Rabbi Tovia Singer Demonstrates that Church Corrupted the New Testament to Bolster Trinity Doctrine

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 чер 2017
  • In this fascinating broadcast, Rabbi Tovia Singer Illustrates how Christian scribes altered the New Testament in order to prove that the doctrine of the Trinity and other late Church teachings were firmly supported by the Christian Bible.
    outreachjudaism.org/ www.toviasinger.tv/

КОМЕНТАРІ • 156

  • @KS-qi5nz
    @KS-qi5nz 6 років тому +19

    Rabbi Tovia is a fantastic man who doesn't hate Muslims. As a Muslim I respect the Jewish community. We have so much in common.

  • @quame70
    @quame70 5 років тому +22

    Salam, Salom and thank you again may the Almighty God bless you. God is One ☝️

  • @TheMrpalid
    @TheMrpalid 3 роки тому +9

    God is one , not three in one. Alhamdulillah

  • @angelwings1446
    @angelwings1446 5 років тому +28

    I have now watched about 20 of your talks , very gutted that all my life I have believed a lie , it’s shocking that I wasn’t educated enough on scripture, now what do I do ? obviously my bible is now useless, but I love God and want to follow him

    • @NeoLegendX
      @NeoLegendX 5 років тому +3

      god is 1
      you know where to look

    • @shearityisraela7924
      @shearityisraela7924 5 років тому +12

      Hits you like a brick, huh? What do you do now? First thank G-d that your ears have been opened. Then listen to him. Mazel Tov

    • @smokiebad
      @smokiebad 4 роки тому +9

      As a Muslim, I am very happy to see that some Christians are now coming back into the fold of monotheism & discarding pagan customs.

    • @truthseeker6837
      @truthseeker6837 4 роки тому +3

      I felt the same reaction and I started attending my local synagogue 1.5 years ago. I also recommend the videos from “Jews for Judaism”. I have learned so much from both Rabbi Tovia and them. I wish you luck in your journey. 😁

    • @shirleyannelindberg1692
      @shirleyannelindberg1692 4 роки тому

      Truth Seeker,
      Yes indeed, Rabbi Skobac (JEWS for Judaism ✡️) is an excellent teacher, he’s my Rabbi 😇 🙌

  • @mariareyneke9953
    @mariareyneke9953 4 роки тому +4

    Thank you....Baruch HaShem. For the truth.

  • @roberthubbard3367
    @roberthubbard3367 5 років тому +4

    Thank you Rabbi, are you so much that I try to repay you, through God. Also being a better person and you have helped me so much. Thank you, may God bless you

  • @Asdfhjkl998
    @Asdfhjkl998 7 років тому +12

    Rabbi you are over pray God Hasem Bless you all my hard in this world and others ........ God give humanity more Rabbi like you :) we need it :)

  • @freyatilly
    @freyatilly 3 роки тому +3

    Love your in-depth unraveling of these vile teachings. Shifting in time like the sands....

  • @baubljos103
    @baubljos103 2 роки тому +4

    Thanks Rabbi, I concur. I thought I was going crazy because I noticed the same bible problems that your describe, but my christian friends were adamantly opposed to my monotheistic view.

  • @angelaschofield2417
    @angelaschofield2417 4 роки тому +6

    God is not a trinty He is God alone without a devine son. The God of isreal is holy and one on his own.

  • @Rovtful
    @Rovtful 5 років тому +14

    even if this passage was authentic, which clearly it is not, Why would such a central theme of Christianity only appear once!? We have dozens of passages in the Hebrew Bible that point to the oneness of God. Wild , isn't it?

    • @petersimon5893
      @petersimon5893 4 роки тому

      It appears more than once though

    • @Rovtful
      @Rovtful 4 роки тому +2

      @@petersimon5893 echad is one not unity.

    • @opsHPC
      @opsHPC 4 роки тому +1

      OTO TAKE
      Again, you mistaken by misinterpreting the OT and moreover taking it out of context, and the fact that you have to justify the trinity in the OT shows how baseless this concept of God in being 1=3 is. If you were to tell me that God(Jesus) crucifixion is alluded in the OT, then I would most certainly believe in what you have to say in regards to your concept of the “UNITY OF THREE”. But guess what? You don’t, there is no allusion of the crucifixion in the OT and moreover of the concept of TRINITY in the OT. You chose and cherry pick bible verses to suite the AGENDA of this FALSE IDEOLOGY of PAUL’s Christianity of what you have known today.
      There is only one God and only him is worthy to be praised, he neither begets nor is he begotten and there is nothing like him. If you were to ascribe God as being FLESH is the likeness of HUMANS, and HUMANS are LIMITED, while GOD IS UNLIMITED, for it goes against the essence of God, for he has no shape nor form and cannot be seen...

    • @Rovtful
      @Rovtful 4 роки тому +3

      @OTO TAKE man and woman are one flesh when Gd commands them to be together. Hear oh Israel gd is one. How much more proof do you need. If Gd wanted humanity to worship the trinity why make it so confusing. The oneness of Gd is blatantly clear. Also, before Christianity do you really think Jews worshipped incorrectly. Would Gd mislead his people on purpose only to change His mind. God is not a man ... see Numbers 23 19 1 Samuke 15 29.

    • @Rovtful
      @Rovtful 4 роки тому +1

      @OTO TAKE im just applying the well known dictum of solo scriptura. Just look at the context. Donyou really think if Gd wanted to be worshipped as a trinity He wouldn't have made it clear without any question. Why didn't he have a passage that said worship Me asa compound unity. Gd doesn't play games like that

  • @wimm1392
    @wimm1392 5 років тому +5

    Isaiah 43:10-11 beautiful closure that explains it all.
    Thank you Rabbi.

    • @c.c.7687
      @c.c.7687 2 роки тому

      @@V_George - Pure blasphemy. Repent before this paganism destroys you on Judgment Day.

  • @TheTrinityDelusion
    @TheTrinityDelusion 7 років тому +9

    Had it been legitimate, 1 John 5:7 would not provided evidence for the doctrine of the Trinity. It would only say there are 3 testimonies in heaven, the Father, the Word, the Spirit. This does not amount to a three-in-one-God.

    • @petersimon5893
      @petersimon5893 4 роки тому

      1John 5:8 the Spirit, the water, and the blood-and these three are in agreement. 9Even if we accept human testimony, the testimony of God is greater. For this is the testimony that God has given about His Son.

    • @petersimon5893
      @petersimon5893 4 роки тому +1

      Matthew 3:17
      And a voice from heaven said, "This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased!"

    • @petersimon5893
      @petersimon5893 4 роки тому +1

      John 8:18
      I am One who testifies about Myself, and the Father, who sent Me, also testifies about Me."

    • @janishart5128
      @janishart5128 3 роки тому +1

      @@petersimon5893: Your false, pagan, man-made, anti-God, anti-Jewish, hate-filled, replacement theology work of fiction "New Testament" is NOT scripture that was given to mankind by God, and it arrogantly, blasphemously and self-righteously puts words in His mouth that He NEVER said to us! PLEASE do the research for YOURSELF, and stop listening with "itching ears" to the "blind guides", who LIE to you from the pulpit every week. Christianity has been outright LYING to us for thousands of years and is the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on mankind. PLEASE DO THE RESEARCH!

  • @realitycheck7307
    @realitycheck7307 2 роки тому +1

    Thx Rabbi for answering explaining these questions to truthseekers

  • @RoseSharon7777
    @RoseSharon7777 3 роки тому

    Thank you Mr. Singer. You're channel has helped me get a better understanding of the bible. I left Christianity about 4 years ago. Though I dont agree with all you believe, I'm thankful I found the truth. :)

  • @GeorgeHall-geehall1
    @GeorgeHall-geehall1 7 років тому +5

    Perhaps the most interesting thing about the Trinity was that it was a LATE development...actually first mooted in an UNFAMILIAR form with Theophilus of Antioch BEFORE the 190s c.e., when he proposed one of God/Logos/SOPHIA (wisdom). Then Tertullian came up with the version we NOW know about.
    However, in the period PRIOR to Theophilus of Antioch...the going idea was "Two Powers in Heaven." Theophilus wasn't that far away from such an idea...essentially his "trinity/triad" was an expansion on the original Gnostic Two Powers, with "Sophia" being a personified concept.
    Not that Two Powers in Heaven was a good idea.

    • @GeorgeHall-geehall1
      @GeorgeHall-geehall1 7 років тому

      Quoting Proverbs 30:4 out of context doesn't change anything...one...the original theology was Two Powers in Heaven. That also meant that the earliest form of Christianity was of a GNOSTIC nature. Definitely a confluence of Samaritan theology and Hellenicised-Jewish (as in Philo) thinking...a development from known streams that tended to try to be rivals to the Jerusalem paradigm.
      From there...heck, every early church father BEFORE Irenaeus shows signs of that Gnostic base. EVEN the guy Irenaeus claimed as his teacher...and gee, you really should research further, because you'll get a shock to find Ignatius AND Polycarp were the SAME person...noted by an independent witness under the description Peregrinus Proteus. The closest that guy had to a real name may be Leucius Charinus...in which case, research that, because you'll find a guy that ended up, also attested by Lucian, as crapping his nest with the early form...the church has since denounced him...but KEPT some of his best stories. You know, the ones about John being at Patmos and Ephesus? They're known to have come from the pen of Leucius Charinus.
      So...a decade or three before Irenaeus, we still have Theophilus of Antioch devising the first KNOWN Trinity idea or "triad" as he called it.
      God-Logos-Sophia. Sophia being the Gnostic term meaning Wisdom.
      Really, the form you're familiar with comes up probably no earlier than Tertullian.
      I'll stand by the idea of the trinity being a LATE development after the 190s c.e., taking over from the Two Powers in Heaven model.
      The fact that the guy running around in the MIDDLE of the second century...and who Irenaeus labeled "many fruits(=the actual meaning of Polycarp), while trying to disguise that he was also the fiery one "Ignatius" (which should tell you the association with the way Peregrinus/Polycarp met his suicidal end) was a creator of new fiction and a but of a showman/huckster is one thing. But then there's Irenaeus...his own works clue in that Irenaeus worked for the EMPEROR.
      Irenaeus' ramblings against a group of Christians/ChrEstians OTHER than his own group can be more easily seen for what they were by looking at the fact at the VERY same time as Irenaeus PERSECUTED a prior grouping...Commodus had a philosopher doing the same thing to the Samaritans.
      That's the underlying reality.
      And...it means Acts is a definite second-century fiction that Irenaeus seemed to want to promote...while he took over the flocks of the prior groupings.
      NOT that the prior Gnostic form was any better...it was a development of the ALTERNATIVE narrativing of the Samaritans and Hellenicists.

  • @crictube6846
    @crictube6846 3 роки тому +1

    I have a question for you singer! It says in the Quran about changes made in the Bible! Doesn’t it make the claim much stronger for Islam!

  • @osvaldolopez9972
    @osvaldolopez9972 5 років тому +1

    Excellent.

  • @samuelbenitez8498
    @samuelbenitez8498 5 років тому +4

    Thank you great rabbi for the truth, I post these on my face book and i get such lash back from the cristians, they get so hateful it's sad that they cannot accept the truth.

  • @mrhollywood7387
    @mrhollywood7387 7 років тому +5

    I know in 1697 Thomas Aikenhead an eighteen year old student charged with denying the Trinity was hanged at Edinburgh Scotland . "GOOD EATS"

    • @petersimon5893
      @petersimon5893 4 роки тому

      And Jesus was charged and killed in +/- AD33

    • @mumthaasshaahudeen9117
      @mumthaasshaahudeen9117 3 роки тому

      the trinity is a Pagan doctrine.

    • @mumthaasshaahudeen9117
      @mumthaasshaahudeen9117 3 роки тому

      SO So bad thing.these trinitarians Are So Bad people.I Am Wondering why are these trinitarians So DESPERATE???

  • @dr.suliman7801
    @dr.suliman7801 7 років тому +13

    First comment as usual! Salam alaikum dear Rabbi, great video as always! God bless

  • @mitzvahgolem8366
    @mitzvahgolem8366 7 років тому +1

    Eusebius reads Mathew 28:18 as " go out and make apostles in my name" Many scholars claim koine greek was modified to comport with Trinity of 1 John 5:7.
    Unitarian researchers have alot on this.
    We already know they admitted modifying John also in 7:53 and Mark 16:9-20 which appear no where in original koine greek papyrus from 130ce.

  • @lindacarballo9021
    @lindacarballo9021 3 роки тому

    Shalom, I just have a question. How do you explain that the Memra is God YHVH himself or is the logos who become God, acording christianity they explain that the memra is the son God who created the universe. Do you know what Im saying?

  • @mogheerbarghuthy2011
    @mogheerbarghuthy2011 7 років тому +2

    dear rabbi thanks for this great video : in 1952 in the Revised Standard Version this verse 1 John 5:7 concerning trinity was thrown out by 32 scholars who revised king James Version and they said this verse doesn't exist in the manuscript but in the 1977 edition of the Revised Standard Version they put it back , ( check the editions for yourself ) who authorized them to add or delete?? God???
    but can you EXPLAIN this for us
    in 2 chronicles 21:20 ""Jehoram"" was 32 years when he became a king and he ruled for 8 years therefor he was 40 years old when he died .
    also the bible tells us just one verse before that verse 17 ""And they came up into Judah, and brake into it, and carried away all the substance that was found in the king's house, and his sons also, and his wives; so that there was never a son left him, save Jehoahaz, the youngest of his sons.""
    so after"" Jehoram"" died in 2 chronicles 22 :1 the bible tells us ""the inhabitants of Jerusalem made Ahaziah his youngest son king in his stead. "
    2 "Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother's name also was Athaliah the daughter of Omri.""
    after ruling one year he was killed , so he was 42 years when he became king for one year then he died .
    the question how can be the son ""Ahaziah"" 3 years older than his father ""Jehoram ""
    even as a miracle doesn't happen . no son can be born before his father .
    so did God inspiar the writers of the Holy book???
    further more in 2 Kings 8:26 ""Ahaziah"" was 22 years old when he became a king not 42 as the writer of 2 chronicles tells us , which one of the two writers was inspiard by God?? one of them is untrue.

  • @mitzvahgolem8366
    @mitzvahgolem8366 7 років тому +7

    From Anthanasius( who killed Arius) onward the church persecuted exterminated all Arians who followed Arius.
    Study history from 4th century Rome onward to crusades.
    They killed more in name of JC and church dogma than the pagan romans did for a much longer period. No one in the holy roman empire could question or reject the Nicean creeds. Arians rejected Trinity insertion .
    The Visogoths ,Vandals were Arians. Later to be converted or killed to accept Nicean creeds.

  • @mrhollywood7387
    @mrhollywood7387 7 років тому

    Hi I just ford The Holy Scriptures According to the Masoretic Text A New Translation with the aid of previous versions and with constant consultation of Jewish Authorities . I would like to know If there is something like note book. Fond your book there 37:00 a book it's steel a lot but getting there. God does have to be first .

  • @fidelcatsro6948
    @fidelcatsro6948 7 років тому +8

    meow meow 2nd visitor comments, great video!

    • @janishart5128
      @janishart5128 4 роки тому

      @@דניאלהאשם: Actually YOU look like the "idiot" - you have a big hook in your eye, that's making it look all red!!! 😆👎🤐

  • @efrenreyes3102
    @efrenreyes3102 3 роки тому

    Shalom thanks for the explanation. I have a question. Is God elohim a corporeous God? Couse some says that the God of Israel has a body since the begining, and they quote the siur qomma.

    • @pardes7342
      @pardes7342 3 роки тому +1

      EFREN: In Orthodox Judaism, G-d is incorporeal- meaning has no material existence like us. He is not human or material and is not under time. HE is outside time. His Holy Name which we don't utter YHVK or call him as HaShem =the name means he is now, past and in the future all merged into one. Hard for any human mind to understand how that works.
      We use HE to mean or refer to him because he is mighty, powerful, full of strength.....as shown in the way he runs the world....like in nature and also even the very minute detail of your life. A person just have to realize it.

  • @Tina4Yhwh
    @Tina4Yhwh 7 років тому

    Tovia look at Waldensian Confessions of Faith, 1120
    It came out way before the KJV. And it talk about the Trinity.

    • @ToviaSinger1
      @ToviaSinger1  7 років тому +2

      That is the whole point. Although the Nicene Creed dates back to he forth century, the Johannine Comma first appeared in Greek manuscripts of the New Testament 500 years ago!

    • @4memotivation
      @4memotivation 6 років тому

      Maryah in other words you have no proof or evidence. Get the veil off yourself.

  • @julianmontoya428
    @julianmontoya428 2 роки тому

    All people should realize, if the holy commandments were given to the Hebrew nation, some point in world history others started to learn truth about the laws from G-D, if a true king or true politician and military leader was serving G-D from their heart, then the laws from G-D would be the laws of the land! ...and as time passes all would be able to obey ! It would fill our hearts and minds as truth....and we would all know the difference between good vs evil!....generation after generation we have world history, and where is the nation that gave their heart and people to the laws from G-D?

  • @Ryan_Zell
    @Ryan_Zell 3 роки тому

    Rabbi Israel Zolli would disagree with you.
    If the gentiles were pouring into this Messianic Jesus called the Christ, why didn't they recognize that the nations were all becoming, not only God fearers, but worshiping God thru this Messiah?

  • @zouksesanet
    @zouksesanet 9 місяців тому

    Apostolic Oneness Pentecostals believe in One numerical God, and reject the Trinity. David K Bernard of UPCI for example. The Biblos Network on this Tube also. See the teaching entitled The Oneness of God.

  • @almakaster6279
    @almakaster6279 6 років тому +1

    I was wondering how Christian came about since Jesus was a jew

  • @shineyourlight9036
    @shineyourlight9036 7 років тому +1

    If I do go in a church, it perplexes me why they say Jesus is Gd! As a Jew it shocks me, I don't understand it.

    • @2009mikeyo
      @2009mikeyo 7 років тому +4

      shineyourlight as the rabbi said in his other video jews can't even use the toilet of a church let alone go in one. As a muslim it also shocks me till now that Christians worship a (MAN) Oh well my God is unseen and immortal and all knowing.

    • @shineyourlight9036
      @shineyourlight9036 7 років тому

      mike younes
      Look they're my beautiful brothers and sisters like ur. I just can't conceive of it the way they believe it or see it. Hashem means the name we can't even say the name but as said they're good people. There was in the past a lot of ignorance by them against Jews and killing and rape etc people are more enlightened now. - we hope!

    • @2009mikeyo
      @2009mikeyo 7 років тому

      Off topic but I would like to know what is your view on islam? Me as a muslim I think jewish people worship the same God as us and we believe that each person is responsible for their own action.

    • @shineyourlight9036
      @shineyourlight9036 7 років тому

      mike younes
      Yes I have to believe each person is responsible for their own actions f sure. I feel I have relationship with Hshem and in different parts of my life I believe He helped me/us. I have no clue about the suffering in the world it bothers me deeply
      I can only think to try to help where possible

    • @2009mikeyo
      @2009mikeyo 7 років тому

      What is your view on islam?

  • @susamongus9981
    @susamongus9981 2 роки тому

    1 John 5:7 and Matthew 28:19 were corrupted to put the trinity into the NT

  • @paulbrill3668
    @paulbrill3668 5 років тому

    Also with the baptism part, Paul says he saw some of the disciples baptizing to only Jesus.

  • @mitzvahgolem8366
    @mitzvahgolem8366 7 років тому +1

    Mathew 29:19... Questionable authenticity as per scholars.

  • @angrypat4023
    @angrypat4023 7 років тому +10

    Man, I don't understand the conflict between muslims and jews. Of course there is the palestine and israel conflict but aside from that, we are literally brothers! I love you rabbi and jews like you. May Allah guide and bless you all towards Islam, the continuation of the religion of the Mighty Prophet Moses AS, or at least let there be peace! Ameen!

    • @PT-kk8dp
      @PT-kk8dp 7 років тому +2

      Rothschild funded fiat money usurious banker state of zionism ruined the world. Problems are geopolitical, not religious and perhaps someone can clarify that the children of Israel are only supposed to return to the promised land only when the Moshiach arrives. Clearly Israel is more of a military base built on injustice/usurpation for the West than a holy land as of now and since creation. I hope my dear rabbi does not take offence at any of this, I have high respect for him he is truly beautiful. I am aware of many Orthodox jews (Naturei Karta) who stand against Israel including the ones in Iran.

    • @PT-kk8dp
      @PT-kk8dp 7 років тому

      Sura (5:51) - "O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people."
      This refers to Jews and Christians who are friends of each other, not all Jews or Christians. In other words, the zionist alliance which is a geopolitical movement and as we see around the world today (Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and even the puppet West created wahabist Kingdom of Saudis, another creation like Israel which is destroying Yemen) lead by US/UK/Israel creating proxy wars in Middle East for Oded Yinon Plan. Please refer to Sheikh Imran Hosein for his explanation on this which is quite simple.

    • @angrypat4023
      @angrypat4023 7 років тому

      C Howard I think it unfair that we can address and explain violence in the torah as being fair in actual fact yet when it comes to Islam, the standards drop and its called murder. There was a reason for bani Qurayza and thus a reason for Khayber. Muslims were betrayed and true Jews would be abhored at jews who break a promise. This I know.
      2. Of course our books contradict one another. That is fact. They condratict on multiple matters. Whats your point? Can't we share similarities and have peace among them? Or do you lot just want to throw accusations left and right?

    • @jamiebehun1743
      @jamiebehun1743 7 років тому

      Deborah stop being an Islamophobe

    • @treeoflife3494
      @treeoflife3494 7 років тому

      Angry Pat
      ''Mayyyybe because after Muhammad issued relgious edicts like ''No two religions can exist in Arabia,' the Jews were exiled into the Desert TO DIE. etc etc etc etc

  • @peterstewart3093
    @peterstewart3093 5 років тому +2

    and how do they keep it , O by kill people who don't believe it .

  • @louislance6523
    @louislance6523 4 роки тому

    1 John 2:18 King James Version (KJV)
    18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.

  • @shawnstephens6795
    @shawnstephens6795 3 роки тому +1

    Read the torah commentary...adding to scripture is a very jewish practice.

  • @petersimon5893
    @petersimon5893 4 роки тому

    Daniel 7:13-14
    13 “In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man,[a] coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence. 14 He was given authority, glory and sovereign power; all nations and peoples of every language worshiped him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion that will not pass away, and his kingdom is one that will never be destroyed.

  • @shineyourlight9036
    @shineyourlight9036 7 років тому +1

    I see what you are doing now. Out of love and compassion for Christian people you are trying to save them. A tall order!!
    I see that the early church there were those who wanted to keep it Jewish but it evolved the other way. But if everything is divine providence then why did it evolve the other way? Free will? I am Jewish maybe you want to do a show on this. It is perplexing
    Of course we do not understand Hshem's ways. I and others would appreciate your take on this

  • @mrhollywood7387
    @mrhollywood7387 7 років тому +1

    The fact that the Gospels that were given to the Gentiles by the Ebionite Nazirene Disciples of Yeshu/ Jesus were themselves of a more sample and lesser spiritual level even prior to being corrupted by the Gentiles. Thus St. Jerome writes with respect to the Original Gospel which was written in Hebrew Characters:

    • @theprimativechurch7067
      @theprimativechurch7067 7 років тому

      Brother never again refer to Jesus as Yeshu, This is a hebrew epithet against Jesus meaning may his name be blotted out. Yeshu, a “play” on His correct name that is actually an acronym standing for Yimmach Shemo Ve-zikro

  • @ghostriders_1
    @ghostriders_1 4 роки тому

    Rabbi I'd really like you to turn your talents to the question of the historicity of Jesus. I'd really appreciate your take on serious mythicism, not the crazies like Joseph Atwill or Archyra S but the Earl Doherty/ Richard Carrier thesis.

  • @mrhollywood7387
    @mrhollywood7387 7 років тому +3

    Know ten my friend, that the Trinity was born above three hundred years after the ancient Gospel was declared; it was conceived in ignorance, brought forth and maintained by cruelty. Arianism is the name given to an anti-Trinitarian belief system taught by Arius. Your said it

    • @theprimativechurch7067
      @theprimativechurch7067 7 років тому

      Not so as Arius believed in a Triad, Of unequal glories. Arius himself was a Lucianite.

  • @jdaze1
    @jdaze1 2 роки тому

    1st John 5:7 is not necessarily corruption. The word and spirit came to the prophets thruout the tanak. The corruption lies in the fact that the WORD was changed to the SON in the NT and made into a Bible character. (Personified) and conflated with the life of John the Baptist. The word and holy spirit are THE FATHER not 2 additional persons. Just like in the Tanak.
    Isaiah 40:3 is pretty clear. Then the corruptions continued by misappropriation of prophecies such Isaiah 7:14 which is refuted by Romans 1:3-4. There was no Jesus, no virgin birth, no crucifixion, no bodily resurrection from a tomb. Spiritual truths (allegory and metaphors) were literalized by Rome and has led to over 1700 years of a strong delusion. Hebrews 5:7, Psalms 18, 41, 91 are just few verses that refute the crucifixion outright. And the tanak clearly states that the firstborn son of God is Israel. Every book in the Christian Bible has been highly corrupted but the simple truth is still hidden within for those who actually study the tanak.

  • @jmlsaft912
    @jmlsaft912 2 роки тому

    Take responsibility for the Hebrews corrupting the OT with plagerism.

  • @peterstewart3093
    @peterstewart3093 5 років тому

    Matt 28:19 , insertion . Lucian of Samosata . Arianism was killed over the trinity . Jeremiah 8:8 .

  • @Brian-vk6tz
    @Brian-vk6tz 4 роки тому

    Maybe everyone should look up marilyn hickey,or slain in the spirit videos..they have to be of God,I've never seen anyone healed using any other name than jesus..

  • @billmartinez315
    @billmartinez315 4 роки тому

    True, there is no savior but God. it was He that sent Moses, and it was He that sent my Lord Jesus.

    • @mumthaasshaahudeen9117
      @mumthaasshaahudeen9117 3 роки тому

      RIGHT.

    • @jo-wv4lc
      @jo-wv4lc Рік тому

      Jesus is lord 😅😂 what a joke?

    • @billmartinez315
      @billmartinez315 Рік тому

      @@jo-wv4lc psalm 110
      1¶[[A Psalm of David.]] The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.
      2The LORD shall send the rod of thy strength out of Zion: rule thou in the midst of thine enemies.
      3Thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power, in the beauties of holiness from the womb of the morning: thou hast the dew of thy youth.
      4The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.
      Daniel 7
      13I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him.
      14And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.

  • @edilalewis654
    @edilalewis654 7 років тому +1

    if the 12 apostles are mistakenly wrong then why is God using their names on the foundation of the Kingdom of Heaven

  • @Bobbel888
    @Bobbel888 5 років тому +1

    Abraham had no scriptures. He had a relationship with God! Now, this Rabbi puts the scriptures over a relationship with God. This is quite natural if you have none with God and it is natural to expect from others to fall into the same hole.

    • @mumthaasshaahudeen9117
      @mumthaasshaahudeen9117 3 роки тому

      you Are Wrong.PROPHET Abraham(PBUH) HAD A SCRIPTURE FOR HIM.GOD ALMIGHTY GAVE PROPHET Abraham(PBUH) "THE SCROLLS" WHICH SHOW THE TRUTH THAT GOD ALMIGHTY Is NEVER EVER a multipersonal being BUT ONLY A SINGLE PERSONAL BEING ONLY.

  • @treeoflife3494
    @treeoflife3494 7 років тому

    the New Testament writers followed the Septuagint translation of the Old Testament Which is far more accurate than the masoretic text that the Jews today like this Jew here uses.
    *UA-cam* - ''New Testament Quotations that follow the Septuagint''

  • @RoseSharon7777
    @RoseSharon7777 6 років тому +2

    I have to thank the Rabbi. He opened my eyes to see the lies of the church but in the process I found the true messiah. He was 100% human anointed by Yhvh. The promised son that was prophecied thru out the OT. He is NOT God in the flesh. He is Yhvhs logos made flesh just like John 1 says. He is the beginning of the new creation, a new type of humanity. By IT and thru IT was all things made. He's the Logos of Yhvh from the foundation of the world, NOT a pre-existant person.

    • @rawbrutaltruth
      @rawbrutaltruth 5 років тому

      go to proverbs 8 chap. the is the one identified as gods master worker before creation.....it the spirit being know as the word....this being is metaphorically called Wisdom in this instance...….do not let gender use throw you there are no male or females in the heavenly so if you see this spirit person seen as a female its the same person. for reasons connected to the creative process metaphorically

  • @louislance6523
    @louislance6523 4 роки тому

    1 John 2:22
    “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.”

    • @mumthaasshaahudeen9117
      @mumthaasshaahudeen9117 3 роки тому +1

      yeah those people may be antichrists.BUT you And Everyone NEEDS TO KNOW A RIGHT THING.Jesus christ(PBUH) IS NEVER EVER a god At All BUT ONLY A SERVANT OF GOD ALMIGHTY WHO IS THE MOST OBEDIENT ONE.

  • @mrhollywood7387
    @mrhollywood7387 7 років тому

    Just funny ...When the Jews pray for there child to profitable to the Lord , Genitals pray for there child to happy To God

  • @billmartinez315
    @billmartinez315 4 роки тому

    All that you are indicating is true, and God will hold those who changed His Word accountable. I know by personal experience that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the Living God. As it is written in Genesis, God stated "let us make man in our image". The first man, Adam.. was created. and was made a living soul when God breathed into his body the breathe of life. The last Adam is like God in that he is the express image of God's person. Jesus is the "last Adam". He is not God. He overcame sin and death (spiritual separation from God) by obeying God.s Word without sin unto death. As born again Christians, we have come to God with a repentant heart, and we have died unto sin, and have been raised from the state of spiritual separation from God into a personal relationship with God. We are being conformed to the image of God's Son as we learn to apply God's Word in our daily lives.

  • @Ronyron3053
    @Ronyron3053 5 років тому

    The Father, the son=the word of God, and the spirit case closed

    • @mumthaasshaahudeen9117
      @mumthaasshaahudeen9117 3 роки тому +1

      That Does NOT show a tri-unity At All.trinity IS NOT found Anywhere in The bible.the trinity is a Later church Invention.

  • @israelomotayo8488
    @israelomotayo8488 5 років тому

    Trinity is not scriptural but Yahshua is the Messiah. Soon, the world will know this for a fact.

    • @putzgadol
      @putzgadol 4 роки тому +3

      Yoshua is NOT the Messiah. He did not accomplish a single requirement. He was not annointed king of Israel. E did not come from the tribe of Judah. He di not cause ingathering the world's Jews back to Israel. He did not create an era of worldwide peace, etc.

  • @tomboker8506
    @tomboker8506 4 роки тому

    in the NAME of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. that conveys Trinity.

    • @TheMrpalid
      @TheMrpalid 3 роки тому +3

      Trinity is pagan polytheism masquerading as monotheism

    • @mumthaasshaahudeen9117
      @mumthaasshaahudeen9117 3 роки тому +2

      that does NOT show trinity AT All.trinity Is NOT mentioned Anywhere in The bible At All.trinity Is A Later church Invention Only.

    • @tomboker8506
      @tomboker8506 3 роки тому

      @@mumthaasshaahudeen9117 it indeed does show trinity. Father Son and Holy Ghost. In the one name.

    • @gabrielleangelica1977
      @gabrielleangelica1977 2 роки тому +1

      @@tomboker8506 I'm sorry but I'm afraid it doesn't...👹