The Bible Clearly Teaches Divorced People Are Allowed To Remarry
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 лип 2024
- In this video, I refute the false doctrine which claims that divorced people must remain single for the rest of their lives. I also provide Biblical evidences for remarriage for all people who have suffered the tragedy of divorce.
#marriage #divorce #gospel
About me:
I am an NCCA licensed clinical pastoral counselor from Texas, USA. I provide Christian Counseling services to people struggling with a wide variety of life challenges, including marital problems, depression, anxiety, trauma, and substance abuse.
For questions, or to get counseling, you can reach me on my website: marriageranger.com
Remarriage is adultery IF you were illegitimately divorced.
The harder question is what happens after legitimate divorce if you were the adulterer
This smells of copium. You're literally telling people don't worry about your sinful life style, it's going to be OK, when God blesses you anyway. You're preaching from the gospel of do whatever the hell you want, of course it sounds tempting to all those who are going through a fivorce or have gone through one. Yeah just offload your worries and cares, forget about your responsibilities.
You know banks don't forgive debt, but responsibility to soul which is infinitely more valuable, nah God will definitely let that slide without any harm or foul.
What you forget to mention about David, is that he for one, he was a man after God's own heart in a way very few if any other humans have been. And despite that he was still a fallen human who sins. With each sin he committed there was grave consequences for the nation of Isreal as a whole. David couldn't mary Bathsheba because she was married, tries to hide the adultery by ordering her husband home while the fighting is serious, and then when Uriah refuses, he sends him to death, on an assult that probably not only kills him, but countless other warriors. Their mission wasn't to take anytging but to die, so that David could cover up his adultery.
But please tell me how this is ok.
Not all second marriages are adulterous as it depends upon the situation for the divorce.
You brought up David. You just elevated divorce and a following marriage above murder on a sin ranking. What David should have actually done was state to the public that he was an adulterer and subject himself to stoning to the death. Would you also say that a woman who had a child out of wedlock shouldn't be able to be blessed by God and she should give the child up for adoption to avoid having a blessing for a sinful act.
Great points, straight to the points, put simply, Excellent video👌
God honors marriages as equal to his love for his church. If you think that divorce and separation from our spouse is biblical then you misunderstand Christ original plan for the marriage union. What God has placed together let no man put asunder
Our ancestors knew that divorce was wrong b/c they knew the meaning of Matthew Gospel when Our Lord said that you could "divorce". Matthew's Gospel was written by a Jew FOR Jews. Jews had a different set up when it came to marriage. You can read about it earlier in Matthew when Joseph wanted to "divorce" Mary after finding out about her being pregnant. Jews had a two step process: betrothal then marriage. But the engagement/betrothal part was much different then what we think. It was contractual. The man went and built a house for his future spouse and the two lived close together. It was a MAJOR thing to back out of something like that. That is why the word "fornicate" is used rather than the word "adultery". Fornication is when you are not married, adultery is when you are. The betrothal stage for the Jews was still not married thus if you cheated it was fornication but it was still a very serious commitment. So when Our Lord says it's ok to "divorce due to fornication" in Matthew's Gospel He was referring to the Betrothal Stage of the Jewish customs. The only "divorce' allowed in Scripture is the Pauline Privilege i.e. when two non-believers are civilly married and one converts and the other doesn't want anything to do with the faith/the partner. The Pauline Privilege allows civil divorce and sacramental marriage to another believer. Hope this helps:+) God bless~
Jesus said, "Whosoever divorces his wife, except for fornication, and marries another, commits adultery." The language is clear pertaining to the nature of the relationship between a man and his WIFE (not betrothed, not fiancé, not prospective wife, but WIFE). Jesus is, beyond any doubt, speaking about two already having been married people. If that is still not clear enough, the disciples' following question makes it further obvious what Jesus is talking about: "If such be the case between a man and his wife..." (verse 10). They knew what Jesus was talking about. They knew he was not discussing putting away a betrothed woman. The betrothal claim is false.
@@marriageranger In Jesus’ time it was customary for a couple to be legally married for about a year before the consummation. The bride continued to live with her family while the husband prepared their home. At the end of this time there was the “fetching of the bride” ceremony, where the groom took her back to his own home with family and friends accompanying them. Then, during the wedding party, the couple would retire and consummate their union. Clearly, within this long time frame unchastity was possible on the part of one of the spouses. Again, it's why Joseph considered "divorcing" Mary...why "divorce" if they were merely "betrothed?" The Jews had a DIFFERENT process then us. God bless~
@@MMC-jp1gl The Pharisees asked about marriage. Jesus answered about marriage. It didn't happen like this: Pharisees-Jesus, can a man break off an engagement for any reason? Jesus didn't answer-Only for sexual immorality can you divorce your wife. No. They asked about marriage and He answered.
@@sfs1167 Yes, and the Jews had a two step process for marriage. There is no other way to explain why Joseph wanted to "divorce" Mary. God bless~
@@MMC-jp1gl He may have been talking about both but there is no evidence that he was just talking about betrothed couples. Furthermore, a "betrothed" couple were as good as married according to culture. Jesus was talking about marriage, meaning betrothed and those who were married and have completing the ceremony.
Wow - thank you for clearing that up! I've had these questions for many years.
@@juanitalouw3958 You are so welcome! Thanks for watching and commenting here.
Great video.
Only if your a widow
or if abandonment by an unbeliever or sexual immorality.
Great video!
Thank you!
Yes, and we were warned about Doctrines of Demons, my friend
What if your wife has withheld sex for 4 years!!!!!
Relatable😔
pro qual harem my level headed friend
💀
I don't understand the meaning of the words.
Yes, in Old Testament Judaism the ex can still be alive when the other marries.
Yes, in New Testament Christianity the ex must be dead before the other can marry again.
Thank you for articulating so well what we know in our hearts and minds!
@mysoulsayings7273 You are very welcome. Thank you for watching!
@@marriageranger You're welcome! This is the first time I've seen your videos. I just subscribed!
You really did teach me something and I really have changed my view on re marriage! Thank you!!! Seriously
@@tony-ms5sfPraise God! I am so glad it helped you.
Jesus teaches that all divorce is wrong. When the Pharisees asked for permissible reasons to divorce, Jesus said there are none: "No one is to separate what God has joined together."
This is confirmed by:
[1.] The reaction of the disciples - "Who would get married?"
[2.] Paul - who repeats this in 1 Corinthians 7:10-11 as "A wife MUST NOT leave her husband... and a husband MUST NOT divorce his wife." He also affirms that this is a COMMAND from the Lord. It is not optional.
[3.] The reaction of the Pharisees - "Huh? What about Moses?" If Jesus was only saying divorce was limited, they wouldn't argue in this manner. Their point is "how can you say it's not allowed, when Moses clearly permits it?" This led to Jesus explaining divorce is not God's plan and He was resetting things. Christians are not to divorce.
After Jesus gave His complete answer, that none are to separate, He went on to address the Pharisee's next question, ("Huh? What about Moses?"), which is where we get the supposed exception from.
The appeal to Genesis 2:18 "It is not good for the man to be alone" does not justify breaking the command of the Lord that anyone marrying a divorcee commits adultery. As is said in this video, you have to harmonise scripture, not ignore one in favour of another. It's a sinful world and there are consequences to sin. Often we are beset by sin not of our own making. A child should grow up with a mother and father, yet accidents and murder and war happen and some children grow up without parents through no fault of their own. Faithful Christians may end up alone and unmarried for years, because of the sin of one or both parties. Please note where in the gospels Jesus tells the disciples that some may have to be celibate for the sake of the kingdom. It is directly after his marriage talk!
John 4 - the woman at the well. Jesus speaks in plain words, so we might all understand. If we talk about two people of the same gender getting married, we both understand their relationship, while at the same time (as Christians) not believing that they are truly married. God has not joined them Likewise, Jesus talks in way awe will understand. If He uses the word 'marriage', the context tells us if He is referring to a true, authorised marriage, or something masquerading as marriage. When Jesus says that anyone who MARRIES a divorced person commits ADULTERY, He is saying that it is ADULTERY not marriage. Not, as Mr Ranger sees it, as MARRIAGE not adultery.
When Herodias divorced her husband Philip, married Herod, and presumably consummated the relationship, neither divorce, nor remarriage, nor the consummation made her married to Herod. John the Baptist, filled with the Holy Spirit from birth, told Herod "You cannot have Philip's wife." Nothing ended the original marriage. It was still on foot. Why? Because if God calls this new ‘marriage’ adulterous, how does it ever become legitimate? When does any sin ever become righteous? When does God ever say "You are sinning in a way I forbade and that grieves my heart. As a reward, I'm not going to punish you but make this new relationship an actual marriage! I'll make you two flesh, and undo the old relationship, even though my word says that sleeping around joins you to a bunch of people." Why doesn’t He marry fornicators in this way, thus ending their sins too? When they switch partners, and eventually get married, then the magic switch described in this idea will fix everything up again when they commit adultery from their marriage-by-fornication.
John the Baptist did not tell Herod to confess his sins, or to come and get baptised, as ways of dealing with the issue, because he couldn’t. Herodias could never be Herod's wife while Philip lived, and their course of action was clear. As usual though, we don't want to give up our sins, we want to pretend they are not sin. Herodias didn’t repent of anything. Instead, she hated John for this, and eventually had him beheaded. (Try discussing this topic with Christians who are already divorced and 'remarried'. Will they listen, or will they more often reject what you say and be more like Herodias?)
It is foolishness to say that the marriage God says is never to be separated will be separated by God, in favour of the marriage He calls adultery! What God joins can be undone and what sinful man does is to be left to stand?!? Divorce is not 'discouraged', divorce is forbidden by Jesus.
There are only two ways you can go with the exceptions. Either Jesus said no one is to separate, but actually meant "except for the following situations, that you will find spread around the scriptures", or He actually meant what He said and the so-called exceptions are not exceptions. What the Lord said was 100% clear as crystal, and all the so-called exceptions are easily explained in other ways that harmonise all parts of scripture.
Further, if there are exceptions, why is there nothing for abuse? Everyone adds this (to the word of God!) despite nothing being said about it in the NT. The consensus is clear. If there is any exception, it should be for this. The fact that it is not is, I feel, further proof that nothing else can be.
Paul says in 1 Cor 7, no one is to divorce (v10-11), if your spouse is an unbeliever you can't divorce them (v12-13), and that marriage only ends at death (v39). And yet some think there is an exception in between! Paul does not say that if the unbeliever leaves you, you are not married. He says we are not 'enslaved', which is totally different. And he certainly doesn't give permission to remarry. In fact, in 1 Cor 7:10-11, Paul includes "...but if she does [that is, if a wife divorces her husband] she is to remain apart or be reconciled." This is not permission to divorce (which Paul had just told us was forbidden by the Lord), but a limitation on sin - "Don't go any further! Don't sin even more by get involved with another". Another way of looking at it is that Paul is saying the only person you can marry after a divorce is your original spouse or no one.
And this is what Marriage Ranger says (6:59) God desires restoration and reconciliation. But God does not mean the kind that comes about by Him overlooking the sin of Christians remarrying, but instead by Christians following the example set by God of waiting and hoping for their original marriage to be restored. How long do we wait? The answer is -- How long did God wait for us? Read the story of the prodigal son, or 1 Corinthians 13. Love is patient, love bears all things, love believes all things, love hopes all things, love endures all things. We are to wait as long as it takes or until the Lord takes us home.
The reference to 1 Timothy 4:1-3 is a red herring. No one who believes what Christ says is forbidding marriage. On the contrary, we believe that the people we talk about are already married. We aren't saying marriage is forbidden but reminding others that adultery is forbidden. To use this as an argument is as wrong as it would be to argue it means Christians should support same-sex marriage.
Let’s not forget, at a certain stage of life, there are fewer never-marrieds, some widows/widowers, but most of the dating pool will be divorcees. Every time two divorced Christians get married, they are stopping two families from reconciling. And how can anyone say it's only adultery for a bit, when they marry, and then it's no longer sin? What about the weeks and months leading up to the second marriage, where person A, who is apart from but still joined to person B, is wooing person C? Falling in love, holding their hand, kisses, etc to the point where they get engaged and then marry? To stand on a stiff interpretation that only that moment of marriage is adultery cannot be right. All the things leading up to it must be as well.
There is much more that could be said but I will stop here. I urge all Christians to think about what God meant when He said "NO ONE is to separate what God has joined together." This doesn't just mean the couple themselves, but anyone who is encouraging or helping them to separate. "No one is to separate" - not well-meaning friends, supportive co-workers, counsel on the internet, or misguided Christians.
EDIT - changed "!" to "?!?" to clarify a sentence.
Hmm...that's a lot of words, and I'm not gonna read 'em😎
"Jesus teaches all divorce is wrong," you said. So, then you must think God the Father was wrong when he divorced Israel? (Jer. 3:8) Your false teaching is not difficult to see through.
@@VaughanCunningham
That's in the OT, whereas Jesus resets things in the NT. Further, look six verses on from Jeremiah 3:8 to v3:14 where God says He is still Israel's husband. This is like when Jesus tells us that divorced people commit adultery when they remarry. The complete separation that people think divorce makes is not actually so complete. Is it that God does not understand how divorce works, or is it perhaps that man is spiritually ignorant?
@dashdecent4462 In 3:8, he is referring to "faithless Israel." In 3:14, he addresses her sister, Judah. Israel was never recovered from captivity. He divorced her. It is the same imagery used by Ezekiel ("Oholah and Oholibah", see Chapt. 23). They were a divided kingdom, and he did not divorce the southern. Please review the passages.
@@VaughanCunningham
I have read this again in multiple translations and I still cannot see that Israel is excluded.
v12 - "Go, and proclaim these words toward the north..." - north = Israel, south = Judah. The passage, incl v14 'husband' reference, is to Israel.
v12 - "Return, faithless Israel..."
v13 - repeats the "every green tree" ("every spreading tree" in some versions) reference made about Israel in v6. Yes, trees are mentioned in the description of Judah's faithlessness, but not in these same words.
v14 - "Return, O faithless children..." - I can't find any version indicating a switch here from Israel to Judah. I'd agree this widens out to include Judah, but it doesn't exclude Israel. The Amplified version says: "‘Return, O faithless children [of the twelve tribes],’ says the LORD, ‘For I am a master and husband to you..."
The whole section clearly includes, and is primarily to, Israel.
1 Corinthian 7:39 The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to who she will; only in the Lord. Jesus said remarriage is adultery. Paul never gave anybody the right to remarry after divorce. Paul gave a person to leave there spouse but never remarriage. Jesus and Paul preached the same things. Stop telling people to remarry after divorce because this is sin.
True. I would be very upset with my wife if she went and married someone else. If I had done something that would cause a divorce (like committing adultery against her), she would no longer be a wife if she so chose. The abandonment concept wouldn't apply here (1 Cor 7:15) as we are both believers.
Very poor exegesis of scripture
It simple if your spouse cheated the one who didn't commit adultery you can put your spouse away. And yes, it does say if you marry someone who committed adultery sex with another while married. And they get put away and you marry them they and the one that marries them is living in adultery. And just cause it's not as joyful as being married that's the consequence of adultery. I question you telling others to risk eternity when it clearly says unless fornication you put away. And if you marry someone that's put away you commit adultery. This is how scripture gets twisted instead of follow Gods word God wants me to be happy not follow him. It says you marry someone that cheated your living in adultery. Now if they were put away and they don't marry. Now Romans 7 say if a spouse dies your released from the law. So, it's a gray if they die even if you had cheated you can remarry but it's still a risk. It comes down to God said what God joined don't let no man put asunder. And you marry an adulterer you live in adultery. David was under the old law and Bathsheba's husband was dead. And just cause that's Christ line doesn't justify sin. Look at 1 Corinthians 5 a man married his stepmom. You speak of leading others away please you need to check your plank of your eye. cause everything you stated was wrong. Corinthians 7 is just saying put Christ first it doesn't give freedom to ignore the verses that say marrying an adulterer you're committing it. And you're not committing adultery on the cheating spouse because you can and have right to put them away if they have sex with someone while married to you.
I'm not sure what bible you are reading, but you ARE WRONG
How can you be spiritually one with 4 or 5 husbands/wives? You cannot. That’s why Jesus said, in order for the wife to remarry, the first husband must die, then she’s no longer spiritually tied down to him. Jesus died for our sins, so the old covenant we were bound to would be renewed.
“For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband.”
Romans 7:2 KJV
In Romans 7, Paul uses an illustration of the dissolution of marriage through death of a husband in order to teach about being dead to the law. It is also true, however, that under the Law of Moses, a woman was free to remarry after being given a certificate of divorce (Deut. 24:1 & 2; cf. Matt. 19:3-9). Romans 7:1 - 4 does not provide boundaries for remarriage. It is simply an example concerning what it means to be dead to the law. Thank you for commenting, but it appears that further study and prayerful consideration are needed. Blessings!
"A woman which hath an husband...." A Biblically divorced individual has no spouse. Now for the former part, the woman at the well was addressed by Jesus as having five "husbands." He recognized each relationship as a marriage.
@@marriageranger “And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband: But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried, or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife.”
1 Corinthians 7:10-11 KJV
@@sfs1167 “But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.”
Mark 10:6-9 KJV
@@marriageranger “And he saith unto them, Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her. And if a woman shall put away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adultery.”
Mark 10:11-12 KJV
This teaching is NOT right.
Absolutely not
Your 3 divorces aren't right😭🙏🏻
I think it is simply the hardest sin to repent from, leaving a second marriage or staying single after a divorce effects a lot of people. He would never say repentance from drug use is to just be sorry and keep on using.
You are one of the teachers that tickle peoples ears.
Yes, you can remarry but only if the divorce was for adultery. You can also remarry if widowed.
i think you need to re read those scriptures and than re read them out loud in you’re videos.
I think you need to re-read your comment🤦♀️
You quote 1 Cor 7:27 at 2:51 and say it’s talking about divorced individuals, but it is not. It is talking about single individuals per verse 25 which says “Now concerning virgins…” Other comments have it correct, a divorced individual CAN remarry IF the divorce was because of adultery in the marriage. If the covenant between two individuals is broken, the agreement between both parties no longer stands.
You should change your name to a wordsmith! Could not finish watching. To whom ever reads this go to John MacArthur from Grace to you teaching. “That began with adultery does not end being adultry” Only 2 reason for remarriage - If you have been Abandoned. and or your partner committed Adultery.
What if you committed adultery?
@desertshadow72 Reformed adulterers need marriage just as much as the innocent party needs marriage. Marriage is for all. As the video states, to deny someone the right to marriage is "doctrine of demons". 1 Tim. 4 is blatant.
@@desertshadow72 Remarriage is permitted for the faithful partner only when the divorce was on biblical grounds. In fact, the purpose for a biblical divorce is to make clear that the faithful partner is free to remarry, but only in the Lord (Rom. 7:1-3; 1 Cor. 7:39).
Those who divorce on any other grounds have sinned against God and their partners, and for them to marry another is an act of “adultery” (Mark 10:11-12). This is why Paul says that a believing woman who sinfully divorces should “remain unmarried, or else be reconciled to her husband” (1 Cor. 7:10-11). If she repents from her sin of unbiblical divorce, the true fruits of that repentance would be to seek reconciliation with her former husband (Matt. 5:23-24). The same is true for a man who divorces unbiblically (1 Cor. 7:11). The only time such a person could remarry another is if the former spouse remarries, proves to be an unbeliever, or dies, in which cases reconciliation would no longer be possible.
The Bible also gives a word of caution to anyone who is considering marriage to a divorcee. If the divorce was not on biblical grounds and there is still a responsibility to reconcile, the person who marries the divorcee is considered an adulterer (Mark 10:12).
What your saying is contrary to what Jesus taught about divorce, if your going to make marriage a law and most do but don't obey it, your making the law of no effect, that makes the law of marriage pointless if you don't keep it, the only excuse Jesus gave for divorce was sexual unfaithfulness, period, now if the divorce was for any other cause or excuse, He didn't justify it but took it a step further, now Paul said this concerning the married, it's not his commandment but the Lord's, if the wife separates from her husband, she is to stay UNMARRIED or return to her husband, then the bible says IF we don't obey Jesus commandments we are LIARS, then the bible says the liars won't make it in but have their part in the lake of fire, now who am I suppose to believe? YOU or the bible, Paul only gives permission for divorce if your married to an unbeliever, what exactly is a unbeliever? someone that don't believe as you or the one's in your church, that's pretty easy to justify divorce over, especially if that person don't go to her or his church, your explanation really doesn't stay in line with the scriptures, I think you need a better explanation to justify sinning is all I'm saying since I know Jesus is God and breaking God's law is sin, 1 Jn 3:4, now I know a way around this but according to the way you understand it, it's probably not suitable for you, it would require you to change the meaning of the words your reading to understand if your sinning or not, what Jesus taught involves everyone in the whole world and not just their customs, He set's no one free to commit sin and He also don't condemn the innocent, two words your using are being combined to mean the same thing and there not, marry and marriage are two entirely different matters, only one is related to law, Jesus said the children of this world marry and are given in marriage, look around you and see what the children of this world do, marriages don't take place in heaven neither does people that marry, your understanding of the word " marry " is incorrect, it means to sexually unite with a woman, example: go in to thy brothers wife and marry her and raise up seed in your brothers name, do WHAT to her? it has nothing to do with making that brother her husband nor the child his, that's why Onan jumped off because he knew the child wouldn't be his, 1 Cor. 7: let them marry, that has nothing to do with marriage and the sentence explains their intentions, BUT unto the MARRIED, married HOW? by whom? and for what reason? did having sex with her make them married? not so according to Paul, what did? according to Jesus? Matthew 19, Jesus mind, whom God had joined together let no man separate or be the cause of them separating, Jesus didn't say what man or God's representative had joined together, that's marriages, Jesus said whom GOD had joined together, now what do we know about God? God is LOVE, now what do we know is not God? adultery, incest, rape, animal sex, man on man sex, woman on woman sex which by the way according to Jesus mind would be impossible for God to make them ONE FLESH, whoredom spoken by the prophets is included which means having MORE than ONE LOVER, NOT ONE LOVER, that applies to the UNMARRIED not the married, the sin of the married is adultery and the whole world knows it, anyway, all those forbidden sexual acts which I listed or any one of them I listed is the meaning of fornication, unlawful sexual contact, only the word fornication is a shorter version to use to keep the author from having to list them all, I might have even missed one but the unmarried and having sex was NOT forbidden, lev.15;16-24 reveals this and also deals with masturbation unless your one of those people that hate their bodies but who are the two that become one flesh, becoming one flesh is NOT the same as being one in body ( the act of sex ) Paul said not to join to a harlot in body because two shall become one flesh, when does two become one flesh, stop and think, two fleshes making one flesh, if you don't see the child as being the ONE flesh made from two fleshes, your missing the whole point of why Jesus said not to separate these two, it was not for their sake but for the sake of the child, God doesn't care about your sex, He cares about your children, it's children that God seeks and for a specific reason, to believe in HIM, giving your seed to a harlot was forbidden in the law, the reason should be self explanatory, if your given to man's customs and traditions your not going to see this, your only going to think you got to be married in order to have sex, that's contrary to the law but if your going to make marriage a law then break it, what good is your law? good for nothing, using God's name to justify it is taking God's name in vain or for a useless matter, if your not going to uphold the law, why make it law? you can't say God forgives it when God said He would call it sin in you if you don't fulfill your vows you make to Him, something you never should have done in the first place if you had listened to Jesus, your also never going to figure this out who Paul said or was referring to about the wife not leaving the husband until you figure out the meaning of the Greek words used for each of them, as a matter of fact your never going to figure out who is being spoken about in the GREEK if your given to customs and traditions of men, the translators could only figure out two of them, either man or woman or husband or wife, they actually mean more than this, every word you see in English for man and woman where there are many different variations in Greek of them are describing what KIND of man he is and what KIND of woman she is, the only likeness they all have is what they assume means man or woman or husband and wife, that likeness in Greek is yuv and av, what comes after these symbols is what they couldn't translate, reading the sentence and how they were used in the sentence was their only clue but they did not combine ALL the sentences where these words were used for a true meaning which causes MUCH confusion, find the likeness in every sentence and you'll find the meaning of the word, don't just use ONE sentence is all I'm saying, use them ALL
You may want to consider using paragraphs. A huge block of text with a few all capitalized words (translates to shouting in text etiquette) is typically a pass.
@@thomasdillon7740 I understand what your saying and don't disagree, my writing skills are less than what many are use to reading, I capitalize certain words to emphasize them, not shouting, comma's to me are only the stopping point or where I would breath if I was talking, I write like I'm speaking, I don't speak like people read, I'm only trying to make a point, the point takes a lot of explaining which is much easier to do when speaking, not writing, unfortunately video comments are not possible, my bad
@@warren6790 totally get it and don’t mean offense. It’s just that you took so much time to share the information I would like for people to be able to access it more readily (myself included).
If I have a longer response, sometimes I type it out on a Google doc, break it up into short paragraphs, and then copy and paste it. Makes it a little bit easier on the for the eyes. God bless my friend!
You're commenting on an 8-minute video, no one wants to read this😮
@@FalseAlarm50 So just saying the video is lying is good enough, no explanation is necessary or rather don't do this or that because I said so, I heard that enough coming up, I want a explanation, some others would like it too, I don't care if you don't want to read the explanation, that's your choice but you can't speak for everyone just because you said so