. Sample and hold displays are still plagued by ghosting and it doesn’t seem like companies or consumers care to make a push for this
Would be nice if they could implement BFI and boost the pixel's brightness beyond normal since it's not on for the full frame. But maybe it can't work like that.
Looking for my 1st OLED TV. G4 83" it is! First new TV in 10 years. Love hearing it is living up to expectations! Woot!
Wow you're gonna love it. One surprising benefit.. Standard definition looks like high definition and high definition looks like 4k.
If you going with a gallery series, gotta hide those cables.
@@totalplonker824G4 comes with a stand now. It's not a separate purchase like in the past.
Same, my 1st new TV in 6 years and my first oled. Gonna get the 77'! Unfortunately the 83 will be out my price range 😂
77 and 83 Inch could not be WOLed but Evo…that means less brightness….
G4 reviews gonna be interesting
In 5 years my next TV will be Meta-OLED 2 or 3. Looking forward.😁
The Mini LED disadvantage examples are quite shocking.😅
I wouldn't be surprised they can still hit 1500-1600 nits potentially "sustained' in peak specular highlights at D65 accurate mode. And that would be damned good. Technically they don't need more. Only the larger windows need to increase for that absolute full brightness in all types of content.
Don’t be fooled, pre production of production first firmwares hit massive numbers. Then after the big wave sales posterior firmware updates tune everything down “to save the screen” and after one year you have a dimmer panel than when you bought it. That happens with my Samsung S95B, when I bought it it was like WOW!!! Now the colors are great but the peak brightness etc is weaker than before (and I don’t watch much so the panel has very few wear out )
Yeah, people are already getting cocky about even higher numbers of Nits, but truth is, that beyond 800-1000 you cant even see a difference. G2 can 1000 at 10% APL sustainend and i have problems looking at the screen or more specific the peak highlights when watching in a dimmed room, cause its already blindingly bright to a certain point. Higher sustained nits at 100% APL could benefit SDR content or sports, like MiniLED does, but besides that, for current Games and Movies, which are mastered at ~1.200 nits at max, its pointless to go higher. That said, its still impressive how much they improve year after year, rendering MiniLED and even MicroLED useless, cause their only real advantage is Peak Brightness and they loose in almost every other Image Quality category.
Do you think it would be worth it to wait for the G4 or just get the G3 on sale now?
I just wish we would see this cone to the 48" screens!
LG has been killing it year after year. There were many that believed QD OLED would be utterly dominant but LG have remained surprisingly competitive at the top end since its arrival. Who would believe that they would be able to hit the brightness numbers we are seeing whilst also conquering burn-in.
Just need better color volume
You don't know what sony has up its sleeve this year. The a95l was superior to the g3.
@@jerardogonzalez007we do…. miniLED. And that’s it.
@@jerardogonzalez007 A95K was too dim, but the A95L is better than both G3 and G4.
@Manuel.Medellin The A95L has broken dolby vision, only two hdmi 2 1 ports, higher imput lag, and is dimmer than the G3. No way in hell its going to be better than the G4!
is there a UA-cam link to the tech video Oled mini led comparison?
5:05 I'd wanna see that tested in Oppenheimer black&white scenes
Having a G2 and can say, that in a moderately dimmed room, 10% APL HDR highlights are already blindingly bright in Games and even Movies. Actually so bright, that i have to look aways sometimes. So the only thing really relevant for the future for MOST home cinema users is a bit more consistent peak brightness in higher APL, 25%-50% with around 800 nits would be a good sweet spot, even higher doesnt really benefit, if you are not using your TV in a very lit room, cause you cant look at the TV anyways in scenes like Matrix 1 with high APL white screen, cause its just too bright AND at some point over 800 nits, the visible difference just gets smaller and smaller.
Exciting stuff - I saw some other news about the new QD-OLEDs also cranking up the brightness too. We 'bout to eat our cake and still have it?
Where did you saw it?
Impressive 😮
I wonder, what brightness level OLED panels manufactures will achieve with that new blue subpixel material.
I hope this generation of LG OLED will improve its Rec. 2020 specs.
Pretty much the only way to go above 75% Rec 2020 coverage is to use quantum dot, laser, or microLED. It just seems to be a limitation of the physics.
_Bring on that retina scorching brightness!!_
OK, I haven't bought a tv in 15 years and I'm finally looking to upgrade, so I'm using HDTVTest to make my decision. I'm also wanting to buy my first wireless home stereo system (I've only used the tv speakers up to this point), probably just a 5.1 (but maybe a 7.1?)... is there a channel that reviews home stereos similar to HDTVtest?
what miniLED TV was used in this comparison?
What miniled is that on the video? I have both an Oled and a miniled, and I honestly never saw my Miniled's algorithm fucking up nearly that bad, and I did run many of these local dimming tests
what about full screen bright scene though, is APL less aggressive
Thankyou for explaining about how oled is better than mini led.
Wow that's bright😊
How does the 2nd gen screen look with any sort of ambient light?
The G3 looked worst then my G2 when I seen it, it had a rainbow look to it and the black didn’t look as black.
I’m not always in a pitch black room so those cons were annoying to me
LG won the CES 2024 Best of Innovation Award with its transparent OLED T tv. CNET's reviewerDavid Katzmaier said " It was one of the coolest tv's he's ever seen". It's a transparent tv that should be available by mid 2024.
I’m starting to feel overwhelmed with the amount of OLED monitors that will be available in 2024. I’m really leaning towards the Samsung 32 inch with 140 PPI, that’s gonna be crazy crispy
Will this panel be in the G4, or some future television?
I read this as "world's first OLED TV panel" and thought you'd lost it
We're finally starting to get TVs that operate in real HDR settings.
When oled hits 4000-5000 nits i do my Upgrade and buy a new OLED..
Hope it is coming fast..2-3 years away maybe..
I have an LG G3, and alot of times at night I already have to turn it down especially in HDR because it's simply too bright for comfortable watching.
Even the expert dark room mode is too bright for my comfort, I turn it down from 50 to 35 brightness.
Don't get me wrong, watching an HDR movie with these kind of brightness levels is amazing, and explosions will sometimes almost have you turn your head away from the screen because it's so bright.
Also while I had problems watching during daytime with alot of sunlight with my previous television, that's completely solved with the G3.
But do I want even more brightness? No, at some point I have to say it's more than enough and can even make the experience uncomfortable, the G3 is more than enough for me, and sometimes even too much at full brightness.
I think the brighter image will only be visible very rarely in hdr specular highlights but for gaming it can be a nice plus. Though the LG G3 I also find bright enough already.
I wonder how the processing compares to the a95l considering Sony doesn’t plan on updating it nor dropping the price down significantly
from what i saw on the video above it's better than g3 and g4,didn.t expect that from the new a11 but we still to wait for the final product g4 hit the market.
It is getting closer to A95L but still lose in colors…
@@haukionkannel while color does play a big role in processing, i think the difference between the two will be more dependent on the panel. I just bought an a95l but wonder how the g4 will handle upscaling, motion etc in comparison.
This years oled gamining monitors are going o interesting!
I remember a breakdown of RGB sub pixel brightness on wrgb being like between 80 -170 nits or something, depending on colour, how can that now be stated at 1500, do they mean with white pixel boosting, not pure RGB? Still a massive unbelievable leap/claim
I assume it means that the RGB pixels combined can momentarily achieve 1500 nits on a 3% window. LG used similar pixel boosting tech on the G3 for small highlights.
@@TheAlienGangster yes, it will mean combined in a tiny window and with the augmentation of mla but still the numbers just don't add up, not for certain bright colour tones especially, like red and blue, which wrgb struggles with
@@lancealex382 what I’m unsure about is if they’re referring to when they have all RGB subpixels on to produce white, or if they’re referring to yellow, since it’s the brightest color that isn’t white.
The G3 was able to produce like 600 nits color luminance if you add the RGB color luminance values from rtings.
how many different brightness levels displayed at the same time for different boxes with size 1% area.
How much it measures in a 10% window?
Any chance for WiFi 7? They seem to be always behind. They only added WiFi 6 to the UK C3 last year.. or even gigabit ethernet would be nice
Panasonic has made my choice for a 77" tv difficult again 😬. Either their Z93 without MLA but a good heat-sink. Also LG G4 with MLA but a lesser heat-sink. Picture processing might make up my mind. Most of my content will be in SDR and 720p,1080p discs and mostly streaming at around 720 but lower bitrate 🤔 No places where I live sell both brands to be able to compare them in the same lighting conditions or better still side by side.
My GT50 Plasma is still hanging in there 🙏
This is super cool. MLA is so smart. I really want 31.5'' gaming monitor with this. Little disappointed by lack of DisplayPort 2.x on them, but other than that, looks super promising.
I wouldn't buy a display in 2024 that doesn't come with DisplayPort 2.1.
Nvidia's next-gen cards will have DisplayPort 2.1. AMD's current cards already have it.
@@PSYCHOV3N0M Same. The Radeon 7000 series, and Intel Arc support DisplayPort 2.0. And considering that monitors often are a long term investment, and DP2.0 was released 4 years aog, and DP2.1 over a year ago, it is criminal there are no DP2.x monitors.
32 inch 240hz qd oled is already on its way
@@adamek9750 only 2k 🤮
@@LordLabWhat is 2K?
Which led tv support dual screen split screen multi-view ??? Left side cctv Right side movie watching
I got the 77” G3 last year, but with these improvements I am so tempted to upgrade to the G4 this year 😅
i have a 77g2 now i want a 83g4 😆
Me too. Only for me 55" may be big enough. I lay in bed watching my 55" E9 tv on my wall. I lay about 10 feet from it. Maybe 65" wouldn't be too big for me could be possible in my room which is 14` and 15` feet both ways.
Very curious to see what this will end up being at 6500K with a 10% window. My guess is somewhere in between 1600 and 2000 nits.
Last years LG G3 was said to have 2100 nits in a 3% window also at around 10.000K and that ended up being about 1400 nits in a 10% window at 6500K.
So about a 33% reduction. Assuming we would get the same ratio, we're looking at about 2000 nits which would be wonderous!
MLA tech can potentially wind up in mircoLED panels to make them more efficient.
Based on your chart I'm going to assume that when calibrated this will come out around 2500 nits
Hey Vincent is my Q95T still holding up well in 2024 ??
*What did the panel measure at 10% window?*
Maybe Vincent can't mention this due to an NDA.
To stop myself from being disappointed I’m only expecting 50 more nits so 1500.
I want to know what 100% window is like.
Impactful specular highlights
Wow LG let’s goooooooooo
What is with the old Technicolor hat? Did you work for them?
So the plot thickens! I guess by this rate OLED will be at 4000 nits or above by 2025… especially if they’re able to implement Phosphorescent Blue into the mix.
The Engineers at LG and Samsung Display are working overtime 😅.
TCL in China already has even brighter displays.
@@anatoliykolesnik5010 They are not OLED though.
Competition is awesome
@@anatoliykolesnik5010yea, but they’re not OLED displays.
@@anatoliykolesnik5010Nobody cares what those bloom monster Chinese LED’s do. They’re like 1000 horsepower American cars that get beat in a race against a 500 horsepower German car 😂
The G series update is pretty impressive to me. Still interested in seeing the C series update even if it is small.
My question is will it not just make OLED brighter but also increase the color accuracy and volume? Will we finally get closer to 100%DCPI-3 and REC 2020?
the brighter the tv gets the more washed out the tv looks that is a fault of the tech, if you want bright color volume you need qd oled.
@@user-oq6sc1qm4j Thanks but I am asking about the new tv's they are seeing at CES that aren't out yet, and that none of us have seen yet.
I hope the color improvements are not just at 3% window sizes
Now if the 83” MLA LG is around $3,000 then I will buy that!
TFTCentral confirmed in a video gen 3 QD-OLED will also have up to 3k nits, unless Sony really doesn't want to release another QD-OLED this year (which will be stupid), we will still have same fight between LG, Samsung and Sony.
Nice 👍🏻 looks like meaningful update compared to underwhelming Samsung release (Matte screen ? Bleh)
Yeah I can't believe Samsung is going with a Matte screen for their 2024 S95D QD-Oled TV. I wrote on Digital Trends channel this morning how disappointed I am. Samsung is definitely out this year. Officially off my list.
Actually makes OLED usuable in bright room tho! So maybe they after people that aren't gonna use OLED in pitch black room? But yeah be interesting to see how these new Samsung vs new LG will compare in bright room testing I"m sure someone will do it.
@@jaimem1788Matte screens degrade picture quality.
99.999% of smartphones use glossy screens which preserves OLED's picture quality.
Zero reason for TV's and monitors to have matte screens. 🤮🤮🤮
@@jaimem1788 movies are not to be watched in bright room, no screen led or oled will show details in dark scenes. For tv bright viewing new OLEDs are plenty bright.
Now imagine to combine this Micro Lens Coating with Samsungs latest QD OLED Panels.
Peak brightness and color volume are going to be crazy
Now I am curious also about Samsung's next "OLED" technology that actually does not use the organic layer. These both promist very good improvements on future screens.
You mean MICRO LED?
@@Forceedge1988 I don't remember the name, I just recently heard about those is some clip on UA-cam. Though, I think you are right about the name.
@@FlorinArjocuMicro OLED combines the benefits of OLED and LCD together.
It's still not affordable for mass consumers.
They don’t know how too mass manufacture Micro-LED yet, although it will probably have some insane native characteristics
6:42 its also caused by the VA-Panel wich is usually on TVs.
For me high brightness was never a thing i worry too much about. I use oled in a completely black room. It's a 2019 model and it's bright enough where i turn it down because it hurts my eyes in a black room
Same. I feel like the people who talk about brightness are putting OLEDs in really bright rooms.
Yeah I have my C9 set to 27 OLED light to match 100 nits, only time it goes higher than that is when I watch HDR content
@@timi.4083 Even at 700 Nits at night time its like a supernova when you sit 90cm from the TV and flash goes off in a game lol.
Have a G1 65” at present but want to upgrade this year, do I get a G3 77” or G4 65” as probably about same price when the G4 is released ? Would like the bigger 77” but the G4 has the MLA 2 tech, decisions decisions 😢
Or save some more money and get a 77 G4. oooooooooo 😲
Is this coming to G4 or next years G5? For me it has come down to almost one thing that holds me back from a G4. It's the SDR gaming, they don't allow peak brightness. So many games are still SDR and I don't want dim gaming. Also don't like ASBL on PC desktop but can almost live with it if they fix the brightness for SDR gaming.
Their new alpha 11 processor is really interesting. I am so tempted. Even though I need to see Sony MiniLED first.
Yes, G4.
Yeah definatelly the new G4 and the new Panasonic Z95 or something. Now SDR brightness will also get higher - I would say around 400 nit fullscreen which is really good - not LCD bright, but good.
@hdtvtest Have any Company use blue phosphorescent oled this year now?
No
I know the 3000 nits is measured with a 3% window and understand what that means (as it's a standerd measurement), but I just wondered what -for example- 2x3% windows on either side results in? I wondered that because heat, and other limiting things, shouldn't interfere?
It's hard to tell, not everything can be easily tested.
Two factors would be overall power consumption (EU laws f.e.) and how much overall resulted heat the heatsink can suck.
You probably don't want the heatsink to get too warm as well, so that the Delta of heatsink avg temp and panel region temp stays big enough.
This probably also can be and is improved by multiple regions of voltage regulations on the panel for better efficiency.
At the 5:00 - 5:30 minute mark the green push seen in the G3 is absent in the G4. Its just in that piece of content though.
Not a great idea to use these panels as comparison. That isn’t the LG G4.
These are standalone displays set up by LG Display to show the panel’s performance. This CES booth was held by LG Display (who makes only the panels, not the TVs).
Vincent even mentions this when he says it has an unfinished SoC behind it. This was resulting in the MLA Gen 2 panel tracking inaccurately.
Is MLA a feature of the panel, or added later by the TV manufacturer?
It's proprietary technology from LG Display. It's built into the panels
I still have the Samsung Q95T , hooked up to my ps5, I can't see no reason atm to upgrade, however I would like an OLED but I'm worried about burn in,,,,
LG gives a 5 year warranty on the oled panel
But how does META Technology 2.0 compare to QD-OLED's color accuracy?
LG has always had very good calibrated accuracy. Thus they're used as client reference monitors, and LG will surely keep accuracy high to maintain that market/cachet.
from the video above it seems that a95l has a better image clarity,i don.t see any a11 power,but we will see when a final form of g4 will hit the market.For sure g4 appear to have more nits than g3 and it seems that it not has that green effect that g3 has even in the video above.
@@paulc5389The LG G3 has less than rec709 color gamut volume whereas QD-OLED’s got 100% P3 coverage. But from what I’ve read, out of the box, tint and saturation were more accurate on the LG. In Professional mode, I had to reduce blue gain by over -7 because HDR10 content is too cool, whereas Dolby Vision Dark looks fine.
I think the overall brightness will increase or they will cut out the white (white pixel) and leave the colors at a new level; brightness
QD OLED can increase the color range due to its high peak color brightness. which has an RGB pixel structure, but burn-in is certainly riskier since the white WOLED pixel provides maximum brightness, while QD OLED requires work for all 3 RGB pixels.
@@johnrambo4877 actually its g3 that’s got permanent screen burn after 4 months on rtings accelerated longevity test and after 10 months on Samsung s95c barely any signs. You can look it up on their website. They made three video since they understood how screen burn works and apologised for mistakes they made in first two videos. You can compare g3 and s95c on their site and you can see the image of test under it.
*Is the S95D using the new 3000 nits qd-oled panel?*
its MLA from LG not Qd-oled from Samsung
The S95D has a trash matte finish that makes it entirely irrelevant.
Good job Samsung, you guys took a massive L this year.
Yeah. I thought Samsung QD-OLED were brighter than LG OLED?
One step forward two steps back. @@rustler08
@@rustler08 It makes it irrelevant only to those clueless like you.
Interesting that the improvements are not from oled pixels themselves, but the layers they attach to the screen and processing. Seems LG are dragging their feet with newer chemicals for the emitters. Mobile phone oled screens are making big moves on peak brightness and the panels aren't from LG or SD
Such a shame that LG refuses to implement MLA tech into their C lineup, I am still rocking my 48 inch LG CX as my desktop monitor and see no reason to replace it, the G4 is not available in 48 or 42 inch and the C4 is only barely an upgrade over the CX. Well, if they don't want my money, they won't get it.
Display brightness will not stop increasing until the consumer has permanent retinal burn-in like a first-generation plasma. What a shame nobody cares about motion clarity!
I wonder whats after mini led? Micro led? Nano led?
I imagine we could using that MERA tech in solar panel, no ? (meaning : more light on each cell, therefore more electricity)
OMG. I had Calman before it was Calman and they used Excel and typically DTP94 colorimeter
Where is the confirmation from LG stating that gaming monitors will also be getting META 2.0 with 3000 nit peak?
There is not… as it was said in this video… it depends on manufacturer how far they push the panel.
i am confused, flat panels hd among other sources said the g 4 would still be 70 percent brighter then the B series, same like last year and concluded brightness will be roughly the same like last year. i trust vincent more though, so i hope he is right!
There is a small channel called insight media that broke the 3000 nit info last CES. When lg display was showing the g3 panel they gave a sneak peek at what they were working on for the G4. He said they claimed it was 3000 nit capable. Looks like he was right and I guarantee Vincent is right.
@@bbump1828 thanks for the additional indiciation! FOMO is still raining like the G4 will have more or less the same brightness even though they talked to lg engineers
That's cool.. so can we get 120hz bfi back again then? Since they ditched the option just because it wasn't bright enough in that use case
Why would you need bfi on an oled?
@@EagleBayNightSuppliesThe lack of it gives them an excuse as to why they missed the headshot. So, LG will keep leaving it out
@@EagleBayNightSupplies To emulate a CRT on an OLED. 120Hz BFI + CRT filters = 😎
If I’m not mistaken, Vincent discussed this during one of the videos for the LG C2. Essentially, they sacrificed the 120Hz BFI circuitry when they expanded the pixel aperture ratio.
It would be nice to see it come back I agree.
@@EagleBayNightSuppliesbecause oled doesn't so anything to combat persistence blur caused by sample and hold.
What about burn issue ? any improvement to get rid off this symptom?
Not until micro led… oled is allway orgsnic, so will allways suffer burn in.
@@haukionkannel LG gives a 5 year warranty on the oled panel
5117 lenses per pixel 🤯
QD gen 3 vs MLA gen 2?👀
look at the delta error + the temp of the reading it's completely off. that's like a full blown blue white
Cool, but can LG make clean panels now after 11 years of development?