Both, tho i would contest the latter as SA would have such a bullshit amount of inmigrants from Europe that it alone can keep the economy from crashing for a couple of years.
@@PabloGonzalez-rv9gf eh it depends on how and if the economies in war are going to crash. I mean, provided that Europe, USA and China keep the food importations, Brazil won't have such a hard time, for example. But if they nuke each other... We're screwed
@@ABanRocks Well... yes and no. It's more about 2 reason. 1. Canadian ressources like petrol, gold, diamond, water... ect. 2. Defend north vs Russia. Canadian way of life looks alot like the american one. America just want everything.... like everywhere they go most of the time
@@rickybobby7835 Well, not only you're wrong, but you don't know what you're talking about. Most of the US economy is directly linked to Canada as we both need eachother. We live in a synbiosis. If you think other wise, you probably never did anything related to finance or had a big buisness. Our economy is linked. It is in your interest to make us stay alive and well. And if you would have done any research, you would see that canadian economy is more stable than US and would in fact, boost your economy
@@rickybobby7835 Canada is closing in on a $2 Trillion GDP this year. That will put them around the top10 economically. Canada joining the U.S. wouldn't be a burden, especially under an economy like Donald Trumps. There would be massive energy and economic expansion throughout the region.
@@britishempireno1fan851 I've never even travelled more than few states of my country, forget travelling West. But I knew that half of West doesn't know anything about world politics and are chutiya people
and the USA will most likely grab the popcorn or fake cry and look to sell weapons, food and energy and blow up anybody to oblivion if they dare cross the oceans
@@be4unvme Well, we're coming to an era where American dominance will have to share space with China and others. We're back to the old age of multiple superpowers...
Russia could've literally floored Ukraine, but trying to minimize casualties, it will take more time. Moreover, during a world war countries don't give a damn about civilians and western world wouldn't have much time to focus on Ukraine
@@joeseppy949 Are you saying Russia is trying to minimize civilian casualties? are you blind? they're literally shelling Kharkiv and Mariupol as I'm writing this
@@nzisobviouslydestinedtorul636 I honestly can see this happening. We had some Vietnamese come over one time and I got their gamer tags and we will be teammates in battlefield or something just arguing who won
@@Winner8501 They will have to leave due to asymetrical warfare, and the Ukranian army cannot now, nor before win the main war. There's no dream there.
@@noobiamyes4853 There's lot to untangle here as this is just very complicated to talk about without first establishing some basic assumptions. (1) *In an absolute isolation, i.e., if no one supported either side of the conflict, there were no sanctions nor any other kind of intervention from outside,* then sure, Russia would win eventually, after a hard slog with terrible casualties lasting for many months or years. (2) *HOWEVER*, the above is not the case. One side has been strongly hit by sanctions and other non-military interventions (Russia), while the other is receiving a great deal of support (though not nearly as much as could be provided) from the premier economic and military powers of today (America, Europe and their allies). This changes the overall situation. It can be reasonably assumed that Russia's ability to prosecute war over the long term will diminish, while Ukraine's ability will be maintained for the time being. This is very much linked to issue No.3: (3) Russia has not fully mobilised its army and population for war as it expected an easy and quick victory, which did not materialise and instead it suffered approximately 20 to 30% losses in manpower and equipment allocated for the operation. To restore combat effectiveness, it needs to replace these losses, regroup and reorganise units, and substantially reduce the scope of the operation (so no more "attack on all fronts simultaneously", it simply doesn't have the troops to do that anymore and arguably it never had; Russia needs to pick one front, likely Donbas, and concentrate its efforts there to achieve a limited objective). (4) Ukraine, in the meanwhile, has mobilised and continues mobilising its entire male population for the war effort. This is very significant in the medium to long term, provided the West will continue propping Ukraine's economy and provide the necessary equipment and materiel. Why? Let's look at the numbers. It is estimated that Russia began the invasion with approx. 200 thousand troops, their professional army core (about a quarter of those are now either dead, maimed, injured or otherwise rendered combat ineffective). Even this was only roughly equal to what Ukraine could put in the field against them (the Ukraine's standing army plus trained reserves). Now Ukraine will be mobilising another 200 thousand reservists plus potentially hundreds of thousands of brand new recruits (who will need weeks to reach at least basic levels of combat effectiveness, nevertheless they are coming - if they only mobilised young men reaching military age, they'd have another 250 thousand easily. Their total available manpower is likely in the millions, though not all will be mobilised). (5) Unless Russia mobilises also, which Putin is very reluctant to do as it would mean admitting the Russian army has failed to achieve any objectives thus far, the situation may soon turn in Ukraine's favour (again provided the West does not stop providing support): *Ukraine will have perhaps twice or even three times as much manpower available*. It will be able to replace its losses on the battlefield. If a Ukrainian unit suffers, say, 20% casualties, it can withdraw, take in new recruits, receive new equipment from the West, restore combat effectiveness, and return to the front to continue fighting. On the other hand, if a Russian unit suffers 20% casualties, it is spent. There are no more easily available and at least somewhat trained soldiers to replace the losses. Their army available for the operation will grow weaker and weaker with every offensive, while the Ukrainians will grow stronger, relatively speaking. Could Russia still win under such circumstances? A limited victory, perhaps. But only if they were able to SUBSTANTIALLY improve morale, discipline and chief of all basic leadership, which seems sorely lacking. The Russian army is really proving very tactically inept, they're not manoeuvring enough, they are wasting their strength in pointless frontal assaults. Their only two big strengths are the artillery and airpower (the latter is hobbled by the Russian's ineptitude and inability to fully utilise it, though). Where does that leave us? Well, I think that Russia will continue the war and do what they've done thus far: pursue essentially WW1 tactics against much more competent and determined Ukrainians, whose main weakness is the general lack of stuff (equipment, vehicles, weapons, planes etc.). But this will not give the Russians any kind of victory, because they'll continue losing thousands of men in unimaginative, WW1-style attacks against entrenched positions in the Donbas - and remember, in this sort of weird trench warfare, the attackers always suffer more casualties than the defenders. Eventually, the Russian army will be bled so dry that it will grind to a stop, leaving it with no reserves to deal with a potential Ukrainian counterattack. Then we might see a quick and rapid collapse and Ukrainian victory. So I am cautiously optimistic, but watching carefully for signs the Western support starts to dry up, because that would mean Ukraine's defeat.
As much good information as is in this video, that particular prediction seemed off to me. Two other comments that got a raised eyebrow from me were support for space force and the idea that drones/robots could be banned. One particularly good comment - which a lot of others miss - is how essential the infantry is to holding real estate
@@finnmyatt8192 I agree. What I am against is further fragmenting of the military. There might have been a time to break off the army air corps for the sake of brass who felt wars "should" be fought on the ground, but I think even the saltiest understand the essential character of space-based assets. Integrating joint force operations is a bigger issue. Otherwise, why not give submarines their own force? Or drones? I could go on
What did history tell us? Piss off Germany and they put on their little armored helmet and go bezerk on the world. It might take them a little while to get going, but once the they get going... oh boy. Of you have that nazi zeal on your side lol... hold on to your butts
Truth, Germany has never sat on their hands for this long. Germany historically would fight each other if there wasn’t anyone else to fight. Germany will be an interesting entrant into a war.
@@LobsterRavioli a germany that decides to fight i think could mobilize and put its industry to a military purpose pretty effectively. I doubt russia could beat a europe that was mobilized
The thing that scares me, and it’s something that I have personally been screaming about since the early 90s. Is that the US has given its industrial base to China on a silver platter. The reason the US was so effective in WW2, is because we were able to out produce the Nazis and Japanese. Now our manufacturing ability is staggeringly hampered. Covid has also exposed just how fragile our supply and transportation network has become.
The US has outsourced mostly cheap consumer goods to China. While the US is no longer the world’s leading industrial nation, it is still #1 in high tech manufacturing, and it’s not even close. Most of the things China makes are designed by the West and can’t be made without Western machine tools and software. US weapons are made by the US and its allies. The only area where the West is really lacking from a military production perspective is semiconductor manufacturing. The supply from Taiwan and South Korea would be vulnerable in a war with China. That’s why the US is investing in domestic semiconductor manufacturing. The only other potential area of concern is steel and rare metals production, but the US has plenty of resources to re-establish those industries if it wants, and plenty of both that can be recycled until the infrastructure is built up.
@@bluemarlin8138 The large castings used in machine tools originate in Asia, mostly Taiwan. A large majority of machine tools are no longer made in the US either.
Remember how fast the US converted peace time factories to war time in WW2 still believe we can do it again if needed Abandoned Factories could be used to do just that if need be.
@@BOOTBOSS1 YOU have the proper attitude for success in this new world war. When the real shit starts, I BEG YOU, throw in with your nation, not against it.
By that logic france would 1 v 4 germany, the UK, austria, russia (maybe with a tiny bit of spanish help) out of habit. If something happened enough to be called a habit, its this.
I really don't think so. People in Taiwan have zero interest in having their island destroyed by the US and Chinese fighting. They'll surrender to China if China can gain a foothold on the beach (a difficult task, but don't expect fighting in Taipei).
@@deepvoicedude4749 Yeah, I believe it will either be a brutal defense or a Taiwanese surrender with those diehard on keeping independence from China evacuating to Japan or starting Guerilla warfare
Nah I think China will probably just use Han nationalism to make the Taiwanese surrender. It ultimately comes down to raise the rifle to your people or not and the answer will probably be a no. kinda like asking west Germans to fight East Germans.
@@leandersearle5094 And still on defcon 2. Like the Cuban Missile Crisis but so far for a month instead of a couple weeks. This could go south very quickly.
But Poland is a decaying country with low fertility rate and a stagnant economy, why would Germany invade it again? to take care of the elderly? They're better off profitting from the brain drain the whole country is suffering...
The thing is, i feel like nukes would be used, but only towards the end of the war when one side starts gaining momentum. the losing side will be backed into a corner and that's when irrational actions tend to happen
Yes. Is that the epitome of bad sportsmanship? First, everybody promises NOT to use nukes and then when one side is about to lose, they use all their nukes!
@Super You aren't the first person to have these fairy-tale ideas to stop war forever.Most young people in militaries worldwide are fully devoted to their cause.They won't let a bunch of conscripts with anti-war ideas get in their way.Remember if you're a concsript that means you're below ever sepoy/private in respect level.Never underestimate the power of nationalism......war can only be prevented through show of strength, countries not willing to defend themselves eg-:Tibet will meet a sticky end.I hope there are no wars.I am just stating reality.
@Super Well... footsoldiers are always gonna be important.Its only when you have two unequal powers fight each other that one side can overwhelm the other purely with technology eg-Afganistan,Iraq.In a war where the tech level of both sides is relatively equal it's always gonna come down to fixing your bayonet and dislodging a stubborn enemy.This is what Army vets have told me.
As a Swede I'll honor our decades old tradition of condemning the actions of both sides of the conflict..... While also selling material and equipment to both sides as well, naturally. Have fun o/
WW1 and 2 sounded pretty scary, but WW3 will definitely be some dark days. Its hard to imagine what it would actually look like between modern weapons, nuclear weapons, cyber attacks and many other horrible things that could spell absolute carnage across much of the world.
As an israeli I can see both countries working together in that front. Israel already aids Egypt to counter ISIS in Siani. While both countries see the relationship with each other as "on paper" relationship, both will agree that "an enemy of my enemy is my friend". A challenge that will probubly rise is the Gaza front again. Hamas defenetly doesn't work with China and have maybe one ally being Qatar, but they wouldn't pass an opportunity to bomb Israel when their main forces are not around. The most effective way I can see Egypt and Israel working together is Egypt keeping Hamas in Gaza buisy while the rest of the Middle East takes the front lines in Syria and Iraq, taking it all and reach Iran. There either stop or taking Iran untill reaching Pakistan and aiding India on that front. Everyone knows Hamas and Israel doesn't like each other, but I'm 99% sure Egypt doesn't like Hamas just as much as Israel doesn't. Because of the state of the Middle East, neither Syria nor Iraq are strong enough to hold against Turkey or Israel if they go all out. Syria have a civil war going on and their only aid is from Iran. They have better things to do than fighting a war with Israel or Turkey, like being a country. Iraq is still recovering from the impact of ISIS. The war will probubly be decided by which side can take Iraq and control the area: American Alliance or Iran-China. The american side can probubly take west Iraq and Iran the east. The way I see it is Israel controlling south Syria, Turkey controlling north Syria and north-west Iraq, Arabia controlling south west Iraq and Iran controlling east Iraq which eventually falls to the american side. Both Saudi Arabia and Turkey now shares a border with Iran and bring the front lines to Iran and not to Iraq. Now the question is: "Can Iran defend herself against 4 of her greatest enemies who controll Syria and Iraq?". Something I'm not sure about almost at all is Lebanon. I believe Lebanon as a country will stay neutral in this war simply because they have no interest in fighting anyone espacially when both Israel and Turkey are so close. Hezbolla will side with Iran and gets aid from them, but if Syria is gone than their means of getting supplys is drasticly reduced. Hezbolla also needs to maintain itself in Lebanon so they are not strong enough to fight anyone in a war like this.
Russia has just been excluded from the 2022 Eurovision Song Contest. I think this may lead to Russia pulling out of Ukraine and rethinking it's whole strategy on world domination. If so, the Eurovision Song Contest would be responsible for stopping WWIII.
WWI - european shenanigans. WWII- european shenanigans strike back WWIII- Asian bat soup supreme the return of Mao Edit: I stand corrected. WWIII- European shenanigans the return of sovietkong. PS: THANKS FOR ALL THE FUN REPLIES!
@@montypythonandtheholygrail9687 like Albert Einstein said, “WWIIII will be fought with sticks and stones due to over use of nuclear weapons” something along the lines of that, I didn’t write it word for word but it’s something like that
@@sidsin7538 Hitler wouldn't have started WW2 if it weren't for his rejection from an art school... since he'd be too busy painting to care about Jews.
@@amrahmed7856 the Mongols won tf, if they hadn't gone Chinese and broken up into pieces that each fight each other then you'd probably be writing that in Mongolian
i think that if you can mass-produce drones cheap enough and then hook them to an advanced ai software like the droid fighters in StarWars, you would achieve what I like to call ''hellfire from above''. It would be a doctrine based on total domination of the sky and due to their cheapness and superior reflex times it would stop the production of expensive high model fighters for overwhelming cheap firepower
@@Cybernaut21J I guess but in war, there is always a push in new technology. Just because it's not possible now does not mean it's not possible later. With many resources being strained globally I believe that a third world war will come down to who can develop better technology to recycle resources or optimize their resources better. In that case, i still think that cheap drones used to dominate the skies will become a key feature of any future wars, in the modern-day more than any other losing control of the sky's is the fastest way to lose the war altogether.
to be honest the worst thing that would happen is the cyber warfare going from 0 to 60 in three seconds. Most of the world runs on things that are derived or based on data, such as money. Even if it doesn't turn into nuclear hell, the year's afterword would be us trying to get everything that we take for granted back online from square one. We would literally remove decades of human progress even if the war is only a couple years long.
I think an important factor many are not paying attention to is that China's rise does not only undermine the US hegemony around the world but before that it greatly undermines Russia's influence in Asia. Considering the various Turkic nations, in Central Asia, are already getting rid of Cyrillic alphabet in favour of the Latin one and Russia's demography is stagnating at best.. I would not be surprised by a Siberian breakup somewhere in the future.
@@kokofan50 I mean, what other choice do they have? China is one of the two countries where Russia cannot throw men at the enemy (India being the other) and would just get overrun once China gets over Siberia. Nuclear weapons are the only way to destroy modern day China in an open conflict.
@COSSACK RAIDER not openly. But more and more Chinese people remember how Russia took away their lands back in 18th century. Especially the Pacific coast with Vladivostok will skyrocket in terms of value once the long awaited Arctic route will be opened (it will by the end of this century). I still believe it will continue as it started: slowing eroding everything Russia related in Central Asia. The Central Asian countries are a much more bendable and preferable economic partner than Russia for China. The Russians, for many decades, have kept their railways system in a way that a Chinese train can't reach Europe by going through Russian controlled land. Siberia is large and one day will be very hard to keep under control. Chechnya already offers an example of sort: rebellious Muslims against Russian authority. Economically and demographically speaking Russia will be seen ever more as China's Finland, if you get the comparison.
I can't see Russia and China tougher , I guess that the Russians would try in central Asia the same politics that they use in middle west , the Chinese are so aggressive to mantein suport in the region
My God... What would you do? Once the food runs out, if all the supply rocket bases and ground control are dust, it's a long slow starvation in the void.
Nepal is NOT an ally of China. I don't know why many people think that. As a Nepalese I would rather side with India than China. China might be trying to be a good neighbour but India's more like a brother to Nepal
@@duckhawkninja3614 well it is it , a small conflict but it is highlighted ccp propaganda like its some big issue . nepal is culturally very much tightly tied to india , like people from my state marry from nepal and vice versa . its just maoist party of nepal which wants to be wana be chinese .
@@opai1821 I am aware of both countries having cultural ties being Hindu majority and all. i was just asking because I remember reading about a border conflict between Nepal and India a little while back and I also know cultural ties are not necessarily an indicator of good relations. One need only look to the way Russia and Ukraine act toward each other to know there are far stronger bonds than culture.
@@duckhawkninja3614 Russia and Ukraine literally blame and fight each other every single time. Not the case for Nepal-India's relation. Of course conflicts arises sometimes but that doesn't mean we are not on good terms or something.
@@duckhawkninja3614 nepal will likely either get attacked from China or will have to let them pass, as an Indian I have no hate for you but you are like Ukraine in this position where china will either give your country money deals or overtake it to enter india Edit replied to wrong comment I wanted to reply to the original commentor sorry
"all the major militaries will go into this conflict thinking like WWII and will be VERY wrong" This aged like wine. Russia went into Ukraine assuming it'd be like a WWII style blitzkrieg... and they were oh so wrong
@@takebacktheholyland9306 There probably is, given their population is big enough and their IQ is too. So there should be, though perhaps their Rommel is playing chess.
You know he’s talking about global conflict. In a regional context there has always been places at war and always will be no matter how peaceful humanity is
JeSUS yeah? there's a cold (saudi and iran) and civil war (SYRIA, iraq, OMAN) that literally has been going on since the Iraq war not to mention Palestine and Israel
“Something goes horrifically wrong, it doesn’t matter if it starts in North Korea, Armenia, The Himalayas, or Ukraine. That last one is eerily truthful.
During this period of human history, I cannot insist enough for Art Teachers to give your Students Good Grades. I repeat, Give your students GOOD GRADES
@@tyronwsison we could just leave it at Adolf with oil and Russia having a normal winter instead of a "particularly harsh winter" or Napoleon just being a little younger a little bit mor on his A game
Also I'd genuinely like to see any actual significant force get through the Himilayas. There's a reason those countries are still there in the Himilayas and that there have been skirmishes but no real war. It's the Himilayas. You thought the Alpines would be bad? Himilayas you just can't move through in any significant numbers. They're natural choke points so a token force can defend the entire border. The only real force concentrations would be through Pakistan as the east would be too filled with jungles. You'll see some battles but nothing too major. The countries we see there today are only there because they couldn't be conquered by their bigger neighbors. It's not for lack of trying but lack of ability.
The most that gets over those mountains in full force is missiles. Normal aircraft already avoid the place because the air is too thin to be safely above the ground, and marching an army over those mountains let alone maintaining a supply line would be insanely difficult and vulnerable to counter missile attack. It just makes more sense to go around or possibly find a couple usable passes and defend it to the teeth as you try and build a highway through it. (I suspect the mountains would be lightly garrisoned by both sides as the main fighting acures elsewhere, mainly near Northern Pakistan and Bangladesh as China's main invasion routes)
@@jasonreed7522 agree but in case of bangladesh, they are a independent country literally because of india, there might be some recent developments with china but i think they'll never pick weapons against india. also even if they choose to fight against indians they be done within a week with strong indian navy and airforce
@@jamesatlas5204 i only meant to imply the China would try and go around the Himalayas while sticking to a land invasion, and the 2 routes that this resukts in are either through Pakistan to the west or Bangladesh to the east. (Picture it like Germany invading France by going through Belgium)
India, Pak, China axis expained very terribly. 90% of Himalayan terrain favours India.... He didn't mention this. But he mentioned hellish climate of the caucases... Lol
Exactly. I saw a Chinese official documentary of the recent standoff, their soldiers were taking canned O2 because they can't cope with the dense air 😂. You try to fuck with India in mountain warfare , UNO reverse.
@@pranjaldev9559yes ahah. We also operate the world's highest battlefield if they don't know. And the last country who tried to attack us in the mountains didn't even accept their martyrs bodies.
I too was surprised when they didn’t take Indian geography into account, Himalaya and thar. And what would happen if India thinks to stop the supply chain to China from malacca strait?
@@gaishgarg Lol they think its all slum in plains with just summer season where temprature normally remains between 35°C-40°C. India's geography is certainly its biggest advantage. Himalayas to the North and North-east, Thar desert to the west, Deccan plateau to the south and the northern plains dissected by major rivers throughout.
@@gaishgarg exactly. I loled at how casually he said , China would attack through the Himalayas 😂 tf. That's the Himalayas we talking about , not Miami 😂.
If Brazil gets in the US side, the Chinese could have famine because Brazil is one of most nations that imports food to China, if China has a famine their military capability reduces by a lot, making a huge humanitarian crisis in history, this could be the decisive feature in the war. But in other side Brazil could probably be neutral because it's a developing country and China is one of the best trade partners of Brazil, also Brazil is too divided to get into a war
@@bevbevan6189 yes, ironically Brazil could be the decisive nation for this war, because it feeds more than 1 Billions people in the world (that's why the Amazon forest is burning), and also other 3rd world countries because it gives resources to China and the US
"Infantry is the only thing you can use to hold onto terrain" I jumped for joy when you said this. The amount of people who argue you can fight wars with missiles or air power and don't need infantry is ridiculous. In order to win a war, you must take and hold ground and once that ground is held it is incredibly difficult for anything, even modern smart bombs and drones, to dislodge infantry from that ground except for other infantry. It's a terrible fact but the infantryman will always be necessary and I don't see computers/robots replacing a human in the frontline infantry for a long long time if ever.
Exactly unless robotic-infantry variants can be created a human will always be slogging it through the mud of a forest or through the rubble of a city.
It the far future they could do a robotic type of think that you see in movies that track a persons body movements and make the robot repeat it but to do it with fast reaction times accurately would take a very long time
@@Miquelalalaa Brits would be doing that but by 2025. Only nation who would do such thing is usa and china. Also, I feel under Biden usa is not very safe. It's just my gut feeling, idk why but guy seems v soft(trump blurts out dumb shit no denying but he isn't soft)
You have to remember that China never conquered Taiwan until the 17th century for a reason. Taiwan is a fortress island that’s geographically as difficult to invade as Japan itself. Also, there’s only a few months and beaches where an invasion is possible. Naval invasions are already difficult against a prepared and determined enemy. Japan in WW2 would have been able to give the Americans a bloody nose despite having already lost control of the seas and air. Taiwan is much smaller, but any invasion of Taiwan would be, long, brutal, and simply impossible without *complete* naval and air dominance. If the Chinese *actually* felt they could invade Taiwan by 2020, they would have already invaded when the world was facing COVID.
No, it does not make much sense to say that if China could invade Taiwan in 2020, they would have done so as that would cripple them at a time when they are recovering and the world population has a lower opinion of China due to the Pandemic. It is possible for China to invade Taiwan using a combination of communication and then missile warfare to cripple Taiwanese digital and physical infrastructure and military resistance and followed by a bloody and massive naval, air and land assault which will cost many millions of lives. However, China does not want war right now since it is not sustainable enough yet and is not in a good enough geopolitical position so I doubt there will be a large scale war for a few decades.
The main difference between Taiwan and Japan hence is the size of the country, proximity to China, and the capabilities and will of China to invade Taiwan which would make Taiwan far less of a struggle logistically to invade and far easier to maintain as diehard Anti-PRC Taiwanese will likely try to evacuate to Japan, America, or Australia
@@bigbrothersinnerparty297 Taiwan is highly motivated to fight and unlike the Japanese in WW2, are not going to be starving due to blockade. China recovered the first from the pandemic. There was a window in April when China had mostly recovered and the rest of the world hadn’t. Secondly, missiles go the other way as well. Missiles can destroy any invasion craft, and they’re not that hard to hide away from bombers. Even just a basic speedboat laden with explosives can seriously harm an invasion vessel (the Japanese did this in WW2, with some success.) Assuming you even win the battle in the skies.
@@innosam123 China mostly recovered, however they still were in a horrible diplomatic situation so your argument still makes no sense. Missiles go the other way however it will not be plausible to use them when China has a better land to air defense system and has a far larger industrial capacity and missile stockpile to use missiles. A preemptive EMP bomb strike or for now more plausibly digital cyber warfare will also cripple missile usage and allow for China to have quite a few windows of attack. China will use as much air support and naval support to protect their convoys and landing craft as they can field most likely and the proximity to China for Taiwan is far closer compared to even most of Okinawa compared to Japan. This all gives a Chinese invasion the ability to precede with acceptable losses at sea, which at most would be a few hundred thousand. China will easily be able to win the skies with the largest manufacturing capacity for missiles, cruise missile stockpile, and air defense system as fighters lose their advantage with how close they are to China’s power center.
India is strong enough to takeover pakistan and defend against Chinese aggression considering the fact that China would not mobilize it's 100% unit on Indian front as they will be facing US,JAPPAN ,KOREA , VIETNAM in east .Moreover India has largest reserve forces in the world and highly trained Mountain warfare Regiments that will be decisive in Himalayan clash
India would have a lot on their plate with the Pakistan, China and Nepal alliance (maybe even the Taliban) to defend on Kashmir border. Another issue is the proximity of the capital to the border. I desperately hope I'm wrong. Especially after the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the world war seems very likely
@@samyamalamsal no Nepal will never go against India....India has many people who are married to Nepalese and vice-versa. Nepal government may become pro chinese for monetary benefits but they will never go against there own people to join a bloodshed.
@@adarsh-singh-bisen Well Nepal wants to stay as neutral as much it can without offending both the neighbours. Nepal has already had enough with the Maoist Civil war. Wars are no good to no one.
@@trihermawan9553 remember the deadly tunnel that the Vietnamese build during that time ? It's still usable There are many small tunnel ( you can't even stand up or crawling inside there) in that place were use manly to lure the US solider to the killing zone
@@stylinnet2395 yes there are jungle there and he just forgot the mountains range between laos and Vietnamese ( it's literally on the border of vietnam and laos ) ( it's higher than 2 km)
Yeah, I think the Vietnamese aren't being given enough credit here. ("You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders. The most famous is 'Never get involved in a land war in Asia!'")
As a Vietnamese, I believe we wouldn't join US side at the start. Sure the populace hate china and love USA, but the government is like a puppet to china. This mostly leads to something like Italy in ww2, the soldiers mostly give up when USA invade vietnam homeland and vhina have to send troops to Vietnam to fight the US.
Welcome to war :D Also the attitude of “not Europe” is exactly what will lose the war to the Chinese. If European leaders refrain from going all in and actually mobilizing, then you’ve got yourself a new world order, with the CCP as global hegemon
@@Flash4ML we can always allie ourselves with them and screw América i mean theres no diference bettewen both so theres no handicaps for either going with one or the other Both are fucking terrible
@@ls200076 Russia: "man China's birth rate is getting low, India's is only getting higher, and our companies are also moving to India because of that population boom and potential customers, also India NEVER claim Siberian land and falsely state a Russian city belongs to them... hmm... China...or India...china? or India?....." China: *Sweats profusely hoping the Russians didn't remember that one border conflict where their forces killed Russian soldiers and Capture a tank, that same same Russian tank is being shown in a Chinese museum*
Russia is pulling its punches heavily against Ukraine right now if they really wanted to they could destroy Ukraine it’s not a show of force against the west it’s a war for population
@@businessproyects2615 Ukraine seems to be holding out better than expected. With more weapons,who knows? If Trump was in office it would have never happened.
Alone? Ye right Remember Russia is not trying to destroy ukraine, if that was their goal, they could do so withon a week. They want to denazifi with as little casualties and damage as possible
@@quck5651 well I am at pre final year of my engineering course. Hope I would get a job in a damn weapons factory or something instead of deployment in war zone lol
@@surendrapatro7932 you would be sent to build bridges. Logistics is very important after all. The good news is your skillset makes you too important to waste as a rife grunt, the bad news is well building bridges under enemy fire isn't any safer.
Either set humanity 2000 year back in time but this time hardcore mode with brand new mutated species Or just a dystopia world like in the boom (Book name : 1984)
@mo gamer Hahaha I always imagine a picture of kids as Austria, Serbia and Germany and when they’re about to got into trouble Austria and Serbia points at Germany
@@vukrankovic7587 so? it was still justified more than russians joining a war they had no business in or the US joining an european war just for saving their loans to the allies
Here we are, in a day in age where this was thought to be just an idea, an idea that maybe something like this wouldn't reach this generation, thought to be too costly, what person would wage war in the 21st century and the same would go for even many future generations that would have never had to be afraid of...but times right now are unsure at best and best put by few recently "nothing is off the table".
I think that the existence of Nukes might prevent WW3 but honestly I'm of the opinion that Russia is more dangerous now than at any point during the Cold War. Simply put, modern Russia is desperate, which the Soviet Union wasn't.
Putin's decisions are fuckin the Russia economy and the people in all over the world is against him, including Russians, his soberany it's about to be test as the president of Russia and he's the type of mad motherfucker who would do anything to continue in that chair, that's what scares me the most
I've always thought even in the 21st century, that war can happen and maybe the most brutal one yet. We are the same species who have been fighting for thousands of years, we are no different. The long peace maybe was just an effect of WW2 where most of Europe was destroyed leaving only USA and USSR. And the rest of the world was impoverished so no major war will happen that can be called "world changing". And then USA and USSR fought a lot of proxy wars. And now with all countries having a good economic and military capability like pre WW1 era, we now have a chance at WW3 happening. Us in the 21st century with depleting resources have a really high chance of the bloodiest war ever fought in human history. If countries are pushed to the limit they will fight.
Ya indian forces already have cover on upper himalayas and Indian forces have experience of war on high altitude and Indian forces have gorkha commandoes
Uh it’s not as impassable as they used to be because they don’t have to climb the entire mountain or anything like that so it’s easier than you might think, just need high altitude training.
He didn’t mention how North Korean troops are practically starving so a more than a few mutinies would be expected, not to mention that they’ll be overall less effective.
Yeah, part of war is actually being able to sustain. Which is why America is powerful, it’s literally a food and manufacturing basket and the sole power of the Americas.
@@1Leggo9my9Eggo2 but you know it is the largest importer of agricultural produce(mainly rice and wheat which is the most important for survival) while usa is a net exporter and the produce usa imports are mostly exotic fruits and vegetables which can be ignored at the time of war.
Once Chinese resources modernize fuel and feed them the NK military will become a formidable force. However, the video skipped the immense military and industrial capabilities f South Korea.
Spoiler Switzerland wins because everyone else kills each other in the war while they chill in the alps
Well if nukes get dropped they will get hit aswell if germany and france get hit
@@sway9725 yes but the bunkers
the swiss have hundereds of thousads of nuclear bunkers just for this.
But what about the swiss army tanks
Hate to be freezing my ass off in the Alps when nuclear winter sets in.
@@the_lonewonder95.mp47 we have the same profile picture lol
"Invading Vietnam would be quick and easy"
*That's what they all think*
Yeah china and us would agree
One dose no simply invade nam
@dragon The US never invaded the north and China didn't invade from all sides, like it would here.
"Invading Vietnam is easy they said,
Conquering Vietnam is simple they said"
USA,China and Mongols agree
Meanwhile, south americans are either in a pub having fun or in the middle of an economic crisis. Or both.
Both, tho i would contest the latter as SA would have such a bullshit amount of inmigrants from Europe that it alone can keep the economy from crashing for a couple of years.
So, no change?
@@Vordigon1 basically haha
@@PabloGonzalez-rv9gf eh it depends on how and if the economies in war are going to crash. I mean, provided that Europe, USA and China keep the food importations, Brazil won't have such a hard time, for example. But if they nuke each other... We're screwed
@@23AlexandreJ I think everyone would be screwed if the nuke each other
"Doesn't matter if it starts in Korea, Armenia, the Himalayas or Ukraine" This man already knew shit was going to go down in Ukraine 😭
Putin certainly watched this video for ideas lmao
i mean, to be fair, it's been in a state of conflict since 2014
@@stephen_dmg2003 Since 2008. It technically has been going on for even longer, but it really ramped up in 08.
Ukraine is a state like Taiwan or Hong Kong or Kashmir. its going to happen sooner or later.
Not too hard, honestly
If a war did break out people would probably be making memes about it for the first few days
Until they get drafted...
@Marek Tužák Now thats something worth another world at war
(Just in case, this is a joke)
True
I think people would make memes up until the day they got shot, its just human nature at this point
@Winston Churchill "We will also give you a free first hand experience of what going to hell is like! :)"
Switzerland's tourism would sky rocket
more like emigration
@@oitubeman1019 more like immigration
Warning: scroll down at your own risk!
Take this gun just in case: 🔫
@@kaustubhkashyap9750 more like emmigareiton
@@dante6055 more like emmigreytion
@@abusedcheeseburger9240 More like imagination
Me, a Canadian : America just invited you to a war.
A- Join
B- Get annexed and join
US has been eyeing Canada for a long time. They just want a good reason lol
@@ABanRocks Well... yes and no. It's more about 2 reason.
1. Canadian ressources like petrol, gold, diamond, water... ect.
2. Defend north vs Russia.
Canadian way of life looks alot like the american one. America just want everything.... like everywhere they go most of the time
Mexico
A-Join
B-Get annexed and Join
C-Fall to drug cartel, get annexed, Join
@@rickybobby7835 Well, not only you're wrong, but you don't know what you're talking about. Most of the US economy is directly linked to Canada as we both need eachother. We live in a synbiosis. If you think other wise, you probably never did anything related to finance or had a big buisness. Our economy is linked. It is in your interest to make us stay alive and well.
And if you would have done any research, you would see that canadian economy is more stable than US and would in fact, boost your economy
@@rickybobby7835 Canada is closing in on a $2 Trillion GDP this year. That will put them around the top10 economically. Canada joining the U.S. wouldn't be a burden, especially under an economy like Donald Trumps. There would be massive energy and economic expansion throughout the region.
I would love a remake of this given the many recent global changes in geopolitics.
every time something major happens means this video would be outdated every few years.
Just remake this, stop being a downer lol I love multiple videos if possible.
Frankly, yes. A LOT has happened in these past few years, and there is much to discuss.
World War III starts,
Apple:- Let's introduce our iGun, iGrenade, iGun Max Pro.
Aashish chanchalani vid😒😒
samsung- here is our galaxy gun s30 ultra, galaxy gun z fold 5, galaxy grenade a69, and our tanks
Lmao very clever
huawei introduce P90 Gun, Mate40Spy and war drone
Instakill by Facebook
It's all fun and games till you realize you're a healthy young male
Bold of you to assume I am healthy
Underated comment
@@ashutoshanand1573 Don’t worry the trans and blm community will protect everyone in the west 🤣🤣🤣
@@britishempireno1fan851 I've never even travelled more than few states of my country, forget travelling West. But I knew that half of West doesn't know anything about world politics and are chutiya people
But you are south american😅
This will be one of the most misunderstood and diverse conflicts ever should it occur, also one of the bloodiest and most horrifying.
Plus we haven’t even factored in the water and environmental crises that will be going on during all of this!
Ah yes, Part III.
Its always the ending part to movies.
and the USA will most likely grab the popcorn or fake cry and look to sell weapons, food and energy and blow up anybody to oblivion if they dare cross the oceans
@@be4unvme Well, we're coming to an era where American dominance will have to share space with China and others.
We're back to the old age of multiple superpowers...
@@WasatchWind except Ireland. we're chill
"Ukraine similarly would be relatively easy pickings" - that hasn't aged so well thankfully
Only in a large conflict (for months - years) still is.
Ukraine is still easy pickins. But when you’re trying to minimize civilian casualties and infrastructure damage, things go much much slower.
Russia could've literally floored Ukraine, but trying to minimize casualties, it will take more time. Moreover, during a world war countries don't give a damn about civilians and western world wouldn't have much time to focus on Ukraine
@@joeseppy949 Are you saying Russia is trying to minimize civilian casualties? are you blind? they're literally shelling Kharkiv and Mariupol as I'm writing this
@@libatonvhs yeah Cathy. “So what you’re saying is”…… grow up child. I said very plainly my exact sentiment.
Switzerland is like the cameraman who will survive any adversity
Plot armor 101
And Spain for that matter.
Neutral
@@swymaj02 spain will destroy itself. like always
No, check the news. Chinese interests are advancing there.
The US: “I never thought I’d die next to a Vietnamese”
Vietnam: “Would you die next to a friend?”
Viets and McMuricans going about embedding axes in ccp heads, bickering over whether Vietnam-war was really a win/loss.
@@nzisobviouslydestinedtorul636 I honestly can see this happening. We had some Vietnamese come over one time and I got their gamer tags and we will be teammates in battlefield or something just arguing who won
@Ta ble uh theres no such thing anymore dude. Its just vietnamese
@Ta ble lol🤣
Happened with the Philippines. Remember, we were at war with them in the late 1800s, and then were allies and protecting them during WWII.
2:03 Setting the Stage
6:00 Theatres of War
15:37 technological progress
21:22 who would win?
@Lone Wolf I was your first like!
And I 181
no one would win...
in a modern war, between major powers, there are no winners, there are only survivors.
this is why the long peace has lasted...
lol in iraq usa was def the winner
15:00 "Ukraine, similarly, would be relatively easy pickings."
This aged like milk.
Ukraine is actually losing; that will be the case for a while, till the Russians give up, or leave the country; after winning the main war, that is.
@@businessproyects2615 Dream on.
@@Winner8501 They will have to leave due to asymetrical warfare, and the Ukranian army cannot now, nor before win the main war. There's no dream there.
@@Winner8501 im on ukrains side but wars are fought over months if not years and eventually russia will win (hope im wrong)
@@noobiamyes4853 There's lot to untangle here as this is just very complicated to talk about without first establishing some basic assumptions.
(1) *In an absolute isolation, i.e., if no one supported either side of the conflict, there were no sanctions nor any other kind of intervention from outside,* then sure, Russia would win eventually, after a hard slog with terrible casualties lasting for many months or years.
(2) *HOWEVER*, the above is not the case. One side has been strongly hit by sanctions and other non-military interventions (Russia), while the other is receiving a great deal of support (though not nearly as much as could be provided) from the premier economic and military powers of today (America, Europe and their allies). This changes the overall situation. It can be reasonably assumed that Russia's ability to prosecute war over the long term will diminish, while Ukraine's ability will be maintained for the time being. This is very much linked to issue No.3:
(3) Russia has not fully mobilised its army and population for war as it expected an easy and quick victory, which did not materialise and instead it suffered approximately 20 to 30% losses in manpower and equipment allocated for the operation. To restore combat effectiveness, it needs to replace these losses, regroup and reorganise units, and substantially reduce the scope of the operation (so no more "attack on all fronts simultaneously", it simply doesn't have the troops to do that anymore and arguably it never had; Russia needs to pick one front, likely Donbas, and concentrate its efforts there to achieve a limited objective).
(4) Ukraine, in the meanwhile, has mobilised and continues mobilising its entire male population for the war effort. This is very significant in the medium to long term, provided the West will continue propping Ukraine's economy and provide the necessary equipment and materiel. Why? Let's look at the numbers. It is estimated that Russia began the invasion with approx. 200 thousand troops, their professional army core (about a quarter of those are now either dead, maimed, injured or otherwise rendered combat ineffective). Even this was only roughly equal to what Ukraine could put in the field against them (the Ukraine's standing army plus trained reserves). Now Ukraine will be mobilising another 200 thousand reservists plus potentially hundreds of thousands of brand new recruits (who will need weeks to reach at least basic levels of combat effectiveness, nevertheless they are coming - if they only mobilised young men reaching military age, they'd have another 250 thousand easily. Their total available manpower is likely in the millions, though not all will be mobilised).
(5) Unless Russia mobilises also, which Putin is very reluctant to do as it would mean admitting the Russian army has failed to achieve any objectives thus far, the situation may soon turn in Ukraine's favour (again provided the West does not stop providing support): *Ukraine will have perhaps twice or even three times as much manpower available*. It will be able to replace its losses on the battlefield. If a Ukrainian unit suffers, say, 20% casualties, it can withdraw, take in new recruits, receive new equipment from the West, restore combat effectiveness, and return to the front to continue fighting. On the other hand, if a Russian unit suffers 20% casualties, it is spent. There are no more easily available and at least somewhat trained soldiers to replace the losses. Their army available for the operation will grow weaker and weaker with every offensive, while the Ukrainians will grow stronger, relatively speaking.
Could Russia still win under such circumstances? A limited victory, perhaps. But only if they were able to SUBSTANTIALLY improve morale, discipline and chief of all basic leadership, which seems sorely lacking. The Russian army is really proving very tactically inept, they're not manoeuvring enough, they are wasting their strength in pointless frontal assaults. Their only two big strengths are the artillery and airpower (the latter is hobbled by the Russian's ineptitude and inability to fully utilise it, though).
Where does that leave us? Well, I think that Russia will continue the war and do what they've done thus far: pursue essentially WW1 tactics against much more competent and determined Ukrainians, whose main weakness is the general lack of stuff (equipment, vehicles, weapons, planes etc.). But this will not give the Russians any kind of victory, because they'll continue losing thousands of men in unimaginative, WW1-style attacks against entrenched positions in the Donbas - and remember, in this sort of weird trench warfare, the attackers always suffer more casualties than the defenders. Eventually, the Russian army will be bled so dry that it will grind to a stop, leaving it with no reserves to deal with a potential Ukrainian counterattack. Then we might see a quick and rapid collapse and Ukrainian victory.
So I am cautiously optimistic, but watching carefully for signs the Western support starts to dry up, because that would mean Ukraine's defeat.
“We’ll call them Oceania for fun” ITS 1984 ITS 1984
The Americans bringing the geography of oceania and the EU with "terreg" some kind of the rules of it
ohhh fuckkk soon war will be peace!
Autarch you have committed first digress double think, that will be 5 years in reelection
This could literally become the 1984 universe if Russia conquers Europe and if China and Russia sept
WE'VE ALWAYS BEEN AT WAR WITH -EAST ASIA- THE CENTRAL POWERS II
Famous last word: Nobody's gonna launch the nukes, right? _Right?_
very underrated comment. Just like "No biological warfare, right? Right? Ok no more after the last one, looking at you China!"
As much good information as is in this video, that particular prediction seemed off to me. Two other comments that got a raised eyebrow from me were support for space force and the idea that drones/robots could be banned. One particularly good comment - which a lot of others miss - is how essential the infantry is to holding real estate
@@MarcillaSmith yeah I think drones would be used but I think protecting satellites would be essential
@@finnmyatt8192 I agree. What I am against is further fragmenting of the military. There might have been a time to break off the army air corps for the sake of brass who felt wars "should" be fought on the ground, but I think even the saltiest understand the essential character of space-based assets. Integrating joint force operations is a bigger issue. Otherwise, why not give submarines their own force? Or drones? I could go on
If anyone gets nuked in ww3 it would probably be Japan again this time by China. Japan has a history of beating China like a bongo drum.
*WW3 starts*
*Everyone looks at Germany*
Germany: What!?!
I didn't do it!
What did history tell us? Piss off Germany and they put on their little armored helmet and go bezerk on the world. It might take them a little while to get going, but once the they get going... oh boy. Of you have that nazi zeal on your side lol... hold on to your butts
Truth, Germany has never sat on their hands for this long. Germany historically would fight each other if there wasn’t anyone else to fight. Germany will be an interesting entrant into a war.
@@LobsterRavioli a germany that decides to fight i think could mobilize and put its industry to a military purpose pretty effectively. I doubt russia could beat a europe that was mobilized
*in heavy Deutsch accent* it wasn't me you guys seriously!
The thing that scares me, and it’s something that I have personally been screaming about since the early 90s. Is that the US has given its industrial base to China on a silver platter. The reason the US was so effective in WW2, is because we were able to out produce the Nazis and Japanese. Now our manufacturing ability is staggeringly hampered. Covid has also exposed just how fragile our supply and transportation network has become.
The US has outsourced mostly cheap consumer goods to China. While the US is no longer the world’s leading industrial nation, it is still #1 in high tech manufacturing, and it’s not even close. Most of the things China makes are designed by the West and can’t be made without Western machine tools and software. US weapons are made by the US and its allies. The only area where the West is really lacking from a military production perspective is semiconductor manufacturing. The supply from Taiwan and South Korea would be vulnerable in a war with China. That’s why the US is investing in domestic semiconductor manufacturing. The only other potential area of concern is steel and rare metals production, but the US has plenty of resources to re-establish those industries if it wants, and plenty of both that can be recycled until the infrastructure is built up.
@@bluemarlin8138 The large castings used in machine tools originate in Asia, mostly Taiwan. A large majority of machine tools are no longer made in the US either.
Remember how fast the US converted peace time factories to war time in WW2 still believe we can do it again if needed Abandoned Factories could be used to do just that if need be.
All done with careful deliberation.
Mainly because freemasonry in the world is now OUT OF CONTROL.
This is an OLD, OLD PLAN.
@@BOOTBOSS1 YOU have the proper attitude for success in this new world war. When the real shit starts, I BEG YOU, throw in with your nation, not against it.
"A kill ratio that's almost never been matched in history"
This sounds like a challenge.
Drone operators: Oh yeah
Bill gates: take my vaccines
It's like he doesn't even know what country he is talking about. We are the kings of Hold my beerism.
Americans did it in the korean war, just saying
We Americans do love a challenge
Plot twist: Switzerland starts WWIII and Germany is neutral
Edit: might be half right…
Hm yes
i think Switzerland is a puppet of globalist banking elites
That's illegal
@Soldat a/s are you high
@Soldat a/s what kind of weird conspiracy are you on lmfao
This channel is changing from "Whatifalthist" to "Ihopenotfuturehist".
I hope to kill at least one man before I die then kill him again to send him deeper
@@isaiahsteele3767 damn ok
@@isaiahsteele3767 not sure if you were trying to be profound but that was really funny
@@isaiahsteele3767 Wow so edgy
Ihonofuthist?
3:52 Or Ukraine 💀? Slaps different now
Germany would invade France purely out of habit
By that logic france would 1 v 4 germany, the UK, austria, russia (maybe with a tiny bit of spanish help) out of habit. If something happened enough to be called a habit, its this.
@@popkhorne5372 Spain? Am I missing something? Lol
@@sampardt797 spain was france's ally during most of the 18th century, and also during napoleon's reign, before he made spain turn against him.
@@popkhorne5372 ahhh, I assumed you were talking about ww1 and 2.
@@sampardt797 nah, ww1 and two france was not doing 1v4 versus these countries, thats for sure.
This map is like the old Mongolian Empire vs the World.
Wow this guy give love event this is 8 month old video
Hmm 🤔
Yes
Hmnmnn🤥
Hmmmm?
The Battle for Taiwan would be the closest thing to Hell we've ever seen
It might end up being reminiscent of the planned invasion of Japan near the end of WW2. The island battles in 1945 were exceptionally brutal.
I really don't think so. People in Taiwan have zero interest in having their island destroyed by the US and Chinese fighting. They'll surrender to China if China can gain a foothold on the beach (a difficult task, but don't expect fighting in Taipei).
@@deepvoicedude4749 Yeah, I believe it will either be a brutal defense or a Taiwanese surrender with those diehard on keeping independence from China evacuating to Japan or starting Guerilla warfare
Nah I think China will probably just use Han nationalism to make the Taiwanese surrender. It ultimately comes down to raise the rifle to your people or not and the answer will probably be a no. kinda like asking west Germans to fight East Germans.
@@nathanli3024 That's disregarding every war of independence in the history of mankind.
POV: You’re watching this after Ukraine has been invaded by Russia
no watching it after russia activated their nukes to high alert
@@LCJammer no watching this after the world goes to defcon 2. This is escalating fast.
@@Bland-79 French narrator: One month later...
@@leandersearle5094 And still on defcon 2. Like the Cuban Missile Crisis but so far for a month instead of a couple weeks. This could go south very quickly.
@@Bland-79 Where I live, I don't have to worry about nuclear war (it'll be a crater).
*WW3 starts*
Germany : *Invades Poland*
The World: Germany!
Germany: Sorry force of habit
LMAOOO 😂
I’ve seen that in a meme somewhere
But Poland is a decaying country with low fertility rate and a stagnant economy, why would Germany invade it again? to take care of the elderly? They're better off profitting from the brain drain the whole country is suffering...
@@transforgoku one can never know what the germans are planning
Closet to that would probably invade a Polish satellite state created by the Russians, or push back the Russians occupying Poland lol.
The thing is, i feel like nukes would be used, but only towards the end of the war when one side starts gaining momentum. the losing side will be backed into a corner and that's when irrational actions tend to happen
And the end of the world...
Speaking from fallout experience?
you do know how ww2 ended right ?
@@neverleverland5685 yep but that was before anyone else had nukes
Yes. Is that the epitome of bad sportsmanship? First, everybody promises NOT to use nukes and then when one side is about to lose, they use all their nukes!
*Me, a physically fit 18 year old male:* 😕
@Super Try that and see what the officers do to you.
@Super You aren't the first person to have these fairy-tale ideas to stop war forever.Most young people in militaries worldwide are fully devoted to their cause.They won't let a bunch of conscripts with anti-war ideas get in their way.Remember if you're a concsript that means you're below ever sepoy/private in respect level.Never underestimate the power of nationalism......war can only be prevented through show of strength, countries not willing to defend themselves eg-:Tibet will meet a sticky end.I hope there are no wars.I am just stating reality.
@Super Well... footsoldiers are always gonna be important.Its only when you have two unequal powers fight each other that one side can overwhelm the other purely with technology eg-Afganistan,Iraq.In a war where the tech level of both sides is relatively equal
it's always gonna come down to fixing your bayonet and dislodging a stubborn enemy.This is what Army vets have told me.
metoo
That's what you get for going to the gym.
Him: brings up Ukraine as an example
Everyone now:😐
Everybody is gangsta until a Austrian kid fails in art school
*angry nazzi noises*
Underrated comment
I'm Austrian lol..and I did fail art in school once.
@@Negs42 Uh-oh
@@Negs42 but do you crazily love germany
As a Swede I'll honor our decades old tradition of condemning the actions of both sides of the conflict..... While also selling material and equipment to both sides as well, naturally. Have fun o/
Swedish Stocks are going to skyrocket
An army marches on it's stomach, so keep the meatballs coming.
If the US loses too much key infrastructure, we can always order more from Ikea.
I was expecting you to say, that Sweden would ask Denmark if you both wanted to have a quick war on the side, for old times sake
We thank you for the Gustav's lmfao
I was a business man, doing business things.
Switzerland: "OHH!!! A Season 3?! Wait, let me get my popcorn and swiss choco"
They get the bad seats this time because Europe isn't special anymore
@@m4l_vinny300 lucky them and the Europeans
And toblerone defenses
@@Jb30866 EU is powerful now
It's not Swiss. It's Ghanaian
WW1 and 2 sounded pretty scary, but WW3 will definitely be some dark days. Its hard to imagine what it would actually look like between modern weapons, nuclear weapons, cyber attacks and many other horrible things that could spell absolute carnage across much of the world.
Imagine someone in the future saying this didn’t age well…
Yeah
Epic
@@luxinvictus9018 But sadly we know it won’t we’re just ready for a world war 3
@@Alfie-ft3bx russia has sent troops too the Ukrainian boarder and China is testing taiwanese defenses
@@adrianotaylor7230
At the end of the day, we're all fucked.
Egyptian: ‘Never thought I’d die fighting with an Israeli.’
Israeli: ‘How about with a friend?’
Egyptian: ‘Aye, I could do that.’
:)
You are a men of culture , I see.
I just can't imagine how they would call each other friends
@@GaladorLP probably they would say : I hate you , but I hate them more than you. So I'll fight with you.
As an israeli I can see both countries working together in that front. Israel already aids Egypt to counter ISIS in Siani. While both countries see the relationship with each other as "on paper" relationship, both will agree that "an enemy of my enemy is my friend". A challenge that will probubly rise is the Gaza front again. Hamas defenetly doesn't work with China and have maybe one ally being Qatar, but they wouldn't pass an opportunity to bomb Israel when their main forces are not around.
The most effective way I can see Egypt and Israel working together is Egypt keeping Hamas in Gaza buisy while the rest of the Middle East takes the front lines in Syria and Iraq, taking it all and reach Iran. There either stop or taking Iran untill reaching Pakistan and aiding India on that front. Everyone knows Hamas and Israel doesn't like each other, but I'm 99% sure Egypt doesn't like Hamas just as much as Israel doesn't.
Because of the state of the Middle East, neither Syria nor Iraq are strong enough to hold against Turkey or Israel if they go all out. Syria have a civil war going on and their only aid is from Iran. They have better things to do than fighting a war with Israel or Turkey, like being a country. Iraq is still recovering from the impact of ISIS. The war will probubly be decided by which side can take Iraq and control the area: American Alliance or Iran-China. The american side can probubly take west Iraq and Iran the east. The way I see it is Israel controlling south Syria, Turkey controlling north Syria and north-west Iraq, Arabia controlling south west Iraq and Iran controlling east Iraq which eventually falls to the american side. Both Saudi Arabia and Turkey now shares a border with Iran and bring the front lines to Iran and not to Iraq. Now the question is: "Can Iran defend herself against 4 of her greatest enemies who controll Syria and Iraq?".
Something I'm not sure about almost at all is Lebanon. I believe Lebanon as a country will stay neutral in this war simply because they have no interest in fighting anyone espacially when both Israel and Turkey are so close. Hezbolla will side with Iran and gets aid from them, but if Syria is gone than their means of getting supplys is drasticly reduced. Hezbolla also needs to maintain itself in Lebanon so they are not strong enough to fight anyone in a war like this.
Asia: " I am RED"
India: " We don't do that here"....
Saudi,Japan, s Korea are blue as well
*get this man a like*
@@hitnailhalfway2485 you forgot phillipines indonesia vietnam the middle east turkey taiwan and malaysia
No one gives a *shit*
see what i did there?
@@Imran-iwnl-Haider u r right
Russia has just been excluded from the 2022 Eurovision Song Contest. I think this may lead to Russia pulling out of Ukraine and rethinking it's whole strategy on world domination. If so, the Eurovision Song Contest would be responsible for stopping WWIII.
where did you come up with that? HAHAHA!!!.....tell that to Putin!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!
A song contest ending ww3. Where did you come up with that stupid shit? 🤣🤣
This comment was the dumbest thing I ever read like dude..... are you retarded?
WWI - european shenanigans.
WWII- european shenanigans strike back
WWIII- Asian bat soup supreme the return of Mao
Edit: I stand corrected. WWIII- European shenanigans the return of sovietkong.
PS: THANKS FOR ALL THE FUN REPLIES!
I prefer WW3: Return of the Nippon
Can’t wait for WW4: Interplanetary
Accurate af 🤣
China won. No one dares to call them out
@@montypythonandtheholygrail9687 like Albert Einstein said, “WWIIII will be fought with sticks and stones due to over use of nuclear weapons” something along the lines of that, I didn’t write it word for word but it’s something like that
China and US declares war at each other
Germany: Anyway I'll invade France.
France: Why
Germany: Because that is a tradition.
(Thanks for all the likes)
@Grey Bubu And Russ....nah fuck that, i dont do that mistake twice.
@@aisnice7421 3 times*
Germany: Big oopsie 😊
@anna sal1982 What the actual fuck is wrong with your brain?
I hope no one get rejected from arts university
you mean a graduate school?
Hahaha noice
@@sidsin7538 Hitler wouldn't have started WW2 if it weren't for his rejection from an art school... since he'd be too busy painting to care about Jews.
Make sure to say it louder or else trust me I’ll do it
Trump got rejected from Hollywood, does that count?
"Ukraine would be easy pickings"
Zelenskyy: "hold my beer"
Yeah that didn't age well lol
ukraine would capture moscow
We’ll at least we know what russia military capabilities are 😂
I am a lying selfish troublemaker... watch me kill my own people - good thing I am a psycho in the film industry... :-}
@C Sorgini idk, it’s looking like we’re gonna see another winter war
*China and America go to war*
Everyone: “Germany No!”
Germany: “what ?”
Everyone: “sorry force of habit”
Somehow Germany does still have one of the most powerful militaries in Europe
Lol
@@gloomsouls Because they are the most economically powerful country in Europe. Also their military is small in comparison to their capabilities.
Germany: *invades France*
sorry force of habit
we should just give germany extra money and watch them trample russia :)
“There are 4 Chinese for every American, a kill ratio that’s almost never been matched in history.”
Nazis and Mongols: *laughs*
That's why he said almost
They both lost so...
For every german solider fought in the eastern front, he needs to kill 5 reds in order to win.
@@amrahmed7856 the Mongols won tf, if they hadn't gone Chinese and broken up into pieces that each fight each other then you'd probably be writing that in Mongolian
@@amrahmed7856 The Mongols won what are you talking about lmao
"Use of robots will become a taboo after the war."
Reminds me of the end of the Clone Wars.
China: I'm something of a scientist myself
*Republic of China's Clone Army has entered chat*
Then, sticks and stones will be used during the WW-IV.
i think that if you can mass-produce drones cheap enough and then hook them to an advanced ai software like the droid fighters in StarWars, you would achieve what I like to call ''hellfire from above''. It would be a doctrine based on total domination of the sky and due to their cheapness and superior reflex times it would stop the production of expensive high model fighters for overwhelming cheap firepower
@@Cybernaut21J I guess but in war, there is always a push in new technology. Just because it's not possible now does not mean it's not possible later. With many resources being strained globally I believe that a third world war will come down to who can develop better technology to recycle resources or optimize their resources better. In that case, i still think that cheap drones used to dominate the skies will become a key feature of any future wars, in the modern-day more than any other losing control of the sky's is the fastest way to lose the war altogether.
to be honest the worst thing that would happen is the cyber warfare going from 0 to 60 in three seconds. Most of the world runs on things that are derived or based on data, such as money. Even if it doesn't turn into nuclear hell, the year's afterword would be us trying to get everything that we take for granted back online from square one. We would literally remove decades of human progress even if the war is only a couple years long.
UA-cam doing it’s thing with recommending things always at the right time
Germany:*invades france*
France:"Dude what the hell are you doing?! We're on the same side"
Germany:"Sorry it's a habit"
@Ardas Donemy ok
@@NobleLaika lol
Stolen
@@haroldinho9930 stolen from what?
@@WexyBooBooBear there’s another comment that’s made before yours with literally the same wording
I think an important factor many are not paying attention to is that China's rise does not only undermine the US hegemony around the world but before that it greatly undermines Russia's influence in Asia.
Considering the various Turkic nations, in Central Asia, are already getting rid of Cyrillic alphabet in favour of the Latin one and Russia's demography is stagnating at best.. I would not be surprised by a Siberian breakup somewhere in the future.
Russia is only allied with China because they have a common enemy.
Russia has basically said that in a war against China, they’re not going bother sending in ground forces; they’re just going to use nukes.
@@kokofan50 I mean, what other choice do they have? China is one of the two countries where Russia cannot throw men at the enemy (India being the other) and would just get overrun once China gets over Siberia. Nuclear weapons are the only way to destroy modern day China in an open conflict.
@COSSACK RAIDER not openly. But more and more Chinese people remember how Russia took away their lands back in 18th century. Especially the Pacific coast with Vladivostok will skyrocket in terms of value once the long awaited Arctic route will be opened (it will by the end of this century).
I still believe it will continue as it started: slowing eroding everything Russia related in Central Asia.
The Central Asian countries are a much more bendable and preferable economic partner than Russia for China.
The Russians, for many decades, have kept their railways system in a way that a Chinese train can't reach Europe by going through Russian controlled land. Siberia is large and one day will be very hard to keep under control. Chechnya already offers an example of sort: rebellious Muslims against Russian authority.
Economically and demographically speaking Russia will be seen ever more as China's Finland, if you get the comparison.
I can't see Russia and China tougher , I guess that the Russians would try in central Asia the same politics that they use in middle west , the Chinese are so aggressive to mantein suport in the region
I hope Germany appear’s as a “Special Guest” in Season 3!
maybe
@@friedrichwilhelmviktoralbe349 Lmfaoo
😅😅😅
im pretty sure germany would re-arm and be a powerhouse and prolly with all of EU rallying behind them
@@fraskf6765 I mean when it’s life or death you know Germany is gonna show up. Forgive me for being dramatic, but it would be redemption.
3:50 the little pause before he says Ukraine is what gives me chills
Fr
"Russia may backstab China"
Me: smiles in Starship Troopers
Would you like to know more?
@@NZAnimeManga *urge to know more intensifies*
@@error5202 is one unfreed POW worth fighting a war over?
I heard that Chinese had lay a claim on eastern siberian. So yeah the Russian would switching side real quick or even won't help the Chinese at all.
@@bodyzalone from what I know, not the whole thing yet just where used to belong to Qing.
People in the international Space Station be like
Are we suppose to fight?
*Laughs in call of duty mw2*
My God... What would you do? Once the food runs out, if all the supply rocket bases and ground control are dust, it's a long slow starvation in the void.
@@kmech3rd no, you just start eating the cosmonauts
A fistfight happens between Americans and Russians lmao
They can see the fireworks from space and eat popcorns
Nepal is NOT an ally of China. I don't know why many people think that. As a Nepalese I would rather side with India than China. China might be trying to be a good neighbour but India's more like a brother to Nepal
Didn’t you guys and India have a border conflict recently?
@@duckhawkninja3614 well it is it , a small conflict but it is highlighted ccp propaganda like its some big issue . nepal is culturally very much tightly tied to india , like people from my state marry from nepal and vice versa . its just maoist party of nepal which wants to be wana be chinese .
@@opai1821 I am aware of both countries having cultural ties being Hindu majority and all. i was just asking because I remember reading about a border conflict between Nepal and India a little while back and I also know cultural ties are not necessarily an indicator of good relations. One need only look to the way Russia and Ukraine act toward each other to know there are far stronger bonds than culture.
@@duckhawkninja3614 Russia and Ukraine literally blame and fight each other every single time. Not the case for Nepal-India's relation. Of course conflicts arises sometimes but that doesn't mean we are not on good terms or something.
@@duckhawkninja3614 nepal will likely either get attacked from China or will have to let them pass, as an Indian I have no hate for you but you are like Ukraine in this position where china will either give your country money deals or overtake it to enter india
Edit replied to wrong comment I wanted to reply to the original commentor sorry
"all the major militaries will go into this conflict thinking like WWII and will be VERY wrong"
This aged like wine. Russia went into Ukraine assuming it'd be like a WWII style blitzkrieg... and they were oh so wrong
WW2 blitzkrieg was actually as slow or slower in a kilometer basis.
@@businessproyects2615 Thank god There's not a russian counterpart of erwin Rommel
@@takebacktheholyland9306 There probably is, given their population is big enough and their IQ is too. So there should be, though perhaps their Rommel is playing chess.
Germany’s gonna be the that one villain who turns good in the next season
Agent Hitler, FBI
Zuko found his honor
And gets nerfed
Character development arc.
Loki
Him: It's been peace for 80 years
People living in the middle east: *About that one*
Intervened in countries: *About that one too...*
You know he’s talking about global conflict. In a regional context there has always been places at war and always will be no matter how peaceful humanity is
@james Butcher huh? Worse than a war? You mean war? Where hundreds of thousands die? Even civilian included? What’s worse than that?
he specifically said industrialized nations.
JeSUS yeah? there's a cold (saudi and iran) and civil war (SYRIA, iraq, OMAN) that literally has been going on since the Iraq war not to mention Palestine and Israel
Everyone knows that Alaska would become the main front! Someone clearly hasn't played enough Fallout. 😅
Lmao nice
I don t want to set the world on fireeeee...
It would be a distraction
The Bread Pirate now we need a LIBERTY PRIME project
or Risk
“Something goes horrifically wrong, it doesn’t matter if it starts in North Korea, Armenia, The Himalayas, or Ukraine. That last one is eerily truthful.
During this period of human history, I cannot insist enough for Art Teachers to give your Students Good Grades. I repeat, Give your students GOOD GRADES
Lmao
Just in case...
Universities will allow Marihuana vending machines on their campuses to keep the sheep sedated...
@@SataniaSquid Agreed
@@transforgoku
Fucking sedate me i’m sad
If its gonna happen, Poland is conquered anyway. Why? Guess... Geography
polen stronk
@@sharkronical nein
Pszypau
oh good old jogrufee
bye bye poland
Allies: Germany do the the thing!
Germany: ok
Blitzkriegs Russia
Russia begging the arctic "do the thing" Russian winter enters the chat
Adolf Hitler Uunona + Jearn-Cristophe, Prince Napoleon is a unstopable duo against Russia cHaNgE mY mInD
@@tyronwsison we could just leave it at Adolf with oil and Russia having a normal winter instead of a "particularly harsh winter" or Napoleon just being a little younger a little bit mor on his A game
Wait till Siberia melts because of climate change. Then blitzkrieg.
Getting into Russia and defeat them in battle is the easy part. Actually reaching Russian heartland and Moscow is the hard part.
/a Swed
Also I'd genuinely like to see any actual significant force get through the Himilayas. There's a reason those countries are still there in the Himilayas and that there have been skirmishes but no real war. It's the Himilayas. You thought the Alpines would be bad? Himilayas you just can't move through in any significant numbers. They're natural choke points so a token force can defend the entire border. The only real force concentrations would be through Pakistan as the east would be too filled with jungles. You'll see some battles but nothing too major. The countries we see there today are only there because they couldn't be conquered by their bigger neighbors. It's not for lack of trying but lack of ability.
The most that gets over those mountains in full force is missiles.
Normal aircraft already avoid the place because the air is too thin to be safely above the ground, and marching an army over those mountains let alone maintaining a supply line would be insanely difficult and vulnerable to counter missile attack.
It just makes more sense to go around or possibly find a couple usable passes and defend it to the teeth as you try and build a highway through it. (I suspect the mountains would be lightly garrisoned by both sides as the main fighting acures elsewhere, mainly near Northern Pakistan and Bangladesh as China's main invasion routes)
@@jasonreed7522 agree
but in case of bangladesh, they are a independent country literally because of india, there might be some recent developments with china but i think they'll never pick weapons against india.
also even if they choose to fight against indians they be done within a week with strong indian navy and airforce
@@jamesatlas5204 i only meant to imply the China would try and go around the Himalayas while sticking to a land invasion, and the 2 routes that this resukts in are either through Pakistan to the west or Bangladesh to the east. (Picture it like Germany invading France by going through Belgium)
Your next videos should be 'What a post WW3 allied victory would look like' and 'What a post WW3 Chinese victory would look like'
Oooh yeah that's a great idea
Great idea!
In fact I will boost this up
Up
Up
India, Pak, China axis expained very terribly. 90% of Himalayan terrain favours India.... He didn't mention this. But he mentioned hellish climate of the caucases... Lol
Exactly. I saw a Chinese official documentary of the recent standoff, their soldiers were taking canned O2 because they can't cope with the dense air 😂. You try to fuck with India in mountain warfare , UNO reverse.
@@pranjaldev9559yes ahah. We also operate the world's highest battlefield if they don't know. And the last country who tried to attack us in the mountains didn't even accept their martyrs bodies.
I too was surprised when they didn’t take Indian geography into account, Himalaya and thar. And what would happen if India thinks to stop the supply chain to China from malacca strait?
@@gaishgarg Lol they think its all slum in plains with just summer season where temprature normally remains between 35°C-40°C. India's geography is certainly its biggest advantage. Himalayas to the North and North-east, Thar desert to the west, Deccan plateau to the south and the northern plains dissected by major rivers throughout.
@@gaishgarg exactly. I loled at how casually he said , China would attack through the Himalayas 😂 tf. That's the Himalayas we talking about , not Miami 😂.
If Brazil gets in the US side, the Chinese could have famine because Brazil is one of most nations that imports food to China, if China has a famine their military capability reduces by a lot, making a huge humanitarian crisis in history, this could be the decisive feature in the war. But in other side Brazil could probably be neutral because it's a developing country and China is one of the best trade partners of Brazil, also Brazil is too divided to get into a war
Either way, the ships won't be able to get from Brazil to China.
@@bevbevan6189 yes, ironically Brazil could be the decisive nation for this war, because it feeds more than 1 Billions people in the world (that's why the Amazon forest is burning), and also other 3rd world countries because it gives resources to China and the US
The US would have prevented any convoys in reaching China either way
@@ocurtamemes1477 now I want to go to Brazil if we win just to celebrate lol
Never mind. USA , India and Australia will do naval blockade in indian Ocean. Cutting of China's supplies
This aged like fine wine
WW3: *starts most likely because of China, North Korea, or USA*
Germany: I used to rule the world.
Imagine Germany actually starting WW3 cuz they don't want that privilege taken away from them
Watch Europa The Last Battle on bitchute
@@lyq232 that would be awesome... I guess.
@@TheRealFocalors the hunt for a new art-school-reject
@@lyq232 yes.
"Infantry is the only thing you can use to hold onto terrain"
I jumped for joy when you said this. The amount of people who argue you can fight wars with missiles or air power and don't need infantry is ridiculous. In order to win a war, you must take and hold ground and once that ground is held it is incredibly difficult for anything, even modern smart bombs and drones, to dislodge infantry from that ground except for other infantry. It's a terrible fact but the infantryman will always be necessary and I don't see computers/robots replacing a human in the frontline infantry for a long long time if ever.
Exactly unless robotic-infantry variants can be created a human will always be slogging it through the mud of a forest or through the rubble of a city.
@@alexaurelian8024 Boston Dynamics.
@@Miquelalalaa Imagine that Atlas robot and the dog thing with guns. It would be nuts
It the far future they could do a robotic type of think that you see in movies that track a persons body movements and make the robot repeat it but to do it with fast reaction times accurately would take a very long time
@@Miquelalalaa Brits would be doing that but by 2025. Only nation who would do such thing is usa and china. Also, I feel under Biden usa is not very safe. It's just my gut feeling, idk why but guy seems v soft(trump blurts out dumb shit no denying but he isn't soft)
what would ww3 be like:
poland: *just the usual*
*cries in Latvian*
India: *Am I a joke to you?*
@@tinodaperson7174 why india 🤔
But Germany has nothing to do with it
Every one: wait, that's illegal
14:50 turns out it was barely functioning.
Chinese Soldiers: “ How on Earth these trees are moving.”
American Soldiers: “ First Time “
Plot twist:the trees got cut off
@@ygotsvlog3762 Why don’t you ask Americans what happened? I think they Can explain better.
Chinese Soldiers: "Nah! .. we came here once before, 4 years after you left"
@@arunsar7893 and 26 other times
While hearing fortunate son on the air at the same time.
You have to remember that China never conquered Taiwan until the 17th century for a reason. Taiwan is a fortress island that’s geographically as difficult to invade as Japan itself. Also, there’s only a few months and beaches where an invasion is possible. Naval invasions are already difficult against a prepared and determined enemy.
Japan in WW2 would have been able to give the Americans a bloody nose despite having already lost control of the seas and air. Taiwan is much smaller, but any invasion of Taiwan would be, long, brutal, and simply impossible without *complete* naval and air dominance.
If the Chinese *actually* felt they could invade Taiwan by 2020, they would have already invaded when the world was facing COVID.
No, it does not make much sense to say that if China could invade Taiwan in 2020, they would have done so as that would cripple them at a time when they are recovering and the world population has a lower opinion of China due to the Pandemic. It is possible for China to invade Taiwan using a combination of communication and then missile warfare to cripple Taiwanese digital and physical infrastructure and military resistance and followed by a bloody and massive naval, air and land assault which will cost many millions of lives. However, China does not want war right now since it is not sustainable enough yet and is not in a good enough geopolitical position so I doubt there will be a large scale war for a few decades.
The main difference between Taiwan and Japan hence is the size of the country, proximity to China, and the capabilities and will of China to invade Taiwan which would make Taiwan far less of a struggle logistically to invade and far easier to maintain as diehard Anti-PRC Taiwanese will likely try to evacuate to Japan, America, or Australia
@@bigbrothersinnerparty297 Taiwan is highly motivated to fight and unlike the Japanese in WW2, are not going to be starving due to blockade.
China recovered the first from the pandemic. There was a window in April when China had mostly recovered and the rest of the world hadn’t.
Secondly, missiles go the other way as well. Missiles can destroy any invasion craft, and they’re not that hard to hide away from bombers. Even just a basic speedboat laden with explosives can seriously harm an invasion vessel (the Japanese did this in WW2, with some success.)
Assuming you even win the battle in the skies.
@@innosam123 China mostly recovered, however they still were in a horrible diplomatic situation so your argument still makes no sense. Missiles go the other way however it will not be plausible to use them when China has a better land to air defense system and has a far larger industrial capacity and missile stockpile to use missiles. A preemptive EMP bomb strike or for now more plausibly digital cyber warfare will also cripple missile usage and allow for China to have quite a few windows of attack. China will use as much air support and naval support to protect their convoys and landing craft as they can field most likely and the proximity to China for Taiwan is far closer compared to even most of Okinawa compared to Japan. This all gives a Chinese invasion the ability to precede with acceptable losses at sea, which at most would be a few hundred thousand. China will easily be able to win the skies with the largest manufacturing capacity for missiles, cruise missile stockpile, and air defense system as fighters lose their advantage with how close they are to China’s power center.
Invading taiwan would be like d-day x 100
Switzerland be like: damn another good fricking movie
Switzerland be chillin with popcorn
@@cestalia in their bunker 😂
I think, this time Switzerland will join war this time...
@Opecuted not if i nuke them first
@Opecuted they’ll have to get out of the bunkers eventually
India is strong enough to takeover pakistan and defend against Chinese aggression considering the fact that China would not mobilize it's 100% unit on Indian front as they will be facing US,JAPPAN ,KOREA , VIETNAM in east .Moreover India has largest reserve forces in the world and highly trained Mountain warfare Regiments that will be decisive in Himalayan clash
Why do I feel like in order for India to be in WW3, Pakistan would have to invade.
India would have a lot on their plate with the Pakistan, China and Nepal alliance (maybe even the Taliban) to defend on Kashmir border. Another issue is the proximity of the capital to the border.
I desperately hope I'm wrong. Especially after the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the world war seems very likely
@@joshuathomas2012 Well the Government of Nepal, as long as India doesn't bully and invade Nepal, will never support China in a war against India.
@@samyamalamsal no Nepal will never go against India....India has many people who are married to Nepalese and vice-versa. Nepal government may become pro chinese for monetary benefits but they will never go against there own people to join a bloodshed.
@@adarsh-singh-bisen Well Nepal wants to stay as neutral as much it can without offending both the neighbours. Nepal has already had enough with the Maoist Civil war. Wars are no good to no one.
"Invading Vietnam would be quick and easy"
25 year later : .....
Well, vietnam jungle is decreased quiet significantly since last war, they wont be able to hide this time
@@trihermawan9553 remember the deadly tunnel that the Vietnamese build during that time ?
It's still usable
There are many small tunnel ( you can't even stand up or crawling inside there) in that place were use manly to lure the US solider to the killing zone
@@GTAandApplechannel yeah those tunnels efficiency is decreased if theres no jungle to hide it
@@trihermawan9553 they are still there in the jungle
@@stylinnet2395 yes there are jungle there and he just forgot the mountains range between laos and Vietnamese ( it's literally on the border of vietnam and laos ) ( it's higher than 2 km)
“Geography plays to much against Vietnam”
First time that has ever been said
They’re in the tree
@かたわれ時 they’re in the tree
Chile Don’t have the tree
@@GTAandApplechannel chile have Andes
@@SanjayKumar-rk9mj k
If you break stick in half you have two stick. You can never defeat stick.
China- invades Vietnam, surprised at how tough the resistance is
USA- "Hey, I've seen this one before, it's a classic"
USA : first time?
Yeah, I think the Vietnamese aren't being given enough credit here. ("You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders. The most famous is 'Never get involved in a land war in Asia!'")
@@walidechchafnaje9812 China: About the 20th or so.
As a Vietnamese, I believe we wouldn't join US side at the start. Sure the populace hate china and love USA, but the government is like a puppet to china. This mostly leads to something like Italy in ww2, the soldiers mostly give up when USA invade vietnam homeland and vhina have to send troops to Vietnam to fight the US.
China has already gone to war with vietnam once and lost in 2 weeks
15:04 This has been categorically disproven.
me: gets shot in war
"that dudes hacking"
Probs got an aimbot
@RoAst It PoAst It I mean these cheaters take all the fun of it
@@jamesrelf5824 plot twist: it was a literal robot with real life aimbot software.
I was able to type this now i have to cite
Report
In summary: Death, pain, misery, and madness for all parties.
@John 건 Benton Europa über Alles
@@DavidGonzalez-ff6yk Europa no existe, Espexit 🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸
Welcome to war :D
Also the attitude of “not Europe” is exactly what will lose the war to the Chinese. If European leaders refrain from going all in and actually mobilizing, then you’ve got yourself a new world order, with the CCP as global hegemon
@@Flash4ML we can always allie ourselves with them and screw América i mean theres no diference bettewen both so theres no handicaps for either going with one or the other
Both are fucking terrible
@@Flash4ML Eh, we substitute corn for rice. Probably get some better rail networks too.
Everyone: **starts killing each other by the millions**
Switzerland:
_"Oh no the neighbors are at it again..._
_Anyway-"_
*dabs in Chinese and Russian nuke launcher in Space*
I reflexively read that in Clarkson voice.
@@ls200076 Russia: "man China's birth rate is getting low, India's is only getting higher, and our companies are also moving to India because of that population boom and potential customers, also India NEVER claim Siberian land and falsely state a Russian city belongs to them... hmm... China...or India...china? or India?....."
China: *Sweats profusely hoping the Russians didn't remember that one border conflict where their forces killed Russian soldiers and Capture a tank, that same same Russian tank is being shown in a Chinese museum*
Anyway, back to chocolate production.
@@enveloreal and making clocks
"Ukraine Would be relatively easy pickings " As Ukraine Defends against Russia alone
Russia is pulling its punches heavily against Ukraine right now if they really wanted to they could destroy Ukraine it’s not a show of force against the west it’s a war for population
@@somerandomguy2447 u very right no big weapons are being used from russia
Ukraine is defending like Stalone in a Rocky movie, it isn't going very well. But is doing something.
@@businessproyects2615 Ukraine seems to be holding out better than expected. With more weapons,who knows? If Trump was in office it would have never happened.
Alone? Ye right
Remember Russia is not trying to destroy ukraine, if that was their goal, they could do so withon a week. They want to denazifi with as little casualties and damage as possible
"The Indo Himalayan front would be bloodiest".
Also me a healthy 19 year old Indian male.... Chuckles... I am in danger. 😢
Oof
You're gonna form the floor on wich tanks will fight, it'll be slaughter
@@quck5651 well I am at pre final year of my engineering course. Hope I would get a job in a damn weapons factory or something instead of deployment in war zone lol
@@surendrapatro7932 you would be sent to build bridges. Logistics is very important after all. The good news is your skillset makes you too important to waste as a rife grunt, the bad news is well building bridges under enemy fire isn't any safer.
@@redhunter8731 eh never mind. Dying for my nation sounds way cooler than working for a corporate entity 9-5.
If these modern videos are going to continue happening, it would be nice to see what you think the world would like after.
Look dude if you want me to fight you want me on your side because I’m ridiculously strong and basically unstoppable. Just saying
Either set humanity 2000 year back in time but this time hardcore mode with brand new mutated species
Or just a dystopia world like in the boom
(Book name : 1984)
Me in 10 Years: Ah just like the simulations.
I see you're a man of culture
Bug found
Friendly fire problems
The loud sergeant died
Pls fix devs
@@insectslayer1374 it's broken since the 2020 patch, it seams that the devs have abandon the project.
@@danorott Nah, we’ve become a mobile game, the more the money the more privileges you have
Don't say it will happen
It’s terrifying that some things said in this video are actually starting to happen
At the end of the day, somehow the Austrians will still be responsible for another World War
@mo gamer Serbs weren't responsible for WW1. Austria-Hungary just waited for Serbia to do something. Sarajevo assassination was their excuse.
@mo gamer Hahaha I always imagine a picture of kids as Austria, Serbia and Germany and when they’re about to got into trouble Austria and Serbia points at Germany
hahahahha
@
Whatifalthist is biased in overestimating China
@@vukrankovic7587 so? it was still justified
more than russians joining a war they had no business in or the US joining an european war just for saving their loans to the allies
Belgium is already setting up its country be the arena for the 3rd world war after enjoying hosting the last 2 already
🤣🤣
considering its been destroyed twice, its still one of the most beautiful places ive visited.
@@Miguel-hw8hj I live in Belgium and i am delivery driver so I get to see a lot of places. I can strongly agree with you
@@sedatmehmed4371 brew some coffee for us americans well be their soon after the first shot is fired
@@TheFIoridaMan canadians*
Here we are, in a day in age where this was thought to be just an idea, an idea that maybe something like this wouldn't reach this generation, thought to be too costly, what person would wage war in the 21st century and the same would go for even many future generations that would have never had to be afraid of...but times right now are unsure at best and best put by few recently "nothing is off the table".
I think that the existence of Nukes might prevent WW3 but honestly I'm of the opinion that Russia is more dangerous now than at any point during the Cold War. Simply put, modern Russia is desperate, which the Soviet Union wasn't.
@@casuallavaring good point
4:02 Funny story about that...
Putin's decisions are fuckin the Russia economy and the people in all over the world is against him, including Russians, his soberany it's about to be test as the president of Russia and he's the type of mad motherfucker who would do anything to continue in that chair, that's what scares me the most
I've always thought even in the 21st century, that war can happen and maybe the most brutal one yet. We are the same species who have been fighting for thousands of years, we are no different. The long peace maybe was just an effect of WW2 where most of Europe was destroyed leaving only USA and USSR. And the rest of the world was impoverished so no major war will happen that can be called "world changing". And then USA and USSR fought a lot of proxy wars. And now with all countries having a good economic and military capability like pre WW1 era, we now have a chance at WW3 happening. Us in the 21st century with depleting resources have a really high chance of the bloodiest war ever fought in human history. If countries are pushed to the limit they will fight.
As Lithuanian, I can say it 2 things:
1. The WW3 is started
2. We are next
I hope not, I'm really excited about me and my family moving to Estonia and it won't happen if Russia invades
God help us all right now. On defcon 2.
Vietnam: Sides with America because China was worse than us.
Americans: *Confused Patriotic noises*
Just like how you guy vote, vote for the one you hate less
@@nswordsn4249 USA Poltics in a nutshell
I’m imagining US forces with Vietnamese forces in a Fox hole together eating rice and listening to Fortunate Son
"We have the power of God and trees on our side!"
~U.S. troops (probably)
@@panzerboidasixth6892 Once Afghanistan get debt-trapped they have another meme ally.
He just ignored Himalayan mountains when talking about indo Chinese war....
Yeah, literally nobody can even cross the Himalayas
Ya indian forces already have cover on upper himalayas and Indian forces have experience of war on high altitude and Indian forces have gorkha commandoes
Uh it’s not as impassable as they used to be because they don’t have to climb the entire mountain or anything like that so it’s easier than you might think, just need high altitude training.
There is no army on earth who stand tall infront of INDIA in Himalayas
To be fair, it's fairly easy to ignore the Himalayas when you can just go around them and invade from the West.
South American: oh no a war. anyway. Time to pay the local cartel the protection fee.
@DeathShoterdoCS do cartels already made that place safe ?
POV: your watching this a year later and it’s actually happening
yeeeah. I'm just here to see my future
About time
He didn’t mention how North Korean troops are practically starving so a more than a few mutinies would be expected, not to mention that they’ll be overall less effective.
Yeah, part of war is actually being able to sustain. Which is why America is powerful, it’s literally a food and manufacturing basket and the sole power of the Americas.
When it comes to manufacturing, I think it’s safe to say China have the advantage.
@@1Leggo9my9Eggo2 but you know it is the largest importer of agricultural produce(mainly rice and wheat which is the most important for survival) while usa is a net exporter and the produce usa imports are mostly exotic fruits and vegetables which can be ignored at the time of war.
chins would most likely support North Korea with food/supplies for it's military or people if necessary in this case.
Once Chinese resources modernize fuel and feed them the NK military will become a formidable force.
However, the video skipped the immense military and industrial capabilities f South Korea.
Thank you very much for the "do not trust me" at 5:40. Good to see that you are humble enough to recognize it.
Only thing is that if everyone goes nuke then as the saying goes the next war will be fought with stick and stones :-)
someone on youtube: invading vietnam is easy
Mongol Empire, America, France, China : agree
INVADING Vietnam is easy. HOLDING Vietnam is a fucking nightmare that never ends.
*"The trees are talking"*
@@SCOMBAG Like Afghanistan
Every country supreme powah until the Nam Trees start speaking.
Zawarudo:Vietnam is *EASY*
The American:Please don't do that,Don't give me hope