5 Differences Between "OLD MONEY" and Rich People

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 150

  • @babycakes1402
    @babycakes1402 Рік тому +112

    Wealth whispers, and money screams.

    • @oldmoneyluxury
      @oldmoneyluxury  Рік тому +12

      Well said!

    • @msairs
      @msairs Рік тому +1

      those people who can't afford real jewels say this. lol. really though back in the really olden days, persian kings and asian royals wore lots of jewels. but then a lot of them were taken from them, so its mostly a ptsd thing thats passed down for generations. lol

    • @ortenciafigueroa2782
      @ortenciafigueroa2782 Рік тому

      Y.quien.da.todoeso...dime.oky

    • @ortenciafigueroa2782
      @ortenciafigueroa2782 Рік тому

      A..eso.son.historias

    • @ortenciafigueroa2782
      @ortenciafigueroa2782 Рік тому

      A.sigen.con.la.misma.tonteri..sean.serios.oky

  • @Silversiren-d1b
    @Silversiren-d1b Рік тому +27

    Old and new money differ in their stealth and flashiness. Old money is often more subtle and conservative with their wealth, while new money is often showy and ostentatious. Old money is usually more content with their wealth and less concerned with status, while new money is often focused on status and impressing others. Old money is typically more concerned with preserving wealth, while new money is more focused on accumulating wealth. Old money is often inherited, while new money is typically earned. New money is often associated with higher risks and greater rewards. This is because old money has already passed down the generations, so the individuals who possess it are already accustomed to their wealth and more content with what they have. They are less likely to take on the risks associated with new money in order to achieve greater rewards. Meanwhile, those who have just acquired their wealth tend to be more motivated to grow it, and in turn, show it off to others.

  • @TheYogaDawg
    @TheYogaDawg Рік тому +21

    Unfortunate that some see money worked for by self-made ppl as unearned, while those who are born into wealth sometimes dodge this scrutiny.

  • @modfus
    @modfus Рік тому +83

    America does not have real "aristocracy" - that is not the correct term for America's elite. They would more correctly be called a plutocracy. In Europe, the aristocracy were the social class of people who were titled by the monarch - they were not always extremely wealthy but had great prestige because of their social rank.
    In America, it's ALWAYS about the money!

    • @LJB103
      @LJB103 Рік тому +13

      Not always in Boston. I met one very old society member, and while he and his family had no money left, they were still invited everywhere due to being descended from one of the more notable Mayflower passengers and having inter-married with society through the centuries.

    • @pvdp2
      @pvdp2 Рік тому +4

      There should be the American local gentry duly recognized by the British monarchy during the colonial period but it did not happen. Unlike the Spanish colonies where the local gentry of indio and mestizo racial class were duly recognized.

    • @Laotzu.Goldbug
      @Laotzu.Goldbug Рік тому +1

      Indeed this is true. America does not have a true aristocracy, because ultimately all true aristocracies are based on those who fight. America has a pseudo aristocracy and perhaps with time may have developed something a little bit more legitimate.

    • @Laotzu.Goldbug
      @Laotzu.Goldbug Рік тому

      @@artandarchitecture6399 aristocracy has nothing to do with titles and everything to do with hierarchy. you can't free yourself from it anymore than you can the need to breathe oxygen. it always comes back because it is part of all human social organization.
      The only thing you can choose is whether your hierarchy, and your elites, will be organic and healthy, or artificial and degenerative.

    • @LegendOfTheOld
      @LegendOfTheOld Рік тому

      It's (almost) always about the money. The aristocracy was not just nobled or appointed, they were rewarded with land and privileges.
      That's why modern monarchs made use of medals for commoners, it's a "nice" way to say "thank you for your service" without commiting on it.

  • @overman2306
    @overman2306 Рік тому +20

    The difference between old and new money is time. Old money was once new money. Super obvious, yet not so obvious.

    • @oldmoneyluxury
      @oldmoneyluxury  Рік тому

      🤔

    • @lucasley20
      @lucasley20 Рік тому +1

      Good point!

    • @overman2306
      @overman2306 11 місяців тому

      @peepeepoopoo5932 Yet the obviousness does not change behavior. Old money still looks down on new money without realizing their ancestors were once new money and looked down upon themselves.

    • @MoivinSulunker
      @MoivinSulunker 8 місяців тому +1

      There is also the element of time + character. New money doesn't become old money unless the traits of character are used.

    • @overman2306
      @overman2306 8 місяців тому

      @@MoivinSulunker That's still time. The Vikings became the Normans. The Normans became the monarch in England.

  • @Classof-iu6yz
    @Classof-iu6yz Рік тому +13

    The easiest differentiator of Old vs New Money I've ever heard of was on Palm Beach at the Bath & Tennis Club. Trump wanted to become a member but they found him to be garish new money. So Trump, in classic Trump style, turned Mar-a-Lago into a club. Greg Norman, yes the golfer, once applied and as part of the process was required to throw a party for the members. As the story was told to me, they saw him drinking a beer from the bottle and based on that plus his first gen wealth was enough to flunk him. My grandmother lived on the island and worked there as a real estate agent to the ultra-wealthy so she always had the inside scoop on the leisure class.

    • @oldmoneyluxury
      @oldmoneyluxury  Рік тому +3

      Fascinating! Mar-a-Lago was definitely designed to “compete” with the Old Money clubs Trump couldn’t get into. If you’d be up for an interview with the channel on this topic, email us: theoldmoneyluxury@gmail.com

  • @davidstephan5116
    @davidstephan5116 Рік тому +29

    Old money…. Born into it. Winning the baby lottery.
    New money… self made, good work ethic

  • @therearenoshortcuts9868
    @therearenoshortcuts9868 Рік тому +16

    Old Money vs New Money vs No Money ("I might have money in the future tho...") LOL

  • @LJB103
    @LJB103 Рік тому +16

    Where in the name of all that's good and holy did you get the idea that Joseph P Kennedy married into the Cabot Lodges? Rose was the daughter of John "Honey Fitz" Fitzgerald (son of Irish Immigrants). I knew only one true "old money" person. He lived in a nice but unpretentious home - everything inside was of the best as was the food and wine. When out with friends, he never bought a round of drinks while everyone else did.

  • @trinitodbone
    @trinitodbone Рік тому +12

    WAIT UNTIL I GET MY MONEY RIGHT
    THEN YOU CANT TELL ME NOTHING..
    RIGHT

  • @lvettesonai
    @lvettesonai Рік тому +4

    Refined and dignified vs usually loud and tacky.

  • @trinitodbone
    @trinitodbone Рік тому +14

    NO ONE MAN SHOULD HAVE ALL THAT POWER

    • @babycakes1402
      @babycakes1402 Рік тому +2

      So true. Absolute power corrupts.

    • @davidstephan5116
      @davidstephan5116 Рік тому +2

      You’d think different if you were successful. Stop being jealous

    • @babycakes1402
      @babycakes1402 Рік тому +4

      @David Stephan it's the same for all of them, regardless of party affiliation. That's why Presidents have term limits & why there is talk of doing the same for the house, senate & possibly even federal judges.

    • @babycakes1402
      @babycakes1402 Рік тому

      @@davidstephan5116 I realize that being a keyboard warrior makes you feel ten feet tall & bullet proof but honestly, you really need a new hobby.

    • @babycakes1402
      @babycakes1402 Рік тому +3

      @@davidstephan5116 So David, what is YOUR definition of 'successful'? Is it getting out & actually doing something productive, or is it hiding behind a keyboard, throwing accusations at people who actually are?

  • @crimsonpride9975
    @crimsonpride9975 Рік тому +7

    You need to work on your research. Joe Kennedy, Sr. married into the Fitzgerald family, not the Cabot Lodge family.

  • @SembuaHumpdediddle
    @SembuaHumpdediddle 8 місяців тому +2

    According to this, I think like Old Money, even though my family was upper Middle Class, and I am poor.
    On one side self-made man, and on mother's side Anglo-Norman landlords of every Anglo-Norman family -- mixed with families of Spanish condes -- losing inheritance during wars of religion, then mixing with indentured Dunbar captives sent to America to mercifully keep from executing them.
    Father's side was mixed low-class Palatine/Swiss/Alsatian anabaptist with German nobility who gave up their catholic inheritance in favor of the Bible and America; and Irish royalty. So the Old Money attitudes I seem to have instinctively inherited.

  • @hummingbirdofgumption3263
    @hummingbirdofgumption3263 Рік тому +16

    Technically speaking, Elon Musk is not new money. His father owned an emerald mine in South Africa. However, he's new to the US and can't shut up, so he's functionally new money.

    • @citizen9403
      @citizen9403 Рік тому

      You are correct and wrong. Yes his dad is wealthy and is an entrepreneur, but Elon did not get any of his wealth. Elon came to Canada and got his citizenship and went to college. He then went to I think it was a college in the United States where he got a his 3rd citizenship. He started and merged with other tech companies to make his money. Some companies he was pushed out of. But Each time he sold he used the money he gained to invest in other companies. He was quite often broke and living on some friends couch with no money. Even though he just made millions after selling he would invest it right away and not have money for rent. Elon is most definitely not of old money. He is 100% new money in every way.

  • @Diablo22967
    @Diablo22967 Рік тому

    What I love about all this is that New money is basically how old money used to be in the 1700 or 1800, procuring their wealth exactly how old money procured their wealth by exploiting the new technologies and methods of the day

  • @bernadettegiancarlo6035
    @bernadettegiancarlo6035 11 місяців тому +1

    All those old money families took on new money ways, except the earning part, and went broke.

  • @wintermatherne2524
    @wintermatherne2524 Рік тому +2

    I can’t stand new money architecture, but unfortunately, I’m no money.

  • @JLW667
    @JLW667 Рік тому +3

    1:02
    3:33
    3:47
    4:37
    7:14

  • @eploy2004
    @eploy2004 8 місяців тому

    Much of old money seems to be centered around pedigree and legacy. Mere money is secondary. Unfortunately, we cannot pick and choose our ancestors. What is the "right" pedigree one should cultivate now so that one's descendants will have a better chance of acceptance into old money society? Obviously, wealth obtained through gambling or a winning lottery ticket won't cut it, and some wealth and ancestral profiles are better than others. Could you elaborate more on this delicate topic in a dedicated video on the subject? In general, thank you for the great content. Will keep watching.

  • @rahimshahid1937
    @rahimshahid1937 Рік тому

    AWESOME AWESOME VIDEO THANK YOU FOR POSTING 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽👑👑👑👑

  • @danf4447
    @danf4447 Рік тому +11

    rockerfellers are only 100 years old at most and made their money from gasoline and cars havent been around for that long. so to call this "old " money is absurd. there is just a lot of it.

    • @LJB103
      @LJB103 Рік тому +4

      Really? John D, Sr. has been dead for 86 years and died at 97 (1937). Standard Oil's (founded in 1870) original product was kerosene for lighting and heating in the days before electricity or cars.

    • @Gabriel-pk8lw
      @Gabriel-pk8lw Рік тому +8

      Well, 150 years of wealth is old money. Sure, there're families out there that have been powerful for centuries (some close to the millennial mark) but 150 years of wealth is old money, specially if you consider that it's an american family

    • @greenguy369
      @greenguy369 Рік тому +4

      There's no generally accepted definition of "old money"... Some professionals believe that any fortune which makes it to the fourth generation in tact qualifies. Others with say the founding of the fortune needs to predate the British Monarchy.
      Ultimately, it's all arbitrary and largely fictitious.

    • @msairs
      @msairs Рік тому +1

      they bought the "old money" description lol

    • @SimpleAbundance
      @SimpleAbundance Місяць тому

      Old Money = Gold
      New Money = Fiat

  • @riyadougla539
    @riyadougla539 Рік тому

    I have respect for both. Whatever rocks your boat.

  • @Hell666-s2m
    @Hell666-s2m Рік тому +2

    I hate how people praise old money so much and bash new money so much. I respect new money more because they are self made.

    • @oldmoneyluxury
      @oldmoneyluxury  Рік тому

      😢

    • @asjaosaline5987
      @asjaosaline5987 Рік тому

      Most people who are considered new money are immoral in many ways. Lets look Bezos, how they threath his workers, low salary, can go even toilet room need to piss in bottle. . or Gates, He is Pushing his family control agenda in world he acts like he is filantropist, but realy he uses all that money to brainwash and push his agendas to build a world where he can profit. Or He gave Billions to WHO for them to Push Vaccination passes and vaccination ideas thought he is one who owns pharmacy companys and earns immense profits from it. So they are immoral. I never trust New money billionairs. Thought few can be realy good people and might even become old money. There is difference about helping a society and have some profit from it or creating a problems in society so they could profit from it.

    • @sbella6719
      @sbella6719 10 місяців тому

      Until recently, all most knew about WAS new money people. Many of us have been tired of attention seekers. We were called the haters-lol. It upsets you that we now have an alternative wealth mindset to praise?
      I for one was turned off from wanting to be rich because of the shallow ostentatious and money over character attitude that has been so prevalent. I can get with the old money psychology though

  • @666mengel
    @666mengel Рік тому +1

    You don't hear much about old money clans in the news, while new money arw in the media daily.

  • @ypcllc
    @ypcllc Рік тому +1

    No one group is better than the other.

  • @faustinae3927
    @faustinae3927 Рік тому +2

    Elon is from a Noble family 😉. Parents live in Canada. Let get that correct please.
    Thank you for this video.👍🌹

  • @cadillacdeville5828
    @cadillacdeville5828 Рік тому +2

    I've been really enjoying your channel

  • @greenguy369
    @greenguy369 Рік тому +6

    People do realize that this "Old Money" vs "New Money" division was an arbitrary line in the sand created by old money that were jealous of the massive, growing and much more liquid fortunes of the new money moving into their neighborhoods. Old money essentially began a concenrrated campaign to lower the status of new money in an attempt to maintain their own power and status in society.
    Old money doesn't spend money like new money because they simply can't. Even if they have a big enough fortune... Its highly unlikely that anyone living has unfettered access to to it. This is rarely a problem for new money.

    • @oldmoneyluxury
      @oldmoneyluxury  Рік тому

      😮

    • @Laotzu.Goldbug
      @Laotzu.Goldbug Рік тому +4

      The separation between the true aristocracy and the mearly rich is, quite literally millennia old. ref Crassus.

    • @sbella6719
      @sbella6719 10 місяців тому

      Old money thinks in terms of investing even when they spend. Can we say that about new money?

    • @Princess-m3k
      @Princess-m3k Місяць тому

      @@sbella6719yes

  • @verabozinovski2827
    @verabozinovski2827 Рік тому +3

    New money is proud that they made it on their own . Remember once upon a time old money started as new money too. Someone had to start the business going and over time every generation added to it .

  • @tsGigiOrtega
    @tsGigiOrtega 4 місяці тому

    I prefer to earn wealth, rather than inherit it. More satisfying that way

  • @YoYo-gt5iq
    @YoYo-gt5iq 11 місяців тому

    Oh
    My
    God
    You said that old money has a focus on education in classic spaces, like language.
    I was once in a meet and greet with some rich folks. This guy says, "ph, my wife went to the same university. Sje studied French."
    I laighed and said, "why didn't she just go to France and work for a year?" Like, 'what a waste!!!!!'

    • @sbella6719
      @sbella6719 10 місяців тому

      She probably had been to France or went afterwards but wanted the academic experience also. Old money places a high value education, I would hard think they see it as a waste

  • @olisykes44420
    @olisykes44420 Рік тому

    🔥

  • @oviliatam7540
    @oviliatam7540 Рік тому

    謝謝~♡♡♡♡♡

  • @jeffreysommer3292
    @jeffreysommer3292 8 місяців тому

    You really have to find other synonyms for "flashy." You're wearing the word out.

  • @phylis3917
    @phylis3917 Рік тому

    Excellent. Thank you

    • @phylis3917
      @phylis3917 Рік тому

      “Old” for me. Cafe in Paris early morning?

  • @ogathingo8885
    @ogathingo8885 Рік тому

    Most old money have experiences of decades, most have some moral values and took patronage of social causes, where as only some of the new money share their wealth for the social causes. Compare : wine : refined wine and new wine….

  • @virginiabify
    @virginiabify Рік тому

    Please talk about old money 's hipocricy. 😊

    • @oldmoneyluxury
      @oldmoneyluxury  Рік тому

      The Dark Side of Old Money Families: Scandals, Crimes, and Controversies
      ua-cam.com/video/3ERQzZNlGlE/v-deo.html

  • @thankfulheart4266
    @thankfulheart4266 Рік тому

    Some are too greedy and too money hungry, they don’t want to spend money on anything but investments just to keep growing their wealth. Life is too short and you have to live a life. You can’t take down your money with you six feet under.

    • @oldmoneyluxury
      @oldmoneyluxury  Рік тому

      🫣

    • @asjaosaline5987
      @asjaosaline5987 Рік тому

      Thats the difference between poor and rich people. Poor people only think about themself initial wants and needs. Rich people plot out they family future. Today world money is easy to come by and constantly loses a value. But there were times when even poor farmer could find a way to leave small silver purse for his heir who would work hard to leave something more to his heir and so centurys passed and poor farmer origin become wealthy land owner. having family is kind of like immortality, you die, but your deeds and effort live on and if you teach your offsprings to value it.

    • @sbella6719
      @sbella6719 10 місяців тому

      Of it's different for everyone but once you get to a certain point spending money to live a happy life just becomes a waste. We've just been conditioned into thinking that consuming is the key to happiness

  • @luxuryfocus6308
    @luxuryfocus6308 Рік тому

    Hello! How can I contact you?

  • @franksellers7858
    @franksellers7858 Рік тому

    And the old money mansions WEREN'T designed to impress?

  • @tuvia4082
    @tuvia4082 Рік тому

    The Great Gatsby

  • @davidd6626
    @davidd6626 Рік тому

    I prefer the other gentleman as narrator.

  • @VoteLaborOut
    @VoteLaborOut Рік тому +1

    Leave the money management to fund managers make it much easier on the family

  • @bradleyadams4496
    @bradleyadams4496 Рік тому

    Elon and Mark and Jeff are evolutionaries. People all seek survival! It is innate. Determining upon whom you are speaking, survival skills would be different, but all these people far too good at survival and far too interested in being successful to fail to evolve. They have the most to gain, respect, purpose, appreciation, and plans to be made for their future. Plans for the future originating from people who have made their fortune out competing everyone else in the short term is very civilized Napolionic. It's good! Where Napoleon failed was winning the peace, and these individuals face the same controversy in civilized circumstance. People who have done exceedingly well need to be taught how to think of the future. The reason why I'm optimistic about the certainty that these individuals will evolve to think differently of the future is because the technology which will be utilized to build the civilization of the future is technology that they will be praised for having invested in. If you are praised for investing during your life, and the result of the investment is something appreciated by those who live after your death, your investments would have secured your family's wealth.
    I'm going to flip the Newport Mansions, they will be barely some changes made to them, and I'll have them attached to double equity from tidal power, and I'll sell them for at least $100 million profit.
    I'm sad we lost JFK Jr.!
    It's humility! It's understanding that no thing made by man is too impressive. It doesn't matter if it's new money innovation or old money refinement, the things are to be made, appreciated and pursued, but they are not actually important. The relationships people have with one another are what's important. And both the innovators and the old bankers have far to go to engage with the populus in a way that allows them to keep pace with either group. We as a civilization are not making progress unless everyone is keeping pace. It's possible, we understand the value of diversified portfolio and having multiple basis for retirement, and unique opportunities for retired folk, but we have to get people invested at the start of their lives. It's doable to get people applying the rule of 72 at 16 but certainly by 18, and at 18, young people will have a boost entering adulthood. The wealth of the civilization adorns the walls of the homes of the people in the civilization to give young people this boost, but each child ought to have a birthday present from the government, to be pooled with other childern born into the civilization, and invested safely towards the creation of jobs for young people. This is the only time the government taxes people to invest money into the market, and it needs to be done in a way that leads towards job creation for young adults entering the workforce.
    This is our iteration. The cooperative relationship people have with one another must always persist, but the next interation of humans will all be of rich people, without the existence of any poor.
    I love John D., but even then, things could have been better. America is the reason why John D. was the way he was, and the world and America wasn't ready for John D. to be different than he was. It would not have a benefit to the world for John D. to lead the World, he was not a unifier, and he was willing to work fingers to the bone. He is an extrodinary, legandary capitalist, and I wish to incorporate all that was good from him into my being, but the world needs people to engage in a way where John D. would have been building more in the town as well as the city. The culture needs to start at a nice thriving tavern saloon playhouse, owned by John D., and he needs to take that troop from city to city, earning more and more each place they go, until they arrive at Broadway.
    If old money is very social amongst themselves, but they aren't social with people who earn less, or don't find the appropriate ways to be social with people who earn less, they aren't actually social people. The most social engagement is in the investment, and people have to think outside the box to develop the community into one which is pleasant for everyone. It's not hard, it's actually quite easy and the by product is better food and cooler expressions of culture.

  • @memyname1771
    @memyname1771 Рік тому +11

    The difference? When they or their ancestors committed their crimes.

    • @oldmoneyluxury
      @oldmoneyluxury  Рік тому +4

      😂

    • @dirtysouth9782
      @dirtysouth9782 Рік тому

      @@oldmoneyluxury A bro I need a shout out from u superior Presa on Instagram

    • @1Skorpia
      @1Skorpia Рік тому +1

      They paid others to do it for them. It was never linked to them

  • @timward3116
    @timward3116 Рік тому +7

    Old Money: Inherited once-new money.
    New Money: Accumulated money made from other money gained through often immoral business practices such as cheating customers and employees and/or bribing politicians.
    Self-Made Man (or Woman): A person who amasses great wealth either by fortunate investments or by having other people do the work.
    No Money: A person who may either outwardly exhibit poverty or whose visible prosperity is based on credit extended by Old Money; the bottom 90%. 😁

    • @oldmoneyluxury
      @oldmoneyluxury  Рік тому +2

      The ever-elusive “credit” 😂

    • @1Skorpia
      @1Skorpia Рік тому +3

      Generational WEALTH is old money. New money is the first "rich" in the family. Huge difference of how much money someone has. Like lottery winners who won millions or celebrities losing all their money- they were new money.

    • @m.s9146
      @m.s9146 Рік тому

      Well that is very cynical. Obviously written by someone with No Money. You have clearly never known someone with old or new money. I not only know several in both categories but am married to someone who is technically new money. He is honest, scrupulous and very, very hard working.
      You “no monies” want to go home at 5 and have your holidays and vacations. You don’t want responsibility. He works through the night sometimes for weeks, has the burden of hundreds of people’s livelihoods on his shoulders in various counties and time zones and hasn’t had a vacation or holiday in nearly a decade. Your comment shows a laziness and jealously of those who’ve done much more with their life than you can even dream.

    • @timward3116
      @timward3116 Рік тому +1

      @@m.s9146 LOL! Talk about cynicism! Actually, I have been inspired by two very great entrepreneurs in my life: One started a pizza chain and one started a drug company. The one who started a pizza chain that grew to over 100 rather large units (half franchises, though) was almost like a second father to me (he's dead, now, and I'm sure he went to the great beyond with a clear conscience). The one who started a generic drug company inspired us all to work long, hard hours because we knew that he appreciated it; this frequently meant no weekends off. Unfortunately, he passed away at 48 years old, other people took over his company, ran it into the ground, defrauded its customers, terminated most of the employees and caused FDA to put it under consent decree.
      I am not a person with "no money," though I do have too little to feel economically secure. And I count my blessings because I know many who work hard without the appropriate compensation. I have worked my long hours for years in management and as non-management (both in pizza and in pharmaceuticals). I have seen the "sausage made," so to speak. That is why I carefully used words like "often" and "may" in my descriptions, allowing enough flexibility in the sentences to ensure they are actually correct.
      I must admit, though, that I do believe that a single person should be able to do an honest job for 40 hours/week and live very modestly in a safe neighborhood. You know, actually have a life. Many honest people don't have a gift for making money but they do work hard and do honest, necessary work; they contribute to making the lives of people like you worth living. The federal minimum wage now (where I live) has one-quarter the purchasing power it had in the mid-1960's, a boom period for companies, workers, and consumers. State minimum wages are often twice the federal minimum wage but they still have half the purchasing power of the federal minimum wage 50 years ago. This was well-illustrated recently when I was in Target and saw the price of a small bag of M&M's was $2.19. The same bag 50 years ago was a dime, so I calculated the cost of the candy as a percentage of both the federal and state minimum wages. In order to maintain the same ratio as in 1967, the federal minimum wage would have to be $27 (and change).
      Then I look at companies like Kroger, now the subject of class action lawsuits in seven (?) states because of its practices of NOT PAYING PEOPLE, forcing those employees to sue. And all the while, Kroger swallows up other companies. Also, a lot of such workers are on government assistance BECAUSE the federal government believes in corporate welfare.
      You aren't kidding anyone except the inexperienced and the blissfully deluded and entitled. You know where you can put your idiotic comments (if there's any room left up there). There is an excellent video on UA-cam by billionaire plutocrat, Nick Hanauer, called "Beware, fellow plutocrats, the pitchforks are coming | Nick Hanauer."

    • @timward3116
      @timward3116 Рік тому

      @Mel C Here, Mel, I think we need to note that my intial comment did say "often" rather than "always." There are SOME decent newly moneyed people. Beyond that, the percentages of those who got their money by cheating someone versus legitimately is up for debate, I suppose. I probably think there's a lot more bad "new money" people out there than you do. We would probably agree that money is not, in itself, a sign of whether the person having it is smart, honest, deserving, and also humble and respectful of others. I am simply not impressed at all by any sign of material wealth. A Rolex means nothing to me, nor does a mansion, a boat, or a sportscar.

  • @madeleinbronner3943
    @madeleinbronner3943 Рік тому

    Harry (the old Prince) is not old money.

  • @PoserAlert
    @PoserAlert Рік тому

    This is why Trump was never let into The Maidstone.

    • @oldmoneyluxury
      @oldmoneyluxury  Рік тому

      😂📝

    • @PoserAlert
      @PoserAlert Рік тому

      @@oldmoneyluxury, It’s a widely known fact that Trump basically begged people to get him into The Maidstone, but they wouldn’t let him because he has always been viewed by the northeast establishment as a low-class blowhard.

  • @dedasalmeida9047
    @dedasalmeida9047 8 місяців тому

    Very disingenuous of you to claim Kim Kardashian and Elon Musk are "self made billionaires"
    😂😂😂😂

  • @tipsyXtwo
    @tipsyXtwo Рік тому

    lol didn’t expect the 90* turn to an anti Trump video

  • @ananyadas2042
    @ananyadas2042 Рік тому +1

    New monies are richer than old monies.

    • @oldmoneyluxury
      @oldmoneyluxury  Рік тому

      Depends on the family

    • @ananyadas2042
      @ananyadas2042 Рік тому

      @@oldmoneyluxury nobody is richer than jeff bezos/elon musk.

    • @shebamaree9026
      @shebamaree9026 Рік тому

      King Solomon was and will always be the wealthiest man ever

  • @gobyfish1399
    @gobyfish1399 Рік тому +2

    There is no difference between old money and new money. Just look at royalty in Europe and the Middle East, they were building palaces, wearing crowns, driving carriages of gold, boy were they "new money" in the past. In the 21st century, we just don't care about old money and admire new money, people who earned it themselves through talent not ancestors. So old money keeps quiet, cos in the new world we live in, talent and individualism is the best currency, not ancestors.

    • @oldmoneyluxury
      @oldmoneyluxury  Рік тому

      There are massive differences between European royalty and Middle Eastern royalty, both now and in the past. Additionally, everywhere on Earth someone who is a wealthy non-Royal is not the same as someone who is royalty…

    • @riyadougla539
      @riyadougla539 Рік тому

      100%. In the past ordinary people simply could not accumulate wealth like this unless they rose the military ranks, and even then that was extremely unusual. In that regard I admire the new money yet hold respect for the old guard.

    • @riyadougla539
      @riyadougla539 Рік тому

      I would say that the USA is probably the best example of this. We have skyscrapers that symbolize individual success rather than palaces, cathedrals and mausoleums. This is the most money-minded and individualistic country on earth. Perhaps it is why it is so immensely successful.

  • @toddsmith5715
    @toddsmith5715 Рік тому +4

    It was going well until you had to repeat the old, tired myth that Kennedy Sr. was a bootlegger. He was nothing of the sort, though this fact has not quite percolated down to the level of common knowledge.

    • @LJB103
      @LJB103 Рік тому +3

      True - also forgot movies and stock manipulation, I mean brokerage.

    • @JanH80-pm5bw
      @JanH80-pm5bw Рік тому +1

      His grandpa was.

  • @adrianchitiga
    @adrianchitiga Рік тому

    here wat i think new money becomes old money when the person who first worked for it dies old money values kick in well becoz u don't know how to make money like the person who left it for u so playing it safe is best.

  • @danf4447
    @danf4447 Рік тому +3

    PS if you have ever seen a show about anderson cooper. gloria vanderbilt etc.. you know they are now..sadly BROKE. so that reputation was great but the money is gone

    • @LJB103
      @LJB103 Рік тому +9

      I'd like to be so "broke" after my mother left me $1.5 million (plus whatever was left to her sons by conductor Leopold Stokowski)

    • @davidcattin7006
      @davidcattin7006 Рік тому +13

      Earning $12 million a year and a net worth of $200 million, I wouldn't exactly say he's broke. :o)

    • @zakosist
      @zakosist Рік тому

      What normal people consider broke or just what rich people consider broke?

  • @cadillacdeville5828
    @cadillacdeville5828 Рік тому +1

    While i agree with being refined and dignified, you can be creative, outspoken and such while still the former. Either way, i wouldn't care but Trump is very kuch uncouth and lacks any sophistication.

    • @msairs
      @msairs Рік тому

      isn't there one brash person in every family though. lol

  • @wildluvvfilms
    @wildluvvfilms Рік тому +1

    old money people know that money means nothing. old money knows that only health is wealth.