I have the Kase 82mm Wolverine magnetic system and love them. I use filters so much more often now because it is so easy. Before, unless I was planning on taking time to set them all up, I would just skip it. With the Kase, I use them all the time. If I crack any of mine (unlikely given how tough), I'll think of your site Henry.
Great vid Hudson, you help me to settle on a filter system. I've been watching a lot of pro's like your self on the various filter systems they use, and honestly it gets a bit overwhelming. Needless to say i've seen a few others that talk about the Kase system, but I have to admit your review was a bit better and nailed the concerns I had to go forward with Kase. As I am in Canada, and the exchange rate sucks, I ordered the kit directly from Kase Canada, otherwise I would have supported you via your website. Cheers and thanks again!!
I too just switched to Kase magnetic circular filters. Love them especially on the beach here in Florida. Doing sunrises and sunsets become so much easier when stacking.
Kase magnetic filters rock! Screw on filters suck! I have dropped and broken large circular polarizing filters when trying to screw it on. Other times they get stuck on. Last April I dropped a Polar Pro filter on a bridge over the Merced River when I was trying to attach it to my lens. Did it land next to me? No, I watched as it rolled over the edge and gone forever. Magnetic... click and attached. Grab and pull off. It is a NO BRAINER. Thank you Hudson for sharing this information with us. And for your great youtube channel!
You’ve convinced me Kase is the way to go. Will be ordering the 112mm Revolution kit to work with my Nikon trinity and the HB-97. Do you have any experience with Kase’s HB-97 equivalent hood?
Magnetic Filters are a game changer really quick to put the filters on and off and stack them, I use the 82mm Haida Filters cause I’m familiar with them and used to use their M10 kit. I do carry the Haida magnetic filters in a Kase case though! 😄
Having bought into the Kase system a few months ago, a note for all you Nikon Z mount users out there. If you don't plan on using the 14-24 F2.8 z and instead stick with the 14-30 F4 z like myself, get the 95mm filter set. I initially ordered the 82mm set, but there was a pretty noticeable vignette at 14mm, and forget stacking. I returned and switched to 95mm and used step up rings as Hudson has shown in this video. No vignetting even with stacked filters at 14mm on that 14-30mm. The bonus is that at 95mm, I can even put them now on my 200-500mm which I never really planned on.
Or better yet future proof yourself with the 112mm set and the hb-97 hood that snaps right on the 14-30 as well as all the 2.8 zooms. :) dead simple. Twist... Click
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Hi Hudson. Thanks for all this great information! Just to make sure I understand correctly, are you saying that the HB-97 hood is compatible with the 14-30 F4 S? I understand that it fits the 2.8 zooms, but if I can use it on my 14-30 F4, then I think I will go with the 112mm set to be future ready. Everything I can find online says that the HB-97 is compatible with only the 2.8.
It sure does. Here's my B&H link: bhpho.to/3zkdfRn I can confirm it clicks right onto the 14-30 S and all the 2.8 S zooms. it's fabulous. I have a feeling they will keep making it a standard for wider bodied lenses. I just wish it fit the 20 1.8 too. :-) Ah well. I have a 77-112 magnetic adapter ring for that. Oh the kit & individual Kase filters are at my site at www.hudsonhenry.com/kase
I was avoiding using filters because of the cumbersome to use filter holders. They are bulky and take space in my pack. The Kase filters changed that. I have the 95 mm kit with the adapter rings. I use it a lot when the situation requires it. As you mentioned, it is a dream to use. The magnets made the filters stackable and easy to put on and off. I recommend going one size bigger than your lens diameter and get the adapter rings to avoid vignetting. Thank you, Hudson!
That totally depends on the lens in question. With my 20 1.8S, a single native 77 filter can vignette, but you can stack as many 112s as you want or a couple of 82mm filters. With my 70-200 S you can stack a couple of native 77s just fine. Here's the deal. Bigger is always better when you do this math and no two lenses or filter brands are the same. ;)
Thank you so much. Great Review. I was making decision between this Wolverine magnetic and Nisi V6 150mm. Nisi gives full option built-in CPL and 2 slots for square filters, but it is really really bulky, hard to carry around, and required time to set up. Today after watching your review, I went out and tested 112 GND kit. I was struggling between square and circular system, since I usually shoot long exposure in daytime, and ND1000 is still not enough. Normally I stack Nisi ND1000 and ND64 to get 16 stop. I use normal screw-in ND with 2 NDs, there is no vignette at 14mm. But if I need PL, then problem occurs at 14mm, I have to zoom in at 18.5 to get rid of all vignette. So, today, I ran out to the dealer, I live in Thailand, and test for three stacking. Surprisingly, no vignette at 14mm!!! OMG!!! (Haven’t got a chance to test 4, they have only one and last set) So, I do not have to hesitate choosing square or circular anymore. These circular glasses are soooo compact and light weights. Super easy to travel with, just only a small bag and HB-97 then I good to go with all the trilogy lenses. Very fast set up, I just leave the magnetic adapter on HB-97. And so much convenient switching filters and swap through lenses. Thanks
Just an FYI, but the thumbnail for this video says "Nikion" instead of Nikon. I just bought a set of 82mm magnetic filters and am excited to try them out. For someone living in China, it's interesting to see where they are branching out.
Love the video and you’re absolutely right about Kase filters. Bought my first 2 years ago and just had to upgrade to an 82mm set for the 14-24 Z lens. Wish I’d have seen you advice about size before. I managed to sell my old kit for a very good price, the company are really helpful and responsive here in the UK.
Sorry Nicole it’s the 14-30mm lens that I have but haven’t noticed any vignetting with that lens and love the Kase filters! It was such a faff juggling screw thread filters, glasses, remote etc but magnetic filters make the job so more pleasurable.
I absolutely agree with your decision regarding Kase filters. I was sold on the 112mm version after your last video comparison. The magnetic system with the easy on/off regarding Nikon's large filter adapter (HB-97) for the Z 14-24 2.8 and no vignetting were key factors. To keep costs down I'm using the HB-97 with the 2.8 Nikon trilogy for the Z system. The only concern I've noted was the accumulation of dust getting behind the filter while using the HB-97 at extreme locations such as southeast Utah. Kase's quality is top notch.
Hello Hudson, I purchased the Kase 112mm package from you and now i am looking to expand and get graduated filters. I use the Z9, 24-120mm F4, the 70-200MM F2.8 and the wide 14-24mm F2.8. I want to make sure i get the correct adaptor to add the rectangular grad filters. What should i be buying?
Really interesting video Hudson! Do you recommend to use larger filters (with a step up adapter) for a specific lens (i.e. a 82mm filter for a 77mm lens)? Or just keep it simple and use a 77mm filter for a 77mm lens? Thanks for your answer in advance"
Hudson - You helped me out a few days ago and I got one more for you. Seeing that I'll eventually get the 14-24 Z lens, do you recommend just getting the 112 size set and then getting the 77-112 step-up ring for all my other else 70-200 and the 100-400? Finalizing the gear for the Antarctica trip (pocketbook is feeling it). Again much appreciated and I owe you dinner and beer if we ever cross paths!
Yes. You'll never regret the magnetic kase 112s. I have them here: www.hudsonhenry.com/kase If you have the 70-200 S that hb-97 112mm hood that comes with it snaps right to that too as well as the 24-70 2.8S, the 14-30 and the 50 1.2 You can get it at B&H separate too. I have it linked here with filtration. Www.hudsonhenry.com/atslinks hit me up with any more questions. Hope we do link up out there! Have fun on the trip! Jealous.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Will do. Will use your affiliate link as well... I'm also looking for a good Diffuser. Looking at PM, Moment, and K&F. Had some good suggestions on the DPR replies. (www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4587996)
I purchased the 82mm set in April 2020 on Amazon before they started getting popular. Since they have gotten so much press the price went up to around $100 more than what I paid for them a year ago. I noticed a slight magenta color cast that was also pointed out by another UA-camr. At the time I was using a Sony with most of my lenses 67mm so great setup. But few months ago I bought a Canon R6 with the 15-35mm f2.8 lens that has a 82mm filter thread. There is lots of mechanical vignetting at anything bellow 20mm. But few days ago I started using my Sony again and will give the Kase filters another go.
Hmmmm, I've seen no cast myself and shooting the Xrite color checker certainly doesn't lie... I wonder if they upgraded the glass??? Yep, if you're shooting ultra-wide there's no substitute for the 112s. I can stack em at 14mm without issue. I love em.
I’m considering a switch from Lee. My new Nikon, Z 14-30 means that my Lee 100 mm system doesn’t work. But I have really enjoyed the 100x150 graduated filters . With the circular system what do you do for graduated…??
ua-cam.com/video/Lbuv-KRp5JM/v-deo.html I hope you'll watch the above video. It's a little bit older ats and I'm working on an update to it. It remains very valid though. I very much believe graduated filters do far more harm than good in today's age. I used them for a decade starting about 22 years ago. :) if you do go kase, you'll be blown away by the 112mm system. Thanks in advance for looking here at them: www.hudsonhenry.com/kase
I also want to buy Kase magnetic filters, they seem to be really good. Watched almost every review I could find :) Only "downside" is that I need 95mm filters for my Nikon 14-30 with 82mm filter thread to avoid vignetting. And those are quite big ... They should release 86mm filters or so :)
The 112s with either the 82-112 magnetic step up or the hb-97 hood that fits it and all the 2.8 zooms is the dream setup on it. Stack away without fear of vignetting. I love the 112s. Check em out at www.hudsonhenry.com/kase
@@HudsonHenryPhoto looking at the Kase website, it looks like they don't make the 112mm step rings for anything smaller than 82mm. Can you confirm that? If so, would you advocate adding yet another step ring to get from 82mm to say 72 or 77? Here's where maybe the 95mm size might be better.
Yep, I have the 82 and 95 steps on my site too. Just use a __ to 82 step. Vignetting clearly won't be an issue from smaller than 82. I think Nikon is clearly ahead of the curve with the 112 hood for the 2.8 trilogy. I'll bet other brands are looking at them and thinking about it too. 112 gives you more leeway not to vignette on a big wide angle and truly future proofs you. :) I love em. I'm sold.
Hudson the neutral night appears to be miss labeled as a UV protective filter, itss going to take some time to save for tese but I love them anf they will be such a big help
Quick question.. I'm using the z50, will the clip-in neutral night filter work for the z50 since the mount is the same or not since the sensor is a different size?
As always I love your videos, you have taken me out of a couple of doubts that I had with these filters. I have been a user of 100mm nisi filters for many years, but I think I will give a change to Kase filters. I have an R5 and I usually use my rf 15-35 of 82mm for landscape with this, I have been thinking about buying a set of 95mm kase filters to avoid vignette problems and use them also with my other 77mm lenses, do you think it is a good option? or better I go for an 82mm kit?
Oh man Rafael... Tricky choice. Do you find the 15-35 vignettes easily? Would you want to stack filters on it? Why don't you email me at hi@hudsonhenry.com so I be sure to not miss the conversation in the feed.
These 112mm bad boys are on my wish list. Thanks for the tip that using the large 14-24 hood on all of the new Z f/2.8 lenses really makes this a fantastic solution. When I buy them, it will be from your website... just saving my pennies... might need to roll a few trick or treaters soon. :P
I have tried them. I think the magnetics are so much easier and more flexible to use. I could see a neutral night internal, but there are many situations where I don't want to open my sensor up to install and swap.
One concern I have about magnetic filters is having them get knocked off while walking around town or hiking. Do these have a strong enough magnet so that's not a concern if a camera is hanging off the side of the body while in motion?
Great concept, but unfortunately I have too much money invested in good quality threaded and square filters to just put them aside and start over again. Your suggested "kit" is quite reasonable though and if I was just beginning I'd jump on it. I'll just have to make do with what I have for the foreseeable future....
Hudson, great job as always. When I was thinking through which filter system to invest in, the one thing that gave me pause about a magnetic system is changing out the filter in the winter (at least for those of us in New England) with gloves on. Do you have a perspective on this?
Hi Henry! Very good video with important information for me. Thank you very much. 🙏 I would like to have your opinion. I already have the Z 14-30 f4. I'm looking for a brighter lens for night shot. Should I sell the Z 14-30 and get the Z 14-24? Or I should keep the Z 14-30 and add the Z 20mm 1.8? I already have the Z 24-70 f2.8 and Z 70-200 f2.8. I also looking to buy the Kase Wolverine Magnetic 112mm kit filter as a one filter solution thank to the Nikon lens hood hb-97 who fit on my two Z f2.8 lenses. What do you think about this situation? Thank you so much for your help.
The HB-97 hood also fits the 14-30 F4 S! :-) The 14-30 is a fabulous lens. So small, light and sharp. The 14-24 is even better with very special color rendition and contrast, but it's far bigger and much more expensive. I find myself using the 20 1.8 much more for star work since I use a MSM tracker and can easily shoot at low ISO with longer shutter speeds. With the 14-24 at F2.8 and 500 ISO I need 240seconds to the 20 1.8s 90s at F1.8. With long exposure noise reduction that saves over 5 minutes per exposure. Both lenses are fabulous. Sharp in the corners with no coma wide open which is a miracle. You can learn more about the filters at www.hudosnhenry.com/kase and email me any time with follow-up questions. You'll never regret the Kase 112s for your system. They're just incredible.
Hi Hudson. Are the 112mm circular filters exclusively for Nikon lenses, or could I use an 82 to 112mm adapter for my R5 and 15-35mm? I own the 82mm set, but I begin to experience vignetting when shooting ultra wide. I'm wondering if I should skip the 95mm set, and just go with the 112mm to avoid these same issues if I invest in a 28-70 down the line which is 95mm.
That will 100% work and you'll love them. I use them even on my Z50 with the tiny 49mm thread kit lenses and I used them testing the R5 too. :) I've got them at www.hudsonhenry.com/kase hit me up with any followup questions at hi@hudsonhenry.com :)
That hood comes with the 14-24 S, but it fits all the 2.8 S zooms S as well as the 14-30 and the 50 1.2 S lenses. I'm crossing my fingers for the 100-400 S too. There's a very thin magnetic adapter ring in the kit that threads into the hood then the magnetic filters just drop in and snap tight, even stacked. There's more details at www.hudsonhenry.com/kase
The HB-97 112mm hood snaps right on to all the 2.8 Zooms (not just the 14-24) as well as the 14-30 f4. The cover image of this video is the 70-200 S with that hood and a 112mm filter. Click, it's that simple. Here's the Hood: bhpho.to/3zkdfRn
This looks like a great option for the trinity of Z-mount f/2.8S zoom lenses for my Z7 II. I discovered (quite by accident) that the Nisi Filter holder I ordered for my 14-24mm f/2.8S fit on all three lenses. My question is this: did you notice any color shifts with the Kase filters that had to be corrected in post?
NO. Not at all. :-) YOu can see in the video where I shoot the color checker through the 10stop ND. :-) Great filters. I've got another video at www.hudsonhenry.com/kase
Hi Hudson, I am planning to invest in a filter system as I currently use NISI and want something magnetic for ease of use. Can you send me a link as all my lenses are 77mm and like to get a kit and also additional 3 rings 77 and caps. I live in Canada and can you ship it and any extra cost involved.
Hey Ruben. I really recommend the 82mm to future proof yourself against some wider lens down the road you decide you need as well as vignetting on your current wide angle. We have all the 82mm gear in stock. If you're dead set on 77mm, we can get that too very quickly. My distributor is across town. We do ship to Canada, but email me to set that all up. We can invoice you for it. I'm in Glacier NP now with very limited data, so please send an email to both Woody and me. Hi@hudsonhenry.com & shop@hudsonhenry.com in the meantime you can see what we carry at www.hudsonhenry.com/kase Thanks so much!
I just tested with the CPL (it and the neutral night, while still thin are a tiny bit thicker than the NDs) It's still so thin that the vignetting at 14 that I don't see any vignetting. If there is any, you can't detect on on the back LCD and I'm sure it would be 100% correctable in post.
Do you think using the HB-97 lens hood on the 70-200 is too short versus the standard HB-92? Wonder if you can afford it to use both size Kase magnetic filters? Thanks
There's really no need to carry both. Once you have the pack of 112s in your hand, you'll see what I mean. As an ambassador they are supplying me with filters to demo to my workshop students in both sizes, but I don't carry the 82s much. I LOVE the 112s. A couple adapter rings and it's on my 50 1.8 with the 62mm thread (62-82 standard ring + 82-112 magnetic ring). The bag of 6 112 filters really isn't that much bigger in my bag than the 82s and they are so thin and light. It's not a big deal to toss that hood, a couple adapters and the filter pouch in the bag. Say goodbye to vignetting. :-) On the 70-200: when you use the hood with the filters, it's not really about avoiding ghosting or flare. it's about applying the filters. It's nearly impossible to use filters with the deep stock hood, so this at least gives you some minimal protection and you still have the stock hood for shooting near into the sun or bright artificial lights.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Hudson, thanks as always. Will try the 112's for my 14-24 and then see if I find them too large for other lens. Would be nice to carry just one size!
Thanks, Hudson. Great video. You have me sold on Kase and almost convinced on getting 112 mm;-). Do you still use a traditional protective filter on your lenses?
I do, but I I don't need a slew of them with the Kase system anymore. I just have a single magnetic 82 and 112. If conditions are rough, I slap it on, it's so easy and it makes swapping to a CPL or ND just one step easier if I need. :) It's not in the kit, but I do have them on my site separately along with the neutral nights and kit filters. www.hudsonhenry.com/kase.
I can only afford three filters, caps and case. I’m defiantly getting CPL but not sure what Density to get. 3 and 6? 3 and 10? 6 and 10? Also do you have issues with “light leak” with the Nikon hood/Filter adapter? Or should I consider Nisi hood in the future?Thanks so much.
I'm not a fan of the nisi hood. It's really heavy and doesn't fit the non 14-24 lenses as well as the Nikon hood. Never had the slightest light leak with the HB97. I have both and much prefer the Nikon. If you must, I'd go cpl, 6 and 10. The cpl acts like a 2 in a pinch. But look close, if you get at least three things (like the kit with two cheap accessories) you get 10% off at my store www.hudsonhenry.com/kase. With that deal the whole stack cap pro kit is about what you say is in your budget. The case, caps, CPL, 3,6 & 10 stop plus a couple adapters. :)
@@HudsonHenryPhoto yeah with the 10% off I’m right around $650 for the bunch. $799 for the kit. I’m defiantly buying from you. Really appreciate the advice!
@@HudsonHenryPhoto really appreciate the help Hudson! Got my order in today! Really looking forward to receiving these. My 14-24 f2.8 S and 70-200 f2.8 S will be very happy! Don’t have the 24-70 yet but do have a 50mm 1.8 s, pretty happy with this setup. Thanks again 👍🏻👍🏻
Do you not worry about the magnetism from the filter holder magnetising the parts in your lens, which could cause the aperture to stick, let alone the delicate electronic parts ? Seems a bit risky ? Would like to know your feedback in 12 months.
I've been using Manfrotto's Xume magnetic system for over 5 years. Never a concern or problem with any of my gear. I've been extensively using these much better Kase magnetic filters on Sony, Canon and Nikon (D850, D500, Z6, Z7, Z50, Z6ii, Z7ii, A1 & R5 and enough lenses it would take a paragraph to list for over the past 6 months before deciding to switch. I don't make such choices lightly No concerns or problems. Rest easy on that one.
I like the effect on cityscapes at bluehour too. It cleans up some of that sodium vapor haze, but it's most important for astro. First name is Hudson, but no big deal at all.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Thank you Hudson. And with a last name like mine, it is a big deal so my apologies for screwing up your name. Love your work and your passion for photography and spreading the good word.
I tend to just use it with the lens I'm working with. Easy swap. :) of course you can. I can either stock that or get you links. :) individual filters each come with them too, I have extras for my uv and neutral night, but I tend to only carry one.
Will think about it - no question on the convenience factor. But, I’ve invested heavily into the NiSi system for all my lenses including the dedicated hood and 112mm filters they have for the 14-24. I use cheap cotton gloves as the workaround to keep everything print-free in the field (magnets would be a lot easier!).
I keep my CF Express cards in a pelican like little case in my bag's top pocket and my kase filters in a really wonderful soft lined 6 filter, ballistic nylon case the kit comes with in the main compartment. It's not a concern for me because those items aren't loose together. Those filters are optical gems and not cheap. Ditto the CF Express cards. Never left loose. Those are the kind of items you take care with. It's like making sure the lid is on your water bottle before tossing it in your camera bag. Standard of care. That said, the CF Express cards are so tough, they'd probably be fine. Not planning to test it though. ;)
I've tested Haida and Freewell filters in the past and not been a huge fan. I had been a Hoya ambassador for years and loved their HD3 and Solas lines, but they lacked 112s so I looked around. I tested the heck out of Kase and NiSi. Both shocked me with the optical and glass quality, but the Kase were so dead easy to use. The magnetic system is fabulous, but the glass is not a let down from the best of the best that I'm accustomed to using.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto isn't the Kase very similar to Freewell in terms of functionality and both have the 112mm filter. Is there something about Freewell that you did not like?
Quality of glass dissaponted, but it was a while ago. With filters you really do get what you pay for generally though. Well crafted optical engineering and production isn't cheap. You've got some of the best glass ever in those S lenses. Be careful to not degrade it with substandard filters. :)
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Freewell filters look and feel like high quality too. I own them but was curious about Kase. And many youtube reviews have rated them highly, close to Breakthrough X4 and PolarPro.
The Kase magnetic filter system certainly looks very interesting, but I don't understand why every filter (outside of a kit) seems to come with its own adapter. Surely the point of the system is that you have just one adapter attached to the lens, to which you then attach different magnetic filters.
If you buy a single filter, you need a ring, sure you might not need one for your 2nd or third, but you do for the first and it's nice they include it instead of making you buy them as an accessory. :)
Sorry, Hudson, this doesn't seem to be a good justification. Why not just sell the adapter separately? As you say, if I buy 3 filters I end up with 3 adapters, rather than just 1. To be honest, it seems like a marketing decision which is at conflict with the whole design principle of the system (which is to separate out the screw-threaded adapter from the optical glass).
This honestly is the first time I've heard complaints about a company including the accessories required for use instead of charging extra. I really just don't comprehend the issue. Some people want a ring on every lens, some people only buy one filter (a ND, a CPL). Nice that they need not buy an extra part to make it work. I mostly hear questions about why adapter rings to smaller sizes aren't included. This is the only complaint so far about too much being included.
I don't quite believe that the adapters are included 'free of charge'. Here in the UK the sale cost of a separate112mm adapter is £40, and the cost of a filter (with adapter) is £199. If I could buy a single adapter for £40 and multiple filters for £159 each then that would be great. But, of course, sale cost is not the same as production cost. My guess is that the actual production cost of the adapter is so low that Kase do not think it worth selling filters both with and without adapter. Anyway, following your persuasive recommendation, I am probably going to order some Kase magnetic filters (unfortunately not from your site since I am in the UK). While I have your attention, Hudson, can you comment on the issue of light leakage with the Nikon HB-97 hood and Kase magnetic ND filters when performing long exposures. I have seen a forum comment to the effect that you do not consider this to be a problem. Is this correct? I am trying to decide whether it is worth getting the Nisi hood.
Totally understand. I had the opportunity to stock the Kase Filters without rings, but the price bump was negligible. No. I have seen zero light leaks. The hood is great and it fits all the lens barrels identically. The nisi (which I've tested) is nice, but quite heavy and does not fit the non 14-24 lenses well. The grooves on the 14-24 are slightly larger than the other lenses. Nikon designed the hb-97 to be universal. Nisi designed their hood to the 14-24. It's scary tight trying to twist it on the 70-200. Not advised.
Yeah, I think the 112 set is really only needed for those investing a lot in glass, 2.8 zooms, zeiss, big primes. 82mm makes sense for everyone else. The Kase isn't a bargain brand even at 82mm, but they are worth the premium.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto I have the Nikon Z 14-30 F4 lens which has 82mm threads.. Would I get vignetting if I went with the 82mm filter set? I was looking at the 95mm to avoid any vignetting? ..
You can get way with very minimal vignetting using one of the Kase 82mm filters as the set up is so thin, but... If you're considering ever moving to the 2.8 or adding a long prime the 112s will future proof you. Nikon seems committed to the 112 hood standard for its ultra wide and top end lenses and it works brilliantly. Email me with any more questions. Hi@hudsonhenry.com
The only time I'd consider grads these days are for video or time-lapse where I can't exposure blend. I tossed my grads for stills about 10 years ago after Art Wolfe made that point to me. Rarely does the world toss you a straight contrast line across your scene. Exposure blending through bracketing gives you a more nuanced way to get all the data wherever the tones lie in the composition.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Thank you Henry. I shot film for 25 years so I really am a beginner again after a 11+ year pause. All of your content is a new thought process for me. I revisited the inside of of a wrecked house to shoot the bedroom again after being resigned that the windows will blow out. Ha, I shot 20 frames own manual decreasing each exposure by 1 second. In Lr I did an HDR Merge, ended up with a 95 Meg DNG with everything exposed correctly. Thanks bro.
after your previous review, I got the Kase magnetic 112mm polariser for the z14-24 f2.8 and it's great! thank you. update: Sadly shipping to the UK is pretty expensive and on top DHL charge a "service" fee, so I can't buy through you. Apologies, but I'm sure you understand. thanks Hudson
I rented the z 70-200 this week and I must say the focusing on this lens is horrific. It's so bad I don't think I will buy it. I wish someone could do a video on this as it's a known issue
The S lens? One of the finest focusing lenses I've used to date... I have a couple dozen friends who report the same. I've owned every copy of the 70-200 made by Nikon (VR, VRII, FL-ED & S) and no other has autofocussed as accurately, quickly or quietly as the S... It's also sharper. Wonder if your rental copy took a hit or something. Maybe the wrong mode? 🤷 I am shocked to see someone actuality type those words about this fabulous a lens. It's rather renowned as the best 70-200 currently made by anyone.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto hey thanks for the feedback. I'm having issues focusing on clouds. Also, I'm using pinpoint focus. I switched to a wider focus point and it still struggles. I would maybe challenge you to try and focus on clouds or maybe I'm being unrealistic with it? Maybe the rental is crap but, I've confirmed this difficulty in focusing from others on UA-cam
I've seen a couple of youtube photogs pushing Kase filters in the last 6-12 months. 1 showed up since with square filters, the other said he avoids filters as much as possible now. I think the 3rd guy might have said something about the magnets not working as well as expected. Seems overpriced compared to square or spending a few seconds more.
I've been testing the first set I've had for over a year. It's held up incredibly well. Still loooks like new and I push my gear hard. I always advocated using the Manfrotto Xume magnetic system for my past filters, but they quit making it, and it added the potential to vignette with wide angles. Sadly it wasn't nearly as well made as these. These filters are incredibly well made, not sure who you're watching, but my opinion is that these are as premium and innovative as it gets. The thin design lets you stack, the magnetic stacking makes the use dead simple, the durability is top notch and I'm sure like me you've dealt with a frustrating stuck thread while the epic light changes. I'm personally done with that. Not only that, they're great to work with and responsive to my input. You can certainly buy cheaper filters, it's questionable whether you should put them in front of your best glass though.
🙏✋ Extra Good job🤝😘👍 Wow. Great view, I love to see new places 👍❤️ Great movie 👍👋 Bravo 👋 And I have a new movie from a walk around the city 😊 Yours sincerely, DJ Janusz from Warsaw Poland 🇵🇱😘🎶🎵🙏✋
I always say on the topic of filters. You don't want to put cheap glass in front of your expensive glass. :-) The 112s are certainly expensive, but it's a lot of very high quality glass and intended to go in front of incredibly expensive lenses like the big Zeiss lenses, long primes or Nikon's 2.8 S trinity. 82mm is plenty for many and while not cheap, again... bargain filters tend to adversely affect image quality.
Been using Kase filters for about a year, love'em. Easy to use, no vignetting when stacking two or more, and they clean easier than others.
I have the Kase 82mm Wolverine magnetic system and love them. I use filters so much more often now because it is so easy. Before, unless I was planning on taking time to set them all up, I would just skip it. With the Kase, I use them all the time. If I crack any of mine (unlikely given how tough), I'll think of your site Henry.
Great vid Hudson, you help me to settle on a filter system. I've been watching a lot of pro's like your self on the various filter systems they use, and honestly it gets a bit overwhelming. Needless to say i've seen a few others that talk about the Kase system, but I have to admit your review was a bit better and nailed the concerns I had to go forward with Kase. As I am in Canada, and the exchange rate sucks, I ordered the kit directly from Kase Canada, otherwise I would have supported you via your website. Cheers and thanks again!!
Thanks Stephen!
I too just switched to Kase magnetic circular filters. Love them especially on the beach here in Florida. Doing sunrises and sunsets become so much easier when stacking.
I was already planning on getting Kase filters for that magnetic system and now this just confirms that they are absolutely what I'm saving up for.
Thanks Gabe! Hit me up with any questions you have and consider my site when you grab them.
Subscribed. I’ve been looking at filters and zeroed in on Case. This was the 1st of your videos I’ve watched and it convinced me. Ordering Case now.
Thanks man. You know I have them in my store. Www.hudsonhenry.com/kase Still loving them
Kase magnetic filters rock! Screw on filters suck! I have dropped and broken large circular polarizing filters when trying to screw it on. Other times they get stuck on. Last April I dropped a Polar Pro filter on a bridge over the Merced River when I was trying to attach it to my lens. Did it land next to me? No, I watched as it rolled over the edge and gone forever. Magnetic... click and attached. Grab and pull off. It is a NO BRAINER. Thank you Hudson for sharing this information with us. And for your great youtube channel!
You’ve convinced me Kase is the way to go. Will be ordering the 112mm Revolution kit to work with my Nikon trinity and the HB-97. Do you have any experience with Kase’s HB-97 equivalent hood?
I just bought a kase magnetic set and it works great, thanks for recommendation.
Magnetic Filters are a game changer really quick to put the filters on and off and stack them, I use the 82mm Haida Filters cause I’m familiar with them and used to use their M10 kit. I do carry the Haida magnetic filters in a Kase case though! 😄
Having bought into the Kase system a few months ago, a note for all you Nikon Z mount users out there. If you don't plan on using the 14-24 F2.8 z and instead stick with the 14-30 F4 z like myself, get the 95mm filter set. I initially ordered the 82mm set, but there was a pretty noticeable vignette at 14mm, and forget stacking. I returned and switched to 95mm and used step up rings as Hudson has shown in this video. No vignetting even with stacked filters at 14mm on that 14-30mm. The bonus is that at 95mm, I can even put them now on my 200-500mm which I never really planned on.
Or better yet future proof yourself with the 112mm set and the hb-97 hood that snaps right on the 14-30 as well as all the 2.8 zooms. :) dead simple. Twist... Click
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Hi Hudson. Thanks for all this great information! Just to make sure I understand correctly, are you saying that the HB-97 hood is compatible with the 14-30 F4 S? I understand that it fits the 2.8 zooms, but if I can use it on my 14-30 F4, then I think I will go with the 112mm set to be future ready. Everything I can find online says that the HB-97 is compatible with only the 2.8.
It sure does. Here's my B&H link: bhpho.to/3zkdfRn I can confirm it clicks right onto the 14-30 S and all the 2.8 S zooms. it's fabulous. I have a feeling they will keep making it a standard for wider bodied lenses. I just wish it fit the 20 1.8 too. :-) Ah well. I have a 77-112 magnetic adapter ring for that. Oh the kit & individual Kase filters are at my site at www.hudsonhenry.com/kase
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Thank you for confirming. That's awesome. I really appreciate the response. I will use your links and place an order soon.
Hudson, wanted your thoughts on the right kit. Have the 14-24 2.8, 50 1.2 & 70-200 2.8 z lenses, Z9. Plan on doing astro and long exposure landscape.
I was avoiding using filters because of the cumbersome to use filter holders. They are bulky and take space in my pack. The Kase filters changed that. I have the 95 mm kit with the adapter rings. I use it a lot when the situation requires it. As you mentioned, it is a dream to use. The magnets made the filters stackable and easy to put on and off. I recommend going one size bigger than your lens diameter and get the adapter rings to avoid vignetting. Thank you, Hudson!
I love the 112s. :)
That totally depends on the lens in question. With my 20 1.8S, a single native 77 filter can vignette, but you can stack as many 112s as you want or a couple of 82mm filters. With my 70-200 S you can stack a couple of native 77s just fine. Here's the deal. Bigger is always better when you do this math and no two lenses or filter brands are the same. ;)
Charleston, SC native here. Love the night picture of the Ravenel Bridge on the monitor on the left in the background.
David Archer and I run spring workshops there frequently. He's a native too. I love your city. :-)
@@HudsonHenryPhoto No way!! I will look into those workshops. Thank you!
Subscribe here and get on my email list. You'll know. :)
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Subscribed and just signed up for the email list. Thank you!
Is there a better order when stacking CPL and ND? (Lens+ND+CPL or Lens+CPL+ND)
Thank you so much. Great Review. I was making decision between this Wolverine magnetic and Nisi V6 150mm. Nisi gives full option built-in CPL and 2 slots for square filters, but it is really really bulky, hard to carry around, and required time to set up. Today after watching your review, I went out and tested 112 GND kit. I was struggling between square and circular system, since I usually shoot long exposure in daytime, and ND1000 is still not enough. Normally I stack Nisi ND1000 and ND64 to get 16 stop. I use normal screw-in ND with 2 NDs, there is no vignette at 14mm. But if I need PL, then problem occurs at 14mm, I have to zoom in at 18.5 to get rid of all vignette.
So, today, I ran out to the dealer, I live in Thailand, and test for three stacking. Surprisingly, no vignette at 14mm!!! OMG!!! (Haven’t got a chance to test 4, they have only one and last set) So, I do not have to hesitate choosing square or circular anymore. These circular glasses are soooo compact and light weights. Super easy to travel with, just only a small bag and HB-97 then I good to go with all the trilogy lenses. Very fast set up, I just leave the magnetic adapter on HB-97. And so much convenient switching filters and swap through lenses.
Thanks
Just an FYI, but the thumbnail for this video says "Nikion" instead of Nikon. I just bought a set of 82mm magnetic filters and am excited to try them out. For someone living in China, it's interesting to see where they are branching out.
Thanks for the introduction to Kase filters. I will defiantly check out your web site.
Love the video and you’re absolutely right about Kase filters. Bought my first 2 years ago and just had to upgrade to an 82mm set for the 14-24 Z lens. Wish I’d have seen you advice about size before. I managed to sell my old kit for a very good price, the company are really helpful and responsive here in the UK.
Sorry Nicole it’s the 14-30mm lens that I have but haven’t noticed any vignetting with that lens and love the Kase filters! It was such a faff juggling screw thread filters, glasses, remote etc but magnetic filters make the job so more pleasurable.
I absolutely agree with your decision regarding Kase filters. I was sold on the 112mm version after your last video comparison. The magnetic system with the easy on/off regarding Nikon's large filter adapter (HB-97) for the Z 14-24 2.8 and no vignetting were key factors. To keep costs down I'm using the HB-97 with the 2.8 Nikon trilogy for the Z system. The only concern I've noted was the accumulation of dust getting behind the filter while using the HB-97 at extreme locations such as southeast Utah. Kase's quality is top notch.
Yeah, i've been working with folks to try and produce a back cap for the HB-97 while it's off the camera.
Hello Hudson, I purchased the Kase 112mm package from you and now i am looking to expand and get graduated filters. I use the Z9, 24-120mm F4, the 70-200MM F2.8 and the wide 14-24mm F2.8. I want to make sure i get the correct adaptor to add the rectangular grad filters. What should i be buying?
Really interesting video Hudson! Do you recommend to use larger filters (with a step up adapter) for a specific lens (i.e. a 82mm filter for a 77mm lens)? Or just keep it simple and use a 77mm filter for a 77mm lens? Thanks for your answer in advance"
I have a Nikkor 14-24mm 1:2.8G wide lens. Kindly advice which set of filters should I purchase.
Hudson - You helped me out a few days ago and I got one more for you. Seeing that I'll eventually get the 14-24 Z lens, do you recommend just getting the 112 size set and then getting the 77-112 step-up ring for all my other else 70-200 and the 100-400? Finalizing the gear for the Antarctica trip (pocketbook is feeling it). Again much appreciated and I owe you dinner and beer if we ever cross paths!
Yes. You'll never regret the magnetic kase 112s. I have them here: www.hudsonhenry.com/kase If you have the 70-200 S that hb-97 112mm hood that comes with it snaps right to that too as well as the 24-70 2.8S, the 14-30 and the 50 1.2 You can get it at B&H separate too. I have it linked here with filtration. Www.hudsonhenry.com/atslinks hit me up with any more questions. Hope we do link up out there! Have fun on the trip! Jealous.
That's so funny. I just posted a forum thread on DPR asking for filter recommendations... 1st reply was for Kase :D.
I love em. Hit me up with any questions at all.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Will do. Will use your affiliate link as well... I'm also looking for a good Diffuser. Looking at PM, Moment, and K&F. Had some good suggestions on the DPR replies. (www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4587996)
I purchased the 82mm set in April 2020 on Amazon before they started getting popular. Since they have gotten so much press the price went up to around $100 more than what I paid for them a year ago. I noticed a slight magenta color cast that was also pointed out by another UA-camr. At the time I was using a Sony with most of my lenses 67mm so great setup. But few months ago I bought a Canon R6 with the 15-35mm f2.8 lens that has a 82mm filter thread. There is lots of mechanical vignetting at anything bellow 20mm. But few days ago I started using my Sony again and will give the Kase filters another go.
Hmmmm, I've seen no cast myself and shooting the Xrite color checker certainly doesn't lie... I wonder if they upgraded the glass??? Yep, if you're shooting ultra-wide there's no substitute for the 112s. I can stack em at 14mm without issue. I love em.
I’m considering a switch from Lee. My new Nikon, Z 14-30 means that my Lee 100 mm system doesn’t work. But I have really enjoyed the 100x150 graduated filters . With the circular system what do you do for graduated…??
ua-cam.com/video/Lbuv-KRp5JM/v-deo.html I hope you'll watch the above video. It's a little bit older ats and I'm working on an update to it. It remains very valid though. I very much believe graduated filters do far more harm than good in today's age. I used them for a decade starting about 22 years ago. :) if you do go kase, you'll be blown away by the 112mm system. Thanks in advance for looking here at them: www.hudsonhenry.com/kase
I also want to buy Kase magnetic filters, they seem to be really good. Watched almost every review I could find :)
Only "downside" is that I need 95mm filters for my Nikon 14-30 with 82mm filter thread to avoid vignetting. And those are quite big ...
They should release 86mm filters or so :)
The 112s with either the 82-112 magnetic step up or the hb-97 hood that fits it and all the 2.8 zooms is the dream setup on it. Stack away without fear of vignetting. I love the 112s. Check em out at www.hudsonhenry.com/kase
The 95mm are not that big. Have them, and love them
@@HudsonHenryPhoto looking at the Kase website, it looks like they don't make the 112mm step rings for anything smaller than 82mm. Can you confirm that? If so, would you advocate adding yet another step ring to get from 82mm to say 72 or 77? Here's where maybe the 95mm size might be better.
Yep, I have the 82 and 95 steps on my site too. Just use a __ to 82 step. Vignetting clearly won't be an issue from smaller than 82. I think Nikon is clearly ahead of the curve with the 112 hood for the 2.8 trilogy. I'll bet other brands are looking at them and thinking about it too. 112 gives you more leeway not to vignette on a big wide angle and truly future proofs you. :) I love em. I'm sold.
Hudson the neutral night appears to be miss labeled as a UV protective filter, itss going to take some time to save for tese but I love them anf they will be such a big help
Thanks David. Hit me up with any questions you have. Email is best.
Quick question.. I'm using the z50, will the clip-in neutral night filter work for the z50 since the mount is the same or not since the sensor is a different size?
As always I love your videos, you have taken me out of a couple of doubts that I had with these filters. I have been a user of 100mm nisi filters for many years, but I think I will give a change to Kase filters. I have an R5 and I usually use my rf 15-35 of 82mm for landscape with this, I have been thinking about buying a set of 95mm kase filters to avoid vignette problems and use them also with my other 77mm lenses, do you think it is a good option? or better I go for an 82mm kit?
Oh man Rafael... Tricky choice. Do you find the 15-35 vignettes easily? Would you want to stack filters on it? Why don't you email me at hi@hudsonhenry.com so I be sure to not miss the conversation in the feed.
These 112mm bad boys are on my wish list. Thanks for the tip that using the large 14-24 hood on all of the new Z f/2.8 lenses really makes this a fantastic solution. When I buy them, it will be from your website... just saving my pennies... might need to roll a few trick or treaters soon. :P
This is great; thanks for sharing.
Did you get a chance to look at their clip on filters?
I have tried them. I think the magnetics are so much easier and more flexible to use. I could see a neutral night internal, but there are many situations where I don't want to open my sensor up to install and swap.
One concern I have about magnetic filters is having them get knocked off while walking around town or hiking. Do these have a strong enough magnet so that's not a concern if a camera is hanging off the side of the body while in motion?
Yes, absolutely.
Great concept, but unfortunately I have too much money invested in good quality threaded and square filters to just put them aside and start over again. Your suggested "kit" is quite reasonable though and if I was just beginning I'd jump on it. I'll just have to make do with what I have for the foreseeable future....
Hudson, great job as always. When I was thinking through which filter system to invest in, the one thing that gave me pause about a magnetic system is changing out the filter in the winter (at least for those of us in New England) with gloves on. Do you have a perspective on this?
It's easier with my gloves than unthreading a traditional polarizer by far. :-)
Hi Henry!
Very good video with important information for me. Thank you very much. 🙏
I would like to have your opinion.
I already have the Z 14-30 f4.
I'm looking for a brighter lens for night shot. Should I sell the Z 14-30 and get the Z 14-24? Or I should keep the Z 14-30 and add the Z 20mm 1.8?
I already have the Z 24-70 f2.8 and Z 70-200 f2.8.
I also looking to buy the Kase Wolverine Magnetic 112mm kit filter as a one filter solution thank to the Nikon lens hood hb-97 who fit on my two Z f2.8 lenses.
What do you think about this situation?
Thank you so much for your help.
The HB-97 hood also fits the 14-30 F4 S! :-) The 14-30 is a fabulous lens. So small, light and sharp. The 14-24 is even better with very special color rendition and contrast, but it's far bigger and much more expensive. I find myself using the 20 1.8 much more for star work since I use a MSM tracker and can easily shoot at low ISO with longer shutter speeds. With the 14-24 at F2.8 and 500 ISO I need 240seconds to the 20 1.8s 90s at F1.8. With long exposure noise reduction that saves over 5 minutes per exposure. Both lenses are fabulous. Sharp in the corners with no coma wide open which is a miracle. You can learn more about the filters at www.hudosnhenry.com/kase and email me any time with follow-up questions. You'll never regret the Kase 112s for your system. They're just incredible.
Hi Hudson. Are the 112mm circular filters exclusively for Nikon lenses, or could I use an 82 to 112mm adapter for my R5 and 15-35mm? I own the 82mm set, but I begin to experience vignetting when shooting ultra wide. I'm wondering if I should skip the 95mm set, and just go with the 112mm to avoid these same issues if I invest in a 28-70 down the line which is 95mm.
That will 100% work and you'll love them. I use them even on my Z50 with the tiny 49mm thread kit lenses and I used them testing the R5 too. :) I've got them at www.hudsonhenry.com/kase hit me up with any followup questions at hi@hudsonhenry.com :)
Does the Kase Filter just connect straight on to the Nikon S12-24 Lens hood or do you screw an adaptor into it and the put the Filter on?
That hood comes with the 14-24 S, but it fits all the 2.8 S zooms S as well as the 14-30 and the 50 1.2 S lenses. I'm crossing my fingers for the 100-400 S too. There's a very thin magnetic adapter ring in the kit that threads into the hood then the magnetic filters just drop in and snap tight, even stacked. There's more details at www.hudsonhenry.com/kase
Hello Hudson, what do you do with your 77mm nikon z 70-200 2.8. There is not an adapter 77 to 112 mm.
The HB-97 112mm hood snaps right on to all the 2.8 Zooms (not just the 14-24) as well as the 14-30 f4. The cover image of this video is the 70-200 S with that hood and a 112mm filter. Click, it's that simple. Here's the Hood: bhpho.to/3zkdfRn
This looks like a great option for the trinity of Z-mount f/2.8S zoom lenses for my Z7 II. I discovered (quite by accident) that the Nisi Filter holder I ordered for my 14-24mm f/2.8S fit on all three lenses.
My question is this: did you notice any color shifts with the Kase filters that had to be corrected in post?
NO. Not at all. :-) YOu can see in the video where I shoot the color checker through the 10stop ND. :-) Great filters. I've got another video at www.hudsonhenry.com/kase
Hi Hudson, I am planning to invest in a filter system as I currently use NISI and want something magnetic for ease of use. Can you send me a link as all my lenses are 77mm and like to get a kit and also additional 3 rings 77 and caps. I live in Canada and can you ship it and any extra cost involved.
Hey Ruben. I really recommend the 82mm to future proof yourself against some wider lens down the road you decide you need as well as vignetting on your current wide angle.
We have all the 82mm gear in stock. If you're dead set on 77mm, we can get that too very quickly. My distributor is across town. We do ship to Canada, but email me to set that all up. We can invoice you for it. I'm in Glacier NP now with very limited data, so please send an email to both Woody and me. Hi@hudsonhenry.com & shop@hudsonhenry.com in the meantime you can see what we carry at www.hudsonhenry.com/kase Thanks so much!
Does the 82mm filters vignette on the Z14-30S lens? Thx
I just tested with the CPL (it and the neutral night, while still thin are a tiny bit thicker than the NDs) It's still so thin that the vignetting at 14 that I don't see any vignetting. If there is any, you can't detect on on the back LCD and I'm sure it would be 100% correctable in post.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto so you are not 100% sure, if you applies that I can correct in post.
Do you think using the HB-97 lens hood on the 70-200 is too short versus the standard HB-92? Wonder if you can afford it to use both size Kase magnetic filters? Thanks
There's really no need to carry both. Once you have the pack of 112s in your hand, you'll see what I mean. As an ambassador they are supplying me with filters to demo to my workshop students in both sizes, but I don't carry the 82s much. I LOVE the 112s. A couple adapter rings and it's on my 50 1.8 with the 62mm thread (62-82 standard ring + 82-112 magnetic ring). The bag of 6 112 filters really isn't that much bigger in my bag than the 82s and they are so thin and light. It's not a big deal to toss that hood, a couple adapters and the filter pouch in the bag. Say goodbye to vignetting. :-)
On the 70-200: when you use the hood with the filters, it's not really about avoiding ghosting or flare. it's about applying the filters. It's nearly impossible to use filters with the deep stock hood, so this at least gives you some minimal protection and you still have the stock hood for shooting near into the sun or bright artificial lights.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Hudson, thanks as always. Will try the 112's for my 14-24 and then see if I find them too large for other lens. Would be nice to carry just one size!
Thanks, Hudson. Great video. You have me sold on Kase and almost convinced on getting 112 mm;-).
Do you still use a traditional protective filter on your lenses?
I do, but I I don't need a slew of them with the Kase system anymore. I just have a single magnetic 82 and 112. If conditions are rough, I slap it on, it's so easy and it makes swapping to a CPL or ND just one step easier if I need. :) It's not in the kit, but I do have them on my site separately along with the neutral nights and kit filters. www.hudsonhenry.com/kase.
I can only afford three filters, caps and case. I’m defiantly getting CPL but not sure what Density to get. 3 and 6? 3 and 10? 6 and 10? Also do you have issues with “light leak” with the Nikon hood/Filter adapter? Or should I consider Nisi hood in the future?Thanks so much.
I'm not a fan of the nisi hood. It's really heavy and doesn't fit the non 14-24 lenses as well as the Nikon hood. Never had the slightest light leak with the HB97. I have both and much prefer the Nikon. If you must, I'd go cpl, 6 and 10. The cpl acts like a 2 in a pinch. But look close, if you get at least three things (like the kit with two cheap accessories) you get 10% off at my store www.hudsonhenry.com/kase. With that deal the whole stack cap pro kit is about what you say is in your budget. The case, caps, CPL, 3,6 & 10 stop plus a couple adapters. :)
@@HudsonHenryPhoto yeah with the 10% off I’m right around $650 for the bunch. $799 for the kit. I’m defiantly buying from you. Really appreciate the advice!
@@HudsonHenryPhoto really appreciate the help Hudson! Got my order in today! Really looking forward to receiving these. My 14-24 f2.8 S and 70-200 f2.8 S will be very happy! Don’t have the 24-70 yet but do have a 50mm 1.8 s, pretty happy with this setup. Thanks again 👍🏻👍🏻
Do you not worry about the magnetism from the filter holder magnetising the parts in your lens, which could cause the aperture to stick, let alone the delicate electronic parts ? Seems a bit risky ? Would like to know your feedback in 12 months.
I've been using Manfrotto's Xume magnetic system for over 5 years. Never a concern or problem with any of my gear. I've been extensively using these much better Kase magnetic filters on Sony, Canon and Nikon (D850, D500, Z6, Z7, Z50, Z6ii, Z7ii, A1 & R5 and enough lenses it would take a paragraph to list for over the past 6 months before deciding to switch. I don't make such choices lightly No concerns or problems. Rest easy on that one.
Thank you for the feedback, that’s so reassuring to to know, I feel more confident about ordering some now.
Am I going to see vignetting using 82mm Kase filters on a Canon RF 15-35 f/2.8? It has 82mm filter threads.
Yes
Henry - would you recommend the Night filter they offer for cityscapes at night? Or mostly astro?
I like the effect on cityscapes at bluehour too. It cleans up some of that sodium vapor haze, but it's most important for astro. First name is Hudson, but no big deal at all.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Thank you Hudson. And with a last name like mine, it is a big deal so my apologies for screwing up your name. Love your work and your passion for photography and spreading the good word.
Will the Manfrotto Xume magnet adapter rings work with the Kase magnetic filter rings?
No not at all, but you don't need them to. The filters come with a much better made, stronger magnetic ring.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Would you want to keep rings on multiple lenses? If so, one can get extra rings?
I tend to just use it with the lens I'm working with. Easy swap. :) of course you can. I can either stock that or get you links. :) individual filters each come with them too, I have extras for my uv and neutral night, but I tend to only carry one.
I do love my Kase magnetic filters :)
Do sell a neutral night filter for the for a Nikon 20/1.8s lens? If so, would this be a magnetic filter?
Yes. I recommend the 82mm natural night magnetic and 77-82 adapter in my store at. Www.hudsonhenry.com/kase there's a short video there explaining why
Will think about it - no question on the convenience factor. But, I’ve invested heavily into the NiSi system for all my lenses including the dedicated hood and 112mm filters they have for the 14-24. I use cheap cotton gloves as the workaround to keep everything print-free in the field (magnets would be a lot easier!).
The NiSi filters are wonderful quality too. I tested them extensively as well and loved em.
Did you hit the Staten Island Ferry?
No not on that trip. We took the kids to the Statue of Liberty though. :-)
What happens if a Magnetic filter makes contact with a CF Express card, or SD card. If they are in your backpack or pocket?
I keep my CF Express cards in a pelican like little case in my bag's top pocket and my kase filters in a really wonderful soft lined 6 filter, ballistic nylon case the kit comes with in the main compartment. It's not a concern for me because those items aren't loose together. Those filters are optical gems and not cheap. Ditto the CF Express cards. Never left loose. Those are the kind of items you take care with. It's like making sure the lid is on your water bottle before tossing it in your camera bag. Standard of care.
That said, the CF Express cards are so tough, they'd probably be fine. Not planning to test it though. ;)
What other brands magnetic filters did you compare with before settling on Kase?
I've tested Haida and Freewell filters in the past and not been a huge fan. I had been a Hoya ambassador for years and loved their HD3 and Solas lines, but they lacked 112s so I looked around. I tested the heck out of Kase and NiSi. Both shocked me with the optical and glass quality, but the Kase were so dead easy to use. The magnetic system is fabulous, but the glass is not a let down from the best of the best that I'm accustomed to using.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto isn't the Kase very similar to Freewell in terms of functionality and both have the 112mm filter. Is there something about Freewell that you did not like?
Quality of glass dissaponted, but it was a while ago. With filters you really do get what you pay for generally though. Well crafted optical engineering and production isn't cheap. You've got some of the best glass ever in those S lenses. Be careful to not degrade it with substandard filters. :)
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Freewell filters look and feel like high quality too. I own them but was curious about Kase. And many youtube reviews have rated them highly, close to Breakthrough X4 and PolarPro.
The Kase magnetic filter system certainly looks very interesting, but I don't understand why every filter (outside of a kit) seems to come with its own adapter. Surely the point of the system is that you have just one adapter attached to the lens, to which you then attach different magnetic filters.
If you buy a single filter, you need a ring, sure you might not need one for your 2nd or third, but you do for the first and it's nice they include it instead of making you buy them as an accessory. :)
Sorry, Hudson, this doesn't seem to be a good justification. Why not just sell the adapter separately? As you say, if I buy 3 filters I end up with 3 adapters, rather than just 1. To be honest, it seems like a marketing decision which is at conflict with the whole design principle of the system (which is to separate out the screw-threaded adapter from the optical glass).
This honestly is the first time I've heard complaints about a company including the accessories required for use instead of charging extra. I really just don't comprehend the issue. Some people want a ring on every lens, some people only buy one filter (a ND, a CPL). Nice that they need not buy an extra part to make it work. I mostly hear questions about why adapter rings to smaller sizes aren't included. This is the only complaint so far about too much being included.
I don't quite believe that the adapters are included 'free of charge'. Here in the UK the sale cost of a separate112mm adapter is £40, and the cost of a filter (with adapter) is £199. If I could buy a single adapter for £40 and multiple filters for £159 each then that would be great. But, of course, sale cost is not the same as production cost. My guess is that the actual production cost of the adapter is so low that Kase do not think it worth selling filters both with and without adapter. Anyway, following your persuasive recommendation, I am probably going to order some Kase magnetic filters (unfortunately not from your site since I am in the UK).
While I have your attention, Hudson, can you comment on the issue of light leakage with the Nikon HB-97 hood and Kase magnetic ND filters when performing long exposures. I have seen a forum comment to the effect that you do not consider this to be a problem. Is this correct? I am trying to decide whether it is worth getting the Nisi hood.
Totally understand. I had the opportunity to stock the Kase Filters without rings, but the price bump was negligible. No. I have seen zero light leaks. The hood is great and it fits all the lens barrels identically. The nisi (which I've tested) is nice, but quite heavy and does not fit the non 14-24 lenses well. The grooves on the 14-24 are slightly larger than the other lenses. Nikon designed the hb-97 to be universal. Nisi designed their hood to the 14-24. It's scary tight trying to twist it on the 70-200. Not advised.
You live in Hawaii? which island?
I live in Portland, but I've spent a lot of time on Kauai. Long family history there on the north shore.
Love the concept.. but can't quite swallow the price for a 112m setup...
Yeah, I think the 112 set is really only needed for those investing a lot in glass, 2.8 zooms, zeiss, big primes. 82mm makes sense for everyone else. The Kase isn't a bargain brand even at 82mm, but they are worth the premium.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto I have the Nikon Z 14-30 F4 lens which has 82mm threads.. Would I get vignetting if I went with the 82mm filter set? I was looking at the 95mm to avoid any vignetting? ..
You can get way with very minimal vignetting using one of the Kase 82mm filters as the set up is so thin, but... If you're considering ever moving to the 2.8 or adding a long prime the 112s will future proof you. Nikon seems committed to the 112 hood standard for its ultra wide and top end lenses and it works brilliantly. Email me with any more questions. Hi@hudsonhenry.com
No grads?
The only time I'd consider grads these days are for video or time-lapse where I can't exposure blend. I tossed my grads for stills about 10 years ago after Art Wolfe made that point to me. Rarely does the world toss you a straight contrast line across your scene. Exposure blending through bracketing gives you a more nuanced way to get all the data wherever the tones lie in the composition.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto Thank you Henry. I shot film for 25 years so I really am a beginner again after a 11+ year pause. All of your content is a new thought process for me. I revisited the inside of of a wrecked house to shoot the bedroom again after being resigned that the windows will blow out. Ha, I shot 20 frames own manual decreasing each exposure by 1 second. In Lr I did an HDR Merge, ended up with a 95 Meg DNG with everything exposed correctly. Thanks bro.
@@michaeld9758 I can relate to this. I've never even used auto focus, or a camera that can adjust iso. Its a learning curve for sure.
after your previous review, I got the Kase magnetic 112mm polariser for the z14-24 f2.8 and it's great! thank you.
update: Sadly shipping to the UK is pretty expensive and on top DHL charge a "service" fee, so I can't buy through you. Apologies, but I'm sure you understand. thanks Hudson
Absolutely understand, but email me. We might be able to work out a shipping discount. :) hi@hudsonhenry.com
I rented the z 70-200 this week and I must say the focusing on this lens is horrific. It's so bad I don't think I will buy it. I wish someone could do a video on this as it's a known issue
The S lens? One of the finest focusing lenses I've used to date... I have a couple dozen friends who report the same. I've owned every copy of the 70-200 made by Nikon (VR, VRII, FL-ED & S) and no other has autofocussed as accurately, quickly or quietly as the S... It's also sharper. Wonder if your rental copy took a hit or something. Maybe the wrong mode? 🤷 I am shocked to see someone actuality type those words about this fabulous a lens. It's rather renowned as the best 70-200 currently made by anyone.
@@HudsonHenryPhoto hey thanks for the feedback. I'm having issues focusing on clouds. Also, I'm using pinpoint focus. I switched to a wider focus point and it still struggles. I would maybe challenge you to try and focus on clouds or maybe I'm being unrealistic with it? Maybe the rental is crap but, I've confirmed this difficulty in focusing from others on UA-cam
I've seen a couple of youtube photogs pushing Kase filters in the last 6-12 months. 1 showed up since with square filters, the other said he avoids filters as much as possible now. I think the 3rd guy might have said something about the magnets not working as well as expected.
Seems overpriced compared to square or spending a few seconds more.
I've been testing the first set I've had for over a year. It's held up incredibly well. Still loooks like new and I push my gear hard. I always advocated using the Manfrotto Xume magnetic system for my past filters, but they quit making it, and it added the potential to vignette with wide angles. Sadly it wasn't nearly as well made as these. These filters are incredibly well made, not sure who you're watching, but my opinion is that these are as premium and innovative as it gets. The thin design lets you stack, the magnetic stacking makes the use dead simple, the durability is top notch and I'm sure like me you've dealt with a frustrating stuck thread while the epic light changes. I'm personally done with that. Not only that, they're great to work with and responsive to my input. You can certainly buy cheaper filters, it's questionable whether you should put them in front of your best glass though.
🙏✋ Extra Good job🤝😘👍
Wow. Great view, I love to see new places 👍❤️
Great movie 👍👋 Bravo 👋
And I have a new movie from a walk around the city 😊
Yours sincerely, DJ Janusz from Warsaw Poland 🇵🇱😘🎶🎵🙏✋
I'll hold off on those filters, too pricey for my wallet.
I always say on the topic of filters. You don't want to put cheap glass in front of your expensive glass. :-) The 112s are certainly expensive, but it's a lot of very high quality glass and intended to go in front of incredibly expensive lenses like the big Zeiss lenses, long primes or Nikon's 2.8 S trinity. 82mm is plenty for many and while not cheap, again... bargain filters tend to adversely affect image quality.