McKinnon used to be my go-to, but he can do one now. Your videos give me everything I’m looking for - honesty, humility, enthusiasm, positivity, gratefulness. Don’t stop what you’re doing Henry.
I have to say your enthusiasm for the outdoors and photography is inspiring Henry. You make me want to get off my arse and get out there and shoot something (in the figurative/photographic sense). Your photography tips are useful too, cheers.
I think I agree with you with the no ND in the waterfall pic...water become too black in the 40 sec...but is all very subjective as usual!!Both great pics mate!!Thanks for your videos again!!!Keep it up!!OUTTT
In this instance I prefer the shorter exposure as I like moving water to look like water rather than a jug of cream being poured into a bowl of steam. But I was glad to hear your recommendation because I bought my first ND filter last month - a 10-stop 😄
10 stop is always in my bag, was the first filter I bought and love it. In terms of the image I preferred the one without the use of the 10 stop as personally i try to strike the balance between movement and detail for rivers and waterfalls. I like to use my 10 stop on seascapes and cityscape images along with my 13 & 16 stops. Nice images Henry and a good discussion to boot
hi Harry I do like using a 10 stop myself as I live in Cornwall and photograph the sea a lot also love to try and find Rivers to photograph loving your last waterfall shot
Just bought myself a 10 stop and a variable + CPF 2 in 1 after watching this and various other videos. Absolutely love watching your videos man. Legend!
I personally like the shorter exposures as there is still some detail in the water. Thanks for the great ND advice. Just working out what I would like for my camera now!!
As for the shutter speed preference for the waterfalls, I prefer the 1/4 second exposure in this case because it's closer to reality, closer to what your eye sees. If you are looking for a my magical/ethereal look, the of course the longer SS works. I came to this video three years later because I'm looking to get an ND and don't have the money to buy an entire kit of them. But, I also don't want to get a VND. So, you're the second video I've seen recommending the 10 stop as a good single filter. Thanks!
Henry, your enthusiasm is so infectious! All I want to do is go out with my camera right now! The only problem with that, it's a little dark at 6.30pm in the winter! Ah well.....☹️....👍 Ps... Loving your videos
Hi Henry well I would be stuck on that one as I like it with and without filter on. I suppose I would do all like you did and admire them. They are brilliant.
oh man i wish i knew what you where talking about,it all seems so complicated just to take a picture.cant say which exposure i liked best as i dont know what on earth you mean,all i can say is the images were beautiful,the waterfall ones are just gorgeous and thank you for sharing,cheers Henry.
@@janetsharp122 thank you Janet but the reason i dont understand is because im not a photographer i find it fascinating and love the images Henry posts but the technical side is way over my head,but thank you for the kind words,best wishes.
I'm a bit surprised that there is so little difference in the waterfall photos. I have no real preference here, but the quarter-second exposure gives me most of what I'd want. Thanks for the comparison!
Henry, thank you for showing us that the best part of landscape photography is getting out and discovering the beauty of our world...... Living the dream! MINT
I'm enjoying your video's I've never had a go at landscape before ,we are having a week at the lake district in the autumn so hope to have a go at this, I'm making notes on what settings ect and watching your video's multiply times to get an idea, thank you.
The shorter shutter speed after some contemplation. As someone who is just about to embark on a landscape journey, i'm usually wildlife, that was really helpful. I've invested in a few filters, including a 6 stop ND & now can't wait to get out there and try my hand at a landscape vlog.
My first filter purchase was a 10stop filter and I just love using it with my waterfall images....my next filter purchase will be a 6 stop. I love all the images but prefer the longer shutter speed for the first of the 2 waterfall images and the shorter shutter speed on the one after it.
Here I am, backtracking through your videos. I really like the longer exposure shots. The waterfall water just looks smoother and to my eye, the shorter exposure water looks rough, but blurry.
i find myself attracted to the softer look of the long exposure. but nether is wrong or right. both are excellent and your footage is nicly put together and is great to watch and inspiring, Keep it up. Im the opposite side of the UK to you in Lincolnshire and your very right about beauty is all around and that you dont need to travel for miles, its all in your door step.
I have got a 10 stop filter I love it I enjoy long exposure photography even though I am just still learning about photography, love both images thank you for this video
Super late to this, but the first comparison I liked the shorter exposure/no filter one better, and then the second, the longer exposure one gave me a big 'wow' moment. That's pretty consistent with how I feel about filter use in general though, I really think it just depends on the shot!
Personally preferred the shorter exposure, Henry. The longer exposure seemed to make the water too "solid". Not sure if that makes sense. Nonetheless superb pics again H and the explanation of your thinking really helpful. Thank you.
Both hold their own beauty. The shorter exposure has a more natural look, retaining some movement but the 10 stop is so calming to look at. Thanks once again for your informative videos
Great vid Henry. I always have my 10 stop in the bag, but hardly ever use it. The waterfall shot is exactly why I don't use it much. I prefer the shorter exposure - you still get all the movement but retain some detail or texture. The 10 stop turns everything milky which I don't enjoy as much. Great for seascapes, smearing clouds, smoothing ripples on lakes etc, but too much for a waterfall, for me.
I agree with Ben Thorne. Personally, I like both long and short exposures…hope that’s ok. I received a ND filter in a filter package I purchased I had no idea what it was for. Thanks for this great video, now I know what the ND filter is for.
I am glad you went through all the trouble to compare both short and long exposure. It helps me to keep using the nd filters. preference? Short exposure. B.
Great vedio!! Both images have the points that shine throught. I do like both along with the ability to change the look. I just got my first ND filter, a 2 to 8 stop K&F to learn with. Thanks and happy shoting!!
I own a few ND1000's, in different sizes for different lenses. I don't do much landscape photography, reason I have a very basic landscape set up of gear, 10 stopper, cpl filters, one nd8 for some reason and a cable release remote that don't work great, one of the click and lock styles.
cracking shots. i definitely lean toward the longer exposures, although even the shots without the filter turned out with a decent amount of movement in the water. the only thing i can think of adding to your video might be a mention of dealing with color cast and white balance when using the 10 stop. thanks for sharing.
First waterfall shot I prefer the long exposure, 2nd view I prefer the 1/4 second. 1/4 second shows more structure in the water which I like for that one. I suspect you really bring down the highlights in post. Is that right?
i like both, depends what you want. the more analogue smoothing of the water was cool. there's something nice and craft about doing it with glass and time (and not photoshop)
Love both waterfall pictures and the loch on the tarn using the 10 stopper. I'm looking just now at getting a 10 stop so will look at the Nisi. Thanks Henry
Thanks Henry. Good advice. If People were only ever to buy 2 filters, then a 10 stop ND and a Cir Polariser. It appeared a somewhat overcast on your photoshoot vlog..it took a 10 stop to get the SS down. even in those conditions. So important for people to know that if you try to shoot in strong midday sunlight even a 10 stop will not be strong enough (hence why manufacturers produce the 15 stop ND and/or produce filters that are 'stackable'' filters to increase strength. But for one's first ND.... Yep, 10 stop all the way......
Great video I got the 10 stop 1st and yeah glad I got that one 1st although I’ve just ordered the 6 stop as in a low light situation the 10 stop was way too long an exposure but wasn’t long enough without an nd . One last note the nissi app is sound although I prefer the simpler looking Lee filter app. All the best looking forward to more vids 👍👍👍👍
Great video, regarding the waterfall images, I greatly prefer the shorter exposures, in this scenario I don't think a 10 stopper adds anything. For faster moving water like this, I almost always go for shutter speeds between 1/10th of a second to 1 second, anything in-between these values depending on the speed of the water. Similarly, on a beach when trying to shoot retreating wave patterns.
I note that you are using Nisi filters & the app is called Nisi. Does the app only work with Nisi filters or does it still give accurate settings for other makes of filter?
I loved both images. Need to get out and use my filters now. Have you got or thought of getting the magnetic filter rings, one attaches to the lens the other to the filter. So easy to use, I love them.
You are my favourite UA-cam camera man, good real world advice and no hard sell. I live in the Peak District so plenty of opportunity to practice your teaching 👏
On M mode, the longest time for long exposure shooting is 30 seconds. That means we must switch to B mode if the total timing is anything near or above 1 minute right? It must be B mode that is compliance with ND filter.
I like the shorter exposure on the images presented. I use Lee Filters and have enjoyed using those for waterfalls in the USA. Thanks for your videos, always enjoy watching them and seeing the countryside in your part of the world.
I like the shorter exposure it gives more detail in the water shows more movement. Would a polarising filter cut down on some of the reflection on the water surface. Still great shots.
thank you for the video. I will get a 10stop to start with. I like all the photos for different reasons. the landscape waterfall I like the 6 the portrait one I like the 10
I have a 10 stop filter which I have used for many years, however, I never use it for running water as in waterfalls. I prefer to use 1/4 or 1/8 second to maintain a little action, coupled with a polariser to remove the glare and reflections and an appropriate f stop I can achieve my desired image. So yes I prefer the unfiltered image
Great video! I'm currently sat in my home office staring at my computer screen wishing I had your job lol! Joking aside, your channel is fast becoming one of my favourites :) keep up the stellar work!
McKinnon used to be my go-to, but he can do one now. Your videos give me everything I’m looking for - honesty, humility, enthusiasm, positivity, gratefulness. Don’t stop what you’re doing Henry.
Thanks Ben, means a lot mate
BT said it perfectly. The calmness lack of hype along with Henry's maximization of his equipment teaches volumes.
For sure. McKinnon makes great cinematic videos but always feels a bit too flashy. Much better to just get some good solid information like this.
I actually like the shorter exposure as it gives more details
Adding a polariser would have given a bit of detail below the water I think.
I think I prefer the 10 stop shots . It adds a grace to the flow of the water . Thanks Henry 👍
I have to say your enthusiasm for the outdoors and photography is inspiring Henry. You make me want to get off my arse and get out there and shoot something (in the figurative/photographic sense). Your photography tips are useful too, cheers.
I think I agree with you with the no ND in the waterfall pic...water become too black in the 40 sec...but is all very subjective as usual!!Both great pics mate!!Thanks for your videos again!!!Keep it up!!OUTTT
In this instance I prefer the shorter exposure as I like moving water to look like water rather than a jug of cream being poured into a bowl of steam. But I was glad to hear your recommendation because I bought my first ND filter last month - a 10-stop 😄
For me it’s the longer exposures, I like the effect on the water and sky that the 10 ND filter creates ‘mint’
I prefer the longer exposures. I recently bought a 10 stop for this very reason, and you've now confirmed that I did the right thing.
10 stop is always in my bag, was the first filter I bought and love it. In terms of the image I preferred the one without the use of the 10 stop as personally i try to strike the balance between movement and detail for rivers and waterfalls. I like to use my 10 stop on seascapes and cityscape images along with my 13 & 16 stops. Nice images Henry and a good discussion to boot
hi Harry I do like using a 10 stop myself as I live in Cornwall and photograph the sea a lot also love to try and find Rivers to photograph loving your last waterfall shot
Just bought myself a 10 stop and a variable + CPF 2 in 1 after watching this and various other videos. Absolutely love watching your videos man. Legend!
I personally like the shorter exposures as there is still some detail in the water. Thanks for the great ND advice. Just working out what I would like for my camera now!!
As for the shutter speed preference for the waterfalls, I prefer the 1/4 second exposure in this case because it's closer to reality, closer to what your eye sees. If you are looking for a my magical/ethereal look, the of course the longer SS works. I came to this video three years later because I'm looking to get an ND and don't have the money to buy an entire kit of them. But, I also don't want to get a VND. So, you're the second video I've seen recommending the 10 stop as a good single filter. Thanks!
Henry, your enthusiasm is so infectious! All I want to do is go out with my camera right now! The only problem with that, it's a little dark at 6.30pm in the winter!
Ah well.....☹️....👍
Ps... Loving your videos
Xo
.hey aloBla
Al are w
@@scottirvine2754 ??
@@gebsrus Don't know what the confusion is. Looks like Scott's comment is in plain English. lol
@@sdspeedy1 😂🤣😂🤣
Hi Henry well I would be stuck on that one as I like it with and without filter on. I suppose I would do all like you did and admire them. They are brilliant.
Henry, I stumbled across your channel some time ago. Your enthusiasm is infectious!!
I'm rather new to your channel but I really appreciate the time you take to develop the between shots compositions.
Love your enthusiasm. Just got a variable nd. Can't get out to try it due to restrictions. Oh, I prefer the 10.😉
oh man i wish i knew what you where talking about,it all seems so complicated just to take a picture.cant say which exposure i liked best as i dont know what on earth you mean,all i can say is the images were beautiful,the waterfall ones are just gorgeous and thank you for sharing,cheers Henry.
Honestly Steven it will all make sense at some point ...we have all been there..just keep reading and taking photos .
@@janetsharp122 thank you Janet but the reason i dont understand is because im not a photographer i find it fascinating and love the images Henry posts but the technical side is way over my head,but thank you for the kind words,best wishes.
@@stevenharland556 ..you are welcome ..I understand where you are coming from , take care ...
I'm a bit surprised that there is so little difference in the waterfall photos. I have no real preference here, but the quarter-second exposure gives me most of what I'd want. Thanks for the comparison!
Henry, thank you for showing us that the best part of landscape photography is getting out and discovering the beauty of our world...... Living the dream! MINT
My pleasure!
The 2nd image on both for me. I've just recently purchased a 10 stop filter and can't wait to get out and try it. Your videos are great 👍.
I'm enjoying your video's I've never had a go at landscape before ,we are having a week at the lake district in the autumn so hope to have a go at this, I'm making notes on what settings ect and watching your video's multiply times to get an idea, thank you.
I think that the shorter exposure its more dramatic, show as more power on the movement. Shorter or longer depends the subjet.
The shorter shutter speed after some contemplation. As someone who is just about to embark on a landscape journey, i'm usually wildlife, that was really helpful. I've invested in a few filters, including a 6 stop ND & now can't wait to get out there and try my hand at a landscape vlog.
My first filter purchase was a 10stop filter and I just love using it with my waterfall images....my next filter purchase will be a 6 stop. I love all the images but prefer the longer shutter speed for the first of the 2 waterfall images and the shorter shutter speed on the one after it.
Here I am, backtracking through your videos. I really like the longer exposure shots. The waterfall water just looks smoother and to my eye, the shorter exposure water looks rough, but blurry.
i find myself attracted to the softer look of the long exposure. but nether is wrong or right. both are excellent and your footage is nicly put together and is great to watch and inspiring, Keep it up.
Im the opposite side of the UK to you in Lincolnshire and your very right about beauty is all around and that you dont need to travel for miles, its all in your door step.
I think the short exposure leaves some detail in the water and still shows movement.
I'd use both & composite to get fine details in the static areas & the movement where it counts.
Great video. I like the longer exposure to make the pool of water like glass.
I have got a 10 stop filter I love it I enjoy long exposure photography even though I am just still learning about photography, love both images thank you for this video
Simplicity as usual. Love your style.
Super late to this, but the first comparison I liked the shorter exposure/no filter one better, and then the second, the longer exposure one gave me a big 'wow' moment. That's pretty consistent with how I feel about filter use in general though, I really think it just depends on the shot!
Personally preferred the shorter exposure, Henry. The longer exposure seemed to make the water too "solid". Not sure if that makes sense. Nonetheless superb pics again H and the explanation of your thinking really helpful. Thank you.
Both hold their own beauty. The shorter exposure has a more natural look, retaining some movement but the 10 stop is so calming to look at. Thanks once again for your informative videos
Thank you, was trying to decide between the 6 and 10 stop and i think based off this video I will go for the 10 stop.
Amazing. Photos I loved congratulations
I have had good photos with my 6 stop so far so in time will go for the 10 stop 😊, I like your enthusiasm its how I feel when out with my camera
Great video. I liked that. For me the slower exposure is the way to go… have ordered my 1st ND at 10 stop as a result 👍
I’m going for the longer exposures buddy they look more like fine art images, but the 1/4 seconds shots look more natural to me.
Beautiful photos.....and I love the shorter exposures the flow was just nice in them .
I am full of admiration for the knowledge, skills of perseverance in making films .. thank you, best regards
Longer. Thanks for this video, I ran into over-exposure issues today and this answers that question. Keep trekking, mate 👍
Thanks for sharing.... I like both images for different reasons.. I am still learning about ND filters so your video was a great help...
I find the shorter ones really interesting.
Not too fuzzy, not to still.
Just about right.
Good video as always mate👍
Truely magnificent, Bravo! 40 sec exposure was quite marvelous shot I must say!
Wow you give me impression how much u enjoy taking photo and your love of nature , so helpful thanks
Glad you enjoy it!
Great vid Henry. I always have my 10 stop in the bag, but hardly ever use it. The waterfall shot is exactly why I don't use it much. I prefer the shorter exposure - you still get all the movement but retain some detail or texture. The 10 stop turns everything milky which I don't enjoy as much. Great for seascapes, smearing clouds, smoothing ripples on lakes etc, but too much for a waterfall, for me.
I agree with Ben Thorne. Personally, I like both long and short exposures…hope that’s ok. I received a ND filter in a filter package I purchased I had no idea what it was for. Thanks for this great video, now I know what the ND filter is for.
WOW! I definitely prefer the longer than short personally! Incredible shots!
I am glad you went through all the trouble to compare both short and long exposure. It helps me to keep using the nd filters. preference? Short exposure. B.
Great stuff! I do not have a ND filter and I have not known that I needed one, but I am still learning. Thanks for sharing your perspective!
Great advice for people like myself just breaking into long exposure photography...thank you ...preferred the 40s shots myself..😊
Hi, I'm a real novice photographer but I prefer the 4sec exposure, for me it doesn't quite stop all movement, it looks just real. Regards
Great vedio!! Both images have the points that shine throught. I do like both along with the ability to change the look. I just got my first ND filter, a 2 to 8 stop K&F to learn with.
Thanks and happy shoting!!
My first ND filter was a 10 stop and it’s always been my favourite. Great video.
I own a few ND1000's, in different sizes for different lenses. I don't do much landscape photography, reason I have a very basic landscape set up of gear, 10 stopper, cpl filters, one nd8 for some reason and a cable release remote that don't work great, one of the click and lock styles.
I think the long exposure brings out more of the tannin color in the water and produces a better overall effect.
That little lake shot is peacefully stunning. Love the waterfalls. Great work Henry!!!
cracking shots. i definitely lean toward the longer exposures, although even the shots without the filter turned out with a decent amount of movement in the water. the only thing i can think of adding to your video might be a mention of dealing with color cast and white balance when using the 10 stop. thanks for sharing.
Yes Henry, talk about the color shift and white balance. Correctable in post?
Very good discussion. You even executed and give examples on how ND filter works. Thanks!
First waterfall shot I prefer the long exposure, 2nd view I prefer the 1/4 second. 1/4 second shows more structure in the water which I like for that one. I suspect you really bring down the highlights in post. Is that right?
I like the longer exposure better. Gives me a sense of tranquility of the whole scene. Thank you for a nice explained video process.
Both of the filter ones win. Just something that draws you in deeper to them both.
longer exposures are beautiful, but the shorter ones help to capture the violence in the water. hard to choose, really!
i like both, depends what you want. the more analogue smoothing of the water was cool. there's something nice and craft about doing it with glass and time (and not photoshop)
Brilliant video, spectacular scenery . Thanks mate🤟🏾
Love both waterfall pictures and the loch on the tarn using the 10 stopper. I'm looking just now at getting a 10 stop so will look at the Nisi. Thanks Henry
Thanks Henry. Good advice. If People were only ever to buy 2 filters, then a 10 stop ND and a Cir Polariser. It appeared a somewhat overcast on your photoshoot vlog..it took a 10 stop to get the SS down. even in those conditions. So important for people to know that if you try to shoot in strong midday sunlight even a 10 stop will not be strong enough (hence why manufacturers produce the 15 stop ND and/or produce filters that are 'stackable'' filters to increase strength. But for one's first ND.... Yep, 10 stop all the way......
I like the shorter exposure on the vertical image, and the longer exposure on the landscape orientation one
Another great video Henry. It was 8 minutes in before I realized it wasn't raining!
Longer exposure by far! You’ve inspired me to purchase a 10 stop NiSi filter & can’t wait to use it. Thanks for the great videos, very inspirational 📷
Both are really nice but I think I prefer the longer exposure. That’s tougher than I thought it would be to pick between the two.
I love the longer exposure! 😀
The Shorter exposures works well in color, the longer one in B/W
Great video I got the 10 stop 1st and yeah glad I got that one 1st although I’ve just ordered the 6 stop as in a low light situation the 10 stop was way too long an exposure but wasn’t long enough without an nd .
One last note the nissi app is sound although I prefer the simpler looking Lee filter app.
All the best looking forward to more vids 👍👍👍👍
Definitely the long exposure photo eas better. Extremely helpful. Thanks brother 😊.
Great video, regarding the waterfall images, I greatly prefer the shorter exposures, in this scenario I don't think a 10 stopper adds anything. For faster moving water like this, I almost always go for shutter speeds between 1/10th of a second to 1 second, anything in-between these values depending on the speed of the water. Similarly, on a beach when trying to shoot retreating wave patterns.
I note that you are using Nisi filters & the app is called Nisi. Does the app only work with Nisi filters or does it still give accurate settings for other makes of filter?
No it's not exclusive mate, can work with any filter brand
I loved both images. Need to get out and use my filters now. Have you got or thought of getting the magnetic filter rings, one attaches to the lens the other to the filter. So easy to use, I love them.
You are my favourite UA-cam camera man, good real world advice and no hard sell. I live in the Peak District so plenty of opportunity to practice your teaching 👏
Thanks for the kind words Mark
@@HenryTurnerphoto your passion is infectious lol
Hi Henry. I prefer the short exposure on the 1st image and the long exposure on the 2nd. No pleasing some people 😀
Great video! I have a 10 and 6 stop ND. I just downloaded the NISI app. I need to use filters more, I never think of using a ND filter. 🤷♀️.
Definitely the longer exposure. Just love the glass look
I loved the long exposure!
Thank you for this amazing demonstration Henry, i loved this video. You just earned yourself a new sub
On M mode, the longest time for long exposure shooting is 30 seconds. That means we must switch to B mode if the total timing is anything near or above 1 minute right? It must be B mode that is compliance with ND filter.
Both shots have their place, superb photos 👍
Definitely the longer exposures. Provides more depth and richness of color.
I like the shorter exposure on the images presented. I use Lee Filters and have enjoyed using those for waterfalls in the USA. Thanks for your videos, always enjoy watching them and seeing the countryside in your part of the world.
Love your energy and passion for your craft. I actually liked the long and short.
I like the shorter exposure it gives more detail in the water shows more movement. Would a polarising filter cut down on some of the reflection on the water surface. Still great shots.
thank you for the video. I will get a 10stop to start with. I like all the photos for different reasons. the landscape waterfall I like the 6 the portrait one I like the 10
I have a 10 stop filter which I have used for many years, however, I never use it for running water as in waterfalls. I prefer to use 1/4 or 1/8 second to maintain a little action, coupled with a polariser to remove the glare and reflections and an appropriate f stop I can achieve my desired image. So yes I prefer the unfiltered image
Long exposure for me. Top video Henry 👏👏
I just love your excitement and energy!! ❤️❤️
Great video! I'm currently sat in my home office staring at my computer screen wishing I had your job lol! Joking aside, your channel is fast becoming one of my favourites :) keep up the stellar work!
Beautiful scenery there