Check out SimpliSafe here: simplisafe.com/covertcabal. SimpliSafe is award-winning home security that keeps your home safe around the clock. It's really reliable, easy to use, and there are no contracts.
@NOTINMYARSE ! No that's what destroys an economy. Especially if you're the one rebuilding. Reducing the population would literally do nothing, and that's a straight up stupid basis for an argument. And what would anyone try to flatten ? None of this makes any sense. The only people who war benefits are the people who can win decisively, and suffer very little in return. Unlike WW2 a major war could hurt everyone, even possibly the US.
Russia and US have a lot of weaponary in "reserves". Thats outdated T-62 T-64 T-55 for example. Same with outdated aircraft. They are not useless if you put some modern electronics on it. For example like India still uses Mig-21 but with modern electronics. You forgot to mention this. The same situation is with US. It's not hard to make a lot of modern equipment on all this things and mobilise a big army. The war would look like more like a fallout game. Making weapons of old scraps. And it can continue for long
I recall a document stating that due to trade based interdependencies the chance of a war between global superpowers was extremely unlikely. The next year WW1 started.
Covis showed the world how dangerous it was to be that interdependent, for the last 7-8 months countries have been racing to become more self sufficient again
Dean Firnatine the us can be self sufficient we don’t need anything outside the america we have everything we need at home it’s funny the world needs us to keep the current world order but they hate the us and we don’t need them the sole world super power with no global interests we have all resources in America and the perfect geography and strongest military
*And you forget that all these systems have their own unique control interfaces.* Which makes it extremely hard to attack every system at once. Not too mention if you can hack the powergrid in some town, it doesnt give you the power to turn off the powergrid in the entire nation. In short its highly unlikely to carry out a significant attack this way. *And its pretty UNscary...* Even if you can control the traffic lights of some small town or city, how long would it take for people to start ignoring the lights and how long before they regain control. In short it maybe a lil fun but unless they have a actual target and goal its hardly a usefull attack, but more of a annoyance at best. Id be more scared of FaceBook and other social media platforms that gather data on you.
@@reconx86 Dude one stike on power plant and every things OFF , literally no matter how cyber secure it is. Maybe a few esential systems running with fuel generators but in short supply or even more likely a hit on those too its all dead. Theres no traffic lights,sewage,water, mobile phones, computers etc.
@@VS-et4pn not all considering war is most likely between the NATO, vs Russia or the US vs China (foreign involvement in that one I have no idea), or some disaster that North Korea causes. Only the Fiber optic cables connecting warring nations would be severed. Of course what you said could still become true if the enemy decided to sabotage said lines reason being to cause economic collapse in enemy countries. However there’s also starlink. SpaceX’s internet constellation. I’m afraid of what anti satellite missiles might do to this. It’d cause massive debris fields and leave all of low earth orbit a place that cannot be traversed by humans. Effectively cutting off Space exploration and satellite launches.
@@Mgl1206 first thing ww3 would do is a few sub orbital emp bursts, that takes out all sat connections, 90% of the cars on the road, any computers or electronics that aren't hardened, and most aircraft in the air, they dont even need to cut the cable to wreck the tv. there isn't any defenes against sub orbital strikes, that we know of anyway.
More like, " Hey ! Do you need Red Flag peoples to heal you, while I am ready to blow up myself, with all the population hiding in bunkers and eating world class cheese, and chocolates, also with guns by their sides, EACH ONE HAS "
@@somebody700 Why? It's not strategically important and isn't allied with anybody. Switzerland has no beef with anybody in the world. And since a lot of rich people keep their money in Swiss banks you can be certain the very same rich people would veto against it.
Trick question: The United States Air Force has more aircraft than any other air force. What military has the 2ND most aircraft? Answer: The United States Navy.
@@rio8651 You know what military has the most anti-air defense weapons, drones to fool anti-air defense systems, and stealth to limit their effectiveness? The United States of America
They moment the war break out overseas, the moment the rationing begins in the homefront, the myth of the overseas war not affecting the people back home will shatter, consumer technology will stagnate, no more iphones or androids, no more multicore cpus and graphics cards at reasonable prices, every bit of those rare earth raw materials will go to the war effort, factories for all intents and purposes will be owned by the government, the government will control the wages and set the production quotas for workers, set prices and of course impose curfew.
@@joshstock6591 you know gps was made by and for the US military, they eventually allowed everyone to use it... its rumored the US military have access to even more precise usage still... Glonass and the new EU version of gps (i forget what its called) have all come about in case a country is against the US in war , as the US can shut down access to gps again, rendering missiles, planes, tanks boats etc (the whole battlefield) blind electronically . other than it being "switched off" to everyday folk, it would be extremely difficult to blow up the satellites as there are loads and they are in geostationary orbit (a long way out) i dont think any geostationary satellites have ever been destroyed intentionally
That would be almost impossible today tbh(as said in video). They could produce small weapons and some spare parts but high end military gear like a F35 is just too complex and requires a dedicated factory.
@@TheEmolano : they felt the same way during ww2. If we learned anything about American spirit and ingenuity, it’s this: If there is a will, there is a way.
Well, M3 Lees were sharing hull design with M4 Sherman, only difference between them in the earliest version was the giant gaping hole in the front right that fit with the 75mm gun. This was because that M3 Lees were design to be a stop gap solution when the turret of M4 didn't met standard in time, so they need a big tank with a big gun to fight in north africa and M3 is born.
M3 Lee isn't as bad as stereotype said. It was capable to buy time for Brits in North Africa. And M3 Lee is superior to the IJ tankettes in Asia-Pacific theatre.
@@zegzbrutal It was a stop gap solution, it was good for its time, only that the crew usually need more training then they had, to operate both the 75mm and 37mm cannon tho.
It may involve nuclear bombs, maybe not the Tsar kinda bombs for the sake of humanity, probably low-yield nukes for a small and controlled demolition/collateral damage.
SlasheR yes because if Call Of Duty makes a modern warfare game During a major War that causes the world to fight each other will strike a controversy and Activision could get bad ratings and they could get in trouble for doing that
I'm more interested on what the internet would look like in a world war. Would it be filled with memes or will it be filled with pleading cries of billions of people sending out their last words on the internet as they're engulfed by nuclear fire. Livestreams of your favorite content creators as they cry out in their rooms,hearing the wail of sirens outside before it cuts of with an earsplitting crash.
After 4 months, the the t90 would be gone so t 55;/54 t44 and t34 would probably be used again So wwIII will turn in to II in no time and the we will see Shermans phanters and t35s
@@viniciusaraujolago Probably not T-34, but some of the cold war era variants perhaps. Then again, German panzers from ww2 were used in Yemen in the last few years as light artillery, so who knows. Syria supposedly has a warehouse full of old Stg-44's as well, although that's more of a rumor than a fact.
Almost at this very moment, China, Russia, Turkey, North Korea, and Iran, are figuring on how they might invade the USA and Canada, . . . probably besom freezing to death, and some cannibalism here-and-there, . . .
@@phillipgaley4416 North Korea can't invade us nor can turkey or Iran they would depend on Russia and China. Besides turkey would probably side with us in a conflict or stay neutral.
A world war now would look like the cold war (which never ended) with indirect, economic, political, phycological, and proxy warfare all together. It would gradually but exponentially escalate into a very short, very fast, very destructive hot war. Basically most people would not realize the world was at war until it is basically over because the direct hot war would be the wrap up phase.
@Concerned Citizen yea, probably the smartest way to win a war is by getting the enemy to fight themselves until they almost collapse and the you rush in and nudge them the rest of the way off the cliff.
@H yeah, although right before it erupts into all out chaos and civil war I suspect you would have actual Russian GRU, Chinese MSS, and Iranian guard corp operatives launch nation wide attacks on government, utilities, and economic centers. I mean if the US is occupied then Russia can steamroll europe, China can swarm east asia and the pacific, and Iran and their allies can take most of the middle east. Their are also a few socialist/communist states in africa and central and south america that would also attack their neighbors. Then after russia and china consolidate and genocide their new subjects into submission they can focus on the US which would have been destroying itself for a year or two.
City folks loose their minds when the wifi craps out, imagine no water or electricity in a first strike cyber attack? Cities would burn because of their own inhabitants
@@saulteauxfirstnationsman5180 may it stay that way even in hardship. Where I am people think too much of themselves and are willing to walk over each other to get ahead
National Security Agency exactly. Except for proxy wars, conventional warfare is pretty much dead. The F35 is basically a flying supercomputer and really doesn’t scream air superiority unless it’s controlling an army of drones.
"The wars of the future will not be fought on a battlefield or at sea. They will be fought in space, or possibly on top of a very tall mountain... In any case, most of the actual fighting will be done by small robots. And as you go forth today, remember, your duty is clear... to build and maintain those robots." - The Commandant, The Simpsons
Wrong Analysis when the narrator said: *"In WW3 there wouldn't be a huge significant scale of collateral damage because we have higher precision and tech ridden weapons like bombs, rockets and missiles etc unlike in WW2 where weapons mostly were unguided which resulted in huge destruction of cities and countries.* *Recent conflicts in IRAQ, SYRIA, LYBIA, one can find that cities and towns are totally destroyed by the one of the most advanced high-tech weaponry of the western world as world as Russian. When full blown-war kicks in, it never sees a specific amount of damage to the hostile nation.*
I highly doubt that patogonia (in South America) will be reach by and kind of missiles (..) There's just smalls cities over there and nothing more... Probably a good place to be during any big scale conflict.
@@p51mustang24 no exactly, if we have a massive nuclear drops on the planet, probably the world temperature will increase (in the first weeks) and so the sea levels... So, probably these islands will be under water for a period of time and maybe it will be a not good place...
@Super Cool Who were the Nazis protecting? What about Napoleon when he tried to conquer Europe? How about Attila the hun? What war did Rome wage that was for its citizens? Ghengis Khan? America in Vietnam or even in Iraq? Alexander the Great? The Crusaders? Need I go on?
@Antun Šturlić Yes I did. I could go on forever with people like: Hernan Cortez, Boudica, Bar Kokhba, Darius & Xerxes, or basically any Roman Emperor with Gothicus attached to their name.
Technicaly the cold war was already the third world war. It was just made with new technologies of the time You still got violent engagement between the two blocs, the two side. World war 3 already happened, killed thousands of people around the world, and ended when the reds collapsed
@@saddecisions its obviously a joke, I know that the likelihood of it happening is infinitesimal, although better now, because of Trumps foreign policy. And Countries that are powerful forming an alliance is not new, take NATO as an example. Call that "idiot think".
"I know not with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones." - some guy quoted in a Call of Duty game, maybe Einstein
lol. I wouldn't say they invented the problem of burglary. 😂 However, your comment is still valid. But also on that note, having decent security around your home really works... motion activated security lights, surveillance cameras, along with a big ol dog or two will usually put off quite a few would be thieves. That along with a carefully stashed firearm or two will definitely do the trick if they get in while your home... Not only can you blast them to hell, but your security lights, and cameras will be all the evidence you need in court for claiming self defense. 😊
This would be a lot more like a chess game, a piece when destroyed is not so easily replaced as it once was in earlier wars. Also most of the board is finally visible at all times for once!
Bizarre analogy. The world was equally visible during WWII. When Nazi Germany began attacking Britain in 1940 they knew exactly where the important industries, shipping yards, ports and logistic centers were. When they planned a sneak attack on the USA (which never happened due to the long distance) they had already earmarked the most important industrial centers - most of them building aircraft in fact - to strike in an attack. Intelligence gathering from local spies, aerial recon and peacetime reports was the norm. Even Imperial Japan which had very little experience with the USA, was well aware of the industrial output of the American industry, which is why it planned on a short and decisive all-out war over a year - otherwise they were well aware they could never win once the civilian industry had made a full transfer to making military equipment. The real issue is the destructive power of modern weapons. Just conventional ones turn cities into rubble. With nuclear weapons we're ALL wiped out and the few survivors are back in the Middle Ages.
@@melvinklark4088 tell that to communists. CCP's "great leap forward" killed millions (idk maybe 100's of millions) just to pull china into modernity. Same as the soviets, i dont even know what specific events killed lots of people there, i just know its in the millions also. TLDR: dont expect communists to care about human lives.
@@Zyscheriah you say this as if 9 million dont die every year from hunger, because its not profitable to feed them. That number has been debunked as it counts nazis and unborn children due to reduced birth rates. But please tell me about the immorality of communism when capitalism lets millions die per year because as previously mentioned, its not profitable
That was the idea soviets had. In case of a war between east and west, soviets would have had tried win the war within few montsh with their A-class forces before sending out their reserves with less refined and advanced weaponry and turning the war into war of attrition.
@@gremlinchemist3621 That is a tricky move, could and couldnt work at the same time.... Destroy the A-Class forces of your enemy with your A-Class forces and then send you vastly superior but inferior in tech to obliterate your enemy reserves.... Or get fucked because ur A-Class are out of combat.
Super Bananas I highly doubt it. Nuclear weapons are the last thing any country wants to use. Everyone knows full well that once one nuke is launched, all the nukes get launched. Firing a nuke almost certainly means that your country will be showered with them in retaliation.nSo it’s only going to be used if your losing the war and on your last legs, because you have nothing left anyway, so why not take everyone with you.
One of my Chiefs talked about aircraft carriers having a big target one them. The number crunchers at the Pentagon figured any carrier had about 20-30 minutes if things went to full scale war with the Soviet Union.
@@useryggfdcc Now, it doesn't even have to be a nuke. China and especially Russia are sinking money into supersonic cruise missiles. Much more cost effective. Ten years ago, Big Navy was talking about going with more amphibious assault ships...today's mini-carriers.
@@scarling9367 Mini carries may work better, still very expensive to build. That Russian carrier is a good idea, but need nuclear reactors to run the ship. Fitted with hupersonic Zercon cruise missiles and a few aircraft, deathly. But this plandemic is the biggest threat to the world right now. This is the start of the NWO. WO2020060606A1 Google it!
@@useryggfdcc As a sub guy, I don't have a dog in the fight. I just know that was the conversation they were having when I was getting out. Big Navy just doesn't seem too thrilled with the Ford class.
Nah. He got tactics completely wrong. No one looks at a charge of "the best enemy tanks" and results in you sending your best tanks to meet them. You pick your battles.
In all likelihood, we'd end up going down the route which think tanks are expecting. A shock, I'm sure. MBTs would be replaced by smaller, faster, off road vehicles which can get away from artillery fire and use APS for protection against heavy weapons. Fighter jets would get simplified. The main benefit of 5th gen fighters is sensor fusion. So along as sensors half as capable and connected as the F35s can be produced in wartime, then a half-decent fighter can be built to pad-out the air force. Carriers will still be built, probably the ski-jump variety. Clusters of Hyper velocity projectiles, with minimal guidance systems will replace smart bombs. They'd only need to know how close they are to each other, and only a few would need to understand how far they've drifted off course, and even then, it wouldn't need to be super precise.
I think it is less likely fighter jets will be simplified, and more large drones will be used to supplement fighter jet roles. These could be new models, or drones built from modified older jet designs & parts. They have all ready tested turning a F16 into a drone. Imagine a drone swarm of 1000 F16 drones. Hundreds would be shot down, but no air defense in the world could stop that swarm from it's mission. Fighting it, would only deplete your AA of limited advanced missiles.
@@TheNinjaDC If they would have the means to produce drone F-16s during a high intensity war, then how would they have trouble building more F35s? Those drone F-16s were also not being used to replace or supplement the 4th gen fighter fleet in combat. They were used as targets for weapons tests and wargames. A target drone needs to be unmanned because you are shooting at it, or when not using it in a live weapons test, are still flying the plane in ways which are unsafe, and not worth risking a pilot who isn't in combat or combat training. I don't see large remote operated planes being used in a WWIII beyond the initial stages. They need satellites for command and control, if not to be directly operated by a remote pilot. If that connection is compromised, the UAV is a liability. And sophisticated guidance systems are required not just in the drone, but its weapons for it to actually be useful in combat. Even in the GWOT, MQ-1 and MQ-9s which lost connection would just crash. Newer drones might not be as vulnerable, but a manned aircraft still has the benefit of being manned. A drone is only advantageous when the pilot in the cockpit is a limiting factor. In all out war, the pilot is an asset, and a remote connection is a security and survivablity risk. Drones are not magic, they are not more capable than manned vehicles (aside from when the drones need to be smaller than manned vehicles), and they do not bring quite as much to the table as some people think. It's a shame that we don't see the real benefit of the drone, and keep trying to push the technology into roles which aren't its strongest, and where it isn't even the strongest. Butterfly bombs with parachutes instead of metal drogues and drone pods like the next gen windmills are expected to use represent the correct way to utilize drone tech. Small kamikaze drones that are the size of a javelin missile and can be used to hit an insurgent position in a fraction of the time or cost of calling in an airstrike represent the correct way to use drone tech. Small parasite fighters that can be attached to a manned fighter and act as weapons racks for the manned fighter, and only get released when the electronic warfare environment permits represent the correct way to use the technology. Small UGVs with heavy machine guns, autocannos, mortars, recoiless rifles, or even just the squads rucks represent the correct way to use the tech. A huntIR round fired from a 40mm is a good way to use the tech. An MQ-1 or MQ-9 operating where it would be politically untenable for manned aircraft is a correct way to use the tech. Using an MQ-9 over US ground troops when a modernized OV-10 would be viable, is an incorrect way to use the tech.
Whether high tech, or low tech it is the country with the greatest manufacturing capacity will win in developed world wars. Guess who is the world's largest manufacturer? Who has the most factories to convert?
@@MichaelSHartman well yeah, but China isn't necessarily "high tech" manufacturing, as is Germany or America. And I imagine a war would cut off Chinese access to Western intellect property... But hopefully that happens *before* any war, as most nations are catching onto Chinese theft.
@@AntifoulAwl Professional law enforcement in the US is just as divided as the rest of the population. I wish you were right, but you're completely wrong.
I imagine world war three is probably going to be more like a giant game of Don't starve than combat considering pretty quickly every country's supply lines and lines of communication would be cut or blocked
A lot of it would look like Afghanistan. 1st-world types who never did much but type on a keyboard having their asses handed to them by working-class people
Really interesting point, you've brought up, about the inability to restock. Even in WW2 there was a 10 year armed race before the actual start, and stockpiles ran dry fast.
The only country that did roughly 10 years of war prep in ww2 was Germany everybody else was court with there pants down to varied degrees UK had just about enought fighter aircraft and radar. They were about the best prepared France had a good sized army with plenty of tanks but much of there other equipment and thinking were decades behind. Poland had only been back together since the end of the 1st world war and had a large but out dated army that had already fought off the Russians in 1920. I could go on but I think you get the picture.
@Deadpoppin Would have to look more dates up but from what I can remember 1931 when Brtain won seaplane race with supermarine s6 powered by Rolls-Royce pv12 engine would good starting point as that engine was the basis for the Merlin used in Hurricane and Spitfire. Many other things were starting to happen to prep us for war as a lot of ordinary people could see with there own eyes that another set too with the Germans was coming. An example would be when Hawker aircraft had the Hurricane complete and approved, the government was dithering around over how many to buy and the head of the company gambled and put a 100 aircraft on the go straight off. Thats why at the start of the war we had a decent number the production lines had got going and sorted out. Many other examples of this sort of thing crop up when you read about the aircraft and people of this time be it Alex Henshaw, Sidney Cotton, R V Jones and W Watt amoung many others. When it all kicked off we were still a long way from ready but better prepared than our immediate allies.
It is so cool to see the dilemmas faced in hand to hand combat and large scale wars. Energy management and strategy. The drawbacks and advantages that come from a chosen strategy etc. In the end, if fight goes to the distance, flashy technique is out if the window and you resort the the most basic punches and hope that the opponent gets caught or tired 😄
So, after maybe at most a month we'd exhaust most of our modern weaponry? What about re arming and modernizing old tech? isn't this the exact reason why we have the aircraft "graveyards" and tank stockpiles across the country? I don't know if this is true but I did hear that the Air Force revived the F-15/F-16 programs in order to upgrade and modernize the fighters.
The F15X/2040c are new F15s meant to replace aged out units, but with upgraded electronics comparable to 5th gen jets. Lockheed Martin is also offering newer F16s, with "F35 DNA" (electronics & radar), but that is for foreign sales (nations who want modern but cheap jets). The USAF isn't currently interested in these though. Another interesting idea I seen explored is turning old F16 into drones. They even had flying prototypes.
It's questionable how much of the planes in the US boneyard and tanks in the Russian junkyard can be restored. You also need to train the pilot/crew to man it.
@@mickeyg7219 well not when we keep chopping up all the parts to save money... everything that's not broken, should be stored, especially aviation related.
I wonder if a spitfire-type WW2 aircraft could be armed with something like Sparrow missiles, which could be guided by AWACS...? With just some cheap electronics on board, solely for getting that missile to target.
Thoroughly enjoyed this video. Super interesting and spot on with your assumptions (in my opinion). Running out of heavy artillery is mind boggling in a sense but very realistic. That’s when they would bring out the nukes though. You only need a few of those 😅
If World War III does happen, the sheer amount of atrocities shown by the Internet will make humanity *_VERY_* anti-war, if we don't go nuclear that is.
Just by cutting the power, every person in a large city would just die. People are so dependent on electricity, including me, but to think, what would you do if the power was cut, no lights, no way to make food, no way to store food, and no electricity for your phones, and then the biggest one, no wifi, who would you ask, where will you go? The population would be devastated. If a country strikes another country, the other country will be devastated, but perhaps not the military, then the other country would retaliate the same way, and now both of them are in deep waters.
I feel like one of your general themes is that countries couldn’t just switch to manufacturing tech. Wars create innovation out of the need for survival and if a country’s resources are streamlined into a particular goal I think you would be surprised.
@@quiahjohnson5871 The rumored, but widely believed to be true, policy that Israel will nuke all of the European capitals if it is ever existentially threatened. Whether true or not, the simple existence of the rumor functions as blackmail to obtain foreign aid and security guarantees from the west to Israel.
I love how he mentions nuclear weapons and then the home security systems, like "you can use water detectors, cameras, door keypads, nukes and motion detectors"
If you look at how the U.S has fought wars in the the Middle East against large and well supplied armed forces. They destroy the opponents airforce and air fields first and then control the ground second. If there was a large scale war against 2 super powers, id assume carrier groups would be the first to be destroyed as priority, limiting that Nations ability to impose force away from home.
Bettertext Philippines recently agreed to open a base there (we used to have one until Duterte cozied up to Xi; Chinas aggressiveness in the SCS has turned this around to an extent). We also have strong allies in Taiwan, South Korea, and India, as well as co-belligerents such as Vietnam who would fight on the US’s behalf against China
Robotics is overhyped. It does not hit effectiveness per price standards yet. Cybersecurity is solved by total internet shutdown. It happens right now in Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict.
I had this mental checklist of things I was wondering if you'd mention. Cyber warfare and satellites were mentioned. The only thing on my list that you didn't mention is unmanned vehicles. Drones. They're cheaper and easier to make than a whole fighter jet or bomber. They would play a massive role in WWIII.
i dont think so. during war productions would shift to weapons and military hardware. you might not see a new production line of f35s but simpler aircrafts would be created
@@roberthavran2522 Operation Fall Blau happened because Germany desperately needed the oil fields in the Caucasus. The process of converting coal to oil was an expensive and lengthy process. They couldn't sustain operations on the eastern front for more than a few months without it. Not to mention they were already heavily relying on horses because they couldn't run their trucks. That's far from self sufficient.
@@Bengals6211 Yes. Also Germany invaded the Soviet in 41 because they knew that they couldn't sustain an invasion later, with all the oil that the battle of Britain was consuming. Another thing that you pointed and that a lot of people think is true is that the German Army wasn't this huge mechanazied machine, but in reality they invaded Russia with more horses than trucks
If it's nukes, it's air raid sirens and then silence. If it's conventional war with bombers, all bomber crews will hear every day: "YOU GOT A HOLE IN YOUR RIGHT WING."
06:27 the snorkels shown here are american the mast left is a attack periscope while the mast right is a radio mast + gps there is no way to tell if its from a 688 or ohio or seaworlf / virgina class as they all use identical looking masts even when they are different... this is on purpose to deter classification of submarine based on mast + rcs of mast ;)
Check out SimpliSafe here: simplisafe.com/covertcabal.
SimpliSafe is award-winning home security that keeps your home safe around the clock. It's really reliable, easy to use, and there are no contracts.
This was a really interesting one, nice work. Definitely scary to think about
Discussion of a civil war in the USA is a hot topic currently. It would be interesting to get your take on it.
@NOTINMYARSE ! No that's what destroys an economy. Especially if you're the one rebuilding. Reducing the population would literally do nothing, and that's a straight up stupid basis for an argument. And what would anyone try to flatten ? None of this makes any sense. The only people who war benefits are the people who can win decisively, and suffer very little in return. Unlike WW2 a major war could hurt everyone, even possibly the US.
Russia and US have a lot of weaponary in "reserves". Thats outdated T-62 T-64 T-55 for example. Same with outdated aircraft. They are not useless if you put some modern electronics on it. For example like India still uses Mig-21 but with modern electronics. You forgot to mention this. The same situation is with US. It's not hard to make a lot of modern equipment on all this things and mobilise a big army. The war would look like more like a fallout game. Making weapons of old scraps. And it can continue for long
Simply safe ... autonomous drone with a 9mm
2 options.
1. Nuclear war kills everyone
2. Trump vs Putin 1v1 on rust.
i bet on putin
My money's on putin.
Trump could win by trolling putin.
@@jamescawl6904 nahh no one can troll the alpha male
@@jamescawl6904 yeah but he'll die because he injected himself with bleach.
I recall a document stating that due to trade based interdependencies the chance of a war between global superpowers was extremely unlikely.
The next year WW1 started.
is there a chance you could souce us???
Covis showed the world how dangerous it was to be that interdependent, for the last 7-8 months countries have been racing to become more self sufficient again
Dean Firnatine the us can be self sufficient we don’t need anything outside the america we have everything we need at home it’s funny the world needs us to keep the current world order but they hate the us and we don’t need them the sole world super power with no global interests we have all resources in America and the perfect geography and strongest military
@@nightrunner9054 with no global interests lmaoo
@@nightrunner9054 and everyone would be happy if you stayed where you are and no one would hate you
"My neighbors house got broken into and I'm concerned about security"
"Now what ww3 look like"?
paid endorsement, obvi
Well that escalated quickly.
he makes more money and i can easly skip it so i dont care
that neighbour was mighty pissed
It's a paid ad I guess
Drones, trolling, electronic warfare, long range engagements, fast skirmishes, and a strong urge to press the f**k it button.
Drone [after anihilating 40 people and 2 tanks]: noob lol
Me when I troll the US Embassy in Iran with a fake grenade
True. The age of physical war is starting to become extinct. Say hello to cyber and drone wars
@@LooperEpic then get nuked because someone took it personally😂😭😂😭
we do a little trolling (annihilates your child hospital with a drone strike)
2020: “I think we can fit that in for November”
Would get loads of likes if it wasn’t late 😔
Stop joking
I can simplify it boom boom boom boom the end. Anyone up for a bong in the blitz afterwards 😎😏
Most people would not notice until the internet broke down.
Save that for 2021
People forget that sewage treatment, power grid and even traffic lights are networked. A very scary thought indeed
*And you forget that all these systems have their own unique control interfaces.* Which makes it extremely hard to attack every system at once. Not too mention if you can hack the powergrid in some town, it doesnt give you the power to turn off the powergrid in the entire nation. In short its highly unlikely to carry out a significant attack this way. *And its pretty UNscary...*
Even if you can control the traffic lights of some small town or city, how long would it take for people to start ignoring the lights and how long before they regain control. In short it maybe a lil fun but unless they have a actual target and goal its hardly a usefull attack, but more of a annoyance at best. Id be more scared of FaceBook and other social media platforms that gather data on you.
People’s entitlement has resulted in this over-centralization. When everything is state, all our eggs are in one basket.
NOOO NOT THE TRAFFIC LIGHTS
@@reconx86 Dude one stike on power plant and every things OFF , literally no matter how cyber secure it is. Maybe a few esential systems running with fuel generators but in short supply or even more likely a hit on those too its all dead. Theres no traffic lights,sewage,water, mobile phones, computers etc.
reconx86 did not mean to imply that all of these systems are centralized; only that most are “networked” to the internet which opens them to attack
At least you can watch it in 4k or HD television
Maybe for a week before all of the technology needed to sustain quality connections are completely severed
@@VS-et4pn not all considering war is most likely between the NATO, vs Russia or the US vs China (foreign involvement in that one I have no idea), or some disaster that North Korea causes. Only the Fiber optic cables connecting warring nations would be severed. Of course what you said could still become true if the enemy decided to sabotage said lines reason being to cause economic collapse in enemy countries. However there’s also starlink. SpaceX’s internet constellation. I’m afraid of what anti satellite missiles might do to this. It’d cause massive debris fields and leave all of low earth orbit a place that cannot be traversed by humans. Effectively cutting off Space exploration and satellite launches.
You need to stay alive to witness that..:)
I'd like to see it filmed in 1940s camera
@@Mgl1206 first thing ww3 would do is a few sub orbital emp bursts, that takes out all sat connections, 90% of the cars on the road, any computers or electronics that aren't hardened, and most aircraft in the air, they dont even need to cut the cable to wreck the tv.
there isn't any defenes against sub orbital strikes, that we know of anyway.
Ww3:
**starts**
Switzerland:
Oh no......
Anyways
More like, " Hey ! Do you need Red Flag peoples to heal you, while I am ready to blow up myself, with all the population hiding in bunkers and eating world class cheese, and chocolates, also with guns by their sides, EACH ONE HAS "
@Opecuted that's not why he made that comment
@@somebody700 Why? It's not strategically important and isn't allied with anybody. Switzerland has no beef with anybody in the world. And since a lot of rich people keep their money in Swiss banks you can be certain the very same rich people would veto against it.
Trick question: The United States Air Force has more aircraft than any other air force. What military has the 2ND most aircraft?
Answer: The United States Navy.
Uh, ever heard of "anti-air vehicles"?
@@rio8651 You know what military has the most anti-air defense weapons, drones to fool anti-air defense systems, and stealth to limit their effectiveness?
The United States of America
@@jonathanryan9946 you know what nation would be able to block hyperbalistic nuclear bombs?, not the United stats of America, no one actually.
@@TS-jm7jm never said that they currently could... but the US is working on how to fix that.
@@TS-jm7jm lazers and microwaves can do the trick
The real reason it hasn't happened: teenage girls signed a petition to make ww3 never happen
Lmao🤣
Ah yes our true saviors
respect
Lmao
Never underestimate the power of teenage girls😁
no internet or mobile signal, then no electricity or running water, then a blinding flash and nothing
@0100101 010101 😳😳😳😳😳😳
The minute GPS goes down is when you really know it's over. If anyone takes out a satellite its nuke time unfortunately.
@@joshstock6591 Hell, everything is so interconnected that if GPS stops working, the whole world falls into anarchy. I wish I was exaggerating.
They moment the war break out overseas, the moment the rationing begins in the homefront, the myth of the overseas war not affecting the people back home will shatter, consumer technology will stagnate, no more iphones or androids, no more multicore cpus and graphics cards at reasonable prices, every bit of those rare earth raw materials will go to the war effort, factories for all intents and purposes will be owned by the government, the government will control the wages and set the production quotas for workers, set prices and of course impose curfew.
@@joshstock6591 you know gps was made by and for the US military, they eventually allowed everyone to use it... its rumored the US military have access to even more precise usage still... Glonass and the new EU version of gps (i forget what its called) have all come about in case a country is against the US in war , as the US can shut down access to gps again, rendering missiles, planes, tanks boats etc (the whole battlefield) blind electronically . other than it being "switched off" to everyday folk, it would be extremely difficult to blow up the satellites as there are loads and they are in geostationary orbit (a long way out) i dont think any geostationary satellites have ever been destroyed intentionally
“You can’t just switch a company from making automobiles to planes”
Ford: *hold my beer*
It's funny because it's true
And every other company in the ww2 era.. 🙄
That would be almost impossible today tbh(as said in video). They could produce small weapons and some spare parts but high end military gear like a F35 is just too complex and requires a dedicated factory.
@@TheEmolano : they felt the same way during ww2. If we learned anything about American spirit and ingenuity, it’s this:
If there is a will, there is a way.
Rolls Royce has entered the chat
"the US built over 50 thousand Sherman tanks"
*Shows M3 Lees under production.*
Well, M3 Lees were sharing hull design with M4 Sherman, only difference between them in the earliest version was the giant gaping hole in the front right that fit with the 75mm gun. This was because that M3 Lees were design to be a stop gap solution when the turret of M4 didn't met standard in time, so they need a big tank with a big gun to fight in north africa and M3 is born.
M3 Lee isn't as bad as stereotype said. It was capable to buy time for Brits in North Africa. And M3 Lee is superior to the IJ tankettes in Asia-Pacific theatre.
@@zegzbrutal Never said it was bad. I actually quite like the lee.
@@zegzbrutal It was a stop gap solution, it was good for its time, only that the crew usually need more training then they had, to operate both the 75mm and 37mm cannon tho.
Ok, nerd.
Poland: Somethings wrong i can feel it
Poland has fought and survived Nazis, Communists, and much more. In a global battle royale, my money’s on Poland
Nah your western borders are fine now, eastern borders arguably too
@@wtfbros5110 Until, Russia decides to have more land.
@@pranjaldev9559 more land for what? They already have their hands full with Siberia
Poland has survived like a European battle royals I think it would be fine
Lets hope this question will never be answered.
Well it will be answered cause WWIII could literally break out by the end of this year according to various "experts".
Let's hope it does. A nuclear war should happen...its destined to happen
absalom0412 that would be a rubbish vid then why did you click here
It may involve nuclear bombs, maybe not the Tsar kinda bombs for the sake of humanity, probably low-yield nukes for a small and controlled demolition/collateral damage.
@@nesseihtgnay9419 ehm no...
*World war 3 starts*
COD: Business is Boomin'
More like the opposite
@@fortheloveofnoise no
Literally boomin
Bring in the riot shield division!!
SlasheR yes because if Call Of Duty makes a modern warfare game During a major War that causes the world to fight each other will strike a controversy and Activision could get bad ratings and they could get in trouble for doing that
I'm more interested on what the internet would look like in a world war. Would it be filled with memes or will it be filled with pleading cries of billions of people sending out their last words on the internet as they're engulfed by nuclear fire.
Livestreams of your favorite content creators as they cry out in their rooms,hearing the wail of sirens outside before it cuts of with an earsplitting crash.
I will go with memes...
Wow I didn’t even think of that. I’m sure almost everything would be recorded
So it's either funny memes or a horrific cry for mercy
Yeah memes seem better
Porn would survive. Imagine that
@Ali Abdollah Zadeh Russian POW Алина gets absolutely drenched in Guantánamo *BRAZZERS Logo*
World War III exist
T 34: ah yes after long break, My friend.
After 4 months, the the t90 would be gone so t 55;/54 t44 and t34 would probably be used again
So wwIII will turn in to II in no time and the we will see Shermans phanters and t35s
@@viniciusaraujolago Probably not T-34, but some of the cold war era variants perhaps.
Then again, German panzers from ww2 were used in Yemen in the last few years as light artillery, so who knows. Syria supposedly has a warehouse full of old Stg-44's as well, although that's more of a rumor than a fact.
_125mm cannon fires at T34 Stalinium™_
*non-penetration*
after the first day of war : *T-34 Break apart*
@@ZaYn.91 build 10k more in 5 hours
Covert Cabal - "Let's hope we never have to find out."
2020 - "That's being scheduled right now."
The Corona wars
Almost at this very moment, China, Russia, Turkey, North Korea, and Iran, are figuring on how they might invade the USA and Canada, . . . probably besom freezing to death, and some cannibalism here-and-there, . . .
@@phillipgaley4416 North Korea can't invade us nor can turkey or Iran they would depend on Russia and China. Besides turkey would probably side with us in a conflict or stay neutral.
Not going to lie, I will not be surprised if a major world conflict occurs by the end the 20s or even the early 2030s.
Agenda 21/2030
The fighting would reach a level never thought possible before.
Just like Tide detergent fights stains at level never thought possible.
Now at your local walmart AT A 50 PERCENT DISCOUNT ON DEC 29
They fight stains? I thought they were just tasty little treats
@@romak4756 bruv momentum
A world war now would look like the cold war (which never ended) with indirect, economic, political, phycological, and proxy warfare all together.
It would gradually but exponentially escalate into a very short, very fast, very destructive hot war.
Basically most people would not realize the world was at war until it is basically over because the direct hot war would be the wrap up phase.
@Concerned Citizen yea, probably the smartest way to win a war is by getting the enemy to fight themselves until they almost collapse and the you rush in and nudge them the rest of the way off the cliff.
@H yeah, although right before it erupts into all out chaos and civil war I suspect you would have actual Russian GRU, Chinese MSS, and Iranian guard corp operatives launch nation wide attacks on government, utilities, and economic centers.
I mean if the US is occupied then Russia can steamroll europe, China can swarm east asia and the pacific, and Iran and their allies can take most of the middle east. Their are also a few socialist/communist states in africa and central and south america that would also attack their neighbors.
Then after russia and china consolidate and genocide their new subjects into submission they can focus on the US which would have been destroying itself for a year or two.
@Concerned Citizen sadly yeah, I think its to late to stop. All we can do is focus on preparing to protect our families and communities.
Well said
Kind of like what's going on right now
City folks loose their minds when the wifi craps out, imagine no water or electricity in a first strike cyber attack?
Cities would burn because of their own inhabitants
Cities are already burning even with wifi & electricity on.
@@TheRibbonRed sheesh! battle hardened grandparents disappointed in the background
Yeah
Maybe in your country, but my city is united in my province.
@@saulteauxfirstnationsman5180 may it stay that way even in hardship. Where I am people think too much of themselves and are willing to walk over each other to get ahead
What would WW3 be like? Moral of the story:
*"Some of you may die, But that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make."*
Said the granpa politicians
Imagine the internet disappearing, I would lose my youtube scerch history.
ever watch that family guy episode? something similar would happen
Thank god... I’m in luck!
I would love that
I wanted to like the comment but it's at 69 likes
That's about the only thing that can make it disappear . and that's spooky
What a world war would look like today?
*Terminator 2 song plays*
National Security Agency exactly. Except for proxy wars, conventional warfare is pretty much dead. The F35 is basically a flying supercomputer and really doesn’t scream air superiority unless it’s controlling an army of drones.
Howdy fam
Terminator 2 - Opening Scene (HD)
So basically a Protoss opening wave followed by a series of terran engagements, ending in a zerg swarm.
Finally someone who speaks English.
A world war today would look like a big ass gender reveal.
What does that mean?
@@papabillydeth4723 fire
@@papabillydeth4723 explosions, just like what happened in California
@@papabillydeth4723 California.
@@REEEPROGRAM Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Russian soldier when he sees you have simpli safe: no way im getting in there
lol
"The wars of the future will not be fought on a battlefield or at sea. They will be fought in space, or possibly on top of a very tall mountain... In any case, most of the actual fighting will be done by small robots. And as you go forth today, remember, your duty is clear... to build and maintain those robots."
- The Commandant, The Simpsons
Prophetic.
Hardcore...
I believe everything the Simpson say
ua-cam.com/video/oazwTDeqF54/v-deo.html link to the clip where it's said.
It's "Nucular"!
"Nucular".
Wrong Analysis when the narrator said: *"In WW3 there wouldn't be a huge significant scale of collateral damage because we have higher precision and tech ridden weapons like bombs, rockets and missiles etc unlike in WW2 where weapons mostly were unguided which resulted in huge destruction of cities and countries.*
*Recent conflicts in IRAQ, SYRIA, LYBIA, one can find that cities and towns are totally destroyed by the one of the most advanced high-tech weaponry of the western world as world as Russian. When full blown-war kicks in, it never sees a specific amount of damage to the hostile nation.*
“In WW2...The UK, and Soviet Union receiving aid and some supplies from others.”
Understatement at it’s best.
Lend-lease program 💁🏼♂️😂
USA is the arsenal of democracy
Except lend lease only account for 10 percent of Ussr production
Still doesnt change the fact that USSR almost singlehandedly defeated Germany. Lend lease was only 7% of USSR's total war production.
@@GenocideWesterners exactly
Just imagine ww3 is not fought with guns but with controllers in a gigantic E sports tournament
So you mean Enders's Game?
@@forrestozbolt1107 at the end enders game was real, they just weren't told it was until after. WW 3 is the information war and we fight it today.
@@CrusaderSports250
We won WWIII. This is WWIV.
Winners get the losers countries for a year
I hear UTUBE will be removing their saved videos???
"there are no safe place" actually there is, in remote areas where no strategic/tactical value for hitting unless youre unlucky.
I mean yeah although you may get hit or nucular waste type stuff
I highly doubt that patogonia (in South America) will be reach by and kind of missiles (..) There's just smalls cities over there and nothing more... Probably a good place to be during any big scale conflict.
Switzerland 😎
Yall stupid. South Georgia Island, or the Keurgulen Islands are the best bet.
@@p51mustang24 no exactly, if we have a massive nuclear drops on the planet, probably the world temperature will increase (in the first weeks) and so the sea levels... So, probably these islands will be under water for a period of time and maybe it will be a not good place...
Whatever which war, it always the civilians who suffer.
@Super Cool , sadly, that is true.
@Super Cool , defend my family.
@Super Cool I'm not even part of this conversation but I have to congratulate and honor you for admitting you deleted your comment.
@Super Cool Who were the Nazis protecting? What about Napoleon when he tried to conquer Europe? How about Attila the hun? What war did Rome wage that was for its citizens? Ghengis Khan? America in Vietnam or even in Iraq? Alexander the Great? The Crusaders? Need I go on?
@Antun Šturlić Yes I did. I could go on forever with people like: Hernan Cortez, Boudica, Bar Kokhba, Darius & Xerxes, or basically any Roman Emperor with Gothicus attached to their name.
We need WW3 to cap off the trilogy. The Cold War was a good spinoff series but there were too many teases for WW3 that never came.
Technicaly the cold war was already the third world war.
It was just made with new technologies of the time
You still got violent engagement between the two blocs, the two side.
World war 3 already happened, killed thousands of people around the world, and ended when the reds collapsed
You could make the argument the Seven Years War was the prequel to WWI & II 🤷🏻♂️
@@jamesbuchanan3145 That and the Crimean War were good prequels but pale in comparison to the World Wars
Are you happy now?
A really loud alarm, then a flash of light, then absolute silence
"I don't know what weapons World War III will be fought with, but I bet they'll be pretty awesome."
- Albert Einstein
did he actually say that
buzz lightyear lol.
Lol i though that was going to be the same fucking phrase that everyones says in this type of videos
I believe he also said: “ww3 will be fought with nuclear weapons, but ww4 will be fought with sticks and stones.” Or something to that effect.
"Imma smack da shit out dat Tojo."
- Robert Oppenheimer, 1945
Everyone gangsta till usa and russia form a coalition
Rip world
it's an idiot think. if that would happened there would be USA and Russia versus all againts the world. so there's no way of coalition
@@saddecisions its obviously a joke, I know that the likelihood of it happening is infinitesimal, although better now, because of Trumps foreign policy. And Countries that are powerful forming an alliance is not new, take NATO as an example. Call that "idiot think".
Imagine a democratic nation making up with Communists that would be hell for everyone else
everyone gangsta until america gets mad. even without russia. we’re stronger than them 20 times over
"I know not with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones." - some guy quoted in a Call of Duty game, maybe Einstein
"Yes, that's my quote"
- Albert Einstein
"Stopping putting my name after random quotes."
-Albert Einstein
But, it is actually Einstein's quote.
"of course it is” -Albert Einstein
Well he’s wrong, WW3 will not involve nukes.
I love those adds: invent a problem, make your potential buyer scared and sell the solution
lol. I wouldn't say they invented the problem of burglary. 😂 However, your comment is still valid. But also on that note, having decent security around your home really works... motion activated security lights, surveillance cameras, along with a big ol dog or two will usually put off quite a few would be thieves. That along with a carefully stashed firearm or two will definitely do the trick if they get in while your home... Not only can you blast them to hell, but your security lights, and cameras will be all the evidence you need in court for claiming self defense. 😊
Simplisafe is going to keep us safe from WW3, 4 and the end of humanity. Yeah right.
2020: corona
2021: were open for options......
This would be a lot more like a chess game, a piece when destroyed is not so easily replaced as it once was in earlier wars. Also most of the board is finally visible at all times for once!
Bizarre analogy. The world was equally visible during WWII. When Nazi Germany began attacking Britain in 1940 they knew exactly where the important industries, shipping yards, ports and logistic centers were. When they planned a sneak attack on the USA (which never happened due to the long distance) they had already earmarked the most important industrial centers - most of them building aircraft in fact - to strike in an attack. Intelligence gathering from local spies, aerial recon and peacetime reports was the norm.
Even Imperial Japan which had very little experience with the USA, was well aware of the industrial output of the American industry, which is why it planned on a short and decisive all-out war over a year - otherwise they were well aware they could never win once the civilian industry had made a full transfer to making military equipment.
The real issue is the destructive power of modern weapons. Just conventional ones turn cities into rubble. With nuclear weapons we're ALL wiped out and the few survivors are back in the Middle Ages.
I would rather boots on the ground than nuclear war lmao
Agreed
That depends if you are losing or not.
@@rogersmith1408 you rather not kill hundreds of millions billions even if your losing imo
@@melvinklark4088 tell that to communists. CCP's "great leap forward" killed millions (idk maybe 100's of millions) just to pull china into modernity. Same as the soviets, i dont even know what specific events killed lots of people there, i just know its in the millions also.
TLDR: dont expect communists to care about human lives.
@@Zyscheriah you say this as if 9 million dont die every year from hunger, because its not profitable to feed them. That number has been debunked as it counts nazis and unborn children due to reduced birth rates. But please tell me about the immorality of communism when capitalism lets millions die per year because as previously mentioned, its not profitable
8:19 I like that they blurred Willie Wonka's face there. Gotta protect the fictional character's identity after all.
now hes dead cos of you well done
Basically after the first couple of weeks it will look like ww2
Then ww1
@@magicwish7258 then 100 years war
@@hmkhgx8068 then the great ooga booga war
then bacteria war
I wonder if a conventional WW3 would essentially be a high tech war for the first months then WW2 tech again.
That was the idea soviets had. In case of a war between east and west, soviets would have had tried win the war within few montsh with their A-class forces before sending out their reserves with less refined and advanced weaponry and turning the war into war of attrition.
@@gremlinchemist3621 That is a tricky move, could and couldnt work at the same time....
Destroy the A-Class forces of your enemy with your A-Class forces and then send you vastly superior but inferior in tech to obliterate your enemy reserves....
Or get fucked because ur A-Class are out of combat.
prolly wudnt notice for a few weeks that ww3 had started
It would probably turn Nuclear pretty quickly so doubt it
Super Bananas I highly doubt it. Nuclear weapons are the last thing any country wants to use. Everyone knows full well that once one nuke is launched, all the nukes get launched. Firing a nuke almost certainly means that your country will be showered with them in retaliation.nSo it’s only going to be used if your losing the war and on your last legs, because you have nothing left anyway, so why not take everyone with you.
Ww4 will be fought with tentacles and floppy flappers from the massive radiological landscape.
One of my Chiefs talked about aircraft carriers having a big target one them. The number crunchers at the Pentagon figured any carrier had about 20-30 minutes if things went to full scale war with the Soviet Union.
True, they will be gone so fast! A nuke will be used to destroy the carrier group, so very few if any survivors to pick up from sea.
@@useryggfdcc Now, it doesn't even have to be a nuke. China and especially Russia are sinking money into supersonic cruise missiles. Much more cost effective. Ten years ago, Big Navy was talking about going with more amphibious assault ships...today's mini-carriers.
@@scarling9367 Mini carries may work better, still very expensive to build.
That Russian carrier is a good idea, but need nuclear reactors to run the ship.
Fitted with hupersonic Zercon cruise missiles and a few aircraft, deathly.
But this plandemic is the biggest threat to the world right now. This is the start of the NWO.
WO2020060606A1
Google it!
@@useryggfdcc As a sub guy, I don't have a dog in the fight. I just know that was the conversation they were having when I was getting out. Big Navy just doesn't seem too thrilled with the Ford class.
@@scarling9367 One torpedo armed with a nuclear warhead hitting any aircraft carrier will mean no survivors.
You should read "The Accidental Superpower", " The Absent Superpower" and "Disunited Nations" by Peter Zeihan.
The first 3 weeks:
Battles between advanced and expensive technological weapons getting destroyed
The rest of war: ww1&ww2 style wars
this assumes the countries don't say 'fuck it time for a peace treaty' when all their good shit is destroyed.
More like who has the good shot left when the other runs out. My money is on the US. The tech advantage is just too wide.
@@sid2112 can’t take cities and villages with F22’s.
@@gmakcon I don't think a couple of AKs could stop guys with latest M4s from taking over.
@@clement28300yip really? How about in the mountains of Afghanistan? Or the Jungles of Vietnam? Or the deserts of Iraq?
This was such a great summary of why we just not only shouldn't go to any type of world war, but why we can't. Very nice video!
Nah.
He got tactics completely wrong.
No one looks at a charge of "the best enemy tanks" and results in you sending your best tanks to meet them. You pick your battles.
The quiet version of this war has already begun only a matter of time till it gets hot enough.
Not many realise that
@@ThePistonPit yes they also don't realize that Israel violates international law every day.
@@crmesson22k examples?
@@rajeevd.296 violate Lebanese air space just to coordinate attacks with Isis against Syria.
@@diegoragot655 Why would Israel team up with ISIS? That doesn't make sense.
War would be like playing AOE2 with "all visible".
And following with "How do you turn this on?" Spam as well as the new code "ninjalui" for 100,000 of each of the resources.
And Black death after all that
“ “ I Still Think The Losing Sides Would Use “ NUKES “
@@TheSonofGod1 let's just keep it cool...
Russian war doctrine is opposite to American, they use strongest weapons first to deter the enemy into terms of surrender.
@Notareptile Like they'd care about our race lmao
@@TheSonofGod1 So their Nukes will hit Bridges and Factories before they hit Military Assets? You still think Fulda Gap? Wow, we got a Time Traveller!
@@benharvie4341 There won't be anyone left to surrender :)
2020: i know this is pandemic, but things always could go worse
2021: challenge accepted
2022 lol
*laughs in 2023*
In all likelihood, we'd end up going down the route which think tanks are expecting.
A shock, I'm sure.
MBTs would be replaced by smaller, faster, off road vehicles which can get away from artillery fire and use APS for protection against heavy weapons.
Fighter jets would get simplified. The main benefit of 5th gen fighters is sensor fusion. So along as sensors half as capable and connected as the F35s can be produced in wartime, then a half-decent fighter can be built to pad-out the air force.
Carriers will still be built, probably the ski-jump variety.
Clusters of Hyper velocity projectiles, with minimal guidance systems will replace smart bombs. They'd only need to know how close they are to each other, and only a few would need to understand how far they've drifted off course, and even then, it wouldn't need to be super precise.
I think it is less likely fighter jets will be simplified, and more large drones will be used to supplement fighter jet roles.
These could be new models, or drones built from modified older jet designs & parts.
They have all ready tested turning a F16 into a drone. Imagine a drone swarm of 1000 F16 drones. Hundreds would be shot down, but no air defense in the world could stop that swarm from it's mission. Fighting it, would only deplete your AA of limited advanced missiles.
@@TheNinjaDC If they would have the means to produce drone F-16s during a high intensity war, then how would they have trouble building more F35s? Those drone F-16s were also not being used to replace or supplement the 4th gen fighter fleet in combat. They were used as targets for weapons tests and wargames. A target drone needs to be unmanned because you are shooting at it, or when not using it in a live weapons test, are still flying the plane in ways which are unsafe, and not worth risking a pilot who isn't in combat or combat training.
I don't see large remote operated planes being used in a WWIII beyond the initial stages. They need satellites for command and control, if not to be directly operated by a remote pilot. If that connection is compromised, the UAV is a liability. And sophisticated guidance systems are required not just in the drone, but its weapons for it to actually be useful in combat.
Even in the GWOT, MQ-1 and MQ-9s which lost connection would just crash. Newer drones might not be as vulnerable, but a manned aircraft still has the benefit of being manned. A drone is only advantageous when the pilot in the cockpit is a limiting factor. In all out war, the pilot is an asset, and a remote connection is a security and survivablity risk.
Drones are not magic, they are not more capable than manned vehicles (aside from when the drones need to be smaller than manned vehicles), and they do not bring quite as much to the table as some people think.
It's a shame that we don't see the real benefit of the drone, and keep trying to push the technology into roles which aren't its strongest, and where it isn't even the strongest.
Butterfly bombs with parachutes instead of metal drogues and drone pods like the next gen windmills are expected to use represent the correct way to utilize drone tech. Small kamikaze drones that are the size of a javelin missile and can be used to hit an insurgent position in a fraction of the time or cost of calling in an airstrike represent the correct way to use drone tech. Small parasite fighters that can be attached to a manned fighter and act as weapons racks for the manned fighter, and only get released when the electronic warfare environment permits represent the correct way to use the technology. Small UGVs with heavy machine guns, autocannos, mortars, recoiless rifles, or even just the squads rucks represent the correct way to use the tech. A huntIR round fired from a 40mm is a good way to use the tech.
An MQ-1 or MQ-9 operating where it would be politically untenable for manned aircraft is a correct way to use the tech. Using an MQ-9 over US ground troops when a modernized OV-10 would be viable, is an incorrect way to use the tech.
Whether high tech, or low tech it is the country with the greatest manufacturing capacity will win in developed world wars. Guess who is the world's largest manufacturer? Who has the most factories to convert?
@@MichaelSHartman well yeah, but China isn't necessarily "high tech" manufacturing, as is Germany or America. And I imagine a war would cut off Chinese access to Western intellect property... But hopefully that happens *before* any war, as most nations are catching onto Chinese theft.
What's an example of a fast MBT you're talking about? Like a Rooikat, or something even more mobile?
You may start a new project "What would a US civil war look like today?" because we are very likely to experience it this election day.
It would look like a bunch of trailer park drinking buddys in a stand off with professional law enforcement.
No guess as to the winners.
@@AntifoulAwl most of the law enforcement would be on the side of your "trailer park boys"..trust me.
@@AntifoulAwl myth
Antifoul Awl yes, because guerilla warfare doesnt exist
@@AntifoulAwl Professional law enforcement in the US is just as divided as the rest of the population. I wish you were right, but you're completely wrong.
"What Would A World War Look Like Today?"
Well it'd be quick, it'd be bloody, it'd be really noisy, and there would be nothing left to fight for.
@Rob Breaux Why just there? It's a world war and everyone is a part of it.
I imagine world war three is probably going to be more like a giant game of Don't starve than combat considering pretty quickly every country's supply lines and lines of communication would be cut or blocked
Today's world war would look like:
-a bunch of gamers that were drafted
-drones maybe
Edit before people take this too seriously: This is a joke.
Drafted to run through mud pounds in physical guns.... Becoming drone operators? In your dreams.
@@stc2828 i play too much Batylefield and Ace Combat, i dont know any better
A lot of it would look like Afghanistan. 1st-world types who never did much but type on a keyboard having their asses handed to them by working-class people
@@alexcarter8807 lol
@@stc2828 that's what bootcamp is for dude
That sponsor transition was literally SO SMOOTH that I didn't realize I was watching a sponsor till tile 20 seconds in
Lmao I noticed it within 0.1 seconds, you must be just a little dense 👌🏼 lol
@@media6969 heck you
@@stickynomcnuggets4977. 😱😱😱 😂🤣
Really interesting point, you've brought up, about the inability to restock. Even in WW2 there was a 10 year armed race before the actual start, and stockpiles ran dry fast.
The only country that did roughly 10 years of war prep in ww2 was Germany everybody else was court with there pants down to varied degrees UK had just about enought fighter aircraft and radar. They were about the best prepared France had a good sized army with plenty of tanks but much of there other equipment and thinking were decades behind. Poland had only been back together since the end of the 1st world war and had a large but out dated army that had already fought off the Russians in 1920. I could go on but I think you get the picture.
@Deadpoppin Would have to look more dates up but from what I can remember 1931 when Brtain won seaplane race with supermarine s6 powered by Rolls-Royce pv12 engine would good starting point as that engine was the basis for the Merlin used in Hurricane and Spitfire. Many other things were starting to happen to prep us for war as a lot of ordinary people could see with there own eyes that another set too with the Germans was coming. An example would be when Hawker aircraft had the Hurricane complete and approved, the government was dithering around over how many to buy and the head of the company gambled and put a 100 aircraft on the go straight off. Thats why at the start of the war we had a decent number the production lines had got going and sorted out. Many other examples of this sort of thing crop up when you read about the aircraft and people of this time be it Alex Henshaw, Sidney Cotton, R V Jones and W Watt amoung many others. When it all kicked off we were still a long way from ready but better prepared than our immediate allies.
@Deadpoppin No prob as you might have guessed bit of a history and tech buff hope it wasn't too long an answer.
This will be 2020's christmas present for us
The boss battle of 2020
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL 2020 BAD JOKE SO FUNNY
This didn't age well
I hate these jokes
@@zeqirzeqiri1216 yeah i want punch anyone that say 2020 jokes in the nose too
1940: world war ii
2020: twitter war 5
inform us on the previous 4 wars
It is so cool to see the dilemmas faced in hand to hand combat and large scale wars. Energy management and strategy. The drawbacks and advantages that come from a chosen strategy etc. In the end, if fight goes to the distance, flashy technique is out if the window and you resort the the most basic punches and hope that the opponent gets caught or tired 😄
12:28-"...let's hope we never have to find out." I agree with this.
9:39
"The US built over 50,000 Sherman tanks"
*shows video of M3 Lee production line*
So, after maybe at most a month we'd exhaust most of our modern weaponry? What about re arming and modernizing old tech? isn't this the exact reason why we have the aircraft "graveyards" and tank stockpiles across the country? I don't know if this is true but I did hear that the Air Force revived the F-15/F-16 programs in order to upgrade and modernize the fighters.
The F15X/2040c are new F15s meant to replace aged out units, but with upgraded electronics comparable to 5th gen jets.
Lockheed Martin is also offering newer F16s, with "F35 DNA" (electronics & radar), but that is for foreign sales (nations who want modern but cheap jets). The USAF isn't currently interested in these though.
Another interesting idea I seen explored is turning old F16 into drones. They even had flying prototypes.
It's questionable how much of the planes in the US boneyard and tanks in the Russian junkyard can be restored. You also need to train the pilot/crew to man it.
@@mickeyg7219 well not when we keep chopping up all the parts to save money... everything that's not broken, should be stored, especially aviation related.
I wonder if a spitfire-type WW2 aircraft could be armed with something like Sparrow missiles, which could be guided by AWACS...? With just some cheap electronics on board, solely for getting that missile to target.
The new 4th gen fighters are basically missile trucks for 5th gen fighters. Stealth requires internal stowage which limits BVR.
Thoroughly enjoyed this video. Super interesting and spot on with your assumptions (in my opinion). Running out of heavy artillery is mind boggling in a sense but very realistic. That’s when they would bring out the nukes though. You only need a few of those 😅
Love the thumbnail of that one dude just chillin while tanks are blowing eachother up lmao
Good video.
Good little documentary.
It's been awhile since I've been pinned to a documentary like this.
I love Covert Cabal, so much better than all the robot voice channels out there
11:20 When "all the mighty weaponry we see today" are used up the nukes will fly....
I agree with the last statement we hope to never find out.
Its gonna be terrifying seeing just how covered it will be by the media across all platforms.
If World War III does happen, the sheer amount of atrocities shown by the Internet will make humanity *_VERY_* anti-war, if we don't go nuclear that is.
They would be busy reporting on Trump
Just by cutting the power, every person in a large city would just die. People are so dependent on electricity, including me, but to think, what would you do if the power was cut, no lights, no way to make food, no way to store food, and no electricity for your phones, and then the biggest one, no wifi, who would you ask, where will you go? The population would be devastated. If a country strikes another country, the other country will be devastated, but perhaps not the military, then the other country would retaliate the same way, and now both of them are in deep waters.
I feel like one of your general themes is that countries couldn’t just switch to manufacturing tech. Wars create innovation out of the need for survival and if a country’s resources are streamlined into a particular goal I think you would be surprised.
Everyone gangsta untill Russia activates "Dead Hand".
I'm more worried about the sampson option. Those MF'ers are crazy enough to actually do it.
As long as ice machines exist, nobody will invade Russia.
@@p51mustang24 What is the Sampson Option?
@@quiahjohnson5871 The rumored, but widely believed to be true, policy that Israel will nuke all of the European capitals if it is ever existentially threatened.
Whether true or not, the simple existence of the rumor functions as blackmail to obtain foreign aid and security guarantees from the west to Israel.
@@p51mustang24 European? To what end?
Me an intellectual:
Just look at Ace Combat and Call of Duty. Bam, you have yourself a modern war
GROUND WAR AAAYYYYYYYYYYY
I love how that hacking scene was someone hosting a website
So this is why the Military is storing their old equipment instead of scraping it.
Yep ... shhhh
"I don't know what weapons would be used in WW3, but I do know that WW4 will be fought with stones and sticks"
You don't need to quote the guy that made nukes
Cliche
*"TACTICAL NUKE INCOM..."*
the end.
10% todays nukes explode, ENY WERE on the plant, even in home town of that nukes .... Every human on the earth is dead cause by radiation poison.
Its strange as I can hear this!
Assuming you’re talking about any major installation, you mean strategic
@@borivojetravica569 that is not true,nobody will carpet nuke a country,and only a few countryes have enought nukes to destroy the other
I love how he mentions nuclear weapons and then the home security systems, like "you can use water detectors, cameras, door keypads, nukes and motion detectors"
If you look at how the U.S has fought wars in the the Middle East against large and well supplied armed forces.
They destroy the opponents airforce and air fields first and then control the ground second.
If there was a large scale war against 2 super powers, id assume carrier groups would be the first to be destroyed as priority, limiting that Nations ability to impose force away from home.
US has a floating carrier in the form of Japan. Wouldn't be surprised if other South China Sea countries start offering airfields to US.
Bettertext Philippines recently agreed to open a base there (we used to have one until Duterte cozied up to Xi; Chinas aggressiveness in the SCS has turned this around to an extent). We also have strong allies in Taiwan, South Korea, and India, as well as co-belligerents such as Vietnam who would fight on the US’s behalf against China
@@mengelmoesNL "US has a floating carrier in the form of Japan" is some of the funniest commentary I've seen in a while. Imma borrow it
AI, cybersecurity, and robotics would probably be top priority...
Robotics is overhyped. It does not hit effectiveness per price standards yet.
Cybersecurity is solved by total internet shutdown. It happens right now in Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict.
"what would world war look like today?"
"It's very hard to imagine"
Well, thanks vid.
This video has been recommended at an interesting time....
Let’s see what is recommended today
“What would a world war look like today”
Looks at the calendar “Don’t you start”
I had this mental checklist of things I was wondering if you'd mention. Cyber warfare and satellites were mentioned. The only thing on my list that you didn't mention is unmanned vehicles. Drones. They're cheaper and easier to make than a whole fighter jet or bomber. They would play a massive role in WWIII.
This comment aged very well
"the most advanced fighter jets fighting out in the skies" *shows footage of concorde crashing*
The military assets you have at the start of the war is what you'll have to work with during the entire war.
i dont think so. during war productions would shift to weapons and military hardware. you might not see a new production line of f35s but simpler aircrafts would be created
3:50 "in WW2 all the most powerful players were self-sufficient" _cries in Nazi_
Germany was self-sufficient as well.
Japan and British home islands were the ones really in trouble once trade started being interdicted.
True, the Nazis were seriously starved of resources. Big part of why they lost.
@@roberthavran2522 Operation Fall Blau happened because Germany desperately needed the oil fields in the Caucasus. The process of converting coal to oil was an expensive and lengthy process. They couldn't sustain operations on the eastern front for more than a few months without it. Not to mention they were already heavily relying on horses because they couldn't run their trucks.
That's far from self sufficient.
@@Bengals6211 Yes. Also Germany invaded the Soviet in 41 because they knew that they couldn't sustain an invasion later, with all the oil that the battle of Britain was consuming. Another thing that you pointed and that a lot of people think is true is that the German Army wasn't this huge mechanazied machine, but in reality they invaded Russia with more horses than trucks
What's the point of having all these toys I'f we don't get to play with them?
I tell my therapist that everytime!
-space force
Had me dying lmaoo
Dammit how many alts do you have Mr. Trump?
*deterrence has entered the chat*
People don’t want to fight you if you have a bunch of toys
*WW3 Starts
COD: Write that down write that down
Bruh
If it's nukes, it's air raid sirens and then silence.
If it's conventional war with bombers, all bomber crews will hear every day:
"YOU GOT A HOLE IN YOUR RIGHT WING."
*Pilot killed*
06:27
the snorkels shown here are american
the mast left is a attack periscope while the mast right is a radio mast + gps
there is no way to tell if its from a 688 or ohio or seaworlf / virgina class as they all use identical looking masts even when they are different... this is on purpose to deter classification of submarine based on mast + rcs of mast
;)
Simple answer: beep boop beep - Missle Launched - Boom
WW3: *Happens*
China: *Hovers over "stop trade" button*
WW3: Understandable have a great day
Well done. Very concise and I believe quite accurate!