The Holographic Universe from AdS/CFT! | with Juan Maldacena

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 14

  • @jimsteen911
    @jimsteen911 Рік тому +4

    As a self taught novice, this interview has been wildly enlightening and has led me to understand ads/cft correspondence & duality much better. I’ve read a lot and have watched many Susskind lectures which gave me a solid foundation but the Professors expertise coupled with the hosts questioning and method of explaining back in his own words was very helpful. I have no formal education in physics and being interested in and wanting to understand astrophysics thoroughly led me to first be able to conceptualize physics in general. So I really had to start from scratch and finding high quality technical information that covers multiple subjects like this is extremely rare. So thank you to this channel. Maldicenas 97 paper is the most cited paper in history, if you didn’t know. The man is a living legend. You should ask him to help you get Susskind on

    • @rhythmfox7000
      @rhythmfox7000 Рік тому

      I was going to say basically the same things, this was a great interview/discussion with Juan. It would be so awesome to have Maldacena and Susskind on together :D

  • @entropicinformation
    @entropicinformation 22 дні тому

    The holographic principle and the Ryu-Takayanagi formula are generalized by establishing mathematically that entropy in gravitational systems universally scales with surface area rather than volume, by extending the applicability of the entropy-area relationship beyond AdS/CFT correspondence, the peer reviewed framework, Scaling Entropy-Area Thermodynamics (SEAT), reveals that gravitational phenomena are fundamentally linked to the statistical mechanics of quantum states on boundary surfaces... 10.59973/ipil.126 .. leading to Holographic Gravity (#HolographicGravity)

  • @jamesbentonticer4706
    @jamesbentonticer4706 Рік тому +7

    What a great job you have, to talk to the smartest people on the planet about the most important questions we can ask. How do you get these towering geniuses to come on your show???

    • @0ArshKhan0
      @0ArshKhan0 Рік тому +2

      Many of such brilliant people are very humble. I've sent mails to Dr Edward Witten as well as Dr Juan Maldacena and both of them replied multiple times. But most people never really send mails.

    • @jamesbentonticer4706
      @jamesbentonticer4706 Рік тому

      @@0ArshKhan0 Wow! that is awesome. I guess, ask and you shall recieve.

    • @jimsteen911
      @jimsteen911 Рік тому

      I have too lol. To Juan, and a few others. Yeah very humble.
      That man is probably in the top 3 smartest physicists alive. Gets paid over 500k a year to think. Susskind is highest paid @ over 600k and he doesn’t even have to teach anymore, he’s pushing 90 and still making breakthroughs

    • @alexswash7875
      @alexswash7875 Рік тому +3

      Davide is himself a phd student in theoretical physics from Munich

  • @DKFX1
    @DKFX1 Рік тому +1

    The word entropy was mentioned close to 100 times during this interview. The word quantum was used 90 times. The word boundary was mentioned 40 times. Seems like you guys were just repeating the same three words over and over.

    • @jimsteen911
      @jimsteen911 Рік тому +3

      It seems like you have no idea what you’re listening to yet decided to comment anyway. That man is one of the greatest theoretical physicists alive-full stop. I hope you had fun counting words bud

    • @DKFX1
      @DKFX1 Рік тому +1

      ​@@jimsteen911 Mister, it seems like you don't know who you're talking to. I don't recognize Juan Maldacena as one of the greatest and nor should you.
      It's funny to me that you think I counted any words during the conversation. I just made a simple search for a couple of terms in the transcript after recognizing how repetitive and circular this conversation was.

    • @derekanderson7854
      @derekanderson7854 6 місяців тому +1

      @@DKFX1 It's kind of like criticizing Newton for saying "force" so many times. The theory is that gravity inside our 3D spacetime is emergent from a quantum theory living on a 2D boundary spacetime, and the main argument for it is based on the concept of entropy; if you're going to talk about it, you have to say a lot of sentences about entropy, about quantum mechanical properties, and about the boundary system

  • @portalsandmagicghostnumbercube

    Good to be here!

  • @portalsandmagicghostnumbercube

    My theory of a boundary within a boundary. A duality within a duality. An Invisible/Holographic Principle of the Multiverse.