Yes, from the topical vibrational bubble-mode envelope POV, Susskind's ER =EPR shell-horizon envelope-shaping holography, of Euler's Unit Circle inside-outside holographic shell membranes, brane barriers to inclusion-exclusion orthogonal-normal reciprocation-recirculation frequency, prime-cofactor integration. Hanging on to big bang discrete-ness is a dead end in the continuous Universe.
Thanks for a very interesting video. I was trying to look up the name mention here: ua-cam.com/video/PvB57tKEu8o/v-deo.html , but it's hard to hear what Mr. Rovelli is saying. Is it "John BaracK" ? I would like to look up the theorem that he is mentioning. Can anyone provide the name / information for me? Thanks!
Carlo, I know Physic, we could talk which would benefit you.see the physical world fixed by time, I see the interweaving clouds. We liive in all possible universe we are probable, that is certain.
So if your doing a quantum Gravity experiment, you must make sure there is no charge. If charge is present then it's EMFS theory. Period. I hate to disagree, but I must. The observational proof is absolutely 💯 percent everywhere for EMFS theory. You can't realistically counter the argument. The best that can be done is describing the actions of such. It's an opinion based in reality
Because it's not there. If it's not there from the beginning it's not there now. I would certainly have a much different philosophy than this gentlemen. To each they're own.
Love professor Rovelli. Subbed
The way he described time was brilliant
Awesome!!
Great video, thank you.
thanks
Yes, from the topical vibrational bubble-mode envelope POV, Susskind's ER =EPR shell-horizon envelope-shaping holography, of Euler's Unit Circle inside-outside holographic shell membranes, brane barriers to inclusion-exclusion orthogonal-normal reciprocation-recirculation frequency, prime-cofactor integration.
Hanging on to big bang discrete-ness is a dead end in the continuous Universe.
The interviewer knew when to remain silent thus proving her intelligence.
The host needs a better mic. Good video.
Thanks for a very interesting video. I was trying to look up the name mention here: ua-cam.com/video/PvB57tKEu8o/v-deo.html , but it's hard to hear what Mr. Rovelli is saying. Is it "John BaracK" ? I would like to look up the theorem that he is mentioning. Can anyone provide the name / information for me? Thanks!
John Barrett. From the Barrett-Crane model: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barrett%E2%80%93Crane_model
@@msnbmnt Thank you very much!
Carlo, I know Physic, we could talk which would benefit you.see the physical world fixed by time, I see the interweaving clouds. We liive in all possible universe we are probable, that is certain.
Never tell me the odds. How much?
Time is a human construct.
Nobody of importance ever said otherwise. Rovelli is just not nearly as important as Rovelli thinks he is. ;-)
Imagine modern Manna (incorruptible milk) .
Huh kyung young
So if your doing a quantum Gravity experiment, you must make sure there is no charge. If charge is present then it's EMFS theory. Period. I hate to disagree, but I must. The observational proof is absolutely 💯 percent everywhere for EMFS theory. You can't realistically counter the argument. The best that can be done is describing the actions of such. It's an opinion based in reality
Linda, great job but please next time use a proper micro and take off the mouse from your mouth!
Just jocking.. almost 😅
Because it's not there. If it's not there from the beginning it's not there now. I would certainly have a much different philosophy than this gentlemen. To each they're own.