hahahaha that song that comes in mid way through, I was thinking, "gosh, I know this from somewhere... where in the world?? maybe a podcast or something?" came back today and realized ;)
I'd be interested to learn how you guys meter for portraits! Whether you're just going straight off the internal light meter or your thought process on it. There's so much info on metering on youtube but y'all's film portraits are always so perfectly clean!
Thank you so much, Matt! They really are so much fun to experiment with. The film component has totally reinvigorated my interest in them! Thanks for watching man 😊
I was wondering how this compares to large format lenses, so I did the calculations. Assume the 16 images are a grid of 4 x 4, with some 25% overlap such that the final dimensions of the image are 6 cm x 4 x 0.75 = 18 cm (~7 inches), and 4.5 cm x 4 x 0.75 = 13.5 cm (~5 1/4 inches). Thus, you have about the same image as you would by taking a 5x7 (inch) large format picture with a 150 mm F/3.5 large format lens. In 35 mm full frame equivalent, this has the same field of view and depth of field as a 30 mm F/0.7 lens. On the 645, you would need a 48 mm F/1.1 to get the same photo in one frame. I use a Schneider Xenar 150 mm F/3.5 on 4x5. To get an idea of what this looks like on 4x5 (35 mm equivalent of 42 mm F/1.0), check out the photography of Kate Miller Wilson. She uses the same lens to very nice artistic effect.
Christopher! Oh my gosh, this is so cool. Thank you so much for taking the time to crunch these numbers! I really appreciate it man. I had been wondering in the back of my mind what this final image replicated, and it's so helpful to have all of this info now. I'll definitely check out Kate's work, I'm fascinated by this style of photography and all of the creative exploration that comes with it. Thanks again, Christopher!! :)
I’ve done 100+ image panos for portraits on digital before and 400+ for landscapes. It’s a riot and diminishing returns but it’s a fun challenge 😂 I’d never do it with film, good on ya
Oh man, that’s awesome!!! Totally agree, it becomes more about the achievement than the end result haha. It’s super fun on film, just a heck of a lot more expensive 🤣
Hi Zac! Glad to hear you're getting into film! That's a great question, there are a few differences. Stitching all of these photos together gives you more depth and more resolution vs. a single frame of film. It can also allow you to get a wider field of view, like you would with a traditional panorama. I made another video on film panoramas where I show the in-depth editing process, which might help explain it a little better if you have further questions. Thanks for watching!! :)
Hi Joseph! I show how to stitch them in another video I made-it’s called “Brenizer Method on Medium Format Film.” You can find it on my channel from a few months back! Hope it helps 😊
I´ve used the Brenizer Method for an eagle eye photo with a drone cause it couldn´t fly the needed height to cover the whole area, lot of urban stitching for sure.
@@StevenSchultz As far as I know nobody has done this before ... so it would instantly place your name in photographic history books ;-) And I bet every step would ultimately lead into nightmares ... processing 15 or 20 sheets at once, scanning ... let alone opening the resulting file on an average machine ... ya... sounds like pure insanity to me :-) But I would definitely watch it ....
![[UA] NAVI vs MOUZ | BO5 | IEM Rio 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CMBYk0cbGoA/mqdefault.jpg)
hahahaha that song that comes in mid way through, I was thinking, "gosh, I know this from somewhere... where in the world?? maybe a podcast or something?" came back today and realized ;)
Hahaha!!! That’s incredible 😂 Hopefully that song will be back in full swing in a few weeks… 👀
I'd be interested to learn how you guys meter for portraits! Whether you're just going straight off the internal light meter or your thought process on it. There's so much info on metering on youtube but y'all's film portraits are always so perfectly clean!
That’s a great question, Eric!! I’ll jot that down as a future video, I’ve got some great advice on that 😊 thanks for the kind words!!!
large format pano next 👀
YOU KNOW IT 👀
Great video! I’ve been enjoying doing these panoramas over the last couple of years, doing them on film is next level!
Thank you so much, Matt! They really are so much fun to experiment with. The film component has totally reinvigorated my interest in them! Thanks for watching man 😊
bringing a whole new definition to the term sunny sixteen you know what i mean
hey @ sunny sixteen where y’all at
😂😂😂
I was wondering how this compares to large format lenses, so I did the calculations. Assume the 16 images are a grid of 4 x 4, with some 25% overlap such that the final dimensions of the image are 6 cm x 4 x 0.75 = 18 cm (~7 inches), and 4.5 cm x 4 x 0.75 = 13.5 cm (~5 1/4 inches). Thus, you have about the same image as you would by taking a 5x7 (inch) large format picture with a 150 mm F/3.5 large format lens. In 35 mm full frame equivalent, this has the same field of view and depth of field as a 30 mm F/0.7 lens. On the 645, you would need a 48 mm F/1.1 to get the same photo in one frame. I use a Schneider Xenar 150 mm F/3.5 on 4x5. To get an idea of what this looks like on 4x5 (35 mm equivalent of 42 mm F/1.0), check out the photography of Kate Miller Wilson. She uses the same lens to very nice artistic effect.
Christopher! Oh my gosh, this is so cool. Thank you so much for taking the time to crunch these numbers! I really appreciate it man. I had been wondering in the back of my mind what this final image replicated, and it's so helpful to have all of this info now. I'll definitely check out Kate's work, I'm fascinated by this style of photography and all of the creative exploration that comes with it. Thanks again, Christopher!! :)
I’ve done 100+ image panos for portraits on digital before and 400+ for landscapes. It’s a riot and diminishing returns but it’s a fun challenge 😂 I’d never do it with film, good on ya
Oh man, that’s awesome!!! Totally agree, it becomes more about the achievement than the end result haha. It’s super fun on film, just a heck of a lot more expensive 🤣
Oh man happy birthday 🥳
Thanks so much, Tatsuki!! :)
Dude this is so cool! I gotta try this.
Thanks Jackson! You totally should, it's so fun to experiment with!!
Be good man. An extra day alive is a great thing.... Let alone completing an orbit. Hbd. Subscribing!
Thank you so much, Ramón! So glad you’re here!! 😊
i’m very new to film photography, what’s the difference between doing this, and just a standard, single frame portrait shot?
Hi Zac! Glad to hear you're getting into film! That's a great question, there are a few differences. Stitching all of these photos together gives you more depth and more resolution vs. a single frame of film. It can also allow you to get a wider field of view, like you would with a traditional panorama. I made another video on film panoramas where I show the in-depth editing process, which might help explain it a little better if you have further questions. Thanks for watching!! :)
A great way to step up from medium format to large without changing a thing 😂 👍🏾👏🏾🙌🏾
Hahahaha exactly 😂😂😂
Right when I thought "why is Eric so out of breath, doesn't he run marathons?" he addressed it 3:01
Hahaha!! So good 😂
❤️🤩 you are so good at this!
Thank you Mom!!! 😊
for the first verticle portrait......it would be interesting to compare it to the look of a current full frame camera with a 50 1.2 lens.
That's a great idea! I'll have to test that out in a future video!!
Can You explain how to Stitch them ❤️
Hi Joseph! I show how to stitch them in another video I made-it’s called “Brenizer Method on Medium Format Film.” You can find it on my channel from a few months back! Hope it helps 😊
I want to try this too soon. MAybe even make a video with my result.
You totally should! I’ll definitely give it a watch 🤘🏻 thanks for being here!!
@@StevenSchultz will try and waiting for more video like this one :)
Would you ever use an entire roll of film on one photo?!
I´ve used the Brenizer Method for an eagle eye photo with a drone cause it couldn´t fly the needed height to cover the whole area, lot of urban stitching for sure.
@@alexistoide oooo nice!! That’s such a cool use for it! I assume that took a little while to stitch?!
@@StevenSchultz ya bet! Good thing it was a paid gig 😉 hbd btw
No 😂
Definitely not I think this method would work out to be much better and cheaper on digital.
slay!
All day!!!
If you want it extreme and insane ... well try 8x10 LF with at least two boxes of Portra ;-)
Hahaha oh mannnn! Might have to try that out in the next video 😂 Thanks for watching!
@@StevenSchultz As far as I know nobody has done this before ... so it would instantly place your name in photographic history books ;-) And I bet every step would ultimately lead into nightmares ... processing 15 or 20 sheets at once, scanning ... let alone opening the resulting file on an average machine ... ya... sounds like pure insanity to me :-) But I would definitely watch it ....
You can’t just put the Rally Caps theme in the video like that! 😝
Hahaha!!! Glad someone noticed-maybe it’s my way of teasing some upcoming episodes 👀👀👀
Your next challenge, should you choose to accept it, is ... Brenizer *_video_*
Hahaha!! Oh man, that would be quite the challenge 😂 Thanks for watching, Ian!
We’re gonna see how it PANS out 😭😭😭😭
Out here practicing my SNL audition tape 💀
Get a 1.x lens for your mamiya and you only need one shot to get that look
Why he need 16 pictures for 1 photo?
0:37 I just need a 85mm lens for such picture LUL
Haha I definitely don’t need it, it’s just fun to experiment with!