Five Pitches For The Next Battlefield

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 сер 2024
  • With Battlefield 6 nearly upon us, the Templin Institute lays out its ideas for what it would like to see in the next global conflict.
    The Templin Institute. Investigating alternate worlds.
    New episodes every week.
    Other Divisions & Branches:
    🔹 Patreon | / templininstitute
    🔹 The Templin Commissary | shop.templin.i...
    🔹 Twitch | / templininstitute
    🔹 The Templin Archives | / @templinarchives
    🔹 UA-cam Membership | / @templininstitute
    🔹 Submit Your Episode Idea | ideas.templin....
    Communications & Media:
    🔹 Website | www.templin.in...
    🔹 Discord | / discord
    🔹 Facebook | / templininstitute
    🔹 Twitter | / templinedu
    🔹 Instagram | / templininstitute
    🔹 Subreddit | / templininstitute
    🔹 Mailing Address | Unit 144 - 919 Centre St SW Calgary, AB T2E 2P6
    Background music "Battlefield 2 Menu Music" by Joel Eriksson.
    Ending music "Battle Forever" used under license from Shutterstock.com.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 761

  • @TemplinInstitute
    @TemplinInstitute  3 роки тому +65

    Which idea is your favorite? Vote in our community poll! ua-cam.com/users/TheTemplinInstitutecommunity

    • @BS-vm5bt
      @BS-vm5bt 3 роки тому +1

      Love the bf 2 menu theme

    • @Commissar_Eiven
      @Commissar_Eiven 3 роки тому +2

      You know what imagine a battlefield where you take place in the red threat series by Battlefield and you have to stop the Communists from going to space

    • @giladpellaeon1691
      @giladpellaeon1691 3 роки тому

      Roma Invicta sounds the best and, unfortunately least likely game to be made.

    • @IAmTheAce5
      @IAmTheAce5 3 роки тому +1

      I propose an alternate-history idea: revolving around the globalist "free trade" and anti-globalist grassroots movement of 1999-2001. The International Monetary Fund and World Trade Organization have called on the United States to enforce wealth-extraction from poor countries of the Global South. The United States convinces its military its fighting for freedom and democracy. The player goes to Latin/South America/Africa/Southeast Asia/Indonesia and discovers the people are fighting for public-ownership and popular rule of their own wealth and utilities against the wealthiest financial institutions that would claim title to everything, and have made _YOU_ do their dirty work. Do you (a) support international corporate capitalist oligarchy or (b) social democracy and justice?

    • @talicadk
      @talicadk 3 роки тому +1

      Hm, a battlefield in a fictional world, where a united union of nations finally breaks down to an all-out civil war between factions emerging from their ashes. Here the battlefield 6 game will tell it a story about the conflict between those factions and where the players will play in those engagements that played out

  • @gabriel__opazo
    @gabriel__opazo 3 роки тому +892

    "While the Templin Institute doesn't have the ability to spark a world wide conflict, it's something we're working on"
    YOU'RE DOING *WHAT* ??

    • @thishonestgrifter
      @thishonestgrifter 3 роки тому +67

      Oh don’t tell me you’re surprised by that.

    • @alecnorton5490
      @alecnorton5490 3 роки тому +68

      It would be truly groundbreaking if a UA-cam channel could start a worldwide conflict of course it wouldn't be the first time mass media nearly caused a World War.

    • @nutmeister1961
      @nutmeister1961 3 роки тому +19

      If a world war started, we know who to blame

    • @thebaccathatchews
      @thebaccathatchews 3 роки тому +23

      If the Templin Institute could conquer Banff Springs so easily, they could conquer the world in no time.

    • @alexross915
      @alexross915 3 роки тому +1

      huh?!

  • @westrim
    @westrim 3 роки тому +138

    The next Battlefield should include dating sim elements. After all, Love is a Battlefield.

    • @camarofan2008
      @camarofan2008 3 роки тому +2

      Damn it take my like

    • @boris001000
      @boris001000 Рік тому

      ...so will it work like Fire Emblem or something?

  • @theconnorwarman5138
    @theconnorwarman5138 3 роки тому +250

    A 'Battlefield: Cold War' has incredible potential to be a fantastic title. Rolling Leopard tanks across the plains of Poland and engaging T-72s as A-10s strafe the buildings around you would be epic.

    • @Luey_Luey
      @Luey_Luey 3 роки тому +9

      this this this
      with BF1's successful handling of numerous individual factions (instead of just US vs RU vs CN) we could actually get the east/west germans, french, poles, etc as playable factions

    • @TheArklyte
      @TheArklyte 3 роки тому

      lol, A-10 was already obsolete against soviets by that point. It's a COIN plane ie it works only when enemy doesn't shoot back. Thanks for a laugh:D

    • @Luey_Luey
      @Luey_Luey 3 роки тому +5

      ​@@marckrieger3277 the "all vehicles for all factions" thing in BF1 is only the case for tanks, and only because WW1 tanks differed drastically (and were pretty much all designed by the allies, except the A7V), this wouldn't be the case in BF Cold War. I think DICE did an alright job of having wide representation in BF1 for the infantry skins and voices, and a passable job on the aircraft and the light transport vehicles
      most eastern bloc countries would have very similar if not identical vehicles in BF Cold War (because thats just how it was), and there would be a decent amount of overlap in NATO vehicles too..

    • @Luey_Luey
      @Luey_Luey 3 роки тому +3

      @@marckrieger3277 check out the BF wiki for the full vehicle list my guy
      there's shared aircraft between some factions but the only plane that is the exact same for all factions is the Ilya muromets (because it presumably didn't have any counterpart for any of the other armies of the game)

    • @Luey_Luey
      @Luey_Luey 3 роки тому +1

      @@marckrieger3277 yea that's what I was saying
      and the reason for the tanks being the same is probably for gameplay reasons: it might be too unbalanced if the germans get the A7V and the US only gets the FT17, or if the British get the Mark V and the ottomans get nothing. In a cold war setting, just as they did in the modern BF games, they can have one single version of the tank (stats-wise), which would differ only in appearance, and allow for each faction to have unique tank models (at least for nato lol)

  • @spectr__
    @spectr__ 3 роки тому +107

    EA owns Command and Conquer. I want Battlefield: Red Alert.

  • @zterrans
    @zterrans 3 роки тому +246

    I had really wanted a cold-war era Battlefield- you could get a hybrid between older and newer weapons, allowing for fan-favorite equipment to still show up and add in more equipment that has fallen by the wayside

    • @salar7902
      @salar7902 3 роки тому +4

      But it doesnt allow for the supreme freedom in direction that a bf set in 2030s has

    • @byron2FZ
      @byron2FZ 3 роки тому +2

      I believe there are a couple Battlefield-esque games currently being worked on that pursue a 1980s "cold war gone hot" theme.

    • @comradekenobi6908
      @comradekenobi6908 3 роки тому

      @@salar7902 elaborate?

    • @comradekenobi6908
      @comradekenobi6908 3 роки тому +1

      @@byron2FZ any links to them?

    • @byron2FZ
      @byron2FZ 3 роки тому +2

      @@comradekenobi6908 one is called 83 and the other is Afterconflict (I believe that one is set shortly after an initial Nuclear exchange)

  • @rare_kumiko
    @rare_kumiko 3 роки тому +137

    "I never understood why I'd want to prevent WW3 when it seemed so much cooler than what I was doing"
    heh

    • @NODnuke45
      @NODnuke45 3 роки тому +8

      Just remember to account for the fact that this is all in the context of playing video games. lol

  • @anthonychilders9549
    @anthonychilders9549 3 роки тому +485

    Speaking of Strangereal, it’d be kinda cool to see, say, the Balkan War or the Lighthouse War from a ground perspective.

    • @broomy1610
      @broomy1610 3 роки тому +29

      Belka did nothing wrong

    • @funnyperson7656
      @funnyperson7656 3 роки тому +24

      Belka did nothing wrong

    • @joshuasantos3692
      @joshuasantos3692 3 роки тому +19

      Belka did nothing wrong

    • @4thdimensionai972
      @4thdimensionai972 3 роки тому +18

      Belka did nothing wrong

    • @RedShocktrooperRST
      @RedShocktrooperRST 3 роки тому +19

      Aces also ride in tanks. Getting the Usean Continental War from the commander's seat of an ISAF M60A1 or T-72B might be interesting.

  • @pob_42
    @pob_42 3 роки тому +174

    Jesus christ Templin, I swear you guys just have a line into my inner thoughts. First Star Wars, now this.

    • @kuradamax
      @kuradamax 3 роки тому +15

      it's their pan-wormhole contract with Xenonion, it gives them access to Xenonions mind control satellite network

    • @CaptainFlowers
      @CaptainFlowers 3 роки тому +9

      They know you in every reality. Of course they know what you're thinking.

    • @darthxerox15
      @darthxerox15 3 роки тому

      Really tho

  • @halofly3
    @halofly3 3 роки тому +48

    Honestly, I would take battlefield 4's level of destruction and combine it with 3's aesthetic. Story wise BF3 actually felt like a plausible conflict, you played a role in the infantry, armor and aviation vs BF4's single squad that does almost everything by itself.

    • @halofly3
      @halofly3 3 роки тому +2

      @@revbladez5773 I remember you could collapse multiple buildings vs the few designated ones in future titles. Not to mention the post match cutscenes were a nice touch as well.

  • @rin-joh8644
    @rin-joh8644 3 роки тому +318

    Clearly, it's going to be Battlefield: Revolution and we're gonna push out those damn redcoats.
    Seriously, though, all I really want is the eastern front in Battlefield 5. Damn Covid.

    • @DaemonKeido
      @DaemonKeido 3 роки тому +35

      Seriously, why the fuck do I not get to fight in Stalingrad in Battlefield 5!?

    • @SpiralSine6
      @SpiralSine6 3 роки тому +32

      We got more eastern front content in Battlefield 1 than Battlefield V. Wack.

    • @nbewarwe
      @nbewarwe 3 роки тому +13

      @@DaemonKeido my guess is that it was planned DLC but Battlefield 5 didn't make enough money to justify releasing it.

    • @georgethompson1460
      @georgethompson1460 3 роки тому

      battlefield napoleon

    • @tunguska2370
      @tunguska2370 3 роки тому +3

      Name: Battlefield
      Actual gameplay: one man army

  • @TheJuggerNate
    @TheJuggerNate 3 роки тому +192

    How about Battfield: Red Alert! EA already owns Command and conquer so it seems like an easy crossover plus a throw back to Renegade. On top of that the wacky setting of Red Alert could still feature mondern tacticool weaponry side by side with wacky syfi weapon systems. Hell it could build off the construction system inovated in BFV. Instead of sandbags and point defense guns bulid Tesla towers and shroud systems!

    • @Rei1Evangelion
      @Rei1Evangelion 3 роки тому +8

      This sounds good and interesting

    • @laurencefraser
      @laurencefraser 3 роки тому +14

      @@Rei1Evangelion hence while they'll either never do it or completely screw it up.
      It's EA after all.
      If the developers manage to produce something good in spite of them they'll kill it with "micro" transaction garbage a few months later.

    • @penial_smasher_500
      @penial_smasher_500 3 роки тому +3

      i've been begging for this for so long

    • @Conscript2109
      @Conscript2109 3 роки тому +8

      Kirov reporting

    • @jerrymartin7019
      @jerrymartin7019 3 роки тому +2

      I've seen videos CNC:RA3 vehicles added to ravenfield, but I don't know for sure if it's a mod you can download or not.

  • @ollikoskinen1
    @ollikoskinen1 3 роки тому +155

    I would like to see a Cold War gone hot in the 70s or the 80s, but the protagonist does not have to be an American. How about seeing the war from the eyes of East and West Germans, or the British or the French, or people from the Warsaw Pact?

    • @blitzkrieg8776
      @blitzkrieg8776 3 роки тому +1

      Still would have the US in it, but I get what you are meaning.

    • @edgardox.feliciano3127
      @edgardox.feliciano3127 3 роки тому +2

      Problem is that the war would only last about a day, since it would start and end with nukes. No point in risking millions of lives pointlessly in a multiple year conflict that will inevitably end in a NATO victory thanks to the two big oceans separating the US from all the danger, when you can just drag your enemy kicking and screaming down to the dephs of Hell with nukes. Youre going to die in nuclear fire anyway, may as well take the enemy with you.

    • @kingdomofvinland8827
      @kingdomofvinland8827 3 роки тому +12

      I think an East or west Germany perspective could be interesting and add more complexity

    • @jonwoodhouse1444
      @jonwoodhouse1444 3 роки тому +16

      @@edgardox.feliciano3127 Not necessarily. While Mutually assured destruction is a strong deterrent for war overall, if conventional war between the two superpowers broke out, I see no reason why both sides would immediately start lobbing nukes at each other. Neither side could achieve a victory if nuclear weapons are used, and so, nuclear weapons would probably only be used if one side or the other is facing an imminent total defeat. Most likely, both the USA and USSR would avoid directly invading the other, with each of their war objectives being to just re-draw the world map. For example, the Soviet Union might demand a total US withdrawal from Western Europe, as the US probably wouldn't risk nuclear Armageddon over influence in France or Germany. The same may be true in reverse with Cuba perhaps.

    • @joshuajoaquin5099
      @joshuajoaquin5099 3 роки тому

      @@edgardox.feliciano3127 nukes were last resort

  • @timothybarron5691
    @timothybarron5691 3 роки тому +13

    Battlefield:fall of Camelot
    Set in medieval ages with magic/monsters with a nice Arthurian influences

  • @michaellaramee1965
    @michaellaramee1965 3 роки тому +44

    I would love to see a return to the Bad Company setting, the characters were reliably fun and the gameplay better lent itself to over the top madness then more grounded historical titles. I would love to see an alternative future setting, a 21st century Roman Empire battle an Imperial China and Aztec empire would be badass

  • @mayuthecop
    @mayuthecop 3 роки тому +88

    Battlefield: The Expanse, and you play as gunnery sergeant Bobbie Draper.

  • @ArionRDAW
    @ArionRDAW 3 роки тому +59

    A Battlefield in the World in Conflict setting.

    • @ln7929
      @ln7929 3 роки тому +10

      Nothing more American then defending a burger King from a Russian assault

    • @bl4k4tt84
      @bl4k4tt84 3 роки тому +11

      Nothing more Russian then paradropping t72 tanks to epic marching music

    • @calwagner1350
      @calwagner1350 3 роки тому

      Same

    • @maciejkamil
      @maciejkamil 3 роки тому

      Yes!

  • @TheOneWhoMightBe
    @TheOneWhoMightBe 3 роки тому +44

    'Battlefield: Rome Invicta' sounds legit.
    Another one might be 'Battlefield: Independence' where the Redcoats press the Independence movement harder and break Washingtons' armies instead of giving them the space they needed to survive and regroup, giving a PoD for sequels set in the modern-but-different day.

    • @edgardox.feliciano3127
      @edgardox.feliciano3127 3 роки тому +3

      Cursed timeline, the greatest nation in the world isnt born.

    • @comradekenobi6908
      @comradekenobi6908 3 роки тому +4

      Battlefield: Civil War
      Like more modern US civil war stuff
      Union Vs Confederates but with automatic weapons

    • @edgardox.feliciano3127
      @edgardox.feliciano3127 3 роки тому +3

      @@comradekenobi6908 also cursed timeline, the union tears itself apart at a time when it was more united than the first one. The 2010s onward is the only era when a civil war is actually somewhat likely, i doubt a civil war would spill out in the 1900s at any time.

    • @comradekenobi6908
      @comradekenobi6908 3 роки тому +1

      @@edgardox.feliciano3127 ah Yes Union Vs Union civil war

    • @edgardox.feliciano3127
      @edgardox.feliciano3127 3 роки тому +1

      @@comradekenobi6908 bruh

  • @MuhammadRFabio
    @MuhammadRFabio 3 роки тому +33

    Why not Battlefield 40,042 ?!

    • @77professional
      @77professional 3 роки тому +8

      How about Battlefield M41? "For the Emperor!"

    • @tba113
      @tba113 3 роки тому

      The Siege of Vraks by itself would give you just about every type of combat you could want. Mechanized, infantry, urban, subterranean, aerial, even space warships, personal duels, stealth/sniper ops, and run-for-your-life survival horror.
      ...Well, I guess it doesn't have underwater or jungle fighting. But that's about it.

  • @Fenristhegreat
    @Fenristhegreat 3 роки тому +31

    2142 was a great game. Horribly underrated. I have some great memories of that battlefield.

  • @GBA811
    @GBA811 3 роки тому +47

    As Brazilian, as much I would like the ideia of Battlefield in South America, with the Brazilian Armed Forces involved, I don't see any moment in our history that we could be in a modern conflict.

    • @antonioabreu5736
      @antonioabreu5736 3 роки тому +2

      Maybe if Brazil was a battlefield where powerful nations fought. That would be cool.

    • @ofthecaribbean
      @ofthecaribbean 3 роки тому

      South America will never have a Battlefield because it has always been the most peaceful continent

    • @darkhope97
      @darkhope97 3 роки тому

      Well to be fair there were a bunch of SA maps in bad company

    • @cocaineisahellofadrug3667
      @cocaineisahellofadrug3667 3 роки тому +3

      @@ofthecaribbean no it isnt

    • @jesseberg3271
      @jesseberg3271 3 роки тому +3

      All you have to do is set it +20 years in the future and explain that everything that could go wrong, did go wrong.

  • @pclone5019
    @pclone5019 3 роки тому +56

    Top 5 settings which would immediately make me more interested in Battlefield:
    Battlefield: 1920+
    Battlefield: Kaiserreich
    Battlefield: Millennium 42
    Battlefield: Falling Sun (Alt Hist American and Soviet Invasion of Japan)
    Battlefield: 1984

    • @meteorstorm415
      @meteorstorm415 3 роки тому +10

      Battlefield 1984 as in Oceania?

    • @yksisolttu
      @yksisolttu 3 роки тому +8

      Fighting for the Kaiser against those infernal Syndies would be my dream

    • @talalshahbaz2220
      @talalshahbaz2220 3 роки тому +3

      Battlefield Redflood would be crazy

    • @workingjoe5599
      @workingjoe5599 3 роки тому +2

      @@talalshahbaz2220 battlefield: Omsk
      200 vs 200 player servers

    • @quocvietophu5452
      @quocvietophu5452 3 роки тому

      @@workingjoe5599 man of culture

  • @chadkingoffuckmountain970
    @chadkingoffuckmountain970 3 роки тому +64

    I got an idea:
    Battlefield: Earth.
    The video game version of a shitty scientology movie.

    • @TemplinInstitute
      @TemplinInstitute  3 роки тому +46

      While you were still learning how to SPELL YOUR NAME, I was being trained to conquer GALAXIES! To do anything less is a disgrace to my entire family line!

    • @Tuikkal
      @Tuikkal 3 роки тому +2

      DO YOU WANT LUNCH?

    • @marimcgee8379
      @marimcgee8379 3 роки тому

      That movie was one of my guilty pleasures to see.

    • @JacatackLP
      @JacatackLP 3 роки тому

      The book slapped when I was in middle school but looking back...

  • @gnaskar
    @gnaskar 3 роки тому +7

    Battlefield 1887. I have not checked what wars there were that year, but it was probably not ones we've seen too often.

  • @ethanmcfarland8240
    @ethanmcfarland8240 3 роки тому +35

    A Post apocalyptic battlefield would be amazing

    • @blindoutlaw
      @blindoutlaw 3 роки тому +9

      Battlefield: Road Warrior

    • @studtistics2448
      @studtistics2448 3 роки тому +7

      Fallout, but with battlefield mechanics.

  • @92HazelMocha
    @92HazelMocha 3 роки тому +8

    Bad Company 3; BC has always been the perfect mix of incredible destructibility, humor, and letting you feel like an absolute nobody in a large scale conflict.

  • @alexanderrothman7830
    @alexanderrothman7830 3 роки тому +168

    Long live the people's federation of ROME!

  • @Slavesforsale1
    @Slavesforsale1 3 роки тому +11

    Battlefield 2242 sounds awesome. Wish there were more Sci-fi games with more believable stakes. Would be cool if their were multiple human space empires as well as aliens embroiled in a massive Galaxy spanning war over something stupid like the rights to a backwater planet or a assassinated alien politician.

  • @maxfieldjoyner5244
    @maxfieldjoyner5244 3 роки тому +22

    Battlefield Kaiserreich: WW2 game set in the Kaiserreich mod focused on conflicts from the Second Weltkrieg to the second American civil war. Playable factions at the start would include the Commune of France, German Empire, and Russian State. War stories would could be from the perspectives of a Syndicalist soldier in the 2nd ACW, a Russian fighting in Ukraine, and a soldier fighting for the remnants of the French Republic.

    • @Somajsibere
      @Somajsibere 3 роки тому +4

      Honestly I was imagining the game would be set in the finishing years of the second American civil war, between a CSA, supported by a victorious Internationale(they would get equipment from the Wermarcht, France and Union of Britain) and the Pacific States of America supported by the remanants of the Entente, along with a democratic Japan, leading the Co-Prosperity Sphere and Russia.

    • @ironwolf5453
      @ironwolf5453 3 роки тому

      @@Somajsibere Victorious internationale? That's kinda cringe bruh

    • @JacatackLP
      @JacatackLP 3 роки тому +1

      @@ironwolf5453 sorry you can’t handle based when you see it

    • @ironwolf5453
      @ironwolf5453 3 роки тому

      @@JacatackLP I can, when I see Entente world conquest

    • @JacatackLP
      @JacatackLP 3 роки тому +1

      @@ironwolf5453 SUPAH cringe

  • @imperialclassstardestroyer5881
    @imperialclassstardestroyer5881 3 роки тому +10

    I have always wanted to see a battlefield game covering the different wars that actually happened during the cold war era. I feel like the iran-iraq war in particular would be an absolutely perfect setting for battlefield.

    • @dvf1736
      @dvf1736 3 роки тому +2

      The Angolan civil war would be interesting too, it'd probably be a bit less controversial than the Iran-Iraq war

  • @FulcrumK
    @FulcrumK 3 роки тому +8

    This background music.... memories.

    • @yksisolttu
      @yksisolttu 3 роки тому

      That is one of the best Battlefield musics ever

  • @77professional
    @77professional 3 роки тому +36

    I would prefer the African bush wars of the 80's to early 2000's.

    • @Luey_Luey
      @Luey_Luey 3 роки тому +3

      first congo war lel

    • @deathgripskaraoke9351
      @deathgripskaraoke9351 3 роки тому +7

      As cool as those conflicts are I really don't think a triple A studio would make a game in which the one of main factions is an Apartheid state that existed within recent living memory

  • @hooligan410
    @hooligan410 3 роки тому +13

    Battlefield: Mexican Chaos, The Mexican Drug War has further escalated when a powerful cartel attempted to assassinate the president, this causes Mexico to be a war-torn nation with cartels fighting for territory and the military trying to fight them off.

  • @patchgatsby9138
    @patchgatsby9138 3 роки тому +3

    I'm a huge fan of an alternate history or even human like beings on another planet. I would like to see an alternate history 1925-1935 technology setting. The idea of a continuation of WWII/Operation Unthinkable is also a cool idea.

  • @Karnage316
    @Karnage316 3 роки тому +8

    Battlefield : Tiberium Wars.... give us GDI vs Nod multiplayer first person combat with access to drive all of the C&C vehicles :D

  • @Emanon...
    @Emanon... 3 роки тому +119

    It depends on the "political enemy of the day"
    Arabs. Russians. Latin Americans. (Not the Chinese, because you want to be able to sell your shit in China.)
    It's just a game, but quite the insight in the contemporary political currents of the time.

    • @Emanon...
      @Emanon... 3 роки тому +4

      @@aaronmchale7522 hahaha, yeah I guess. But making the CCP the baddies is a definite no-go.

    • @ln7929
      @ln7929 3 роки тому +4

      Isn't it to late since bf4 is about over throwing communist china

    • @ln7929
      @ln7929 3 роки тому +4

      I only mention that because they did the same thing for wwz but forgot Brad Pitt made a movie in Tibet and got banned

    • @aaronmchale7522
      @aaronmchale7522 3 роки тому +3

      @@Emanon... battlefield 4 had china as the main antagonists of their campaign.

    • @Emanon...
      @Emanon... 3 роки тому

      @@aaronmchale7522 oh, didn't know that.
      Is it also available in China?

  • @artificerdrachen6908
    @artificerdrachen6908 3 роки тому +15

    Strangereal, huh? It would be interesting to see the Demons of Razgriz fighting overhead in a singleplayer campaign.

  • @heero75
    @heero75 3 роки тому +46

    As a fan of the Southern Victory Series by Harry Tutledove how about Battlefield America with the USA and the CSA (the South having won the Civil War) fighting in either WW1 or WW2 like the books or carry it more into the future in the 1960s or 80s. Fighting in the remains of Richmond to take the CSA capital or defending Cincinnati from an invasion across the Ohio river would be a neat turn.

    • @SeriouslySirius1066
      @SeriouslySirius1066 3 роки тому +13

      As cool as that sounds and I love alternate history stories, that will be politicized heavily by the media. With things as it is now in todays political climate its going to end up being a shit storm by the media and people in general. HBO's Confederate series (which was a alternate history series where the American Civil War was stalemated) ended up canceled because of politicized it was by the media. Things are just too politically volatile for us to have something like that made into a AAA title game. We can't have nice things anymore.

    • @heero75
      @heero75 3 роки тому +4

      @@SeriouslySirius1066 Sadly you are probably right, the only way it could happen would be if the South still lost the civil war and instead in say the 1960s a second civil war broke out from the culture war turning hot or a war between the Western states and the Eastern states that had nothing to do with slavery or race.

  • @twrampage
    @twrampage 3 роки тому +18

    How about Battlefield: Australia, where the Australian Defense Force battles the People's Emu Triumvirate Army for control of the continent?

  • @lazychuckproductions
    @lazychuckproductions 3 роки тому +3

    The next Battlefield game should be the defense of Korea from China or even a future where you are a Marine in one of Japan's American bases. The objective to retake each city from south to north. Maybe fighting during a tsunami or typhoon. The concept of a tightly packed city. Would be kinda cool.

  • @gabrielandradeferraz386
    @gabrielandradeferraz386 3 роки тому +2

    just imagine an abrams looking tank with the Roman Aquila on top and a very stylized SPQR sort of graffitied in the barrel of the cannon

  • @sohrabroozbahani4700
    @sohrabroozbahani4700 3 роки тому +20

    Titanfall 2 had nice campaign, some colonial militia trying to fight back corporate mercenary armies over some resources... very human and just enough reason to cause all sorts of atrocities and heroics...

    • @tunguska2370
      @tunguska2370 3 роки тому +5

      You see...
      In the future villains working as corporation

  • @GrassesOn97
    @GrassesOn97 3 роки тому +70

    Battlefield: unga bunga: Uruk bashes Buruk over the head with a rock for 24 hours
    (Or a Korean War setting, maybe even, if I dare suggest, a 19th century setting with breach loading riffles, muskets, Gatling guns, Napoleonic cannons, etc.)

    • @GreenBlueWalkthrough
      @GreenBlueWalkthrough 3 роки тому

      Or civil war or even better olde world wars the ones before WW1 and call it Battlefield 0.

    • @GrassesOn97
      @GrassesOn97 3 роки тому +1

      @@GreenBlueWalkthrough maybe Zulu or Franco-Prussian war

    • @silvermasktraveler1788
      @silvermasktraveler1788 3 роки тому +1

      @@GrassesOn97 nobody’s going to play those. Having 5 or 6 guns to only pick from the entire game.

    • @georgethompson1460
      @georgethompson1460 3 роки тому

      @@silvermasktraveler1788 you know there where more than 5/6 guns before ww1 right.

    • @runecrafter753
      @runecrafter753 3 роки тому

      I would love a Korean war setting!

  • @VeteranAlpha
    @VeteranAlpha 3 роки тому +4

    Honestly do you know what would be cool?
    Battlefield Warhammer 40K.
    Just imagine a single match... The Space Marines, the various Astra Millennium Regiments, the factions ranging from Humans to Orcs to Heretics, the guns, the vehicles, the maps set on all of those different planets across the universe. It would be absolutely mental.

    • @LordOfTheEyebots
      @LordOfTheEyebots 3 роки тому

      Set a joke map of somewhere on catachan and watch as every five seconds some poor guardsman dies from some map element lmao

    • @VeteranAlpha
      @VeteranAlpha 3 роки тому

      @@LordOfTheEyebots On the Catachan map there would be a 50% to spawn and die instantly because you caught a new disease. 😂
      But on a real note. A Catachan map would be like a futuristic and more badass Vietnam war map.

  • @Damien_N
    @Damien_N 3 роки тому +5

    I definitely love the aesthetic of Ralph Fiennes’ version of Coriolanus.

    • @grimelysecheh6028
      @grimelysecheh6028 3 роки тому

      Scrolled through the comments section to find this, thank you

  • @zupugi
    @zupugi 3 роки тому +5

    I actually think the Strangereal approach would be really cool and kinda freeing for DICE to do whatever they pleased.

  • @trygveplaustrum4634
    @trygveplaustrum4634 3 роки тому +6

    I'd love to see the East African Federation involved in the next Battlefield!

  • @casbot71
    @casbot71 3 роки тому +4

    A very near future idea:
    Battlefield involving China, the war is fought over *Hard Drive Storage* as the rest of the world tries to get back PC parts from the *cryptocurrency miners.*
    _"First they came for our graphics cards and we did nothing, now all storage is threatened … the line must be drawn here"._
    [The irony is the game will probably be a 100 gig download].

  • @novakhin1642
    @novakhin1642 3 роки тому +12

    battlefield: kane lives ... again i want it, i need it

  • @Quinton151
    @Quinton151 3 роки тому +4

    YEAH! BAD COMPANY 3! LETS GOOOO!!!!

  • @imperialzealot2939
    @imperialzealot2939 3 роки тому +6

    Esta seção de comentários foi anexada em nome do Império do Brasil.

    • @cavaleiroamarelo1139
      @cavaleiroamarelo1139 3 роки тому +2

      kkkk The joke is that the monarchist movement and the restoration of the empire of Brasil is gaining major support lately because of the delusion with the left and right wings of the government.

  • @DreadNought0255
    @DreadNought0255 3 роки тому +3

    You know what'd be interesting? If NATO with US at the center would be the clearest antagonists. A scenario where no one is clearly the mustache twirling, cackling evil, but if present, the single-player story is seen mostly through the eyes of fighters who are fighting against what we would have usually seen as the good guys. I don't see it as entirely unbelievable that some socio- and geopolitical situation has resulted in NATO, EU and UN as we know it to have cracked, splintered and reformed. New alliances and all that. With nations normally depicted as liberators or fighters for good, having turned towards overt ultra-nationalism and the conflicts themselves being centered around smaller nations and alliances desperately fighting against larger ones who would conquer and annex these nations and regions for resources, positions, simple buffer-territory or because they allied themselves with some other actor and thus became enemy by proxy.
    But Strangereal is a really cool option too. And 2142 brings back sweet memories.

  • @VoiceOfTheEmperor
    @VoiceOfTheEmperor 3 роки тому +9

    This was what I was thinking of for DICE to capture. Something focusing on the Eastern Front AND the Pacific War.

  • @baronvonbork2856
    @baronvonbork2856 3 роки тому +6

    Battlefield: 1947
    With Japan knocking out almost everything in Pearl Harbor US pulls almost half of it's resources from the European theater to the Pacific Theater to defend it's US territory. Meanwhile there is a stalemate at Eastern Europe and Italian Peninsula as a result of reduced help from USA

    • @TheOneWhoMightBe
      @TheOneWhoMightBe 3 роки тому +1

      Harry Turtledove did something about this, where the IJN did managed to sink the US carrier fleet and then invaded and occupied the Hawiian Islands (mainly O'ahu). Even in the books they knew it was futile and the US would taken them back but it was purely an attempt buy them time to create a defensive perimiter closer to the home islands. The loss of the Hawiian Islands and much of the Pacific Fleet sets the Allies back by a couple of years as they retreat and rebuild, leaving Imperial Japan pretty much to its own devices in the Pacific.
      There's also quite a lot of rape and attempted rape in the two books, which, while it is historically accurate to what the IJ forces did to civilian populations, isn't necessary to advance the story, and may put you off the story.

  • @thefirstprimariscatosicari6870
    @thefirstprimariscatosicari6870 3 роки тому +2

    Now to make a video about 2042. Kind of similar to your ideas, even if an Hot Cold War would have been quite good too. I like the ecological wars background!

  • @boris001000
    @boris001000 Рік тому

    Battlefield: Military Sci-Fi vs Fantasy! That's basically an idea I have been creating in Game Ideas wiki. One side has hover tanks, mechs, and power armored infantry, other has magic knights, cavalry, dragons, and gods!

  • @saberdewsproductions6422
    @saberdewsproductions6422 2 роки тому +2

    The intro aged well in the last 11 months

  • @CaptainZlex
    @CaptainZlex 3 роки тому +3

    Battlefield: Roma Invicta sounds really cool.

  • @joshuasantos3692
    @joshuasantos3692 2 роки тому +2

    “This one didn’t age quite so well”

  • @rgm-96xjesta31
    @rgm-96xjesta31 3 роки тому +3

    4:41
    So basically Iron Harvest's 1920+ universe then?

  • @saadvideoguru
    @saadvideoguru 3 роки тому +2

    Here's a slightly niche idea:
    Command and Conquer - Battlefield

  • @merkavamkivm3373
    @merkavamkivm3373 3 роки тому +1

    The last idea is very cool.

  • @blindoutlaw
    @blindoutlaw 3 роки тому +3

    How about we go backwards in time?
    Battlefield: War of the Roses/Pike and Shot/Last Kingdom (saxons vs Vikings)

  • @lordulberthellblaze6509
    @lordulberthellblaze6509 3 роки тому +1

    This will be absolutely controversial but a Battlefield game set during the 6 day war or Yom kippur war would be interesting.
    Of course the media firestorm would be more intense than the combat in game.
    Other ideas include Alternate History Sino Soviet Border Conflict escalation or India-Pakistan Wars
    Specifically the 2nd Kashmir war or the 1971 Conflict in Bangladesh.
    And for those wishing a more low level conflict like Vietnam, then Africa is full of potential
    The Algerian War of Independence, Portugese Colonial wars and the Rhodesian or South African Bush wars.
    The Cold War and decolonization era is chop full of potential.
    In the Middle east you also have the North Yemen Civil war dubbed "Egypt's Vietnam"
    And the Iran-Iraq War.

  • @jack1701e
    @jack1701e 3 роки тому +3

    Bad Company 3, they left us on a big cliff hanger we need a resolution!

  • @gundamheavyarms4879
    @gundamheavyarms4879 3 роки тому

    I grew up in Port Valdez, Alaska. Loved that map in Bad Company 2.

  • @VictorKiithsa
    @VictorKiithsa 3 роки тому +1

    Roman Republic vs Imperial China/Asia over the new world with ww2 era technology would be amazing, maybe even have the natives be a wildcard in there with rennasauce level tech.

  • @gundamheavyarms4879
    @gundamheavyarms4879 3 роки тому +1

    More than anything, I want a return to Bad Company.... the second one ended on one hell of a cliffhanger!

  • @jesseberg3271
    @jesseberg3271 3 роки тому +1

    The nice thing about the cold war turns hot idea is that if any of the multiplayer battles run over 15 minutes, they automatically end when the nukes fall and kill everyone still alive. Of course, that's also the downside, since the single player campaign ends 15 minutes after the war starts when the nukes fall and kill everyone still alive.

  • @definitelyslav2025
    @definitelyslav2025 3 роки тому +1

    Battlefield: Easter Front/ battlefield:Soviet Eye
    It’ll go across each year of ww2 from Soviet standpoint and across different characters. Starts with a prologue in the invasion of Finland but main story in USSR vs Germany. It will also have not only the won battles but also the lost battles. And it has to include a battle of Stalingrad Moscow and Leningrad.

  • @yeenmachine206
    @yeenmachine206 3 роки тому +3

    I'd want it to be a remake of 2142, but with a campaign on the scale of Battlefield 4's campaign

  • @kokolekroko882
    @kokolekroko882 3 роки тому +2

    1:03 And I'll march to your side camarades!

  • @darthhodges
    @darthhodges 3 роки тому +1

    I definitely like the idea of an alternate now (Rome or Iriqouis with 20th century tech) or a sci-fi future setting. I wonder if the makers of Battlefield would find Warhammer 40k worth pursuing, especially if they were willing to go all in and have as many factions as possible. Imagine a Battlefield game with 12 distinct factions and multiple sub factions for each.

  • @topsmug3409
    @topsmug3409 3 роки тому +1

    Honestly, tiberium wars battlefield practically writes itself.

  • @Engineofwarr
    @Engineofwarr 3 роки тому +5

    I want to return to the future... 2142.... But less ice and more... Titans, Battle Mechs, Goliaths, Hover tanks, and more...

  • @dirk903
    @dirk903 3 роки тому

    The plot from homefront was pretty cool
    I like the idea for a world war game where tones of fighting actually takes place in north america. All types of weather, all types of cities and towns etc.
    A mission called "the battle for Anchorage" seems like a good idea and gets my interest

  • @SpartanML
    @SpartanML 3 роки тому +2

    mfw The Templin Institute's actual endgame is to kick off an all-out interdimensional war drawing in as many high end combatants as possible just to see how it turns out. I'm ok with this.

  • @josesanchez1011
    @josesanchez1011 3 роки тому +1

    That last idea deserves to be a thing.

  • @scottjennings503
    @scottjennings503 3 роки тому

    That bit about an alternate-history Battlefield game reminds me, I should go request a Templin video on the Pacific Federation from Project Wingman.

  • @ColdHighway7
    @ColdHighway7 3 роки тому +1

    A Battlefield set in the Ace Combat Strangereal setting would be great. I love the Ace Combat series but a Cold War era game in which the war turns hot would be great too

  • @adamm.6595
    @adamm.6595 3 роки тому +2

    Coriolanus was a great modernization...

  • @TihetrisWeathersby
    @TihetrisWeathersby 3 роки тому +10

    I wouldn't mind a Medieval Battlefield or Call of Duty

    • @DOSFS
      @DOSFS 3 роки тому

      WHICH COD NEARLY DID ROMAN ERA------

    • @pob_42
      @pob_42 3 роки тому

      Chivalry/Mordhau/Mount and Blade already exists.

    • @TihetrisWeathersby
      @TihetrisWeathersby 3 роки тому

      @@pob_42
      And?

  • @shadowno2298
    @shadowno2298 3 роки тому +1

    Battlefield 1967/1973/Middle east? Six day war/Yom kippur war gone too hot scenario? Could also use some "Expirimental" tech like Pereh TD or galil/Merkava/Lavi prototype? Also will provide great maps. Sinai desert for flat tank and AT battles, mount hermon outpost for close querters, golan hights/Vally of tears for tank on tank action with alot of places to get into a shooting position, suez outposts for those who like trenches, morters and room to room combat. It cam be a great game.

  • @ekszentrik
    @ekszentrik 3 роки тому

    If you haven't seen it, you absolutely need to the film Titus. It doesn't have military elements, but is a fascinating take on a modern-day Rome.

  • @clement28300yip
    @clement28300yip Рік тому +1

    I actually like the last one with "People's Federation of Rome" vs "Xi Dynasty".

  • @ThatTrafficCone
    @ThatTrafficCone 3 роки тому +5

    Maybe the Battlefield franchise isn't the best suited for this, but I'd love to see an alternate history where the US uses nukes during the Korean War. While the war ends in a decisive US victory, the world is left appalled. You play as the British, when behind closed doors NATO teams up with the Warsaw Pact to retaliate militarily against the US and try to take away the nukes from this nuke-happy superpower. You'd play with '50s tech in Korea, Europe, and the US as basically the entire world teams up against the US, and probably end with its fragmentation.

  • @cass7448
    @cass7448 3 роки тому

    I'd be on-board for a far-future setting like you described, but I'm also very conscious of the WW2-sized hole that BFV promised to fill but didn't. I'd unironically like Dice to give it another shot.

  • @RomLoneWolf23
    @RomLoneWolf23 3 роки тому

    I was gonna suggest an alternate Steampunk or Battlefield timeline, but the Roma Invicta timeline sounds dope. Maybe the conflict is between the People's Republic of Rome and the Eastern Roman Empire, with China and the Persians being extra factions.

  • @Vanq22114
    @Vanq22114 2 роки тому +1

    "Although the Templin Institute does not currently have the ability to spark global wars, it's something we're working on."
    Concern.

  • @TheT7770ify
    @TheT7770ify 3 роки тому +7

    Personally I don't really play battlefield but I think it would be rad if they did a Mass Effect spin off in the battlefield style. Something like playing another N7 fighting Cerberus or the Reaper invasion on another front well Commander Shepard is reangling politicians in

    • @michaelknox3715
      @michaelknox3715 3 роки тому

      What about the First Contact War?

    • @TheT7770ify
      @TheT7770ify 3 роки тому

      @@michaelknox3715 It was like a week long wasn't it? I feel like it would be kind of limited in what you can do.

  • @krthecarguy5150
    @krthecarguy5150 3 роки тому +5

    This might be a completely insane idea, but I'd like to see a Desert Storm Gone Hot approach, with Iraq being an actual formidable foe instead of a walk in the park and it actually takes effort to defeat them

    • @joshuajoaquin5099
      @joshuajoaquin5099 3 роки тому +2

      You mean if they didn't invade Iran and goes to the Kuwait instead? Iraqi military after the Iran Iraq war is a shadow of its former self. Plus Airstrikes were so powerful that it help reduced the Iraqi divisions

  • @navypolice55
    @navypolice55 3 роки тому

    All of these sound like fun but my personnel favorite is the Roma Invicta idea.

  • @commanderwookiecopc806
    @commanderwookiecopc806 3 роки тому +6

    Battlefield: Tiberian Sun when?

  • @runecrafter753
    @runecrafter753 3 роки тому +1

    My ideal next battlefield game would be one of three settings. 1. A vietnam war battlefield, I'm not particularly picky about the year it is set in just as long as we get a reasonably historically accurate campaign with interesting Vietcong AI that are constantly trying to ambush the player and their squad.
    2. My second dream battlefield would be a bad company three. The ending to the second game to me just ended on a cliffhanger which just left a sour taste in my mouth tbh. Either a conclusion or just another adventure with the cast of bad would be fine.
    3. My third idea, which is probably the least likely to happen, would be a game set in the korean war. I say it's the least likely to happen because I have a feeling EA will be much more concerned about pleasing daddy china than choosing setting that involved china as a major combatant against the U.S and its allies. Which sucks because that is the one out of the three I would most want. I'm sick and tired of future wars and half-assed ww2 games. A Korean war battlefield would be the second time I've been surprised at the setting they chose for a battlefield game (the 1st being ww1 for bf1). Plus No one has ever really made a shooter set in the Korean war as far as I'm aware and would be great at once again bringing the series into new territory.

  • @viper3-346
    @viper3-346 3 роки тому +1

    Coriolanus ! Loved that movie.

  • @TheSgruby
    @TheSgruby 3 роки тому

    Battlefield: Warlord Era (China)- early modern equipment, action from modern cities like like Shanghai, to rice field countryside, to steppes of Manchuria. Warlords (good ones, bad ones and crazy ones), mercenaries from world, European Powers, Japan, Soviet Union and some common bandits.

  • @bubbasbigblast8563
    @bubbasbigblast8563 3 роки тому +5

    Sci-Fi is feeling a little overdone now, so maybe something more fantastical, like a WW2/Korean War technology faction against something more magically inclined, where both sides are after each-other's technology because it will make them completely dominate over the other. That way, you can actually make grabbing people's gear and vehicles into more of a game mechanic, where the winning side starts getting powerful hybrid weapons, and the losing one can do things like write off one or two control points, destroying them so the current loser can focus more on the points they're more likely to be able to control.

  • @IamgRiefeR7
    @IamgRiefeR7 3 роки тому

    A Battlefield set in the Kaiserreich universe, specifically the Second American Civil War, with the factions having American weapons mixed with lend lease from nations which back them: the CSA receiving French and British weapons, the AUS with German guns, the Pacific States Japanese equipment, etc. Combine with fighting across the vast lands of the US, from the steps of the White House to rural villages in central America, the so called "Fly-over states".

  • @dr.mcninja7354
    @dr.mcninja7354 3 роки тому

    I’ve also always thought a Cold War era Battlefield game would be an incredible idea. That and a Korean War Battlefield. They already took a chance with the lesser represented wars with BF1 and people really liked it, so I hope it’s something they try at some point.

  • @privatejfx1412
    @privatejfx1412 3 роки тому

    I would like to see a Battlefield set in the C&C Tiberium universe. Would definitely be awesome to be part of a massive amphibious landing in Estonia to kick off TW1 or dense fighting around the Temple of Nod. Basically Renegade X on steroids.