woah, a UA-camr pilot whose camera is not fixed on his face. That's cause this guys an oldschool American pilot from the heyday of aviation. Thanks for not being a "me-monster" cap, love your videos. 😊
Wow! Almost the entire runway used for takeoff. Also it was interesting that the plane flew through the plumes of steam ascending from the industries below. Thanks for an excellent video!
I now live in Newark up on a hill and can see the planes coming and going from my living room window. The airport itself is too far and downtown is in the way, but when my wife has flown out of there for work, they sometimes route her right over our building and I get pictures of her plane. (And yes, I wave.) I have a bunch of videos I shot out the window as a passenger, but it is cool seeing it from the front end like that! Even as a layman, I could tell you used up a lotta runway. Interesting info about why. Thanks for posting!
Cool! You should post some of your videos. Here are some photos I took at MIA. Some were taken from my driveway! I live 7 miles from FLL. photos.app.goo.gl/Wu5SxTTjmp3TXKAv7
Nice, where were y’all going. Also, I think EWR has to be my favorite airport, on the edge of a big city, around the area of cars, ships, and trains. And the view of the skyline on departure is amazing.
Thanks for keeping the sound of the plane and ATC in there (the ATC was dubbed in though I believe). Do they still use the old EFIS/MAP display or have they all converted to PFD/ND?
OMG! It looked like the pilot ran over the ground crew. The adrenaline rush of watching these videos is both completely gratifying, and yet, horribly unnerving, and yet, I keep coming back for more. 😉
This is great,waiting for the employee shuttle always watching these 737's takeoff right at the end,this an 800 or 900 because definitely isn't a 700 lol.
This airplane is headed down south. It would have continued its right turn after the initial left turn after takeoff. It was on the Colts Neck routing. Clearly following Arthur Kill down until abeam the Driscoll bridge where it makes a left hugging the coast down to COL then WHITE. Why was the ATC dubbed in on departure? The takeoff was from Taxiway W but the ATC was from a day landing 29 taking off 22R at Y.
I recently flew a 739 from newark to fort myers. Old airplane no tv etc. I was getting impatient no seeing the plane take off. I took almost all the runway and the landing was super fast and those brakes were full applied too. I wonder why this plane takes so much runway. I undertand a full cap 777 or 380 but not a 739. Once on the skies it was superfast we arrived 20 mins earlier.
The size of the airplane has little to do with the takeoff length or the landing speed. You must have been in the early version of the -900. It was a very flawed aircraft design. They basically just stretched a -800 with the same wing and flap system. It is a much heavier airplane because of the stretch job, so of course it's performance is poor. I hated flying the aircraft. The newer -900 versions like the 900ER were much better with a redesigned flap system and more powerful engines. That was my favorite 737 version to fly. The takeoff run in all 737 models will be long because we always use reduced thrust to save engine life. That means we only use enough takeoff power to just get off the runway using almost the entire length. This is SOP.
The B739 is an absolute slug. Small wing for the size of that airframe and not the most powerful engines, and the end result is ultra long takeoff rolls at high airspeeds on the regular. Especially on these high load factor Caribbean runs COA/UAL did with them. The high airspeed though gives it outstanding 2nd segment climb performance around sea level at places like Newark. They were absolutely rocketing in the V/S on the EWR2 loop. A lot of the B739ERs elect to use the full length of 22R with a de-rate.
@@WiLDCATZ The B739 was a terrible airplane. Beside the long takeoff run, the approach speed was crazy fast - usually just below max flap speed. The scariest takeoff I ever made was LAS-EWR in 100+ temp and a full load of PAX. We had to takeoff east. If I had lost an engine, I don't think we would have made it. It was also the hardest 737 to land well. The 900ER was a totally different animal. It was actually my favorite 737 after the -700. TO and landing speeds were much lower, and it was very easy to make great landings. I can't overstate how different it flew from the regular 900.
For clarification, my understanding is that the displays were set up like this because the airline was still operating “classic” 737’s, 300, 500, etc. Once all of the older aircraft were retired, the displays would be switched back to the full “ng” mode.
@@CraZy291 Iran Air, Alba Wings, Aerolíneas Argentinas, Belavia, Boliviana de Aviación, Canadian North, Jet2.com to name a few. I could list Cargo Carriers that still use them, but I suspect passenger carriers are more relevant
@@starlight122012 Iran Air doesn't even operate 737s, nor does Canadian North the NG. Jet2 has the normal display layout, judging from cockpit photographs. So does Aerolineas (see Mr Fabio on youtube, he flies the 737). So not that many after all...
This is great, and I am a lay person, with no way to judge this except by admiration.. but could you reject a take off at the V1 point indicated, using nothing more than this vision and all the human and tech distortions inherent, to answer something as objective?
If I'm not not mistaken, that PFD option for 737 NG was not a very popular one, but for US-based airlines were only used by Continental *and then United because of the similarity between 737 classics that they had. Now no more "round dials" PFD option planes are left in the UAL fleet
@@DmitriyKopylenko I think SW might have used it for a while also. I also heard they could not use VNAV descent because of the large classic fleet. I think the analog display is superior because it gives you so much more useful information. You look at dial positions rather than having to read and interpret numbers. The problem is that the young kids never developed a proper scan.
I’ve flown from Newark many MANY times. As a layman, I could swear that the transatlantic 747/57/67/77/87 used less runway than the this 737. It does have a reputation, deservedly or not, of being a runway hog. Here are a few: ua-cam.com/video/uMprPPwT0qQ/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/M0L9RDOtWqw/v-deo.html
@@CockpitScenes I’m sure you’re right! I haven’t been on a 727 in a long long time. I remember taking off from JFK in a 707-320 (I’m 65), and I thought it would never leave the ground.
The derated thrust they’re using (89.9% N1) poses less ware on the engines while requiring more runway for takeoff roll... the heavier aircraft could be utilizing less of a derate and therefore more thrust.
@@wotan10950 They were even bigger ground hogs when they had the early pure jets with water injection in the late 50s/early 60s. AAL and PAA had em. Some great photos of those early 707s in the late 50s with the short tail blowing tons of jet black smoke on the climb out with the water injection turned on still stuck in ground effect. The addition of the fan was a huge boost in thrust but it wasn't ready at the time of the 707 launch. Jet technology moved fast in those days. GE elected to put the fan on the rear of their engine for the Convair Coronados. They used to cruise around a .92-.94 mach and do LAX-JFK in around 4 flat with a nice big tailwind.
woah, a UA-camr pilot whose camera is not fixed on his face. That's cause this guys an oldschool American pilot from the heyday of aviation. Thanks for not being a "me-monster" cap, love your videos.
😊
737 Classic-style displays on a 737 NG, a Classic in its own right.
Loved the way you ended the video and the ascent began with Mountain Lullaby.
Yes, very well done !
Wow! Almost the entire runway used for takeoff. Also it was interesting that the plane flew through the plumes of steam ascending from the industries below. Thanks for an excellent video!
Awesome video. I always love watching takeoffs out of EWR from a pilot’s perspective.
Well done. Classy ending, music and slow fade.
Aww man, when you guys lined up on 22R I saw that SWA 737, how I miss them at KEWR...
Great video. Crazy how much runway the 737 uses!!
Oh how I miss this.Thanks.
That is so cool seeing the takeoff from the cockpit
That was a nice video.
I now live in Newark up on a hill and can see the planes coming and going from my living room window. The airport itself is too far and downtown is in the way, but when my wife has flown out of there for work, they sometimes route her right over our building and I get pictures of her plane. (And yes, I wave.) I have a bunch of videos I shot out the window as a passenger, but it is cool seeing it from the front end like that! Even as a layman, I could tell you used up a lotta runway. Interesting info about why. Thanks for posting!
Cool! You should post some of your videos. Here are some photos I took at MIA. Some were taken from my driveway! I live 7 miles from FLL. photos.app.goo.gl/Wu5SxTTjmp3TXKAv7
Very nice. Thank you!
This Pilot is 60 years old and still a bad man, keep gettin it boy
Awesome video must've been a heavy bird with that takeoff run cool videos ✈👍
Great music for once. Not the usual you tube tripe.
Fascinating videos! EWR is my home airport; well, actually SWF is my home airport, but there’s so little commercial traffic. Subscribed.
Cockpit Scenes I took this (poor quality) video from my window, landing on EWR runway 29 (6800 ft) in a 747!
ua-cam.com/video/dZY-A0hExkc/v-deo.html
Nice, where were y’all going.
Also, I think EWR has to be my favorite airport, on the edge of a big city, around the area of cars, ships, and trains. And the view of the skyline on departure is amazing.
Can't remember where we were going, but probably somewhere in Florida. Glad you like EWR, but I don't think many people agree with you on that :)
Very nice!!!!! I really miss flying 😕.
Me too!
Nice video captain, thank you !
Is it commun to hand fly your departures in your airline ?
Thanks for posting, I’m terrified of flying and seeing this makes me rest more easily
As someone who flies all the time, it's more relaxing than scary!
Thanks for keeping the sound of the plane and ATC in there (the ATC was dubbed in though I believe). Do they still use the old EFIS/MAP display or have they all converted to PFD/ND?
I agree, but I'm older. I'm an RN and would rather use mercury thermometers and sphygmomanometer! lol
NICE!!!
Amazing!!!!!
OMG! It looked like the pilot ran over the ground crew.
The adrenaline rush of watching these videos is both completely gratifying, and yet, horribly unnerving, and yet, I keep coming back for more. 😉
This is great,waiting for the employee shuttle always watching these 737's takeoff right at the end,this an 800 or 900 because definitely isn't a 700 lol.
Cactus Dronography I think it’s a 900
This airplane is headed down south. It would have continued its right turn after the initial left turn after takeoff. It was on the Colts Neck routing. Clearly following Arthur Kill down until abeam the Driscoll bridge where it makes a left hugging the coast down to COL then WHITE. Why was the ATC dubbed in on departure? The takeoff was from Taxiway W but the ATC was from a day landing 29 taking off 22R at Y.
Wow thats amazing. How you know all that?
I recently flew a 739 from newark to fort myers. Old airplane no tv etc. I was getting impatient no seeing the plane take off. I took almost all the runway and the landing was super fast and those brakes were full applied too. I wonder why this plane takes so much runway. I undertand a full cap 777 or 380 but not a 739. Once on the skies it was superfast we arrived 20 mins earlier.
The size of the airplane has little to do with the takeoff length or the landing speed. You must have been in the early version of the -900. It was a very flawed aircraft design. They basically just stretched a -800 with the same wing and flap system. It is a much heavier airplane because of the stretch job, so of course it's performance is poor. I hated flying the aircraft. The newer -900 versions like the 900ER were much better with a redesigned flap system and more powerful engines. That was my favorite 737 version to fly. The takeoff run in all 737 models will be long because we always use reduced thrust to save engine life. That means we only use enough takeoff power to just get off the runway using almost the entire length. This is SOP.
What is the music? Love it
It's in the video description.
@@the_listamin Thank you, i see it now
Now that was a takeoff roll! Curious, what was your rotate speed?
Probably around 155kts.
The B739 is an absolute slug. Small wing for the size of that airframe and not the most powerful engines, and the end result is ultra long takeoff rolls at high airspeeds on the regular. Especially on these high load factor Caribbean runs COA/UAL did with them. The high airspeed though gives it outstanding 2nd segment climb performance around sea level at places like Newark. They were absolutely rocketing in the V/S on the EWR2 loop. A lot of the B739ERs elect to use the full length of 22R with a de-rate.
@@WiLDCATZ The B739 was a terrible airplane. Beside the long takeoff run, the approach speed was crazy fast - usually just below max flap speed. The scariest takeoff I ever made was LAS-EWR in 100+ temp and a full load of PAX. We had to takeoff east. If I had lost an engine, I don't think we would have made it. It was also the hardest 737 to land well. The 900ER was a totally different animal. It was actually my favorite 737 after the -700. TO and landing speeds were much lower, and it was very easy to make great landings. I can't overstate how different it flew from the regular 900.
@@CockpitScenes Interesting facts, it is so cool to learn them from a pilot.
How do you get the PFD to display a different format than the 777/747 style. It looks like electronic 737 classic instruments. How did you do that?
Cockpit Scenes interesting. So are all the 737 at your airline set up that way?
Must be an older video. Displays can be changed via a software upload.
For clarification, my understanding is that the displays were set up like this because the airline was still operating “classic” 737’s, 300, 500, etc. Once all of the older aircraft were retired, the displays would be switched back to the full “ng” mode.
@@Spyke-lz2hl Correct.
This must be a long time ago. You can clearly see a Continental tug at 1:46.
But the livery is already UNITED
Bryan Liu I mean to be fair it’s continental’s livery with United’s name. The tug is probably just a leftover from EWR being continental’s hub
@@jr13227 gotcha
Must be the last carrier to still use the side-by-side engine display. Classic in its own right...
Plenty of airlines still use them since these older aircraft are leased throughout the country/world.
@@starlight122012 Which ones though?
@@CraZy291 Iran Air, Alba Wings, Aerolíneas Argentinas, Belavia, Boliviana de Aviación, Canadian North, Jet2.com to name a few. I could list Cargo Carriers that still use them, but I suspect passenger carriers are more relevant
@@starlight122012 Iran Air doesn't even operate 737s, nor does Canadian North the NG. Jet2 has the normal display layout, judging from cockpit photographs. So does Aerolineas (see Mr Fabio on youtube, he flies the 737). So not that many after all...
Where were u going
This is a great takeoff video.
This is great, and I am a lay person, with no way to judge this except by admiration.. but could you reject a take off at the V1 point indicated, using nothing more than this vision and all the human and tech distortions inherent, to answer something as objective?
I didn't understand that last part, but yes, you could reject at the V1 point.
Is this the Newark 6 departure??
I don't remember, but it is the departure for RW 22R going south.
EWR 8 now
Are you a military veteran?
Yes, Army - Vietnam.
What this aircraft type and airlines?
Boeing 737-800
@@CockpitScenes United
5:13 almost looked like an unintentional use of the entire runway lol
The 737 NG uses a lot of runway when heavy. Also, all takeoffs are calculated with reduced thrust. This is a typical takeoff at EWR.
screen height at the end of TODA would be achieved in case of engine failure
Is this United Airlines or Delta Airlines
United/Continental
Love those round dial displays. Quite easier than reading and interpreting.
I agree 100%. However, I seem to be in the minority...
So, you work for United.... pretty solid airlines.
Continental I think that's the buggy pushing him off says
@@davidreeves8388 It's United, according to the ATC. EWR probably still has some ground equipment though that still uses Continental logos.
That’s United Airlines right or am I wrong
Yeah it is.
What are these displays?
Standard 737NG displays set up for round dials - still the best to use. New is not always better...
@@CockpitScenes Thanks!
I see them very rarely.
If I'm not not mistaken, that PFD option for 737 NG was not a very popular one, but for US-based airlines were only used by Continental *and then United because of the similarity between 737 classics that they had. Now no more "round dials" PFD option planes are left in the UAL fleet
@@DmitriyKopylenko I think SW might have used it for a while also. I also heard they could not use VNAV descent because of the large classic fleet. I think the analog display is superior because it gives you so much more useful information. You look at dial positions rather than having to read and interpret numbers. The problem is that the young kids never developed a proper scan.
@@CockpitScenes Ahh, thanks for the clarification about SWA. As a "sim pilot", I also prefer round dials representation 😀
when was this flight?
At least 10 yrs ago.
@@WiLDCATZ Definitely not. All planes painted for United with the globe livery would have been painted for Continental Airlines.
ecoRfan Continental tug at 1:46
must had been fully loaded that dog almost took all runway
@@CockpitScenes yup - heard AS pilot ask for the entire runway in august i was on b6 to orlando and damm he took the entire runway
yeah and newark has long runways
I posted a Newark 747 and 777 takeoff on UA-cam, and they used less runway than the 739!!
all calculated
@@piotrkuler2474way calculated, they do that crap every where
must've had a really low N1 for that long of a roll
SOP
I’ve flown from Newark many MANY times. As a layman, I could swear that the transatlantic 747/57/67/77/87 used less runway than the this 737. It does have a reputation, deservedly or not, of being a runway hog. Here are a few:
ua-cam.com/video/uMprPPwT0qQ/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/M0L9RDOtWqw/v-deo.html
The 727 is worse...
@@CockpitScenes I’m sure you’re right! I haven’t been on a 727 in a long long time. I remember taking off from JFK in a 707-320 (I’m 65), and I thought it would never leave the ground.
The derated thrust they’re using (89.9% N1) poses less ware on the engines while requiring more runway for takeoff roll... the heavier aircraft could be utilizing less of a derate and therefore more thrust.
@@wotan10950 They were even bigger ground hogs when they had the early pure jets with water injection in the late 50s/early 60s. AAL and PAA had em. Some great photos of those early 707s in the late 50s with the short tail blowing tons of jet black smoke on the climb out with the water injection turned on still stuck in ground effect. The addition of the fan was a huge boost in thrust but it wasn't ready at the time of the 707 launch. Jet technology moved fast in those days. GE elected to put the fan on the rear of their engine for the Convair Coronados. They used to cruise around a .92-.94 mach and do LAX-JFK in around 4 flat with a nice big tailwind.
hi
can i post with credit in @flight_no1 instagram acount ?
Airline and Arrival Airport
This video is only a departure from EWR. Can't remember the destination. You can guess the airline.