Ethics Investigation into Becky Hill, Murdaugh Family Murders Trial
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 гру 2023
- Becky Hill, the Clerk of Court in SC v. Alex Murdaugh, could now face criminal charges and jail time for allegedly using taxpayer money to promote her book, according to reports of an ethics investigation.
#CourtTV What do YOU think? ⚖️
Catch up on the FACTS here: www.courttv.com/tag/alex-murd...
#alexmurdaugh #murdaughmurders #jury
Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today www.courttv.com/
Join the Investigation Newsletter www.courttv.com/email/
Court TV Podcast www.courttv.com/podcast/
FOLLOW THE CASE:
Facebook / courttv
Twitter/X / courttv
Instagram / courttvnetwork
TikTok / courttvlive
WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE www.courttv.com/trials/
WHERE-TO-WATCH www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/
Catch up on the FACTS here: www.courttv.com/tag/alex-murdaugh/?
Becky hill is very guilty.. but how much faith can one have in SC state ethics to do anything about it?
@@georgewashington3555, Luke 19:22-23 ("I will judge you by your own words") and Luke 6:38 ("For with the measure you use, it shall be measured for you.")
After reading Neil Gordon's threat to Will Folks on another thread on this blog; and after hearing Neil Gordon yesterday on Court TV, this is addressed to him:
You, Neil Gordon, and Becky "Boo" claim to be religious, etc. I leave that for God to judge; but I want to ask YOU about your own words.
Fair enough?
Using the book you, "Neil Gordon, co-author[ed] 'Behind the Doors of Justice[,]'"
for starters, page xix: "Word is from someone on the defense team that Alex had been practicing and perfecting his snot-and-crying display for weeks."
All possibilities:
1. This is a total fabrication by you and/or your co-author.
2. You and/or your co-author were spying on "the defense team" during "the trial of the century."
3. Alex's "defense team" has/had at least one traitor working against Alex's interests during and/or after the trial.
4. The juror with the borrowed coat two-sizes wide for him ("the borrowed-coat juror") invented that story with you and/or Becky "Boo."
5. "The borrowed-coat juror" invented that story and fed it to you and/or to Becky "Boo" after the trial but before writing the book.
6. You and/or Becky "Boo" fabricated that story and fed it to the jury, with only "the borrowed-coat juror" dumb enough to repeat it in media interviews.
7. You and/or Becky "Boo" knew your spying on Alex's "defense team" during the trial would, sooner or later, come out; so, you sought to pre-empt that revelation by pretending Alex's "defense team" was sending out "word" just out of the treacherousness of its own heart or, according to your theory of the world, out of contrition for defending Alex.
Which is it?
However you respond by insulting me, it will not change the fact that I am quoting VERBATIM from page xix of your and Becky "Boo's" book.
Also a legal principle is "qui non negat fatitur," which should not apply to a defendant in a criminal case because that defendant has no burden at all; but that principle should apply if you're threatening a civil defamation suit againat Will Folks; and I am NOT a lawyer.
Wow, in one fell swoop, I am defending Will Folks and sending many more to buy your and Becky "Boo's" book to look at page xix!
But that is only a by-product of my main intent: to reach the truth and exonerate the wrongly-convicted.
Respond if you can; or "qui non negat fatitur."
Luke 19:22-23 ("I will judge you by your own words") and Luke 6:38 ("For with the measure you use, it shall be measured for you.")
After reading Neil Gordon's threat to Will Folks on another thread on this blog; and after hearing Neil Gordon yesterday on Court TV, this is addressed to him:
You, Neil Gordon, and Becky "Boo" claim to be religious, etc. I leave that for God to judge; but I want to ask YOU about your own words.
Fair enough?
Using the book you, "Neil Gordon, co-author[ed] 'Behind the Doors of Justice[,]'"
for starters, page xix: "Word is from someone on the defense team that Alex had been practicing and perfecting his snot-and-crying display for weeks."
All possibilities:
1. This is a total fabrication by you and/or your co-author.
2. You and/or your co-author were spying on "the defense team" during "the trial of the century."
3. Alex's "defense team" has/had at least one traitor working against Alex's interests during and/or after the trial.
4. The juror with the borrowed coat two-sizes wide for him ("the borrowed-coat juror") invented that story with you and/or Becky "Boo."
5. "The borrowed-coat juror" invented that story and fed it to you and/or to Becky "Boo" after the trial but before writing the book.
6. You and/or Becky "Boo" fabricated that story and fed it to the jury, with only "the borrowed-coat juror" dumb enough to repeat it in media interviews.
7. You and/or Becky "Boo" knew your spying on Alex's "defense team" during the trial would, sooner or later, come out; so, you sought to pre-empt that revelation by pretending Alex's "defense team" was sending out "word" just out of the treacherousness of its own heart or, according to your theory of the world, out of contrition for defending Alex.
Which is it?
However you respond by insulting me, it will not change the fact that I am quoting VERBATIM from page xix of your and Becky "Boo's" book.
Also a legal principle is "qui non negat fatitur," which should not apply to a defendant in a criminal case because that defendant has no burden at all; but that principle should apply if you're threatening a civil defamation suit againat Will Folks; and I am NOT a lawyer.
Wow, in one fell swoop, I am defending Will Folks and sending many more to buy your and Becky "Boo's" book to look at page xix!
But that is only a by-product of my main intent: to reach the truth and exonerate the wrongly-convicted.
Respond if you can; or "qui non negat fatitur."
So many shady people in such a small town
It reminds me of the show Ozark, everyone up to something
agree.
Can we ask Neil Gordon why his wife posted the photo captioned “the original and only photo of Alex in his holding cell” if she didn’t take the photo? I’m genuinely curious.
I hope they throw the book at her.
@@bonnieleeamos finally a good purpose for the book 😜🤣
@@sherylrae right?! I listened to the book and was grateful I didn't pay for it!!
@@sherylrae 💀
The only good part of the book, all the evidence written in black and white..
Vinny stirring the pot by bringing them both on 😭😭😭😭😭
Apparently it was known and this cat was on Facebook groups telling people he was taking this lawyer down and to tune in at 8 pm or whatever lol.
I don't know which story is more delightful - the one that I thought was happening in real time where they spontaneously bring on the person their guest is talking crap about, or the one where it's like a middle aged man essentially orchestrating a middle school flag pole fight to which he invites the entire school as spectators.
Either way, I needed the laugh that resulted from this man riding in unexpectedly on his drama llama. 🦙
Co-author dissing her podcast while publishing that self-serving book with clerk becky is WILD😅
I bet her following is substantially increased following this interaction lol
Not to mention...it's not a podcast...it's tiktok!!
Super wild
Yep, yep, yep!
His credibility went out the window when he acted like he has no idea where the picture came from.. don’t tell her to not curse, you tell that to your wife..she has a right to say exactly what she wants to say and how she says it
If Becky would have waited until Alex’s appeals ran out, then published her book, none of this would have happened!
And no one would have bought the book or been interested in it.
Can’t appeals last like a decade
She shouldn't have written the book at all.
Agree. She shouldn't had written a book and she wasn't nice to some jurors in her book. So not only are we making money off the corruption she was part of in that little town. Let's poke fun of the people ( tax paying jurors) that pay your salary. Horrible just horrible. She needs to sit in the next cell of Alex
I bet she wanted to be the first one to get a book out there.
Every time when someone says “freedom of speech”. Remember, there’s consequences for the words you choose to say.
The tongue is a sword, double edged at that!
Exactly what I told my husband. It's my first amendment right! Freedom of speech! Well, it's not total. Words & accusations have consequences. Also, seems to me Lori is the one who wants all the attention. If she wasn't so needy in that area then why does she have a podcast devoted to this subject when clearly she's an accomplished defense attorney. To me it's the pot calling the kettle black. She wasn't my cup of tea during the trial & she's not my cup of tea now. Her energy is so confrontational.
I have lost all respect for Lawyer Lori! Wow … piece of work.
@@vanessafowler3704 She's fantastic and handled that ridiculous rant like a true professional!
Freedom of speech isn’t unfettered. These are not protected cases of speech: incitement, defamation, fraud, obscenity, child corn, fighting words, and threats.
He was talking smack about Lori, then when was asked to say it to her face he satrted with "oh maybe it's the fact that I am oldschool", so already backtracking. Then he focuses on the language instead of the key problems. He cannot attack the facts so he is attacking whatever he can... this dude would be "great politician". I am not Lori's fan, mostly know her from court tv... but here I stand with her. (And the fact that he knows her ratings and view counts by heart... just shows how upset and petty he is)
Sorry this is a mess..... She should be fired immediately dismissed immediately to jeopardize such a case ! She should not ever be working in that in justice system ever again..!!!
Exactly!!!
So wait… !
there’s been a trial already… ?
and she was found guilty… ?
that was quick… !
when did you say sentencing will be… ?
and her son too, yikes!
@susanharrington8715 A trial is not needed to fire an employee for clear ethics violations. She used her position to enrich herself, was found to have spoken irresponsibly and prejudiciallly in the presence of the jury, AND admitted to plagiarism while unethically writing a book about a current trial she was working at! She hasn't (yet) been charged legally... but that doesn't mean she can't be fired for poor job performance and violating the rules.
She's probably getting more money from her book sales thanks to this jury tampering allegation, but she might end up putting all that extra money toward her own legal expenses.
She should save those sales earnings for the fat sanctions she's going to be receiving and attorneys fees she'll have to pay for Murdaughs attorneys to retry the case 😅
SC taxpayers should be furious. All for nothing?
If Becky's guilty, she should be held accountable to repay county restitution.
They should not allow it to cause a retrial… the Judge I saw who was being asked to allow a retrial said she was unwilling to go that route over 1 comment that a clerk made to a single juror. The judge said she would instead hear each of the jurors independently on whether the comment swayed their decision in any way. This to me is the most sensible way to go. The evidence was so beyond reasonable doubt that jurors took only a short time to say guilty… I doubt any of them would change their minds regardless.
This was a wild segment!!
"Lawyer Lori" 👉 _unapologetically herself!_
Mr. Gordon (whom I seem to recall, from FItsNews, has/had some sort of 'Christian podcast') is out of line, when he seeks to regulate the speech another adult. Nor is it as admirable as he seems to believe, to 'white-knight' as proxy for the adult woman to whom he is married. Surely, she is capable of defending her own name and reputation? Such defense would certainly carry more weight, coming from her own mouth.
Ugh....these corrupt roaches are EVERYWHERE
Interesting how when Vinny asks him about the digital image taken of the security camera, this guy talks about some selfies! Unbelievable!
Who is paying who down there? Most are seeming corrupt to me. If they wanted to clean up their image, it isn't happening.
well the tax payers of course
@@4marcygo So true! Thanks for the laugh - that's fantastic!
Pull the phone records sir. Let the receipts speaks for themselves.
The Gordons never should have gotten mixed up with all this.
34:37 🔥🔥 "You lack standing Sir, to come at me" 💯 respect
How is the way he is speaking to her any better? He’s on national television bashing her but it’s okay because he’s not cursing? Lol
Well, that was stressful! Lol. But I’m with the lawyer. She can use whatever language she wants when she isn’t in the courtroom!
Exactly! To report her to the Supreme Court was such a drama move from a person that does not understand the law.
And then Neil tried to pitch why he thought it was creative to post the photo of Alex in holding cell. Vinnie having none of that. Love Vinnie.
Who is 'Beil'?! Im trying so hard to understand your comment.....🤔🤦
Wow! Gordon forgets what Lori does on personal time is NOT a violation of ethics! I'm afraid that photo is gonna come back to bite him and his wife. Curiously he couldn't find where he got it. Not sus at all? He wants her to be ethical, yet imo, he has no idea how to be ethical. IF, these allegations against Becky are true, imo, he's gonna be shown in a light different from what he wants ppl to believe he is in.
Actually, Lori’s behavior on TikTok is a violation of the “civility code” of SC that all lawyers have to abide by- even on personal time and business!
@@Snoozysusie Actually that's not correct. In that code, it does say professional and personal, but it only means she can't give legal advice outside a client just like a nurse can't give professional medical advice to personal family or friends. They CAN express an opinion in BOTH professions. Her YT does not fall in the professional arena. She has every right to express her opinion on her personal channel as long as she is not directly involved in the case.
Neil Gordon, his wife and Becky Hill are super shady. How unprofessional and nasty of Neil to speak to Lori like that on a major public platform like this. It speaks volumes about his character and level of respect for women.
He showed just how guilty all 3 of them are. How he kept dodging question after question. Then he wanted to quote Will Smith. Really??
I agree. Why couldn’t his wife take up for her own self against another woman. I heard him say to Lori I don’t know if you are married or not. I’m sure he hopes not because if she is and he’s like my husband or most husbands he will regret jumping on to someone’s wife. I think it was very low life. Loved your comment about it
she demanded he not interrupts her but continuously interrupted him ... who disrespects who
This bloke is off his chops. And no-one knows where the photo came from, not even the official photographer? Interesting! Lori tore him to pieces
Fitnews does.
@@iffyangel3380 Love it! Fitsnews is on it!
There's no way the photographer took it though. It was from the surveillance camera.
I could be wrong but it seems to me that would be more of a screen shot of the monitor to the surveillance camera, right? So someone with access would have had to provide it.
Unless she was accessing wherever the feed is and she took a picture of the monitor. But that doesn't seem to be the case.
It's all very weird and this guy being sooooooo offended makes it weirder. I wouldn't have thought the photographer had anything to do with anything- it's not as if it was her job to make sure whatever access Becky allowed her was indeed allowed. It would make sense that she'd think if she had Becky's permission she was fine.
Really ?
27:00 He says "I have never cussed at you..." when in fact he just got done swearing at her!!! See 25:22.
Neil really had to reach out to the Supreme Court 🙄. Neil needs to reevaluate.
When I heard Becky Hill was writing a book I immediately thought this is wrong for her to flourish
What a petty little man. Reporting her for swearing?
Something seems very wrong about this book.
There’s something very wrong about this trial!!
Yeah, it shouldn't have been written. Ever.
Not a satisfactory answer on where the photo of Alex not long before verdict came from.
Yes. It was very interesting that the coauthor couldn’t answer that question.
His wife shared it in a private fb group saying it was the original and only picture…. That’s what has me confused, too, because he’s also in the group she posted it in
I still believe the theory that Becky was behind them getting the photo. Otherwise they would probably just say that they won’t tell where they got it because they are protecting their source. I don’t think there is a different source, how would anyone even know that his wife is a photographer and that there was going to be a book in the first place. Just shows that a book was in the works during the trial.
wow he really beat up free speech. Told her she had an awful mouth and then proceeded to cuss at her and call her and tell her to keep his wifes name out of her mouth. Wow. audacity telling a person what they can say. disappointed every time I see this guy
This guy had a nasty attitude. Why does he keep his face in the media??
Neil only "cussed @ her" when he wrote an email to lawyer Lori, calling her out for cussing @ him and he put her actual words in quotes in his reply to her. Also, Lori said that Neil retweeted a video of hers...implying he agreed with it I guess....but sometimes people retweet what someone else has posted, in an attempt to call them out for there misinformation and/or lies. Lori, herself in this interview said Becky was writing the book during the trial and during court time....then we hear clip of podcast, and she says she didn't begin WRITING book until 3 weeks AFTER the trial ended. So what is Lori saying here?
I think, jury tampering aside(for sake of this argument), someone is attempting to cut Becky off @ the knees ,so when there is evidenciary hearing ,Becky will not be believed because of all this side mess, then AM gets his new trial. I'm sorry ,I will never trust Jim and Poot! Ever!
Lori would wipe the floor with Neil- he doesn’t want that smoke
@@ratatouillesabatejr 🫢😆😂
@@donnasantiago5016 aka Melissa Gordon just stop. We all know that the only female on earth who would defend a cuck like Neil would be his stupid wife. What Lori is saying is that Neil was never mentioned in her so-called "rant". I would love to see the Supreme Court of South Carolina laugh Neil's pathetic ass all the way back to Augusta for turning Lori in for her "rant". He is just so stupid. In fact, he is really to dumb to function in regular life.
No way he quoted Will Smith here XD and called them "immortal words" hahhahaha does he know why they got so immortal? What consequences Will faced? And how his marriage is doing now?! And his wife can speak for herself, write to Lori. Or does he treat his wife as his property? Omg this dude is putting his foot into his mouth deeper, minute by minute.
Why the heck are there anonymous sources? More secrecy.
“My wife and i are one” 😂😂 loved it. Hahaha!!! Cant be that.
What a dog-and-pony show! Having a Clerk of Court "manage" any jury is unheard of in my County. Deputy Sheriff bailiffs, under the direction of the Judge, are the only person allowed anywhere near the jury...throughout the entire process. Becky Hill sounds like a pimple-faced teenager trying to insert herself into a rock band's schedule. And then has the absolute hubris to "write" a book?!
Fair assessment.
Clerks keep track of the records - affidavits, physical evidence & transcript.
In most areas they supervise the court reporter & audio/video recording.
And have guards make room for witnesses & galley visitors to walk in or out.
Plus food ordered in, bus or other transport to hotel if needed. And meals etc. there.
Locales vary but there is a lot to the job in many places.
@@rethinkcps2116 Those places better be prepared for a plethora of overturned convictions.
Lori vs Neil this should be good…. 😂
So she was stealing while filling motions about financial crimes? lol the irony
I wonder how much money it is and if that's where the 30k they paid to self publish their book.
Which funnily enough was what this guy asserted as a defense on Becky's behalf when the jury tampering allegations first broke - "why would she do that, there's no book deal, there was no money to be had"
@@leiliyahdecotta yea and to steal from kids in need for ur book is despicable…she def needs to be investigated. I do believe that she is guilty of jury tampering bc I believe the jury already reported that when interviewed by the state but we shall see
Lol listening to this again.
34:43 "You lack standing, sir, to come at me"
Lady Lawyerese for "come at me bro."
Exquisite turn of phrase.
For real! And then he has the audacity to accuse her of ethics violations when his party is under investigation 🙄 She wounded him, and now he gonna cry to the Supreme Court or whatever to get her sanctioned. What a b%^# baby.
Maybe know who took a photo you publish in the book you co-authored?
This guy is spinning his wife's role in the misconduct so hard. Lol. He knows she took that picture and got special treatment from Mrs. Becky. They all figured it would go unnoticed or swept away under the rug with the guilty verdict. They figured wrong.
They figured that any news is good news. oops
But it's so weird though because it's not like it's a crime to get special treatment from someone unless you're getting it as a result of say, bribing or blackmailing them. It's Becky who took an oath of office and violated it. It's not like the photographer is expected to know beyond what Becky tells her is okay or not, you know?
I swear if these Gordon grifters fucked up this entire case, they’re about to be the most hated people on the planet
Lori has the right to 1st amendment, Neil should use right to the 5th. His media tours might turn against him, his wife and his dear friend Becky. Mrs Hill lawyers should call him and ask him to zip it. He doesnt help her case. He might get called as a witness now, and this would be rare time that I would be on Murdaugh team side as they ask him questions. I just hope mr Barber will be examining him, as he was the best from this team.
This show isn't the only place he's inserting himself.
He's been posting in several of the Murdaugh murders discussion groups on Facebook. He certainly isn't helping his wife, Becky, or himself.
He must not watch very many true crime stories, how many times have we seen social media posts entered into evidence?
I have been weary of her ever since she went on her press tour about this dang book. I've never seen such a thing so close to when a trial was completed. Where there's smoke, there's fire. I would not be surprised if he got a new trial. Just because someone was hungry for fame and money which unironically is what Alex was going after too! (The money, not the fame)
Having the SC Atty Gen take over any part of this courtroom investigation is ridiculous... He was taking a victory lap with the prosecutors at that presser on the courthouse steps and Becky the Busy Beaver pops outta the 2 Nd floor window like she’s on Hee Haw😂
😂😂😂😂 not Hee Haw 💀💀
I am dying over the image you painted of Becky & Hee Haw! 😂😂😂 Hilarious! Thankfully I wasn’t drinking anything when I read it. Lol
Also!!! WHO the hell has the power in the courthouse to allow book signings and tours? That’s usually something a judge has to approve!!!!
Wait a minute did he quote Will Smith WTF:))) 😂 not a good one 👈🏻
Unhinged co-author
@@rozanne799 what’s unhinged?? Is that the Becky book?? I can’t remember:)
My question is... how do you "accidentally" record? Unless shes got a recorder from the 80s on her.. and the fact he said she couldn't bring her phone in... hmmm... sus af
It was outside of the courthouse, so you’re allowed to have phones, and take pics/videos. I accidentally hit video instead of picture on my phone all the time, you don’t need an old school recorder to record something.
Where is the end of the segment with Joe MCulloch and Bland?
Neil Gordon's rant was hilarious! He pulled a Will Smith. What a self-righteous, out of touch individual. Him and his wife made bad decisions and he is pointing fingers at everyone rather than taking accountability for their own actions. He should have taken his friends lead and stayed silent - - - but he couldn't pass up the opportunity to chase fame.
The Gordons got themselves into a mess and they are more concerned about saving themselves versus justice. I guess that is the theme of the trial. Self-enrichment has superseded the truth and Paul and Maggie have been forgotten.
Lori - AMAZING! I see why you have such a following!
Yeah let's believe the word of the husband and co-author... sure 🙄 I don't believe a word he says. Or his wife or Becky Hill. Of course they're going to lie! They have the most to lose.
Vinnie you are so smart! Great questions for Will.
Did he actually think quoting Will Smith was a serve?
There are plenty of lawyers who have UA-cam channels, instagram, tic Tok, Twitch, X, etc … who cus. It’s their own personal time. Who cares. Don’t like it avoid those channels.
A person can not be professional 24 hours a day. That’s ridiculous.
Wow. Neil Gordon is unpleasant.
You’re just saying this for attention
I’m still waiting to hear the rest of Joe and Eric’s discussion
Gordon is a complete joke!!
It’s getting hot 🥵 don’t come for Lori. She’s amazing 💥👈🏻
That Gordon guy has record of every single thing but has no idea how they got that photo?! Lmao sketchyyyyyy
Oh please this guy has no idea where the photo came from. Give me a break. Kudos to Vinny they keep on him.
So, if you publish photos in a book, do you have to have legal authorization for the photo if you do not own the photo? This isn't adding up at all. This co-author angry /man should bow out and remain silent. He is making himself and his wife look bad. I think he likes media appearances.
His wife posted it in a private group saying it was the original and only photo taken of Alex in his holding cell. Him saying he doesn’t know where it came from is astounding.
@@alliehogge Fits News reported that the photo came from courthouse surveillance cameras and Becky is who provided the access to the footage for the photo.
They’re pretty correct. I saw the post, picture, and read all of the comments, & his wife’s recent comments as of 2-3 days ago. She said herself it was the original and only so he’s pretty crazy to say different when his wife stated it. Ya know? I can’t believe he’s truly arguing they don’t know where it came from.
Also, it is said a person who cusses is more truthful than someone who does not. I believe that because I swear it like a truck driver, and I don’t speak with some family members due to my telling of the truth. There’s a reason there’s a saying the truth hurts because it really does and most people don’t like to hear it. I just had to get that in there a little jab to my family lol.
Poor Neil.. lol. He knows he's so screwed. Oops
She strikes me as a busy body. I have no doubt she had her hand in something suspicious. 🤨
Ms. BECKY HILL REMINDS ME OF PAM HUPP....
The one claim that never fits is that she needed a guilty verdict for her book to succeed. Weakest claim of them all.
it fits real well actually and she worked on it hard with kicking one juror out that looked to her like had some sympathy for Murdaugh and Becky also made negative comments about murdaugh to jurors every day. Becky is very guilty.
It would be much, much more interesting. Most people were cheering against him.
I don't think that a guilty verdict was needed, but a hung jury would have stopped her from publishing. No one wants to read a half finished story, and if a second trial was sill in the future she could not publish the book until everything was settled or else no one would have bought it.
She wouldn't be able to have women's intuition if the jury did not come back with a guilty verdict.
@@azrobbins01 That's a good point and that makes more sense than them saying she needed a guilty verdict. Kind of the same but not exactly. Alex would never be exonerated by 12 so yeah if it was not guilty, it would be hung jury...
Neil Gordon seems a bit unhinged there. He had to "speak to the manager" and file a complaint against her...lol ... he obviously doesn't know how that works. 😂 Him pointing at her at the end what a piece a 💩. All he did was bring more attention to him and his wife about that photo. 😂😂
Can't wait to watch the replay. Got here late
😮 keep my wifes name out your mouth!!!says photogs husband 🎉
Stop interrupting LORI!!
Neil’s whole gripe is focused 0n the language used by Lori, he doesn’t have a legitimate argument otherwise. And his biggest recourse is tattling to the Supreme Court. 😂
One day, when Sherlock Holmes visited the Lowcountry, he said, "Come on, Watson, come on. The grifting game is afoot. Not a word! Grab the microphone, press 'record' and come!"
Seriously, how nice it would be if a resourceful person could now enrich fans of the Murdaughverse with a beautiful 2024 calendar. The most leaked photos from Murdaugh's cell, portraits of all the lawyers involved - that would be heavenly!
"Corruption" is such an ugly word for something that makes the cash registers ring so nicely.
If he gets a new trail it will be shorter cause he’s convicted on the financial part , so that boring part isn’t coming back. So it’s only the murder of Maggie and Paul
The financial crimes were never part of the first trial and shouldn’t have been brought in, IMO. They were, however, ruled admissible, so they probably would be allowed in again. They were only allowed in based on their relevance in these matters. (Murder)
@@angeldobosh1991 he’s convicted for that so it must be one thing that shows why he murders Maggie and Paul
This guy is full of it.
This author doesnt seem credible at all... he suddenly doesnt know where the photo came from? And there is some recording, done by TOTAL ACCIDENT? If he is a friend to Becky why is he even talking out? Only her lawyers should be giving public statements. This dude only cares about his poorly written book (and he was co-author, editor of it, so the poor language is on him).
Becky's coauthor is... wow. Just so I'm clear... he's saying he "can't figure out" where the leaked cell photo came from.. but he has time to cyberstalk another guest, attack her freedom to use fowl language with her adult audience - which is TOTALLY normal among top people in her profession, to the extent of spitefully reporting her to the court out of petty vengeance? Okay. I heard no reasons from him that make me believe Becky and his wife are innocent and frankly his nasty attempt to distract us from the issue by attacking someone else doesn't make him look great either. Ugh. Might write my own letter in her defense. I don't think anyone involved with that book is ethical so... also cute of him to quote Will Smith, but it's tempting to respond with what Eminem had to say about Will's refusal to cuss.
He needs a hug…and a clue 😂
I’ve seen the evidence that he knows where it came from. His wife posted it in a private Facebook group, and just commented two days ago, that she isn’t deleting it because it’s already there. He also put his foot in his mouth when he said she (Becky) thought about writing the book and worked on it towards the end of his speaking segment.
*foul, not fowl 🐓🦃🦆😅
Gordon made a fool of himself. He's a whiny moron. Felt bad for Lori having to deal with that idiot but she was a champ. She's tough stuff and she was in the right.
@@truthhurts2879 betrayed by my own ducking autocorrect again 🤣🥰 appreciate you
This woodland elf husband guy is creepy as hell. Whatever point he's trying to make, he's not helping.
Dirty Becky Hill. I told people the woman was crocked
I have to go back and relisten - I only got the Audible and listened months ago before the allegations - but I thought the forward of Miss Becky's book was written by the co-author's wife/photographer, and the impression I got was that she was getting a special seat, and Miss Becky would do anything for her, and Miss Becky was the best superstar fairy princess ever.... not exactly the picture her husband is painting (edit - it wasn't Melissa - it was a journalist who wrote the forward - and an over-the-top fan girl... or figment of Becky's imagination)
I like the way u think & speak!!! Lol I’m sooo sick of this “Miss Becky” crap too. Can’t people see behind her super saccharine facade?
@@NancyClue932 and she says in the Audible “read by Yours Truly “. Saying that on a recording should itself be a crime.
@@starofairdrie Absolutely! 🤮
@star Merry Christmas
This should be resolved on judge Judy
Vinnie having a ball
I call BS. He doesn’t know where the photo came from….smh. Bunch of liars. If I was a SC resident. I would be so mad more of my tax dollars are going to this case!!!! Wtf!!!
Lori gave him hell! LOL. I love it!
Vinnie - you knew what you were doing when you brought these people on - this is not the Maury Povich show.
Well this video suddenly got spicy!
Wow! Fascinating actually!
Still trying to get out of prison! Ain’t gonna happen captain
Neil is a dope 🤡
29:22 Vinny's 'awkward' face lol
They should have known this would occur on tv.
@@livelylawsons3767 Definitely. Vinny stopped it before it turned into Jerry Springer at least.
I think knowing that they have Lawyer Lori regularly, they owe it to her to be able to face what the guy was claiming he was going to say on it.
@@maggiebuddeandfamily7014 Good point.
Gordon and Becky shall pay for the new trial. Vanity costs.
Your sooo close to 1 million subs!
That book could’ve waited until after the appeals process was complete. Why was Becky in such a rush to do that?
There will definitely be a Netflix Part 2. Too bad some of those funds couldn't help the taxpayers of the state pay for the next trial.
Get your Popcorn 🍿
Just glad i don't live in that county
This isn't aging well for Neil😂.
This. Did. Not. Age. Well.
What a tangled web….
We love FITS News. They are the best!
Why is Lori so miserable…? She seems like they type of human that has zero empathy or compassion. She makes a great witch.
I still maintain that the state did not put the gun in Alek's hand. I feel there was speculation and circumstance.
Amen! So much reasonable doubt. No forensic evidence on Alex whatsoever AND they have his phone moving around at the main house while the murders were theoretically taking place. He couldn’t have done it. Plus, last I checked, shot out opiate addicts don’t make the best forensic crime scene cleanup specialists. Tell me how a shot out 55 year old man can clean all evidence off himself and his vehicle in 7 mins. A whole crew couldn’t accomplish that
Wouldn’t the clerk have known better?
Apparently not.
Check if any jurors are spending money that they normally wouldn't have...Desperate People Do Desperate Things.......