Very attractive sequencer. Didn’t buy it because it was a bit expensive for me considering what other options like the Keystep offers. I do see it’s usefulness for many, though, as an additional polysequencer that does not occupy much space. Great job! If you can tell us, what are the improvements in version 2?
Hi I really appreciate that! Yes, I consider the Poly a complimentary device to the keystep. Not a replacement by any means. However, it does a couple things that the keystep doesnt. This is version one, however, if you check my channel, I have another video demoing the new CC sequencing functionality on version 2.1. Basically, the poly gives motion control in 128 steps to pretty much any synth that has midi CC mapped to its controls. In my video I sequence my moog sub phatty which controls pitch as well as filter cutoff, envelopes, mixer, osc sync, and mod wheel! Thanks again!
@@spacebraincircuits1358 pretty amazing. I saw the video and have two questions. How many simultaneous controls can be recorded in the same sequence? I mean, can you record, for instance, filter changes and envelope changes (and other CCs) in the same sequence steps? What is the limit of simultaneous CCs per step? The second question is: it seems you’re saying the price of v.2 is the same of v. 1? Great work again!
@@WxkR Hi again! Thanks for checking out the video! As of now, it can only record 1 CC change per step. I know... I wish I could do more however, Im limited by the AVR chips internal memory. It could be done by upgrading to a larger chip, however price would then go up as well. I really like the idea of keeping it as affordable and simple as I can, especially since there are so many "more expensive" options out there. Still trying to figure out what is most important based on feedback.
@@spacebraincircuits1358 I think you’re in the right path! I know this is purely speculative and only my view but if you could have three/four tracks and perhaps three simultaneous automated CCs, and keep it around $200-250, it’d be a top competitor. The sequencers market is really lacking in offers.
@@WxkR It's definitely doable. Ive considered it but I also know it will take a good amount of time developing! but you're right, im confident i could develope a 3 track version at a price point of 200USD. maybe in the future! really appreciate the advice !
Very attractive sequencer. Didn’t buy it because it was a bit expensive for me considering what other options like the Keystep offers. I do see it’s usefulness for many, though, as an additional polysequencer that does not occupy much space. Great job! If you can tell us, what are the improvements in version 2?
Hi I really appreciate that! Yes, I consider the Poly a complimentary device to the keystep. Not a replacement by any means. However, it does a couple things that the keystep doesnt. This is version one, however, if you check my channel, I have another video demoing the new CC sequencing functionality on version 2.1. Basically, the poly gives motion control in 128 steps to pretty much any synth that has midi CC mapped to its controls. In my video I sequence my moog sub phatty which controls pitch as well as filter cutoff, envelopes, mixer, osc sync, and mod wheel! Thanks again!
@@spacebraincircuits1358 pretty amazing. I saw the video and have two questions. How many simultaneous controls can be recorded in the same sequence? I mean, can you record, for instance, filter changes and envelope changes (and other CCs) in the same sequence steps? What is the limit of simultaneous CCs per step? The second question is: it seems you’re saying the price of v.2 is the same of v. 1? Great work again!
@@WxkR Hi again! Thanks for checking out the video! As of now, it can only record 1 CC change per step. I know... I wish I could do more however, Im limited by the AVR chips internal memory. It could be done by upgrading to a larger chip, however price would then go up as well. I really like the idea of keeping it as affordable and simple as I can, especially since there are so many "more expensive" options out there. Still trying to figure out what is most important based on feedback.
@@spacebraincircuits1358 I think you’re in the right path! I know this is purely speculative and only my view but if you could have three/four tracks and perhaps three simultaneous automated CCs, and keep it around $200-250, it’d be a top competitor. The sequencers market is really lacking in offers.
@@WxkR It's definitely doable. Ive considered it but I also know it will take a good amount of time developing! but you're right, im confident i could develope a 3 track version at a price point of 200USD. maybe in the future! really appreciate the advice !