Pan-Asian Coalition | Battlefield 2142

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 лип 2024
  • As climate change shifted the geopolitical balance of the world, nation states consolidated into larger supranational unions. By 2142, nearly half the world's population was under the authority of the Pan-Asian Coalition.
    The Templin Institute. Investigating alternate worlds.
    New episodes every week.
    Other Divisions & Branches:
    🔹 Patreon | / templininstitute
    🔹 The Templin Commissary | shop.templin.institute
    🔹 Twitch | / templininstitute
    🔹 The Templin Archives | / @templinarchives
    🔹 UA-cam Membership | / @templininstitute
    🔹 Submit Your Episode Idea | ideas.templin.institute/
    Communications & Media:
    🔹 Website | www.templin.institute/
    🔹 Discord | / discord
    🔹 Facebook | / templininstitute
    🔹 Twitter | / templinedu
    🔹 Instagram | / templininstitute
    🔹 Subreddit | / templininstitute
    🔹 Mailing Address | Unit 144 - 919 Centre St SW Calgary, AB T2E 2P6
    Background music Ground Breaker by Isaac Marshall. Used under license from PremiumBeat.com
    Ending music "Battle Forever" used under license from Shutterstock.com.
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 330

  • @TemplinInstitute
    @TemplinInstitute  2 роки тому +75

    We never expected the Twitter plug. twitter.com/TemplinEdu

    • @orderofphleb983
      @orderofphleb983 2 роки тому +2

      Mmm. Yes how could I forget such a integral part of the grand institute

  • @westrim
    @westrim 2 роки тому +346

    I hope this precedes a Templin Dispatch on the PAC or Battlefield 2142 as a whole, because it's one of those underdeveloped and underbaked settings that had much more potential than it realized, if not to the degree that 2042 is turning out to be.

    • @anarchyandempires5452
      @anarchyandempires5452 2 роки тому +9

      I always thought it was kind of weird that they never actually got it American to the game even though they did mention that it still existed and had become an isolationist semi fascistic technocracy under the control of a freaking AI, we never did get to see are awesome paratrooping cyborgs, and UGVs.

    • @danwhowatches707
      @danwhowatches707 2 роки тому +6

      Comparing the setting and lore in 2142 to Battlefield 2042's "lore" is quite the exaggeration, it is nowhere near as empty, hollow and random as 2042. Although underdeveloped and underbaked is agreeable

    • @DaDunge
      @DaDunge 2 роки тому +8

      @@anarchyandempires5452 Actually not having America in the game was a breath of fresh air. Also wasn't the reason for this that the US has basically ceased to exist as it was swallowed up by the ice age and the US population fled to Mexico.

    • @giahuynguyenkim6389
      @giahuynguyenkim6389 2 роки тому +1

      @@danwhowatches707 2042 seems very realistic though, and not hollow at all

    • @ATP2555ify
      @ATP2555ify 2 роки тому +2

      @@anarchyandempires5452 America doesn't have to be in every game

  • @eduardomarrinhas7942
    @eduardomarrinhas7942 2 роки тому +162

    The best Battlefield.

  • @europanzer3929
    @europanzer3929 2 роки тому +234

    One of the things I like about the setting is the role reversal from the usual status quo, with the Russian led Asia as the technologically advanced power while the EU makes do with brute force and thick hide. A rather stark contrast to Endwar, where the EU also stars.

    • @zeehero7280
      @zeehero7280 2 роки тому +32

      EU in endwar uses the pew pew orbital lasers. Murrica be like "Why use lasers when we can achieve even more damage dropping metal rods from orbit?" then russia be like "I had this idea when drinking my 20 gallons of vodka, why do we not put a giant vaccum cleaner into bomb, then we have explosion that clean up itself!"

    • @TheArklyte
      @TheArklyte 2 роки тому +8

      Where is the role reversal though? It's literary "stereotypical USA allies and puppets" vs "stereotypical targets of US propaganda".
      Meanwhile Endwar puts EU at war with US, something anybody very rarely has the balls to do. Pity that it didn't had the balls to make China one of the belligerents too.

    • @olafjansowidz
      @olafjansowidz 2 роки тому +4

      @@TheArklyte cuz there is no US in bf2142?

    • @TheArklyte
      @TheArklyte 2 роки тому +1

      @@olafjansowidz will it be too much if I ask you to read my comment?

    • @olafjansowidz
      @olafjansowidz 2 роки тому +2

      @@TheArklyte your comment is a crap

  • @noneedtoknow07
    @noneedtoknow07 2 роки тому +152

    Battlefield players: So who is the US fighting this time China or Russia
    EA: Yes...

    • @lionhartjohn1000
      @lionhartjohn1000 2 роки тому +7

      Huh, just looked it up and the European Union does include the United States of America, for some reason.

    • @noneedtoknow07
      @noneedtoknow07 2 роки тому +2

      @@lionhartjohn1000 If you are looking that up on Wikipedia I'm pretty sure some put that in there as joke to or to win an argument.

    • @73_65
      @73_65 2 роки тому +4

      @@noneedtoknow07 I agree, there is no logical reason the US would ever be part of the EU, much more likely some sort of North American Union or something like that.

    • @ranbojd1070
      @ranbojd1070 2 роки тому +4

      @@73_65 if im not wrong both Australia and the USA join forces Whit the EU since you know.... America is basically a Frozen hell and Australia is going the same route

    • @73_65
      @73_65 2 роки тому +5

      @@ranbojd1070 Honestly the lore of Battlefield 2142 makes no sense, even today we have the technology to survive the glacial maximum of an ice age, and there is more advanced technology in the game than what we have now. So going to war over warmer parts of the Earth doesnt really make sense since the resources used for that would be better used making things like indoor farms and other similarly useful things.

  • @default_7481
    @default_7481 2 роки тому +254

    Honestly wished BF2042 didn't use the old and over used US vs RU again

    • @westrim
      @westrim 2 роки тому +38

      It's weird when they come up with a setting that should be able to break that paradigm, only to do it anyway. This game did the same, with the EU subbed in for the US; the PAC is basically Russia, with little to no presence by any of their coalition partners. There are no Indians, no Thais, no... (a while later) and no Indonesians. There was almost no attempt to incorporate design language referencing anywhere but Russia. Similarly, the EU basically ignores Africa despite a good chunk of the game taking place there.

    • @Marylandbrony
      @Marylandbrony 2 роки тому +13

      In some of the games concept art, it was going to be just the US and China fighting in space actually.

    • @janlim0916
      @janlim0916 2 роки тому +33

      They didn't have the balls to involve China as a faction anymore.

    • @noneedtoknow07
      @noneedtoknow07 2 роки тому +5

      End War brings the European Union (Federation in game) as a faction.

    • @LordDarthHarry
      @LordDarthHarry 2 роки тому +29

      @@janlim0916 Yeah China threw a really big hissy fit over the BF4 campaign from what I remember. As long as the Chinese gaming market is profitable and the Chiese government is such an Orwellian nightmare, they will try not to step on Winnie the Pooh's toes.

  • @WilliamMosicki-Nystrom
    @WilliamMosicki-Nystrom 2 роки тому +96

    Factions I would like to see next:
    1. Ice Nation - The 100
    2. Team Rocket - Pokémon
    3. The Necromonger Empire - Riddick
    4. The Predacons - Beast Wars
    5. The Golden Army - Hellboy

    • @Marylandbrony
      @Marylandbrony 2 роки тому +5

      6: Equestria - My Little Pony Mythos

    • @Owl_013
      @Owl_013 2 роки тому +8

      7: Candy Kingdom - Adventure Time

    • @zeehero7280
      @zeehero7280 2 роки тому +4

      Templin should do Academy City - Toaru franchise. could draw on material from the animated series and light novels, its a fascinating setting.

  • @ranbojd1070
    @ranbojd1070 2 роки тому +65

    now i want to see the EU from the same setting its really rare to see the EU as a main faction in a Game as far as i know there are only like +10 Games that have It as a playable or important faction

    • @crazychinese7315
      @crazychinese7315 2 роки тому

      Because people thought EU will be a great power to match the US.. But nope, just another organisation of bixxchez for the yanks to pound

    • @ranbojd1070
      @ranbojd1070 2 роки тому +4

      @@crazychinese7315 ironic of you to say having chinese on the name better the yanks than the reds

    • @DaDunge
      @DaDunge 2 роки тому +1

      @@crazychinese7315 Funny but the EU may yet lead the west because it's increasingly looking doubtful the US will be able to get past it's internal problems in the future.

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      I kinda dislike the setting, its kinda wishful thinking and its always russia vs the west or the US yet again. And it doesn't make sense that Russia leads the Pan Asian coalition, tbh it should be china. Russia, not only a has been super power but it is also not even asian, it just doesn't make sense. Thou Pan Asian coalition is kinda a good lore when expanded upon as its very interesting how asian states would solve their problems with each other. EU countries nowadays rarely have any problems so its gonna be easier for them to team up.

    • @JoaoSoares-rs6ec
      @JoaoSoares-rs6ec Рік тому

      Really I only know two bf 2142 and end war, there was generals but it never came out, which are the others

  • @lihkan
    @lihkan 2 роки тому +34

    I never forgive EA not making 2142 sequel

    • @JoaoSoares-rs6ec
      @JoaoSoares-rs6ec 2 роки тому

      No one does, they cancelled promising games to release crap abandoned franchises for absolute failures

    • @Solaxe
      @Solaxe 2 роки тому

      @@JoaoSoares-rs6ec EA is a publisher not dev, they don't make games

    • @JoaoSoares-rs6ec
      @JoaoSoares-rs6ec 2 роки тому

      @@Solaxe they also developed games

  • @dannya1854
    @dannya1854 2 роки тому +15

    I dig through BF2142 files a lot cause I like modding it and there's so much unfinished stuff in there and names that liken to things that they just didn't get to. There are weapon skins for models that don't exist, a lot of EU content is labeled as US content, there are gun and vehicle sounds that don't belong to any known weapons. They even have German, French, and Italian voices for presumably different parts of the EU but they just stuck with British English for the EU. Concept art for planned maps that never got made. It's so sad to see it never fulfilled.

    • @Mr_Wardino
      @Mr_Wardino 2 роки тому +1

      I was reading online and apparently, the very early version of Battlefield 2142 was leaked online by hackers and originally the game was supposed to have the US faction to appear in the game. That’s why in the game files, all of the classes e.t.c for the EU have US labelled on them and the game was also set to appear on three different planets.

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      I kinda dislike the setting, its kinda wishful thinking and its always russia vs the west or the US yet again. And it doesn't make sense that Russia leads the Pan Asian coalition, tbh it should be china. Russia, not only a has been super power but it is also not even asian, it just doesn't make sense. Thou Pan Asian coalition is kinda a good lore when expanded upon as its very interesting how asian states would solve their problems with each other. EU countries nowadays rarely have any problems so its gonna be easier for them to team up.

  • @Jayjay-qe6um
    @Jayjay-qe6um 2 роки тому +16

    The emblem of the Pan-Asian Coalition; depicting a lotus flower.

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому +1

      Which is weird, because the pan-asian coalition is lead by Russia which is not Asian. I kinda dislike the setting, its kinda wishful thinking and its always russia vs the west or the US yet again. And it doesn't make sense that Russia leads the Pan Asian coalition, tbh it should be china. Russia, not only a has been super power but it is also not even asian, it just doesn't make sense. Thou Pan Asian coalition is kinda a good lore when expanded upon as its very interesting how asian states would solve their problems with each other. EU countries nowadays rarely have any problems so its gonna be easier for them to team up.

    • @basedtvrk9125
      @basedtvrk9125 2 місяці тому

      @@jmgonzales7701 Russia is quite "Asian" in a certain sense, a Russo-Chinese coalition ruling over Asia is not as far fetched as you would think. Russia has had a long history of Eurasianism, especially in recent years, seeing itself as the synthesis of east and west, however with its current shift towards the east, that could easily turn into ‘Asianism’ only. Russia has never been seen as a purely European state, similar to Turkey.

  • @bubbasbigblast8563
    @bubbasbigblast8563 2 роки тому +150

    I know that gamers love pretty borders and pretty conflicts, but future wars will probably look more like an absolute mess of countries working together part-time than anything: China and the US working together to keep oil prices stable in the Middle East is just as likely as China and the US fighting over Antarctica, because Australia promised to give the US some concessions if it helped Australia to expand southwards.
    Historically speaking, switching sides depending on the results of seeking objectives is more the norm than any permanent coalition: just ask Britain, who switched sides like three times when Russia and Sweden were fighting, or the unholy mess that is the Italian Wars.

    • @shadmandem918
      @shadmandem918 2 роки тому +20

      Wait till we see Russia vs Norway vs the UK get hot and bothered over Arctic shipping routes and resources

    • @yokogoph
      @yokogoph 2 роки тому +5

      That US-China alliance also depends on whether there are deposits under the hotly contested Spratly Island chain becomes worth it (to the Chinese government it appears so).

    • @WellBattle6
      @WellBattle6 2 роки тому +11

      So back to the medieval style of limited wars over limited regions because no one wants to go all in again.

    • @zeehero7280
      @zeehero7280 2 роки тому +3

      How about oil corporations fighting the emerging fusion power industry?

    • @mycaleb8
      @mycaleb8 2 роки тому

      Some people think the super powers are on the way out and we're returning to an older world order with regional powers and PMCs. So Blackrock mercenaries in the Balkan fighting Chinese mercenaries.

  • @casbot71
    @casbot71 2 роки тому +17

    As a veteran of the *Battlefield* of *2142,* one of the common issues was that there were a lot of recruits who had previously fought in the *Battlefield* of *2* and their training and experience was all wrong.

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому +2

      I kinda dislike the setting, its kinda wishful thinking and its always russia vs the west or the US yet again. And it doesn't make sense that Russia leads the Pan Asian coalition, tbh it should be china. Russia, not only a has been super power but it is also not even asian, it just doesn't make sense. Thou Pan Asian coalition is kinda a good lore when expanded upon as its very interesting how asian states would solve their problems with each other. EU countries nowadays rarely have any problems so its gonna be easier for them to team up.

  • @generalveers9544
    @generalveers9544 2 роки тому +179

    Really wish we could’ve gotten a sequel to this instead

    • @crazychinese7315
      @crazychinese7315 2 роки тому +5

      Why spend time to creat so many new models for a new game when you can make a new games with access from all the old games :D

    • @nobodyherepal3292
      @nobodyherepal3292 2 роки тому

      Well, technically, we at least got a prequel in 2042.

    • @patrickryan1821
      @patrickryan1821 2 роки тому

      But there is nothing from 2142 in Portal.

    • @lamhoang8986
      @lamhoang8986 2 роки тому +1

      @@patrickryan1821 maybe they will release a dlc 🤷‍♂️ but there is some easter egg of prototype of vechicles from 2142, since the old school style is not trending anymore, maybe futuristic style will return soon, battlefield 2142 will be back, or a completely new version

    • @patrickryan1821
      @patrickryan1821 2 роки тому +1

      @@lamhoang8986 where this corporate trash is involved I have absolutely zero faith that any of that will happen. These CorpoRATS are going to do the absolute bare minimum with the 4 dlc seasons (so they don't get sued) and then let the game die and move on to the next BF game which will likely be a hero shooter.

  • @nick31092
    @nick31092 2 роки тому +11

    Saw the Battlefield 2142 setting and could not have clicked faster. Veterans of the Cold War unite!

  • @Martyr217
    @Martyr217 2 роки тому +14

    Where's the Tiberium? I'm seeing mechs, hovercraft and orcas.

  • @LogicalMan6
    @LogicalMan6 2 роки тому +37

    Still wishing we'd gotten 2143

  • @legitm0nkey
    @legitm0nkey 2 роки тому +13

    2142 was my first Battlefield and it will forever hold a special place in my heart as one of the greats of the FPS genre!

  • @chrispytel245
    @chrispytel245 2 роки тому +54

    2142 was the best battlefield to come out of EA. BF2 is a classic but 2142 captured something special. Part of me doesn't want to see 2143 released because i know that modern EA will just ruin it.

    • @NiiRubra
      @NiiRubra 2 роки тому +8

      I think 2142 benefited both from having a more refined version of the gameplay found in Battlefield 2, and of being Dice's most original setting in the whole series, in which they took a lot of liberties with the classes and technology.
      The current US-Rus war setting, that they have been doing in Battlefield for what feels like forever, was also done in Cod and various other post-cold war stories, but the setting of 2142 is not something I've seen a lot of in the past, especially since it's an incorrect interpretation of what climate change would look like.
      Maybe if they were to remake this game, it would be cooler if instead it was a story about Earth being knocked out of its orbit around the sun and being gradually ejected from the solar system, which would lead to these events, and ultimately a pretty horrible future.

    • @jipikaijee2402
      @jipikaijee2402 2 роки тому +2

      Yeah my toughtas exactly. I woud really love this game to get remaster or sequel, but based on the resent titles and actinos of DICE, I really dont trust their ability to do it right. 2142 was ahead of its time and captured beatifully and fairly realisically the atmosphere what war would be like in its universe and timeline.

    • @pissyourselfandshitncoom2172
      @pissyourselfandshitncoom2172 Рік тому

      @@NiiRubra Apparently some scientists do think we're about to enter a deep ice age in a couple centuries after this crazy heating/destabilizing spell.
      So maybe it was right all along

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      I kinda dislike the setting, its kinda wishful thinking and its always russia vs the west or the US yet again. And it doesn't make sense that Russia leads the Pan Asian coalition, tbh it should be china. Russia, not only a has been super power but it is also not even asian, it just doesn't make sense. Thou Pan Asian coalition is kinda a good lore when expanded upon as its very interesting how asian states would solve their problems with each other. EU countries nowadays rarely have any problems so its gonna be easier for them to team up.

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      @Jan it doesnt make sense, russia is not asian and its a declining power, china how ever has everything to gain and is asian enough to lead asia. No one would like a white man to lead the asian coalition.

  • @ironspartan1526
    @ironspartan1526 2 роки тому +18

    Some Interesting Factions would be the Western Coalition or Red Star Alliance from Frontlines Fuel of War, The Joint Strike Force, European Federation Enforcers Corp, or Spetsnaz Guard Brigade from Tom Clancy's Endwar, or Any faction from Shattered Union.

  • @AwankO
    @AwankO 2 роки тому +15

    That was a Phyrric victory if anything.

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      I kinda dislike the setting, its kinda wishful thinking and its always russia vs the west or the US yet again. And it doesn't make sense that Russia leads the Pan Asian coalition, tbh it should be china. Russia, not only a has been super power but it is also not even asian, it just doesn't make sense. Thou Pan Asian coalition is kinda a good lore when expanded upon as its very interesting how asian states would solve their problems with each other. EU countries nowadays rarely have any problems so its gonna be easier for them to team up.

  • @Dennis-nc3vw
    @Dennis-nc3vw 2 роки тому +8

    Originally I remember reading the plot was that the EU was invading Asia in hopes of getting at its warmer reasons. That makes a lot more sense to me. I wonder why they changed it. Maybe because they didn't want to cast the West as "the bad guys" given that that's where most of their consumers are from, or maybe because they thought it would drudge up old memories of colonialism.

    • @MrHAR1B0
      @MrHAR1B0 2 роки тому

      Source? It doesn´t make sense for EU to go to Asia for warm territory. Southern Europe is warm, and northern Africa is so much closer and much more practical logistically than Asia. And likely less resistance from a less developed continent. And EU would be extremely outnumbered against the east. Maybe the future totally changes all of this with the ice age and new technology etc. But I think an ice age would be a bigger problem for Russia than it would be for EU, since temperatures in Sibir and northern Russia gets to -40 every year now without ice age. While south Europe is 12-30 all year around. There are just so many logical fallacy´s in this plot, I think that´s the reason they dropped it. But you could be right about western bias to be the good guys, lol.
      IMO Europe has evolved beyond aggressive invasion / occupation / colonialism. We realized how much we fucked up the world in the past. Such admittance of wrong doings and giving up power is something you will never see from Russia and China. Spain, Portugal, UK were global superpowers at some point in history, but let go of it, understanding that such actions will likely cause perpetual war in the future.

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому +1

      @@MrHAR1B0 I kinda dislike the setting, its kinda wishful thinking and its always russia vs the west or the US yet again. And it doesn't make sense that Russia leads the Pan Asian coalition, tbh it should be china. Russia, not only a has been super power but it is also not even asian, it just doesn't make sense. Thou Pan Asian coalition is kinda a good lore when expanded upon as its very interesting how asian states would solve their problems with each other. EU countries nowadays rarely have any problems so its gonna be easier for them to team up. Europe is not benevolent, they didn't wake up one day and said to themselves that colonialism is wrong and we should just let them go. Countries like France and Netherlands wanted their colonies back it just that there were independence movements and kicked their ass. And even in Africa France is controlling the resources of Africa. US invaded the middle east, to say europe evolved colonialism depends, war? probably. But by controlling economics and resources is not counted as colonialism then idk what is. People are shitty, IF you give them power they will be shitty, Just like if you give the previous colonial powers their Super power status back then will just be as shitty as then.

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      I kinda dislike the setting, its kinda wishful thinking and its always russia vs the west or the US yet again. And it doesn't make sense that Russia leads the Pan Asian coalition, tbh it should be china. Russia, not only a has been super power but it is also not even asian, it just doesn't make sense. Thou Pan Asian coalition is kinda a good lore when expanded upon as its very interesting how asian states would solve their problems with each other. EU countries nowadays rarely have any problems so its gonna be easier for them to team up.

  • @Kaiser_Xeno
    @Kaiser_Xeno 2 роки тому +4

    The pac logo is in 2042 the season 1 map data mined seems to be a titan facility or mech factory

  • @fadhilahzaidan4946
    @fadhilahzaidan4946 2 роки тому +4

    Whoa,never expected Templin would cover my favourite underrated game. :D

  • @Econ1991
    @Econ1991 2 роки тому +15

    Huh so a classic example of a pyrrhic victory where they won a war but not the one for survival.

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      I kinda dislike the setting, its kinda wishful thinking and its always russia vs the west or the US yet again. And it doesn't make sense that Russia leads the Pan Asian coalition, tbh it should be china. Russia, not only a has been super power but it is also not even asian, it just doesn't make sense. Thou Pan Asian coalition is kinda a good lore when expanded upon as its very interesting how asian states would solve their problems with each other. EU countries nowadays rarely have any problems so its gonna be easier for them to team up.

  • @loopdelooperlouis5541
    @loopdelooperlouis5541 2 роки тому +8

    1:01 you forget the war of 2007.(Battlefield 2) And yes BF2 and BF2142 our connected. Check the red truck at the Operation Roadrage (64 MP) map in BF2.

  • @Panzerfan93
    @Panzerfan93 2 роки тому +10

    2142 was awesome. I hope you do a video on the EU next

  • @mho...
    @mho... 2 роки тому +4

    OMG YES ! Templin, awesome, to feature the best BattleField ever made ;)
    I miss my Bogatyr Walker!

  • @colton1325
    @colton1325 2 роки тому +1

    I like how they got out the timelines for bf3 and 4 before they were released as you mentioned with the wars in 2014 and 2020

  • @jacklennox2358
    @jacklennox2358 2 роки тому +4

    I was just searching this up to see what was on the topic, surprised to see something 5 minutes ago.

  • @srbrant5391
    @srbrant5391 2 роки тому +7

    We should have gotten a remake of this game instead of _2042._

    • @gabriel__opazo
      @gabriel__opazo 2 роки тому +4

      Or a sequel!

    • @nobodyherepal3292
      @nobodyherepal3292 2 роки тому +2

      At least we got a prequel now. So there hope.

    • @srbrant5391
      @srbrant5391 2 роки тому +1

      @@nobodyherepal3292 A hopelessly glitchy mess of a sequel.

    • @pissyourselfandshitncoom2172
      @pissyourselfandshitncoom2172 Рік тому +2

      2042 would've been amazing if Old DICE was making it.. New DICE just lost the vision completely. But it's improving with each patch at least.
      It's still a _prequel_ to 2142 though.

  • @srbrant5391
    @srbrant5391 2 роки тому +2

    I always loved the Titans, they remind me of the Carry-Alls from _Dune._

  • @EKP41423
    @EKP41423 2 роки тому +4

    Would love to see you guys cover Barotrauma!

  • @sergiovieira8272
    @sergiovieira8272 2 роки тому +3

    Very cool! Do the Eu from 2142 next, and the 2042 Cold War conflict.

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      I kinda dislike the setting, its kinda wishful thinking and its always russia vs the west or the US yet again. And it doesn't make sense that Russia leads the Pan Asian coalition, tbh it should be china. Russia, not only a has been super power but it is also not even asian, it just doesn't make sense. Thou Pan Asian coalition is kinda a good lore when expanded upon as its very interesting how asian states would solve their problems with each other. EU countries nowadays rarely have any problems so its gonna be easier for them to team up.

  • @mingchoi8369
    @mingchoi8369 2 роки тому +6

    So you gonna follow this up with the EU from Battlefield 2142 and some additional videos from 2042?

  • @nobodyherepal3292
    @nobodyherepal3292 2 роки тому +5

    2142 EU next please!

  • @ambientlightofdarknesss4245
    @ambientlightofdarknesss4245 2 роки тому +2

    I think we know what battlefield the templin institute wants in portal

  • @TheLongasen
    @TheLongasen 2 роки тому

    Only legends still play this to this day.

  • @kurisuuu48
    @kurisuuu48 2 роки тому +3

    Man I really hope they'll add BF2142 to BF2042's Portal Mode

  • @SonicNitro
    @SonicNitro 2 роки тому +1

    Its a shame we never got a sequel to this game, with more info on the the PAC and Eu's backgrounds.

  • @nonyabiz6036
    @nonyabiz6036 2 роки тому +2

    Hopefully 2142 vehicles will be included in future 2042 dlc for portal

  • @theformerkaiser9391
    @theformerkaiser9391 2 роки тому

    Didn’t see this coming

  • @EmperorJeff3239
    @EmperorJeff3239 2 роки тому

    you guys should do some episodes on Endless Space 2.

  • @IveGotChicken
    @IveGotChicken Рік тому +1

    Still holding for that 2143....

  • @sohrabroozbahani4700
    @sohrabroozbahani4700 2 роки тому +1

    Who remembers the lost planet EDN3?

  • @epicmickey2351
    @epicmickey2351 2 роки тому +1

    We need this on Battlefield Portal!

  • @aqu9973
    @aqu9973 2 роки тому

    The Templin institute needs to do the Speedwagon Foundation from Jojo

  • @Seeber420
    @Seeber420 2 роки тому +1

    Hard to believe they could never top titans, closest they came were aircraft carriers and they weren't even close. Capping missiles and podding onto titans will never be beat.

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      I kinda dislike the setting, its kinda wishful thinking and its always russia vs the west or the US yet again. And it doesn't make sense that Russia leads the Pan Asian coalition, tbh it should be china. Russia, not only a has been super power but it is also not even asian, it just doesn't make sense. Thou Pan Asian coalition is kinda a good lore when expanded upon as its very interesting how asian states would solve their problems with each other. EU countries nowadays rarely have any problems so its gonna be easier for them to team up.

  • @InFamou5Killer
    @InFamou5Killer 2 роки тому +1

    amazin now we need an eu version

  • @matthewrolls9426
    @matthewrolls9426 2 роки тому +4

    I wish they put 2142 in portal

    • @stormlancer6929
      @stormlancer6929 2 роки тому

      Well Theirs Always Hope That They’ll Add 2142 to Portal in a Future Update, Probably After 2042 Is Fully Released.

  • @DaDunge
    @DaDunge 2 роки тому +3

    I'd love to see a breakdown on the EU from Bf 2142

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      I kinda dislike the setting, its kinda wishful thinking and its always russia vs the west or the US yet again. And it doesn't make sense that Russia leads the Pan Asian coalition, tbh it should be china. Russia, not only a has been super power but it is also not even asian, it just doesn't make sense. Thou Pan Asian coalition is kinda a good lore when expanded upon as its very interesting how asian states would solve their problems with each other. EU countries nowadays rarely have any problems so its gonna be easier for them to team up.

    • @DaDunge
      @DaDunge Рік тому

      @@jmgonzales7701 Not sure I managed to follow your line of thought, first it sounded like you were unhappy with the EU being a faction then near the end it sounds like you were happy about it.
      I agree the panasian coalition should probably have been china led. Didn't even know they were not suposed to be, they seem to have more asian design.

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      @@DaDunge oh i am fine about the Eu they deserve to be the strongest out of everyone. My problem is the concept of the pan asia coalition with russia as its head, First russia is not asian, 2nd it is a dwindling power and no one in asia will just follow a white man. 3rd Even a concept of asian coalition is impossible. As an Asian i can tell you that we hate each other, war between us is always possible. Asia pacific alone there is trouble brewing, China, Korea and japan all hate each other. There is also the problem of taiwan out there and the south china see fiasco. This is why the west will always reign supreme. They just have circumstances that arent available in asia.

    • @pissyourselfandshitncoom2172
      @pissyourselfandshitncoom2172 Рік тому

      @@jmgonzales7701 lololol. Every time I come back to watch this video, I am reminded how badly you have a hatred-boner for Russia; copying-&-pasting that same template reply on EVERY THREAD. Your incredibly pro-NATO stance gets more laughable with time, as events continue to unfold......
      Do you still think Russia is a has-been power? Or are you starting to wake up to the plot yet? When I inevitably come across this video again in 6 months, you know I'm gonna ask how the G7/NATO is fairing.

  • @Gaz918
    @Gaz918 9 місяців тому

    When will you cover the EU? It's been a while since this episode and it will be a nice tooic to talk about.

  • @Castillo525
    @Castillo525 2 роки тому +3

    Battlefield 2142 had soooo much potential tho

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      I kinda dislike the setting, its kinda wishful thinking and its always russia vs the west or the US yet again. And it doesn't make sense that Russia leads the Pan Asian coalition, tbh it should be china. Russia, not only a has been super power but it is also not even asian, it just doesn't make sense. Thou Pan Asian coalition is kinda a good lore when expanded upon as its very interesting how asian states would solve their problems with each other. EU countries nowadays rarely have any problems so its gonna be easier for them to team up.

  • @roseyflame1694
    @roseyflame1694 2 роки тому +1

    Can you do one about The Philosophers & The Patriots from Metal Gear Solid?

  • @ronniehopper2726
    @ronniehopper2726 2 роки тому +2

    Wow this is short

  • @rajarshisarkar999
    @rajarshisarkar999 2 роки тому +1

    So basically Command & Conquer but with 1st Person look rather than RTS.

    • @Denterify2
      @Denterify2 2 роки тому +2

      Which would be C&C Renegade, sadly we never got the sequel.

  • @paulwilliams916
    @paulwilliams916 2 роки тому

    Yes

  • @pplesandoranges
    @pplesandoranges 2 роки тому

    Has the Martian Congressional Republic or the Outer Planets Alliance or the [spoiler] Empire been done yet? Perfect time for it before Season 6 releases.

  • @Magnus_Caramelo_55
    @Magnus_Caramelo_55 6 місяців тому

    Any plans to make the EU video for 2142?

  • @proudalbanianjcdenton7129
    @proudalbanianjcdenton7129 2 роки тому +2

    Sucks no one ever made a project reality mod for 2142, not even asking for an official remake. Just sucks my favorite battlefield seems to have had the lower eat playerbase out of all the classic battlefield games, and the smallest modding scene too

  • @Brofederationgoogleplus
    @Brofederationgoogleplus 2 роки тому

    2142 dlc will be nice

  • @guerillaguru8650
    @guerillaguru8650 2 роки тому

    Soon in portal!
    (I hope)

  • @jacobfreeland8597
    @jacobfreeland8597 2 роки тому +4

    2142 in 2042 portal anyone?

  • @2Potates
    @2Potates 2 роки тому +1

    When are you going to cover the BF2142's European Union?

  • @nobodyherepal3292
    @nobodyherepal3292 2 роки тому +1

    CSAT from Arma 3 also please?

  • @agbottan
    @agbottan 2 роки тому +1

    What mas de Titans float? Fusion power?
    Do they float on diesel oil?

    • @danwhowatches707
      @danwhowatches707 2 роки тому +1

      According to the debrief of the map "Yellow Knife" they are somewhat powered by diamonds since they are fighting over the last diamond mine available to be used

  • @logger22
    @logger22 Рік тому +1

    I don’t think the story is related to Battlefield 4. I think the Final Stand dlc is just a series of nods to to 2142 because there are logos located in the maps of the the PAC which contradicts the time it was established, which was way further into the future. Personally I believe there was a planned sequel since they hinted it with a futuristic drone Easter egg in BF3 and 2143 written in random props on some maps in BF4. But they dropped the idea because Cod was making futuristic games at the time, so they went on to make BF1 set in WW1 to lure the audience from the dying futuristic setting.

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      I kinda dislike the setting, its kinda wishful thinking and its always russia vs the west or the US yet again. And it doesn't make sense that Russia leads the Pan Asian coalition, tbh it should be china. Russia, not only a has been super power but it is also not even asian, it just doesn't make sense. Thou Pan Asian coalition is kinda a good lore when expanded upon as its very interesting how asian states would solve their problems with each other. EU countries nowadays rarely have any problems so its gonna be easier for them to team up.

    • @johnwest5957
      @johnwest5957 Рік тому

      @@jmgonzales7701 China couldn't lead anything effectively though

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      @@johnwest5957 so as russia

  • @ivanvelez2779
    @ivanvelez2779 2 роки тому

    Make one about talon companie from fallout

  • @fizkallnyeilsem
    @fizkallnyeilsem 2 роки тому +1

    The noodle Coalition

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      russia is with them and middle east as well. so i wouldn't say its noodle coalition.

  • @FulcrumK
    @FulcrumK 2 роки тому

    When Battlefield was epic.

  • @Chris-jw8vm
    @Chris-jw8vm 2 роки тому +4

    Events in 2014 and 2020
    Uh that's Crimea and corona.
    Lol this game did w good job predicting those. The two big fallings out between Russia China and the west.

    • @pissyourselfandshitncoom2172
      @pissyourselfandshitncoom2172 Рік тому

      It gets even crazier: The 2014 war depicts the US & Russia going hot over a conflict in Iran. They almost did precisely that over the Syrian Civil War, which was also in 2014. They had to tap dance around each other's forces. BF3 ends on a cliffhanger with Dima hiding out in Ukr., as he's being abducted by some special police. There's your Ukr reference too!
      Not done yet, the US navy came very close to conflict with the PLA navy in 2020; october or november I believe.. But anyway, Gen. Milley had to call his Chinese counterparts to let them know he wasn't gonna attack them (it was just a show of force)

  • @BiggusWeeabus
    @BiggusWeeabus 2 роки тому

    I wish we get a BF2142 reboot with an epic story mode one day

    • @Kazasia-_-
      @Kazasia-_- 2 роки тому

      I don’t think they will reboot it since it is canon after all but maybe a sequel

  • @bigbitehood1353
    @bigbitehood1353 2 роки тому +1

    Still waiting for 2143

  • @thelonelypilot
    @thelonelypilot 2 роки тому +10

    They should remake BFD 2142 or another studio should use the same setting idea.
    Sadly DICE won't because Chinese money tastes so sweet lol. Cowards didn't even include Chinese operators or weapons in 2042.

    • @westrim
      @westrim 2 роки тому +1

      Is China even a major market for PC and console games? I was under the impression that they're mostly a mobile market.

    • @jimmyseaver3647
      @jimmyseaver3647 2 роки тому +2

      @@westrim They're also heavily into MMOs and RPG games. The FPS genre never really appealed to most folks in the Far East, probably between existing tensions and the legacy of the Second Sino-Japanese War and World War II's Pacific Theater.

    • @Botar48
      @Botar48 2 роки тому +1

      @@jimmyseaver3647 Well why would it? All FPS games are like Americans gunning down Russians or Chinese.

    • @pissyourselfandshitncoom2172
      @pissyourselfandshitncoom2172 Рік тому

      @@Botar48 Yea everybody goes on a tirade about the PRC banning BF4, but never considers what might get this banned.

  • @johncarter8103
    @johncarter8103 2 роки тому

    can you do The Master from Doctor Who

  • @testiclegaming1250
    @testiclegaming1250 2 роки тому

    PLR From BF3 when

  • @mysticassam102
    @mysticassam102 2 місяці тому

    Wow

  • @superiorsoldier57
    @superiorsoldier57 Рік тому

    Awesome! Great job guys!!! Now do the European Union!

  • @MercShame
    @MercShame 2 роки тому

    Do the factions of world war 3 in star trek.

  • @dragonking7585
    @dragonking7585 2 роки тому

    Deathclaws fallout

  • @jacobbeaver2975
    @jacobbeaver2975 2 роки тому

    Y’all should do Yara from Far Cry 7

  • @Unused_Account_D3E2F1
    @Unused_Account_D3E2F1 Рік тому

    👍

  • @ravenks1sr15
    @ravenks1sr15 2 роки тому +1

    The very last great Battlefield game before they went downhill starting with the Bad Company series all the way to Battlefield 2042

  • @ISOwren
    @ISOwren 2 роки тому

    You know what never remember hereing any lore on what north Americas state was like in 2142. Only Europ, Asia, Affrica.

    • @DeltaPhoenix180
      @DeltaPhoenix180 2 роки тому +2

      There was mention of other alliances/unions elsewhere in the world, but outside the PAC/EU (and a passing reference to the Union of African States) they never explored them.
      Honestly the entire setting would have been great for expansion, tons of singleplayer story opportunities as well as expanding the traditional battlefield gameplay to include more factions with asymmetrical equipment in interesting match ups / locales against everyone else.

    • @NiiRubra
      @NiiRubra 2 роки тому +3

      I think I remember reading that the US suffered with the changing climate and, in a somewhat humorous reversal, found itself begging Mexico to allow its population to cross the border and migrate to the warmer equatorial climate.

    • @duitk
      @duitk 2 роки тому +1

      @@NiiRubra that would be so stupid, Russia and Europe would freeze way earlier once the ocean currents that bring warm it are disrupted. Not to mention the US already has war wet humid climates in the south, Europe and Russia would die first their weather being already cold, as we saw in the last ice age where Europe and Russia were under Ice sheets while the southern US was livable. China would do much better than Europe and Russia because it's south is similar to the southern US.

    • @NiiRubra
      @NiiRubra 2 роки тому

      @@duitk Well, the world is not supposed to freeze because of climate change either, so that's where these games were at.

    • @duitk
      @duitk 2 роки тому

      @@NiiRubra I know, but the game specifically mentions Earth is entering a new ice age. By that logic Europe and Russia would die first, we know this because we know what the last ice ages looked like.

  • @SilliestGoober999
    @SilliestGoober999 2 роки тому

    Way better than 2042 garbo..

  • @skepticalmagos_101
    @skepticalmagos_101 2 роки тому +1

    Use tech to adapt to the new climate or use it too bonk other humans 😂
    I love humanity 😃.

  • @patrickryan1821
    @patrickryan1821 2 роки тому +1

    Back when Battlefield was good. So sad there was 10 times more innovation in the dynamics of gameplay in this than its 15 year old successor.

  • @marshallxox7624
    @marshallxox7624 2 роки тому

    Could you guys do the scp foundation

  • @qetiogusliriope7436
    @qetiogusliriope7436 2 роки тому

    I am a pac man. Through and through.

  • @parkerconnolly2484
    @parkerconnolly2484 2 роки тому

    Do nopats please

  • @SergioBocanegra
    @SergioBocanegra 2 роки тому +3

    I read the pan-sexual coalition before clicking and now I gotta Wright creepy pasta about this crazy idea.

  • @IAmTheAce5
    @IAmTheAce5 2 роки тому +18

    "Pan-Asian" for when countless millennia of diverse cultures in unique relations to each other just escapes you...

    • @Strettger
      @Strettger 2 роки тому +13

      Ditto for the "European Union", completely unbelievable that millennia of diverse cultures in unique relations would ever unify.

    • @ronaldlennier86
      @ronaldlennier86 2 роки тому +11

      I mean it's possible the "pan Asian alliance" is actually just a coalition of small Asian nations extremely economically and politically dependent on China

    • @Strettger
      @Strettger 2 роки тому +7

      @@ronaldlennier86 I think it's basically the real life SCO turned into a formal alliance/Codominion of Moscow and Beijing

    • @ronaldlennier86
      @ronaldlennier86 2 роки тому +2

      @@Strettger considering the large industry and influence both nations have and presuming that the UN doesn't exist anymore, the two nations could exert a large amount of influence over the comparatively smaller nations, in a fashion similar to the Warsaw pact.

    • @Nebo8ful
      @Nebo8ful 2 роки тому +2

      @@Strettger well honestly the same could be said for a lot of country now and in the past. The concept of nation-state is relatively new in the history of humanity and is a very western concept. For most of our history the concept of nation didn't exist and for some place like in Asia or Africa still don't exist. Who knows how we could define what make a state in a century or two ?

  • @panzertank938
    @panzertank938 2 роки тому +1

    I do wonder if the Philippines was in the war and if they joined the pan Asian Union

    • @Jose.AFT.Saddul
      @Jose.AFT.Saddul 2 роки тому +1

      I do hope the Philippines would choose to be neutral.
      As war has generally only brought death and destruction to the islands

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      The Philippines is very close to china geographically and we would be under its sphere of influence (Tbh realistically we are under its influence, lets be honest) and seeing everyone basically fell to Chinese influence, even its long time rivals such as japan and Korea. If the Philippines was under American influence china would make sure to assert itself. can be by force or through economics tbh. I say its only a matter of time before the Philippines joins the pan asian union lead by russia and china.

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      @@Jose.AFT.Saddul might be impossible to be neutral in that scenarios

    • @panzertank938
      @panzertank938 Рік тому

      @@jmgonzales7701 um you do realize that china is literally intruding on Philippine waters right I mean let's be honest here china likes to steal

    • @Jose.AFT.Saddul
      @Jose.AFT.Saddul Рік тому

      @@jmgonzales7701 it's fictional who know

  • @JoaoSoares-rs6ec
    @JoaoSoares-rs6ec 2 роки тому +2

    OK next EU and the cold war

  • @X3105i
    @X3105i 2 роки тому

    Bah glory to Europe

  • @explodingwolfgaming8024
    @explodingwolfgaming8024 2 роки тому

    Commenting 4 algorithm

  • @DABViktor
    @DABViktor 2 роки тому

    Please, give an English subtitle.

  • @davesthrowawayacc1162
    @davesthrowawayacc1162 2 роки тому

    China got the other countries to join, because of the implication.
    That something could go wrong for them if they didn't. But the thing is, they're not going to say no, because none of these countries would say no. Because of the implication. Not that things are going to go wrong

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      I kinda dislike the setting, its kinda wishful thinking and its always russia vs the west or the US yet again. And it doesn't make sense that Russia leads the Pan Asian coalition, tbh it should be china. Russia, not only a has been super power but it is also not even asian, it just doesn't make sense. Thou Pan Asian coalition is kinda a good lore when expanded upon as its very interesting how asian states would solve their problems with each other. EU countries nowadays rarely have any problems so its gonna be easier for them to team up.

    • @jmgonzales7701
      @jmgonzales7701 Рік тому

      I kinda dislike the setting, its kinda wishful thinking and its always russia vs the west or the US yet again. And it doesn't make sense that Russia leads the Pan Asian coalition, tbh it should be china. Russia, not only a has been super power but it is also not even asian, it just doesn't make sense. Thou Pan Asian coalition is kinda a good lore when expanded upon as its very interesting how asian states would solve their problems with each other. EU countries nowadays rarely have any problems so its gonna be easier for them to team up.

  • @-JA-
    @-JA- 2 роки тому

  • @MPKb19
    @MPKb19 2 роки тому

    Comment for statistics