Symbolic interactionism | Society and Culture | MCAT | Khan Academy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лип 2024
  • Created by Sydney Brown.
    Watch the next lesson: www.khanacademy.org/test-prep...
    Missed the previous lesson? www.khanacademy.org/test-prep...
    MCAT on Khan Academy: Go ahead and practice some passage-based questions!
    About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
    For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
    Subscribe to Khan Academy’s MCAT channel: / @khanacademymcatprep
    Subscribe to Khan Academy: ua-cam.com/users/subscription_...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 85

  • @jenniferlitt4500
    @jenniferlitt4500 2 роки тому +169

    In summary: Small scale sociology theory, Herbert Blumer's First tenant: 1) We act based on the meaning we have given something. 2)We give meaning to things based on our social interactions. The same thing can have a different meaning for different people. 3) The meaning we give something is not permanent and can change due to everyday life.3 Central ideas: Action depend on meaning, different people assign different meaning of things, and the meaning of something can change. Criticism: Doesn't ask the same questions as some large scale theories do. Restricted to studying small interactions between individuals. Capable of explaining how aspects of society can change as they are created and re-created by social interactions. It examined society on a small scale and gives the individual the same importance as society as a whole. It is a necessary view when studying a society.

  • @codyuntch4850
    @codyuntch4850 4 роки тому +64

    This theory is so important in relationships. Understanding this has helped me to better make sense of when my husband and I have different views about the same thing.

  • @sohaibahmed226
    @sohaibahmed226 7 років тому +24

    Thanks so much for posting these videos very equivalent to what I'm learning in sociology 101 class.

  • @ofiawiafewa2996
    @ofiawiafewa2996 3 роки тому +6

    just want to thank you for helping me write my final exam for this semester.

  • @Liboo52
    @Liboo52 2 роки тому +15

    I was so invested in the little cartoon people's story. During their conversation I thought, "This poor, "all trees are infested with ants" person. What a sad way to go through life, unable to experience the joy of lounging beneath beautiful trees just because you have some irrational fear of harmless ants. I'm so glad I'm like the tree=shade person. Then they got bit by the ants and my entire worldview was shattered.

  • @Kaycee357
    @Kaycee357 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much. Its so easy to understand quickly

  • @nevermind2190
    @nevermind2190 2 роки тому

    this helped a lot! thanks!

  • @takudzwakelly7230
    @takudzwakelly7230 3 роки тому

    wow this is enough ..thank you so much

  • @jcbbb
    @jcbbb 9 років тому +65

    THX BRO IM A DOCTER NOW!

  • @cyrilldeodoco476
    @cyrilldeodoco476 4 роки тому

    thank you so much

  • @nexypointy
    @nexypointy 10 років тому

    thank you

  • @stefanoercolano1896
    @stefanoercolano1896 3 роки тому +397

    Who else trying to study a whole semester on finals day?

  • @catchjayleaux_
    @catchjayleaux_ Рік тому

    This explanation is very much imperative thank you

  • @deedagqadeer9139
    @deedagqadeer9139 Рік тому +3

    2. Sociological perspectives
    a. Functionalist (structural functionalist perspective)
    i. Society as a whole system
    b. Conflict perspective
    i. The problem of inequality
    c. Symbolic interactionism
    3. Sociology and Globalization
    a. Thinking globally
    b. Global perspective in sociology
    c. Globalization and sociology
    4. Social Groups
    a. Definition & Functions
    b. Types of social groups
    i. In and out groups
    ii. Primary and Secondary group
    iii. Reference groups
    iv. Informal and Formal groups
    v. Pressure groups
    5. Formal organizations
    a. types of formal organization
    b. Weber and bureaucracy
    c. problems of bureaucracy
    6. Culture
    a. Definition, aspects and characteristics of Culture
    i. Material and non material culture
    ii. Ideal and real culture
    b. Elements of culture
    i. Beliefs
    ii. Values
    iii. Norms and social sanctions
    c. Other related concepts
    i. Cultural Relativism
    ii. Sub Cultures
    iii. Ethnocentrism and Xeno-centrism
    iv. Cultural lag
    v. Social Stratification
    vi. Social Change

  • @AMANKUMARSINGH-yp1qz
    @AMANKUMARSINGH-yp1qz 3 роки тому

    Thanks ❤️

  • @yennhinguyen3205
    @yennhinguyen3205 Рік тому

    I'm studying this in my Journalism - Public Relations class. Does it works the same?

  • @craftstyle4279
    @craftstyle4279 6 років тому +33

    so what does this word mean in a FEW Sentences Thank You

    • @Kencan254
      @Kencan254 6 років тому +6

      Lavanie Lubin : you are the label I give you.

    • @salmajaffar2102
      @salmajaffar2102 5 років тому +16

      how you perceive things based on your interactions

  • @nehginhaokip7276
    @nehginhaokip7276 10 місяців тому +1

    I understood way faster and easier than 6 hours of classes of the same topic

  • @tufailkhan6506
    @tufailkhan6506 5 років тому +2

    can u tell me that how interactionalism theory is different from other language acquisition theories?

  • @kumargaurav8140
    @kumargaurav8140 Рік тому +1

    In summary : mead , micro perspective , small scale interaction, focus individual actor's meaning and change in it through interaction.

  • @Cicz477
    @Cicz477 2 роки тому

    How does thhe Symbolic interaction differ from the Cognitive behavioral theory which is determined by interactions with the environment etc.?

  • @theinfohub320
    @theinfohub320 Рік тому +1

    Your situation: The wording of slide was very confusing thats why you opened UA-cam to get the basic concept of the topic 😮

  • @alexrichter1362
    @alexrichter1362 2 роки тому +7

    Imagine it's the 1980s in the USA and I'd go out and call myself jokingly a Communist because I heard it's the most offensive and unjustifiable thing you could be, my mind now having this word primed in my memory as being very subjectively positive, in contrast to my outside world and society, and I feel like a true pioneer, being the first person to stand up to this authoritarian father-figure always telling it's kids what to be and not to be. The next day I wake up in Guantanamo Bay, and a CIA-Agent begins to torture me until I'm dead. Turns out he was a Vietnam veteran, and some Vietnamese communists brutally tortured and killed all his friends, having a completely different, subjective inner experience of the word "Communism" than I did, and through symbolic interactionism, believing me one of the men that killed his friends.
    When you think about it more deeply, this happens in one form or another every single day with every single conversation between two or more subjects, every subject has dozens of life-years of different experiences and brain connections, meaning even when we talk about Milk, everyone will have totally different feelings and imaginations about this object in their minds, so having an idea, but never fully grasping what the other is meaning when he says "milk." You may be a farmer and think of the warm milk you take from your cow every morning, while the city guy thinks of the bottle of milk he has in his fridge from the supermarket, so they have two totally different objects in their heads, and none of them knows it, and they just keep talking, imagining that the other has the same image in their heads as you do.
    This is kind of frightening, it would mean that you never actually fully understood anybody in your life, and nobody ever fully understood you. We learned to use words, their extended meaning, and our subjective experience with the objects or ideas these words represent, but everybody reading the word will have different emotions and memories about the word.
    This idea of Symbolic Interactionism is such an interesting concept.😄 And no matter how my philosophical, moral, and political views have changed during my life, I guess my instinctive appalment of collectivism, and always retaining the individual as the first importance of any Just society was correct.

  • @dumbledoratheexplora1140
    @dumbledoratheexplora1140 5 років тому +2

    What if saying "all trees are infested with ants" was actually a magic chant

    • @realDarkPeterson
      @realDarkPeterson 3 роки тому +4

      Then all of sociology rapidly falls apart as social interactions become increasingly unpredictable and unstable, with the introduction of verbal incantations that can alter the very fabric of reality itself. Indeed, all of science would be under an existential threat, and our only hope to restore faith in reality would be to either purge magic, or to create the Sociological School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.

  • @chipbychoc6360
    @chipbychoc6360 2 роки тому

    the example was very confusing

  • @marjumkamcham270
    @marjumkamcham270 Рік тому

    Jn college pasighat hit like

  • @libertyfp
    @libertyfp 7 років тому +9

    What if microsociology is more valid than macrosociology? I mean we live in a world where different people have different interactions with different objects/people. This creates different beiefs, values, etc. So then different people go out and interact with the world differently. This makes more sense with racism because I know I'm not racist but people will tell me I've been "socialized to be racist as a white person" and that "I'm just in denial". I think they have a false belief and that they're racists themselves.

    • @heruartist71
      @heruartist71 5 років тому +8

      Sounds exactly like what a Racist would say.

    • @erzan
      @erzan 5 років тому +4

      That was basically a version of "I am not racist BUT"

  • @kevinlethbridge5826
    @kevinlethbridge5826 5 років тому +14

    This is the most idiotic concept I have ever had to learn

    • @aishdelosreyes9702
      @aishdelosreyes9702 3 роки тому +1

      Just my thoughts. 😶

    • @unknownuser4664
      @unknownuser4664 3 роки тому

      I guess in your experience you know more than meets the eye

    • @Venuk
      @Venuk 2 роки тому +1

      Thought the same, actually pretty cool once you get to know it