MSP is not minimum selling price, it is minimum support price, matlab ye amount ek suugestion hota hai, jis pe sirf gov. Buy krti hai crop. Private players es se km rate pe buy krte hai.. jis region me gov. Acquisition km hai vala pe msp 1800 hona k baad bhi crop 1000 pe bikto hai.. Es mein farmers ki knowledge ki problem nahi hai. Farmera esa legal gurantee banana chahta hai ki es amounts se km pe kahi bhi crop na bika
Yeh to biased tarah se hi apne discuss kar dia, yesehi lakho log road par 4-5 month se a kar nehi bathi hain. You must also discuss the negetive point of the bill jo fermers soch rahe hain ki yeh vi hoga. Same tarah se BSNL hathake JIO la dia, ab APMC hathake koe or la denge, or pura munafa wo le jayenge, MSP private sector main kiu nehi hain , ho sakta hain alag alag state main alag alag MSP de do.. do to sehi.. Nehi kal agar sab trader a gaye or bole ki 1800 KA SAMAN 600 MAIN BECHO NEHI TUM TUMAHARE PASS HI RAKKHO. to kia karoge tab.
'Minimum time maximum explanation' is your saving grace mam. i appreciate your efforts and great respect for the effort which u have made behind this informative video.
Good Explanation. However you discussed only flaws of various APMC Acts and existing practices, not how new Bills will resolve these issues (except few). You didn't discussed about new bill for agreement between farmers and sponsors, how the disputes among them will be resolved, what will be the power of courts in this regard, what if SDM is unbiased or his decision otherwise prejudice to farmers, what if produce will not match quality,grade standards, criteria (inspection will be done by sponsor and they can reject). The price can be varied and corporates are smarter than innocent farmers, and they may take undue advantage of section 5. Bargaining power of big corporates may induce individual farmers to sell their produce at lower price, no other central law prohibits it. Corporates can now stock huge in their cold storage and sell later at higher price. I appreciate that now farmers can sell their produce directly to consumers if they wish to, there revenue will be increased by 8 to 10 percent with same inputs and efforts, it means there profit will increase by about 40%. Overall, new bills and their motives are good but lacks certain critical considerations.
Sir even earlier there was no restriction on farmers to sell directly to consumer. This bills will lead set up of private mandis and middlemen will shift there because 85% of indian farmers are small and due to lack of bargaining power this will ultimately exploit farmers
@@MukeshSingh-su8ow but the current system will not remove .. Govt. Is just providing a new option for the sake of farmers. Its not binding in nature. Use some sense.
@@mayanktiwari4063 after that what about APMC ? Unka haal fr BSNL jaisa hoga Aur MSP ko renew krne ki zarurat thi sab jaante hai kuki sarkari data k hisaab se 6percent farmers ko hi MSP milta hai
MSP is not minimum selling price, it is minimum support price, matlab ye amount ek suugestion hota hai, jis pe sirf gov. Buy krti hai crop. Private players es se km rate pe buy krte hai.. jis region me gov. Acquisition km hai vala pe msp 1800 hona k baad bhi crop 1000 pe bikto hai.. Es mein farmers ki knowledge ki problem nahi hai. Farmera esa legal gurantee banana chahta hai ki es amounts se km pe kahi bhi crop na bika
You are too good to explain it. The best part of your lecture is- "Your discussion was limited to law points only. It was unbiased legal discussion"... Keep it up and. Keep sharing. Thanks.
Just realised u have studied from the college I m studying in and it makes me feel proud I know some people who have lost lives in peaceful protest....sad for that
Thankyou ma'am. The best thing about your Video is that you explained everything with respect to our constitutions law & order, statistics and also how our govt. operates & recieves tax which therefore leaves no scope of giving a biased review.
Dear mam🙏🕊🌹 आप किसी भी topic पर बोहत अच्छा समझाती हो मैन आपके sirf 2 वीडियो ही देखे है। But I am very impress with you👌 And Your way of communication is spectacular. 👍 Your inossency and qtness is Also the good qualities of your Personality🕊🙏👍 God bless you mam🌠🌠🌠🌠 YOu are the proud of india🙏🇮🇳
FROM FARMER'S DAUGHTER- PLEASE DONT MISSGUIDE.. For the record, ONLY 6% farmers GET MSP BENEFIT is not because of the lack of education for farmers. The government only acquires wheat rice and sugarcane at MSP prices. Other products like maize dalls etc. Their MSP is launched but GOV. hardly acquires them, PRIVATE agencies CAN ACQUIRE THESE PRODUCTS AT LESS THAN MSP.. THE DEMAND OF FARMERS IS TO MAKE ACQUISITION OF CROPS BELOW MSP CRIMINAL.. SHE NO WHERE MENTIONS THAT.. WE FARMERS ARE NOT ILLITERATE.. THATS THE REASON WE KNOW WHEN TO FIGHT FOR OUR RIGHTS
Yes , I am seeing this part for the first time . This is the reason some people say there's favour for some states . Punjab state gov can't get all it's money from Mandi - that is the main issue and the local government is pushing the farmers to go against the centre .
The best explanation I have ever heard! Brilliant! This should be tending. Guys get this trending. For the global public get this in English too.. even if there is closed captioning.
@@_FinologyLegal sktrnirhthjthjig she reply’s hejrhbrnrbbrnr omggg 😆 *gets excited* let me chat 💬 *chats and gets no reply’s from her* *gets sad 😢 * she-she di-didn’t r-reply *starts crying* 😭 plz replyyy
She had explained the things well but finally end up in a erroneous conclusion. Definitely there are lots of issues with current APMC systems. Bt the new acts are going to worsen the situation further. Now onwards the farmers needs to bargain with more powerful purchasers than earlier small traders. The small/medium farmers wouldn't have any bargaining power with big corporates. If the intention was to make MSP mandatory in every private transaction, why did the bills not contain a clause that the price paid to the farmer by the purchaser shall not be less than the notified MSP?. That's why lakhs of farmers are on the streets. I hope you will review your conclusion.
The e-commerce system helps in creating auction-system through price and marketing intelligence system where price will be greater than MSP. The other thing is e-commerce platform unlike APMC has no market fees thus there will be no profit cannibalism.
Recently, there have been strong protests from farmers, especially from the states of Punjab and Haryana, against three farm bills that seek to replace ordinances issued in june 2020. These bills envisage to bring change in some of the key aspects of the farm economy - trade in agricultural commodities, price assurance, farm services including contracts, and stock limits for essential commodities. These bills sought to bring much needed reforms in the agricultural marketing system such as removing restrictions of private stock holding of agricultural produce or creating trading areas free of middlemen and take the market to the farmer. However, farmers are apprehensive that the free market philosophy supported by these bills could undermine the Minimum Support Price (MSP) system and make farmers vulnerable to market forces. Note : Three Farm Bills that are bond of contention: The Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020, The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement of Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020, Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill, 2020. Intended Benefits Associated with These Bills The Bills aim to do away with government interference in agricultural trade by creating trading areas free of middlemen and government taxes outside the structure of Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs). It will allow farmers an option to sell their produce directly to these new zones, without going through the middlemen and paying levies such as mandi fees. It sought to remove stock holding limits as well as curbs on inter-State and intra-State trade, and create a framework for contract farming. Also, these bills promote the creation of Farmer Producer Organisations (FPO) on a large scale and will help in creating a farmer-friendly environment for contract farming where small players can benefit. These bills may enable private players to invest in warehousing, grading and other marketing infrastructure. A combined effect of these bills will help in creating a ‘One Nation, One Market’ for agricultural produce. Issues Raised by The Farmers & Opposition Federal Angle: The provisions in the Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020, provides for unfettered commerce in designated trade areas outside APMC jurisdictions. Apart from this, the bill empowers the Centre government to issue orders to States in furtherance of the law’s objectives. However, matters of trade and agriculture being the part of subjects on the State list, have caused resentment in States. Lack of Consultation: First the ordinance route and now the hastily attempt to pass the Bills without proper consultation adds to the mistrust among various stakeholders including farmers. Also, by allowing ‘trade zones’ to come up outside the APMC area, farmers have become apprehensive that the new system would lead to eventual exit from the minimum support price. Absence of any regulation in non-APMC mandis: Another issue that is raised by the farmers is that the proposed bills give the preference for corporate interests at the cost of farmers’ interests. In absence of any regulation in non-APMC mandis, the farmers may find it difficult to deal with Corporates, as they solely operate on the motive of profit seeking. Non-Favourable Market Conditions: While retail prices have remained high, data from the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) suggest a deceleration in farm gate prices for most agricultural produce. With rising input costs, farmers do not see the free market based framework providing them remunerative prices. These fears gain strength with the experience of States such as Bihar which abolished APMCs in 2006. After the abolition of mandis, farmers in Bihar on average received lower prices compared to the MSP for most crops. Way Forward Improve Agricultural Infrastructure to Strengthen Competition: Government should massively fund the expansion of the APMC market system, make efforts to remove trade cartels, and provide farmers good roads, logistics of scale and real time information. Empowering State Farmers Commissions: Rather than opting for heavy centralisation, the emphasis should be on empowering farmers through State Farmers Commissions recommended by the National Commission for Farmers, to bring about a speedy government response to issues. Consensus Building: The Centre should reach out to those opposing the Bills, including farmers, explain to them the need for reform, and get them on board. Conclusion Without strong institutional arrangements, the free market may harm lakhs of unorganised small farmers, who have been remarkably productive and shored up the economy even during a pandemic
Government should not allow hoarding of crops/pulses as small farmers without quantity or storage would be vulnerable. Also make MSP legally binding in Contract Farming too.
@@romilmahant2971 Tumhe 200 kilometres door jana hai kisi location pe, tum ek taxi stand pe jaoge. Agar saare taxi waale tumhe same rate bolein, jo ki tumhaare budget se zyada ho, to kya tumhaare paas koi option bachega? Paidal jaa sakte ho 200 km? Matlab ye hai ki agar corporates kisi farmer ko koi deal propose karenge tu uss farmer ke pass, APMC khatam hone ke baad, us deal ko maanne ke alawa koi option nahi hoga, chahe wo deal kitni bhi kharab deal ho.
City guys will never understand the sentiments of farmers. City guys are like birds. They move from pond to pond. But the farmers are like fish in the pond. Their life and world starts and ends in the pond.
Just tell me r u happy without this bill? Were u happy?? Was the ild apmc was very beneficial fir farmers?? Ni agents were taking money ?? Did farmer got his deserving money for the produce?? If any one also is yes i will nit support this bill. Evryone who is supporting is not a city guy buddy u just do not know whats the real reason for declining of agriculture in india
Same happened with me bro on Quora app. But those guys don't tried to understand me and just spelling namo namo. Nobody cares about Farmers whether it is a Politician or aCity guys. They just want food and don't care about farmers
@@hrutikpisal6403 tumhara kapda bata raha he tum bade Kishan ho hamare gao me chota Kishan ro raha he bada Kishan aap jese hi bol raha he simple he jese india ki 90% money 1 % ameero ke pass he ase hi ameer jyada acre jameen bala Kishan kuch aur garib Kishan dukhi he, apko ye sahi lagta he to GST kesa laga ye bhi batana jiske baad se chote business khatam hue gdp 8% se 4% par pahucha 2019 tak abhi to -24 % he, me khud Kishan hu na ki Kishan ka beta jese bade bade neta kahate phirte he
Ma'am I wouldn't say wether this bill is bad or not.. But if this bill fails & farmers suffer in the future our mainstream media will never discuss it as they are praising & discussing now
@@abhinavsharma3819 Let me conclude it better as long as BJP is in power popular media like republic Tv, Times now will not talk about this. On what basis an I saying this: its because they didn't talk about so many issues like NTPC, RRB, JEE and for a long time they didn't show about farmer protest as well, mainstream media as became a place for hate speech rather than a place of genuine news.
this Bill Is To Force GMOs In India ..Through Contract farming , Government is Just a Puppet To get The Control Over seeds and Our Health Search This on You Tube 1. >
I am requesting to all farmers plz. Plz. Read these three ordinances of farm bill. This farm bill will benefit the farmers. plz don't believe on political or farmers leaders rumors. Farm bill is providing you choices and Read it and then react. Specially punjab people plz read and don't take this protest on your ego.🇮🇳
Bro actually they take time to understand bill nd congress and other opposition take it as an opportunity to narrate there own story and create violence in country just like CAA and jammu kashmir stuff. And every time aam aadmi got effected.
Here want to conclude from stats mentioned in video 1. Check the money distribution to states from GOI, Punjab is in the list of developed states having very well established APMC architecture, But on the other side look at Bihar where np APMC So how anyone can say removing APMC will give the better opportunities to farmers 2. What about the 1750Cr or respective amount for State Govts? 3. Only 6% people getting MSP, so means need to improve MSP providing architecture which is feasible with APMC architecture or LAW
We are not convinced by the politicians We are convinced by the prices of our produce we are getting The crop(rice) which would sell for 3000-4000 per quintal is now selling for 1100-1600 whic you can cleart see is very is not even half of it Also guarantee to MSP ( for 22 crops) is said by the government but it is not being provided even for the crops they are saying Also the third law which removes the limit of storage was never for farmers as setting up cold storage is very expensive and to acquire license you ought to have very good Connection with politicians of the ruling party therefore it was clearly meant for industrialist Last and the most important thing of this protest is that if there are private players in it there will be no monitoring the MRP of crops so even if they provide MSP to farmers the new farm bill be problematic for lower and middle class of our country
@@vitaminprotein2309 yes those are the concerns we are talking about, now they will call us anti modi, even without any ground reality. Even , I am supporter for him in many cases, but not for this. And Galat ko Galat hi kehna chahiye,
@@vitaminprotein2309 According to my knowledge of this bill, it will work as below mentioned way. Please correct me if i am wrong. I am here to learn more about this bill. You look like have some knowledge regarding this, hence i am sharing this with u. If corporate enters in this field, the price of the product will be fixed before production. So if farmer thinks offered price is not good enough then he can tell the corporate, he will produce something else. As on season and off season product price is difference. So the corporate have to bid some thing in between. Like on season per quintal rice price is 1100-1600 but in off season it is 3000-4000 quintal. If the price is known by farmer before he produce something. Then there will be less risk of loss.
The information is lacking and in a way biased , you need to find answers to points raised below Madam ne sirf purane laws samjhaye , lekin new bills k barre maen kuch bola hi nhi ...🤔 Chlo aap hi bta do Madam ji eplained it legaly ,now as a farmer of punjab allow me to explain it at ground level So lets begin point by point My first point is that out of 3 bills you only explained about 1 bill , what about other 2, so i thought it as my moral duty to explains others too 1. The Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill Ek baar ek time aesa aya jbb pyaaz ka rate bdd kr 120 rupee kilo ho gya , toh tbb ek baat uthi ki iska karan hae kalabazari , jmakhori ya fir stocking of product , tbb bola gya ki agar mehngayi se bachna hae toh stocking khatm krni chahiye sarkar ko orr hum log uchhal uchhal k support kr rhe the , lekin abb NEW BILL k according corporate and private stickist jitni chahe jma khori kr skte haen , lekin state sarkar jo stock jma krti thi taki time aane pe usko market maen liquify krke use kiya ja ske taki mehngayi ko control rakha ja ske woh provision khatm krdi new bill maen , abbb mujhe yeh nhi samj ata ki logo ka ya kisano ka isme kya fayda , isme indirectly kaunse sector ka fayda hae yeh sochne valli baat hae 🤔... Kahi modi sarkar apnr financial favour k chakkar maen kisi specific sector jaese corporate thugg sector ko benifit ya favour toh nhi de rhi ... Yeg madam aap duscuss krna bhool gye 2. The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020 Pehle farmers apni jamern ya kisi ki jameen theke pe leke kheti krte the or jo bhi produce hota tha usko sell krke apna ghar chlate the , lekin theke pe private ya corporate sector nhi ghus skta tha, mtlb ki agar corporate sector ko buy krna hae kuch toh woh kisan ki produce ko bikne k baad khareed skta hae naki khud theke pe uga ya ugva skta hae kuch bhi , abb kya hoga ki suppose ek bda corporate player hae eg. Reliance group toh woh kya krega ki 1000 chotte kisano se 1-2 acre zameen contract pe lega or usme aoni mrzi ki fasl ugvayega , or uske pass maen 200 kisan haen jo apni apni 1-2 acre zameen maen kheti krenge or jb fasal ko bechne ka time ayega toh jo toh contractor jisko apne liye khud k use k liye specific fasal chahiye hogi woh doosre kisano se lene ki bjaye khud apni contract farming valli fasal use krega or market se kisano ki ugayi huyi fasal woh kyu kharredega agar market se woh khareedega bhi toh usko jo theek lgge ussi rate oe khareedega kyuki MSP ki assurity toh inn bills maen hae hi nhi , isme marrega kaun *gareeb kisan* , or benifit kaun lega cirporate sector valla contractor , sochne ki baat hae🤔 Isi ka ek doosra scenario leke chlte haen Lets say ki agar koi corporate player contract farming 2000 acre maen kr rha hae , jisko na toh apne ghar ka kharcha nikalna hae naa hi zameen khareedne ka paesa lgana hae , sirf per acre benifit nikalna hae , itne badde level pe suppose agar farming cost 900 rupee ayi per acre or corporate player ne apni 2000 acre ki fasal bechni hae or usne doosre corporate company ko 1000 per acre maen bech di toh 18 lakh ki investment krke usko 20 lakh mill gye lekin uss fasal ka market value set ho gya 1000 jabki uska MSP hoga 1300 ya 1500 lekin kyuki abb mandi nhi hae , MSP nhi hae toh jo 200 chotte kisan haen unko wohi fasal obviously km market value maen bechni pdegi yani k jha ek chotte kisaan ko 3000 milne the jisse usne apne ghar ko chalana tha, bachho ko padana tha , beti ki shadi krni thi wahi usko millege 2000 or yeh jo impact hae chotte kisan pe yeh bohat hi jyada brutal hoga Abb isi act ka doosra provision suniye , woh kehta hae ki cobtractor kisaan ki zameen girvi rkh k uspe loan le skta hae , suppose koi cobtractor jis company ko kisan nhi jante woh 2000 kisano ki zameen ko contract farming k bahane se leta hae , fir uspe loan leta hae or vijay malya ki tra desh se bhag jata hae toh uski marr kisko pdegi , woh loan chukayega kaun , kisaan ya bank , effect kisko hoga dedh ko , or benifit kiska hoga sochne ki baat hae🤔 Abb isi bill ki ek orr provision jo kehti hae k kisan contract farming k liye normal legal system ka use nhi kr skta , iske liye alag channel hoga SDM level ka ,yeh provision ka matlab kya hae samj nhi atta ki sarkar ko kya problem kisan ke judicial system ko ise krne se , kahi iska readon yeh toh nhi ki judicial system independent hita hae , lekin administrative system jaese ki SDM , DC , police yeh sarkar , politicians or ameer corporate sectors k under hotte haen , kahi yeh indirectly kisaan ko apahij or system ko corrupt banane ki sajish toh nhi ... Sochne ki baat hae🤔 Aur ek baat hae ki bill is baised as it could be termenated by contracter anytime but farmer cant terminate it Why?Kisan k haq maen bill pr power contractor ko Sochne ki baat hae 🤔 Rahi baat toh Why farmers of haryana and punjab are protsating Instead aap k according toh state governments should protest Abb maen yeh dono points sabhi ko forward kr rha hoon , lekin abhi ek farm bill baki hae jiske flaws madam jitne achge se toh nhi lekin maen explain jroor kroga next comment maen , jisne yeh comment pda orr third bill k flaws janna chahta hae woh next comment ko read krle ....kyuki jusne yeh comment poora pda woh doosra bhi pdd lega Dhanyavad and do read comment by SK T....
hey brother bhaut hi achaa samjhaaya aapne , plzz ese hi logo ko jaagrook kijiye taaki logon ko pata chal sake bjp kitna bada dhoka kar rhi hai kisaano ke saath
You did tell us how farmers were affected by the APMC act.. Very nice.. (Yeh to sabhko pata chal gaya hai) But when did you list out the benefits of the new farm bills..?? (Bills ke fayde kyu nahi bata rahi hai govt)
No wonder the girl covered good information but she only narrated one side of coin. Her title is wrong firstly as it only sounded like she’s 100% supporting new bills and is only narrating flaws of previous APMC system. 1. Yes, the current APMC system needs reforms, but why she didn’t covered flaws/ negative side of new bills? 2. Why she did not mention the involvement and benefits of corporates? 3. Why she didn’t mention that even though the three bills are already executed in numerous states and on numerous crops, yet why states like Bihar’s Agricultural system got worsened? 4. Why Bihar farmers come to Punjab and Haryana to sell their crops? 5. Why it’s believed that all farmers are damn illiterate and needs education? This protest includes educators, teachers and every sector of Indian population. This is incomplete information.
You seriously think the only problem with the bill is tax acquisition🤦♀️I’m from a farming family and I’m doing llb.These are death warrents for us.Born in a farming family and you’ll realise the differences
Hey mam!! Your lectures are so interesting. I suggest FL team, especially priya mam to start lecture series on Indian National movement and Indian constitution... Good luck
FROM FARMER'S DAUGHTER- PLEASE DONT MISSGUIDE.. For the record, ONLY 6% farmers GET MSP BENEFIT is not because of the lack of education for farmers. The government only acquires wheat rice and sugarcane at MSP prices. Other products like maize dalls etc. Their MSP is launched but GOV. hardly acquires them, PRIVATE agencies CAN ACQUIRE THESE PRODUCTS AT LESS THAN MSP.. THE DEMAND OF FARMERS IS TO MAKE ACQUISITION OF CROPS BELOW MSP CRIMINAL.. SHE NO WHERE MENTIONS THAT.. WE FARMERS ARE NOT ILLITERATE.. THATS THE REASON WE KNOW WHEN TO FIGHT FOR OUR RIGHTS
I heard a very interesting analogy today, A 10 floor building did not have a lift, so people had problem climbing up and down. Specially the elderly and the kids, so the society started exploring options. Finally they got some donkeys, who could carry people up and down. The donkey owners would charge people for carrying them up and down for a fee and would also pay 10% to the society from the revenue they earned. It was a very happy situation for all involved. After sometime the society management changed, the new management decided to install a lift for carrying people up and down. All hell broke loose and everyone started protesting, this is not fair, society will loose revenue, the donkey owners will be jobless and no food for them (human rights issue), the donkeys will be worthless (animals rights issue), all were angry. Society management clarified, the lift is available to all but the gentlemen who wanted to use the donkeys could still do it. But no, the agitation continued and so finally the new management had to succumb to the pressure. The final arrangement was arrived and so anyone who wanted to climb the building could still use the donkey. The donkey would carry a person, go in the lift and carry people up & down. All were happy. Disclaimer: any resemblance of this with the farmers agitation is a coincidence.
FROM FARMER'S DAUGHTER- PLEASE DONT MISSGUIDE.. For the record, ONLY 6% farmers GET MSP BENEFIT is not because of the lack of education for farmers. The government only acquires wheat rice and sugarcane at MSP prices. Other products like maize dalls etc. Their MSP is launched but GOV. hardly acquires them, PRIVATE agencies CAN ACQUIRE THESE PRODUCTS AT LESS THAN MSP.. THE DEMAND OF FARMERS IS TO MAKE ACQUISITION OF CROPS BELOW MSP CRIMINAL.. SHE NO WHERE MENTIONS THAT.. WE FARMERS ARE NOT ILLITERATE.. THATS THE REASON WE KNOW WHEN TO FIGHT FOR RIGHTS
@Vicky Sandhu ye farmers double income by 2022 target ko achieve karne ke liye aab kux bhi kiya jaa raha hai. Pata nahi 5 trillion economy ke liye kaunsa bramha Astra chalane wale hai sarkar. Target achivement ke liye kux bhi kar sakte hai. Anyway thanks for your ground report.
this Bill Is To Force GMOs In India ..Through Contract farming , Government is Just a Puppet To get The Control Over seeds and Our Health Search This on You Tube 1. >
Modi is rejecting the earlier setup installed by earlier govt regimes. . 1) Playing of role in External Domain: Food Corporation of India was established with the same intention which Modi is now propagating with this new farm bill. . The problem of farmers is that they can not store their output. It is very difficult to do sorting, cleaning, packaging etc, transport to other markets where they can get more price. . Farmers can not do this extra job, they need helping-services. Farmers need warehouses for storing, materials and tools for processing & packaging, transportation help to bring their product to the warehouse and send it to the market for sale. . FCI has not built enough well developed storage houses, packaging, transportation setups where farmers can hire those services so that they can sell their products to prospective buyers when there is a right price for their end-products. . Modi is becoming an assistant to businessmen, not as an assistant to farmers.
this Bill Is To Force GMOs In India ..Through Contract farming , To get The Control Over seeds and Our Health ,Government is Just a Puppet Search This on You Tube 1. >
Srivathsan...understood bhai...what Raga meant was ki hum log food processing industry lagayenge....but yeh industry govt PSU lagayegi ya koi pvt company jaise ke pepsico...cocacola...Ambani Adani lagayenge.....??
There are few things that you could have explained as well like what impact these bills will have in future, an example of similar thing happened in past, why this approach failed in western countries, and how Bihar is doing now since they have implemented these laws in past. I am not a farmer and not biased either but see the long term impact of these bills on them clearly.
Beautiful video. Finally someone explained it so clearly for people who don't know the political terms and are not able to understand the law by reading it.
FROM FARMER'S DAUGHTER- PLEASE DONT MISSGUIDE.. For the record, ONLY 6% farmers GET MSP BENEFIT is not because of the lack of education for farmers. The government only acquires wheat rice and sugarcane at MSP prices. Other products like maize dalls etc. Their MSP is launched but GOV. hardly acquires them, PRIVATE agencies CAN ACQUIRE THESE PRODUCTS AT LESS THAN MSP.. THE DEMAND OF FARMERS IS TO MAKE ACQUISITION OF CROPS BELOW MSP CRIMINAL.. SHE NO WHERE MENTIONS THAT.. WE FARMERS ARE NOT ILLITERATE.. THATS THE REASON WE KNOW WHEN TO FIGHT FOR rights
Recently, there have been strong protests from farmers, especially from the states of Punjab and Haryana, against three farm bills that seek to replace ordinances issued in june 2020. These bills envisage to bring change in some of the key aspects of the farm economy - trade in agricultural commodities, price assurance, farm services including contracts, and stock limits for essential commodities. These bills sought to bring much needed reforms in the agricultural marketing system such as removing restrictions of private stock holding of agricultural produce or creating trading areas free of middlemen and take the market to the farmer. However, farmers are apprehensive that the free market philosophy supported by these bills could undermine the Minimum Support Price (MSP) system and make farmers vulnerable to market forces. Note : Three Farm Bills that are bond of contention: The Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020, The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement of Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020, Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill, 2020. Intended Benefits Associated with These Bills The Bills aim to do away with government interference in agricultural trade by creating trading areas free of middlemen and government taxes outside the structure of Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs). It will allow farmers an option to sell their produce directly to these new zones, without going through the middlemen and paying levies such as mandi fees. It sought to remove stock holding limits as well as curbs on inter-State and intra-State trade, and create a framework for contract farming. Also, these bills promote the creation of Farmer Producer Organisations (FPO) on a large scale and will help in creating a farmer-friendly environment for contract farming where small players can benefit. These bills may enable private players to invest in warehousing, grading and other marketing infrastructure. A combined effect of these bills will help in creating a ‘One Nation, One Market’ for agricultural produce. Issues Raised by The Farmers & Opposition Federal Angle: The provisions in the Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020, provides for unfettered commerce in designated trade areas outside APMC jurisdictions. Apart from this, the bill empowers the Centre government to issue orders to States in furtherance of the law’s objectives. However, matters of trade and agriculture being the part of subjects on the State list, have caused resentment in States. Lack of Consultation: First the ordinance route and now the hastily attempt to pass the Bills without proper consultation adds to the mistrust among various stakeholders including farmers. Also, by allowing ‘trade zones’ to come up outside the APMC area, farmers have become apprehensive that the new system would lead to eventual exit from the minimum support price. Absence of any regulation in non-APMC mandis: Another issue that is raised by the farmers is that the proposed bills give the preference for corporate interests at the cost of farmers’ interests. In absence of any regulation in non-APMC mandis, the farmers may find it difficult to deal with Corporates, as they solely operate on the motive of profit seeking. Non-Favourable Market Conditions: While retail prices have remained high, data from the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) suggest a deceleration in farm gate prices for most agricultural produce. With rising input costs, farmers do not see the free market based framework providing them remunerative prices. These fears gain strength with the experience of States such as Bihar which abolished APMCs in 2006. After the abolition of mandis, farmers in Bihar on average received lower prices compared to the MSP for most crops. Way Forward Improve Agricultural Infrastructure to Strengthen Competition: Government should massively fund the expansion of the APMC market system, make efforts to remove trade cartels, and provide farmers good roads, logistics of scale and real time information. Empowering State Farmers Commissions: Rather than opting for heavy centralisation, the emphasis should be on empowering farmers through State Farmers Commissions recommended by the National Commission for Farmers, to bring about a speedy government response to issues. Consensus Building: The Centre should reach out to those opposing the Bills, including farmers, explain to them the need for reform, and get them on board. Conclusion Without strong institutional arrangements, the free market may harm lakhs of unorganised small farmers, who have been remarkably productive and shored up the economy even during a pandemic
Now farmers have two ways to sell their produce, one at APMCs and Another Outside Of APMCs. If the private traders won't give MSP to the farmers they have to choose APMC (only for 23 yields). And here education and awareness is necessary for farmers, because private traders have high knowledge of negotiation when compare to farmers, so farmers need to aware of market in their areas. And I think MSP to be made a legal right, so the small margin farmers won't get exploited by big traders.
@swarup mitra yeah I know APMC is, But now farmer have the chance to choose and compare the prices, If the MSP is a legal right, farmer have the chance to ask APMC, when they(APMC) don't give at MSP. Because APMCs Are under state govts.
@@dracharya5037 FROM FARMER'S DAUGHTER- PLEASE DONT MISSGUIDE.. For the record, ONLY 6% farmers GET MSP BENEFIT is not because of the lack of education for farmers. The government only acquires wheat rice and sugarcane at MSP prices. Other products like maize dalls etc. Their MSP is launched but GOV. hardly acquires them, PRIVATE agencies CAN ACQUIRE THESE PRODUCTS AT LESS THAN MSP.. THE DEMAND OF FARMERS IS TO MAKE ACQUISITION OF CROPS BELOW MSP CRIMINAL.. SHE NO WHERE MENTIONS THAT.. WE FARMERS ARE NOT ILLITERATE.. THATS THE REASON WE KNOW WHEN TO FIGHT FOR OUR RIGHTS
this Bill Is To Force GMOs In India ..Through Contract farming , To get The Control Over seeds and Our Health ,Government is Just a Puppet Search This on You Tube 1. >
I think many farmer leaders will see this video and then conclude. Didi, you had made an amazing video for us to understand this chaotic protest of farm laws.
Who buys maximum wheat from farmers? FCI Where does maximum wheat damage सड़ता है? FCI Who buys this damaged wheat? Alcohol makers, food processor How is Alcohol consumption in Punjab? BINDAS Which ministry does HarsimratBadal always take? Food processing Hmmmmmmmm
I Feel that All School Students, All IIT Students, All AIIMS Students, All Engineering Students, All Agriculture Engineering Students, All IAS OFFICERS, ALL NRI'S and All Military officers and Soldiers must tell their stand on Farmers BILL and must explain why they took that stand.
I'm from IIT R. This word middle man middle man is very hyped. My family paid my fees cuz of agriculture. Apmc aren't in bihar ,assam why farmers aren't able to get the correct price from pvt sectors? Punjab haryana apmc are very efficient and farmers gets paid at MSP on paddy. See pvt engineering college btech they are working at 8k in metro cities. How one can convince our farmer that aren't educated and hold less than 2 acres of land. Farmers were expecting govt to make Apmc more stronger and transparent and strong will to make sure msp is implemented on majority of crops. All these points which she is telling in videos are very good to write in upsc exams but factually very inaccurate and not possible to implement in India
Every sector has it's own supply system but sadly, none are quite transparent. If the existing system is exploitative (which actually is) then Govt should bring in reforms rather than straight scrapping it. When big supply chain companies will become the players, what is the guarantee that they will sell at a reduced price? They will show there range of sophisticated supply chain in their audits and add the cost. Final consumers will suffer anyway.
Consumer and even farmer...they will own the farmer and enslave them.. ask them to grow what they want by hoarding some items for creating demand and then selling for higher prices...inflation in the market will make common man survival harder..
How they are scraping it , clearly they have given a option to farmers to sell there crops outside the mandis , it's not mandatory you free to sell in Apmc if they are giving you better prices than market
I agree that private participation in agriculture is need of the hour as it will bring infrastructure and technology . But farmers fears are also true bcoz in India 85% farmers own 2 or less than hectares, they don't have power to bargain. A proper mechanism to safeguard the interests of farmers must be set up by bringing a specific legislation. Elders farmers can be illiterate, but young and educated farmers have been spearheading this protests . So u can't dismiss their concerns by saying they are illiterate and unaware. No they are educated and know how to defend their rights.
Many states are encouraging FPOs Or Farm Producers Organization for collective bargaining and producing economies of scale jiske kam zameen wale kisaan apni collective kheti and contract kr paye. This will also act as a protection against legal proceedings in any case.
@Shaurya Kumar bro in Kerala for there is strong grass root level procurement system in place for paddy and copra, the two crops eligible for assistance from the Centre under the MSP regime. To weed out middle men and protect small farmers in the markets, Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation (SUPPLYCO), along with different cooperative institutions and local self-government institutions procure rice, vegetables and fruits.
@Shaurya Kumar So are the farmers from here getting the best price for their produce. In Bihar the farmers have not prospered after this abolishment. Why do the people move out looking for other jobs in other states instead of doing farming in Bihar if it's was that much good.
Sorry.. to break your heart.. but she is giving wrong information.. farmers are demandinv to make MSP compulsary, cz at present only 6% of products are acquired at msp by gov. The private traders acquire product af much less rate.. farmers KNOW OF MSP .
DO YOU KNOW? She steered clear of real torment of the farmers....Her idea is to inststigate you against the state gov. rather than to focus on the real culprit in the current scenario....
The information is lacking and in a way biased , you need to find answers to points raised below Madam ne sirf purane laws samjhaye , lekin new bills k barre maen kuch bola hi nhi ...🤔 Chlo aap hi bta do Madam ji eplained it legaly ,now as a farmer of punjab allow me to explain it at ground level So lets begin point by point My first point is that out of 3 bills you only explained about 1 bill , what about other 2, so i thought it as my moral duty to explains others too 1. The Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill Ek baar ek time aesa aya jbb pyaaz ka rate bdd kr 120 rupee kilo ho gya , toh tbb ek baat uthi ki iska karan hae kalabazari , jmakhori ya fir stocking of product , tbb bola gya ki agar mehngayi se bachna hae toh stocking khatm krni chahiye sarkar ko orr hum log uchhal uchhal k support kr rhe the , lekin abb NEW BILL k according corporate and private stickist jitni chahe jma khori kr skte haen , lekin state sarkar jo stock jma krti thi taki time aane pe usko market maen liquify krke use kiya ja ske taki mehngayi ko control rakha ja ske woh provision khatm krdi new bill maen , abbb mujhe yeh nhi samj ata ki logo ka ya kisano ka isme kya fayda , isme indirectly kaunse sector ka fayda hae yeh sochne valli baat hae 🤔... Kahi modi sarkar apnr financial favour k chakkar maen kisi specific sector jaese corporate thugg sector ko benifit ya favour toh nhi de rhi ... Yeg madam aap duscuss krna bhool gye 2. The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020 Pehle farmers apni jamern ya kisi ki jameen theke pe leke kheti krte the or jo bhi produce hota tha usko sell krke apna ghar chlate the , lekin theke pe private ya corporate sector nhi ghus skta tha, mtlb ki agar corporate sector ko buy krna hae kuch toh woh kisan ki produce ko bikne k baad khareed skta hae naki khud theke pe uga ya ugva skta hae kuch bhi , abb kya hoga ki suppose ek bda corporate player hae eg. Reliance group toh woh kya krega ki 1000 chotte kisano se 1-2 acre zameen contract pe lega or usme aoni mrzi ki fasl ugvayega , or uske pass maen 200 kisan haen jo apni apni 1-2 acre zameen maen kheti krenge or jb fasal ko bechne ka time ayega toh jo toh contractor jisko apne liye khud k use k liye specific fasal chahiye hogi woh doosre kisano se lene ki bjaye khud apni contract farming valli fasal use krega or market se kisano ki ugayi huyi fasal woh kyu kharredega agar market se woh khareedega bhi toh usko jo theek lgge ussi rate oe khareedega kyuki MSP ki assurity toh inn bills maen hae hi nhi , isme marrega kaun *gareeb kisan* , or benifit kaun lega cirporate sector valla contractor , sochne ki baat hae🤔 Isi ka ek doosra scenario leke chlte haen Lets say ki agar koi corporate player contract farming 2000 acre maen kr rha hae , jisko na toh apne ghar ka kharcha nikalna hae naa hi zameen khareedne ka paesa lgana hae , sirf per acre benifit nikalna hae , itne badde level pe suppose agar farming cost 900 rupee ayi per acre or corporate player ne apni 2000 acre ki fasal bechni hae or usne doosre corporate company ko 1000 per acre maen bech di toh 18 lakh ki investment krke usko 20 lakh mill gye lekin uss fasal ka market value set ho gya 1000 jabki uska MSP hoga 1300 ya 1500 lekin kyuki abb mandi nhi hae , MSP nhi hae toh jo 200 chotte kisan haen unko wohi fasal obviously km market value maen bechni pdegi yani k jha ek chotte kisaan ko 3000 milne the jisse usne apne ghar ko chalana tha, bachho ko padana tha , beti ki shadi krni thi wahi usko millege 2000 or yeh jo impact hae chotte kisan pe yeh bohat hi jyada brutal hoga Abb isi act ka doosra provision suniye , woh kehta hae ki cobtractor kisaan ki zameen girvi rkh k uspe loan le skta hae , suppose koi cobtractor jis company ko kisan nhi jante woh 2000 kisano ki zameen ko contract farming k bahane se leta hae , fir uspe loan leta hae or vijay malya ki tra desh se bhag jata hae toh uski marr kisko pdegi , woh loan chukayega kaun , kisaan ya bank , effect kisko hoga dedh ko , or benifit kiska hoga sochne ki baat hae🤔 Abb isi bill ki ek orr provision jo kehti hae k kisan contract farming k liye normal legal system ka use nhi kr skta , iske liye alag channel hoga SDM level ka ,yeh provision ka matlab kya hae samj nhi atta ki sarkar ko kya problem kisan ke judicial system ko ise krne se , kahi iska readon yeh toh nhi ki judicial system independent hita hae , lekin administrative system jaese ki SDM , DC , police yeh sarkar , politicians or ameer corporate sectors k under hotte haen , kahi yeh indirectly kisaan ko apahij or system ko corrupt banane ki sajish toh nhi ... Sochne ki baat hae🤔 Aur ek baat hae ki bill is baised as it could be termenated by contracter anytime but farmer cant terminate it Why?Kisan k haq maen bill pr power contractor ko Sochne ki baat hae 🤔 Rahi baat toh Why farmers of haryana and punjab are protsating Instead aap k according toh state governments should protest Abb maen yeh dono points sabhi ko forward kr rha hoon , lekin abhi ek farm bill baki hae jiske flaws madam jitne achge se toh nhi lekin maen explain jroor kroga next comment maen , jisne yeh comment pda orr third bill k flaws janna chahta hae woh next comment ko read krle ....kyuki jusne yeh comment poora pda woh doosra bhi pdd lega Dhanyavad and do read comment by SK T..
I loved the way you presented this content. Must have taken a lot of efforts. Please keep doing more such informative/meaningful stuff. And also wish your channel gets the kind of traction it deserves. 👍
The information is lacking and in a way biased , you need to find answers to points raised below Madam ne sirf purane laws samjhaye , lekin new bills k barre maen kuch bola hi nhi ...🤔 Chlo aap hi bta do Madam ji eplained it legaly ,now as a farmer of punjab allow me to explain it at ground level So lets begin point by point My first point is that out of 3 bills you only explained about 1 bill , what about other 2, so i thought it as my moral duty to explains others too 1. The Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill Ek baar ek time aesa aya jbb pyaaz ka rate bdd kr 120 rupee kilo ho gya , toh tbb ek baat uthi ki iska karan hae kalabazari , jmakhori ya fir stocking of product , tbb bola gya ki agar mehngayi se bachna hae toh stocking khatm krni chahiye sarkar ko orr hum log uchhal uchhal k support kr rhe the , lekin abb NEW BILL k according corporate and private stickist jitni chahe jma khori kr skte haen , lekin state sarkar jo stock jma krti thi taki time aane pe usko market maen liquify krke use kiya ja ske taki mehngayi ko control rakha ja ske woh provision khatm krdi new bill maen , abbb mujhe yeh nhi samj ata ki logo ka ya kisano ka isme kya fayda , isme indirectly kaunse sector ka fayda hae yeh sochne valli baat hae 🤔... Kahi modi sarkar apnr financial favour k chakkar maen kisi specific sector jaese corporate thugg sector ko benifit ya favour toh nhi de rhi ... Yeg madam aap duscuss krna bhool gye 2. The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020 Pehle farmers apni jamern ya kisi ki jameen theke pe leke kheti krte the or jo bhi produce hota tha usko sell krke apna ghar chlate the , lekin theke pe private ya corporate sector nhi ghus skta tha, mtlb ki agar corporate sector ko buy krna hae kuch toh woh kisan ki produce ko bikne k baad khareed skta hae naki khud theke pe uga ya ugva skta hae kuch bhi , abb kya hoga ki suppose ek bda corporate player hae eg. Reliance group toh woh kya krega ki 1000 chotte kisano se 1-2 acre zameen contract pe lega or usme aoni mrzi ki fasl ugvayega , or uske pass maen 200 kisan haen jo apni apni 1-2 acre zameen maen kheti krenge or jb fasal ko bechne ka time ayega toh jo toh contractor jisko apne liye khud k use k liye specific fasal chahiye hogi woh doosre kisano se lene ki bjaye khud apni contract farming valli fasal use krega or market se kisano ki ugayi huyi fasal woh kyu kharredega agar market se woh khareedega bhi toh usko jo theek lgge ussi rate oe khareedega kyuki MSP ki assurity toh inn bills maen hae hi nhi , isme marrega kaun *gareeb kisan* , or benifit kaun lega cirporate sector valla contractor , sochne ki baat hae🤔 Isi ka ek doosra scenario leke chlte haen Lets say ki agar koi corporate player contract farming 2000 acre maen kr rha hae , jisko na toh apne ghar ka kharcha nikalna hae naa hi zameen khareedne ka paesa lgana hae , sirf per acre benifit nikalna hae , itne badde level pe suppose agar farming cost 900 rupee ayi per acre or corporate player ne apni 2000 acre ki fasal bechni hae or usne doosre corporate company ko 1000 per acre maen bech di toh 18 lakh ki investment krke usko 20 lakh mill gye lekin uss fasal ka market value set ho gya 1000 jabki uska MSP hoga 1300 ya 1500 lekin kyuki abb mandi nhi hae , MSP nhi hae toh jo 200 chotte kisan haen unko wohi fasal obviously km market value maen bechni pdegi yani k jha ek chotte kisaan ko 3000 milne the jisse usne apne ghar ko chalana tha, bachho ko padana tha , beti ki shadi krni thi wahi usko millege 2000 or yeh jo impact hae chotte kisan pe yeh bohat hi jyada brutal hoga Abb isi act ka doosra provision suniye , woh kehta hae ki cobtractor kisaan ki zameen girvi rkh k uspe loan le skta hae , suppose koi cobtractor jis company ko kisan nhi jante woh 2000 kisano ki zameen ko contract farming k bahane se leta hae , fir uspe loan leta hae or vijay malya ki tra desh se bhag jata hae toh uski marr kisko pdegi , woh loan chukayega kaun , kisaan ya bank , effect kisko hoga dedh ko , or benifit kiska hoga sochne ki baat hae🤔 Abb isi bill ki ek orr provision jo kehti hae k kisan contract farming k liye normal legal system ka use nhi kr skta , iske liye alag channel hoga SDM level ka ,yeh provision ka matlab kya hae samj nhi atta ki sarkar ko kya problem kisan ke judicial system ko ise krne se , kahi iska readon yeh toh nhi ki judicial system independent hita hae , lekin administrative system jaese ki SDM , DC , police yeh sarkar , politicians or ameer corporate sectors k under hotte haen , kahi yeh indirectly kisaan ko apahij or system ko corrupt banane ki sajish toh nhi ... Sochne ki baat hae🤔 Aur ek baat hae ki bill is baised as it could be termenated by contracter anytime but farmer cant terminate it Why?Kisan k haq maen bill pr power contractor ko Sochne ki baat hae 🤔 Rahi baat toh Why farmers of haryana and punjab are protsating Instead aap k according toh state governments should protest Abb maen yeh dono points sabhi ko forward kr rha hoon , lekin abhi ek farm bill baki hae jiske flaws madam jitne achge se toh nhi lekin maen explain jroor kroga next comment maen , jisne yeh comment pda orr third bill k flaws janna chahta hae woh next comment ko read krle ....kyuki jusne yeh comment poora pda woh doosra bhi pdd lega Dhanyavad and do read comment by SK T..
@@parmjitkaursandhu1336 yes u r correct (law is not express at every point some things and exception to rule are implied thereto) lol being law student need u remind u laws are there ,government made it but it will be fully correct 😅 it's not possible after all humans are drafting it but finallality lies in FR in same as examples of passport act
Passport act manika gandhi s case supreme court s strict supervision over lose lows or inconsistent laws yes there is some kind of provision in second bill but remember the rule of justifiability of law lies there second point laws are good with bad provision or inconsistent to framers right doesn't means whole law is worng it's law. law can be declared null and void upto the inconsistency it is creating with farmers or anyone's right
Hey... you are an awesome inspiration. I study you immensely. I get to know things about India almost at first hand. This is grand. I hope one day I can live in India, at least after I retire, and I want to talk with the matters concerning India with some background knowledge. You have informed me so well. My blessings and support.
She has given you wrong information.. only 6% of farmers produce is acquired at MSP. Not cz of their lack of education.. its because only giv.acquires at MSP, the private traders they buy at less than MSP.. farmers are agitating to make MSP compulsary for any purchase to be made from farmers.
this Bill Is To Force GMOs In India ..Through Contract farming , To get The Control Over seeds and Our Health ,Government is Just a Puppet Search This on You Tube 1. Genetic Roulette The Gamble of Our Lives
2. Bill Gates and his plans for world's future - Real Eyes 3. Modi government के farm bill के उन दिक्कतों की बात जिसने America-Europe में पहले से तबाही मचा रखी है
@@kabeerkabeer3285 ooo angrez ki ulad Angrez jo lakho baar m kr pae h vo hm Hindustanion ne ek baar m kia h . West ka example dena band kro Or aap hi dekho in Librandu media ko Hme to Bhartiya hone pr fakr h😎😎
@@MeenuKumari-hy2sl o madam ji Thori si apni dharamvaad , jaativadd K zehar se bhari hui Soch ko full stop lgao or apne desh k logo k liye sochna shuru kro thora logically , ek tarf toh apko duniya se mukabla krna hae or doosri tarf aap glbalisation se drte ho , koi ek criteria toh accept kro , dont be hypocratic but a factual person
Mam you should add the procedure of farmers to private sector. How they will decide price of crops and what will be the security of farmers. It is good that government is deciding msp but how if private will decide. Think about it..thank you
She is missguiding please cross check the facts regarding MSP.. and farmers demands for making MSP compulsary.. farmers are well awair of MSP. But in states without mandis private traders buy products at rate much less than MSP
Question: Note: I had all these questions after I read about these bills from multiple news outlets, feel free to point out if I'm wrong about any of them 1. in case of dispute farmers cannot go to civil court, is that correct? and if yes then isn't that bad 2. farmers will have to pay a fee when they sell in mandi (just like it is right now) but if they choose to sell outside of mandi then they will not get charged anything, don't you think that in the long run then the purchasers will take adv. of this fact and force farmers to pay just a small hair above net profit that farmer will get if he/she decides to sell in mandi? and in most cases small farmers are not going to return without selling otherwise they'd have to cover the cost of two way trip from farm to outside seller 3. govt. is also not going to keep most info. about who farmers are selling, at what prices, etc. 4. there is also no limit on keeping the stock for processors and value chain members, how is that not going to get abused by some medium to big entity who will keep those produce in stock untill their prices get high enough?
@@abhinavsharma3819 why would some private company or traders would prefer mandi where they have to pay tax ? Obviously these trader would also prefer to purchase outside mandi with no regulations . These reform isn't going to make MSP legal. It will be choice. And i believe no traders are saint enough to go mandi and purchase where they have other options. Where they can make their own bid outside mandi.
@@DhruvSoni-lb7nf well to fake news ko dur kaise karte hai debate and discussion karke na, aise zabardasti bill ko pass karvaoge to fir obviously logo k man mein shak paida hoga hi Vikas dubey ki gadi achank palat gai to logo k man mein shak paida hua na k aise kaise achank news valo ko rukvaya gaya zabardasti and jab chance mila to gadi palat gai, right?
I think there should be A middle way. Govt has to decide MSP for both apmc and private traders. So the farmers can get a Saficient deal for there hard work.
@@anksssssssss No body will be there to buy from APMC as private players will not buy from APMC now . So crops which goes to APMC will be waste like as usual even if it goes to VIA MSP . 2. Not all crops are in MSP . 3. 68% is small land owners where produce is less and MSP has certain criterias of its own and only 6% of farmers make use to MSP due to lack of knowledge and exploitation. 4, New rules say if somebody betrays farmer they cannotgo to court , Local authority will give judgement which can be easily bought out by money by private players , so overall it big loss for farmer by Modi gov
@@mandeepchawla594 lots of miss information in ur msg . 1. Govt will buy it if no buyers at APMC as per the rule in essential commodities act. And there are many states which allowed selling crops outside APMC , and they are having no issues . 2. Crops which don't have msp , what the difference will new bill gonna make to them ??? Nothing , may be they got some better price becoz no tax and commision . 3. Ur statement contradict ur first comment . If farmers don't know about msp , them what the point of APMC ??? . Secondly issue with APMC is that farmers must have his own land to sell on APMC , small farmers don't have their own land , they farm on rented land , that's why they can't sell at APMC , those farmers got exploited by mediator who buy their products on lesser price and sell on APMC on higher price , and those small farmers have no other option but to get exploited becoz they can't sell it directly . But now they can sell directly at good price , all thanks to new bill . The major chaos in protest is created by big farmers who rent their land or those who buy cropsat cheap price from small farmers and sell at higher price at APMC . 4. Who said u can't go to court ???? U can go to court of u r u happy with desicion from local authority . And if u think local authority is bad , complain to state government , what center is gonna do if ue state government can't clean curroption from local authority ????
@@mandeepchawla594 Expanding MSP beyond the current Mandis will very well result in inflation. So while the farmer will think that he's getting more money now, in reality that extra money would be nothing more than inflated money. So his real income won't increase. To increase the real income of people from any sector, you need external investment, which private players can very well provide. That's what these bills plan to do.
Farmers should have stopped chasing a particular crop instead opt for alternative most probably Horticulture and government needs to provide them a infrastructure,market, platform and policies in favour of them.
I was against Modi about MSP, but when u said, only 6% farmers are getting benefitted through this, then farmer bill must come, and today is the day, Farmer bill has passed. Hope it will change the situations of farmers, their income and standard.
1. The Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce Bill just says that all types of agri trade will be allowed (even outside state regulated) APMC mandis. So, now anyone can trade within the State or across the state all over India and it can be physical trade or online trade. And the most important thing is if Vivek opens a mandi/market for trade of agri commodities (ether i am procuring from farmers and selling it to retailers in my physical mandi or I opened an online portal just like amazon) anywhere in India then NO STATE CAN PUT ANY KIND OF TAX/CHARGES ON AGRI TRANSACTIONS. 2. But if trade happens through State APMC mandis then there are various charges. For example commission agents (arhatiyas) get 2.5%, State Govt imposes mandi charges and cess which gives them Revenue BUT all these charges get built in the price and ultimately the 135 crore consumers suffer in terms of higher prices. So, if the trade move out of these APMC Mandis (till 5th June no one was allowed to trade outside APMC), then who is at LOSS???. Answer: The commission agents (intermediaries) and the State Govt and its corrupt officials. And who will gain..........135 crore consumers of India. And there is no direct impact on farmers but in future they will gain because of several mandis and buyers. And direct procurement from farmers may end up giving more money to farmers for their produce. BUT THEY WHY FARMERS ARE PROTESTING???? Answer is they are being lured into protest. Big farmers of Punjab and Haryana who sell at MSP to FCI in these mandis are thinking (and are forced to think by politicians) that in future Govt. may stop procuring at MSP (but the amendment does not say this at all) of wheat and Rice and if prices fluctuates on lower side then they may loose because then they have to sell to private traders. BUT why not the other farmers of India are protesting. The Answer is....................MSP is announced for all over India for 25 crops but SINCE 1965........(when FCI got established).............FCI HAS PROCURED ONLY WHEAT AND RICE AND MAINLY FROM THESE TWO STATES PUNJAB AND HARYANA (and to a certain level from MP, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh also). BUT mostly Punjab and Haryana farmers, traders, commission agents, govt has benefitted till now. And who has lost...........135 crore Indians, All other state's farmers. 3. Actually in the last 50 years of this REGULATED agri trade has benefitted the corrupt intermediaries and officials/politicians and they dont want this system to be reformed. Govt should stop procuring at MSP and it should stop giving PDS foodgrains. And just transfer the same benefit in to their account. Everyone will benefit except these agents/corrupt FCI officials/politicians.
dummy they are not being lured. and farmers never took the benefit. it was the govt. now govt they want to focus more on corporate side which is not good for farmers. if you are not a farmer you will never understand. don't talk the talk. walk the walk. those farmers are not some stupid who don't know anything. we understand. i think you have to do some more research. he failed the whole india. first banknote demonetisation, then GST and now this.
Farm laws are indeed a Big GOOD thing for farmers. Surprisingly the well-to-do farmers in Punjab and Haryana want STATUS-QUO to continue. Farmers from other states do see a HUGE benefit from farm laws! The left elements and opposition have been very good at enhancing the confusion. Since this issue is happening in the mid-term it is not going to influence 2024 elections. Unnecessarily they are robbing the farmers from escalating to NEW HEIGHTS in the field of Agriculture
Madam, you are very good at propagating the middlemen of framing business but your nautanki is how good is the bill. Comments on the level playing field of Farmers vis a vis the Corporate has not explained also on how the APMC law is letting traders cartel and making farmers to sell at below MSP. Cannot the Centre make a provision on purchasing anything produced by farmers and then asking the traders to purchase from Central Government in this way the BJP party will not have to face opposition in any state?
I don't understand why the government can't go on tv to explain this the way you've done. Everything would become black and white!! Fantastic job and thank you for bringing this to us.
Priya ji, I have a few queries ma'am.. 1. Why can't farmers form a similar cartel (as traders) to control the prices at which to sell to the traders? At least this should be possible with the new farming bill... 2. Isn't the agricultural produce tax free item? If yes, then how does the Central government benefit for this bill? 3. You say that farmers won't benefit as much as consumers... but in free market economy an equilibrium is achieved by demand and supply. Thus why would a farmer go directly to a retailer if he is happy to get MSP.. he can go to the APMC for that...he will go to the retailer to get a good deal. A retailer too will also give him a better rate than MSP as they too have avoided the middle man and will still get a higher margin.. 4. Land acquisition act is not just necessary for farm sector but more importantly for establishing Industries... isn't it? Moreover, in a country like ours, poor farmers need jobs with steady incomes rather than farming outputs which are very much dependent on many variables such as monsoon, MSP, Politics etc... 5. I think, another point that needs mentioning wrt poverty in farming relates to the dimnishing size of land holdings with successive generations due to distribution of land within more & more siblings... this leads to smaller and smaller land holdings which further leads to poverty as the output reduces in proportion. Pls share your thoughts...
1. Artiyas before start bidding have there own meeting first in which they set there rates. You know the quality of crop depends on certain factors amount of sunlight it got, fertilizers, soil conditioning, etc. Every field does not get all the things right So there are crops if not sell fast will rot in mandis. So farmers have there majburi to sell the crop on artiyas rate Farmer's profit has shrunk to such a margin that he is farming by taking loans and if he does not sell his crop fast 2 things happens 1. His crop rottens 2. Interest keeps on increasing. It is hard for a farmer to risk not selling.
2. Centres aim is corporatization of farm lands. To let ambanis adanis to cash on farm lands and latter fund them in elections again. Removing tax only favours corporates to establish themselves in farms and abolish APMC mandis. Mandis require roads, infrastructure maintenance if no one comes to mandis how we can keep mandis running. Eventually they have to dismantle APMC mandis. As our finance minister nirmila sitharaman said in 2019.
3. Whoever comes will give a better prices and i think in 3 years every farmer will be doing contract farming and government will remove APMC mandis and MSP because there will not be any role of it to play moreover it requires funds to keep mundis running. If you see in long run in future i can easily see exploitation of farmers. There will not be any alternative to go. No APMC mandi No MSP. Only option will be the corporates.
4. I agree with you that farmers do need a steady income source and agriculture do involve risks. In bihar they removed APMC now a farmer who owns 10 acres land comes to punjab to farm for another guy who owns same 10 acre of land because he is not getting atleast the MSP. I belong to a farming family, i live in village, i saw this happening. Where will we go if this same things repeat itself. Farmers do need alternative options for income but it does not mean that we can only be used for cheap labour.
FROM FARMER'S DAUGHTER- PLEASE DONT MISSGUIDE.. For the record, ONLY 6% farmers GET MSP BENEFIT is not because of the lack of education for farmers. The government only acquires wheat rice and sugarcane at MSP prices. Other products like maize dalls etc. Their MSP is launched but GOV. hardly acquires them, PRIVATE agencies CAN ACQUIRE THESE PRODUCTS AT LESS THAN MSP.. THE DEMAND OF FARMERS IS TO MAKE ACQUISITION OF CROPS BELOW MSP CRIMINAL.. SHE NO WHERE MENTIONS THAT.. WE FARMERS ARE NOT ILLITERATE.. THATS THE REASON WE KNOW WHEN TO FIGHT FOR OUR RIGHTS
@Vicky Sandhu I read your points but let's wait for more details and effects caused by this bill after its enforced. I don't understood all your reasoning but I got the gist of it.
@@visible12329 nahi bhai kuch galat info aayi h aapke paas... kisi ke upar boundation nahi thi ki vo APMC me beche.... sirf choice thi.... my father is a farmer brother, he sells half of its potato to APMC and half to a bhujia firm named "Bikaji Bhujia" and no one is stopping him even before the bills!
I V_haan matlab tumhare pitaji state k sath dhko krrhe the.. sarri detail do kab se kabtak kiya aesa , mai abhi exice wale bhjta hu. Sarkari paisa khare ho kyunki sarkar ko ghnta ni frak padta tha pehle
O mere bhai ... Tu lagta dirf dabbe k andar ki baat janta hai tbhi to tum jaise log sadako pe hai pta hi nahi k seen kya hai.. hahaj Sunn jis state me tu reh ra hai uss state ne apmc act me change kiye hai nahi yo jo actual apmc act hai wo padh pehle baatein krek hwa bazi na karr.. 12 gadiya seb ki itawa bhjta hu.. har saal.. pehle khud padhle kya hai apmc aur konsi state ne usme changes kiye
@@kabeerkabeer3285 GMO has no proven side effects. We have GMOs since 2006. But aren't able to use them because of islamic protests regarding genetic modification.
@@kabeerkabeer3285 GMO has no proven side effects. We have GMOs since 2006. But aren't able to use them because of islamic protests regarding genetic modification.
Very good unbiased video, one of the best about this issue. Ok, so new bills are trying to end monopoly of traders (govt supporters) that is great. But this will do not cater the problem of exploitation by buyers which won't buy produce at MSP or above MSP, because new bills do not provide legal backing to MSP. Hence farmers are protesting. Only 6% farmers are able to buy at MSP+ rates.
UPSC civil services....I m writing mains this year.
Your vedios are way better than any coaching institute.
same bro. Although this video is complete bs and reeks of bias
@@PS1604 bias bs ? Rationality flush kardi kya subah subah?
All the best bro
MSP is not minimum selling price, it is minimum support price, matlab ye amount ek suugestion hota hai, jis pe sirf gov. Buy krti hai crop. Private players es se km rate pe buy krte hai.. jis region me gov. Acquisition km hai vala pe msp 1800 hona k baad bhi crop 1000 pe bikto hai..
Es mein farmers ki knowledge ki problem nahi hai. Farmera esa legal gurantee banana chahta hai ki es amounts se km pe kahi bhi crop na bika
All the best
Good, unbaised and neutral analysis of whole subject, thank you.
Welcome!
@@_FinologyLegal omggg you reply?!
neutral presentation excellent
@@_FinologyLegal U prostutite have never been to a farm, how come you know what's good bad for farmers
@@RAY-Money khud banale fir video !! How dare u abuse anybody else
I request you to Please restart weekly current affairs🙂... Thank you for this great efforts ☺️🙏
@Vicky Sandhu well said veere 👍
@Vicky Sandhu well explained sir...
@Vicky Sandhu great 🙏🏻🙏🏻
More Unbiased Than Anyone Else Videos on Farm Bills. ❤️🙏 Thank You Mam
Yeh to biased tarah se hi apne discuss kar dia, yesehi lakho log road par 4-5 month se a kar nehi bathi hain. You must also discuss the negetive point of the bill jo fermers soch rahe hain ki yeh vi hoga.
Same tarah se BSNL hathake JIO la dia, ab APMC hathake koe or la denge, or pura munafa wo le jayenge, MSP private sector main kiu nehi hain , ho sakta hain alag alag state main alag alag MSP de do.. do to sehi..
Nehi kal agar sab trader a gaye or bole ki 1800 KA SAMAN 600 MAIN BECHO NEHI TUM TUMAHARE PASS HI RAKKHO. to kia karoge tab.
'Minimum time maximum explanation' is your saving grace mam. i appreciate your efforts and great respect for the effort which u have made behind this informative video.
This video is simply one of the best I have found breaking down the whole Farm Bills...thank you so much.
Good Explanation.
However you discussed only flaws of various APMC Acts and existing practices, not how new Bills will resolve these issues (except few). You didn't discussed about new bill for agreement between farmers and sponsors, how the disputes among them will be resolved, what will be the power of courts in this regard, what if SDM is unbiased or his decision otherwise prejudice to farmers, what if produce will not match quality,grade standards, criteria (inspection will be done by sponsor and they can reject). The price can be varied and corporates are smarter than innocent farmers, and they may take undue advantage of section 5. Bargaining power of big corporates may induce individual farmers to sell their produce at lower price, no other central law prohibits it. Corporates can now stock huge in their cold storage and sell later at higher price.
I appreciate that now farmers can sell their produce directly to consumers if they wish to, there revenue will be increased by 8 to 10 percent with same inputs and efforts, it means there profit will increase by about 40%.
Overall, new bills and their motives are good but lacks certain critical considerations.
what about government.... when it is itself biased
May i ask how are you calculating the increase ? What mathematical model are you using?
Sir even earlier there was no restriction on farmers to sell directly to consumer.
This bills will lead set up of private mandis and middlemen will shift there because 85% of indian farmers are small and due to lack of bargaining power this will ultimately exploit farmers
@@MukeshSingh-su8ow but the current system will not remove .. Govt. Is just providing a new option for the sake of farmers.
Its not binding in nature.
Use some sense.
@@mayanktiwari4063 after that what about APMC ?
Unka haal fr BSNL jaisa hoga
Aur MSP ko renew krne ki zarurat thi sab jaante hai kuki sarkari data k hisaab se 6percent farmers ko hi MSP milta hai
We def need such subjects covered in school level. I wasnt aware of so many things..thx u very much
This should be showed on TV
Tv wale sare moorkh ho chuke hai ab..
MSP is not minimum selling price, it is minimum support price, matlab ye amount ek suugestion hota hai, jis pe sirf gov. Buy krti hai crop. Private players es se km rate pe buy krte hai.. jis region me gov. Acquisition km hai vala pe msp 1800 hona k baad bhi crop 1000 pe bikto hai..
Es mein farmers ki knowledge ki problem nahi hai. Farmera esa legal gurantee banana chahta hai ki es amounts se km pe kahi bhi crop na bika
Tv wale adds nahi center se passe lete ha , I'll not see TV news again
Bilkul TV per dikahna chahiye
TV is a joke now.
You are too good to explain it. The best part of your lecture is- "Your discussion was limited to law points only. It was unbiased legal discussion"... Keep it up and. Keep sharing. Thanks.
Just realised u have studied from the college I m studying in and it makes me feel proud
I know some people who have lost lives in peaceful protest....sad for that
Which college is that?
Peaceful protests? Lol
@@av2319 NALSAR (NLU HYDERABAD)
@@doshyantsingh3132 yes peaceful
@@doshyantsingh3132 yes peaceful
Thankyou ma'am. The best thing about your Video is that you explained everything with respect to our constitutions law & order, statistics and also how our govt. operates & recieves tax which therefore leaves no scope of giving a biased review.
Dear mam🙏🕊🌹
आप किसी भी topic पर
बोहत अच्छा समझाती हो
मैन आपके sirf 2 वीडियो ही
देखे है।
But
I am very impress with you👌
And
Your way of communication is spectacular. 👍
Your inossency and qtness is
Also the good qualities of your
Personality🕊🙏👍
God bless you mam🌠🌠🌠🌠
YOu are the proud of india🙏🇮🇳
FROM FARMER'S DAUGHTER- PLEASE DONT MISSGUIDE.. For the record, ONLY 6% farmers GET MSP BENEFIT is not because of the lack of education for farmers. The government only acquires wheat rice and sugarcane at MSP prices. Other products like maize dalls etc. Their MSP is launched but GOV. hardly acquires them, PRIVATE agencies CAN ACQUIRE THESE PRODUCTS AT LESS THAN MSP.. THE DEMAND OF FARMERS IS TO MAKE ACQUISITION OF CROPS BELOW MSP CRIMINAL.. SHE NO WHERE MENTIONS THAT.. WE FARMERS ARE NOT ILLITERATE.. THATS THE REASON WE KNOW WHEN TO FIGHT FOR OUR RIGHTS
Gist of all farm bills, the concept of rich and poor state is new for me,
Very well explained mam
Thank you
Yes , I am seeing this part for the first time .
This is the reason some people say there's favour for some states .
Punjab state gov can't get all it's money from Mandi - that is the main issue and the local government is pushing the farmers to go against the centre .
How can anyone can be so good in explaining....with crystal clear facts....Explaining Skills you developed is amazing... Thanks for the video mam
You're most welcome!
The best explanation I have ever heard! Brilliant! This should be tending. Guys get this trending. For the global public get this in English too.. even if there is closed captioning.
You are amazing. The way you teach, oh my god. You are an inspiration.
Thank you so much.
DPp
True.
Great explanation
@@_FinologyLegal sktrnirhthjthjig she reply’s hejrhbrnrbbrnr omggg 😆 *gets excited* let me chat 💬 *chats and gets no reply’s from her*
*gets sad 😢 * she-she di-didn’t r-reply *starts crying* 😭 plz replyyy
She had explained the things well but finally end up in a erroneous conclusion. Definitely there are lots of issues with current APMC systems. Bt the new acts are going to worsen the situation further. Now onwards the farmers needs to bargain with more powerful purchasers than earlier small traders. The small/medium farmers wouldn't have any bargaining power with big corporates. If the intention was to make MSP mandatory in every private transaction, why did the bills not contain a clause that the price paid to the farmer by the purchaser shall not be less than the notified MSP?. That's why lakhs of farmers are on the streets.
I hope you will review your conclusion.
The e-commerce system helps in creating auction-system through price and marketing intelligence system where price will be greater than MSP. The other thing is e-commerce platform unlike APMC has no market fees thus there will be no profit cannibalism.
Recently, there have been strong protests from farmers, especially from the states of Punjab and Haryana, against three farm bills that seek to replace ordinances issued in june 2020.
These bills envisage to bring change in some of the key aspects of the farm economy - trade in agricultural commodities, price assurance, farm services including contracts, and stock limits for essential commodities.
These bills sought to bring much needed reforms in the agricultural marketing system such as removing restrictions of private stock holding of agricultural produce or creating trading areas free of middlemen and take the market to the farmer.
However, farmers are apprehensive that the free market philosophy supported by these bills could undermine the Minimum Support Price (MSP) system and make farmers vulnerable to market forces.
Note :
Three Farm Bills that are bond of contention:
The Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020,
The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement of Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020,
Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill, 2020.
Intended Benefits Associated with These Bills
The Bills aim to do away with government interference in agricultural trade by creating trading areas free of middlemen and government taxes outside the structure of Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs).
It will allow farmers an option to sell their produce directly to these new zones, without going through the middlemen and paying levies such as mandi fees.
It sought to remove stock holding limits as well as curbs on inter-State and intra-State trade, and create a framework for contract farming.
Also, these bills promote the creation of Farmer Producer Organisations (FPO) on a large scale and will help in creating a farmer-friendly environment for contract farming where small players can benefit.
These bills may enable private players to invest in warehousing, grading and other marketing infrastructure.
A combined effect of these bills will help in creating a ‘One Nation, One Market’ for agricultural produce.
Issues Raised by The Farmers & Opposition
Federal Angle: The provisions in the Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020, provides for unfettered commerce in designated trade areas outside APMC jurisdictions.
Apart from this, the bill empowers the Centre government to issue orders to States in furtherance of the law’s objectives.
However, matters of trade and agriculture being the part of subjects on the State list, have caused resentment in States.
Lack of Consultation: First the ordinance route and now the hastily attempt to pass the Bills without proper consultation adds to the mistrust among various stakeholders including farmers.
Also, by allowing ‘trade zones’ to come up outside the APMC area, farmers have become apprehensive that the new system would lead to eventual exit from the minimum support price.
Absence of any regulation in non-APMC mandis: Another issue that is raised by the farmers is that the proposed bills give the preference for corporate interests at the cost of farmers’ interests.
In absence of any regulation in non-APMC mandis, the farmers may find it difficult to deal with Corporates, as they solely operate on the motive of profit seeking.
Non-Favourable Market Conditions: While retail prices have remained high, data from the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) suggest a deceleration in farm gate prices for most agricultural produce.
With rising input costs, farmers do not see the free market based framework providing them remunerative prices.
These fears gain strength with the experience of States such as Bihar which abolished APMCs in 2006. After the abolition of mandis, farmers in Bihar on average received lower prices compared to the MSP for most crops.
Way Forward
Improve Agricultural Infrastructure to Strengthen Competition: Government should massively fund the expansion of the APMC market system, make efforts to remove trade cartels, and provide farmers good roads, logistics of scale and real time information.
Empowering State Farmers Commissions: Rather than opting for heavy centralisation, the emphasis should be on empowering farmers through State Farmers Commissions recommended by the National Commission for Farmers, to bring about a speedy government response to issues.
Consensus Building: The Centre should reach out to those opposing the Bills, including farmers, explain to them the need for reform, and get them on board.
Conclusion
Without strong institutional arrangements, the free market may harm lakhs of unorganised small farmers, who have been remarkably productive and shored up the economy even during a pandemic
The MSP is not abolished, you bloody fool.
Bhai katayi chutiye aadmi ho tum
Example - Bihar
Government should not allow hoarding of crops/pulses as small farmers without quantity or storage would be vulnerable. Also make MSP legally binding in Contract Farming too.
>
Search This on You Tube
this Bill Is To Force GMOs In India ..Through Contract farming
To get The Control Over seeds and Our Health
>
Search This on You Tube
Absolutely..
contract farming mai kisan rate decide krega aur agar rate nhi pasand to vo existing system mai bhi sell kr sakta hai
@@romilmahant2971 Tumhe 200 kilometres door jana hai kisi location pe, tum ek taxi stand pe jaoge. Agar saare taxi waale tumhe same rate bolein, jo ki tumhaare budget se zyada ho, to kya tumhaare paas koi option bachega? Paidal jaa sakte ho 200 km?
Matlab ye hai ki agar corporates kisi farmer ko koi deal propose karenge tu uss farmer ke pass, APMC khatam hone ke baad, us deal ko maanne ke alawa koi option nahi hoga, chahe wo deal kitni bhi kharab deal ho.
Mam ur teaching method is very simple......ap koi bhi topic bht detail s aur ache s padhati h
Thank you
@@_FinologyLegal
Mam also share farm law by Vikas sir drishti IAS....
To spread awareness.....!!
City guys will never understand the sentiments of farmers. City guys are like birds. They move from pond to pond. But the farmers are like fish in the pond. Their life and world starts and ends in the pond.
True bro...
From tamilnadu
Just tell me r u happy without this bill? Were u happy?? Was the ild apmc was very beneficial fir farmers?? Ni agents were taking money ?? Did farmer got his deserving money for the produce?? If any one also is yes i will nit support this bill. Evryone who is supporting is not a city guy buddy u just do not know whats the real reason for declining of agriculture in india
City guys also understand bhai...
Farmers get loan waiver every election. Does shop owner, traders get that?
Same happened with me bro on Quora app. But those guys don't tried to understand me and just spelling namo namo.
Nobody cares about Farmers whether it is a Politician or aCity guys.
They just want food and don't care about farmers
Thank you! Politics has a way of destroying clarity when a nation truly needs it.
Nothing Political, Only knowledge!🔥🙏
Exactly 👍🏼
kishan ka nukshan hua he fake knowledge he
@@LiveTradeIndia main Ek kisan ka beta ho mujhe koi nuksan nahi lagta
@@hrutikpisal6403 tumhara kapda bata raha he tum bade Kishan ho hamare gao me chota Kishan ro raha he bada Kishan aap jese hi bol raha he simple he jese india ki 90% money 1 % ameero ke pass he ase hi ameer jyada acre jameen bala Kishan kuch aur garib Kishan dukhi he, apko ye sahi lagta he to GST kesa laga ye bhi batana jiske baad se chote business khatam hue gdp 8% se 4% par pahucha 2019 tak abhi to -24 % he, me khud Kishan hu na ki Kishan ka beta jese bade bade neta kahate phirte he
@@LiveTradeIndia tumhara nam Bata raha hai ki Tum kisan Kam congressi jyada ho 😂🤣
Mam aap itna acha samjhate ho ✔️
Itna deeply + ek lucid manner mein
Thank You Mam
Please keep making maximum videos
Ma'am I wouldn't say wether this bill is bad or not.. But if this bill fails & farmers suffer in the future our mainstream media will never discuss it as they are praising & discussing now
That's still an assumption
@@abhinavsharma3819 Let me conclude it better as long as BJP is in power popular media like republic Tv, Times now will not talk about this. On what basis an I saying this: its because they didn't talk about so many issues like NTPC, RRB, JEE and for a long time they didn't show about farmer protest as well, mainstream media as became a place for hate speech rather than a place of genuine news.
@@Xawans you can kindly stop calling others looser & start selling tea.. or you can even become a food delivery guy that will be a good idea
this Bill Is To Force GMOs In India ..Through Contract farming
, Government is Just a Puppet
To get The Control Over seeds and Our Health
Search This on You Tube
1. >
2.
I am requesting to all farmers plz. Plz. Read these three ordinances of farm bill. This farm bill will benefit the farmers. plz don't believe on political or farmers leaders rumors. Farm bill is providing you choices and Read it and then react. Specially punjab people plz read and don't take this protest on your ego.🇮🇳
Bro actually they take time to understand bill nd congress and other opposition take it as an opportunity to narrate there own story and create violence in country just like CAA and jammu kashmir stuff. And every time aam aadmi got effected.
Here want to conclude from stats mentioned in video
1. Check the money distribution to states from GOI, Punjab is in the list of developed states having very well established APMC architecture, But on the other side look at Bihar where np APMC
So how anyone can say removing APMC will give the better opportunities to farmers
2. What about the 1750Cr or respective amount for State Govts?
3. Only 6% people getting MSP, so means need to improve MSP providing architecture which is feasible with APMC architecture or LAW
We are not convinced by the politicians
We are convinced by the prices of our produce we are getting
The crop(rice) which would sell for 3000-4000 per quintal is now selling for 1100-1600 whic you can cleart see is very is not even half of it
Also guarantee to MSP ( for 22 crops) is said by the government but it is not being provided even for the crops they are saying
Also the third law which removes the limit of storage was never for farmers as setting up cold storage is very expensive and to acquire license you ought to have very good Connection with politicians of the ruling party therefore it was clearly meant for industrialist
Last and the most important thing of this protest is that if there are private players in it there will be no monitoring the MRP of crops so even if they provide MSP to farmers the new farm bill be problematic for lower and middle class of our country
@@vitaminprotein2309 yes those are the concerns we are talking about, now they will call us anti modi, even without any ground reality. Even , I am supporter for him in many cases, but not for this. And Galat ko Galat hi kehna chahiye,
@@vitaminprotein2309 According to my knowledge of this bill, it will work as below mentioned way. Please correct me if i am wrong. I am here to learn more about this bill. You look like have some knowledge regarding this, hence i am sharing this with u.
If corporate enters in this field, the price of the product will be fixed before production. So if farmer thinks offered price is not good enough then he can tell the corporate, he will produce something else. As on season and off season product price is difference. So the corporate have to bid some thing in between. Like on season per quintal rice price is 1100-1600 but in off season it is 3000-4000 quintal. If the price is known by farmer before he produce something. Then there will be less risk of loss.
The information is lacking and in a way biased , you need to find answers to points raised below
Madam ne sirf purane laws samjhaye , lekin new bills k barre maen kuch bola hi nhi ...🤔
Chlo aap hi bta do
Madam ji eplained it legaly ,now as a farmer of punjab allow me to explain it at ground level
So lets begin point by point
My first point is that out of 3 bills you only explained about 1 bill , what about other 2, so i thought it as my moral duty to explains others too
1. The Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill
Ek baar ek time aesa aya jbb pyaaz ka rate bdd kr 120 rupee kilo ho gya , toh tbb ek baat uthi ki iska karan hae kalabazari , jmakhori ya fir stocking of product , tbb bola gya ki agar mehngayi se bachna hae toh stocking khatm krni chahiye sarkar ko orr hum log uchhal uchhal k support kr rhe the , lekin abb NEW BILL k according corporate and private stickist jitni chahe jma khori kr skte haen , lekin state sarkar jo stock jma krti thi taki time aane pe usko market maen liquify krke use kiya ja ske taki mehngayi ko control rakha ja ske woh provision khatm krdi new bill maen , abbb mujhe yeh nhi samj ata ki logo ka ya kisano ka isme kya fayda , isme indirectly kaunse sector ka fayda hae yeh sochne valli baat hae 🤔...
Kahi modi sarkar apnr financial favour k chakkar maen kisi specific sector jaese corporate thugg sector ko benifit ya favour toh nhi de rhi ...
Yeg madam aap duscuss krna bhool gye
2. The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020
Pehle farmers apni jamern ya kisi ki jameen theke pe leke kheti krte the or jo bhi produce hota tha usko sell krke apna ghar chlate the , lekin theke pe private ya corporate sector nhi ghus skta tha, mtlb ki agar corporate sector ko buy krna hae kuch toh woh kisan ki produce ko bikne k baad khareed skta hae naki khud theke pe uga ya ugva skta hae kuch bhi , abb kya hoga ki suppose ek bda corporate player hae eg. Reliance group toh woh kya krega ki 1000 chotte kisano se 1-2 acre zameen contract pe lega or usme aoni mrzi ki fasl ugvayega , or uske pass maen 200 kisan haen jo apni apni 1-2 acre zameen maen kheti krenge or jb fasal ko bechne ka time ayega toh jo toh contractor jisko apne liye khud k use k liye specific fasal chahiye hogi woh doosre kisano se lene ki bjaye khud apni contract farming valli fasal use krega or market se kisano ki ugayi huyi fasal woh kyu kharredega agar market se woh khareedega bhi toh usko jo theek lgge ussi rate oe khareedega kyuki MSP ki assurity toh inn bills maen hae hi nhi , isme marrega kaun *gareeb kisan* , or benifit kaun lega cirporate sector valla contractor , sochne ki baat hae🤔
Isi ka ek doosra scenario leke chlte haen
Lets say ki agar koi corporate player contract farming 2000 acre maen kr rha hae , jisko na toh apne ghar ka kharcha nikalna hae naa hi zameen khareedne ka paesa lgana hae , sirf per acre benifit nikalna hae , itne badde level pe suppose agar farming cost 900 rupee ayi per acre or corporate player ne apni 2000 acre ki fasal bechni hae or usne doosre corporate company ko 1000 per acre maen bech di toh 18 lakh ki investment krke usko 20 lakh mill gye lekin uss fasal ka market value set ho gya 1000 jabki uska MSP hoga 1300 ya 1500 lekin kyuki abb mandi nhi hae , MSP nhi hae toh jo 200 chotte kisan haen unko wohi fasal obviously km market value maen bechni pdegi yani k jha ek chotte kisaan ko 3000 milne the jisse usne apne ghar ko chalana tha, bachho ko padana tha , beti ki shadi krni thi wahi usko millege 2000 or yeh jo impact hae chotte kisan pe yeh bohat hi jyada brutal hoga
Abb isi act ka doosra provision suniye , woh kehta hae ki cobtractor kisaan ki zameen girvi rkh k uspe loan le skta hae , suppose koi cobtractor jis company ko kisan nhi jante woh 2000 kisano ki zameen ko contract farming k bahane se leta hae , fir uspe loan leta hae or vijay malya ki tra desh se bhag jata hae toh uski marr kisko pdegi , woh loan chukayega kaun , kisaan ya bank , effect kisko hoga dedh ko , or benifit kiska hoga sochne ki baat hae🤔
Abb isi bill ki ek orr provision jo kehti hae k kisan contract farming k liye normal legal system ka use nhi kr skta , iske liye alag channel hoga SDM level ka ,yeh provision ka matlab kya hae samj nhi atta ki sarkar ko kya problem kisan ke judicial system ko ise krne se , kahi iska readon yeh toh nhi ki judicial system independent hita hae , lekin administrative system jaese ki SDM , DC , police yeh sarkar , politicians or ameer corporate sectors k under hotte haen , kahi yeh indirectly kisaan ko apahij or system ko corrupt banane ki sajish toh nhi ...
Sochne ki baat hae🤔
Aur ek baat hae ki bill is baised as it could be termenated by contracter anytime but farmer cant terminate it
Why?Kisan k haq maen bill pr power contractor ko
Sochne ki baat hae 🤔
Rahi baat toh Why farmers of haryana and punjab are protsating Instead aap k according toh state governments should protest
Abb maen yeh dono points sabhi ko forward kr rha hoon , lekin abhi ek farm bill baki hae jiske flaws madam jitne achge se toh nhi lekin maen explain jroor kroga next comment maen , jisne yeh comment pda orr third bill k flaws janna chahta hae woh next comment ko read krle ....kyuki jusne yeh comment poora pda woh doosra bhi pdd lega
Dhanyavad
and do read comment by SK T....
hey brother bhaut hi achaa samjhaaya aapne , plzz ese hi logo ko jaagrook kijiye taaki logon ko pata chal sake bjp kitna bada dhoka kar rhi hai kisaano ke saath
Well done. This Ma'am is educated illiterate. She doesn't know anything but still she has to bombast about the things 😂😂
Gud question raised against Hoarding !
Nice attempt to explain.
@@bhuvneshgarg2720 sister hai bro
@@amanzehen9257 sister hai
You did tell us how farmers were affected by the APMC act.. Very nice.. (Yeh to sabhko pata chal gaya hai)
But when did you list out the benefits of the new farm bills..??
(Bills ke fayde kyu nahi bata rahi hai govt)
ma'am, your voice is too good ...
and your way of explaining things are mind blowing...
thanks a lot for your guidance
Thanks a lot 😊
@@_FinologyLegal feeling privileged...thanks
No wonder the girl covered good information but she only narrated one side of coin. Her title is wrong firstly as it only sounded like she’s 100% supporting new bills and is only narrating flaws of previous APMC system.
1. Yes, the current APMC system needs reforms, but why she didn’t covered flaws/ negative side of new bills?
2. Why she did not mention the involvement and benefits of corporates?
3. Why she didn’t mention that even though the three bills are already executed in numerous states and on numerous crops, yet why states like Bihar’s Agricultural system got worsened?
4. Why Bihar farmers come to Punjab and Haryana to sell their crops?
5. Why it’s believed that all farmers are damn illiterate and needs education? This protest includes educators, teachers and every sector of Indian population.
This is incomplete information.
You seriously think the only problem with the bill is tax acquisition🤦♀️I’m from a farming family and I’m doing llb.These are death warrents for us.Born in a farming family and you’ll realise the differences
Right
So true..
Yr plzz discuss what are the problems ??
Iam from farming faimly too dis aint dat bad -_-
Instead of making such apparently baseless emotive comments, please explain.
Hey mam!!
Your lectures are so interesting.
I suggest FL team, especially priya mam to start lecture series on Indian National movement and Indian constitution... Good luck
Hahaha yes... 😂😂😂
"Desh me farmer reform ke baare me baat honi chahiye" [sic.] I see it happening from Finology Legal:)
FROM FARMER'S DAUGHTER- PLEASE DONT MISSGUIDE.. For the record, ONLY 6% farmers GET MSP BENEFIT is not because of the lack of education for farmers. The government only acquires wheat rice and sugarcane at MSP prices. Other products like maize dalls etc. Their MSP is launched but GOV. hardly acquires them, PRIVATE agencies CAN ACQUIRE THESE PRODUCTS AT LESS THAN MSP.. THE DEMAND OF FARMERS IS TO MAKE ACQUISITION OF CROPS BELOW MSP CRIMINAL.. SHE NO WHERE MENTIONS THAT.. WE FARMERS ARE NOT ILLITERATE.. THATS THE REASON WE KNOW WHEN TO FIGHT FOR OUR RIGHTS
this Bill Is To Force GMOs In India ..Through Contract farming
To get The Control Over seeds and Our Health
>
Search This on You Tube
@Vicky Sandhu any other solutions you have in this
U just listen to vidoes not fake people
@@aakashshetty4365 how to make sure bdw?
I heard a very interesting analogy today,
A 10 floor building did not have a lift, so people had problem climbing up and down. Specially the elderly and the kids, so the society started exploring options.
Finally they got some donkeys, who could carry people up and down. The donkey owners would charge people for carrying them up and down for a fee and would also pay 10% to the society from the revenue they earned. It was a very happy situation for all involved.
After sometime the society management changed, the new management decided to install a lift for carrying people up and down.
All hell broke loose and everyone started protesting, this is not fair, society will loose revenue, the donkey owners will be jobless and no food for them (human rights issue), the donkeys will be worthless (animals rights issue), all were angry.
Society management clarified, the lift is available to all but the gentlemen who wanted to use the donkeys could still do it. But no, the agitation continued and so finally the new management had to succumb to the pressure.
The final arrangement was arrived and so anyone who wanted to climb the building could still use the donkey. The donkey would carry a person, go in the lift and carry people up & down. All were happy.
Disclaimer: any resemblance of this with the farmers agitation is a coincidence.
Wow brother😂😂
You explained that protest very good way👏
Easiest way ever to get explanation on this topic
How do you make it so simple like butter to understand such crucial topics .....without this channel its now difficult to survive
😜😜😜😜😜
Anyways, your way of explanation is par excellence!😌❤️
Samruddhi Ganjale burnol laga lo modiji hi jitenge
@@toiletbug5547 well, your name totally suits you😂😂
FROM FARMER'S DAUGHTER- PLEASE DONT MISSGUIDE.. For the record, ONLY 6% farmers GET MSP BENEFIT is not because of the lack of education for farmers. The government only acquires wheat rice and sugarcane at MSP prices. Other products like maize dalls etc. Their MSP is launched but GOV. hardly acquires them, PRIVATE agencies CAN ACQUIRE THESE PRODUCTS AT LESS THAN MSP.. THE DEMAND OF FARMERS IS TO MAKE ACQUISITION OF CROPS BELOW MSP CRIMINAL.. SHE NO WHERE MENTIONS THAT.. WE FARMERS ARE NOT ILLITERATE.. THATS THE REASON WE KNOW WHEN TO FIGHT FOR RIGHTS
Excellent 👍 Skill to explain any topic...very easy to understand... Thanks a lot Ma'am...
One of the best educator on youtube
Really you have an ability to teach... very nice way of explaining....a good speaker. God bless you.
Thanks a lot
I watched many videos regarding farm bill but only your explanation is totally free of politics
@Vicky Sandhu hm.g brother aap ne bilkul sahi kha , thnx
@Vicky Sandhu ye farmers double income by 2022 target ko achieve karne ke liye aab kux bhi kiya jaa raha hai. Pata nahi 5 trillion economy ke liye kaunsa bramha Astra chalane wale hai sarkar. Target achivement ke liye kux bhi kar sakte hai. Anyway thanks for your ground report.
this Bill Is To Force GMOs In India ..Through Contract farming
, Government is Just a Puppet
To get The Control Over seeds and Our Health
Search This on You Tube
1. >
2.
@Vicky Sandhu vrr 👍🏻 100 percent correct and to the point comment
Modi is rejecting the earlier setup installed by earlier govt regimes.
.
1) Playing of role in External Domain:
Food Corporation of India was established with the same intention which Modi is now propagating with this new farm bill.
.
The problem of farmers is that they can not store their output. It is very difficult to do sorting, cleaning, packaging etc, transport to other markets where they can get more price.
.
Farmers can not do this extra job, they need helping-services.
Farmers need
warehouses for storing,
materials and tools for processing & packaging,
transportation help to bring their product to the warehouse and send it to the market for sale.
.
FCI has not built enough well developed storage houses, packaging, transportation setups where farmers can hire those services so that they can sell their products to prospective buyers when there is a right price for their end-products.
.
Modi is becoming an assistant to businessmen, not as an assistant to farmers.
this Bill Is To Force GMOs In India ..Through Contract farming
,
To get The Control Over seeds and Our Health
,Government is Just a Puppet
Search This on You Tube
1. >
2.
You are Right...
Punjab and Rajasthan have SONE ki factories now...Idhar se Anaaj/ Aloo dalo...udhar se SONA nikalo...
Agree sir..
@@tarachandb2899 hao Rahul Gandhi told and now Rajasthan govt is supplying gold to farmers
Srivathsan...understood bhai...what Raga meant was ki hum log food processing industry lagayenge....but yeh industry govt PSU lagayegi ya koi pvt company jaise ke pepsico...cocacola...Ambani Adani lagayenge.....??
she explains it very easily and clearly
I'm surprised how I missed u all these times .... Impressed
mee 2
There are few things that you could have explained as well like what impact these bills will have in future, an example of similar thing happened in past, why this approach failed in western countries, and how Bihar is doing now since they have implemented these laws in past. I am not a farmer and not biased either but see the long term impact of these bills on them clearly.
In beginning everything seems risky..but we have to give farmers a choice
Yes absolutely right 👍👍
Bill k bare me kahan hai ..???
She escaped it cunningly....everybody is making vedio on it...so she also made....she has less researched or dont want to talk about it
@@yashthakur1382 yeah just like demonetisation, GST
It's like magic and those hand gestures were really helpful ma'am such a nice lecture on recent topics 😍😍😍😍
Beautiful video. Finally someone explained it so clearly for people who don't know the political terms and are not able to understand the law by reading it.
This presentation should be put on tv
Kal live session kafi informative tha
Thank u priya di..
FROM FARMER'S DAUGHTER- PLEASE DONT MISSGUIDE.. For the record, ONLY 6% farmers GET MSP BENEFIT is not because of the lack of education for farmers. The government only acquires wheat rice and sugarcane at MSP prices. Other products like maize dalls etc. Their MSP is launched but GOV. hardly acquires them, PRIVATE agencies CAN ACQUIRE THESE PRODUCTS AT LESS THAN MSP.. THE DEMAND OF FARMERS IS TO MAKE ACQUISITION OF CROPS BELOW MSP CRIMINAL.. SHE NO WHERE MENTIONS THAT.. WE FARMERS ARE NOT ILLITERATE.. THATS THE REASON WE KNOW WHEN TO FIGHT FOR rights
Recently, there have been strong protests from farmers, especially from the states of Punjab and Haryana, against three farm bills that seek to replace ordinances issued in june 2020.
These bills envisage to bring change in some of the key aspects of the farm economy - trade in agricultural commodities, price assurance, farm services including contracts, and stock limits for essential commodities.
These bills sought to bring much needed reforms in the agricultural marketing system such as removing restrictions of private stock holding of agricultural produce or creating trading areas free of middlemen and take the market to the farmer.
However, farmers are apprehensive that the free market philosophy supported by these bills could undermine the Minimum Support Price (MSP) system and make farmers vulnerable to market forces.
Note :
Three Farm Bills that are bond of contention:
The Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020,
The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement of Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020,
Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill, 2020.
Intended Benefits Associated with These Bills
The Bills aim to do away with government interference in agricultural trade by creating trading areas free of middlemen and government taxes outside the structure of Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs).
It will allow farmers an option to sell their produce directly to these new zones, without going through the middlemen and paying levies such as mandi fees.
It sought to remove stock holding limits as well as curbs on inter-State and intra-State trade, and create a framework for contract farming.
Also, these bills promote the creation of Farmer Producer Organisations (FPO) on a large scale and will help in creating a farmer-friendly environment for contract farming where small players can benefit.
These bills may enable private players to invest in warehousing, grading and other marketing infrastructure.
A combined effect of these bills will help in creating a ‘One Nation, One Market’ for agricultural produce.
Issues Raised by The Farmers & Opposition
Federal Angle: The provisions in the Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020, provides for unfettered commerce in designated trade areas outside APMC jurisdictions.
Apart from this, the bill empowers the Centre government to issue orders to States in furtherance of the law’s objectives.
However, matters of trade and agriculture being the part of subjects on the State list, have caused resentment in States.
Lack of Consultation: First the ordinance route and now the hastily attempt to pass the Bills without proper consultation adds to the mistrust among various stakeholders including farmers.
Also, by allowing ‘trade zones’ to come up outside the APMC area, farmers have become apprehensive that the new system would lead to eventual exit from the minimum support price.
Absence of any regulation in non-APMC mandis: Another issue that is raised by the farmers is that the proposed bills give the preference for corporate interests at the cost of farmers’ interests.
In absence of any regulation in non-APMC mandis, the farmers may find it difficult to deal with Corporates, as they solely operate on the motive of profit seeking.
Non-Favourable Market Conditions: While retail prices have remained high, data from the Wholesale Price Index (WPI) suggest a deceleration in farm gate prices for most agricultural produce.
With rising input costs, farmers do not see the free market based framework providing them remunerative prices.
These fears gain strength with the experience of States such as Bihar which abolished APMCs in 2006. After the abolition of mandis, farmers in Bihar on average received lower prices compared to the MSP for most crops.
Way Forward
Improve Agricultural Infrastructure to Strengthen Competition: Government should massively fund the expansion of the APMC market system, make efforts to remove trade cartels, and provide farmers good roads, logistics of scale and real time information.
Empowering State Farmers Commissions: Rather than opting for heavy centralisation, the emphasis should be on empowering farmers through State Farmers Commissions recommended by the National Commission for Farmers, to bring about a speedy government response to issues.
Consensus Building: The Centre should reach out to those opposing the Bills, including farmers, explain to them the need for reform, and get them on board.
Conclusion
Without strong institutional arrangements, the free market may harm lakhs of unorganised small farmers, who have been remarkably productive and shored up the economy even during a pandemic
Educating farmers is wonderful point.
Very positive approach towards farm Bill's and growth of the farm sector...nicely explained...example of LPG is very apt and evidential.....❤👌👏
Now farmers have two ways to sell their produce, one at APMCs and Another Outside Of APMCs. If the private traders won't give MSP to the farmers they have to choose APMC (only for 23 yields). And here education and awareness is necessary for farmers, because private traders have high knowledge of negotiation when compare to farmers, so farmers need to aware of market in their areas.
And I think MSP to be made a legal right, so the small margin farmers won't get exploited by big traders.
MSP is an administrative policy not a statutory one.
@@dracharya5037 it is not mandatory for private traders, out side of APMC I think?
@@ayushpratapsingh7969 can you explain? Plz
@swarup mitra yeah I know APMC is,
But now farmer have the chance to choose and compare the prices,
If the MSP is a legal right, farmer have the chance to ask APMC, when they(APMC) don't give at MSP. Because APMCs Are under state govts.
@@dracharya5037 FROM FARMER'S DAUGHTER- PLEASE DONT MISSGUIDE.. For the record, ONLY 6% farmers GET MSP BENEFIT is not because of the lack of education for farmers. The government only acquires wheat rice and sugarcane at MSP prices. Other products like maize dalls etc. Their MSP is launched but GOV. hardly acquires them, PRIVATE agencies CAN ACQUIRE THESE PRODUCTS AT LESS THAN MSP.. THE DEMAND OF FARMERS IS TO MAKE ACQUISITION OF CROPS BELOW MSP CRIMINAL.. SHE NO WHERE MENTIONS THAT.. WE FARMERS ARE NOT ILLITERATE.. THATS THE REASON WE KNOW WHEN TO FIGHT FOR OUR RIGHTS
Your way of explanation amazing & outstanding. you are an ideal & inspiration for students & youth.
Thanks a ton!
Her channel must reach above million....
Thank you so much!
Your way of teaching helps to learn the terminology and dates very easily just like a story
hey everybody...... now a days this has become my fav line......😊😊😊🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻👍👍👍
Thanks a lot... Priya Jiiiiii🙂🙂
jyoti mishra hi
@@pranshusharma7399 ji.....
jyoti mishra ap kya krti ho ?can we bcome frnds?
@@pranshusharma7399Ji.. no.. not required.....🙏🏻
this Bill Is To Force GMOs In India ..Through Contract farming
,
To get The Control Over seeds and Our Health
,Government is Just a Puppet
Search This on You Tube
1. >
2.
Mam Ur Explaination is Best I have Ever Seen In You tube ❤❤
I think many farmer leaders will see this video and then conclude. Didi, you had made an amazing video for us to understand this chaotic protest of farm laws.
Who buys maximum wheat from farmers? FCI
Where does maximum wheat damage सड़ता है? FCI
Who buys this damaged wheat? Alcohol makers, food processor
How is Alcohol consumption in Punjab? BINDAS
Which ministry does HarsimratBadal always take? Food processing
Hmmmmmmmm
Bc lala ji
Illuminati
Well said
I Feel that All School Students, All IIT Students, All AIIMS Students, All Engineering Students, All Agriculture Engineering Students, All IAS OFFICERS, ALL NRI'S and All Military officers and Soldiers must tell their stand on Farmers BILL and must explain why they took that stand.
I'm from IIT R. This word middle man middle man is very hyped. My family paid my fees cuz of agriculture. Apmc aren't in bihar ,assam why farmers aren't able to get the correct price from pvt sectors? Punjab haryana apmc are very efficient and farmers gets paid at MSP on paddy. See pvt engineering college btech they are working at 8k in metro cities. How one can convince our farmer that aren't educated and hold less than 2 acres of land. Farmers were expecting govt to make Apmc more stronger and transparent and strong will to make sure msp is implemented on majority of crops. All these points which she is telling in videos are very good to write in upsc exams but factually very inaccurate and not possible to implement in India
As allways, very informative n to the point Madam! I liked Ur note on understating these new Agri laws with unprejudiced mind!
Bhut Aacha, True, You Are Not One Sided, Truely Speak What Is Right
Excellent explanation with so much of clarity. Looking forward to many more videos.
Every sector has it's own supply system but sadly, none are quite transparent. If the existing system is exploitative (which actually is) then Govt should bring in reforms rather than straight scrapping it. When big supply chain companies will become the players, what is the guarantee that they will sell at a reduced price? They will show there range of sophisticated supply chain in their audits and add the cost. Final consumers will suffer anyway.
Consumer and even farmer...they will own the farmer and enslave them.. ask them to grow what they want by hoarding some items for creating demand and then selling for higher prices...inflation in the market will make common man survival harder..
No after this farmer will be king.. cause government had legalised hoarding
How they are scraping it , clearly they have given a option to farmers to sell there crops outside the mandis , it's not mandatory you free to sell in Apmc if they are giving you better prices than market
Thank you for detailed explanation Priya ma'am. Your explanation is understood clearly.
You are welcome 😊
Really... clicked on the video looking at presenters face but conntent was awesome..I found the missing link i was looking for. Much thanks
How amazingly you covered this topic so easily 🙏 thank you so much.....god bless you
Thankyou!
Hi Priya I'm from down south india..I don't know Hindi but ur way of explain is great..👍
Then who stopped you from learning HINDI
I agree that private participation in agriculture is need of the hour as it will bring infrastructure and technology . But farmers fears are also true bcoz in India 85% farmers own 2 or less than hectares, they don't have power to bargain. A proper mechanism to safeguard the interests of farmers must be set up by bringing a specific legislation. Elders farmers can be illiterate, but young and educated farmers have been spearheading this protests . So u can't dismiss their concerns by saying they are illiterate and unaware. No they are educated and know how to defend their rights.
Many states are encouraging FPOs Or Farm Producers Organization for collective bargaining and producing economies of scale jiske kam zameen wale kisaan apni collective kheti and contract kr paye. This will also act as a protection against legal proceedings in any case.
Yeah, it's high time that agriculture is improved using new technologies
@Shaurya Kumar bro in Kerala for there is strong grass root level procurement system in place for paddy and copra, the two crops eligible for assistance from the Centre under the MSP regime.
To weed out middle men and protect small farmers in the markets, Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation (SUPPLYCO), along with different cooperative institutions and local self-government institutions procure rice, vegetables and fruits.
@Shaurya Kumar do u have an APMC system or a system like in Kerala where they get this MSP.
@Shaurya Kumar So are the farmers from here getting the best price for their produce. In Bihar the farmers have not prospered after this abolishment. Why do the people move out looking for other jobs in other states instead of doing farming in Bihar if it's was that much good.
This is fantastic unbiased thoughts. Thank you very much thinking of Bharat!!
Your analysis is really impressive. I saw dhruv rathee's videos on this topic but he seemed biased.
Ha bhai
dhruv rathee is completely baised
An open letter and finology is too good
Sorry.. to break your heart.. but she is giving wrong information.. farmers are demandinv to make MSP compulsary, cz at present only 6% of products are acquired at msp by gov. The private traders acquire product af much less rate.. farmers KNOW OF MSP
.
@@Mahim19419 she is giving wrong info on MSP
Easily to understood such a crystal clear voice thankyou so much Mam 💙
DO YOU KNOW?
She steered clear of real torment of the farmers....Her idea is to inststigate you against the state gov. rather than to focus on the real culprit in the current scenario....
Much cry and little wool is the phrase that exemplifies her condition..
Bhai apko study iq dekhna chahiye
The information is lacking and in a way biased , you need to find answers to points raised below
Madam ne sirf purane laws samjhaye , lekin new bills k barre maen kuch bola hi nhi ...🤔
Chlo aap hi bta do
Madam ji eplained it legaly ,now as a farmer of punjab allow me to explain it at ground level
So lets begin point by point
My first point is that out of 3 bills you only explained about 1 bill , what about other 2, so i thought it as my moral duty to explains others too
1. The Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill
Ek baar ek time aesa aya jbb pyaaz ka rate bdd kr 120 rupee kilo ho gya , toh tbb ek baat uthi ki iska karan hae kalabazari , jmakhori ya fir stocking of product , tbb bola gya ki agar mehngayi se bachna hae toh stocking khatm krni chahiye sarkar ko orr hum log uchhal uchhal k support kr rhe the , lekin abb NEW BILL k according corporate and private stickist jitni chahe jma khori kr skte haen , lekin state sarkar jo stock jma krti thi taki time aane pe usko market maen liquify krke use kiya ja ske taki mehngayi ko control rakha ja ske woh provision khatm krdi new bill maen , abbb mujhe yeh nhi samj ata ki logo ka ya kisano ka isme kya fayda , isme indirectly kaunse sector ka fayda hae yeh sochne valli baat hae 🤔...
Kahi modi sarkar apnr financial favour k chakkar maen kisi specific sector jaese corporate thugg sector ko benifit ya favour toh nhi de rhi ...
Yeg madam aap duscuss krna bhool gye
2. The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020
Pehle farmers apni jamern ya kisi ki jameen theke pe leke kheti krte the or jo bhi produce hota tha usko sell krke apna ghar chlate the , lekin theke pe private ya corporate sector nhi ghus skta tha, mtlb ki agar corporate sector ko buy krna hae kuch toh woh kisan ki produce ko bikne k baad khareed skta hae naki khud theke pe uga ya ugva skta hae kuch bhi , abb kya hoga ki suppose ek bda corporate player hae eg. Reliance group toh woh kya krega ki 1000 chotte kisano se 1-2 acre zameen contract pe lega or usme aoni mrzi ki fasl ugvayega , or uske pass maen 200 kisan haen jo apni apni 1-2 acre zameen maen kheti krenge or jb fasal ko bechne ka time ayega toh jo toh contractor jisko apne liye khud k use k liye specific fasal chahiye hogi woh doosre kisano se lene ki bjaye khud apni contract farming valli fasal use krega or market se kisano ki ugayi huyi fasal woh kyu kharredega agar market se woh khareedega bhi toh usko jo theek lgge ussi rate oe khareedega kyuki MSP ki assurity toh inn bills maen hae hi nhi , isme marrega kaun *gareeb kisan* , or benifit kaun lega cirporate sector valla contractor , sochne ki baat hae🤔
Isi ka ek doosra scenario leke chlte haen
Lets say ki agar koi corporate player contract farming 2000 acre maen kr rha hae , jisko na toh apne ghar ka kharcha nikalna hae naa hi zameen khareedne ka paesa lgana hae , sirf per acre benifit nikalna hae , itne badde level pe suppose agar farming cost 900 rupee ayi per acre or corporate player ne apni 2000 acre ki fasal bechni hae or usne doosre corporate company ko 1000 per acre maen bech di toh 18 lakh ki investment krke usko 20 lakh mill gye lekin uss fasal ka market value set ho gya 1000 jabki uska MSP hoga 1300 ya 1500 lekin kyuki abb mandi nhi hae , MSP nhi hae toh jo 200 chotte kisan haen unko wohi fasal obviously km market value maen bechni pdegi yani k jha ek chotte kisaan ko 3000 milne the jisse usne apne ghar ko chalana tha, bachho ko padana tha , beti ki shadi krni thi wahi usko millege 2000 or yeh jo impact hae chotte kisan pe yeh bohat hi jyada brutal hoga
Abb isi act ka doosra provision suniye , woh kehta hae ki cobtractor kisaan ki zameen girvi rkh k uspe loan le skta hae , suppose koi cobtractor jis company ko kisan nhi jante woh 2000 kisano ki zameen ko contract farming k bahane se leta hae , fir uspe loan leta hae or vijay malya ki tra desh se bhag jata hae toh uski marr kisko pdegi , woh loan chukayega kaun , kisaan ya bank , effect kisko hoga dedh ko , or benifit kiska hoga sochne ki baat hae🤔
Abb isi bill ki ek orr provision jo kehti hae k kisan contract farming k liye normal legal system ka use nhi kr skta , iske liye alag channel hoga SDM level ka ,yeh provision ka matlab kya hae samj nhi atta ki sarkar ko kya problem kisan ke judicial system ko ise krne se , kahi iska readon yeh toh nhi ki judicial system independent hita hae , lekin administrative system jaese ki SDM , DC , police yeh sarkar , politicians or ameer corporate sectors k under hotte haen , kahi yeh indirectly kisaan ko apahij or system ko corrupt banane ki sajish toh nhi ...
Sochne ki baat hae🤔
Aur ek baat hae ki bill is baised as it could be termenated by contracter anytime but farmer cant terminate it
Why?Kisan k haq maen bill pr power contractor ko
Sochne ki baat hae 🤔
Rahi baat toh Why farmers of haryana and punjab are protsating Instead aap k according toh state governments should protest
Abb maen yeh dono points sabhi ko forward kr rha hoon , lekin abhi ek farm bill baki hae jiske flaws madam jitne achge se toh nhi lekin maen explain jroor kroga next comment maen , jisne yeh comment pda orr third bill k flaws janna chahta hae woh next comment ko read krle ....kyuki jusne yeh comment poora pda woh doosra bhi pdd lega
Dhanyavad
and do read comment by SK T..
Really impressed With your presentation .. this Needs to reach every individual for a proper understanding of what's going around us ..
Iske liye Fb pe dalna chahiye video viral ho jayega
I loved the way you presented this content. Must have taken a lot of efforts. Please keep doing more such informative/meaningful stuff. And also wish your channel gets the kind of traction it deserves. 👍
That's called a true dedication when she held onion for better understanding!
@@gmailaaaa i too thought .. where is her review ! .
Thanks a lot, so this Bill is so beneficial for Farmers!! Then these protest are actually Traders in the name of Farmers!
HELLO PRIYA DIDI JAKASSSSSSS ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ LIVE THA KAL KA BHOUT ACHA EXPLAIN KIYA APNE 😎😎😎😎😎😎 COOL AS ALWAYS
Hi Dolli!
Thank you for your encouragement in yesterday’s Live Session... morning was looking forward to your comments ❤️
@@_FinologyLegal ❤️❤️❤️❤️ sach me app mere guru ho didi ❤️😭😭 khass apke jaise ho sab teacher log god bless you ❤️❤️❤️
The information is lacking and in a way biased , you need to find answers to points raised below
Madam ne sirf purane laws samjhaye , lekin new bills k barre maen kuch bola hi nhi ...🤔
Chlo aap hi bta do
Madam ji eplained it legaly ,now as a farmer of punjab allow me to explain it at ground level
So lets begin point by point
My first point is that out of 3 bills you only explained about 1 bill , what about other 2, so i thought it as my moral duty to explains others too
1. The Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill
Ek baar ek time aesa aya jbb pyaaz ka rate bdd kr 120 rupee kilo ho gya , toh tbb ek baat uthi ki iska karan hae kalabazari , jmakhori ya fir stocking of product , tbb bola gya ki agar mehngayi se bachna hae toh stocking khatm krni chahiye sarkar ko orr hum log uchhal uchhal k support kr rhe the , lekin abb NEW BILL k according corporate and private stickist jitni chahe jma khori kr skte haen , lekin state sarkar jo stock jma krti thi taki time aane pe usko market maen liquify krke use kiya ja ske taki mehngayi ko control rakha ja ske woh provision khatm krdi new bill maen , abbb mujhe yeh nhi samj ata ki logo ka ya kisano ka isme kya fayda , isme indirectly kaunse sector ka fayda hae yeh sochne valli baat hae 🤔...
Kahi modi sarkar apnr financial favour k chakkar maen kisi specific sector jaese corporate thugg sector ko benifit ya favour toh nhi de rhi ...
Yeg madam aap duscuss krna bhool gye
2. The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Bill, 2020
Pehle farmers apni jamern ya kisi ki jameen theke pe leke kheti krte the or jo bhi produce hota tha usko sell krke apna ghar chlate the , lekin theke pe private ya corporate sector nhi ghus skta tha, mtlb ki agar corporate sector ko buy krna hae kuch toh woh kisan ki produce ko bikne k baad khareed skta hae naki khud theke pe uga ya ugva skta hae kuch bhi , abb kya hoga ki suppose ek bda corporate player hae eg. Reliance group toh woh kya krega ki 1000 chotte kisano se 1-2 acre zameen contract pe lega or usme aoni mrzi ki fasl ugvayega , or uske pass maen 200 kisan haen jo apni apni 1-2 acre zameen maen kheti krenge or jb fasal ko bechne ka time ayega toh jo toh contractor jisko apne liye khud k use k liye specific fasal chahiye hogi woh doosre kisano se lene ki bjaye khud apni contract farming valli fasal use krega or market se kisano ki ugayi huyi fasal woh kyu kharredega agar market se woh khareedega bhi toh usko jo theek lgge ussi rate oe khareedega kyuki MSP ki assurity toh inn bills maen hae hi nhi , isme marrega kaun *gareeb kisan* , or benifit kaun lega cirporate sector valla contractor , sochne ki baat hae🤔
Isi ka ek doosra scenario leke chlte haen
Lets say ki agar koi corporate player contract farming 2000 acre maen kr rha hae , jisko na toh apne ghar ka kharcha nikalna hae naa hi zameen khareedne ka paesa lgana hae , sirf per acre benifit nikalna hae , itne badde level pe suppose agar farming cost 900 rupee ayi per acre or corporate player ne apni 2000 acre ki fasal bechni hae or usne doosre corporate company ko 1000 per acre maen bech di toh 18 lakh ki investment krke usko 20 lakh mill gye lekin uss fasal ka market value set ho gya 1000 jabki uska MSP hoga 1300 ya 1500 lekin kyuki abb mandi nhi hae , MSP nhi hae toh jo 200 chotte kisan haen unko wohi fasal obviously km market value maen bechni pdegi yani k jha ek chotte kisaan ko 3000 milne the jisse usne apne ghar ko chalana tha, bachho ko padana tha , beti ki shadi krni thi wahi usko millege 2000 or yeh jo impact hae chotte kisan pe yeh bohat hi jyada brutal hoga
Abb isi act ka doosra provision suniye , woh kehta hae ki cobtractor kisaan ki zameen girvi rkh k uspe loan le skta hae , suppose koi cobtractor jis company ko kisan nhi jante woh 2000 kisano ki zameen ko contract farming k bahane se leta hae , fir uspe loan leta hae or vijay malya ki tra desh se bhag jata hae toh uski marr kisko pdegi , woh loan chukayega kaun , kisaan ya bank , effect kisko hoga dedh ko , or benifit kiska hoga sochne ki baat hae🤔
Abb isi bill ki ek orr provision jo kehti hae k kisan contract farming k liye normal legal system ka use nhi kr skta , iske liye alag channel hoga SDM level ka ,yeh provision ka matlab kya hae samj nhi atta ki sarkar ko kya problem kisan ke judicial system ko ise krne se , kahi iska readon yeh toh nhi ki judicial system independent hita hae , lekin administrative system jaese ki SDM , DC , police yeh sarkar , politicians or ameer corporate sectors k under hotte haen , kahi yeh indirectly kisaan ko apahij or system ko corrupt banane ki sajish toh nhi ...
Sochne ki baat hae🤔
Aur ek baat hae ki bill is baised as it could be termenated by contracter anytime but farmer cant terminate it
Why?Kisan k haq maen bill pr power contractor ko
Sochne ki baat hae 🤔
Rahi baat toh Why farmers of haryana and punjab are protsating Instead aap k according toh state governments should protest
Abb maen yeh dono points sabhi ko forward kr rha hoon , lekin abhi ek farm bill baki hae jiske flaws madam jitne achge se toh nhi lekin maen explain jroor kroga next comment maen , jisne yeh comment pda orr third bill k flaws janna chahta hae woh next comment ko read krle ....kyuki jusne yeh comment poora pda woh doosra bhi pdd lega
Dhanyavad
and do read comment by SK T..
@@parmjitkaursandhu1336 yes u r correct (law is not express at every point some things and exception to rule are implied thereto) lol being law student need u remind u laws are there ,government made it but it will be fully correct 😅 it's not possible after all humans are drafting it but finallality lies in FR in same as examples of passport act
Passport act manika gandhi s case supreme court s strict supervision over lose lows or inconsistent laws yes there is some kind of provision in second bill but remember the rule of justifiability of law lies there second point laws are good with bad provision or inconsistent to framers right doesn't means whole law is worng it's law. law can be declared null and void upto the inconsistency it is creating with farmers or anyone's right
Hey... you are an awesome inspiration. I study you immensely. I get to know things about India almost at first hand. This is grand. I hope one day I can live in India, at least after I retire, and I want to talk with the matters concerning India with some background knowledge. You have informed me so well. My blessings and support.
The most unbiased and unpolitical explanation ever♥️♥️🇮🇳🇮🇳
She has given you wrong information.. only 6% of farmers produce is acquired at MSP. Not cz of their lack of education.. its because only giv.acquires at MSP, the private traders they buy at less than MSP.. farmers are agitating to make MSP compulsary for any purchase to be made from farmers.
this Bill Is To Force GMOs In India ..Through Contract farming
,
To get The Control Over seeds and Our Health
,Government is Just a Puppet
Search This on You Tube
1. Genetic Roulette The Gamble of Our Lives
2. Bill Gates and his plans for world's future - Real Eyes
3. Modi government के farm bill के उन दिक्कतों की बात जिसने America-Europe में पहले से तबाही मचा रखी है
@@kabeerkabeer3285 ooo angrez ki ulad
Angrez jo lakho baar m kr pae h vo hm Hindustanion ne ek baar m kia h .
West ka example dena band kro
Or aap hi dekho in Librandu media ko
Hme to Bhartiya hone pr fakr h😎😎
@@MeenuKumari-hy2sl o madam ji Thori si apni dharamvaad , jaativadd K zehar se bhari hui Soch ko full stop lgao or apne desh k logo k liye sochna shuru kro thora logically , ek tarf toh apko duniya se mukabla krna hae or doosri tarf aap glbalisation se drte ho , koi ek criteria toh accept kro , dont be hypocratic but a factual person
@@DaljeetSingh-kz4bn globalisation and privatization ka virodh congress kr rgi h mr. M nhi
Mam you should add the procedure of farmers to private sector. How they will decide price of crops and what will be the security of farmers. It is good that government is deciding msp but how if private will decide. Think about it..thank you
Excellant! At last I have partly understood about the new farm bills
So clearly explained, current farmer issue is specific & should be termed as Punjab Farmer issue
Policies should pe explained to common people..Most of them even don't know what Govt is doing .
Thanks for this amazing video🙏
She is missguiding please cross check the facts regarding MSP.. and farmers demands for making MSP compulsary.. farmers are well awair of MSP. But in states without mandis private traders buy products at rate much less than MSP
@Vicky Sandhu can you please share the link for the information. 🙏
@Vicky Sandhu it's only slippery slope fallacy
Question:
Note: I had all these questions after I read about these bills from multiple news outlets, feel free to point out if I'm wrong about any of them
1. in case of dispute farmers cannot go to civil court, is that correct? and if yes then isn't that bad
2. farmers will have to pay a fee when they sell in mandi (just like it is right now) but if they choose to sell outside of mandi then they will not get charged anything, don't you think that in the long run then the purchasers will take adv. of this fact and force farmers to pay just a small hair above net profit that farmer will get if he/she decides to sell in mandi? and in most cases small farmers are not going to return without selling otherwise they'd have to cover the cost of two way trip from farm to outside seller
3. govt. is also not going to keep most info. about who farmers are selling, at what prices, etc.
4. there is also no limit on keeping the stock for processors and value chain members, how is that not going to get abused by some medium to big entity who will keep those produce in stock untill their prices get high enough?
Mandis are still open
Outside Mandi option is now open
Ander bech lo
Agar achha lagta hai to bahar bech lo
Agar bahar nuksaan hai to ander bech lo
🤦
@@abhinavsharma3819 Bhai India Ka opposition bilkul productive nhinhai ....... Ye sab fake news ke jaal mein fase baithe hai
@@abhinavsharma3819 why would some private company or traders would prefer mandi where they have to pay tax ?
Obviously these trader would also prefer to purchase outside mandi with no regulations .
These reform isn't going to make MSP legal. It will be choice. And i believe no traders are saint enough to go mandi and purchase where they have other options. Where they can make their own bid outside mandi.
Did you know that contract farming is not new ! Its already been happening from long in maharashtra , tamilnadu etc states
@@DhruvSoni-lb7nf well to fake news ko dur kaise karte hai debate and discussion karke na, aise zabardasti bill ko pass karvaoge to fir obviously logo k man mein shak paida hoga hi
Vikas dubey ki gadi achank palat gai to logo k man mein shak paida hua na k aise kaise achank news valo ko rukvaya gaya zabardasti and jab chance mila to gadi palat gai, right?
I think there should be A middle way.
Govt has to decide MSP for both apmc and private traders.
So the farmers can get a Saficient deal for there hard work.
????? Farmers can alway sell in APMC on msp if private companies are buying at lower price . APMC law is not cancelled .
@@anksssssssss No body will be there to buy from APMC as private players will not buy from APMC now . So crops which goes to APMC will be waste like as usual even if it goes to VIA MSP .
2. Not all crops are in MSP .
3. 68% is small land owners where produce is less and MSP has certain criterias of its own and only 6% of farmers make use to MSP due to lack of knowledge and exploitation.
4, New rules say if somebody betrays farmer they cannotgo to court , Local authority will give judgement which can be easily bought out by money by private players , so overall it big loss for farmer by Modi gov
@@mandeepchawla594 lots of miss information in ur msg .
1. Govt will buy it if no buyers at APMC as per the rule in essential commodities act. And there are many states which allowed selling crops outside APMC , and they are having no issues .
2. Crops which don't have msp , what the difference will new bill gonna make to them ??? Nothing , may be they got some better price becoz no tax and commision .
3. Ur statement contradict ur first comment . If farmers don't know about msp , them what the point of APMC ??? . Secondly issue with APMC is that farmers must have his own land to sell on APMC , small farmers don't have their own land , they farm on rented land , that's why they can't sell at APMC , those farmers got exploited by mediator who buy their products on lesser price and sell on APMC on higher price , and those small farmers have no other option but to get exploited becoz they can't sell it directly . But now they can sell directly at good price , all thanks to new bill . The major chaos in protest is created by big farmers who rent their land or those who buy cropsat cheap price from small farmers and sell at higher price at APMC .
4. Who said u can't go to court ???? U can go to court of u r u happy with desicion from local authority . And if u think local authority is bad , complain to state government , what center is gonna do if ue state government can't clean curroption from local authority ????
@@mandeepchawla594 Expanding MSP beyond the current Mandis will very well result in inflation. So while the farmer will think that he's getting more money now, in reality that extra money would be nothing more than inflated money. So his real income won't increase.
To increase the real income of people from any sector, you need external investment, which private players can very well provide. That's what these bills plan to do.
Farmers should have stopped chasing a particular crop instead opt for alternative most probably Horticulture and government needs to provide them a infrastructure,market, platform and policies in favour of them.
I was against Modi about MSP, but when u said, only 6% farmers are getting benefitted through this, then farmer bill must come, and today is the day, Farmer bill has passed. Hope it will change the situations of farmers, their income and standard.
1. The Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce Bill just says that all types of agri trade will be allowed (even outside state regulated) APMC mandis. So, now anyone can trade within the State or across the state all over India and it can be physical trade or online trade. And the most important thing is if Vivek opens a mandi/market for trade of agri commodities (ether i am procuring from farmers and selling it to retailers in my physical mandi or I opened an online portal just like amazon) anywhere in India then NO STATE CAN PUT ANY KIND OF TAX/CHARGES ON AGRI TRANSACTIONS.
2. But if trade happens through State APMC mandis then there are various charges. For example commission agents (arhatiyas) get 2.5%, State Govt imposes mandi charges and cess which gives them Revenue BUT all these charges get built in the price and ultimately the 135 crore consumers suffer in terms of higher prices. So, if the trade move out of these APMC Mandis (till 5th June no one was allowed to trade outside APMC), then who is at LOSS???.
Answer: The commission agents (intermediaries) and the State Govt and its corrupt officials. And who will gain..........135 crore consumers of India. And there is no direct impact on farmers but in future they will gain because of several mandis and buyers. And direct procurement from farmers may end up giving more money to farmers for their produce. BUT THEY WHY FARMERS ARE PROTESTING???? Answer is they are being lured into protest.
Big farmers of Punjab and Haryana who sell at MSP to FCI in these mandis are thinking (and are forced to think by politicians) that in future Govt. may stop procuring at MSP (but the amendment does not say this at all) of wheat and Rice and if prices fluctuates on lower side then they may loose because then they have to sell to private traders. BUT why not the other farmers of India are protesting. The Answer is....................MSP is announced for all over India for 25 crops but SINCE 1965........(when FCI got established).............FCI HAS PROCURED ONLY WHEAT AND RICE AND MAINLY FROM THESE TWO STATES PUNJAB AND HARYANA (and to a certain level from MP, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh also). BUT mostly Punjab and Haryana farmers, traders, commission agents, govt has benefitted till now. And who has lost...........135 crore Indians, All other state's farmers.
3. Actually in the last 50 years of this REGULATED agri trade has benefitted the corrupt intermediaries and officials/politicians and they dont want this system to be reformed. Govt should stop procuring at MSP and it should stop giving PDS foodgrains. And just transfer the same benefit in to their account. Everyone will benefit except these agents/corrupt FCI officials/politicians.
dummy they are not being lured. and farmers never took the benefit. it was the govt. now govt they want to focus more on corporate side which is not good for farmers. if you are not a farmer you will never understand. don't talk the talk. walk the walk. those farmers are not some stupid who don't know anything. we understand. i think you have to do some more research. he failed the whole india. first banknote demonetisation, then GST and now this.
Farm laws are indeed a Big GOOD thing for farmers. Surprisingly the well-to-do farmers in Punjab and Haryana want STATUS-QUO to continue. Farmers from other states do see a HUGE benefit from farm laws! The left elements and opposition have been very good at enhancing the confusion. Since this issue is happening in the mid-term it is not going to influence 2024 elections. Unnecessarily they are robbing the farmers from escalating to NEW HEIGHTS in the field of Agriculture
Madam, you are very good at propagating the middlemen of framing business but your nautanki is how good is the bill.
Comments on the level playing field of Farmers vis a vis the Corporate has not explained also on how the APMC law is letting traders cartel and making farmers to sell at below MSP. Cannot the Centre make a provision on purchasing anything produced by farmers and then asking the traders to purchase from Central Government in this way the BJP party will not have to face opposition in any state?
Dude the farmers do not need to sell lower than MSP. MSP is there...We just need to educate farmers about MSP.
I don't understand why the government can't go on tv to explain this the way you've done. Everything would become black and white!! Fantastic job and thank you for bringing this to us.
Priya ji,
I have a few queries ma'am..
1. Why can't farmers form a similar cartel (as traders) to control the prices at which to sell to the traders? At least this should be possible with the new farming bill...
2. Isn't the agricultural produce tax free item? If yes, then how does the Central government benefit for this bill?
3. You say that farmers won't benefit as much as consumers... but in free market economy an equilibrium is achieved by demand and supply. Thus why would a farmer go directly to a retailer if he is happy to get MSP.. he can go to the APMC for that...he will go to the retailer to get a good deal. A retailer too will also give him a better rate than MSP as they too have avoided the middle man and will still get a higher margin..
4. Land acquisition act is not just necessary for farm sector but more importantly for establishing Industries... isn't it? Moreover, in a country like ours, poor farmers need jobs with steady incomes rather than farming outputs which are very much dependent on many variables such as monsoon, MSP, Politics etc...
5. I think, another point that needs mentioning wrt poverty in farming relates to the dimnishing size of land holdings with successive generations due to distribution of land within more & more siblings... this leads to smaller and smaller land holdings which further leads to poverty as the output reduces in proportion.
Pls share your thoughts...
She wont answer this trust me.
She is pro-govt.
Not a single utter word on protection of MSP.
1. Artiyas before start bidding have there own meeting first in which they set there rates. You know the quality of crop depends on certain factors amount of sunlight it got, fertilizers, soil conditioning, etc. Every field does not get all the things right So there are crops if not sell fast will rot in mandis. So farmers have there majburi to sell the crop on artiyas rate Farmer's profit has shrunk to such a margin that he is farming by taking loans and if he does not sell his crop fast 2 things happens 1. His crop rottens 2. Interest keeps on increasing. It is hard for a farmer to risk not selling.
2. Centres aim is corporatization of farm lands. To let ambanis adanis to cash on farm lands and latter fund them in elections again. Removing tax only favours corporates to establish themselves in farms and abolish APMC mandis. Mandis require roads, infrastructure maintenance if no one comes to mandis how we can keep mandis running. Eventually they have to dismantle APMC mandis. As our finance minister nirmila sitharaman said in 2019.
3. Whoever comes will give a better prices and i think in 3 years every farmer will be doing contract farming and government will remove APMC mandis and MSP because there will not be any role of it to play moreover it requires funds to keep mundis running.
If you see in long run in future i can easily see exploitation of farmers. There will not be any alternative to go. No APMC mandi No MSP. Only option will be the corporates.
4. I agree with you that farmers do need a steady income source and agriculture do involve risks. In bihar they removed APMC now a farmer who owns 10 acres land comes to punjab to farm for another guy who owns same 10 acre of land because he is not getting atleast the MSP. I belong to a farming family, i live in village, i saw this happening. Where will we go if this same things repeat itself. Farmers do need alternative options for income but it does not mean that we can only be used for cheap labour.
Mam itna perfect kaise समजा सक्ती हो आप... Nice mam 🙏🙏🙏 .... Very nice explained
Yr di ap itne ache se explain krti hu sch me mja a jta hai...
Aur bhi broad topic smjha dia kro di ....ap diffrent area se
FROM FARMER'S DAUGHTER- PLEASE DONT MISSGUIDE.. For the record, ONLY 6% farmers GET MSP BENEFIT is not because of the lack of education for farmers. The government only acquires wheat rice and sugarcane at MSP prices. Other products like maize dalls etc. Their MSP is launched but GOV. hardly acquires them, PRIVATE agencies CAN ACQUIRE THESE PRODUCTS AT LESS THAN MSP.. THE DEMAND OF FARMERS IS TO MAKE ACQUISITION OF CROPS BELOW MSP CRIMINAL.. SHE NO WHERE MENTIONS THAT.. WE FARMERS ARE NOT ILLITERATE.. THATS THE REASON WE KNOW WHEN TO FIGHT FOR OUR RIGHTS
this Bill Is To Force GMOs In India ..Through Contract farming
To get The Control Over seeds and Our Health
>
Search This on You Tube
@Vicky Sandhu I read your points but let's wait for more details and effects caused by this bill after its enforced.
I don't understood all your reasoning but I got the gist of it.
Bahut achha mam ji may god media bhi aise hi samjhate so that protest kam ho 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻💓💓
Ma'am you did a mistake... no farmer was bound to sell his product through APMC before the bills were passed !
I second you 👍
@@visible12329 nahi bhai kuch galat info aayi h aapke paas... kisi ke upar boundation nahi thi ki vo APMC me beche.... sirf choice thi....
my father is a farmer brother, he sells half of its potato to APMC and half to a bhujia firm named "Bikaji Bhujia" and no one is stopping him even before the bills!
I V_haan matlab tumhare pitaji state k sath dhko krrhe the.. sarri detail do kab se kabtak kiya aesa , mai abhi exice wale bhjta hu. Sarkari paisa khare ho kyunki sarkar ko ghnta ni frak padta tha pehle
@@ManuNGhost bata dena 3 ton maal gaya hai pichle mahine or 4 ton tak allowed hota hai... pehle law padhke aao
O mere bhai ... Tu lagta dirf dabbe k andar ki baat janta hai tbhi to tum jaise log sadako pe hai pta hi nahi k seen kya hai.. hahaj
Sunn jis state me tu reh ra hai uss state ne apmc act me change kiye hai nahi yo jo actual apmc act hai wo padh pehle baatein krek hwa bazi na karr.. 12 gadiya seb ki itawa bhjta hu.. har saal.. pehle khud padhle kya hai apmc aur konsi state ne usme changes kiye
I think you should also see Dr. Faizan Mustafa on this topic.
Link plz
But his video does not talk about the impact of these bills on farmers. He sticks only to constitutional provisions. So his video is not very useful.
this Bill Is To Force GMOs In India ..Through Contract farming
To get The Control Over seeds and Our Health
>
Search This on You Tube
@@kabeerkabeer3285 GMO has no proven side effects. We have GMOs since 2006. But aren't able to use them because of islamic protests regarding genetic modification.
@@kabeerkabeer3285 GMO has no proven side effects. We have GMOs since 2006. But aren't able to use them because of islamic protests regarding genetic modification.
👏👏👏lucid explanation...ma'am...You got one more subscriber from today onwards...
Very good unbiased video, one of the best about this issue.
Ok, so new bills are trying to end monopoly of traders (govt supporters) that is great.
But this will do not cater the problem of exploitation by buyers which won't buy produce at MSP or above MSP, because new bills do not provide legal backing to MSP. Hence farmers are protesting.
Only 6% farmers are able to buy at MSP+ rates.
I saw many videos of law subject on youtube but she is the best in all ❤️