SAVE 30% on all new cockpit & airport videos THIS WEEKEND ONLY at shop.justplanes.com/ AND consider SUBSCRIBING today and click the bell to know when a new video is posted.
I've seen this Captain before in one of your past videos. He's brilliant! On a scale of 1 - 10 that landing was 10/butter! It totally deserved the multiple camera shots that you did film☆☆☆☆
Absolutely agree, incredibly smooth. I was surprised to hear 'Speedbrake up' call out as I was certain they were still airborne. Perhaps I should fly Ryanair less often, you can't miss the touchdown flying with them 😉
20:14 that is one of the best touch down I've ever seen, besides the captain looks really experienced confident. The touch down VS was around -100, and the camera didn't even shake at all. That was perfect!
Two very confident, cool headed and professional pilots. The interaction between these guys is possibly the best that I've seen on this channel. And, that landing was sweet.
Dziękuję za wspólny lot. To była przyjemność oglądać pracę 100% profesjonalistów takich jak Wy Panowie. Życzę sukcesów i samych dobrych wrażeń podczas pracy ale mając takie "biuro" jest to zapewnione. Pozdrawiam serdecznie.
This guy lands a 737 and makes it look easy , perfect,right down the middle. My first attempt at landing a Cessna 172 was a horror show , my instructor had to take the yoke . We nearly ended up in turf .
Thanks for sharing, Flew B737-200's ages ago (1980's) and I try to explain how much more input you have to do compared to smaller aircraft (King Airs and my C414A I fly now) seems to go beyond them. This video will help that, not even a windy landing!
I like these videos. The bits i pay attention to the most are all the briefings and what the pilots do/say. Please don’t ever get rid of these. I know the briefings are airline specific but its good to get the gist
Is there a better ATC service than at Heathrow? It was a quiet day but quiet or busy they're never rushed, well articulated, standard phraseology, polite. Compare that to US :)
It was nice to hear you did a single engine taxi to the stand for fuel efficiency. I’ve asked about this on other videos and everyone always says “that’s not done it isn’t worth it”.
@@lorenzoFCIM1908 I also have another idea that I know will get done eventually and it will have been mine but I don’t have the money to invest and make it happen. I want electric powered tugs, that the ground crew attach to the plane, but the pilots control it and they use it to push back, then take the planes all the way out to just before the runway. Where the ground crew (just sitting inside the tug, or later remote controlled from elsewhere) will then disconnect and take the tug back to the stand. The pilots then use the engines the rest of the way, either having started them shortly before arrival to runway, or have them just idling. It will save more fuel but again for a while people will say it’s not worth it. Eventually it will be though.
In airports with long taxi patterns this is standard operating procedure for many airline. Most commonly seen in never aircraft like the b737 max, the a320 family, a350 and b787. But single engine taxi out has been mostly removed due to some incidents, as it increases work load prior to takeoff, and pilots can become too distracted. The main reason why airplanes are not tugged around, is because it is very slow and harder to control.
Great captain! I have seen him before I believe they are from LOT Polish airways! My guess would be flying direct from Warsaw to London on this flight.
Also idc what anyone says my all time fav planes are the 737 NG and now the MAX 8-10 are absolutely beautiful planes . So glad the unfortunate issues that caused a couple tragic accidents were fixed but they should have never happened.
watch the netflix documentary Downfall: The Case Against Boeing. Those planes were doomed from the start, absolute negligence from boeing is astonishing. I personally will never be getting on a MAX plane ever.
@@takers786 I will def watch that! You are completely right about Boeing but i promise the max is one of the safest aircraft along with its predecessor the 737-800 next gen and before that the 737-300/400 which combined were flying with almost pristine records for 50 years plus. Boeing neglected to put in the procedures for the mcas system purposely which was extreme negligence to say the least but it was not the planes fault I do understand you not wanting to fly them but it was complete miscommunication and not the planes systems no one knew what it was and how to control it when it activated in very specific and rare conditions. Don’t hate on the max it’s beautiful! Lol I promise it was stupid humans not the planes fault.
@@nickpapagiorgio5056 The 737 MAX aircraft are impressive technically, and credit where it's due. Unfortunately however they are hamstrung by being forced on an incredibly antiquated design dating back to the -100 and -200 variants. One of the big constraints comes from engine clearance; the original JT8Ds were slim and thus the landing gear didn't have much clearance, but when the Classic and NG variants were built the much larger CF6es had to have their nacelles squashed at the bottom to not strike the ground. This wasn't a problem in itself until the MAX series aircraft with their CFM LEAP-1Bs - even bigger in fan diameter, to the point where they no longer fit in their existing position and had to be moved far forward and tilted upwards so they no longer provided thrust directly along the pitch axis. This led to the aircraft having a natural tendency to pitch up under power and it thus relied on the flawed MCAS system to correct this. The MAX's failing was mainly due to overreliance on a system that could go wrong due to the whole design not being naturally stable aerodynamically. Due to Boeing's refusal to invest money in a new airliner they decided to continue overdeveloping a design beyond it's practical limits and this is what caused these tragic accidents ultimately speaking. So yes, the 737 MAX aircraft are impressive but they're not fit for further development. The 737 has had its day and there's a sore need for a new short/medium-haul airliner instead.
@@Silvera-Avian "This led to the aircraft having a natural tendency to pitch up under power and it thus relied on the flawed MCAS system to correct this. " Debunked by EASA after they themselves tested the plane before it's re certification. Don't think I need to add any words on this, whatever or wherever you read and heard the 737 max is unstable, has tendency to pitch up all of them are false unless they're a source with higher authority and credential than Europe's aviation agency. The 737 MAX doesn't need MCAS at all in fact, in most flights it doesn't even serve any purpose. It was added just so the max's stall related characteristics would be similar enough to other variants so that it wouldn't be classified it as a different type. The only "issue" Boeing faced by re using the old 737 air frame was this, but if we were to ignore it then the 737 air frame would be perfectly fine for further generations to come, a stable and solid airplane like the 737 max is but the only issue would be how Boeing would overcome the issues related to having commonality with older 737 variants. Also I thought it's a common knowledge but aerodynamically unstable airplanes aren't allowed to be certified in the first place no matter what software it has. The crashes of 737 MAX basically boils down to giving MCAS wayy more power and authority than it needs and the worst thing Boeing did imo was using a single sensor for the mcas to detect when to activate. In both the crashes the sensor sent faulty data so the mcas tried to save the aircraft thinking it was stalling. The Netflix documentary wasn't bad but it didn't do a good job about actually talking about the 737 MAX itself, and it's incidents. If someone wanted to learn about the 737 MAX that documentary is among the last places I'd recommend.
Can I ask an honest question? Why is there so much movement with the yoke as your coming in for a landing yet, it doesn't appear to impact the movement of the plane...
The airspeed is quite low and flaps down, so the plane is in quite a cumbersome state so larger surface movements are needed, plus this is one of the few planes that still use cables, pulleys, and linkage along with hydro assist to move the surfaces.
Great and beautiful landing by both the Pilots, amazing video with knowledge of the Cockpit, showing people, what a great technology, thanks for this video, all the best and good luck in your career, and may our Creator bless you and your families, and keep safe always in the air and on the ground.
I believe this particular day, the other runway was closed. In a situation like this where a closer runway to your assigned gate isnt avaliable, the taxi could be around the entire airport.
There are designated spots to park but if yours is occupied due to a late flight or repair plane that space will not be available and you must go to an alternate space.AaTC will direct pilot.
Awesome....from start to finisch!!)) I've seen these pilots before....very motivated!! I love this....many thanks JP;)) Enjoy the weekend;!)) Warm greetings 💖👌✈🌟😘.....X Betsy.....
Thank so much Just planes. This video is so helpful for the preparation of my Pilot assesment which will be assessed by Ryanair. The flight crew explain all of the briefing and procedures very clear and consistent. They look really proffesional and they know clearly what they are doing at all times. Respect for these pilots
Great briefing and Crew Coordination. Excellent handling. Brilliant video! Want to see another with departure briefing. Which Airline? Why discrete call sign for 73Max? How is the MCAS aberration eliminated now? Best wishes and safe operations.
the main issue with MCAS was it was way to powerful. and it relyed on only 1 AOA sensor. i think boeing fixed it to use bith sensors and made it less powerful. also all pilots have been trained on MCAS now and can identofy a mcas error. So hopefully all should be well.
@@YN-io6kj let's hope it does. I flew on one 737Max..aside from a shaky nervous landing in Istanbul it was ok. I did not notice it was a max till after I disembarked!
@@k.psingh5330 not always guaranteed. Ethiopian max pilots did that. But the mcas has moved the trim forward and once you press those two buttons the electric motor for the trim is turned off. So the trim has to be done mechanically. And the aerodynamic forces means the pilots simply wont have enough muscle to set the trim back up. Stupid design imo but its worked for 50 odd years.
I noticed that the bigger airplanes more easy to land like b 777 and b 747 , i think the heavy weight decrease the wind effect especially during landing .Is this right?
Why don't they let the auto pilot land the plane? It does eveything until the last 30-45 seconds. I notice it's smooth until the pilot takes over and then it starts moving around. Am I missing something?
Most airlines require a manually flown landing. Far faster to react to an emergency or waive off. Will be a long time before a computer will have the touch of a pilot like this during landing.
Because as a pilot , you are supposed to know how to land a plane by yourself, and the autopilot wasnt configured for autoland, you constantly need to tell it what to do, where to go.... Autolands are only meant to be used during low visibility operations when manual landings are considered unsafe. You would also need to perform some autolands with a clear weather(around 1-2times per month)in order to practice the manoeuver or just to watch and rate the behavior of the autoland for the airline. Otherwise, the vast majority of landings are always manual.
Because autopilot landings are more work than manual landings and it wasn’t necessary here. Also as someone else said, the autopilot wasn’t set up for an autoland and there was no time to do so in that short of a time. As you can tell from these videos the autopilot isn’t very “auto” you have to tell it what to do. There isn’t just some button you press to make the autopilot land the plane, it’s a pretty workload intensive process to set up and then monitor. Also, I have never heard of any airline that require pilots to land manually. Pilots just prefer to land manually because it’s less work and more fun.
Yes crew is from Poland LOT is national airline in my country. Go watch video from takeoff in Warsaw same flight and crew. LOT Boeing 737 Max Warsaw Takeoff. Amazing video really interesting.
Flying the Max is Max, who was indeed schooled in the USA. English is fairly rare in Poland, most people speaking British, Welsh or some other bastardized regional dialect. Even Derek, the co-pilot, speaks British.
Oh man Captain is handsome 🥵 Buttery landing makes him even hotter! 😍 Keeping power in till the last second like he did is definitely my preferred technique. Yanking it back to idle at 20-30 foot usually guarantees you slam down hard or balloon and float as you rip the control column aft to try and not slam down 🤣.
At what altitude is auto-pilot typically disengaged at on approach? Also, is it typical to be at 50 feet just before the beginning of the runway at landing?
This varies based on many factors Crew preference, workload, weather, company policy etc. There is no single answer to this question since it varies from airline to airline, airplane to airplane, approach to approach , and crew to crew. How much the pilots will fly using the automation as opposed to fly manually really varies from flight to flight. The only true constant is that anywhere in RVSM airspace the pilots are required to use the autopilot and for airplanes and crews certified to do so at airports with runways with the capability if the weather is bad pilots will perform an autoland
SAVE 30% on all new cockpit & airport videos THIS WEEKEND ONLY at shop.justplanes.com/
AND consider SUBSCRIBING today and click the bell to know when a new video is posted.
OK
@@joemiller2437,
👎 👎 👎
do you fly for Polish airlines?
@@szymeq1526 I’m going to fly for easyJet when I’m older.
I've seen this Captain before in one of your past videos. He's brilliant! On a scale of 1 - 10 that landing was 10/butter! It totally deserved the multiple camera shots that you did film☆☆☆☆
Absolutely agree, incredibly smooth. I was surprised to hear 'Speedbrake up' call out as I was certain they were still airborne. Perhaps I should fly Ryanair less often, you can't miss the touchdown flying with them 😉
I agree,a superb landing 10/10 !!!
Is he actually American, or just one of those Europeans that learns English with an annoying American accent?
95% of the captains in the world are 10/10 , don't underestimate us
@@droge192 likely European but went to an American or international school in his home country
20:14 that is one of the best touch down I've ever seen, besides the captain looks really experienced confident. The touch down VS was around -100, and the camera didn't even shake at all.
That was perfect!
the camera is using a stabilizer
@@stevemar.6758 with that said, pilots prefers smooth landings
Love watching a good, co-ordinated crew at work. Great communication, clear, confident and with total professionalism.
They make it look easy
Two very confident, cool headed and professional pilots. The interaction between these guys is possibly the best that I've seen on this channel. And, that landing was sweet.
such a calm and professional mood on the flightdeck, great fun to watch and great motivation to move on to my pilots training in 3 months ;)
So how is your training going? Hope you're enjoying
Incredibly competent crew and fabulous views of London that were crystal clear. Great production.
I wish there could be an honest no holds barred interview with this pilot and get his feelings on the Max both as it was before and now.
Fantastic airplane, always was and will continue to be a great plane to fly on.
Dziękuję za wspólny lot. To była przyjemność oglądać pracę 100% profesjonalistów takich jak Wy Panowie. Życzę sukcesów i samych dobrych wrażeń podczas pracy ale mając takie "biuro" jest to zapewnione. Pozdrawiam serdecznie.
I hope I can make my dream come true and sit in a cockpit myself some day…
What a very talented Captain and Senior First Officer. Very thorough and precise and a credit LOT - well done guys! 😎👍😎
Probably the best landing I've seen! Great job!! 10kt crosswind and not even a camera wobble!
It was so smooth i don't think the water in a glass moved
Thanks a LOT for this video :)
Wow that was a smooth landing
This guy lands a 737 and makes it look easy , perfect,right down the middle. My first attempt at landing a Cessna 172 was a horror show , my instructor had to take the yoke . We nearly ended up in turf .
I’ve seen this captain many videos, he’s a great communicator with co-pilots
Thanks for sharing, Flew B737-200's ages ago (1980's) and I try to explain how much more input you have to do compared to smaller aircraft (King Airs and my C414A I fly now) seems to go beyond them. This video will help that, not even a windy landing!
I like these videos. The bits i pay attention to the most are all the briefings and what the pilots do/say. Please don’t ever get rid of these. I know the briefings are airline specific but its good to get the gist
Is there a better ATC service than at Heathrow? It was a quiet day but quiet or busy they're never rushed, well articulated, standard phraseology, polite. Compare that to US :)
Those Polish pilots are very-well trained - no question about this and their English is really outstanding.
15:20 Amazing view of london City
Yes, an amazing view of the university which rejected me
Amazing video. Best aviation video I've seen to date.
Is it still the best av video you’ve seen to date?
Thank you for these amazing videos that show these professionals at work. What a job, blows my mind. Thank you also for not using music!
Excellent pilots!! Great landing and video!!
You can't even tell when the plane touches down! Smooth AF!!
Love these! More Heathrow approaches just like this would be awesome!
I noticed they got released off 210 before lambourn
Thanks to all pilots and staff. Around the world 🌍🌍🌍🌍🌍
I've seen this captain also before I think is one of the best and explains very well
It was nice to hear you did a single engine taxi to the stand for fuel efficiency. I’ve asked about this on other videos and everyone always says “that’s not done it isn’t worth it”.
Depends the aircraft, most recent modern aircraft can taxi with just one engine on idle. Other factors can affect this however.
@@lorenzoFCIM1908 I also have another idea that I know will get done eventually and it will have been mine but I don’t have the money to invest and make it happen. I want electric powered tugs, that the ground crew attach to the plane, but the pilots control it and they use it to push back, then take the planes all the way out to just before the runway. Where the ground crew (just sitting inside the tug, or later remote controlled from elsewhere) will then disconnect and take the tug back to the stand. The pilots then use the engines the rest of the way, either having started them shortly before arrival to runway, or have them just idling. It will save more fuel but again for a while people will say it’s not worth it. Eventually it will be though.
@@GNX157 Good idea actually.
In airports with long taxi patterns this is standard operating procedure for many airline. Most commonly seen in never aircraft like the b737 max, the a320 family, a350 and b787. But single engine taxi out has been mostly removed due to some incidents, as it increases work load prior to takeoff, and pilots can become too distracted.
The main reason why airplanes are not tugged around, is because it is very slow and harder to control.
Great captain! I have seen him before I believe they are from LOT Polish airways! My guess would be flying direct from Warsaw to London on this flight.
As a 757-200WL pilot for Condor i must say that landing was the best ive seen in my 14 years of flying.
This was absolutely AWESOME!!! I love planes.. They are so amazing..
Great video indeed; one of the best, if not the best, about a landing at Heathrow. Much respect and admiration for these pilots. Thanks for posting.
737 max LOT, flight from Warsaw. Quite important info for me - a Pole 😄
That landing was butter! 🔥
Also idc what anyone says my all time fav planes are the 737 NG and now the MAX 8-10 are absolutely beautiful planes . So glad the unfortunate issues that caused a couple tragic accidents were fixed but they should have never happened.
watch the netflix documentary Downfall: The Case Against Boeing. Those planes were doomed from the start, absolute negligence from boeing is astonishing. I personally will never be getting on a MAX plane ever.
@@takers786 I will def watch that! You are completely right about Boeing but i promise the max is one of the safest aircraft along with its predecessor the 737-800 next gen and before that the 737-300/400 which combined were flying with almost pristine records for 50 years plus. Boeing neglected to put in the procedures for the mcas system purposely which was extreme negligence to say the least but it was not the planes fault I do understand you not wanting to fly them but it was complete miscommunication and not the planes systems no one knew what it was and how to control it when it activated in very specific and rare conditions. Don’t hate on the max it’s beautiful! Lol I promise it was stupid humans not the planes fault.
Same! I love the 737 MAX's winglets, it's a very pretty plane and a really reliable one as well! I wish one day ill be able to fly on one
@@nickpapagiorgio5056 The 737 MAX aircraft are impressive technically, and credit where it's due. Unfortunately however they are hamstrung by being forced on an incredibly antiquated design dating back to the -100 and -200 variants.
One of the big constraints comes from engine clearance; the original JT8Ds were slim and thus the landing gear didn't have much clearance, but when the Classic and NG variants were built the much larger CF6es had to have their nacelles squashed at the bottom to not strike the ground. This wasn't a problem in itself until the MAX series aircraft with their CFM LEAP-1Bs - even bigger in fan diameter, to the point where they no longer fit in their existing position and had to be moved far forward and tilted upwards so they no longer provided thrust directly along the pitch axis. This led to the aircraft having a natural tendency to pitch up under power and it thus relied on the flawed MCAS system to correct this.
The MAX's failing was mainly due to overreliance on a system that could go wrong due to the whole design not being naturally stable aerodynamically. Due to Boeing's refusal to invest money in a new airliner they decided to continue overdeveloping a design beyond it's practical limits and this is what caused these tragic accidents ultimately speaking.
So yes, the 737 MAX aircraft are impressive but they're not fit for further development. The 737 has had its day and there's a sore need for a new short/medium-haul airliner instead.
@@Silvera-Avian "This led to the aircraft having a natural tendency to pitch up under power and it thus relied on the flawed MCAS system to correct this. "
Debunked by EASA after they themselves tested the plane before it's re certification. Don't think I need to add any words on this, whatever or wherever you read and heard the 737 max is unstable, has tendency to pitch up all of them are false unless they're a source with higher authority and credential than Europe's aviation agency.
The 737 MAX doesn't need MCAS at all in fact, in most flights it doesn't even serve any purpose. It was added just so the max's stall related characteristics would be similar enough to other variants so that it wouldn't be classified it as a different type. The only "issue" Boeing faced by re using the old 737 air frame was this, but if we were to ignore it then the 737 air frame would be perfectly fine for further generations to come, a stable and solid airplane like the 737 max is but the only issue would be how Boeing would overcome the issues related to having commonality with older 737 variants.
Also I thought it's a common knowledge but aerodynamically unstable airplanes aren't allowed to be certified in the first place no matter what software it has. The crashes of 737 MAX basically boils down to giving MCAS wayy more power and authority than it needs and the worst thing Boeing did imo was using a single sensor for the mcas to detect when to activate. In both the crashes the sensor sent faulty data so the mcas tried to save the aircraft thinking it was stalling.
The Netflix documentary wasn't bad but it didn't do a good job about actually talking about the 737 MAX itself, and it's incidents. If someone wanted to learn about the 737 MAX that documentary is among the last places I'd recommend.
Can I ask an honest question? Why is there so much movement with the yoke as your coming in for a landing yet, it doesn't appear to impact the movement of the plane...
It actually does but you can't see it, this small moves keeps plane flying stable
@@tomaszsadow Could you expound aa little bit more? What exactly is being stabilized and how? The descent? The speed? The sway? What?
A 737 column and especially wheel throw characteristic. Not so on other Boeings except perhaps 707,727.
The airspeed is quite low and flaps down, so the plane is in quite a cumbersome state so larger surface movements are needed, plus this is one of the few planes that still use cables, pulleys, and linkage along with hydro assist to move the surfaces.
@@GNX157 What surface movements? which cables are controlled by the yoke?
Landing was butter. Nice video! 👍🏻
Excellent landing Captain, absolutely SMOOOOTH landing. What an incredibly professional crew.
Thank you very, very much for your good movies. Best wishes
Great and beautiful landing by both the Pilots, amazing video with knowledge of the Cockpit, showing people, what a great technology, thanks for this video, all the best and good luck in your career, and may our Creator bless you and your families, and keep safe always in the air and on the ground.
Great views!!!!!!!! Thanks for sharing with us passengers.......!
I didn't notice that plane actually landed 😍awesome job cappy.
Are we calling him 'cappy' now? Is he comfortable with that? lol
Cappy.....??? If he is a cappy, you must be an idiot then!
Like a baby's behind, smoooooth as butter on the landing. Very professional pilots, I'd be proud to fly with that team.
I agree would love to have them on board , landing was spot on🤙
랜딩절차는 언제봐도 아름답고 경의롭습니다.
Was cool to see the variety of views during the land :) . Great landing - didn't hear a thing, lol . Awesome pilot ;)
That's my gate 216 at Heathrow flying for swiss-virtual on VATSIM .
Great landing, so smooth!
Is the Captain single? I'm in love. Great landing too, btw. Smooth as buttah.
Like that Captain and great job! Love the PFD and ND looks!
I thought DFW was a long taxi. Wow. How does it work in terms of the runway you land on and the gate proximity? Is it just you get what you get?
I believe this particular day, the other runway was closed. In a situation like this where a closer runway to your assigned gate isnt avaliable, the taxi could be around the entire airport.
There are designated spots to park but if yours is occupied due to a late flight or repair plane that space will not be available and you must go to an alternate space.AaTC will direct pilot.
I've never seen such a landing... I'd say, imperceptible. Congratulations to the Captain!! 😄👍👍👍🥰
Awesome....from start to finisch!!)) I've seen these pilots before....very motivated!! I love this....many thanks JP;)) Enjoy the weekend;!))
Warm greetings 💖👌✈🌟😘.....X Betsy.....
Wow keep up the great wrk best airline videos on the net 👏 👍
Beautifull B737❤❤
Excited here!!❤🇵🇭
Nice the Avee kit of the 1st officer on the bose headset! I have one also this is really a nice device 😁
The pilot looks 100% like Paul Walker. Wow!
Facts.
Thank so much Just planes. This video is so helpful for the preparation of my Pilot assesment which will be assessed by Ryanair. The flight crew explain all of the briefing and procedures very clear and consistent. They look really proffesional and they know clearly what they are doing at all times. Respect for these pilots
Very professional indeed these guys hey great vid, I hope ya pass your assessment good luck
That landing was butter😮😮😮😮😮
Great briefing and Crew Coordination. Excellent handling. Brilliant video! Want to see another with departure briefing. Which Airline? Why discrete call sign for 73Max? How is the MCAS aberration eliminated now? Best wishes and safe operations.
I think the airline is lot polish
the main issue with MCAS was it was way to powerful. and it relyed on only 1 AOA sensor. i think boeing fixed it to use bith sensors and made it less powerful. also all pilots have been trained on MCAS now and can identofy a mcas error. So hopefully all should be well.
@@YN-io6kj let's hope it does. I flew on one 737Max..aside from a shaky nervous landing in Istanbul it was ok. I did not notice it was a max till after I disembarked!
It is eliminated by stab trim switch behind flaps lever if any problem occur it will be turned off by pilots
@@k.psingh5330 not always guaranteed. Ethiopian max pilots did that. But the mcas has moved the trim forward and once you press those two buttons the electric motor for the trim is turned off. So the trim has to be done mechanically. And the aerodynamic forces means the pilots simply wont have enough muscle to set the trim back up. Stupid design imo but its worked for 50 odd years.
Must be a powerful pc to be able to land at heathrow with good fps while using max graphics and multiplayer. My 3080ti and r9 are crying at that
🤣🤣🤣
Right? Picture perfect.
That was a butter banding and before thr 1000' markers. Well done boys
at 20:17 , pilot pulls throttle levers all the way back, what is the second lever at the back that he pulls back?
Reverse thrust
Hi, I don't know if i missed it but, Why descent using VS and not VNAV? Any particular reason or preference?
Fantastic views of London. A treat.
Wonderful,loud and clear briefing 👍
Very well done video and very professional flight crew. Nicely done all around.
Awesome job fellas, bravo.
I noticed that the bigger airplanes more easy to land like b 777 and b 747 , i think the heavy weight decrease the wind effect especially during landing .Is this right?
Sorry though, am I right in saying that both have their *epaulettes the wrong way around?*
Why don't they let the auto pilot land the plane? It does eveything until the last 30-45 seconds. I notice it's smooth until the pilot takes over and then it starts moving around. Am I missing something?
Most airlines require a manually flown landing. Far faster to react to an emergency or waive off.
Will be a long time before a computer will have the touch of a pilot like this during landing.
Because as a pilot , you are supposed to know how to land a plane by yourself, and the autopilot wasnt configured for autoland, you constantly need to tell it what to do, where to go....
Autolands are only meant to be used during low visibility operations when manual landings are considered unsafe.
You would also need to perform some autolands with a clear weather(around 1-2times per month)in order to practice the manoeuver or just to watch and rate the behavior of the autoland for the airline.
Otherwise, the vast majority of landings are always manual.
Because autopilot landings are more work than manual landings and it wasn’t necessary here. Also as someone else said, the autopilot wasn’t set up for an autoland and there was no time to do so in that short of a time. As you can tell from these videos the autopilot isn’t very “auto” you have to tell it what to do. There isn’t just some button you press to make the autopilot land the plane, it’s a pretty workload intensive process to set up and then monitor.
Also, I have never heard of any airline that require pilots to land manually. Pilots just prefer to land manually because it’s less work and more fun.
A very competent crew. Well disciplined and drilled.
How do you know when you’ve touchdown on the touchdown area?
Nice landing 50 over the threshold pause before 10 and smooth at the 1000ft
This is pure floating at it best 👌 👍, smooooooth, great eye view of the capital scenery more than 4k perfect landing,👍😎
What is the name of the app that pilot used for briefing?
Briliant video, Excellent pilots, superb landing, Thank you 🙂
What a team , amazing work
Beautiful plane incredible video thanku so much love this much love and God bless always x
Nice video of London and even better to see a MAX capable of actually landing properly 🤔
Nice view of CITY AIRPORT at 12:10
Quality video. Thanks for that one.
The definition of a butter landing.
Smooth as butter!
Beautiful landing!
Now thats a landing! 10/10
Nice camera quality 👍
Super Landing !!!
Great landing!
Well done all the way!
How ddi you do your flight training it’s very expesnive
I guess the captain is Polish, but he has an amazing American (or Canadian) accent.
Yes crew is from Poland LOT is national airline in my country.
Go watch video from takeoff in Warsaw same flight and crew.
LOT Boeing 737 Max Warsaw Takeoff.
Amazing video really interesting.
His English is fantastic!
Flying the Max is Max, who was indeed schooled in the USA. English is fairly rare in Poland, most people speaking British, Welsh or some other bastardized regional dialect. Even Derek, the co-pilot, speaks British.
Oh man Captain is handsome 🥵 Buttery landing makes him even hotter! 😍 Keeping power in till the last second like he did is definitely my preferred technique. Yanking it back to idle at 20-30 foot usually guarantees you slam down hard or balloon and float as you rip the control column aft to try and not slam down 🤣.
That landing was smooth as silk.
If MCAS pitched down, could the crew save the plane and not let it slam into the ground?
It’s been updated to be turned off if pilots detect it’s having a fault
Why does London City Airport have a mote around it?
How does this guy get clearance for all these videos? Like how’s he just allowed in all these fockpits
At what altitude is auto-pilot typically disengaged at on approach? Also, is it typical to be at 50 feet just before the beginning of the runway at landing?
This varies based on many factors
Crew preference, workload, weather, company policy etc.
There is no single answer to this question since it varies from airline to airline, airplane to airplane, approach to approach , and crew to crew.
How much the pilots will fly using the automation as opposed to fly manually really varies from flight to flight.
The only true constant is that anywhere in RVSM airspace the pilots are required to use the autopilot and for airplanes and crews certified to do so at airports with runways with the capability if the weather is bad pilots will perform an autoland
And I think he should be an instructor because he has a nice calm voice