Your channel is my fave bike channel. You are straight forward and don't fill the review with useless fluff that pads the review and makes it unnecessarily long.
Have to say this is one of your most comprehensive reviews. I am currently riding the Marlin 8 Gen 2 because I enjoy my positioning on it and I don’t have to worry about anything I encountered on the road. But, this one is a great in-between bike for my City riding without all the weight of my Marlin and more speed. The preferred Road-Bike options are out of my reach financially.
I had an FX4 Gen 3 until 3 months ago when someone stole it. It was the best bike I ever owned. The only thing that concerns me about the Gen 4 is the cable routing through the top. Is this going to collect water, dust, and dirt? I will also miss the DuoTrap S compatibility, but I realize that there are other options.
Just purchased a 2024 fx sport 5 in crimson. It's my first carbon fiber bicycle. So far I'm happy, although I do need to take it back to have the bikes shifting adjusted
Just bought a FX Sport 6 and absolutely love it. Had an older FX 2 I sold and can't believe the difference. The FX 6 weighs only 21 lbs and even with a rear rack, computer and water cages still only around 23 lbs. It just takes off, especially when you stand up to pedal up hills , it just takes off. I plan on doing a video if it ever cools down, has been almost 100 degrees for the last few weeks.
I noticed the very handy bike stand you have. I think that would be perfect in my storage so I can skip mounting a fixed bike stand on my bike. Where did you buy that?
Thanks for this detailed review. I was keen to get the FX2 disc, but now I'm thinking the extra cost for the FX3 is worth, particularly for the 1x10 gearing.
Why does it have a quick release lever on the rear axle, but NOT on the front axle??? If anything, I'd want the opposite. Makes it a nuisance for putting inside a car. By the way, I own this bike, and love it - except for the lack of front QR. The hex blue is beautiful.
The 2025 FX 2 Stagger has already dropped, but I'm waiting for the regular diamond frame FX 2. Aluminum fork just as God intended , Schrader valves because they make sense, and a more generic handlebar so I can fit the grips and bar end plugs of my choice instead of being confined to IsoZone.
I'm debating on buying this, the verve 2, or the FX 3 Gen 3. Primarily a recreational rider in the city but I want to be able to bring my bike to trails on road trips and vacations. Eventually, I'm going to get a second bike to keep at our place in Massachusetts which will be primarily for trails and around town. Any advice?
I saw their only offer 2025 Verve Gen 5 in low step configuration and cross bar one is gone. This new FX 3 looks like an old verve in design. Is there any change made to riding position to be move like Verve? Or it's the same as older FX models?
IMO, I preferred when the fx was more aggressive and had flat bar road bike parts, especially the old Fx sport 4 with Tiagra. This one is too gravel focused for my taste, and it encroaches on the new DS’s territory.
Anybody considering this, unless you live in San Francisco (hill climbing!!!), I'd recommend changing out the chain ring from the stock 40T to a 42T. I tried it both ways, and I *really* like the extra high end for flat riding (rail trails, etc.). The bottom end is still MORE than easy to pedal, but with a 1x, it can be tough to get a fast/challenging/muscle-building top end. I noticed on Trek's website that other riders were dissatisfied with the upper end of the gearing also. Yes, I could go for a more traditional racing/road bike with a 2x if that really bugs me, but I like having the best of both worlds! :) Might even try a 44T down the road, but worried about the chainstay clearance. Trek says 42T is limit...
@@thewhitehelmetguy I think they only changed out the ring. I remember him looking up what rings were available for that particular crank set. I'll try to remember to dig out the receipt or call the shop and see if I can give you a part number.
@@thewhitehelmetguy Sorry took so long. Been crazy at work. This is the message I got back from the fellow at my local bike shop who installed the substitute ring: "We were able to keep the cranks stock and used a Wolf Tooth 110 bcd 42t chainring ( part # SH11042-GR). This chainring needed a very minor amount of modification for fitment to the crank, this is normal and unpredictable without experimentation. I can go into detail if you are curious, but it's very minor file work." Hope this helps...
what is the different between fx 3 and Chinese bike sunpeed keplar hybrid bike 2924,,there are same design,,little bit gear radiance and aluminium fork but half the price ,can it run smooth and durable ? is it OK buy Chinese bike ?
Just as we thought that the shenanigans would end with internal cable routing, they bestow integrated cable routing upon us! The OEMs seem hell-bent on making it as hard for us to service our own bikes as possible, so as to drive more service, maintenance, and repair business to their own dealers and authorized distributors. For shame.
Depends what you value. The prior generation is a darn good bike and has the double up front. The new Gen 4 is definitely slicker, and more simple while being just as high quality. I think it's worth the extra money for CUES and the better cable routing, but that is up to you.
@@Jamesthebikeguy how different does the geometry feel, in the riding experience ? I always felt the previous fx was very endurance road bike like, how is this one ?
Still uses the dreaded proprietary through skew. That's what turned me off from FX Sport 6 that had Carbon wheelaet. It's way past time to go with a proper through axle and no walmart cranks.
@@Jamesthebikeguy are you referring to gen 2 as the double up front? the previous gen (gen 3) is a 1x chain ring like this gen 4. I too was wondering if it's still worth getting older gens, with gen 2 being cheaper than gen 3. new geometry is a major change though, but I guess we don't have info on the ride quality yet. thanks for the great bike reviews!
I haven't tried a Gen 4, but I just bought a Gen 3 and having compared the specs, there's really not very much difference. The Gen 3 doesn't have the frame bag mounts, and has that different cable routing like he said, but in terms of specifications they're extremely comparable, the only major difference being the switch from Deore to CUES, neither of which are significantly better than the other.
I have recently bought dual sport 3 gen 5 but got to know about this bike, now i am repenting that why i bought dual, i think i should have gone with this
Not a big fan of all that internal cable routing. Sure it looks clean but for DIY mechanics, internal routing is a massive PITA. The FX is a fitness hybrid, not a carbon fibre race rocket. Serviceability makes more sense to me than the "clean aero" look. Other than that, seems like a well put together, value packed hybrid. Thanks for the review.
Excellent video! As for the FX 3, I feel like it’s a lot of money for a bike that most people who buy it will ride it around the block five times this summer and park it in the garage.
@@ProAvgeek6328 you are totally entitled to that opinion, if it works for you great. Check out helicopter tape though, works great on areas of high rub, for example cables or bike bags.
In 2 yrs trek has totally changed the FX bikes frame geometry. Why? Looks like a MTB that’s been home tweaked for the asphalt. Also trek bikes have entry level components for high end bike prices. Research & read read read. So many better bikes than trek garbage relying on a name.
Nah dont like it, gearing is too low, dont want internal cables, looks pretentious with its huge drainpipe down tube with skinny top which looks like one kick would right it off. Prefer my old Dawes hybrid 😁
Don't believe the HYPE 😡. I have been an FX owner for over 20 plus years so I consider myself a knowledgeable owner from experience. Having said that. Here are my thoughts on the lastest FX 3. The geometry is too relaxed for my taste. It doesn't breed performance. The bike is trendy at best. Nothing special about it Component. Again trendy nothing cutting edge. For example 1X and the same H2 but the comp version. These tires look like a Pathfinder knock off Ride quality. It would be equal to that of the FX 2 capable of LIGHT off road adventures .on hard packed gravel However, not an all weather bike with those tires. Nor can it handle anything that is chucky or mud. Acceleration, would be slower due to having to dump so many gears to gain speed In conclusion. An FX was designed to be a flat bar road bike.wirh performance in mind. No matter the frame material..This is designed for comfort like the Verve.😡 Those are my thoughts from my combined experiences with the 7500Fx and FX2 2023
Maybe you should ride one... Having been a FX 4 owner, a FX Sport 6 owner, and now videoing the new model, I personally think it is a step in the right direction. You of course are entitled to your own opinion, but don't yell at new riders who love these changes.
@@Jamesthebikeguy James. I understand your point of view is biased However. Since I own the original 730 (steel) along with the 7100, FX2 (2023) and have owned the 7500Fx . I am confident I know what I am talking about. The previous versions of this bike were more road oriented in their selection of chainrings and cassette choices. With the newer generations.Its more comfort and trendy oriented All of these features are trendy. For example Shimano Cue, 1X 35c cable routing through head tube. Meh I could get all of that and more from Giant, specialized Kona, surly just to name a few. My 7500 FX had xt fd, Rd and cranks along with 11x34 cassette 9 speed paired with 48,38,28 chainrings. My 730 has a 50,40,30 biopace paired with friction shifters and a 11x32 cassette. My 730 out performs FX 2 in every way. Even can accommodate a 42c tires So there's nothing special about the FX 3. Oh wait it has a carbon fork and weighs 22.5 lbs . Meh. Again my 7500Fx weighted 21.5 lbs Btw I am not yelling at anyone I am just giving an honest unbiased, no BS opinion BASED ON EXPERIENCE
@tmayberry7559 The riding position of the FX is plenty aggressive for a hybrid bike. If the riding position was any more forward it would be less comfortable and you should just buy a road bike. The new gen 4 frame has been better aero over the gen 3 so it should be faster if anything. Also you're stats are nonsense. The 7500FX was weighed at 27 pounds on a review by roadbikesreview, your 21.5 lbs is BS.
@@PlayWaves1 1st let me say thank you for your comments. 2nd regarding the forward position of the FX 2 (2023) in my experience the position of the bike was not as forward as I was to, due to the sweep of the handlebars. In order to accomplish this I put on a longer stem and inverted it. 3rd I have multiple bikes. Including road ,mountain, and hybrid. I wanted the same position on each bike.this was John Tomac belief since he rode both mountain and road bikes. 4th regarding the 7500 FX it weighed 21 1/2 lb due to the Holo tech XT crankset as well as a carbon seatpost as well as a lighter seat and lighter 23 meal tires these are facts not made up numbers In closing. Why am I explaining all of this IDK🤔. Remember opinions are like azzholes everybody's got one. Sometimes when stated they are quite smelly
Your channel is my fave bike channel. You are straight forward and don't fill the review with useless fluff that pads the review and makes it unnecessarily long.
Have to say this is one of your most comprehensive reviews. I am currently riding the Marlin 8 Gen 2 because I enjoy my positioning on it and I don’t have to worry about anything I encountered on the road. But, this one is a great in-between bike for my City riding without all the weight of my Marlin and more speed. The preferred Road-Bike options are out of my reach financially.
I'm so glad I bought a FX 4 Disc (2021) model. I've not seen an 11 speed since, in the aluminum FX line up.
I was close to buying one but I went with the new dual sport 3 for some extra ruggedness.
Hard to argue with the dual sport.
Will there be a 2025 version of the DS 3?
This is a really great review. Thank you. I’m going to buy it now.
I had an FX4 Gen 3 until 3 months ago when someone stole it. It was the best bike I ever owned. The only thing that concerns me about the Gen 4 is the cable routing through the top. Is this going to collect water, dust, and dirt? I will also miss the DuoTrap S compatibility, but I realize that there are other options.
Just purchased a 2024 fx sport 5 in crimson. It's my first carbon fiber bicycle. So far I'm happy, although I do need to take it back to have the bikes shifting adjusted
Wow, so close .I've been waiting for a
Trek FX Sport 6 carbon bike video.
I'll keep waiting patiently for it .
Great details and presentation 👌
Just bought a FX Sport 6 and absolutely love it. Had an older FX 2 I sold and can't believe the difference. The FX 6 weighs only 21 lbs and even with a rear rack, computer and water cages still only around 23 lbs. It just takes off, especially when you stand up to pedal up hills , it just takes off. I plan on doing a video if it ever cools down, has been almost 100 degrees for the last few weeks.
@gregghershberger7968 That's awesome Greg .Enjoy it, and I'll be looking forward to your video on it 🫡 I know it's hot at Orlando Fl 😳
Good review, thanks man. Just bought one.
I noticed the very handy bike stand you have. I think that would be perfect in my storage so I can skip mounting a fixed bike stand on my bike. Where did you buy that?
James, I’m interested in a 2025 Fx Sport 4….what’s your review date? Thanks! Mike
Thank you so much for the review..
So so beautiful ❤️❤️❤️❤️
James, thank you for another great review. Any word on updates to FX 5 or FX 6 ?
Thanks
Thanks for this detailed review. I was keen to get the FX2 disc, but now I'm thinking the extra cost for the FX3 is worth, particularly for the 1x10 gearing.
Where did you talk about the weight of the bike? I just saw it was close to the old one.
I think you're mistaken on the 1-by. I have the previous generation FX-3 and it is a 1x10.
I just bought the Gen 3 FX3 and yes, it's a 1x10 with Shimano Deore
Why does it have a quick release lever on the rear axle, but NOT on the front axle??? If anything, I'd want the opposite. Makes it a nuisance for putting inside a car. By the way, I own this bike, and love it - except for the lack of front QR. The hex blue is beautiful.
This frame looks identical to my 2023 Dual Sport 3 Gen 5. Other than the tires and the CUES derailleur, are there any other major differences?
It's the same frame.
FX gen 4 is slimmer in width and has less tire clearance but is also faster with 700c wheels. Less off-road, more paved prowess.
The 2025 FX 2 Stagger has already dropped, but I'm waiting for the regular diamond frame FX 2. Aluminum fork just as God intended , Schrader valves because they make sense, and a more generic handlebar so I can fit the grips and bar end plugs of my choice instead of being confined to IsoZone.
Another great review, James! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Glad you enjoyed it!
Excellent review
I'm debating on buying this, the verve 2, or the FX 3 Gen 3. Primarily a recreational rider in the city but I want to be able to bring my bike to trails on road trips and vacations. Eventually, I'm going to get a second bike to keep at our place in Massachusetts which will be primarily for trails and around town. Any advice?
That color is beautiful.
Very nice. Think of getting one
i have a fx sport 5 in blue,i love it i bought it last year.
I saw their only offer 2025 Verve Gen 5 in low step configuration and cross bar one is gone. This new FX 3 looks like an old verve in design. Is there any change made to riding position to be move like Verve? Or it's the same as older FX models?
That internal cable routing 🔥
Where is the weight comparison?
Somehow I missed it in editing. The FX Gen4 is slightly heavier (within 1/2 lb to the Gen3)
@@Jamesthebikeguy thanks James,…no problem
Weight!
@@JamesthebikeguyYes, what is the weight?
@@rorystorm428425lbs
Can you please review a Giant Fastroad AR?
IMO, I preferred when the fx was more aggressive and had flat bar road bike parts, especially the old Fx sport 4 with Tiagra. This one is too gravel focused for my taste, and it encroaches on the new DS’s territory.
I agree with you 💯 1000 percent See my review of the FX2 2023
This bike was more Racey now it just Trendy
Please review the new FX sport 6 with that new sram drivetrain
Anybody considering this, unless you live in San Francisco (hill climbing!!!), I'd recommend changing out the chain ring from the stock 40T to a 42T. I tried it both ways, and I *really* like the extra high end for flat riding (rail trails, etc.). The bottom end is still MORE than easy to pedal, but with a 1x, it can be tough to get a fast/challenging/muscle-building top end. I noticed on Trek's website that other riders were dissatisfied with the upper end of the gearing also. Yes, I could go for a more traditional racing/road bike with a 2x if that really bugs me, but I like having the best of both worlds! :) Might even try a 44T down the road, but worried about the chainstay clearance. Trek says 42T is limit...
Thanks for this advice. Can you keep the crank set and just change the ring? Do you happen to have a part number or model I can search for?
@@thewhitehelmetguy I think they only changed out the ring. I remember him looking up what rings were available for that particular crank set. I'll try to remember to dig out the receipt or call the shop and see if I can give you a part number.
@@KevinQHall thanks!
@@thewhitehelmetguy Sorry took so long. Been crazy at work. This is the message I got back from the fellow at my local bike shop who installed the substitute ring:
"We were able to keep the cranks stock and used a Wolf Tooth 110 bcd 42t chainring ( part # SH11042-GR). This chainring needed a very minor amount of modification for fitment to the crank, this is normal and unpredictable without experimentation. I can go into detail if you are curious, but it's very minor file work."
Hope this helps...
@ thank you so much! I really appreciate it. Riding my bike every day I keep thinking about a 42 conversion. I now plan on making it happen. Cheers!
Unfortunately, their new axle setup for the FX series means you are stuck with Bontrager wheels if you want an upgrade.
I recently got my fx3 2022 wondering why it is 38 mm the wider wheel I can get...
James - would you get this or the new DS 3?
i like this bike but where i like it isn't available, there is instead the trek fx2 gen 3 which costs the same as domane al 2 rim brake
Did I miss the bit where you weighed it?🤔
Very nice, but I just picked up a Gen3 FX3 at a $300 discount 😁
Can this bike be ridden on dirt roads in the park (without any rock hopping)?
$1000 Trek came a long way, used to be bottom barrel freewheel for the money.
What about the weight?
From Trek website - Medium is 11,50 kg / 25.36 lbs
is there any difference between FX 3 Gen 4 and the dual sport 3 gen 5?
The FX 3 Gen 4 looks identical to the Dual Sport 3 Gen 5.
The frame is identical. The difference is a wider fork and wider tires.
what is the different between fx 3 and Chinese bike sunpeed keplar hybrid bike 2924,,there are same design,,little bit gear radiance and aluminium fork but half the price ,can it run smooth and durable ? is it OK buy Chinese bike ?
What size of the FX3 Gen 4 was this is the video medium, large, xl?I’m 5’9” but will grow to or past 6feet and was wondering what size I should get.
Large probably
Is this new FX3 the same frame now as a DS3 gen. 5.?
Yes it is. I noticed it when I went to a local Trex shop
You said "we'll get into the weight at the end" but you never did! How much does this weigh?
Giant escape 1 new release next bro
…and NO Dual Trap Sensor due to the “beef up” of the rear chain stay,…🫤🙄😰😒for that money!?🤔😯
Tiny but great improvement
The Fox isn’t a straight bar gravel bike. It’s a fitness bike unlike the Fox sport which is a hybrid of gravel with fitness.
What IS the gear range?
Cassette: Shimano Deore M4100, 11-46, 10 speed, chainring: 40T (max: 42T although I may try a 44T at some point)
@@KevinQHall Shimano CUES LG300, LINKGLIDE, 11-48, 10 speed
Fx 2 gen 4 next
Just as we thought that the shenanigans would end with internal cable routing, they bestow integrated cable routing upon us! The OEMs seem hell-bent on making it as hard for us to service our own bikes as possible, so as to drive more service, maintenance, and repair business to their own dealers and authorized distributors. For shame.
Hi, having reviewed the previous generation, which is now 300 bucks less than this generation,which one would you go for?
Depends what you value. The prior generation is a darn good bike and has the double up front. The new Gen 4 is definitely slicker, and more simple while being just as high quality. I think it's worth the extra money for CUES and the better cable routing, but that is up to you.
@@Jamesthebikeguy how different does the geometry feel, in the riding experience ? I always felt the previous fx was very endurance road bike like, how is this one ?
Still uses the dreaded proprietary through skew. That's what turned me off from FX Sport 6 that had Carbon wheelaet. It's way past time to go with a proper through axle and no walmart cranks.
@@Jamesthebikeguy are you referring to gen 2 as the double up front? the previous gen (gen 3) is a 1x chain ring like this gen 4. I too was wondering if it's still worth getting older gens, with gen 2 being cheaper than gen 3. new geometry is a major change though, but I guess we don't have info on the ride quality yet.
thanks for the great bike reviews!
I haven't tried a Gen 4, but I just bought a Gen 3 and having compared the specs, there's really not very much difference. The Gen 3 doesn't have the frame bag mounts, and has that different cable routing like he said, but in terms of specifications they're extremely comparable, the only major difference being the switch from Deore to CUES, neither of which are significantly better than the other.
It should have sealed hubs for that much money
I have recently bought dual sport 3 gen 5 but got to know about this bike, now i am repenting that why i bought dual, i think i should have gone with this
Does anyone know if this bike is fit for child seats?
Yes it will fit child seats
@@Jamesthebikeguy Thank you for the response. Do you know if it would be a front or rear seat? And the weight limitations to them?
Nice bike
Landry's: does that mean you are from MA? 👋
Have you gotten a chance to review the crux dsw yet? I am considering the crux comp or the dsw and every review of the dsw is awfulllll
Max speed with this 1 by setup?
Put a larger chainring on mine. It helps. (That being said, it's not a racing bike).
It looks like you can easily fit a 45mm tire on this bike. What’s your take on that? Great review
Can this bike go fast?
Oh yeah. Fast as you can pedal
Not a big fan of all that internal cable routing. Sure it looks clean but for DIY mechanics, internal routing is a massive PITA.
The FX is a fitness hybrid, not a carbon fibre race rocket. Serviceability makes more sense to me than the "clean aero" look. Other than that, seems like a well put together, value packed hybrid. Thanks for the review.
Excellent video! As for the FX 3, I feel like it’s a lot of money for a bike that most people who buy it will ride it around the block five times this summer and park it in the garage.
The tires are still cheap and the saddle Trek can do better Same story
Your hyping up integrated cable routing as a positive feature ahahhah.
Cables are messy and they actually stripped the paint where they touch the headset tube on my fx1, so screw external cables.
@@ProAvgeek6328 you are totally entitled to that opinion, if it works for you great. Check out helicopter tape though, works great on areas of high rub, for example cables or bike bags.
In 2 yrs trek has totally changed the FX bikes frame geometry. Why? Looks like a MTB that’s been home tweaked for the asphalt. Also trek bikes have entry level components for high end bike prices. Research & read read read. So many better bikes than trek garbage relying on a name.
Not much gears
J
Nah dont like it, gearing is too low, dont want internal cables, looks pretentious with its huge drainpipe down tube with skinny top which looks like one kick would right it off. Prefer my old Dawes hybrid 😁
You can't afford it
Over $1000 and no through axel. And it’s not like they don’t know it’s needed - that’s why they have that silly “thru-skew.”
Trek should move on.
Lots of good reasons such as; repair parts availability and cost, ease of use, cross compatibility among many others.
Don't believe the HYPE 😡.
I have been an FX owner for over 20 plus years so I consider myself a knowledgeable owner from experience.
Having said that. Here are my thoughts on the lastest FX 3.
The geometry is too relaxed for my taste. It doesn't breed performance. The bike is trendy at best. Nothing special about it
Component. Again trendy nothing cutting edge. For example 1X and the same H2 but the comp version. These tires look like a Pathfinder knock off
Ride quality. It would be equal to that of the FX 2 capable of LIGHT off road adventures .on hard packed gravel
However, not an all weather bike with those tires. Nor can it handle anything that is chucky or mud.
Acceleration, would be slower due to having to dump so many gears to gain speed
In conclusion. An FX was designed to be a flat bar road bike.wirh performance in mind. No matter the frame material..This is designed for comfort like the Verve.😡
Those are my thoughts from my combined experiences with the 7500Fx and FX2 2023
Maybe you should ride one... Having been a FX 4 owner, a FX Sport 6 owner, and now videoing the new model, I personally think it is a step in the right direction. You of course are entitled to your own opinion, but don't yell at new riders who love these changes.
@@Jamesthebikeguy James. I understand your point of view is biased
However. Since I own the original 730 (steel) along with the 7100, FX2 (2023) and have owned the 7500Fx . I am confident I know what I am talking about.
The previous versions of this bike were more road oriented in their selection of chainrings and cassette choices.
With the newer generations.Its more comfort and trendy oriented
All of these features are trendy. For example Shimano Cue, 1X 35c cable routing through head tube. Meh I could get all of that and more from Giant, specialized Kona, surly just to name a few.
My 7500 FX had xt fd, Rd and cranks along with 11x34 cassette 9 speed paired with 48,38,28 chainrings. My 730 has a 50,40,30 biopace paired with friction shifters and a 11x32 cassette.
My 730 out performs FX 2 in every way. Even can accommodate a 42c tires
So there's nothing special about the FX 3. Oh wait it has a carbon fork and weighs 22.5 lbs . Meh. Again my 7500Fx weighted 21.5 lbs
Btw I am not yelling at anyone I am just giving an honest unbiased, no BS opinion BASED ON EXPERIENCE
@tmayberry7559 The riding position of the FX is plenty aggressive for a hybrid bike. If the riding position was any more forward it would be less comfortable and you should just buy a road bike. The new gen 4 frame has been better aero over the gen 3 so it should be faster if anything. Also you're stats are nonsense. The 7500FX was weighed at 27 pounds on a review by roadbikesreview, your 21.5 lbs is BS.
@@PlayWaves1 1st let me say thank you for your comments.
2nd regarding the forward position of the FX 2 (2023) in my experience the position of the bike was not as forward as I was to, due to the sweep of the handlebars. In order to accomplish this I put on a longer stem and inverted it.
3rd I have multiple bikes. Including road ,mountain, and hybrid. I wanted the same position on each bike.this was John Tomac belief since he rode both mountain and road bikes.
4th regarding the 7500 FX it weighed 21 1/2 lb due to the Holo tech XT crankset as well as a carbon seatpost as well as a lighter seat and lighter 23 meal tires these are facts not made up numbers
In closing. Why am I explaining all of this IDK🤔. Remember opinions are like azzholes everybody's got one. Sometimes when stated they are quite smelly
Integrated cables has no reason to be on this bike
People who want a FX are not allowed to get nice things? Why are they not deserving?
Why not?