I wonder if he has read The Jews Should Keep Quiet. By Rafael Medoff. Also, FDR's Folly. By Jim Powell. How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression. A great novel about freedom is John Grit's Feathers on The Wings of Love and hate. Let the Gun Speak.
Click bait title. This may be another early baby step towards national reciprocity, but it is not now legal to carry in all 50 states without a permit! Please choose your words more appropriately.
Why hasn't uscca or anyone filed an 1983 242 case against the feds? The are conspiring to deprive everyone of inalienable rights explicitly enshrined in the bill of rights. This is an open and shut case. File it.
My rights as a US citizen shouldn't end at my state border, they should be covered throughout the country. ANY judge or lawyer that isn't an absolute joke will agree
Which has further reaching implications that any state with laws against carry are unconstitutional. We already know they are, but now it sets precedence.
I'll do you one better, that our rights are not limited by ANY border, that these rights are in fact HUMAN RIGHTS we receive simply by merit of having been born as sentient beings, and MUST be afforded to all.
@@darthtechnologies553, except for my wife, first Amendment rights generally aren't LOUD and the words can't be used to physically shoot someone. The words can do damage in other ways though. Comparing being able to carry a gun is not the same as being able to tell someone you think they're ugly.
You can't have it both ways. You can't be a proponent of home rule (power of the state) and have an all powerful Federal Government at the same time. The Founding Fathers limited the power of the Federal Government for exactly what we are all dealing with today. A bloated all-powerful, tyrannical, Federal Government instead of the "home rule" of the states. The Founding Fathers envisioned the states to hold the true power and expected them to be independent of one another. Personally speaking, if, for instance, California, the New England states ,Illinois, and anyone of the rest of the states wants to prohibit gun rights, I don't give a Damm. As a Floridan, I will elect not to go there, or if I do need to go there I will operate under its laws and rules. It's all about MORE HOME RULE, AND LESS RULE AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL. Time to downsize the federal government... PERIOD!
I'm an over the road truck driver. I have a ccw from my home state. I'm also a USCCA member. I travel across many state lines on a daily basis. The reciprocity map in the USCCA app is very useful to me. I've pretty much memorized it. Including the duty to inform. So this would be awesome. Not having to worry about state lines anymore. I carry 2 guns a semi auto and a revolver. I have locking cases I use when I'm in a restricted state. This would make daily life easier. Being a truck driver. It's very dangerous. My biggest concern is driving through cities at night. And trying to find a safe place to park for the night. Most of the general public are unaware of the amount of violent crimes that were subject too. The main stream media never reports on trucker incidents. Well sometimes. But most are never in the news. In the trucking world via popular social media apps that's where you'll see this. On average I'd say there's 4-6 per month.
A friend was a long haul trucker and had to stop in Laredo one night. When he got up early to start his pre-trip, 3 guys came from his blind spots, beat him with a tire iron, and left for dead. Another trucker intervened and saved his life. He spent a week in ICU and had to be flown home. No reason a trucker, or anyone else, shouldn't be able to defend themselves no matter where they are.
Sad think is most trucking companies will fire anyone carrying a firearm (or even most things considered a weapon) even if you do it legally. They worry more about getting sued than for the life of a trucker.
I am an otr driver as well. Any law that goes against my rights means nothing to me. I have always carried while on the road, regardless of what state I was in. I will not disarm because some state thinks my rights don't exist in their backward ass minds. I have had to park in some of the most questionable places from LA to the NE corner of Maine. In total I've had to draw down on someone 4 times while on the road. The 5th time I've had to pull my gun, I was playing "local" for a hardware store transferring stuff between stores. Employee at a different store tried attacking me with a knife right in front of the store manager and I pulled my gun. Needless to say he ran away screaming like a 5 year old and I lost my job for workplace violence. That's fine, I will wear that like a badge of honor.
A use of force where possession of a firearm successfully ended a confrontation without significant injuries to any party would not be widely publicized because it would be too counterproductive to the overall goal of disarming citizens. Even the media that supposedly is aligned with the right to keep and bear arms, it would be a mere footnote in reporting. Carrying as an employee is likely going to be strictly prohibited due to the insurance implications, which means that for the most part it is only the owner-operators who are carrying. I doubt that the USCCA insurance would also cover an action against my LLC, but in that case it might just be better for me to pierce my own corporate veil as without me the company functionally doesn't exist and a good chunk of my personal savings is tied up in my equipment owned by the company. Other than giving myself a decent alias to use on a business card, at least in this particular case, there is absolutely no benefit of having the LLC. Insurance in trucking is expensive enough without investigating a plan that also specifically covers the company in case of use of force in self-defense.
2A, ...shall not be infringed by Congress, SCOTUS 1876 The 2A is about stopping Congress from infringing on a birthright. You were born with the Right.
The analogy I always want to use is asking people to imagine being pulled over, say driving in Arizona with a California driver's license, and the cop tells you that you don't have an Arizona driver's license, can't get one, and Arizona is going to charge you with driving without a license, the result of which will be you lose the right to ever get a license again. It's that stupid.
the cop tells you that you that when you lived in AZ you forever lost your right to drive in AZ. A former mentally ill person with State restored gun rights cannot get a CCWP because of reciprocity, the question on the application: are you a Federal prohibited possessor?. But is allowed to permitless carry in the State.
@@swmplvr Driving isn't defined as commerce, but you are right, we do have the right to travel, such as simply being a Passenger in a car, traveling via the motorway.
1st amendment of freedom of speech and not being censored sits hand in hand. We need to start going after these infringers of civil right and locking them up.
@@DreidMusicalXSo true, they are all important but if you lose the second Amendment you will not get it back with the first but you could possibly get back the first with the second amendment. Just saying. But yea both 1st and 2nd protect all others.
This is a genius stand point. Our rights should not end at state borders. I hope this gets the support that it needs! Please keep us updated! Thanks so much for the video!
@@frankmcgowan9457, I like the idea of permits required because that means they've gotten some training. Just like driving a car. You have to be trained, then permitted and licensed. The restriction I would balk at is denying permits in their states.
I'm 100% for this especially in the case for truck drivers. They get targeted often and should be able to defend themselves in whatever state they deliver to.
My uncle is a retired U.S. Army sergeant who is now a trucker and didn't want to violate laws of other states so opted to not carry... Until he was held up at gunpoint! Now he always carry.. He didn't because of the B.S. with reprocity not existing across state lines. I agree with the fact licenses should be honored across state lines.
They need to keep this going. Traveling between states often feels like traveling to a different country with how different the laws can be. They may as well issue us passports when we take a trip to the nearest big city.
Try going to NY (I'm from Rochester) I got the hell outta that scum hole right after they decided to elect Kathy Jokul. Much happier down here in Jacksonville FL.
It feels like now days we are the separated states of america instead of the united states of america and there is liberal separatist army within our own justice system and government it sure seems like maybe they are marxist communist traitors god only knows!
Where is the NRA ? Where are all the attorneys ? The unconstitutional restrictions on our second ammendment rights seem like low hanging fruit for a class action lawsuit.
What about State(s) that do not issue CCWP like Vermont. If you have restored gun rights (no CCWP) another State may not like you carrying in their State. That is why the question on CCWP, Are you a FEDERAL Prohibited possessor?
Article IV, section I Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. There just needs to be a case that lets SCOTUS say, yep, that applies to concealed carry permits.
I haven't traveled outside of the state of Texas for over 3 years. I'm a widow, and I'm not going through the Southwestern States to see my kids and grandkids if I'm not able to take my 9 without fear of being harassed. Or accosted by someone not legally in my country.
And 1000's more are being manufactured and bought every day. If Taiwan were to implement a "2nd Amendment" similar to ours, China wouldn't even dream of invading them.
A foreign country invasion hasn't been a concern for over 50 years. I like your enthusiasm and your quote is cool, but armed citizens aren't a part of our national defense strategy. Our defense strategy is a promise that if any country attacks us we can annihilate them.
I have a CCL from MA, and just moved to IL. Had to take a two day class and $250 here in IL to qualify/apply for a CCL. Can be up to 4 months until I find out if the state police clear me. Way past due getting our 2A rights back. Sick of these jackboots drunk on power.
confiscators are true believers that outlawing guns will make criminals avoid guns... or the other incentive is to pander to the true bemliever group for political power and political contributions,$$"
We need to take this all the way. That is no licensing or fees in order to exercise our rights. The Supreme Court has already ruled that a right cannot be taxed.
Additionally now starting September 13, New York State will“tax” you for background checks through NY state police, no longer NICS. Though nominal at $9 for firearms and $3 for Ammo… the future is clear in this communist state. Once they put a limit on how much ammo one can buy at a time, we’ll see how this adds up.
9 months later and we are no closer. Maryland courts deemed Maryland State laws for handguns unconstitutional last year, yet 3 months ago I still had to go through the same exact process to get my HQL and CCW. It's crazy how our government is not abiding by the rules set in place by the constitution.
how many cops have you killed? did you buy a gun through the systems in place or through a legal private party sale? you are a liar and you’re using my civil rights as a fashion statement
As a California woman who travels for work and recreation, I want the ability to protect myself and loved ones without committing a felony. And pepper spray isn't going to do anything but upset a drugged out zombie that wants to hurt me!
@@catwoman2596 And? I'm sure you have a point, I'm just not seeing it. I've lived lots of other places in the US and the 2nd Amendment applies there as well. Do you think I should stop bothering my sherriff and pestering the politicians and just move?
Being in IA, a wrong turn along I-80 can take you from IA to IL instead of IA to WI. WI recognizes my CCW, while IL could make me a felon, depending on what I'm carrying and/or have in my trunk. Let's get some reciprocity going!
Live in upper peninsula Michigan. Took route from Florida not through Illinois cause I refused to be disarmed while driving home Didn’t care it took a little longer
@@michiganprotectionI agree, I live in Colorado and when traveling to Texas I won't go through New Mexico. I have lots of family in Washington state, I can travel freely there as long as I avoid Oregon and of course I refuse to step foot in California. Washington state is bad also, I left that state partially because of how bad it was becoming. Only visit family occasionally.
I live in Wisconsin and I don't care about the waterbrain governor of Illinois everytime I go to Chicago I concealed carry with handgun and a spare18 rnd mag My family and my life come first justice is above law and Illinois governor's is not going to help me if a criminal is going to hurt me or my love's one's God bless America The 2A the Freedom WHE THE PEOPLE
@@mrbyamile6973 ???? A loaded firearm may be carried/transported either openly or concealed in a vehicle without a permit in NM. It is legal to open carry a loaded rifle and/or handgun in New Mexico without a permit. NM has extended domain of the Castle Doctrine, your car is Home.
This is exactly our problem. We moved (ran) from CA to North Idaho. Happily cc. Husband went to visit our kids and couldn't carry, even with his license. My former cop husband can't get a county cc, because we are no longer residents! Ironically, that state has become far more dangerous than when we left. Very frustrating.
@@mizbehavin That's awesome. Thank you. My apologies. But you've got to understand where I'm coming from when most of the Californians that are leaving California are people who voted blue. I'm just hoping that they've changed and won't spread that toxicity to other states. Best wishes to you and your family.
@@jamesmanx6075 to put it in perspective, most of the folks i know who are leaving can't stomach what has become of our beautiful state. Daddy was a proud (legal) immigrant from Costa Rica and proudly served in the Army as a combat photographer and Mama's Scot/Irish family came to CA from the dustbowl of Oklahoma. Good, salt of the earth people, who found paradise in Northern CA. i'm old enough to remember Californians bitterly complaining about the east coast transplants who wanted to change our state. And change it they did. Horribly. Yes, we ran to North Idaho - to a world we had lost. Your first clue should have been that my wonderful husband was a peace officer. The only thing blue about him. lol. The funny thing I've noticed about our Idahome is that when folks complain about Californians, I can only think about the really rude Washingtonians! Ah well, we can only live our best life, revel in our newfound community and VOTE! Now to get our kids and grands out of CA. Thanks for the apology, James. Takes the sting out. i apologize for any typos - broken wrist. 🤕
The fact that something enumerated in the constitution doesn’t apply nationwide is just ridiculous. You can exercise certain rights with certain tools within certain jurisdictions and be perfectly law abiding, but if you take a step too far into another jurisdiction, you become a felon instantaneously. Often times it feels more like going from one country to another rather than from one county or state to another.
I was going to say something similar, you got the point out so much better. I would like say 1. Thing though. I don't understand how anyone could think BIDEN ,is a so much better as a President/ than Trump? I realize Satan ,rules this ONCE GREAT NATION? It is so sad to watch. I AM SO EMBARRASSMED TO SAY! I AM AMERICA. What is coming to hard to believe, what is coming to America soon,!😢
More than thirty years ago, while traveling through the middle of Georgia, I stopped, to get gas at a small town gas station , the gas station attendants were wearing pistols on their hips. When I asked what with the guns , they told me that the store across the street had been robbed several times. And the station had been robbed three times. And if I came across what looked like a wreck anywhere up the road. Do not stop, cause that it would probably be staged , when you get out of your vehicle to check, then you will probably be shot and robbed. I did not see any thing through the rest of my traveling through the back roads of Georgia at night. But you can bet I always carry protection.
Don't let the title mislead you. The decision was about a single individual not everyone. But, this decision gets us one step closer to our goal of national reciprocity.
Yes. Do NOT miss the question mark in the title. The answer to that question is No. Lawfully, yes. Legally, No. Just becaue the Constitution mandates it, doesn't mean you won't get arrested and/or convicted for doing it (for now).
It’s good to get viewers but in our headline reading society how many less bright people will see that and think it’s ok and end up with a felony getting their rights taken away completely. Everybody needs to be a little more responsible. Not everything is about clicks and views. Be vigilant and responsible to convey information without misleading representation even if there is a strong desire to get as many eyes on it as you can
@@CSAcrazy Totally agree. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. When potential severe criminal penalties are associated with a topic, you should not rush to present some new nugget of information especially in a way that will mischaracterize how it may apply to others. I have noticed that far too many 2A related channels are sloppy in this regard.
When last I checked, the line of "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." was pretty straight forward. We don't need to ask the feds or the state for permission to carry whatever weapon we see fit in whatever way we see fit.
The gun grabbing left does not believe that 2A is absolute; they only believed it applied to the militia which is now the National Guard. Sadly, we allowed the slow decay of our rights and now have to fight hard to get them back. I also do not think it's a coincidence that the worst states in the union for crime are also the ones with the most restrictive gun laws - because the Founders recognized that 2A wasn't just for militia purposes, but rather, for personal defense. The government wants you to believe that you NEED them to protect you - that you're not competent enough to do that yourself. That's one of many reasons why they want your guns. They also realize that an armed citizenry is the foundation of a free society. National reciprocity needs to go to SCOTUS. And the concept of "assault weapon" needs to be deleted from the vernacular - it's arbitrary and subjective.
@@williammandel9378 What do you mean he's ignoring the part talking about a well put together and skilled Militia? I don't see how that applies here (I presume you're trying to talk about the wording of well regulated, which when it was made, essentially meant well put together)
Same exact thing happened to me in '98 very different outcome. I was Maine resident with a CCP and was traveling thru Massachusetts when I was pulled over for a traffic infraction. When asked if I was carrying any firearms etc. I declared my handgun (which was stowed unload, breach open). I was arrested and subsequently jailed for 1yr under minimum mandatory sentencing guidelines. There were no aggravating factors (such as drunk driving or drug possession) just me , an improper lane change and a legally purchased and licensed handgun from my State of residency. My attorney argued 2nd Amendment to no avail. And despite having no criminal record , min. mandatory sentencing made it impossible for the Judge to reduce the 1year (day for day/no good time/no parole) . I'm pleasantly surprised that a Superior Court Judge in the Common Wealth has finally found the Constitution and wasn't afraid to apply it.
@@frankavellino6659 because very time we get one struck down as unconstitutional, thy just pass a new law to do it all over again, and there is no consequence. The Supreme court proves how toothless they are, they don't hold anyone accountable for their crimes. and so people just need to stop obeying illegal laws and ignore them, nullify them.
Because we don’t have a government looking after the people. They feel they are the ruling class and want to remove our capability of keeping them civil. If we loose the right to keep AND BEAR arms we will certainly become even more over taxed until we are simply peasants serving our masters.
As someone who wants to travel across the US and camp, not being able to carry a gun for self defense against predators is FRUSTRATING. I just want to be able to travel freely and protect myself if need be
CCW should be universal as once you have obtained one in any state you should be able to go anywhere in the country without having to be subjected to other state restrictions,your background check goes through the FBI to start with 11:03
I live in NJ and have a CCW. I work in NYC. I spend more time in NYC then I do in NJ yet my permit is invalid once I cross that bridge or tunnel. I also have a UTAH CCW. Funny thing is I applied for a CCW in PA and the only prerequisite is that I have a CCW in my home state which I do and they denied me without any explanation/cause. Crazy. And PA doesn’t not recognize MY NJ CCW and they do not recognize any non resident CCW from any other state. They would recognize my UTAH CCW if I was a resident which makes zero sense. What is the difference? It would make more sense to have reciprocity with neighboring states where people frequently travel across state lines then to have reciprocity with states that are hundreds of miles away. Many people that live in Newark, NJ, East Orange, Jersey City, work in Manhattan. Many people that live in Camden, NY work in Philly. It’s insane that neighboring states do not recognize each others permits.
It's all a bunch of nonsense. We need national reciprocity, any CCW should be valid nationwide. This case could be the opening we need to set precedent.
It sounds like the state of Pennsylvania made a mistake in your case because it is the case that if you have a permit from another state, Pennsylvania grants you a permit in the state of Pennsylvania, and so the fact that you were denied means that the state erred, unless there was some other basis. I would reach out to the state of Pennsylvania for assistance to correct this error. PA license is accepted in most states west and south of it except DC and MD.
As a California resident for Six decades. It's gotten so much hassle Just to go to a Shooting range. Because you have to have everything separated gun locked in one box, then Ammunition locked up in another box at least six feet away from the gun. Next they will probably make you break your guns down to the frames and each piece will be required to also be in a Locked box. 🤪
It is ridiculous to me that they can issue 1 permit & moot the entire case to keep an unconstitutional law in place. Once there is a court case about the constitutionality of any law, there needs to be a DECISION. How they get away with these unscrupulous ways of sidestepping laws is beyond me, but then again, I have and use morals & ethics...
The issue is "standing". When the gun owner is charged for not having a ccw and then challenges it, the AG in CA (knowing theyre gona lose the constitutional debate) issues that person a ccw ... thereby removing any claim he/she can make. Once that individual HAS the ccw, they can no longer challenge the law because they are no longer aggrieved and lack standing. It's silly -but it is a legal technicality.
@@michaelsharp2272 I'm no lawyer, but I have common sense. there should not be a way to lose your standing once you are charged. Once entered, standing is established & it shouldn't matter if they give the person what they wanted or not. He's still injured by the hassle, time, etc. That must be challenged somehow, or it's hopeless. Unethical practices should never be allowed.
This could change everything and put an end to all gun control permanently. It would also end "gun free zones" as well. Back when the 2nd Ammendment was written there was no such thing as a gun free zone.
Even in the late 1990s, I could carry my firearm openly in Calif. I had to stop at the state line and take my legally concealed weapon out pf its holster and put it on the dash of my car to enter CA.
As a over the road truck driver this would be awesome because my truck is my home and I’m constantly crossing state lines having to check each state and how I can and can not carry my fire arm. Ohio ccs is excepted by most of the country but many states I go through would not protect my second amendment rights as a ccw carrier even just passing through.
Yep, my Arkansas permit is accepted in 37 or 38 states, so I travel and take vacations in these states. Those 12 liberal states don't get any of my money, which is ok with me. Due to there no cash bail and high crime rates why would i want to go vacation there anyway..
@@daveoldham3121 Agreed. I would have to enter Commiefornia for business reasons and would drive in, but I always carried anyway regardless of their illegal carry laws. When it's my choice I don't travel to anti-carry states, I stick to Constitutional carry ones or those that are open carry without needing a permit such as Nevada.
We need more similar cases. The other day a Tennessee man was arrested in Wall, New Jersey for having a handgun without a New Jersey permit. Hopefully he gets the same decision under Bruen.
You can expect to risk going through the same thing that happened in Massachusetts. Being able to and being jailed and forcing to go through each of the State’s Supreme Courts is another thing.
No. The Constitution applies *_always_* and *_everywhere_* to *_every citizen_* in the United States. That would mean that state and local officials who would jail you for exercising your rights under the Constitution are guilty of infringing the right(s) in question and unlawful detention (or whatever they call it) under color of authority. Punish them! Everyone from the legislators who voted for the bill and governor who signed it right down to the LEOs that arrested, processed and incarcerated you, including the prosecutor(s) whose job it is to know better and the judge whose job it is to make certain the proceedings in his/her court is strictly legal. Round'em up; they took part in a criminal conspiracy to infringe your rights and punish you for it.
@@frankmcgowan9457, of course it applies everywhere, except in the eyes of gun controllers. That’s still not going to stop them from arresting people and forcing you to waste years and money fighting them.
The real story we need to be talking about with regards to this case is that the man's lawyer was a PUBLIC DEFENDER. That said, in MA most public defenders are practicing attorneys who volunteer their time to take on these cases. So while in most states you're getting an overworked underpaid lawyer, you're essentially getting a "paid" attorney pro-bono.
I recently got my CCW approved in Los Angeles county (West Covina) so if you live here, understand that it is definitely possible. The cost is outrageous, but they are being approved whereas it was impossible to get one in my city before Bruen. If you live in California and you're thinking about it, and you can afford it, DO IT. Just my two cents.
This needs to not wait, it's ideal timing for exactly what has been a long time coming. This is the ideal supreme court to properly review the case law history and determine that at the very least national reciprocity is required. I definitely think the law should more closely align with the 2A but 1 step at a time back to where we belong.
How we ever got away from being able to carry wherever we go. Young boys took their shotguns to school and they would be hunting the entire time and the parents would be at ease knowing that their kids are safe from harm .
Yep we can carry any place we wish to carry , even without a permit . Just can't legally use it. At that point it's a " id rather be judged by twelve than carried by six " thing . To many crooked district attorneys out there trying to make a point these days by arresting and convicting a lawful citizen for doing what THEY would consider an unlawful thing . Imo the whole thing sucks
@@markmassie3719, not necessarily (just can't legally use it). If you get pulled over for a traffic violation and the officer finds out you have a loaded firearm, you will likely be taken to jail.
@@larrycollie3123 very true . I'm a valid permit holder in my state so I'm not concerned about that issue. Just sad we have to have a permit for something that is a constitutional right to begin with.
I'm a supporters of USCCA but this video is total clickbate. Read the title. It is false! Why are you putting this in your title?? Very frustrating and disappointing
The time has come to disolve many of these unconditional State and Federal agencies and reign in runaway Government. Centure or remove these judges that refuse to adhere to the Constitution and can't seem to comprehend clear English language and definitions of words. The Constitution needs no reinterpretation or legalese to confuse what is clear and simple language of inalienable rights and enlighten them on what enumerated exactly means!
It's my opinion that a lawsuit needs to be levied against both the New York State Police and the New York City Police gun license division because these agencies violate the 4th amendment the First Amendment as well as the Second Amendment. Let me try to explain when you make an application to the New York City Police Department for example or even that of the New York State Police what they're going to do is your background check you are required to provide any social media accounts that you may have had presently or in the past for character analysis where does it say you gave up your first amendment where does it say you have to also give up your fourth amendment what does your political views have to do with you being conferred a Firearms carry permit as long as you have met the federal requirement that you are not a prohibited person to own a firearm through a standard background investigation this is one of the arguments I feel should be brought before a court of law because in the past when a person made an application for a gun permit you did a background check and that was it another thing that I find really a pain in the ass for lack of a better word is the 16-hour requirement in New York for training apparently the standard National Rifle Association pistol certification course is not adequate enough to meet New York State and New York City training requirements which I think is ridiculous you're not preparing for war you're not preparing for a career in law enforcement or private security you just want to have the means to protect yourself your loved ones from the escalating crime in New York this is why there needs to be a lawsuit to address this
"The right to bear arms" means just that. It means we are allowed to keep our limbs with 5 fingers intact. and pretty soon, they wanna take that away; and next they will come for our legs.
I live in Massachusetts and it's run by left wing nutjobs. Fortunately for me, I carry under LEOSA/ HR-218. With that said, ANY person who is of age and not a convicted felon should be able to carry nationwide. After all, carrying a gun is a right and driving a car is merely a privilege. Yet, you don't need a separate driver's license to cross state lines. Lastly, cars kill way more people than guns and the vast majority of gun violence involves convicted felons who can't legally carry to begin with.
CA, OR & WA all have the same prohibitions for non-residents, except OR & WA have exceptions for neighboring state residents who work in their state with reason. This should absolutely not be allowed because that flagrantly opposes the spirit of the 2nd amendment.
Your driver's license extends to every state, your right to speak your mind extends to every state, your right to protection for illegal Search and seizures extendstoeverystate, in what world wouldn't this extend to your right to carry firearms?
While I completely agree that you should be able to carry anywhere in the country, but MA does issue non-resident LTC's. They made it more difficult, requiring an in-person application and ANNUAL renewal with a fee every time of $100, instead of $100 for a 5-year LTC for residents. And, please, enough with the clickbait video titles. Cheapens the channel.
The Constitution already gives me this right "Period". We the people need to Enforce that right and stop being Weak! And letting a bunch of Tyrannical clowns tell us what we can and cannot do especially when it comes to our Constitutional rights. ✝️🇺🇸✝️
Ok, I love you, but this is click bait, you are way out of reality, and even if I agree with you (I do) this video is more reason not to buy in to your organization because you are engaging in false information. Please just stick to the real fight and the real fact. Tell me, why aren't USCCA members part of the exemption from the pistol brace rule? Because, you're just building an organization (think NRA) you're not actually fighting the fight. Thank you, though, I am grateful for insurance.
I like the USCCA videos but the titles are click bait. This one in particular leads you to believe that this is a thing today but it is not. Slippery slope.
Even if national reciprocity becomes law, you had better think twice before travelling cross country with a gun in your car. In states such as New York, New Jersey, California and Illinois, you will be arrested and will face a costly trial, at which you will be found guilty, imprisoned and heavily fined. Yes, you can appeal and if the case reaches the Supreme Court, you will be exonerated. But at what cost? You will be out tens of thousands or more in legal fees, you will have lost your job while in jail, and your nerves will be a shamble. Better to map a route that goes around all red states.
Why the click bait headline? One that uses BOTH a ? and an !. From a firm with a good credibility, and one that I pay money too, this is potentially confusing to the viewers and disappointing.
Concealed carry permitting by itself unconstitutional per opinions by SCOTUS since in 1791 there was never a rule, restriction or need for a permit to have a weapon on my person as I move from colony or settlement to another territory. I don’t need a permit to talk or have a permit to trial by jury. Driver’s license is not a right, but it is honored in every state. Right to bear Arms is a right and subject to state and local restrictions by some miracle.
It is just amazing to me that the federal government is able to make any gun law. Thats not the jurisdiction of the federal government. Their job is to commerce and the border not legally making any gun law. I have read Federalist 51 and James Madison states that their is to be no gun regulations. So why is there gun regulations? If someone does something bad with one there are laws against that but to try and ban all guns is insane
This title isn't accurate - you cannot carry across every state legally without a permit. I agree that the ruling in this Federal District Court is interesting and important, it is pretty meaningless outside of MA as it isn't even a Federal Appeals Court ruling. I wish people would stop titling videos like this (yes, I recognize it is click bate to generate views), as it is deliberately misleading and anyone that doesn't understand what happened here may falsely believe that there is now national reciprocity on carry permits. There isn't and believing so could get you into serious legal trouble (if you get caught).
The 2nd amendment should not be taxed because it’s an infringement on anyone rich or poor to have a weapon.The permits al,licenses and these dumb insurance companies for gun issues better never be made mandatory because it is horrible idea and once again an infringement.
Be careful who you choose as your self defence lawyer, read The fine print USCCA says they will not represent anybody in a criminal act they can turn You down if they feel it was a "criminal act" You got to be careful do a lot of research on them before you choose them read the fine print very Carefully.
I have a C C W and I am trained well and at 50 feet I can shoot a fist sized group of 9 rounds in approximately 7 seconds. And the only way that they will get my gun is when they pull it from my cold dead fingers.
Now get rid of the gun-free zones (soft targets) and the stupid stickers on businesses. If a business wants to do business in the USA then it must abide by our wonderful Bill of Rights.
do i need a permission in / of every State to exercise my 1st Amendment Right ? nope do i need a permission in / of every State to exercise my 4th Amendment Right ? nope do i need a permission in / of every State to exercise my Right to remain silent ? nope do i need a permission in / of every State to exercise any of my Right ( aside the 2A ) ? nope
I'm not a lawyer and so I don't know the intricacies of the law, but I've long felt it was just a matter of time that national reciprocity becomes law. The reason being that eventually someone was going to be arrested, and the case would eventually be taken to the top. The back and forth of opinion decisions, the case law that is established even if a case doesn't get taken to the highest courts, etc... It would all contribute to the point that either Congress acts (albeit reluctantly) and makes reciprocity legal, thereby cleaning up this mess. Or, the courts decide the final say. The argument is solid, no other rights that we possess as US Citizens are subject to our location. I would be interested to see what comes of this. I think I'm going to go read the decision in this matter now and see what the judge thought about it.
▶[GIVEAWAY] Enter To Win Here: bit.ly/3sjujbJ
I wonder if he has read The Jews Should Keep Quiet. By Rafael Medoff. Also, FDR's Folly. By Jim Powell. How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression. A great novel about freedom is John Grit's Feathers on The Wings of Love and hate. Let the Gun Speak.
@@Anon54387 We have permit-less carry in FL now. Thanks to our Republican governor. I actually liked it the way it was.
Click bait title. This may be another early baby step towards national reciprocity, but it is not now legal to carry in all 50 states without a permit! Please choose your words more appropriately.
He chose his punctuation appropriately. Or did you miss the question mark?
Why hasn't uscca or anyone filed an 1983 242 case against the feds?
The are conspiring to deprive everyone of inalienable rights explicitly enshrined in the bill of rights. This is an open and shut case. File it.
My rights as a US citizen shouldn't end at my state border, they should be covered throughout the country. ANY judge or lawyer that isn't an absolute joke will agree
Which has further reaching implications that any state with laws against carry are unconstitutional. We already know they are, but now it sets precedence.
@np4057 we've got major problems when the law of the land is so compromised.
I'll do you one better, that our rights are not limited by ANY border, that these rights are in fact HUMAN RIGHTS we receive simply by merit of having been born as sentient beings, and MUST be afforded to all.
@@darthtechnologies553, except for my wife, first Amendment rights generally aren't LOUD and the words can't be used to physically shoot someone. The words can do damage in other ways though. Comparing being able to carry a gun is not the same as being able to tell someone you think they're ugly.
You can't have it both ways. You can't be a proponent of home rule (power of the state) and have an all powerful Federal Government at the same time. The Founding Fathers limited the power of the Federal Government for exactly what we are all dealing with today. A bloated all-powerful, tyrannical, Federal Government instead of the "home rule" of the states. The Founding Fathers envisioned the states to hold the true power and expected them to be independent of one another. Personally speaking, if, for instance, California, the New England states ,Illinois, and anyone of the rest of the states wants to prohibit gun rights, I don't give a Damm. As a Floridan, I will elect not to go there, or if I do need to go there I will operate under its laws and rules. It's all about MORE HOME RULE, AND LESS RULE AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL. Time to downsize the federal government... PERIOD!
I'm an over the road truck driver. I have a ccw from my home state. I'm also a USCCA member. I travel across many state lines on a daily basis. The reciprocity map in the USCCA app is very useful to me. I've pretty much memorized it. Including the duty to inform. So this would be awesome. Not having to worry about state lines anymore. I carry 2 guns a semi auto and a revolver. I have locking cases I use when I'm in a restricted state. This would make daily life easier.
Being a truck driver. It's very dangerous. My biggest concern is driving through cities at night. And trying to find a safe place to park for the night. Most of the general public are unaware of the amount of violent crimes that were subject too. The main stream media never reports on trucker incidents. Well sometimes. But most are never in the news.
In the trucking world via popular social media apps that's where you'll see this. On average I'd say there's 4-6 per month.
A friend was a long haul trucker and had to stop in Laredo one night. When he got up early to start his pre-trip, 3 guys came from his blind spots, beat him with a tire iron, and left for dead. Another trucker intervened and saved his life. He spent a week in ICU and had to be flown home. No reason a trucker, or anyone else, shouldn't be able to defend themselves no matter where they are.
Appreciate the work you do.
Sad think is most trucking companies will fire anyone carrying a firearm (or even most things considered a weapon) even if you do it legally. They worry more about getting sued than for the life of a trucker.
I am an otr driver as well. Any law that goes against my rights means nothing to me. I have always carried while on the road, regardless of what state I was in. I will not disarm because some state thinks my rights don't exist in their backward ass minds. I have had to park in some of the most questionable places from LA to the NE corner of Maine. In total I've had to draw down on someone 4 times while on the road. The 5th time I've had to pull my gun, I was playing "local" for a hardware store transferring stuff between stores. Employee at a different store tried attacking me with a knife right in front of the store manager and I pulled my gun. Needless to say he ran away screaming like a 5 year old and I lost my job for workplace violence. That's fine, I will wear that like a badge of honor.
A use of force where possession of a firearm successfully ended a confrontation without significant injuries to any party would not be widely publicized because it would be too counterproductive to the overall goal of disarming citizens. Even the media that supposedly is aligned with the right to keep and bear arms, it would be a mere footnote in reporting. Carrying as an employee is likely going to be strictly prohibited due to the insurance implications, which means that for the most part it is only the owner-operators who are carrying. I doubt that the USCCA insurance would also cover an action against my LLC, but in that case it might just be better for me to pierce my own corporate veil as without me the company functionally doesn't exist and a good chunk of my personal savings is tied up in my equipment owned by the company. Other than giving myself a decent alias to use on a business card, at least in this particular case, there is absolutely no benefit of having the LLC. Insurance in trucking is expensive enough without investigating a plan that also specifically covers the company in case of use of force in self-defense.
The 2nd Amendment should protect us " NO MATTERS" what states we are in.....
Facts
it shouldn’t solely because you people use it as a fashion statement instead of actually exercising civil rights
Our vehicles are an extension of our home.
2A, ...shall not be infringed by Congress, SCOTUS 1876
The 2A is about stopping Congress from infringing on a birthright.
You were born with the Right.
@@rjay7019 In my State, Extended Domain of the Castle Doctrine,
Any mode of transportation; bicycle, horse, carriage,....
The analogy I always want to use is asking people to imagine being pulled over, say driving in Arizona with a California driver's license, and the cop tells you that you don't have an Arizona driver's license, can't get one, and Arizona is going to charge you with driving without a license, the result of which will be you lose the right to ever get a license again. It's that stupid.
the cop tells you that you that when you lived in AZ you forever lost your right to drive in AZ.
A former mentally ill person with State restored gun rights cannot get a CCWP
because of reciprocity, the question on the application: are you a Federal prohibited possessor?.
But is allowed to permitless carry in the State.
Or coming to Michigan witch requires insurance for vehicles and from a state that doesn’t require it.
And driving is a privilege, not even a right
@@WhydoIsuddenlyhaveahandle driving is defined as commerce.. we do how ever have the RIGHT to travel...
@@swmplvr Driving isn't defined as commerce, but you are right, we do have the right to travel, such as simply being a Passenger in a car, traveling via the motorway.
The second amendment is my number one voting issue now. There are others for me but 2nd amendment is #1 issue
1st amendment of freedom of speech and not being censored sits hand in hand. We need to start going after these infringers of civil right and locking them up.
@@DreidMusicalXSo true, they are all important but if you lose the second Amendment you will not get it back with the first but you could possibly get back the first with the second amendment. Just saying. But yea both 1st and 2nd protect all others.
Me also. Any politician that doesn't support 2nd ammendnent is out with me.
@@normtheteacher5485 That is one part of Trump policies I've never liked. Trump would support red flag laws.
@@normtheteacher5485 Based on Vivek's campaign to date, Vivek is far more pro 2A than Trump
This is a genius stand point. Our rights should not end at state borders. I hope this gets the support that it needs! Please keep us updated! Thanks so much for the video!
Please appeal this case, MA. Then we can finally get national reciprocity!
No. The proper implementation of 2A would be "National Constitutional Carry." No permits required. Your choice of concealed carry, open carry or both.
@@frankmcgowan9457have to take one step at a time with scotus cases.
@@frankmcgowan9457damn right
@@frankmcgowan9457 your absolutely right
@@frankmcgowan9457, I like the idea of permits required because that means they've gotten some training. Just like driving a car. You have to be trained, then permitted and licensed. The restriction I would balk at is denying permits in their states.
I'm 100% for this especially in the case for truck drivers. They get targeted often and should be able to defend themselves in whatever state they deliver to.
My uncle is a retired U.S. Army sergeant who is now a trucker and didn't want to violate laws of other states so opted to not carry... Until he was held up at gunpoint! Now he always carry.. He didn't because of the B.S. with reprocity not existing across state lines. I agree with the fact licenses should be honored across state lines.
They need to keep this going. Traveling between states often feels like traveling to a different country with how different the laws can be. They may as well issue us passports when we take a trip to the nearest big city.
Going to California is like going to Mexico!
Try going to NY (I'm from Rochester) I got the hell outta that scum hole right after they decided to elect Kathy Jokul. Much happier down here in Jacksonville FL.
It feels like now days we are the separated states of america instead of the united states of america and there is liberal separatist army within our own justice system and government it sure seems like maybe they are marxist communist traitors god only knows!
Only if you are a US citizen would the passport and travel permits be needed.
I've been to both, and I'd choose Mexico ANYDAY.@@coreydarr8464
The state's have no right whatsoever to impede constitutional rights.
Where is the NRA ? Where are all the attorneys ? The unconstitutional restrictions on our second ammendment rights seem like low hanging fruit for a class action lawsuit.
National reciprocity by default without legislation? That would be awesome.
What about State(s) that do not issue CCWP like Vermont.
If you have restored gun rights (no CCWP) another State may not like
you carrying in their State.
That is why the question on CCWP, Are you a FEDERAL Prohibited possessor?
@@aolvaar8792luckily you can get non resident permits from states like Arizona
That would be just too easy :'(
The constitution already covers it.
Article IV, section I Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. There just needs to be a case that lets SCOTUS say, yep, that applies to concealed carry permits.
I haven't traveled outside of the state of Texas for over 3 years. I'm a widow, and I'm not going through the Southwestern States to see my kids and grandkids if I'm not able to take my 9 without fear of being harassed. Or accosted by someone not legally in my country.
Time for this anti gunners to see "I will not invade the US, because there's a gun behind every blade of grass" as an awesome patriotic quote.
And 1000's more are being manufactured and bought every day. If Taiwan were to implement a "2nd Amendment" similar to ours, China wouldn't even dream of invading them.
Land mines at border are safer for all.
A foreign country invasion hasn't been a concern for over 50 years. I like your enthusiasm and your quote is cool, but armed citizens aren't a part of our national defense strategy. Our defense strategy is a promise that if any country attacks us we can annihilate them.
Exactly why we all aren’t speaking Chinese
You do realize that this quote is attributed to the man who masterminded the attack on Pearl Harbor, don't you?
I have a CCL from MA, and just moved to IL. Had to take a two day class and $250 here in IL to qualify/apply for a CCL. Can be up to 4 months until I find out if the state police clear me. Way past due getting our 2A rights back. Sick of these jackboots drunk on power.
Never move to IL
About time someone is seeing the right to bear arms besides just in your home
🐻 arms
confiscators are true believers that outlawing guns will make criminals avoid guns...
or the other incentive is to pander to the true bemliever group for political power and political contributions,$$"
Permits are unconstitutional. They are an infringement of 2A
We need to take this all the way. That is no licensing or fees in order to exercise our rights. The Supreme Court has already ruled that a right cannot be taxed.
Exactly! Suppressors, SBR's, SBS's, and machineguns should all be fair game for everyone without an extortion fee (aka 'tax stamp').
Yet they tax guns and ammo.
Additionally now starting September 13, New York State will“tax” you for background checks through NY state police, no longer NICS. Though nominal at $9 for firearms and $3 for Ammo… the future is clear in this communist state. Once they put a limit on how much ammo one can buy at a time, we’ll see how this adds up.
The Socialist Demonrats started the idea of charging a tax to vote. FDR taxed guns.
Unfortunately NYS did not get the memo
9 months later and we are no closer. Maryland courts deemed Maryland State laws for handguns unconstitutional last year, yet 3 months ago I still had to go through the same exact process to get my HQL and CCW. It's crazy how our government is not abiding by the rules set in place by the constitution.
Thanks for reminding
Everyone To Exercise Their Second Amendment Right 24/7/365 Everywhere We Go And Never Be A Victim In A Gun Free Zone
Well said brother
He should be reminding ppl that the 2A doesn't say "... With a permit!" It says, we have the right to bear arms!
how many cops have you killed? did you buy a gun through the systems in place or through a legal private party sale? you are a liar and you’re using my civil rights as a fashion statement
Would you carry a gun into a bank or a courthouse? Or a hospital? I wouldn't.
@@HothenrikThat works great when someone else who actually wants to hurt people does carry into there doesn't it?
As a California woman who travels for work and recreation, I want the ability to protect myself and loved ones without committing a felony. And pepper spray isn't going to do anything but upset a drugged out zombie that wants to hurt me!
Yes!
It's your decision to live there.
@@catwoman2596 And? I'm sure you have a point, I'm just not seeing it. I've lived lots of other places in the US and the 2nd Amendment applies there as well. Do you think I should stop bothering my sherriff and pestering the politicians and just move?
Being in IA, a wrong turn along I-80 can take you from IA to IL instead of IA to WI. WI recognizes my CCW, while IL could make me a felon, depending on what I'm carrying and/or have in my trunk. Let's get some reciprocity going!
Live in upper peninsula Michigan. Took route from Florida not through Illinois cause I refused to be disarmed while driving home Didn’t care it took a little longer
@@michiganprotectionI agree, I live in Colorado and when traveling to Texas I won't go through New Mexico. I have lots of family in Washington state, I can travel freely there as long as I avoid Oregon and of course I refuse to step foot in California. Washington state is bad also, I left that state partially because of how bad it was becoming. Only visit family occasionally.
WI here…. Exactly!!
I live in Wisconsin and I don't care about the waterbrain governor of Illinois everytime I go to Chicago I concealed carry with handgun and a spare18 rnd mag My family and my life come first justice is above law and Illinois governor's is not going to help me if a criminal is going to hurt me or my love's one's God bless America The 2A the Freedom WHE THE PEOPLE
@@mrbyamile6973 ????
A loaded firearm may be carried/transported either openly or concealed in a vehicle without a permit in NM.
It is legal to open carry a loaded rifle and/or handgun in New Mexico without a permit.
NM has extended domain of the Castle Doctrine, your car is Home.
This is exactly our problem. We moved (ran) from CA to North Idaho. Happily cc. Husband went to visit our kids and couldn't carry, even with his license. My former cop husband can't get a county cc, because we are no longer residents! Ironically, that state has become far more dangerous than when we left. Very frustrating.
If your husband was a LE officer and has at least 10 years service as one, he can get a federal 50 state CCW permit as a former LE officer.
Just make sure that you don't vote for the same blue policies in Idaho that you voted for in California.
@@jamesmanx6075 never voted blue. Don't make assumptions!
@@mizbehavin That's awesome. Thank you. My apologies. But you've got to understand where I'm coming from when most of the Californians that are leaving California are people who voted blue. I'm just hoping that they've changed and won't spread that toxicity to other states.
Best wishes to you and your family.
@@jamesmanx6075 to put it in perspective, most of the folks i know who are leaving can't stomach what has become of our beautiful state. Daddy was a proud (legal) immigrant from Costa Rica and proudly served in the Army as a combat photographer and Mama's Scot/Irish family came to CA from the dustbowl of Oklahoma. Good, salt of the earth people, who found paradise in Northern CA. i'm old enough to remember Californians bitterly complaining about the east coast transplants who wanted to change our state. And change it they did. Horribly. Yes, we ran to North Idaho - to a world we had lost. Your first clue should have been that my wonderful husband was a peace officer. The only thing blue about him. lol. The funny thing I've noticed about our Idahome is that when folks complain about Californians, I can only think about the really rude Washingtonians! Ah well, we can only live our best life, revel in our newfound community and VOTE! Now to get our kids and grands out of CA. Thanks for the apology, James. Takes the sting out. i apologize for any typos - broken wrist. 🤕
I live in IL, and this great news to hear cause IL needs to hear this clearly.
The Constitution and Bill of Rights no longer apply in illinois It's a marxist run state. and most of the people are ok with that.
It’ll take some iron clad rulings from the Supreme Court for our state to ever stop infringing
Yeah they’re a bout out of control now
The fact that something enumerated in the constitution doesn’t apply nationwide is just ridiculous. You can exercise certain rights with certain tools within certain jurisdictions and be perfectly law abiding, but if you take a step too far into another jurisdiction, you become a felon instantaneously. Often times it feels more like going from one country to another rather than from one county or state to another.
I was going to say something similar, you got the point out so much better. I would like say 1. Thing though. I don't understand how anyone could think BIDEN ,is a so much better as a President/ than Trump? I realize Satan ,rules this ONCE GREAT NATION? It is so sad to watch. I AM SO EMBARRASSMED TO SAY! I AM AMERICA. What is coming to hard to believe, what is coming to America soon,!😢
Stop with the false clickbait titles. You're being reported.
More than thirty years ago, while traveling through the middle of Georgia, I stopped, to get gas at a small town gas station , the gas station attendants were wearing pistols on their hips. When I asked what with the guns , they told me that the store across the street had been robbed several times. And the station had been robbed three times. And if I came across what looked like a wreck anywhere up the road. Do not stop, cause that it would probably be staged , when you get out of your vehicle to check, then you will probably be shot and robbed. I did not see any thing through the rest of my traveling through the back roads of Georgia at night. But you can bet I always carry protection.
Don't let the title mislead you. The decision was about a single individual not everyone. But, this decision gets us one step closer to our goal of national reciprocity.
That way they get you to open the story.
Yes. Do NOT miss the question mark in the title.
The answer to that question is No.
Lawfully, yes. Legally, No.
Just becaue the Constitution mandates it, doesn't mean you won't get arrested and/or convicted for doing it (for now).
A little clever click baiting -
It’s good to get viewers but in our headline reading society how many less bright people will see that and think it’s ok and end up with a felony getting their rights taken away completely. Everybody needs to be a little more responsible. Not everything is about clicks and views. Be vigilant and responsible to convey information without misleading representation even if there is a strong desire to get as many eyes on it as you can
@@CSAcrazy
Totally agree.
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
When potential severe criminal penalties are associated with a topic, you should not rush to present some new nugget of information especially in a way that will mischaracterize how it may apply to others.
I have noticed that far too many 2A related channels are sloppy in this regard.
I really hate intentionally misleading and clickbait titles, especially from a channel you would hope to be authoritative.
When last I checked, the line of "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." was pretty straight forward. We don't need to ask the feds or the state for permission to carry whatever weapon we see fit in whatever way we see fit.
The gun grabbing left does not believe that 2A is absolute; they only believed it applied to the militia which is now the National Guard. Sadly, we allowed the slow decay of our rights and now have to fight hard to get them back. I also do not think it's a coincidence that the worst states in the union for crime are also the ones with the most restrictive gun laws - because the Founders recognized that 2A wasn't just for militia purposes, but rather, for personal defense.
The government wants you to believe that you NEED them to protect you - that you're not competent enough to do that yourself. That's one of many reasons why they want your guns. They also realize that an armed citizenry is the foundation of a free society.
National reciprocity needs to go to SCOTUS. And the concept of "assault weapon" needs to be deleted from the vernacular - it's arbitrary and subjective.
Why do you ignore the first half of the 2d Amendment?
@@williammandel9378I thought i was pretty clear on my 2a position. But your question seems to disreagard 2b as a rebuttal to the original commenter.
@@williammandel9378 What do you mean he's ignoring the part talking about a well put together and skilled Militia? I don't see how that applies here (I presume you're trying to talk about the wording of well regulated, which when it was made, essentially meant well put together)
Same exact thing happened to me in '98 very different outcome. I was Maine resident with a CCP and was traveling thru Massachusetts when I was pulled over for a traffic infraction.
When asked if I was carrying any firearms etc. I declared my handgun (which was stowed unload, breach open).
I was arrested and subsequently jailed for 1yr under minimum mandatory sentencing guidelines.
There were no aggravating factors (such as drunk driving or drug possession)
just me , an improper lane change and a legally purchased and licensed handgun from my State of residency.
My attorney argued 2nd Amendment to no avail.
And despite having no criminal record , min. mandatory sentencing made it impossible for the Judge to reduce the 1year (day for day/no good time/no parole) .
I'm pleasantly surprised that a Superior Court Judge in the Common Wealth has finally found the Constitution and wasn't afraid to apply it.
Why is it that these unconstitutional laws can stay on the books because "there was no harm done"?
they can't. the violation of the Constitution itself is harm, is a crime.
@@SoloRenegade then why do they stand. As the narrator stated, MA. Probably won't appeal so not to go to Supreme Court.
@@frankavellino6659 because very time we get one struck down as unconstitutional, thy just pass a new law to do it all over again, and there is no consequence. The Supreme court proves how toothless they are, they don't hold anyone accountable for their crimes.
and so people just need to stop obeying illegal laws and ignore them, nullify them.
@@frankavellino6659corruption.
Because we don’t have a government looking after the people. They feel they are the ruling class and want to remove our capability of keeping them civil. If we loose the right to keep AND BEAR arms we will certainly become even more over taxed until we are simply peasants serving our masters.
Every state is like living in a different country. Laws are vastly different, it is absolutely crazy.
You brought up the 4th Amendment. The Patriot Act practically erased our 4th and 5th Amendment rights.
You are right it partially your mind will say deleted them acts
I'm sorry them amendments
I live in a state where you can both open carry and concealed carry without need for a permit.
If this happens, I wouldn't mind visiting Cali and N.Y. #FromTexas
Don't bother. The only place you can carry in NYC is a public sidewalk and any business that has a "guns are allowed" sign.
As someone who wants to travel across the US and camp, not being able to carry a gun for self defense against predators is FRUSTRATING. I just want to be able to travel freely and protect myself if need be
But what if your gun shoots someone?
perfect wording ...travel across... travel freely
Title of the video is not accurate.
CCW should be universal as once you have obtained one in any state you should be able to go anywhere in the country without having to be subjected to other state restrictions,your background check goes through the FBI to start with 11:03
You shouldn't need a permit PERIOD.
What’s with the click bait title? It hasn’t happened yet, and probably won’t.
I guess you missed the ? mark
Rather than regulating access to firearms, the govt should subsidize training and safe storage.
Would be nice if California would pay for an $8000 Liberty safe lol
I live in NJ and have a CCW. I work in NYC. I spend more time in NYC then I do in NJ yet my permit is invalid once I cross that bridge or tunnel. I also have a UTAH CCW. Funny thing is I applied for a CCW in PA and the only prerequisite is that I have a CCW in my home state which I do and they denied me without any explanation/cause. Crazy. And PA doesn’t not recognize MY NJ CCW and they do not recognize any non resident CCW from any other state. They would recognize my UTAH CCW if I was a resident which makes zero sense. What is the difference? It would make more sense to have reciprocity with neighboring states where people frequently travel across state lines then to have reciprocity with states that are hundreds of miles away. Many people that live in Newark, NJ, East Orange, Jersey City, work in Manhattan. Many people that live in Camden, NY work in Philly. It’s insane that neighboring states do not recognize each others permits.
It's all a bunch of nonsense. We need national reciprocity, any CCW should be valid nationwide. This case could be the opening we need to set precedent.
It sounds like the state of Pennsylvania made a mistake in your case because it is the case that if you have a permit from another state, Pennsylvania grants you a permit in the state of Pennsylvania, and so the fact that you were denied means that the state erred, unless there was some other basis. I would reach out to the state of Pennsylvania for assistance to correct this error. PA license is accepted in most states west and south of it except DC and MD.
They intentionally don’t recognize each others permits. The whole process is to discourage you from even trying.
Connecticut permit is not recognized by NY, MA, or RI, which are all surrounding states. And I agree it's to deter.
PA absolutely recognizes Ohio permits.
Ah never mind I see now you said any NON resident out of state permit.
As a California resident for Six decades. It's gotten so much hassle Just to go to a Shooting range. Because you have to have everything separated gun locked in one box, then Ammunition locked up in another box at least six feet away from the gun. Next they will probably make you break your guns down to the frames and each piece will be required to also be in a Locked box. 🤪
Six feet??? What they both have covid😊😊😊
Super awesome if this happens... state laws infringement on U.S. constitution (carry = everywhere) is never a good thing... thnx 4 the 411.
Seems legit to me.
There need to be organized civil disobedience actions against these states to force their hand.
It is ridiculous to me that they can issue 1 permit & moot the entire case to keep an unconstitutional law in place. Once there is a court case about the constitutionality of any law, there needs to be a DECISION. How they get away with these unscrupulous ways of sidestepping laws is beyond me, but then again, I have and use morals & ethics...
The issue is "standing". When the gun owner is charged for not having a ccw and then challenges it, the AG in CA (knowing theyre gona lose the constitutional debate) issues that person a ccw ... thereby removing any claim he/she can make. Once that individual HAS the ccw, they can no longer challenge the law because they are no longer aggrieved and lack standing. It's silly -but it is a legal technicality.
@@michaelsharp2272 I'm no lawyer, but I have common sense. there should not be a way to lose your standing once you are charged. Once entered, standing is established & it shouldn't matter if they give the person what they wanted or not. He's still injured by the hassle, time, etc. That must be challenged somehow, or it's hopeless. Unethical practices should never be allowed.
Steven, please keep up these great videos. As a fellow Californian and in general 2A supporter, I very much appreciate them.
It would take a MASSIVE shift in thinking for CA to ever accept anything resembling reciprocity on the 2A.
No kidding, perhaps a gigantic "shift" of the tectonic plates into the ocean.
#RevolutionIStheONLYsolution...period.
Easy solution....kick kalifornia out of the union
49 is just fine.
@@mrbyamile6973 Take a Sawzall to it and slice it off at the border.
You don't need to kick all of California out, just the coastal elite areas...and Sacramento. The rest of the state is nothing like those blue areas.
We don't have permits at all in this state. You can carry openly or concealed without permit or permissions.
Wait what? This would be awesome
This could change everything and put an end to all gun control permanently. It would also end "gun free zones" as well. Back when the 2nd Ammendment was written there was no such thing as a gun free zone.
Even in the late 1990s, I could carry my firearm openly in Calif. I had to stop at the state line and take my legally concealed weapon out pf its holster and put it on the dash of my car to enter CA.
We need to go back to those days and the days of Mutual Combat!
My driver's license is good in all states, why can't a permit to carry be good in all states????😅
Thanks for keeping us updated with the very latest!👍
Be safe all. 🇺🇲👍✌️🇺🇲
As a over the road truck driver this would be awesome because my truck is my home and I’m constantly crossing state lines having to check each state and how I can and can not carry my fire arm. Ohio ccs is excepted by most of the country but many states I go through would not protect my second amendment rights as a ccw carrier even just passing through.
Never paid any mind to states that restrict the right to carry by ignoring those states illegal rules and laws.
Yep, my Arkansas permit is accepted in 37 or 38 states, so I travel and take vacations in these states. Those 12 liberal states don't get any of my money, which is ok with me. Due to there no cash bail and high crime rates why would i want to go vacation there anyway..
@@daveoldham3121 Agreed. I would have to enter Commiefornia for business reasons and would drive in, but I always carried anyway regardless of their illegal carry laws. When it's my choice I don't travel to anti-carry states, I stick to Constitutional carry ones or those that are open carry without needing a permit such as Nevada.
We need more similar cases. The other day a Tennessee man was arrested in Wall, New Jersey for having a handgun without a New Jersey permit. Hopefully he gets the same decision under Bruen.
You can expect to risk going through the same thing that happened in Massachusetts.
Being able to and being jailed and forcing to go through each of the State’s Supreme Courts is another thing.
shouldn't be necessary. applying for a license out of state without actually carrying there should give you standing to sue once denied...
No.
The Constitution applies *_always_* and *_everywhere_* to *_every citizen_* in the United States.
That would mean that state and local officials who would jail you for exercising your rights under the Constitution are guilty of infringing the right(s) in question and unlawful detention (or whatever they call it) under color of authority. Punish them! Everyone from the legislators who voted for the bill and governor who signed it right down to the LEOs that arrested, processed and incarcerated you, including the prosecutor(s) whose job it is to know better and the judge whose job it is to make certain the proceedings in his/her court is strictly legal.
Round'em up; they took part in a criminal conspiracy to infringe your rights and punish you for it.
@@frankmcgowan9457, of course it applies everywhere, except in the eyes of gun controllers. That’s still not going to stop them from arresting people and forcing you to waste years and money fighting them.
@@frankmcgowan9457 Firing Squads for those Commies who Infringe upon the 2A....period.
I never understood why all these gun regulations exist in the first place. "Shall not be infringed" is pretty clear
2A, ...shall not be infringed by Congress, SCOTUS 1876
The real story we need to be talking about with regards to this case is that the man's lawyer was a PUBLIC DEFENDER. That said, in MA most public defenders are practicing attorneys who volunteer their time to take on these cases. So while in most states you're getting an overworked underpaid lawyer, you're essentially getting a "paid" attorney pro-bono.
why even is California part of the United States when so much is illegal in California that is legal in other states?
I recently got my CCW approved in Los Angeles county (West Covina) so if you live here, understand that it is definitely possible. The cost is outrageous, but they are being approved whereas it was impossible to get one in my city before Bruen.
If you live in California and you're thinking about it, and you can afford it, DO IT. Just my two cents.
This needs to not wait, it's ideal timing for exactly what has been a long time coming. This is the ideal supreme court to properly review the case law history and determine that at the very least national reciprocity is required. I definitely think the law should more closely align with the 2A but 1 step at a time back to where we belong.
Good details, but not a fan of clickbait titles
How we ever got away from being able to carry wherever we go.
Young boys took their shotguns to school and they would be hunting the entire time and the parents would be at ease knowing that their kids are safe from harm .
Lmao by the time this goes through the court system and is actually implemented i would be already dead lol.
just carry anyways, it's your 2nd A right.
Maybe, I have driven through many states that out law ed firearms. The key is just do not do stupid things! Be safe out there!
Yep we can carry any place we wish to carry , even without a permit . Just can't legally use it. At that point it's a " id rather be judged by twelve than carried by six " thing . To many crooked district attorneys out there trying to make a point these days by arresting and convicting a lawful citizen for doing what THEY would consider an unlawful thing . Imo the whole thing sucks
@@markmassie3719, not necessarily (just can't legally use it). If you get pulled over for a traffic violation and the officer finds out you have a loaded firearm, you will likely be taken to jail.
@@larrycollie3123 very true . I'm a valid permit holder in my state so I'm not concerned about that issue. Just sad we have to have a permit for something that is a constitutional right to begin with.
I'm a supporters of USCCA but this video is total clickbate. Read the title. It is false! Why are you putting this in your title?? Very frustrating and disappointing
The time has come to disolve many of these unconditional State and Federal agencies and reign in runaway Government. Centure or remove these judges that refuse to adhere to the Constitution and can't seem to comprehend clear English language and definitions of words. The Constitution needs no reinterpretation or legalese to confuse what is clear and simple language of inalienable rights and enlighten them on what enumerated exactly means!
It's my opinion that a lawsuit needs to be levied against both the New York State Police and the New York City Police gun license division because these agencies violate the 4th amendment the First Amendment as well as the Second Amendment.
Let me try to explain when you make an application to the New York City Police Department for example or even that of the New York State Police what they're going to do is your background check you are required to provide any social media accounts that you may have had presently or in the past for character analysis where does it say you gave up your first amendment where does it say you have to also give up your fourth amendment what does your political views have to do with you being conferred a Firearms carry permit as long as you have met the federal requirement that you are not a prohibited person to own a firearm through a standard background investigation this is one of the arguments I feel should be brought before a court of law because in the past when a person made an application for a gun permit you did a background check and that was it another thing that I find really a pain in the ass for lack of a better word is the 16-hour requirement in New York for training apparently the standard National Rifle Association pistol certification course is not adequate enough to meet New York State and New York City training requirements which I think is ridiculous you're not preparing for war you're not preparing for a career in law enforcement or private security you just want to have the means to protect yourself your loved ones from the escalating crime in New York this is why there needs to be a lawsuit to address this
"The right to bear arms" means just that.
It means we are allowed to keep our limbs with 5 fingers intact.
and pretty soon, they wanna take that away; and next they will come for our legs.
That must be a joke. A poor one at that. 120 million people killed by their own governments in the last 100 years. FDR added to that number.
I live in Massachusetts and it's run by left wing nutjobs. Fortunately for me, I carry under LEOSA/ HR-218. With that said, ANY person who is of age and not a convicted felon should be able to carry nationwide. After all, carrying a gun is a right and driving a car is merely a privilege. Yet, you don't need a separate driver's license to cross state lines. Lastly, cars kill way more people than guns and the vast majority of gun violence involves convicted felons who can't legally carry to begin with.
CA, OR & WA all have the same prohibitions for non-residents, except OR & WA have exceptions for neighboring state residents who work in their state with reason. This should absolutely not be allowed because that flagrantly opposes the spirit of the 2nd amendment.
Your driver's license extends to every state, your right to speak your mind extends to every state, your right to protection for illegal Search and seizures extendstoeverystate, in what world wouldn't this extend to your right to carry firearms?
What a trash clickbait title. Also a lie. Glad it might be the start of national reciprocity but cmon guys. Do better.
Thanks for this story it's so awesome that you have folks backs. I appreciate strong systems. I live in Massachusetts. ✌️😏.
While I completely agree that you should be able to carry anywhere in the country, but MA does issue non-resident LTC's. They made it more difficult, requiring an in-person application and ANNUAL renewal with a fee every time of $100, instead of $100 for a 5-year LTC for residents.
And, please, enough with the clickbait video titles. Cheapens the channel.
Meanwhile, in NY... hey California, hold my beer...
The Constitution already gives me this right "Period". We the people need to Enforce that right and stop being Weak! And letting a bunch of Tyrannical clowns tell us what we can and cannot do especially when it comes to our Constitutional rights. ✝️🇺🇸✝️
2A, ...shall not be infringed by Congress, SCOTUS 1876
You were Born with the right.
Ok, I love you, but this is click bait, you are way out of reality, and even if I agree with you (I do) this video is more reason not to buy in to your organization because you are engaging in false information. Please just stick to the real fight and the real fact. Tell me, why aren't USCCA members part of the exemption from the pistol brace rule? Because, you're just building an organization (think NRA) you're not actually fighting the fight. Thank you, though, I am grateful for insurance.
It's incredibly simple. Your RIGHT to keep & 🐻 💪💪 shall NOT be infringed. What's so complicated about that 🤔
I like the USCCA videos but the titles are click bait. This one in particular leads you to believe that this is a thing today but it is not. Slippery slope.
What a load of legal gobledegook complicating a simple right. The justice system is a joke.
Even if national reciprocity becomes law, you had better think twice before travelling cross country with a gun in your car. In states such as New York, New Jersey, California and Illinois, you will be arrested and will face a costly trial, at which you will be found guilty, imprisoned and heavily fined. Yes, you can appeal and if the case reaches the Supreme Court, you will be exonerated. But at what cost? You will be out tens of thousands or more in legal fees, you will have lost your job while in jail, and your nerves will be a shamble. Better to map a route that goes around all red states.
10 amendment says , ONLY LAWS LEFT OVER IS FOR THE STATES, last I checked 2nd amendment is a federal constitution rights
Why the click bait headline? One that uses BOTH a ? and an !. From a firm with a good credibility, and one that I pay money too, this is potentially confusing to the viewers and disappointing.
The 2nd Amendment is our permit! The right to BEAR arms shall not be infringed!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Concealed carry permitting by itself unconstitutional per opinions by SCOTUS since in 1791 there was never a rule, restriction or need for a permit to have a weapon on my person as I move from colony or settlement to another territory.
I don’t need a permit to talk or have a permit to trial by jury. Driver’s license is not a right, but it is honored in every state. Right to bear Arms is a right and subject to state and local restrictions by some miracle.
It is just amazing to me that the federal government is able to make any gun law. Thats not the jurisdiction of the federal government. Their job is to commerce and the border not legally making any gun law. I have read Federalist 51 and James Madison states that their is to be no gun regulations. So why is there gun regulations? If someone does something bad with one there are laws against that but to try and ban all guns is insane
You have always been able to.y permit is the constitution, and it"Shall not be infringed" wake up people
This title isn't accurate - you cannot carry across every state legally without a permit. I agree that the ruling in this Federal District Court is interesting and important, it is pretty meaningless outside of MA as it isn't even a Federal Appeals Court ruling. I wish people would stop titling videos like this (yes, I recognize it is click bate to generate views), as it is deliberately misleading and anyone that doesn't understand what happened here may falsely believe that there is now national reciprocity on carry permits. There isn't and believing so could get you into serious legal trouble (if you get caught).
The 2nd amendment should not be taxed because it’s an infringement on anyone rich or poor to have a weapon.The permits al,licenses and these dumb insurance companies for gun issues better never be made mandatory because it is horrible idea and once again an infringement.
Be careful who you choose as your self defence lawyer, read The fine print USCCA says they will not represent anybody in a criminal act they can turn You down if they feel it was a "criminal act" You got to be careful do a lot of research on them before you choose them read the fine print very Carefully.
I have a C C W and I am trained well and at 50 feet I can shoot a fist sized group of 9 rounds in approximately 7 seconds.
And the only way that they will get my gun is when they pull it from my cold dead fingers.
I’m all for 2A rights and would like to see this go through. However, I’m a bit disappointed by your misleading title just to get views.
Now get rid of the gun-free zones (soft targets) and the stupid stickers on businesses. If a business wants to do business in the USA then it must abide by our wonderful Bill of Rights.
Concealed arms that are not firearms. Everyone is focused on firearms when they should be talking about ALL arms.
do i need a permission in / of every State to exercise my 1st Amendment Right ? nope
do i need a permission in / of every State to exercise my 4th Amendment Right ? nope
do i need a permission in / of every State to exercise my Right to remain silent ? nope
do i need a permission in / of every State to exercise any of my Right ( aside the 2A ) ? nope
There are no limits to the Constitution and concealed means concealed
I'm not a lawyer and so I don't know the intricacies of the law, but I've long felt it was just a matter of time that national reciprocity becomes law. The reason being that eventually someone was going to be arrested, and the case would eventually be taken to the top. The back and forth of opinion decisions, the case law that is established even if a case doesn't get taken to the highest courts, etc... It would all contribute to the point that either Congress acts (albeit reluctantly) and makes reciprocity legal, thereby cleaning up this mess. Or, the courts decide the final say. The argument is solid, no other rights that we possess as US Citizens are subject to our location. I would be interested to see what comes of this. I think I'm going to go read the decision in this matter now and see what the judge thought about it.
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." - Marbury vs Madison (1803)
This!!