What if you drunk at home and someone trying to get inside your house and they don't care that you inside , you grab weapon and protect yourself. You were using weapon while under influence... What will happen?
Retroactive 18usc922g9 LAUGHTENBERG AMENDMENT used in NICS BACKGROUND CHECKS, took away my 2A rights for life and i never knew it. I didn't get DUE PROCESS for this illegal RETROACTIVE, EX POST FACTO, DBL JEOPARDY BILL OF ATTAINDER that INFRINGED my 2A rights violating RULE OF LAW without informing me making me a felon without due process if i excersize my 2a rights. For a 30 yr old falsly accused misdemeaner of cpl days jail with no proof of said misdemeaner action.
No victim no crime I'm teaching Civics classes to young people in the community very soon. This is exactly what I will be teaching them. No victim no crime. But there's plenty of people to crime victim these days lol
But the government is the victim. No different than having a King rule us. This is not the way America was meant to be, though this is the America we allowed to happen.
I'm 60, have owned guns basically my entire life including pistols, been a hunter my entire life, and I carry concealed every day. I also partake cannabis daily. I'm a peaceful, sane, level headed adult who has never been unemployed, has had the same job for 30+ years, and I meet every one of my responsibilities with an 800+ credit rating. Being told I'm somehow a federal criminal because of my fondness for cannabis is as un-American as it gets. Government, the ATF, is the actual criminal entity, not me.
You just stated all the reasons why people like you must be made into criminals by the acronyms (ATF, FBI, NSA, DEA, DOJ...), so they can imprison you when the time comes. Keeping pot illegal just gives them a way to do it.
As a medical cannabis user, Having to decide on health vs safety every single morning has not only caused mental anguish, it's caused me to lose all faith in the government and the governments ability to have any common sense approach to regulation. I have no representation in the government.
just quit smoking bro I highly doubt you "need" weed. Just be responsible and do what's right for you and your family by quitting weed and not letting the government have the ability to take away your guns and put you away. I don't agree with the laws but you gotta make a choice.
@@clutchboi4038 but that’s extremely un-american. we should be able to do what we want as long as we are not harming others or attempting to harm others
@@JimJWalker ???? Ok. But that doesn't have any effect on either the etymology of the word or my historically accurate explanation for your question. Neither of those require the existence of state or federal firearms laws.
@@taylorlibby7642in 1791? I don’t think anyone had cartridges in their gun belt in 1791. I also doubt there was any prohibition in carrying in a public house.
What's crazy is people still compete field sobriety tests. They're not required in any state and only give them evidence. Blood, breath or urine and never on the side of the road.
How is this not being seen as the final nail in the coffin for federal marijuana laws? This clearly shows they have no constitutional basis and should not be applied in any manner.
Your absolutely right. The US Constitution gives courts 3 routes to having jurisdiction over you. Common law "which in fact holds if there is no victim or damage to someone else's property then there is no crime. Equity which deals with contracts and the violation of contracts, and maritime which can combine both but you must have a valid contract in court to dispute. They're roping us into statutory law which in reality is only the color of law. The courts are acting as courts of color to enforce it and is how and why they can circumvent our Constitutional rights. If you know how you can force them to acknowledge your Common Law rights and in turn you can sue them for violating your rights. "That includes officers and judges". They don't like the real law of the land. Understand that part of the function of the US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.
because it only applies to citizens in the 5th circuit, LA,TX,and MISS. If the supreme court doesn't rule on this issue, you are still subject to it's enforcement. They will do everything they can to keep this from the SOTUS.
@@dark_winter8238 It could be argued that banning a medically beneficial plant on a federal level with ZERO benfit to anyone or anything other than for-profit prisons is a crime against humanity.
It literally makes me sick to think that people are getting put in a jail cell over smoking weed! The fact that this still happens in 2023 is just another showcase of how flawed our justice system is. No one should be stripped of the right to defend themselves and their loved ones over marijuana. Period!
Ben Franklin also was a prolific whoremonger and spread STDs across Paris. Our founding fathers were never supposed to be role models. They just facilitated a better style of government.
They grew hemp for rope, sacks, bearing packing etc. We were an agricultural nation back then. Are there any writings other than marijuana organizations that have bonafide proof?
Everything alters your mindset. Coffee. Lack of sleep. Too much sleep. Etc. Legal use of marijuana should never make you think twice about defending yourself.
@@smugfrog8111 That story was popular when I was in college in the early 1970s, but like most "facts" promoted by cannabis enthusiasts over the decades, it's not supported by any real documentation. They grew the plant, but that was for use of its fibers to make rope and cloth. Saying they smoked the crap they grew on their plantations is an insult to all the growers who have advanced the science over the last 50 years. Hell, even most of the home grown we had in college back in the day would barely get you high.
@@bjs301 "Of course they grew it but the never smoked it" Common my man, Really? I don't make the claim they where burning all day like some people do, but... just.. common. Of course they tried it. IDK if you know this or not, but Hemp can "Go hot" and produce far more THC than normal. It's not the straight up fire indoor you can get now with like 35% THC or more. But it'd be decent for 1760s and 70s standards. They can and do have dormant genetics that become dominant and cause their seeds to produce marijuana flower. This happens now, it happened then. Man has been smoking Cannabis since history began, literally. So it's pretty much common sense they absolutely did smoke it. Also, taking into account the shear level of government propaganda against cannabis in the last 80 or so years. It's basically impossible to know what's really true about it at this point. They would have certainly been capable of, and willing to scrub or alter historical documents at some point over that time.
@@bjs301 There actually is indication Washington smoked it because theres field notes of them separating male and female plants. This is only done to increase thc production and make it so the female plants dont produce seeds.
@@hurpaderpp There are actual reasons to separate male and female hemp plants grown for industrial use. There is no evidence that Washington smoked pot. If he had, and if any of the other founders had, there would be contemporary records reflecting it. Just like there were loads of contemporary records reflecting Washington's (and others') beer consumption. There is tons of literature on colonial use of other drugs, such as opium. If they were really smoking weed, why would there be no record, and only iffy suppositions?
The legalization of Marijuana was a gun control honeypot anyways. This government doesn’t do anything at all to benefit you; it’s ALWAYS to benefit them.
@@marcelobrozovic9872 Because it's a federal problem. There should be no restriction on guns by government, period. The second amendment is VERY clear.
@@grimreaper4811 Abolish taxation. Deregulate weed, alcohol, tobacco, and guns. Death penalty for constitutional oath violations. Decentralize information and currency. Expose the aristocracy while declassifying all secrets. Vote for me 2024 🤠
@@skylinefootball Right, all the freedom with no freedom. Exactly free to do nothing, as you say because it can all be invaded to check whether or not you are drunk or whatnot at any time. Freedom, but not. Is exactly what you're saying.
The marijuana issue is ridiculous when one considers the history of how federal marijuana legislation was enacted in this country and the long rivalry with the alcohol industry. Marijuana and alcohol are essentially the same and *should be treated as such*: in small amounts they're medicinal, but heavy and prolonged use/abuse has negative effects. Then there's the pharmaceutical effects regarding pain management that I'm positive BIG PHARMA is lobbying hard against. My uncle Ricky (82) began growing over ten years age when his wife, aunt Elda, got sick with cancer. He didn't care a rat's piece of cheese what the Fed's thought - he wasn't harming anyone, he was helping his wife and he wasn't going broke doing it. *edited for clarity
They're not "essentially the same". Alcohol has literally killed millions of people, and has contributed to countless other lapses in morality resulting in serious real world consequences that directly affect others. Cannabis has killed exactly zero people. Sure, you can get very intoxicated on either one, but it's not the same - so much so that it's not even comparable. It's not even comparing apples to oranges. I've never seen any solid scientific evidence of cannabis causing harm with long term use. I've seen studies that correlate cannabis use with mental disorders, but they had small sample sizes and besides - that's basicaly like saying asprin causes headaches because people that take aspirin experience headaches.... and you can guess who funded said studies. That being said, it's not illegal to drink bleach or smoke cigarettes, and it shouldn't be illegal to drink alcohol or smoke cannabis. Even if they can all kill you. Even if you would recommend people don't do it - freedom first. I agree to some extent that they should be treated the same legally. I think anyone 18 or older should be allowed to buy/sell/trade/consume either one freely without fear of prosecution. Licenses shouldn't be cost-prohibitive or arbitrarily limited in numbers, but they are. People should be free to choose to purchase alcohol or cannabis from a local producer without the need for a license, but there should be a system in place for producers to obtain one. The free market would quickly result in most people obtaining a license to ensure product safety to their customers, and if people still chose to buy a bottle of moonshine or a bag of weed from some random dude in a parking lot, that's on them, but people should be free to choose. A license to sell liquor is basically a "what if" law. What if someone sells to kids? What if someone sells tainted alcohol? Well how about we just make both of those things illegal and leave the what if laws to societies devoid of freedom.
Daily medical users of cannabis are still robbed of their second amendment rights. Even if I never traveled with them together, I would still be a prohibited possessor in my home, and defense of myself would be illegal if I used cannabis regularly, the same as opioids (my illness qualifies for either). More reform is definitely needed.
the medication you take should not effect ppl around you that is the main issue just because you want to smoke it that dose not mean you can or should be allowed
@TaskForceEntertainment2022 right so some people "medicate" with alcohol, even though of course Marijuana actually has medial uses and alcohol doesn't, what's the difference there? People who drink can certainly effect those around them, often more so then Marijuana. The only argument would potentially be the smell, but the same could be said about cigarettes. Cigarettes and alcohol are both legal and both can effect people around you and both have less (if any) medical benefits.
There’s a dispensary that’s connected to a gunshop in my city lol so I don’t get how they can still justify making it illegal to have both on you at the same time.
The only reason the government keeps it illegal is because they can't effectively tax everyone who is using it on the sly. The medical card users pay plenty of tax on it but there are millions who use it without any card because they don't want to lose their 2A rights in the commie states.
Actually medical card holders in most states pay very minimal tax. In Illinois it's like 1%, the same as on prescription drugs. It's really the only benefit of having a card anymore in states where recreational is also legal. States can and are making lots of money on taxed weed. They way to do that is to set substantial but not outrageous taxes on it. If you tax it at something ridiculous like 25-40%, people stay with the black market. At around 10%, most people won't bother with street weed and the state makes hundreds of millions a year.
Back when I had a card I didn't realize that was the case until I got to the end of a long line and then they showed me the "VIP" entrance for medical people!🤣 Really though the most reliable way for anyone to avoid lines is don't go on a Friday night or the weekends. Pick a random Tuesday afternoon.
Our forefathers drank beer daily and opioids were commonly used! The legislative branch found no need to regulate either at the time of the Constitution and Bill of Rights 1791.
They charged this dude with felony firearm possession for smelling like pot? Not even in possession of the weed? I hope they get sued after the Supreme Court gets a hold of this
In 1619 the Virginia Assembly passed legislation requiring every farmer to grow hemp. Hemp was allowed to be exchanged as legal tender in Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Maryland. Domestic production flourished until after the Civil War, when imports and other domestic materials replaced hemp for many purposes.
Hi Steve. It ceases to amaze me how criminals who actually commit crimes, including unlawful possession etc don't get convicted or they get off with no bail and serve no time, but law abiding citizens get convicted. It just boggles my mind.
Literally, don’t care still going to smoke weed and own a firearm if people cannot get blackout drunk and still be able to access the firearms then I’m definitely not gonna follow this rule and just hope for the best.
I absolutely 110% am Of the same mindset yeah I literally don’t care I’m still going to smoke weed and on my going and carry my gun obviously not while I’m intoxicated but when I’m sober absolutely every day all day
How many people have been put in prison using this law? Will they get a retrial now? Or will it have to go through the Supreme Court before that happens?
This is how case law is born... Bravo, 5th Circuit! "The RIGHT of the PEOPLE to KEEP and BEAR ARMS Shall Not Be Infringed." Read that until you understand it.
If you ever end up on a grand jury for someone who has these charges levied against them, refuse to indict them. If the grand jury fails to do their job, and you end up on a criminal jury, refuse to convict. Protect your fellow Americans from tyrannical, unconstitutional entities at all costs. It just might be your turn someday.
I k ow it’s not federally legal “yet” but almost half of the us has legalized marijuana in some fashion, at what point do they stop grasping for these cases
1781 is when the first time marijuana and hashish was brought by the Turkish ambassador that came brought a bunch with him and many of the founding fathers also grew it on their farms and consumed it regularly as well. Even the history channel reported about this back in the late 2000’s on one of their special series.
Even that's too much. A guy can't sit in his own home, smoke a joint, have a glass of whiskey / a beer or two and clean his guns now? That's how it's always been.
That makes no sense. You do realize you can eat marijuana and it also comes in pill forms now. You telling me I can't eat food and be in possession of my gun?
It's all about discipline. Hell, I think it's dumb that going out for a couple beers means you can't conceal. Some people actually drink responsibly and don't deserve to be stripped of their rights to self defense because SOME people are morons, but SOME =/= EVERY
Wow, I can't believe someone would cabbage up and go plinkin. Why would you use something that will increase your caution, focus, and muzzle-awareness? ReeeeeeeEEEEE sounds way too safe for me 😉
Now he should sue that judge, dea agent and the cops for that bs and get back pay plus damages for his time spent in prison in civil court and demand a PUBLIC apology by each of them on the MSM!
I think people get confused and think that when somebody uses drugs, their soul leaves their body, and a demon takes over. Although that may be a nice excuse for bad behavior, it is not true. The person you are is still there just with different stimulation, and how you choose to act is still ultimately up to you.
In all honesty I smoke weed sometimes not every day but when I’m done with my day absolutely I indulge but you know what that should not impede my ability to protect myself and the people that I love it’s be quite honest with you alcohol is far more dangerous here’s why it impairs your mental decision making it impairs her judgment makes you act like a jackass in most cases secondly causes damage to your liver weed does none of those things the only thing you might do is get sleepy and eat a bag of chips so dangerous to me would be somebody drinking and strapping a gun onto them the pothead might still strap a gun to them but only after they’ve gone to sleep and gotten up and are sober again
The logic that a "criminal" isn't entitled to 2A rights would lead to including that person's right to free speech, right to vote, right to protest, right to exercise religion, etc. Because they are saying that committing a crime eliminates your rights from the Constitution.
When your society votes to make a substance legal.... you shouldn't lose constitutionally protected rights because some foreigners (FEDS are Foreigners to me and my statesman) disapprove.
Missouri repealed the prohibition of marijuana 6 months ago, and our amendment protects gun owners within the state, but not from Federal agents, so it's a grey zone mine field for someone if they want to be sure they are doing the lawful thing.
What grey zone? Federal law takes precedence over state law. Liberals can pass all the state legal MJ laws they want to entrap conservatives and take their rights from them. And I guarantee state law enforcement will arrest for violating this regardless and turn it over to the feds if they choose to do so to get a nice felony enhancement for other criminal charges.
@@bradleyrhodes2820 While I would agree, it's a small consolation to own that knowledge if you are arrested, jailed, fined and fired from your job, could lose your home, marriage and kids.
That’s because Missouri along with all the other “State of’s” are a franchise of the federal corporation. See the buck act. Title 4 U.S.C. sect. 106-116. The republic state must claim sovereignty under the 10th amendment. The federal government is ONLY supposed to have jurisdiction over the 10 square miles of DC.
Police officers and DEA agents partake in occasional off duty drinking to various degrees of intoxication. Do they lose their jobs and get prosecuted for carrying their service weapon? If not, why not? Case dismissed
4.5 Years in prison? My friend Ralph was railroaded by the fuzz here in NY, and had a 14 Year prison sentence! *Possession of marijuana in proximity to his firearms.. But in Nazi-NY, they went above and beyond.. They took every single 'add-on' that his rifles had, added them all up, and charged separately. Unreal.. I remember 1 charge that was having a 'bayonet mount' specifically.. Absolute corruption/tyany.
The job of an FFL isn't to investigate people for their use of marijuana, their job is to see that they fill out the paperwork and have the proper ID and if they are approved let them have their paid for property. Where I live there are at least 5 or more marijuana dispensaries within 10 minutes, so yes many people locally are buying and using marijuana. I also happen to live in an area with more nudist communities than anywhere in the US, personally I think that is more weird than someone who smokes marijuana. So, morally speaking what is right and what is wrong and who has the right to tell you that your banned from participating in your constitutionally protected rights. If your bank robber, no guns for you, smoke on your own time, not a bad person, well you should own a gun as you deserve to be able to protect not only yourself but your family and your property.
I got charged in a similar instance. I went and got my medical card and the judge gave me a plea in abeyance or something like that after a year on probation charges were supposed to be dropped but now I’m to scared to carry or even go shooting it’s been years since I’ve felt lawful even though I’ve gone through all the procedures
I don't use it, but have always thought it was rather ridiculous it was banned. Haven't heard of anyone being high and shooting up their neighborhood. Snack machine, maybe. Don't carry when you're impaired -- alcohol, weed, whatever. Regardless, Daniels should be out. He didn't commit a crime using his firearm.
It isn't about that but is about increasing jail sentences of gang members. Caught with a gun and test positive for Marijuana now you have a federal beef you can plead out for another 2 to 5 in jail. At least that was part of the plan to keep black people form owning guns.
Should we not carry when tired? On the way home from a ridiculous 12 hour graveyard shift? That's similar to being drunk. Being stoned after smoking weed pales in comparison to the impairment of being drunk or merely tired. If I want to have a smoke, that shouldn't require to disarm myself and become vulnerable. I wouldn't want to be robbed while enjoying a smoke.
@@Steve-ev6vx Yeah the 2nd doesn't allow you to become a danger to the public. Which is my point. If you are not able to drive safely you are probably not able to see what's behind your target either.
Government corruption. If it worked properly, the highest law of the land would actually function as the highest law. Instead it only counts when courts feel like it.
@@rodvan-zeller6360 Same way they can act on civil forfeiture. They don't. "Good conscience", if they had it previously, is long gone by the time they're doing these acts.
The more it becomes legal in states the more it should be treated like alcohol and if you can own guns and have beer in your fridge then you should be able to own guns and have a little weed
Thank you for the video, I found out that investing is not for everybody, you just need a strong stomach too see your portfolio go down. It might be wiser for a novice to start with copy trading investing, but it is not easy. To invest in growth stocks it is another level, definitely you need to know what are you doing.
From my own point of view, you need to invest smartly if you need the good things of life. so far i've made over $255k in raw profits from just 6 months into the market from my diversified portfolio strategy and i believe anyone can do it you have the right strategy, mutual funds takes long time but investing smartly is the key for short term. Most of us tend to pay more attention to the shiniest position in the market to the cost of proper diversification.
This is a phenomenal advice for a new stock traders and investors who want that quick short term game, but don't see the light at the end of the tunnel.
@@waltercamelaI've been solely investing in real estate. But with the recent hyper home pricing i've liquidated a few things and have $45k in cash laying around idle. Would love to get your recommendations, I'm in search of something lucrative in the current crazy markets, i will be glad.
My portfolio is very much diversified so it's not like i have a particular fund i invest in, plus i dont do that by myself. i follow the trades of Mrs Karen Gaye Gray.
She is a popular broker you might have heard of. I can correctly say she's worth her salt as a financial advisor as her diversification skills are top notch, because i see that in her results as my portfolio grows by averages of 10 to 15% on a monthly basis, unlike i can say for my IRA which has just been trudging along, my portfolio just mirrors what she trades and not just on some particular industries of my choosing.
Under federal law you can't even use with a state medical MJ license. It is not recognized under federal law as valid becuz MJ has no federally recognized medicinal value, and federal law takes precedence. There is so much misunderstanding about this...
It's no different than someone sitting at a Bar stool lawfully licensed to carry then drive's home .. Clear over reach of government especially by an officer's judgment who does not have a medical degree ! Smh
Yes they did all of our founding fathers up & to include Benjamin Franklin Thomas Jefferson Thomas Jefferson‘s favorite thing was cannabis tea don’t know how he made that 🤔But anyways yes you are correct
No I don’t think they would at all I don’t think they would have any problem with the United States citizens smoking weed I think that would be the least of their problems or their concerns their main concern would be is how did we let this government get the way it has because they have too much power and they need to be checked really hard I’m talking into the boards hockey style
With all of the government funded propaganda studies against cannabis over the last century, I'd be willing to bet money the answer is no. Or, that study is omitting key components to make it sound much worse than it is.
No. Correlation =/= causation. There have been a few biased studies that show a correlation between schizophrenia and cannabis use. Implying that cannabis caused the skitzophrenia without any articulable reasoning would be akin to suggesting that aspirin causes headaches because people that get headaches use aspirin. There has never been any sold scientific evidence to suggest that cannabis use causes schitzophrenia - at least that I've seen. And I've looked.
Schizophrenia can be triggered in someone by weed, but those people where already schizo and where going to turn anyway. Schizophrenia usually hits in you early to mid 20's and 1-2 percent of the population is going to have it whether they use cannabis or not.
"Shall not be infringed" I think it's been incredibly inconsistent that people who drink alcohol and people that are on prescription medications are allowed to have firearms. But a little greenery and all of a sudden, you're a scourge to society? It's nice to see judges finally upholding their oaths.
What's the difference between and alcoholic and a pot head? A drink driver will plow through a stop sign, a pot head will wait for the sign to turn green.
How could Presidents who admittedly done drugs (even harder) can control the worlds second largest nuclear weapons arsenal but a bus boy at Arbys can’t own a handgun if he’s smoked a joint… 😂
What if there was a law that prohibited a marijuana user from exercising his First Amendment rights like marching in a protest or pracricing his religion freely?
I would also argue that they don't charge anyone with 18usc because they drink a beer , and I've seen many many more drunk people unlawfully use a firearm than a person thats high on pot
Excellent excellent analysis Mr. Stephen Great video very informative I appreciate you making this video you are a blessing to all of us Pro second amendment citizens. 👍🏼💯
When you buy a firearm you have to declare that you are not an "unlawful" user of marijuana. Since Marijuana is illegal on the Federal level, if you say you aren't a user on the form, you are "lying" to the government. Until that is corrected, they will continue to arrest people. If you have a medical card, you are not an "unlawful" user on the state level but are still "unlawful" on the Federal level. If you cross a state line from a state that allows marijuana and go into another state that allows legal marijuana, you are still a "criminal" because crossing state lines falls under Federal jurisdiction / intercommerce laws.
The court has already ruled that lying on a form in order to maintain a basic right is protected speech even if you’re lying. You have no obligation to self incriminate.
Are there tests that can delineate with absolute clarity if someone is under the influence of pot at that moment as opposed to if someone got high with a fishing buddy three weeks ago. Thanks for your help.
U.S. District Judge Patrick Wyrick set this precedent in back in February of this year with U.S. v Harrison. It could be argued on Freedom of Religion and Right To Pursue Happiness.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
▶[SECRET GIVEAWAY] Enter To Win Here: bit.ly/47AxCeM
What if you drunk at home and someone trying to get inside your house and they don't care that you inside , you grab weapon and protect yourself. You were using weapon while under influence... What will happen?
Retroactive 18usc922g9 LAUGHTENBERG AMENDMENT used in NICS BACKGROUND CHECKS, took away my 2A rights for life and i never knew it. I didn't get DUE PROCESS for this illegal RETROACTIVE, EX POST FACTO, DBL JEOPARDY BILL OF ATTAINDER that INFRINGED my 2A rights violating RULE OF LAW without informing me making me a felon without due process if i excersize my 2a rights. For a 30 yr old falsly accused misdemeaner of cpl days jail with no proof of said misdemeaner action.
FYI
August 9, 2023, the federal Fifth Circuit ruled 922(g)(3) is unconstitutional.
www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/22/22-60596-CR0.pdf
HUNTER STILL GUILTY OF LYING ABOUT HIS DISHONORABLE DISCHARGE FROM THE NAVY GUN CHARGE STILL VALID
WTF kind of lawyer says "Pot". It's caninibus in English. M word is Espanol.
Putting people in prison for conduct that hurts nobody else is tyranny. It's that simple. No victim, no crime.
No victim no crime I'm teaching Civics classes to young people in the community very soon. This is exactly what I will be teaching them. No victim no crime. But there's plenty of people to crime victim these days lol
Also the term driver means for hire so you if you're not driving and getting paid you are actually traveling
The government trying to teach "everyone is a victim" just for being alive mentality.... Got your victim :smh
But the government is the victim. No different than having a King rule us. This is not the way America was meant to be, though this is the America we allowed to happen.
@@o3nisoaso3 The question is, a victim of what? Violence or fraud? If not either of these, no victim.
Just because we use cannabis should never infringe upon our rights to defend ourselves
There is more alcohol induced shootings than cannabis.
George Washington and other forefathers literally grew cannabis.
@smoggington1240exactly
Or seek employment of our choosing.
Especially if it’s legal at the state level
I'm 60, have owned guns basically my entire life including pistols, been a hunter my entire life, and I carry concealed every day. I also partake cannabis daily. I'm a peaceful, sane, level headed adult who has never been unemployed, has had the same job for 30+ years, and I meet every one of my responsibilities with an 800+ credit rating. Being told I'm somehow a federal criminal because of my fondness for cannabis is as un-American as it gets. Government, the ATF, is the actual criminal entity, not me.
You just stated all the reasons why people like you must be made into criminals by the acronyms (ATF, FBI, NSA, DEA, DOJ...), so they can imprison you when the time comes. Keeping pot illegal just gives them a way to do it.
As a medical cannabis user,
Having to decide on health vs safety every single morning has not only caused mental anguish, it's caused me to lose all faith in the government and the governments ability to have any common sense approach to regulation.
I have no representation in the government.
I'd rather be caught with it than without it. It's hard to prove you're high on the scene unless you have bloodshot eyes.
@@Billybob-go8hnyou a cop or something?
@@CookieIsBack024 Yep...... You're now under investigation for asking to many questions🤓👮♂️
just quit smoking bro I highly doubt you "need" weed. Just be responsible and do what's right for you and your family by quitting weed and not letting the government have the ability to take away your guns and put you away. I don't agree with the laws but you gotta make a choice.
@@clutchboi4038 but that’s extremely un-american. we should be able to do what we want as long as we are not harming others or attempting to harm others
Question: If guns were not historically carried in bars, then why was a pour of liquor that was traded for ammunition referred to as a "Shot glass"?
Because guns would be checked at the door but gun belts, usually with ammunition loops containing extra rounds, would still be worn.
@@taylorlibby7642 Not in every city. That was a city ordinance and not state or federal law in 19th century.
@@JimJWalker ???? Ok. But that doesn't have any effect on either the etymology of the word or my historically accurate explanation for your question. Neither of those require the existence of state or federal firearms laws.
I always wonderd that too, and I dont drink... or have ammo
@@taylorlibby7642in 1791? I don’t think anyone had cartridges in their gun belt in 1791. I also doubt there was any prohibition in carrying in a public house.
Funny how DEA and police in general seem to “smell” marijuana everywhere
Cops are worse than theives becaus they act literally tje same but also like theyre justified
What's crazy is people still compete field sobriety tests. They're not required in any state and only give them evidence. Blood, breath or urine and never on the side of the road.
It's cause they had just finished smoking one themselves before they pull you over
It smells like ass, so yeah, you'll smell it everywhere.
How else are they going to be able to violate your 4A rights?
I'm glad a judge has some sense. As we all know common sense is not common!
Soon to be called uncommon sense
How is this not being seen as the final nail in the coffin for federal marijuana laws? This clearly shows they have no constitutional basis and should not be applied in any manner.
Your absolutely right. The US Constitution gives courts 3 routes to having jurisdiction over you. Common law "which in fact holds if there is no victim or damage to someone else's property then there is no crime. Equity which deals with contracts and the violation of contracts, and maritime which can combine both but you must have a valid contract in court to dispute.
They're roping us into statutory law which in reality is only the color of law. The courts are acting as courts of color to enforce it and is how and why they can circumvent our Constitutional rights. If you know how you can force them to acknowledge your Common Law rights and in turn you can sue them for violating your rights. "That includes officers and judges". They don't like the real law of the land. Understand that part of the function of the US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.
because it only applies to citizens in the 5th circuit, LA,TX,and MISS. If the supreme court doesn't rule on this issue, you are still subject to it's enforcement. They will do everything they can to keep this from the SOTUS.
For profit prison still need bodies.
Because there is a law that prohibits it. Having that law is not against the constitution.
Is it a stupid law? Yes, but a law none the less.
@@dark_winter8238 It could be argued that banning a medically beneficial plant on a federal level with ZERO benfit to anyone or anything other than for-profit prisons is a crime against humanity.
It literally makes me sick to think that people are getting put in a jail cell over smoking weed! The fact that this still happens in 2023 is just another showcase of how flawed our justice system is. No one should be stripped of the right to defend themselves and their loved ones over marijuana. Period!
Tell this to these old ass politicians that's been in that seat since 1940s
🔥🌲💨💯
Did you realize that Benjamin Franklin grew weed on vast scales, right? He was even known for making his own liquor infused with cannabis.
This is true
Everyone knows it they just won’t admit the truth they would rather have a weirdo opinion
Ben Franklin also was a prolific whoremonger and spread STDs across Paris. Our founding fathers were never supposed to be role models. They just facilitated a better style of government.
@@2A_supporter couldn’t have said it better myself.
They grew hemp for rope, sacks, bearing packing etc. We were an agricultural nation back then. Are there any writings other than marijuana organizations that have bonafide proof?
I bet that for every marijuana user denied their second amendment right there is relatively a zero percent impact on violent crime
Exactly the point, much easier to take away guns from the average citizen than it is a criminal.
True, because “good guys” with guns don’t stop “bad guys” with guns.
Everything alters your mindset. Coffee. Lack of sleep. Too much sleep. Etc.
Legal use of marijuana should never make you think twice about defending yourself.
The 2nd amendment didn’t say it’s ok to infringe if you smoke weed did it now?
Not only did it no prohibit it, the Founding Fathers likely, if not certainly grew and smoked cannabis.
@@smugfrog8111 That story was popular when I was in college in the early 1970s, but like most "facts" promoted by cannabis enthusiasts over the decades, it's not supported by any real documentation. They grew the plant, but that was for use of its fibers to make rope and cloth. Saying they smoked the crap they grew on their plantations is an insult to all the growers who have advanced the science over the last 50 years. Hell, even most of the home grown we had in college back in the day would barely get you high.
@@bjs301 "Of course they grew it but the never smoked it"
Common my man, Really? I don't make the claim they where burning all day like some people do, but... just.. common. Of course they tried it.
IDK if you know this or not, but Hemp can "Go hot" and produce far more THC than normal. It's not the straight up fire indoor you can get now with like 35% THC or more. But it'd be decent for 1760s and 70s standards.
They can and do have dormant genetics that become dominant and cause their seeds to produce marijuana flower. This happens now, it happened then.
Man has been smoking Cannabis since history began, literally. So it's pretty much common sense they absolutely did smoke it.
Also, taking into account the shear level of government propaganda against cannabis in the last 80 or so years. It's basically impossible to know what's really true about it at this point.
They would have certainly been capable of, and willing to scrub or alter historical documents at some point over that time.
@@bjs301 There actually is indication Washington smoked it because theres field notes of them separating male and female plants. This is only done to increase thc production and make it so the female plants dont produce seeds.
@@hurpaderpp There are actual reasons to separate male and female hemp plants grown for industrial use. There is no evidence that Washington smoked pot. If he had, and if any of the other founders had, there would be contemporary records reflecting it. Just like there were loads of contemporary records reflecting Washington's (and others') beer consumption. There is tons of literature on colonial use of other drugs, such as opium. If they were really smoking weed, why would there be no record, and only iffy suppositions?
The legalization of Marijuana was a gun control honeypot anyways. This government doesn’t do anything at all to benefit you; it’s ALWAYS to benefit them.
www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/22/22-60596-CR0.pdf
I've been saying it's a trap
why do you blame a government when this is a state question and if I remember well tennesse is a red state?
@@marcelobrozovic9872 so is Indiana but that doesn't keep the progressive boot on everyone
@@marcelobrozovic9872
Because it's a federal problem.
There should be no restriction on guns by government, period.
The second amendment is VERY clear.
"Some of my finest hours have been spent on my back veranda, smoking hemp and observing as far as my eye can see."
-Thomas Jefferson.
Cannabis needs to be 100% legal to grow, consume, trade and sell without government interference.
Even if it becomes legal,
Government contractors will probably still have to drug test.
Should be tax free, too
@@grimreaper4811 Abolish taxation. Deregulate weed, alcohol, tobacco, and guns. Death penalty for constitutional oath violations. Decentralize information and currency. Expose the aristocracy while declassifying all secrets. Vote for me 2024 🤠
Agree, but the public needs to be protected as well. No public consumption or carrying weapons or driving while intoxicated.
@@skylinefootball
Right, all the freedom with no freedom.
Exactly free to do nothing, as you say because it can all be invaded to check whether or not you are drunk or whatnot at any time.
Freedom, but not. Is exactly what you're saying.
The government is never on our side.
The amount of cases this is going to affect is gonna be crazy.
The marijuana issue is ridiculous when one considers the history of how federal marijuana legislation was enacted in this country and the long rivalry with the alcohol industry. Marijuana and alcohol are essentially the same and *should be treated as such*: in small amounts they're medicinal, but heavy and prolonged use/abuse has negative effects. Then there's the pharmaceutical effects regarding pain management that I'm positive BIG PHARMA is lobbying hard against.
My uncle Ricky (82) began growing over ten years age when his wife, aunt Elda, got sick with cancer. He didn't care a rat's piece of cheese what the Fed's thought - he wasn't harming anyone, he was helping his wife and he wasn't going broke doing it.
*edited for clarity
They're not "essentially the same". Alcohol has literally killed millions of people, and has contributed to countless other lapses in morality resulting in serious real world consequences that directly affect others. Cannabis has killed exactly zero people. Sure, you can get very intoxicated on either one, but it's not the same - so much so that it's not even comparable. It's not even comparing apples to oranges. I've never seen any solid scientific evidence of cannabis causing harm with long term use. I've seen studies that correlate cannabis use with mental disorders, but they had small sample sizes and besides - that's basicaly like saying asprin causes headaches because people that take aspirin experience headaches.... and you can guess who funded said studies.
That being said, it's not illegal to drink bleach or smoke cigarettes, and it shouldn't be illegal to drink alcohol or smoke cannabis. Even if they can all kill you. Even if you would recommend people don't do it - freedom first. I agree to some extent that they should be treated the same legally. I think anyone 18 or older should be allowed to buy/sell/trade/consume either one freely without fear of prosecution. Licenses shouldn't be cost-prohibitive or arbitrarily limited in numbers, but they are. People should be free to choose to purchase alcohol or cannabis from a local producer without the need for a license, but there should be a system in place for producers to obtain one. The free market would quickly result in most people obtaining a license to ensure product safety to their customers, and if people still chose to buy a bottle of moonshine or a bag of weed from some random dude in a parking lot, that's on them, but people should be free to choose. A license to sell liquor is basically a "what if" law. What if someone sells to kids? What if someone sells tainted alcohol? Well how about we just make both of those things illegal and leave the what if laws to societies devoid of freedom.
@donnyfever3374I mean you technically can however it's very hard to lol
The first death from the Devils lettuce will be the first one. They are having a hard time getting over the "Reefer Madness" movie days.
Hell, don't forget: Too much WATER can kill you... EASILY!
@donnyfever3374I’ve greened out a lot
Daily medical users of cannabis are still robbed of their second amendment rights. Even if I never traveled with them together, I would still be a prohibited possessor in my home, and defense of myself would be illegal if I used cannabis regularly, the same as opioids (my illness qualifies for either). More reform is definitely needed.
Unconstitutional laws dont matter .
The federal government should not be involved with telling me what type of medication I can or cannot take.
*You get prescribed cannabis*
Government: Jail
*You get prescribed opiates*
Government: That's fine
You're darn right.
It isn't any of their business how we heal ourselves.
@@TheJessC
There is No, Heroin Sulfate, U.S.P.
Schedule 1, Quaaludes, MJ, Heroin, LSD
the medication you take should not effect ppl around you that is the main issue just because you want to smoke it that dose not mean you can or should be allowed
@TaskForceEntertainment2022 right so some people "medicate" with alcohol, even though of course Marijuana actually has medial uses and alcohol doesn't, what's the difference there? People who drink can certainly effect those around them, often more so then Marijuana. The only argument would potentially be the smell, but the same could be said about cigarettes. Cigarettes and alcohol are both legal and both can effect people around you and both have less (if any) medical benefits.
There’s a dispensary that’s connected to a gunshop in my city lol so I don’t get how they can still justify making it illegal to have both on you at the same time.
The only reason the government keeps it illegal is because they can't effectively tax everyone who is using it on the sly. The medical card users pay plenty of tax on it but there are millions who use it without any card because they don't want to lose their 2A rights in the commie states.
Actually medical card holders in most states pay very minimal tax. In Illinois it's like 1%, the same as on prescription drugs. It's really the only benefit of having a card anymore in states where recreational is also legal.
States can and are making lots of money on taxed weed. They way to do that is to set substantial but not outrageous taxes on it. If you tax it at something ridiculous like 25-40%, people stay with the black market. At around 10%, most people won't bother with street weed and the state makes hundreds of millions a year.
@kenofken9458 medical cards let you skip the line ahead of recreational users in my state so that's a benefit
@@kenofken9458no tax in Florida for medical
Back when I had a card I didn't realize that was the case until I got to the end of a long line and then they showed me the "VIP" entrance for medical people!🤣
Really though the most reliable way for anyone to avoid lines is don't go on a Friday night or the weekends. Pick a random Tuesday afternoon.
This channel needs more of this lawyer.
Our forefathers drank beer daily and opioids were commonly used! The legislative branch found no need to regulate either at the time of the Constitution and Bill of Rights 1791.
www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/22/22-60596-CR0.pdf
Thomas Jefferson grew weed so safe to say he smoked it too
They charged this dude with felony firearm possession for smelling like pot? Not even in possession of the weed? I hope they get sued after the Supreme Court gets a hold of this
In 1619 the Virginia Assembly passed legislation requiring every farmer to grow hemp. Hemp was allowed to be exchanged as legal tender in Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Maryland. Domestic production flourished until after the Civil War, when imports and other domestic materials replaced hemp for many purposes.
Hi Steve. It ceases to amaze me how criminals who actually commit crimes, including unlawful possession etc don't get convicted or they get off with no bail and serve no time, but law abiding citizens get convicted. It just boggles my mind.
Yes like Hunter Biden
@@pogolaugh You got what I was insinuating with this. 👍
Literally, don’t care still going to smoke weed and own a firearm if people cannot get blackout drunk and still be able to access the firearms then I’m definitely not gonna follow this rule and just hope for the best.
I absolutely 110% am
Of the same mindset yeah I literally don’t care I’m still going to smoke weed and on my going and carry my gun obviously not while I’m intoxicated but when I’m sober absolutely every day all day
Exactly
I made a snippy comment before but then i watched the whole video and am very pleasantly surprised of the commitment to the law.
THANK YOU
How many people have been put in prison using this law? Will they get a retrial now? Or will it have to go through the Supreme Court before that happens?
This is how case law is born... Bravo, 5th Circuit!
"The RIGHT of the PEOPLE to KEEP and BEAR ARMS Shall Not Be Infringed."
Read that until you understand it.
If you ever end up on a grand jury for someone who has these charges levied against them, refuse to indict them. If the grand jury fails to do their job, and you end up on a criminal jury, refuse to convict. Protect your fellow Americans from tyrannical, unconstitutional entities at all costs. It just might be your turn someday.
Yes! People go to jury duty and protect your fellow citizens against tyranny
Absolutely no individual should be incarcerated for cannibis possession in the United States.
Under this ruling, that UA-cam gunner, FPSRussa, can now seek leave to appeal his conviction.
That would be the comeback of the century
Free The Professional Russian!
I k ow it’s not federally legal “yet” but almost half of the us has legalized marijuana in some fashion, at what point do they stop grasping for these cases
Most of us would go to jail if we got caught. Let’s be honest 😂
1781 is when the first time marijuana and hashish was brought by the Turkish ambassador that came brought a bunch with him and many of the founding fathers also grew it on their farms and consumed it regularly as well. Even the history channel reported about this back in the late 2000’s on one of their special series.
Natives and Mexicans already had it locally
@@JamesBond-ut5iv fake news it doesn't grow natively here.
Any law regarding firearms is unconstitutional
One shpuld be able to smoke weed, possess firearms and be free to do so. Treat it like alcohol just dont be in possession of the gun while you smoke
Even that's too much. A guy can't sit in his own home, smoke a joint, have a glass of whiskey / a beer or two and clean his guns now? That's how it's always been.
That makes no sense. You do realize you can eat marijuana and it also comes in pill forms now. You telling me I can't eat food and be in possession of my gun?
It's all about discipline. Hell, I think it's dumb that going out for a couple beers means you can't conceal. Some people actually drink responsibly and don't deserve to be stripped of their rights to self defense because SOME people are morons, but SOME =/= EVERY
Wow, I can't believe someone would cabbage up and go plinkin. Why would you use something that will increase your caution, focus, and muzzle-awareness? ReeeeeeeEEEEE sounds way too safe for me 😉
@jonathancrouse8003Yup, it calms the body and makes you steadier.
Now he should sue that judge, dea agent and the cops for that bs and get back pay plus damages for his time spent in prison in civil court and demand a PUBLIC apology by each of them on the MSM!
I think people get confused and think that when somebody uses drugs, their soul leaves their body, and a demon takes over. Although that may be a nice excuse for bad behavior, it is not true. The person you are is still there just with different stimulation, and how you choose to act is still ultimately up to you.
In that case, alcohol should be a drug and pot. Should just be an over-the-counter prescription.
Imagine how people who are disabled are treated all because they take medications that are legally prescribed.
Exactly
Just like women who blame whorish behavior on "the alcohol": they think it gives them COVER.
In all honesty I smoke weed sometimes not every day but when I’m done with my day absolutely I indulge but you know what that should not impede my ability to protect myself and the people that I love it’s be quite honest with you alcohol is far more dangerous here’s why it impairs your mental decision making it impairs her judgment makes you act like a jackass in most cases secondly causes damage to your liver weed does none of those things the only thing you might do is get sleepy and eat a bag of chips so dangerous to me would be somebody drinking and strapping a gun onto them the pothead might still strap a gun to them but only after they’ve gone to sleep and gotten up and are sober again
The logic that a "criminal" isn't entitled to 2A rights would lead to including that person's right to free speech, right to vote, right to protest, right to exercise religion, etc. Because they are saying that committing a crime eliminates your rights from the Constitution.
When your society votes to make a substance legal.... you shouldn't lose constitutionally protected rights because some foreigners (FEDS are Foreigners to me and my statesman) disapprove.
Shall Not Be Infringed!!!
Thx again for your perspectives
No problem. Thanks for the support!
This was so well done. Incredibly clearly explain. Thank you for your time
Missouri repealed the prohibition of marijuana 6 months ago, and our amendment protects gun owners within the state, but not from Federal agents, so it's a grey zone mine field for someone if they want to be sure they are doing the lawful thing.
What grey zone? Federal law takes precedence over state law. Liberals can pass all the state legal MJ laws they want to entrap conservatives and take their rights from them. And I guarantee state law enforcement will arrest for violating this regardless and turn it over to the feds if they choose to do so to get a nice felony enhancement for other criminal charges.
Doing the lawful thing? The law itself is unlawful.
@@bradleyrhodes2820 While I would agree, it's a small consolation to own that knowledge if you are arrested, jailed, fined and fired from your job, could lose your home, marriage and kids.
That’s because Missouri along with all the other “State of’s” are a franchise of the federal corporation. See the buck act. Title 4 U.S.C. sect. 106-116. The republic state must claim sovereignty under the 10th amendment. The federal government is ONLY supposed to have jurisdiction over the 10 square miles of DC.
@@breeezy57 While all that may indeed be the case, how does any of it change the facts as we live them?
It’s a slippery slope saying someone is deserving of constitutional protections ONLY when sober.
"Were there people using marijuana in 1791?"
Yes, they were known as the founding fathers.
Police officers and DEA agents partake in occasional off duty drinking to various degrees of intoxication. Do they lose their jobs and get prosecuted for carrying their service weapon? If not, why not? Case dismissed
Begs the question about illegal drug use and filling out the federal form for a firearm purchase. Is that question allowable?
I'd argue that the 4473 is unconstitutional in its entirety.
The entire form 4473 is unconstitutional. It's nobodies business what you buy or own but this crap has been allowed to violate our rights for decades.
Yay! This law SHOULD BE struck down! ❤
❤Love your videos. It's like I'm talking to my lawyer friend about the interesting and relevant law news of the day. Well done and engaging videos.
The administration will simply ignore the ruling
Under their mentality, if you have a gun at home and get drunk, this law will automatically make you a criminal, ... Place you in jeopardy.
4.5 Years in prison? My friend Ralph was railroaded by the fuzz here in NY, and had a 14 Year prison sentence!
*Possession of marijuana in proximity to his firearms.. But in Nazi-NY, they went above and beyond..
They took every single 'add-on' that his rifles had, added them all up, and charged separately. Unreal..
I remember 1 charge that was having a 'bayonet mount' specifically.. Absolute corruption/tyany.
Really really hate to be this way, but kinda what you get for living in a place like NY and living life like an American. Can't do that there
Wow, thats awfull
Each drug has a different level of intoxication and impairment. We don’t find people laying on the side of the road from an overdose on pot.
The job of an FFL isn't to investigate people for their use of marijuana, their job is to see that they fill out the paperwork and have the proper ID and if they are approved let them have their paid for property. Where I live there are at least 5 or more marijuana dispensaries within 10 minutes, so yes many people locally are buying and using marijuana. I also happen to live in an area with more nudist communities than anywhere in the US, personally I think that is more weird than someone who smokes marijuana. So, morally speaking what is right and what is wrong and who has the right to tell you that your banned from participating in your constitutionally protected rights. If your bank robber, no guns for you, smoke on your own time, not a bad person, well you should own a gun as you deserve to be able to protect not only yourself but your family and your property.
I concur
I got charged in a similar instance. I went and got my medical card and the judge gave me a plea in abeyance or something like that after a year on probation charges were supposed to be dropped but now I’m to scared to carry or even go shooting it’s been years since I’ve felt lawful even though I’ve gone through all the procedures
I don't use it, but have always thought it was rather ridiculous it was banned. Haven't heard of anyone being high and shooting up their neighborhood. Snack machine, maybe. Don't carry when you're impaired -- alcohol, weed, whatever. Regardless, Daniels should be out. He didn't commit a crime using his firearm.
It isn't about that but is about increasing jail sentences of gang members. Caught with a gun and test positive for Marijuana now you have a federal beef you can plead out for another 2 to 5 in jail. At least that was part of the plan to keep black people form owning guns.
Should we not carry when tired? On the way home from a ridiculous 12 hour graveyard shift? That's similar to being drunk. Being stoned after smoking weed pales in comparison to the impairment of being drunk or merely tired. If I want to have a smoke, that shouldn't require to disarm myself and become vulnerable. I wouldn't want to be robbed while enjoying a smoke.
@@GeminoSmothers Any time that you are not in a safe mental condition to drive you shouldn't operate a firearm.
@@Laugh1ngboy I missed that part of the 2nd amendment
@@Steve-ev6vx Yeah the 2nd doesn't allow you to become a danger to the public. Which is my point. If you are not able to drive safely you are probably not able to see what's behind your target either.
The biggest BS part of it all is the court being able to tell you what argument you can use in your own defense.
Off topic, why does the Second Amendment not override CCW permits?
Government corruption. If it worked properly, the highest law of the land would actually function as the highest law. Instead it only counts when courts feel like it.
Money 💰
@@TheMelnTeam How can a cop in good conscience enforce CCW permits?
@@rodvan-zeller6360"good" cops dont
@@rodvan-zeller6360 Same way they can act on civil forfeiture. They don't. "Good conscience", if they had it previously, is long gone by the time they're doing these acts.
The more it becomes legal in states the more it should be treated like alcohol and if you can own guns and have beer in your fridge then you should be able to own guns and have a little weed
Make pot legal on a federal level....problem solved. Its 2023, this is just stupid. Ty for the information :)
Exactly what we need
Long story short, the federal government loves having leverage on the American people and they never plan to give that up.
Thank you for the video, I found out that investing is not for everybody, you just need a strong stomach too see your portfolio go down. It might be wiser for a novice to start with copy trading investing, but it is not easy. To invest in growth stocks it is another level, definitely you need to know what are you doing.
From my own point of view, you need to invest smartly if you need the good things of life. so far i've made over $255k in raw profits from just 6 months into the market from my diversified portfolio strategy and i believe anyone can do it you have the right strategy, mutual funds takes long time but investing smartly is the key for short term. Most of us tend to pay more attention to the shiniest position in the market to the cost of proper diversification.
This is a phenomenal advice for a new stock traders and investors who want that quick short term game, but don't see the light at the end of the tunnel.
@@waltercamelaI've been solely investing in real estate. But with the recent hyper home pricing i've liquidated a few things and have $45k in cash laying around idle. Would love to get your recommendations, I'm in search of something lucrative in the current crazy markets, i will be glad.
My portfolio is very much diversified so it's not like i have a particular fund i invest in, plus i dont do that by myself. i follow the trades of Mrs Karen Gaye Gray.
She is a popular broker you might have heard of. I can correctly say she's worth her salt as a financial advisor as her diversification skills are top notch, because i see that in her results as my portfolio grows by averages of 10 to 15% on a monthly basis, unlike i can say for my IRA which has just been trudging along, my portfolio just mirrors what she trades and not just on some particular industries of my choosing.
Any words, as they cannot be laws, that infringe on any part of the second amendment is wholly illegal at best and at worst it is optional compliance.
Please address the issue of the so called "community safety act" in regards to establishing universal background check ... thank you
near and dear to our hearts and lungs
In Maryland i can't own a gun and have a medical cannabis license
Yep not only Maryland.
Under federal law you can't even use with a state medical MJ license. It is not recognized under federal law as valid becuz MJ has no federally recognized medicinal value, and federal law takes precedence. There is so much misunderstanding about this...
Time to change the ATF Form 4473
It's no different than someone sitting at a Bar stool lawfully licensed to carry then drive's home ..
Clear over reach of government especially by an officer's judgment who does not have a medical degree !
Smh
You really have to know each law and how to proceed with each one as a play card when defending yourself in court
Which invalidates its authority and we need to eraeicate it and rebuild it with TOTAL accountability
You just need money
Props to Jerry Smith in this case, who knew a Rick and Morty character would save someone in court 😂
Uh, didn't the forefathers utilize cannabis in many forms? I'd be sure they would see a non-issue with the weed.
Yes they did all of our founding fathers up & to include Benjamin Franklin Thomas Jefferson Thomas Jefferson‘s favorite thing was cannabis tea don’t know how he made that 🤔But anyways yes you are correct
No I don’t think they would at all I don’t think they would have any problem with the United States citizens smoking weed I think that would be the least of their problems or their concerns their main concern would be is how did we let this government get the way it has because they have too much power and they need to be checked really hard I’m talking into the boards hockey style
In Oklahoma we have constitutional carry. A person just can’t have anything in the chamber and have a medical card.
Permitless carry in Oklahoma,
It would be constitutional carry, if Oklahoma did not issue CCWP and
allowed Felons and 16 yr olds to carry.
Nothing in the chamber? Why even carry then
I'd rather a pothead with a gun than a drunk with a gun.....
Long term marijuana use has been linked to structural brain changes similar to those observed in schizophrenia patients?
With all of the government funded propaganda studies against cannabis over the last century, I'd be willing to bet money the answer is no. Or, that study is omitting key components to make it sound much worse than it is.
Yes. Everyone who smokes weed gets schizophrenia. That is definitely a fact - boomer.
No. Correlation =/= causation. There have been a few biased studies that show a correlation between schizophrenia and cannabis use. Implying that cannabis caused the skitzophrenia without any articulable reasoning would be akin to suggesting that aspirin causes headaches because people that get headaches use aspirin. There has never been any sold scientific evidence to suggest that cannabis use causes schitzophrenia - at least that I've seen. And I've looked.
Schizophrenia can be triggered in someone by weed, but those people where already schizo and where going to turn anyway. Schizophrenia usually hits in you early to mid 20's and 1-2 percent of the population is going to have it whether they use cannabis or not.
"Shall not be infringed"
I think it's been incredibly inconsistent that people who drink alcohol and people that are on prescription medications are allowed to have firearms. But a little greenery and all of a sudden, you're a scourge to society? It's nice to see judges finally upholding their oaths.
first
lol
Hi
What's the difference between and alcoholic and a pot head?
A drink driver will plow through a stop sign, a pot head will wait for the sign to turn green.
How could Presidents who admittedly done drugs (even harder) can control the worlds second largest nuclear weapons arsenal but a bus boy at Arbys can’t own a handgun if he’s smoked a joint… 😂
Spot on!
Oh my goodness someone within the judicial system with a sense a rationality
What if there was a law that prohibited a marijuana user from exercising his First Amendment rights like marching in a protest or pracricing his religion freely?
14 times a month? Those are rookie numbers.
@@GeminoSmothers facts
I would also argue that they don't charge anyone with 18usc because they drink a beer , and I've seen many many more drunk people unlawfully use a firearm than a person thats high on pot
Excellent excellent analysis Mr. Stephen Great video very informative I appreciate you making this video you are a blessing to all of us Pro second amendment citizens. 👍🏼💯
When you buy a firearm you have to declare that you are not an "unlawful" user of marijuana. Since Marijuana is illegal on the Federal level, if you say you aren't a user on the form, you are "lying" to the government. Until that is corrected, they will continue to arrest people. If you have a medical card, you are not an "unlawful" user on the state level but are still "unlawful" on the Federal level. If you cross a state line from a state that allows marijuana and go into another state that allows legal marijuana, you are still a "criminal" because crossing state lines falls under Federal jurisdiction / intercommerce laws.
Genuinely refreshed by the lack of fuddy comments
The court has already ruled that lying on a form in order to maintain a basic right is protected speech even if you’re lying. You have no obligation to self incriminate.
Are there tests that can delineate with absolute clarity if someone is under the influence of pot at that moment as opposed to if someone got high with a fishing buddy three weeks ago. Thanks for your help.
U.S. District Judge Patrick Wyrick set this precedent in back in February of this year with U.S. v Harrison. It could be argued on Freedom of Religion and Right To Pursue Happiness.
Great show guys!
Keep up the great work
Wow way to go updating the description .
Saves time.
Glad it all worked out
Great overlook on the subject. Thank you very educational.
Thank you!
Bravo.thenks