Farer Lander GMT Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 лип 2017
  • For more pictures, and a written review please check out my website at: www.gearzeit.com and my instagram here: / aaron_shapiroedc
    Farer Watches: farer.com
    Music by: Martyr on the Free Music Archive - freemusicarchive.org/music/Mar...
    Thanks!!
    -Aaron

КОМЕНТАРІ • 64

  • @munmun2769
    @munmun2769 6 років тому +2

    You do a nice job finding and sharing high quality items, from knives to watches. I appreciate your attention to detail. Thanks for continuing the videos.

  • @jasonwhitehurst7576
    @jasonwhitehurst7576 6 років тому +8

    That colorway is phenomenal. I've seen a number of reviews struggling to define the color of the dial and that's what attracts me. Ordering it, thanks for the review I needed. I picked​ #400. I have a new Rolex DateJust 41 silver on silver and I love it but this calls me.

  • @Bradley8707
    @Bradley8707 2 роки тому

    I’ve lived with this watch for three weeks now, it’s not swatch like.
    Love the dial in different lights, love looking at the movement. Well done Farer.

  • @MIGHTYcbu
    @MIGHTYcbu 6 років тому +1

    Very beautiful, love the design! Love the dome and how it maximizes the use of the dial, a bit vulnerable without a bezel of course, but much prettier imho

  • @Claus-L.Mueller
    @Claus-L.Mueller 7 років тому +6

    Definitely a watch Design you won't see on many wrists! Not quite sure about the colour combination but it seems to be a fair price for what you get.

  • @wordonwatches
    @wordonwatches 6 років тому

    Great video of a great watch! Thanks for sharing.

  • @gmotionedc5412
    @gmotionedc5412 3 роки тому

    I love it. Looks like Sellita movement now. That dial is what your buying🔥🔥

  • @feelgoodconcept
    @feelgoodconcept 4 роки тому

    Congratulations, nice review for a very nice watch👍🏻

  • @MrAlbellis
    @MrAlbellis 6 років тому +2

    Great design, you can pick the band you want, and great quality guts... it is expensive though.

  • @vkkaliki
    @vkkaliki 6 років тому

    love this watch

  • @andtothewestamerica
    @andtothewestamerica 2 роки тому

    Love what this brand is doing

  • @Billeh556
    @Billeh556 6 років тому +15

    It’s 10 atmos (100m) it’s definitely better water resistance than you alluded to

    • @erikkalifornia5182
      @erikkalifornia5182 3 роки тому +1

      Agree that it is, but as an owner of this watch, I do agree with the reviewer in that I wouldn't feel comfortable swimming with it. Even if the watch is rated for swimming, which it is, I prefer not to swim with a watch unless it's got a screw down crown and is at least 20atm. I guess for $1500, to me, it's not worth taking the chance.

    • @Billeh556
      @Billeh556 3 роки тому +1

      Erik Kalifornia not what I said. I have a SARB033 also rated to 100m but I also wouldn’t swim with it.

  • @Cal316326
    @Cal316326 7 років тому +2

    Love that teal dial. Overpriced for a a relative unknown microbrand imo. Of course if you love it it will be worth the money spent.

  • @blackmax5503
    @blackmax5503 5 років тому

    Beautiful rare piece

  • @AtilioEscobar
    @AtilioEscobar 4 роки тому +1

    I still don't understand the GMT function. Does the GMT hand move independently with the crown? I'm new to wrist watches.

    • @cryingbball
      @cryingbball 4 роки тому

      Atilio Escobar you can track two timezones basically

    • @tangoalphawhiskey
      @tangoalphawhiskey 3 роки тому +1

      The GMT hand works on a 24 hour dial or “military” time. It rotates around the dial one time in 24 hours unlike the standard 12 hour “standard” hand that rotates around the dial twice a day.

  • @Archer335
    @Archer335 4 роки тому +1

    This would be really nice in a 36mm case with a decent crown.

  • @eviola11
    @eviola11 6 років тому

    Wrist frosting?

  • @aivarb
    @aivarb 4 роки тому +2

    Why is your date disk white whereas the one shown on their site has matching color to the dial?

  • @keithrockpro
    @keithrockpro 7 років тому +2

    Nice watch, great design imo

  • @Solaar_Punk
    @Solaar_Punk 5 років тому +2

    Good review. I swim with mine, as I did with my GMT Master. 100m suits me!

  • @malthus101
    @malthus101 6 років тому

    Just bought this model - let's see how it is in the flesh - they say if you don't like it, 30 days for full refund no questions asked! It really stands out to me amongst the micro-brand dross.
    I also have an Autodromo and a Halios.

    • @malthus101
      @malthus101 6 років тому +2

      Well, I got it... and it's not for me. Honestly it looks like a Swatch in the flesh, much smaller than I thought it would be (and I have 6.5" wrists) so, think I'll send it back for a refund.
      Can't justify that much money on something that looks like a kids toy watch. Nah....

    • @Someothername2134
      @Someothername2134 2 роки тому +1

      What made it look like a kid’s toy watch?

  • @Locutus2k
    @Locutus2k 6 років тому +1

    Can't understand how you track the minutes. I can't see minutes markers on the bezel, only smal signs each 5 minutes not related to intermediate minutes. Can you explain please?

  • @R3DLiFE
    @R3DLiFE 3 роки тому

    i say resale value is there as well with all of their watches

  • @pleaseplantme-lawnmowingse3859
    @pleaseplantme-lawnmowingse3859 6 років тому

    Is this a brand that will hold value ?

  • @JohnThomas-su5bw
    @JohnThomas-su5bw 6 років тому +1

    Try Bernhart GMT.Mind blowing value.

  • @clontstable1
    @clontstable1 6 років тому +8

    I really like the look of this watch. However, I think Christopher Ward offers more bang for the buck.

    • @FatSamEIE
      @FatSamEIE 5 років тому +3

      CW and Seiko probably do offer more bang for the buck if you want a sports watch- but these are more everyday/casual dress watches. I own a Marinemaster and a Speedmaster but wouldn’t mind of these for work and traveling. It’s different, has character and you’re not likely to see one in the wild.

    • @eyeofthetiger6002
      @eyeofthetiger6002 4 роки тому +3

      But the quality and looks of the CW is a notch below this Farer.All of the Farer watches are beautiful and distinct to look at(eg, the bronze crown)and for all intents and purposes,this is a Swiss watch with a British name and design!(perfect combination, marrying Swiss precision engineering with British design flair.)

    • @erikkalifornia5182
      @erikkalifornia5182 3 роки тому

      @@eyeofthetiger6002 Agree, i own the the Lander showed here, as well as the CW C8 Chronometer, which is a really nice watch for $2000. Most of CW watches are pretty cheap however, like Seiko, good value for the money, but not overly special. The Lander shown here is a much nicer watch than most CW watches...

  • @HH60gPaveHawk
    @HH60gPaveHawk 5 років тому +2

    Not swim with a 10ATM watch? lol I'd sincerely hope you'd swim with a 10ATM watch, most of the early dive watches were that depth rating or less.

    • @tangoalphawhiskey
      @tangoalphawhiskey 3 роки тому

      It’s not so much the 10ATM rating as the lack of a screw down crown. The screw down crown makes all of the difference.

  • @frips1000
    @frips1000 7 років тому +6

    10 atm means 100m water resistans means swimming!!!!

    • @aaronshapiroedc
      @aaronshapiroedc  7 років тому +5

      With no screw down crown I would be hesitant to submerge it, regardless of depth rating. You may do as you like though.

    • @tt6368
      @tt6368 6 років тому +2

      frips1000 in Swiss term 10 atm means “be really careful when you are washing your hands”

  • @rockyescape8989
    @rockyescape8989 7 років тому +1

    You can get a longines conquest GMT at that price.

    • @McHale72
      @McHale72 7 років тому +6

      I'd prefer the ETA 2893 TOP movement over the movement in the Conquest.

    • @malthus101
      @malthus101 6 років тому +7

      why on earth would ANYBODY buy a Longines Conquest GMT?? It is one UGLY motherwatcher!

  • @JettyLife23
    @JettyLife23 6 років тому +7

    Every time I see their watches I want one. Then I see the price. If it was closer to $500 It'd be a great watch.

    • @Solaar_Punk
      @Solaar_Punk 5 років тому +6

      It's worth it if the unique design speaks to you and you can see yourself keeping it forver. It was for me.

    • @Itzzmeagain28
      @Itzzmeagain28 4 роки тому +1

      Money comes and goes. If you really like that watch go for it.

    • @IulianlM
      @IulianlM 4 роки тому

      @@Itzzmeagain28 Money never comes always goes. :))

  • @Ryouchijtx
    @Ryouchijtx 7 років тому

    Will you be posting anymore knife videos..what's up with all these watches.
    Jk keep up the amazing content broheim.

  • @11shore2
    @11shore2 6 років тому +3

    i love micro brands but these guys are a little pricey compared to most.

  • @mcrae1977
    @mcrae1977 5 років тому

    Show a GMT watch with the function of how the time zone and GMT functions work please. Not just an exterior view back to back.

    • @dukeviper8385
      @dukeviper8385 5 років тому +1

      Learn how to use GMT instead of complaining almost anyone interested in GMT knows how to use it. It's like having interest in watches without knowing how to read the time. Your complain doesn't make any sense

    • @mcrae1977
      @mcrae1977 5 років тому +2

      @@dukeviper8385 why doesn't it make any sense? People want to know if it's a True GMT or a follow GMT. And reading the time of a watch is rather simple.
      There may be watch owners who wish to move into gmt watches that may want to know how the gmt function works. Nothing wrong with that.

    • @alastairwright77
      @alastairwright77 4 роки тому

      @@mcrae1977 agreed, although he did mention the type of GMT complication featured, drawing the distinction between it and a 'true' GMT watch, like the Rolex.

    • @timemycollection
      @timemycollection 3 роки тому

      Well i was here hoping to see how the GMT works. To see if it’s true or different. I’m looking at the new gmt bezel in white 🙌🏾

  • @hazyday5623
    @hazyday5623 5 років тому

    the buckle looks underwhelming. Its priced more than a hamilton gmt

  • @MegaBlackley
    @MegaBlackley 5 років тому

    Love the design of the Lander and Carter; best use of color in the business I feel. But it's too damn small. I need a watch that is 42mm or it looks too diminutive on my wrist. I'm fine with the price, just not the size, and the thing is, all of the Farer watches are 39.5mm.

  • @YounanPhoto
    @YounanPhoto 7 років тому +2

    Sorry but this is not good value. It's a lot more than an airman

    • @FatSamEIE
      @FatSamEIE 5 років тому +6

      If you want strictly value buy a timex/g shock/ Seiko sarb etc
      If you want something a bit different and with character but still well made with good materials this is fine and it’s not too expensive in my book

    • @oliverwarren1074
      @oliverwarren1074 5 років тому +1

      But it looks way better than an airman. OKay that is subjective, but they're totally different looking watches. I can't imagine people tossing up the two. This is the kind of watch an author, musician or artist might wear, for example. The airman is far more masculine and suits an entirely different type of wrist.

    • @strickostricko
      @strickostricko 3 роки тому

      Don’t apologise. It’s your opinion even if you are wrong.

  • @anonymousonlineuser6543
    @anonymousonlineuser6543 6 років тому +2

    Unremarkable watch. There are so many watches one can buy for 1500 this one becomes another Frankenstein, quasy-vintage design. Reminds me of Citizen bullheads with their Franken dials and aftermarket hands.