World of Warships - You're Doing It Wrong
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 тра 2019
- In World of Warships, as in life, there's a right way and a wrong way of doing things. Unlike in life, World of Warships tries to idiot-proof things by colour-coding good things green and bad things red, but the internet always seems to keep coming up with better idiots...
All music licensed from www.epidemicsound.com and www.machinimasound.com
Patreon: / themightyjingles
Discord: / discord
Twitch: / the_mighty_jingles
Facebook! / themightyjingles
Twitter: / mightyjingles
Merchandise!
teespring.com/stores/mighty-j...
teespring.com/stores/mighty-j...
For any business, press or industry related enquiries, please contact Jingles.business@gmail.com
System Specs: Core i7 4.3Ghz CPU, 32GB DDR4 RAM, nVidia GTX1080 8GB GDDR5 GPU, running at 1920x1080 resolution
If you have a World of Tanks replay you'd like to submit, upload it to a hosting service like wotreplays.com and email the link to your replay to charlton.paul70@gmail.com.
If you have a World of Warships replay, consider using a hosting service like replayswows.com/
Just be aware that I get hundreds of emails every week and I can't promise that I'll show what you send in. - Ігри
3:25 If the Arizona is in her post-World War Two configuration, I don't expect much from her engines or main armament, either!
Oh, Jingles, we love you...
But that sweet visitor's center.
Well it'll still be in better shape than the bismarck...
I think everyone means pre-WW2 configuration? Post WW2 means *after* WW2. Or maybe Jingles meant Post WW1?
@@DanielLopez-up6os That skin is even in the game ^_^
i Don't expect much from the bridge...or the smokestack...or the everything else
Man... every time I have beautiful opening salvos on enemy broadsiding cruisers, 90% of the shells just straddle the ship and the 10% that hit just overpenetrate -_-
I know our pain.
specially on KMS battleship.
Two days ago, I was in my old South Carolina and there was a Phoenix behind an island at maximum range. I successfully one-shotted him with three citadel penetrations. That has never happened for me before or since. Felt like Christmas, it did.
I remember a schors on the other side of an island at about 16km, I was in my Gneisenau, fired at him, 4 citadels. That's long range for a Gneisenau, unfortunately he was already on half health by the time they arrived and something like that has never happened again :(
I did it once in my Amagi. Maximum range against a Pensacola that was moving slightly away at a 20 degree angle. 3 citadels, instant kill right at the start of the game and boy did it feel good. As one guy said here, it felt like Christmas. Never happened again or since. RNG sucks hard for bb's but occasionally, VERY occasionally the RNG gods give you one.
At 13'55"" a wild Akizuki purs in pleasure
13:55 KITTY!
Jingles: "He's top tier in his Arizona."
*looks at the Scharnhorst and Gadja Madah*
Yup, video definitely not made by an impostor. That's good to know. ;)
Don't forget the Atlanta! ;)
Or the Colorado :)
He also said "post-World War Two" when he meant "post-World War ONE"!
We love our Crappy Gnome Overlord.
That buffing carriers joke for dumb players is probably the scariest thing you've ever said jingles.... you know there's a chance someone at WG thought that was a good idea
...its what they've been doing to Destroyers for months before the CV rework...
...hides from barrage of abuse from DD players.
But seriously, I see a DD player in every game I play doing stupid things. Yet somehow, their inevitable demise is never their fault.
@Bread i have the buff for dumb players in mind. remove the fuse time for the air dropped torpedoes so arm immediately after being dropped.
@@Thot-Slayer-420 Perfect! That way they explode when they hit the water and take the carrier's planes with them!
And because most DDs are either too dumb or arrogant to even try to dodge HE bombs their aiming gets nerfed. Can't make this stuff up.
Danny Trent I had one DD who got really unlucky, ate 4 HE bombs, and exploded. Detonation from bombs is still a thing. Seriously though WG doesn’t even know what the real problem is and the hint is fighter consumable.
Don't think we wouldn't have noticed Akizuki making an entrance at around the 14 minute mark jingles.
Akizuki is the main reason we all tune in.
Jean-Yves Mead fair
FFS Jingles don't teach carrier players how to be better, that guy is doing just fine :D
That is easy to say until that player is on YOUR team. 8^>
@@dennisuerling899
Ah...true. A "Pro" and "Con" for everything.
Yeah, when that kind of CV player is in his team I'm pretty sure he won't doubt on bitching.
that carrier might be doing his first carrier run since the rebuild of carrier gameplay. i had the same problem with my langley until i watch a video explaining how the torpedos work on the new CV system work
Just imagine how furious that Ryujo captain probably is seeing how his torps keep hitting the target and yet they just refuse to explode for some odd reason.
I bet he reported him and called him cheater. :D
Reminds me of that guy in another Jingles vid who free XPd his way up the Pan-Asian DD line and was very salty in the comments that his perfectly aimed torp salvo sailed underneath an enemy DD without doing any damage so he got torped in return...
And I met the same stripe of player in game a couple of times. As Jingles said, "the internet keeps coming up with better idiots"
@@wingsofwrath4647 which video was that again?
@@Mighty_Ogrelord Can't remember. It was maybe 6 months ago?
Found it. ua-cam.com/video/GZFIVYhD5Ts/v-deo.html
Possible explanation for the carriers ... interesting tactics. A couple of weeks ago someone tried to convince me that the gold part of the torpedo aiming area was the "Critical hit zone" instead of the "warhead not armed" zone.
The great thing about idiots is they always find a new way to mess things up no matter how "fool proof" you think you made it
I can see maybe screwing up 1 drop because he didn't take the correct speed of the target into account but making that many drops inside the yellow zone is absurd.
You definitely have the best videos on the game. I've learned a lot watching them, and your style is both engaging and educational. Thank you for your work.
and hugely funny
Grease Monkey - Quite true that.
If you're learning the game from jingles you are out of your mind. He's completely clueless about the game, people like to watch him say dumb things about the game
@@karonic115 They like him because he' entertaining, saying dumb things is one of your talents too, don't worry, it is a quality.
the enemy carrier is probably the target audience WG is trying to cater to with the CV rework
Plays with one hand? Is that what you are implying? ;)
@@dobiem1 I think he was implying that the rework made CVs less useful and less complex to such a degree that they're pretty much pointless to play now.
@@DarkEmperorRay13 - well, I dont know about that....... see that guy called Yuro? XD
checked stats, the Ryujo doesn't play often or very much; and played a lot of low tier in his Valkyrie. He can be forgiven his noob status.
This is why I like this channel, you get your daily dose of Jingles, naval history lessons, in game tactics and a commentary that just brightens my day!
Cheers from Mexico Jingles!
the safty area is highlighted instead of having a big warning sign inside with some helpfull "MINIMUM ARMING RANGE" text flashing, so theres that for poor poor carrier players.
I highly convinced that Ryuujou didn't even know how torpedo bomber works
if that cv aim this well in a t6 CV, he must be a god in t4 XD
"because then Mr. Torpedo does the explodey thing that makes him so much fun to have around at parties"
That sounds like what I would imagine Jingles giving his kids the "sex talk" would sound like.
I bet that carrier-player was coming over from WoT after playing arty and not hitting anything.
Lol shotgunning in arty is hella fun at the end of the game
even better, shotgunning from the start of the game
@@Thot-Slayer-420 Better still, Removing arty and banning the morons who play it
ACKSHUALLY JINGLES, the South Dakota name was re-used as well for a new line of South Dakota-class fast battleships. The first of the line, the South Dakota, was commissioned on March 20th, 1942. The Massachusetts and Alabama were both of that class.
I was driving my Konig up through the strait on Two Brothers (the old, more narrow version). Towards the end of the channel, I ran across a Japanese destroyer player hiding in one of the corners there and who obviously had no idea that his torpedoes had a minimum range. I knew he was going to try to torpedo me as soon as I cleared the rock so I tried to get as close as possible to him. He actually sent all his torpedoes and all 8 (I think it was) failed to detonate and he had no idea why.
Then my guns had swung around and I was able to give him full HE broadside off my starboard-rear quarter, effectively deleting him from the game.
He was obviously dumbfounded that all his torpedoes could have failed. Apparently he had either never been in that close before or free-XPed his way to T6 after exclusively playing BBs.
I saw the thumbnail and was hoping for a World of Warplanes video.
Damnit, Jingles.
The carrier was probably suffering with lag. It has happened to me and controlling aircraft is nearly impossible, so no need to monster him and set up a training room Jingles.
"Never attribute to poor ping that which is adequately explained by stupidity." :P
Misquote of Hanlon's Razor aside, that is one possible explanation for that carrier's performance.
Jingles as a neighbor from across the pond, when you mention the south Dakota class of battleships that was the south Dakota class of 1923, there was a second class of south Dakota class battleships, most notable in the class the USS Alabama.
We all know that Ryujo player is on a forum somewhere reporting his torpedoes are bugged and don't do any damage when they hit.
🤔there was a South Dakota Class befor a South Dakota Class. OK you never stop learning something new in life.
Yeah the ww2 South Dakota class was just before the Iowa class. The South Dakota, Indiana, Massachusetts, and Alabama were the 4 of the class.
Yeah, first South Dakota class would have been a really SLOOOOOW version of WW2 Montana class.
@@troybalster3687 and two of those are museum ships. The Massachusetts and the Alabama. The North Carolina that came before them is also still in existence.
@@timothyhouse1622 a few of the gun barrels screw and anchor are here at the memorial in Sioux Falls SD.
The first South Dakota class was planned as upgrades of the Colorado class, in the 1920s. But the Washington Naval Treaty restricted the numbers of battleships everyone could have, so they were canceled. After the escalator clause was invoked, allowing more battleship construction with 16 inch guns, the US designed and built the North Carolina class, then the South Dakota class that the Alabama and Massachusetts represent in the game.
Jungles,
The Dunkerque at ~10:20 was dead in all possible scenarios. If he turned to port as you suggested, he would still be spotted and shot (at flat broadside) by the Okt. Revolutsiya. He should have been further back in the first place if he was to even attempt to survive this.
As for your comments on internet idiots - quotes like this are the main reason I love your vids :D Keep up the good work, man!
Pre WW2 AA config for the Arizona? Not post right? :C
that or Post WW1 AA configuration
@@Nutty31313 Yeah, tomato tomato. :p
However, post WW1 could mean post WW2 as well. Pre WW2 specifically indicates before any chance in WW2. As far as I understand semantics and grammar but tomato tomato tbh.
Technically, it does have its post WWII AA armament as well.....
it was a joke about the ingame arizona having terrible AA which is compadable to post wwii arizona, which is none because its underwater
@@letome1676I really don't think it was, it seemed/sounded too serious. But all in all everyone knows what he meant. Not upgraded and/or crap. :D
Need to start having "Jingles said something wrong" counters in the videos. I'm 3:42 seconds in and he's already complained about the terrible top speed twice, talked about the Arizona's Post WWII AA, and described New Mexico as having survived Pearl Harbor when she wasn't even there.
the issue I have found, being just a occasional player, WoW's training is on places like UA-cam, buried in promo, event announcements, company announcements, game play highlights, and alike.
There is no built in training areas with practice scenarios to help new players build any sort of proficiency.
Being the son of a 42 yr veteran that was a Lt.JG, Lt., Lt. Commander, and then Capt. on 4 different Carriers, I like to play them.
Also understanding Carrier flight tactics, I find WoW lacking in it's abilities.
Such as, removing the fighter squadrons was a mistake, if you wished to have any resemblance of reality. Taking away the ability of multiple squadron attacks and alike.
The way it was set up originally was more what CIC situation room operations would look like.
Funny part is that the South Dakota, North Carolina, Iowa, and Montana-class ships all had essentially the same hull design layout. The only difference was that, with each new ship class, the hulls were elongated gradually until the Montana-class battleship design, which was projected to be between 271-280 meters long. Also, the North Carolina-class actually preceded the South Dakota, with four ships of the South Dakota-class having been built between 1939 and 1942, and being decommissioned by 1947.
Ahem...
Actually Jingles, torpedoes were a destroyers basic gameplay long before the carrier rework.
Sure the torpedo arming distance existed with the RTS carrier gameplay, but a lot of ppl playing carriers now did not bother with carriers back then.
Jingles notices the Colorado that briefly appears, but not the Atlanta that's in the middle of the screen, for a long time I might add, after the kill shot on the Kirov
:thonk:
And Jingles is Jingles yet again. "The Arizona that we see in the game features the original post-World War II anti-aircraft configuration", he says.
Since the Arizona was lying face-down on the seabed in Pearl Harbor at the time, it didn't *have* an anti-aircraft configuration after World War II.
Submerged is the best anti aircraft configuration, change my mind!
You can't hit what you can't see!
Watching this at 4:40 in the morning on the eastern coast of the US. Hail no sleep.
It was 0230 for me when this came up. I know your pain, and name you my brother.
Those torp drops were painful to watch...each one stung just a little bit more lol
An interesting aside, one of the turrets from the sunken Arizona was fitted to a coastal defense mount near Honolulu.
There are many artifacts from the Arizona, in Phoenix, at the State Capital Museum.
About South Dakotas and their names - second USS "Montana" was also cancelled, so Montana is the only state (of 48 which existed during battleship era) which never had battleship named after her. I think it was quite unfair, because there were states which had multiple battleships named after them.
6:39 "But even though the last of the Colorados was built in 1923, they would remain the most powerful battleships in the U.S. Navy's *INFANTRY* until the introduction of the North Carolina class of battleships..."
Maybe he hasn't played since the early days when it was possible to loldrop torpedoes at point blank range and leave the target 0 chance to dodge.
Jingles The Arizona had its original PRE-WW2 AA. only. It sat out the War under Pearl Harbor. This rendered it quite unsuitable for Wartime or Post War upgrades. Cheers.
Jingles..... The South Dakota was built. In a fight between her and the Kirishima and numerous other light cruisers and destroyers the South Dakota took a confirmed 28 hits. The Washington was with her and managed to sneak around the South Dakota using her as a shield and managed to then fire and sink the Kirishima. This was one of if not the last battleship on battleship engagements of world war II.
He is discussing an entirely different class of South Dakota battleships: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota-class_battleship_%281920%29
@@Azrael_the_Black But was it a complete rework or not?
@@chucklesbachelor9947 Not sure what you're getting at, but I guess it could be classified as a complete rework. The South Dakotas that were actually built were a completely different, later class: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota-class_battleship_(1939)
Point #3: You see that line at the bottom of the torpedo indicator? The end closest to your planes?
You need the enemy further out than that. Same goes for you destroyer and cruiser players who keep narrowly avoiding a ram and trying to torpedo me as we pass.
13:54 Akizuki chirped upon hearing Ryujo, maybe she thought there was some planes to shoot down.
Jesus jingles great video as per usual, I love how you add history into your video reviews its great.
Ladies and gentlemen! The lesson to be learned here is this: DO NOT prioritize morons over sophisticated people. No matter how easy you're gonna make it for them, they'll fail anyway.
Should have kept old CV mechanics...
True but the problem with the old mechanics is it put ALL the power of winning or losing a game in the hands of those very good CV players. They were too OP in the hands of someone good but utterly useless in the hands of someone clueless like me. Giving one class that much power over all other classes isn't balanced even if many games seemed balanced because the majority of CV players were shiite. It only took one uber CV player to completely rule the game.
@@gothamgoon4237 It was a mistake to add manual drops that were virtually impossible to mitigate with skill in the old system but they decided to double down on it. They should have kept it RTS and undo the attempts to create more 'exiting and engaging' mechanics that turned CV captains into pilots. Give me back my plotting room!
So shorter barrels = more accuracy. Gotta love arcade-game logic.
Great video jingles! 👍🏼
That Ryujo learned carrier gameplay from the Ociex school of carrier warfare.
Hey jingle, it’s just ur typical lad from Canada. Me and my English teacher both watch your video’s first thing we do in the AM, and talk about it during class. I’m gonna graduate high school this year and continue my career as a plumber for college. This is also his last year of teaching before he retires.
You brought me and my teacher so many laughs and so on. Personally I feel kinda weird asking. If you could say.
“Hey Donald, Justin wishes you happy retirement.” Next week on mingles with jingles it would mean the world to me. Cause I won’t see him again cause my last exam is in his class today.
Thank you for the time. Take care, btw keep up the good work;)❤️
Everyone upvote this comment
@The Mighty Jingles Thanks for bringing back your historical ed format :)
The amount of times Jingles didn`t show us the Kraken-unleashed meme whenever someone got a Kraken is astounding!
This can only mean 1 thing: He captured the REAL Jingles and has taken his place!
Salt mine minions, time for a Revolution to get our true Gnome Overlord back!
Fun Fact - USS Arizona was christened with water from Arizona. After she sank, no more ships were christened with water.
That nostalgia kick when hearing Jingles' voice. Makes me want to start up WoT again.
And then I remember my M3 Grant grind and toxic teammates...yeah, not so much.
You've got to wonder if the Ryujo player's a friend who's throwing the match... but making a determined effort to appear to attack things so it doesn't look too obvious.
I deliberately drop my first wave on ships in the back camping. Close enough that the torps dont arm but i still get called all kinds of things in chat for it. One of these days RNG is gonna give me a big FU and detonate one of the torps anyway. but until then "WAKE UP CALL get your ass moving"
Anyone else remember the World of tanks "your doing wrong" ramming compilation?
Pure Gold
That enemy carrier was more intent on chipping the paint job on the Arizona
What a great story, especially the comic relief at the end.
Speaking of the USS Montana it is the only state to which a battleship was never completed under its name. With moth the south-Dakota class and as head of its own class both being cancelled prior to completion.
USS New Mexico didn't return to the Pacific until after Pearl Harbor. She wasn't there during the attack. She had been in Pearl Harbor, although she left there in May 1940. She was with the Atlantic Fleet during the Pearl Harbor attack. Confusing her with the USS Nevada or California, perhaps? Arizona, California, Maryland, Nevada, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and West Virginia were the BBs at Pearl Harbor during the attack.
Jingles, you should have probably mentioned that there are two different South Dakota classes. the cancelled 1920 class and the built 1939 class that we have 'Bama and Mamie from in the game
Jingles, to be absolutely fair, you had a 3 in 25 chance to name a correct perspective South Dakota Class name that was reused. In fact, that number is a lot smaller. For those not in the know and haven't researched it or caught on yet, USN BB's are named after one of the 50 states of the country. So 6/50 reduces to 3/25, but you could consider that at the time of commission and construction, other states were already battleshipped. So the 6 out of 50 lowers to 6 out of
Great video and commentary Mr Jingles. Shout out to Akizuki. Waiting for tomorrow's video.
I miss the carriers before the rework. They were good, this is wtf
they were awesome...fun and challenging.
now its boring and annoying for everyone.
refunded ALL of my CVs, which means ALL the CVs in the game
Yea, I've tried them after a 2yr absence from game...can you only have 1 squadron in the air at a time now ???
@@SuperChoronzon
Yes..and attacks are only parts of the squad
@@cobrazax yea, they've really screwed CV's up, man-oh-man...smh
@@SuperChoronzon
No real fighters...no real counterplay...boring.
Anyone remember when a carrier player would attack you, you had a chance of dodging his attack by turning into the torps and then you had a minute to play as normal before the next attack? Not this getting torped every 20 seconds by the same squadron? Happy days!
Old school Jingles, love it.
4:31 - Hang on a minute .. its actually a tier-7 battle .. at least I caught the mistake this time
Jingles, please never change .. lol
Oh Mighty Lord of the saltmines. Give us more of those fantastic commentaries and historical facts, so we can all mine more salt 😀
Thanks solely to you and these videos I have now been playing this for the last few weeks. I eventually worked my way up the German cruiser line to tier V. And then started partaking in the various Soviet themed missions/tasks/whatever they are called. And I have now ended up "earning" two Soviet battleships. The tier V and VI ones. "Cool!" was my immediate response. Some battleship fun. Umm. No. Yeah. Really not. I kinda just got used to being one of the first to die in my cruisers as the rest of the people on my team in the random battles just sailed around in circles. In an effort to not be one of those battleships that camps on the border as far away from the action for as long as possible I have tried leading from the front. No. Not so much. I come steaming in and any and all of my "teammates" promptly pull back. So when I try to hang back and wait for some of the enemy destroyer screen to be knocked back before heading in I still arrive too early and get killed before any of the other battleships on my team have even fired a shot in anger.
What the hell am I doing wrong? What am I missing? Do I just need to forget Soviet battleships and German cruisers and pay Wargaming half my yearly salary and immediately get a tier X American battleship?
I want to like this game I really do. I am not in the frame of mind to pay for anything right now but I had hoped to be enjoying it enough by now to at least buy a couple of months of the premium account. But it's so sodding frustrating!
Also. Wargaming. Seriously. Stop expecting one person to be able to steer and shoot at the same time! That was old fashioned way of doing things 120 years ago! Please, please, sort out the autopilot/driving AI so that the ship can be piloted properly while we, the human, takes care of the gunnery! Or is that just going against the whole spirit of the game and making too much of a simulation?
So when I tried to do Carrier after the latest update, my entire squadron gets blown out of the sky before I can even get close! I think they have nerfed carriers into irrelevancy. Any thoughts on the latest carrier changes? Any new techniques to be more successful?
Those looked like good RTS style dropps but well, someone didn´t get his UI.
That CV player could be new to the reworked and still learning.
I think WG screwed up on fighters and rockets. They should them as an option of using your fighters for attacking planes or armed with rockets and attacking ships.
I wonder... perhaps the carrier captain had earned his way up to the Ryujo in the OLD system, and this was one of his first games in the new system?
I saw a carrier like that recently. Wouldn't leave me alone the entire fight. Dropped too close every single time.
I'm kinda frazzled that not once did Jingles ever mention that, not only did the USS Pennsylvania survive Pearl Harbor, but it was one of the few ships to actually attempt a defense! It was also repaired and refitted with more guns, including main caliber, secondary caliber, defensive armament (both air and surface) as well as a better engine. The armor was slightly altered and the turrets were moved around. The USS Pennsylvania was use mostly as a propaganda Ship as it was pretty scary with the amount of lead it can throw around. The air defense was so massively improved it would even put some later BBs to shame and even some Heavy/Battle Cruisers (Most Cruisers unless specifically designed for AA purposes didn't have an extreme amount of AA guns, but there were still quite a bit). The USS Arizona was definitely a sad sight after Pearl Harbor, but the USS Pennsylvania actually took the mantle farther for Pennsylvania Class BBs.
The New Mexico and the USS Pennsylvania had subtle differences in their main caliber, the New Mexico had 12 14" (356mm)/50 Caliber Guns (4x3) and the Pennsylvania had 12 14" (360mm)/45 Caliber Guns, the Pennsylvania was later retrofitted with 12 × 5"/51 Caliber Guns, 8 × 5"/25 Caliber Anti-Aircraft Guns and 8 × .50-cal M2 Browning machine guns, in 1931, however the USS Pennsylvania was also again retrofitted with 16 × 5"/38 Caliber Guns, 40 × 40 mm (1.6 in) Bofors guns and 51 × 20 mm (0.79 in) Oerlikon guns, in 1942. As far as I know the Pennsylvania's 5" guns always stayed 130mm guns, whereas the New Mexico's 5" guns were 127mm.
The Pennsylvania Class BB also came with 21" (533mm) submerged torpedo tubes. As far as I know this wasn't removed during the armament retrofits as well as the armor redux.
My Ryujo Torp planes spread never closes like yours did, even though I fly straight through flack, loose half the planes and drop. Is there a commander skill I should be using OR CV upgrade that helps? All these WoWS CV videos make it look easy, but I'm loosing planes faster than WoT is loosing players.
That Kirov driver was pissed off lol
I need more games with that CV on the enemy team.
I didn't like CV's before, and now...well, arty comes to mind.
seriously Jingles? "It's always fun when your torpedo explodes?"
but that big warm fuzzy marker of zone in torpedo drop shows the FUN ZONE! if the tubes hit inside there YOU CAUSE FUN FOR ALL! you would want to miss that! :D
The USS New Mexico was definitely NOT at Pearl Harbor at the time of the 1941 Japanese attack.
BB’s that WERE present at the time of the attack were:
USS Arizona; USS Nevada; USS Oklahoma; USS Tennessee; USS California; USS Maryland; & USS West Virginia.
Wonder if that Ryujo player had been away from the game for a while ie since before the CV rework. And now they're back, and they are trying to use the old tactic of manual drops which could be placed very close to enemy ships.
I have a tier 6 and a tier 8 cv the 8 is premium. But only played a hand full of times since the rework. So might have been hes first time?
The only thing the CV rework has done successfully is to attract more idiots with it's overly simplistic and faster gameplay. I honestly didn't think the standard of play could drop any further ... I was wrong.
Damnit! It’s that bloody Pacific Theater simulator again!
Jingles: "Sees Colorado"
Me: "Saw the Atlanta a minute earlier"
Jingles, please never change
Ripple firing, scroll zooming, nonpremium consumable using premium BB? Yeah, sounds about right.
I think maybe for the sake of the newbs Jingles you should have also explained torp arming distance and that yellowed out area too.
Mr.Jingles Can you do a Video on how to play the Bismarck please???
I am grinding the german line now and i find it difficult to adapt to the Bismarck from Geneisenau.
@@Powerhaus88 The problem is i tried to use my concealment to my advantage and performed well in battles where I'm top tier or tier 9 ships.When i face tier 10 ships, all hell breaks loose
“You’re doing it wrong.”
Y’all know what’s coming don’t you?
"Programming is the race between the Programmer making an idiot-proof program and the Universe producing more stupid idiots. So far, the universe is winning."
llol when he got to the "Emergency meeting in St. Petersburg".
there is also the 1939 South Dakota class (2 of which (Alabama and Massachusetts) appear as premiums) that was built which is a little confusing
Think of the '39 SoDaks as slightly shorter North Carolinas and you wouldn't be far wrong. About 10 foot shorter hull length but otherwise darned near identical.
Jingles, I think you meant “original PRE-WW2 anti-aircraft configuration.”
It's RIDICULOUS how many players make these mistakes on low tier games.
I've won games and gotten cheeky kills because of early CV torp bomber ineptitude
How to CV with our Mighty Overlord Rear Admiral Jingles Jingleton-Smythe . .
Brilliant well explained and demonstrated . So DD's when in battle with a CV just pray they have not seen this vid and are crap
.. don't forget to Wiggle Wiggle , and Turn Off your AA .
Just as a note, the New Mexico survived Pearl Harbor by not being there. It was in the Atlantic fleet at the time.
Might I add from personal experience (started playing on 20th April), that in game there are still only old tutorial videos on how to play a CV. I am not a good player and thanks to this I abandoned playing CV's altogether. Strike aircraft are easy of course. Torpedoes you can learn (and I have taught myself how to use them), that you need to wait for the reticle being mostly parallel - unless you actually want a V-shape, because AA guns are too dangerous and you have no idea where the target is going to be - although in my case it was me being stupid and trying to hit a destroyer or a swift cruiser - at least you learn that way. I have no idea how to set up a training though, so I have to do it in co-op, which means that enemy team is slaughtered in 5 minutes usually - so it is hard to train.
Also I seriously have no idea how to bomb (aiming is difficult). After this post, I will try to find some tutorials on UA-cam, but most that I've already found are from before CV's play style were remodeled. Please laugh all you want, but unless I will get better at this, I will stay in standard surface ships.
Imagine how pissed that Ryūjō must have been after the fifth fail, and crying cheater at the BB...
i guess he didnt even noticed