You couldn't have said it better, and on the other hand there are some who won much more than Nalbandian but they live for tennis, they don't retire at an appropriate age in order to squeeze as much as they can the sports even if they have to live through many painful defeats or injuries, in other words they are a kind of autistic and that's not the best either...
Nalbandian was pure talent and intelligence. But he himself has said that he didn't want to lose the opportunity to enjoy other things in life because of tennis, that's why he didn't give it that much priority. It wasn't a lack of commitment, it was a choice.
@ Yes, they called him. Roddick dropped out of the tournament last minute, and he received an invitation in the nick of time. Thats exactly how it happened.
He wasn't a wasted talent. He got to be number 3. You don't get to that level if you're wasting your talent. He just pursued other passions aside from tennis. But we all remember him as a tremendous player. Long live El Rey David.
Obviously the "wasted talent" for someone that reached #3 in the world implies that he could be #1 for many years. It is not unreasonable if you think that he himself explained that he did not want to lose the pleasure of the nicer things in life and that was why tennis was not a priority for him.
Nalbadian is incredible. He's also a great driver. When he was not playing tennis, he was doing motor racing (rally). The man lived his life. He could've been a better tennis player, but he choose not, gratefully he gifted us with unforgivle matches. 🇦🇷
Ni cerca está, no se pueden comparar. Ronaldinho ganó Mundial, Champions, Libertadores, Copa América, Liga española, Serie A, Confederaciones y Balón de Oro. Nabaldián no ganó ni un Grande Slam.
@@Brtf23 bueno bro, pero el futbol es un juego en equipo, podes no dar tu 100% y tu equipo te va a apoyar, en el tenis si no das tu 100% te van a ganar. Sin contar que en el futbol hay una parte del equipo que se centra en el orden defensivo y el otro ofensivo (ronaldinho se centraba en este orden). En el tenis tenes que ser realmente mejor que el otro en TODO para ganarle
@@guidodiana1992 de acuerdo. Pero también se puede utilizar ese argumento al revés. En el tenis sólo dependes de ti y en el fútbol no también de los compañeros. En el tenis si eres mejor en ese partido ganas, en cambio en el fútbol puedes ser el mejor, hacer un partidazo y perder por culpa de los fallos de tus compañeros.
@@Brtf23 pero no estas hablando del descanso, en el tenis uno no puede descansar mucho, en cambio Ronaldinho si quería podía hacer una jugada maestra y luego descansar medio partido teniendo a su equipo jugando defensivo hasta que él se recupere y repetir ese ciclo. Literalmente Corea llego lejos en el mundial solo haciendo eso...
Not a tennis fan. But even a non-fan like me can see this isn't a fluke, and he's not catching anybody on a bad day -- that Nalbandian is just overwhelming and -- gotta say it -- embarrassing these super-elite, all-time great players because he's just so much stronger, faster, smarter. Eye-popping, jaw-dropping to see, to say the least.
@@pugsnhogz To my untrained eye -- just looking at them in that head-to-head match (though certainly not generally speaking, over their whole careers lol) -- he certainly did appear so. Pretty impressive he could ever handle a player like Nadal like that tho, on any occasion
Indeed at his best in the couple masters tournaments and at the end of the 2005 ATP season he was the best. Nobody else made the big three look less than all-time greats at the same time. As brightly as he shined, since he couldn’t win any grand slams (They are the top 4 tennis tournaments of each year requiring seven consecutive wins in best out of five sets… You need at least eight grand slams to be one of the best 10 all-time, and even the third place just looking at grand slams has 20 titles) which requires an extended passion into tennis, he is considered an underachiever. As an added note, I’ve noticed in this video that his style is classic for the most part, even as the commentator mentioned, “so simple yet so effective.” So again proves that mastering and expounding on the basics can get someone to the top of the game (Federer & Djokovic-perhaps Sampras, Agassi, Alcaraz & more). Sadly as seen in some other comments to this video, he chose to not pursue tennis in an extended effort to chase the grand slams, but we do have moments of his brightness to be able to enjoy.
Nalbandian wasn't a wasted talent because he won 2 masters 1000 and the season ending master final beating Federer in an epic 5 set final final and won some other tournaments, he just didn't win a slam..he was a great player and competitor when he was in good form. Ernestes Gulbis is a wasted talent in comparison..
Goulpiss was a talent inside his mind, as he stated most of the top players do not deserve the ranking while he did as he used his daddies private jet to get to those difficult challenger events.
nalbandian liked to party and didnt take proper care of his body, nor did he train enough. had he been as disciplined as the big three, he could have very well won at least one grand slam
Talent without commitment will not get you to the top. When he put his focus onto his game he was real good. It 's his choice. Still l admire him for his talent. Even more l've said it before this channel celebrates tennis players champions or near champions. Thanks Wivo.
Nalbandian no ganó al menos un Grand Slam ni tampoco fué aún más grande, porque él no quiso. Le sobraban cualidades y talento para medirse ante cualquiera, pero lamentablemente se dejaba estar, subía de peso y se inclinaba hacia su otra pasión: el rally. Por él; en mi adolescencia, madrugaba para verlo jugar en el Abierto de Australia, sólo por él. Saludos.
So he cares when he wins, doesn’t when he loses. How convenient! Sounds like the argument of a 7 year old. “I wasn’t really trying, so it doesn’t count!” 😂
In career matches, Nalbandian had 8 wins vs. Federer 11 wins. Against Nadal, he won 2 vs. Nadal's 5 wins. 1 win in 5 vs. Djokovic. Very talented. He's now Rally Racing in Argentina.
A fun fact is that Nalbandian was Roger´s terror in Junior, he beat Fed almost every time they played. The comparison with Nole is a bit tough because there was about 12 years of difference between them.
I'm from Cordoba just 40 kms from where Nalbandian was born (Unquillo). He was top 3 in the world at one point (I think it was around 2007 as well). He was our ace player Davis Cup for many years. Whenever he played on a Davis Cup you knew that he would most likely win his singles matches and it was only up to the other players to help out to close the series. Unfortunately he wasn't able to win it either even though he tried really hard. Del Potro ended up lifting that trophy for him. Nalbandian was pure talent and he's a chill and nice guy !
I was introduced to Nalbandian in 2006 or 07 at an event by a marketing agency. It was for an ad campaign we were interested in using his image. When the owner of the agency introduced me to Nalbandian and his manager, we were speaking for about a minute when a very attractive girl goes by, and Nalbandian proceeds to makes a comment, turns around and leave to try to pick her up. The ad agency guy told me that Nalbandian had quite the weakness for females, food and cars. He may be one of the only top 10 tennis players with a bit of a beer belly. To be a great in any sport requires a special drive, hyper competitiveness, incredibly talent and dedication to practicing and hyper focus. Nalbandian had almost alll except he didn't have the consistency and he wanted to be a rally race driver. It would've been great to see how everything would have turned out if he had Federer's personality.
We all know it's the warrior more so than the sword, but a fair amount of credit goes to the strung spec that David was able to wield: a Yonex RDX 500 MP, extended to 28" (for extra reach and angular leverage), weighed up to a solid 377 grams and swinging at a bulldozing 377 swing weight. You get that much racquet moving and leveraged the way he could, and you're going to do some serious damage, as he did, even against those wielding similar specs -- because most other players couldn't. That ability alone was unmatched by most then, and even by most up until now -- to say nothing of the intelligence, tennis IQ, touch and finesse he had to go along with it. Incredible athlete, wielding an incredible spec, making for a crazy combo of creativity, precision and counter-attacking, and of course, one of the best two-handed backhands to ever grace the game. Very likely the best to never win a slam, indeed.
on a diet note, if only he went pure carnivore than mainly fasta pasta. His stamina was also second to none for his build quite incredible 5 set player and now realizing he was wielding a longer heavier spec than Hewitt goes to show what a beast he was. Another 28 wielding wonder with a OHBH was Rochus who also undersized but brought down giats like Safin and Delpo as well, albeit Delpo was coming back from injury and Rochus was already about to retire.
Pero a tener en cuenta que no solo le gano a los 3 grandes, le gano en esos torneos a Moya, Ferrer, Del Potro, Gasquet, tremendo lo de Nalbandian en ese momento, una lastima que era un jugador con altibajos y problemas físicos, pero técnicamente estaba a la par de de los mejores.
Qué lindo era verlo jugar a Nalbandián!! Estando en su top podía disputarle y ganarle a estos monstruos y, por momentos, como con cierta facilidad porque lo hacía con mucha soltura y recursos de élite. Además del tenis, le gustaba hacer otras cosas también y quizá por eso no obtuvo más títulos, pero seguramente disfrutó todo muchísimo y considero que también en un nivel tan alto y justo en una época que quizá dió la mejor camada de toda la historia, poder ubicarse en la cima requería de un gran sacrificio porque las diferencias son mínimas y nadie regalaba nada. Ojalá tuviésemos otro argentino que se le pudiese acercar un poco al Gran David!
Watching players like Nalbandian or Kyrgios, you realise that in the end it's the mental side (on and off the court) that separates you from being a Great Player to being a Legend. That's why Federer, Nadal and Djokovic are what they are besides their technical skills.
Loco El Rey..this guy was the strangest phenomena in tennis, in genetic terms I could say he was his own father from another mother or even he was his own mother from another father! Such a player in such an era of tennis..much appreciation to what he did overall, never a waste, the waste was the linesman he kicked 😂
Puro disfrute verlo jugar . Es lo que hizo , jugó al Tenis , lo disfrutó , nunca lo tomó demasiado en serio . De habelo hecho , con semejante talento natural ....creen que no hubiese sido N° 1 ? Simplemente no lo buscó , la vida le pasaba por otro lado . Te extraño David ! Gracias por tanto disfrute viendote jugar
David was touched by the divine providence, in terms of skill set to play tennis, he was incredible, but his lack of professionalism never allowed him to be amongst the best 3 and win a great tournament, besides de Mater in Shanghai 2005 He loved women, night life, car racing and a bit of crazy style of life.
And the idiot haters kept saying federer had weak era opponents, while new gen players couldnt even kick out old grandpa federer and injury nadal and old out of prime djokovic
These pictures show he could do whatever he wanted to do! Imagine if this guy had worked ! I saw him practicing at Roland Garros in 2007, never saw such ease to put the ball the same exact spot 10 times straight... i'm still shocked.
Nalbandian was an outrageous talent on tennis court, the only player to defeat Prime Roger Federer and beast mode Rafa convincingly in their prime!!!! It's just that he didn't concentrate on tennis enough, swimming with sharks, paragliding and mountain jumping were his real passion in his best years!!!! He has absolute mastery over every shot and great anticipation on returns, perfect timed fore hands and a near perfect backhand which was more lethal than Novak and Agassy as per me because of the angles he could create from every corner or the court!! Above all, he had the great gift which comes to only a very few, the ability to tweak his game according to the opponent he plays. His game against Roger was a complete different one , he adopts while he plays Rafa or Davydenko or Novak!!!! Game wise, I have never seen an opponent heckling Roger Federer in pre 2010 on a hard court, while all the others were at a distant level!!!! He could be the only one A fully fit Rafa felt helpless against, In that period!!!! Anybody having doubts on these, pl go and watch his 2007-2008 period matches against the best of the game!!!! If he was around with the passion in tennis as the big three, he wud have been the one to go past 20 slams easily!!!!
Nalbandian 2007 is far from his peak level, not able to make QF in any of the 4 Grand Slams. After that, he'd never even make to another GS 4th round. Nalbandian 2002-2006 is where he truly shines as a top player. The two fabulous masters1000 title runs in 2007 are supernormal plays.
In deed, I think his prime was mostly between the 2005-2006 seasons, with specially remarkable moments in Davis Cup where he destroyed on their homeland players like Hrbaty, Hewitt, Davydenko or Safin. Absolutely astonishing. He would have had a real chance of menacing no. 1 if he managed to win against Baghdatis in Aus Open 2006 and faced Roger at that final, but suffered from the greatest problem along his entire career: physic health and stamina.
@@Alejandro_Magno. La verdad que es bastante real. El 2006, que fue el año donde David toca su mejor ranking, llega al Masters como N°3 del entry (después se cae al 8 porque no pasa de semis y había ganado el anterior) compartiendo el top-10 con Federer, Nadal, Robredo, Ljubicic, Davydenko, Roddick, Robredo, González, Blake y Berdych. Creo que salvo Robredo, que era bastante mediocre sacando, el resto o bien tenían un saque parejo con él y eran más constantes, o bien sacaban mucho mejor (caso RF, Ljubicic, Roddick, Blake o Berdych)
El más entretenido para ver, por la calidad de sus golpes. Mucho talento para este deporte, pero tenía más talento para los asados con amigos. Vive la vida que todos queremos pero no podemos. Un absoluto genio.
Too bad he was hurt so much. Imagine a healthy Nalbandian in his prime against Nadal and Federer in their prime. The ridiculous tennis level at that time would have gone to an even higher level.
He was a Beast specially over 5 sets but over ate pasta and suffered less injuries than maccas and cup noodle Nishikori, who was another clean ball striker. Sadly David was committed when he felt like it or needed the cash but worse of all he loved the ladies more than Stepanek. He was said to be often up till dawn until looking out for girls.
Djokovic had a lot to improve and the Masters Series of Madrid and Paris was a nightmare for Nadal,he never won Paris and Madrid even on clay a few years later was the toughest of the clay season tournaments for him,but beating Federer in 2007 twice in a roll it's insane,Nalbandian was definitely not a wasted talent,he was better than most of these house party pay check spoiled brats today,with the exception of Alcaraz and Sinner.
Impresionante el talento de David. De haber querido hubiese logrado ser el uno del mundo. Ganar esos puntos contra semejantes genios es algo que muy poquitos lograron.
@@marvinsilverman4394 cool. I knew Agassi was Armenian descent but never thought of the name Nalbandian. Argentina has always been a melting pot for European emigrants 👍🏻
Ni cerca está, no se pueden comparar. Ronaldinho ganó Mundial, Champions, Libertadores, Copa América, Liga española, Serie A, Confederaciones y Balón de Oro. Nabaldián no ganó ni un Grand Slam.
It's exactly the same with Gulbis, when he was focus on his game he destroyed anyone, but he never trained. Gulbis lived like a rockstar, unfortunately 🫤
I remember this when David beat the top 3 players Federer, Nadal, and Novak in consecutive tournaments..it was unbelievable...but I dont feel sorry for the players mentioned they each won over 20 grand slams each and reached world #1. So I think I will take Fed,Nad or Novak career any day.
Similar to the phenomenon that was Miloslav Mecir in the late 80's. He made it to two Gram Slam Finals and was especially hard on the great Swedish players of that time (Edberg, Wilander, Nystrom, etc).
Difference is quite visible that why he was able to do what other were not as he is standing quite closer even inside the baseline so is able to hit these one two punches on regular basis
El punto debil de David era su saque. Ningún jugador con un saque así pudo competir con los mejores. El no tenia puntos gratis. Se desgastaba demasiado cuando sacaba y también cuando recibía. No tenia margen de error. Y jugar perfecto y con intensidad todo el tiempo, es casi imposible, salvo que tengas la mentalidad de Nadal.
Another one of these explosive dangerous players you never wanted to have to play, underrated but capable of anything. Of course everyone now thinks of Kyrgios, but Gael Monfries, Tommy Haas, Michael Stich, Goran Ivanisevic - unbelievable games on their day but just unfortunate not to have dominated in their time.
You often see talented LatAm players not having long successful careers, don't ask me why. Vilas, Kuerten did well, Delpo might have been another one with the right mindset but he got injured all the time unfortunately. Nalbandian, Coria, Rios, such ridiculous talents but couldn't make it as multiple Slam winners which was certainly possible considering their talents and skills.
The difference being Fedal was in their prime and in 2007 Novak wasn`t even close his prime. Novak`s best play, with his physicality being at 100% came only at 2011 and it lasts ever since.
What a talent and what a waste of talent, he really should have been a multiple slam winner and challenged the big three for several years. He had Roger's number until he hit his prime, but could still throw up surprises against him.
@@ryokan9120 He beat him 5 times consecutively until 2003, two of those after Wimbledon 2003. Once in 2005 when Roger could barely walk and the 2 times this video mentions, for his 8 victories over Roger. So your comment is plain wrong.
beautiful time from 2005 to 2018 of tennis, I feel that they were the golden years, Federer, Nadal, Nole and Murray, eventually players like Nalbandian, Delpo and many others appeared, I feel that that magic was lost with the crop of new players, I think the younger players hardly value winning grand slams or masters... it's like "oh, another tournament I've won", very lazy
I always appreciate guys so insanely talented that they can live a very not-Spartan type of life, but still occasionally destroy elite competition, just because they had nothing better to do that week. An athlete that instantly comes to mind these days is Nikola Jokić, who just wants to go back home to Vojvodina and be with his horses. :D Btw, earning more than 11 million dollars during carreer in which he occasionally had beer belly can hardly be defines as 'wasted talent'. Not everyonw is obsessed with success and legacy.
he was one of the players when having o good week he beats all of them , he was nr 3 at one time so not wasted talent he only didnt had the same goals as the big 3
Cuando a Nalbandian la remera no le marcaba un abdomen adiposo, era imbatible! A Nalbandian le gustaba mucho el asado( carne cocinada a las brasas) y por ahí perdía estado físico por comerlo en demasía!
Wasted? What a terrible title for this video! Nalbandian reached the top of the tennis world, competed with the best, often beat the best, and earned millions in the process--success by any measure! Anyone who might see his career as a failure just doesn't appreciate all the factors that pertain to a multiple Slam winner. Some of these factors are within one's control, and many are not.
The last point at 12:26 - netroller and Nalbandian didn’t put his hand up to excuse his luck - this is the reason he was cursed and not remembered! Mark me!
It's not wasted when you mop the floor with the best of your time and then proceeds to enjoy life with your family... in my book that's a win.
Thats for sure!!
You couldn't have said it better, and on the other hand there are some who won much more than Nalbandian but they live for tennis, they don't retire at an appropriate age in order to squeeze as much as they can the sports even if they have to live through many painful defeats or injuries, in other words they are a kind of autistic and that's not the best either...
Nalbandian was pure talent and intelligence. But he himself has said that he didn't want to lose the opportunity to enjoy other things in life because of tennis, that's why he didn't give it that much priority. It wasn't a lack of commitment, it was a choice.
The ball-striking, the touch, the shot-selection, the footwork, anticipation, reflexes, tennis IQ, creativity, all-court game... what a player.
Agree 100%
Speed
And is Argentina, don not forget that
@@walterfernandez9070 What is Argentina? You mean he's from Argentina? I was talking about his game, not his biography.
@@LuLu-nw6bi I meant, nalbandian is argentian, besides all you described about him.
Nalbandian was on vacation drinking wine and eating asado and they called him to go to the masters and he wiped the floor with everyone.
Hi cloud
Así es, se iba a pescar; y en cambio se volvió con la Masters Cup🏆
Yeah, they called him to go to the Masters... Oh boy...
@ Yes, they called him. Roddick dropped out of the tournament last minute, and he received an invitation in the nick of time. Thats exactly how it happened.
He wasn't a wasted talent. He got to be number 3. You don't get to that level if you're wasting your talent. He just pursued other passions aside from tennis. But we all remember him as a tremendous player. Long live El Rey David.
I don't know who this guy is.
@@holliswilliams8426 preguntale a federer el mejor de todos los tiempos, el lo conoce
Obviously the "wasted talent" for someone that reached #3 in the world implies that he could be #1 for many years. It is not unreasonable if you think that he himself explained that he did not want to lose the pleasure of the nicer things in life and that was why tennis was not a priority for him.
Federer once said that Nalbandian was a number one undercover
For a fun tidbit, two of players Nalbandian beat before the big 3 in his Madrid run were Del Potro and Berdych
🤯
The best double backhanded I have ever seen.
💯 Amazing precision, control and power. He could put the ball anywhere with that shot.
So good it makes you forget how amazing his forehand was
100%
Amen to that sir
and when he hits it in the middle of jumping, better even
Nalbadian is incredible. He's also a great driver. When he was not playing tennis, he was doing motor racing (rally). The man lived his life. He could've been a better tennis player, but he choose not, gratefully he gifted us with unforgivle matches. 🇦🇷
El Ronaldinho del tenis. Fiestero como pocos! 🎉🎉
Ni cerca está, no se pueden comparar. Ronaldinho ganó Mundial, Champions, Libertadores, Copa América, Liga española, Serie A, Confederaciones y Balón de Oro. Nabaldián no ganó ni un Grande Slam.
@@Brtf23 bueno bro, pero el futbol es un juego en equipo, podes no dar tu 100% y tu equipo te va a apoyar, en el tenis si no das tu 100% te van a ganar. Sin contar que en el futbol hay una parte del equipo que se centra en el orden defensivo y el otro ofensivo (ronaldinho se centraba en este orden). En el tenis tenes que ser realmente mejor que el otro en TODO para ganarle
@@guidodiana1992 de acuerdo. Pero también se puede utilizar ese argumento al revés. En el tenis sólo dependes de ti y en el fútbol no también de los compañeros. En el tenis si eres mejor en ese partido ganas, en cambio en el fútbol puedes ser el mejor, hacer un partidazo y perder por culpa de los fallos de tus compañeros.
@@Brtf23 pero no estas hablando del descanso, en el tenis uno no puede descansar mucho, en cambio Ronaldinho si quería podía hacer una jugada maestra y luego descansar medio partido teniendo a su equipo jugando defensivo hasta que él se recupere y repetir ese ciclo. Literalmente Corea llego lejos en el mundial solo haciendo eso...
@@Brtf23 habla de su actitud ante el deporte lo cual comparto, evidentemente sus carreras no se asemejan en nada. Nalbandian no estuvo en prisión.
El rey David.
15 years old, hes my idol, doesnt really matter if hes retired or not, love him so much😃
Not a tennis fan. But even a non-fan like me can see this isn't a fluke, and he's not catching anybody on a bad day -- that Nalbandian is just overwhelming and -- gotta say it -- embarrassing these super-elite, all-time great players because he's just so much stronger, faster, smarter. Eye-popping, jaw-dropping to see, to say the least.
eyy the enthusiasm is def appreciated fam but slow your roll calling anyone "so much stronger and faster" than Nadal lol
@@pugsnhogz To my untrained eye -- just looking at them in that head-to-head match (though certainly not generally speaking, over their whole careers lol) -- he certainly did appear so. Pretty impressive he could ever handle a player like Nadal like that tho, on any occasion
@@mikeythompson7777 i feel you, Nalbandian had crazy tools.
Indeed at his best in the couple masters tournaments and at the end of the 2005 ATP season he was the best.
Nobody else made the big three look less than all-time greats at the same time.
As brightly as he shined, since he couldn’t win any grand slams (They are the top 4 tennis tournaments of each year requiring seven consecutive wins in best out of five sets… You need at least eight grand slams to be one of the best 10 all-time, and even the third place just looking at grand slams has 20 titles) which requires an extended passion into tennis, he is considered an underachiever.
As an added note, I’ve noticed in this video that his style is classic for the most part, even as the commentator mentioned, “so simple yet so effective.” So again proves that mastering and expounding on the basics can get someone to the top of the game (Federer & Djokovic-perhaps Sampras, Agassi, Alcaraz & more). Sadly as seen in some other comments to this video, he chose to not pursue tennis in an extended effort to chase the grand slams, but we do have moments of his brightness to be able to enjoy.
Nalbandian wasn't a wasted talent because he won 2 masters 1000 and the season ending master final beating Federer in an epic 5 set final final and won some other tournaments, he just didn't win a slam..he was a great player and competitor when he was in good form.
Ernestes Gulbis is a wasted talent in comparison..
Goulpiss was a talent inside his mind, as he stated most of the top players do not deserve the ranking while he did as he used his daddies private jet to get to those difficult challenger events.
nalbandian liked to party and didnt take proper care of his body, nor did he train enough. had he been as disciplined as the big three, he could have very well won at least one grand slam
Made tennis look easier , really pleasant to watch
Tenia tanto talento como vocacion por la joda. Amaba verlo jugar la Davis para Argentina, era victoria segura
That match at máster was amazing. Never saw Nadal so lost.
Talent without commitment will not get you to the top. When he put his focus onto his game he was real good. It 's his choice. Still l admire him for his talent. Even more l've said it before this channel celebrates tennis players champions or near champions. Thanks Wivo.
Nalbandian no ganó al menos un Grand Slam ni tampoco fué aún más grande, porque él no quiso. Le sobraban cualidades y talento para medirse ante cualquiera, pero lamentablemente se dejaba estar, subía de peso y se inclinaba hacia su otra pasión: el rally. Por él; en mi adolescencia, madrugaba para verlo jugar en el Abierto de Australia, sólo por él. Saludos.
Nalbandian toyed with the Big Three. Never seen anything quite like it
He had a losing record against all three of them. Watching a highlight video is supposed to make you think that
@@ven8107 He had a losing record because he didnt care at all, but when he cared (not very often) he defeated them, thats all
So he cares when he wins, doesn’t when he loses. How convenient! Sounds like the argument of a 7 year old. “I wasn’t really trying, so it doesn’t count!” 😂
@@lukeserrano62 You seem to have a problem man, your remark is pointless and idiotic. Maybe a little therapy will do you good
@@ven8107 It's not just a "highlight video", he beat them all in the same event back to back to back. No one else ever did that.
Superlative 2-handed backhand, when his serve and forehand accompanied him it was ... whell as you can see, unstoppable. ❤
In career matches, Nalbandian had 8 wins vs. Federer 11 wins. Against Nadal, he won 2 vs. Nadal's 5 wins. 1 win in 5 vs. Djokovic. Very talented. He's now Rally Racing in Argentina.
A fun fact is that Nalbandian was Roger´s terror in Junior, he beat Fed almost every time they played. The comparison with Nole is a bit tough because there was about 12 years of difference between them.
At 5:14... I haven't seen anyone replying better than this to Federer's brutal forehand...hats off..
Tremendo mostro el Rey David, el verdadero Unquillosaurus.
I'm from Cordoba just 40 kms from where Nalbandian was born (Unquillo). He was top 3 in the world at one point (I think it was around 2007 as well). He was our ace player Davis Cup for many years. Whenever he played on a Davis Cup you knew that he would most likely win his singles matches and it was only up to the other players to help out to close the series. Unfortunately he wasn't able to win it either even though he tried really hard. Del Potro ended up lifting that trophy for him. Nalbandian was pure talent and he's a chill and nice guy !
I was introduced to Nalbandian in 2006 or 07 at an event by a marketing agency. It was for an ad campaign we were interested in using his image. When the owner of the agency introduced me to Nalbandian and his manager, we were speaking for about a minute when a very attractive girl goes by, and Nalbandian proceeds to makes a comment, turns around and leave to try to pick her up. The ad agency guy told me that Nalbandian had quite the weakness for females, food and cars. He may be one of the only top 10 tennis players with a bit of a beer belly. To be a great in any sport requires a special drive, hyper competitiveness, incredibly talent and dedication to practicing and hyper focus. Nalbandian had almost alll except he didn't have the consistency and he wanted to be a rally race driver. It would've been great to see how everything would have turned out if he had Federer's personality.
We all know it's the warrior more so than the sword, but a fair amount of credit goes to the strung spec that David was able to wield: a Yonex RDX 500 MP, extended to 28" (for extra reach and angular leverage), weighed up to a solid 377 grams and swinging at a bulldozing 377 swing weight. You get that much racquet moving and leveraged the way he could, and you're going to do some serious damage, as he did, even against those wielding similar specs -- because most other players couldn't. That ability alone was unmatched by most then, and even by most up until now -- to say nothing of the intelligence, tennis IQ, touch and finesse he had to go along with it. Incredible athlete, wielding an incredible spec, making for a crazy combo of creativity, precision and counter-attacking, and of course, one of the best two-handed backhands to ever grace the game. Very likely the best to never win a slam, indeed.
on a diet note, if only he went pure carnivore than mainly fasta pasta. His stamina was also second to none for his build quite incredible 5 set player and now realizing he was wielding a longer heavier spec than Hewitt goes to show what a beast he was. Another 28 wielding wonder with a OHBH was Rochus who also undersized but brought down giats like Safin and Delpo as well, albeit Delpo was coming back from injury and Rochus was already about to retire.
So much truth in your comment, thanks!
Pero a tener en cuenta que no solo le gano a los 3 grandes, le gano en esos torneos a Moya, Ferrer, Del Potro, Gasquet, tremendo lo de Nalbandian en ese momento, una lastima que era un jugador con altibajos y problemas físicos, pero técnicamente estaba a la par de de los mejores.
My favorite player with Roger.
Y Marat Safin!!!
Insane this dude never won a slam. At least Safin (also an underachiever won 2)
Solid player our Dave !!!!!!!
Qué lindo era verlo jugar a Nalbandián!! Estando en su top podía disputarle y ganarle a estos monstruos y, por momentos, como con cierta facilidad porque lo hacía con mucha soltura y recursos de élite. Además del tenis, le gustaba hacer otras cosas también y quizá por eso no obtuvo más títulos, pero seguramente disfrutó todo muchísimo y considero que también en un nivel tan alto y justo en una época que quizá dió la mejor camada de toda la historia, poder ubicarse en la cima requería de un gran sacrificio porque las diferencias son mínimas y nadie regalaba nada. Ojalá tuviésemos otro argentino que se le pudiese acercar un poco al Gran David!
Watching players like Nalbandian or Kyrgios, you realise that in the end it's the mental side (on and off the court) that separates you from being a Great Player to being a Legend. That's why Federer, Nadal and Djokovic are what they are besides their technical skills.
Truly remarkable talent
Loco El Rey..this guy was the strangest phenomena in tennis, in genetic terms I could say he was his own father from another mother or even he was his own mother from another father!
Such a player in such an era of tennis..much appreciation to what he did overall, never a waste, the waste was the linesman he kicked 😂
How I was delighted seeing him play with his mix of power, intelligence and subtleness. I hate he retired!
I remembered the name but didn’t remember/realize the incredible level of talent this guy possessed - thanks for letting me and other people know!
He could have been more, but he was still top ten for 5 years, not many players can say that
Puro disfrute verlo jugar .
Es lo que hizo , jugó al Tenis , lo disfrutó , nunca lo tomó demasiado en serio .
De habelo hecho , con semejante talento natural ....creen que no hubiese sido N° 1 ?
Simplemente no lo buscó , la vida le pasaba por otro lado .
Te extraño David ! Gracias por tanto disfrute viendote jugar
David was touched by the divine providence, in terms of skill set to play tennis, he was incredible, but his lack of professionalism never allowed him to be amongst the best 3 and win a great tournament, besides de Mater in Shanghai 2005
He loved women, night life, car racing and a bit of crazy style of life.
Нальандян относится к той категории игроков, суперталант, но ужасно ленивый! Мог добиться куда больше, если б пахал на тренировках
I am Agree
He wins in the best time of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic.
His level on this tournament was the best I have seen in a man.
And the idiot haters kept saying federer had weak era opponents, while new gen players couldnt even kick out old grandpa federer and injury nadal and old out of prime djokovic
These pictures show he could do whatever he wanted to do! Imagine if this guy had worked ! I saw him practicing at Roland Garros in 2007, never saw such ease to put the ball the same exact spot 10 times straight... i'm still shocked.
Nalbandian was an outrageous talent on tennis court, the only player to defeat Prime Roger Federer and beast mode Rafa convincingly in their prime!!!! It's just that he didn't concentrate on tennis enough, swimming with sharks, paragliding and mountain jumping were his real passion in his best years!!!! He has absolute mastery over every shot and great anticipation on returns, perfect timed fore hands and a near perfect backhand which was more lethal than Novak and Agassy as per me because of the angles he could create from every corner or the court!! Above all, he had the great gift which comes to only a very few, the ability to tweak his game according to the opponent he plays. His game against Roger was a complete different one , he adopts while he plays Rafa or Davydenko or Novak!!!!
Game wise, I have never seen an opponent heckling Roger Federer in pre 2010 on a hard court, while all the others were at a distant level!!!! He could be the only one A fully fit Rafa felt helpless against, In that period!!!!
Anybody having doubts on these, pl go and watch his 2007-2008 period matches against the best of the game!!!!
If he was around with the passion in tennis as the big three, he wud have been the one to go past 20 slams easily!!!!
If he was that good then why he never won at least one slam ?
Nalbandian 2007 is far from his peak level, not able to make QF in any of the 4 Grand Slams. After that, he'd never even make to another GS 4th round. Nalbandian 2002-2006 is where he truly shines as a top player. The two fabulous masters1000 title runs in 2007 are supernormal plays.
In deed, I think his prime was mostly between the 2005-2006 seasons, with specially remarkable moments in Davis Cup where he destroyed on their homeland players like Hrbaty, Hewitt, Davydenko or Safin. Absolutely astonishing. He would have had a real chance of menacing no. 1 if he managed to win against Baghdatis in Aus Open 2006 and faced Roger at that final, but suffered from the greatest problem along his entire career: physic health and stamina.
@@davidag90 si, y el peor saque de entre los jugadores top con aspiraciones, no tenia puntos gratis, se desgastaba demasiado sacando y recibiendo.
@@Alejandro_Magno. La verdad que es bastante real. El 2006, que fue el año donde David toca su mejor ranking, llega al Masters como N°3 del entry (después se cae al 8 porque no pasa de semis y había ganado el anterior) compartiendo el top-10 con Federer, Nadal, Robredo, Ljubicic, Davydenko, Roddick, Robredo, González, Blake y Berdych.
Creo que salvo Robredo, que era bastante mediocre sacando, el resto o bien tenían un saque parejo con él y eran más constantes, o bien sacaban mucho mejor (caso RF, Ljubicic, Roddick, Blake o Berdych)
Thanks for paying tribute to this wonderful player, 👏
My pleasure buddy ❤️
Juan Carlos Ferrero too but he's getting the last laugh by becoming Alcarazes coach.
El más entretenido para ver, por la calidad de sus golpes. Mucho talento para este deporte, pero tenía más talento para los asados con amigos. Vive la vida que todos queremos pero no podemos. Un absoluto genio.
I remember those matches. Nalbandian was ridiculous indoors.
Too bad he was hurt so much. Imagine a healthy Nalbandian in his prime against Nadal and Federer in their prime. The ridiculous tennis level at that time would have gone to an even higher level.
He was a Beast specially over 5 sets but over ate pasta and suffered less injuries than maccas and cup noodle Nishikori, who was another clean ball striker. Sadly David was committed when he felt like it or needed the cash but worse of all he loved the ladies more than Stepanek. He was said to be often up till dawn until looking out for girls.
Djokovic had a lot to improve and the Masters Series of Madrid and Paris was a nightmare for Nadal,he never won Paris and Madrid even on clay a few years later was the toughest of the clay season tournaments for him,but beating Federer in 2007 twice in a roll it's insane,Nalbandian was definitely not a wasted talent,he was better than most of these house party pay check spoiled brats today,with the exception of Alcaraz and Sinner.
I think Nalbandian has the best two handed backhand shot I remember.
Nalbandian was great. But people said he didn't bother to eat and train well as the greats did.
that was exactly the problem
And he partied too hard.
"Wasted talent". 99% of the tennis players would love to be this "wasted"...beating prime both Federer and Nadal.
Impresionante el talento de David. De haber querido hubiese logrado ser el uno del mundo. Ganar esos puntos contra semejantes genios es algo que muy poquitos lograron.
Pure raw talent and the best double backhanded i ever seen.
Had he trained, followed a healthy diet and deprived from going to discos, no doubt Nalbandian would've been tennis all time number one
That could be wht made him so good though 😂
If my grandmother had 2 wheels, she would be a bicycle.
Nadal's h2h with Nalbandian is 5 to 2
You need to see the Davis cup match against Hewitt in Australia.
i agree.. that's cinema!
This dude was like Agassi on steroids minus the Slams
Whale of a talent!
Agassian, Nalbandian Armenian roots
@@marvinsilverman4394 cool. I knew Agassi was Armenian descent but never thought of the name Nalbandian. Argentina has always been a melting pot for European emigrants 👍🏻
The Ronaldinho of tennis.
Ni cerca está, no se pueden comparar. Ronaldinho ganó Mundial, Champions, Libertadores, Copa América, Liga española, Serie A, Confederaciones y Balón de Oro. Nabaldián no ganó ni un Grand Slam.
It's exactly the same with Gulbis, when he was focus on his game he destroyed anyone, but he never trained. Gulbis lived like a rockstar, unfortunately 🫤
unfortunately? for whom?
I remember this when David beat the top 3 players Federer, Nadal, and Novak in consecutive tournaments..it was unbelievable...but I dont feel sorry for the players mentioned they each won over 20 grand slams each and reached world #1. So I think I will take Fed,Nad or Novak career any day.
Nal had the potential to become the first double backhanded GOAT of modern tennis!
Similar to the phenomenon that was Miloslav Mecir in the late 80's. He made it to two Gram Slam Finals and was especially hard on the great Swedish players of that time (Edberg, Wilander, Nystrom, etc).
Dude is a legend. He beat these dudes in their absolute prime.
Difference is quite visible that why he was able to do what other were not as he is standing quite closer even inside the baseline so is able to hit these one two punches on regular basis
What a player!!!
El Rey David! crack total
My all time favorite player!
Nalbandian just didn’t have enough the same stamina and ability to maintain such a high standard for long periods of time.
Nunca falta el que dice: Ah, pero...
El punto debil de David era su saque. Ningún jugador con un saque así pudo competir con los mejores. El no tenia puntos gratis. Se desgastaba demasiado cuando sacaba y también cuando recibía. No tenia margen de error. Y jugar perfecto y con intensidad todo el tiempo, es casi imposible, salvo que tengas la mentalidad de Nadal.
Molto bene grazie frufru.
it must have been something else to watch the best backhands of the two different styles in the same time on the same court.
Another one of these explosive dangerous players you never wanted to have to play, underrated but capable of anything. Of course everyone now thinks of Kyrgios, but Gael Monfries, Tommy Haas, Michael Stich, Goran Ivanisevic - unbelievable games on their day but just unfortunate not to have dominated in their time.
glad you mentioned Stich. He is in my book one of the biggest talents ever.
He was top 5 for over 10 years!!...by no means wasted talent..!!!
Jogava muito!
Corner to corner. Run the life out of the opponent. Great stuff.
Used to give Fed fits, one of the first to pick on his backhand
You often see talented LatAm players not having long successful careers, don't ask me why. Vilas, Kuerten did well, Delpo might have been another one with the right mindset but he got injured all the time unfortunately. Nalbandian, Coria, Rios, such ridiculous talents but couldn't make it as multiple Slam winners which was certainly possible considering their talents and skills.
The difference being Fedal was in their prime and in 2007 Novak wasn`t even close his prime. Novak`s best play, with his physicality being at 100% came only at 2011 and it lasts ever since.
who cares?
I always like Nalbandian, big, powerful, and remarkably fast for his size.
Terrible player 👏👏👏👏👏 se quedaba sin físico muchas veces, pero un tenista al nivel de los top cuando estaba entero
Todos los argentinos y Latinoaméricanos aprendimos a creer q podíamos ser alguien en el tenis gracias al maestro Marcelo Ríos
What a talent and what a waste of talent, he really should have been a multiple slam winner and challenged the big three for several years. He had Roger's number until he hit his prime, but could still throw up surprises against him.
No! He had Roger's number when Roger was in his prime! When he beat Roger, Roger was already a multiple grand slam winner.
@@ryokan9120 He beat him 5 times consecutively until 2003, two of those after Wimbledon 2003. Once in 2005 when Roger could barely walk and the 2 times this video mentions, for his 8 victories over Roger. So your comment is plain wrong.
@@lanapearce9968Still impressive
beautiful time from 2005 to 2018 of tennis, I feel that they were the golden years, Federer, Nadal, Nole and Murray, eventually players like Nalbandian, Delpo and many others appeared, I feel that that magic was lost with the crop of new players, I think the younger players hardly value winning grand slams or masters... it's like "oh, another tournament I've won", very lazy
his backhand was better than anyone's back then
The only person I’ve ever seen make the 2HBH look beautiful
When Nalbandian was in form there's never been a better ball striker.
Reaching that level is a great achievement but few can maintain it like the big three did...
"Wasted" is a hard word. The man who loved to party and had an amazing talent is better!
I always appreciate guys so insanely talented that they can live a very not-Spartan type of life, but still occasionally destroy elite competition, just because they had nothing better to do that week. An athlete that instantly comes to mind these days is Nikola Jokić, who just wants to go back home to Vojvodina and be with his horses. :D
Btw, earning more than 11 million dollars during carreer in which he occasionally had beer belly can hardly be defines as 'wasted talent'. Not everyonw is obsessed with success and legacy.
His return is so brutally fast
El Rey David es nuestro último y verdadero talento.
he was one of the players when having o good week he beats all of them , he was nr 3 at one time so not wasted talent he only didnt had the same goals as the big 3
Lovely technique; no grunting
Cuando a Nalbandian la remera no le marcaba un abdomen adiposo, era imbatible! A Nalbandian le gustaba mucho el asado( carne cocinada a las brasas) y por ahí perdía estado físico por comerlo en demasía!
Wasted? What a terrible title for this video! Nalbandian reached the top of the tennis world, competed with the best, often beat the best, and earned millions in the process--success by any measure! Anyone who might see his career as a failure just doesn't appreciate all the factors that pertain to a multiple Slam winner. Some of these factors are within one's control, and many are not.
Perhaps wasted if you take into account that he had talent to be N°1 in the world
Wasted to be number 1 amongst the best ever...that was the meaning of wasted.
El rey david
The last point at 12:26 - netroller and Nalbandian didn’t put his hand up to excuse his luck - this is the reason he was cursed and not remembered! Mark me!
His true passion was always motor sports, as if Toretto played tennis to get money to pay for his cars :p