Any plans for a shorter version of this ? I'm 70kg / 170cm so right on the lower limit for the weight range (plus it wouldn't fit in my DaKine snowboard bag ;) so I imagine it would be pretty stiff for me. For comparison the Swoard Gen5 (hardboot) board I'm considering is 161 for my weight/height... PS Didn't know about Stranda until spending a great week with Clarance Gagnon in Cervinia so a shout out to him :)
would u be able to explain this to me better? you want a larger radius 8-10 right? and more effective edge and full camber not double camber, if my understanding is correct?
@@zacharendt7086 The cambre is like a Travis Rice or Burton flyingV From the custom X where underneath each of your feet is a separate camber section although between the feet is playful with little bit of rocker In a directional twin... And through tortional flex it also allows the board to have 2 miniature sidecut radiuses depending if you are pressuring on the front or rear half of the board. But on a board like I described having that large of a radius would allow it to be extremely stable at high speeds through sweeping turns And high-speed off piste chunder. A race board would have something like a 155 cm of effective edge. I cannot find any stability on a freestyle board less than a 131 cm tho. I don't know I've just been calling it double camber for the past dozen or so years
beautiful craftmanship
Thanks!
I wondered how well a Decender 162 will carve?
I’m after a board that will carve well on the groomers, but work well off piste.
Great little video.
Any plans for a shorter version of this ? I'm 70kg / 170cm so right on the lower limit for the weight range (plus it wouldn't fit in my DaKine snowboard bag ;) so I imagine it would be pretty stiff for me. For comparison the Swoard Gen5 (hardboot) board I'm considering is 161 for my weight/height...
PS Didn't know about Stranda until spending a great week with Clarance Gagnon in Cervinia so a shout out to him :)
12-14 meter radius
eff edge 131+
double camber
???
would u be able to explain this to me better? you want a larger radius 8-10 right? and more effective edge and full camber not double camber, if my understanding is correct?
@@zacharendt7086 The cambre is like a Travis Rice or Burton flyingV From the custom X where underneath each of your feet is a separate camber section although between the feet is playful with little bit of rocker In a directional twin... And through tortional flex it also allows the board to have 2 miniature sidecut radiuses depending if you are pressuring on the front or rear half of the board. But on a board like I described having that large of a radius would allow it to be extremely stable at high speeds through sweeping turns And high-speed off piste chunder. A race board would have something like a 155 cm of effective edge. I cannot find any stability on a freestyle board less than a 131 cm tho. I don't know I've just been calling it double camber for the past dozen or so years
my naked weight is 70 kg. shoe size is 8.5. which model do you recommend? 170 or 170 wide
170