I agree with what you're saying about the dialogue, bored the arse off me. Constantly hitting that skip button. Overall I liked the graphics and trying different builds but that's it. Keep up the good work mate, love watching your brutally honest videos 👍👍👍👍
I got 450 hours on PS5, and 1200+ on PC.. the game is great, but when you add mods!? L E G E N D A R Y, choom! There’s so many ways to approach the game, with insane amount of side missions, unexpected moments that are phenomenal, and the mystery behind it all.. there’s still secrets ppl haven’t found yet, along with hidden missions, and Easter eggs.. so much in this game, it’s absolutely mind boggling to see anyone say it’s terrible, unless they’re farming for engagement/views.
@@MidTierVillain I can imagine. I got it on ps5 but I'm planning on building a PC (wanted one since 5th grade to mod skyrim lol). I can't wait to try out the vr cyberpunk mod and all the other ones. I really wish CDPR would drop the modding kit for cyberpunk like they just did for the Witcher 3 and like BGS does for all their games and then the mods can be even crazier!
@@clemp23 fuck both of you I had to deal with the bullshit on PS4 still fell in love with it, and even now now after upgrading it, I have more fun in that version with all the memories I’ve made jank and all
im on PC barely saw any bugs, just booted it up and played for 1week since i wanted to see how many bugs i could find (2-3hrs a day roaming and story mode) overall i found it much better tbh but it gets boring if you havent played for more than a couple weeks, its something that grows on you like witcher 3, its honestly quite boring but if you play it for a while it gets better, the small nuances are great since i love reading those small shards i get traveling the city, but for the average gamer its ok, for me its great.
I have about 1,400 hours on pc and 578 or so on Xbox (across the Xbox One and Series X). Didn’t even see half of this stuff neither. Must be really unlucky or something, I don’t know.
@@flymasterkyle1277 that makes no sense. Optimisation is significantly easier for console ports than it is for PC port, almost every game that’s on both PC and console has less bugs on console 99% of the time. But this video is still very stupid nontheless
Just started my first playthrough post 2.0 today. NPCs glitching through the floor, enemies spotting me through walls, NPCs not talking during dialogue scenes. And this is in my first three hours. It's still got so many issues it's crazy. And that's before we get to the terrible story
It has potential as a masterpiece but no way it reached those heights. The gameplay is mediocre - the shooting is lackluster, same with melee and the hacking elements are too simplistic... The world is gorgeous and very immersive for the most part. The story is good and the side quests are unique.. but it's not a masterpiece..
@@StacheBoi Ah yes, RDR2 which has the gameplay loop of shooting bad guy in head with small gun, or shooting the same bad guy with big gun - for 200 hours. Very depth such wow.
ive recently got this game on my pc and i have not experienced any glitches or bugs which you have shown in this video, i think its just an issue on the console version of the game because my experience so far has been incredible
On consoles it's another story, I can't get it out of my head that this game should never have come out on consoles. I have an XBOX One X Series X and the game crashes a lot.
The game is fine on console. I played it on ps5 and its solid, not perfect mind you (I did get some crashes here and there but they're very few and far between).
@@omarcruz1047 PS5. Legit never crashed once. Granted I got the game on 2.1 update but still never got any bugs, crashes, soft locks or none of that so it’s really strange how a series x (a console I’d say is a little bit better than ps5) still managed to have bugs like that with this game
I am looking at your gameplay and you seem to never play any of the side quests and rushed straight to Hanako which is like the least interesting story bit. If you played all the side stories and even the bigger side quests like getting Evelin back or finding the serial killer questline you might not have said that the story is uninteresting. In fact I don't think you gave any examples of how you found the story uninteresting or boring. Which sections were you bored at? What dialogue did you skip or find tedious? For the gameplay comparison to Red Dead. I actually think the open world in Cyberpunk is better paced and more fun to explore than in RD. I quit playing the game and its story missions in RD because I hated how on rails it was and how much Rockstar relied on watching cutscenes for everything and even making me "play out" boring tasks that should not have to be animated like that. They actively took away fun and so my immersion was ruined and I could not take the story seriously. Cyberpunk put me in the first person of V and made me experience the consequences and left me making decisions decisions that had me sitting in my chair speechless. Gameplay is far cry but more options and playing over 200 hours of Cyberpunk you come too realize how fluid and versatile your movements are. Come my third playthrough I could clear camps that took me 10 attempts my first time by being able to jump over enemies, shooting them in the head, pushing them down floors, throwing knives while I stab someone in the back and blow up their reinforcements with quickhacks. To conclude. It is worth playing and worth playing for me three times over. It is a 10 out of 10 for me and I find the story from both the DLC and main game to be phenomenal if you put the freaking time to do all the side missions with the characters you form relationships with. The meat of the game is the city it self but the filling is and what makes it that much more special is how it challenges the player. At the end of the day its a matter of opinion of course but I think you are seriously wrong in thinking that the game is not a masterpiece, I think it is and will be remembered as such for years and years.
Are you sure he actually played the game? He claims to but all his videos are things that you can just find on youtube. He did a modding video on Cyberpunk and one on the RDR remake, the RDR has video that points to him actually playing it, the cyberpunk one doesn't. Also he complained about the RDR remake and decided that visual mods made it "the game we should have got", aka this guy has his priorities in some weird places.
but what about the AI, npcs models and facial expressions in game? 😁😁🤣🤣 the game is a joke, the only gorgeous thing it has are the visuals, and illumination.
I just played Cyberpunk for the first time this year and it was one of the most memorable gaming experiences of my life. I saw a couple of minor graphical bugs, but nothing that fundamentally impacted the gameplay. We obviously had drastically different experiences, and that's fine. Personally, I loved every moment of Cyberpunk. Night City sucked me in like few gaming environments ever have.
with about 90 hours on my first run through (starting a second) is the amount of times NPCs shoot me through walls. Although it wasn't all the time, it was bad enough to be noted in my playthrough. That was probably the only big I've encountered minus a single glitch through map which caught me off guard (after installing mods)
@@MartyrHandle You do know that some guns allow shooting through walls right? If you alert them and then try to hide some of them are supposed to be able to hit you.
@gmoder10 Because it couldn't be that we simply had different experiences with the game? No, it must be that I simply haven't played enough games to know better . . .
Or... And get this, people try the game to see if they can get to the point where they find it's amazing like everyone is saying. Don't ever find that part and then bring it up as valid criticism for a game people are saying is fantastic. It's shallow in basically every regard and the games it apes, GTA, Ubisoft (for the side content) and Deus Ex Human Revolution for how the stealth, melee, shooting and dialogue plays basically the core gameplay sucks compares to all those games. Hell FarCry has tighter gunplay.
@deetsitmeisterjd it's also shallow in it's references to other cyberpunk stories, more cosplaying as cyberpunk. For example, the pills you're given to help with your illness are an obvious Matrix reference. But where The Matrix made the red pill a metaphor for choosing to live authentically and be yourself, the red pill in the game literally kills you, giving control of your body over to silverhand and shortening the amount of time you have left.
one of the most entertaining and groundbreaking games in recent memory, and thats without mentioning the relatively untapped societal topics in mainstream gaming that it covers extensively. most people haven’t had too many bugs recently but if you truly have, just look past them, please. it also has possibly the best soundtrack of any game, ever. sincerely, permanent cyberpunk glazer
*_LETS BE REAL, the visuals are so good, and the amount of details, but the NPCs animations, facial expressions and AI in general sucks_* There are older games with a decent character model, npcs and pretty decent AI, what is happening to new games??
I left a terrible review on Steam several years ago when it was released, and I'm not changing my mind about this game. It's over hyped, and there was and isn't currently anything "next gen" about it all. I paid $60 during the release when everyone was playing it, it's probably cheap now in the US, but internationally the price for this game is ridiculous, it costs $96.33 for the Ultimate Edition in Costa Rica, that's more than I paid for it when it was released. Let's be real here, this is a dogsh!t game.
@@markb7848 yep, honestly is just a game for playing campaign and experience visuals or ambient, but when it comes to interact with NPCs, the game ruins that experience.
@@anonisnoone6125 What hes complaining about isnt even addressed in the patch. If he'd go back to play it now, i doubt he would like it even an iota more compared to release version
Be prepared because CDPR fanboys are gonna spam the entire comment section claiming that game is fixed. Cyberpunk was 6/10 on release and is 7/10 now. DLSS is still not fixed. CDPR forum is full of people complaining about flashing lights and terrible performance after patch 2.0. AI is still as stupid as people who preorder games, gunplay sucks, choices don't exist, cars go flying here and there but yeah, game is "fixed". Also, still not an RPG
And cyberpunk haters like yourself are going to do the same, you will lie and claim you have played the game and then repeat what you have heard from other people that lie and say that they have played the game. If you have played it what quest was the worst and why? Which gun did you like the best? What are your stats in game? What build do you have?
@@Earth2McKay 94% positive on steam for the last 30 days, 84% positive for all time. Hey OP up there, we got another one of your liar friends here. Maybe next time you can say it is a 2/10 on release and a 3/10 now next time you are trying to BS your attempt to stay with the "popular" position.
@@thomgizziz which quest was the worst? Umm all of them? The story is gawd awful. No one cares about Johnny silver dick. The only time I had fun was when I used cheats and ran around super jumping everywhere murdering NPCs with a katana. What building did I use? I used cheats after like 17 hours and used all the perks. Big deal the game has a skill tree 🌴 omg how innovative and RPG like. It made me feel soooo immersed The cars suck. The driving sucks. The city map sucks. The city itself sucks. The desert sucks. The NPC dialog sucks. Not a single thing about CD project red games are good. The fans are the worst. Witcher 3 was by far one of the worst games of its generation via gameplay and game mechanics. But everyone looks past dog shit controls and fighting mechanics for a mediocre story with boobs.
Your opinion might or might not be popular. But I am a die hard GTA fan, having started with GTA 1. I am also a die hard RDR1 & 2 fan. The most fun I have had playing a single player game EVER, was with Cyberpunk. Yes it is imperfect. RDR2 comes much closer to being perfect imo, true. But the unique world building, art, music, missions, setting, characters, are just addicting. Even more so than with GTA, at least for me. Everyone else can hate the game, I do not care. I LOVE IT and have finished the entire game 10 times and put in 1100 hours so far. I hope more content gets released, and I am certainly looking forward to Cyberpunk Orion.
Man I feel you, the theme is great but I would love to play CP 2077 with RDR 2 attention to details, NPCs and relatable story. When I play now CP 77 something is disturbing my experience so much that I don’t want to play anymore
Dude its obvious you've never played a sci fi game with this aesthetic EVER. That is why you subjectively like it so much its like the first time you've tasted ice cream when all you've done your whole life is drink milk. Its obvious most people are like you where its a fresh impression but the game objectively is subpar to mid as far as story telling, dialog, mechanical depth let alone the fact its all illusion of choice. Slop
I disagree a bit on the AI driving, they always get out of the way when I'm faster than them, they open a corridor for me to pass them, but sometimes they behave like maniacs
well, I don't know what hardware you have, but you should buy a new graphic card, or do some maintenance and cleaning to the one you already have, because in my case I have not experienced as many bugs as you have.
@@L321 xDDD you just need to read some comments of this video to realize what is actually happening here, Reality: there aren't even a quarter of the bugs you say there are.
@@DemocracyOfficerKeegani personally play on a ps5 and have had minor bugs, not sure what anybody else has experienced with other consoles/pc builds but im so-so-so curious as to what this guy’s playing on as well as what build of the game he’s running. this whole video seems fishy to me honestly. i dont think he made this video out of personal spite because that seems way too out of touch, i believe it more to be a troll.
Ive never seen any of those bugs u have in these video and I have completed the game 2 times, now going for a third. Are u sure u have updated it properly?
The fact that the game has 9/10 on steam and people are praising devs for "fixing" the game after 4 years is hilarious. The game is still unfinished. Giving high rating and praises will encourage companies to create unfinished games and then progressively "fix" them.
As a huge fan of this game I very much agree with most of these points, while I personally enjoyed the story and it's DLC because I have always enjoyed science fiction, I do think that this game is still unpolished in a lot of areas. The good news though is that there are no more devs working on this game and CDPR is moving onto the sequel, which hopefully has a much better launch now that they've switched engines and have something to actually work off of.
@@commenceun upcoming isn’t the word I would use, we probably wont see anything about Cyberpunk for at least 2-5 years, as of writing this in 2024 at least
@@L321 Every game is unpolished in a lot of areas and the only reason you said "Thanks for the honesty" is because he agreed with you. Are you going around and saying "Thanks for the honesty" to people that disagree with you? Do you assume they are lying or that you are the only one that is correct? Either way your logic is beyond bad.
I have 700hrs on Cyberpunk, I really like the world of cyberpunk and it's social commentary on how big corporations own us. I would strongly recommend anyone to do all the side quests with yellow markers because that's where the best missions are with important characters that can unlock new endings, or you can skip it all and beat the game in 20hrs with the vanilla ending up to you. Also suggest playing on the hardest difficulty for best experience. For me the gameplay has been good since launch (I played on PC). There's lots of cool guns. The double jump + dash mechanics, mixed with the wall climbing make jumping across rooftops one of my favorite ways to traverse the map. The body modifications in general are cool and add more variety like gorilla arms vs mantis blades, or being a netrunner vs being a ninja build. The are minor bugs with ai but a lot of the stuff pointed out in the video I never noticed, maybe because I do the missions and am not roaming around killing npc's. I will say driving cars does suck, most the time I drive a motorcycle because it feels better. The graphics are cutting edge. Full RTX implementation means best lighting and reflections I've ever seen. Only improvement I would want is the characters and npc's could look more realistic and have more variety in hairstyles and clothing. Overall 9/10 - Great game overall, great replay value with different life paths, playstyles, endings and lots of mods to mix things up even further. The graphics are stunning. If you try your hardest you can find bugs but the story and gameplay are peak gaming.
In comparison to RDR2, I much prefer cyberpunk's gameplay. I personally do not enjoy riding a horse around and find the combat simple. Can not judge RDR2's story as I dropped in 20hrs in.
@@cendresaphoenix1974i beat rdr2 as well, great game, but would never replay it, gameplay wise it was so boring at times. i loved the story but it took way too long to get to the good part, id rather play cuberpunk or gta v again.
They will never fix this game and make it not terrible because 90% of the game is still missing. Without going into an overly long post explaining everything that is absolutely wrong with this game, I will just sum it up with a clear and concise way to show how bad this game was gutted. In the Cyberpunk 2020 tabletop game, there are 9 different classes, or "roles" you can play as: Rockerboy, Solo, Netrunner, Techie, Media, Cop, Corporate, Fixer, Nomad. Cyberpunk 2077 lets you pick Solo, and extremely gutted versions of Techie and Netrunner, with Netrunner being worse because the actual 3D 'Net does not even exist in the game at all. CDPR gave people the equivalent of a D&D game where you can only play as a Fighter, or a Fighter/Mage or Fighter/Thief that is capped to level 5. It's such a massive disaster of a game compared to what they promised us.
Wtf r u on about? Half the shit that fans expected to be in the game was shit people made up. I can guarantee u that a lot of the content u expected wasn't even mentioned by CD Project themselves.
@@anonisnoone6125 CDPR claimed it to be an 'RPG' yet I can name a bunch of GTA games off the top of my head with actual RPG mechanics that CP2077 severly lacks
The fact that you titled the video "Cyberpunk 2077 is still terrible" then proceeded to say "I think it's a decent game" within the first 2 minutes means I'm not watching the rest. Obvious telltale of a liar who wants attention.
Some people really did not like this video. dude gave his opinions and credit where he felt deserved. Sure he dropped an occasional meat rider, but people are actin like he called it simcity.
This is indeed subjective. I on the other hand I find RDR2 story boring. Somebody who is more into history, western, bandids will be more into RDR2, somebody who likes future, technology, AI will be more into Cyberpunk. I agree its not the best open world, but I dont think it was ever meant to be. Its first and foremost RPG, not a action sandbox like rockstar games. If you compare it to RDR2 on open world building then why dont we compare them on character progression and skills? Cause here Cyberpunk wins by a mile. We need to be fair here. They are different games.
@@rezibabe5210Bro, it's character progression not being better than the witcher doesn't make it bad. Cyberpunk provided different players with different builds and style. The growth of my character is satisfying so far.
@@adrian_veidt You can have fun with it, but by great rpg standards it s mediocre at best. Especially how fast you lvl up, lacks pacing. It s the combat gameplay that is excellent now.
I've been gaming since I was 6, starting on a Sega Genesis. In 30 years of gaming I haven't played such a compelling, deep-thought-inducing game. The combat after 2.0 is amazing IMHO. I play on very difficult with almost no HUD, and if I die, I have to roll a dice for my character to survive, so it increases the stakes. Every encounter I have to use all my abilities to survive. Night City is beautifully crafted. Sure, it isn't as interactive or as dynamic as RDR2, which I think takes the cake for best open world. But the cars, which were so carefully crafted, even the interiors, are so much fun to drive. But I prefer the setting and the lore of cyberpunk. I love how natural the dialogue scenes play out, where you can walk around. The graphics are amazing. My only issues are that they haven't yet fixed all the bugs, actually there are now new bugs post -2.0. Also, they should keep releasing DLC like Phantom Liberty. They've had tremendous financial success with edgerunnners, 2.0, and phantom liberty, and night City has so much potential for more stories
if youve been gaming that long and you consider cyberpunk amazing then your standards are astonishingly low. the graphics are the only part of the game that even remotely lived up to its marketing.
@@jagostrife361 I didn't pay attention to the marketing. My tastes are simply different than yours, there's tons of people like me. I also don't like Elden Ring at all, which to many gamers makes my opinion in invalid. I liked the Witcher 3 a lot but I prefer the world of cyberpunk. I like sci-fi movies, I like action RPGs, and I like the combat mechanics and world building in cyberpunk. It immerses me. It's like it was built for me, it has almost everything I look for in a game. Graphics are important but certainly not the most important factor when choosing games. I just found Night City's scale, seamlessness, and perceived realism unbelievable compared to other games worlds. I'm also playing the Dead Space remake and the RE2 remake right now, which are both amazing. I would say RDR2 is superior but unfortunately they never patched it to 60 fps on PS5 and so it looks like garbage, being that Im used to seeing everything at 60 fps at least 1440p with HDR. I absolutely loved it, it's an absolute masterpiece, but I just couldn't stop hating the frame rate, so I'm waiting for Rockstar to charge me for a "remaster'. Then, maybe RDR2 would be better than CP2077. What would be some games on PS5, preferably action RPGs, that blow CP2077 out of the water? I have FF7 remake but haven't played. Since your tastes are so much more refined than mine 🙄 typical redditor
@@tch2296 lol im not on reddit but i will concede that its most likely this game simply isnt for me. I like the things you listed as well, sci fi, rpg's, etc. However i didnt like cyberpunk in the least. there are too many design choices that baffle me and I unfortunately did follow the marketing and I dont feel it lived up to any of it. The city seems shallow to me. the npc generation is terribly repetitive. the lack of any flying vehicles even though they do exist in game. the stores being empty and simply menus. the amount of customization that is completely pointless. the amount of things you simply cant customize (vehicles, apartments) tons of development time seemingly for nothing, at least in my opinion. the physics are ridiculous especially the water. For a game that was promising a "next gen" experience I dont feel like it delivered that. The police ai is terrible but after going back and playing gta's and RDR2 its not any better so I wont shit on that too much. Overall for me cyberpunk only looks good. Maybe the story didnt resonate with me, I dont know. I do think RDR2 is a better game but if you were to break down every aspect individually there is definitely things cyberpunk does better, such as combat. Ive been gaming a long time as well. perhaps im just bitter and jaded with the current state of gaming. You do you. my criticism is definitely invalid I enjoy fallout 76 alot, and its a broken mess of a game. I cant think of anything that blows it out of the water. I guess I just have to ask, obviously you like the game but what flaws would you say it has? I guess what I dont understand when people who love a piece of media cant admit its flaws. I love FF7 and the new games have some decent qualities but I would never call them a masterpiece. What do you feel cyberpunk brought to the action RPG genre that hadnt been done better by other games?
@@jagostrife361 Yeah, you're not alone. It's weird: some people find the world pretty but shallow, like it feels strangely empty. For me that improves a lot after 2.0 and phantom liberty - Dogtown feels much more alive. For me, I enjoy the layout and feel of the city, and the cars, that I love just cruising around and checking everything out. And after 2.0 the spare parts you find are super important so there is real reward for exploring everywhere. So I think that's just a matter of how it hits you personally, but I've heard many say the same thing.. Same with the story, to me, I thought the dialogue was incredible and the ideas were super interesting to me. AI, corporate overreach, it's like living in a version of our world if we keep making the same mistakes, which to me makes it kind of profound and interesting. I love how you can move around during conversations and how good the faces look. I found the pilot to be mature, engaging, and although I'm aware you're not actually making huge choices most of the time, it at least feels to me very cinematic and cool. But again, I've heard many complain that it's not not heavy enough on the RPG. It's definitely an action RPG with emphasis on action. I love the lore, I bought several of Pondsmiths books, th cyberpunk universe has been around since the 1980s and there is a huge amount of lore starting when it's universe splits from ours. It's just personally appealing to me. NPC repetition is a problem and has to do with hardware limitations. If you're on PC there are options I think that help with that. It's not as bad as it was on PS5, but occasionally I'll see the same mohawked girl walk by twice in two seconds. There are other bugs, some pretty big ones, like all the radio hosts disappearing after phantom liberty, and the TV audio being bugged. I've emailed CDPR many times to report and inquire why they won't fix the remaining bugs but I think they've moved on. The bugs are still a problem, it's just now at the point where personally I can look past it. But it's a huge contrast when I play a game like the dead space remake which is absolutely perfectly polished in every way. And for some ppl the bugs are enough to pull them out of the game. I still haven't played Baldurs Gate 3, which I'm sure I will love. I also never played fallout 4 - was waiting for next gen patch, or fallout 76. I own fallout 4 and loved fallout 3 and new Vegas, two of my favorite games. I was thinking of diving into fallout soon - 4 and then 76. It's just taste. Like I can't explain why souls games have just never had any appeal to me. The world isn't appealing, the combat looks decent but I'm not all about boss-centered gameplay, I'm not huge into fantasy, etc Honestly it's tough when you've been gaming so long and seen it all. You'll find fault in every game. And Cyberpunk isn't perfect, it just hits the spot for me. If Rockstar wasn't so fucking lazy/greedy all they have to do is unlock the frame rate limiter on PS5, someone already figured out how to do it on XBox and the PC version runs uncapped. If I could play RDR2 at 60 fps I'd drop everything else and go straight for that. Edit: and yeah I dunno why I said reddit lol
@@tch2296 haha i came out a little aggressive assuming I knew why you liked the game, the reddit comment is fair play. I cant say that I'll be getting into cyberpunk2077 but this convo has made me realize i need to reevaluate my passion for gaming and get back to enjoying them more than critiquing them. I appreciate the measured responses and I apologize for being a bit of a dick. I truly hope you continue to enjoy the games you play and best of luck with your back log!
Just finished it today, 74.5 hours. I did most of the main additional sidemissions before finishing the main story. Of those 74.5 hours. I did 44.8 in the last 2 weeks. To anyone asking "is it ready for 2024" Yes. Yes it's ready for 2024
Nah, it will never be ready because the devs are still liars and scammed millions by promising many things to be in this game, including decisions that matter on every turn and we still don't have that, nor are we going to.
Doesn't matter. I doubt he plays it. He grabs some footage of the internet and tries to find a couple things to nit pick and the slaps the video together. His cyberpunk hate videos does well for him so he would lie through his teeth and say he hates it even if he likes it. It is weird for a game that he hates so much that he makes so much content for it, right?
@@L321 it's not a glitch his character model is like that because he's a drug addiction and he injected himself in the shoulder, theirs NPC tweaking out on drugs all over the map or being excorted home by a friend.
@@BrotherSham See people like this like to play pretend. They will talk about RDR when in reality most of RDR is empty vastness and towns or quests have people so they think because everybody talks but there are only a few people that it is more alive. Or they will bring up GTAV... which makes no sense because it is the same or worse than Cyberpunk but it is a more popular game so they feel it must be better. Most people that criticize the game haven't played it. They heard bad things about it and assumed it must be true and you can't reason yourself out of nonsense you didn't reason yourself into. I have asked hundreds of people like this to tell me specific instances of bugs or quests they didn't like... their response is straight up insults or "the lips didn't move", and similar very vague stuff like that.
@@thomgizziz Yeah RDR 2 did feel quite dead, which I guess is kinda the point but I wasn't a fan of how you had to go and find a lot of the side quests and stranger missions when I'd rather be led to it or he shown where it is because that map is massive
Started in February of this year and at 336 hrs and still have a few gigs and 40 gang hideouts left I been binging car theft missions visiting the bar in between to decompress head to the hideout inDogtown to crash into a drunk slumber so I can wake up and visit 4 ripperdocs to distribute stolen weapons from murdered enemy gang members afterwards visit a vehicle dealer to reward my blood soaked crusade with a new super car to race later that night- this is why I cant stop playing the role play is ridiculous even after beating the story and the DLC.
I bought Cp just month ago on Steam sale. For me it's mix of GTA and Skyrim but with every aspect (plot, graphics, characters) better. Sure, there are bugs (which game doesn't have ones), but overall it's jaw dropping for me.
There are flaws no doubt. None of them are bad enough to really affect core gameplay in my experience however. I’ve played this game for 1,300 hours and from what I’ve seen, it’s mostly just vehicle pop in when I’m on the freeway looking further ahead since I’m driving at a faster speed or my vehicle freaking out when I use the call menu occasionally. Sometimes I experience like a weird DLSS slowdown after opening the pause menu, but that’s probably because I only have 8 GB of VRAM and the 2.0 update kind of beefed up system requirements.
This game is boring. Literally, the most over hyped nonsense I've ever played. I'm personally never playing cpr game again. I spent the last 3 years trying get invested in this game but I've readmitted it's just boring. I'll definitely try to beat the witcher 3. I'm only going to reinstall this game when I get 4090 run a Benchmark or something.
But the people that complain about it usually say they have played it and haven't and bash on things that aren't actually relevant to the game. They complain that it isn't cyberpunk enough or doesn't have enough classes or the classes aren't what they wanted. It is because they didn't play the game they heard negative stuff about it and decided that was going to be their position, negative.
@@JayUchiha17 No you haven't. And then you claim you are going to play the witcher 3. You are pretending you have played it because you think it gives your lies more weight. I played it on a 1060 on a laptop with little issue at medium 1080p. Your little 4090 comment just made it even more clear that you aren't telling the truth.
Some of the fixes and updates won’t apply to old saves from what I remember so give it another try in a new save ( I might be wrong but It’s just what I remember)
People calling it a masterpiece and the best game they’ve ever played baffles me. It’s slightly above average at best. Did we even play the same game? 😂
We are not the same people. For many especially women Sims are still a masterpiece. Some people are not bothered by buggy mechanics. Look at Skyrim community. You just have to look from a wider perspective than your own eyes. I personally had a lot of fun with this game, especially the story. It is mature and touches deep topics such as hidden control of society.
@@L321You should delete your channel for sure, your opinion is instantly invalid and useless. Like it is simply impossible not to call Cyberpunk a masterpiece. On the other hand we have Starfield, I mean trashfield that shows us how beautiful cyberpunk is
I mean the same can be said for red dead 2. A lot of people find rdr2 boring. But that doesnt mean much does it? Cyberpunk is a masterpiece for a lot of people. That is all that matters.
That may be your honest thoughts, but I honestly feel it's one of the best games i've ever played in my life. I have put over 200 hours in the game so far on 2 playthroughs. I played on PS5 at launch.
I’m craving a futuristic RPG with deep RPG elements and first person gameplay and a crafting system with thousands of different items you pick up. This game isn’t doing it for me.
@@sayankakalita7827 You need to stop saying shit like that. If this dude feels it's the best game ever made, it's obviously because he connected with it in ways you didn't. It's a chickenshit move to belittle a person or assume they haven't experienced good gaming (or are missing out on things) just because they fawn over something you didn't.
are you people legitimately insane? The story is boring, there are barely any choices ,combat sucks as enemies are bulletsponges and the atmosphere, what atmosphere? Its gta with robotic arms, if you were talking about deus ex or stalker i woudl understand, but this game has no atmosphere.
Even if you like story, the bugs are terrible in missions like "Ghost Town", the last gen (like Xbox One) versions are not good, and it's funny when the wheelchair bound characters run. I thought you were disabled, NPC.
The physics in this game is just atrocious and no amount of patches is going to fix that. It was shit on release and it's still shit now. People who say this game has been fixed are insane.
WTF are you on about? Oh you haven't played the game have you? You listened to another person that was making up BS and thought it sounded good so you started parroting their lie.
I've played this game since launch and even from day one I never saw anything like the issues UA-camrs have. Obviously I did experience a few but nothing that ruined the game for me
Nice to know people still complain about games when they see a couple of bugs within it. The same can literally be send for any other game, but because those games had a better release at first. Makes this whole video very invalid
The release for cyberpunk was great outside of the previous gen consoles. The big thing with cyberpunk was that the games journalists saw that bashing the game was getting them more clicks and it was also getting normal people more views on twitter and so people that had never played the game bashed on it and then to pretend to have credibility they started pretending they had played the game but almost none of them were able to tell me what happened in the game they just said it was buggy and bad.
It used to be good but the 2.0 update completely ruined the loot system and weapons, i remember when every single weapon had unique stats and you could pick up dropped weapons and actually use them
Opinions... I personally didnt like RDR2 and would place Cyberpunk in my top 10 with games like KCD, Fallout NV, Deus Ex... I didnt feel RDR2 open world was good. I would compare its open world to KCD. RDR2 seems too colorful, fake with fabolous views in every corner. Look up KCD forests for a comparison. Cyberpunk did a good job in creating an immersive open world, after 100h i still feel like im constatly seeing new things and feel like a forreign in a realistic dystopian city. About the combat, man in RDR2 every gun and enemy feels the same... Cyberpunk there are many combat compilation on yt...
The only bug I’ve encountered is Jackie Welles walking through a car….but the only complaint I have is combat seems too easy, and I’m not even an fps guy…
I’ve noticed this from when I was released from prison, before I went in 2 years ago, this game wasn’t so appreciated but now I see a lot of people praising it
I've played 700 hours of this game. Every single playthrough has had its own unique bugs. Despite this, its been one of the most immersive games I've ever played. And I think the gameplay is significantly better than RDR2 (600 hours).
I always wonder how people can see this game as particularly immersive. Are you new to games? I see repeating assets at every corner and, aside from the FX, the art design is lazy af with bland, repeating textures and copy-paste models. Dialogues and (reactions of) lower tier NPCs are shallow, repetitive and often simply autistic. The shooting and moving is clunky at lower levels, so in the early game you can't even play it as a shooter because your movement sucks and AI is as dumb as it gets. The driving is clunky all the time. The world/level building offers rarely any depth (as in actual interaction and worthwhile exploring, there rarely is any point in going anyhwere else than the obvious paths or choosing different approaches. For me it all feels "on rails" ... much of the world is just "watch, don't engage"). The story is boring and has no proper character build-up, the looting & leveling is neither creative nor complex (compared to something like Grim Dawn or Borderlands). I really don't get it. Even a "dumb" and very much linear shooter like Doom Eternal had much more depth, emotional engagement and attention to detail than this game. I tried multiple times to force myself into the game but it just feels like cheap early 2000s game in a nice FX dress.
Saying Cyberpunk is better than RDR2 completely invalidates any opinion you could have. RDR2 is a masterpiece that had a very positive release along with it being still cherished today as one of the top games on most platforms. Cyberpunk is a joke compared to that.
But you gotta believe me bro the game is trash and buggy and crashes all the time. Everybody hates the game and so should you, if you like it then you are wrong and a terrible person, bro.
I dont get why people like this game at all. All the rpg elements have been stripped from it. Theres nothing to do. Its soooooo boring. I cant find anything fun to do in the game.
The game is a masterpiece in many ways. It definitely has some glitches, some of which you show here way too many times. Cars falling from the sky, npcs freaking out in traffic and causing deadly accidents because you pass then when you did something blocks away before getting into a car, npcs spawning in the same spot simultaneously; sure some bad stuff. NPCs pulling out invisible cigarettes. There are lots of unusual things that will happen with NPCs and overlapping game artifacts over the course of play, that are not intended, but to me it doesn't happen enough to kill immersion. The issue with the repeated appearances on random NPCs is an option slider in the graphics settings. If you are getting too many you have the settings turned down for higher performance. Same with the cars I think. Random pissing guys, I think they toned that down, and I have not noticed a random standing pissing girl in a while. They clearly took out the one pissing in the market way up in NW Watson lol where people would all be dancing around him. I have no idea how they thought it would be possible to drive a car in first person mode, just no. The story being 'boring' is like, just your opinion man. Anyone finding it boring is still the exception rather than the rule. I had not seen a complaint about it until you mentioned it. I don't know, I love the game despite it's issues. Still need to play RDR2 to see that one.
i keep reading that about cyberpunk driving - its fixed by modders since 2.0 :) check out ""if driving in modded cyberpunk 2077 was realistic:" if you want and tell me what you think.
I just bought the game a few days ago and gawd damn it crashes before I get to the “cd PROJEKT red” screen lmao. I did get into the game one time through administrator mode but now that doesn’t work. What’s wrong with it? Honestly considering returning it. Which is a shame because the few minutes I got to play was pretty fun.
Not sure why you're getting the hate. It's a strange situation at the moment where devs can straight up lie at release, face massive criticism and then face praise years later for getting a game to the point it should have been at release. I still haven't bought the game and although it was on sale there was a morality holding me back haha People really need to be fighting the current state of gaming
At this point it's a whole system thing, I've personally given up on fighting the whole system if I'm gonna go early anyway. Capitalism is a bitch and a half.
The game was a lot better at 1.63 tbh, The updates screwed up the pacing of combat and did absolutely stupid crap like stamina being tied to shooting alongside the cyberware cap. The most damning thing of all though was enemy level scaling which basically renders the whole RPG aspect utterly pointless. If I ever get around to replaying the game it will be a heavily modded version that removes the stupid crap and rebalances combat to once more be fast paced. Dumping multiple magazines into bullet sponges is not fun or challenging but tedious.
I tried to like Cyberpunk but I dont have time to watch 45 minutes of unskippable cut scenes every time I sit down to play. Thats not a game to me, thats a movie. Had to uninstall.
@@HenryTownsmyth I've encountered a few minor bugs here and there, most were some minor NPC models that were screwed up which is nothing in todays games. They in no way impeded on my progress and enjoyment of the game and it's still one of the best games I've played, deal with it.
I didn't experience many of the bugs in this video. I know everyone's gaming experience is different but yeah. I just don't get it. Yeah a few mods from Nexus can fix some of these bugs, this game is superior on PC without a doubt and I don't think it should have been made for consoles in the first place
@@HenryTownsmythif you’d look at literally any other video about cyberpunk other than this one, you’d see that there are no bugs. I’m actually starting to think that he actively went looking for bugs, because I have never seen any like this
There are tons of successful games that don't have 1st and 3rd person modes. The most popular game on steam doesn't have 3rd person so it must be a failure with 1.3 million people playing it at one time today and probably 3 million people that logged into the game. You are so right and you know everything.
The thing that bothers me is most of the time someone criticises the game, every comments just stop at "I don't have a bugs or glitches, I run the game at 60/120fps 4k and the game is a masterpiece. And this is showing how low expecations are today. (I don't care about the support console or PC, this is not my main point). The game a meh and at best good, but excels nowhere: - Like most Ubisoft game, it's a interesting open world and good graphics. Since it's a CDPR game, the story is somehow good or maybe very good but the "Punk" is Cyberpunk is so soft. It supposes to be " a low-life and high tech universe with features futuristic technological and scientific achievements, such as artificial intelligence and cyberware, juxtaposed with societal collapse, *dystopia or decay*." The last part is very soft in this game. When you read william gibson's cyberpunk books (who is the Daddy of Cyberpunk theme), the social, politics and economics theme are much more impactful and interesting than in this game (every game is politic because they explain a state of a city/world between people which is super important in Cyberpunk universe). - But when the game was announced, it was promised to be a GTA-like + The Witcher/Skyrim-RPG with real important choices in story. At the end, it's just a Far Cry/Assassin's Creed game with a cyberpunk skin and RPG-lite (yes liberty patch reworks the spec tree and implants but this is just the minimum) with a good story and no real important choices, which for most of players is already a good experience when you see others AAA games and I respect that (especially for casuals) but not for more invested players. If you had mods, yes the game starts to be a real good game in some aspects but it stills lack solids foundations.
True 100% with you there man. People seem to forget about 90% of the game just bc the story is good😂 like you even show some evidence to people and they are starting to yap things like: well i don‘t care about the details and npc behaviour. Or they straight lie by saying nah cyberpunk has better details/npc‘s and is more immersive eventho it makes objectively seen no sense when you see the same models back to back and have no real random encounters and the fact that enemies don‘t die with a headshot is the worst thing if you want immersion especially with them damage-numbers above their heads like people have LITERAL brain rot if they do not get these points i mean they seem to not even understand what people are criticizing
No the problem is that most people that criticize it do so about nonsensical things like "Its over hyped", "The lips didn't move correctly during one cut scene", "It cost too much where I live", "It isn't next generation enough", "It crashes". Those are 99% of the criticisms that people come up with. Your complaint is "it isn't like necromancer" which isn't a critique on the actual game. Harry potter isn't lord of the rings and lord of the rings pretty much defines the genre... so does that mean Harry Potter is bad? No. Next you complain about what it was promised to be like... but a lot of those promises didn't come from CDPR they came from the games journalists reading into things that were never promised. But lets pretend you are correct here and they didn't deliver what you thought they said it would be... that doesn't make it a bad game, it is a critique against the devs and what they promised but not against what came out. You claim RPG-lite while naming games like the witcher and skyrim which are RPG lite games compared to earlier RPGs and TTRPGs and calling a game RPG-lite isn't saying that the game is bad it is just you thinking it should be one thing and because it isn't you are mad. Also far cry and assassin's creed are huge franchises, I don't think you are making the point you think you are making. It doesn't seem like you have actually played the game and instead listened to the journos bash the game because that was getting them the most clicks and then you decided to blindly hate the game because it was the trendy thing to do and then kept that anger and bias for 4 years.
@thomgizziz 300 hours, cleared the full game, heavy modded it because nexusmod 🤷♂️ and move on. "most people who criticize it" with bad arugments, don't read them too. Why are you talking about LOTR and Harry... I understand that my point about comparing it with other games like is bad (right?). Well that's the purpose of genre, here RPG action-adventure. He is good next to other AAA ? Yes. Is he deep compared to them ? Meh, above average of course but feel empty, lacking something. The promise was about full liberty and immersion (AI, exploration, police - wanted system and corruption, trauma team implemented, strong RPG - quest leave effects on the world, unique npc, important skills check, real build [and not net running the game lol], lifepath, gangs interactions), the list is long I will stop here, it was not there at release, simple. Does the game is bad ? No, it's decent but empty. Not gonna go into the rabbit hole of "Skyrim is not a rpg", yes it's less than his predecessor but each tree give you a feeling of "I'm this ranger,mage,warrior, etc". True, older RPG were more developed, I give you that, I just prefer to compare it with recent games(too me, good old rpg are things like fallout 2, bg1/2, grow up with them). CP2020 got 9 roles, I didn't feel it during my session (mods excluded). Am I mad about the game ? Disappointed, not mad, I don't spread hate I just start my comment by saying "sadly people have lower expectations nowadays + this will affect next games" and this opinion age like wine. About FC and Assassins, what's the issue about being a huge franchise ? Does that mean CP77 should not be compared to them because he was new ? Nonsense. Same genre (more AC than FC), but feel more like a looter shooter at the end (more FC than AC) with lack of meaningful impacts in universe. As a example, I thought it would be something like Fable. A city, a gang or something change because of your actions. And no, I don't hate the game, I just hope it has more.
I came across some bugs on my first two playthroughs. I ocasionally got stuck in some of the apartments because the elevator button wouldn’t trigger, forcing me to save/reload; I saw a car get swallowed by the road, lol, and the car spawned on top of the head of detective han (last mission from the River Ward + Peralez storyline), but that was it. I have to mention that all this was before 2.0. I played Phantom Liberty for 100 hours from scratch, and I can’t remember any bugs. Maybe I encountered a few, but nothing significant enough for me to recall.
started it again today after finishing the release version years ago.. first couple fights i get into, enemies are randomly invincible to damage, sidewalks are unreachable for a car moving forward, yet backwards you can get onto them to park just fine, allied AI is blocking me, standing around like a sack of potatoes, random events during dialog heavy scenes speed up/slow down my movements speed randomly, the cover system is confusing at best, hotkeys seem to change around at will (draw weapon is alt, then its b, wtf?), i haven't even finished the intro mission yet and i feel like this is worse then it used to be. i love the athmosphere, the vibes, the qol features and additional content. it just let's me down on the basics already so early on. i will probably finish this second playthough, but i sure am not off to a good start.
@@LamarBentley smoothly tbh. i checked the difficulty down from very hard, cause it felt a bit too demanding to min/max which i didn't quite sign up for after all these years, apart from that i'm sailing. gonna go for the panam ending (female V, judy romance) *my favorite.
@@fo0liner1985 please try mods if you can :) can greatly improve game balance (play very hard with just enemy hp values of hard or normal? sure!) qol in many aspects and add more content and detail! keybinds are fully customizable via config file editing btw^^ the whole game isnt easy to get into - but very rewarding if you stick and fuck around for longer.
@@MikeGrau0hrthere certainly are worse games/engines i got used to or tailored to my liking via .ini/.cfg manipulation and just careful and methodical play. IE getting used to wierd physical behavior or little quirks of an engine that could result in silly behavior. there certainly is no major flaw left here and im quite enjoying my time with the game right now tbh. even without mods. tho i will take them into consideration more so, now that you mentioned them.
Very hard is necessary for the game to be challenging at all and I've experienced none of what your talking about in my 400 hours, are you sure you updated the game.
Also just curious are you the same person behind the channel console warehouse as the person on console warehouse and you sound pretty much the exact same and if so I'm sorry to say this but a lot of the videos you made the stealth servers and a lot of other videos seem very old or by 2024 no longer exist like xb online and ninja no longer exist
Red Dead is so linear to the point where if you try to approach missions in a different way, you fail the mission. The story is good though and the characters are awesome. I hate when Dutch asks me to throw more money in the tithing box though after I donate $5,000 and Javier donates two feathers🤣
The problem with cyberpunk is that it tries to do RPG and visceral FPS and doesn’t pull either one off. The enemies are bullet sponges and everything is dictated by RPG damage numbers but the RPG elements are shallow and your character is only ever defined by arbitrary dialogue options. Trying to do RPG and action adventure shooter is a big task. As an open world, it’s less ambitious than GTA, the gold standard; and as an RPG, it’s less immersive than 15-year-old Fallout games.
Enemies are not even that spongey unless if they are mechs or boss fights which make sense. The combat feels very good in this game and it’s unique with the cyberware. Side quests even tie into each other pretty frequently. I did a side quest where I had to give a car to a gang that had some big wig corpo in the trunk. You have the option to free him before you drop him off or if you encountered one of his coworkers in another side quest before this one, you’ll find out he was using nomads as human experiments. It’s the subtle things like this that make the game feel immersive and that your choices do have an impact. Disproves your point that the only choices you can make to shape your role is only through dialogue. Seems to me like you haven’t played the game enough to figure out these things. Don’t get me wrong though, there definitely is some jank in this game with vehicles popping in, weird “dead slides” when you try to slide, romance options that leave you wanting more and duplicate NPC’s. I think the gameplay as well as a story that is this good, and characters that are written so well kind of makes up for its problems. There are mods that fix some of these things and add more for sure, but at least there is a game there. Same can’t be said about Bethesda, the company that somehow made half baked games as a framework for modders mainstream.
@@commenceun it’s not even that. Game just released in such a piss poor state that it didn’t get a chance to get all the content like it was supposed to. Game is still solid for the most part. Just wish there was more
I played cyberpunk on its release, i actually pre ordered it. When the game was somewhat playable (still incredibly buggy) I finished my first playthrough and absolutely adored the game. The story was amazing and the atmosphere in night city was as well. I did one more playthrough and then left the game until the DLC was available. I played the DLC on a brand new character so I played more of the base game as well and had an amazing time once again. I truly adore this game and it is my favorite shooter game out there, third favorite game overall. Im actually going to start another playthrough tonight, this time trying out a stealth build.
This would be such an amazing game... if it was a third-person game. First person ruins the game tbh. There is a reason open-world RPGs are typically 3rd person... It's not a coincidence. It's to highlight the game's greatest asset, its world... Two major benefits of this (a) Zoom out a little bit, third person, and you actually see more of this world, teeming with detail, at any moment. (b) Get to see all the outfits and details and cyberpunk modifications that your character has in this fictional world... Instead, we don't see the character. Don't see anything but the hands, don't see his fighting, don't even get to see all the weapons in entirety, and this fictional setting they've created goes to waste. And you have the constricted 1st-person view, which has never caught on in any genre except shooters -- which it works for, because the main focus of a game like COD is the combat, not experiencing all that Jalalabad has to offer. Even racing games have a toggle so that you can actually _see_ the cars. 1st person was a frankly terrible idea for Cyberpunk.
the story was alright at least from what i saw, never finished the game because it was kind of boring even with all of the fixes. stealth feels underdeveloped, gunplay is overall garbage and hacking/netrunning puts you to sleep. the different kinds of augmentations are nice, but thats about it. the music sounds like shid, the game's dialog feels like it was written by a teenager, the world is lifeless beyond the mediocre sidequests. the game is simply eye candy with sub-par gameplay and rpg mechanics. 6/10 game, heard a dude say that its "one of the best rpgs ever made" lmfao
Still can’t believe people just seemed to forget how CDPR lied to everyone about the ai, the world reacting to players’ choices, potential multiplayer, pre-rendered trailers, just to shill an underdeveloped Far Cry-like posing as an RPG. Played the game to 100% at launch and after phantom liberty, there is no amount of patches and updates that will make up for the blatant false advertising and lying directly to customers. Don’t get me wrong, it’s still a decent bit of fun and does have an incredibly pretty world, but it is not and will not be what CDPR wanted it to be and what we wanted it to be. I don’t believe this game will have the opportunity to bounce back like NMS due to CDPR being otherwise occupied.
The problem I have is I constantly compare it to the chaotic loot filled and object heavy world of Fallout 4 where every area had tons of interactivity and tactical options to take care of enemies. Cyberepunk feels very "rigid", the buildings are maze like and boxed in, and the enemy encounters are very similar. Again I'm comparing it to a lot of the chaotic freedom of Fallout 4 with crafting, base building, and just overall madness post apocalypse, if they could bring that feel to the dystopian city it would be incredible. I had much more memorable fights and interactions in the winding alleys of Fallout 4 than in Cyberpunk
@@Jordan27893 This video was posted 2 weeks ago and now has 20,000 views, yet with a ratioed 1k thumbs up vs 1.1k thumbs down... and even at launch, the game received 63000 negative reviews vs well over 226,000 positive reviews. This was at launch with all the bugs. 2 months back, the game somehow managed to peak over the "Overwhelmingly Positive" from it's previous "Mixed" reviews on Steam. As of today, it finally leveled out to a solid "Very Positive". The devs got to work and they did good. So don't get it twisted my friend... you are in the minority on this one. The majority rules that this game is excellent while the minority thinks it's dogshit for "reasons". But in the end, who gives a fuck, right? :) Just play or don't play.
This is just too fun and immersive to play to be worried about some glitches or bugs (PC version), it pales in comparison with what it offers. I´ve played all rockstar games and this is more immersive. All GTA´s and RDR 2 are very good, but after 2.0 this game is just better, not techically better, but better as a game. It´s the first game I´ve played in the last 10 or 15 years that I really thought it brought to the table something more than the rest. Pity they will return to witcher and not stick with NC for a couple more years. I love PANAM :)
Stop that bro, you cant even interact with the npc’s, driving is terrible, npc behavior is terrible, cant interact with street vendors, cant do anything in the strip clubs, gunplay is bad, customization is bad, police system is terrible. The core of this game is bad, the graphics on console are extremely grainy. Crazy pop in, clipping and everything its bad gtav still does open world better and its a ps3 game
@@AP90x Can I have my own opinion? I still prefer cyberpunk to any rockstar game and I don´t have half the problems you have with the system mechanics. Maybe you have played the console version or we simply have diferent tastes. It´s a matter of taste.
@@chocolate5217 your opinion is garbage. If people had the same opinion as you, we would have terrible games because devs would see that people would buy any old thing so they could put as little effort in it as possible and you’d eat it right up. This game is no where close to gta5 or rdr2 or rdr1 and thats an actual fact. You liking a more mediocre product is just stubbornness and foolishness. Get better taste so we get better games bud
@@AP90x Sight,another fanboy that thinks that can force me to like things that he likes. grow Up. And play the game before you post your opinion, from what I am reading you didn´t even play the game, at least after 2.0. (yeah you will say you have done it, guess what...I don´t believe you or you wouldn´t post such nonsense)
It’s an RPG, of course there is dialogue in the game. Sorry the game didn’t turn out to be the regurgitated scop like CoD you want, every single year. You are just trying to be a contrarian because “it’s cool to be different or whatever”.
I've been playing the game for the first time after Phantom Liberty, but followed the hype back before launch. From my experience, I've seen WAY MORE shilling for the game than criticism after the Edgerunners anime happened. Just look at this comment section, their arguments are often "don't care", "bugs never happened with me", "Red Dead Redemption 2 is repetitive". The game is still too basic, GTA San Andreas had car parts customization in 2004, while Cyberpunk 2077 doesn't even let you paint your cars in 2024. Modding? Oh yeah, a simple mod to let you own NPC variants of the cars requires 1 mod, that requires 2 mods, that require 3 mods, let alone a car customization mod. All of that to crash at launch due to the finicky checks that want every single mod to be the correct version with each other and the game because the modding community made no effort to properly organize itself. GTASA also had very basic street NPCs that would walk the streets looking for ped paths, this could result in them crossing from one side of the street to another in an endless patrol of the same 1 street, this in 2004. Cyberpunk 2077 has that same level of NPC AI - Zero improvements in 20 years, while a game like Red Dead Redemption 2, which is a 2018 AAA open-world game (same category as Cyberpunk), has a much more robust and believable NPC system with routines and variation in dialogue and interaction with the player. "I never ran into bugs", oh curious. Because I've had NPCs refusing to follow V and being stuck in place for gigs to progress. I've had non-lethal takedown bodies exploding into death if I tried to move them. I've had cars spawning out of nowhere behind me to crash into my car. Or the random gangsta floating on top of a major highway shooting at the cars passing by. Who needs Aerial Vehicles when people can apparently fly? Ending the comparisons, there is also the lack of a third person view or any difference in V's body after installing so much cyberware, something a lot of people desired to see. So many kiosks scattered throughout the city and you can't even have an animation of sitting down on them and eat (nitpicking? it was sold as an immersive experience) rather than having to pick the item off your inventory and simply clicking on it. Or also the fact that stealth is still rather clumsy during gameplay, with prompts for silent kills often failing to appear at the right moment. Or when cars are falling down from the sky, exploding or simply crashing into you without reason. A company promised a product and purposely didn't deliver it, even with bandaids over 4 years and still lacks the basics that AAA open-world games established 20 years ago. The truth is: People don't value their own money, as someone not living in a cushy first-world country, this is pretty obvious since people who go through hardship learn that you can't pay and accept crap in return.
This game is shit 😂 this comment section is brain dead. I've never tried so hard to play this game over the last 4 years. Thanks for making this video. If there is edible shit. There will be people who says it tastes good😂
@DemocracyOfficerKeegan illiteracy and assumptions. I've put in countless hours into the game, waiting for it to get good for years. Then it dawned on me it's just boring. What am I fighting to have fun for. I was looking around to see if anyone else played at least half of the game and realised it just nonsense. The I game is only about visual spectacle for anyone with a 7800/4070 gpu or higher. When your friends come over to see you new rig and run this game with Ray tracing on walk through the streets, then turn it off.
@@JayUchiha17 Fundamentally incorrect: I play with an rx 6600 which could barely run the game until the latest update which introduced fsr 3, and I still had a blast. Admittedly, the game was pretty ass before patch 1.3, but that was years ago, and as someone who only started at update 2.0 and never saw the overhyped marketing, I have been free of any bad first impressions or unrealistic expectations and have found this game to be absolutely brilliant. since it's release it has evolved from bug dumpster, to playable, to ok, to fun, to masterpiece, to best game i've every played. It's story is one of the only video game stories to actually get me invested in it's characters (the other was rdr2), the gameplay is brilliantly fun, with many different options to fight enemies besides generic shoot/stealth, the world and universe are brilliantly designed and written, the graphics are out of this world and it is easily the best game CD projeckt red has ever made, and the best video game I have ever played. frankly, you should be disappointed in yourself for agreeing with a video that is so obviously rage bait, and shitty rage bait to say the least. (also before you call me a glazer, this game is so good that it deserves being glazed} FYI I have played this game twice without mods, once with mods, and I'm about to play it a fourth time in vr with the arrival of my meta quest 3. Also the only illiteracy is from your comment.
I only had minor bugs on PC and was always able to fix it with a quick save/quick load (something that Bethesda and Rockstar are still unable to achieve: you either become a master of the console for Bethesda games or are told to restart your game and expect a different result by Rockstar games). Story wise.. I mean, just listen to yourself, you are far from being objective and one must be a fool to give any credit to such clearly biased opinion.
The game sucks. Either you luck out on PC or xbox and don't get bugs or you play the PlayStation version and realize the game still plays like puke. As for the actual gameplay the people who play this game and don't realize the games sudden drop in quality after the prologue are just liars. Yes I'm calling you out if you claim to have 1000 hours or whatever BS. I played Skyrim for 5 years straight when I was in school and barely got 2000 so you claiming to have 1000 already is just BS. The game just isn't that good it's certainly not Skyrim quality of I have to pause my exploration so I can sort out my inventory or dick around. No I got close to 100% on my slow playthrough and basically without trying and still didn't get close to 1000 hours and I had long run out of quest to do. Stop lying to me, yourself, and others just because you are in denial that you got ripped off dispite ample warning.
phantom liberty combined with the main story missions is an easy 35+ hrs if you rush. side missions as well, its not always made obvious but they can have different outcomes depending on your approach. and dont forget ncpd scanner hustles! that combined with multiple endings i can definitely see how many people have over +1000 hours. there are also multiple hidden quests available depending on how you finished your previous one which i was unaware of until my second playthrough, as well as some of the choices which i assumed to be smaller but choose differently the second time around to see if things changed and THEY DID!!! fyi - there are 6 different endings for the main character (not including how you end side character journeys) and even if you started at the final quest for each respective ending you’re looking at 1hr and a half plus for EACH. thats roughly 9hrs for the ending quests alone. now imagine the people who replay the game and thats your answer. forgot to mention that each build is vastly different too. this time around im not investing into blades or sandevistan so ive been learning how to hack and forcing enemies to commit suicide, turning them cyberspycho, frying brains into mush, remote controlling vehicles like toy rc cars, jamming weapons has been incredibly fun and i didn’t even know were possible! next play through i wanna invest into blunt weapons so i can throw bodies and maybe use the dildo as my main weapon lol.
Started the game 2 weeks ago and the only thing I can relate with is that npc’s does happen to repeat a few times. I’m playing in 1080p with no raytracing and I’ve experienced a signle glitch where my car spawned from 10m heigh. Npc do not try to get money from insurace while driving and for story line i think it’s a matter of taste. I feel really immerse in the story line, in the caracter and in the whole environment. If you experience this kind of glitches try adjusting preferences. See ya 🤙🏻
i dont understand the hate honestly, there were so many fuck ups at launch as well as with with whatever dogshit marketing team was hired. that said its def my top 5 games of all time. and like many other comments have stated, ive had less than 10% of the bugs shown in the vid… weird. 1. last of us 2. gta v 3. cyberpunk 2077 4. rdr 2 5. bloodborne
The game in my opinion is terrible, because they promised so much, and delivered so little. There are still features that they promised that aren't even in the game.
Your honest thoughts on Cyberpunk? 👀
I think you're 💯 correct in your analysis but it's still a lot of fun.
All I've learned from the video is great game but terrible npc AI
LOVE IT,love the story,heavily moldable,highly replayable.....unless u just spoilt,this is an awesome game
I agree with what you're saying about the dialogue, bored the arse off me. Constantly hitting that skip button. Overall I liked the graphics and trying different builds but that's it.
Keep up the good work mate, love watching your brutally honest videos 👍👍👍👍
Very average open world game 5-6/10
Don't care. Playing it like crazy and have never been more immersed in a game. I just spent 3 days playing it only stopping to sleep.
I got 450 hours on PS5, and 1200+ on PC.. the game is great, but when you add mods!? L E G E N D A R Y, choom!
There’s so many ways to approach the game, with insane amount of side missions, unexpected moments that are phenomenal, and the mystery behind it all.. there’s still secrets ppl haven’t found yet, along with hidden missions, and Easter eggs.. so much in this game, it’s absolutely mind boggling to see anyone say it’s terrible, unless they’re farming for engagement/views.
@@MidTierVillain I can imagine. I got it on ps5 but I'm planning on building a PC (wanted one since 5th grade to mod skyrim lol). I can't wait to try out the vr cyberpunk mod and all the other ones. I really wish CDPR would drop the modding kit for cyberpunk like they just did for the Witcher 3 and like BGS does for all their games and then the mods can be even crazier!
Did you eat or drink?
@@theoverwhelmer yeah maybe 1 meal a day but I ate it while I was playing 😂
Addicted much?
This guy saw more bugs in his 20hrs or so playthrough than I saw in my 200hrs one. Curious
That’s mad. Do you play on PC?
@@L321 Nah, Xbox series S. I got some minor bugs but man your game seems to come straight outa hell I don’t know how you’ve had so many
@@clemp23 fuck both of you I had to deal with the bullshit on PS4 still fell in love with it, and even now now after upgrading it, I have more fun in that version with all the memories I’ve made jank and all
im on PC barely saw any bugs, just booted it up and played for 1week since i wanted to see how many bugs i could find (2-3hrs a day roaming and story mode) overall i found it much better tbh but it gets boring if you havent played for more than a couple weeks, its something that grows on you like witcher 3, its honestly quite boring but if you play it for a while it gets better, the small nuances are great since i love reading those small shards i get traveling the city, but for the average gamer its ok, for me its great.
The bugs were never the issue. More like the lack of player choice and life paths making no difference
To be fair, saying that story is boring and subjective without clear explanation is not a lot
100%
Hmm strange I get it's his opinion and he's entitled to it ofc but the story really isn't boring , it was great.
I wouldn't even say it's boring at all. It's pretty interesting actually.
It is however, way too short
@@hollowxi No, it is boring. It's unimaginative and bland.
@@Omega-EP you just described your comment idiot.
There are more bugs in this video than I've seen in over 1,500 hrs playing the game.
I have about 1,400 hours on pc and 578 or so on Xbox (across the Xbox One and Series X). Didn’t even see half of this stuff neither. Must be really unlucky or something, I don’t know.
@@MitchSorenstein My daughter had the same problem on her pc. Endless bugs. Her pc was better than mine though...
I've not had any of these issues on PS5?
Where did he say he plays on PS5
@@שלמה-נ1ח here 🍪
@@שלמה-נ1ח hes talking about the game as a whole
Meaning all platforms not just ps5/xbox/pc
@@שלמה-נ1חPC should run it better, so he’s capping
@@flymasterkyle1277 that makes no sense. Optimisation is significantly easier for console ports than it is for PC port, almost every game that’s on both PC and console has less bugs on console 99% of the time. But this video is still very stupid nontheless
The game stopped being terrible a few years ago and became a masterpiece when patch 2.0 dropped.
Just started my first playthrough post 2.0 today.
NPCs glitching through the floor, enemies spotting me through walls, NPCs not talking during dialogue scenes.
And this is in my first three hours.
It's still got so many issues it's crazy. And that's before we get to the terrible story
It has potential as a masterpiece but no way it reached those heights. The gameplay is mediocre - the shooting is lackluster, same with melee and the hacking elements are too simplistic...
The world is gorgeous and very immersive for the most part. The story is good and the side quests are unique.. but it's not a masterpiece..
Masterpiece?! lmfao buy rdr2 if you haven't, that's what you call a masterpiece.
@@StacheBoi Ah yes, RDR2 which has the gameplay loop of shooting bad guy in head with small gun, or shooting the same bad guy with big gun - for 200 hours. Very depth such wow.
"masterpiece"
It's a shallow copy of 5 other games with albeit very nice graphics. How is that a masterpiece?
ive recently got this game on my pc and i have not experienced any glitches or bugs which you have shown in this video, i think its just an issue on the console version of the game because my experience so far has been incredible
I also play on PC 🫣
On consoles it's another story, I can't get it out of my head that this game should never have come out on consoles. I have an XBOX One X Series X and the game crashes a lot.
The game is fine on console.
I played it on ps5 and its solid, not perfect mind you (I did get some crashes here and there but they're very few and far between).
@@omarcruz1047y’all need to clean your consoles because I have 246+ hours and only one crash back in 2022
@@omarcruz1047 PS5. Legit never crashed once. Granted I got the game on 2.1 update but still never got any bugs, crashes, soft locks or none of that so it’s really strange how a series x (a console I’d say is a little bit better than ps5) still managed to have bugs like that with this game
Its actually one of my favourite games, ive experienced little to no bugs and its so immersive
same
Deus Ex is better
@@Drundeshut up you silly nostalgia merchant
@@jack5k697 how i am being nostalgic?????
Lol, blind fanboyism. The bugs are there, you choose to ignore them. Perhaps you have never played other open world games.
I am looking at your gameplay and you seem to never play any of the side quests and rushed straight to Hanako which is like the least interesting story bit. If you played all the side stories and even the bigger side quests like getting Evelin back or finding the serial killer questline you might not have said that the story is uninteresting. In fact I don't think you gave any examples of how you found the story uninteresting or boring. Which sections were you bored at? What dialogue did you skip or find tedious?
For the gameplay comparison to Red Dead. I actually think the open world in Cyberpunk is better paced and more fun to explore than in RD. I quit playing the game and its story missions in RD because I hated how on rails it was and how much Rockstar relied on watching cutscenes for everything and even making me "play out" boring tasks that should not have to be animated like that. They actively took away fun and so my immersion was ruined and I could not take the story seriously. Cyberpunk put me in the first person of V and made me experience the consequences and left me making decisions decisions that had me sitting in my chair speechless.
Gameplay is far cry but more options and playing over 200 hours of Cyberpunk you come too realize how fluid and versatile your movements are. Come my third playthrough I could clear camps that took me 10 attempts my first time by being able to jump over enemies, shooting them in the head, pushing them down floors, throwing knives while I stab someone in the back and blow up their reinforcements with quickhacks.
To conclude. It is worth playing and worth playing for me three times over. It is a 10 out of 10 for me and I find the story from both the DLC and main game to be phenomenal if you put the freaking time to do all the side missions with the characters you form relationships with. The meat of the game is the city it self but the filling is and what makes it that much more special is how it challenges the player. At the end of the day its a matter of opinion of course but I think you are seriously wrong in thinking that the game is not a masterpiece, I think it is and will be remembered as such for years and years.
This wasn't an attempt to judge the game in good faith. Listening to the tone of his voice for a couple of seconds told me everything I needed to know
@@turkeybeef6269 🤡 Listen to yourself
@@turkeybeef6269 Wow how blind you are.
Are you sure he actually played the game? He claims to but all his videos are things that you can just find on youtube. He did a modding video on Cyberpunk and one on the RDR remake, the RDR has video that points to him actually playing it, the cyberpunk one doesn't.
Also he complained about the RDR remake and decided that visual mods made it "the game we should have got", aka this guy has his priorities in some weird places.
"The story is good but you have to play the side stories to like the story but the story is good I swear"
Cyberpunk 2077 on PS4: COMPLETELY BROKEN LIKE STADIA VERSION.
Cyberpunk 2077 PS5: Absolutely perfect despite a bit clunky.
PC 2024: a few bug fixing mods and this game is very much playable.
never felt clunky to me
but what about the AI, npcs models and facial expressions in game? 😁😁🤣🤣 the game is a joke, the only gorgeous thing it has are the visuals, and illumination.
@@raulsalazar05 it's really not its a great game. Just had a shitty launch
@@raulsalazar05Have u actually played it post 2.0?
I just played Cyberpunk for the first time this year and it was one of the most memorable gaming experiences of my life.
I saw a couple of minor graphical bugs, but nothing that fundamentally impacted the gameplay.
We obviously had drastically different experiences, and that's fine. Personally, I loved every moment of Cyberpunk. Night City sucked me in like few gaming environments ever have.
with about 90 hours on my first run through (starting a second) is the amount of times NPCs shoot me through walls. Although it wasn't all the time, it was bad enough to be noted in my playthrough. That was probably the only big I've encountered minus a single glitch through map which caught me off guard (after installing mods)
@@MartyrHandle You do know that some guns allow shooting through walls right? If you alert them and then try to hide some of them are supposed to be able to hit you.
"one of the most memorable gaming experiences of my life"
brother, play more games
@gmoder10 Because it couldn't be that we simply had different experiences with the game? No, it must be that I simply haven't played enough games to know better . . .
It’s amazing now. It’s one of the best games I have ever played and I have been playing games for 37 years.
I am 52.
I don’t like the game so I’mma force myself to play it and then gonna project my opinion as objective truth.
Or... And get this, people try the game to see if they can get to the point where they find it's amazing like everyone is saying. Don't ever find that part and then bring it up as valid criticism for a game people are saying is fantastic. It's shallow in basically every regard and the games it apes, GTA, Ubisoft (for the side content) and Deus Ex Human Revolution for how the stealth, melee, shooting and dialogue plays basically the core gameplay sucks compares to all those games.
Hell FarCry has tighter gunplay.
@@deetsitmeisterjdwhat the hell are you smoking?
@@flymasterkyle1277I read his text twice and still didn’t understand it lmao
@deetsitmeisterjd it's also shallow in it's references to other cyberpunk stories, more cosplaying as cyberpunk.
For example, the pills you're given to help with your illness are an obvious Matrix reference. But where The Matrix made the red pill a metaphor for choosing to live authentically and be yourself, the red pill in the game literally kills you, giving control of your body over to silverhand and shortening the amount of time you have left.
@bluerie the game is quality, bunch of clowns think otherwise
one of the most entertaining and groundbreaking games in recent memory, and thats without mentioning the relatively untapped societal topics in mainstream gaming that it covers extensively. most people haven’t had too many bugs recently but if you truly have, just look past them, please. it also has possibly the best soundtrack of any game, ever.
sincerely,
permanent cyberpunk glazer
*_LETS BE REAL, the visuals are so good, and the amount of details, but the NPCs animations, facial expressions and AI in general sucks_*
There are older games with a decent character model, npcs and pretty decent AI, what is happening to new games??
Games are evolving. Backwards
I left a terrible review on Steam several years ago when it was released, and I'm not changing my mind about this game. It's over hyped, and there was and isn't currently anything "next gen" about it all. I paid $60 during the release when everyone was playing it, it's probably cheap now in the US, but internationally the price for this game is ridiculous, it costs $96.33 for the Ultimate Edition in Costa Rica, that's more than I paid for it when it was released. Let's be real here, this is a dogsh!t game.
@@markb7848 yep, honestly is just a game for playing campaign and experience visuals or ambient, but when it comes to interact with NPCs, the game ruins that experience.
@@markb7848 So u just never replayed the game again after patch 2.0?
@@anonisnoone6125 What hes complaining about isnt even addressed in the patch. If he'd go back to play it now, i doubt he would like it even an iota more compared to release version
Be prepared because CDPR fanboys are gonna spam the entire comment section claiming that game is fixed. Cyberpunk was 6/10 on release and is 7/10 now. DLSS is still not fixed. CDPR forum is full of people complaining about flashing lights and terrible performance after patch 2.0. AI is still as stupid as people who preorder games, gunplay sucks, choices don't exist, cars go flying here and there but yeah, game is "fixed".
Also, still not an RPG
The game is a two out of 10 on release and it is a three out of 10 now it is one of the worst games of all time
And cyberpunk haters like yourself are going to do the same, you will lie and claim you have played the game and then repeat what you have heard from other people that lie and say that they have played the game. If you have played it what quest was the worst and why? Which gun did you like the best? What are your stats in game? What build do you have?
@@Earth2McKay 94% positive on steam for the last 30 days, 84% positive for all time. Hey OP up there, we got another one of your liar friends here. Maybe next time you can say it is a 2/10 on release and a 3/10 now next time you are trying to BS your attempt to stay with the "popular" position.
@thomgizziz cyberpunk is a trash game it still is
@@thomgizziz which quest was the worst? Umm all of them? The story is gawd awful. No one cares about Johnny silver dick.
The only time I had fun was when I used cheats and ran around super jumping everywhere murdering NPCs with a katana.
What building did I use? I used cheats after like 17 hours and used all the perks. Big deal the game has a skill tree 🌴 omg how innovative and RPG like. It made me feel soooo immersed
The cars suck. The driving sucks. The city map sucks. The city itself sucks. The desert sucks. The NPC dialog sucks.
Not a single thing about CD project red games are good. The fans are the worst.
Witcher 3 was by far one of the worst games of its generation via gameplay and game mechanics. But everyone looks past dog shit controls and fighting mechanics for a mediocre story with boobs.
Your opinion might or might not be popular. But I am a die hard GTA fan, having started with GTA 1. I am also a die hard RDR1 & 2 fan. The most fun I have had playing a single player game EVER, was with Cyberpunk. Yes it is imperfect. RDR2 comes much closer to being perfect imo, true. But the unique world building, art, music, missions, setting, characters, are just addicting. Even more so than with GTA, at least for me. Everyone else can hate the game, I do not care. I LOVE IT and have finished the entire game 10 times and put in 1100 hours so far. I hope more content gets released, and I am certainly looking forward to Cyberpunk Orion.
Man I feel you, the theme is great but I would love to play CP 2077 with RDR 2 attention to details, NPCs and relatable story. When I play now CP 77 something is disturbing my experience so much that I don’t want to play anymore
RDR2 is a borefest.
Dude its obvious you've never played a sci fi game with this aesthetic EVER. That is why you subjectively like it so much its like the first time you've tasted ice cream when all you've done your whole life is drink milk. Its obvious most people are like you where its a fresh impression but the game objectively is subpar to mid as far as story telling, dialog, mechanical depth let alone the fact its all illusion of choice. Slop
@@Lerppunen clown if you thought rdr2 was boring 😆
@@DoesNotInhale clown 🤡
I disagree a bit on the AI driving, they always get out of the way when I'm faster than them, they open a corridor for me to pass them, but sometimes they behave like maniacs
well, I don't know what hardware you have, but you should buy a new graphic card, or do some maintenance and cleaning to the one you already have, because in my case I have not experienced as many bugs as you have.
Got a RTX 4090, nothing wrong with my build. The game is just filled with bugs still which not all people may experience
What sort of logic is that, lmfao
@@L321 xDDD you just need to read some comments of this video to realize what is actually happening here, Reality: there aren't even a quarter of the bugs you say there are.
@@L321idk bro I play with an rx 6600 and I’ve never seen any bugs
@@DemocracyOfficerKeegani personally play on a ps5 and have had minor bugs, not sure what anybody else has experienced with other consoles/pc builds but im so-so-so curious as to what this guy’s playing on as well as what build of the game he’s running. this whole video seems fishy to me honestly. i dont think he made this video out of personal spite because that seems way too out of touch, i believe it more to be a troll.
Ive never seen any of those bugs u have in these video and I have completed the game 2 times, now going for a third. Are u sure u have updated it properly?
1:37 You're acting like what you showed happens the entire time, all the time.and thats not true. You even present it as if it happens frequently.
I hate that people accept this underbaked game, because we are just gonna keep getting subpar games again and again
The fact that the game has 9/10 on steam and people are praising devs for "fixing" the game after 4 years is hilarious. The game is still unfinished. Giving high rating and praises will encourage companies to create unfinished games and then progressively "fix" them.
Only thing good about cyberpunk 2077 is the PR and marketing...
As a huge fan of this game I very much agree with most of these points, while I personally enjoyed the story and it's DLC because I have always enjoyed science fiction, I do think that this game is still unpolished in a lot of areas. The good news though is that there are no more devs working on this game and CDPR is moving onto the sequel, which hopefully has a much better launch now that they've switched engines and have something to actually work off of.
Thanks for the honesty 👍🏻
There is an upcoming a sequel? Hell yeah!
@@commenceun upcoming isn’t the word I would use, we probably wont see anything about Cyberpunk for at least 2-5 years, as of writing this in 2024 at least
@@L321 Every game is unpolished in a lot of areas and the only reason you said "Thanks for the honesty" is because he agreed with you. Are you going around and saying "Thanks for the honesty" to people that disagree with you? Do you assume they are lying or that you are the only one that is correct? Either way your logic is beyond bad.
Lol this is the same video you pump out every couple months. We get it you don’t like it
I have 700hrs on Cyberpunk, I really like the world of cyberpunk and it's social commentary on how big corporations own us. I would strongly recommend anyone to do all the side quests with yellow markers because that's where the best missions are with important characters that can unlock new endings, or you can skip it all and beat the game in 20hrs with the vanilla ending up to you. Also suggest playing on the hardest difficulty for best experience. For me the gameplay has been good since launch (I played on PC). There's lots of cool guns. The double jump + dash mechanics, mixed with the wall climbing make jumping across rooftops one of my favorite ways to traverse the map. The body modifications in general are cool and add more variety like gorilla arms vs mantis blades, or being a netrunner vs being a ninja build. The are minor bugs with ai but a lot of the stuff pointed out in the video I never noticed, maybe because I do the missions and am not roaming around killing npc's. I will say driving cars does suck, most the time I drive a motorcycle because it feels better. The graphics are cutting edge. Full RTX implementation means best lighting and reflections I've ever seen. Only improvement I would want is the characters and npc's could look more realistic and have more variety in hairstyles and clothing.
Overall 9/10 - Great game overall, great replay value with different life paths, playstyles, endings and lots of mods to mix things up even further. The graphics are stunning. If you try your hardest you can find bugs but the story and gameplay are peak gaming.
In comparison to RDR2, I much prefer cyberpunk's gameplay. I personally do not enjoy riding a horse around and find the combat simple. Can not judge RDR2's story as I dropped in 20hrs in.
@@calebadamu I can tell
@@cendresaphoenix1974 i beat rdr2 now
@@cendresaphoenix1974i beat rdr2 as well, great game, but would never replay it, gameplay wise it was so boring at times. i loved the story but it took way too long to get to the good part, id rather play cuberpunk or gta v again.
I played so many games but Cyberpunk 2077 gives me a different fun while playing. Its one of the best games Ive ever played.
They will never fix this game and make it not terrible because 90% of the game is still missing. Without going into an overly long post explaining everything that is absolutely wrong with this game, I will just sum it up with a clear and concise way to show how bad this game was gutted.
In the Cyberpunk 2020 tabletop game, there are 9 different classes, or "roles" you can play as: Rockerboy, Solo, Netrunner, Techie, Media, Cop, Corporate, Fixer, Nomad.
Cyberpunk 2077 lets you pick Solo, and extremely gutted versions of Techie and Netrunner, with Netrunner being worse because the actual 3D 'Net does not even exist in the game at all.
CDPR gave people the equivalent of a D&D game where you can only play as a Fighter, or a Fighter/Mage or Fighter/Thief that is capped to level 5. It's such a massive disaster of a game compared to what they promised us.
Wtf r u on about? Half the shit that fans expected to be in the game was shit people made up. I can guarantee u that a lot of the content u expected wasn't even mentioned by CD Project themselves.
😂😂that was never going to be in the game buddy
@@tysontitus996 then they shouldn't have told people it would be at the CDPR 2012 summer conference they did
@ 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@anonisnoone6125 CDPR claimed it to be an 'RPG' yet I can name a bunch of GTA games off the top of my head with actual RPG mechanics that CP2077 severly lacks
The fact that you titled the video "Cyberpunk 2077 is still terrible" then proceeded to say "I think it's a decent game" within the first 2 minutes means I'm not watching the rest. Obvious telltale of a liar who wants attention.
This is 100% for attention.
Some people really did not like this video. dude gave his opinions and credit where he felt deserved. Sure he dropped an occasional meat rider, but people are actin like he called it simcity.
Yeah I get that people get offended but I just prefer to be honest
It feels packed but empty at the same time..
This is indeed subjective. I on the other hand I find RDR2 story boring. Somebody who is more into history, western, bandids will be more into RDR2, somebody who likes future, technology, AI will be more into Cyberpunk.
I agree its not the best open world, but I dont think it was ever meant to be. Its first and foremost RPG, not a action sandbox like rockstar games. If you compare it to RDR2 on open world building then why dont we compare them on character progression and skills? Cause here Cyberpunk wins by a mile. We need to be fair here.
They are different games.
For an rpg the character progression is quite shit. Compare it to The witcher made by the same team.
@@rezibabe5210Bro, it's character progression not being better than the witcher doesn't make it bad.
Cyberpunk provided different players with different builds and style. The growth of my character is satisfying so far.
@@adrian_veidt You can have fun with it, but by great rpg standards it s mediocre at best. Especially how fast you lvl up, lacks pacing. It s the combat gameplay that is excellent now.
Both rdr2 and cyberpunk 2077 are shit imo
I've been gaming since I was 6, starting on a Sega Genesis. In 30 years of gaming I haven't played such a compelling, deep-thought-inducing game.
The combat after 2.0 is amazing IMHO. I play on very difficult with almost no HUD, and if I die, I have to roll a dice for my character to survive, so it increases the stakes. Every encounter I have to use all my abilities to survive.
Night City is beautifully crafted. Sure, it isn't as interactive or as dynamic as RDR2, which I think takes the cake for best open world. But the cars, which were so carefully crafted, even the interiors, are so much fun to drive.
But I prefer the setting and the lore of cyberpunk. I love how natural the dialogue scenes play out, where you can walk around. The graphics are amazing.
My only issues are that they haven't yet fixed all the bugs, actually there are now new bugs post -2.0. Also, they should keep releasing DLC like Phantom Liberty. They've had tremendous financial success with edgerunnners, 2.0, and phantom liberty, and night City has so much potential for more stories
if youve been gaming that long and you consider cyberpunk amazing then your standards are astonishingly low. the graphics are the only part of the game that even remotely lived up to its marketing.
@@jagostrife361 I didn't pay attention to the marketing. My tastes are simply different than yours, there's tons of people like me. I also don't like Elden Ring at all, which to many gamers makes my opinion in invalid. I liked the Witcher 3 a lot but I prefer the world of cyberpunk.
I like sci-fi movies, I like action RPGs, and I like the combat mechanics and world building in cyberpunk. It immerses me. It's like it was built for me, it has almost everything I look for in a game. Graphics are important but certainly not the most important factor when choosing games. I just found Night City's scale, seamlessness, and perceived realism unbelievable compared to other games worlds.
I'm also playing the Dead Space remake and the RE2 remake right now, which are both amazing.
I would say RDR2 is superior but unfortunately they never patched it to 60 fps on PS5 and so it looks like garbage, being that Im used to seeing everything at 60 fps at least 1440p with HDR. I absolutely loved it, it's an absolute masterpiece, but I just couldn't stop hating the frame rate, so I'm waiting for Rockstar to charge me for a "remaster'. Then, maybe RDR2 would be better than CP2077.
What would be some games on PS5, preferably action RPGs, that blow CP2077 out of the water? I have FF7 remake but haven't played. Since your tastes are so much more refined than mine 🙄 typical redditor
@@tch2296 lol im not on reddit but i will concede that its most likely this game simply isnt for me. I like the things you listed as well, sci fi, rpg's, etc. However i didnt like cyberpunk in the least. there are too many design choices that baffle me and I unfortunately did follow the marketing and I dont feel it lived up to any of it. The city seems shallow to me. the npc generation is terribly repetitive. the lack of any flying vehicles even though they do exist in game. the stores being empty and simply menus. the amount of customization that is completely pointless. the amount of things you simply cant customize (vehicles, apartments) tons of development time seemingly for nothing, at least in my opinion. the physics are ridiculous especially the water.
For a game that was promising a "next gen" experience I dont feel like it delivered that. The police ai is terrible but after going back and playing gta's and RDR2 its not any better so I wont shit on that too much. Overall for me cyberpunk only looks good. Maybe the story didnt resonate with me, I dont know.
I do think RDR2 is a better game but if you were to break down every aspect individually there is definitely things cyberpunk does better, such as combat. Ive been gaming a long time as well. perhaps im just bitter and jaded with the current state of gaming. You do you. my criticism is definitely invalid I enjoy fallout 76 alot, and its a broken mess of a game.
I cant think of anything that blows it out of the water. I guess I just have to ask, obviously you like the game but what flaws would you say it has? I guess what I dont understand when people who love a piece of media cant admit its flaws. I love FF7 and the new games have some decent qualities but I would never call them a masterpiece.
What do you feel cyberpunk brought to the action RPG genre that hadnt been done better by other games?
@@jagostrife361 Yeah, you're not alone. It's weird: some people find the world pretty but shallow, like it feels strangely empty. For me that improves a lot after 2.0 and phantom liberty - Dogtown feels much more alive. For me, I enjoy the layout and feel of the city, and the cars, that I love just cruising around and checking everything out. And after 2.0 the spare parts you find are super important so there is real reward for exploring everywhere. So I think that's just a matter of how it hits you personally, but I've heard many say the same thing..
Same with the story, to me, I thought the dialogue was incredible and the ideas were super interesting to me. AI, corporate overreach, it's like living in a version of our world if we keep making the same mistakes, which to me makes it kind of profound and interesting. I love how you can move around during conversations and how good the faces look. I found the pilot to be mature, engaging, and although I'm aware you're not actually making huge choices most of the time, it at least feels to me very cinematic and cool. But again, I've heard many complain that it's not not heavy enough on the RPG. It's definitely an action RPG with emphasis on action.
I love the lore, I bought several of Pondsmiths books, th cyberpunk universe has been around since the 1980s and there is a huge amount of lore starting when it's universe splits from ours. It's just personally appealing to me.
NPC repetition is a problem and has to do with hardware limitations. If you're on PC there are options I think that help with that. It's not as bad as it was on PS5, but occasionally I'll see the same mohawked girl walk by twice in two seconds. There are other bugs, some pretty big ones, like all the radio hosts disappearing after phantom liberty, and the TV audio being bugged. I've emailed CDPR many times to report and inquire why they won't fix the remaining bugs but I think they've moved on. The bugs are still a problem, it's just now at the point where personally I can look past it. But it's a huge contrast when I play a game like the dead space remake which is absolutely perfectly polished in every way. And for some ppl the bugs are enough to pull them out of the game.
I still haven't played Baldurs Gate 3, which I'm sure I will love. I also never played fallout 4 - was waiting for next gen patch, or fallout 76. I own fallout 4 and loved fallout 3 and new Vegas, two of my favorite games. I was thinking of diving into fallout soon - 4 and then 76.
It's just taste. Like I can't explain why souls games have just never had any appeal to me. The world isn't appealing, the combat looks decent but I'm not all about boss-centered gameplay, I'm not huge into fantasy, etc
Honestly it's tough when you've been gaming so long and seen it all. You'll find fault in every game. And Cyberpunk isn't perfect, it just hits the spot for me. If Rockstar wasn't so fucking lazy/greedy all they have to do is unlock the frame rate limiter on PS5, someone already figured out how to do it on XBox and the PC version runs uncapped. If I could play RDR2 at 60 fps I'd drop everything else and go straight for that.
Edit: and yeah I dunno why I said reddit lol
@@tch2296 haha i came out a little aggressive assuming I knew why you liked the game, the reddit comment is fair play.
I cant say that I'll be getting into cyberpunk2077 but this convo has made me realize i need to reevaluate my passion for gaming and get back to enjoying them more than critiquing them.
I appreciate the measured responses and I apologize for being a bit of a dick.
I truly hope you continue to enjoy the games you play and best of luck with your back log!
Just finished it today, 74.5 hours. I did most of the main additional sidemissions before finishing the main story. Of those 74.5 hours. I did 44.8 in the last 2 weeks.
To anyone asking "is it ready for 2024"
Yes. Yes it's ready for 2024
Nah, it will never be ready because the devs are still liars and scammed millions by promising many things to be in this game, including decisions that matter on every turn and we still don't have that, nor are we going to.
You sure you’re playing update 2.12
Doesn't matter. I doubt he plays it. He grabs some footage of the internet and tries to find a couple things to nit pick and the slaps the video together. His cyberpunk hate videos does well for him so he would lie through his teeth and say he hates it even if he likes it. It is weird for a game that he hates so much that he makes so much content for it, right?
4:04 made me spit out my drink. 😂 Why do NPCS’s even do that?
He’s using footage from the launch build
@@jazcaastthat’s not from launch. That was recorded about 2 weeks ago 😂
@@L321 May I ask if You started a new game or did You load some old save? xD
@@L321 it's not a glitch his character model is like that because he's a drug addiction and he injected himself in the shoulder, theirs NPC tweaking out on drugs all over the map or being excorted home by a friend.
@@MrVisp44 Loading an old save doesn't bring back old fixed bugs LOL
The dead open world is my only problem
What are you on about?
Have u played it on ps5/Xbox X after patch 2.0?
@@BrotherSham See people like this like to play pretend. They will talk about RDR when in reality most of RDR is empty vastness and towns or quests have people so they think because everybody talks but there are only a few people that it is more alive. Or they will bring up GTAV... which makes no sense because it is the same or worse than Cyberpunk but it is a more popular game so they feel it must be better.
Most people that criticize the game haven't played it. They heard bad things about it and assumed it must be true and you can't reason yourself out of nonsense you didn't reason yourself into. I have asked hundreds of people like this to tell me specific instances of bugs or quests they didn't like... their response is straight up insults or "the lips didn't move", and similar very vague stuff like that.
@@thomgizziz Yeah RDR 2 did feel quite dead, which I guess is kinda the point but I wasn't a fan of how you had to go and find a lot of the side quests and stranger missions when I'd rather be led to it or he shown where it is because that map is massive
Ohhhhh ok you said the story was bad, it's ragebait. This all makes more sense.
No one ever said the story was boring wtf are you talking about
it sold as an rpg but littreally nothing like witcher 3 choices we got. only gun blazing game.
Me personally it’s my favorite game as of now…
Started in February of this year and at 336 hrs and still have a few gigs and 40 gang hideouts left I been binging car theft missions visiting the bar in between to decompress head to the hideout inDogtown to crash into a drunk slumber so I can wake up and visit 4 ripperdocs to distribute stolen weapons from murdered enemy gang members afterwards visit a vehicle dealer to reward my blood soaked crusade with a new super car to race later that night- this is why I cant stop playing the role play is ridiculous even after beating the story and the DLC.
They did an amazing job at world building. It really draws you in. It's rare for games to be that immersive and thats what hooked me when I played it.
I bought Cp just month ago on Steam sale. For me it's mix of GTA and Skyrim but with every aspect (plot, graphics, characters) better. Sure, there are bugs (which game doesn't have ones), but overall it's jaw dropping for me.
HANKKKK NOOOOOO DON'T ABBREVIATE CYBERPUNK LIKE THAT NOOOOOOOOOO
Please never abbreviate cyberpunk as cp ever again.
"Don't recommend channel", that's enough ragebait outta you for forever.
I totally agree with you. I think people that praise it don't want to admit that it is heavily flawed. Just like when Kojima released Death Stranding.
There are flaws no doubt. None of them are bad enough to really affect core gameplay in my experience however. I’ve played this game for 1,300 hours and from what I’ve seen, it’s mostly just vehicle pop in when I’m on the freeway looking further ahead since I’m driving at a faster speed or my vehicle freaking out when I use the call menu occasionally. Sometimes I experience like a weird DLSS slowdown after opening the pause menu, but that’s probably because I only have 8 GB of VRAM and the 2.0 update kind of beefed up system requirements.
This game is boring. Literally, the most over hyped nonsense I've ever played. I'm personally never playing cpr game again. I spent the last 3 years trying get invested in this game but I've readmitted it's just boring. I'll definitely try to beat the witcher 3. I'm only going to reinstall this game when I get 4090 run a Benchmark or something.
But the people that complain about it usually say they have played it and haven't and bash on things that aren't actually relevant to the game. They complain that it isn't cyberpunk enough or doesn't have enough classes or the classes aren't what they wanted. It is because they didn't play the game they heard negative stuff about it and decided that was going to be their position, negative.
@@JayUchiha17 No you haven't. And then you claim you are going to play the witcher 3. You are pretending you have played it because you think it gives your lies more weight. I played it on a 1060 on a laptop with little issue at medium 1080p. Your little 4090 comment just made it even more clear that you aren't telling the truth.
Some of the fixes and updates won’t apply to old saves from what I remember so give it another try in a new save ( I might be wrong but It’s just what I remember)
I was actually wondering if my old save would still be valid or if a new game would be mandatory, to get the post launch updates applied
@@Dsrgreyy New save. The updates will not apply well over and may almost certainly result in severe bugs or crashes.
People calling it a masterpiece and the best game they’ve ever played baffles me. It’s slightly above average at best. Did we even play the same game? 😂
Exactly
We are not the same people. For many especially women Sims are still a masterpiece. Some people are not bothered by buggy mechanics. Look at Skyrim community. You just have to look from a wider perspective than your own eyes. I personally had a lot of fun with this game, especially the story. It is mature and touches deep topics such as hidden control of society.
@@L321You should delete your channel for sure, your opinion is instantly invalid and useless.
Like it is simply impossible not to call Cyberpunk a masterpiece. On the other hand we have Starfield, I mean trashfield that shows us how beautiful cyberpunk is
@@skrypnykk.770 And yours is?
I mean the same can be said for red dead 2. A lot of people find rdr2 boring. But that doesnt mean much does it? Cyberpunk is a masterpiece for a lot of people. That is all that matters.
the game is a masterpiece its known atp no point in arguing anymore😭
That may be your honest thoughts, but I honestly feel it's one of the best games i've ever played in my life. I have put over 200 hours in the game so far on 2 playthroughs. I played on PS5 at launch.
For me it's the best game ever made by far. Nothing comes close to story and atmosphere.
Well then you are missing out on things
I’m craving a futuristic RPG with deep RPG elements and first person gameplay and a crafting system with thousands of different items you pick up.
This game isn’t doing it for me.
@@sayankakalita7827 You need to stop saying shit like that. If this dude feels it's the best game ever made, it's obviously because he connected with it in ways you didn't. It's a chickenshit move to belittle a person or assume they haven't experienced good gaming (or are missing out on things) just because they fawn over something you didn't.
@@Choom2077 nah if they think cp2077 is best gmae, the sure they are missing out on things
are you people legitimately insane? The story is boring, there are barely any choices ,combat sucks as enemies are bulletsponges and the atmosphere, what atmosphere? Its gta with robotic arms, if you were talking about deus ex or stalker i woudl understand, but this game has no atmosphere.
Even if you like story, the bugs are terrible in missions like "Ghost Town", the last gen (like Xbox One) versions are not good, and it's funny when the wheelchair bound characters run. I thought you were disabled, NPC.
The physics in this game is just atrocious and no amount of patches is going to fix that. It was shit on release and it's still shit now. People who say this game has been fixed are insane.
WTF are you on about? Oh you haven't played the game have you? You listened to another person that was making up BS and thought it sounded good so you started parroting their lie.
I've played this game since launch and even from day one I never saw anything like the issues UA-camrs have. Obviously I did experience a few but nothing that ruined the game for me
Nice to know people still complain about games when they see a couple of bugs within it. The same can literally be send for any other game, but because those games had a better release at first. Makes this whole video very invalid
The release for cyberpunk was great outside of the previous gen consoles. The big thing with cyberpunk was that the games journalists saw that bashing the game was getting them more clicks and it was also getting normal people more views on twitter and so people that had never played the game bashed on it and then to pretend to have credibility they started pretending they had played the game but almost none of them were able to tell me what happened in the game they just said it was buggy and bad.
It used to be good but the 2.0 update completely ruined the loot system and weapons, i remember when every single weapon had unique stats and you could pick up dropped weapons and actually use them
Opinions... I personally didnt like RDR2 and would place Cyberpunk in my top 10 with games like KCD, Fallout NV, Deus Ex... I didnt feel RDR2 open world was good. I would compare its open world to KCD. RDR2 seems too colorful, fake with fabolous views in every corner. Look up KCD forests for a comparison. Cyberpunk did a good job in creating an immersive open world, after 100h i still feel like im constatly seeing new things and feel like a forreign in a realistic dystopian city. About the combat, man in RDR2 every gun and enemy feels the same... Cyberpunk there are many combat compilation on yt...
The only bug I’ve encountered is Jackie Welles walking through a car….but the only complaint I have is combat seems too easy, and I’m not even an fps guy…
I love this game, flaws and all -- but I would never call it a masterpiece.
nobody cares. This dude's masterpiece is RDR2... I would never call that a masterpiece does that mean it isn't one?
I’ve noticed this from when I was released from prison, before I went in 2 years ago, this game wasn’t so appreciated but now I see a lot of people praising it
I've played 700 hours of this game. Every single playthrough has had its own unique bugs.
Despite this, its been one of the most immersive games I've ever played. And I think the gameplay is significantly better than RDR2 (600 hours).
I always wonder how people can see this game as particularly immersive. Are you new to games? I see repeating assets at every corner and, aside from the FX, the art design is lazy af with bland, repeating textures and copy-paste models. Dialogues and (reactions of) lower tier NPCs are shallow, repetitive and often simply autistic. The shooting and moving is clunky at lower levels, so in the early game you can't even play it as a shooter because your movement sucks and AI is as dumb as it gets. The driving is clunky all the time.
The world/level building offers rarely any depth (as in actual interaction and worthwhile exploring, there rarely is any point in going anyhwere else than the obvious paths or choosing different approaches. For me it all feels "on rails" ... much of the world is just "watch, don't engage"). The story is boring and has no proper character build-up, the looting & leveling is neither creative nor complex (compared to something like Grim Dawn or Borderlands).
I really don't get it. Even a "dumb" and very much linear shooter like Doom Eternal had much more depth, emotional engagement and attention to detail than this game. I tried multiple times to force myself into the game but it just feels like cheap early 2000s game in a nice FX dress.
Saying Cyberpunk is better than RDR2 completely invalidates any opinion you could have.
RDR2 is a masterpiece that had a very positive release along with it being still cherished today as one of the top games on most platforms.
Cyberpunk is a joke compared to that.
@@_DMNO_ You provide no compelling argument and are being intellectually dishonest.
@@_DMNO_bro Red Dead has awful gameplay it’s a movie
😂😂😂😂😂 sorry I guess weird flex
I got cyberpunk in december, and the only problem i had is the one time I phased through the floor
wtf 😂
But you gotta believe me bro the game is trash and buggy and crashes all the time. Everybody hates the game and so should you, if you like it then you are wrong and a terrible person, bro.
@@thomgizziz Too late, its my #1 game OAT. Haven't seen any glitches or crashes since I made this comment
@@thomgizzizlmao then I'm the worst person too and I will keep on liking it
Only 2 complains from me is it's more unoptimised since phantom liberty came out and I'm still seeing bugs quite often
Which bugs?
I dont get why people like this game at all. All the rpg elements have been stripped from it. Theres nothing to do. Its soooooo boring. I cant find anything fun to do in the game.
This is story based game lol, so immerse yourself
What killed it for me was the annoying protagonist (played male) ; his remarks were so obnoxious...
The game play is trash, the driving is awful, the story is cringe, the world is boring, it's ugly, and it's still buggy after patches
Yep
Name adds up
That is infact a poorly written review. Kudos
Thanks not buying it
@ 😂😂😂😂
I just wanna know is if it’s worth buying for 50$ on the ps5 but everyone is so split😭😭😭
Get a xbox 😂,like have alittle self respect 😂
It’s very much worth it on ps5. My first play through was on the ps5 and I easily put 180 hours into it without getting bored once
@@Kelly-f7rwhy are you promoting a console that has no exclusives, and is technologically worse than the ps5?
The game is a masterpiece in many ways. It definitely has some glitches, some of which you show here way too many times. Cars falling from the sky, npcs freaking out in traffic and causing deadly accidents because you pass then when you did something blocks away before getting into a car, npcs spawning in the same spot simultaneously; sure some bad stuff. NPCs pulling out invisible cigarettes. There are lots of unusual things that will happen with NPCs and overlapping game artifacts over the course of play, that are not intended, but to me it doesn't happen enough to kill immersion.
The issue with the repeated appearances on random NPCs is an option slider in the graphics settings. If you are getting too many you have the settings turned down for higher performance. Same with the cars I think.
Random pissing guys, I think they toned that down, and I have not noticed a random standing pissing girl in a while. They clearly took out the one pissing in the market way up in NW Watson lol where people would all be dancing around him.
I have no idea how they thought it would be possible to drive a car in first person mode, just no.
The story being 'boring' is like, just your opinion man. Anyone finding it boring is still the exception rather than the rule. I had not seen a complaint about it until you mentioned it.
I don't know, I love the game despite it's issues. Still need to play RDR2 to see that one.
i keep reading that about cyberpunk driving - its fixed by modders since 2.0 :) check out ""if driving in modded cyberpunk 2077 was realistic:" if you want and tell me what you think.
Deus Ex is better, the first one from 2000's absolutely destroys 2077.
@@Drunde i’d understand if you were in every comment saying this about borderlands 2, but nga deus ex? come on man
@@gangboi9996 deus ex is also a cyberpunk fps game with hubs/open world.
its a looter shooter gta its not a masterpiece its a terrible rpg.
I just bought the game a few days ago and gawd damn it crashes before I get to the “cd PROJEKT red” screen lmao. I did get into the game one time through administrator mode but now that doesn’t work. What’s wrong with it? Honestly considering returning it. Which is a shame because the few minutes I got to play was pretty fun.
Not sure why you're getting the hate. It's a strange situation at the moment where devs can straight up lie at release, face massive criticism and then face praise years later for getting a game to the point it should have been at release. I still haven't bought the game and although it was on sale there was a morality holding me back haha People really need to be fighting the current state of gaming
they were rushed asf dude
@@cunnieseverywhere doesn't change the fact they lied haha You can still be transparent about things
@@daveyfunk what did they lie about man
At this point it's a whole system thing, I've personally given up on fighting the whole system if I'm gonna go early anyway. Capitalism is a bitch and a half.
The game was a lot better at 1.63 tbh, The updates screwed up the pacing of combat and did absolutely stupid crap like stamina being tied to shooting alongside the cyberware cap. The most damning thing of all though was enemy level scaling which basically renders the whole RPG aspect utterly pointless. If I ever get around to replaying the game it will be a heavily modded version that removes the stupid crap and rebalances combat to once more be fast paced. Dumping multiple magazines into bullet sponges is not fun or challenging but tedious.
Needs a survival mode , something similar to fallout4 or the og stalker ; you die fast , but so do the enemies.
I tried to like Cyberpunk but I dont have time to watch 45 minutes of unskippable cut scenes every time I sit down to play. Thats not a game to me, thats a movie. Had to uninstall.
I have replayed this game 4 times, which cutscenes are you referring to? There isn’t a single cutscene longer than five minutes tops
If your attention span is that short, then RPGs simply aren't for you. Stick to COD and sports games.
so you have adhd and can’t appreciate good writing, noted.
@@flymasterkyle1277no way I'm sitting through cut scenes that last 5 minutes.
God doesn’t even care how much you hate Cyberpunk 2077.
I've been gaming since the '80's and Cyberpunk 2077 is one of the best games I've played, personally.
It doesn't excuse the bugs which is the point of the video. Take your rose tinted glasses off.
@@HenryTownsmyth I've encountered a few minor bugs here and there, most were some minor NPC models that were screwed up which is nothing in todays games. They in no way impeded on my progress and enjoyment of the game and it's still one of the best games I've played, deal with it.
I didn't experience many of the bugs in this video. I know everyone's gaming experience is different but yeah. I just don't get it. Yeah a few mods from Nexus can fix some of these bugs, this game is superior on PC without a doubt and I don't think it should have been made for consoles in the first place
@@HenryTownsmythif you’d look at literally any other video about cyberpunk other than this one, you’d see that there are no bugs. I’m actually starting to think that he actively went looking for bugs, because I have never seen any like this
If they just made the game 3rd person it would be a massive hit, its 2024 games need to have both 3rd and 1st person modes.
There are tons of successful games that don't have 1st and 3rd person modes. The most popular game on steam doesn't have 3rd person so it must be a failure with 1.3 million people playing it at one time today and probably 3 million people that logged into the game. You are so right and you know everything.
The thing that bothers me is most of the time someone criticises the game, every comments just stop at "I don't have a bugs or glitches, I run the game at 60/120fps 4k and the game is a masterpiece. And this is showing how low expecations are today. (I don't care about the support console or PC, this is not my main point). The game a meh and at best good, but excels nowhere:
- Like most Ubisoft game, it's a interesting open world and good graphics. Since it's a CDPR game, the story is somehow good or maybe very good but the "Punk" is Cyberpunk is so soft. It supposes to be " a low-life and high tech universe with features futuristic technological and scientific achievements, such as artificial intelligence and cyberware, juxtaposed with societal collapse, *dystopia or decay*." The last part is very soft in this game. When you read william gibson's cyberpunk books (who is the Daddy of Cyberpunk theme), the social, politics and economics theme are much more impactful and interesting than in this game (every game is politic because they explain a state of a city/world between people which is super important in Cyberpunk universe).
- But when the game was announced, it was promised to be a GTA-like + The Witcher/Skyrim-RPG with real important choices in story. At the end, it's just a Far Cry/Assassin's Creed game with a cyberpunk skin and RPG-lite (yes liberty patch reworks the spec tree and implants but this is just the minimum) with a good story and no real important choices, which for most of players is already a good experience when you see others AAA games and I respect that (especially for casuals) but not for more invested players.
If you had mods, yes the game starts to be a real good game in some aspects but it stills lack solids foundations.
True 100% with you there man. People seem to forget about 90% of the game just bc the story is good😂 like you even show some evidence to people and they are starting to yap things like: well i don‘t care about the details and npc behaviour. Or they straight lie by saying nah cyberpunk has better details/npc‘s and is more immersive eventho it makes objectively seen no sense when you see the same models back to back and have no real random encounters and the fact that enemies don‘t die with a headshot is the worst thing if you want immersion especially with them damage-numbers above their heads like people have LITERAL brain rot if they do not get these points i mean they seem to not even understand what people are criticizing
No the problem is that most people that criticize it do so about nonsensical things like "Its over hyped", "The lips didn't move correctly during one cut scene", "It cost too much where I live", "It isn't next generation enough", "It crashes". Those are 99% of the criticisms that people come up with.
Your complaint is "it isn't like necromancer" which isn't a critique on the actual game. Harry potter isn't lord of the rings and lord of the rings pretty much defines the genre... so does that mean Harry Potter is bad? No.
Next you complain about what it was promised to be like... but a lot of those promises didn't come from CDPR they came from the games journalists reading into things that were never promised. But lets pretend you are correct here and they didn't deliver what you thought they said it would be... that doesn't make it a bad game, it is a critique against the devs and what they promised but not against what came out. You claim RPG-lite while naming games like the witcher and skyrim which are RPG lite games compared to earlier RPGs and TTRPGs and calling a game RPG-lite isn't saying that the game is bad it is just you thinking it should be one thing and because it isn't you are mad. Also far cry and assassin's creed are huge franchises, I don't think you are making the point you think you are making.
It doesn't seem like you have actually played the game and instead listened to the journos bash the game because that was getting them the most clicks and then you decided to blindly hate the game because it was the trendy thing to do and then kept that anger and bias for 4 years.
@thomgizziz 300 hours, cleared the full game, heavy modded it because nexusmod 🤷♂️ and move on.
"most people who criticize it" with bad arugments, don't read them too. Why are you talking about LOTR and Harry...
I understand that my point about comparing it with other games like is bad (right?). Well that's the purpose of genre, here RPG action-adventure. He is good next to other AAA ? Yes. Is he deep compared to them ? Meh, above average of course but feel empty, lacking something.
The promise was about full liberty and immersion (AI, exploration, police - wanted system and corruption, trauma team implemented, strong RPG - quest leave effects on the world, unique npc, important skills check, real build [and not net running the game lol], lifepath, gangs interactions), the list is long I will stop here, it was not there at release, simple. Does the game is bad ? No, it's decent but empty.
Not gonna go into the rabbit hole of "Skyrim is not a rpg", yes it's less than his predecessor but each tree give you a feeling of "I'm this ranger,mage,warrior, etc". True, older RPG were more developed, I give you that, I just prefer to compare it with recent games(too me, good old rpg are things like fallout 2, bg1/2, grow up with them). CP2020 got 9 roles, I didn't feel it during my session (mods excluded).
Am I mad about the game ? Disappointed, not mad, I don't spread hate I just start my comment by saying "sadly people have lower expectations nowadays + this will affect next games" and this opinion age like wine.
About FC and Assassins, what's the issue about being a huge franchise ? Does that mean CP77 should not be compared to them because he was new ? Nonsense. Same genre (more AC than FC), but feel more like a looter shooter at the end (more FC than AC) with lack of meaningful impacts in universe. As a example, I thought it would be something like Fable. A city, a gang or something change because of your actions.
And no, I don't hate the game, I just hope it has more.
I came across some bugs on my first two playthroughs. I ocasionally got stuck in some of the apartments because the elevator button wouldn’t trigger, forcing me to save/reload; I saw a car get swallowed by the road, lol, and the car spawned on top of the head of detective han (last mission from the River Ward + Peralez storyline), but that was it. I have to mention that all this was before 2.0. I played Phantom Liberty for 100 hours from scratch, and I can’t remember any bugs. Maybe I encountered a few, but nothing significant enough for me to recall.
started it again today after finishing the release version years ago.. first couple fights i get into, enemies are randomly invincible to damage, sidewalks are unreachable for a car moving forward, yet backwards you can get onto them to park just fine, allied AI is blocking me, standing around like a sack of potatoes, random events during dialog heavy scenes speed up/slow down my movements speed randomly, the cover system is confusing at best, hotkeys seem to change around at will (draw weapon is alt, then its b, wtf?), i haven't even finished the intro mission yet and i feel like this is worse then it used to be. i love the athmosphere, the vibes, the qol features and additional content. it just let's me down on the basics already so early on. i will probably finish this second playthough, but i sure am not off to a good start.
How's it going?
@@LamarBentley smoothly tbh. i checked the difficulty down from very hard, cause it felt a bit too demanding to min/max which i didn't quite sign up for after all these years, apart from that i'm sailing. gonna go for the panam ending (female V, judy romance) *my favorite.
@@fo0liner1985 please try mods if you can :) can greatly improve game balance (play very hard with just enemy hp values of hard or normal? sure!) qol in many aspects and add more content and detail!
keybinds are fully customizable via config file editing btw^^ the whole game isnt easy to get into - but very rewarding if you stick and fuck around for longer.
@@MikeGrau0hrthere certainly are worse games/engines i got used to or tailored to my liking via .ini/.cfg manipulation and just careful and methodical play. IE getting used to wierd physical behavior or little quirks of an engine that could result in silly behavior. there certainly is no major flaw left here and im quite enjoying my time with the game right now tbh. even without mods. tho i will take them into consideration more so, now that you mentioned them.
Very hard is necessary for the game to be challenging at all and I've experienced none of what your talking about in my 400 hours, are you sure you updated the game.
Also just curious are you the same person behind the channel console warehouse as the person on console warehouse and you sound pretty much the exact same and if so I'm sorry to say this but a lot of the videos you made the stealth servers and a lot of other videos seem very old or by 2024 no longer exist like xb online and ninja no longer exist
Completely agree. The game is just…boring as hell
"more flaws than your mums teeth". yeaa this dude is british for sure
Haha
Rockstar build systems, CD Red try and fake it and it all becomes an ungodly mess. You can't fix this without re-writing the entire game differently
Red Dead is so linear to the point where if you try to approach missions in a different way, you fail the mission. The story is good though and the characters are awesome. I hate when Dutch asks me to throw more money in the tithing box though after I donate $5,000 and Javier donates two feathers🤣
@@MitchSorensteinbut it can't be compared to this cybertrash, it's not even close
period.
If i buy this game on ps4,ps4 version..do i get free upgrade ps5 version to download when i get a ps5?
Yes!
@@L321 its 40% discount .. no brainer
The problem with cyberpunk is that it tries to do RPG and visceral FPS and doesn’t pull either one off. The enemies are bullet sponges and everything is dictated by RPG damage numbers but the RPG elements are shallow and your character is only ever defined by arbitrary dialogue options. Trying to do RPG and action adventure shooter is a big task. As an open world, it’s less ambitious than GTA, the gold standard; and as an RPG, it’s less immersive than 15-year-old Fallout games.
Enemies are not even that spongey unless if they are mechs or boss fights which make sense. The combat feels very good in this game and it’s unique with the cyberware. Side quests even tie into each other pretty frequently. I did a side quest where I had to give a car to a gang that had some big wig corpo in the trunk. You have the option to free him before you drop him off or if you encountered one of his coworkers in another side quest before this one, you’ll find out he was using nomads as human experiments. It’s the subtle things like this that make the game feel immersive and that your choices do have an impact. Disproves your point that the only choices you can make to shape your role is only through dialogue. Seems to me like you haven’t played the game enough to figure out these things. Don’t get me wrong though, there definitely is some jank in this game with vehicles popping in, weird “dead slides” when you try to slide, romance options that leave you wanting more and duplicate NPC’s. I think the gameplay as well as a story that is this good, and characters that are written so well kind of makes up for its problems. There are mods that fix some of these things and add more for sure, but at least there is a game there. Same can’t be said about Bethesda, the company that somehow made half baked games as a framework for modders mainstream.
Hey that's actually a big point heavily overlooked. The game is uncertain of what it is.
@@commenceun it’s not even that. Game just released in such a piss poor state that it didn’t get a chance to get all the content like it was supposed to. Game is still solid for the most part. Just wish there was more
I played cyberpunk on its release, i actually pre ordered it. When the game was somewhat playable (still incredibly buggy) I finished my first playthrough and absolutely adored the game. The story was amazing and the atmosphere in night city was as well. I did one more playthrough and then left the game until the DLC was available. I played the DLC on a brand new character so I played more of the base game as well and had an amazing time once again. I truly adore this game and it is my favorite shooter game out there, third favorite game overall. Im actually going to start another playthrough tonight, this time trying out a stealth build.
you are probably just addicted to the rpg aspect bc you are a low value male, the game is trash.
This would be such an amazing game... if it was a third-person game. First person ruins the game tbh.
There is a reason open-world RPGs are typically 3rd person... It's not a coincidence. It's to highlight the game's greatest asset, its world... Two major benefits of this (a) Zoom out a little bit, third person, and you actually see more of this world, teeming with detail, at any moment. (b) Get to see all the outfits and details and cyberpunk modifications that your character has in this fictional world...
Instead, we don't see the character. Don't see anything but the hands, don't see his fighting, don't even get to see all the weapons in entirety, and this fictional setting they've created goes to waste. And you have the constricted 1st-person view, which has never caught on in any genre except shooters -- which it works for, because the main focus of a game like COD is the combat, not experiencing all that Jalalabad has to offer. Even racing games have a toggle so that you can actually _see_ the cars. 1st person was a frankly terrible idea for Cyberpunk.
my god the stupid comments.
the story was alright at least from what i saw, never finished the game because it was kind of boring even with all of the fixes. stealth feels underdeveloped, gunplay is overall garbage and hacking/netrunning puts you to sleep. the different kinds of augmentations are nice, but thats about it. the music sounds like shid, the game's dialog feels like it was written by a teenager, the world is lifeless beyond the mediocre sidequests. the game is simply eye candy with sub-par gameplay and rpg mechanics. 6/10 game, heard a dude say that its "one of the best rpgs ever made" lmfao
Still can’t believe people just seemed to forget how CDPR lied to everyone about the ai, the world reacting to players’ choices, potential multiplayer, pre-rendered trailers, just to shill an underdeveloped Far Cry-like posing as an RPG.
Played the game to 100% at launch and after phantom liberty, there is no amount of patches and updates that will make up for the blatant false advertising and lying directly to customers.
Don’t get me wrong, it’s still a decent bit of fun and does have an incredibly pretty world, but it is not and will not be what CDPR wanted it to be and what we wanted it to be. I don’t believe this game will have the opportunity to bounce back like NMS due to CDPR being otherwise occupied.
The problem I have is I constantly compare it to the chaotic loot filled and object heavy world of Fallout 4 where every area had tons of interactivity and tactical options to take care of enemies. Cyberepunk feels very "rigid", the buildings are maze like and boxed in, and the enemy encounters are very similar. Again I'm comparing it to a lot of the chaotic freedom of Fallout 4 with crafting, base building, and just overall madness post apocalypse, if they could bring that feel to the dystopian city it would be incredible. I had much more memorable fights and interactions in the winding alleys of Fallout 4 than in Cyberpunk
Agree , a random encounter in fallout 4 is more engaging and fun than cyberpunk 2077 , especially if you are playing on survival
no hate but thats just your subjective opinion .
It's not only his opinion a good amount of people will agree with this
@@Jordan27893 and that good amoutn of people doesnt even reach 10 k XD
@@Jordan27893 This video was posted 2 weeks ago and now has 20,000 views, yet with a ratioed 1k thumbs up vs 1.1k thumbs down...
and even at launch, the game received 63000 negative reviews vs well over 226,000 positive reviews.
This was at launch with all the bugs. 2 months back, the game somehow managed to peak over the "Overwhelmingly Positive" from it's previous "Mixed" reviews on Steam. As of today, it finally leveled out to a solid "Very Positive". The devs got to work and they did good.
So don't get it twisted my friend... you are in the minority on this one. The majority rules that this game is excellent while the minority thinks it's dogshit for "reasons".
But in the end, who gives a fuck, right? :) Just play or don't play.
This is just too fun and immersive to play to be worried about some glitches or bugs (PC version), it pales in comparison with what it offers. I´ve played all rockstar games and this is more immersive. All GTA´s and RDR 2 are very good, but after 2.0 this game is just better, not techically better, but better as a game. It´s the first game I´ve played in the last 10 or 15 years that I really thought it brought to the table something more than the rest. Pity they will return to witcher and not stick with NC for a couple more years. I love PANAM :)
Stop that bro, you cant even interact with the npc’s, driving is terrible, npc behavior is terrible, cant interact with street vendors, cant do anything in the strip clubs, gunplay is bad, customization is bad, police system is terrible. The core of this game is bad, the graphics on console are extremely grainy. Crazy pop in, clipping and everything its bad gtav still does open world better and its a ps3 game
@@AP90x SA still does it better and it's a ps2 game lol
@@AP90x Can I have my own opinion? I still prefer cyberpunk to any rockstar game and I don´t have half the problems you have with the system mechanics. Maybe you have played the console version or we simply have diferent tastes. It´s a matter of taste.
@@chocolate5217 your opinion is garbage. If people had the same opinion as you, we would have terrible games because devs would see that people would buy any old thing so they could put as little effort in it as possible and you’d eat it right up. This game is no where close to gta5 or rdr2 or rdr1 and thats an actual fact. You liking a more mediocre product is just stubbornness and foolishness. Get better taste so we get better games bud
@@AP90x Sight,another fanboy that thinks that can force me to like things that he likes. grow Up. And play the game before you post your opinion, from what I am reading you didn´t even play the game, at least after 2.0. (yeah you will say you have done it, guess what...I don´t believe you or you wouldn´t post such nonsense)
Cyberpunk 2077? More like Cyberpunk dialogue simulator with npcs 2077
Are you mad because you can’t afford the game or still playing old generation consoles?😂
It’s an RPG, of course there is dialogue in the game. Sorry the game didn’t turn out to be the regurgitated scop like CoD you want, every single year. You are just trying to be a contrarian because “it’s cool to be different or whatever”.
@@MitchSorenstein 🤓🤓🤓
@@MitchSorenstein the irony , this game is basically a " f to pay respects simulator" ...
I've been playing the game for the first time after Phantom Liberty, but followed the hype back before launch. From my experience, I've seen WAY MORE shilling for the game than criticism after the Edgerunners anime happened. Just look at this comment section, their arguments are often "don't care", "bugs never happened with me", "Red Dead Redemption 2 is repetitive".
The game is still too basic, GTA San Andreas had car parts customization in 2004, while Cyberpunk 2077 doesn't even let you paint your cars in 2024. Modding? Oh yeah, a simple mod to let you own NPC variants of the cars requires 1 mod, that requires 2 mods, that require 3 mods, let alone a car customization mod. All of that to crash at launch due to the finicky checks that want every single mod to be the correct version with each other and the game because the modding community made no effort to properly organize itself.
GTASA also had very basic street NPCs that would walk the streets looking for ped paths, this could result in them crossing from one side of the street to another in an endless patrol of the same 1 street, this in 2004. Cyberpunk 2077 has that same level of NPC AI - Zero improvements in 20 years, while a game like Red Dead Redemption 2, which is a 2018 AAA open-world game (same category as Cyberpunk), has a much more robust and believable NPC system with routines and variation in dialogue and interaction with the player.
"I never ran into bugs", oh curious. Because I've had NPCs refusing to follow V and being stuck in place for gigs to progress. I've had non-lethal takedown bodies exploding into death if I tried to move them. I've had cars spawning out of nowhere behind me to crash into my car. Or the random gangsta floating on top of a major highway shooting at the cars passing by. Who needs Aerial Vehicles when people can apparently fly?
Ending the comparisons, there is also the lack of a third person view or any difference in V's body after installing so much cyberware, something a lot of people desired to see. So many kiosks scattered throughout the city and you can't even have an animation of sitting down on them and eat (nitpicking? it was sold as an immersive experience) rather than having to pick the item off your inventory and simply clicking on it. Or also the fact that stealth is still rather clumsy during gameplay, with prompts for silent kills often failing to appear at the right moment. Or when cars are falling down from the sky, exploding or simply crashing into you without reason.
A company promised a product and purposely didn't deliver it, even with bandaids over 4 years and still lacks the basics that AAA open-world games established 20 years ago. The truth is: People don't value their own money, as someone not living in a cushy first-world country, this is pretty obvious since people who go through hardship learn that you can't pay and accept crap in return.
This game is shit 😂 this comment section is brain dead. I've never tried so hard to play this game over the last 4 years. Thanks for making this video. If there is edible shit. There will be people who says it tastes good😂
If you’ve never tried to play the game then how can you say it’s shit? It sounds to me like you’re just hating for the sake of hating
@DemocracyOfficerKeegan illiteracy and assumptions. I've put in countless hours into the game, waiting for it to get good for years. Then it dawned on me it's just boring. What am I fighting to have fun for. I was looking around to see if anyone else played at least half of the game and realised it just nonsense. The I game is only about visual spectacle for anyone with a 7800/4070 gpu or higher. When your friends come over to see you new rig and run this game with Ray tracing on walk through the streets, then turn it off.
@@JayUchiha17 Fundamentally incorrect: I play with an rx 6600 which could barely run the game until the latest update which introduced fsr 3, and I still had a blast. Admittedly, the game was pretty ass before patch 1.3, but that was years ago, and as someone who only started at update 2.0 and never saw the overhyped marketing, I have been free of any bad first impressions or unrealistic expectations and have found this game to be absolutely brilliant. since it's release it has evolved from bug dumpster, to playable, to ok, to fun, to masterpiece, to best game i've every played. It's story is one of the only video game stories to actually get me invested in it's characters (the other was rdr2), the gameplay is brilliantly fun, with many different options to fight enemies besides generic shoot/stealth, the world and universe are brilliantly designed and written, the graphics are out of this world and it is easily the best game CD projeckt red has ever made, and the best video game I have ever played. frankly, you should be disappointed in yourself for agreeing with a video that is so obviously rage bait, and shitty rage bait to say the least. (also before you call me a glazer, this game is so good that it deserves being glazed} FYI I have played this game twice without mods, once with mods, and I'm about to play it a fourth time in vr with the arrival of my meta quest 3. Also the only illiteracy is from your comment.
I only had minor bugs on PC and was always able to fix it with a quick save/quick load (something that Bethesda and Rockstar are still unable to achieve: you either become a master of the console for Bethesda games or are told to restart your game and expect a different result by Rockstar games). Story wise.. I mean, just listen to yourself, you are far from being objective and one must be a fool to give any credit to such clearly biased opinion.
The game sucks. Either you luck out on PC or xbox and don't get bugs or you play the PlayStation version and realize the game still plays like puke. As for the actual gameplay the people who play this game and don't realize the games sudden drop in quality after the prologue are just liars. Yes I'm calling you out if you claim to have 1000 hours or whatever BS. I played Skyrim for 5 years straight when I was in school and barely got 2000 so you claiming to have 1000 already is just BS. The game just isn't that good it's certainly not Skyrim quality of I have to pause my exploration so I can sort out my inventory or dick around. No I got close to 100% on my slow playthrough and basically without trying and still didn't get close to 1000 hours and I had long run out of quest to do. Stop lying to me, yourself, and others just because you are in denial that you got ripped off dispite ample warning.
phantom liberty combined with the main story missions is an easy 35+ hrs if you rush. side missions as well, its not always made obvious but they can have different outcomes depending on your approach. and dont forget ncpd scanner hustles! that combined with multiple endings i can definitely see how many people have over +1000 hours. there are also multiple hidden quests available depending on how you finished your previous one which i was unaware of until my second playthrough, as well as some of the choices which i assumed to be smaller but choose differently the second time around to see if things changed and THEY DID!!!
fyi - there are 6 different endings for the main character (not including how you end side character journeys) and even if you started at the final quest for each respective ending you’re looking at 1hr and a half plus for EACH. thats roughly 9hrs for the ending quests alone. now imagine the people who replay the game and thats your answer.
forgot to mention that each build is vastly different too. this time around im not investing into blades or sandevistan so ive been learning how to hack and forcing enemies to commit suicide, turning them cyberspycho, frying brains into mush, remote controlling vehicles like toy rc cars, jamming weapons has been incredibly fun and i didn’t even know were possible! next play through i wanna invest into blunt weapons so i can throw bodies and maybe use the dildo as my main weapon lol.
You didn't explained shit. Just babbling on and on about hours played.
Your taste and reasoning are shit.
The roadmap for fixing the game partly was free dlc when I read that . I thought more like the phantom liberty dlc , not clothing and stuff like that.
Started the game 2 weeks ago and the only thing I can relate with is that npc’s does happen to repeat a few times. I’m playing in 1080p with no raytracing and I’ve experienced a signle glitch where my car spawned from 10m heigh. Npc do not try to get money from insurace while driving and for story line i think it’s a matter of taste. I feel really immerse in the story line, in the caracter and in the whole environment. If you experience this kind of glitches try adjusting preferences. See ya 🤙🏻
Npcs do not try to get insurance😂😂 it was was a joke are u serious 😂
@@roug3640 They are hired or bots that's why they only ever complement this crap fest.
@@roug3640youre taking it too literally, hes refrencing the hard braking
i dont understand the hate honestly, there were so many fuck ups at launch as well as with with whatever dogshit marketing team was hired. that said its def my top 5 games of all time. and like many other comments have stated, ive had less than 10% of the bugs shown in the vid… weird.
1. last of us
2. gta v
3. cyberpunk 2077
4. rdr 2
5. bloodborne
"Attempts to explain that he and others have a different opinion on this game"
"Cannot comprehend that others have a different opinion on this game"
The game in my opinion is terrible, because they promised so much, and delivered so little. There are still features that they promised that aren't even in the game.
Im playing on pc, should i play with controller or keyboard?