Any tips on iMac users? I have the latest iMac (M3, 8core, 24GB) can use UE5 fine with some settings turned down but there are certain features that simply don’t work (nanite, certain landscaping brushes). Would it help at all to get an external GPU, or maybe a future UE upgrade will work better with Mac anyway? Idunno. Your thoughts would be appreciated.
@@bigheadrhino Thanks for the great question. UE5 is optimised for systems running Windows, and while the M3 chip is a veritable powerhouse, it can't compete with Nvidia GPUs when it comes to optimised tasks found in UE5. I'm not overly experienced with Mac and UE5, but some forums mention M3 supporting Nanite. It could be worth looking into the UE5 settings and ensuring they are enabled. Some users report it being turned off by default when running on MacOS. I don't believe the M3 supports an external GPU (eGPU) (at least not Nvidia tech), which is one of the new platform's major drawbacks. If anyone has any insights to add, please share, and we can all learn! Thanks for watching and commenting and good luck with your creative endeavours! Cheers, Craig
@@princelyan3m149@princelyan3m149 Any comment is a good one! ... thanks for watching, and if you do have a question or any tips to share, drop them here! Cheers, Craig
Awesome! What a great comment to get :) We will keep sharing our knowledge, and we really appreciate you taking the time to share your experience! Thanks for supporting our efforts! Cheers, Craig
intel is definitly not best CPU for UE5. read this : Unreal Engine supervisor at ModelFarm blasts 50% failure rate with Intel chips - company switching to AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X, praises single-threaded performance and then he said For those curious at work our failure rate for our 13900k and 14900k machines is about 50% so far, any new machine builds going to be 9950x's, production environments need reliability
Hey, thanks for your comment and for taking the time to share your insights. This has been a rollercoaster time for the industry, and who would have thought we'd ever be in a place where AMD was seen as the safe bet?! To give some context that might help balance your perspective, of all the workstations we have shipped with Intel 13th and 14th Gen chips into production environments, we have had exactly zero-yes, zero systems show this issue. Lucky? perhaps, yes, but I think it's important to share as otherwise, it would seem like half or more of the chips out there are failing, and that's just not what we see. If you have an Intel chip that has shown no issues, updates from Intel and board partners are now available to ensure you don't eventually have this problem - happy days :) We shipped our first Intel systems with these updates to clients yesterday. Sadly, if an Intel ship has had an issue, then an RMA to Intel will be needed-and I agree entirely that downtime in a production environment is not a good thing! As for the new AMD 9000 chips, single-core performance and efficiency are good, and I don't blame anyone who has experienced an issue (or not) in deciding to move to AMD. We have seen an increase in AMD sales, and there's no doubt AMD will be making some power plays to capture market share. A competitive marketplace is needed to drive innovation and value to end users, so in the long run, this may deliver better chips from both vendors and more competitive pricing. Again, thanks for sharing your insights and taking the time to comment. As we try to grow our community here on UA-cam, your comments are incredibly important! Hope you stick around! Cheers, Craig
@@vishnuramachandran5725 if you want multi threaded rendering for game development and video editing then 7950 but if you want just gaming then 7800X3D is the best
Wow, what a great comment to start the day! Thanks and it’s really cool to know this one hit the mark! Any tech related questions, send them our way and we will do our best to answer them and hope to see you on the next one! Cheers, Craig
If i need a cpu for something around $180-250 what should I get?Also is intel viable right now due to the instability? Or should I just wait for intel 15th gen on the LGA 1851 setup. Final question, is AMD gpus viable? I heard crash issues with it, I'm looking at the 7800 xt and I don't see any other Nvidia gpus even near the performance at this budget.(maybe like a 4060 ti 16gb?)
Thanks for getting in touch! Good Question, for around that budget we'd suggest AMDs 5900X. With regards to the Intel instability, so far all major motherboard vendors have BIOS updates to correct the issue. We always recommend NVIDIA card for their stability, yes you might get more performance but as mentioned crashes can be common with AMD cards, not as often now which is great but still something to be aware of
Hi thanks for the video! Do you think 32GB of DDR5 RAM would be enough for a UE5 beginner mostly doing architecture visualization for work and doing some light game development for fun?
It was our pleasure! Yeah that would be more than enough for a beginner, I would suggest using 2x 16GB which if your motherboard allows, you can always add another 32GB later on down the line. - Ryan
Thanks! Very helpful video, I appreciate it. I'm thinking about building a pc by my self for the first time. I've tried to research as much as I could and I was wondering if my components are compatible or if there is something I should swap out for something else or think about. My picks as of now is: * CPU: Ryzen 5 9600x (216£) / (280$) * GPU: RX 7900 gre (500£) / (655$) * Motherboard: msi MAG Tomahawk wifi (158£) / (205$) * RAM: DDR5 2x16 gb (65£) / (84$) * Cooling: Thermalight Aqua Elite 360 V3 (65£) / (84$) * Storage: 2TB ssd NVMe Gen 4 (125£) / (163$) * Case: Lian Li LANCOOL 216 (94£) / (122$) *Power: 750W 80 PLUS Bronze (68£) / (88$) A total cost of about 1290£ or 1680$ Is there anything I've missed or could do differently. Is the rx 7800 xt worth it at the cost of 40£ / 57$ less (in my country)? I would be so thankful if you could help me, I feel quite lost.
Hello! Thank you so much for the kind words! Looking at the specs there are a few options that might increase your performance, most notably the CPU. The 9600X would be more than capable of handling UE5 with no issues however, you might find any CPU intensive plug-ins or parts of UE5 will slow down your system. The good news is you can always test with the 9600X and see how sell it handles your usecase, and if need be you can always upgrade to a faster chip later on down the line. Overall it's a great system to get your started especially all the other components. - Ryan
@ Thanks for the advice! Yes I am pretty conflicted about the CPU. Thinking a R7 9700x may be a better option for about 100$ more. Thanks again, I will definetly subscribe after this!
Hey, thanks for the great question. I'd say an AMD 5600x is your best budget option. If you can afford the jump then anything above that will be beneficial (to a point). So, consider the 7600x if budget allows. For Intel, you'd really want to consider a 12600k or above, but AMD offers better value at the moment in this price point. Cheers and thanks for watching! Craig
Thanks for the question, generally speaking, both are impressive options for most users. On both AMD and Intel platforms at the moment, you will struggle to get your 128GB to run at its fully rated speeds. This means if you don't need the extra RAM the 96GB should give you more performance. We all wish RAM was easier at the moment! Thanks for watching and hope this helps! Cheers, Craig
Great question! AMD GPUs can offer great value for money, especially if you are looking for the most VRAM on a budget. From my perspective, Nvidia is just a very safe bet just now. An Nvidia GPU will run any 3D application you may need, driver updates are solid, and you will be covered should new AI features come out. Nvidia are also the most valuable company in the world as I write this, so I'd suggest that R&D development of their offering will only continue to improve with driver updates. But, as I said, for UE5, you will be fine with both AMD and Nvidia GPUs. Thanks for watching and for your excellent words of support! Cheers, Craig
Hi, I recently tried ElectricDreamsEnv on my System… Specs: Ryzen 7 5700X @Stock RX 7800 XT @Stock 4x8GB @3200MT/s Now I am not sure why my UE5 lagging sometimes 😅
Thanks for getting in touch! EDE is very CPU intensive and the minimum requirements for this is an Intel Core i9 CPU or 8 Cores which your 5700X does have but may not be fast enough. The good news is you can always upgrade to say the 5970X giving you 16 cores in total. Again these are minimum specs so you may encounter frame dips when working on a larger projects - Ryan
Hello. I build PC specialty for UE 5.4 7000$ components. It’s not for game, just for visualisation and video production. My main SSD is Crucial T700 4Tb (gen5) I think to install Windows and UE5 on them. My question: should I install on 4Tb together with Windows or make partition and separate UE5? Second SSD is MP44 8Tb (gen4) Ram ddr5 96Gb 5600Mhz X670E Creator Ryzen 9 9750x Rtx 4090 1200W Arctic Liquid Freezer III
I choose 5600Mhz (not more) because of stability. I choose 96Gb (not 128) because 2 sticks are performed better then 4. Still not sure did my choice good. Money didn’t problem.
Hey there! First off, you’ve got a seriously impressive build-definitely ready to tackle Unreal Engine 5.4 and video production. Now, let’s dive into your questions: 1. Install Windows and UE5 on the Same SSD or Partition? You can install both on the same SSD without partitioning, especially since your Crucial T700 4TB Gen5 SSD is incredibly fast. Unreal Engine will benefit from the full speed of the drive when loading assets. Partitioning won't really give you a performance boost in this case, so I’d recommend keeping it simple-just install everything on the SSD as is. 2. RAM Choice - 96GB at 5600MHz: Your reasoning for 96GB (2 sticks over 4) is spot on. 2 sticks will give you better stability and avoid potential memory controller strain, which is especially important with higher capacity RAM. And 5600MHz is a solid choice-it’s fast but keeps stability in check, especially for a Ryzen 9 7950X. Honestly, you’ve made good decisions here. If money’s no issue and you really need more RAM down the line, you could always upgrade later, but 96GB should more than handle your workload for now. Overall Thoughts: Your build is beastly, and it looks like you’ve made smart choices with stability in mind. No need to second-guess it-you’re ready to crush those visualizations and video production projects. Thanks so much for taking the time to share your build and reasoning with our little community! Cheers, Craig
The RTX 3070 is a more powerful GPU compared to the RTX 4060, however, if you're not in a hurry maybe wait a few months as NVIDIA will announce its new line-up which usually means the old gen cards will drop in price again
I’ve a question, would I regret buying Macbook M3 Max with 96GB or 128GB unified memory if my scenes are very intensive? I know render times will not compete with Nvidia RTX, but will it handle massive scenes better because of the vram? I’m a filmmaker and trying to find the best solution as I travel a lot.
Thanks for getting in touch! The Macbooks are fantastic video editing laptops using Final Cut Pro, however, like you said the capabilities are limited compared to a Windows based laptop. Depending on the software you use, our recommendation would be to move over to a Windows based laptop , as they will be more powerful and have the ability to utilise their power in a lot more applications
The information is very helpful and would totally follow when I will assemble a PC in future. Is it recommended to use high end gaming laptops such as Asus Rog Strix Scar m16/m18 or Lenovo Legion Pro 7 as a mobile option for UE5 setup?
Thanks for getting in touch, and your kind words! These laptops are certainly mobile workstations and would be great alternatives to a desktop if your current situation only allows you a laptop. Of course the performance would dip compared to a desktop, but both the ROG and Lenovo laptops will not be slow in anyway - Ryan
Thank you for your video it was very helpful. Although i am between buying a rtx4070 super and a rx7900 GRE. I consider buying the rx 7900 GRE only because of the benefit of more VRAM, could you maybe help me choosing ?
thank you for the kind words! The RX 7900 GRE is only marginally faster than the RTX 4070S and in our experience the NVIDIA card comes with better benefits that UE5 can utilise. Yes the 7900 has more RAM which is beneficial however, that really depends on your workload. Personally I'd go with the RTX 4070 Super or better yet, hold off a few months as NVIDIA will be releasing new cards very soon....
Y'all should mention that for RAM, more isn't always better. You want as much RAM as you can get in two sticks, due to CPU limitations on clock speed when mounting more than 2 slots. 2x48 is about as good as you can get these days.
Thanks a ton for your insightful comment and for supporting the channel! You bring up a great point about RAM configurations. You're right-while modern CPUs like the i9-14900K are incredibly powerful, they often perform best with dual-channel memory setups. Using two sticks instead of four can help maintain higher clock speeds and system stability. For tasks like Unreal Engine development, where you need a lot of memory, balancing the quantity and speed of your RAM is key. I'll definitely include this important tip in future videos. Thanks again for sharing your expertise and helping out the community! Cheers, Craig
You can indeed, however UE5 won't be able to utilise both cards, only rendering apps like Octane etc will be able to use both cards. As for the motherboard, it depends on the CPU you're using. If you go for Intel we'd suggest any Z790, AMD X670E and with Threadripper it will have to be either TRX50 or WRX80.
I have an RX 6700XT, and I am a beginner in UE5, so I was thinking of swapping my GPU with an RTX 4060, as Nvidia has good support for development software. I need suggestions.
The RTX 4060 like you said offers a broader support system compared to AMDs RX range however, if you're looking for a boost in performance then you may need to look at the RTX 4060Ti or above. Ohhh if you're not in a rush, the new NVIDIA range might be announced soon 👀
@@Sunandshine51Intel is being delisted from the DOW because of how low their stocks got, that tells you a lot about their products lately, go with the 9950X.
Hey there! Great question! Both the 7950X3D and the 7800X3D are fantastic CPUs, but they cater to slightly different needs. The 7950X3D has more cores (16 vs. 8) and threads (32 vs. 16), which can benefit tasks that require heavy multitasking or parallel processing, like some complex rendering and simulations in Unreal Engine 5. However, the 7800X3D has the same 3D V-Cache technology and might be more cost-effective for most gaming and general UE5 tasks since not all processes will utilise the extra cores of the 7950X3D. So, if your focus is mainly on Unreal Engine 5 and gaming, the 7800X3D is a solid choice. But if you're juggling many heavy-duty tasks at once, the 7950X3D might be worth the extra investment. Hope that helps and thanks for supporting our little channel! Cheers, Craig
I hope u would reply I m building a pc with the following specs Cpu - Intel core i5 12600k GPU - RTX 4060 8 gb vram RAM - 32gb(16×2) 5200mhz ddr5 Storage - 1 tb M.2 NVMe gen4 (i would increase it when i need) Is it good?
@@sygungames yes, quite good, if you're doing 3D graphics work like Blender and Unreal Engine 5, which require a GPU with a lot of VRAM, you should choose the RTX 3060 12GB, which is priced similarly to the RTX 4060 8GB
Hello @katon3442 thanks for getting in touch. Sadly this is not the case in this scenario. The RTX 4060 due to its more refined architecture and overall performance stats, gives the RTX 4060 the lead over the RTX 3060. Yes VRAM is important but so it RAW power.
Hello thanks for getting in touch! Sadly we currently don't ship to the US at the moment, however if you're able to email us with the specifications you're looking at we can see if this is possible - thanks
For a more budget friendly build, the 5600X is the best bet for the cheapest option. Moving to the likes of the 7600 you have to consider the more expensive motherboards and DDR5 memory you will need to use . Selecting the 5600X also allows you to upgrade to faster models should wish later on down the line, as AMD have confirmed a refresh of the 5000 series chips, which is a big W from AMD.
@@bait-kx1ph If you're looking for the best bang for your buck and don’t mind losing a few percentage points of performance, go with the Ryzen 5 5600. If you want that extra bit of performance and are okay with spending a bit more, go for the 5600X. The 5600X has a slightly higher base and boost clock speed, translating to a minor performance bump in single-core and multi-core tasks. In either case, you're getting a great CPU for the price! Happy building, and thanks for watching!
Loving your positive vibes for your workstation! That's what it's all about...finding the right setup for you and enjoying the workflow! Thanks for watching and commenting, Cheers Craig! PS I am I the only person who wants a world with both AMD and Intel? 😂
For most Unreal Engine 5 developers, the AMD 7900 will provide more than enough power. However, if you’re working on particularly large projects or need every bit of performance you can get, the 7900X might be the way to go. Pair either of these with good cooling, a strong GPU and plenty of RAM, and you’ll have a system ready to tackle UE5 development with ease. Thanks for your question and for watching. It really helps our little channel! Cheers, Craig
Hey, great question! The decision between the 7800X3D and the 7900 depends on your specific needs and workflow in Unreal Engine 5. 7800X3D: This CPU is a beast for gaming thanks to its 3D V-Cache, which boosts performance in-game engine environments. If your UE5 work involves a lot of real-time rendering or you're focusing on game development, this could give you an edge with higher frame rates and better in-game performance. 7900: Conversely, the 7900 offers more cores, which means better multi-threading performance. If you're doing a lot of heavy compiling, rendering, or multitasking (like running UE5 alongside other intensive applications), those extra cores will come in handy. Bottom line: If your main focus is on gaming or real-time applications within UE5, the 7800X3D is a solid choice. But if you're looking for a more versatile CPU that can handle a broader range of tasks, the 7900 might be the way to go. Either is a solid choice. Still not sure, let the price be the decider. Want a curve ball? You should look at the new 9000 series chips. We are still watching benchmarks, but 9900x is a little faster and way more power efficient than a 7900x! Hope that helps clear things up! Let me know if you have any other questions. Cheers, Craig
@@utopiacomputers Yes you said it right. In my country 7800x3d is cheaper than both 7900 and 7900x. 9000 isn't available yet and it won't bring much difference on the table. Also, 7800x3d is a beast in it's own. Still today, 5800x3d is rock solid in games. 7800x3d will definitely run gta 6 way better than 7900 could ever do in future. I need unreal engine to work just smoothly. So 40 50 fps in viewport is more than enough for me. 7800x3d won't be anywhere far behind 7900.
@@connorjade5460 Awesome, it looks like we found a winner. On a gaming note, there is currently a bug in Windows that is dropping the performance of Zen 4 and Zen 5 chips by up to 7% in gaming. This should be patched soon, and then everyone will get a nice boost in games. It's worth saying that in productivity apps, there is no increase in speed. Cheers!
The Intel A750 would normally be compared to the likes of an NVIDIA RTX 3050, which would b considered nowadays as low performance. Since the Intel cards aren't as mature as NVIDIA or AMD cards, it would be a smart investment to increase your budget for a more solid NVIDIA graphics cards as it comes with a whole host of refined technologies that UE5 can take advantage of. - Ryan
@@Mugdho_programmer that would be a great choice of graphics card! Although, I belive the RTX 4060 isn't that much more expensive for a relative performance boost
stay away from the 14900 and 13900 till they fix their problems with oxydation and crashing your system that a major issue with game developers get a safe and not much slower 12700 or 12900 and rock out with no worries
Hey there! Thanks for your input! You're spot on. At the time of writing, there are some issues with the 14900 and 13900. However, we are hoping updates from Intel and board partners will arrive in the next few weeks. After that, we should see everything settle down. While the 12700 and 12900 are still great options, don't forget that AMD also has some cracking alternatives if you want to use new tech like DDR5 and the latest NVMe storage. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and for taking the time to comment. It all helps add value to the community we are building around this channel. Cheers, Craig
@@deadeye_plays Hi there, all of the CPUs that were affected by the chip code issues have now been (touch wood) resolved with motherboard BIOS updates. Therefore , if you were to ask if the 13700 is a good CPU for UE5 then our answer would now be yes!
@@deadeye_plays@deadeye_plays Intel and board partners have all released updates, so as long as you run the latest BIOS, you are safe with any new Intel CPU. As for 13700 performance, this is still a fast CPU. Thanks!
one 16 tb ssd cost $2400 USD Ten time more than HDD and 2TB (8 x 256GB) DDR5 5600mhz memory it may cost you more than $23k usd wait that is naza computer lvl
Thanks for watching and commenting...you could always open 6000+ tabs in Chrome if you had 2TB of RAM...handy? Not so much, but it made a great LTT video a few years ago 😂 Cheers, Craig
HP Victus Gaming 15-FA0212TX Notebook Pc Intel® Core™ i7-12650H 32 GB DDR4-3200 MHz RAM (2 x 8 GB), 512 GB PCIe® Gen4 NVMe™ TLC M.2 NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 3050 4 GB GDDR6 15.6" FHD (1920 x 1080), 144 Hz, 9 ms response time, IPS, micro-edge, anti-glare After having these specs, still facing issues: -Video memory has been exhausted (1.60 GB over budget). Expect extremely poor performance. -Texture streaming pool over budget Can you please tell me reason? OR Upgrade withing the above specs?
Thanks for getting in touch! Looking at your specs it would seem the GPU is your downside, as not only does it come with 4GB of VRAM the RTX 3050 mobile chip wouldn't be powerful enough to handle most of UE5s demands. Sadly with most laptops you're stuck with core components such as the CPU and GPU meaning the only way to upgrade would be to purchase another more powerful laptop. - Ryan
Do you really recommend i7 ad i9 14th gen with k processors? So if you RECOMMEND you will pay if something goes wrong with my PC and i will lose my job on it? Super, I will buy i9 and will watch wat will heppen! 😂😂😂
Hey, First off, thanks a ton for dropping by and sharing your thoughts! It’s been a wild ride in the industry lately, right? Who would’ve guessed we’d live in a world where AMD is considered the “safe bet”? Crazy times! To add a bit of context from our side: out of all the workstations we've shipped with Intel's 13th and 14th Gen chips, we've had a grand total of zero (yep, zero!) systems showing the infamous issue. Lucky streak? Maybe. But I think it's important to share because, honestly, the internet can sometimes make it feel like half of these chips are ticking time bombs. That's just not what we’re seeing in the field. If you’re rocking an Intel chip and haven’t had any issues, good news! Intel and the board partners have rolled out updates to make sure you’re all set and don’t run into this problem in the future-happy days, indeed! We’ve already started shipping our first batch of Intel systems with these updates, so we’re ahead of the curve there. Now, if your Intel chip has thrown a tantrum (ugh, we know, not ideal), an RMA is the way to go. And yeah, I totally get it-downtime in a production environment is no joke. No one wants to see their workflow grind to a halt, or worse, jobs on the line! On the AMD front, we are definitely seeing an uptick in interest. AMD’s making some serious moves to grab market share, and we’re here for it. Competition is what keeps this industry alive and kicking, driving innovation and delivering better products and prices for all of us. So, in the grand scheme of things, maybe this is just what we need to see even better chips from both sides. Thanks again for engaging with us. We’re building a community here, and every comment like yours adds loads of value. Hope you stick around for more! Stay awesome, Craig
@@utopiacomputers thx for your time! I hear that intel problems are deeper than you think and some dev has huge problems with i9 14th gen! I always used to buy intel but this can be critical moment. After windows update amd are faster another 10% with low 🤒 so i think that can be safer way! Kind regards
We did hear Microsoft heavily invested in the Scottish accent / lingo for Copilot and we're still unsure if it's 100% accurate. Hopefully the next video will be better with more 'Awch aye the noos' 😉
Why is your "Good" CPU a) The best gaming CPU on the market, and a monster of a CPU overall, and b) Only about %6 weaker than your "Better" CPU in single thread performance. It's also weird that your "Good" GPU is a 4060 which is an entry level 1080p card even when playing games. But your "Better" GPU is the best gaming GPU on the market. It looks like "Good" is entry level GPU plus monster CPU and "Better" is monster GPU and monster CPU.
Thanks for your comment! You've highlighted these components as gaming components which yes some of your comments are accurate for games. However UE5 is not a game and requires either less or more power depending on what aspect of UE5 you'll be using and of course the complexity of the projects. I hope this helps 😀
@@utopiacomputers I understand. However, I did say "and a monster of a CPU overall" and "only about %6 weaker than the "Better" CPU in single thread performance". Those points still stand. Why is the lowest tier "Good" requires a behemoth of a CPU and the difference between "Good" and "Better" CPUs is so small? For GPUs, I don't think there is a problem with saying "gaming". UE5 is still going to do rendering just like a game does. Even if I'm wrong, the difference between a 4060 and 4090 in terms of raw performance, whether you are rendering with CUDA or Optix, or doing any media work or gaming, is sky high. It just doesn't make sense. I understand going for a Ada GPU even if it's weaker than the "Better" 4090, because it has double the VRAM. But why 4060 to 4090? Why not something like 4080 or maybe even a 4070 Super. Or why not an AMD card? Why not a 7900 XT or 7900 XTX with 20 and 24 GB (Same as 4090) respectively? I'm questioning these because I have a measly i3-12100F and it can still do work. I would expect your "Good" CPU to be something like i5-12600K or Ryzen 7 5800X.
3:02 really wanted to listen to this, kept turning up volume but not only that it is low, but you are also pretty soft spoken, both dont do well together. try to work on that.
Always happy to get feedback. With each video we try to improve on sound, lighting and, of course, content quality! Hope you choose to stick around! Cheers, Craig
Thanks for the feedback! I'm always looking to improve, so I really appreciate you pointing that out. I'll work on getting the audio levels up and improving the mic quality for future videos. Stay tuned, and thanks for watching! Craig
Thanks for getting in touch! Yeah 16GB is a great amount of VRAM for Unreal Engine. However the 7600XT graphics card itself would be classed as mid range, so depending on the complexity of the projects, you may require a faster AMD card such as the 7700TX or higher - Ryan
Questions or top tips for Unreal Engine 5? Drop them in here and we can all learn! Cheers, Craig
Any tips on iMac users? I have the latest iMac (M3, 8core, 24GB) can use UE5 fine with some settings turned down but there are certain features that simply don’t work (nanite, certain landscaping brushes). Would it help at all to get an external GPU, or maybe a future UE upgrade will work better with Mac anyway? Idunno. Your thoughts would be appreciated.
@@bigheadrhino Thanks for the great question. UE5 is optimised for systems running Windows, and while the M3 chip is a veritable powerhouse, it can't compete with Nvidia GPUs when it comes to optimised tasks found in UE5. I'm not overly experienced with Mac and UE5, but some forums mention M3 supporting Nanite. It could be worth looking into the UE5 settings and ensuring they are enabled. Some users report it being turned off by default when running on MacOS.
I don't believe the M3 supports an external GPU (eGPU) (at least not Nvidia tech), which is one of the new platform's major drawbacks.
If anyone has any insights to add, please share, and we can all learn!
Thanks for watching and commenting and good luck with your creative endeavours! Cheers, Craig
I
@@princelyan3m149@princelyan3m149 Any comment is a good one! ... thanks for watching, and if you do have a question or any tips to share, drop them here! Cheers, Craig
why did you not talk about the 4070? the 4070 does better then the rtx 4060
You guys built my pc 4 years ago and it’s never had a problem . I’ll listen to everything you say ,great job guys .
Awesome! What a great comment to get :) We will keep sharing our knowledge, and we really appreciate you taking the time to share your experience! Thanks for supporting our efforts! Cheers, Craig
intel is definitly not best CPU for UE5. read this : Unreal Engine supervisor at ModelFarm blasts 50% failure rate with Intel chips - company switching to AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X, praises single-threaded performance and then he said For those curious at work our failure rate for our 13900k and 14900k machines is about 50% so far, any new machine builds going to be 9950x's, production environments need reliability
Hey, thanks for your comment and for taking the time to share your insights. This has been a rollercoaster time for the industry, and who would have thought we'd ever be in a place where AMD was seen as the safe bet?!
To give some context that might help balance your perspective, of all the workstations we have shipped with Intel 13th and 14th Gen chips into production environments, we have had exactly zero-yes, zero systems show this issue. Lucky? perhaps, yes, but I think it's important to share as otherwise, it would seem like half or more of the chips out there are failing, and that's just not what we see.
If you have an Intel chip that has shown no issues, updates from Intel and board partners are now available to ensure you don't eventually have this problem - happy days :)
We shipped our first Intel systems with these updates to clients yesterday.
Sadly, if an Intel ship has had an issue, then an RMA to Intel will be needed-and I agree entirely that downtime in a production environment is not a good thing!
As for the new AMD 9000 chips, single-core performance and efficiency are good, and I don't blame anyone who has experienced an issue (or not) in deciding to move to AMD. We have seen an increase in AMD sales, and there's no doubt AMD will be making some power plays to capture market share.
A competitive marketplace is needed to drive innovation and value to end users, so in the long run, this may deliver better chips from both vendors and more competitive pricing.
Again, thanks for sharing your insights and taking the time to comment. As we try to grow our community here on UA-cam, your comments are incredibly important!
Hope you stick around!
Cheers, Craig
These processor are too costly. Is 7950 or 7800x3d okay?
@@vishnuramachandran5725 if you want multi threaded rendering for game development and video editing then 7950 but if you want just gaming then 7800X3D is the best
One of the most informative PC videos I have ever watched you have earned a subscriber!
Wow, what a great comment to start the day! Thanks and it’s really cool to know this one hit the mark! Any tech related questions, send them our way and we will do our best to answer them and hope to see you on the next one! Cheers, Craig
If i need a cpu for something around $180-250 what should I get?Also is intel viable right now due to the instability? Or should I just wait for intel 15th gen on the LGA 1851 setup. Final question, is AMD gpus viable? I heard crash issues with it, I'm looking at the 7800 xt and I don't see any other Nvidia gpus even near the performance at this budget.(maybe like a 4060 ti 16gb?)
Thanks for getting in touch! Good Question, for around that budget we'd suggest AMDs 5900X. With regards to the Intel instability, so far all major motherboard vendors have BIOS updates to correct the issue.
We always recommend NVIDIA card for their stability, yes you might get more performance but as mentioned crashes can be common with AMD cards, not as often now which is great but still something to be aware of
Hi thanks for the video! Do you think 32GB of DDR5 RAM would be enough for a UE5 beginner mostly doing architecture visualization for work and doing some light game development for fun?
It was our pleasure! Yeah that would be more than enough for a beginner, I would suggest using 2x 16GB which if your motherboard allows, you can always add another 32GB later on down the line. - Ryan
Thanks! Very helpful video, I appreciate it. I'm thinking about building a pc by my self for the first time. I've tried to research as much as I could and I was wondering if my components are compatible or if there is something I should swap out for something else or think about.
My picks as of now is:
* CPU: Ryzen 5 9600x (216£) / (280$)
* GPU: RX 7900 gre (500£) / (655$)
* Motherboard: msi MAG Tomahawk wifi (158£) / (205$)
* RAM: DDR5 2x16 gb (65£) / (84$)
* Cooling: Thermalight Aqua Elite 360 V3 (65£) / (84$)
* Storage: 2TB ssd NVMe Gen 4 (125£) / (163$)
* Case: Lian Li LANCOOL 216 (94£) / (122$)
*Power: 750W 80 PLUS Bronze (68£) / (88$)
A total cost of about 1290£ or 1680$
Is there anything I've missed or could do differently. Is the rx 7800 xt worth it at the cost of 40£ / 57$ less (in my country)? I would be so thankful if you could help me, I feel quite lost.
Hello! Thank you so much for the kind words!
Looking at the specs there are a few options that might increase your performance, most notably the CPU. The 9600X would be more than capable of handling UE5 with no issues however, you might find any CPU intensive plug-ins or parts of UE5 will slow down your system. The good news is you can always test with the 9600X and see how sell it handles your usecase, and if need be you can always upgrade to a faster chip later on down the line. Overall it's a great system to get your started especially all the other components. - Ryan
@ Thanks for the advice! Yes I am pretty conflicted about the CPU. Thinking a R7 9700x may be a better option for about 100$ more.
Thanks again, I will definetly subscribe after this!
Can you suggest some good budget process to tie up with rtx 4060?
Hey, thanks for the great question. I'd say an AMD 5600x is your best budget option. If you can afford the jump then anything above that will be beneficial (to a point). So, consider the 7600x if budget allows. For Intel, you'd really want to consider a 12600k or above, but AMD offers better value at the moment in this price point. Cheers and thanks for watching! Craig
Do you recommend Patriot Viper Xtreme 24x4 96 GB 8000 MHz or G.Skill Trident X5 32x4 128 GB 6800 MHz?
Thanks for the question, generally speaking, both are impressive options for most users. On both AMD and Intel platforms at the moment, you will struggle to get your 128GB to run at its fully rated speeds. This means if you don't need the extra RAM the 96GB should give you more performance. We all wish RAM was easier at the moment! Thanks for watching and hope this helps! Cheers, Craig
Great video, man! Very well explained and detailed! By the way, what about AMD GPUs?
Great question! AMD GPUs can offer great value for money, especially if you are looking for the most VRAM on a budget. From my perspective, Nvidia is just a very safe bet just now. An Nvidia GPU will run any 3D application you may need, driver updates are solid, and you will be covered should new AI features come out. Nvidia are also the most valuable company in the world as I write this, so I'd suggest that R&D development of their offering will only continue to improve with driver updates.
But, as I said, for UE5, you will be fine with both AMD and Nvidia GPUs.
Thanks for watching and for your excellent words of support! Cheers, Craig
Hi, I recently tried ElectricDreamsEnv on my System…
Specs:
Ryzen 7 5700X @Stock
RX 7800 XT @Stock
4x8GB @3200MT/s
Now I am not sure why my UE5 lagging sometimes 😅
Thanks for getting in touch! EDE is very CPU intensive and the minimum requirements for this is an Intel Core i9 CPU or 8 Cores which your 5700X does have but may not be fast enough.
The good news is you can always upgrade to say the 5970X giving you 16 cores in total.
Again these are minimum specs so you may encounter frame dips when working on a larger projects - Ryan
Hello.
I build PC specialty for UE 5.4
7000$ components.
It’s not for game, just for visualisation and video production.
My main SSD is Crucial T700 4Tb (gen5)
I think to install Windows and UE5 on them.
My question: should I install on 4Tb together with Windows or make partition and separate UE5?
Second SSD is MP44 8Tb (gen4)
Ram ddr5 96Gb 5600Mhz
X670E Creator
Ryzen 9 9750x
Rtx 4090
1200W
Arctic Liquid Freezer III
I choose 5600Mhz (not more) because of stability.
I choose 96Gb (not 128) because 2 sticks are performed better then 4.
Still not sure did my choice good.
Money didn’t problem.
Hey there! First off, you’ve got a seriously impressive build-definitely ready to tackle Unreal Engine 5.4 and video production.
Now, let’s dive into your questions:
1. Install Windows and UE5 on the Same SSD or Partition?
You can install both on the same SSD without partitioning, especially since your Crucial T700 4TB Gen5 SSD is incredibly fast. Unreal Engine will benefit from the full speed of the drive when loading assets. Partitioning won't really give you a performance boost in this case, so I’d recommend keeping it simple-just install everything on the SSD as is.
2. RAM Choice - 96GB at 5600MHz:
Your reasoning for 96GB (2 sticks over 4) is spot on. 2 sticks will give you better stability and avoid potential memory controller strain, which is especially important with higher capacity RAM. And 5600MHz is a solid choice-it’s fast but keeps stability in check, especially for a Ryzen 9 7950X. Honestly, you’ve made good decisions here.
If money’s no issue and you really need more RAM down the line, you could always upgrade later, but 96GB should more than handle your workload for now.
Overall Thoughts:
Your build is beastly, and it looks like you’ve made smart choices with stability in mind. No need to second-guess it-you’re ready to crush those visualizations and video production projects.
Thanks so much for taking the time to share your build and reasoning with our little community! Cheers, Craig
Should I get a rtx 3070 or a rtx 4060, I found them for similar prices
The RTX 3070 is a more powerful GPU compared to the RTX 4060, however, if you're not in a hurry maybe wait a few months as NVIDIA will announce its new line-up which usually means the old gen cards will drop in price again
I’ve a question, would I regret buying Macbook M3 Max with 96GB or 128GB unified memory if my scenes are very intensive?
I know render times will not compete with Nvidia RTX, but will it handle massive scenes better because of the vram?
I’m a filmmaker and trying to find the best solution as I travel a lot.
Thanks for getting in touch! The Macbooks are fantastic video editing laptops using Final Cut Pro, however, like you said the capabilities are limited compared to a Windows based laptop. Depending on the software you use, our recommendation would be to move over to a Windows based laptop , as they will be more powerful and have the ability to utilise their power in a lot more applications
The information is very helpful and would totally follow when I will assemble a PC in future. Is it recommended to use high end gaming laptops such as Asus Rog Strix Scar m16/m18 or Lenovo Legion Pro 7 as a mobile option for UE5 setup?
Thanks for getting in touch, and your kind words! These laptops are certainly mobile workstations and would be great alternatives to a desktop if your current situation only allows you a laptop. Of course the performance would dip compared to a desktop, but both the ROG and Lenovo laptops will not be slow in anyway - Ryan
@@utopiacomputers Thanks so much for your comment, this will be very helpful!
@@PrasadNarse We are here to help! Cheers!
Thank you for your video it was very helpful. Although i am between buying a rtx4070 super and a rx7900 GRE. I consider buying the rx 7900 GRE only because of the benefit of more VRAM, could you maybe help me choosing ?
thank you for the kind words! The RX 7900 GRE is only marginally faster than the RTX 4070S and in our experience the NVIDIA card comes with better benefits that UE5 can utilise. Yes the 7900 has more RAM which is beneficial however, that really depends on your workload. Personally I'd go with the RTX 4070 Super or better yet, hold off a few months as NVIDIA will be releasing new cards very soon....
When the price doesn't matter which one is better for UE5. An Ryzen 7950X or 7950X3D?
If money isn't a concern then opting for the X3D would be our choice as it is an overall better CPU for many applications. - Ryan
Y'all should mention that for RAM, more isn't always better. You want as much RAM as you can get in two sticks, due to CPU limitations on clock speed when mounting more than 2 slots. 2x48 is about as good as you can get these days.
Thanks a ton for your insightful comment and for supporting the channel! You bring up a great point about RAM configurations.
You're right-while modern CPUs like the i9-14900K are incredibly powerful, they often perform best with dual-channel memory setups. Using two sticks instead of four can help maintain higher clock speeds and system stability.
For tasks like Unreal Engine development, where you need a lot of memory, balancing the quantity and speed of your RAM is key. I'll definitely include this important tip in future videos.
Thanks again for sharing your expertise and helping out the community! Cheers, Craig
Can we use two 4090 without nvlink and what ultimate motherboard recommendations. Thank u
You can indeed, however UE5 won't be able to utilise both cards, only rendering apps like Octane etc will be able to use both cards. As for the motherboard, it depends on the CPU you're using. If you go for Intel we'd suggest any Z790, AMD X670E and with Threadripper it will have to be either TRX50 or WRX80.
I have an RX 6700XT, and I am a beginner in UE5, so I was thinking of swapping my GPU with an RTX 4060, as Nvidia has good support for development software. I need suggestions.
The RTX 4060 like you said offers a broader support system compared to AMDs RX range however, if you're looking for a boost in performance then you may need to look at the RTX 4060Ti or above. Ohhh if you're not in a rush, the new NVIDIA range might be announced soon 👀
For unreal engine 5 and blender which is best choice cpu Intel core ultra 9 vs ryzen 9950x.
definitely, intel
@@Sunandshine51Intel is being delisted from the DOW because of how low their stocks got, that tells you a lot about their products lately, go with the 9950X.
Hi , just a question isnt the 7950x3d better than 7800x3d ?
Hey there! Great question! Both the 7950X3D and the 7800X3D are fantastic CPUs, but they cater to slightly different needs.
The 7950X3D has more cores (16 vs. 8) and threads (32 vs. 16), which can benefit tasks that require heavy multitasking or parallel processing, like some complex rendering and simulations in Unreal Engine 5. However, the 7800X3D has the same 3D V-Cache technology and might be more cost-effective for most gaming and general UE5 tasks since not all processes will utilise the extra cores of the 7950X3D.
So, if your focus is mainly on Unreal Engine 5 and gaming, the 7800X3D is a solid choice. But if you're juggling many heavy-duty tasks at once, the 7950X3D might be worth the extra investment. Hope that helps and thanks for supporting our little channel! Cheers, Craig
@@utopiacomputers thanks i opted to go for 7950x3d
@@sanidhyadevgupta6452 Nice! Enjoy your new system! Cheers, Craig
Awesome video, just what I was looking for cheers!
Wow, thanks for letting us know. Glad you got value from the video and cheers for commenting, it means a lot to small channels like ours! Craig 😎
I hope u would reply
I m building a pc with the following specs
Cpu - Intel core i5 12600k
GPU - RTX 4060 8 gb vram
RAM - 32gb(16×2) 5200mhz ddr5
Storage - 1 tb M.2 NVMe gen4 (i would increase it when i need)
Is it good?
change 4060ti 16gb, i5 12600k => i7 12700
@Sunandshine51 i m on tight budget. Can u rate this pc. Is this good?
@@sygungames yes, quite good, if you're doing 3D graphics work like Blender and Unreal Engine 5, which require a GPU with a lot of VRAM, you should choose the RTX 3060 12GB, which is priced similarly to the RTX 4060 8GB
@Sunandshine51 but i dont want to make large projects as I am buying for learning purpose and will surely upgrade later to RTX 4060 ti
Very helpful video, thanks!
Thank you very much for your kind comment! We really do appreciate it
isnt the 3060 12gb better than the 4060 8gb? I thought more vram is better
Hello @katon3442 thanks for getting in touch. Sadly this is not the case in this scenario. The RTX 4060 due to its more refined architecture and overall performance stats, gives the RTX 4060 the lead over the RTX 3060. Yes VRAM is important but so it RAW power.
Do you ship to the U.S.?
Hello thanks for getting in touch! Sadly we currently don't ship to the US at the moment, however if you're able to email us with the specifications you're looking at we can see if this is possible - thanks
I’m using ryzen 5000 series 3060GPU 64gigs of ram
Amazing! It would be great to hear what you're experience is with those specs? - Ryan
I have a low budget should i get 12600k , 5600 , 5700 , 7600
For a more budget friendly build, the 5600X is the best bet for the cheapest option. Moving to the likes of the 7600 you have to consider the more expensive motherboards and DDR5 memory you will need to use . Selecting the 5600X also allows you to upgrade to faster models should wish later on down the line, as AMD have confirmed a refresh of the 5000 series chips, which is a big W from AMD.
@@utopiacomputers should I go with 5600 price 145$ , or 5600x priced 162$
And thank you for the help.
@@bait-kx1ph If you're looking for the best bang for your buck and don’t mind losing a few percentage points of performance, go with the Ryzen 5 5600. If you want that extra bit of performance and are okay with spending a bit more, go for the 5600X. The 5600X has a slightly higher base and boost clock speed, translating to a minor performance bump in single-core and multi-core tasks.
In either case, you're getting a great CPU for the price!
Happy building, and thanks for watching!
ty very much sir!
It's all good! Thanks for taking the time to comment and for watching our video. Your support means a lot to small channels like ours! Cheers, Craig
My 7950x and 4070ti super run UE5 just fine! Always! My temps under 40c, my gpu under 1500mhz running my resolution at 2880, INTEL IS TRASH
Loving your positive vibes for your workstation! That's what it's all about...finding the right setup for you and enjoying the workflow! Thanks for watching and commenting, Cheers Craig! PS I am I the only person who wants a world with both AMD and Intel? 😂
What about 7900 and 7900x
For most Unreal Engine 5 developers, the AMD 7900 will provide more than enough power. However, if you’re working on particularly large projects or need every bit of performance you can get, the 7900X might be the way to go. Pair either of these with good cooling, a strong GPU and plenty of RAM, and you’ll have a system ready to tackle UE5 development with ease. Thanks for your question and for watching. It really helps our little channel! Cheers, Craig
@@utopiacomputers I'm planning to get a 7800x3d. And I'm confused. Should I get it or should I go with 7900, which gives you more cores?
Hey, great question! The decision between the 7800X3D and the 7900 depends on your specific needs and workflow in Unreal Engine 5.
7800X3D: This CPU is a beast for gaming thanks to its 3D V-Cache, which boosts performance in-game engine environments. If your UE5 work involves a lot of real-time rendering or you're focusing on game development, this could give you an edge with higher frame rates and better in-game performance.
7900: Conversely, the 7900 offers more cores, which means better multi-threading performance. If you're doing a lot of heavy compiling, rendering, or multitasking (like running UE5 alongside other intensive applications), those extra cores will come in handy.
Bottom line: If your main focus is on gaming or real-time applications within UE5, the 7800X3D is a solid choice. But if you're looking for a more versatile CPU that can handle a broader range of tasks, the 7900 might be the way to go. Either is a solid choice. Still not sure, let the price be the decider.
Want a curve ball? You should look at the new 9000 series chips. We are still watching benchmarks, but 9900x is a little faster and way more power efficient than a 7900x!
Hope that helps clear things up! Let me know if you have any other questions. Cheers, Craig
@@utopiacomputers Yes you said it right. In my country 7800x3d is cheaper than both 7900 and 7900x. 9000 isn't available yet and it won't bring much difference on the table. Also, 7800x3d is a beast in it's own. Still today, 5800x3d is rock solid in games. 7800x3d will definitely run gta 6 way better than 7900 could ever do in future. I need unreal engine to work just smoothly. So 40 50 fps in viewport is more than enough for me. 7800x3d won't be anywhere far behind 7900.
@@connorjade5460 Awesome, it looks like we found a winner. On a gaming note, there is currently a bug in Windows that is dropping the performance of Zen 4 and Zen 5 chips by up to 7% in gaming. This should be patched soon, and then everyone will get a nice boost in games. It's worth saying that in productivity apps, there is no increase in speed. Cheers!
I want to buy a intel arc a750 card. Can i make games.
The Intel A750 would normally be compared to the likes of an NVIDIA RTX 3050, which would b considered nowadays as low performance. Since the Intel cards aren't as mature as NVIDIA or AMD cards, it would be a smart investment to increase your budget for a more solid NVIDIA graphics cards as it comes with a whole host of refined technologies that UE5 can take advantage of. - Ryan
@@utopiacomputers thanks. Can i go for rtx 3060 12 gb
@@Mugdho_programmer that would be a great choice of graphics card! Although, I belive the RTX 4060 isn't that much more expensive for a relative performance boost
@@utopiacomputers yeah.
stay away from the 14900 and 13900 till they fix their problems with oxydation and crashing your system that a major issue with game developers get a safe and not much slower 12700 or 12900 and rock out with no worries
Hey there! Thanks for your input! You're spot on. At the time of writing, there are some issues with the 14900 and 13900. However, we are hoping updates from Intel and board partners will arrive in the next few weeks. After that, we should see everything settle down.
While the 12700 and 12900 are still great options, don't forget that AMD also has some cracking alternatives if you want to use new tech like DDR5 and the latest NVMe storage. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and for taking the time to comment. It all helps add value to the community we are building around this channel. Cheers, Craig
@@utopiacomputerswhat about 13700?
@@deadeye_plays Hi there, all of the CPUs that were affected by the chip code issues have now been (touch wood) resolved with motherboard BIOS updates. Therefore , if you were to ask if the 13700 is a good CPU for UE5 then our answer would now be yes!
@@deadeye_plays@deadeye_plays Intel and board partners have all released updates, so as long as you run the latest BIOS, you are safe with any new Intel CPU. As for 13700 performance, this is still a fast CPU. Thanks!
one 16 tb ssd cost $2400 USD Ten time more than HDD and 2TB (8 x 256GB) DDR5 5600mhz memory it may cost you more than $23k usd wait that is naza computer lvl
Thanks for watching and commenting...you could always open 6000+ tabs in Chrome if you had 2TB of RAM...handy? Not so much, but it made a great LTT video a few years ago 😂 Cheers, Craig
@@utopiacomputers thanks but i have 32000 mb Ram
HP Victus Gaming 15-FA0212TX Notebook Pc
Intel® Core™ i7-12650H
32 GB DDR4-3200 MHz RAM (2 x 8 GB),
512 GB PCIe® Gen4 NVMe™ TLC M.2
NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 3050 4 GB GDDR6
15.6" FHD (1920 x 1080), 144 Hz, 9 ms response time, IPS, micro-edge, anti-glare
After having these specs, still facing issues:
-Video memory has been exhausted (1.60 GB over budget). Expect extremely poor performance.
-Texture streaming pool over budget
Can you please tell me reason? OR
Upgrade withing the above specs?
Thanks for getting in touch! Looking at your specs it would seem the GPU is your downside, as not only does it come with 4GB of VRAM the RTX 3050 mobile chip wouldn't be powerful enough to handle most of UE5s demands. Sadly with most laptops you're stuck with core components such as the CPU and GPU meaning the only way to upgrade would be to purchase another more powerful laptop. - Ryan
@@utopiacomputers thanks for the response
Do you really recommend i7 ad i9 14th gen with k processors? So if you RECOMMEND you will pay if something goes wrong with my PC and i will lose my job on it? Super, I will buy i9 and will watch wat will heppen! 😂😂😂
Hey,
First off, thanks a ton for dropping by and sharing your thoughts! It’s been a wild ride in the industry lately, right? Who would’ve guessed we’d live in a world where AMD is considered the “safe bet”? Crazy times!
To add a bit of context from our side: out of all the workstations we've shipped with Intel's 13th and 14th Gen chips, we've had a grand total of zero (yep, zero!) systems showing the infamous issue. Lucky streak? Maybe. But I think it's important to share because, honestly, the internet can sometimes make it feel like half of these chips are ticking time bombs. That's just not what we’re seeing in the field.
If you’re rocking an Intel chip and haven’t had any issues, good news! Intel and the board partners have rolled out updates to make sure you’re all set and don’t run into this problem in the future-happy days, indeed! We’ve already started shipping our first batch of Intel systems with these updates, so we’re ahead of the curve there.
Now, if your Intel chip has thrown a tantrum (ugh, we know, not ideal), an RMA is the way to go. And yeah, I totally get it-downtime in a production environment is no joke. No one wants to see their workflow grind to a halt, or worse, jobs on the line!
On the AMD front, we are definitely seeing an uptick in interest. AMD’s making some serious moves to grab market share, and we’re here for it. Competition is what keeps this industry alive and kicking, driving innovation and delivering better products and prices for all of us. So, in the grand scheme of things, maybe this is just what we need to see even better chips from both sides.
Thanks again for engaging with us. We’re building a community here, and every comment like yours adds loads of value. Hope you stick around for more!
Stay awesome, Craig
@@utopiacomputers thx for your time! I hear that intel problems are deeper than you think and some dev has huge problems with i9 14th gen! I always used to buy intel but this can be critical moment. After windows update amd are faster another 10% with low 🤒 so i think that can be safer way! Kind regards
Lol, he used microsoft copilot to generate him speech😂😂
We did hear Microsoft heavily invested in the Scottish accent / lingo for Copilot and we're still unsure if it's 100% accurate. Hopefully the next video will be better with more 'Awch aye the noos' 😉
Why is your "Good" CPU a) The best gaming CPU on the market, and a monster of a CPU overall, and b) Only about %6 weaker than your "Better" CPU in single thread performance.
It's also weird that your "Good" GPU is a 4060 which is an entry level 1080p card even when playing games. But your "Better" GPU is the best gaming GPU on the market.
It looks like "Good" is entry level GPU plus monster CPU and "Better" is monster GPU and monster CPU.
Thanks for your comment! You've highlighted these components as gaming components which yes some of your comments are accurate for games. However UE5 is not a game and requires either less or more power depending on what aspect of UE5 you'll be using and of course the complexity of the projects. I hope this helps 😀
@@utopiacomputers I understand. However, I did say "and a monster of a CPU overall" and "only about %6 weaker than the "Better" CPU in single thread performance". Those points still stand. Why is the lowest tier "Good" requires a behemoth of a CPU and the difference between "Good" and "Better" CPUs is so small?
For GPUs, I don't think there is a problem with saying "gaming". UE5 is still going to do rendering just like a game does. Even if I'm wrong, the difference between a 4060 and 4090 in terms of raw performance, whether you are rendering with CUDA or Optix, or doing any media work or gaming, is sky high. It just doesn't make sense. I understand going for a Ada GPU even if it's weaker than the "Better" 4090, because it has double the VRAM. But why 4060 to 4090? Why not something like 4080 or maybe even a 4070 Super. Or why not an AMD card? Why not a 7900 XT or 7900 XTX with 20 and 24 GB (Same as 4090) respectively?
I'm questioning these because I have a measly i3-12100F and it can still do work. I would expect your "Good" CPU to be something like i5-12600K or Ryzen 7 5800X.
3:02 really wanted to listen to this, kept turning up volume but not only that it is low, but you are also pretty soft spoken, both dont do well together. try to work on that.
Alright Scorsese, how about you just mind your business poppet.
Always happy to get feedback. With each video we try to improve on sound, lighting and, of course, content quality! Hope you choose to stick around! Cheers, Craig
Thanks for the support! Very appreciated and thanks again for taking the time to watch and comment! Cheers, Craig
your voice is too low. improve your microphone
Thanks for the feedback! I'm always looking to improve, so I really appreciate you pointing that out. I'll work on getting the audio levels up and improving the mic quality for future videos. Stay tuned, and thanks for watching! Craig
The mic sounds fine, just need to up the level a bit...
Is amd 7600xt 16 gb vram good for unreal engine
Thanks for getting in touch! Yeah 16GB is a great amount of VRAM for Unreal Engine. However the 7600XT graphics card itself would be classed as mid range, so depending on the complexity of the projects, you may require a faster AMD card such as the 7700TX or higher - Ryan