Equivalent focal lengths.. So its an 85mm on the full frame and 55mm on the APSC (82.5) Both F1.8 If I had 85 on each lens it'd look drastically different
Crop sensor gets so much hate.. and I honestly don't know why..🤷🏼♂️ As long as you're lighting your images well then it looks great! + you arent fighting to keep things in focus all the time
@@ajsarsfield from what I understand (I’m fairly new but come from professional audio world) it is simply because most are used to shooting full frame. Multiple colleagues admit that they would just buy numerous fx30s if not for how accustomed they have become to their ff counterparts. Not to mention pros love shit like built in nd etc. The argument for the money shouldn’t be between the fx3 and fx30 imo. It should between the fx30 and the fx6. The fx6 compared to the fx3 price wise is a massive upgrade compared to the vast price ocean between the fx30 and the fx3. And this is coming from someone who has his cameras purchased by his company…
I used both crop and FF , both have a different purpose on my shooting style. When I am doing event especially during wedding reception, I used 2x APS-C body. It’s lightweight and has better IBIS due to it smaller sensor. Plus constant aperture Zoom lenses are far more cheaper on APS-C. My FF body is solely for portraits , the advantages of FF sensors will come to play above 85mm lenses! Those background compression and creamy bokeh are it main strengths against APS-C . So yeah, there are no correct or wrong choices between the two, it just they have a different purposes.
Same here! that's why I have 1 of each 🤭 I shoot weddings too (video though) and having that extra apsc reach is great in certain locations. Or as you said the smaller form factor comes in handy.. Everyone always complains "apsc is worse in low light" but 9/10 time I rarely have to go over 800 iso and it still looks great Even up to 3200 isn't too bad
That’s bc theres more dynamic range in that particular sensor (not just bc it’s full frame). An aps c or super 35mm or even micro four thirds sensor would have equal or better detail in highlights in this specific image if the sensor quality was on par or greater. The biggest difference between apsc and full frame or any smaller sensor vs full frame is the amount of light it is able to allow in to expose the image. It’s like what cup can carry more water? Well answer is obvious the larger one. And since bokeh is directly correlated with the f stop or aperture the primary distinguishing mark between apsc (or smaller sensor) when compared to full frame is the intensity of the bokeh.
Also the color transitions are much kore subtle in FF. Transition from background to head shot is smooth, while there is a definite glow in case of Crop.
@@upcloseoutdooradventuresdo larger sensors actually gather more light? I have a hunch that f1.8 is f1.8 regardless of sensor size in terms of light intensity. I set up my full frame camera to have equivalent settings as my iPhone and the resulting image was of exactly the same brightness.
I think its easier to point out the difference if its a portrait lens due to the background blur. May be try quizing us using wide angle lens. I think its going to be a great test
I see a lot of people talking about how the bokeh is a huge giveaway (which it is) but to me one thing that stood out is that the full frame has better dynamic range, the contrast just seems a bit more profound. Maybe I’m just seeing things but i feel like there is a difference in the color richness between both.
you're probably right too! Full frame usually does have slightly better dynamic range! Even using the same picture profiles etc.. Not always the easiest thing to see depending on what device you're viewing it on though
Technically Full Frame sensors don't provide more blur by itself, The 85mm lens on the FF sensor provides the extra blur because its more telephoto to get the same FOV as the 55 on the crop BUT if I had an 85mm 1.8 on FF and a 55 1.2 on the crop the DOF would probably look the same...
@@ajsarsfield bro i tried cropped sensor camera and full frame camera with the same lens ( 50mm 1.8f ) and the result are that the full frame gave me more blur , you can try it 😊
@@ajsarsfieldif the width of the aps c sensor is similar to the height of a full frame (just slightly smaller) then if I shoot a vertical photo on aps c I should have an half of a horizontal full frame picture, right? Could it be a good way to compare the bokeh?
Top is the Full frame weirdly! That colour/contrast is probably the slight lens difference Top is A7iii with a Sony 85mm 1.8 And bottom is the Sony A6600 with the Zeiss 55 1.8 Both a bit older cams these days bur csn produce great looking images still
Price wise i think I'm going to have to go for one of the Alpha6000's with the kit lens to start with, even if i only want a 16-50mm and something wider in general (won't be using anything longer in the immediate future!) i think its still gonna be too expensive for me to start on a full frame, even though i would definitely benefit from the low light performance, and i feel the sharpness and light collection of a full frame would be good. Its a shame the kit lens on the crop sensor comes out at like 24-75mm, i just wish a 10-18mm E fit lens was cheaper ! Argh! (All in good time) Thanks for the comparison anyway, good stuff for my research!
Exactly! I do these tests to show that's its not really necessary to have The most expensive gear to create good images.. Sure FF looks a tiny bit different but if both shots are well lit they look great
Holy smokes! I just realized the limitations of crop sensor in this video. When you use a 55mm focal length on a APS-C is a 85mm equivalent but the depth of field doesn’t adjust to the 85mm focal length, stays at 55mm. Problem is, if you use an 85mm focal length it’s now punched into 135mm. This make sense?
YES!!! That's exactly it. You get the benefits of a longer reach without the actual Optics of a longer lens.. Which can be good in some situations Shooting sports for example easier to keep subjects in focus because less shallow DOF etc.. But for shooting portraits etc. You'd potentially be using a less flattering lens and youd also need a Faster aperture to get the same DOF as the FF lens...
Ill try to explain 🤭 A speed booster is just another piece of glass that helps focus the full image circle from full frame lenses onto smaller crop sensors. (Theyre basically Reverse teleconverters ) So the lens and optics technically don't change BUT You are now seeing more of the lens Image so you get a wider FOV. AND becsuse it's now a wider FOV (Effectively a wider lens) The Fstop also changes to let in more light because Fstop is a mathematical calculation of focal length / Entrance pupil of the lens.. But Becsuse it's only an effective change not a literal one, sadly the DOF doesn't change even though the F stop/exposure does This is very complex for just a comment 🤭 But there's some great articles n videos out there demonstrating how it works.. I used to have a speedbooster when I shot Lumix cameras and they worked super well
Both are great in their own way! 🔥 I actually like crop sensors, especially when shooting at these low apitures cause you still get a nice blurry background but you have slightly more subject in focus.. Instead if just an eyelash or tip of a nose 😅
I added a very simple LUT to them both (same one) But I shoot mostly in Cine 4 picture profile (Not LOG) so the footage doesn't need too much doing to it.
The depth of field always gives it away. But people with no experience won’t care at all. They won’t even see it. Imo, we put too much time and effort into equipment.
100% agree with you.. That's honestly why I started making these types of videos originally... They were to show how there's not THAT much of a noticeable difference to the average audience, its ONLY creators who care or notice...
I only have 3 weeks of experience in photography with my Nikon D3300 and I noticed with ease...so. The real question is, if it's possible to guess without the comparison.
they both look beautiful and the differences is ignorable for the viewers. only until low light shooting comes in, full frame is much easier to work with.
Oh for sure!! Full frame will 100% shine in those more difficult situations! Although saying that, lots of modern APSC cameras are getting pretty good in low light now as well
the debates keeps the market and its economy going, thats why they exist. after all more than half of user use them to shoot test videos, its their way of fun. I own both but honestly when it comes to making meaningful videos most of them come out of my phone. it just happened to be in my pocket. no spec makes me focus on sequences and angles. result usually better. @@ajsarsfield
Lighting wise i think he looks better on photo B, his beard is a warmer brown and his clothes look comfortably worn out rather than very light and just bought B looks comfortable A looks professional
I know that the bokeh is a big tell but actually the first things i noticed were more “tele” looking perspective because of the higher focal length which also lead to the difference in bokeh and also the contrast and dynamic range difference is obvious to the experienced eyes. And the things is it would be harder to tell from the colors and contrast ratios because you actually used a good crop frame camera i’d say that is a sony a6700 or something , most crop frame cameras footage is worse than that
@PenguinsTechStuff because it'd be WAY more obvious to guess 🤭 One of the images would be WAY more zoomed in than the other OR I'd have to move one of the cameras back like 5 or 10 feet to Try and kind of match the same framing But the background wouldn't look the same size, so it'd still be obvious
if i remember correctly, I think the one further away will look Less shallow.. Distance to the subject is one of the things that affects how DOF looks!
I assume its because 35mm "film" was the common size for years. So It made sense to call it "full frame" for people switching from film to digital cameras to know that their current lens collection would Fit the cameras properly Where as anything with a smaller sensor would be "cropped"
Not necessarily true... Sensor size doesn't directly affect depth of field Distance to subject Lens focal length And F stop do though. So technically the 85mm F1.8 Vs the 55mm F1.8 I used should be the same distance and F stop BUT the focal length is physically longer on the full frame (85mm) so will be more blurry due to compression
A = fullframe, B= crop sensor (softer bokeh in A, magnification in B a bit bigger, colors seem a bit different... but in this format (seeing a micropicture that's made for consumation on smartphone...) it's not relevant.
100% agree.. I started this series to see if the difference was actually worth it for "online" viewing.. and most of the time it's hardly noticeable, as long as you light/compose a shot well
That is true! (Depends on pixel density a bit) But it's hard to tell for most people when you use ND filters and are shooting outside. Compression and DOF are the bigger Differences here (which are still small not super noticeable to an average viewer)
Hell even Film was basicslly super 35 for the longest time too! People put WAY too much emphasis on sensor size etc... When in reality if you're lighting your footage right, audiences won't care and probably cant even tell the difference
Exactly! That's kinda the point of these videos tbh.. I started this series to show that for "online" or phone watching it rarely matters what type of equipment you use. its more about what you do with it
E n el A es más pronunciado el bokeh y hay más información en altas luces. Pero eso lo sé porque me he fijado en eso para descubrir cuál es cuál. Si no plantearas esa pregunta, me habrían parecido iguales 🤷♂️
You got it!!! Also the background is a BIT more out of focus on that one too Larger sensor = i need a longer lens to get the same shot, so more compression/Bokeh
![Is Full Frame Better Than APS-C? Here's The [Annoying] Truth...](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tOx3Y52EPNI/mqdefault.jpg)
Bottom is crop sensor, seems more adjusted to the frame
Is the focal length the same?
Equivalent focal lengths..
So its an 85mm on the full frame and 55mm on the APSC (82.5)
Both F1.8
If I had 85 on each lens it'd look drastically different
It's because of the crop factor
@@ajsarsfieldif we use 55mm f1.2 on the crop sensor, vs 85mm 1.8 on the ff, i think the bokeh will be similar
They almost look the same. A slight difference in focal length. The nain difference is the depth of field.
B is crop sensor
It’s a little punched in and the depth of field is just a tad deeper.
Good eyes!
The DOF is defo the biggest giveaway
85mm FF and 55mm crop (both 1.8)
I actually personally think it looks better as well.
Crop sensor gets so much hate.. and I honestly don't know why..🤷🏼♂️
As long as you're lighting your images well then it looks great!
+ you arent fighting to keep things in focus all the time
@@ajsarsfield from what I understand (I’m fairly new but come from professional audio world) it is simply because most are used to shooting full frame. Multiple colleagues admit that they would just buy numerous fx30s if not for how accustomed they have become to their ff counterparts. Not to mention pros love shit like built in nd etc. The argument for the money shouldn’t be between the fx3 and fx30 imo. It should between the fx30 and the fx6. The fx6 compared to the fx3 price wise is a massive upgrade compared to the vast price ocean between the fx30 and the fx3. And this is coming from someone who has his cameras purchased by his company…
@@ajsarsfield I was able to tell A is full frame. B is sharper though.
The full frame one looks more dreamy!
I used both crop and FF , both have a different purpose on my shooting style.
When I am doing event especially during wedding reception, I used 2x APS-C body. It’s lightweight and has better IBIS due to it smaller sensor. Plus constant aperture Zoom lenses are far more cheaper on APS-C.
My FF body is solely for portraits , the advantages of FF sensors will come to play above 85mm lenses! Those background compression and creamy bokeh are it main strengths against APS-C .
So yeah, there are no correct or wrong choices between the two, it just they have a different purposes.
Same here!
that's why I have 1 of each 🤭
I shoot weddings too (video though) and having that extra apsc reach is great in certain locations.
Or as you said the smaller form factor comes in handy..
Everyone always complains "apsc is worse in low light" but 9/10 time I rarely have to go over 800 iso and it still looks great
Even up to 3200 isn't too bad
The obvious difference is the way your face looks - distortion difference is the main difference between so called equivalents. ;)
Which constant aperture zoom lens you have?
Your comment will be valuable for next 10 years. ✨
The one from the crop is the one from the setup that was the easiest to carry around and the cheapest.
Its not only bokeh, with experienced eyes over can easily tell top one is FF
Bokeh is the most obvious thing... but you're right haha ✅️
yeah the top one visibly has more detail on the highlights
That’s bc theres more dynamic range in that particular sensor (not just bc it’s full frame).
An aps c or super 35mm or even micro four thirds sensor would have equal or better detail in highlights in this specific image if the sensor quality was on par or greater.
The biggest difference between apsc and full frame or any smaller sensor vs full frame is the amount of light it is able to allow in to expose the image.
It’s like what cup can carry more water? Well answer is obvious the larger one.
And since bokeh is directly correlated with the f stop or aperture the primary distinguishing mark between apsc (or smaller sensor) when compared to full frame is the intensity of the bokeh.
Also the color transitions are much kore subtle in FF. Transition from background to head shot is smooth, while there is a definite glow in case of Crop.
@@upcloseoutdooradventuresdo larger sensors actually gather more light? I have a hunch that f1.8 is f1.8 regardless of sensor size in terms of light intensity.
I set up my full frame camera to have equivalent settings as my iPhone and the resulting image was of exactly the same brightness.
I think its easier to point out the difference if its a portrait lens due to the background blur. May be try quizing us using wide angle lens.
I think its going to be a great test
I agree! I need to get 2 equiv wide lenses for that..
Wider would be much harder cause of the lack of shallow DOF...
A feels fullframe with smoother bokeh
Good eye!!
both 1.8 but the 85mm on the Full frame just has More compression/ shallower DOF
The bottom one is crop but the quantity is slightly better also
Can we get 1.8 FF vs 1.4/1.2 APSC, with equivalent mm. Thanks, great video
“Equivalent lens” very important.
100%
This would be a whole different Shot/test if I used the exact same lens on both haha
I see a lot of people talking about how the bokeh is a huge giveaway (which it is) but to me one thing that stood out is that the full frame has better dynamic range, the contrast just seems a bit more profound. Maybe I’m just seeing things but i feel like there is a difference in the color richness between both.
you're probably right too!
Full frame usually does have slightly better dynamic range!
Even using the same picture profiles etc..
Not always the easiest thing to see depending on what device you're viewing it on though
A = FF
B = crop
Crop is pushed in a bit and The bokeh isn’t as creamy it’s more intense.
Wow, this is amazing! Thank you for sharing this
I've never used a CS before but using FF all my life I can confidently say the top one is the full frame sensor.
the shallow depth of field is what makes it unique so the A is full frame for sure
Good Eye!!!
Easy to figure out If you know what to look for
(Apsc 55mm F1.8
vs
Full Frame 85mm F1.8)
@@ajsarsfield what are these cameras?
@@aperturefilm bit older now..
but the Sony A7iii and the Sony a6600
If. A had been stopped down slightly more to match faces (B has more face and bg def) then it would be harder to tell the difference.
Top is FF, immediately noticeable in the background and foreground separation
A is full frame , B is crop
For everyone who wants to identify the difference clearly : check the amount of blur ( full frame provides more blur )
Technically Full Frame sensors don't provide more blur by itself,
The 85mm lens on the FF sensor provides the extra blur because its more telephoto to get the same FOV as the 55 on the crop
BUT if I had an 85mm 1.8 on FF and a 55 1.2 on the crop the DOF would probably look the same...
@@ajsarsfield bro i tried cropped sensor camera and full frame camera with the same lens ( 50mm 1.8f ) and the result are that the full frame gave me more blur , you can try it 😊
@@ajsarsfieldif the width of the aps c sensor is similar to the height of a full frame (just slightly smaller) then if I shoot a vertical photo on aps c I should have an half of a horizontal full frame picture, right?
Could it be a good way to compare the bokeh?
The colours and contrast are nicer in the bottom, which is which? (I'm wondering what camera to get atm..)
Top is the Full frame weirdly!
That colour/contrast is probably the slight lens difference
Top is A7iii with a Sony 85mm 1.8
And bottom is the
Sony A6600 with the Zeiss 55 1.8
Both a bit older cams these days bur csn produce great looking images still
Price wise i think I'm going to have to go for one of the Alpha6000's with the kit lens to start with, even if i only want a 16-50mm and something wider in general (won't be using anything longer in the immediate future!) i think its still gonna be too expensive for me to start on a full frame, even though i would definitely benefit from the low light performance, and i feel the sharpness and light collection of a full frame would be good. Its a shame the kit lens on the crop sensor comes out at like 24-75mm, i just wish a 10-18mm E fit lens was cheaper ! Argh! (All in good time)
Thanks for the comparison anyway, good stuff for my research!
A is full frame and you cane make the difference only from the bokeh, otherwise you would not see the difference.
Exactly!
I do these tests to show that's its not really necessary to have The most expensive gear to create good images..
Sure FF looks a tiny bit different but if both shots are well lit they look great
B is crop sensor bcz the background compressed and it means you used a smaller focal length (to match the framing)
Bottom is cropped. The bokeh is not as dense as the top one.
YOU GOT IT!
easy when you know what to look for..
Holy smokes! I just realized the limitations of crop sensor in this video. When you use a 55mm focal length on a APS-C is a 85mm equivalent but the depth of field doesn’t adjust to the 85mm focal length, stays at 55mm. Problem is, if you use an 85mm focal length it’s now punched into 135mm.
This make sense?
YES!!!
That's exactly it.
You get the benefits of a longer reach without the actual Optics of a longer lens..
Which can be good in some situations
Shooting sports for example easier to keep subjects in focus because less shallow DOF etc..
But for shooting portraits etc.
You'd potentially be using a less flattering lens and youd also need a Faster aperture to get the same DOF as the FF lens...
@@ajsarsfield so what does a speed booster actually do?
Ill try to explain 🤭
A speed booster is just another piece of glass that helps focus the full image circle from full frame lenses onto smaller crop sensors.
(Theyre basically Reverse teleconverters )
So the lens and optics technically don't change BUT
You are now seeing more of the lens Image so you get a wider FOV.
AND becsuse it's now a wider FOV (Effectively a wider lens)
The Fstop also changes to let in more light because Fstop is a mathematical calculation of focal length / Entrance pupil of the lens..
But Becsuse it's only an effective change not a literal one, sadly the DOF doesn't change even though the F stop/exposure does
This is very complex for just a comment 🤭
But there's some great articles n videos out there demonstrating how it works..
I used to have a speedbooster when I shot Lumix cameras and they worked super well
@@ajsarsfield appreciate the explanation! Maybe something else to compare? Speed boost vs. full frame?
Me who exchange fullframe sony 7ii to aps c fuji xt2… should i feel remorse.. regret… no..?
Am i the only one who thinks crop sensor looks nicer?
Both are great in their own way! 🔥
I actually like crop sensors, especially when shooting at these low apitures cause you still get a nice blurry background but you have slightly more subject in focus..
Instead if just an eyelash or tip of a nose 😅
Do same test indoor plz, i think thats where we can see how much difference full frame can make.
Hi 😊 ! great comparison. just wanted to know did you used an Apsc lense on the A6600 ? or was it a full frame lens?
Both full frame lenses..
Sony 85mm F1.8
Vs Zeiss 55 F1.8 on the Apsc
@@ajsarsfield thankyou for info 😊👍🏻
Simple one nice pic small crop cheythu vechapolle und.... That is the variation
So...good full frame👍🏻
A is full frame B is crop senseor
A. Is a full frame, you can see slighly bright. The bigger senser the more light it will get.
Yes
Which cameras did you use, and did you edit / colour grade then or is this straight from camera
Sony a7iii and a sony a6600 - Same picture profile/settings so everything was matched as much as possible
@@ajsarsfield good choice of cameras!! And the footage and colours are really nice, did you process them later or are they straight out of camera?
I added a very simple LUT to them both (same one)
But I shoot mostly in Cine 4 picture profile (Not LOG)
so the footage doesn't need too much doing to it.
The depth of field always gives it away.
But people with no experience won’t care at all. They won’t even see it.
Imo, we put too much time and effort into equipment.
100% agree with you..
That's honestly why I started making these types of videos originally...
They were to show how there's not THAT much of a noticeable difference to the average audience, its ONLY creators who care or notice...
I only have 3 weeks of experience in photography with my Nikon D3300 and I noticed with ease...so. The real question is, if it's possible to guess without the comparison.
A with longer zoom lens
Correct!
85 on the FF
And a 55 on the APSC 🔥
A - full frame, B- crop sensor
they both look beautiful and the differences is ignorable for the viewers. only until low light shooting comes in, full frame is much easier to work with.
Oh for sure!!
Full frame will 100% shine in those more difficult situations!
Although saying that, lots of modern APSC cameras are getting pretty good in low light now as well
the debates keeps the market and its economy going, thats why they exist. after all more than half of user use them to shoot test videos, its their way of fun. I own both but honestly when it comes to making meaningful videos most of them come out of my phone. it just happened to be in my pocket. no spec makes me focus on sequences and angles. result usually better. @@ajsarsfield
B is a crop sensor
A full frame Boke 👌
Lighting wise i think he looks better on photo B, his beard is a warmer brown and his clothes look comfortably worn out rather than very light and just bought
B looks comfortable
A looks professional
A is full freme. Higher Dynamic range
The real comparison should be when trying to recover shadows from a RAW file. That’s where the truth happens.
Top is full frame, mo colors & image is more complete + wide higher ❤📸.
B has more “3D pop”
B is the crop sensor
So which ome do you prefer?
A full frame
The bottom one would be apsc
Good eye!
both cams have Equivalent lenses on them 55mm + 85mm
That 85 on the Full frame just has a more Blurry background
I know that the bokeh is a big tell but actually the first things i noticed were more “tele” looking perspective because of the higher focal length which also lead to the difference in bokeh and also the contrast and dynamic range difference is obvious to the experienced eyes.
And the things is it would be harder to tell from the colors and contrast ratios because you actually used a good crop frame camera i’d say that is a sony a6700 or something , most crop frame cameras footage is worse than that
A is full frame due to the stronger background blur and B is the crop sensor due to the not so strong background blur
Good eye!!
The 85mm Lens makes it way more blurry than the 55 on the crop 🔥
@@ajsarsfield why not make the comparison with the same lens?
@PenguinsTechStuff because it'd be WAY more obvious to guess 🤭
One of the images would be WAY more zoomed in than the other OR I'd have to move one of the cameras back like 5 or 10 feet to Try and kind of match the same framing
But the background wouldn't look the same size, so it'd still be obvious
@@ajsarsfield still not a that fair of a comparison if the lens is diffirnet
A - FF
B - APSC
Any cheap telezoom camera could do this as long as you have like 20 meters of empty space between the camera and the background and great light.
Absolutely FF on top!
EASY if you know what to look for 🔥
The focal length looks way different I like A over B
A would be the 85mm Lens on a FF
B is 55 on a Crop sensor
yes I can, FF is A cam
Hell yeah!
Easy if you know what to look for! L
.
Most general audiences probably couldn't tell or care though lol
B - crop sensor
my phone running the video in 420p 👁️👄👁️
Top crop sensor🎉
What if both use 85 mm but you move the crop further behind. Will it look the same or still be different?
if i remember correctly, I think the one further away will look Less shallow..
Distance to the subject is one of the things that affects how DOF looks!
@@ajsarsfield yes that is correct(already found out) but thank you!
a is full frame and b is the aps-c sensor
Good eye!
Even though they have Equivalent lenses on them 55mm + 85mm
that 85 on the Full frame just has a more Blurry background
yesss...the blutty background... a is the full sensor
You got it 🔥
Easy when you know what to look for!
A has sweet bokeh. Its full sensor.
✅️ easy when you know what to look for!!
.
Although I thought it might be harder if people were watching on a phone 🤭
What lenses did you use?
Zeiss 55mm F1.8 and a Sony 85mm F1.8
basically the same FOV when on crop/FF camera
A is full frame while B is crop sensor
I dunno why ppl keep saying 4/3 or apsc are crop sensor, full frame actually crop from 70mm frame 😂
I assume its because 35mm "film" was the common size for years.
So It made sense to call it "full frame" for people switching from film to digital cameras to know that their current lens collection would Fit the cameras properly
Where as anything with a smaller sensor would be "cropped"
Top a is full frame
A. is full frame because of it's background
are you sure there is any difference?
A is FF & B is DX
GG's!
Easy when you know what to look for!
Depth is the difference
B has more bokhe that's why it's crop
Not necessarily true...
Sensor size doesn't directly affect depth of field
Distance to subject
Lens focal length
And F stop do though.
So technically the 85mm F1.8
Vs the 55mm F1.8 I used should be the same distance and F stop
BUT the focal length is physically longer on the full frame (85mm) so will be more blurry due to compression
A = fullframe, B= crop sensor (softer bokeh in A, magnification in B a bit bigger, colors seem a bit different... but in this format (seeing a micropicture that's made for consumation on smartphone...) it's not relevant.
100% agree..
I started this series to see if the difference was actually worth it for "online" viewing..
and most of the time it's hardly noticeable, as long as you light/compose a shot well
B is full frame
jajajaja is APSC
Ok, I can see a difference, let me see if the photography class I took is any good: the A is full frame and B is cropped, am I right?
Those classes clearly paid off 😅✅️
@@ajsarsfieldNice, thanks 🎉
Big sensor more light.. that is the law of physics... am I right?
That is true! (Depends on pixel density a bit)
But it's hard to tell for most people when you use ND filters and are shooting outside.
Compression and DOF are the bigger Differences here (which are still small not super noticeable to an average viewer)
A full
Your beard looks nicer in B
B one is fullframe
Wrong. Full frame has a bigger aperture. The cropped one means there's less of him in the picture
Not necessarily true..
I'm using a 55mm cropped and an 85mm lens FF so the FOV difference is pretty negligible
Both shot at F1.8
A is full frame; B is crop sensor
Easy ✅️
A full frame
B Super35
A - full frame
A full frame
B crop frame
But i get the point
most commercial cameras are super 35
Hell even Film was basicslly super 35 for the longest time too!
People put WAY too much emphasis on sensor size etc...
When in reality if you're lighting your footage right, audiences won't care and probably cant even tell the difference
Of course not on a tiny phone screen
Exactly!
That's kinda the point of these videos tbh..
I started this series to show that for "online" or phone watching it rarely matters what type of equipment you use. its more about what you do with it
A is the full frame sensor
Good eye!
Easy if you know what to look for! 🤭
E n el A es más pronunciado el bokeh y hay más información en altas luces. Pero eso lo sé porque me he fijado en eso para descubrir cuál es cuál. Si no plantearas esa pregunta, me habrían parecido iguales 🤷♂️
Judging from the bokeh the top is a full frame
✅️ Easy if you know what to look for!
A is crop sensor
A has had and arms never leaving frame. B not so much things are cu off the top especially
A ,full flame
Asoka B frame ma topi Kat raha hai ji
The dynamic range look better on the video A. I think A is Full Frame and B APS-C.
You got it!!!
Also the background is a BIT more out of focus on that one too
Larger sensor = i need a longer lens to get the same shot, so more compression/Bokeh
@@ajsarsfieldYea, to be closer you need to use 85 mm f1.8 on FF and 55 f1.2 on APS-C. The background will be the same like this.
Interesting. I like b more.
That's the crop sensor!!
Both look great in their own way 🥰
Same 😂
B is crop sensor.
B is full?
Top one is full frame
Nailed it!! 🔥
Why I use aps APSC camera cheaper 😊, no difference in quality can use wide angle lens
More distortion on the b
A: Full frame
B: APSC
Easy when you know what to look for!!
@@ajsarsfield I own both full frame and APSC FX30/A7R3 and soon FX3 😆
Bottom is crop
one is darker and one is lighter
No just the bottom one is smaller cause at the bottom you can't see the top top part of the hat but the other you can
Getting the crop even was kinda difficult otherwise bottom text covers most of the image 🙃