To me if someone died for my sins then what ever I do there is no accountability at all for what we do wrong. That means we can do whatever we want! It is a very dangerous statement.
dangerous statement for idiots/simpletons perhaps... a believer is one who has adheres by his righteous acts, and is atoned when consciousness of the reprimanded act has been taken into accounts.. therefore upon a believers death he is guaranteed the resurrection by Jesus s purchase of their souls...that is all atonement of sin means and this rooted in Judaism.
Thats not how it works, if you continue to sin willfully it makes Christs blood as mud in your life because youre willfully diaobeying Gods commands. Jesus said those that love Him are those that do his Father's will. Quite different from just being able to do whatever you want and this is addressed.
@Martin Solomon To me, it is clear if you do not honor the Son you do not honor the Father, for the Son is sent of the Father. I can get more into this when I'm off work in a few hours and try to address each of your points, because they deserve to be addressed. I love you too, thanks.
@Martin Solomon I hope you actually read all of this lol! So clearly Isaiah 43:10-11 is the Lord declaring Himself the savior of Israel and affirming that He is the only God and that He is eternal. If we read on we see that Babylon is to be destroyed and after that the Lord pronounces Israel's shortcomings. I wish you would have brought up Isaiah 42 instead... "Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles." Then if we go to Mathew 12:15-21 we find this... "But when Jesus knew it, he withdrew himself from thence: and great multitudes followed him, and he healed them all; And charged them that they should not make him known: That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias the prophet, saying, Behold my servant, whom I have chosen; my beloved, in whom my soul is well pleased: I will put my spirit upon him, and he shall shew judgment to the Gentiles." Now on to your point about the Lord's prayer. The Lord's prayer was intended as a template to guide believers in prayer, not something to repeat like a robot. You say Jesus does not mention praying to the Son in the Lord's prayer. I agree, and keep in mind that at the time when Jesus was saying these things he had not yet been glorified; in the sense that the disciples were still expecting messiah to establish an earthly kingdom and free them from Roman rule, not be crucified and resurrected and ascend to heaven. Now, after Jesus' death and resurrection he appears to the disciples in Mathew 28 beginning at verse 16. Then the eleven disciples went away into Galilee, to the mountain which Jesus had appointed for them. When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some doubted. And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age." So there you have it...But even if Jesus hadn't personally said to pray in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (which I've demonstrated that he did,) you still have all of these statements I've listed below being made by either Jesus, his disciples, or prophets. John 10:30 "I and my Father are one." Corinthians 8:6 "yet for us there is one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we for Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and through whom we live." 2 Corinthians 3:17 "Now the Lord is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty." Isaiah 9 beginning in verse 6 "For unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given; and the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. Of the increase of His government and peace there will be no end, Upon the throne of David and over His kingdom, To order it and establish it with judgment and justice From that time forward, even forever. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this." In Revelation 22:13, probably one of the most important verses, Jesus says "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last," corresponding to the Lords declaration of externality in Isaiah 43 10:11 Now as for the eucharist, I'm just assuming you're calling it into question. Well, what's Jesus have to say about it? Luke 22:19 20 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and broke it, and gave unto them, saying, "This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me." Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is shed for you." It's purely symbolic of his death and was meant to be observed solemnly, not some bizarre cannibal ritual like some insuiate. And as far as how the 33,000 different Christian denominations practice that? I don't know. Not my concern, just what the text says. When it comes to it comes to iconography of Miriam I would tell you to talk to a Catholic about it. I know that iconography serves several purposes according to the Orthodox and Catholic churches but I'm not apart of either, or any church for that matter. I agree with you that the sabbath is on Saturday and never changed. I don't even really want to get into that because I don't observe it. Faith and grace alone is crap. You referred to James and in James 2:15-17 he says "Suppose a brother or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to them, 'Go in peace; keep warm and well fed,' but does nothing about their physical needs, what good is it? So also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead." The replacement of the temples you mentioned didn't come until much later out of necessity. There was actually massive construction of new churches and cathedrals. At first the pagan temples were preserved. Until around the 6th or 7th centuries I think because of barbarian invansions, they needed the materials, and then in the 10th century building on ruins. Here's a description of the attitude towards pagan temples in the 4th century “That Christian emperors continued to protect the temple buildings of Rome is evident from their legislation. A law by Constantius and Constans, issued to the urban prefect of Rome, already prescribed that ‘although all superstitions must be completely eradicated, nevertheless, it is Our will that the buildings of the temples situated outside the walls shall remain untouched and uninjured’” (Theodosian Code, 16.10.3)
I was raised in Christianity family.but I am doing my own learning on the Bible for the past year I learned that I was tought so many lies growing up about the Bible I have been studying different beliefs to find the truth .
@@ProgressiveTeen: The "quran" is NOT scripture that was given to man by God, and it blasphemously, arrogantly and self-righteously DENIES the ETERNAL (i.e. STILL in effect and binding today!) Torah that God gave to Moses on Mt. Sinai, by saying that it is "corrupted"! God told us that the Torah, that He gave to Moses on Mt. Sinai, is ETERNAL, therefore He DID NOT ALLOW IT to become "corrupted"!! Do some actually research and learn from the rabbis, who have been studying the original Hebrew all the way back to Mt. Sinai!
@Mansoor Ahmad Wow, you are simply ASSUMING that an opponent hasn't read the Qur'an. I personally have read the Qur'an (front to back) some three times where I took numerous notes. The issue I have with your comment is that you said that if you don't understand a particular Sura, you should seek out an Islamic scholar. What you are really saying is that you should ask a scholar who has a heavy bias towards Islam and will ensure the interpretation is nice and comfy for you. And what type of scholar should you as ask? A moderate Sunni? What about hardliner Sunni? Or maybe you should ask the nice Sufi Imam about a particular passage? Or maybe not, maybe you should ask a Sufi hardliner! Wait a minute!!! maybe Sunnis and Sufis have constantly, and deliberately misinterpreted the Qur'an all over the place simply to prop up their particular flavour of Islam, so why not ask a moderate Shi'ite Scholar, or maybe a hardliner one instead! Point is that you will not get a proper answer from anyone of them. Another point is if the Qur'an came from God Himself (via an angel) then surely there shouldn't be any difficulty in understanding God's words, no matter how hard you want it to say something else, after all, isn't Allah all-knowing? Couldn't he write a book that isn't open to interpretation or confusion,? Another issue: You only mentioned the Qur'an, but what I've learnt is that to understand Islam, you have to read what all the Hadiths have to say, and on top of this, it helps if you study the history of Muhammad and how Islam spread. Do all these things and one cannot deny that Islam is inherently a violent religion and very autocratic one at that. It was spread by lies and by swords, and millions of people throughout the world have either been traumatized or killed by that religion. The world would be a better place if Muhammad have never been born. Muhammad was a curse on humanity, and that curse is still spreading like a disease.
@@mephistophelean you realize Torah was g-d speaking and Moses writing. I’d say that is truth enough. A whole nation witnessed and heard g-d at Sinai and their descendants live today. Just saying.
This is one of my new FAVOURITE videos by Rabbi Tovia Singer. B"H R. Tovia for your honesty, compassion and willingness to spend time answering these questions!
I got out my paper Bible and verified it for myself. What Hebrews 10:5 quotes as Psalm 40:6 actually does say something different than what it says in Psalms 40:6. Unbelievable!
The writer of Hebrews was quoting from the Septuagint (the Old Testament in Greek). That's what the vast majority of Jews in the 1st century were familiar with. Where as your modern English Bible is translated from Hebrew sources.
@@maxprescott9371 he just kind of took a shot in the dark about my question. From what I know there wasn’t a complete Grecian translation until much later. But with close examination of the book of Hebrews... leaves clues to it being originally written in Hebrew, clearing up any discrepancies between the New and Old Testament.
@@maxprescott9371 I’m glad it helped. There are definitely a lot of Pharisees in the world. But we live because He lives! Bless you my brother in Christ!
@Iyas kelu If the Messiah by definition, is supposed to bring world peace, fight off the Romans and unite the Jews and the dark ages came after Jesus died, I'm curious what evidence you have to make you believe that he was the Messiah?
@Iyas kelu It's obvious you haven't read "The Real Messiah" by Aryeh Kaplan or you wouldn't ask such foolish questions. If you're going to make an argument, please go to source material, then we can talk.
"The gospels are a theological crime scene." I really need to quote this. Brilliant wording!!! I'm in awe, Rabbi Singer of your chelek of Torah. I listen to you erev Shabbat and you have me in awe! Shabbat shalom u'mevorach
@Iyas kelu lol of course it is anti Christianity. News flash. For 40 years he has been a.counter Christian missionary. Did you expect someone with that job title to sell Christianity along side you?
Sister, you are closing your eyes to what Jesus said, this teacher have history but no Holy Spirit. You follow him and may become a jew, but not a child of God.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 yes i believe that we should do our best to follow God commandments, but keeping the commandments cannot save you. Only God can save and He made a way for man to be saved by grace through Jesus Christ.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 do you realized that Isaiah 64:6 man's righteousness is like filthy rags. Righteousness by works is self righteousness, but when we believe God He gave us righteousness as a gift. Romans 3: 21--24. That is the righteousness that Abraham had.
Rabbi Singer I am in Brasil now , and I am continuing my ministry here via the internet , as im sure you know that im in a real hornets nest Here because Brasil is A Catholic Country . Im learning Portugues so I spread the word in THIER language as best I can . PRAY for me and thank you for your teachings.
Rabbi Singer, as a fellow Jew I would like to wholeheartedly request if it would be possible to set up a debate for the ex-Jewish UA-camr named Brother Nathanael.
"The most important commandment," answered Jesus, "is this: 'Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one. (Gospel of Mark ch12 v29).........Sh'ma Yisrael ADONAI Eloheinu ADONAI E?ad - "Hear, O Israel: the LORD is our God, the LORD is ONE."(deuteronomy 6:4)
@@fidelcatsro6948 really? Go check abraham meeting with God.KJ'1769, King James Version, 1769 Gen 18:2 And he lift up his eyes and looked, and, lo, three men stood by him: and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed himself toward the ground,
@@nehemiasservant9853 Lord could also mean Master, he couldve been talking to an Angel...bowing down could have been a mark of respect to the 3 angel visitors, dont forget Torah didnt exist during time of Prophet Abraham so he could not have been told about bowing prohibitions yet
@@fidelcatsro6948 translation... Man. God does as he wants. Hes not asking for your permission. God as Spirit can eat? Descending to Sodom as a mañ? Washing his feet also? Gen 18:2-22: "And he lift up his eyes and looked, and, lo, three men stood by him: and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed himself toward the ground, And said, My Lord, if now I have found favour in thy sight, pass not away, I pray thee, from thy servant: Let a little water, I pray you, be fetched, and wash your feet, and rest yourselves under the tree: And I will fetch a morsel of bread, and comfort ye your hearts; after that ye shall pass on: for therefore are ye come to your servant. And they said, So do, as thou hast said. And Abraham hastened into the tent unto Sarah, and said, Make ready quickly three measures of fine meal, knead it, and make cakes upon the hearth. And Abraham ran unto the herd, and fetcht a calf tender and good, and gave it unto a young man; and he hasted to dress it. And he took butter, and milk, and the calf which he had dressed, and set it before them; and he stood by them under the tree, and they did eat. And they said unto him, Where is Sarah thy wife? And he said, Behold, in the tent. And he said, I will certainly return unto thee according to the time of life; and, lo, Sarah thy wife shall have a son. And Sarah heard it in the tent door, which was behind him. Now Abraham and Sarah were old and well stricken in age; and it ceased to be with Sarah after the manner of women. Therefore Sarah laughed within herself, saying, After I am waxed old shall I have pleasure, my lord being old also? And the LORD said unto Abraham, Wherefore did Sarah laugh, saying, Shall I of a surety bear a child, which am old? Is any thing too hard for the LORD? At the time appointed I will return unto thee, according to the time of life, and Sarah shall have a son. Then Sarah denied, saying, I laughed not; for she was afraid. And he said, Nay; but thou didst laugh. And the men rose up from thence, and looked toward Sodom: and Abraham went with them to bring them on the way. And the LORD said, Shall I hide from Abraham that thing which I do; Seeing that Abraham shall surely become a great and mighty nation, and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him? For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the LORD, to do justice and judgment; that the LORD may bring upon Abraham that which he hath spoken of him. And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous; I will go down now, and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which is come unto me; and if not, I will know. And the men turned their faces from thence, and went toward Sodom: but Abraham stood yet before the LORD." And now to Sodom the 2 angels without the Lord Gen 19:1-2: "And there came two angels to Sodom at even; and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom: and Lot seeing them rose up to meet them; and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground; And he said, Behold now, my lords, turn in, I pray you, into your servant's house, and tarry all night, and wash your feet, and ye shall rise up early, and go on your ways. And they said, Nay; but we will abide in the street all night."
He speaks volumes of knowledge. I have purchased a Hebrew English Tanakh. I have come to learn a lot of information from Rabbi Singer . I have become awakened to truths of the Christian Bible .
. . .... the sound of coyotes . The truth ..that it is a big fat lie one after the other misquoting changing words left and right. _____ Buyer beware. There are printings of the תנ"ך in Hebrew that are translations from the fake septuagent. That poisonous crap I know was sold in Israel at bookstores selling side by side translations in Hebrew and English. Also every Passover and Rosh Hashonah Jews in Israel are targeted and subjected to repulsive messianic mailings. CUT IT OUT !
We have text fragments from around the Babylonian exile (~540 BC) for the Torah itself and comments from surrounding civilizations of Israel being captured at various times. AFAIK the current consensus is that the Torah was first written down during the exile but we have evidence of at least the dietary restriction on pork being practiced far earlier in Canaan. Maybe the Hittite or Ugarit texts have more information though. There's an Egyptian inscription mentioning events that sound similar to three of the plagues but it could just be hyperbolic language: the river was blood and made people sick to drink it, pestilence among the livestock and sickness among the people.
There are also Muslims and other people who are Monotheistic but follows the false book. Xtians who follow one G-d should become Noahide because it is the same G-d as revealed to Moses at Mt. Sinai.
Salam, rabbi tovia, u know how the Quran says people called Mary the “sister of Aaron", as a Jew, how would u respond to that? people think this is a contradiction.
Her family line goes to Aaron people referred to her when she came with miraculous child.19:28 "O sister of Aaron! Thy father was not a man of evil, nor thy mother a woman unchaste!" It is tradition to refer the nobility of the family. For example for Jesus it same as Son of David Matt 1:1 This is the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah the son of David, the son of Abraham:
Dabat ul Ard , Contradiction must be abolished from the source itself! Watch, how Joel let 2:17 priests weep between the porch and the altar: See 13:16 in Hosea? Also violent men of your people shall exalt Daniel's 11:14 in fulfilment of this BS but they shall fall, Nevertheless Ezekiel will give 16:60 of them to you as sisters or daughters of the NT+ OT- Now 7:4 Micah shall be their perplexity!!! Do you think that David really honors your fathers, because he has sent comforters 2 Samuel's 10:??? Let he who curse his mother and father be put to death!!!
@@dabatulard6045 Mary, the sister of Aaron? Let us look at Noble Verse 19:27-28 "At length she brought The (babe) to her people, carrying him (in her arms). They said: 'O Mary ! Truly an amazing thing Hast thou brought ! O sister of Aaron ! Thy father was not a man of evil, nor thy mother a woman unchaste!'" There are no errors in the above Noble Verses!. Let us look at what Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him said regarding this Noble Verse: Mughira b. Shu'ba reported: "When I came to Najran, they (the Christians of Najran) asked me: You read "O sister of Harun (Aaron)" (i. e. Mary) in the Qur'an, whereas Moses was born much before Jesus. When I came back to Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) I asked him about that, whereupon he said: They (people of the old age) used to give names (to their persons) after the names of Apostles and pious persons who had gone before them. (Translation of Sahih Muslim, The Book on General Behaviour (Kitab Al-Adab), Book 025, Number 5326)" As we clearly see from the Saying (Hadith) of our beloved Prophet, this issue was brought to him before and he clearly responded to it. The false claim made against our Prophet about him meaning that Mary was a biological sister of Aaron is clearly refuted. The People of Isreal used to call people by either their last names, or by adding words such as you "Son of..." or "Brother of...." or "Sister of...." When they called people "O Son of...." they didn't mean for that person to be the actual biological son of the person whom they used his name. The other person could be a simply in the family tree or a last name. When Jesus was called "Jesus the son of David" for instance, the Jews didn't mean to call Jesus the actual biological son of David. Similarily, when they called Mary "O sister of Aaron", they meant to call her sister of Aaron in faith !. Not the actual biological sister of Aaron. The Noble Quran talked about Aaron being Moses's biological brother and messenger to Pharoah in Noble Verses 2:248, 4:163, 6:84, 7:122, 7:142, 7:150-151, 10:75, 10:87, 10:89, 19:28, 19:53, 20:30-35, 20:42, 20:70, 20:92-94, 21:48, 21:23, 21:45, 25:35-36, 26:13, 26:48, 28:34-35, 37:114-122 and many more..... The Noble Quran also talks about Moses being the People of Isreal's first Messenger of GOD in Noble Verses 2:108, 2:248, 4:153, 5:20-26, 6:84, 14:8, 19:51-53, 22:44, 25:35-36, 28:3, 37:114-122, 18:60-82, 20:9-48, 27:7-12, 28:29-35, 79:15-19, 7:109-126, 10:79-82, 20:56-73, 26:38-51, 33:7, 2:53, 2:87, 2:136, 3:84, 6:91, 6:154, 7:144-145, 10:87, 11:110, 14:5, 17:2, 21:48, and may more.... The Noble Quran also talks about Jesus comming to the people of Isreal so many years after Moses and the many other Messengers of GOD that were sent to the People of Isreal in Noble Verses 3:49-51, 5:46, 5:72, 43:59, 61:6, 61:14, 4:171, 5:75, 43:59, 42:13, 4:172, 19:30, 43:64, 43:63, 3:52-54, 5:111-113, 57:27, 61:14, 61:6 and many more..... The Noble Quran also talks about Mary being the biological Mother of Jesus in Noble Verses 3:35-37, 19:22-26, 21:91, 66:12, 5:75, 21:91, 4:156, 4:171, 5:17, 5:116, 21:91, 3:42-51, 19:16-21, and many more... So if the Noble Quran speaks clearly about Aaron being the biological brother of Moses, and speaks clearly about Jesus comming many years after Moses and the many other Messengers of GOD that were sent to the people of Isreal, and speaks clearly about Mary being the Mother of Jesus, then therefore, the Noble Quran (1) Recognizes Mary as a woman who was born long years after Aaron, and (2) When the Jews called Mary 'O sister of Aaron..', then meant it to be Sister of Aaron in faith only and not a biological sister.
That is my favorite musical. I laughed and cried through it many times. Although Anitevka is a fictitious village, in many important ways, I think the show conveys a fanciful yet accurate portrayal of Jewish peasant life in the "shtetle" of Russia and Easter Europe.
To Venus Craigslist nothing you stated is true. when you say comments like that it's clear you know nothing about Judaism or Torah, OR even what God is talking about.
I would like to know, what was Jesus's ( Jes- us ) name before 1638 A.D. being that there was no " J ", in the alphabet until 1638 A.D. that l can find? NO James, Judah, Jerusalem, Josephus, Jews or any other name that start or had a " J " in it before 1638 A.D..
I grew up in a Baptist church, my father was the pastor. I thought they were all nuts. At 18 I went to boot camp and decided I was an atheist. At 46 I had an experience that convinced me that there was a God, so I went to the Christian Bible with a pro Christian bias, but it still made no sense to me. Fortunately I kept going. I got to Genesis where God tells Cain do well, be accepted. Don't, and sin is waiting for you. That makes sense. Then I got to Solomon dedicating the Temple and he prays that foreigners accept God, not that they become Jews. So I wondered, can we do that now? After a few Google searches I discover that you could. I became a Noahide before I knew they existed. I found Rabbi Singer while trying to learn more, and my Christian wife said "he sounds just like you". The problems in the NT aren't hidden. But I needed nearly 30 years to clear my head of the false views they teach so I could worship God in truth. I'm lucky I had the courage to reject the false gods as a teenager. It made it possible for me to accept the one true God later in life. I pray everyday that my family and friends will seek Hashem so they can find him too.
Seeing the investment of about 70 years of devotion unto God which began as a fundamentalist Christian life, I nevertheless don't resent the errors and falsehood as much as I thought I would. Many are still misled, even my closest family. Now detached, I see the acquiescence to Jesus' murder as CONSPIRACY= Temptation: the notion of doing away with Law=EVIL": and creeds of worshipping men are IDOLATRY. T.I.E.=captive to your Christ, instead of being liberated. The Idol, never given a burial, is accursed, an abomination which still tells the world who comprises the house of DEATH and HADES=== the Roman Church !
Yeah, Mark 12:29 quotes the Shema Yisroel...but after that...we still have a Christianity since the late-2nd century trying to divide one by three cleanly (and still getting that recurring .33333333333333 ad infinitum)...prior to that with Theophilus of Antioch talking a Gnostic God/Logos/Sophia triad...and before that, Two Powers in Heaven...so doesn't matter which way you look ag it, the NT wasn't really focused on the Shema. However...that's not to say an early NT canon wasn't based on some VARIATION of Jewish Scripture...be that Samaritan theology or Alexandria's Hellenicised and Platonised interpretation via Philo. Therin lies the problem: It wasn't derived from Torah Judaism, but on syncretism. Howvever, that was the situation in 70 c.e. There ends up being outright forgery at two atages of the 2nd century...first with some over-prolific idiot running around Ephesus to Antioch claiming he was a student of John, while ending up with a heap of aliases...and then there's Irenaeus, paid by the emperor Commodus adding more forgery, swiping an earlier Christianity's material, then declaring the earlier version heretical. It'a bad enough the LATE-1ST version was favoured more by Samaritans, Hellenicised Jews and Greek while being totally against Jerusalem-based Judaism...but the second century version relies too much on dubious and outright forgery as well as by Irenaeus' time outright plagiarism. When practically all we know of disciples like Thomas, Andrew, Peter and John comes through Leucius Charinus (known to Lucian as Peregrinus Proteus) AKA Papias, AKA Ignatius, AKA Polycarp and perhaps even AKA second-century Christian Josephus Hegessipus. Gee, and nobody connects the name Luke to Leucius...might also point out no one before Irenaeus even had mentioned a Gospel of Luke.
The Trinity of God is not something the human mind can conceive. Only the Holy Spirit can reveal it to your Spirit. But you have to be Born Again to receive the Spirit.
@@zarabees2123 The trinity wasn't the first idea...in fact, so much never the first idea...that it's Theophilus of Antioch, just after the mid-2nd century who is noted as developing the FIRST trinity/triad idea. One thing...his formula went God/Logos/SOPHIA. It takes till Tertullian before we hear of the more familiar version. BUT...before Theophilus of Antioch? "Two Powers in Heaven." "Hidden Second God." In fact, if you care to even read Justin Martyr's works, or Polycarp, you'll see they tend to be more...binitarian. So...
Admits I am wrestling with what I believe, Southern Baptist but of Jewish heritage, I love the Lord. Some of my biggest challenges to my Christian faith are the ways that some of what should be the holiest of our holidays (be sure and pick up your Easter ham and dye eggs for outreach) are celebrated and things that the Bible says we should be doing and celebrating(Passover) and observing (Sabbath)we are not, but by all means let have a Halloween party ( I choose not to participate in what I consider the more obviously insulting to our Lord ) I read and study a lot am certain there are people who think I should just take their word for what the Bible does and does not say but that's not good enough for me, I want to know scripture so well that no one can mess with my head on that subject. Rabbi Tovia Singer does a better job of quoting the Christian Bible then most so-called Christians. Will continue to listen to what I consider his very well thought out answers to a wide variety of questions.
Lori Cash I agree with you if you're going to read the Bible's with a Jewish translate from Hebrew to English you can see he's completely two different Bibles that you have the Jewish Bibles denied the New Testament in everything opposite what new Testament teaching you, if u read new testament chapter to chapter disciples to disciples compare the testimonies what you find is completely amazing no foundation for Christianity and yes you right again Christmas is from Pagan faith from the Greek and the Rome gods there was adopted by the Christianity with the trees and the Bells and the 25th of December and Easter copy from the pageant faith studied research and you will find the truth may the Lord God of Israel bless you and open your eyes to the truth
Nisim Falach The same God who sent a final uncorrupted Quran. Worth a read though if you believe God is ONE not three and keep his laws you should be fine. Insha Allah.
Say: He is God, The One, The Absolute, He begets not, nor is He Begotten, and there is none like unto Him. (Qur'an). This is what we Muslims believe. God has responded to the lies against Him and against Jesus. Jesus was a man, and the Messenger of God.
Lori Cash I've learned a lot from the Rabbi about what the xtians did in translating the hebrew books, the corruption of the words, to make their bible. But the Rabbi, as far as i know, has not spoken of the corruption of the Torah or Jewish text. Jeremiah 8 v8 mentions this and so does the Qur'an. Alhamdulillah (All praise is due to God), I'm Muslim. Good luck in your research. Peace
Brother Nathaniel like David duke and Farrakhan should never be given any attention . Dr Brown although wrong is not an evil person and I feel someday will return to Torah. Brother Nathaniel is an insane lunatic and debating evil people like him simply gives them more credibility....and helps his cause. HaShem will deal with him.שלום
Rabbi Tovia Singer Thank you for confirming everything I have been teaching and saying to Thousands of people on the Internet as well as when I had my CONGREGATION . Many people will not believe everything I have told them same as what you are teaching , So I give them your website to learn more of the real truth That there Is still Only ONE GOD , ADONAI ELOHEINU ADONAI ECHAD .
@@maxprescott9371 You are still saying GOD IN THREE PERSONS . You are not listening, you are a hopeless case completely Brainwashed. God is not a Person he is not a man, He is SPIRIT, MAN YOU ARE REALLY IGNORANT OR JUST PLAIN STUPID. I HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO SAY TO YOU .GOODBYE 👋 ENJOY YOUR PHONEY god.
@@maxprescott9371 I dont need your blessing in a dead prophets name ,get it right, in the name of HASHEM OUR ELOHIM. AND BY THE WAY YOU HAVE IGNORED MY QUESTION TO YOU ........ OUR GODS REAL HEBREW HOLY NAME.JUST AS I thought you don't know the name of our God but yet you follow dead and a false prophet . ,
@@maxprescott9371 That is the Problem with the Bible you read ,it is not Translated from a Hebrew Bible. Hashem is the name we use to avoid using Hashems real Hebrew and holy name in n vain. If you are reading from a King James ,that is the worst translated book of all. It was translated from Greek,and the Greeks had a poor translation of Hebrew.King James had it translated from the Greek instead of the Hebrew scripts ,so it really got screwed up Royally. We Jews do not use the word god,we only use it for you that don't understand our language. Love and grace and Fellowship with Hashems Holy spirit all comes from Hashem our Elohim and not from the dead prophet jesus. And which question do you want me to Repeat again?? If you are asking about .... What is the real Hebrew holy name of Hashem in the letters YHVH, THAT HAVE NEVER ANSWERED. YES IM STILL WAITING.IF YOU DONT KNOW IT ,DO YOUR RESEARCH ,BECAUSE OF YOUR STUBBORNESS I REFUSE TO SHARE WITH YOU.
My friend do you realized that the jews were reading the scriptures weekly and still didn't recognised John the baptist or Jesus, Mal 3:1-2, Matt 17: 10- 13. Without the Holy Spirit there would be no new testement. Eg, in Isaiah 7 :14 accordind to rabbi it says" a young woman be with child" , is that really a sign. But Matt 1: 23 say a virgin ..... call him immanuel, that is the Holy Ghost interpretation given to the apostle. Jesús said that the Holy Spirit will teach us all things.
@@orringreene3410 I have no use for the New Testament Orrin. MATTHEW talks about the Genealogy of Jesus and he lied . Jesus is not of the lineage of King David. It is Yosef his stepfather who was of the lineage of King David.The book of Luke contradicts Matthew in the lineage. That in its self will tell you that Jesus was not and is not the Messiah.
Is is possible that early Christians believed in one God because of Mark12:29-30. Also I like to know why early Christians were called catholic. The word kath’-holēs (catholic) is used in Act(9:31). Does the word catholic implies believing in one God because the word holēs(root word for catholic) is used in Mark12:29-30 four times.
The word Catholic does not appear anywhere in Acts 9:31. Instead, the word ekklesía, which means a place of meeting appears in this passage. The first record of any person to have ever used the term Catholic Church is Ignatius of Antioch, an early second century church father.
If you UNDERSTAND THE WAY THAT YAHUWSHUWAH TAUGHT YOU WOULD UNDERSTAND THE FREEDOM OF HIS WAY! UNCOMPLICATED YET PURE, IF RUWAH RESIDES IN YOU AFTER BAPTISM! NOT GRACE TO SIN, BUT FORGIVENESS IF YOU ARE STRIVING AFTER RIGHTEOUSNESS AND THE WAY! THIS MAN IS SO BUSY STRIVING AGAINST THE WAY, HE DOES NOT EVEN REALISE HIS ERROR IN CALLING ALUHIYM BY PAGAN AND BLASPHEMOUS NAMES?
Before the first day, Genesis said G-d already created the heavens, earth and water. Light was created by fiat. They were created with perfect ex nilho. But everything after that has an aspect of imperfect ex nilho- the water was split into the heaven and earth, it gave forth the fish, luminaries were placed in heaven, the earth gave out plants and animals. The ex nilho of everything except the heavens, earth water and light was imperfect- everything else had an aspect of Ex nihilo nihil fit mixed with pure ex nilho- they were created by an ex nilho fiat applied to an already created thing . But man has two aspects- earthly- "man from the ground" and spiritual "and G-d breathed the spirit of life...". The former is that imperfect ex nilho- Ex nihilo nihil fit and ex nilho mixed, ex nilho fiat on an already created thing. But the latter, the soul was as ex nilho as the earth itself. Man is unique in having an aspect of imperfect ex nilho- ex nilho fiat applied to an already created thing WITH a pure ex nilho fiat. Thus, "let us make man" -G-d says: "Let man be created in a plurality of creative methods- my pure ex nilho fiat, and an ex nilho fiat applied to an already created thing.
What I am trying to understand is that rabbinic literature says that the death of the righteous atones for the wicked why would Rabbi Tovia singer not acknowledge his Rabbinic literature and we see in the Old testament that the human sacrifices that were offered up to Idols are an abomination in the sight of Yahweh thats what God considers to be an abomination
"Theologically correct" ? As in the religion doesn't contradict the book it's based on? If human sacrifice is such an abomination then why was Abraham willing to sacrifice his only son Isaac? Peace
1) Abraham and Isaac didn't know it was just a test. If your god is omniscient there'd be no need for such a test, thus sparing father and child the trauma. 2) "Prior to Mosaic law." As in the law written by the guy who allegedly led the Jews out of Egypt just to kill 3000 of them for worshipping a golden calf? Peace
So if your father would put you in a cellar when you where 5 yrs old, for the rest of your life, for not eating your dinner, you'd agree with it? Because the actions of an adult are beyond a childs understanding? Peace
My parents tried to raise me roman-catholic, going to church every sunday and holiday, sunday-school every week, catholic school my entire life. But the more I learned about the religion, the less I believed it. Then I spend some time looking for another religion, read other religious texts. Tried being a Buddhist for a while. But in the end my conclusion was: it's all based on feelings, visions, dreams, revelations, no science, no logic, no evidence. So I've been an Atheist with anti-theist tendencies since I was 20 yrs old. Why? Peace
חזק ואמץ ישר כוח, אני אוהב את הידע שלך, בעיה שנוצרים מאמנים בשקר באמת, ויש מנפולציה נוצרית אמונה עוורת לכל שקרי הנצרות, תמשיך ותמשיך טיפה ועוד טיפה תעשה שבר הסלע , ויאמנו כולם האלוהי ישראל
@@RoseSharon7777 Well the idea is that the Old Testament is similar to the statutes while the Talmud is similar to case law which interprets statutes. So the Old Testament says "do not boil a kid in his mother's milk." But what does that mean. It is the basis of the laws describing what is kosher and what is not. The Talmud then explains all of it in detail.
@@tapasyatyaga4041 Oh I see, kinda like the NT Explains the fulfillment of the old and brings about the Jer. 31 promise? Granted there are corruptions in the NT but I'm sure there are corruptions in the Talmud. Right?
@@RoseSharon7777 The Talmud is seen as the operating manual. The Rabbis believe that the Talmud is the oral law. It was given to Moses orally along with the written law. It is therefore the word of God. However not all Jews believe that. The Karaites [which was maybe 10% - 15% of the Jewish population for several hundred years [maybe 800 AD to 1300 AD] did not believe in the Talmud and saw it as a creation of the Rabbis
Why would a Hebrew speaking writer, in the book of Hebrews, writing to a group of Hebrews, quote from a anything other than a Hebrew language book such as the Septuagint.
Well, as someone who doesn't know what to make of the 3 alternative versions of the afterlife presented in the OT, or the fact that Yewhey is the Phonecian god of iron, and the "People of Israel" refers to the people created/governed by Saturn, or that Elohim refers to the Caananite creator god - implying that the god of the OT embodies the aspects of at least 3 different cosmic deities, the fact that the story of Noah and various books of the OT seem to be cherry picking Zoroastrian mythos, etc. I don't frankly know what to make of the Jews. If you then add on top mystical rabbinical traditions such as Hermeticism and Kabbalah, then I simply don't know what to say about the Jewish tradition apart from noting that it's not the same religion today that it was in 1500 BC.
Couldn't have quoted Septuaginta other than the 5 books of Moses, as the Septuaginta only comprised the 5 books of Moses, as the rabbi states in another video. About the original Septuaginta, which later was lost: as Paul was missioning to Greek speaking heathens, why couldn't he have quoted the orginal Septuaginta? Not quoting Jewish Tanakh, as they did not understand Hebrew? Now I have to look in the Pauline letters which quotes from the Jewish scriptures he made, or which quotes were added by later Christians to his letters. And compare those quotes with the Tanakh.
To Retedzepnem I'll be more than happy to provide proofs ,contradictions, and corruption, but we'll have to do it in another format other than here because other people will start commenting on things they know nothing about. so you can contact me thru UA-cam private message or email.
Few phenomena could ever match what some scholars now see in 20=20 hindsight: that as far as the substantiations made and interpretations made by Christianity, to the present date, probably no greater farce nor fraud has had such success in using half-truths and naive Theology to lead people into Error, Ignorance, and Sin. It has taken 50 years to unlearn the filth therein. I hope to now be Worthy to ESCAPE those errors, according to Scripture.
I just noticed something. In the New Testament, the prophecy of the Anti-Christ sounds eerily similar to the story of Jesus. Here's a quote from a Catholic bishop that sums up the prophecy: "The Antichrist will not be so called; otherwise he would have no followers... he will come disguised as the Great Humanitarian; he will talk peace, prosperity and plenty not as means to lead us to God, but as ends in themselves... He will tempt Christians with the same three temptations with which he tempted Christ... He will have one great secret which he will tell to no one: he will not believe in God. Because his religion will be brotherhood without the fatherhood of God, he will deceive even the elect. He will set up a counterchurch... It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content. It will be a mystical body of the Antichrist that will in all externals resemble the mystical body of Christ." Lets dissect it. 1) "The AntiChrist will not be so called; otherwise he would have no followers... he will come disguised as the Great Humanitarian; he will talk peace, prosperity and plenty not as a means to lead us to God but as ends in themselves" Isn't that exactly what Jesus did? He distinguished himself from the rest of the Jewish rabbis of that period by being... a great humanitarian. He talked peace, prosperity and plenty as a means to lead people not to Judaism or even the God of the Torah but to worship himself as God in order to avoid hell. Jesus makes himself The Gatekeeper to God, and you can't find God without first accepting Jesus. That is blasphemy. 2) "He will tempt Christians with the same three temptations with which he tempted Christ." Temptation #1: the physical temptation. The devil tells Jesus to prove himself the Son of God by turning stones into loaves of bread. Surely the Son of God, and therefor God Himself, could easily do this to prove he is not a false prophet. Jesus gives a cop out of an answer instead, and avoids having to prove himself. Christians believe they can be "saved" even after a lifetime of sin, of doing whatever the hell they want. As long as you sell your soul to Jesus a second before you die you're golden. Temptation #2: the emotional/spiritual temptation. Aka, questioning God's love. The devil tells Jesus to jump off the roof of a temple, saying that God will protect his fall. Jesus responds, again, with a cop out and says "you must not test the Lord your God". Isn't that EXACTLY what you're doing, Jesus? Testing the Lord YOUR GOD? Teaching your disciples to question their Jewish faith by misleading them to believe that YOU are God? Temptation #3: the temptation of power. The devil offers Jesus all of the kingdoms of the world and their glory, Jesus refuses, claiming 'you must worship the Lord your God, and serve ONLY HIM". That's not what you did, Jesus. You made yourself out to be God and spiritually blackmailed Jews to believe YOU are God, and your legacy is that almost all of the kingdoms of the world now worship you as God instead of worshiping THE REAL GOD. 3) "He will have one great secret which he will tell to no one: he will not believe in God." Only a man who doesn't believe in the God of the Hebrew bible would have the audacity to call himself God and break the first commandment, and have his disciples tell their adherents to not follow God's law given to Moses on Mt. Sinai. Also, unlike David who cried out "why have you forsaken me?", Jesus crying out the same sentence on the cross makes absolutely no sense if Jesus knew the prophecy all along. Surely this moment, of all moments, would be the moment where he DOESN'T question God's love (see also point #2 again). 4) "Because his religion will be brotherhood without the fatherhood of God, he will deceive even the elect. He will set up a counterchurch... It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content. It will be a mystical body of the Antichrist that will in all externals resemble the mystical body of Christ." Considering the fact that Jesus and his disciples were Jews, you can replace the word "Church" with "synagogue", as they essentially have the exact same meaning, both literally and figuratively. What Jesus and his disciples created was a Godless form of Judaism, where God was replaced by Jesus, who was the human placeholder for God in his mind, and emptied this form of Judaism from its divine content by repurposing and repackaging bits and pieces of Judaism WITHOUT THE MAIN CHARACTER - HASHEM. All of the mental gymanstics in the world cannot excuse the simple fact that in Christianity it is not יה-ה who is the centerpiece but Jesus of Nazareth, a man claiming to be God. This "church" his disciples created, which we still see today, has all the bells and whistles of a Jewish synagogue but it's missing GOD, God's laws, etc. And finally, when you look at the legacy of Jesus, what is that legacy? Like what's the REAL legacy? Is it world peace? Does this world look like a post-Messianic world? Or maybe, just maybe, was his legacy THOUSANDS of years of persecution of God's people, the demonization of Judaism, of Jewish people, and he managed to turn billions of people AWAY from Hashem. He didn't bring Christians to Hashem, he brought them to Christ. If Jesus isn't the Messiah, and there's zero evidence that he was, and there is evidence that he WASN'T, then that makes Jesus of Nazareth, at best, a false prophet. And at worst, THE false prophet. The Great Deceiver himself.
I think the same can be said about Christianity as well. Certainly anyone examining Christianity from a historical perspective would be inclined to come to the conclusion that Catholicism and Protestantism are built on a pyramid of falsehood and half truths. The issue really becomes, is the Orthodox/Coptic faith an acceptable tradition or did Christianity itself go off the rails in the 1st and 2nd century? Mind you, the Manichaens and the Mandeans both worshipped Jesus but did not claim he was "god". I think the deification of Jesus is what a lot of people have trouble with.
Just one question. This god you speak of, has the power to make life, the universe, omnipotent ect, Don't you find it odd, he can't make a book of his instructions for us, written so clearly that no one misinterprets them? Is he really that inept at communication?
ok the Torah is not a book of history or fairy tale is a spirtual book Hashem wrote the Torah in this way because from holy sage of israel Hashem had tell to moses teach them exode 24.12 is mean th oral Torah the Mishna give to moshe to teach oraly the difficuk verses of the Torah and secondly Hashem forseing that the nation will attack Israel to take the Torah make they own and say this our book we are the true chosen people but couldn understand the Torah without the teaching of Moses oraly no one can understand the Torah exept the jews there are a lot of verses in the torah that without a orale teaching u will ever figured out i will send u some next time
*K. Day:* If you read that passage VERY carefully, you will discover that the "new covenant" is a miracle that God will perform for the Jewish people _in Messianic times_ (hasn't happened yet!) where He will place His Torah DIRECTLY into the hearts and minds of the Jewish people, so that they will no longer need to study and teach Torah, because they will already KNOW it by heart, due to the miracle! It says it very clearly right there in the text, but Christianity chooses to bastardize what the text actually says, to 'Christianize' God's original message - this is blasphemous and arrogant! FYI, "new covenant" does not in any way equate to "New Testament" - not even close! Please do some research on your religion for YOURSELF and you WILL discover that it did NOT come from God, Creator of the universe.
The angel Gabriel foretold that the second temple was to stand for less than 500 years. There was no prophecy that it would stand forever. The temple that will stand forever is the messianic temple.
Thanks for clarifying. Want to know the truth, of course. Have read the chapters where Hezhekiel is sent to measure the temple in a vision. There is a parallell to the story in Torah / Joshua where the land of Kanaan is shared among the tribes. The land is going to be shared among the tribes returning from Babylon and all other sites to where they have been dispersed. And there are measurements how large the temple area will be, enormous areas, as far as I understand. Is this about the second temple, or is it the messianic temple?
Hi Rabbi. I had a question. 1) What are the loopholes in the Jewish Bible which gave way for Christianity? 2) Why the Jewish Bible does not describe God as described in the Quran that He do not begets and not begotten?
2) Why the Jewish Bible does not describe God as described in the Quran that He do not begets and not begotten? This is Quran refuting Christian trinity, has nothing to do with Torah.
Peace, The language is sent in the Prophets and messengers pbut language. If there were a prophet that spoke English he would have gotten the message in English.
Only God will reveal the truth in the end Gods word endures the bible itself revealed that the Christian bible will be discredited by some Jesus Christ died for our sins and Only through Jesus Christ we will receive Gods salvation God bless
When an OT scripture is quoted in the NT a little differently, it is due to progressive revelation, not to the unimportance of words or the lack of preservation. Example: Hebrews 10:5-9 quotes Psalm 40:6-8 twice. First quote refers to the Messiah. Second quote refers to saved Israel.
If the two nations(southern and northern(1st born and 2nd born) started out in union and divided would it not make sense the two representatives mbd and mbj would also start out in union and divide...but where are they unified? We know Messiah ben Joseph comes from the 2nd born birthright line of Joseph(hence the name) and Messiah ben David comes from the sceptre line of Judah...so we see a Judah and Joseph and we know those two did not always get along so well. Joseph will use the birthright in order to offer the sacrifice(high priest) in the millennium as that is a birthright holders position...Mbd will use the sceptre position to rule the nations as king david. The two become divided over the birthright we see in the throne room Joshua the high priest has an adversary...if you guessed it is the firstborn you would be correct...where do we see mbd the sceptre holder in the throne room Rev 12 the man-child who will rule the nations...God unifies them and they are sent to earth to unify the firstborn and 2nd born nation that all of Israel will be one house once again. In the torah we see example after example of how the firstborn and 2nd born do not get along....but after the throne room visit they will
About Christian teachings not in the Thorah. God let his prophets know new things all the time. In Thorah there are rules for animal sacrificing, which is commanded. But later prophets relates God denying this. Why do you think I need any of your sacrifices!! My will is you act righteously toward each other. So if God chances his mind in the Tanakh, why couldn't he have told new things to the apostles?
No G-d was saying sacrifices without repentance is meaningless. In Deuteronomy it says repeatedly that the Torah will never be changed . Circumstances change, laws don't.
Rabbi You believe One is to come from the house of you no , would he be deity or become deity. How well he come into the world is he with God waiting for he time. Is the resisting one wih God our is under are feet ???????????????
Well explained. Now if Christians accept that Jesus is not God nor the son of God and they accept that God our Creator is One, what would they then be if their ancestory is not Jewish? If Jesus said he did not come to change the Laws of God and Prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon both prophets) said that he did not come to change the Laws of God, I would suggest they are then Muslim?
Tovia, Would the Martian know what the names of the sons of God names were when listed in Genesis? Adam through Noah in order? What do their names mean in order?
*Edward Kochanowski:* What exactly are you quoting from?! "Servant" in the Hebrew scriptures, always refers to ISRAEL (i.e. Isa. 53 - please read Is. 52 AND Isa. 54 - not JUST Isa. 53!)! God ABHORS human sacrifice, which is a totally PAGAN practice, and "sacrifices", by definition, STAY DEAD! They DON'T 'rise again' a few days later! At no time did God ever tell us that HUMAN sacrifice atones for our sins! PLEASE do some honest research on your false, pagan religion, and you WILL discover that it absolutely DID NOT come from God, Creator of the universe - it just did NOT! Nowhere in the Hebrew scriptures did God tell us to expect a SECOND SET of scriptures (i.e. false, pagan "New Testament") after He already told us that the Torah He gave to Moses on Mt. Sinai, is ETERNAL (i.e. STILL in effect and binding today!) and that we are NOT to follow ANY other teaching that what is in the ETERNAL Torah. Christianity IS another teaching that God NEVER gave to us, therefore, we are NOT to follow its false, pagan teachings. PLEASE do the research!
@@janishart5128 God told Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaak, and Abraham would have obeyed but GOD at the very last moment stayed Abraham's hand for God saw that Abraham who loved Isaak very much, chose to obey GOD. In this act of obedience GOD found Abraham and his descendant's worthy of GOD one-day sending GOD'S SON, the perfect LAMB, genetically pure of sin, no fallen ancestry for Jeshua came from above to save mankind, worthy of GOD'S plan of salvation. All animal sacrifice before Jeshua was a stop gap measure until Jeshua's perfect and pure sacrifice. The passage does not refer to Israel as a nation, Isaiah 53 speaks of GOD'S Arm coming to assist GOD, coming from eternity, it is very clear as to how the ONE suffers and dies, and rises from the dead, for HIS HEROIC sacrifice ever pleasing to GOD. Moses said, " a prophet like him was sure to come, Moses was rejected by Israel, and died to the life Moses knew in Egypt, but was found worthy to REEDEM Israel from slavery in Egypt forever . History repeats itself, only this time, the ONE greater than Moses, WHO like Moses is rejected and murdered by HIS own, literally dies, a perfect sacrifice, and rises from the dead and found worthy to return to Jerusalem to REDEEM Israel and the world from slavery to death and sin, FOREVER ! Moses was to be as GOD, Jeshua is GOD, ONE with HaShem " you are my SON, before the Daystar I have begotten you ", before all Creation, for Jeshua is, " GOD Hero, Father Forever, Wonder Counselor, Prince of Peace upon whose Shoulder Dominion rests " FOREVER. Jeshua is the beginning of the NEW and EVERLASTING COVENANT, " circumcised into our hearts, no longer in our flesh. How long has the Temple been gone along with the animal sacrifice commanded in the COVENANT of Sinai, Jeshua's sacrifice saves the world and is the final sacrifice for this sacrifice restores Paradise on Earth upon Jeshua's RETURN, so pleasing was this HEROIC act of Jeshua to GOD. " My House shall be a House of Prayer " not sacrifice, in the time to come, " O death where is thy power where is thy sting " defeated by the GUILTLESS SERVANT of GOD who Rose from the dead, and all those who believe in HIM, BORN from ABOVE in the REBIRTH. Shalom
@@tnrtnr7706 Ezekiel is actually referring to the sacrifice of the carnal addictions of our hearts, if you know the Prophets they also speak of Ha Shem having enough of animal sacrifice, which failed to end carnal desire in Israel, Our GOD DESIRES THE SACRIFICE OF OUR HEARTS, IN THE NEW AND EVERLASTING COVENANT, THE LAW WRITTEN IN OUR HEARTS, NO LONGER THE FLESH. Since Mashiach JESHUA we are in the NEW AND EVERLASTING COVENANT.
when mbd and mbj come they don't come to redeem...their purpose is to unite the northern kingdom and southern kingdom...notice David is from firstborn line Judah and messiah ben Joseph is from the birthright line 1 chronicles 5:2. when searching the scriptures look for the first born and 2nd born and you will find mbd and mbj..example Isaiah 40s mention Jacob and israel..Jacob was a 2nd born birthright holder and Judah/Israel is the firstborn...showing mbj and mbd..their position are mbd/king and mbj/birthright holder/high priest and they come to unite the two kingdoms Ezekiel 37
The extant manuscripts of the writings of the first-century Romano-Jewish historian Flavius Josephus include references to Jesus and the origins of Christianity. Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews, written around 93-94 AD, includes two references to the biblical Jesus Christ in Books 18 and 20 and a reference to John the Baptist in Book 18. Scholarly opinion varies on the total or partial authenticity of the reference in Book 18, Chapter 3, 3 of the Antiquities, a passage that states that Jesus the Messiah was a wise teacher who was crucified by Pilate, usually called the Testimonium Flavianum. The general scholarly view is that while the Testimonium Flavianum is most likely not authentic in its entirety, it is broadly agreed upon that it originally consisted of an authentic nucleus, which was then subject to Christian interpolation and/or alteration. Although the exact nature and extent of the Christian redaction remains unclear, broad consensus exists as to what the original text of the Testimonium by Josephus would have looked like. Modern scholarship has largely acknowledged the authenticity of the reference in Book 20, Chapter 9, 1 of the Antiquities to "the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James" and considers it as having the highest level of authenticity among the references of Josephus to Christianity. Almost all modern scholars consider the reference in Book 18, Chapter 5, 2 of the Antiquities to the imprisonment and death of John the Baptist also to be authentic and not a Christian interpolation. The references found in Antiquities have no parallel texts in the other work by Josephus such as The Jewish War, written 20 years earlier, but some scholars have provided explanations for their absence. A number of variations exist between the statements by Josephus regarding the deaths of James and John the Baptist and the New Testament accounts. Scholars generally view these variations as indications that the Josephus passages are not interpolations, for a Christian interpolator would have made them correspond to the New Testament accounts, not differ from them.
@Yerachmiel HaLevi Yerachmiel, we who are TRULY BORN AGAIN, baptized in the Mikvah of the HOLY SPIRIT worship the ONE TRUE GOD of ISRAEL, OUR FATHER in SPIRIT and TRUTH, who dwells in Jeshua in ONENESS. Moses was to be as GOD and Prophesied that ONE greater than him was to come, who is GOD ONE with the FATHER. The GOD of LIGHTS, the GOD of SPIRTS dwelling FOREVER in the LIGHT of the WORLD. Immanuel, GOD with US. Shalom
@Yerachmiel HaLevi I once felt similar to you, and today's Christianity is full of wolves in sheep's clothing, but that is not new that is exactly what infiltrated Judaism, culminating in the destruction of the most sacred and beautiful Temple of our God, and the two thousand year Diaspora of misery and death, for history repeats itself. Moses was rejected by Israel, and suffered a death to the life Moses knew in Egypt, only to be sent back by HaShem to REDEEM Israel from slavery in Egypt, forever. Jeshua was rejected by Israel also, and died a miserable death to the life Jeshua knew, only to be sent back by HaShem to REDEEM Israel and the world from, SLAVERY to sin and death, FOREVER ! Yerachmiel, HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF, I pray that " MAY GOD HAVE MERCY " upon you Yerachmiel, and reveal to you, what was revealed to me. Shalom
@@Mshussain525 Isaiah the Prophet, prophesied " If my SERVANT gives HIS life as an offering for sin HE shall see HIS descendants in a long life " obviously rising from the dead to live FOREVER with HIS descendants. Moses was rejected by the Israelite's and died to the life Moses knew in Egypt, only to be sent back by GOD forty years later to redeem Israel from slavery to the Egyptians, forever. Moses prophesied that a Redeemer/Mashiach like him was sure to come, even greater than Moses. Jeshua also was rejected by Israel, though not all Israelite's rejected Jeshua, and literally murdered by HIS own people, after performing many wonderful signs among them. Like Moses who was told by GOD, that Moses would be as GOD before Pharaoh, not GOD mind you but as GOD. Jeshua is GOD, ONE with the CREATOR who is greater than all, Jeshua is ONE with the FATHER our CREATOR always pleasing GOD, never ever sinning rising from the dead on the third day by the authority of GOD conquering Iblis/ ha satan who brought death into the world in rebellion to GOD, Jeshua ascending back to GOD the FATHER of creation. Like Moses, Jeshua who is as the prophets of Israel prophesy, " GOD HERO, FATHER FOREVER, WONDER COUNSELOR, PRINCE OF PEACE, upon whose SHOULDER DOMINION RESTS " is to return to Israel to REDEEM Israel and the whole earth from slavery to death, FOREVER ! Restoring paradise earth, world peace, crushing deaths power and sting, and restoring ETERNAL LIFE as it was in the BEGINNING. Restoring UNIVERSAL PEACE, and ending war on earth forever. Yes Arab and Israelite's will live as brothers in love and peace in Mashiach Jeshua's day as the prophets of Israel prophesied along with all the nations of earth, so great was Jeshua's sacrifice in the EYES of GOD, Jeshua the RIGHT HAND of GOD ! Shalom/Salaam
Actually it did. Proven in hieroglyphics the names of a certain pharaoh. One of those names found was Haman who was the Pharaohs chief Architect. Absolute amazing. Just spot on with the Quranic description.
As if much of the Tanakh was not written well after the events described, includes myths and legends, has two contradictory versions of the Creation, etc. There is a terrific story about two Rabbis vigorously arguing back-and-forth over the meaning of a single sentence in the Torah. Eventually, growing impatient at their ignorance, the voice of YHWH calls down, "You're both right." A little more humility in proclamations about one's understanding of the incomprehensible and an acceptance that many religious writings, including the Gospels, the Epistles, and Revelation might be divinely inspired, and "truth" is found in their interstices, would go a long way to making our world a better, more loving, and more tolerant place.
With all due respect. To say that "God is one" is a strange thing to say. The only reason you would say something like that is so that people could understand that there are individual aspects of a specific entity or thing that can be differentiated between each other. "we are one" hits differently than "I am one." the former seems more reasonable to take at face value. While the latter seems to be euphemistically speaking. In either case it seems to imply that people should understand that the "entity" is made up of individuals. If you say "America is 1", it means that the Americans (Just work with me on this) are united by a specific ideology. However we know that America is made up of many individuals. However if u SAY that "Jon Dough" is one.....it is almost nonsensical. Outside of thinking that John Dough is some sort of organization. In what other context would anyone specifically say something like that? I am is just understood to mean an individual...unless you need to clarify something that it's not what you assume. There is No point in saying I am one. "Rabbi Tovia's" .....is...." There is NO point in saying "one" as the "one" part in this example is understood. Im not a Hebrew scholar nor historian nor linguistic expert....so perhaps Just food for thought. But based on the way that we use modern language (in English anyway) It almost seems as if the understanding is that there are several entities/individuals are united under some sort of agreement are at play here.
Some of the Dead Sea Scrolls actually have more in common with the Greek Septuagint than the traditional Hebrew Masoretic Text, showing that the Greek translators must have been translating from Hebrew texts that resembled the Dead Sea Scrolls.
That is just incorrect. The Dead Sea Scrolls are almost identical to the Masoretic text except it has some extra letters that barely change pronunciation and extra letters to mark vowels. This was most likely done by the authors of the DSS to make it easier to read before they had vowels.
@@innominatusambrosius7103 I actually can. I have read parts of the dead sea scrolls, have you read any? The furthest difference I noticed was קנהו in Isaiah 1:3 was written as קונאו. The difference being a reduction of ה to א. It just demonstrates a pronunciation difference, no difference in meaning. Another difference is that כי was spelled as כיא which does not change meaning or pronunciation. It just has some variable spelling, most likely done to help readers of the time without vowels. There are all sorts of these small variant spellings, but none change the meaning or even the pronunciation for the most part. Every time the vowel o or u is used in the Masoretic text, it is replaced by a ו in the DSS. Every time the vowel i is used Masoretic text it is replaced by a י in the DSS. These letters can make the vowel sounds respectively. It basically confirms that the Masorites were careful to preserve the text.
Jesus = a Jew His Apostles = Jews Paul of Tarsus = another Jew James (Jesus brother's) = a Jew why is the New Testament originally written in Greek if all of them were Aramaic / Hebrew speaking Jews! P L A G A R I S M.
Islam is derived from Judaism and Christianity. And although we may share some common characteristics, God revealed himself through Gabriel as "Allah" to Muhammad. By contrast, G-d revealed himself directly to the Jews by name. Explain that.
Master Gichin Funakoshi prophet Muhammad ( peace be upon him) was illiterate , he could not read or write moreover the bible in his time was written in Hebrew and Greek so there is no chance that he copied the bible, could you explain to me why would a jewish Rabbi of Medina Abdullah ben Sallam accepted Muhammad peace be upon him as a true prophet of Almighty GOD
jewish encyclopedia, 1925; volume 5 page 41 'quote: Esau / Edom is in modern jewry' www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/5434-edox-idumea now you know, why the israeli court is full of satanic freemason symbols. It is the old fight esau vs jacob. source know your enemy by thefuelproject. they expose themselve like the ouran does in surah 3.54 and 8.30.
THIS IS THE TRUE GOSPEL!! OBEY Christ and His commands they are not taught in traditional churches nowadays. First, The Laws Christ commanded are the perfect Law of Love. They are these 3 that fulfill all the law. 1: Love the One True Eternal One with all your strength, all your heart , and all you have. 2: Do Not do unto others/creatures as you would not want them to do unto you. 3: Do unto others/creatures as you would have them do unto you. The teachings of Christ in Lections XLVI verse 12 We are taught that if a person desires to be a disciple of Christ we must Not eat any flesh from any animal or bird. In the beginning in Genesis 1:29-30 YAHUAH stated very clearly that He gave the herbs, fruits, and seeds for meat to sustain mankind and to sustain the animals. We were never ordained to eat any type of flesh meat that had blood in it. This may be a hard saying but we dine with demons that have influenced men to slaughter innocent animals and birds for our pleasure. This is a great sin and if you are a true follower of Christ we must obey it! The command "Thou shalt not kill" meant not to kill anything, for pleasure in food, or for profit, nor torment any living creature which has the breath of life in it given by YAHUAH. This is in Lections XLVI and Exodus 20:13. I am open to spend more time teaching on these subjects and laws given through Christ but one must have an open heart and an ear to hear. Moses gave laws on certain animals to eat out of the hardness of their hearts in the wilderness even though Yah commanded them not to and they ate and fell by the thousands from the plagues that consumed them from eating flesh meat. Roman Emperor Constantine in the 4th century changed the food laws in scripture that it was ok to eat meat. It was never ok. ANYONE THAT FOLLOWS THESE TEACHINGS WILL BECOME THE ISRAEL OF GOD THE ETERNAL LIVING ONE! Praise the Father YAHUAH
I hope and pray that everyone that listens to this man... reads the whole chapter that he refers to with his picking and choosing verse. When I was a child there used to be a man called Paul Harvey on the radio. He used to tell what's called the rest of the story. Please get the full story from the Bible and not part of it from this rabbi.
One of the Books Revelation this one make me thing. With Ezekiel, Isaiah ,Daniel. Daniel 9:26 Jeremiah 25:11-12 .Rev 18:21 Do you thing Paul who seem to have more writing have more wrog
The reason Jews don't accept Jesus is Jesus gave the 2nd born northern kingdom the firstborn birthright. The northern kingdom is jacob/Israel/feminine(2nd born birthright holder)...the southern kingdom is Judah/Israel/masculine(firstborn sceptre holder) When messiah ben David and messiah ben joseph arrive they will unite the firstborn Judah/Israel and 2nd born Jacob/Israel and all of Israel will be one house again The torah is divided between 1st born and 2nd born.. sceptre and birthright..masculine and feminine..kingship and priesthood and this will be the difference between mbd and mbj as we see david comes from the firstborn line of judah and joseph comes from the 2nd born birthright line of Joseph. Throughout the torah we see the adversary of the 2nd born birthright holder is the firstborn..example Judah and Joseph but in the end they unite and this is what mbd and mbj will do they will unite the firstborn and 2nd born.
+RichardGMoss the scrptures...if you have something to add then add it ...I am waiting your reply...it is easy to condemn others without giving your own opinion
+RichardGMoss you don't have the understanding of the unification of the firstborn and 2nd born birthright holder...I take it you think you are a firstborn judah....lol
![The 6 Life-Changing Stages Of Spiritual Awakening [Which One ARE YOU In?]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZAlrKsMf9C4/mqdefault.jpg)
To me if someone died for my sins then what ever I do there is no accountability at all for what we do wrong. That means we can do whatever we want! It is a very dangerous statement.
dangerous statement for idiots/simpletons perhaps... a believer is one who has adheres by his righteous acts, and is atoned when consciousness of the reprimanded act has been taken into accounts.. therefore upon a believers death he is guaranteed the resurrection by Jesus s purchase of their souls...that is all atonement of sin means and this rooted in Judaism.
Thats not how it works, if you continue to sin willfully it makes Christs blood as mud in your life because youre willfully diaobeying Gods commands. Jesus said those that love Him are those that do his Father's will. Quite different from just being able to do whatever you want and this is addressed.
@Rick Nash Why then was animal sacrifice necessary for the temporal covering of sins?
@Martin Solomon To me, it is clear if you do not honor the Son you do not honor the Father, for the Son is sent of the Father. I can get more into this when I'm off work in a few hours and try to address each of your points, because they deserve to be addressed. I love you too, thanks.
@Martin Solomon I hope you actually read all of this lol!
So clearly Isaiah 43:10-11 is the Lord declaring Himself the savior of Israel and affirming that He is the only God and that He is eternal. If we read on we see that Babylon is to be destroyed and after that the Lord pronounces Israel's shortcomings. I wish you would have brought up Isaiah 42 instead...
"Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles." Then if we go to Mathew 12:15-21 we find this...
"But when Jesus knew it, he withdrew himself from thence: and great multitudes followed him, and he healed them all; And charged them that they should not make him known: That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias the prophet, saying, Behold my servant, whom I have chosen; my beloved, in whom my soul is well pleased: I will put my spirit upon him, and he shall shew judgment to the Gentiles."
Now on to your point about the Lord's prayer. The Lord's prayer was intended as a template to guide believers in prayer, not something to repeat like a robot. You say Jesus does not mention praying to the Son in the Lord's prayer. I agree, and keep in mind that at the time when Jesus was saying these things he had not yet been glorified; in the sense that the disciples were still expecting messiah to establish an earthly kingdom and free them from Roman rule, not be crucified and resurrected and ascend to heaven.
Now, after Jesus' death and resurrection he appears to the disciples in Mathew 28 beginning at verse 16.
Then the eleven disciples went away into Galilee, to the mountain which Jesus had appointed for them. When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some doubted. And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age."
So there you have it...But even if Jesus hadn't personally said to pray in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (which I've demonstrated that he did,) you still have all of these statements I've listed below being made by either Jesus, his disciples, or prophets.
John 10:30 "I and my Father are one."
Corinthians 8:6 "yet for us there is one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we for Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and through whom we live."
2 Corinthians 3:17 "Now the Lord is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty."
Isaiah 9 beginning in verse 6
"For unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given; and the government will be upon His shoulder.
And His name will be called
Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God,
Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.
Of the increase of His government and peace there will be no end,
Upon the throne of David and over His kingdom,
To order it and establish it with judgment and justice
From that time forward, even forever.
The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this."
In Revelation 22:13, probably one of the most important verses, Jesus says "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last," corresponding to the Lords declaration of externality in Isaiah 43 10:11
Now as for the eucharist, I'm just assuming you're calling it into question. Well, what's Jesus have to say about it?
Luke 22:19 20 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and broke it, and gave unto them, saying, "This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me."
Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is shed for you."
It's purely symbolic of his death and was meant to be observed solemnly, not some bizarre cannibal ritual like some insuiate. And as far as how the 33,000 different Christian denominations practice that? I don't know. Not my concern, just what the text says.
When it comes to it comes to iconography of Miriam I would tell you to talk to a Catholic about it. I know that iconography serves several purposes according to the Orthodox and Catholic churches but I'm not apart of either, or any church for that matter.
I agree with you that the sabbath is on Saturday and never changed. I don't even really want to get into that because I don't observe it.
Faith and grace alone is crap. You referred to James and in James 2:15-17 he says "Suppose a brother or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to them, 'Go in peace; keep warm and well fed,' but does nothing about their physical needs, what good is it? So also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead."
The replacement of the temples you mentioned didn't come until much later out of necessity. There was actually massive construction of new churches and cathedrals. At first the pagan temples were preserved. Until around the 6th or 7th centuries I think because of barbarian invansions, they needed the materials, and then in the 10th century building on ruins.
Here's a description of the attitude towards pagan temples in the 4th century
“That Christian emperors continued to protect the temple buildings of Rome is evident from their legislation. A law by Constantius and Constans, issued to the urban prefect of Rome, already prescribed that ‘although all superstitions must be completely eradicated, nevertheless, it is Our will that the buildings of the temples situated outside the walls shall remain untouched and uninjured’” (Theodosian Code, 16.10.3)
I was raised in Christianity family.but I am doing my own learning on the Bible for the past year I learned that I was tought so many lies growing up about the Bible I have been studying different beliefs to find the truth .
@@ProgressiveTeen: The "quran" is NOT scripture that was given to man by God, and it blasphemously, arrogantly and self-righteously DENIES the ETERNAL (i.e. STILL in effect and binding today!) Torah that God gave to Moses on Mt. Sinai, by saying that it is "corrupted"! God told us that the Torah, that He gave to Moses on Mt. Sinai, is ETERNAL, therefore He DID NOT ALLOW IT to become "corrupted"!! Do some actually research and learn from the rabbis, who have been studying the original Hebrew all the way back to Mt. Sinai!
There no no real truths found within any religious texts, they all lean heavily on blind faith rather than empirical evidence.
@Mansoor Ahmad Wow, you are simply ASSUMING that an opponent hasn't read the Qur'an. I personally have read the Qur'an (front to back) some three times where I took numerous notes. The issue I have with your comment is that you said that if you don't understand a particular Sura, you should seek out an Islamic scholar. What you are really saying is that you should ask a scholar who has a heavy bias towards Islam and will ensure the interpretation is nice and comfy for you. And what type of scholar should you as ask? A moderate Sunni? What about hardliner Sunni? Or maybe you should ask the nice Sufi Imam about a particular passage? Or maybe not, maybe you should ask a Sufi hardliner! Wait a minute!!! maybe Sunnis and Sufis have constantly, and deliberately misinterpreted the Qur'an all over the place simply to prop up their particular flavour of Islam, so why not ask a moderate Shi'ite Scholar, or maybe a hardliner one instead! Point is that you will not get a proper answer from anyone of them. Another point is if the Qur'an came from God Himself (via an angel) then surely there shouldn't be any difficulty in understanding God's words, no matter how hard you want it to say something else, after all, isn't Allah all-knowing? Couldn't he write a book that isn't open to interpretation or confusion,?
Another issue: You only mentioned the Qur'an, but what I've learnt is that to understand Islam, you have to read what all the Hadiths have to say, and on top of this, it helps if you study the history of Muhammad and how Islam spread. Do all these things and one cannot deny that Islam is inherently a violent religion and very autocratic one at that. It was spread by lies and by swords, and millions of people throughout the world have either been traumatized or killed by that religion. The world would be a better place if Muhammad have never been born. Muhammad was a curse on humanity, and that curse is still spreading like a disease.
Gentiles are obligated to keep the 7 Noahide commandments. Good luck.
@@mephistophelean you realize Torah was g-d speaking and Moses writing. I’d say that is truth enough. A whole nation witnessed and heard g-d at Sinai and their descendants live today. Just saying.
Rabbi you're changing my life and help opening my heart too.
@Mansoor Ahmad what islam? Because today's islam isn't in the quran.
This is one of my new FAVOURITE videos by Rabbi Tovia Singer. B"H R. Tovia for your honesty, compassion and willingness to spend time answering these questions!
I got out my paper Bible and verified it for myself. What Hebrews 10:5 quotes as Psalm 40:6 actually does say something different than what it says in Psalms 40:6. Unbelievable!
The writer of Hebrews was quoting from the Septuagint (the Old Testament in Greek). That's what the vast majority of Jews in the 1st century were familiar with. Where as your modern English Bible is translated from Hebrew sources.
ThyWordIsTruth where is your source for there being a complete Septuagint by the first century?
@@maxprescott9371 I believe that you have greatly misunderstood me!
@@maxprescott9371 he just kind of took a shot in the dark about my question. From what I know there wasn’t a complete Grecian translation until much later. But with close examination of the book of Hebrews... leaves clues to it being originally written in Hebrew, clearing up any discrepancies between the New and Old Testament.
@@maxprescott9371 I’m glad it helped. There are definitely a lot of Pharisees in the world. But we live because He lives! Bless you my brother in Christ!
Baruk Hashem. This is very clear and concise answer. Toda rabba.
The point about translation at 30:30 is impossible to answer without strange apologetics. You make a good point, Rabbi.
"All stories are true and some of them actually happened."-Mark Twain
Love that Sam Clemens, Dr. R - I also love R.Tovia, & I also love Chiropractic medicine! (Elizabeth Martin, D.C.)cheers
There's Only ONE GOD.
God of Adam
God of Moses
God of Muhammad
@Iyas kelu If the Messiah by definition, is supposed to bring world peace, fight off the Romans and unite the Jews and the dark ages came after Jesus died, I'm curious what evidence you have to make you believe that he was the Messiah?
@Iyas kelu It's obvious you haven't read "The Real Messiah" by Aryeh Kaplan or you wouldn't ask such foolish questions. If you're going to make an argument, please go to source material, then we can talk.
@@maxprescott9371 there is no god the son thats idolatry.
Thank you for explaining the questions so understandable.
"The gospels are a theological crime scene." I really need to quote this. Brilliant wording!!!
I'm in awe, Rabbi Singer of your chelek of Torah.
I listen to you erev Shabbat and you have me in awe!
Shabbat shalom u'mevorach
@Iyas kelu lol of course it is anti Christianity. News flash. For 40 years he has been a.counter Christian missionary. Did you expect someone with that job title to sell Christianity along side you?
Thank you! 👍🏼🙏 finally things are making sense too me. When I started to study ancient history then I come across your videos I've found answers
Sister, you are closing your eyes to what Jesus said, this teacher have history but no Holy Spirit. You follow him and may become a jew, but not a child of God.
@@orringreene3410 Gentiles are obligated to keep the Torah's 7 Noahide commandments.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 yes i believe that we should do our best to follow God commandments, but keeping the commandments cannot save you. Only God can save and He made a way for man to be saved by grace through Jesus Christ.
@@hrvatskinoahid1048 do you realized that Isaiah 64:6 man's righteousness is like filthy rags. Righteousness by works is self righteousness, but when we believe God He gave us righteousness as a gift. Romans 3: 21--24. That is the righteousness that Abraham had.
Rabbi Singer
I am in Brasil now , and I am continuing my ministry here via the internet , as im sure you know that im in a real hornets nest Here because Brasil is A Catholic Country .
Im learning Portugues so I spread the word in THIER language as best I can .
PRAY for me and thank you for your teachings.
Rabbi Singer, as a fellow Jew I would like to wholeheartedly request if it would be possible to set up a debate for the ex-Jewish UA-camr named Brother Nathanael.
Solbady
do u as a Jew believe we worship the same god?
Dabat ul Ard I'm assuming you are Muslim? Then the answer is an easy yes! Baruch HaShem!
Solbady
yep I'm Muslim
what does Baruch hashem mean, sorry I'm not familiar with Hebrew terms
Dabat ul Ard It means Blessed is the Name. Another way of saying "Thank G-D."
sternfan75 . thanks,
Baruch hashem,
lol
"The most important commandment," answered Jesus, "is this: 'Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one. (Gospel of Mark ch12 v29).........Sh'ma Yisrael ADONAI Eloheinu ADONAI E?ad - "Hear, O Israel: the LORD is our God, the LORD is ONE."(deuteronomy 6:4)
And? Did Abraham meet God in flesh with 2 angels? Is not the first time.
@@nehemiasservant9853 nope God doesnt appear as created being im sorry..
@@fidelcatsro6948 really? Go check abraham meeting with God.KJ'1769, King James Version, 1769
Gen 18:2
And he lift up his eyes and looked, and, lo, three men stood by him: and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed himself toward the ground,
@@nehemiasservant9853 Lord could also mean Master, he couldve been talking to an Angel...bowing down could have been a mark of respect to the 3 angel visitors, dont forget Torah didnt exist during time of Prophet Abraham so he could not have been told about bowing prohibitions yet
@@fidelcatsro6948 translation... Man. God does as he wants. Hes not asking for your permission.
God as Spirit can eat? Descending to Sodom as a mañ? Washing his feet also?
Gen 18:2-22: "And he lift up his eyes and looked, and, lo, three men stood by him: and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed himself toward the ground, And said, My Lord, if now I have found favour in thy sight, pass not away, I pray thee, from thy servant: Let a little water, I pray you, be fetched, and wash your feet, and rest yourselves under the tree: And I will fetch a morsel of bread, and comfort ye your hearts; after that ye shall pass on: for therefore are ye come to your servant. And they said, So do, as thou hast said. And Abraham hastened into the tent unto Sarah, and said, Make ready quickly three measures of fine meal, knead it, and make cakes upon the hearth. And Abraham ran unto the herd, and fetcht a calf tender and good, and gave it unto a young man; and he hasted to dress it. And he took butter, and milk, and the calf which he had dressed, and set it before them; and he stood by them under the tree, and they did eat. And they said unto him, Where is Sarah thy wife? And he said, Behold, in the tent. And he said, I will certainly return unto thee according to the time of life; and, lo, Sarah thy wife shall have a son. And Sarah heard it in the tent door, which was behind him. Now Abraham and Sarah were old and well stricken in age; and it ceased to be with Sarah after the manner of women. Therefore Sarah laughed within herself, saying, After I am waxed old shall I have pleasure, my lord being old also? And the LORD said unto Abraham, Wherefore did Sarah laugh, saying, Shall I of a surety bear a child, which am old? Is any thing too hard for the LORD? At the time appointed I will return unto thee, according to the time of life, and Sarah shall have a son. Then Sarah denied, saying, I laughed not; for she was afraid. And he said, Nay; but thou didst laugh. And the men rose up from thence, and looked toward Sodom: and Abraham went with them to bring them on the way. And the LORD said, Shall I hide from Abraham that thing which I do; Seeing that Abraham shall surely become a great and mighty nation, and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him? For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the LORD, to do justice and judgment; that the LORD may bring upon Abraham that which he hath spoken of him. And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous; I will go down now, and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which is come unto me; and if not, I will know. And the men turned their faces from thence, and went toward Sodom: but Abraham stood yet before the LORD."
And now to Sodom the 2 angels without the Lord
Gen 19:1-2: "And there came two angels to Sodom at even; and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom: and Lot seeing them rose up to meet them; and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground; And he said, Behold now, my lords, turn in, I pray you, into your servant's house, and tarry all night, and wash your feet, and ye shall rise up early, and go on your ways. And they said, Nay; but we will abide in the street all night."
He speaks volumes of knowledge. I have purchased a Hebrew English Tanakh. I have come to learn a lot of information from Rabbi Singer . I have become awakened to truths of the Christian Bible .
.
. .... the sound of coyotes .
The truth ..that it is a big fat lie one after the other misquoting changing words left and right.
_____
Buyer beware.
There are printings of the תנ"ך in Hebrew that are translations from the fake septuagent. That poisonous crap I know was sold in Israel at bookstores selling side by side translations in Hebrew and English. Also every Passover and Rosh Hashonah Jews in Israel are targeted and subjected to repulsive messianic mailings. CUT IT OUT !
Your vids are very interesting. Enjoyed it very much. Very thought provoking!
Do we have anything other the Dead Sea scrolls written before that is contemporary to the authors of the Torah? Just curious.
We have text fragments from around the Babylonian exile (~540 BC) for the Torah itself and comments from surrounding civilizations of Israel being captured at various times. AFAIK the current consensus is that the Torah was first written down during the exile but we have evidence of at least the dietary restriction on pork being practiced far earlier in Canaan.
Maybe the Hittite or Ugarit texts have more information though. There's an Egyptian inscription mentioning events that sound similar to three of the plagues but it could just be hyperbolic language: the river was blood and made people sick to drink it, pestilence among the livestock and sickness among the people.
I thank G-D for you.
Great video.
Thank you rabbi!!!!!
No it is not all fake. They copied correctly some stuff from us and they got right that christians should expect to be mocked
There are christians that are monotheistic what is your opinion on this.
There are also Muslims and other people who are Monotheistic but follows the false book. Xtians who follow one G-d should become Noahide because it is the same G-d as revealed to Moses at Mt. Sinai.
Thank you Rabbi. I really enjoyed this video.
Salam, rabbi tovia, u know how the Quran says people called Mary the “sister of Aaron", as a Jew, how would u respond to that?
people think this is a contradiction.
Her family line goes to Aaron people referred to her when she came with miraculous child.19:28 "O sister of Aaron! Thy father was not a man of evil, nor thy mother a woman unchaste!" It is tradition to refer the nobility of the family. For example for Jesus it same as Son of David
Matt 1:1 This is the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah the son of David, the son of Abraham:
Muhammad Hussain
thanx, jazakumullah al khairan
Dabat ul Ard ,
Contradiction must be abolished from the source itself!
Watch, how Joel let 2:17 priests weep between the porch and the altar: See 13:16 in Hosea?
Also violent men of your people shall exalt Daniel's 11:14 in fulfilment of this BS but they shall fall, Nevertheless Ezekiel will give 16:60 of them to you as sisters or daughters of the NT+ OT-
Now 7:4 Micah shall be their perplexity!!!
Do you think that David really honors your fathers, because he has sent comforters 2 Samuel's 10:???
Let he who curse his mother and father be put to death!!!
@@dabatulard6045 Mary, the sister of Aaron?
Let us look at Noble Verse 19:27-28 "At length she brought The (babe) to her people, carrying him (in her arms). They said: 'O Mary ! Truly an amazing thing Hast thou brought ! O sister of Aaron ! Thy father was not a man of evil, nor thy mother a woman unchaste!'"
There are no errors in the above Noble Verses!.
Let us look at what Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him said regarding this Noble Verse:
Mughira b. Shu'ba reported: "When I came to Najran, they (the Christians of Najran) asked me: You read "O sister of Harun (Aaron)" (i. e. Mary) in the Qur'an, whereas Moses was born much before Jesus. When I came back to Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) I asked him about that, whereupon he said: They (people of the old age) used to give names (to their persons) after the names of Apostles and pious persons who had gone before them. (Translation of Sahih Muslim, The Book on General Behaviour (Kitab Al-Adab), Book 025, Number 5326)"
As we clearly see from the Saying (Hadith) of our beloved Prophet, this issue was brought to him before and he clearly responded to it. The false claim made against our Prophet about him meaning that Mary was a biological sister of Aaron is clearly refuted.
The People of Isreal used to call people by either their last names, or by adding words such as you "Son of..." or "Brother of...." or "Sister of...." When they called people "O Son of...." they didn't mean for that person to be the actual biological son of the person whom they used his name. The other person could be a simply in the family tree or a last name.
When Jesus was called "Jesus the son of David" for instance, the Jews didn't mean to call Jesus the actual biological son of David. Similarily, when they called Mary "O sister of Aaron", they meant to call her sister of Aaron in faith !. Not the actual biological sister of Aaron.
The Noble Quran talked about Aaron being Moses's biological brother and messenger to Pharoah in Noble Verses 2:248, 4:163, 6:84, 7:122, 7:142, 7:150-151, 10:75, 10:87, 10:89, 19:28, 19:53, 20:30-35, 20:42, 20:70, 20:92-94, 21:48, 21:23, 21:45, 25:35-36, 26:13, 26:48, 28:34-35, 37:114-122 and many more.....
The Noble Quran also talks about Moses being the People of Isreal's first Messenger of GOD in Noble Verses 2:108, 2:248, 4:153, 5:20-26, 6:84, 14:8, 19:51-53, 22:44, 25:35-36, 28:3, 37:114-122, 18:60-82, 20:9-48, 27:7-12, 28:29-35, 79:15-19, 7:109-126, 10:79-82, 20:56-73, 26:38-51, 33:7, 2:53, 2:87, 2:136, 3:84, 6:91, 6:154, 7:144-145, 10:87, 11:110, 14:5, 17:2, 21:48, and may more....
The Noble Quran also talks about Jesus comming to the people of Isreal so many years after Moses and the many other Messengers of GOD that were sent to the People of Isreal in Noble Verses 3:49-51, 5:46, 5:72, 43:59, 61:6, 61:14, 4:171, 5:75, 43:59, 42:13, 4:172, 19:30, 43:64, 43:63, 3:52-54, 5:111-113, 57:27, 61:14, 61:6 and many more.....
The Noble Quran also talks about Mary being the biological Mother of Jesus in Noble Verses 3:35-37, 19:22-26, 21:91, 66:12, 5:75, 21:91, 4:156, 4:171, 5:17, 5:116, 21:91, 3:42-51, 19:16-21, and many more...
So if the Noble Quran speaks clearly about Aaron being the biological brother of Moses, and speaks clearly about Jesus comming many years after Moses and the many other Messengers of GOD that were sent to the people of Isreal, and speaks clearly about Mary being the Mother of Jesus, then therefore, the Noble Quran (1) Recognizes Mary as a woman who was born long years after Aaron, and (2) When the Jews called Mary 'O sister of Aaron..', then meant it to be Sister of Aaron in faith only and not a biological sister.
Salam rabbi, have u ever seen fiddler on the roof, and do u think that movie portrays Jews accurately?
That is my favorite musical. I laughed and cried through it many times. Although Anitevka is a fictitious village, in many important ways, I think the show conveys a fanciful yet accurate portrayal of Jewish peasant life in the "shtetle" of Russia and Easter Europe.
Tovia Singer
cool, I love that movie too, I love how they make distinctions between the Jews and Christians in the way they look and dress
Tovia Singer - sometimes i hear my mother singing to herself, "do you love me, yes I love you... " :)
Tovia Singer Salam Rabbi , I am waiting for Isaiah 8
heshamgalal68
To Venus Craigslist
nothing you stated is true.
when you say comments like that it's clear you know nothing about Judaism or Torah, OR even what God is talking about.
If Jesus died for my sins,
did my sins return when Jesus resurrected?
Now THERE'S a question!! 😉
I would like to know, what was Jesus's ( Jes- us ) name before 1638 A.D. being that there was no " J ", in the alphabet until 1638 A.D. that l can find? NO James, Judah, Jerusalem, Josephus, Jews or any other name that start or had a " J " in it before 1638 A.D..
they used the letter ' i' . Iesus Nazarene Rex Judaeorum
I grew up in a Baptist church, my father was the pastor. I thought they were all nuts. At 18 I went to boot camp and decided I was an atheist.
At 46 I had an experience that convinced me that there was a God, so I went to the Christian Bible with a pro Christian bias, but it still made no sense to me. Fortunately I kept going.
I got to Genesis where God tells Cain do well, be accepted. Don't, and sin is waiting for you. That makes sense. Then I got to Solomon dedicating the Temple and he prays that foreigners accept God, not that they become Jews. So I wondered, can we do that now?
After a few Google searches I discover that you could. I became a Noahide before I knew they existed. I found Rabbi Singer while trying to learn more, and my Christian wife said "he sounds just like you".
The problems in the NT aren't hidden. But I needed nearly 30 years to clear my head of the false views they teach so I could worship God in truth. I'm lucky I had the courage to reject the false gods as a teenager. It made it possible for me to accept the one true God later in life. I pray everyday that my family and friends will seek Hashem so they can find him too.
Seeing the investment of about 70 years of devotion unto God which began as a fundamentalist Christian life, I nevertheless don't resent the errors and falsehood as much as I thought I would. Many are still misled, even my closest family. Now detached, I see the acquiescence to Jesus' murder as CONSPIRACY= Temptation: the notion of doing away with Law=EVIL": and creeds of worshipping men are IDOLATRY. T.I.E.=captive to your Christ, instead of being liberated. The Idol, never given a burial, is accursed, an abomination which still tells the world who comprises the house of DEATH and HADES=== the Roman Church !
❤ thank you rabbi ❤ for everything
Making sense to set the record straight
❤ Let's get biblical ❤ coming home
Torah Hashem Israel
🕎 🇮🇱
If you believe God is one, who is Shekinah?
The shecina is the result of G-d intensifying his presence in a particular place.
Shekinah means "the dwelling of the Lord". How does that in any way refute the notion that God is one?
Yeah, Mark 12:29 quotes the Shema Yisroel...but after that...we still have a Christianity since the late-2nd century trying to divide one by three cleanly (and still getting that recurring .33333333333333 ad infinitum)...prior to that with Theophilus of Antioch talking a Gnostic God/Logos/Sophia triad...and before that, Two Powers in Heaven...so doesn't matter which way you look ag it, the NT wasn't really focused on the Shema. However...that's not to say an early NT canon wasn't based on some VARIATION of Jewish Scripture...be that Samaritan theology or Alexandria's Hellenicised and Platonised interpretation via Philo. Therin lies the problem: It wasn't derived from Torah Judaism, but on syncretism. Howvever, that was the situation in 70 c.e. There ends up being outright forgery at two atages of the 2nd century...first with some over-prolific idiot running around Ephesus to Antioch claiming he was a student of John, while ending up with a heap of aliases...and then there's Irenaeus, paid by the emperor Commodus adding more forgery, swiping an earlier Christianity's material, then declaring the earlier version heretical. It'a bad enough the LATE-1ST version was favoured more by Samaritans, Hellenicised Jews and Greek while being totally against Jerusalem-based Judaism...but the second century version relies too much on dubious and outright forgery as well as by Irenaeus' time outright plagiarism. When practically all we know of disciples like Thomas, Andrew, Peter and John comes through Leucius Charinus (known to Lucian as Peregrinus Proteus) AKA Papias, AKA Ignatius, AKA Polycarp and perhaps even AKA second-century Christian Josephus Hegessipus. Gee, and nobody connects the name Luke to Leucius...might also point out no one before Irenaeus even had mentioned a Gospel of Luke.
The Trinity of God is not something the human mind can conceive.
Only the Holy Spirit can reveal it to your Spirit.
But you have to be Born Again to receive the Spirit.
Vulcaneer900 There is only ONE HOLY SPIRIT, why does the Holy Spirit tell different things to different denominations. ?
@@zarabees2123 The trinity wasn't the first idea...in fact, so much never the first idea...that it's Theophilus of Antioch, just after the mid-2nd century who is noted as developing the FIRST trinity/triad idea. One thing...his formula went God/Logos/SOPHIA. It takes till Tertullian before we hear of the more familiar version. BUT...before Theophilus of Antioch? "Two Powers in Heaven." "Hidden Second God." In fact, if you care to even read Justin Martyr's works, or Polycarp, you'll see they tend to be more...binitarian. So...
Admits I am wrestling with what I believe, Southern Baptist but of Jewish heritage, I love the Lord. Some of my biggest challenges to my Christian faith are the ways that some of what should be the holiest of our holidays (be sure and pick up your Easter ham and dye eggs for outreach) are celebrated and things that the Bible says we should be doing and celebrating(Passover) and observing (Sabbath)we are not, but by all means let have a Halloween party ( I choose not to participate in what I consider the more obviously insulting to our Lord ) I read and study a lot am certain there are people who think I should just take their word for what the Bible does and does not say but that's not good enough for me, I want to know scripture so well that no one can mess with my head on that subject. Rabbi Tovia Singer does a better job of quoting the Christian Bible then most so-called Christians. Will continue to listen to what I consider his very well thought out answers to a wide variety of questions.
Lori Cash I agree with you if you're going to read the Bible's with a Jewish translate from Hebrew to English you can see he's completely two different Bibles that you have the Jewish Bibles denied the New Testament in everything opposite what new Testament teaching you, if u read new testament chapter to chapter disciples to disciples compare the testimonies what you find is completely amazing no foundation for Christianity and yes you right again Christmas is from Pagan faith from the Greek and the Rome gods there was adopted by the Christianity with the trees and the Bells and the 25th of December and Easter copy from the pageant faith studied research and you will find the truth may the Lord God of Israel bless you and open your eyes to the truth
Nisim Falach The same God who sent a final uncorrupted Quran.
Worth a read though if you believe God is ONE not three and keep his laws you should be fine.
Insha Allah.
Say: He is God, The One, The Absolute, He begets not, nor is He Begotten, and there is none like unto Him. (Qur'an). This is what we Muslims believe. God has responded to the lies against Him and against Jesus. Jesus was a man, and the Messenger of God.
IngramSnake Ameen
Lori Cash
I've learned a lot from the Rabbi about what the xtians did in translating the hebrew books, the corruption of the words, to make their bible.
But the Rabbi, as far as i know, has not spoken of the corruption of the Torah or Jewish text.
Jeremiah 8 v8 mentions this and so does the Qur'an.
Alhamdulillah (All praise is due to God), I'm Muslim.
Good luck in your research.
Peace
Its kind of simple. If you claim your Bible is the word of G-d. There can be NO misquote. Otherwise you are worshipping a lie.
In 250 BCE, were the Jews under duress when they allowed the Greeks to translate their Torah into the Septuagint? Or did they permit it willingly?
Hellenistic Jews lacked competence of Hebrew, so they substituted the Hebrew by Greec.
@@bell1095 Somebody must have been competent , else how was it translated ?
@@mikev4621 bilinguals, see „septuaginta“ in wikipedia.
@@bell1095 Great article - thanks
@@bell1095 you're saying that they did it for themselves. But only for the Torah...
Brother Nathaniel like David duke and Farrakhan should never be given any attention . Dr Brown although wrong is not an evil person and I feel someday will return to Torah. Brother Nathaniel is an insane lunatic and debating evil people like him simply gives them more credibility....and helps his cause. HaShem will deal with him.שלום
Robbi yahudi Tovia singer is honest 👍
Rabbi Tovia Singer
Thank you for confirming everything I have been teaching and saying to Thousands of people on the Internet as well as when I had my CONGREGATION .
Many people will not believe everything I have told them same as what you are teaching , So I give them your website to learn more of the real truth That there Is still
Only ONE GOD , ADONAI ELOHEINU ADONAI ECHAD .
@@maxprescott9371
You are still saying GOD IN THREE PERSONS . You are not listening, you are a hopeless case completely Brainwashed.
God is not a Person he is not a man, He is SPIRIT, MAN YOU ARE REALLY IGNORANT OR JUST PLAIN STUPID. I HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO SAY TO YOU .GOODBYE 👋
ENJOY YOUR PHONEY god.
@@maxprescott9371
I dont need your blessing in a dead prophets name ,get it right, in the name of HASHEM OUR ELOHIM.
AND BY THE WAY YOU HAVE IGNORED MY QUESTION TO YOU ........
OUR GODS REAL HEBREW HOLY NAME.JUST AS I thought you don't know the name of our God but yet you follow dead and a false prophet .
,
@@maxprescott9371
That is the Problem with the Bible you read ,it is not Translated from a Hebrew Bible.
Hashem is the name we use to avoid using Hashems real Hebrew and holy name in n vain.
If you are reading from a King James ,that is the worst translated book of all. It was translated from Greek,and the Greeks had a poor translation of Hebrew.King James had it translated from the Greek instead of the Hebrew scripts ,so it really got screwed up Royally.
We Jews do not use the word god,we only use it for you that don't understand our language.
Love and grace and
Fellowship with Hashems Holy spirit all comes from Hashem our Elohim and not from the dead prophet jesus. And which question do you want me to Repeat again??
If you are asking about ....
What is the real Hebrew holy name of Hashem in the letters YHVH, THAT HAVE NEVER ANSWERED.
YES IM STILL WAITING.IF YOU DONT KNOW IT ,DO YOUR RESEARCH ,BECAUSE
OF YOUR STUBBORNESS I REFUSE TO SHARE WITH YOU.
My friend do you realized that the jews were reading the scriptures weekly and still didn't recognised John the baptist or Jesus, Mal 3:1-2, Matt 17: 10- 13. Without the Holy Spirit there would be no new testement. Eg, in Isaiah 7 :14 accordind to rabbi it says" a young woman be with child" , is that really a sign. But Matt 1: 23 say a virgin ..... call him immanuel, that is the Holy Ghost interpretation given to the apostle. Jesús said that the Holy Spirit will teach us all things.
@@orringreene3410 I have no use for the New Testament Orrin.
MATTHEW talks about the Genealogy of Jesus and he lied . Jesus is not of the lineage of King David. It is Yosef his stepfather who was of the lineage of King David.The book of Luke contradicts Matthew in the lineage. That in its self will tell you that Jesus was not and is not the Messiah.
" It's a Crime Scene!"
Is is possible that early Christians believed in one God because of Mark12:29-30. Also I like to know why early Christians were called catholic. The word kath’-holēs (catholic) is used in Act(9:31). Does the word catholic implies believing in one God because the word holēs(root word for catholic) is used in Mark12:29-30 four times.
The word Catholic does not appear anywhere in Acts 9:31. Instead, the word ekklesía, which means a place of meeting appears in this passage. The first record of any person to have ever used the term Catholic Church is Ignatius of Antioch, an early second century church father.
Do you believe what 1st-century Jewish historian Josephus wrote about Joseph Caiaphas The High Priest?
If you UNDERSTAND THE WAY THAT YAHUWSHUWAH TAUGHT YOU WOULD UNDERSTAND THE FREEDOM OF HIS WAY! UNCOMPLICATED YET PURE, IF RUWAH RESIDES IN YOU AFTER BAPTISM! NOT GRACE TO SIN, BUT FORGIVENESS IF YOU ARE STRIVING AFTER RIGHTEOUSNESS AND THE WAY! THIS MAN IS SO BUSY STRIVING AGAINST THE WAY, HE DOES NOT EVEN REALISE HIS ERROR IN CALLING ALUHIYM BY PAGAN AND BLASPHEMOUS NAMES?
What did God mean when he said " Let us make man in our image.?
Gary Flowers :
Moses, Moses!!
seen : unseen, inferior : superior , belief god : man?
Angels around him while he created
Before the first day, Genesis said G-d already created the heavens, earth and water. Light was created by fiat. They were created with perfect ex nilho. But everything after that has an aspect of imperfect ex nilho- the water was split into the heaven and earth, it gave forth the fish, luminaries were placed in heaven, the earth gave out plants and animals. The ex nilho of everything except the heavens, earth water and light was imperfect- everything else had an aspect of Ex nihilo nihil fit mixed with pure ex nilho- they were created by an ex nilho fiat applied to an already created thing . But man has two aspects- earthly- "man from the ground" and spiritual "and G-d breathed the spirit of life...". The former is that imperfect ex nilho- Ex nihilo nihil fit and ex nilho mixed, ex nilho fiat on an already created thing. But the latter, the soul was as ex nilho as the earth itself. Man is unique in having an aspect of imperfect ex nilho- ex nilho fiat applied to an already created thing WITH a pure ex nilho fiat. Thus, "let us make man" -G-d says: "Let man be created in a plurality of creative methods- my pure ex nilho fiat, and an ex nilho fiat applied to an already created thing.
@@LangThoughts can you pls use other terms. I dong understand ex nilho
Hashem gave us a mind to use, unfortunately most Christians don't use it.
What I am trying to understand is that rabbinic literature says that the death of the righteous atones for the wicked why would Rabbi Tovia singer not acknowledge his Rabbinic literature and we see in the Old testament that the human sacrifices that were offered up to Idols are an abomination in the sight of Yahweh thats what God considers to be an abomination
I explore and explain this topic at 1:13:30 on ua-cam.com/video/JjVwJu5bRa4/v-deo.html
"Theologically correct" ? As in the religion doesn't contradict the book it's based on?
If human sacrifice is such an abomination then why was Abraham willing to sacrifice his only son Isaac?
Peace
1) Abraham and Isaac didn't know it was just a test.
If your god is omniscient there'd be no need for such a test, thus sparing father and child the trauma.
2) "Prior to Mosaic law." As in the law written by the guy who allegedly led the Jews out of Egypt just to kill 3000 of them for worshipping a golden calf?
Peace
***** And yet you find such a being worthy of worship?
Peace
So if your father would put you in a cellar when you where 5 yrs old, for the rest of your life, for not eating your dinner, you'd agree with it? Because the actions of an adult are beyond a childs understanding?
Peace
Xarxxon Xon are you an atheist?
My parents tried to raise me roman-catholic, going to church every sunday and holiday, sunday-school every week, catholic school my entire life. But the more I learned about the religion, the less I believed it.
Then I spend some time looking for another religion, read other religious texts. Tried being a Buddhist for a while. But in the end my conclusion was: it's all based on feelings, visions, dreams, revelations, no science, no logic, no evidence. So I've been an Atheist with anti-theist tendencies since I was 20 yrs old. Why?
Peace
3:27
חזק ואמץ ישר כוח, אני אוהב את הידע שלך, בעיה שנוצרים מאמנים בשקר באמת, ויש מנפולציה נוצרית אמונה עוורת לכל שקרי הנצרות, תמשיך ותמשיך טיפה ועוד טיפה תעשה שבר הסלע , ויאמנו כולם האלוהי ישראל
So does the Rabbi follow the Torah or the Talmud?
They are not mutually exclusive. One supplements the other.
Tapasya Tyaga Oh, I see. Kinda like the New Testament supplements the Old Testament?
@@RoseSharon7777 Well the idea is that the Old Testament is similar to the statutes while the Talmud is similar to case law which interprets statutes. So the Old Testament says "do not boil a kid in his mother's milk." But what does that mean. It is the basis of the laws describing what is kosher and what is not. The Talmud then explains all of it in detail.
@@tapasyatyaga4041 Oh I see, kinda like the NT Explains the fulfillment of the old and brings about the Jer. 31 promise? Granted there are corruptions in the NT but I'm sure there are corruptions in the Talmud. Right?
@@RoseSharon7777 The Talmud is seen as the operating manual. The Rabbis believe that the Talmud is the oral law. It was given to Moses orally along with the written law. It is therefore the word of God. However not all Jews believe that. The Karaites [which was maybe 10% - 15% of the Jewish population for several hundred years [maybe 800 AD to 1300 AD] did not believe in the Talmud and saw it as a creation of the Rabbis
Why would a Hebrew speaking writer, in the book of Hebrews, writing to a group of Hebrews, quote from a anything other than a Hebrew language book such as the Septuagint.
Because the Septuagint was what the vast majority of Jews used during the 1st century.
Well, as someone who doesn't know what to make of the 3 alternative versions of the afterlife presented in the OT, or the fact that Yewhey is the Phonecian god of iron, and the "People of Israel" refers to the people created/governed by Saturn, or that Elohim refers to the Caananite creator god - implying that the god of the OT embodies the aspects of at least 3 different cosmic deities, the fact that the story of Noah and various books of the OT seem to be cherry picking Zoroastrian mythos, etc. I don't frankly know what to make of the Jews. If you then add on top mystical rabbinical traditions such as Hermeticism and Kabbalah, then I simply don't know what to say about the Jewish tradition apart from noting that it's not the same religion today that it was in 1500 BC.
Couldn't have quoted Septuaginta other than the 5 books of Moses, as the Septuaginta only comprised the 5 books of Moses, as the rabbi states in another video. About the original Septuaginta, which later was lost: as Paul was missioning to Greek speaking heathens, why couldn't he have quoted the orginal Septuaginta? Not quoting Jewish Tanakh, as they did not understand Hebrew? Now I have to look in the Pauline letters which quotes from the Jewish scriptures he made, or which quotes were added by later Christians to his letters. And compare those quotes with the Tanakh.
What is a Galatian?
Masoretic text , what is the best translation?
ua-cam.com/video/OxBCIi1phkI/v-deo.html
No, not the entire old testament, but the entire bible !
I find nothing "odious" in the ethics of the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7) or in the "love chapter" 1 Corinthians 13.
To Retedzepnem
I'll be more than happy to provide proofs ,contradictions, and corruption, but we'll have to do it in another format other than here because other people will start commenting on things they know nothing about.
so you can contact me thru UA-cam private message or email.
Few phenomena could ever match what some scholars now see in 20=20 hindsight: that as far as the substantiations made and interpretations made by Christianity, to the present date, probably no greater farce nor fraud has had such success in using half-truths and naive Theology to lead people into Error, Ignorance, and Sin. It has taken 50 years to unlearn the filth therein. I hope to now be Worthy to ESCAPE those errors, according to Scripture.
I just noticed something. In the New Testament, the prophecy of the Anti-Christ sounds eerily similar to the story of Jesus. Here's a quote from a Catholic bishop that sums up the prophecy:
"The Antichrist will not be so called; otherwise he would have no followers... he will come disguised as the Great Humanitarian; he will talk peace, prosperity and plenty not as means to lead us to God, but as ends in themselves... He will tempt Christians with the same three temptations with which he tempted Christ... He will have one great secret which he will tell to no one: he will not believe in God. Because his religion will be brotherhood without the fatherhood of God, he will deceive even the elect. He will set up a counterchurch... It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content. It will be a mystical body of the Antichrist that will in all externals resemble the mystical body of Christ."
Lets dissect it.
1) "The AntiChrist will not be so called; otherwise he would have no followers... he will come disguised as the Great Humanitarian; he will talk peace, prosperity and plenty not as a means to lead us to God but as ends in themselves"
Isn't that exactly what Jesus did? He distinguished himself from the rest of the Jewish rabbis of that period by being... a great humanitarian. He talked peace, prosperity and plenty as a means to lead people not to Judaism or even the God of the Torah but to worship himself as God in order to avoid hell. Jesus makes himself The Gatekeeper to God, and you can't find God without first accepting Jesus. That is blasphemy.
2) "He will tempt Christians with the same three temptations with which he tempted Christ."
Temptation #1: the physical temptation. The devil tells Jesus to prove himself the Son of God by turning stones into loaves of bread. Surely the Son of God, and therefor God Himself, could easily do this to prove he is not a false prophet. Jesus gives a cop out of an answer instead, and avoids having to prove himself. Christians believe they can be "saved" even after a lifetime of sin, of doing whatever the hell they want. As long as you sell your soul to Jesus a second before you die you're golden.
Temptation #2: the emotional/spiritual temptation. Aka, questioning God's love. The devil tells Jesus to jump off the roof of a temple, saying that God will protect his fall. Jesus responds, again, with a cop out and says "you must not test the Lord your God". Isn't that EXACTLY what you're doing, Jesus? Testing the Lord YOUR GOD? Teaching your disciples to question their Jewish faith by misleading them to believe that YOU are God?
Temptation #3: the temptation of power. The devil offers Jesus all of the kingdoms of the world and their glory, Jesus refuses, claiming 'you must worship the Lord your God, and serve ONLY HIM". That's not what you did, Jesus. You made yourself out to be God and spiritually blackmailed Jews to believe YOU are God, and your legacy is that almost all of the kingdoms of the world now worship you as God instead of worshiping THE REAL GOD.
3) "He will have one great secret which he will tell to no one: he will not believe in God."
Only a man who doesn't believe in the God of the Hebrew bible would have the audacity to call himself God and break the first commandment, and have his disciples tell their adherents to not follow God's law given to Moses on Mt. Sinai. Also, unlike David who cried out "why have you forsaken me?", Jesus crying out the same sentence on the cross makes absolutely no sense if Jesus knew the prophecy all along. Surely this moment, of all moments, would be the moment where he DOESN'T question God's love (see also point #2 again).
4) "Because his religion will be brotherhood without the fatherhood of God, he will deceive even the elect. He will set up a counterchurch... It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content. It will be a mystical body of the Antichrist that will in all externals resemble the mystical body of Christ."
Considering the fact that Jesus and his disciples were Jews, you can replace the word "Church" with "synagogue", as they essentially have the exact same meaning, both literally and figuratively. What Jesus and his disciples created was a Godless form of Judaism, where God was replaced by Jesus, who was the human placeholder for God in his mind, and emptied this form of Judaism from its divine content by repurposing and repackaging bits and pieces of Judaism WITHOUT THE MAIN CHARACTER - HASHEM. All of the mental gymanstics in the world cannot excuse the simple fact that in Christianity it is not יה-ה who is the centerpiece but Jesus of Nazareth, a man claiming to be God. This "church" his disciples created, which we still see today, has all the bells and whistles of a Jewish synagogue but it's missing GOD, God's laws, etc.
And finally, when you look at the legacy of Jesus, what is that legacy? Like what's the REAL legacy? Is it world peace? Does this world look like a post-Messianic world? Or maybe, just maybe, was his legacy THOUSANDS of years of persecution of God's people, the demonization of Judaism, of Jewish people, and he managed to turn billions of people AWAY from Hashem. He didn't bring Christians to Hashem, he brought them to Christ. If Jesus isn't the Messiah, and there's zero evidence that he was, and there is evidence that he WASN'T, then that makes Jesus of Nazareth, at best, a false prophet. And at worst, THE false prophet. The Great Deceiver himself.
I think the same can be said about Christianity as well. Certainly anyone examining Christianity from a historical perspective would be inclined to come to the conclusion that Catholicism and Protestantism are built on a pyramid of falsehood and half truths. The issue really becomes, is the Orthodox/Coptic faith an acceptable tradition or did Christianity itself go off the rails in the 1st and 2nd century? Mind you, the Manichaens and the Mandeans both worshipped Jesus but did not claim he was "god". I think the deification of Jesus is what a lot of people have trouble with.
Just one question. This god you speak of, has the power to make life, the universe, omnipotent ect, Don't you find it odd, he can't make a book of his instructions for us, written so clearly that no one misinterprets them? Is he really that inept at communication?
Michael Cunningham that book your looking for is called the Quran
ok the Torah is not a book of history or fairy tale is a spirtual book Hashem wrote the Torah in this way because from holy sage of israel Hashem had tell to moses teach them exode 24.12 is mean th oral Torah the Mishna give to moshe to teach oraly the difficuk verses of the Torah and secondly Hashem forseing that the nation will attack Israel to take the Torah make they own and say this our book we are the true chosen people but couldn understand the Torah without the teaching of Moses oraly no one can understand the Torah exept the jews there are a lot of verses in the torah that without a orale teaching u will ever figured out i will send u some next time
So what is the new covenant of Jer. 31 made to the two different houses of Israel?
*K. Day:* If you read that passage VERY carefully, you will discover that the "new covenant" is a miracle that God will perform for the Jewish people _in Messianic times_ (hasn't happened yet!) where He will place His Torah DIRECTLY into the hearts and minds of the Jewish people, so that they will no longer need to study and teach Torah, because they will already KNOW it by heart, due to the miracle! It says it very clearly right there in the text, but Christianity chooses to bastardize what the text actually says, to 'Christianize' God's original message - this is blasphemous and arrogant! FYI, "new covenant" does not in any way equate to "New Testament" - not even close! Please do some research on your religion for YOURSELF and you WILL discover that it did NOT come from God, Creator of the universe.
He has Jeremiah 31 videos. Go there if that is your question here.
The second temple was to stand for ever. But it was destroyed. Was the prophet wrong?
The angel Gabriel foretold that the second temple was to stand for less than 500 years. There was no prophecy that it would stand forever. The temple that will stand forever is the messianic temple.
Thanks for clarifying. Want to know the truth, of course. Have read the chapters where Hezhekiel is sent to measure the temple in a vision. There is a parallell to the story in Torah / Joshua where the land of Kanaan is shared among the tribes. The land is going to be shared among the tribes returning from Babylon and all other sites to where they have been dispersed. And there are measurements how large the temple area will be, enormous areas, as far as I understand. Is this about the second temple, or is it the messianic temple?
100% accurate
Hi Rabbi. I had a question.
1) What are the loopholes in the Jewish Bible which gave way for Christianity?
2) Why the Jewish Bible does not describe God as described in the Quran that He do not begets and not begotten?
2) Why the Jewish Bible does not describe God as described in the Quran that He do not begets and not begotten?
This is Quran refuting Christian trinity, has nothing to do with Torah.
But the Jewish Bible _does_ describe God as one who does not beget and is not begotten.
whats that about beeing a 120 years old at the time of death? Can somebody explain?
Moses died at that age.
Some Jewish people have found it!!!!!!!!!
Can Holy Spirit only talk Hebrew? Why could he Not convey truths to people speaking other languages, like in Greek translations?
This is a "would" question. Would God convey eternal truths to His prophets in English or German? Does this claim raise questions?
Peace,
The language is sent in the Prophets and messengers pbut language. If there were a prophet that spoke English he would have gotten the message in English.
Only God will reveal the truth in the end Gods word endures the bible itself revealed that the Christian bible will be discredited by some Jesus Christ died for our sins and Only through Jesus Christ we will receive Gods salvation God bless
5:50
When an OT scripture is quoted in the NT a little differently, it is due to
progressive revelation, not to the unimportance of words or the lack of preservation.
Example: Hebrews 10:5-9 quotes Psalm 40:6-8 twice. First quote refers to the
Messiah. Second quote refers to saved Israel.
If the two nations(southern and northern(1st born and 2nd born) started out in union and divided would it not make sense the two representatives mbd and mbj would also start out in union and divide...but where are they unified? We know Messiah ben Joseph comes from the 2nd born birthright line of Joseph(hence the name) and Messiah ben David comes from the sceptre line of Judah...so we see a Judah and Joseph and we know those two did not always get along so well. Joseph will use the birthright in order to offer the sacrifice(high priest) in the millennium as that is a birthright holders position...Mbd will use the sceptre position to rule the nations as king david. The two become divided over the birthright we see in the throne room Joshua the high priest has an adversary...if you guessed it is the firstborn you would be correct...where do we see mbd the sceptre holder in the throne room Rev 12 the man-child who will rule the nations...God unifies them and they are sent to earth to unify the firstborn and 2nd born nation that all of Israel will be one house once again. In the torah we see example after example of how the firstborn and 2nd born do not get along....but after the throne room visit they will
About Christian teachings not in the Thorah. God let his prophets know new things all the time. In Thorah there are rules for animal sacrificing, which is commanded. But later prophets relates God denying this. Why do you think I need any of your sacrifices!! My will is you act righteously toward each other. So if God chances his mind in the Tanakh, why couldn't he have told new things to the apostles?
No G-d was saying sacrifices without repentance is meaningless. In Deuteronomy it says repeatedly that the Torah will never be changed . Circumstances change, laws don't.
Rabbi You believe One is to come from the house of you no , would he be deity or become deity. How well he come into the world is he with God waiting for he time. Is the resisting one wih God our is under are feet ???????????????
Well explained. Now if Christians accept that Jesus is not God nor the son of God and they accept that God our Creator is One, what would they then be if their ancestory is not Jewish? If Jesus said he did not come to change the Laws of God and Prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon both prophets) said that he did not come to change the Laws of God, I would suggest they are then Muslim?
nadia m - they need to follow the law of Noa... Search on UA-cam and you will find them.
Tovia, Would the Martian know what the names of the sons of God names were when listed in Genesis? Adam through Noah in order?
What do their names mean in order?
" If my SERVANT gives HIS life as an OFFERING for sin, HE shall see HIS descendants in a LONG LIFE ", clearly showing the SERVANT rises from the dead.
*Edward Kochanowski:* What exactly are you quoting from?! "Servant" in the Hebrew scriptures, always refers to ISRAEL (i.e. Isa. 53 - please read Is. 52 AND Isa. 54 - not JUST Isa. 53!)! God ABHORS human sacrifice, which is a totally PAGAN practice, and "sacrifices", by definition, STAY DEAD! They DON'T 'rise again' a few days later! At no time did God ever tell us that HUMAN sacrifice atones for our sins! PLEASE do some honest research on your false, pagan religion, and you WILL discover that it absolutely DID NOT come from God, Creator of the universe - it just did NOT! Nowhere in the Hebrew scriptures did God tell us to expect a SECOND SET of scriptures (i.e. false, pagan "New Testament") after He already told us that the Torah He gave to Moses on Mt. Sinai, is ETERNAL (i.e. STILL in effect and binding today!) and that we are NOT to follow ANY other teaching that what is in the ETERNAL Torah. Christianity IS another teaching that God NEVER gave to us, therefore, we are NOT to follow its false, pagan teachings. PLEASE do the research!
@@janishart5128 God told Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaak, and Abraham would have obeyed but GOD at the very last moment stayed Abraham's hand for God saw that Abraham who loved Isaak very much, chose to obey GOD. In this act of obedience GOD found Abraham and his descendant's worthy of GOD one-day sending GOD'S SON, the perfect LAMB, genetically pure of sin, no fallen ancestry for Jeshua came from above to save mankind, worthy of GOD'S plan of salvation. All animal sacrifice before Jeshua was a stop gap measure until Jeshua's perfect and pure sacrifice. The passage does not refer to Israel as a nation, Isaiah 53 speaks of GOD'S Arm coming to assist GOD, coming from eternity, it is very clear as to how the ONE suffers and dies, and rises from the dead, for HIS HEROIC sacrifice ever pleasing to GOD. Moses said, " a prophet like him was sure to come, Moses was rejected by Israel, and died to the life Moses knew in Egypt, but was found worthy to REEDEM Israel from slavery in Egypt forever . History repeats itself, only this time, the ONE greater than Moses, WHO like Moses is rejected and murdered by HIS own, literally dies, a perfect sacrifice, and rises from the dead and found worthy to return to Jerusalem to REDEEM Israel and the world from slavery to death and sin, FOREVER ! Moses was to be as GOD, Jeshua is GOD, ONE with HaShem " you are my SON, before the Daystar I have begotten you ", before all Creation, for Jeshua is, " GOD Hero, Father Forever, Wonder Counselor, Prince of Peace upon whose Shoulder Dominion rests " FOREVER. Jeshua is the beginning of the NEW and EVERLASTING COVENANT, " circumcised into our hearts, no longer in our flesh. How long has the Temple been gone along with the animal sacrifice commanded in the COVENANT of Sinai, Jeshua's sacrifice saves the world and is the final sacrifice for this sacrifice restores Paradise on Earth upon Jeshua's RETURN, so pleasing was this HEROIC act of Jeshua to GOD. " My House shall be a House of Prayer " not sacrifice, in the time to come, " O death where is thy power where is thy sting " defeated by the GUILTLESS SERVANT of GOD who Rose from the dead, and all those who believe in HIM, BORN from ABOVE in the REBIRTH. Shalom
@@edwardkochanowski2531 lol no just no, if you say Jesus is the last sacrifice then your NT contradicts the Hebrew scripture’s in Ezekiel 45
@@tnrtnr7706 Ezekiel is actually referring to the sacrifice of the carnal addictions of our hearts, if you know the Prophets they also speak of Ha Shem having enough of animal sacrifice, which failed to end carnal desire in Israel, Our GOD DESIRES THE SACRIFICE OF OUR HEARTS, IN THE NEW AND EVERLASTING COVENANT, THE LAW WRITTEN IN OUR HEARTS, NO LONGER THE FLESH. Since Mashiach JESHUA we are in the NEW AND EVERLASTING COVENANT.
Shalom
BTW, how do Christians treat you now?????? Any Jesus believing man I know loves the Jewish people. At least I do.
Now the moment we disagree we hear the most hateful of NT verses
when mbd and mbj come they don't come to redeem...their purpose is to unite the northern kingdom and southern kingdom...notice David is from firstborn line Judah and messiah ben Joseph is from the birthright line 1 chronicles 5:2. when searching the scriptures look for the first born and 2nd born and you will find mbd and mbj..example Isaiah 40s mention Jacob and israel..Jacob was a 2nd born birthright holder and Judah/Israel is the firstborn...showing mbj and mbd..their position are mbd/king and mbj/birthright holder/high priest and they come to unite the two kingdoms Ezekiel 37
I thought the same thing about this sacrificial idea.
Paul was not a Christian he was a Jew
The extant manuscripts of the writings of the first-century Romano-Jewish historian Flavius Josephus include references to Jesus and the origins of Christianity. Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews, written around 93-94 AD, includes two references to the biblical Jesus Christ in Books 18 and 20 and a reference to John the Baptist in Book 18. Scholarly opinion varies on the total or partial authenticity of the reference in Book 18, Chapter 3, 3 of the Antiquities, a passage that states that Jesus the Messiah was a wise teacher who was crucified by Pilate, usually called the Testimonium Flavianum.
The general scholarly view is that while the Testimonium Flavianum is most likely not authentic in its entirety, it is broadly agreed upon that it originally consisted of an authentic nucleus, which was then subject to Christian interpolation and/or alteration.
Although the exact nature and extent of the Christian redaction remains unclear, broad consensus exists as to what the original text of the Testimonium by Josephus would have looked like.
Modern scholarship has largely acknowledged the authenticity of the reference in Book 20, Chapter 9, 1 of the Antiquities to "the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James" and considers it as having the highest level of authenticity among the references of Josephus to Christianity. Almost all modern scholars consider the reference in Book 18, Chapter 5, 2 of the Antiquities to the imprisonment and death of John the Baptist also to be authentic and not a Christian interpolation. The references found in Antiquities have no parallel texts in the other work by Josephus such as The Jewish War, written 20 years earlier, but some scholars have provided explanations for their absence. A number of variations exist between the statements by Josephus regarding the deaths of James and John the Baptist and the New Testament accounts. Scholars generally view these variations as indications that the Josephus passages are not interpolations, for a Christian interpolator would have made them correspond to the New Testament accounts, not differ from them.
@John Smith: Excellent comment.
Is it OK for a jew to eat with a non Jewish, especially an orthodox jew
There's Only ONE GOD.
God of Adam, God of Moses, God of Jesus, God of Muhammad.
He is The Almighty.
He is The One and Only.
The GOD of Abraham, Isaak, and Jakob, the GOD of the LIVING not the dead.
@Yerachmiel HaLevi Yerachmiel, we who are TRULY BORN AGAIN, baptized in the Mikvah of the HOLY SPIRIT worship the ONE TRUE GOD of ISRAEL, OUR FATHER in SPIRIT and TRUTH, who dwells in Jeshua in ONENESS. Moses was to be as GOD and Prophesied that ONE greater than him was to come, who is GOD ONE with the FATHER. The GOD of LIGHTS, the GOD of SPIRTS dwelling FOREVER in the LIGHT of the WORLD. Immanuel, GOD with US. Shalom
@Yerachmiel HaLevi I once felt similar to you, and today's Christianity is full of wolves in sheep's clothing, but that is not new that is exactly what infiltrated Judaism, culminating in the destruction of the most sacred and beautiful Temple of our God, and the two thousand year Diaspora of misery and death, for history repeats itself. Moses was rejected by Israel, and suffered a death to the life Moses knew in Egypt, only to be sent back by HaShem to REDEEM Israel from slavery in Egypt, forever. Jeshua was rejected by Israel also, and died a miserable death to the life Jeshua knew, only to be sent back by HaShem to REDEEM Israel and the world from, SLAVERY to sin and death, FOREVER ! Yerachmiel, HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF, I pray that " MAY GOD HAVE MERCY " upon you Yerachmiel, and reveal to you, what was revealed to me. Shalom
@@edwardkochanowski2531 why do Christian and Muslims say Jesus will return
@@Mshussain525 Isaiah the Prophet, prophesied " If my SERVANT gives HIS life as an offering for sin HE shall see HIS descendants in a long life " obviously rising from the dead to live FOREVER with HIS descendants. Moses was rejected by the Israelite's and died to the life Moses knew in Egypt, only to be sent back by GOD forty years later to redeem Israel from slavery to the Egyptians, forever. Moses prophesied that a Redeemer/Mashiach like him was sure to come, even greater than Moses. Jeshua also was rejected by Israel, though not all Israelite's rejected Jeshua, and literally murdered by HIS own people, after performing many wonderful signs among them. Like Moses who was told by GOD, that Moses would be as GOD before Pharaoh, not GOD mind you but as GOD. Jeshua is GOD, ONE with the CREATOR who is greater than all, Jeshua is ONE with the FATHER our CREATOR always pleasing GOD, never ever sinning rising from the dead on the third day by the authority of GOD conquering Iblis/ ha satan who brought death into the world in rebellion to GOD, Jeshua ascending back to GOD the FATHER of creation. Like Moses, Jeshua who is as the prophets of Israel prophesy, " GOD HERO, FATHER FOREVER, WONDER COUNSELOR, PRINCE OF PEACE, upon whose SHOULDER DOMINION RESTS " is to return to Israel to REDEEM Israel and the whole earth from slavery to death, FOREVER ! Restoring paradise earth, world peace, crushing deaths power and sting, and restoring ETERNAL LIFE as it was in the BEGINNING. Restoring UNIVERSAL PEACE, and ending war on earth forever. Yes Arab and Israelite's will live as brothers in love and peace in Mashiach Jeshua's day as the prophets of Israel prophesied along with all the nations of earth, so great was Jeshua's sacrifice in the EYES of GOD, Jeshua the RIGHT HAND of GOD !
Shalom/Salaam
Psalms 82.6, but to say it all correctly, refers to the eternal divine soul we all have, and Jesus referred to this psalm
The quran also says there was a meeting between Haman and pharoah which could not of taken place
Actually it did. Proven in hieroglyphics the names of a certain pharaoh. One of those names found was Haman who was the Pharaohs chief Architect. Absolute amazing. Just spot on with the Quranic description.
As if much of the Tanakh was not written well after the events described, includes myths and legends, has two contradictory versions of the Creation, etc. There is a terrific story about two Rabbis vigorously arguing back-and-forth over the meaning of a single sentence in the Torah. Eventually, growing impatient at their ignorance, the voice of YHWH calls down, "You're both right." A little more humility in proclamations about one's understanding of the incomprehensible and an acceptance that many religious writings, including the Gospels, the Epistles, and Revelation might be divinely inspired, and "truth" is found in their interstices, would go a long way to making our world a better, more loving, and more tolerant place.
With all due respect. To say that "God is one" is a strange thing to say. The only reason you would say something like that is so that people could understand that there are individual aspects of a specific entity or thing that can be differentiated between each other.
"we are one" hits differently than "I am one." the former seems more reasonable to take at face value. While the latter seems to be euphemistically speaking.
In either case it seems to imply that people should understand that the "entity" is made up of individuals.
If you say
"America is 1", it means that the Americans (Just work with me on this) are united by a specific ideology. However we know that America is made up of many individuals.
However if u SAY that "Jon Dough" is one.....it is almost nonsensical. Outside of thinking that John Dough is some sort of organization.
In what other context would anyone specifically say something like that? I am is just understood to mean an individual...unless you need to clarify something that it's not what you assume.
There is No point in saying I am one. "Rabbi Tovia's" .....is...."
There is NO point in saying "one" as the "one" part in this example is understood.
Im not a Hebrew scholar nor historian nor linguistic expert....so perhaps Just food for thought.
But based on the way that we use modern language (in English anyway)
It almost seems as if the understanding is that there are several entities/individuals are united under some sort of agreement are at play here.
Offline!
Just hi
The early Christians thought that Judaism was up for grabs after the failure of the Bar Kochba revolt. So they tried to grab it!
Ahmed Deedat on you tube
Some of the Dead Sea Scrolls actually have more in common with the Greek Septuagint than the traditional Hebrew Masoretic Text, showing that the Greek translators must have been translating from Hebrew texts that resembled the Dead Sea Scrolls.
That is just incorrect. The Dead Sea Scrolls are almost identical to the Masoretic text except it has some extra letters that barely change pronunciation and extra letters to mark vowels. This was most likely done by the authors of the DSS to make it easier to read before they had vowels.
@@rafoageaeatef4169 no. you are wrong. Can you read ancient Hebrew?
@@innominatusambrosius7103 I actually can. I have read parts of the dead sea scrolls, have you read any?
The furthest difference I noticed was קנהו in Isaiah 1:3 was written as קונאו. The difference being a reduction of ה to א. It just demonstrates a pronunciation difference, no difference in meaning. Another difference is that כי was spelled as כיא which does not change meaning or pronunciation. It just has some variable spelling, most likely done to help readers of the time without vowels. There are all sorts of these small variant spellings, but none change the meaning or even the pronunciation for the most part.
Every time the vowel o or u is used in the Masoretic text, it is replaced by a ו in the DSS. Every time the vowel i is used Masoretic text it is replaced by a י in the DSS. These letters can make the vowel sounds respectively. It basically confirms that the Masorites were careful to preserve the text.
Lori Cash, not every Christian believes in the fertility god or all the other pagan worship!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jesus = a Jew
His Apostles = Jews
Paul of Tarsus = another Jew
James (Jesus brother's) = a Jew
why is the New Testament originally written in Greek if all of them were Aramaic / Hebrew speaking Jews!
P L A G A R I S M.
All prophets were Muslim,
Muslim = one who submits his will to Allah
Master Gichin Funakoshi - how can all prafets be muslim if Islam was created, 800 to 900 year after? Please explain
Islam is derived from Judaism and Christianity. And although we may share some common characteristics, God revealed himself through Gabriel as "Allah" to Muhammad.
By contrast, G-d revealed himself directly to the Jews by name.
Explain that.
Master Gichin Funakoshi prophet Muhammad ( peace be upon him) was illiterate , he could not read or write moreover the bible in his time was written in Hebrew and Greek so there is no chance that he copied the bible, could you explain to me why would a jewish Rabbi of Medina Abdullah ben Sallam accepted Muhammad peace be upon him as a true prophet of Almighty GOD
jewish encyclopedia, 1925; volume 5 page 41 'quote: Esau / Edom is in modern jewry'
www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/5434-edox-idumea
now you know, why the israeli court is full of satanic freemason symbols. It is the old fight esau vs jacob. source know your enemy by thefuelproject.
they expose themselve like the ouran does in surah 3.54 and 8.30.
THIS IS THE TRUE GOSPEL!! OBEY Christ and His commands they are not taught in traditional churches nowadays. First, The Laws Christ commanded are the perfect Law of Love. They are these 3 that fulfill all the law.
1: Love the One True Eternal One with all your strength, all your heart , and all you have.
2: Do Not do unto others/creatures as you would not want them to do unto you.
3: Do unto others/creatures as you would have them do unto you.
The teachings of Christ in Lections XLVI verse 12 We are taught that if a person desires to be a disciple of Christ we must Not eat any flesh from any animal or bird. In the beginning in Genesis 1:29-30 YAHUAH stated very clearly that He gave the herbs, fruits, and seeds for meat to sustain mankind and to sustain the animals. We were never ordained to eat any type of flesh meat that had blood in it. This may be a hard saying but we dine with demons that have influenced men to slaughter innocent animals and birds for our pleasure. This is a great sin and if you are a true follower of Christ we must obey it! The command "Thou shalt not kill" meant not to kill anything, for pleasure in food, or for profit, nor torment any living creature which has the breath of life in it given by YAHUAH. This is in Lections XLVI and Exodus 20:13. I am open to spend more time teaching on these subjects and laws given through Christ but one must have an open heart and an ear to hear. Moses gave laws on certain animals to eat out of the hardness of their hearts in the wilderness even though Yah commanded them not to and they ate and fell by the thousands from the plagues that consumed them from eating flesh meat. Roman Emperor Constantine in the 4th century changed the food laws in scripture that it was ok to eat meat. It was never ok. ANYONE THAT FOLLOWS THESE TEACHINGS WILL BECOME THE ISRAEL OF GOD THE ETERNAL LIVING ONE! Praise the Father YAHUAH
Utter idolatry and paganism, loud and clear!
I hope and pray that everyone that listens to this man... reads the whole chapter that he refers to with his picking and choosing verse. When I was a child there used to be a man called Paul Harvey on the radio. He used to tell what's called the rest of the story. Please get the full story from the Bible and not part of it from this rabbi.
"true" only if it quotes your book? :-) you are biased
He literally admits that later on in the video if you care enough to keep watching past the first 5 minutes
One of the Books Revelation this one make me thing. With Ezekiel, Isaiah ,Daniel. Daniel 9:26 Jeremiah 25:11-12 .Rev 18:21 Do you thing Paul who seem to have more writing have more wrog
The reason Jews don't accept Jesus is Jesus gave the 2nd born northern kingdom the firstborn birthright. The northern kingdom is jacob/Israel/feminine(2nd born birthright holder)...the southern kingdom is Judah/Israel/masculine(firstborn sceptre holder) When messiah ben David and messiah ben joseph arrive they will unite the firstborn Judah/Israel and 2nd born Jacob/Israel and all of Israel will be one house again The torah is divided between 1st born and 2nd born.. sceptre and birthright..masculine and feminine..kingship and priesthood and this will be the difference between mbd and mbj as we see david comes from the firstborn line of judah and joseph comes from the 2nd born birthright line of Joseph. Throughout the torah we see the adversary of the 2nd born birthright holder is the firstborn..example Judah and Joseph but in the end they unite and this is what mbd and mbj will do they will unite the firstborn and 2nd born.
Boy do you have your head filled with garbage. Who is responsible?
+RichardGMoss ..do tell what is in your head...anything to add or subtract..or just a random comment?
You can't even answer my question so your head might explode if I add anything!!
+RichardGMoss the scrptures...if you have something to add then add it ...I am waiting your reply...it is easy to condemn others without giving your own opinion
+RichardGMoss you don't have the understanding of the unification of the firstborn and 2nd born birthright holder...I take it you think you are a firstborn judah....lol