Focke Wulfen't - Fw 190A-5/U-14

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
  • My personal Discount Code: store.gaijin.n...
    Fuel: 20 minutes
    20 mm ammo: Air
    Convergence: 600 meters
    Vertical Targeting: No
    Crew: maxed (lvl 75) + expert
    Discord: / discord
    Outro: A.N.O. - Vanish
    ------------------------------------------
    It's not necessary but always appreciated, all donated money will be there to improve quality and frequency of my content.
    ------------------------------------------
    Patreon: / defyn
    Merch: defyn-shop.fou...
    Donations: www.paypal.me/...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 284

  • @bananomet4052
    @bananomet4052 Рік тому +14

    Thank you for the video, I have been eagerly waiting for it.
    I used to be a Bf109 main, before I gave another shot to the Fw190 this summer and realised the high speed combat flaps / low speed landing flaps potential. So I started flying them all and here is what I learned. First of all, I will dare to say, the Fw190 are better (yes better) planes than Bf109 in relation to the BR placement.
    Fw 190 A-1 - BMW 801 С1 (1360HP)
    Fw 190 A-4 / A-5 - BMW 801 D2 (1470HP)
    Fw 190 A-8 / F-8 - BMW 801 TU (1470HP)
    Fw 190 D-9 - Jumo 213А (1745HP)
    Fw 190 D-12 - Jumo-213E1 (1730HP)
    Ta 152 H-1 - Jumo-213E1 (1730HP)
    Ta 152 C-3 - Daimler-Benz DB-603LA (2100HP)
    Fw 190 A-1 (3.0) - Very powerful, borderline OP at 3.0. Not that many planes can go toe to toe with it. Its biggest negative is, that it's placed at rank 2. Worth.
    Fw 190 A-4 (4.3) - I don't like this one because of the mixed guns. It's all over the place and it only adds weight. Not worth.
    Fw 190 A-5/U2 (4.3) - IMHO the best Fw190 in the game in relation to the BR. It is possible to turnfight zeroes or spitfires with it and win if you utilize high tail maneuvers and play with your throttle and flaps a bit. Only has two 20mm which saves weight, but they are in the wing roots - easy to aim - has plenty of ammo (500). My only gripe with it is that it only has 1 available default skin! WORTH.
    Fw 190 A-5 (4.7) - Literally copy pasted FW190 A-4 but 0.3BR higher (because of the 2 rockets?). Not worth.
    Fw 190 A-5/U12 (4.7) - Again, just A-4 version but 0.3BR higher (because of the 4 gunpods?). Not worth.
    Fw 190 A-8 (5.0) - Not as agile as the A-5 I think, but it still can hold its own even at 5.0 due to +200HP over the previous A versions in WEP. Very good gun setup, the center mounted MG131 are good for setting fires. Worth.
    Fw 190 F-8 (5.0) - About the same as the A-8 version BUT it can mount SC1000 bomb, or mk103 cannons or rocket pods. I like this one alot, especially in GRB. Worth.
    Fw 190 D-9 (5.0) - The D's are different than the preveious radial engine ones. You gotta play them like the Bf 109, but offer much higher roll speed. D-9 specifically feels like the K-4 but at 5.0. I like it alot. Worth.
    Fw 190 D-12 (5.0) - Worse than D-9, but has the same loadout. Just play D-9, it's beter. Not worth.
    Ta 152 H-1 (6.0) - The peak of German props. Not the best top speed, but good energy retention. Feels very light and flaps deploy almost instantly, granting very sharp turns. Roll rate suffers because of the longer wings. It has good guns. Sadly no bombs or rockets. WORTH
    Ta 152 C-3 (6.0) - This plane is strange and you have to have alot of patience. I love the engine on this thing, you can feel its torque at low speeds, meaning if you utilize vertical stall maneuvers, you will be the king. But if you get anyone on your six, you are dead. In ground RB though? It is my 1st pick because of the mk103 in the nose. It used to be a brick, but it must have recieved a flight model update, because it is a pretty good plane now. Shame it only has 1 default skin. Worth!
    Note: I didn't play the D-13 as I don't have it, but on paper it looks like a copy pasted D-9.

    • @wolfgangkolber381
      @wolfgangkolber381 Рік тому +2

      I've heard from people in in-game chat that the D-13 climbs a bit better and that the guns are easier to use, but who knows how accurate that is. I'm planning to get it over this sale, but at the very least I can say that everyone I've asked has been impressed with it.

    • @DaisiesTC
      @DaisiesTC Рік тому

      H-1 has been my favorite plane in the game even back before it got an airspawn. Sideclimbing for an hour sucked but was worth it. Plus its sexy so at least you had something nice to look at.

    • @daenery2471
      @daenery2471 5 місяців тому

      Thanks a lot!

  • @haglo.
    @haglo. Рік тому +33

    Hey Defyn, I know you are working on covering all of the 'new' "content" that Gaijin has gifted us with, but I'd like to make a small request:
    I was wondering if you could make a follow up video on the J-22B since its flight model was updated. I used to play it avidly, but since the change I'm having a hard time figuring it out again. I know the potential is there, I'm just not sure how to unlock said potential.
    I found you only recently and have been learning so much from your vids, and I firmly believe you are one of the best WT content creators as far as teaching others goes from explaining tactics and strategies and breaking down aircraft in depth.
    Thanks and keep up the awesome work!

    • @TheLazyKat
      @TheLazyKat Рік тому +4

      Move on from the J22
      Best I can say

    • @alexhurlbut
      @alexhurlbut Рік тому

      What lazee said. 22's biggest flaw is that its engine will always remain underpowered.

    • @AliceC993
      @AliceC993 Рік тому +6

      @@TheLazyKat +1
      Both J22 models have been raised too high in BR to be useful and the engine is too weak
      There's simply better planes at the BR
      I have tried to like it as well but it's just in a bad place

    • @TheLazyKat
      @TheLazyKat Рік тому +7

      @@AliceC993 Especially now that we have 109s in TT
      J22 will be decent if it was like 2.3/2.7

    • @haglo.
      @haglo. Рік тому +3

      @@TheLazyKat Ehh, I was hoping the little gems would still have something to give. Don't get me wrong, I have ground up to the Saab 105G, AJ37, and J32B, I was just hoping that I could return to an "old pal" per se and take a break from top tier

  • @ColorfulSyke
    @ColorfulSyke Рік тому +33

    I very much appreciate the test of the U-14 vs other variants. Reminds me of Adam's old comparison vids with the late 109 variants when they were all 5.3.
    Absolutely down for more projects like this and the stuff you mentioned in the Fire and Ice vid

  • @Bullet4MyEnemy
    @Bullet4MyEnemy Рік тому +35

    I wonder if they used an older flight model for this, because waaay back in the day the Antons used to lock up unless they had above ~30 mins fuel because of the fuel tank placement and centre of gravity.
    With a lot of fuel, they used to turn really nicely at speed, but with low fuel they were bricks that compressed into the ground.
    Maybe this might pull better with more fuel? Might be worth testing, could be a “mistake” on Gaijin’s part.

    • @rainsilent
      @rainsilent Рік тому +3

      It still flips wildly. It is a lot easier to recover with more fuel though.

    • @chris_hisss
      @chris_hisss Рік тому +2

      Once I found this out I do not fly a/f without full fuel. You need it for that extra authority though you do pay for it with needing to be more patient, worth it. I don't know that Def would do that though, there have been several planes we mention fly better with full fuel like the S.199 and I don't think he revisited them, albeit at least in video.

    • @sule.A
      @sule.A 3 місяці тому

      They brought something similar to all a5s but the a1 is alright

  • @dominicfagan6457
    @dominicfagan6457 Рік тому +124

    Really liked seeing the 1v1 segment, comparing the two planes, also those groundpounding clips were cracked 😳😳😳

    • @reinbeers5322
      @reinbeers5322 Рік тому +6

      The 190 F8 is a lotta fun with this change, if no fighters throw away all their altitude just to kill you, you can give your team a massive ticket advantage.

  • @-brutus-1290
    @-brutus-1290 Рік тому +3

    1v1 segments and the specific how-to-vs-planes-at-your-br idea you discussed in an earlier video are great, I would love to see more

  • @rifwann
    @rifwann Рік тому +10

    penetration at air rb for ground pounding is increased, has been a season but nice touch indeed. it makes games progress when the map only has medium tanks.
    for light pillboxes, any gun can do but accuracy is everything. roof if ap (easy to aim), window if he

  • @dirtbag_jim
    @dirtbag_jim Рік тому +4

    Damn, was gonna pick this up thinking it'd perform the same as well as the other A5's, didn't realize it performed noticeably worse.
    Cheers for saving me the GE

    • @kingcamilo
      @kingcamilo 22 дні тому

      All fw190 A5's are trash now because gaijin is retarded and nerfs planes depending on how good they've been doing in numbers K/d ratio and wins by the general public

  • @voldenrudvek9661
    @voldenrudvek9661 Рік тому +45

    I honestly was so looking forward to getting this 190 but I can't exactly say Im thrilled by the passive gameplay required

  • @Tiger2071-e6f
    @Tiger2071-e6f Рік тому +87

    Ive done a few test flights in this thing in sim and at first it almost felt like it was really badly trimmed and was much more touchy than any other 190. I also noticed that in a dive it practically didnt pull at all past 500kph. Im curious if this thing has a bugged FM unless theres something in the air frame thats causing this

    • @jonwinfield9193
      @jonwinfield9193 Рік тому +4

      It reminds me of way back in the day when the 190a all had a bugged elevator.

    • @thegrayjedi5202
      @thegrayjedi5202 Рік тому +1

      Yea this thing definitely sucks compared to the earlier 190 at tier 2. I was excited to have a badass 190 along with extra firepower but it’s so slow and clunky. Nothing at all like the others.

    • @lukeskywalket2894
      @lukeskywalket2894 Рік тому +2

      @@jonwinfield9193 yeah, I remember this. Sounds pretty similar tbh. Also, given some…shall we say, vertical stabilizer implementation issues in the past in regards to specific aircraft (Ho 229 a few years back, and I also remember that before they added the Mirage, they said they were having trouble with the tail interacting correctly with the delta wing when asked about it in a Dev QnA), I wouldn’t be surprised if the flight model for this 190 was implemented unusually given the larger tail.

    • @Tiger2071-e6f
      @Tiger2071-e6f Рік тому +5

      @@lukeskywalket2894 im thinking the same thing, maybe that old 190 elevator crept in through the spaghetti code cuz if it has a larger elevator youd think it would be able to pull harder. since trimming it out a little though its as twitchy as 190s tend to be but it still takes a lot of elevator to get the nose to rise especially below 350kph and much more so than other 190s almost as if it's excessively nose heavy.

    • @cola-warthunder
      @cola-warthunder Рік тому +5

      Maybe it's because of the slightly different tail?

  • @ConnorJohnson98
    @ConnorJohnson98 Рік тому +4

    When you mention the drop off of MG151, I thought I was the only one. I flew the K4 For a few games after the most recent patch before 10th anniversary and I knew something was off

  • @Marin3r101
    @Marin3r101 Рік тому +8

    Balance team at Gaijin is an excel spreadsheet Defyn!

  • @GingerNinja__
    @GingerNinja__ Рік тому +13

    You have to take it out in Naval before I can draw a conclusion from a review smh

    • @penclaw
      @penclaw Рік тому +2

      it'll probably tear up any destroyer ship with training belt ammo

  • @mil0335
    @mil0335 Рік тому +6

    Defyn, some of the maps dont have damage models for the tanks, so they are always pretty much a 1 tap, but some maps do have the damage models and you actually have to shoot them in the right spot, i dont know why they did that, but i aint complaining lol

  • @angga2917
    @angga2917 Рік тому +4

    With the new ballistic changes the bullets feel like they have drag chutes, at low altitude you can actually almost overtake the 23mm bullets in the mig23 before they disappear.

  • @Reaf121286
    @Reaf121286 Рік тому +5

    Regardin the part where you kill tanks with the air belts - I'm pretty sure that is a thing for most if not all planes that have cannons when you are on maps where the ground AI doesn't have a full damage model. It used be impossible to kill "Heavy Tanks" with 30mm HE rounds - well now I do it on the regular.

    • @pouletbidule9831
      @pouletbidule9831 Рік тому +2

      Can confirm. Even with the nerf, an/m3's can do this aswell

  • @YeetThyBaby
    @YeetThyBaby Рік тому +152

    Game is just premiums vs premiums now, tech trees are dead. Still enjoy your vids though

    • @PorWik
      @PorWik Рік тому +31

      I love shitting on premium players, for this reason. Why is it so much to ask that people earn the planes through skill instead of money

    • @Klonnno
      @Klonnno Рік тому +42

      Because tech trees don’t pay SL for shit and you’re punished for playing. At least with premiums you make your SL back plus some with at least 1 kill if you die.
      What fun is there in being punished? Lol. It’s not even always a skill issue but just a bad game some days.

    • @TheLazyKat
      @TheLazyKat Рік тому +11

      Let's be honest
      We all get dopamine from higher SL number :)

    • @dedmajor
      @dedmajor Рік тому +5

      I have quite a few premiums but still find tech tree vehicles more fun than premiums most of the time so i agree but the economy of repair cost vs sl gained, later tech tree vehicles are just detrimental to play unless you have prem time

    • @CptPandy-tj9ty
      @CptPandy-tj9ty Рік тому +8

      @@Klonnno honestly lmao I used to love flying my Fw190 D9 but repair costs just left me with such little sl and then I bought the D13 and it has a way cheaper repair costs and the rewards is obviously way better

  • @brettmihlbachler
    @brettmihlbachler Рік тому +1

    that 10:00 - 10:40 segment is peak warthunder. oh boy time to farm after I deal with the one person who is a threat to me... *watches as farm gets melted in your face*

  • @elf6191
    @elf6191 Рік тому +1

    "I don't work for Gaijin, I just get to play their sh**y game" PMSL

  • @Stahlwollvieh
    @Stahlwollvieh Рік тому +2

    Regarding the tanks blowing up with air belts: It's something I have noticed for quite a while now, I also do it, e.g., with my Vautour and DEFA air belts... seems to be somewhat dependent on the gun/tier/map however, it doesn't work all the time everywhere. While it is silly i feel like it does help to win games against space climbers when you're down on tickets, so I for one won't be complaining about it anytime soon. GL otherwise killing a ton of medium tanks to make up for a ticket disadvantage in something like a FW.

  • @catooloo5139
    @catooloo5139 Рік тому

    These videos are always super entertaining. I would like to possibly see more US rank 3 and 4 planes. After drone age it seems like a lot of their entries don't do so hot anymore, at least that's the way they feel and would be nice to see some insight on what to do during those tiers.

  • @CaptainFluffySlipper
    @CaptainFluffySlipper 2 місяці тому

    the way that ive recovered from the flat spin is you pitch down and use ur rudder to go against the spin. More often than naught ive recovered most of the times.

  • @penclaw
    @penclaw Рік тому +2

    I came across a Fw 190A guy today, whole chat belong to him as he was using insults in every post, at some point he got more emotional than twilight fangirl lmao

  • @pedromedeiros4955
    @pedromedeiros4955 Рік тому +1

    I never got the hang of the play style of the 190 because I was used to play the 109 for a long time.

  • @jg54sayaka11
    @jg54sayaka11 Рік тому +1

    Just as they say, what goes up stalls out

  • @MDzmitry
    @MDzmitry Рік тому +1

    I really like the camo and the whole "prototype" vibe this U14 gives off, but I guess I'll put the purchase off until the FM is fixed (if it's broken to begin with, which I hope is true).

  • @Razurik001
    @Razurik001 Рік тому +1

    I like how you start the video about the plane, and the more in we get the more it get about how bad the game play is but not because of the plane, because of the players that just cant fly, head on. Seems like that a lot of the experience in the air lately

  • @kmodo93
    @kmodo93 Рік тому +2

    So maybe a better way to describe this plane other than as a "support plane" would be to call it an "oportunistic plane" in that you need to wait for the opportunity to arise (with proper preperation) to use it successfully.

  • @13deadghosts
    @13deadghosts Рік тому +3

    Personally, I like the Ta-154, because it is the only german twin engine fighter that isn't complete ass. The A8 is just shit, and the F-8 only right to exist is to drop one ton warheads on forheads. And dear god, I wish we had the 190 A-9.

    • @reinbeers5322
      @reinbeers5322 Рік тому

      The A-8 ain't that bad, definitely belongs at 4.7 though

  • @NheNiceGuy
    @NheNiceGuy Рік тому +1

    The only things I like about the U14 is the camo the torpedo and its OK in Air Arcade.

  • @lithium1135
    @lithium1135 Рік тому +1

    "i dont work at gaijin, i just get to play their shitty game"-DEFYN 2022.

  • @unoriginalplays120
    @unoriginalplays120 Рік тому +2

    Gotta use that torpedo on planes

  • @152mmapfsds
    @152mmapfsds Рік тому +1

    LET'S GOOOOOOOOOOOOO

  • @libra9381
    @libra9381 Рік тому +6

    The FW A5/U2 is still the best performing Anton with lower br off all Antons, my favourite.

  • @godemperormeow8591
    @godemperormeow8591 Рік тому +1

    Being able to one shot Shermans means more silver lions.

  • @PaulieLDP
    @PaulieLDP Рік тому

    And here I was think it was identical to the U2 but with a torpedo option.

  • @FockeWolf100
    @FockeWolf100 Рік тому +2

    Funny thing is my favourite 190 is the ugly duckling absolutely *noone* talks about
    The 190C. Turns amazingly, people see a 190 turn at a low speed and think "free kill", but the 190C out turns most allied planes, while still having great climbing ability and fantastic high altitude performance. Love it.

    • @reinbeers5322
      @reinbeers5322 Рік тому

      Nobody talks about it because it's super rare and also expensive.

    • @AFakeName
      @AFakeName Рік тому

      "out turns most allied planes" lmfaoooooooo

    • @FockeWolf100
      @FockeWolf100 Рік тому +2

      @@AFakeName tbf... allied players..

  • @rifwann
    @rifwann Рік тому +1

    the spin every stall is horror enough to keep me away from using that thing, thanks for comparison though.

  • @kingcamilo
    @kingcamilo Рік тому

    15:35 mood

  • @ccramit
    @ccramit Рік тому

    Hey Defyn. As a newish player to War Thunder who doesn't have all his planes spaded, I was wondering if you'd consider a video series where you start off with a fresh account and go through and spade planes. I know it'd def help out a player like me as most videos pertaining to Air RB are made by expert players with expert crews and spaded planes, which doesn't really help me out much as 1) as previously mentioned, I have so few spaded vehicles and 2) my crews are only in the 10-20 range for planes.
    Might help make the grind a little easier if we actually knew what we were doing outaide of dogfighting as well. Your videos already help alot, but dogfighting in a spaded plane vs. non-spaded is very different as characteristics of the planes are obviously very different.
    Just a request, I still love your content and learn new things with every video.

    • @wolfgangkolber381
      @wolfgangkolber381 Рік тому

      Hey, just a quick couple of tips for starting out with planes (assuming Air RB). First, if you find a plane you like and you're good with it, just use that to grind out everything within 1 tier of it ( so if it's a tier 2 you can use it to grind out tiers 1-3 without penalties). Second, for levelling your crew, prioritise your Stamina, then G-tolerance (or whatever it's called, the G-force thing), then vitality or keen sight.
      If anyone has different or better advice, feel free to correct/add to this.

  • @thelonious2213
    @thelonious2213 Рік тому +1

    La-5FN isn't even available. Maybe it will be during the sale. Even so, I'd just pick something from Rank IV, the way this thing starts tumbling in a stall limits it so much compared to other Fw-190s.

    • @Zelectrocutica
      @Zelectrocutica Рік тому

      just get german yak 1B it's amazing plane.

    • @thelonious2213
      @thelonious2213 Рік тому +1

      @@Zelectrocutica no arguments there, Yak-1Bs are great. Problem is, it's a Rank II plane, so you can't grind events and most of the Battle Pass with it. Rank II premiums you get for fun, for everyday use it's better to get Rank III+ vehicles.

    • @reinbeers5322
      @reinbeers5322 Рік тому

      What do you mean it's not available, the 5FN is a tech tree plane

    • @thelonious2213
      @thelonious2213 Рік тому

      @@reinbeers5322 are you for real?
      He was talking about Rank III premium alternatives for the Fw-190 A-5/U14. There's a premium La-5FN for Germany, which was removed in the 2021 economy update.

  • @sinisterisrandom8537
    @sinisterisrandom8537 Рік тому

    Pretty sure this thing was ment to be on the Graf zeppelin.

  • @Sag05501
    @Sag05501 Рік тому

    Would love to see a video on the J32B!

  • @kocurowskyy39
    @kocurowskyy39 Рік тому +1

    Can they finally do a step forward in their game? I started playing it 3 years ago and man... i want to go back in time just to play my germans again ;-;

  • @asadchatha4184
    @asadchatha4184 Рік тому

    As you can see the lake was Frozen, so the torpedo was of no use, Let It Go guys.

  • @Leon_der_Luftige
    @Leon_der_Luftige Рік тому +2

    I'm honestly fine with the German guns being able to murder tanks. Completely unrealistic but so are US .50 cal being able to pen German Leopard 2 AV or strafing a train of 100 waggons and it blowing up like a greek candle.

    • @rainsilent
      @rainsilent Рік тому

      The trains exploding is entirely dependent upon what is in them. More unstable things like some explosives or rocket fuel will react like that.

    • @Leon_der_Luftige
      @Leon_der_Luftige Рік тому

      @@rainsilent Generally speaking however .... 2 bullets don't do such damage.

    • @rainsilent
      @rainsilent Рік тому

      @@Leon_der_Luftige 1 .50 will get unstable explosives or rocket fuel to make a very big boom. 1 .50 will also instantly kill water cooled engines if it goes through the engine block. It will also instantly kill a radial if it hits the master cylinder. What the round hits dictates the significance of the damage. Hit something vital and the aircraft is at least crippled.

    • @Leon_der_Luftige
      @Leon_der_Luftige Рік тому

      @@rainsilent yes but this is the same game where you get hit on your wingtip by a P47 and your entire plane is engulfed in flames immediately.
      You get the point.

  • @vlay4274
    @vlay4274 Рік тому

    i got a choice to make
    the pyörremyrsky or the xp 50
    :))

  • @de7cay934
    @de7cay934 Рік тому

    DEFYN sir could you do a video on the CL-13A Mk.5 sabre please. Im getting very annoyed with this matchmaker and there's not much guide on the internet for this aircraft thank you

  • @mclouj
    @mclouj Рік тому

    Huh. I noticed the 20mm on the spitfire and zeros were massacring the medium tanks now as well. Weird balancing change, not sure if its intentional.

    • @rainsilent
      @rainsilent Рік тому

      I'm pretty sure it isn't intentional. I'm also about 90% sure it is because of the HE rounds and the frag effect that they have.

    • @pouletbidule9831
      @pouletbidule9831 Рік тому

      @@rainsilent ap belts seem to be just as good.

  • @stevelandlantistime6132
    @stevelandlantistime6132 Рік тому

    i would like to see you get an ace in the clipfire, i enjoy the spit and seafires, but that thing is quite literally unplayable compared to the rest

  • @dayviscleverly3027
    @dayviscleverly3027 Рік тому

    DEFYN you need to play the B-239 it is soooo much fun!

  • @Erden99
    @Erden99 Рік тому +2

    What the fuck the Sherman slaughter is absolutely ridiculous what are they doing??

  • @davidfans5852
    @davidfans5852 Рік тому

    Next added focke wulf: fw190d11 :0

  • @jacobdonnely2608
    @jacobdonnely2608 Рік тому

    You should totally play the Yak-9P

  • @districtnull
    @districtnull Рік тому +1

    M.D.157, do you accept this challenge?

  • @kingghidorah8106
    @kingghidorah8106 Рік тому +1

    the best 190 in my opinion is the d9, it's an amazing dogfighter compared to the majority of 190s and it has enough engine power to run away in case you mess up because radial 190s are kind of "no mistakes allowed" type of planes

  • @rainsilent
    @rainsilent Рік тому +1

    If the 190 doesn't have an interceptor spawn then I'm going to say that the 154 is the better premium for newer players. They have similar climb rates (the 190 has maybe a .3m/s advantage with the 190 carrying full fuel which makes recovering from the tumble fairly quick and easy) and similar turn rates (with the 154 out turning the 190 at low speeds, again with the 190 carrying full fuel). Sure the 190 is around 20mph faster in level flight and can roll effortlessly but the interceptor spawn of the 154 makes it very powerful early game on the smaller maps. That makes it an easier plane to do well in for newer players as they start with a positional advantage. On larger maps or maps where everything gets an air spawn the 190 is the better plane. Ultimately both are very flawed and sub par for said rank premiums in the game.

    • @reinbeers5322
      @reinbeers5322 Рік тому

      Why would you ever carry full fuel in a 190 that isn't this one though? They all perform much better with less of it.

    • @rainsilent
      @rainsilent Рік тому

      @@reinbeers5322 I never said to carry more fuel in other 190s. I was only ever talking the new premium 190 vs the Ta-154. This doesn't apply to other 190s.

    • @diegowushu
      @diegowushu Рік тому

      Thank you, I'm a new player and was thinking on getting a fun cheap rank 3 german prem and was between those 2, I'll get the 154 next time it's 50% off and just use the tech tree 190s.

  • @yukioh1296
    @yukioh1296 Рік тому

    W upload

  • @_GODSFIGHTER
    @_GODSFIGHTER Рік тому

    Hilarious and weird how mg151s can now kill tanks in air rb

  • @mites7
    @mites7 Рік тому

    For the algo and your suffering

  • @donovanyoung1220
    @donovanyoung1220 Рік тому

    If you play naval this thing is not a bad option

  • @Leon_der_Luftige
    @Leon_der_Luftige Рік тому

    Nice video.
    Could you show us how you kill light pillboxes with guns please?

    • @Delantho
      @Delantho Рік тому

      at downward angle through the roof or into the windows/door

    • @Leon_der_Luftige
      @Leon_der_Luftige Рік тому

      @@Delantho Never tried the latter. Which is quicker?

    • @rainsilent
      @rainsilent Рік тому

      @@Leon_der_Luftige Through the roof. It is an easy to hit target. When looking at a light pillbox there is a very obvious line where the walls stop and the roof begins. It can easily be hit in level flight or in a very, very shallow dive. The steeper the dive the easier to hit but the higher the risk of crashing into the ground.

    • @Leon_der_Luftige
      @Leon_der_Luftige Рік тому

      @@rainsilent Alright thx. Does it do more damage if I go through the door or the gun opening in the front?
      Like attacking a tank from the side doing more harm?

    • @rainsilent
      @rainsilent Рік тому

      @@Leon_der_Luftige No difference in terms of direction of attack.

  • @kimjanek646
    @kimjanek646 Рік тому +2

    Everytime Gaijin buffs Ai AA, they nerf the the armor of Ai tanks.
    Now look what we’ve come to 🤣

  • @liamboyle9199
    @liamboyle9199 Рік тому

    Poor Ta154😂
    It is kinda meh but it's unique and as a grinder I think it's relatively consistent

  • @kingcamilo
    @kingcamilo Місяць тому

    4:36 isn't that nuka

    • @kingcamilo
      @kingcamilo 22 дні тому

      Nevermind its actually an italian who's really good and has a youtube channel

  • @polishseal7768
    @polishseal7768 Рік тому

    I have a problem while fighitng against fighters like I-16 zeros etc. Someone have any tips how to fight against such targets?

    • @Delantho
      @Delantho Рік тому

      stay fast and BnZ them, theyre too slow to do anything about it

    • @MDzmitry
      @MDzmitry Рік тому

      @@Delantho Unless they can evade in ways that help them gain speed. Then the whole deal becomes much harder, and you have to drain them of energy before properly engaging

    • @polishseal7768
      @polishseal7768 Рік тому

      @@Delantho thanks but lets say they have energy advantage and they are diving on me what do I do

    • @rainsilent
      @rainsilent Рік тому

      @@polishseal7768 Use speed to keep them at distance. If you let them get so close that they can actually reach you in a dive you are doing a poor job of using your speed to keep them at distance.
      Edit: If you know the speeds at which they lock up and you are flying an aircraft that can take advantage of that you can potentially reverse them.

  • @who_tf_stole_my_name
    @who_tf_stole_my_name Рік тому

    Wtf is that flightmodel

  • @Ravenguardsluca
    @Ravenguardsluca Рік тому

    Yo guys what's up your gone kill me certainly but i try hard to find what compression mean when they say don't compress or i compress can someone explain me how it works ? XD

    • @MDzmitry
      @MDzmitry Рік тому +1

      In short: "the faster you go, the shittier your plane responds". It's somewhat similar for every aircraft, but the severity varies and depends on the airframe design.
      Take out an La-5 and make it go over 600 kmph IAS, then it starts to compress

    • @rainsilent
      @rainsilent Рік тому

      To elaborate even better than above compression is the result of air forces on the control surfaces making it more difficult to deflect those control surfaces. The faster you go the more force is required to deflect the control surfaces. The result is that at higher speeds the aircraft will not be able to deflect said control surfaces which means reduced movement in the desired direction you are trying to get the aircraft to go relative to what you could do at lower speeds.
      If you want a real life example that you can try next time you ride in a car roll the window down when the car is traveling at low speeds. At first stick your hand out horizontally but then rotate the back of your hand up and down. Notice how easy it is. Then do the same thing when the car is on a highway or something equivalent where higher speeds are permitted and do the same. You will notice that there is more air resistance to moving your hand at the higher speeds.

  • @jimmycrawfish1531
    @jimmycrawfish1531 Рік тому

    All the american 20 mils do the same thing to ground targets lately

  • @spicynoodle7419
    @spicynoodle7419 Рік тому

    This plane has been nerfed in December 2022

  • @lemonylemon2289
    @lemonylemon2289 Рік тому

    The Ta-154 is fantastic. It's fast, it climbs, and has a hell of a lotta guns. Its my fav german premium lol, idk how you can say its worse than a shitty 190.

    • @rainsilent
      @rainsilent Рік тому +1

      Because it is worse in every performance metric but one. Low speed turn rate. The 190 is faster in level flight by ~20mph (and the 154 is actually on the slower side compared to single engined fighters of the BR range it is at), it climbs slightly better (No, the 154 does not have a good climb rate relative to single engined fighters. In fact it isn't even competitive. Most single engined fighters have better than a 20m/s climb rate whereas the 154 has a best sustained 19.7m/s which is actually worse that the climb rate of the B18B when it isn't carrying ordnance.), rolls a lot better, et cetera. The only thing that makes the 154 a worthwhile aircraft to consider is that its interceptor spawn makes it very dangerous on smaller maps in the early game. In every other scenario the 190 is technically the better performing plane. It just happens to have a nasty stall characteristic that one has to be very careful of.
      That said, for most players I would still recommend the 154 over the 190 only because of that interceptor spawn and the fact that it makes the 154 more dangerous than the 190 would be in most players hands. To do good in the 190 would just take more than most players are capable of whereas the 154 new players get a free positional advantage on about 1/3rd of the maps.

    • @lemonylemon2289
      @lemonylemon2289 Рік тому

      @@rainsilent I'm not going to say anything you said was wrong. All I know is I can get kills in a 154 and grind out a decent bit of my german tech tree and have never had ANY luck with any 190.

    • @rainsilent
      @rainsilent Рік тому +1

      @@lemonylemon2289 It isn't hard to get kills in it. It is a very good heavy fighter in general but compared to the single engined fighters of the same BR the 154 actually isn't a strong plane once it loses its interceptor spawn advantage. It is a great plane that shows the advantage that air spawns provide.
      The 190s are planes that require knowing more than just the basics in combat techniques. Most players tend to struggle with them as a result. There isn't anything wrong with that though. It is just a matter of learning and getting better as a player.
      Personally I like the 154 but if I had to take one German plane from the BR I'd rather take the 190A-5/U-2. Then the 154 over the 109G-2s. The 154, when it can take advantage of its interceptor spawn, is easily the most relaxing mid BR German fighter to fly.

  • @pinngg6907
    @pinngg6907 5 місяців тому

    14:00

  • @Deadtrigger24
    @Deadtrigger24 Рік тому +1

    Is the p47d not aviable aynmore to buy ?

    • @pinguspringus8356
      @pinguspringus8356 Рік тому +1

      The razorback still is tho

    • @dakotahondalock5621
      @dakotahondalock5621 Рік тому +1

      The 4.3 one was removed and replaced with the P-47D-16RE AT 4.0 because the 4.3 wasn’t the historically captured P47

  • @ThePeanut999
    @ThePeanut999 Рік тому

    I'm so excited to see just how bad this thing is.

  • @calimdonmorgul7206
    @calimdonmorgul7206 Рік тому

    Probably should be 4.0.

  • @karl_3885
    @karl_3885 Рік тому

    i totally would've guessed they just copied the A-5/U-2 but i guess not :O

  • @_GODSFIGHTER
    @_GODSFIGHTER Рік тому

    The only unique thing about this thing is the skin 😂 imma stick with the u2. Before the pandemic i hated this thing because I didn't like having 2 20s only. After I spaded it I never flown it again. I recently tried it again and I've grown to like it

  • @rolandhunter
    @rolandhunter Рік тому +1

    190s should have better elevator force with high speed turn (better instantaneous turn rate). 190s should not lock up at high speed.

  • @harryqiddel1247
    @harryqiddel1247 Рік тому

    ground punding is because gaijin needs a reason to get people to buy it

  • @JayNDFTL
    @JayNDFTL Рік тому

    DEFYN FLY KI-83 PleeAAAAASE

  • @r2d2hunter38
    @r2d2hunter38 Рік тому

    O this one

  • @6._d._.a._.n_.9
    @6._d._.a._.n_.9 Рік тому +1

    Unga bunga Nazi waffle

  • @quisno11
    @quisno11 Рік тому

    Capital

  • @yamatokurusaki5790
    @yamatokurusaki5790 Рік тому

    wait they nerfed the 20 mm 151? you kidding me?

    • @rainsilent
      @rainsilent Рік тому +1

      They made the ammo lighter (which is a historically accurate change) meaning that medium to long range accuracy suffers but the ammo does travel farther.

    • @wolfgangkolber381
      @wolfgangkolber381 Рік тому

      They also significantly reduced the TNT filler, MV, firerate, and made it so the shells needed to go through 4mm to detonate with a 3mm delay after that (decreasing hit reliability, basically) a while back.

    • @rainsilent
      @rainsilent Рік тому

      @@wolfgangkolber381 According to datamine records that I have been able to search through all of this is false. The last time I can find 151/20s were touched before this patch, which only changed their ballistic properties, they got the frag effect added to them which nearly doubled the damage they did. Can you link datamine patch notes showing this?

    • @wolfgangkolber381
      @wolfgangkolber381 Рік тому

      @@rainsilent This is just something I found reading the forums, so all I can say is that the posts I read claimed to have gotten their information from datamining. I do know, just based on the protection analysis screen, that the fuse information is correct ( assuming that protection analysis is not lying). I do not recall if that was always the case for the fuse, but I have seen enough people complain about it to put more weight on it having been changed to what it is than it having always been that way.
      Apologies for any accidental misinformation of mine, I was rather tired when I started commenting on this video, and while I thought I put disclaimers on my info, it appears that I did fail to do this in some areas.

    • @rainsilent
      @rainsilent Рік тому

      @@wolfgangkolber381 They did change the fuses but that was a long time ago and it was a buff as before the change on profile shots to the wing the ammo was going through the wing before exploding thereby doing less damage than it should have been. The change made sure that the ammo was detonating in the wing. It did increase the chances of the odd deflection at extreme angles but those are extremely rare.

  • @thunderwithchrissy
    @thunderwithchrissy Рік тому

    how much is 1 km in ft?

    • @Damian-03x3
      @Damian-03x3 Рік тому +10

      Translating to the incorrect measurement system, it's 3 280.8399 foot fetish units.

    • @frankeinfish
      @frankeinfish Рік тому +3

      Fucking lol!

    • @thunderwithchrissy
      @thunderwithchrissy Рік тому

      @@Damian-03x3 i used to know metric but since where i live everyone uses feet i got used to it so i forgot how much it is.

    • @thunderwithchrissy
      @thunderwithchrissy Рік тому

      @@Damian-03x3 that is kinda funny though ngl

    • @Damian-03x3
      @Damian-03x3 Рік тому

      @@thunderwithchrissy My condolences.

  • @arash2236
    @arash2236 Рік тому

    is decal out yet?

    • @IHaevATajpo
      @IHaevATajpo Рік тому +1

      its coming very soon

    • @arash2236
      @arash2236 Рік тому +1

      @@IHaevATajpo i hope it comes before slaes

  • @eriahbranton3675
    @eriahbranton3675 Рік тому

    Probably the most worthless premium out there, played until my free repairs were out and I only had 4 kills by the end of it.

  • @pedromedeiros4955
    @pedromedeiros4955 Рік тому

    It feels like this game is dying each upgrade with all the shit gaijin is doing.

  • @TheWarthog2012
    @TheWarthog2012 Рік тому

    But La-5FN isn`t accessible to buy anymore. Or will it be made once again on upcoming sales?

    • @reinbeers5322
      @reinbeers5322 Рік тому

      It's a tech tree plane.

    • @TheWarthog2012
      @TheWarthog2012 Рік тому

      @@reinbeers5322 Ofc I`m talking about premium one shown in the video, splitcheeks

  • @Marcel0FF
    @Marcel0FF Рік тому +1

    Show some d13 gameplay after the plane got the worst focke wulf due to nerfs

  • @little_weed192
    @little_weed192 Рік тому

    Defyn how do u aim so well with top tier I seem to miss every gun ( I’m even lvl 100 and still suck)

  • @Zargabaath
    @Zargabaath Рік тому

    Do you rage at people a lot?

  • @ProfessorBooty69
    @ProfessorBooty69 Рік тому

    Yeah its not unfair to call the 190s support planes. Been playing since beta and I thought that was the general consensus. Each nation has it. Spitfires and Typhoons, P51s and P47s, Zeros and Ki84s and 109s and 190s. Thats just how its always been.

  • @lickmytoaster9550
    @lickmytoaster9550 Рік тому +1

    Never stop playing this shitty game please

  • @deadeyecpt.7765
    @deadeyecpt.7765 Рік тому +88

    I love 190s and all other kinds of "support planes" because getring into dogfights, being the first to charge in is still hard for me. I'm not very aggressive, no matter what I fly, so having something that allows me to help my teammates while still keeping me in my comfort zone in grear for me.

    • @asian5682
      @asian5682 Рік тому +5

      You would love the p47s/mustangs

    • @deadeyecpt.7765
      @deadeyecpt.7765 Рік тому +17

      @@asian5682 Tbh, I can't stand the P51s: they look ugly to me. The P47 I enjoy quite a lot. I prefer the Navy planes in the US tech tree though.

    • @getehrwolf6111
      @getehrwolf6111 Рік тому +1

      @@deadeyecpt.7765 Agree, P-51 is a good plane but is a kick to the balls in appearance, P-47 in my opinion are more much beautiful and eye catching

    • @MDzmitry
      @MDzmitry Рік тому +8

      @@deadeyecpt.7765 true tbh, out of American designs I personally fancy the Corsair (or the P-39 if you need an inline-engined one)
      Spitfire or the 109 just get the "slim fighter" vibe better imo

    • @emersoncaicedo3146
      @emersoncaicedo3146 Рік тому +8

      Ugly? The P-51? First time I’ve ever heard that. Wow

  • @ddddddddddd5354
    @ddddddddddd5354 Рік тому +9

    "What if we added a premium 190... but worse ?"

  • @pedrotrivelatoferreira2776
    @pedrotrivelatoferreira2776 Рік тому +12

    14:00 just overpressure being a perfectly balanced mechanic, nothing unusual there

  • @mst3145
    @mst3145 Рік тому +2

    “I’m not a balancing department worker. I just play their shitty game” 😂😂😂😂

  • @finn_mcmissile
    @finn_mcmissile Рік тому +3

    one of the fucking wolfs of all time

  • @dashadower
    @dashadower Рік тому +3

    Your videos are really helpful at improving air RB skills.
    I'm seeing lots of your victims getting caught in situations that I also put myself in. If you see someone fuck up and you get a kill by punishing their mistakes, can you give a light explanation on how the opponent could've played it better?