Got the PX2S earlier this week and have put in two 9-mile runs so far. The PX2S has been the most anticipated running shoe of this year for many (especially for PXS v1 fans like myself!) after all the hype generated by BITR guys after TRE late last year. Then, there was the "leak" launch of the green colorway and a bunch of negative reviews from the early adopters on Reddit. I had the chance to get it myself but I just didn't want green and decided to wait. So, initially before the launch, I had these super high expectations of the PX2S being a lighter, faster, and more propulsive version of v1. Then, there was a big letdown about the increased weight and all the negative reviews about how firm it felt and was a step backwards. So, my expectations were tempered (or greatly reduced) and I came to think that it's not better but a different kind of shoe altogether from v1. Maybe it's the lowered expectations and, like you say, the novelty of a truly over-the-top running shoes and it's shiny and new but, after the two runs, I have to say that I really, really like this show. It isn't as bouncy, fast, and exciting as the v1 but it retains the DNA of what made the v1 so fun while improving stability (although this was never an issue for me) for easy/slow paces and better fit on the upper. The ride is unique - similar in some ways but also quite different from the v1. The bounce is more controlled and focused that is directed forward - not this wild trampoline kind of upward bounce I get from v1. I can understand why some people just couldn't get on with the v1 - the wild bounce and the narrow heel would become a stability nightmare for many casual runners. The v2 is definitely more stable although it isn't a 'stability shoe' by any stretch of the definition. With the v1, I was always mindful of using strictly forefoot strikes when turning corners, jumping on and off of sidewalks, running on cambered roads or with lots of potholes and other obstacles, and when running downhill at fast paces. Although stability isn't an issue for me with v1, I still remember to be more careful than when I'm running in other shoes and choose routes that are flat, smooth, and straight-line tarmac as much as possible. With v2, I can run in it like any of my other shoes with "normal" stack height shoes in the "legal" 40mm stack height category. This stability improvement alone makes the v2 a very different feeling shoe along with the added weight. Now, let's talk about the weight and all the negative talk about it. Yes, it's noticeably heavier than v1 but, for me, isn't as bad as I expected. I weighed my US size 8 and it came in at 9.9oz, virtually identical to my Nimbus 25, More v4, and SC Trainer in the same US size 8 and Invincible Run 2 which is 8.5 half-size up for me and about 0.4oz heavier than PX2S. It's about 1.5oz heavier than v1 for me - noticeable but not as bad as I expected. And I can say with confidence that the PX2S is much bouncier, faster, more propulsive, and a *LOT* more enjoyable than all the aforementioned shoes - not even close. The PX2S handled my fast paces (6:00~7:30/mile or 3:44~4:40/km) just fine with the sweet spot being in the 7:30~7:45/mile range. I can say that I don't even want to try going faster than 8:00/mile or 5:00/km pace with the aforementioned easy/recovery pace shoes. The thing about the PX2S is that it now feels fine at easy and slow paces of 9:00~10:00/mile or around 5:40~6:13/km while the v1 feels unstable and cumbersome. When I lace up the v1, I'm thinking long runs at moderate-to-fast paces. With the v2, I can think of moderate to occasional fast as well as easy/recovery due to the improved stability at slower paces. With the v1, I can push it to all-out and it can compete with the likes of Vaporfly 2/3 and Adios Pro 3 due to its amazing propulsion. I've run short bursts of under 5:00/mile paces with v1 but I'd be hesitant to try going that fast with v2. So, speed-wise, the v1 wins but, for all-out speed, there are better options. As for the ride and running experience, the v2 - just like v1 - sort of sits in a category of its own. There is nothing quite like it. I'm not saying it's "better", just that it's very unique and different. Some will love it and some will hate it. That's what makes trying different shoes and experiencing them so fun. Personally, I really like it. I'm now glad that it's different from v1 and it's an improvement in some ways. You just can't have it all in one shoes. Adidas decided to address the stability issue of v1 and that simply meant added weight. I'm light (around 5'6 or 167cm and 125lbs or 57kg) with strong ankles so I'm sure that has something to do with how and why both v1 and v2 feel stable to me. The v2 feels even more stable for slower runs, which I welcome. It's bouncy but also reassuringly firm and is very protective underfoot. My feet and legs felt very fresh after the 9-mile runs and I'm looking forward to taking it on a 15~20 mile run tomorrow at an average pace of around 9:00/mile. The PX (OG) and PXS were and remain a "controversial" and divisive shoe. The PX2S continues that tradition and, if anything from a business sense, it sure is generating a lot of publicity for Adidas. It's definitely not for everyone. It's expensive and I'd have to say that only a small percentage of everyday runners would benefit from it. It's not a shoe I'd recommend to even experienced runners unless they are interested in such a high-stack shoe. I'm a big fan of Adidas Adizero line of shoes and the LSP midsole foam and really enjoy running in the PXS, Adios Pro 3, Takumi Sen 8, Adios 8, and Boston 12. They just work *for me* better than other shoes from other brands. So, naturally, the PX2S seems to work just fine for me and fills a certain niche that's complementary to the other Adizero shoes. If you are an Adizero fan, then I think it's worth checking out the PX2S and see how it fits in your collection/rotation. If you haven't tried any Adizero shoes, I'd recommend starting out with, say, the Adios Pro 3 or the Boston 12 to get the feel of what the LSP foam is like and what a mega version of it would be like in the PXS and this PX2S.
Alex!!!!! This is a perfectly worded and most analysed or measured comment I have ever read. Not just on my channel, I mean ever. You have articulated my entire opinion so eloquently. Thank you so much for this!
very well written and good review. i have the v1 and love the feel and was worried about all the negative reviews regarding v2 and was thinking of switching my long run training shoe from the v1 to the vaporfly 3 when i can get it. it is always sold out. i was also thinking of stocking up on v1 since i like the shoe but interestingly, on the adidas website today, the price for v1 is $300, as the same for v2. i was hoping to get a discount on the shoe itself and stock up.
A comparison so many of us have been very curious to hear about!! The first Strung seemed to create some totally divided opinions , people seemed to either love it or hate it!! So it sounds like this one might win more runners over ?? Well … we’ll see!! Me I’m a Boston girl myself ever since the 10, and am soooo happy to just stick with them!! 🥰
It’s the beauty of this running thing. Diversity in opinion. I personally love this shoe despite the weight. That’s the down side of it but honestly despite that, I love the feel of it when running. It won’t work for everyone for sure but for me… it does!
Keep up the good work brother. These shoes look unique and incredible. It's been a week now and i still don't feel like taking them out for a run just so that i can preserve them well ... 😅
i usually wear 10.5 but in the prime X V1 I wear a 10 because of the massive room in the toe box which I love. When I tried on version 2 in size 10 it was much tighter and even felt more narrow which is odd since the landing platform is actually wider! Also the shoe is so stiff that if you don't tie down enough it will heel slip just due to the stiffness. In any case I ordered the 10.5 to see if there is a difference. If not I may have to return these, good thing I bought an extra pair of the V1. I may take the money and purchase the Asics super last or the Mizuno wave rebellion pro. But we'll see... I'll write back when I get the new ones Monday. Btw great video you have a new subscriber. Keep it up!
I love the fairness in this comment and I can’t argue with your experience. For me personally, maybe because I have a bias for max cushion styles but I just everything about this shoe which is rare. I love the look of it, I love the performance and also love how daring they have been with it. It a reviewers dream. Yes it’s heavy and I wish it was lighter but hey, I don’t mind the weight if it can be rationalised. Just my view. Thank you for joining my little part of this UA-cam world.
or get the first version now and get the 2nd version next year when price drops. i love a fast cadence so a weight gain is not always welcome unless it's a very light shoe to start with but i also like a stable non-stability shoe
Great review👍🏻 I have the original prime X (1) I love the bounce and how my legs feel after running. BUT I don’t use them much as they are so unstable and if I don’t know the route and running with friends I worry we might hit some uneven paths or trails. Tempted by the Strung 2 though if they are stable enough to handle more than straight roads! In a rotation they would no doubt be a great addition, just have to justify the price of yet another pair of shoes 😬
I don’t necessarily want to promise that they will be stable for you because I only share my own experiences and I never struggled with the first one to promise that the second delivers more stability. I can only share that it has features that would do so. A wider base, a lesser drop etc. but please please let me know your thoughts if you try them
Hey mate! Really love this style of video! Earned my like and sub! I’m still deciding between the pro 3 and prime - do you have any recommendations on when one should pick one over the other?
Way too much Cushion unless you're a runner with carrying some weight. Just seeing the lateral play can leave some pretty risky biomechanics leading to an ankle roll.
Very fair comment and can’t argue too much with it. I agree with your view but I’m also that runner you’ve just described L. I generally have a bias towards max cushion shoes
@@AubreyRunning : Mate, I understand. At this point Max Cushion shoes can benefit on impact protection therefore protecting heavy shock travel to your knees. Its a win for that type of athlete. Have you thought about putting 'support' insoles in your max cushion shoes. To have the best of both worlds would be a win. Imagine, MAX Cushion while keeping your gait in line. :) That's just my set up :) All the Best!
That’s very fair but also the beauty of running is the diversity of opinions. I genuinely love the shoe but more importantly I do my best to say why on these reviews. I do my best to explain why I love them.
One of the worse thing to do with the strung material is to sew a super hard plastic to it and create a rough bulge that rubs your feet when you try to tie it down as the lacing gap is too wide ! It practically useless . It not a bad boy , it’s the worse design to copy NB super comp and make it even worse . The shoe is so stiff and heavy . It’s useless . Trying to mimic the air pods using a mash Mellow foam just doesn’t give you any sort of energy return . Yes if your feet can fit into the poor sock strung , you will notice if you run a power meter . It needs more power to get the same pace . It doesn’t have the pop the v1 has and yes it’s more stable too , but if you are looking at a super soft , daily runner . May as well buy the NB v2 trainer which is so much cheaper and lighter and feels the same . This sluggish v2 dung is not even worth buying .. too much hype and poorly executed. I would not recommend this bad shoe .
I am learning that everyone has their opinion and have a strong right to have that opinion and I sincerely respect yours. Thank you for taking time to engage with the video and starting up the conversation… but I also hope that you will allow me and others to have a different view to yours
I appreciate when shoe brand innovates but there is no innovation here. You replace energy rods by double plate system and gained extra weight so where is the innovation? If you reduced the weight or at least be able to keep the same weight while having double plate then that's improvement. Well at least I know this reviewer likes to push products
@@fergusdenoon1255 you should also google innovation... if additional weight on shoes is innovation for you then you'll love it when it's triple plate season with 5 layers of foam and additionsl 80g but hey, more "stuff" and higher numbers is innovation right! I'll stick to real innovation when I see it and label other things as marketing gimmicks when the innovation doesn't really improve things.
Got the PX2S earlier this week and have put in two 9-mile runs so far. The PX2S has been the most anticipated running shoe of this year for many (especially for PXS v1 fans like myself!) after all the hype generated by BITR guys after TRE late last year. Then, there was the "leak" launch of the green colorway and a bunch of negative reviews from the early adopters on Reddit. I had the chance to get it myself but I just didn't want green and decided to wait. So, initially before the launch, I had these super high expectations of the PX2S being a lighter, faster, and more propulsive version of v1. Then, there was a big letdown about the increased weight and all the negative reviews about how firm it felt and was a step backwards. So, my expectations were tempered (or greatly reduced) and I came to think that it's not better but a different kind of shoe altogether from v1.
Maybe it's the lowered expectations and, like you say, the novelty of a truly over-the-top running shoes and it's shiny and new but, after the two runs, I have to say that I really, really like this show. It isn't as bouncy, fast, and exciting as the v1 but it retains the DNA of what made the v1 so fun while improving stability (although this was never an issue for me) for easy/slow paces and better fit on the upper. The ride is unique - similar in some ways but also quite different from the v1. The bounce is more controlled and focused that is directed forward - not this wild trampoline kind of upward bounce I get from v1. I can understand why some people just couldn't get on with the v1 - the wild bounce and the narrow heel would become a stability nightmare for many casual runners.
The v2 is definitely more stable although it isn't a 'stability shoe' by any stretch of the definition. With the v1, I was always mindful of using strictly forefoot strikes when turning corners, jumping on and off of sidewalks, running on cambered roads or with lots of potholes and other obstacles, and when running downhill at fast paces. Although stability isn't an issue for me with v1, I still remember to be more careful than when I'm running in other shoes and choose routes that are flat, smooth, and straight-line tarmac as much as possible. With v2, I can run in it like any of my other shoes with "normal" stack height shoes in the "legal" 40mm stack height category. This stability improvement alone makes the v2 a very different feeling shoe along with the added weight.
Now, let's talk about the weight and all the negative talk about it. Yes, it's noticeably heavier than v1 but, for me, isn't as bad as I expected. I weighed my US size 8 and it came in at 9.9oz, virtually identical to my Nimbus 25, More v4, and SC Trainer in the same US size 8 and Invincible Run 2 which is 8.5 half-size up for me and about 0.4oz heavier than PX2S. It's about 1.5oz heavier than v1 for me - noticeable but not as bad as I expected. And I can say with confidence that the PX2S is much bouncier, faster, more propulsive, and a *LOT* more enjoyable than all the aforementioned shoes - not even close.
The PX2S handled my fast paces (6:00~7:30/mile or 3:44~4:40/km) just fine with the sweet spot being in the 7:30~7:45/mile range. I can say that I don't even want to try going faster than 8:00/mile or 5:00/km pace with the aforementioned easy/recovery pace shoes. The thing about the PX2S is that it now feels fine at easy and slow paces of 9:00~10:00/mile or around 5:40~6:13/km while the v1 feels unstable and cumbersome. When I lace up the v1, I'm thinking long runs at moderate-to-fast paces. With the v2, I can think of moderate to occasional fast as well as easy/recovery due to the improved stability at slower paces. With the v1, I can push it to all-out and it can compete with the likes of Vaporfly 2/3 and Adios Pro 3 due to its amazing propulsion. I've run short bursts of under 5:00/mile paces with v1 but I'd be hesitant to try going that fast with v2. So, speed-wise, the v1 wins but, for all-out speed, there are better options.
As for the ride and running experience, the v2 - just like v1 - sort of sits in a category of its own. There is nothing quite like it. I'm not saying it's "better", just that it's very unique and different. Some will love it and some will hate it. That's what makes trying different shoes and experiencing them so fun. Personally, I really like it. I'm now glad that it's different from v1 and it's an improvement in some ways. You just can't have it all in one shoes. Adidas decided to address the stability issue of v1 and that simply meant added weight. I'm light (around 5'6 or 167cm and 125lbs or 57kg) with strong ankles so I'm sure that has something to do with how and why both v1 and v2 feel stable to me. The v2 feels even more stable for slower runs, which I welcome. It's bouncy but also reassuringly firm and is very protective underfoot. My feet and legs felt very fresh after the 9-mile runs and I'm looking forward to taking it on a 15~20 mile run tomorrow at an average pace of around 9:00/mile.
The PX (OG) and PXS were and remain a "controversial" and divisive shoe. The PX2S continues that tradition and, if anything from a business sense, it sure is generating a lot of publicity for Adidas. It's definitely not for everyone. It's expensive and I'd have to say that only a small percentage of everyday runners would benefit from it. It's not a shoe I'd recommend to even experienced runners unless they are interested in such a high-stack shoe. I'm a big fan of Adidas Adizero line of shoes and the LSP midsole foam and really enjoy running in the PXS, Adios Pro 3, Takumi Sen 8, Adios 8, and Boston 12. They just work *for me* better than other shoes from other brands. So, naturally, the PX2S seems to work just fine for me and fills a certain niche that's complementary to the other Adizero shoes. If you are an Adizero fan, then I think it's worth checking out the PX2S and see how it fits in your collection/rotation. If you haven't tried any Adizero shoes, I'd recommend starting out with, say, the Adios Pro 3 or the Boston 12 to get the feel of what the LSP foam is like and what a mega version of it would be like in the PXS and this PX2S.
Alex!!!!! This is a perfectly worded and most analysed or measured comment I have ever read. Not just on my channel, I mean ever. You have articulated my entire opinion so eloquently. Thank you so much for this!
@@AubreyRunning Thanks, Aubrey! Happy to contribute in what little way I can to your channel. Keep up the great work!
very well written and good review. i have the v1 and love the feel and was worried about all the negative reviews regarding v2 and was thinking of switching my long run training shoe from the v1 to the vaporfly 3 when i can get it. it is always sold out. i was also thinking of stocking up on v1 since i like the shoe but interestingly, on the adidas website today, the price for v1 is $300, as the same for v2. i was hoping to get a discount on the shoe itself and stock up.
A comparison so many of us have been very curious to hear about!! The first Strung seemed to create some totally divided opinions , people seemed to either love it or hate it!! So it sounds like this one might win more runners over ?? Well … we’ll see!! Me I’m a Boston girl myself ever since the 10, and am soooo happy to just stick with them!! 🥰
It’s the beauty of this running thing. Diversity in opinion. I personally love this shoe despite the weight. That’s the down side of it but honestly despite that, I love the feel of it when running. It won’t work for everyone for sure but for me… it does!
This is the first time I see one of your videos. I like your style. You have my like and subscription.
Oh wow, thank you so much for that, I sincerely appreciate having you on board
Keep up the good work brother. These shoes look unique and incredible. It's been a week now and i still don't feel like taking them out for a run just so that i can preserve them well ... 😅
Let me know when you finally do and how you find them. Thanks for the feedback too on the content. Truly appreciate it
i usually wear 10.5 but in the prime X V1 I wear a 10 because of the massive room in the toe box which I love.
When I tried on version 2 in size 10 it was much tighter and even felt more narrow which is odd since the landing platform is actually wider!
Also the shoe is so stiff that if you don't tie down enough it will heel slip just due to the stiffness.
In any case I ordered the 10.5 to see if there is a difference. If not I may have to return these, good thing I bought an extra pair of the V1.
I may take the money and purchase the Asics super last or the Mizuno wave rebellion pro.
But we'll see... I'll write back when I get the new ones Monday.
Btw great video you have a new subscriber. Keep it up!
I love the fairness in this comment and I can’t argue with your experience. For me personally, maybe because I have a bias for max cushion styles but I just everything about this shoe which is rare. I love the look of it, I love the performance and also love how daring they have been with it. It a reviewers dream.
Yes it’s heavy and I wish it was lighter but hey, I don’t mind the weight if it can be rationalised. Just my view.
Thank you for joining my little part of this UA-cam world.
Haven’t even started this video yet and I’m already enjoying it lol
Genuinely love this shoe! Well, both of them
Thank you
You're welcome, my pleasure
or get the first version now and get the 2nd version next year when price drops. i love a fast cadence so a weight gain is not always welcome unless it's a very light shoe to start with but i also like a stable non-stability shoe
Good idea that one and definitely agree because bargains are only a matter of time
Hi thanks for a great review. I just want to know. What is the difference between the Y-3 prime x2 strung vs the regular prime x2 strung?
I’m sure I know what the Y-3 version is
@@AubreyRunning can you tell me then?
Great review👍🏻 I have the original prime X (1) I love the bounce and how my legs feel after running. BUT I don’t use them much as they are so unstable and if I don’t know the route and running with friends I worry we might hit some uneven paths or trails. Tempted by the Strung 2 though if they are stable enough to handle more than straight roads! In a rotation they would no doubt be a great addition, just have to justify the price of yet another pair of shoes 😬
I don’t necessarily want to promise that they will be stable for you because I only share my own experiences and I never struggled with the first one to promise that the second delivers more stability. I can only share that it has features that would do so. A wider base, a lesser drop etc. but please please let me know your thoughts if you try them
Thanks I will let you know but will be a while I’m waiting for a discount 👍🏻👍🏻
Hey mate! Really love this style of video! Earned my like and sub! I’m still deciding between the pro 3 and prime - do you have any recommendations on when one should pick one over the other?
Thank you so much for the feedback, I love for comments like this! It means a lot! As for my choice, I’d say pro 3 all day!
@@AubreyRunning thanks for your response! Keep up making those kind of banger videos!!
I love your videos man
Thank you so much… genuinely, that’s a big compliment and makes it all worth doing
Great comparison video
Glad you enjoyed it and cheers for the feedback. I sincerely appreciate it
Way too much Cushion unless you're a runner with carrying some weight. Just seeing the lateral play can leave some pretty risky biomechanics leading to an ankle roll.
Very fair comment and can’t argue too much with it. I agree with your view but I’m also that runner you’ve just described L. I generally have a bias towards max cushion shoes
@@AubreyRunning : Mate, I understand. At this point Max Cushion shoes can benefit on impact protection therefore protecting heavy shock travel to your knees. Its a win for that type of athlete.
Have you thought about putting 'support' insoles in your max cushion shoes. To have the best of both worlds would be a win. Imagine, MAX Cushion while keeping your gait in line. :) That's just my set up :) All the Best!
PX2 for training. PX1 for racing ;)
Fair enough… I can’t argue with that except I’m probably the other way round. The PX2 is my half marathon shoe
Well done!
Thank you so much, very kind
Ignoring the price, it sounds like a shoe I could love but, already having a pair of V.1's that I bought for £144, I just can't justify it!
The price is not defendable unfortunately. Only when you’re a UA-cam running shoe reviewer and you have shoe collection problem can you justify it 😂😂😂
@@AubreyRunning I just bought some new trail shoes so daren’t even contemplate it 😂😂
@@TheHutchRuns what did you get
@@AubreyRunning ASICS Fuji Speed 2
😎
👏👏
my Boston 11 was high enough , imagine that stilleto ! hell no😊
😂😂😂😂 stiletto 😂😂😂
I'm surprised by your review. Most of people who purchased this shoe consider it a downgrade from Version 1
That’s very fair but also the beauty of running is the diversity of opinions. I genuinely love the shoe but more importantly I do my best to say why on these reviews. I do my best to explain why I love them.
One of the worse thing to do with the strung material is to sew a super hard plastic to it and create a rough bulge that rubs your feet when you try to tie it down as the lacing gap is too wide ! It practically useless . It not a bad boy , it’s the worse design to copy NB super comp and make it even worse . The shoe is so stiff and heavy . It’s useless . Trying to mimic the air pods using a mash Mellow foam just doesn’t give you any sort of energy return . Yes if your feet can fit into the poor sock strung , you will notice if you run a power meter . It needs more power to get the same pace . It doesn’t have the pop the v1 has and yes it’s more stable too , but if you are looking at a super soft , daily runner . May as well buy the NB v2 trainer which is so much cheaper and lighter and feels the same . This sluggish v2 dung is not even worth buying .. too much hype and poorly executed. I would not recommend this bad shoe .
I am learning that everyone has their opinion and have a strong right to have that opinion and I sincerely respect yours.
Thank you for taking time to engage with the video and starting up the conversation… but I also hope that you will allow me and others to have a different view to yours
they look SO squishy!
Have you tried these! The price is ridiculous but I love them!
@@AubreyRunning I haven’t. The last pair of Adidas I ran in was the supernovas???? Like a decade ago… wild to even say that out loud 😆
I appreciate when shoe brand innovates but there is no innovation here. You replace energy rods by double plate system and gained extra weight so where is the innovation? If you reduced the weight or at least be able to keep the same weight while having double plate then that's improvement.
Well at least I know this reviewer likes to push products
I think so too, especially if he likes them.
You may need to Google what innovation means...
You don't have to, it's just a suggestion, but it may stop you saying stupid stuff.
Well said , this shoe is rubbish
@@fergusdenoon1255 you should also google innovation... if additional weight on shoes is innovation for you then you'll love it when it's triple plate season with 5 layers of foam and additionsl 80g but hey, more "stuff" and higher numbers is innovation right! I'll stick to real innovation when I see it and label other things as marketing gimmicks when the innovation doesn't really improve things.
@@fergusdenoon1255 👏