Know your rights…
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 січ 2024
- It is both Personnel and your Managers job to train any new employees they may hire. It is not in your job description and if you are requested to do so, you can politely decline.  Should you wish to assist in training a new employee, make sure you get your Union involved to ensure you are fairly compensated, and your workload is adjusted
been there, done that, way too often, to the point where i did myself “a favor” and resigned.. when they see how many people they have to hire to replace 1 you, who did those nondescript “additional duties as assigned,” it’s too late for them to recognize your worth
Asking an underling to train your new hires is like getting a copy of a copy. Supervisors are responsible the quality of their underlings. When a supervisor pawns off training to a regular employee, you're just inviting incompetence. IF... IF your underling can train new employees to meet all the standards and job skills necessary... they should be a supervisor.
I mean, this is all 100 💯 accurate! But if we try this in real life, we get fired
It depends. Because that can be considered for wrongful termination. Also, let’s say you train them, the trainee is a liability for ur job since if they do something wrong, they can blame you too for not ‘training them properly’.
This is the difference between a union job and a nonunion job. Unions require you be compensated for the skills you provide and the work you perform, while in the private sector you are no more than a replaceable cog in a machine - some would call just an indentured servant working off the cost of existence 😢
@@CSEA-Chap42 Well-worded.
@@CSEA-Chap42 "At will" employment should abolished.
@@kevinerbs2778 Its only existing in the red states, let them vote a different way.
My employer foisted upon me a junior trainee. I told him I will never train him to do my job. He complained to the boss. My boss complianed to me. I told him that "thing" is not in my jog description. I told him "Why would anyone train any cheap wage earner to take over their job"?
Luv Veronica. She's savage 😎
They tried to get me to train someone less than 6 months on the job, when I was still learning too. I just flat refused and said they have to get someone else. I just got a promotion last week.
Sarcasm is paramount actually.
Brilliant
For my last job, when the new hires needed training, if the new hire didn't ask me to train them, they didn't get it.
If a supervisor asked me to train a new hire, i said no the new hire needs to ask me. If they don't ask, they don't get trained.
If the new hire wants the job, they need to go out and ask, not get their hands held.
Didn't do a lot of training cause the new hires had no guts.
If it takes her longer than 40 hrs per week and our wages were based on 40 hours per week then she gets overtime. She doesn’t get paid extra because she’s doing something slightly different and training is kind of normal. This type of mentality will wipe out our jobs which will just lower our wages
Just because you work more then 40 hours doesn't mean you get overtime. Quite a few salaried positions don't get overtime for working more then 40 hours.
Also unless your job description states you are to be training people as part of your job duties then it should be considered extra work and compensated appropriately.
Since usually in these situations, you are training the person replacing you, it's really no loss to you tonstand your ground. Cause I can promise you, the vast majority of companies will fire you for no other reason then oops we paid more in fines and litigations then we expected sooo byeeee
guystoners, you sound like a manager.
You must work for HR.
No, people not doing additional duties for free actually creates additional jobs instead.
@@Dk-kz1vy You could also be training someone that will be helping lower your load. Jobs aren't asking you to train someone to then fire you. If so, they could just fire you and train the new hire by someone whose work they value enough to retain. If you are that insecure about your role in the company, this one scenario isn't likely to change anything that wasn't obvious.
Workers: We don't have enough support. I keep having more work and am burning out.
Veronica: I am not helping train someone that can ease my workload.
You don't get corporate mindset; they're having her train her replacement, _WHILE_ still maintaining her normal workload (which is already probably severely oversized). Basically, "Here you go! We're giving you yet _another_ thing we need done, but refuse to compensate you in any way, shape or form for! And if you try to refuse, I'll say you're not a 'team player' and that 'our company is our family!' to try and guilt-trip you into doing what I want."
Rather " I am not helping train someone they can pay less and who's gonna replace me"
So just make her salary and force her to do it. If she doesn't then fire her. You don't want someone with her attitude working for you. It's toxic
How is it toxic lmao even if she was salaried if you want someone to train a new employee you need to free up the time for them to do it so whatever other tasks she has to do would have to either be postponed or picked up by someone else
“You don’t want someone with her attitude working for you” says the guy who is unemployed on his couch, about the girl who makes far more than he will
@@kingofgrim4761 you're hilarious, but also clueless
@@benfurnish9948 thanks I am pretty funny, but clueless is not the case here
@@kingofgrim4761 you don't know me at all, just making baseless accusations about a stranger you've never met.