What makes BMPT-72 so great? BMPT-72 Terminator Review
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 чер 2020
- - Play War Thunder for FREE! Support my channel and get a premium aircraft, tank or ship and a three day account upgrade as a BONUS: gjn.link/RedEffectWarThunder
Also available for free on PlayStation®4 and Xbox One.
Patreon: / redeffect
Today we are going to take a look at BMPT-72 Terminator, not to be confused with BMPT Terminator, since BMPT Terminator is a discontinued predacesor of BMPT-72 which was made on T-90 hull.
Sources:
gurkhan.blogspot.com/2015/02/b...
gurkhan.blogspot.com/2013/09/b...
gurkhan.blogspot.com/2017/09/b...
gurkhan.blogspot.com/2018/03/2...
gurkhan.blogspot.com/2018/02/b...
gurkhan.blogspot.com/2018/01/2...
gurkhan.blogspot.com/2013/12/7...
gurkhan.blogspot.com/2017/10/b...
gurkhan.blogspot.com/2017/06/b...
gurkhan.blogspot.com/2017/05/i...
gurkhan.blogspot.com/2015/03/b...
www.armyrecognition.com/russi...
"Т-72/Т-90" - by S.V. Ustyancev & D.G. Kolmakov, published by UVZ - Авто та транспорт
- Play War Thunder for FREE! Support my channel and get a premium aircraft, tank or ship and a three day account upgrade as a BONUS: gjn.link/RedEffectWarThunder
Also available for free on PlayStation®4 and Xbox One.
He have 2 mussile and bullys can smash havvy still he can distryd one building
Will you be making a video about t-55 variants? I personally think it would be a great video! Love you content, keep going!
Pls video on T-90 M proryv 3
What do you think about the "new" b2 centauro from Italy ?
Attempt #2
What Tank Game can you suggest me to play? I really love tanks, Is Gunner Heat PC good?
T-72: I'LL BE BACK
He thinks T-72 pre-composite spaced is sheet. They are obv. not, they are just old and obsoleted by the cold war ending and warsaw pact getting no new tanks. Just dont take his claims too seriously.
cdgncgn no he just said its better if they gave it a new era
Back to the battlefield to be blown off and burnt to a crisp. All bless St. Javelin.
@@Xtermy
Ukraine will evacuate to victory!
@@vulgardisplayofpower2901 Correct. It will evacuate all the russians back to their filthy swamps and wastelands.
Gaijin:How many vid do you want us to sponsor???
Redeffect : yes
ALL OF THEM
but it makes sense, war thunder is the game version of red effect
Check out the channel “Defence Updates” they sponsee literally al of his
President Jimmy Carter Speech on the One China Policy
ua-cam.com/video/1NoFdXQehPQ/v-deo.html
Now THIS would be a great addition to high tier Russian tree in WT!
Soviet tree already have bmp-2 with 30mm and Kharizantima-S with 1200mm pen ATGMs. This would be a lovely addition but not the unique one as we already have same plateforms
@@yawarfareed Yes, but currently those vehicles can be easily taken out by anything larger than 12.7mm caliber machine guns. Bmp-T72 would require enemies to actually aim their main guns and would also have larger ammo belts for the 2a42 guns. Also it would be a lot harder for strafing planes to take them out!
Gaijin TOR M1 SAm system WheN
Sergio Gonzalez yeah you're right. In terms of protection, this thing has a lot of it
Well I have Ramka-99 (On T-90 hull) and BMPT-72 in Armored Warfare. Dont have premium version with adictional armor at sides.
It would be nice to see this evolve into a system of auto cannons married to a mm radar to address incoming atgms and suicide/combat drones at a distance.
2A72 is too outdated, in addition to it there are no projectiles with a remote fuse. Too light splinters...
The only reason for using this gun, the availability of ammunition and even if not outstanding, but good characteristics.
For air defense, there is a Derivation-air defense 57mm self-propelled gun with adjustable projectiles.
@@elusive6119 Yes, that's true. 2A72 is not the right auto cannon for anti/drone and anti-atgm, but i think the Terminator as a concept-vehicle needs to evolve to fill the roles i mentioned in addition to anti-infantry/light vehicle. I like the 57mm for long-range work, and in addition, the evolving threat (ie, drone development direction) appears to be drone swarms/suicide drones/combat drones operating in 20m-1000m space. There is also an opportunity to extend active protection against ATGMs from right beside the tank to several hundred meters out. Terminator concept (tank-support vehicle) would fit this role if it were better equipped.
the issue is that radar doesnt like small shit. though we got good at predicting rounds, but most radar design for that only goes out like, 5 to 10 meters.
atgms arent that much larger than a 120mm shell so at most youre looking at maybe 35 meters of distance between the radar spotting it and it hitting. 35 meters may sound a lot until you realize that most atgms travel anywhere from 80 meters a second for the first generation to 300 meters a second for modern ones. meaning at 30 meters you have a tenth of a second of reaction time. an automated gun platform wouldnt even react that fast.
drones would be easier to destroy but the problems goes from reaction time to can you kill it before its explosion is to close and will still be knocked out. small drones would be harder to hit but need to be closer which they can do with ease because, well, theyre smaller and harder to hit.
or theyre big bois and "easier" to hit but dont need to get as close. also these bigger drones could be armed with something like a hot missile or a tow and you got even bigger problems now.
@@Thekilleroftanks thanks for taking the time to give a thoughtful answer.
@@stevestandley5571 It is supposed to make a new BMPT based on the T-15 with a 57mm gun. Probably something in between, T-15 + combat module from the Derivation + new universal ATGM. BMPT-72 was late, its development did not meet the requirements of the military, so it did not receive orders. The usage niche is too narrow.
Listen to me very carefully:
SAVE THE T-80
T-80 must never be retired
I don't really know how good it is in combat, but I think T-80 is the cutest tank ever. I just spend hours in Men of war Cold war editor just to move and shoot random objects with T-80 and take screen shots of it :D
@@kitten30 it could've been more improved
@@kitten30 Wait, men of war has a cold war add-on?
Some old chechen guy : RPG goes brrr
Its name:
*TERMINATOR*
Just get some multon metal
The BMPT predecessor to the BMPT-72 used a T-72 hull not a T-90 hull.
which are basicly the same :))) difference between them being the engine not the hull.
@@torque_original composites....
@@torque_original there quite a lot of difference in composites of the hull, even different iteration of T-72 have differently armored hull, T-90 one is much better in the front which renders it almost invincible outside of small weakspots
I would certainly enjoy seeing this thing in war thunder
You would, but the entire enemy side wouldn't!
It's bmp but can't be hull Break
BR would be at least 11.0 if not higher because 800 against KE rounds and Kornet like missiles would make it the best vehicle in game
@@turkishbigdaddy3334 And that's why it would be so much fun to play with it.
@@lepatriote9498 Nah, not 11.0! More like 10.3! The 30mm guns are the same like on the BMP-2M, only the 4 missiles are powerful. The only advantage the BMPT-72 has (over the BMP-2M) is it's protection but less mobility. So when playing RB, the BMP-2M is actually deadlier due to it's speed and size.
Uralvagonzavod: "How much firepower you want on this new vehicles?"
Russian MoD: ".......Yes?"
Dear RedEffect.
You talk about the BMPT-72, and you show the BMPT-2.
The BMPT-72 is an (export) option for countries who like to upgrade their old T-72's with a new BMPT turret.
Russia did not buy the BMPT-72, but they bought the BMPT-2... A normal BMPT with the new ATGM-launchers (like used on the BMPT-72).
The BMPT-2 does have the two 30mm grenade launchers left and right of the driver. Those (Green Russian) vehicles are mostly in use by only the Russians, some are send to Syria for testing.
Only the BMPT-72 doesn't have the grenade launchers because it is ment for only T-72 hulls, no modifications needed.
I love your content, but as a vehicle recognition instructor, I thought, I might point out this point.
Sylvain.
Nice explanation mate, thanks!!
Oh heck yes!!! I always wanted you to make a video about this extremely unique and overpower Machine!
well, it's essentially a T-72 with its' main guns replaced with autocannons. How is it going to fare better than your standard-fare T-72? It's a IFV with no troop carrying ability. There's a reason why this vehicle is not mass produced, becuz even the russians think it doesn't make much economic sense. Great for propaganda though...
@@melvinthedeathless.melvint6727 will you shut up?
I think this is a great design for flushing out militants in built up areas.
The Syrians did something similar in Ghoutta city with a combo of the Shilka and T-72.
Two grenades dropped from a relatively cheap drone (those drones are also small and silent), and this T-72 based "Terminator" is history..
No tank can survive those grenedes
@@VorteX_SH exactly
yet we didnt seen any of them being destroyed while they are online, its like drones is just a target practice for modern AA teams
There was a news as of today that Algeria recieved first shipment of BMPT-72 of around 60 units.
I checked The Military Balance 2019 and 2020 there is no exact numbers of BMPT in Russian service but i guess its pretty small since there are number of other vehicles performing same task, for example Kornet-D1 2x4 with Tiger or VPK 233116 armoured vehicles. Plus in development/under testing T-15, Kurganets, Bumerang which could perform same anti-tank role.
It's good to see those along with T90M tanks and T80BVM And T 14 in the military parade
india called, they want to start beef with u
aRjUn iS dEfInAtElY cOmPaRaBlE tO lEoPaRd 2 aNd m1 AbRaMs
Anyong Rai if it’s not going to get shot from the front then absolutely
Fools, Arjun is the real terminator!!
It can terminate any WW2 era tank!!!💪💪💪
Can you please stop it
@@defenceosprey983 no one's talking to u
This is a brilliantly simple and Russia solution to the issue of reusing all those old T-72 chassis in modern combat. Can't wait for the inevitable AA version which would be an easy modification. Simply replace the ATGMs with AA missiles and add the proper AA fire control.
Expected aged wine but found vinegar
How ?
@stv1 we did except Russian like to keep it secret
@stv1 no you wouldnt it probably is good enough to even kill the cameraman
@@mbtenjoyer9487 nope 2 got blown up and they took the rest out of deployment
@@James-9999 nope so far 0 have been destroyed
But keep trying with ur bs
I subscribe to many military info channels on the UA-cam, yours is the best for information and updates.
This would be a great platform for for Supporting Tank Formations and for Infantry Support. I'm betting these vehicles could be made to order with various weapons packages, engines packages, Armor packages, Sensors Choices and Hull choice. It really makes sense to use the T-72 Hull as the Russians have a huge surplus of T-72s.
This is a great way to update old tanks.
What makes BMPT-72 so great?
It's made out of Stalinium
I think this specific variant is produced with new prototype Putinium composite armour, to compliment the traditional Stalinium package.
@@kobusdowney5291 In addition, depleted Leninium round is developed for 30mm autocanon. which shape projectile itself without sapot.
And remove those weak trotskite
@@kobusdowney5291 or tsarinium Putinium composite armor
Is this blursed ???
Yes should be added to WT asap. This is an awesome "tank" I need one for my drive to work....
Ok....so the 2 crew compartments for the AGS30's. In my opinion this was a good idea. Think about it? If your on the battlefield and your supporting tanks, you could pick up or add 2 crew or soldiers have them safe in the crew compartments and they can also fight now inside the vehicle. That was the reason for those 2 postions in the vehicle. Not because they NEED 2 crew to operate grenade launchers.
Them Russkies should do the same with T-64 and T-80 hulls. From what I've seen, this thing is what keeps tanks alive in close quarters of urban areas, therefore it's critical to have lots of these babies in great numbers!
why would anyone dislike more guns on a tank?
its MORE DAKKA!
Everyone dislike more guns when they perform maintenance.
@@joelau2383 Lmao
Is that à WH40K reference ?
@@ayobruce8211 yes, it is.
exactly from the Orks' Flash Gitz who are the best ranged units for Orks in DoW1 DC+
lovely fellows^^
I love this piece of kit. It knows exactly what it is and what it wants to be. There was a position that needed to be filled-and this what the answer. With no added baggage and "mission creeo" that haunts and hinders do many US projects.
This vehicle is a lesson learned from the first Chechen war. The first battle of Grozny.
Where Russian tanks and BMP had great difficulties in street fighting and had to call in AAA vehicles to provide direct fire to clear infantry from buildings and cellars at close quarters.
Now they have a dedicated vehicle for the role.
why it supports tanks and not infantry.
In my opinion it is a good concept for a new type of vehicles, furthermore it has a great advantage, since russia doesn't have to build new chassis but can use older tanks ones, which russia has in grat numbers.
The only drawback of the BMPT-72 are the twin 30mm guns, they could be replaced by a single more modern autocannon with a few millimiters more of caliber and that could switch between AP and HE rounds.
Actually from the information I gathered one 30mm autocannon is loaded with AP and the other with HE rounds, that's why they can be fired singularly choosing what kind of ammo to use or both together for maximum anti-armor effect.
@@ClaudeMagicbox yeah the video says that, they couldn´t figure out how to make a similar system the Puma has ... which can switch the AP and HE ammo on same gun. So was it a lazy solution or was it too complicated for them. 2 guns if one would be sufficient is not a great solution and firing HE alongside AP against IFV/APC ( tanks could not get penetrated anyway in most situations) doesnt get a much better performance ... and you could e.g. load alternating shots on same clip with Puma if you so desire.
Does it work against Tractors?
we might have just seen it prove itself
will you do a video on latest presentation of modernizing m84 (m84as1)?
expect bias or that its sheet cause its based on pre-T-72B model.
@@cdgncgn Well his video on M84 was objective, I'd like to see him compare this new AS1 with other modern mbts.
Now it's used north of popasna
I have this tank in Armored Warfare. It's super fun to play 😁😁
Mk. 5:10 - I was typing this question when you answered it!
Does it offer any configs using slat armour? Lol.
Great Vid. Cheers
Thanks for the video and the effort! Best Regards.
You stand with Nazis 😢
I would imagine most of the BMPT's I imagine use the older engine for economical reasons.
make a video about the means to destroy a tank, in general.
BOOM BOOM
Militaries train their troops to identify the specific tank and target its weakest points, the most general method would be a top down attack such as the javelin. In all other cases it would be required to target the specific known weak points of the target in question which removes the "generalistic" capacity.
Will you do a video about New M-84AS1tank?
American tank designers in the pre-war era: "How many machine guns you want on it?"
US Army: "Yes."
Back then tanks were fighting almost exclusively infantry, more turrets meant more enemies dead.
try looking some japanese tank like type 10 or type 90 even type 74
Did chi-ha actually good?
Useless expensive shits
@@radenprasetyo8234 i think they're good at their role as infantry support on island warfare condition. Chi-ha's poor reputation might've come because they're facing mid-late war tanks like Shermans.
@098765 Craper What? They arent even remotely close to american tanks. Are you even trying?
All 3 of them are made specifically made for japan and dont have any export version. You can maybe think the type 90 has some inspiration from older leopards from germany, but not even remotely close to US ones
@098765 Craper The japanese were inspired by the US Abrams, M60 and Leopard series but their tanks are far more different than NATO tanks.
Red Effect, do you think the Terminator BMPT is a better choice than MBTs in low intensity conflict against armed civilians etc, or do you think having a larger tank to terminator ratio would win quicker?
the 30mm cannon 2A42 has a dual feed, so both cannons can use AP and HE ammunition. The gunner just has to flick a switch to change between ammunition types
I know the 9m120 ataka is really good of an ATGM, but I never knew about this vehicle.
I'm writing this comment just in case anyone can answer in May 2022 bmpts were spotted near sievierodontesk but after that nothing would just like to know if there any footage of them engaged in combat or if they were destroyed if you know what happened please comment
Yes apparently 1 was destroyed
And multiple others damaged
It's going to be even more deadly when they replace the 30mm with the 57mm
Red Effect, do you think air defense vehicles are obsolete? Which ones are the best?
Did the barrel vibrate when the other one was shooting? Would this severely decrease accuracy
Question, I thought the 2A42 has a dual feed allowing it to switch between HEI and AP rounds. Is Wikipedia wrong, or is there something I am missing here.
It is dual feed. Dont tell RE, so much an expert on making vids full of ... bs.
@@cdgncgn arjun fan?
Grenade launchers removed!? (cries in ork).
ikr
So much less dakka
в версии 3 которая была принята на вооружение в России гранатометы вернули :-)
Can you do a video on different atgms maybe like a Spike Vs kornet vs ataka vs javelin vs hellfire
Could you do a video on the British Ajax.
I think its pretty cool
5:15 i lol'd
Wait???What?? Use smartphones for navigation????? Reminds me of a Russian heavy weight modernish version of an Ontos
Could you do a video on like artillery or like MRLS, love your videos best quality
This is a major improvement over typical IFVs because it's based on the T-72 tank chassis and thus has a respectable amount of armor. Probably nothing short of an actual tank will be able to kill it. Most IFV concepts are horribly flawed, though; you have vehicles able to kill a tank but easier to destroy, so they're going to be a target even over the actual tanks. Plus they also function as an APC, so they're effectively just rolling coffins. This, at least, both has good armor and is a dedicated fighting vehicle so it lacks these drawbacks. This is a great way to recycle old T-72 tanks into modern war machines.
I dont think using your smartphone as a gps is a safe idea hahaha, you could also ask the enemy where to go, the end result will be the same lol
I don't think the tank commander actually relys on a smartphone lol. I think they have their own military grade issued Glonass (Russian GPS equivalent) 10' tablet that has digitally protected communication channel for both navigation and communication between the other tanks and the base.
You should review the new latest version of Serbian m-84 tank.
Didnt he do that already?
@@Kumyar no
@@lazarjovanovic4388 what u mean? He already did a video on T-72..
@@Kumyar there was an upgrade prenested anout 2 weeks ago.
@@Kumyar It is the deep-upgraded T-72 version of Serbia called M84AS1 with a clean ERA arrangement.
Will you make a review of Harimau Hitam Medium Tank? It is pretty unique, especially its role in Indonesian Military Doctrine.
Hey you finally uploading
I'd love to see a video on the FV-107 Scimitar and it's Mk2 revision. I'm not sure if many people share my enthusiasm, but I've always saw it as the earliest embodiment of heavily armed IFV/LAV doctrine.
Edit: It might be worth mentioning the CVRT Sabre, which I believe was a cheaper version of the FV-107.
I also forgot to mention that I absolutely love your videos, I have never seen someone convey such relatively high-level information in such an easily digestible and entertaining format. Thanks for the content!
I'm 100% sure Gaijin will add this into the game and it'll break the game even more than before.
The UK could do this with the older challenger 1 chassis. It is the equivalent of the T72 .
The turret doesn't go flying when it gets hit?
calling Warthunder "historically accurate" is the best joke :D
So there's
BMPT 72 terminator
And BMPT terminator
I so confused
It is very easy, the original BMPT was on a different chassis, it was on t-90 chassis, it also had an additional 2x30mm granade guns, but with a total of 5 crew members. That version never entered service. Instead the newer model is on a t72 chassis, which is cheaper, and also has 3 crew members instead of 5
@@duuke4618 But wikipedia says even original "Bmpt Terminator" was based on T 72 chassis... Meaning that both
Bmpt Terminator and ""Bmpt-72 T-2" are based on T 72... Only difference being the absense of 2-30mm grenade launchers... Bmpt-72 T-2 kind of looks better than Bmpt Terminator...
""Bmpt-72 T-3"" is suppposed to be based on T 90...
@@theblackbandit2703 I never trust Wikipedia
@@ikill-98 Forget wikipedia... Both Army Recognition & Army Technology state the same
Even they say that both "Bmpt T" and "Bmpt-72 T-2" are based on T 72 chassis....
There is also 3rd one: mix of this 2 variants that now accepted by Russian Ministry of Defense. Hull is from the first BMPT and turret from BMPT-72
1:38 Where did you get the drawings from? I want to have those!
BMP sounds like it best matches with Calvary Fighting Vehicle (CFV) such as the M3 Bradley
"War thunder features historically accurate tanks"
HAH!
It does yeah
@@jaimykuijn6052 oh, you mean a 1964 tank fighting ww2 tanks, is that what you mean?
or do you mean the hstv stats being changed for "balance" and not being historically accurate
Cookie cracker2
We said the tank are accurate not the balance
Gaijin is the worst at balancing BR
I know what you mean but he means that they are real vehicules and prototypes, not like those super tanks on wot xD still wt has shitty balancing
@RedEffect i know this may sound stupido, but can you make a new series called 'how it could improve'
like what could make this vehicle better. If its not a problem, can you start with arjunk mk2?
I like how youtubers say its a bonus if you use their links but regardless link or not you get 3days perm and 1 prem tank
wait, i thought the BMPT-72 is an export option for countries which operates T-72, sort of like an upgrade package, and the Russian use BMPT with those dual automatic grenade launcher, isn't the one the Russian use in parade the one which has those grenade launcher? I'm confused.
Nope. Version on T-90 hull wasn't economically suitable for the Russian armor. That version is often referred as RAMKA-99 and has 5 crew members. BMPT-72 was offered as upgrade and chiper evolution on T-72 hull for the Russia as well fir any other country that opererate T-72 tanks. In basic, as far as I have seen till now, there are options for the export version - T-72M or T-72 M1 hull is tha base. The engine coul be changed to an modern, but it is an option only. Also, there is an another option, known as BMPT-72 mod 2017 with addon armor in bags, that was tested in the Syria.
@@w0lfgm But wikipedia says that both Bmpt T and "Bmpt-72 T-2" are based on T 72 chassis...
"Bmpt-72 T-3" will be based on T 90...
@@w0lfgm ah i see, ok. but still there are BMPT with 5 men crew in russian arsenal right? russian are weird man, it like
Russian: No T-72B2 rogatka is too expensive adding relikt to T-72 is too expensive
also Russian: lets slap relikt onto a T-72 based vehicle!
Russia does not use BMPT at all(only prototypes), the military was dissatisfied with ignoring their requirements for BMPT from the developer. developed a new BMPT based on the t-15 with a 57mm gun, 30mm is not enough.
@@elusive6119 Yes, Russian army awaits so called Terminator 3 on Armata platform.
Hi
Can you make a video about mi24 hind your content is amazing
Loved this vid 👍👍.
Igor: Boris bring all of our BMPT72's to the front to defend our motherland, how many do you have?
Boris: 10
10 tanks with 4 missiles each that mean 40 missiles total...that is 40 tanks they can destroy.
If their was a fashion contest among military equipments
Russians will win almost everywhere
Germans would win lol
And imo the Israelis would be on the bottom.
@@arya31ful actually merkava mk4 looks pretty cool though..
russian stuff look ugly. just look at the t14. it looks like a giant fridge and a tank version of a hi point. its horrible and looks retardd. worst tank in the world in terms of both quality and aesthetics.
@@usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816 you definitely blinded by your american-ness not to see the armata's aethestics....
Could you do a video on the new British IFV AJAX?
I HAVE A REQUEST TO ASK : sure everyone else would agree , can you review the Russian IFV Kurganets 25 , its brand new and likely not many in service yet but it has to be one of the best in the world , would be really interesting to see what kind of features and equipment it has .THX
Attack the D point!
Affirmative!
Warthunder historically accurate
Ye tell that to those mbt fighting at normandy
Is War thunder fun? Just asking
Amir Zafri
It’s only fun when you get kills and have skills. You can play modded custom servers if you want peace, they’re fun servers usually.
@@apple222sickly very funny to get killed by a helo from 10 km
My country (Norway) is considering purchasing K2 Black Panther or Leopard 2A7. Therefore, would you kindly make a tank review of the K2 Black Panther? I think it would be a really interesting video tbh ;)
Its to expensive
You should do the Bradley IFV
Arjun: I sea nou worthy comipetitors here
*BMP T72 joined the chat*
BMP T72: Suka Blyat!!!!!!!!!
Arjun Fan boi: we do nut lik ur tone of voice sir!
*Arjun has left the chat*
Enlighten me. Why is arjun tank being trolled?
@@hafsalbasheer211 look at Indian guy comment on Arjun
...”so great” untill cope under a javelin missile, I’m very courious how will be !
You do realize that most modern tanks/military vehicles are vulnerable to atgms right?
@@yeeterskeeter6356 all of them or russians with small “r” (mostly) ?
Please be professor and explain why !
Good vid as usual
@RedEffect imagine your in battle and you forget to charge your phone
This video aged really badly 😆
How? None lost so far
@@sooryan_1018 and used so far as well
or did it?
What makes this thing so great? It’s an easy target for atgm’s !!!
it hunts manpad`s squads faster than they can lock on and can provide as much suppressing fire as 3 IFV`s. Can survive any frontal hits and crew can survive any top attack missile
@@iMost067 "uch suppressing fire as 3 IFV`" as 3 dogshit 80's IFV yes . Good army have FCS in their IFVs bro and good armement and not using stock soviet BMP-2 which never seen the shadow of a GPS or a FLIR
@@nicolas8098 wow, ifv suppressing enemies with GPS, new tech
whats the point of making tanks? They will be destroyed by AT weapons. Whats the point of having infantry? They will be killed easily. Whats the point of having an army? They can be defeated by others.
Thats your logic.
Cool Channel! Facts facts facts....love it!
It looks fantastic, terminator can support a t90m expertly if used properly, it could even blind tanks with its 30mm while atgms engage other tanks. (I doubt such a perfect scenario would happen more than a handful of times but this is theoretical.)
When Terminator meets Javelin/NLAW etc.🔥
They haven’t met them yet, except that they made Ukraine lose more territory.
those 2 weapons would fuck any vehicle, even NATO ones
@@fuckedlaptop364 Yes Modern armor cant keep up with the firepower and versatility of Modern hand help anti-armor weapons, regardless who it is.
@kc korea
Ever heard of autocorrection on a phone using a different native language?
LMAO so where are the legions of destroyed Terminators then? Oh wait they dont exist because if Javelins/NLAWs truly mattered then Ukraine wouldn't be losing as bad as it is xD
Finally a support vehicle MBT Arjunk can take out!
Do a vid on Trabant so Indian nationalists can feel happy they can destroy it too!
East Germany did have a military jeep version of the Trabant.
I disagree with the removal of the AGL systems being a good thing ( even if it saves 2 crew positions) ... this takes away a lot of the versatility such a system would have. Its considered a support vehicle for tanks against infantry. And infantry hides behind stuff when tanks approach to deny line-of-sight ... so what is the Terminator supposed to do then ? If it can lob grenades behind cover and into trenches it can cover more tactical situations. And also peeking out of you own cover to get in a shot risks your own destruction vs. ATGM armed infantry despite the relatively heavy armor it has. If the west would build a similar system it should have a single autocannon, light machine gun, ATGMS and at least one 40mm AGL alongside the AC in the turret. Heck every IFV should have AGL´s to be able to stay in hard cover and still support their dismounted infantry from safety.
You didn’t describe its role other than support for MBTs. Is it simply a cheaper AFV than a tank?
3:25 "The crew has to rely on their smartphones for navigation"... how about a map?
If you wanna unfold it, and reading a map is harder than reading SATNAV
there are most likely a couple of layers of navigation, but smartphone is the most convenient
Good luck getting gps inside all tha armor
A... map? This is 2021, not 1991.
I feel some ppl in the comment are making conclusions too fast, any kind of advanced equipment needs to be combined with modern military informatization, which admitted by Russian themselves heavily lagging behind
Few lost in Ukraine doesn't necessarily mean their vehicle is bad or anything, any kind of advanced equipment may fail to other weapons try to counter it. Loss is normal in the battlefield, if conclude this fast that bmpt terminator is crap, then ig leopard 2 after losing shit amt by Turkish army in one battle means its a worthless junk, same goes with abrams and others
Keep a cool mind, analyzing its strength and weakness carefully than make a conclusion, should be the most basic thing an adult can do.
review the new m84
We have 500 leo1A5 in my country, i wonder what tha nato terminator would look like using the hull ;)